All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 30, 2011 - InfoWars Nightly News
01:00:10
20110930_Fri_NightlyNews
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Good evening and welcome to the Friday, September 30th, 2011 edition of InfoWars Nightly News.
I'm Aaron Dyke, sitting in for Alex while he's out on assignment.
Now, coming up in the show tonight, we have two in-studio guests from the Fluoride Action Network.
That would be Dr. Griffin Cole and Laura Presley, Ph.D.
We also have a two-part Fluoride Special Report coming up.
But first, the news.
Two US-born terrorists were killed in the CIA-led drone strike.
That would be top Al-Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki, the double agent who dined at the Pentagon, admittedly, and was now assassinated, the first US citizen to be targeted by predator drones, killed in Yemen, according to official reports.
However, he has been reported dead more than five times before.
We have the report from Steve Watson.
No more Pentagon dinners.
Al-Qaeda leader killed again.
And it gets into how there were many untimely reports of his death.
So with more on that, we take you now to a special report on the life and times of CIA Pentagon asset, Anwar al-Awlaki.
A U.S.
counterterrorism official says American forces targeted al-Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki's convoy in Yemen with a drone and jet attack and believe he's been killed.
The Yemeni government says the airstrike happened near the eastern town of Kashf.
Al-Awlaki is on a U.S.
kill-or-capture list.
The cleric, known for his fiery anti-American rhetoric, has been suspected of ties to the Fort Hood attack and the attempted Christmas Day airliner bombing in 2009.
The Pakistani-American, who pleaded guilty to the May 2010 Times Square car bombing attempt, told interrogators he was inspired by al-Awlaki after making contact over the Internet.
In July, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said the Yemeni-American was a priority target.
The Yemeni Defense Ministry, when they first came out with report guys about an hour and ten minutes ago, said it was their doing, that they were involved, that they were the ones that got him.
First of all, what is the hard, confirmed identification of it?
Where is the body?
And what are we doing with that body?
And so far, it is Friday, prayers day, so Yemeni government officials are kind of out of contact in this time period.
FBI documents obtained as part of an ongoing Fox investigation state that Anwar al-Awlaki, now the first American on the CIA's killer capture list, was a lunch guest of the military.
After being vetted by a Defense Department employee, quote, Awlaki was invited to and attended a luncheon at the Pentagon in the Secretary of the Army's Office of Government Counsel.
Alonky, who is the imam at this mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, was interviewed at least four times by the FBI in the first week after 9-11 because of his previous contact with three of the hijackers who struck the Pentagon.
This information was apparently never reviewed by the Pentagon.
An Army spokesman insisted that the launch was not an Army event, but rather it was sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
He's a controlled asset.
And of course, it's not a matter of failure to connect the dots.
We're hearing all about the unconnected dots.
No!
This is the desired outcome.
Let me just point out a couple of other things here.
We're told that the alleged bomber, right, the Knicker bomber, whatever they call him, Uh, he was in contact with his character, Al-Laki, in Yemen.
And of course, this Al-Laki, I call him Al-Laki the CIA lackey.
Al-Laki the lackey.
And remember, he's a CIA lackey.
He's a double agent, a triple agent, if you want.
He is used as a kind of beacon to recruit patsies across the world.
And they can always sheep-dip somebody, like Major Hassan, if they want to say, you're linked to Al-Qaeda.
They just have you exchange a few emails with this al-Laki.
And that's what he's good for, right?
He goes back to 9-11 and Hani Hanjour.
So this guy, he's a U.S.
agent under whatever layers of garb that he's got.
The other thing is, how was this young Patsy, Omar Farooq Muttalib, how was he radicalized?
And I think we're getting some pretty good indications that it's this Brixton Mosque, Finsbury Mosque, that's just in London.
The school for Patsy, the British Patsy Academy.
Which by the way, six months ago, I remember it, you predicted we'd see plane bombings out of that mosque.
This is not so hard to do.
Remember Richard Reed?
Richard Reed, mentally retarded vagrant who was sleeping on the floor of Brixton Mosque, I think.
He was given the same PETN explosive by somebody, so that's what this Omar Farouk was given then, allegedly, once again in Yemen.
So you can see it all fits together, and it all comes from these same places.
There are reports today that the Christmas Day body bomber met with an American-born radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, he's believed to be living in Yemen, al-Awlaki is.
He's not only been linked to Al-Qaeda in the past, but he reportedly exchanged emails with the suspected Fort Hood shooter, Nidal Hassan, before that shooting massacre in Texas.
Now again, Anwar al-Awlaki, the CIA lackey, as Webster Tarpley appropriately calls him, is connected to all these foiled terror plots.
He's connected to, as the clip mentions, three, at least three, of the 9-11 hijackers.
He was interviewed by the FBI more than four times, and yet he was invited to the Pentagon only months after 9-11 to meet with top brass that really should tell a huge story about what's going on in this phony war on terror.
Now, on the other side of the same coin, you have today in the news, or this week in the news rather, Reswan Firdaus, the man accused of trying to blow up the Capitol and Pentagon using a remote-controlled airplane, and he was once again, admittedly, set up by the FBI.
They provocateured him, lured him into extremist action, gave him what appeared to be the bomb and the other weapons, including phony AK-47s and so forth.
And this is the pattern we have seen repeatedly, especially since 9-11, but also long before it, where the FBI is directly behind setting up random patsies they find on the streets, these mentally low-IQ people, and so-called extremists, to use them to advance the public agenda.
So the public believes these plots are always happening.
Meanwhile, the FBI is admittedly behind them.
Even Geraldo was on Fox News talking about how bogus this whole paradigm is.
And remember too, the FBI was admittedly behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, cooking the bomb, giving it to those people, and encouraging them to carry out their attempted act of terrorism, which killed four people.
Let's go to this clip now.
They say that just today, the operatives, the undercover operatives gave Ferdows material that was supposed to be the explosive material C4.
They say only a small amount of it was the real thing.
A law enforcement official also tells us they gave him AK-47s and grenades, but those were not functional.
