NXR Podcast - THE LIVESTREAM - Women Must Be Removed From All Public Service
Aired: 2025-02-14
Duration: 01:47:25


=== Five Star Reviews Boost Reach (14:37) ===

[00:00:00]  Leave us a five star review on your favorite podcast platform.
[00:00:04]  I get it.
[00:00:04]  It's annoying.
[00:00:05]  Everybody asks, but I'm going to tell you why.
[00:00:07]  When you give us a positive review, what that does is it triggers the algorithm so that our podcast shows up on more people's news feeds.
[00:00:16]  You and I both know that this ministry is willing to talk about things that most ministries aren't.
[00:00:21]  We need this content for the glory of God to reach more people's ears.
[00:00:27]  In John Knox's polemic, the first blast of the trumpet against the monstrous regiment of women.
[00:00:34]  John Knox wrote that to promote a woman to bear rule, superiority, dominion, or empire above any realm, nation, or city is repugnant to nature, insulting to God, and subversion of good order, equity, and justice.
[00:00:52]  And John Knox, in keeping with the scripture, is exactly right.
[00:00:57]  To promote women to rule as senators, presidents, lawyers, generals, and CEOs isn't simply An agree to disagree type of issue.
[00:01:09]  Instead, it erodes the bedrock of stability and good order that is necessary for flourishing societies, and therefore, it cannot be tolerated.
[00:01:19]  Nowhere is the truth of John Knox's warning more visibly on display than in today's conservative and Christian women in leadership.
[00:01:28]  Take Kristen Hawkins, for example.
[00:01:31]  She's an anti abortion activist and president of Students for Life of America.
[00:01:36]  Here's a woman who has spent her life as a conservative in public service defending the unborn.
[00:01:43]  However, under just a little bit of scrutiny, we've discovered this past week that she's actually a mother who is regularly abandoning her own children, a couple of them who happen to be very sick and even dying, while living high on the hog with a $300,000 a year salary based off of donations.
[00:02:02]  Now, hear me out.
[00:02:04]  It's not wrong for someone who's doing good, faithful work to be paid.
[00:02:08]  Well, however, when an abolition bill finally made it to the North Dakota legislator, Ms. Hawkins and Students for Life vociferously opposed equal protection for unborn children.
[00:02:22]  If these are our greatest champions, then we're not going to make it.
[00:02:26]  See, the problem for Ms. Hawkins is this.
[00:02:29]  Two of her greatest ambitions all of a sudden found themselves in contradiction.
[00:02:35]  On the one hand, she wants to save the lives of unborn children.
[00:02:39]  I believe that that is a genuine desire in her heart.
[00:02:43]  On the other hand, she is a raging feminist.
[00:02:46]  And a law that says mothers who murder their children are actually morally culpable and should experience some consequence under the law is something that a feminist cannot tolerate.
[00:03:01]  This episode is brought to you by our premier sponsors, Armored Republic and Reese Fund, as well as our Patreon members and our faithful donors.
[00:03:12]  You can join our Patreon by going to Patreon.com forward slash right response ministries, or you can donate by going to right response ministries.com forward slash donate.
[00:03:26]  Guys, it's high time to get all women out of all positions of public service.
[00:03:32]  Not only is it a tactical necessity, but also a profound kindness to women.
[00:03:39]  Bring women home again, make motherhood great again.
[00:03:45]  Tune in now as we discuss.
[00:03:47]  Thank you.
[00:03:59]  All right, all right, all right.
[00:04:00]  Happy Valentine's Day.
[00:04:02]  This Valentine's Day, let's repeal the 19th Amendment.
[00:04:06]  What could be possibly more loving, more romantic for the good of our wives, our children, our future posterity than to say, hey, sweetheart, what I got you for this Valentine's Day is repealing the 19th Amendment.
[00:04:20]  On a Friday, too.
[00:04:20]  So we have time to celebrate.
[00:04:22]  It's beautiful.
[00:04:22]  Yeah.
[00:04:23]  That's so.
[00:04:24]  All right.
[00:04:25]  We hate feminism.
[00:04:26]  We love women.
[00:04:27]  And because we love women, we hate feminism.
[00:04:30]  Feminism absolutely hate it, and so I don't want to waste any time.
[00:04:33]  I'm going to go ahead and justify what you heard in that cold open.
[00:04:38]  There was some strong language, particularly as it pertains to Kristen Hawkins, who just chose to be one of the primary forces working against an abolition bill in North Dakota to see to it that everybody would shoot it down.
[00:04:53]  She wrote letters to everybody who was involved, said, You can't vote for this bill, it's not just, it's bad, and this hurts the pro life cause that we've been working towards, you know, and all these kinds of things.
[00:05:03]  And so that was a bill that had a chance.
[00:05:05]  There's bills that just they don't have a shot of even making it out of committee.
[00:05:08]  This one had come out of the committee to the floor.
[00:05:11]  16 Republicans voted for it.
[00:05:13]  And then there were all these so called conservatives that were lobbying the rest of the Republicans don't vote for it.
[00:05:18]  Don't let this pass.
[00:05:19]  Don't let this happen.
[00:05:20]  It has a chance of it.
[00:05:21]  So please make sure it doesn't.
[00:05:22]  Right.
[00:05:22]  They were scared.
[00:05:23]  They were actually, they knew that this one was viable.
[00:05:26]  And so the conservatives, right, with conservatives like these who need liberals, the conservatives and Kristen Hawkins being one of the loudest voices.
[00:05:34]  Interjected themselves to see to it that babies would still be murdered in North Dakota and made sure to shoot it down.
[00:05:41]  And the reason why is because there's a clear line from feminism to abortion.
[00:05:46]  There is.
[00:05:47]  I've said it for a few years now, like basically every two or three months, I'll just shoot out a tweet where I say, America has two options.
[00:05:56]  You can worship women or save babies, but you can't do both.
[00:05:59]  You can worship women or you can save babies, but you can't do both.
[00:06:04]  And so, real quick, just to substantiate some of the claims, because people might think, oh, you're being hyperbolic.
[00:06:08]  You know, to say that she's a raging feminist.
[00:06:11]  Let's go ahead and hear it from her.
[00:06:12]  Here's a taking care of your kids right now.
[00:06:15]  Excuse me, are you trying to shame a working mother of four?
[00:06:21]  Who's taking care of my kids right now?
[00:06:23]  What an anti feminist statement to make.
[00:06:26]  In fact, I have an amazing spouse who homeschools my children.
[00:06:31]  But if my children were in daycare right now, who are you to tell me that I'm not a good mother?
[00:06:39]  Oh, you just asked who are taking care of my children.
[00:06:41]  Would you ask a man that?
[00:06:43]  Would you have asked a man that?
[00:06:45]  If a man was standing here, would you have said, Who's at home taking care of your kids?
[00:06:49]  No, you wouldn't.
[00:06:50]  You asked me that because I was a woman.
[00:06:53]  That's anti feminist.
[00:06:58]  And that's when I lose.
[00:07:00]  Sorry.
[00:07:01]  I'll calm down.
[00:07:04]  I'll calm down.
[00:07:05]  Does anyone else have a question after I was so nice now?
[00:07:10]  There you have it Raging Feminist.
[00:07:11]  What a terrible day to have ears.
[00:07:13]  Yeah.
[00:07:13]  I had eyes.
[00:07:15]  So she literally said, Would you ask a man?
[00:07:18]  If it was a man standing here, would you ask him that?
[00:07:20]  And the proper answer, of course, is no, because it's good, right, and necessary, in accordance with nature and God's design, for a man to work outside of the home.
[00:07:31]  It is good and right that men who are qualified and fit would sit in the city gates, deliberating and making decisions for the village, for the community, for the town.
[00:07:41]  The reason you don't ask a man in that position, outside of the home, in the public square, who's watching his children, is because you should instinctively know the answer.
[00:07:51]  Who's watching the children?
[00:07:53]  Their mother, because that's right.
[00:07:56]  That's good.
[00:07:57]  That is God's design.
[00:07:58]  It is a perfectly legitimate question, however, to ask a woman in the public square if she's a mother, if you have children, and as we'll see later, a couple of those children, not just children, but a couple of those children who are significantly ill with cystic fibrosis and have regular, frequent needs that accompany an illness like that, an illness that, by the way, statistically greatly shortens your length of life.
[00:08:27]  So, children who are not only sick, but children who, barring a miracle from God, which we can pray and hope for, children that will not be alive very long.
[00:08:42]  Many people, I remember growing up, and I knew someone with cystic fibrosis, and they lived to their early 20s and then died.
[00:08:49]  And when you say make a wish, that's not just hypothetical language.
[00:08:54]  This woman and her children actually were selected by Make a Wish.
[00:08:58]  They applied for it because they were selected.
[00:09:00]  Or your dad.
[00:09:01]  Yep, Kristen Hawkins.
[00:09:03]  They were selected by the Make A Wish Foundation.
[00:09:07]  So her children, the illness that they have is significant enough that an organization like Make A Wish would come in and say, yeah, these kids aren't going to make it.
[00:09:18]  Not long term.
[00:09:19]  And so we're going to do something special for them.
[00:09:21]  So you're talking about a mother with children who's already shirking her duties and God's design.
[00:09:27]  But not just a mother with children, a mother with sick children.
[00:09:30]  How sick?
[00:09:31]  So sick that a nationally known organization that usually intervenes with children who are on death's doorstep would be willing to say, Yeah, you qualify for this service.
[00:09:42]  And so she's leaving her sick and, this is not hyperbole, her sick and dying children.
[00:09:48]  Her sick and dying children to go and save someone else's children, right?
[00:09:52]  This gets into the order of morals, right?
[00:09:55]  So you care about foreigners, but you don't care about your natural citizens, right?
[00:09:58]  You care about other people's families, but not your family.
[00:10:02]  Well, what do we find out?
[00:10:03]  You know, the avocado and the steak, right?
[00:10:05]  The heat map meme.
[00:10:05]  If you've seen it, you know, the liberal cares about things that are inanimate objects and trees and rocks, you know, and certain kinds of smelt fish, endangered fish.
[00:10:16]  They care about inanimate objects.
[00:10:17]  And then, as it, you know, if human beings created in the image of God even find their way into the category of love for a liberal, it's going to be, you know, human beings that are as far removed as you could possibly imagine.
[00:10:29]  It's human beings on the other side of the planet.
[00:10:32]  Whereas the conservative, Typically, is going to love starting with their wife and their children, their immediate family, then extended family, then neighbors and the community and church and nation.
[00:10:43]  There's going to be that ripple effect going out.
[00:10:47]  But what I've noticed in my own personal experiences anytime I talk to somebody who's more progressive leaning in their cultural views, religious views, political views, who has this disordered love, they love those who are furthest away and not their own.
[00:11:02]  It's not because their loves are really disordered.
[00:11:04]  What it really comes down to.
[00:11:06]  Is it's not that they love the foreigner over their own people, it's that they love no one, and it's just easier to claim a false claim of love for a stranger that's completely far removed that you never have to back that statement up, right?
[00:11:22]  So, you can claim to love people on the other side of the world all day long, and all it requires is a few social media posts.
[00:11:29]  Whereas, if you're loving your own children, that doesn't just require virtue signaling occasionally on social media, which is free, that involves Like thousands and thousands of dollars and time and effort and work and all these kinds of things.
[00:11:44]  Because one, it's not that it's just misordered loves, it's a false claim, it's false love, it's not love.
[00:11:52]  And then there's real love.
[00:11:53]  Real love is blood, sweat, tears, cash, you know, and false love is, you know, little post here, little post there.
[00:12:02]  So, my point is this you have someone who's saying, I care about the unborn children of other people, other people's children.
[00:12:10]  Meanwhile, they're abandoning their own sick and dying children.
[00:12:14]  And then come to find out, they don't love any children.
[00:12:18]  Because when the very thing that they claim to stand for, right, to stop abortion, Stop the murder of other people's children when there's a viable option under the law for that to take place.
[00:12:30]  Not only do they not get behind it, but they stand in the way.
[00:12:33]  They're one of the leading hindrances in a bill for equal protection getting passed.
[00:12:40]  And that's what happened.
[00:12:41]  And just, I guess, you know, we have new listeners that join every single week.
[00:12:45]  So if you're not familiar, equal protection, the line of logic is really simple.
[00:12:49]  I'm going to lay it out real quick and then I'm going to give it to Wes and we're going to move into some other things.
[00:12:54]  But here's the point if you really believe, That all human beings are made in the image of God from the point you are a person, a human being with innate dignity, not half of a life, not half human, not half dignity, but full dignity.
[00:13:10]  If you believe that that begins at conception, and with the church and with all of history, you believe that conception begins at the point of fertilization, not implantation, but fertilization, that that is the beginning of a human life, and that Jesus was fully human and fully God from the womb, not just when he was born.
[00:13:30]  Right, that I mean, it even messes up the hypostatic union in your Trinitarian doctrine if you don't believe this.
[00:13:36]  Jesus was fully, he was the God man, fully God and fully human, not just from the moment he was born, but from the moment of conception, the moment he was conceived by the Holy Spirit.
[00:13:47]  If you believe that, then to say that the unborn child has just as much value, dignity, and worth as the born child, if you're going to back that up and really believe it, then what you essentially have to say is if they have the same degree of dignity.
[00:14:02]  And value their life is just as valuable as a born person's life, then you have to say, then their life it merits protecting just as much as a born person's life, right?
[00:14:13]  If there was any class of people, born people, that we said, you know what, homicide is going to incur the death penalty.
[00:14:21]  If we decided homicide is going to incur the death penalty, unless you kill a white person, then you know you get a fine.
[00:14:29]  Well, then we you should the immediate reaction should be so white people are less valuable, you don't really believe they're fully human.

