IRAN WAR DAY 3: ISRAEL Dragged US To War, Rubio CONFIRMS | America First Ep. 1649
America First Ep. 1649 alleges Israel manipulated the U.S. into Iran war via 2015 JCPOA sabotage, Soleimani’s 2020 assassination, and Operation Rising Lion (June 2025), framing it as regime-change under Netanyahu’s "Clean Break" strategy. JD Vance’s shift from anti-intervention to "punching Iran hard" is exposed as neoconservative alignment, while Rubio confirms U.S. involvement stems from Israel’s demands—not Iranian threats. The episode ties geopolitical control to Jewish lobbying (AIPAC, BlackRock), Epstein files, and surveillance tech (Palantir), ending with calls for "America First" nationalism against perceived globalist enemies. [Automatically generated summary]
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day inadvertently with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
unidentified
I got places to be Good evening everybody You're watching America First.
I, I, I, I, I, I, I No one's allowed to say that the blood is a quintessential part of this, that the blood of our people is something that is essential.
That we are different.
that america was different because we are different palantir is an ai data analytics company
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithms, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
If we don't have freedom on the internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind raped every day forever.
Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geolocation, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you asleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
You have a smart home, economy of things.
It's like total, like, rape of everybody by the system forever.
My life is like a first-person video game, you know?
There is something involved where we have to forgive them.
We do have to forgive them for their ignorance, We do have to forgive them for their misunderstanding And we have to embrace them and say, better late than never, Welcome to the right side of history.
to our massive vision, our massive and ambitious vision for how we want the world to be.
unidentified
Hello, I got places to be Good evening everybody You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Quentis.
Have a great show for you tonight!
You got that back, bad, dance, like a bump.
You got that back, bad, it's a kind of bump.
You got that back, that's a like a bump.
You got that, that's a like a bump.
Listen to the cure, I listen to the cure, listen to the cure, and then it cry.
All the people cry, all the things you had, running through my head, running through my head, running through my head.
All the things you had, all the things I've had, running through my head, running through my head, all the future side, all the things you're fine.
I can't get it.
All the things you had, all the things you had.
All the things you've had, all the things you had, all the things you're sad, all the things you had, all the things you had.
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
Because they voted for Kamala Harris.
People do not stab young girls on trains because they're born black.
People do not shoot Palestinians in the back of the head or cheer it on just because they're Jewish.
The people that do this are lost.
They have to be isolated and segregated out.
A new consensus must emerge.
Are you in favor of a society with meaning?
A society where life is sacred.
Where life has sanctity, where people's lives and their dignity and their integrity is respected?
Or are we going to live in a society that is a never-ending war between nihilistic tribes, warlords, savages, pagans?
I see an emerging consensus.
And I think that the mature people that actually love America, actually love our children, the people that recognize the division, the peril that we're in, we need to fortify a new consensus and rally the people of conscience, the people of decency, the people of humanity, the people of charity towards their fellow man,
against those that want to kill us, against those that laugh and celebrate when innocent people are harmed.
For any reason, for any ideological reason.
Against the people that are cruel, the people that are hateful.
And by that, I mean the people that are really cruel.
The people that say things you disagree with, not the people that are provocative, not the people that are sometimes angry, but the people that are really cruel and really evil.
What makes Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the bearing of suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us.
An overflowing of love.
An overflowing of self-giving love.
So much of it it cannot be contained.
An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children, even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
That is what makes us different.
That is what makes us good.
Canary Mission Exposed00:12:42
unidentified
Canary mission
is an Israeli-funded blacklist which, since july 2025, has been confirmed to be used by the Trump administration to target students, professors and professionals who oppose Israel and reside in the United States.
This idea is part of an initiative created by the Heritage Foundation, the same group responsible for the infamous Project 2025.
In their initiative, titled Project Esther, they state that students participating in pro-Palestinian protests and activism are supporting Hamas, a group that the United States designates as a foreign terrorist organization.
Therefore, pro-Palestinian students are considered to be supporting terrorism and are subject to the revocation of visas, frozen bank accounts, asset seizures, and the denial of basic constitutional rights.
In effect, the Canary mission serves as a means to circumvent constitutional protections, allowing the federal government to engage in intelligence gathering activities that would otherwise be considered unlawful.
But the Canary mission is not alone.
Palantir, another company closely aligned with the state of Israel, uses AI-driven analytics to maintain private databases on U.S. citizens and currently works with four federal agencies.