We have to stress one very important point, Wolf.
A U.S.
law enforcement official CNN spoke with today said there was no danger to the public since undercover operatives were involved very early on.
There's at least 20 plots I've read about where the FBI admittedly used entrapment techniques.
These people may have hated the country, they may have even been radical in their minds, but they had no means to carry out the things they were accused of.
They only became dangerous once they were set up through these FBI systems.
And it's all just a fraud meant to trick the public and we've had enough of it.
We need to learn what's going on and say no to this entire phony war on terrorism because they are clamping down on our freedoms as ordinary Americans.
Now as we're talking about the police state domestic terrorism clampdown in this country, there's an entirely different kind of clampdown that continues to go on.
You've heard about lemonade stands being shut down.
You've heard about Gibson guitars not able to manufacture in the US.
You've heard about lemon trees being seized and quarantined.
Now in Wisconsin, a very controversial and important ruling where a judge has said You do not have a right to produce your own food or even eat the foods of your own choice.
He specifically ruled that plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to own and use a dairy cow, they do not have a fundamental right to consume the milk from their own cow, do not have a fundamental right to board their cow at a farm or with a certain farmer, and that private contracts don't fall outside the scope of the state's police power.
And furthermore that there's no fundamental right to even produce or consume foods of their own choice.
That is absolutely radical and they've used the FDA and the other arms of the federal government, just agencies with policies, to try to tell Americans that The government will tell them what to eat, when and where, but that making your own choices, using raw dairy, you've seen the raids on Rawsome Foods and others.
It's just incredible, but it continues to happen.
The raids on the Amish dairy farmers and all the rest of it.
Here's a video we put together highlighting some of the past clamped down on what should really be ordinary American behavior that even the founding fathers warned tyrannical government would control.
Remember Julie Bass?
She's the Oak Park mom who's being prosecuted for putting a vegetable garden in her front yard.
Why?
Because the city's ordinance says a front yard has to have suitable live plant material.
Get off my property!
I don't want you here!
I'm shutting my garage!
Get out of my garage!
Listen, so now we get the right to interrogate you if I'm not interrogating you, but we... I got the right to remain silent.
Alright, listen... I have both the right to remain silent, so... I'll wave that at you.
Hey, how's it going?
And you call me a Nazi?
Why are you calling me a Nazi?
Because you're acting like one.
You need to get off my property.
I need to see your ID.
I'm standing in my garage.
Yes sir, you are.
You are violating my fourth amendment.
Show me a search warrant.
You're in my property.
No, no, no.
You're not welcome here.
You're not welcome here.
So I need your driver's license.
I need some form of ID.
I'm handing him my ID.
This is not constitutionally allowed.
This guy is violating my Fourth Amendment right.
Both of y'all should be ashamed of yourselves.
You're violating your oath to the Constitution right now.
We are not slaves.
You work for me, buddy.
For what?
For what?
Am I under arrest?
I'm under arrest.
Don't be intimidated.
Don't be intimidated.
Don't be intimidated. Don't be intimidated by them.
You can dream alive.
Whoa, whoa!
Hey, hey, hey!
Hey, hey, hey!
Leave these people alone!
I'm sorry, you're under arrest.
Leave these people alone!
Leave them alone!
I am getting arrested for selling lemonade.
Do I have certainty?
Ten cents, guys, we've got a few cups left.
So what happens when you sell lemonade?
I'm selling lemonade.
Stop using force against peaceful people.
uh...
people the sun citizens in the southern california town of venez are outraged following a police raid on a raw food store all over a few bottles of milk citizens in the southern california town of venez are outraged following a police raid on a raw food store all over a few bottles of milk illegal rock rock
park park uh...
and this is tyranny Again, we're seeing a clampdown on really what should be some of the most wholesome behavior in America.
That's classic America.
Lemonade stands and the rest of it.
Then, the coup d'etat on top of it.
You see them repeatedly pushing away the cameras.
Don't even show what they're doing.
Don't document it.
No First Amendment.
No right to consume your own foods.
The Founding Fathers warned about this and it's disgusting.
Then, you've seen the news where they're going to start doing TSA-style pat-downs at all the NFL stadiums, but One small step in the right direction, Lambeau Field, home of the Green Bay Packers at least, has decided for the time being to only use metal detectors rather than the full pat-downs and the touching of private parts.
The National Football League is pushing for enhanced security and starting with Sunday's game at Lambeau.
All fans will be subjected to a handheld metal detecting wand before being admitted.
That's from the Green Bay Press Gazette.
Now, I think all this security is overdone, but at least they've said no for the time being to the full-on TSA style deal.
We know Homeland Security has been working with the NFL.
They did the past Super Bowl that took place in Dallas, and I guarantee you they're behind this overall agenda.
And we just need to say no, they're not going to stop the mobs who get drunk and celebrate after victories or losses alike and tear up public property.
This is just about training the public, of course, as Alex always says, to be the slaves that society is becoming.
Now, on the other side of the news, we have vaccines and coming up in a few minutes, fluoride.
But just last week, a couple days ago, Dr. Merkula wrote how vaccines have serious side effects and the Institute of Medicine says so.
That is, they're now admitting that vaccines are not free from side effects or adverse effects.
They're admitting that the admission came after a review of more than a thousand vaccine studies.
Which found convincing evidence of 14 health outcomes including seizures, inflammation of the brain and fainting that could be caused by certain vaccines.
The truth is nobody knows how many vaccine victims there are in America.
And how many of the 1 in 6 learning disabled children, or 1 in 9 with asthma, or the 1 in 100 who develop autism, or the 1 in 100 and 450 who become diabetic, can trace it to the chronic inflammation disease and disability back to the vaccine reactions?
And yet, we know it's going on.
Now, of course, with public health coming up to speed in the 50s, we've seen most of the worst kinds of infectious diseases go way, way down.
And yet, these vaccines are being pushed by the establishment with the perception that it's mandatory, when of course it isn't.
We all have a right to our own freedom and health, despite what the Wisconsin judge would say.