=== The Penalty for Abortion (16:19) ===

[00:14:37]  You believe they're subhuman.
[00:14:39]  Well, so too, you have to say if it's not life or a life, if it's not whatever the same penalty is, and I believe it should be the death penalty, capital punishment.
[00:14:47]  But taking that aside, even if a society is wrong, if they have an unequal protection, meaning if you kill a born person, you get this penalty, but if you kill an unborn person, you get a lesser penalty, then the line of logic is very clear, right?
[00:15:07]  The unborn person than it is for killing the born person, then you have to admit that you believe that the unborn person is a lesser penalty because they're less human.
[00:15:17]  They are subhuman, subvalue, subdignity.
[00:15:21]  And this equal protection bill that went before the legislator hit the floor, it had a viable chance.
[00:15:28]  Kristen Hawkins and a bunch of conservatives, and many of them from reading the paper, it was at least half, if not over half, of them being women, female conservatives in the public square.
[00:15:39]  We've got to stop that.
[00:15:40]  Have to stop it.
[00:15:42]  But a bunch of women who claim to care about other people's children while neglecting their own children, they, when the rubber meets the road and they actually have a chance to stop the murder of other people's unborn children, not only do they not get behind it, they get in the way.
[00:16:00]  They actually work as hard as they can to stop it, to stop it.
[00:16:05]  Because all of her bills, and this is the last thing I'm going to show, go ahead.
[00:16:09]  These are the bills that Kristen Hawkins has supported.
[00:16:11]  Nathan, go ahead and put the screenshots up.
[00:16:14]  I want you to see, we're just going to show snippets.
[00:16:16]  Well, before you read that, there were a couple comments in the chat.
[00:16:19]  Who is this lady that we're talking about?
[00:16:20]  I know the cold open mentioned it, but maybe worth just.
[00:16:24]  She's a president of Students for Life.
[00:16:26]  Students for Life.
[00:16:26]  They have about 150,000 students here in the United States, and they have young energy, right?
[00:16:31]  You think of organizations, they're big, but those aren't the people knocking on doors, going to rallies.
[00:16:35]  This is Students for Life.
[00:16:36]  So younger adults, very energized.
[00:16:38]  You've seen that kind of hashtag, I am the pro life generation.
[00:16:41]  That's Students for Life.
[00:16:43]  Big organization, pro life here in the United States.
[00:16:45]  Yep.
[00:16:45]  And she travels.
[00:16:46]  To a lot of colleges, talks and even kind of debates.
[00:16:51]  She helps pass or sponsor legislation.
[00:16:55]  She is very active and travels a lot.
[00:16:58]  While the kids with cystic fibrosis are at home, go ahead.
[00:17:00]  And we'll mention it briefly so we don't have to come back to it, but she makes a very healthy salary to do so.
[00:17:06]  And so from receipts, because nonprofits are public, she makes over $300,000.
[00:17:11]  And this is $300,000 of money, probably not from students in this case, but mom and dad and grandparents who want to see abortion done.
[00:17:17]  They're paying her salary.
[00:17:18]  She has a million dollar plus home in Idaho.
[00:17:21]  And she goes around the country, as you were just saying, to end abortion, to drive a stake in it in this state and that state.
[00:17:28]  Oh, no, actually, to keep it legal.
[00:17:30]  They pay her all of this money.
[00:17:32]  She abandons her kids and then fights tooth and nail to keep abortion legal, which is awful.
[00:17:38]  It's a robbery of the people that donated it.
[00:17:39]  It's a lie.
[00:17:40]  It's a farce.
[00:17:41]  It's immoral.
[00:17:42]  It's unequal weights and measures.
[00:17:43]  The list goes on and on.
[00:17:45]  Right.
[00:17:46]  Okay.
[00:17:47]  So.
[00:17:48]  Here's some quotes.
[00:17:50]  Real quick equal dignity.
[00:17:52]  It's just three little dots.
[00:17:53]  Here we go, and I'm going to connect them.
[00:17:55]  Equal dignity.
[00:17:56]  If you believe the unborn child has equal dignity in the sight of God as the born child, the born person, if equal dignity, then there must be equal protection.
[00:18:04]  And equal protection means equal threat of consequence.
[00:18:08]  Whatever the penalty is for murdering a two year old child in the back alleyway, that should be the same penalty for murdering a two month old child in the womb.
[00:18:18]  If the penalty, if the consequence is less, then the protection is less.
[00:18:22]  And if the protection is less, if we're giving less protection to the unborn child, then we are saying that this is a class of people that merits less dignity.
[00:18:31]  They're not fully human.
[00:18:32]  They are not truly, not fully image bearers of the living God.
[00:18:36]  And if that's your view, fine.
[00:18:38]  It's wicked.
[00:18:39]  You're going to go to hell apart from repentance and grace, which is found in Christ alone.
[00:18:43]  But that's fine.
[00:18:43]  That's your prerogative to hold that view.
[00:18:45]  But do not call yourself pro life.
[00:18:48]  Don't be the president of a pro life organization.
[00:18:51]  Don't claim to be a conservative and go home.
[00:18:55]  If you're not going to love all these other unborn children, then at least go home and love your own children.
[00:19:00]  Okay, so here's some lines.
[00:19:02]  These are actual bills.
[00:19:04]  These are lines from the bills that Kristen Hawkins does support.
[00:19:08]  So these are the ones that she supports.
[00:19:09]  She said, don't support that bill.
[00:19:11]  It's bad.
[00:19:12]  It's misogynist.
[00:19:15]  It's hateful towards women and this kind of stuff because women who murder their children through abortion don't know what they're doing.
[00:19:20]  Right, we all know that women are stupid, they don't know, they just think it's a clump of cells, the same as a tumor or cancer.
[00:19:26]  We can't expect women to have the intelligence level to know that the baby in their womb is actually a baby, right?
[00:19:33]  I mean, the whole thing that's the irony of the whole thing.
[00:19:36]  It's like, here's a bunch of feminists, but what they have to depend on for their argument to make sense is they have to depend on, they literally have to crux their argument on women being so dumb that they can't possibly be held morally culpable, right?
[00:19:50]  In the same way that if you had somebody with severe mental illness, right, they could be tried for insanity or something like that, and they would get a lesser penalty if they committed murder.
[00:20:01]  Well, you're treating every single woman in the United States as though they're mentally ill.
[00:20:05]  You're literally saying, we cannot possibly, We cannot possibly hold as consequences for women that this is murder of their own children because we can't expect women to actually know, to be intelligent enough to know what they're doing, which is just, the whole thing is just laughable.
[00:20:22]  All right, here's a line.
[00:20:23]  It says, this is one of the bills that she does support.
[00:20:26]  A patient upon whom an abortion is performed may not be prosecuted, may not be prosecuted for a violation of this section or a conspiracy to violate this section.
[00:20:39]  In other words, The woman who signs up for the abortion, who brings her child in her womb in order to be murdered by the hitman that she's paying to do it, or you're paying, depending what state you live in.
[00:20:52]  You might be paying.
[00:20:53]  If you live in a blue state, you're literally paying for abortion.
[00:20:55]  All of us were paying until, praise God, Trump recently stopped the federal funding of Planned Parenthood.
[00:21:02]  But the woman who actually goes and pays for the abortion or sees to it that the taxpayer pays for it and brings her baby in the womb to the hitman to do the job.
[00:21:11]  The hitman, he can have some prosecution, some kind of consequence, slap on the wrist, but she doesn't get anything.
[00:21:17]  Complete impunity.
[00:21:18]  Okay, here's another example.
[00:21:20]  Here's another bill.
[00:21:22]  This section does not authorize a woman to be charged with or convicted of a criminal offense.
[00:21:28]  So, not just murder, right?
[00:21:30]  But any criminal offense in the death of her own unborn child.
[00:21:34]  Here's another bill, right?
[00:21:36]  These are all lousy bills.
[00:21:37]  Here's another one.
[00:21:39]  This section shall not be construed to impose civil or criminal liability, any responsibility.
[00:21:45]  On a woman upon whom an abortion is performed or attempted in which an abortive fashion drug, otherwise prohibited under this section, is used.
[00:21:57]  Otherwise prohibited.
[00:21:58]  So we'll prohibit it, but.
[00:22:00]  We'll prohibit it, but if somehow she gets a hold of it and uses it, no harm, no foul.
[00:22:06]  Yep.
[00:22:07]  No liability, responsibility whatsoever.
[00:22:09]  Real quick, last one.
[00:22:10]  One more example.
[00:22:11]  All right.
[00:22:11]  These are four different examples.
[00:22:13]  These are four different bills.
[00:22:14]  They all say the same thing.
[00:22:16]  And these are your pro life bills.
[00:22:18]  Brothers and sisters, you got to get this through your head.
[00:22:21]  This is the pro life industry.
[00:22:23]  This is Kristen Hawkins and many more.
[00:22:27]  She's just one example, the most recent example.
[00:22:29]  The ERLC was behind the same Brent Leather Bill.
[00:22:32]  The Bill almost made it.
[00:22:33]  It actually looked like it had the votes for complete abolition in Louisiana.
[00:22:37]  And it's today, Speaker Mike Johnson and then Brent Leather went through the ERLC, the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, Convention, Committee, lobbied and got that bill killed.
[00:22:50]  So it was about to happen.
[00:22:51]  This is a couple years ago, not even recently.
[00:22:52]  A couple years ago, it was about to be ended.
[00:22:54]  So, for those who are saying, Well, you've got nothing better, actually, we have better.
[00:22:57]  We have states that have been on the verge of passing these kinds of bills.
[00:23:01]  And people like Kristen Hawkins and the RLC have stepped in to kill those bills.
[00:23:06]  And this has happened ad nauseum again and again.
[00:23:08]  All right, last example.
[00:23:09]  This section does not authorize a woman to be charged with or convicted of a criminal offense in the death of her own unborn child.
[00:23:19]  All right, so here's the point it's pretty simple.
[00:23:22]  Kristen Hawkins.
[00:23:24]  President of Students.
[00:23:26]  What is it?
[00:23:27]  Students for Life.
[00:23:28]  Students for Life with 150,000.
[00:23:30]  150,000 some members.
[00:23:31]  People in America who were involved in it.
[00:23:33]  And people like Brent Leatherwood with the ERLC, they don't want to stop abortion.
[00:23:39]  Because here's the deal God has told us how to stop abortion, it is just murder.
[00:23:43]  And God has told us how to stop murder.
[00:23:45]  God has literally told us how to stop murder.
[00:23:48]  All the way back in Genesis chapter 9 with the Noahic covenant, it is life for life.
[00:23:54]  And we see that in Deuteronomy, we see it in Leviticus, we see it over and over throughout biblical law.
[00:23:58]  God has told us if you want crime to stop, the law is a tutor.
[00:24:03]  And what you do is you must have swift justice, it can't be delayed.
[00:24:08]  It must also be proportional justice tooth for tooth, eye for eye, life for life.
[00:24:13]  Life for life.
[00:24:15]  If you don't take someone's life for committing an abortion, then you're saying that the abortion they committed was taking less than a life.
[00:24:23]  They don't forfeit their life because they didn't actually take a life, they took something less than a life.
[00:24:28]  If you give them complete impunity and there's no legal consequence whatsoever, then you're saying they didn't do anything.
[00:24:35]  So at that point, you're not just saying you killed half of a person or a quarter of a person.
[00:24:39]  No, you didn't do anything wrong whatsoever.
[00:24:43]  There is no penalty because there is no crime.
[00:24:46]  That's what you're conveying.
[00:24:47]  That's the message that you're expressing.
[00:24:49]  The Bible tells us how to end murder.
[00:24:50]  The way that you end murder is you execute, there's a fair trial, but then you execute murderers.
[00:24:58]  And what happens is it's twofold it gets rid of the murderers so they don't murder again.
[00:25:02]  And also, anybody who is even slightly contemplating or tempted by the thought of committing murder, they all stand in fear.
[00:25:11]  That's what Deuteronomy says.
[00:25:13]  The rest shall stand in fear.
[00:25:15]  And fear, but when you say to society, right, the law functions as a tutor, it has a tutoring teaching function, it shapes the conscience of society.
[00:25:23]  But when you say to a society as a whole over the course of half a century that there's a particular class of people that you can murder not just with a lesser penalty but with zero penalty, yeah, zero penalty, then you are tutoring and shaping for generations 50 years.
[00:25:41]  You're talking two, three generations of women saying, um, sweetheart.
[00:25:46]  There is nothing wrong with this.
[00:25:49]  And here's the deal.
[00:25:50]  We expect that.
[00:25:51]  You guys are probably, none of this is new.
[00:25:54]  You expect that from the Democrats.
[00:25:55]  You expect that from progressives.
[00:25:58]  But here's the deal.
[00:25:58]  You need to come to expect that, sadly, from Republicans, from conservatives, from pro lifers.
[00:26:06]  From pro lifers.
[00:26:07]  That is their position.
[00:26:09]  Their position.
[00:26:10]  The only difference between their position and the Democrat position is at the end of the day, they would like to see a little bit less access.
[00:26:21]  To abortion.
[00:26:22]  But even with that, most of the pro lifers are fine with plenty of access in pill form.
[00:26:27]  Yep.
[00:26:28]  In pill form.
[00:26:29]  But a little bit less access in terms of going into a clinic, a murder mill.
[00:26:32]  They'd like to see less access in that regard.
[00:26:35]  And some of them would like to see some kind of penalty for the abortion doctor, the hitman, that he gets, you know, forever, you know, he commits, you know, 100 abortions, gets paid tens of thousands of dollars, but then every now and then, you know, somebody comes in and fines him, you know, $1,500.
[00:26:53]  Right.
[00:26:54]  Something like that.
[00:26:55]  That's the difference.
[00:26:57]  So that's your conservative GOP member.
[00:26:59]  And then the Democrat is abortion anytime, anywhere, all the way up to nine months and maybe even after.
[00:27:05]  So one position is worse.
[00:27:07]  I'm not saying that one position isn't worse.
[00:27:09]  But what I want you to understand is that the pro-life industry is not pro-life.
[00:27:16]  And in some way, it is conceptually better than the Democrat position.
[00:27:21]  However, practically, conceptually, so theoretically, it is better.
[00:27:25]  But practically, the way it plays out is that it's most of your pro lifers are the reason why abolition bills can't ever get passed.
[00:27:34]  Because they go in and.
[00:27:35]  The Democrats don't have to fight them.
[00:27:36]  That's right.
[00:27:37]  Pro lifers do.
[00:27:38]  Exactly.
[00:27:38]  The Democrats don't actually have to fight abolitionists.
[00:27:41]  The Republicans will do it for them.
[00:27:44]  So, all that being said, I wanted you to understand a little bit about abolition of abortion, the abolitionist position.
[00:27:53]  I also wanted you to be particularly aware of this case with Kristen Hawkins.
[00:27:58]  And call for her resignation.
[00:27:59]  People need to put pressure on her until she is um, removed from from public office um so, so the uh, the big idea of, uh of abolition, the local uh, practical example of Kristen Hawkins.
[00:28:13]  And then lastly, I I really wanted you guys to see um, practically and theologically uh, the straight line, uh the immediate correlation that exists between feminism and abortion.
[00:28:24]  Feminism and abortion, you cannot right it is.
[00:28:28]  It is asinine For us to think that that woman who you just saw in this clip, who's like, what an anti feminist thing to say.
[00:28:35]  I can't believe you're not a feminist like me.
[00:28:39]  Would you ask a man that?
[00:28:41]  Would you ask a man who's with his children?
[00:28:43]  You're asking me who's with my children right now because you expect me as a mother to be home with my sick and dying children.
[00:28:51]  Well, what gave you such a crazy idea?
[00:28:56]  I am an empowered woman.
[00:28:58]  I'm wearing a pantsuit.
[00:28:59]  I'm a boss babe.
[00:29:01]  Hear me roar.
[00:29:02]  And what I want you to see is that woman.
[00:29:05]  That feminist woman, by her own words, because she's literally raging against what she considers to be anti feminist, aka, I think it's pretty safe to assume that she is pro feminist.
[00:29:15]  So, a feminist woman is also a woman who, when you really get beneath the surface, is not a pro life woman.
[00:29:23]  The woman who is pro feminism will never be pro baby.
[00:29:27]  You can worship women or you can save babies.
[00:29:30]  You can be a boss babe or you can be a mother.
[00:29:34]  You can't do both.
[00:29:35]  Cannot.
[00:29:36]  Nope.
[00:29:37]  The thing about abortion, too, it was a bit of a black pill.
[00:29:39]  I think it was probably about six months or so ago we talked about it, but you cannot have a society where it's generally expected that you can have sex without consequences.
[00:29:49]  And that is your right.
[00:29:50]  That any given woman, you have the right in your early 20s to go to college, to experiment, to have fun, do all of these things and face no consequences.
[00:29:58]  If all you do at the very end of that long line of feminist reasoning is just take away the one method that makes it impossible, if you somehow manage through Herculean strength, rule of power, will, if you manage to take that last bit away, abortion, But you didn't fix all the steps that led to it of autonomy, of women saying, I have the right, I have the freedom to do everything I want.
[00:30:18]  If you don't do that, you are just going to get abortion back.
[00:30:22]  It's not just about like we have this one thing society, if we fix it, if somehow, some way, some law, we discourage it.
[00:30:28]  No, the whole thing, all the way back to the beginning, has to be thoroughly reset.
[00:30:33]  So women and wives and mothers, they're thinking in terms of what's my life calling?
[00:30:37]  What am I intended to do?
[00:30:39]  I'm looking forward to a home and a husband and children.
[00:30:43]  And that is my expectation.
[00:30:44]  It's not career and it's not politics.
[00:30:46]  It's not necessarily college, though there can be places for those.
[00:30:49]  But primarily, when this happens, as a result of natural things that it happens, this is exactly what I expected.