While government contracting with the private sector is longstanding, the prominent influence of Jewish groups within these increasingly powerful organizations warrants careful examination.
I renew the call for all able-bodied young American men, all of our elite human capital, all of our geniuses, warriors, intelligent people to dedicate themselves to American sovereignty and independence as Christians, as Americans, as white people, as citizens of the United States.
And anybody that settles for anything less is just as much of an enemy.
I would actually consider them worse than our oppressors.
So on Independence Day, it's important to reflect on the fact that we are an occupied nation.
Now, just like then, we're being ruled by a small country across an ocean, serving itself at our expense.
And as long as that is the case, I will always be obsessed with that.
As long as that is the case, I will always be speaking out against that and fighting against that.
And I will always be anchored, understanding that that is the fundamental struggle.
As long as our presidents have to kiss the wall in Israel and wear a small hat, as long as they have to say that we want to make Israel great again and they're the greatest country ever, and I will never be okay with that.
Ever.
And it doesn't matter what they offer me or us.
It doesn't matter how they might try to placate us or appease our interests, the concessions they'll make.
Barack Obama created the joint comprehensive plan of action, the JCPOA, or the Iranian nuclear deal.
And Barack Obama brought together China, Russia, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the European Union to enforce a nuclear deal that restricts Iran's enrichment of uranium.
The early talks were conducted in secret, and the Israelis were furious, furious about this.
They hated Obama.
Netanyahu went to a joint session of Congress and gave a speech in defiance of the American president and its nuclear deal, and Congress gave 37 standing ovations.
This is the background of Trump's first election.
2016 election happens.
Trump gets elected with the help of the Israelis.
You don't believe me?
There's a whole article about it.
It's an excerpt from James Bamford's book, Spy Fail.
It goes into great detail about the hidden collusion in the 2016 election.
It wasn't Trump and Russia.
It was Trump and Israel.
And why was Israel so hell-bent on getting a Republican elected in 2016?
In 2018, Donald Trump declares the IRGC, the Revolutionary Guard, which is the military of the regime, a terrorist group.
Green likes that group for sanctions, for attacks.
Now the United States is in a shadow war with Iran.
It culminates by January 2020 in the assassination of Qasim Suleimani.
Suleimani was the architect of the axis of resistance.
Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Suleimani built all of it.
Are you starting to see Obama had this solved?
He made the deal.
The Israelis hated him for it.
They colluded with Trump to get him elected so that Trump would do maximum pressure and create a ladder of escalation, pulling us out of the deal, declaring the IRGC terrorists, then killing its leader, putting sanctions on the regime.
This is a war that started a long time ago, that Trump made hot in 2018 and has been going on for seven years.
That's the nature of forever wars.
Just like in Iraq, which went from 1990 until today, just like Libya, which went from 2011 to today, Syria, which went from 2011 to today, and Iran, which went from 2018 until today.
That's the nature of forever wars.
And if you're not paying attention to those underlying forces, you're going to fall for it again and again.
You're going to be surprised and confused and coping over and over.
And people are just tripping over themselves to do it again.
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
I told you so.
unidentified
When I get home, I want you.
Hello, I got places to be Cheaping everybody You're watching America First.
I have to say that the blood quintessential part, the blood of our people is something that is essential.
That we are different.
that America was different because we are different.
Palantir is an AI data analytics company.
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithms, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
Thank you so much, everybody.
Then I just say, are you trusting me in your hands?
Are You Winning, Son?00:04:50
unidentified
When I get home, I want you.
Hello.
Got places to be Good evening, everybody You're watching America First.
if we don't have freedom on the internet in the age of ai we are going to be mind raped every day forever Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geo location, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you're asleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
You have a smart home, economy of things.
It's like total, like, rape of everybody by the system forever.
My life is like a first-person video game, you know?
Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Monday.
We're going to be talking all about the war in Iran.
Can't even believe I'm saying it, but we're back here from our short weekend.
I did a little emergency broadcast on Saturday night, and we talked all about the outbreak of the war and what we knew at the time.
We are now on day three.
And so tonight, we're going to be talking about everything that we've learned.
We're going to talk about the developments in the war.
And specifically, we're going to talk about a few things tonight, things that we actually just learned today.
First and foremost, and to me, this is the most interesting thing that has come across our desk here.