But these vaccines are admittedly causing more problems than the diseases they attempt.
To cut down on.
Now at the same time, we have a clip about the whooping cough out of New Zealand, where they've again made it seem like it's mandatory, and people are getting hurt by it.
Here's one of those clips right now.
Brittany Collins is the hidden face of vaccinations.
There you go, Brittany.
Wheelchair bound, brain damaged.
She's severely disabled.
I mean, she's lovely.
She was crippled by a vaccine.
She can't stand or sit or hold anything.
The 20-year-old is on accident compensation for an adverse reaction to the whooping cough vaccine.
Since Brittany's elder brother had an adverse reaction to the whooping cough vaccine, Cherie asked her specialist if she should vaccinate Brittany.
And he said, yes.
I mean, I threw it at normal.
There's no chance of a reaction.
She'll be fine.
What occurred after that?
She became very unhappy.
She basically was screaming night and day.
It was quite a strange cry.
That's enough, but you notice how this poor girl who was damaged, permanently disabled for the rest of her life, they told her to get the vaccine even after her own brother was damaged by it, and the same disgusting Tdap What's happening in America?
You saw in California Natoma school officials go door-to-door to find unvaccinated students and this ignorant just hateful little bootlicking system lover had the audacity to go to people's doors and tell them it's required to get vaccines when it's been on record for years that there's a waiver for religious or even just personal conscientious objection and again These vaccines are doing more harm than the diseases they try to stop.
You also saw Mike Adams of Natural News reporting that the CDC is now calling homes in the U.S.
and demanding that they provide their child's immunization records as part of a vaccine surveillance and tracking program.
And it's just pure intimidation.
There's no law.
We have a right to our own bodies and to at least attempt to make responsible decisions, yet they persist in this.
I believe we have another clip.
Let's go to that right now.
This is Jasmine Renata.
She was just 18 when she died.
Her family suspect a vaccine was to blame.
Her parents believe the Gardasil vaccine, aimed to combat cervical cancer, took her life almost two years ago.
After the first injection, she said she had the tinglings in her hands.
She said her hands had pins and needles in them.
She's getting stomach pains, warts on her hands, and then the chest pains that she was having, and the racing heart, and it was just one thing after another.
A year later, and six months after her third injection, Rhonda would have her last conversation with Jasmine.
She put her hand out, and she goes, look, these warts are coming back again.
The next day they found their girl dead in bed.
The Renatas have sent Jasmine's tissue samples to a Canadian neuroscientist for further testing.
He says he happens to share my belief that aluminium and other toxic compounds in the vaccine may have been the key causal factors in Jasmine's health problems and death.
And of course, that is not the only clip.
Both of these are from foreign media news services, but we have CBS here in America with dozens of reports on the harm that Gardasil's done to girls.
Now they're pushing it on boys as well.
And of course, right now in the GOP primary, we have globalist Bilderberg attendee, pimp Rick Perry, who gave the perception that it was mandated in Texas, which really got the ball rolling for the Gardasil in particular.
Of course, he had Merck donations and the rest of it.
And you heard Russell Blaylock last week on InfoWars Nightly News talking about how well under 2% of people even report the adverse reactions and yet more than 18,000 adverse reactions have been reported far more than the annual deaths from cervical cancer which Gardasil is expected to treat or supposedly would treat and there's been many deaths as well at least 30 reported but I know it's much more than that it is so sad So, paralysis from Guillain-Barre Syndrome.
going to go now to dr nikki turner from the immunization advisory center imac and she's defending vaccines admitting well there could be reactions but we're going to force them on the whole public anyway it's time to wake up to this and stop going along with this thing we've gotten used to where everyone's supposed to get these vaccines that clip now please so paralysis from guilinbarre syndrome four cases serious Guilin-Barre can be serious.
It's a spectrum.
It can be very mild to really serious.
So if you have a Guilin-Barre case, you'll pay out on ACC because it may have been associated with the vaccine and we will never know.
So, why don't I, when I pick up my leaflet, it says, caution, this vaccine could paralyse your child.
Yes, well it does in the data sheets, but your pamphlet would need to be more than two pages long because of all the possibilities of what any medication or vaccine could possibly be related to.
In New Zealand we have no recorded deaths from vaccination.
It's really important that we report everything that happens after a vaccination.
You'll see a lot of reports related to children who have died after vaccinations were given, but we are vaccinating pretty well every child in the population.
You're going to see deaths happening.
And my understanding from the data is none of them have been shown to be caused by the vaccine.
It says medicine may be contributory.
Yeah, that would be the standard way of saying it, because in science you would never say never appropriately.
But if we do get a case, or a second case, or a third case, Yeah, no confirmed deaths, but of course deaths will happen, and isn't it annoying how long the adverse reaction sheet is and the warnings?
Well, coming up, we have a full second half of the show, a Floride special.
Again, we have the in-studio guests from the Floride Action Network.
They're coming up, and the special reports, but I want to remind you to please subscribe to InfoWars Nightly News.
We depend on your support.
We're not corporate supported, and we want to make this show better and better and get it out to as many people as possible and try to make it a condensed, palatable, but hard-hitting news program.
So please help us with that.
Infowarsnews.com.
We're going to break right now, and we'll be back with the fluoride special in the second half.
Thank you.
Obama is notoriously a liar.
We need to go to where the real architecture of government is, and it's not in a president. - Listen.
Wall Street has hijacked Washington in broad daylight.
While Obama's already fudging.
He's fudged since day one in this election.
The elite are using Obama to pacify the public, so they can usher in the North American Union by stealth, launch a new Cold War, and continue the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.
The globalists are outside all the nations.
That gives them safety, and they play countries off against each other.
You've got to give them a stake in creating the kind of world order that I think all of us would like to see.
Partnership and cooperation among nations is not a choice.
What they're doing is using the existence of the United States to act out their Wall Street fantasies of world domination and maintaining their capital structures and maintaining their system of looting.
The fight that this country has been waging since its inception is for the central bankers not to take over the country.
President Barack Obama is only the tool of a larger agenda.