=== Retooling to End Abortion (04:07) ===

[00:30:56]  This was always part of my plan.
[00:30:58]  Retooling that is what's going to eventually lead to the ending of abortion.
[00:31:02]  And it's not just, well, hearts and minds, one heart, one mind at a time.
[00:31:06]  You teach through the law that life is precious.
[00:31:09]  So you end abortion with the force of law.
[00:31:12]  I think you put the Republican Party, Platform, women will not hold public office.
[00:31:16]  We're about to talk about that in another segment.
[00:31:18]  Teaching the place of the woman is in the home.
[00:31:21]  So, through the law with abortion, through the law with politics, that wouldn't necessarily be the law so much as the convention itself, but still with societal expectations, you teach, Hormonal birth control, off the shelves.
[00:31:33]  It's not abortion, narrowly speaking, but it is a way of you should have consequence free sex.
[00:31:38]  You shouldn't experience the results of your action.
[00:31:40]  So, you teach all the way back.
[00:31:42]  That's how you actually end abortion, not just for five years to the backlash, but once and for all.
[00:31:47]  And the hormonal birth control pill is an abortive fashion in the sense that three primary mechanisms of.
[00:31:53]  You know, slowing down the sperm and then not producing the egg.
[00:31:59]  But the third is thinning the uterine wall, the lining of the uterine wall.
[00:32:04]  And, you know, people make the argument and say, well, you know, but if the first two mechanisms fail, slowing down the sperm and causing the woman, you know, her cycle not to happen so that she doesn't produce an egg that could be fertilized, well, if those two fail, then we should assume that the third, or I'm sorry, if the third, the thinning of the uterine wall, if that fails, then we should assume that the step one and step two fail as well.
[00:32:26]  But the research has never been done.
[00:32:27]  And as far as I'm concerned, it never will be done because there's not an incentive, financial incentive for any pharmaceutical company to ever do this kind of research.
[00:32:36]  But so then you're playing Russian roulette.
[00:32:38]  You don't know.
[00:32:39]  You're guessing.
[00:32:40]  You're saying that if, because we know, here's the point we know the pill can fail.
[00:32:44]  How do we know that the pill can fail?
[00:32:45]  Because there are people who take the pill who get pregnant.
[00:32:48]  So you know that all three of the mechanisms can fail.
[00:32:52]  So then the question is we know all three can fail.
[00:32:55]  Some combination of the three can succeed because we also know that people can regularly not get pregnant if they're on the pill.
[00:33:03]  So then the question is can some of those three mechanisms fail while one, namely the third, remains intact?
[00:33:10]  Because if the sperm are not slowed down and if the eggs are still reproduced, so that you do have fertilization, which is conception, all Christian thought for centuries, so fertilization, life is still happening,
[00:33:25]  but then there's no hospitable environment for that life to go to because the The uterine wall has been thinned, and so you're just sending a human being fertilized to its death to go and to die because it can't attach to anything to then be implanted.
[00:33:42]  Then, the hormonal birth control pill is a killing mechanism.
[00:33:49]  And there's never been, from what I've seen and some of the research I've done, any conclusive study that it's not a killing mechanism.
[00:33:57]  So, anybody who is using it, You are using it at the risk of your children's lives.
[00:34:05]  You're using it at the risk of your children's lives.
[00:34:07]  Plus, that's just on the abortion issue.
[00:34:09]  Plus, all the hormonal issues of your husbands, you have to realize that you are psychologically and arguably long term, if not forever, changing the disposition of your wife.
[00:34:24]  Women will be attracted to different men.
[00:34:26]  There will be couples that get together and she's on the pill and she goes off of it.
[00:34:30]  And something fundamentally changes, and she's no longer attracted to the man that she married.
[00:34:35]  So, even if the first two, even that third one, if you could, with 100% scientific certainty, say this is not aborting, still be wrong, still banned.
[00:34:42]  Like a copper IUD, for instance.
[00:34:44]  It's not abortive fashion in that way.
[00:34:46]  And I still don't think it should be legal.
[00:34:48]  These are mechanisms that we put in place to teach people you should be free from the consequences of the thing that God has made.
[00:34:54]  Right.
[00:34:54]  Sexual revolution, sex without consequences.
[00:34:57]  Before we go into our break, I wanted to pick up on one thing that Wes said and relate it to a comment that Soledale Music said earlier.

=== Dispensationalist Myths Debunked (08:20) ===

[00:35:03]  And she said, oh, So Kristen Hawkins is a fraud propped up by the abortion industry.
[00:35:09]  I actually think it's worse than that.
[00:35:11]  We're not impugning motives here.
[00:35:12]  We don't know where her funding comes from.
[00:35:15]  It seems like it actually comes from well-intentioned donors.
[00:35:19]  But the problem is not that she's a fraud.
[00:35:22]  The problem is she actually thinks that the pro life position can exist alongside the feminist position.
[00:35:31]  Right.
[00:35:32]  The idea that we can ban abortion in all cases except for when a mother is involved in it because the mother's rights are more important, or as you said earlier, Jewel, a mom is too dumb to know that she's killing her baby.
[00:35:49]  Is such a logical contradiction that it would be better if she was just a grifter and a fraud trying to get money out of it.
[00:35:56]  But she and many of the people in her orbit believe that the positions of don't kill babies and don't hold women responsible can mutually live together.
[00:36:07]  That's actually a much, much worse position than if she was just a grifter and a fraud.
[00:36:12]  Yep.
[00:36:13]  Amen.
[00:36:14]  Nathan, real quick, go up to conceptual clarity.
[00:36:18]  They had a comment that I want to address.
[00:36:19]  It says, Abortion abolition is right, meaning it's the correct position, folks.
[00:36:24]  But unless there is a revival, the likes of which we have never seen in this country, there's no chance of it in our lifetime.
[00:36:31]  And I just want to say that I'm not trying to pick on you, conceptual clarity.
[00:36:35]  I appreciate your involvement and engagement.
[00:36:37]  I'd prefer to see a super chat next time.
[00:36:39]  All right, let's do that.
[00:36:41]  But apart from that, glad you're listening to the show.
[00:36:44]  Appreciate your input.
[00:36:46]  Could not possibly disagree more.
[00:36:48]  Okay.
[00:36:49]  And the only reason I'm saying this is not to pick on you.
[00:36:51]  But because I've just heard this ad nauseum again and again from so many believers for several months now, for years, really, for the last two or three years, as I've embraced more of what I believe is the reform tradition and the biblical position on political philosophy, which is the revival mentality, I think, has destroyed our country.
[00:37:16]  Revivalism, I think, has been one of our great downfalls.
[00:37:20]  This idea that the only way we can. Experience any positive change is that we're basically just forced to just wait upon the Holy Spirit to choose that He's sovereignly going to move and regenerate 50% of the hearts in this country plus one.
[00:37:39]  And then through our sacred democracy with a simple majority, we can then vote in and elect good people and get good laws.
[00:37:47]  That's not true.
[00:37:48]  That's not, when you look historically, that is not how history has been made.
[00:37:52]  Even in biblical history, in the Old Testament with Israel, that's not how history has been made.
[00:37:57]  Time and time again, there are examples after examples after examples of not a simple majority, but a minority, in many cases, a stark minority of people who were strategic, influential.
[00:38:10]  They got involved, they moved this way, moved that way, they made this decision, and they passed a law.
[00:38:16]  And then, even if the majority of people didn't agree with it, they still had to abide by it.
[00:38:22]  They still had to abide by it.
[00:38:24]  And if you're wondering, like, well, give me one example.
[00:38:26]  Well, I'll give you one example in the negative.
[00:38:30]  3% of the population of this country over the course of 40 years replaced the American flag with a rainbow.
[00:38:39]  And not only for this country, but as we're finding out every single day, they actually saw to it that we would send billions upon billions and billions of dollars to make sure that our sacred sodomy would be exported, the number one export from the United States, so that Pakistanis could learn how to do arithmetic and sodomize.
[00:39:01]  Yep.
[00:39:02]  And not just Pakistan, but every nation virtually on the planet in South America and the Middle East, all over, all over.
[00:39:09]  And here's the deal 3% of the population, what they did was they were methodical, they were calculated, they were strategic, and they were determined.
[00:39:21]  And they would not take no for an answer.
[00:39:23]  And what they did slowly over time, but not that much time 40 years.
[00:39:27]  That's one generation.
[00:39:28]  One generation, they were able to change the minds because now, Most people are actually okay with gay marriage.
[00:39:36]  Now it's ticking down.
[00:39:37]  I was about to say, praise God.
[00:39:38]  It has peaked.
[00:39:39]  But here's the deal.
[00:39:39]  Well, that's another thing that this listener and many others need to hear.
[00:39:44]  It can change in both directions.
[00:39:47]  There is no biblical argument.
[00:39:49]  I get sick and tired of people.
[00:39:51]  They think that it's somehow written in the stars, that it's inscripturated, that in every generation and in every nation, every time, every people, every place, that things can change, but only for the worse.
[00:40:04]  That is not a biblical idea.
[00:40:05]  It's not.
[00:40:06]  It's not a biblical idea.
[00:40:08]  That's a dispensationalist idea.
[00:40:10]  That's a Schofield idea.
[00:40:12]  That's our greatest ally Israel idea.
[00:40:15]  That's a Zionist idea.
[00:40:17]  But that's not a biblical idea.
[00:40:19]  Our channel, we do Bible.
[00:40:23]  We don't do American Zionism dispensationalism.
[00:40:26]  There's a lot of channels to choose from.
[00:40:28]  If that's what you're looking for, if not, then yeah, we're the anti Semitic channel.
[00:40:34]  Not truly, not really.
[00:40:36]  We believe that Jews should repent of their sin.
[00:40:38]  And believe the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ and be saved by grace through faith in Him alone, and that they should be converted and be friends.
[00:40:45]  I love Jews and I would love to see them pleasantly converted to Christianity.
[00:40:50]  I wish them a very pleasant conversion to Christianity.
[00:40:52]  Apart from that, though, then yeah, get out of the church, get out of American politics.
[00:40:59]  And no, I don't want Zionism.
[00:41:02]  I don't want Judaism.
[00:41:03]  I don't want Islam.
[00:41:04]  I don't want Hinduism.
[00:41:05]  I don't want LGBT, LMNOP, the alphabet mafia.
[00:41:11]  I don't want.
[00:41:11]  Any of it.
[00:41:13]  And here's the point small groups of people from Zionism, from LGBT, from Marxism, there is example after example after example of a minority, always a minority, changing the majority.
[00:41:26]  It has happened time and time again, and it can happen both ways.
[00:41:29]  It is not written in the stars that things can only be changed by a minority for the worse, and that if you're a Christian, you simply have to sit on your hands and hope that God would send a supernatural, you know, a third great awakening, because the second one was lousy, but a third great awakening.
[00:41:46]  And until then, then we just have to deal with abortion.
[00:41:50]  It's just going to be a regular part of it.
[00:41:51]  No.
[00:41:52]  Which doesn't mean we don't pray for an awakening.
[00:41:54]  Yeah, you do.
[00:41:55]  Yes.
[00:41:55]  So I'm a pastor.
[00:41:56]  So there's different spheres.
[00:41:58]  There are different realms.
[00:41:59]  So as a churchman, as a pastor, and not just for pastors, but as a Christian, you should be in a church.
[00:42:04]  As a church member, a churchman, you should all be churchmen.
[00:42:07]  You need to be worshiping with the saints on the Lord's day.
[00:42:10]  And you need to be doing the work of an evangelist, right?
[00:42:13]  Sharing your faith, sharing the gospel, and seeking to make disciples, all these kinds of things.
[00:42:17]  So, you do that on the one hand, so that if God does send revival, there's, if God does send the fire of revival from heaven, there's actually some kindling for it to ignite.
[00:42:27]  Okay, so we do that.
[00:42:29]  Also, we can also, in the meantime, while we're waiting for God to do something like that, we can recognize He might, He also might not.
[00:42:36]  And so, what we can also do is in our other spheres of human society, right?
[00:42:40]  Because it's not just the church institute, but the church as people, as Christians, we're involved in other realms of life.
[00:42:48]  So, start influencing media, start influencing art, start.
[00:42:51]  Start a business and be successful.
[00:42:54]  Be powerful.
[00:42:55]  Be wealthy if you can, not for your own comfort, not because your treasure is here on earth, but so that you can utilize and wield all these things as levers, as influence, in order to push forward the crown rights of King Jesus.
[00:43:10]  Pursue local office in the political realm.
[00:43:14]  All these things.
[00:43:15]  And here's the deal if we can do these faithfully by God's grace, you can enact change, whether people agree with it or not.