Today, we actually have official confirmation, as official as it gets, from the Secretary of State, Marco Rubio.
But this is also retold in the New York Times.
And it's claimed by other officials inside the administration, unambiguously, Israel dragged us into this war.
Not a conspiracy theory.
It's not speculation.
It's not even a theory.
It is a fact.
And today, Marco Rubio came out addressing the press pool, and he said, the reason we went to war is because Israel was preparing to strike whether we intervened or not.
This is the statement.
This was reported in the Times earlier today, and then Rubio confirmed that Israel was going to hit Iran regardless.
So the decision was whether we would join them or not.
The decision was made to join them because, in the event that Israel struck Iran without us, Iran would retaliate against us regardless.
This is the messaging.
This is the statement.
They said, so if we're going to get hit anyway, if Iran already has the missile launch platforms in place and the coordinates are entered in and we're going to get hit no matter what, Rubio said, well, so we might as well hit Iran too and will mitigate the potential damage from that inevitable retaliation.
Now, here's the problem.
It leaves out the fact that there is obviously a third option.
So the way that Rubio tells the story is that Israel is planning to hit Iran.
So the decision is binary.
Either we're going to hit Iran with Israel or not.
And if we're going to get retaliated against regardless, well, we might as well hit Iran too.
Okay, but why are we starting in the middle of the story?
Why don't we rewind and consider that Israel is a client state of the United States of America, completely dependent on U.S. military aid, on U.S. military technology, on U.S. diplomatic cover in the United Nations for sanctions, its deterrent force.
Why is Israel making the decisions here?
Aren't they the client?
Aren't they the satellite, the puppet?
We're the superpower.
We're the country of 350 million people.
We're the country with the $30 trillion GDP.
We have a $1 trillion military and the aircraft carriers and the 5,000 nuclear warheads.
Why does Israel get to make the decision?
Netanyahu picks up the phone and calls the White House and says, well, I've made the decision.
We are going to war.
You're either with us or not.
And we have no recourse but to say, well, we're with you.
Maybe we're not.
Obviously, the decision that should have been made, and I said this from the very beginning, if you want peace in the Middle East, Iran is not the problem.
Iran is not the problem.
Iraq was not the problem.
Syria was not the problem.
Israel is the problem.
Why is there no peace in the Middle East?
Because Israel does not want it.
Israel will not let any of us have it.
So if you want to deal with Iran, if you want to stabilize the region, the word you're looking for is restraint.
We enable them.
We empower them.
They're dependent on us.
If we want peace, it is incumbent on Washington to restrain Israel.
Not Iran, not Russia, not China, not Syria, not the Houthis, not Hezbollah.
We have to restrain Israel.
And the U.S. president cannot or will not do that.
And that is why we have war.
So we'll talk all about that.
We're also going to talk about the advice of JD Vance.
We were led to believe this is the guy who is going to save us in 2028.
He's actually more hardcore.
Tucker Carlson encouraged Trump to nominate JD Vance last year.
Tucker said, you need to pick JD Vance as assassination insurance.
If the neocons know that Vance would succeed you in the event of your death or impeachment, well, then they would be apprehensive about it because they're afraid of Vance because he's the real deal.
So what happened to that?
These are things that were seriously said two years ago, that Vance was somehow more hardcore.
He was the guarantor of the America First Agenda.
Yeah, well, now he's supporting the conflict.
Big surprise.
We'll talk about that vindicated on that as well.
And then lastly, we're going to talk about the now unignorable reality, which is that there is no plan here.
There is no plan.
There is no strategy.
There is no plan in place.
Let me tell you what the plan seems to be.
So Israel is going to launch this strike.
The U.S. determines that if we want to mitigate the casualties on our side at our bases in the Gulf, we are going to have to intervene.
If we intervene, we should go big and disrupt their command, control, and communications and destroy their missile launch platforms so they can't retaliate.
What's more, we are decapitating the government.
We killed the supreme leader.
The CIA got intelligence.
He would be at his residential compound on Friday.
And so they made the move.
Okay, so now what?
Well, the Trump administration says, Pete Hegseth says it ain't no regime change.
We're not doing regime change.
Well, the Iranians are not surrendering, and they haven't run out of missiles.
Meanwhile, we are running out of missile interceptors.
They still have a million-man army.
So, what exactly is the plan here?
Where is this going?
Nobody really knows.
Nobody knows if the Iranian regime doesn't surrender, will the regime be toppled?