Senator Obama had a desire to do some meetings.
Others have a desire to meet with him tonight in a private way, and that's what we're doing.
Presidential candidate Barack Obama was publicly criticizing the North American Free Trade Agreement in a bid for votes, but privately telling Canadian officials not to worry about it.
If you talk to our generals, they are desperate for is a civilian counterpart to our military force.
What do you call this thing where you get this false sense of gratification, but because a black man is in office, everything's going to be alright.
No, everything's not going to be alright.
So I know how unpopular it is to be seen as helping banks right now, especially when everyone is suffering in part from their bad decisions.
I promise you, I get it.
The Obama Deception.
The truth strikes back.
Get your copy of the Obama Deception today at Infowars.com or download it in super high quality at PrisonPlanet.tv.
Okay, ladies and gentlemen, we're back from break again.
I'm Aaron Dyk sitting in.
Alex is going to be back on Monday, but we want to take you now to a special Fluoride Report we've put together just for this episode of the InfoWars Nightly News, and there's several segments.
You're going to see them coming up.
Now, the first one is hidden footage never before seen from the Austin Water Treatment Plant where they add the fluoride After the filtration process, I went on this tour and we also sat through a lecture along with some of the fluoride action people from here in the area, and it's incredible.
They have a pretty reasonable water treatment facility, several stages of filtration, and then they just add the corrosive, deadly, and harmful fluoride on top of it after cleaning the rest of the water.
It's shameful, but we're going to take you now to that report so you can see for yourself what really goes on to your water.
For more than 60 years, the federal government in the United States, as well as many other governments across the planet, have carried out an elaborate hoax designed to convince the public that fluoride is added to most water supplies to improve oral hygiene.
This report will examine the facts.
Hundreds of chemicals are added to municipal water supplies, all under the name fluoride.
Sodium fluoride and its variants are the chemical byproducts of aluminum fertilizer, cement, steel, and nuclear weapons manufacturing.
Children who ingest fluoride will actually get a form of tooth decay called dental fluorosis.
Dark brown stains and tooth decay.
The American Dental Association recently put out a nationwide alert.
In the memo, they warned parents not to make baby formula using fluoridated water.
Fluoride is the active ingredient in many pesticides, like rat poison.
Fluoride has been proven to cause brain damage, reduced IQ, impairs memory and learning.
It has been conclusively shown to cause damage in the kidneys.
It has been directly linked to bone disease, bone cancer, reduced thyroid activity, and it has also been proven that it's linked to other cancers, unfortunately.
This is only the beginning of the list of medical issues directly related to the ingestion of fluoride.
After years of attempting to get the city of Austin to allow our crew in to show the deadly poison-filled fluoride tanks, we were finally allowed to.
But the tour guide at the water treatment plant told us that it was their policy that we not shoot video.
Well, it's our policy to show the people of Central Texas and the world who are being forcibly fluoridated to see the truth.
It is our policy to resist tyranny.
So here's the footage.
So there's tank two and tank one.
And this is a discharge line and a return line.
A tour guide even jokingly pointed out the fact that the fluoride acid would eat holes in the concrete and paint.
See this corrosion here?
This is not corroding just from the air.
This is from acid vapors in here, okay?
So they've had to go in and it looks like replace this, okay?
They had to take it out, it looks like.
Here you can see the pipes where they lovingly pump the carcinogenic brain-eating chemical weapon into you and your children's water supply.
This type of fluoride-based acid has the CDC's highest danger rating of number four.
Again, it is in the most dangerous class of chemicals, with an MSDS health rating of four.
Life-threatening.
Major or permanent damage may result from a single or repeated exposure.
Organ failure.
Cancer.
The list goes on and on.
All purposely pumped into your water supply.
If sodium fluoride and its other variants are so dangerous, then why are more than 70% of U.S.
cities forcing it on their citizens as a form of forced medication?
Eugenics is the long-standing plan of population control and domination being quietly carried out by those who are determined To bring about a one world government and a new world order.
Fluoride was used by the Nazis to poison the water in the concentration camps and slave labor camps.
The Nazis knew that the brain damaging effects of fluoride would enable them to control the populations with more ease.
Today, fluoride is being forced upon Americans in more than 70% of the country.
This is not law, it is a federal mandate.
Because the population is becoming aware and medical doctors are speaking out, The feds are now lobbying states like Arkansas to pass laws commanding local governments to add high levels of sodium fluoride to their water supplies.
As Americans are becoming more educated about the issue, many activists are standing up to water fluoridation and laying the groundwork for taking it out of their water supply.
Dr. Paul Conant is the Executive Director of the Fluoride Action Network.
Thanks to Dr. Conant's efforts, the Calgary City Council voted 10 to 3 to remove toxic substances from their public drinking water.
A few days ago it was finalized that Calgary in Alberta, that's 1.1 million people, are now going to be fluoride free.
Now many other cities in the US and across the world are following suit.
And that's why the establishment is striking back.
Tim Cameron of Mount Clemens City, Michigan, proposed to his city council to have all fluoride removed from the tap water and won with a 6-0 vote.
Agenda item 9C.
Request commission approval of a resolution rescinding the addition of fluoride at the City of Mount Clemens water filtration plant.
I need a motion please.
Motion to approve a resolution rescinding the addition of fluoride at the City of Mount Clemens water filtration plant.
Second.
Campbell?
Yes.
Draeger?
Yes.
Gager?
Yes.
Hill?
Yes.
Johns?
Yes.
Blesch?
Yes.
Motion carries unanimously.
That's what one man did by simply presenting the scientific facts to his council.
State Representative Dr. Joe Hensley of Tennessee sent letters to every district in his state urging them to stop adding fluoride to the drinking water and has had very successful results.
In future reports, we will document the fact that under the name fluoride, upwards of 300 plus chemicals are legally added to your water supply.
Americans are forced to drink a literal toxic waste stew that is left over from different industries, who would have to pay to store the toxic waste.
Instead, our cities, in some cases, pay millions of dollars a year for the poison.