=== Building Blocks of Heritage (05:09) ===

[00:43:23]  You do not need 50% of the country plus one to agree with you.
[00:43:29]  In order to enact God's law, you see all throughout biblical history, guys like Josiah.
[00:43:34]  He comes into the kingship and he says, Israel, what do the majority of you want to do?
[00:43:41]  No, he says, Israel, you're degenerates.
[00:43:44]  We're going to worship Yahweh.
[00:43:45]  Well, we don't want to.
[00:43:46]  Tough.
[00:43:47]  I loved one comment.
[00:43:48]  It said, I don't know who it was from.
[00:43:50]  Maybe Nate could pull it up.
[00:43:51]  Revivalism is feminine instincts cloaked, reform is masculine.
[00:43:57]  Revival says we wait.
[00:43:58]  It's feminine, it's passive.
[00:43:59]  Timothy Hatcher.
[00:44:01]  Yeah, bang on.
[00:44:01]  Right there.
[00:44:02]  That is a comment.
[00:44:03]  Still would have loved to see a super chat on that.
[00:44:06]  He said, Reform is masculine, bold, courage of the few.
[00:44:11]  Few know this.
[00:44:12]  Read the whole thing one more time.
[00:44:13]  Timothy Hatcher, go ahead.
[00:44:15]  Revivalism is just cloaked feminine consciences.
[00:44:19]  Reform is masculine, bold, courage of the few.
[00:44:23]  That's so good.
[00:44:24]  Wow.
[00:44:24]  Yep.
[00:44:24]  Yep.
[00:44:25]  Amen.
[00:44:25]  All right.
[00:44:26]  Show's done, Timothy.
[00:44:27]  He just, yeah.
[00:44:28]  We could have just, we could have just said that.
[00:44:30]  Ended with that.
[00:44:30]  The show's done.
[00:44:31]  Maybe the section.
[00:44:32]  Real quick, speaking of super chats, because I've been.
[00:44:34]  Oh, yeah, there's a lot of.
[00:44:35]  I've been, I'm being comical, just for the record.
[00:44:38]  Okay, but somebody actually did one.
[00:44:40]  So Cameron Stevenson, appreciate it.
[00:44:42]  He said, Joel, I think it would be helpful if you guys, for you guys to talk about the concept of household vote.
[00:44:48]  Yeah.
[00:44:49]  Thanks and see you at the Crisis King Conference.
[00:44:51]  Looking forward to seeing you.
[00:44:53]  He basically is saying, like, you know, you want to answer it maybe at the end more fully?
[00:44:57]  I'll do it real fast.
[00:44:58]  So repealing the 19th Amendment, I will.
[00:45:00]  Just for the record, here's the deal American, our American heritage.
[00:45:05]  As it pertains to government, we have always held to representative government.
[00:45:09]  Somebody represents you.
[00:45:11]  Always.
[00:45:11]  Somebody right now represents me.
[00:45:13]  And it's not just me.
[00:45:14]  On multiple levels, even.
[00:45:15]  Right.
[00:45:15]  On multiple levels.
[00:45:16]  I'm being represented at the county level, at the state level, at the federal level.
[00:45:20]  We are always being represented.
[00:45:23]  All repealing the 19th Amendment, all we mean by that, and really it's even wider than that.
[00:45:28]  Universal suffrage was a very, very wicked and bad idea.
[00:45:34]  It was a bad idea.
[00:45:35]  It's representative government.
[00:45:37]  And what that asserts is that the basic building block of a society in these United States is not an individual atomistic person.
[00:45:45]  I'm the captain of my own destiny.
[00:45:47]  No, the basic, the fundamental building block is not the atom, but the molecule.
[00:45:51]  And the molecule, in this analogy that I'm using, is the family, it's the household.
[00:45:56]  So it goes all the way down to households, not individuals, but households.
[00:46:00]  And therefore, someone has to represent the household.
[00:46:03]  And that's something that God has already determined in his word that the husband should be the head of the wife, he's the head of the household.
[00:46:09]  So, well, how do women get a voice?
[00:46:10]  They get a voice.
[00:46:12]  Through their husband, through their father, through their uncle, through their brother, right?
[00:46:16]  And this is how things worked in the past that men would represent the family.
[00:46:22]  And what kind of men?
[00:46:24]  Men who had a stake in the country's past and in its future, right?
[00:46:29]  So they actually had a heritage.
[00:46:30]  They cared about the country.
[00:46:32]  They didn't just show up 15 minutes ago.
[00:46:34]  They were heritage Americans, okay?
[00:46:35]  So people who had a stake in the country's past and also they were fathers, they weren't childless cat ladies.
[00:46:44]  Voting.
[00:46:45]  They were men with children, with wives and children, meaning they weren't just voting for what would be best for this generation.
[00:46:52]  Well, free trade without any limitations whatsoever.
[00:46:55]  And let's, you know, tariffs are bad because GDP must go up.
[00:46:58]  And I'm currently invested, you know, in Palantir.
[00:47:01]  And I need Peter Thiel to, you know, be successful.
[00:47:03]  And I need pennies on the dollar and outsourcing labor so that I can retire and have four houses and go on cruises.
[00:47:10]  Right.
[00:47:10]  That's a guy who's not thinking about the next generation.
[00:47:12]  Right.
[00:47:12]  You call that a boomer.
[00:47:14]  That's like that.
[00:47:15]  That is someone who's not thinking about the future.
[00:47:17]  So who did you want voting?
[00:47:19]  You wanted guys who had fathers who were part of this nation.
[00:47:22]  Their own fathers, right?
[00:47:24]  So that they had a stake in the past and they had sons, sons and daughters.
[00:47:29]  So they had a stake in the future.
[00:47:30]  And then that guy would vote and be the voice for his household representative government.
[00:47:36]  That's what we're advocating for.
[00:47:38]  Let me make one correction.
[00:47:39]  There was a super chat from Nathan Weiser, a prominent abolitionist, I believe.
[00:47:42]  He said, Hey, just for the record, copper IUDs are, that's 100,000%.
[00:47:46]  100,000 cents.
[00:47:47]  100,000 cents.
[00:47:48]  Abortifashion.
[00:47:49]  In fact, it's their only mechanism.
[00:47:51]  Just Googled it.
[00:47:52]  He is correct that it is one part of it.
[00:47:53]  It is toxic to the embryo, which would be a human life.
[00:47:56]  So that is true.
[00:47:57]  And I am corrected.
[00:47:58]  The primary mechanism is, though, copper ions that affect the sperm.
[00:48:02]  So you put wire, which is so mechanical and crazy.
[00:48:05]  You put a wire in there for 10 years, it releases these positive ions that are toxic to sperm, so you don't get pregnant, but also as a fail safe mechanism.
[00:48:13]  He is absolutely correct.
[00:48:14]  So then it's this embryo.
[00:48:15]  The second concept is the hormonal birth control.
[00:48:17]  So it's like there may be another thing that's not an abortive fashion as a primary means, but that could technically fail.
[00:48:25]  And then the fail safe is abortive fashion, it is murderous.
[00:48:29]  We've got so many, we've got to do them real quick.
[00:48:31]  Michael, super chat.
[00:48:32]  Look at these super chats.