Nobody knows.
By who?
No clue.
So, what if the regime doesn't surrender?
What's the plan?
Keep bombing them?
How long?
Forever?
Indefinitely?
For months?
For years?
Trump even said, which is amazing, Trump said he is not ruling out boots on the ground.
Says he doesn't have the yips about boots on the ground like other presidents.
Pete Hegset said the same thing.
He said, we don't need to send in 200,000 soldiers, but we're not ruling out boots on the ground.
Okay, so are we going to get a ground war in Iran unless they surrender because we've bombed them into submission?
Like, what exactly is the plan?
Nobody seems to know.
And that's maybe the scariest thing about all this.
It's just chaos.
So we're going to talk about it.
We're going to try to make some sense out of it on the show.
We'll go through, like I said, some revelations about how we got here.
And then we're going to talk about how the war has been progressing.
But it's going to be a good show.
Before we get into it, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble, smash the like button, leave a comment.
Let me know what you think about the show.
Check out our merch store, Fuentes.store.
We have our Groyper Intelligence Agency hat as seen on James Fishback's head.
He signed one of these in Florida, which was pretty cool.
And he's excellent.
He said it has two meanings: Goyam in abundance, Grouper Intelligence Agency.
So, as seen by the Fishback campaign, check it out.
We also have the classic America First hats.
Look, we have to get rid of these.
These are going in the garbage.
This is going on your head.
When it's MAGA Night at the White House, when we go and protest World War III at the White House and we get drone strike by Palantir, we're going to need these, okay?
Get your blue hats because we're going to need them.
We may need them.
If there's a protest, if there's an event, this is what you need, okay?
Fuentes.store.
Also, if you want to support the show, subscribe on our website, AmericaFirst.plus.
15 bucks a month.
Have our brand new and improved website.
You get every episode of the show, every debate I've done, every speech, every gaming stream, commentary stream, thousands and thousands of videos.
It's all there.
We have them in MP3 format, an RSS feed.
You can download the MP3 of the show as well on the website.
And the video player is better than Rumble.
So some people complain about the video player on Rumble.
The new website has a much better video feed.
And we have the most recent five episodes on the website for free.
So if you even just want to watch the replay of the show, watch it on the website, AmericaFirst.plus.
It's a better viewing experience.
$100 a month, you get to be in the exclusive group chat with me, but that's a little hush-hush.
That's for the high rollers.
We're going to keep that one kind of low-key.
But that's AmericaFirst.plus.
Okay, we're going to dive into the show because there's a lot to talk about.
And I hope you caught my show on Saturday.
We did a little emergency live stream.
The war broke out Friday night.
And this was not really a big surprise.
I said on my previous show on Thursday that most likely we were looking at strikes this weekend.
And without getting too much into detail, you had that third and final round of negotiations between Iran and the United States on Thursday morning.
They held those talks in Switzerland.
And as recounted by the Wall Street Journal, this is how it went down.
Jared Kushner, who is running the negotiations, and Steve Witkoff traveled to Switzerland and they gave Iran an ultimatum.
And the ultimatum was: Iran has to dismantle its nuclear enrichment facilities.
They have to pledge to never enrich again.
They have to give up their highly enriched uranium to the United States.
And this can never sunset.
So this just goes on in perpetuity.
They're going to be a non-nuclear state.
And Iran rejected all of these demands.
So on Thursday, I said, more likely than not, these negotiations are now dead.
The U.S. has made it clear that these are our demands.
And they had been making it clear for several weeks.
Their red line has not moved.
And the Iranians are no more willing to accede to those demands than they were a couple weeks ago, a year ago, seven years ago.
And if a deal isn't going to happen, then a war is going to happen.
And it's going to happen sooner rather than later because of the calculus of how that war is going to play out.
So that's where we left off on Thursday.
It's funny, I didn't even do a show on Friday because I thought you guys were sick of hearing about Iran.
That was all that had happened in the news.
And so I said to myself, I'm not going to torture these people.
I'm not going to torture my favorite viewers with another boring show about Iran.
But sure enough, they made the move and they launched the war on Friday.
And just to recap some of these developments from Saturday, we'll go very quickly and then we'll get on into the latest.
Make no mistake about it.
We are now engaged in a full-fledged regime change war in Iran.
That is what Trump announced on Friday night.