The good news is people all over the world, not just the United States, are waking up.
Right here in Austin, we're seeing more and more restaurants advertising that they have fluoride-free, healthy, clean, filtered water.
Our reporter Darren McBreen traveled to one of these restaurants to talk to the owner.
Darren McBreen.
Thanks Alex.
We're standing outside of Hopdoddy's, a local hamburger restaurant located in South Austin.
Now this is just one of the many restaurants in town choosing organic and locally produced ingredients over GMO and conventionally farmed foods.
However, Hopdoddy's has taken this trend one step further.
They're also removing the fluoride as well as other toxins from the drinking water that they serve their customers.
You'd be surprised.
It's a small percentage that really appreciate it.
But the ones that do understand what fluoride does to you, they are ecstatic.
They love seeing that.
Sodium fluoride is a chemical byproduct of aluminum, phosphate, cement, steel, and nuclear weapons manufacturing.
It reduces IQ, impairs memory and learning.
It has shown to poison kidney function.
It causes bone disease as well as reduce thyroid activity and is a proven cause of cancer.
Well, not only is it bad for humans, it's also bad for animals of all kinds as well.
I just don't understand why fluoride needs to be in the water to begin with.
I do not think it belongs in our water supply.
It's for promoting tooth health, oral hygiene, stuff like that.
It's supposed to be good for your teeth.
Anything in the water supply doesn't sound like something that I'd be for.
So if I know something's being put into a water supply that doesn't necessarily have to be there, I'd rather it not be there.
Back in elementary school they made you like gargle that stuff and like wash your mouth out with it but I just remember it made me sick every time I had it so it's like I don't know if it needs to be in my water.
I think it's just awful.
I don't think anything should be added to the water supply that doesn't need to be added.
It just sounds scary.
Anything that's being put into a city's water supply without everybody's consent.
So would you like to see all the restaurants turn the corner like you are and remove the fluoride from the drinking water that they serve their customers?
Well, I'd like to see the city turn the corner and remove all the fluoride and not burden everyone with putting RO systems in their restaurants.
I think that'd be the best way to do it.
But I think that we can get the word out by doing that and I would love to see more restaurants do that.
Well, you know, a lot of advocates are starting to educate people and more and more people are becoming aware of the dangers of sodium fluoride.
In fact, right down the street, Hopdoddy's, they've made a cautious decision to remove the sodium fluoride from the drinking water that they serve their customers.
What do you think about that?
I think it's great.
I actually go over there quite a bit.
I appreciate it, yeah.
I don't want... They can filter out anything.
The more filtration of the water, the better.
I think it's great that they're standing by something.
They believe in it.
I'd like it if a lot more business started to do that.
They actually spent the money to...
To take it out of their own water supply.
I think that's pretty cool.
They don't need to spend money to take it out.
It just needs to not be there to begin with.
I'd like it personally if Austin stopped putting the fluoride in the water altogether.
The majority of people we talk to on the street flat out don't approve of sodium fluoride being added to their water.
Which is why we applaud individual activists and activist groups like the Fluoride Action Network who stand in the way of fluoridating public water supplies.
And thanks to restaurants like HopDotty's playing a role in the health of their customers and their community.
I'm Darren McBreen for InfoWars Nightly News.
So as you can see, although not everyone's informed about fluoride, those who are don't want it added to the water, and as we've otherwise demonstrated, it's not good science.
It's not good health and it's important we recognize that because the bioethicists of the world and the elites are trying to add more chemicals to our drinking water such as the proposals for lithium just to treat a few people with depression.
Then there's the prescription medicine that's in the water anyway.
Now we want to show you a clip from May 2011.
We showed you some other clips from Dr. Paul Conant.
Pretty much the leading anti-fluoride activists out there yesterday, and here in this clip at a roundtable with Alex, they talk about some of the successes and how really the tide is beginning to turn, especially as the public becomes more aware, but at the same time these mid-level bureaucrats have no interest in helping out the public they supposedly serve.
Dr. Conant, thanks for coming in.
Well, thank you, Alex.
You know, water fluoridation is not the most important issue confronting our planet, but it's the easiest one to end.
All you need is a strong wrist to turn off the tap.
Once the tap is turned off, it's over.
But you need the political will to turn the tap off, and to get that political will, we need people informed and we need people organized.
Thanks to you, millions of people around the world are being informed on this issue, and thanks to Fluoride Free Texas, Thousands of people in the city of Austin are being informed about the issue and organized, being organized on the issue.
So we're keeping our fingers crossed that Austin, Texas will be our next big victory.
A few days ago it was finalized that Calgary in Alberta, that's 1.1 million people, are now going to be fluoride free.
And after 20 years.
And people in Waterloo, Ontario, voted it out.
So the squeeze is on Ontario.
And don't forget that most of British Columbia and most of Quebec, the wings of Canada, are already fluoridation-free.
And we're squeezing on Alberta, with Calgary out, Edmonton maybe next.
And then we're squeezing on Ontario.
If Ontario was to go, if Toronto was to go, or even Ottawa was to go, I think it would be the end of fluoridation in Canada.
Meanwhile, we've got a very good organizing group in New Zealand.
FAN New Zealand is excellent, and FAN Australia has just been formed.
So there's a fight back everywhere.
And then a few days ago I was in Dublin, which is mandatory fluoridation.
Because of American pressure back in the 1960s, Ireland has mandatory fluoridation.
It's the odd man out in Europe.
Only three countries in Europe have any fluoridation at all.
England at 10%, Spain at 3%, and Ireland at 73%.
But lots of people in Ireland don't want this fluoride in their water, but many other people Don't know it's there.
Now you've been talking about some of the big cities that are going fluoride free.
I've seen reports like towns outside Austin like Lago Vista having it removed.
Other cities not putting it in.
Big fights in places like San Diego where they've had to bring in supposed private money to do it.
I've tried to work out for 15 years.
You notice in our book, it's the last chapter, trying to understand motivations.
Now, for the rank and file dentists and doctors, it's very simple.
They're too busy treating patients to read the literature.