=== Copper Ions and Abortifashion (15:26) ===

[00:48:33]  That's what I'm talking about.
[00:48:34]  Michael, God bless you.
[00:48:36]  He says, Trump can't even find a real pastor, a man, right?
[00:48:40]  That's right.
[00:48:41]  Paula White.
[00:48:42]  You're absolutely right.
[00:48:43]  He appoints a lady preacher with the Boss Babe pantsuit, Paula White, as pastor of America.
[00:48:50]  God have mercy.
[00:48:51]  We won't change this until the church changes this.
[00:48:56]  Is it?
[00:48:58]  We have to get women out of the pulpit first.
[00:49:01]  So you're saying we got to get women out of the pulpit.
[00:49:03]  You're not going to get your Kristen Hawkins.
[00:49:05]  Out of the public square, if you can't even get women out of the pulpit.
[00:49:09]  If the church can't do it, the nation can't do it.
[00:49:12]  I would have always supported that.
[00:49:15]  Like my whole life.
[00:49:17]  Here's the deal.
[00:49:19]  And these are some of the things that I've changed on, much to the chagrin of many, pearl clutching Christians.
[00:49:30]  Wes and I have kind of a running bet with some of the American Reformer guys, Josh Abitoy.
[00:49:37]  And just, okay, this is where I always get in trouble.
[00:49:41]  Dynamic difference between a prediction and a prescription.
[00:49:44]  Please understand that.
[00:49:45]  Okay.
[00:49:46]  So a prescription is something you're saying, this is what we should do.
[00:49:49]  This is what's morally right.
[00:49:51]  This is what's ideal.
[00:49:52]  That's a prescription.
[00:49:54]  A prediction is saying, I think this is what's going to happen, whether you like it or not.
[00:50:02]  I think that it should have been the church.
[00:50:05]  Okay.
[00:50:05]  I'm 100% on board with that.
[00:50:06]  Prescriptive should have been the church leading the way.
[00:50:10]  The church has not led the culture in America for at least what?
[00:50:14]  What do you think?
[00:50:14]  50 years?
[00:50:15]  70 years?
[00:50:15]  No, longer than that, yeah.
[00:50:16]  I'd say old Princeton was kind of the height of it, which would be early 1900s.
[00:50:20]  Yeah.
[00:50:20]  Okay, 100 years.
[00:50:22]  So the church has not been leading the culture for a century.
[00:50:27]  Fair.
[00:50:28]  Probably fair.
[00:50:31]  Have you seen the meme going around?
[00:50:34]  I think it's hilarious.
[00:50:35]  It's a scene from, I think the show is The Umbrella Academy, another superhero show, because we don't have enough of those.
[00:50:42]  No, we need more.
[00:50:42]  Yeah.
[00:50:43]  But it's like two of the characters, two superheroes, brother and sister, and one of them is trying to catch up with the other.
[00:50:49]  One drove off in a car, and then you got the other sibling who jumps in a car real quick and is trying to catch them.
[00:50:54]  And so they're going around a bend trying to catch them.
[00:50:57]  And then all of a sudden, they see the person that they're literally trying to catch.
[00:51:01]  They've, I guess, went around the bend and then turned around.
[00:51:03]  And now they're coming back the exact opposite way.
[00:51:06]  And they both are driving, trying to find each other.
[00:51:09]  And now they're driving past each other, and they're both kind of doing one of these head swiveling, like, What?
[00:51:13]  You're going that way?
[00:51:14]  I'm going this way.
[00:51:15]  And then the meme says, The text says, The American church.
[00:51:22]  Uh, trying to appease woke culture in the United States as the culture has whiplashed to the right, and I think that's profound.
[00:51:36]  I think that's exactly what we're seeing, and that's been my shtick for like every episode for the last two years.
[00:51:45]  I've gotten a ton of grief for it from everyone you could possibly imagine, every single Christian pastor you can imagine.
[00:51:52]  But here's my thing all along, I've said it a million times, all along, I said.
[00:51:58]  Nature will return with a vengeance.
[00:52:00]  The rubber band will snap back when it does, because it's been held so long, suppressed so long.
[00:52:07]  When it snaps back, it's going to go back fast and hard.
[00:52:14]  And the question will be not whether, but which.
[00:52:17]  There will be a return from leftist globalism to, on the right, nationalism, from egalitarianism to hierarchy, from feminism to patriarchy.
[00:52:26]  At every level, we're going to snap back into the natural order.
[00:52:30]  Nature remains.
[00:52:31]  The undefeated champion of all of human history and secular humanism was able to temporarily suppress it, but not ultimately beat it.
[00:52:41]  Nature will win, and when it wins, it will win suddenly and powerfully.
[00:52:47]  And so, then the rubber band is going to snap back, the culture is going to snap back to nature.
[00:52:52]  What is natural?
[00:52:54]  And already we're seeing it in real time every day.
[00:52:57]  The Overton window is shifting at light speed.
[00:53:00]  And so, then here's the question not whether we return to nature, but which.
[00:53:04]  Which form of nature will we return to?
[00:53:06]  So, when we inevitably snap back from globalism to nationalism, will be Islamic nationalism?
[00:53:13]  Will be Zionism?
[00:53:14]  Right?
[00:53:15]  One nation is allowed to have the same.
[00:53:16]  There's some blood and soil right there.
[00:53:18]  Yep, there you go.
[00:53:18]  Israel.
[00:53:19]  Everybody's on board for that.
[00:53:21]  And then, you know, or will it be pagan nationalism?
[00:53:25]  You know, or will it be Christian nationalism?
[00:53:27]  Same with patriarchy.
[00:53:28]  Will it be Andrew Tate?
[00:53:30]  That guy's patriarchal, but it's not Christian patriarchy, it's not biblical patriarchy.
[00:53:34]  So, is it going to be Islamic patriarchy?
[00:53:36]  Is it going to be degenerate pagan patriarchy?
[00:53:39]  You're going to get it, it's not whether, but which.
[00:53:41]  So, you will get patriarchy, you will get nationalism, you will get hierarchy, God's order.
[00:53:47]  You're going to get it.
[00:53:49]  And my whole thing for the last two years has been saying, I've been trying to say, Christians, stop playing it close to the chest.
[00:53:56]  Stop trying to be safe.
[00:53:59]  Stop trying to be safe.
[00:54:00]  You need to run out, run all the way back to what's old, tested, tried, and true.
[00:54:09]  What did Calvin think?
[00:54:10]  What did Luther think?
[00:54:13]  What did Athanasius think?
[00:54:14]  What did Aristotle think?
[00:54:15]  He wasn't a Christian, but what did he think?
[00:54:16]  What did Aquinas?
[00:54:17]  We'll use it.
[00:54:18]  What is old, tried, tested, and true Christian thought throughout the centuries?
[00:54:23]  Because they all adhered to nature.
[00:54:26]  None of them were globalist.
[00:54:28]  None of them were feminist.
[00:54:29]  None of them.
[00:54:30]  So you need to get out of the 20th century.
[00:54:32]  We need to repeal not just the 19th Amendment, we need to repeal the entire 20th century.
[00:54:36]  So go back before that and see what every single Christian thought.
[00:54:40]  And then you need to run to that spot and plant a Christian flag in the ground so that when the culture snaps back and they're looking and say, okay, we realize globalism was a mistake.
[00:54:53]  We need to embrace nationalism so that they can say, oh, here's one of the options Christian nationalism.
[00:54:59]  But if Christians just spent the last two years saying that Christian nationalism is Adolf Hitler and that it's icky and scary and bad, and they dissuaded every single young, Christian, who would even consider Christian nationalism as a viable option, so that there are no Christians now standing in that space.
[00:55:18]  Now, when the culture snaps back into God's natural order and embraces nationalism over globalism, they'll look and say, Well, I guess there's not a Christian option.
[00:55:27]  We know we need nationalism, but there is no Christian option, no Christian version of nationalism.
[00:55:34]  So I guess it's going to be just a pagan nationalism or a humanist, Darwinian nationalism or this or that or the other.
[00:55:45]  That's where we're at.
[00:55:46]  The return is inevitable.
[00:55:48]  So, all the way back to the comment who said, you know, we got to, the church has to lead the way.
[00:55:54]  The church should lead the way, prescriptive.
[00:55:57]  But in terms of what will happen, prediction, well, if the precedent set over the last hundred years is any indicator, which is the church following the culture on everything for a hundred years straight.
[00:56:13]  That's currently the precedent.
[00:56:16]  Then, yeah, not my prescription, not what I would want, but in terms of my prediction, what I think will occur is I think that the church, in a sad, pathetic attempt to be relevant, not true principle, not true fidelity to God's word and virtue, but simply doing what the church has done for 100 years, wanting to be relevant and receive the praise of men, that the culture will actually snap back into the natural order, and then the church.
[00:56:44]  Will get there 10 years later, like it always does, and then find out, oh, Stephen Wolfe was right.
[00:56:50]  And that's if a Christian prince doesn't come in and say, hey, mainlines, you're done.
[00:56:55]  That would be awesome.
[00:56:55]  Like, honestly, like, I don't think we have 50 years for them to organically run out of money.
[00:57:00]  We need the prince to come in and say, you had a good run.
[00:57:03]  We're going to take it from here.
[00:57:03]  We're going to give these churches to churches that are actually Christian.
[00:57:07]  Dude, all right.
[00:57:08]  I know we got to go to the commercial, but.
[00:57:10]  No, this is great.
[00:57:10]  We got a $50 super chat.
[00:57:13]  That's.
[00:57:14]  But you got to try to pronounce that name.
[00:57:15]  When we talk about super chat, I can do a candy.
[00:57:17]  Bo?
[00:57:18]  Yeah.
[00:57:18]  Say it, Bo Kennington.
[00:57:20]  Kennington, yeah, we got it.
[00:57:21]  There we go.
[00:57:22]  He's like probably one of my best friends.
[00:57:25]  We've been friends for like 20 seconds since I saw the super chat, but we are friends.
[00:57:29]  Um, $50 super chat incredibly kind, incredibly generous.
[00:57:33]  Thank you, Bo.
[00:57:34]  Um, he said this I'll support Timothy's statement.
[00:57:36]  What Timothy said earlier on, I think he was the guy who said the, um, yeah, it needs to be reformation, not revivalism, uh, masculine and not uh, feminine.
[00:57:44]  Um, he said, I'll support Timothy's statement and your ministry, um, in general.
[00:57:49]  Appreciate your work and outreach.
[00:57:51]  Thank you so much, Bo.
[00:57:52]  We appreciate it.
[00:57:53]  Let's go ahead now.
[00:57:54]  Hold on.
[00:57:54]  Hold on.
[00:57:54]  I think we're going to pivot away from the abortion.
[00:57:58]  So it's worth reading Ben Zaisloff's correction because that does need to be mentioned just for the accurate record.
[00:58:04]  So, Nate, if you can pull up.
[00:58:05]  Yeah.
[00:58:05]  No super chat from Ben?
[00:58:06]  Yeah, right.
[00:58:07]  He thinks he's getting his correction in.
[00:58:09]  He's like, I can do this for free.
[00:58:10]  No, this is good.
[00:58:11]  We want to be, you know, we want to be accurate.
[00:58:12]  Okay.
[00:58:13]  All right.
[00:58:15]  He says lots of solid points.
[00:58:17]  Just a quick correction.
[00:58:18]  Kristen signed a letter against a North Dakota Republican Party equal.
[00:58:22]  Protection resolution, not the abolition bill specifically in North Dakota.
[00:58:26]  But to your point, that action still tossed cold water on the idea of equal protection in North Dakota.
[00:58:31]  And just this afternoon, she said that she would have opposed the bill had she known about it.
[00:58:36]  Good to know.
[00:58:37]  There you go.
[00:58:37]  So, she didn't technically oppose the bill because she didn't know about it.
[00:58:42]  She opposed something less than the bill.
[00:58:45]  Like resolutions are less than bills.
[00:58:47]  So, even just the resolution, I can't do it.
[00:58:48]  So, really, if anything, that's an argument from the greater to the lesser.
[00:58:51]  She's like, this isn't even a bill.
[00:58:52]  It's just a resolution.
[00:58:53]  I'm still going to give it everything I got to propose that.
[00:58:56]  Yeah, that's pretty crazy.
[00:58:57]  Thank you for that correction, Ben.
[00:58:59]  Remind me in the future making jokes about super chats is highly effective because we can't ever go to a person.
[00:59:06]  You're supposed to say that off camera.
[00:59:07]  Yeah, you're right.
[00:59:07]  Sorry, but it's the 14th.
[00:59:08]  People got paid probably.
[00:59:09]  That's right.
[00:59:10]  It's coming up.
[00:59:11]  They got paid on Friday.
[00:59:11]  It's probably all these single guys who are living in their mom's basement with no job.
[00:59:15]  All the on the kids who are getting ready to celebrate Valentine's Day, you know, because they don't have a girlfriend.
[00:59:21]  No, we're actually not getting ready to go on a great steak dinner with their wife.
[00:59:24]  We're actually, yeah, we're actually not one of those ministries that will disparage every single guy who thinks that maybe Christians were faithful, you know, before 1945.
[00:59:34]  Lots of ministries that'll do that, that'll just automatically assume and disparage you must be unemployed, live in your mom's basement.
[00:59:40]  You, when in reality, Because we've gotten to know a lot of these guys.
[00:59:44]  They're 35, 40, 45, 50 years old.
[00:59:48]  Several of them are millionaires.
[00:59:51]  About half of them are entrepreneurs and own their own business.
[00:59:54]  And on average, they're married with five or six children.
[00:59:58]  I was about to say, three to five is like average.
[01:00:01]  Like many have more, some have slightly fewer, they're younger.
[01:00:04]  Three to five is just starting point.
[01:00:06]  That's your anonymous accounts on X.
[01:00:08]  Yeah.
[01:00:09]  Seriously.
[01:00:10]  Are some of them completely unhinged?
[01:00:13]  Sure.
[01:00:15]  But most of these guys are good guys, and they're good guys who, let's just, all these other ministries need to be honest and just say, we don't like them.
[01:00:24]  And we also don't like any other Christian before 1945.
[01:00:28]  Right.
[01:00:29]  Like, we just, like, just be consistent.
[01:00:30]  It's just like, we don't like the Anons.
[01:00:32]  We also don't like Calvin.
[01:00:34]  We also don't like Aquinas.
[01:00:35]  We also don't like Luther.
[01:00:37]  We also don't like, we would have excommunicated the reformers, and that's why we're trying to hunt down and dox and excommunicate the anonymous accounts.
[01:00:44]  So let's just be fair.
[01:00:45]  So, anyways, Tyler, thank you so much.
[01:00:47]  Super chat from him.
[01:00:48]  He says the Christian church needs to lead the way and money.
[01:00:53]  Put its money.
[01:00:53]  And put its money where its mouth is.
[01:00:56]  And it needs to get rid of women voting in our congregations first.
[01:01:00]  All right, fair.
[01:01:01]  It rings hollow when we call for repealing the 19th Amendment.
[01:01:06]  I think most Christians that are calling for repealing the 19th are in churches where women are not in the church.
[01:01:11]  Probably.
[01:01:11]  For our church, I don't have time to get into it, but we are congregational.
[01:01:15]  We do have congregation voting.
[01:01:18]  We're a little bit creative, and the elders were a little bit creative with this in the sense that what I don't like is I don't like the single woman whose parents are not members of the church, right?
[01:01:27]  Because maybe she's a college student or something like that, and her parents live out of state.
[01:01:31]  Which we've had in our church.
[01:01:32]  Which we've had in our church.
[01:01:34]  So you have a 22 year old single lady who absolutely deserves to be a member in the church, right?
[01:01:39]  Because she's stationed in our county for the foreseeable future because of school or whatever it is, and her parents are in another state, and her father has given her permission to be a member in our church.
[01:01:51]  She's pursuing membership.
[01:01:52]  And then, because we're congregational and members are getting votes, now she gets a vote because she's not married and her father's not a member in our church.
[01:01:59]  So she is her own household.
[01:02:01]  So now the 22 year old single woman has a household vote that rivals in voting power the patriarchal man with a wife and 10 kids.
[01:02:13]  And I'm like, that guy should, like, if she gets a vote, then that guy should get like 10 votes.
[01:02:19]  Right, right.
[01:02:19]  He should have more voting power.
[01:02:21]  So we kind of do it in our church, it is household.
[01:02:24]  But it's household, and you get more votes based off of how many baptized members of your family you represent.
[01:02:31]  So if you have eight children and a wife, so there's 10 kids in the family, and six of those children are baptized, and the wife is baptized, and you're baptized, then we're going to count that as a vote of eight.
[01:02:44]  But we don't have any instance of a wife is voting against her husband.
[01:02:49]  And the husband of that home could say, I'm going to take the eight votes that I have and vote in favor or against this.
[01:02:54]  He has that authority.
[01:02:55]  That's right.
[01:02:55]  Although he does not have to.
[01:02:57]  Right.
[01:02:58]  Okay, all right, here we go.
[01:02:59]  Commercial break.
[01:03:00]  Our sponsor, Private Family Banking, wants to help you with one money move that'll implicate itself in multi generational wealth building starting the first day.
[01:03:10]  They help you to avoid taxation and to draw compound interest to your money.
[01:03:15]  Now, if you're a high net worth individual, someone who has maybe even $10 million in net worth, then they can help you even more.
[01:03:24]  W 2 workers, contract workers, business owners, it's all about.
[01:03:28]  Cash flow and making tax deferred gains on all your money for the rest of your life.
[01:03:34]  Don't avoid this.
[01:03:35]  It's a big move, but it's a great time to make it.
[01:03:38]  Click the link below and you can get on Chuck de Lotterante's calendar and he'll go over your background and what you want to accomplish.
[01:03:46]  And he's going to help model a program that exactly fits your needs.
[01:03:50]  So go ahead and send an email to Chuck at Private Family Banking.com.
[01:03:55]  Again, that's Chuck at Private Family Banking.com.

=== High Net Worth Tax Strategies (04:42) ===

[01:03:59]  Or you can click the link below.
[01:04:01]  Make a free discovery call now.
[01:04:04]  The danger of centralized power is often represented by the word king.
[01:04:09]  As Americans, we hate the word king.
[01:04:12]  Civilian ownership of body armor is about helping people to have increased power to resist tyrants and criminals.
[01:04:21]  And so, Armored Republic is about helping you to preserve your God given rights to the honor of the Lord Jesus Christ because he is the king of kings and he governs kings and he will judge them.
[01:04:33]  This is Armored Republic.
[01:04:35]  And in a republic, there is no king but Christ.
[01:04:39]  We are free craftsmen, and we are honored to be your armor spread of choice.
[01:04:58]  All right.
[01:04:59]  I'm going to make the argument now from the lesser to the greater.
[01:05:02]  I think it's called inductive reasoning when you use an example and you use that to then reason to a pattern, right?
[01:05:07]  I checked my master bedroom.
[01:05:08]  There was nobody in there.
[01:05:09]  So I'm going to reason to the greater, which is.
[01:05:10]  You better not be noticing patterns.
[01:05:12]  Oh, that's.
[01:05:13]  We're going to be in trouble.
[01:05:14]  Go ahead.
[01:05:15]  I'm going to reason from the example to the principle.
[01:05:18]  And so I want to flesh out more what is the general principle underneath the title of this episode, which is to get women out of public service.
[01:05:25]  The thesis would be, right?
[01:05:26]  You can't make a whole argument on this one woman that's grifting.
[01:05:28]  She's opposing, like, true abolition of abortion.
[01:05:31]  She's abandoning her sick kids.
[01:05:32]  Like one person is doing that doesn't necessarily validate a whole premise.
[01:05:36]  But the premise that we're arguing is that when you put women in the station of public life, and again, the reformers from Bollinger, from Knox, from Calvin, they all argued this.
[01:05:44]  When you put her in public life, specifically in positions of authority, power, rule, and reign, that you put her in an unnatural position, and being in an unnatural position, like a man that is maybe a stay at home husband, it's against nature, it's contrary to nature.
[01:05:59]  When you do that, you set someone up for failure.
[01:06:03]  There have been notable, I'm not going to like, We're not going to show images of every headline that's come across.
[01:06:08]  It's a little bit tabloid.
[01:06:09]  But you think of some of the most well known conservative.
[01:06:12]  Now, these would be conservative.
[01:06:13]  These would be quote unquote Christian women that serve in elected office all over this country.
[01:06:18]  One of them, for example, would be Christy Nome.
[01:06:20]  She was governor for a while.
[01:06:21]  Was it North or South Dakota, Michael?
[01:06:23]  Governor of South Dakota.
[01:06:24]  Had a lot of conservative legislation, this, that, or the other.
[01:06:27]  A couple of years ago, it turns out while she was at the governor's office doing governor things, she had an over year long affair with a Trump staffer.
[01:06:35]  That's not good.
[01:06:36]  Marjorie Taylor Greene, Lauren Bober, Sarah Palin, all of them have been divorced while they're in office.
[01:06:43]  Over and over again, there are two other governors the governor of Alabama and the governor of Iowa, Republican governors.
[01:06:49]  They're both divorced.
[01:06:50]  One of them has no children whatsoever.
[01:06:52]  And so you start seeing a pattern emerge.
[01:06:54]  And then you go to the literature and you look at the literature and you say, okay, so if a woman enters the workforce and she's promoted and gets raises, how does that affect her happiness?
[01:07:01]  How does that affect her marriage, her longevity, all of that?
[01:07:05]  So this is a study from an economics journal.
[01:07:06]  Nate, you can show graph number one here.
[01:07:09]  And it shows on the graph.
[01:07:10]  Real quick, there's also a study about subscribing to our YouTube channel and how that will make a difference for the kingdom of God and getting the algorithm to subscribe.
[01:07:18]  And liking the video.
[01:07:19]  That's what they call it.
[01:07:20]  And liking the video and sharing the video and clicking the bell when you subscribe so that you'll be notified by every new piece of content that we put out.
[01:07:28]  And also going over on X to our handle at RightResponseM.
[01:07:33]  Lots of studies show that if you do that, you won't be gay and a good Christian message will be promoted.
[01:07:40]  Peer reviewed studies show this.
[01:07:41]  Peer reviewed studies.
[01:07:42]  We are the peers.
[01:07:43]  We need meta studies.
[01:07:44]  Yeah, yeah, yeah.
[01:07:45]  Meta studies.
[01:07:45]  Okay, meta analysis.
[01:07:46]  All right, so 2018, all the single ladies is the title of the article, Job Promotions and Durability of Marriage.
[01:07:53]  So you have here a graph, and you see on the left, women, and on the right, men.
[01:07:57]  And so they tracked women and the sample size they had, a certain point where they were promoted.
[01:08:03]  So they were promoted to a higher level.
[01:08:04]  They were given a higher billet.
[01:08:06]  Which generally means they're climbing the corporate ladder.
[01:08:08]  Right, they're working longer hours, et cetera.
[01:08:11]  So in women, right here on the left, you can see this quote, for women, Obtaining such a promotion, promotion to a higher level, doubles, doubles the probability of divorce, whereas men's divorce rate remains unaffected by similar career advancements.
[01:08:30]  There's not a ton of literature on this.
[01:08:32]  It's not like people are getting studies of 80,000, some people, and parsing it all out.
[01:08:36]  But when you go and look at it, it's not just, well, there's a slight increase.
[01:08:39]  Well, it's 10% higher.