And specifically, he said the goal of this operation is to destroy Iran's navy, to destroy its missile production capabilities, to destroy its missiles and missile launch platforms, and to kill the military and civilian leadership of the country.
He said the operation would go on as long as it needed to.
And when it is over, he encouraged the Iranian people to emerge from their shelters and to rise up against the government and that this is their opportunity to take their country back.
Now, the United States has done exactly this.
We have completely destroyed Iran's navy.
Their navy was finished in 24 hours.
And so one of the big risks involved in the war was the threat that Iran would use its navy to close the Strait of Hormuz, which is a narrow sea route which gives access from the Indian Ocean to the Persian Gulf.
So I believe it's about 20% of all the world's fossil fuels flow through the Strait of Hormuz.
All of the Persian Gulf's oil and its liquefied natural gas from Kuwait, from the Emirates, from Qatar, Saudi, Iran, it all goes through there.
That's the choke point.
And the big risk involved in the war is that Iran would attack those ships, close the strait, and constrain global energy supplies.
And that would increase prices everywhere, including in the United States.
That was one of the big risks.
Well, that has been neutralized because the Navy's been destroyed.
As far as the missiles are concerned, this is Iran's other deterrent weapon.
So we've talked about their nuclear program, and we've discussed how that is really a hedge.
They're hedging their bets.
Why are they halfway between not having a nuclear weapon and having a nuclear arsenal?
Because they're effectively saying, if we are attacked, then we'll build the bomb.
And that will deter an invading army like the U.S. or Israel or a would-be attacker from putting Iran in an existential situation.
Well, the missiles are like the second best option.
If the U.S. and Israel attack Iran, Iran has thousands and thousands of ballistic missiles, which not all of them can be intercepted.
And so these are, you press a button, they go up, and they will kill people.
They'll destroy critical infrastructure.
And the success rate of intercepting the missiles last year was about 86%.
So if Iran launches, let's say for the sake of argument, 100 missiles, 14 of them are getting through.
And in a city like Tel Aviv and a city like Dubai, that's a problem.
If you've got 15 or 20 missiles landing every single day, for every 100 that are launched, that's a problem.
And so this is a deterrent threat.
Well, in the first 48, 72 hours of the conflict, Israel claims that 50% of Iran's missile launch platforms have been destroyed.
So they're using up their arsenal.
Their actual launch platforms have been destroyed.
So that ability has been, let's say, subdued for the time being.
So the United States is sort of achieving its objectives.
As it stands right now, the conflict looks pretty one-sided.
Iran, its airspace is controlled by the U.S. and Israel.
They say that the U.S. and Israel have launched thousands of airstrikes now against regime targets, against weapon systems, all throughout the entire country.
And Iran is not able to effectively fight back.
They have no effective anti-aircraft systems.
Their air force has not been competent.
Even their missiles have been so far mostly intercepted.
It looks pretty one-sided.
And then finally, the United States has also been successful at assassinating the military and civilian leadership of the country.
In the first round of strikes, the United States assassinated the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who is the supreme leader of Iran, which is a huge deal.
That would be like killing the king of England or like Putin.
This is their head of state.
He is the top cleric of the country.
He is the head of the revolutionary regime.
And so killing him is a significant blow.
And they've also killed a number of people that run the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, which is the paramilitary vanguard that answers to the Ayatollah.
And they've killed a number of other civilian and military leadership on top of that, too.
So that is how the war is progressing so far.
Now, before we get further into where all this is going, because I think that even though the war has been one-sided so far, that may not be the case in the coming days and weeks.
And we'll talk a little bit more about the strategy.
But before we do, first of all, I want to talk about the justification for this war, how we got here, because it's very interesting.
As you know, I have been predicting for two and a half years that we would be engaged in a war with Iran.
I have been predicting this since October 7th, 2023.
Nobody is talking about October 7th, 2023 anymore.
Why not?
The reason why October 7th matters is because you have to consider that we didn't start out in a war with Iran.
This has been slowly building for a very long time.
And in order to understand exactly how we got here, because it's sort of surreal, I seriously wake up today, yesterday, Saturday.
And even though I have been predicting this and I believe it in my bones and I've analyzed and I've talked about it on the show, honestly, I still can't believe it's actually happening.
It's really, when I see the headlines, which are that the U.S. and Israel are bombing Iran every day, we're at war with Iran.
We're in a regime change war with Iran, this like once and for all confrontation.