Most of them don't.
You've got a wonderful guy in Austin, Griffin Cole.
He's a dentist.
He has read the literature and he's very much opposed to it.
A very important man, Griffin Cole.
But most dentists and doctors don't have time to read the literature.
We do, of course, three professors here, retired professors at that.
Then you've got the people in the middle of the bureaucracy.
Basically, they are trained not to question policy.
Policies decide, determined in Washington or in the... It's like the military.
They follow orders.
They follow orders, literally.
And the CDC, remember, is in uniform.
It's a uniform branch of the Department of Health and Human Services, CDC.
They're in uniform.
Surgeon General.
Surgeon General.
Yes, you say, it's a chain of command.
So don't expect the middle bureaucrats, don't expect the health officers in the cities to... And then the big chemical companies, they lobby the politicians that give the orders to the bureaucrats, who give the orders to the unquestioning minions, that then put it in our water, and meanwhile it's a pesticide... I mean, they had a guy in California a few months ago who went to a house that was being gassed to kill bedbugs.
He walked in, a homeless guy, for like a minute and it killed him.
And it killed him, and it said... That's the same stuff.
That's sulfur fluoride.
Yeah.
Being used, vicane.
Being used for years to fumigate buildings.
So this is simple.
He walked in and seconds was dead.
That's right.
And this is what they're pumping the food with.
And you were talking about the numbers of what gets in white flour and things.
Yeah, the level in the flour that was being permitted by the EPA was 125 parts per million.
And that flour, wheat flour, goes into dough, pizza dough, bread, cookies, cakes, and so on.
And there's no doubt that's to kill bugs.
So you're eating something that's meant to kill bugs.
Now, I'm no rocket scientist, but I mean, that's insane.
But the top of the chain of command, I went to the bottom, in the middle, what about the top?
What's the motivation of these people in the Center of Disease Control, etc., Department of Health, Kathleen Sebelius, why do they keep this going?
For me, it's The fear of losing credibility.
They have waxed lyrical so much, for so long, about this practice.
I think they fear that if they lose fluoridation, they lose credibility.
If they lose credibility, they lose other, the public's trust, which threatens other public health.
Well, this is the same government that secretly injected black people with syphilis.
Yeah.
And now it's come out they were doing it in Latin America and the atomic soldiers.
I mean, these people have no credibility.
And I agree with you, Doctor, at that level, at the top policy wonks, but they're taking orders from people like John P. Holdren and people he admired before him who all wrote about putting things like this in the water to reduce fertility.
And we know it reduces fertility.
And we know that they see us as animals, as a scourge upon the earth, and that's what my film Endgame Blueprint for Global Enslavement covers, is their own statements.
This is being done by design.
I know you only stick with what, you know, the actual chemicals.
And I would make a distinction between the dentists and doctors out there who are usually very decent people.
They're compartmentalized.
Yeah, they do not.
I don't think they have any notion other than what they've been told.
That fluoridation is good for teeth and that it's perfectly safe.
We have them on the ropes with the science.
You know, the best study they've ever done on tooth decay in the United States.
They looked at 39,000 children in 84 communities and what did they conclude?
That if a child had lived all its life in a fluoridated community compared with a child that lived all its life in a non-fluoridated community, there was a saving, average saving, for 5 to 17 year olds of 0.6, 0.6 of one tooth surface out of over 100 tooth surfaces in a child's mouth.
And you have to say to yourself, Is this world crazy?
Are we doing all this to save 0.6 of a tooth surface?
Are we going to threaten their brains, lower IQ, bone damage in adults, arthritis, lower thyroid function, all these possibilities to save 0.6 of one tooth surface.
It doesn't make sense, does it?
So again, as you just saw in that Dr. Paul Connick clip, there are a lot of victories.
The tide is beginning to turn.
And of course, one of the cities he's been working with the most is right here in Austin.
And we're joined now by two members of the Fluoride Free Austin, Laura Presley.
She's a PhD in physical chemistry.
And Dr. Griffin Cole, he's a dentist here in town.
And they're going to tell us about some of the action that's been taking place right here in Austin.
Thanks for joining us.
Thank you.
There's been a major change that's happened very recently.
The supplier of the hydrofluorosilicic acid that Austin uses as their fluoride source and their fluoride chemical in the tap water, the supplier of the chemical changed their material safety data sheet as recently as May, the end of May.
I have looked at a lot of material safety data sheets in my career as a chemist.
Probably scores and scores of them.
And I can say, honestly, I have never seen this type of health warning in a material safety data sheet.
Do you want to read?
Would you like to read through that?
Yeah, let's go over that.
And that's important, of course, because this is the company that admittedly uses aluminum byproducts and industrial waste, really, that they put in so much of the water throughout the country.
Now, we have a quote from that material data sheet here.
It says, prolonged or repeated overexposure to fluoride compounds may cause fluorosis Sclerosis is characterized by skeletal changes consisting of osteosclerosis, hardening or abnormal density of the bone, as well as osteomalacia, softening of the bones, and by model discoloration of the enamel of teeth if exposure occurs during enamel formation.
Symptoms may include bone and joint pain and limited range of motion.
And of course, fluoride is known to be a contributor to bone cancer, thyroid disorder, brain inflammation, even reduced sterility and fertility.
Kind of a common meme when we talk about these modern day chemicals and some of the agendas behind it.
But again, the material data sheet's important because it's as good as an official admission right from the company that supplies the fluoride.
And so, tell us more about what this means.
So what's interesting about what you just read, and I'm going to repeat just one phrase, if exposure occurs during enamel formation, what that signifies, and when Florida Free Austin, when we first saw this, we were incredibly alarmed and actually glad that they admitted this.
Most material safety data sheets are intended for The chemical workers at the plant, the chemical handlers who are handling these chemicals and putting them into the water supply.
This warning specifically targets infants whose teeth are erupting and young children who are having their secondary teeth come in.
This is what's unusual about this.
It is warning and alarming the user, which is the City of Austin and other cities in the United States that use the supplier, that children can be affected.