=== Generational Wealth and Jobs (02:19) ===

[01:08:41]  A woman that takes those advancements, that prolongs in her career, Doubles her chance of divorce.
[01:08:47]  And divorce, it is, of course, destructive in the sin sense, in the dissolution of the family.
[01:08:53]  Divorce ruins people's finances.
[01:08:55]  It ruins their family relationships.
[01:08:57]  Divorce eats.
[01:08:59]  You talk about generational wealth and things like that.
[01:09:03]  You think about why we're in so much trouble younger generations, millennials, and especially Gen Z. Gen Z is furious and rightfully so, justifiably so, because prior generations have made it virtually impossible for them to own a home and get married and have kids, especially to have a single household income and all those kinds of things.
[01:09:24]  And one of the things that often doesn't get cited as one of the reasons, but it is a reason, is globalism and free trade and zero tariffs.
[01:09:33]  Trump is fixing some of these things so that all of our jobs were exported, all manufacturing is overseas, and then just a flood of immigration for people to come in.
[01:09:41]  Democrats have always held the position of, but who will pick the cotton?
[01:09:46]  Somebody's got to pick the cotton, right?
[01:09:48]  Someone, anyone.
[01:09:49]  Democrats needed the slaves back in the day.
[01:09:51]  Now they need the illegal immigrants so that they can be their house cleaner or whatever.
[01:09:57]  No, no, actually, we can do those kinds of jobs.
[01:10:00]  Americans can do those jobs, and they won't be the best paying jobs, but they would be better paying.
[01:10:04]  They would be better paying if we didn't have the burden, the tax burden of supporting all these millions of people who shouldn't be here.
[01:10:14]  You have a lot more walking around money, you know, like so taxes would be lower, wages would be higher, goods would cost more.
[01:10:21]  I'll admit that.
[01:10:22]  Goods would cost more, but they also would not need to be replaced every day.
[01:10:27]  18 months.
[01:10:28]  You build things to last.
[01:10:30]  So you'd be buying a refrigerator.
[01:10:33]  Like back in the day, you look at those refrigerators.
[01:10:36]  They still work.
[01:10:37]  Those refrigerators that were made in the 50s.
[01:10:40]  And now it's like everything has to be, every electronic has to be replaced within two weeks.
[01:10:45]  Planned obsolescence.
[01:10:47]  Exactly.
[01:10:47]  Planned obsolescence.
[01:10:48]  So products would be more expensive, but they would last longer.
[01:10:51]  Wages would be higher.
[01:10:52]  Taxes would be lower.
[01:10:54]  So there's all those things immigration, globalism, free trade that's limitless without any barriers whatsoever.

=== Planned Obsolescence Explained (08:20) ===

[01:11:01]  But another one is divorce.
[01:11:03]  For Gen Z and millennials, if you're wondering, like, where's my inheritance?
[01:11:07]  Well, your dad's on his third marriage.
[01:11:09]  Right.
[01:11:10]  If you're, it's like, seriously, you're a boomer father.
[01:11:13]  You're wondering, what, like, how come, you know, I talked to him, like, Dad, do you have a will?
[01:11:17]  And like, oh, my dad actually, he's not being selfish.
[01:11:19]  He's not just spending all on cruises and all those kinds of things, not caring about me and the grandkids.
[01:11:24]  He actually is leaving us an inheritance.
[01:11:26]  But I don't understand.
[01:11:26]  My dad's had a good job for 40 years.
[01:11:29]  And we talked about it briefly, and I didn't want to give him a hard time.
[01:11:33]  He said he's going to leave us like $15,000.
[01:11:35]  That's it.
[01:11:36]  Like, where did it go?
[01:11:37]  Well, he's on his third marriage.
[01:11:38]  Because he split his finances in half.
[01:11:40]  That's why he split in half.
[01:11:41]  Multiple times.
[01:11:42]  That's where it went.
[01:11:43]  Yep.
[01:11:44]  Yep.
[01:11:44]  Absolutely.
[01:11:45]  Someone put this, Tyler put this in the chat.
[01:11:47]  Putting lots of women around them, which would be other men in leadership positions, is naturally incentivized for many reasons in that you put women with men.
[01:11:56]  And me and Michael, we were talking about in the way over, like work wife, work husband.
[01:12:00]  For one, that's of course disjunctable.
[01:12:01]  It's gross.
[01:12:02]  The idea that, like, there's your wife or your husband at home, but then there's the person at the office that you flirt with.
[01:12:07]  But maybe the problem isn't necessarily, oh, these people get into positions and they do immoral things.
[01:12:13]  Maybe, hear me out, the pairing is immoral in the first place.
[01:12:16]  Let's take young men and young women, let's throw in their late 20s, so the prime of attractiveness, fitness, all these different things.
[01:12:23]  We're going to throw them together.
[01:12:24]  We're going to have them work long hours on projects, spend 50, 60 hours a week together, travel to hotels.
[01:12:29]  We're going to do that and we're going to expect not an ounce camaraderie, shared humor, shared interest, anything like that.
[01:12:36]  The problem is not that.
[01:12:38]  Well, how could Christy Noam have had an affair with this man that she was staying up till 10 p.m. at night with in a conference room planning for a presentation?
[01:12:45]  How could this have happened?
[01:12:47]  Oh, because she was in an unnatural station.
[01:12:50]  You could say, well, men have affairs too.
[01:12:51]  Yes, they do.
[01:12:52]  But the sin didn't start when they themselves took a position or political office in the first place.
[01:12:56]  That's right.
[01:12:57]  For the woman, that's where it started.
[01:12:59]  She went into office.
[01:13:00]  She was someplace she should have been.
[01:13:02]  Exactly.
[01:13:02]  It started when he gave in to the temptation.
[01:13:05]  But like John Owen talks about making no provisions for the flesh, the man, it was not a sin for him to get a job.
[01:13:12]  It was not a sin, inherently a sin from the get go, for him to work in politics.
[01:13:18]  And work late hours and long.
[01:13:19]  Or work long hours.
[01:13:21]  None of that is inherently sinful.
[01:13:22]  Right.
[01:13:23]  For the woman, though.
[01:13:24]  It's not just when she gave into the temptation of having the affair that it was a sin.
[01:13:28]  It was a sin to be in that context to begin with.
[01:13:31]  Exactly.
[01:13:32]  And so you throw people together.
[01:13:34]  This weird world where we take men and women, like Jordan Peterson, he's weird, but he's correct on this.
[01:13:40]  He says, We have never experimented like this before.
[01:13:43]  We take women and we put them in makeup, which all makeup is meant to do is to accentuate features that relate to fertility.
[01:13:49]  We take men and put them in suits.
[01:13:51]  We throw them together in cubicles for 40, 50 hours a week.
[01:13:54]  And then we throw up our hands, like, oh my goodness, divorce has gone up and affairs have gone up and fertility.
[01:13:59]  Someone called it out.
[01:14:00]  Fertility is down.
[01:14:01]  Like, I always joke about the pantsuits, but it's not even just that.
[01:14:06]  Like, being a little bit specific here, but I think it helps to be specific and get into some of the ulterior motives and stuff.
[01:14:14]  How many women in the business context, how many of them wear flat footwear?
[01:14:22]  Like, isn't it almost always like high heels?
[01:14:25]  Yep.
[01:14:26]  I don't know.
[01:14:27]  I've seen both, but I think both.
[01:14:28]  Yeah.
[01:14:29]  I think when women entered, I won't make the argument if in the 80s and 90s it was definitely all high heels, but I think that has.
[01:14:37]  Yep.
[01:14:38]  But structured suits.
[01:14:39]  So there's framing on the shoulders because shoulders and framing, it's a power pose.
[01:14:43]  It gives you a type of authority.
[01:14:44]  Like even like red lipstick and stuff like that.
[01:14:47]  Those are designed to accentuate how God made women, which is to be attractive to men.
[01:14:52]  And so we could look at it and say, well, the problem is men.
[01:14:54]  The problem is youth.
[01:14:56]  The problem is all these different things.
[01:14:58]  Sure, those are problems when they lead into sin.
[01:15:00]  But putting them together in the first place.
[01:15:03]  And so we say, take women out of public service.
[01:15:05]  Take these women like Kristen Hawkins that are doing damage to the cause.
[01:15:09]  Take these conservative Christian women that should be loving their new grandchildren right now.
[01:15:14]  Like a lot of these women like Pam Bondi and others that have been put in office.
[01:15:18]  For one, and it's not fun to think about, for one, most of them are in menopause.
[01:15:22]  So they're going through a huge hormonal psychological change as they exit their 40s and get into their 50s.
[01:15:28]  And you're asking them to work.
[01:15:29]  Guys, these people work 50 to 60 hours a week, if not more.
[01:15:33]  Yep.
[01:15:34]  50, 60, 70 hours a week, stressful.
[01:15:37]  Like I see down in the Capitol where I work, the amount of demands that are on local state representatives.
[01:15:43]  These senators and these attorney generals are demanded of for 60, 70 hours a week.
[01:15:49]  They're going through changes in their body.
[01:15:51]  The most loving thing you could do, loving, kind, protective for their health, their flourishing, their happiness, their joy, their sanctification, is to take them home, to love their children, to get down on the floor with their grandkids.
[01:16:06]  To care for the home, to serve others around them.
[01:16:10]  Those are the most loving things.
[01:16:12]  And you cannot tell me, I love women and I love them so much.
[01:16:16]  I'll send them to DC, half a country away, to work 70 hours a week because I love them so much.
[01:16:22]  No, you don't.
[01:16:22]  You hate them and you're a monster.
[01:16:25]  Stop it.
[01:16:26]  That's good.
[01:16:27]  All right.
[01:16:28]  Anything else for this segment?
[01:16:30]  Are there some quotes that you wanted to read, Wes?
[01:16:32]  Are there like some theological ones?
[01:16:33]  Let me play a video of just a good example.
[01:16:36]  We talk a lot about don't, Let me show you a woman.
[01:16:40]  I got one more graph too.
[01:16:41]  Let me show you a woman that's happy.
[01:16:43]  We got called Wes's chart game.
[01:16:45]  I just got to say.
[01:16:46]  No, I'm just trying to.
[01:16:47]  I'm Westminster in competition, so I've got to compete.
[01:16:50]  Well, here's the deal.
[01:16:51]  When in doubt, charts save lives.
[01:16:54]  They save lives.
[01:16:55]  The whole world is a better place right now because of charts save President Trump.
[01:17:00]  If you think you're a patriot and you're not putting charts in your podcast, then you're just a joke.
[01:17:03]  Okay.
[01:17:04]  All right.
[01:17:05]  Let's play this video.
[01:17:06]  Nate, this is video two and show one chart and go to our last commercial break.
[01:17:12]  Video three.
[01:17:13]  I just finished feeding him and he just like cuddles up on me like this.
[01:17:16]  How am I supposed to put him back in the car seat to drive home?
[01:17:19]  I don't want to.
[01:17:21]  He's being so.
[01:17:23]  Sweet.
[01:17:23]  He's been so good.
[01:17:25]  He ate 45 minutes after he was supposed to.
[01:17:29]  Now he just wants to cuddle.
[01:17:30]  It's like rainy.
[01:17:32]  We're eating at home tonight.
[01:17:38]  I love being a mom.
[01:17:39]  I want nothing more in this life but to have like a million more babies, honestly.
[01:17:48]  God bless it.
[01:17:49]  I love it.
[01:17:50]  Doesn't that woman look a lot happier?
[01:17:52]  She looks happy.
[01:17:53]  Than uh, than Kristen Hawkins, for instance.
[01:17:55]  I same thing, argue from the lesser, happier, thinner.
[01:17:58]  I mean, happier.
[01:18:00]  No, but I mean, there is a correlation.
[01:18:01]  There is a correlation.
[01:18:02]  You, if you're a monster on the inside, little by little by little, you become a monster on the outside.
[01:18:07]  Women that are overweight vote Democrat more often.
[01:18:10]  There's a correlation.
[01:18:12]  Um, so lesser, this great example to the greater.
[01:18:14]  This is a study from American Family Values.
[01:18:16]  Nate, you can show this last chart, just came out.
[01:18:19]  Guys, you're just not going to believe this.
[01:18:21]  You wouldn't have expected this.
[01:18:22]  This isn't what I would think would happen.
[01:18:25]  So, the chart came out and wrote, ranked, asked women, how likely are you to feel lonely?
[01:18:30]  And do you often feel lonely?
[01:18:32]  Liberal women, 29% of them answered in the affirmative compared to 11% for conservatives.
[01:18:39]  So, more than twice as many liberal women say, I feel lonely often.
[01:18:45]  Then down in the bottom, liberal women least likely to be completely satisfied with life.
[01:18:50]  You've got 37% of conservative women that said, I am completely satisfied with life.
[01:18:55]  Like, legitimately, of all that I could reasonably expect in life, I'm satisfied.
[01:19:00]  12% of liberal women.
[01:19:02]  These stats bear out over and over.
[01:19:04]  Less than a third.
[01:19:04]  Wow.
[01:19:05]  Across every category, every domain, every measurement you can do.
[01:19:10]  That way of life is unnatural and it makes people unhappy and it destroys the soul for the love of those people.
[01:19:19]  But especially for women.
[01:19:20]  Especially for women.

=== Loneliness Among Liberal Women (03:04) ===

[01:19:21]  Yeah.
[01:19:21]  Yeah.
[01:19:22]  Nobody, I feel like nobody other than babies, unborn babies, right?
[01:19:25]  They die.
[01:19:27]  But apart from unborn babies, I feel like there's no class of people that's more negatively affected by.
[01:19:33]  Democrat policies and ideologies and all those kind of things than women.
[01:19:38]  Yep.
[01:19:39]  Yeah.
[01:19:39]  Absolutely.
[01:19:39]  Especially single women.
[01:19:41]  Yep.
[01:19:41]  Yep.
[01:19:42]  Like, I have a daughter and I love her so much that I will never let any of this, like these ideas, these thoughts, empowerment, never going to let it get to her.
[01:19:49]  Not because I have grand dreams or whatever, like I keep you isolated and sheltered, all these things, because I want her to be the happiest and the best that she's going to be.
[01:19:58]  It is a profound love to say, no, that's not good for you.
[01:20:02]  That's not healthy.
[01:20:04]  And I won't let you do that.
[01:20:05]  I'll teach you against it.
[01:20:06]  Yeah.
[01:20:07]  Let's have a second commercial break, and we've got some great questions in the chat.
[01:20:11]  All right.
[01:20:11]  The clock is running out.
[01:20:12]  You need to go and register now for our Christ is King How to Defeat Trash World Conference.
[01:20:19]  It's happening the year of our Lord 2025, April 3rd, 4th, and 5th.
[01:20:24]  That's a Thursday, Friday, and Saturday.
[01:20:26]  And by God's grace, we're able to provide for you an all star lineup.
[01:20:31]  We've got Steve Dace, Calvin Robinson, Orrin McIntyre, Dr. Stephen Wolf, Eric Kahn, David Reese, Andrew Iskert.
[01:20:39]  John Harris, AD Robles, Dan Burkholder, Dusty Devers, Ben Garrett, CJ Engel, and yours truly, Pastor Joel Webbin.
[01:20:48]  Come on out, join us April 3rd, 4th, and 5th, 2025, Thursday through a Saturday.
[01:20:54]  Go to rightresponseconference.com to register today.
[01:20:59]  Again, that's rightresponseconference.com.
[01:21:02]  Listen, guys, you probably listen to Right Response Ministries because you take the Dominion mandate offered to us in Scripture seriously.
[01:21:11]  Well, unsurprisingly, so does Dominion Wealth Strategist.
[01:21:15]  As the only distinctly reformed financial consulting firm, they help Calvinistic.
[01:21:21]  Covenantal and confessional Christians to steward their resources faithfully in a way that actually aligns with God's Word.
[01:21:29]  Dominion Wealth leverages all corners of the financial service industry as independent brokerage agents, matching you with suitable products and services from dozens of top industry providers.
[01:21:43]  Their mission is to equip believers to secure their family's future and build a legacy that glorifies God by building holistic financial strategies that include budgeting.
[01:21:55]  Insurance, debt management, retirement planning, estate planning, and more.
[01:22:01]  In order to make wealth Christian again with a portfolio that might even put King Solomon to shame, go and take dominion over your finances today by visiting www.reformed.money and book an introductory overview right now.
[01:22:19]  All of Christ for all of life and all of finance for Christendom.