You got to understand, this has been building for 20 years.
I've watched it my entire life.
I got into politics in 2012, and I became very interested in this topic when the original nuclear deal was signed in 2015, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
That was 11 years ago.
And so this war has been a long, long time in the making.
And it really has always been a question, will we or won't we?
It was always unthinkable that we would.
There was this expectation that we had made this mistake so many times in Iraq, in Libya, in Syria.
There was such a small appetite for more of this among the American electorate.
It felt inevitable, but at the same time, it also felt unthinkable.
It felt inevitable that Israel and the Jews would get what they wanted, that the momentum, the inertia behind this terraforming strategy in the Middle East was unstoppable and it was really just a certainty.
At the same time, it was unthinkable how a government could do this, would do this.
Nobody wants this.
And the latest polling from everybody, from Reuters, Washington Post, it all says that this war has about a 27% approval rating.
That means that the war in Iraq was twice as popular.
The bombing run last year in June had an 80% approval rating among Republicans, 60% overall.
So Iraq was more popular.
Afghanistan was more popular.
I think Syria was more popular.
Midnight Hammer was more popular.
You just look at Trump and you're filled with disgust.
You look at him.
He's a totally diminished figure.
Watching him on Friday declare this war in his sad little hat, no tie with a black curtain.
He's 80 years old.
He doesn't even care.
He's at a ceremony today, pinning a medal on a soldier, slurring his words, stumbling over a speech.
You look at this guy and you're like, who are you?
Seriously, who are you?
What is this?
It's actually scary.
It's actually disturbing.
And the reason I say that I've witnessed this my whole life, I've watched all these developments.
I watched the original nuclear deal get signed and I heard all the arguments about it then.
And we watched Trump come down the escalator in 2015, in June.
And he said, we should have never went to Iraq.
There were no weapons of mass destruction.
They knew there were no weapons of mass destruction.
We don't have it.
We spent all this money.
And to think 10 years later, we're doing this.
You look at Trump and it's like, I don't know you.
I don't know who you are.
I don't know what you are.
You are demonic.
You are a demonic force.
And what's really freaky is now he's always talking about going to heaven.
I'm not going to heaven.
Yeah, I think you might be right about that because you are a demonic force.
You are a liar.
You are diabolical.
You are a traitor.
And let me explain why I feel so strongly about this.
Let's talk about some of these developments from today.
So bringing up that speech again on Friday, Trump lays out the case for going to war with Iran.
He's bringing up the Iranian hostage crisis in 1979.
He's bringing up the barracks bombing in Beirut in 83.
He's bringing up the use of IEDs by Iranian-backed militias, the Kuds Force, the IRGC in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East.
And he lays out the case that we had to hit Iran because they are a danger to the world.
They're a danger to America.
They're working on a nuclear bomb and they're unwilling to negotiate.
That is what Trump told us was the justification for war on Friday.
Now understand, this is a war of aggression.
Plain and simple.
The United States was not under attack at all.
Iran poses no threat to the United States.
They are not building a nuclear bomb because they cannot, because we already bombed their nuclear facilities last year.
So we're not in any danger.
We're not acting in self-defense.
One way to say it is that this is a preemptive attack, but preempting what exactly?
Well, more on that in a moment.
This is a war of choice.
This administration chose to go to war.
We weren't forced into it like we were at Pearl Harbor or on 9-11, arguably.
At least in those contexts, there was a nominal reason.
And both of these things are debated, whether Pearl Harbor was really a surprise, whether 9-11 was not an inside job, or if it was.
This is a war of choice, purely, and a war of aggression.
The Trump administration thought that it could remove the Ayatollah from power.
And so we made a decision to kill a foreign head of state because they are a rival, because they are a revisionist power.
So we made a decision to go in there.
Let's just put that out there for openers.
Now, that is what Trump said on Friday.
What we have since learned, however, is that this is really a lie.
Trump said we're going to war because Iran is sponsoring all this terrorism and they're a historical antagonist and they're a threat to world safety.
Again, none of this is true.
As I said, war of choice, war of aggression.
But Trump's own statement on Friday has today been undermined by his own Secretary of State and according to reports in the New York Times.
And this is a story.
This is from Alibaba.
It says, quote, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has suggested that a planned Israeli attack on Iran determined the timing of Washington's assault on the government in Tehran.