This is unusual and it is phenomenal because now we've taken this to our Austin City Council and said, you have been warned.
You now have the duty to put this warning that you now have received from your supplier.
This warning needs to go on to our water bills, the end users of Citizens of Austin.
And this can be used across the country.
Anybody can take this to their city council and say, look, this has recently changed.
You are now basically liable.
You need to warn downstream of your citizens.
That's the impact of this.
Yeah, and of course there was the CDC warning earlier in January of this year, warning that young people could also be affected, recommending to lower it from 1.2 parts per million standard to a .7.
But at the same time, we were talking about this earlier, there's so many commercial forms of bottled water targeted directly at babies.
Can you tell us the impact of that, Dr. Cole?
This really dovetails nicely with what you just mentioned.
And it was actually Health and Human Services and the EPA who did the downgrading.
So when you go down from 1.2 parts per million to 0.7, I think that was just a way to let people know, wow, they're getting way too much exposure.
I still don't think it's enough.
But at least it's a start that they're acknowledging that this fluorosis, which for years was called just a cosmetic effect, we now realize that's not true.
This is a serious adverse effect.
This is the physical thing that we see As human beings, but we can't see inside that the thyroid's being lowered, that the pineal gland's being affected, and all those other things you mentioned.
So it's interesting that this came out.
It's very timely.
But the baby water, there's now several suits.
In fact, there's one very recently against Nestle and Gerber because they were targeting on the bottles it was saying, you know, good for healthy teeth and good for babies to drink and that's not true.
And in fact, even Besides the CDC, organized dentistry actually now warns that you really shouldn't be feeding or making formula with tap water.
So even the people that have been standing behind it for so long are now realizing, maybe we shouldn't do this.
Yeah, so is this going to put cities like Austin at a point of liability now that they're warning that it is dangerous?
So if they continue to put in the fluoride, what will that mean?
I think that is a high probability.
Now that they've warned the city, the city has the duty, they have the information, and they have to pass that on.
So Fluoride Free Austin has spoken with councils.
I know they've had several presentations.
Can you tell us about some of the things they've said?
And do you think the tide's going to turn here in Austin?
Because cities across the nation, as you know, have begun doing away with it or refusing to put it in.
I really feel like it's happening.
I think so too.
Our group, if you go to any city council meeting on any random week and they let citizens speak about whatever, there's always people that are talking about fluoride.
Every week someone speaks against fluoride.
Every week.
They're hearing it over and over again.
We've met with council members privately, all of us, a group of a lot of professionals, chemists.
M.D.' 's, chiropractors, you name it.
And we have sat there and provided them all the science and all the reasons why.
You know, Austin should be the first large city in the continental United States to get rid of it.
It would start a huge trend, I believe.
Yeah, a lot of credible people, but only a year or two years ago they were laughing at people's faces when they would bring this up at city council.
Now again, here in Texas, just a little ways down the road, the big Longhorn rival, College Station, just got rid of it.
So, I guess the Aggie jokes aren't true.
They're not as stupid as we are here in Austin.
They did an excellent job.
My hat's off to their city council.
It was just last week, they voted 6-1 to remove the fluoride from the budget.
And they initially approached this as a budgetary issue, because times are hard and taxes are low, etc.
The tax incomes are not as high as they want them to be.
So then it got put back on the agenda to re-evaluate.
So they did that last week.
And out of the seven council members, including the mayor, four out of the seven themselves went and did the research and looked at the most recent research that's out there in the last 10 years and the issues of hypothyroidism, the issues of IQ in children, the issues of fluorosis the issues of IQ in children, the issues of fluorosis and attention deficit disorder, which has been linked to fluoridation.
Only in 2010 there was a publication, the journal Toxicity, linked to those things.
And they actually went out and did the research, came back and said, I don't want to keep fluoride in our water.
It was phenomenal.
And only one of the members basically said, no, we want to keep fluoride in our water.
And I trust all the dentists that just showed up without any kind of research on her own.
It was amazing what they did.
It was very responsible and very respectful.
So we want to show a graphic right now.
There's the cumulative number of U.S.
cities who have rejected or eliminated fluoridation by year.
And I guess this chart goes back to 1990 all the way up here to 2011.
all the way up here to 2011 and went from almost zero just a couple cities to now approaching 250 cities and still growing I know several Nashville suburbs recently voted to do away with the fluoride.
Now, of course, the people in Austin, now that they've done the research, they need to serve the public, as they were elected to do, and actually get rid of it.
What kind of action are we looking for on that?
Well, we've met with them several times, as I mentioned, and quite honestly, the easiest way would be to get four council members to just put it on the agenda and just vote it.
That's what we're really hoping for.
To go to a vote with all the people would be a challenge because big money would come in.
You're talking about the other options, collecting signatures.
Yeah, signatures.
That's not what we want to do.
That's not what we want to do.
It's going to be dragged out.
It's going to take too long.
And all we're asking for right now is a warning on the water bill.
Clearly written, hopefully in bold, saying, do not give this to infants, young children, because that will at least raise eyebrows.
And the parents say, well, if they can't have it, why should I be drinking it?
That's our first, first agenda.
Second agenda is, get it out.
And of course, you mentioned the cost, too.
I'm not sure if the numbers are up to date.
I've heard it's more than a million dollars a year we pay to add a toxin to our water, which, again, I took the tour of the water facilities.
We just showed the footage earlier in this episode, and there's what looks to be a reasonable filtration system, several systems, and then once they have the clean water, which is already a great source from here in Central Texas, then they add the fluoride and the chlorine, too, I believe, but that's another topic.
It's about $800,000 a year, I think is what the most recent number is, to purchase it and get it into water supply.
Yeah, so if only for budgetary reasons, we should get that back.
Yeah, I totally agree.
Now, I believe we have another graphic of a warning about fluoride here.
Fluoride warning on Austin water utility bills, direct language from the CDC and Austin City website, as well as the material safety data sheet.
So I guess this is what you're proposing to put on the water bill?