=== Male Headship in Context (14:53) ===

[01:22:26]  All right.
[01:22:27]  We're going to take questions.
[01:22:28]  We've got some great ones already.
[01:22:29]  We'll see how many we get to.
[01:22:30]  Thanks, everyone, for the comments, the questions, the likes, all those different things.
[01:22:34]  We got a super chat.
[01:22:35]  Darth Amigulation.
[01:22:38]  We did vociferously in the cold open.
[01:22:40]  Joel nailed the pronunciation.
[01:22:41]  We've got another big word here.
[01:22:43]  Did I?
[01:22:43]  Oh, yeah.
[01:22:44]  You did great.
[01:22:45]  I got to find a bigger word next week.
[01:22:47]  All right.
[01:22:49]  Darth asked this super chat.
[01:22:51]  Thank you very much.
[01:22:52]  What do you say about the argument that 1 Timothy only applies to women in the family and in the church, but not to the secular?
[01:23:00]  I agree with you, by the way.
[01:23:01]  That's a great question.
[01:23:02]  And I would actually say that probably in Paul's view, there is only the home and the church.
[01:23:08]  I think of 1 Timothy I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man.
[01:23:13]  So some would say that's speaking of the home, where the husband is the head of the home and authority flows from him.
[01:23:18]  And in the church, where the pastors are the head of the church, under shepherds, under Christ, and authority flows through them.
[01:23:24]  So the home and the church, but not necessarily in the secular realm.
[01:23:29]  That is true.
[01:23:30]  I think that's Paul's narrow scope.
[01:23:32]  It's nature that teaches more generally that for women to hold authority and to rule and to reign in different ways is generally unnatural.
[01:23:40]  That is not suited to their disposition, to their makeup, to their constitution.
[01:23:44]  However, caveat, and we'll just be honest about the historical record, there was some level of disagreement among the reformers.
[01:23:51]  And so we actually had these quotes prepared for a different segment.
[01:23:54]  But I'm going to read these out to you now from two different guys that had a little bit of a broader view on it than maybe you would think that we have.
[01:24:00]  We understand that there's complexities, there's nuances.
[01:24:03]  This is a timely thing.
[01:24:08]  This is from a Swiss theologian, Hendry Bullinger, active in the 1500s.
[01:24:13]  He said this But if a woman in compliance with or in obedience to the laws and customs of the realm, so she's a lawful, law abiding citizen, is acknowledged as queen, and in maintenance of the hereditary right of government is married to a husband, or in the meantime holds the reins of government by means of her own conciliars, it is a hazardous thing for godly persons to set themselves in opposition.
[01:24:35]  To political regulations, especially as the gospel does not seem to unsettle or abrogate hereditary rights and the political laws of kingdoms.
[01:24:45]  Nor do we read that Philip the eunuch, by right of the gospel, drove out Candace from the kingdom of Ethiopia.
[01:24:52]  Essentially, saying if you are in a scenario, Christians are in a scenario where a queen or a princess has inherited the right to the throne for a time, that in and of itself, that's not necessarily something to be overthrown and resisted.
[01:25:04]  That there's times and places where that rule.
[01:25:06]  Again, not for all time, not as a pattern, not as a majority.
[01:25:10]  There's a time where that could be appropriate.
[01:25:12]  That's at least his argument.
[01:25:14]  I'm not saying we all necessarily agree with that, but there are good reform men that have said there could be situations.
[01:25:20]  Actually, Calvin, on that specific point, added two things.
[01:25:24]  He said, There are times in history when a woman is so exceptional that it's not the populace or the people or social convention elevating her to a natural role.
[01:25:36]  It's God himself by putting such an exceptional stamp on her, elevating her.
[01:25:40]  in that time and place.
[01:25:41]  And you could maybe even say this was the case with Deborah.
[01:25:44]  He also said, and this is why it's important to know core principles.
[01:25:49]  He said, okay, you've got a woman who has, by hereditary title, attained the position of the queen.
[01:25:55]  Like Queen Elizabeth.
[01:25:55]  Yep.
[01:25:56]  And you have the biblical mandate of rulers are supposed to provide for a peaceful and orderly society.
[01:26:02]  So he said, well, we could be dogmatic.
[01:26:05]  I'm paraphrasing here.
[01:26:06]  And if a woman comes to be queen, we overthrow her and we upset the entire nation.
[01:26:11]  Or we could apply the biblical principle of orderly, peaceful, prosperous rule and say, okay, for a time, the more fundamental principle of it's better for people to be orderly and peaceful and have laws and have the ability to work and provide for their families.
[01:26:28]  And in the moment, the position of woman not exercising authority, not that that position is any less biblical, but by God's providence, you say, which do we set these at odds?
[01:26:40]  Do we throw the entire nation into chaos?
[01:26:43]  Depose the queen and start a civil war.
[01:26:45]  And he actually said, No, you don't do that.
[01:26:47]  You carry on in a Christian society, the peaceful ordering of society, and you pray and you hope and you work towards God elevating a man back into that position.
[01:26:57]  Yep.
[01:26:58]  And then Zachary Garrus, this is from his excellent book, Honor Thy Fathers, from New Christendom Press.
[01:27:02]  He said this.
[01:27:04]  He was a Dutch theologian.
[01:27:05]  Buitis differed from Knox.
[01:27:07]  That's John Knox, we listen to in the Cold Open.
[01:27:09]  While he thought that magistrates and monarchs should ordinarily be men, he did not consider female rulers to be an absolute, like you're getting at, Michael.
[01:27:17]  Absolute violation of scripture or nature.
[01:27:19]  Thus, he agreed with Calvin and Bollinger that women should not ordinarily serve as civil rulers, but he did not go so far as Knox and Goodman in opposing them outright.
[01:27:27]  So, to the point, home and the church, there is just no space at all to argue that there would ever be a time that a wife would be head of the home over her husband or that a woman would serve as pastor.
[01:27:38]  There are some times in the secular realm where it's been debated whether that would be permissible or not.
[01:27:44]  But you can, I mean, essentially what we're saying about in the secular realm would be a situation where there's a man with a terminal illness who's bedridden.
[01:27:52]  Right, and so the woman, even though she's the wife, has assumed some sort of legal responsibility.
[01:27:56]  Assigning contracts, you know is, is like that's the, that's a no one would say.
[01:28:02]  Well, she's usurping her role, right.
[01:28:04]  She's still trying to be godly, she's still trying to be some submissive to her husband, but her husband, for maybe years, is in this position, and so she's.
[01:28:12]  She's having to exercise some degree of an unnatural authority while doing her best to be a picture of godly femininity.
[01:28:19]  That's what we're saying with, with the queen coming into power, like it wouldn't be ideal.
[01:28:24]  In all things, she should seek to Defer to the wisdom of counsel.
[01:28:30]  Absolutely.
[01:28:30]  Yep.
[01:28:31]  Not lead in war, for example, in war to step down to a general, for instance.
[01:28:35]  But again, we have to be careful not to make the exception the Princeton.
[01:28:38]  Exactly.
[01:28:41]  I don't think we can do that.
[01:28:42]  I think we, I'm with you guys, maybe in a timeless sense, but in terms of right now.
[01:28:48]  No, I think we have proven like a million times over.
[01:28:53]  And when I say we, I'm not just talking about America.
[01:28:55]  I'm talking about, I'm talking about complementarians and reformed churches.
[01:28:59]  I'm talking about male elders.
[01:29:03]  In their Calvinist churches, they have proven that they can't do this.
[01:29:09]  It's because it's kind of like it's instead of, yeah, the Lord sovereignly and occasionally does these things by his providence and it's rare.
[01:29:20]  Instead, we've had this mentality, I feel like, for decades come one, come all.
[01:29:24]  Yep.
[01:29:25]  Right.
[01:29:26]  So now it's, and everybody would say, oh, but we're still complementary and believe in male headship.
[01:29:31]  We don't have any female elders.
[01:29:32]  We don't have a woman who preached.
[01:29:34]  The sermons, she does the announcements, and it's also a woman who's singing as the worship leader.
[01:29:38]  And it's also like, so, you know, a woman who's doing our childcare because we don't let our kids come to church.
[01:29:42]  We send them to a separate, you know, Christian childcare, daycare thing instead of church.
[01:29:46]  So our kids, you know, they go all the way until they're 12 years old, not only without taking the Lord's Supper, but without even seeing the Lord's Supper ever administered.
[01:29:54]  So that, you know, we have female, you know, we have women who are leading the kids in a separate place that's not even church.
[01:29:59]  And then we have women who are leading the worship, women who are doing the announcements, and women who are doing the scripture reading.
[01:30:04]  But a man preaches and None of the women are elders by title.
[01:30:08]  Now, of course, they are.
[01:30:08]  They're the shadow elders, right?
[01:30:10]  So, all those men who are holding the office of elder, they go home, they talk to their wives.
[01:30:14]  Their wives don't like it.
[01:30:15]  The wives, you know, say, Well, I don't like it.
[01:30:17]  And then the elders come back and they make a different decision that pleases their wives, you know.
[01:30:21]  So, you know, but you do all that and it's enough.
[01:30:25]  It's just barely enough to say, Yeah, we hold to male headship in the church and then in the home, right?
[01:30:31]  And what does it look like in the home?
[01:30:32]  Well, it looks like the husband being the head of the wife in a practical level, what that looks like is when we disagree, We go with the husband.
[01:30:41]  Nope.
[01:30:42]  When we disagree, we pause and we pray.
[01:30:45]  And then, if we still can't agree, then we go to the elders, who will typically agree with the wife and go usurp the husband's authority, because that's what complementarian elders tend to do.
[01:30:56]  And then, even if the elders, in a rare occasion, say, you know what, this is, by golly, this is just an absolute tie, you know, you could go either way.
[01:31:04]  Then, and only then, then the husband's headship comes into play.
[01:31:09]  And that, you know, in a healthy marriage, that's an occurrence.
[01:31:12]  Well, what he does is he deferred to the wife because he's a servant leader.
[01:31:15]  Right.
[01:31:16]  And then he comes into play and he goes with what she wants.
[01:31:18]  And then he goes with what she wants, anyways.
[01:31:20]  Yeah, servant leader.
[01:31:22]  So, my point is, you know, I was about to say, I'm, you know, I'm being silly, but I'm not.
[01:31:28]  That is actually how it happens, both in the church and in the home and complementary reformed churches.
[01:31:33]  It is how it happens.
[01:31:35]  But the point is, most of the reformed guys today would say, we are, you know, male headship.
[01:31:40]  And then, you know, in the church and the home, and I just expressed what that actually looks like it looks like no male headship at all.
[01:31:46]  But then over here, out this isn't church and this isn't home.
[01:31:49]  So, like this woman who's, you know, doing it's a ministry, sure, you know, but it's not the church, you know, or it's this over here, but it's not the church or it's that over there.
[01:31:58]  And we just don't say anything, you know, like it's just like, oh, it's free game because it's technically not in the house and it's technically not in the church, you know.
[01:32:07]  So, it's she's running for political office or she's starting a podcast or she's speaking at a conference, but it's not church, you know, like she's doing this, she's doing that.
[01:32:19]  So, I guess I agree with the quotes that you guys read.
[01:32:22]  I know that, you know, I've heard that before the distinction.
[01:32:25]  I read Zach's book and know the distinction between like a John Calvin and a John Knox.
[01:32:29]  But I think we're living in one of those moments where, like, if you know, like, I just think that's what good rulers do.
[01:32:36]  So, like, if you know that your citizens, that there's like a widespread epidemic that your citizens are just notorious for thievery and they're just constantly robbing and mugging people and this and that, then you just crack down for a while, you know, and then you get that high trust society that allows for some exceptions.
[01:32:58]  But, or just like, you know, that's a civil example, but like a parental in the home example.
[01:33:03]  It's like if one of your children has proven to not be trustworthy again and again and again, then they just don't get some of the liberties that maybe another child might because they've proven that they can't, they're not responsible enough to maintain those.
[01:33:15]  And I would just say that America as a nation, and not America including the church, but America and especially the evangelical church, and especially, especially, especially the Calvinist Reformed Evangelical Church.
[01:33:30]  Has proven, we have literally yelled at God and said, we do not agree with male headship and we cannot do it and we will not do it.
[01:33:42]  So I think if you're living in a generation like that, then I'm going to go with, I got to go with my Scottish boy, John Knox.
[01:33:48]  Love it.
[01:33:49]  And I just say, no exceptions.
[01:33:51]  I'm sorry.
[01:33:53]  You know, it is with me that I must announce to you that under Christian nationalism, at least for the next 50 years in all Western countries, There will be no female leadership ever in any sphere of human society whatsoever.
[01:34:08]  Completely agree.
[01:34:09]  We do this in all areas.
[01:34:10]  I'm a teacher and I have a policy where if you're willing to do some extra work, I'm going to reward that and I'm going to let you redo a homework assignment or something like that.
[01:34:17]  But I found a couple months ago that it seemed like students were just not doing the homework and then wanting to redo it.
[01:34:22]  So I said, guys, the privilege is off the table.
[01:34:24]  Amen.
[01:34:24]  Like I'm not giving this sort of exception anymore.
[01:34:28]  Like we all do this in almost every area of life.
[01:34:31]  And the quotes that we said, notwithstanding, we're just trying to be balanced historically.
[01:34:37]  We are in a time where sadly we cannot have those things.
[01:34:40]  We can't have nice things.
[01:34:41]  Can't have nice things.
[01:34:43]  Because the kids keep running around breaking them.
[01:34:44]  That's what you bring back to Christian nationalism.
[01:34:46]  That's right.
[01:34:46]  Because eventually we could have those nice things.
[01:34:48]  That's right.
[01:34:49]  But you lost it.
[01:34:50]  Yep, you lost it.
[01:34:50]  The aristocratic South was great.
[01:34:52]  Yep.
[01:34:52]  And it got destroyed by you know who.
[01:34:55]  Yep, that's right.
[01:34:55]  And eventually, you know, like that, because that's the thing, because people think, well, the Proverbs 31 woman.
[01:35:00]  Yeah, that's in the household, like she had a lot of power.
[01:35:04]  She did.
[01:35:05]  Like she's commanding servants.
[01:35:07]  And I have no doubt that some of those servants were probably men.
[01:35:10]  Right.
[01:35:10]  Sure.
[01:35:11]  She has female servants and male servants.
[01:35:13]  She's looking over fields and she's looking over, you know, inside the house.
[01:35:16]  And she's also making investments with her husband's money, I might add.
[01:35:19]  So, where does she get the money?
[01:35:20]  It's her husband's money.
[01:35:22]  He's the one who's bringing in capital.
[01:35:24]  But then she's saying, Oh, I've considered this field.
[01:35:26]  I'm going to buy that one.
[01:35:27]  She's trading.
[01:35:28]  She's overseeing.
[01:35:29]  She's doing all these things.
[01:35:30]  She's industrious, is what I'm saying.
[01:35:32]  She's industrious.
[01:35:33]  But she's not boss, babe, hear me roar outside of the home, leaving the family.
[01:35:38]  She's industrious from the position of the home, not leaving the home to be industrious for another man.
[01:35:45]  She does work, but she works instead of outside the home for the man, she works inside the home for her man.
[01:35:52]  That's the difference.
[01:35:53]  But she works, and as a worker, she's a manager.
[01:35:57]  She has workers under her, and she's exercising power, she's spending capital, she's making investments, she's doing all those kinds of things.
[01:36:04]  Praise God.
[01:36:05]  But we can't do that right now.
[01:36:08]  We are just simply not, we're too feminist.
[01:36:11]  If we give an inch, the complementarians will take a mile.
[01:36:18]  And the egalitarians will also take a mile because corporate needs you to see the difference between these two pictures.
[01:36:24]  And it's the same picture.
[01:36:25]  Egalitarians accomplish.
[01:36:26]  So that kind of answers Josh Roja had two good questions.
[01:36:29]  He asked, Is there anything wrong with her pursuing some business venture like baking or really anything where she's a small business owner?
[01:36:34]  No, nothing principally wrong with that.
[01:36:36]  We can go to his first question, another really good one.
[01:36:38]  Michael, I definitely want to hear from you on this.
[01:36:40]  Where should a young woman's energy and focus be spent while she is waiting for marriage?
[01:36:44]  Education question mark, industry question mark, where should it be?
[01:36:47]  Yeah.
[01:36:49]  I think that there are some skills and training that will set her up to be a more godly, more effective, and more productive wife and mother.
[01:36:57]  And she should be working on gaining those skills and training.
[01:37:00]  Obviously, parents have a large role in helping a woman find a spouse.
[01:37:05]  But as one of the other commenters said, it's hard right now finding sometimes a based, qualified spouse.
[01:37:12]  And so there might be a period where a young woman is still under her father's authority, but she might, you know, she's not maybe in high school anymore.