And the text would read, in January of 2011, the CDC lowered the maximum level of fluoride allowed in tap water from 1.2 parts per million to 0.7 parts per million.
Austin currently fluoridates at 0.7 parts per million.
Prolonged or repeated overexposure to fluoride compounds may cause fluorosis and fluorosis is characterized by skeletal changes consisting of osteosclerosis and osteomalacia and by model discoloration of the enamel teeth if exposure occurs during enamel formation and again that means as a baby and in early childhood when people are when you're Most at risk for all kinds of chemical infusions.
And I think the most important point though is that this is not just here in Austin.
We've showed the other cities where they've taken it out.
And they have a great network here in town, Fluoride Free Austin.
But people need to be doing this everywhere.
Confronting their city councils wherever they are and making this an issue.
And I know people have done videos on YouTube calling out the companies, calling out the fluoridated baby water.
But we need to see more.
Yes, and we have What's interesting about this warning, the Water Department here in Austin has said they will not put the warning on the bill unless the City Council dictates to them and votes to do that.
So we've got a couple of steps to get to that point.
And we need your help with this.
We have a City Council meeting.
It's a Public Health and Human Services subcommittee that is going to vote.
Three members, Morrison, Martinez, and Riley.
They will potentially pass And make a recommendation that this warning be on the bill.
So then it goes to the full council.
Then the full council will vote.
So we need people at the October 18th meeting at the City Council Public Health and Human Services Committee meeting at 2 p.m.
Sign up will probably be around 2.30 p.m.
It actually starts at 3.
Yeah, so that's coming up in just a little over two weeks.
That is coming up in a couple weeks and that is a big deal.
And then we can get, once it gets out of that little committee, can move up to the full council and then they will vote on it.
And then we will see where everybody stands.
Yeah, we'd like to see action on that.
So, is there anything else you'd like to tell the listening audience out there who, as you know, are worldwide and they're doing this throughout the Western world?
You talked, too, about the graphic where there's an overall decline in teeth health and all the other factors, too.
Well, if I could go first.
I've always said this and I think this brings it down to a really easy level to understand for everybody.
You don't have to know the science at all.
There's three inherent flaws with water fluoridation.
Number one, it doesn't do its intended function.
It was designed to prevent cavities, to benefit the teeth.
Science has now shown over the past decade and a half or further that it does nothing beneficial for the teeth.
And in fact, does a lot of deleterious things down the road like the modeling of the teeth as well as other skeletal changes.
So that's the first thing.
It's not doing what it was supposed to do.
Number two, it's not fluoride.
We talk about fluoride like it's this general term.
It's hydrofluosilicic acid.
It's a waste product from the fertilizer industry.
The EPA does not allow it to be dumped in landfills.
It cannot be aerated into the air.
But somehow we can put it in our water supply.
So that's the second thing.
It's not fluoride.
And the last thing is there's no dosage control.
A little infant who is fed formula, the majority of their diet is water and usually tap water.
It's not going to be some nice spring water that has no fluoride in it.
So a small baby will drink more water for his or her weight than I will for my weight.
It's the only drug that's prescribed without a prescription I'm glad you mentioned that, because this is a line in the sand for public health everywhere.
Because as you know, they propose putting lithium in mass water supplies and forced mass medication.
This is not acceptable.
And so if we don't say no to fluoride, we're going to see all kinds of things added.
If I prescribe you an antibiotic, I'm going to look at your body weight, your age, and I'll call accordingly.
Give them 500 milligrams.
For a child, I would lower that because of the body weight and what they can consume.
Fluoride, there's no dosage control.
You drink what you want, you take as many showers as you want, whatever.
There's no rules.
That's our argument, is that this is the one medication that there's just no control over.
And make no mistake about it, that's what's happening.
I want to reiterate what Dr. Cole said, and I've talked to thousands of people in my business over the last several years, and When I talk about fluoride, the one thing that gets everybody's eyes absolutely lit up is the concept of dose control.
There is no dosage control where a man six and a half feet tall and a little child two to three years old gets the same amount of this chemical in one glass of water.
That hits people's heart.
They don't have to understand this research, that research, and all the conflicting information.
They don't have the technical background to really understand that, but they do understand the dose control.
And then they also have people that they know that have hypothyroidism.
It's rampant in women.
And it's the fluoride in the water attacks the thyroid.
Your thyroid wants iodine.
It competes with iodine.
Stronger.
The fluoride competes with the iodine that your thyroid wants.
And so you give it something else that's in the environment that you're drinking, you know, tea, coffee.
It's in foods.
It's in foods.
Wherever things are irrigated.
It's a derivative into all our foods.
We are overloaded.
You cannot avoid it.
We are overloaded with fluoride and hypothyroidism, ADHD, which is rampant.
Pineal gland issues.
And when it's on the toothpaste, at least there's a warning on the back saying it's poison.
And you have a choice.
There's no warning on the water glass.
And you have a choice.
There's unfluoridated toothpaste.
See, I like that.
Yeah.
But with the water, I mean, like, I have an RO system at home.
I know Laura, you know, she's looked into this for years.
You know, I try my best to buy, you know, all organic foods.
It doesn't matter.
You're still going to get it.
It's there.
And by the way, you can't shower in RO water.
Well, I guess you could, but it'd be hard to set up an RO system.
That is very difficult.
Global warming is not the real fight.
These kind of chemical additives, that's what we can't take back from nature once it's sinked in all the ecosystem and down the line.
So thank you for joining us and of course Austin is one of the main fronts in this battle against fluoridation but the battles also wherever you are out there as a viewer And of course we are viewer supported so we hope you will support and subscribe to the InfoWars Nightly News at PrisonPlanet.tv and InfoWarsNews.com.
If you can't do that, please at least spread the word about this broadcast.
Send people the videos that are out there and warn them.
This affects the public health of everyone.
All across the Western world and they're going to push it into the third world too in time if we don't say no and fight back against this.
These are our lives.
We have to take it back from those who have other agendas.
Thank you for joining us.
Alex will be back on Monday.
I'm Aaron Dyk sitting in.
▲
Export Selection