=== Finding Qualified Spouses Today (10:06) ===

[01:37:19]  What she should be doing, just sitting around twiddling her thumbs?
[01:37:21]  No, of course not.
[01:37:22]  Right um, she should be gaining practical skills that are going to and and, for the record, like i'm not even necessarily opposed to a woman, to a woman getting some sort of degree, that would help with that.
[01:37:32]  If she gets um my uh, I I know people who have been helped by a woman in a church, single woman um, who has a marketing degree.
[01:37:41]  Right, her father's business has profited greatly from the fact that she actually knows something about how to get your business out there.
[01:37:50]  And if she gets married and her husband has a is is a business owner, That's a skill that's going to help the household income greatly.
[01:37:58]  That doesn't mean she is out working in a marketing company.
[01:38:00]  She's not.
[01:38:01]  She's at home.
[01:38:02]  She's working for her father right now.
[01:38:04]  And someday she'll be working for her husband.
[01:38:06]  So, all that to say is she should be gaining skills.
[01:38:11]  She should be investing, not because we fall into the other trap too, where we say, well, all she can do is spiritual things.
[01:38:18]  Well, we live in a tangible world.
[01:38:20]  Pray and babysit.
[01:38:21]  Yep.
[01:38:22]  And that's great.
[01:38:23]  Like my daughter does a lot of babysitting right now.
[01:38:26]  In some ways, she's not ready to be a mom.
[01:38:28]  She's only 16.
[01:38:29]  But in many ways, because of how my wife has invested in her and what she has chosen to do with her free time, which is babysitting, nannying, cooking, things like that, like in some ways, as a 16-year-old, she could actually take over a household right now.
[01:38:46]  There's some other areas where we're still working with her, but in a lot of practical ways.
[01:38:50]  So don't sit around.
[01:38:51]  Don't waste the time.
[01:38:52]  The Lord has given you that time for a reason.
[01:38:55]  Profit from it.
[01:38:56]  Use it well.
[01:38:57]  And make financial decisions that are going to benefit your husband.
[01:39:00]  Don't get $120,000 in debt that you're going into a marriage with.
[01:39:05]  But also, don't sit around and not develop skills.
[01:39:08]  You've got to develop some skills and trust that the Lord is going to cause those to bear fruit down the road.
[01:39:13]  That's really well said.
[01:39:14]  Real quick, while we're on this, if you are a woman who does want to get married, you're currently single.
[01:39:20]  Amen.
[01:39:22]  We're doing a singles event, and it's not just organic, it's actually going to be meticulously organized and run by a woman who is.
[01:39:31]  She's the wife of one of my very best friends.
[01:39:33]  A wonderful wife and mother.
[01:39:34]  She's a wonderful wife and mother, and she's a faithful member in good standing in our local church.
[01:39:38]  She's going to be heading up this event.
[01:39:41]  And right now, we are pretty much full with the guys, but we will have to cancel it if we don't get enough girls.
[01:39:51]  I think it's rough right now.
[01:39:53]  It's like, we've kind of capped it at like four.
[01:39:57]  We need 40 guys and 40 girls.
[01:39:58]  We've got 40 guys, and I think we have like.
[01:40:02]  What?
[01:40:04]  Okay, it's 20 now.
[01:40:05]  We have 20 and 20?
[01:40:09]  No, no, no.
[01:40:09]  That's the cap.
[01:40:10]  Oh, 20 and 20.
[01:40:10]  Okay, so 40 overall.
[01:40:12]  So, we currently have 20 guys, but we have like three girls, which is, that's why I tweeted out the other day, Ecclesiastes, right?
[01:40:22]  Like, among a thousand.
[01:40:23]  I only found one upright man, but I did not find one upright woman among them all.
[01:40:30]  It's like, it's hard, guys.
[01:40:31]  I get it.
[01:40:32]  Like, I hear women from time to time, it's so hard to find a good Christian man.
[01:40:36]  I told friends, I'm like, I'm so thankful I'm not dating right now.
[01:40:39]  Right.
[01:40:39]  Yeah.
[01:40:39]  It is hard to find a good Christian man, harder to find a good Christian girl.
[01:40:43]  Yeah.
[01:40:43]  That's been my experience.
[01:40:46]  Yep.
[01:40:46]  So we need some women.
[01:40:48]  Anyways, that's the point.
[01:40:49]  We've got 20 guys who are already signed up.
[01:40:51]  So we're full on the guys.
[01:40:53]  We've got like three or four, five tops.
[01:40:55]  So we need like 15 godly single women to sign up.
[01:41:00]  Go to Write Response Conference.
[01:41:01]  It's a part of our conference, but you have to register separately.
[01:41:05]  Writeresponseconference.com.
[01:41:08]  Scroll down.
[01:41:08]  You register for the conference and then go ahead and register for the singles event as well.
[01:41:12]  I just wanted to say that.
[01:41:13]  Yep.
[01:41:15]  Interesting super chat.
[01:41:16]  Maybe this will be the last one that we hit.
[01:41:18]  I'm going to send Nate a picture of it.
[01:41:20]  I actually don't know anything about this.
[01:41:21]  So, yeah, Wes, I'm excited to hear this from you.
[01:41:23]  Well, don't be too excited.
[01:41:26]  Curb your enthusiasm.
[01:41:27]  Mr. Pitt.
[01:41:28]  Mr. Pitt, $10 super chat.
[01:41:29]  Thanks so much.
[01:41:31]  He said this I'd like to know what each of you, every single one of us, think of the Trump themed golden goat statue at Mar a Lago.
[01:41:38]  And so the picture will probably be coming up in a minute.
[01:41:41]  It is a goat covered in $100 bills that I think have Trump's likeness on them.
[01:41:49]  Yeah, I'm gonna be honest.
[01:41:50]  I don't love that.
[01:41:51]  Don't love that.
[01:41:52]  Ooh.
[01:41:54]  Yeah, you get into the elites.
[01:41:55]  Like you listen to Martyr Maid's Jeffrey Epstein series.
[01:41:58]  There's some weird things that go on with people with a lot of money and a lot of power.
[01:42:03]  And yeah, that's it's stuff like this that has satanic symbolism in it.
[01:42:08]  Pizza gay, like all of that.
[01:42:09]  Yeah, it's weird demonic worship.
[01:42:10]  And then, you know, the birds of a feather flock together.
[01:42:13]  So, you know, there's certain things that just kind of come as like peas in a pot demon worship, pedophilia.
[01:42:27]  Jeffrey Epstein?
[01:42:29]  Would you like to name it?
[01:42:30]  Just give a few last names?
[01:42:31]  The pedophile?
[01:42:32]  Let's not say it straight out, but just give a few last names.
[01:42:35]  I think.
[01:42:36]  No.
[01:42:36]  Right, right, right.
[01:42:37]  All right.
[01:42:37]  Hugh White, can you sign up your daughter?
[01:42:39]  I mean, you know.
[01:42:40]  They say in Trump we trust.
[01:42:41]  Aaron Perryman said they also say in Trump we trust rather than God we trust.
[01:42:45]  Yeah, it's not good.
[01:42:46]  I don't love it.
[01:42:47]  Yeah, I don't know enough about it, but from what I do know, by just looking at the picture, don't like it.
[01:42:52]  If I was there, I would burn it.
[01:42:55]  Yeah, I don't like it.
[01:42:57]  Yeah.
[01:42:59]  The goats will all be coming down under Christian nationalism.
[01:43:01]  We are not there yet.
[01:43:02]  We're not there yet.
[01:43:03]  In Christian nationalism, no Christian prince, goat, and $100 bills.
[01:43:06]  We're getting there.
[01:43:06]  Because we'll be in Bitcoin, not in fiat.
[01:43:09]  That's why.
[01:43:11]  All right.
[01:43:12]  I think that's a good Valentine's Day.
[01:43:13]  Just for the record, I saw somebody who's like, do you guys like, are you not on board with Bitcoin?
[01:43:19]  I'm on board.
[01:43:20]  I am so on board with Bitcoin.
[01:43:22]  Yeah, we're Bitcoin.
[01:43:23]  We are central banking disrespectors.
[01:43:25]  Yeah.
[01:43:26]  We are fiat disrespectors.
[01:43:27]  Yeah.
[01:43:28]  It's decentralized, it's not fiat currency.
[01:43:30]  Yeah, it's we like Bitcoin.
[01:43:33]  Um, all right, I think that's it.
[01:43:34]  Thank you guys so much for tuning in.
[01:43:36]  Uh, one last thing please subscribe to the channel, um, click the bell so that you'll be notified with all the content that comes out.
[01:43:44]  And right here at the end, I think this video is a banger, I think this is a good episode, and it's an important topic ending feminism, ending abortion.
[01:43:52]  But I repeat myself, it's a bit redundant there.
[01:43:55]  Um, we need to get this out, so please don't just subscribe and click the bell.
[01:44:00]  The biggest thing that you can do is just share the video.
[01:44:02]  Please share this video and let's get it to go as far and wide as possible so that by God's grace, you can put pressure on some of these GOP neocons who are standing in the way of actually abolishing abortion so that we can see the lives of unborn children mercifully spared by the kindness of God.
[01:44:23]  Okay, so thanks for tuning in.
[01:44:25]  And that's it for this whole week.
[01:44:27]  We'll see you guys again on Monday.
[01:44:29]  We've got a few things in the hopper that are planned, but part of the reason we do the live stream every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 3 p.m. Central Time. Is so that we have this regular space to plan things for long form content with thorough ideas that are thought out where you get your strong chart game, you know, and where you get your chart game coming every episode to be fair.
[01:44:49]  Every episode, but it's also by having every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 3 p.m. Central Time, it also just leaves a space to be able to have a quick turnaround when things happen like this.
[01:45:00]  Joel made the call last night.
[01:45:02]  Last night, yeah, exactly.
[01:45:03]  Ben's Isloff and some other people reached out to us.
[01:45:05]  Jacob Miller, who's a faithful member at our church, we're like.
[01:45:08]  Guys, if you can, we're not telling you what to do.
[01:45:11]  They were gracious about it.
[01:45:11]  But if you can, right?
[01:45:13]  Because an abolitionist is like, if you can, could you make every episode for the rest of your life?
[01:45:18]  So, Ben and Jacob, it's like that meme where it's like the veins popping out of his forehead as an abolitionist waiting for the next episode of abolitionist writing.
[01:45:29]  But they did it the right way.
[01:45:30]  Ben and Jacob, they were both like, hey, we know that it doesn't always have to be about this, but this one's big.
[01:45:35]  Like there was a real bill that was viable.
[01:45:38]  I mean, it could have happened.
[01:45:40]  And pro lifers stood in the way.
[01:45:42]  And we've been talking about pro lifers being a hindrance to abolishing abortion for a very long time.
[01:45:48]  But this is one of the clearest examples that might prove it to people, to where people could see that.
[01:45:53]  So, anyways, the point is by doing the live stream three times a week, Monday, Wednesday, Friday at 3 p.m. Central Time, it allows us to have long form content that Wes and Michael are helping to write.
[01:46:02]  But it also allows me to say, we're going to run an audible and to have a quick turnaround.
[01:46:07]  So, like guys that we love, some of our closest friends in ministry, like Kings Hall.
[01:46:12]  Um, Kings Hall does incredibly thorough deep dive information.
[01:46:15]  Um, and Kings Hall, like the Order of Morris and things like that, like they're gonna come and it's gonna be here's an awesome piece of content on this subject.
[01:46:23]  Cold open is 55 minutes, 55 minute cold open, and you're gonna get it, you know, three to four weeks after it was in the news.
[01:46:31]  And, um, because that's just the nature of it, and there's pros and cons with that.
[01:46:35]  There's awesome things that come with that.
[01:46:37]  Uh, but one of the reasons we do things the way we do with having a three time a week live stream is so that we can, um, So, that we can have a quick turnaround, a sense of urgency, and hit things fast.
[01:46:49]  So, next week, if something crazy happens, we're going to try to hit it.
[01:46:53]  And to the listeners, follow us, follow us on X. That's probably the quickest way.
[01:46:59]  Follow us on X and tag us and say, Joel, can you do an episode on this?
[01:47:04]  Or could this be just at least a segment of an episode?
[01:47:08]  Like this thing's happening right now in politics or in culture or in the SBC or in the PCA or whatever it is.
[01:47:15]  Let us know and we will see it when you tag, when you pull quotes, et cetera.
[01:47:20]  Yep.
[01:47:21]  So, all right, that's it.
[01:47:22]  We hope to see you guys again on Monday and God bless.