The top diplomat told reporters on Monday that Washington was aware Israel was going to attack Iran and that Tehran would retaliate against U.S. interests in the region.
So U.S. forces struck preemptively.
So this is the preemptive strike.
Sort of an interesting logic, isn't it?
Rubio said, quote, we knew there was going to be an Israeli action.
We knew that would precipitate an attack against American forces.
And we knew that if we didn't preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties.
The state secretary's comments came minutes before the U.S. military confirmed that its death toll from the conflict had risen to six after two bodies were recovered from a regional facility struck by Iran.
Israel made the decision that they were going to war with Iran because this has been their plan for many years.
And the plan began to be put in motion after October 7th.
This is Israel's timeline, Israel's world.
This is the Jews' world, and we're living in it.
This is Israel's world, and we're living in it.
This is their timeline, their tempo, their discretion.
Rubio says that Israel informed us they were going ahead with the attack, and we were given the option of participating or not.
So Israel was launching its war of choice, its war of aggression.
They were going to bomb Iran.
Well, Israel was not going to be very successful because Israel doesn't actually have that big of an air force.
And so if Israel went at it alone, maybe they would have gotten themselves in trouble and they couldn't handle it.
And we would have to come in and save the day.
And you know what else would have happened?
If Israel went in by themselves, they would not have absolutely destroyed Iran's command, control, and communications, and they would not have destroyed Iran's missile launch platforms.
So if Israel triggered the war and didn't finish it, all that would do is force Iran to retaliate, not just against Israel, but against us, because we are the sugar daddy for Israel.
So Iran was then planning on hitting U.S. military facilities in the United Arab Emirates, in Qatar, in Bahrain, in Saudi Arabia, in Kuwait, in Iraqi Kurdistan, in Jordan.
Even they hit targets in Oman as well, which is actually a neutral country.
So think about the logic here.
Israel was planning on attacking Iran.
It would have been an unsuccessful attack.
All it would have done is put Israel in harm's way, knowing they couldn't save themselves, and triggering Iran to retaliate, not just against them, but against us.
In other words, Israel was going to trigger an attack that would kill a lot of Americans.
So in order to preempt Iran's counterattack, we had to join Israel's war of choice.
Think about the rhetoric here.
Israel is unprovoked, aggressively attacking Iran for no reason, literally no reason.
Israel is attacking Iran because they felt like it, because they chose to, because of their ambitions in the region.
Israel wants Iran gone and Israel gets what it wants.
So Israel aggressively and with choice attacked Iran.
Iran was going to counterattack against us too.
So we had to preempt the counterattack, preempt the imminent threat from Iran retaliating against us for Israel bombing them.
That's our preemptive war.
Okay.
Now, let's just state the obvious here.
Israel was probably not going to attack Iran by themselves.
Why was Israel intimating that they would?
Why?
Perhaps they would have followed through.
Why would they have carried out a unilateral strike?
Because this is exactly what they wanted.
If they tell the United States, we're going it alone, guess all your troops are going to get killed in the crossfire.
Oops.
They know exactly what they're doing.
Israel provoked this, triggered this.
They know that if they attack Iran, Iran is going to rain missiles on American bases and a lot of Americans are going to die.
And that would drag the United States into a war.
Think about it.
And by the way, that was reported in all the papers of record last week, in Politico.
They said the logic inside the administration is that they maybe wanted Israel to attack Iran first because then Iran would hit our bases and that would create a better justification for the United States to enter the war.
You could sell it to the public.
But when you think about it, whether Israel attacked alone or with us, we would eventually be dragged into the conflict.
If Israel attacked alone and Iran bombed all of our bases, we would be attacking Iran.
The only difference is, if we go in at the beginning with Israel, then fewer of our soldiers would die.
Because if we go in at the very beginning, we can hit Iran a lot harder than Israel can.
We can kill more of the leadership.
We can destroy more of the missile launch platforms.
But you understand that Israel checkmated us.
They reduced the number of outcomes and possibilities.
They cut off all the off-ramps.
They burned the boats.
At a certain point, they made it so that there was no scenario where we don't go to war.
If Israel attacked Iran, Iran would retaliate against us.
We would have to intervene.
And a lot of dead Americans would result from that scenario.
So to prevent that, we had to go in with Israel at the beginning.
And we find ourselves bombing Iran when we really don't need to, and we really shouldn't.
And I think we really don't even want to.
Israel, in a word, orchestrated this.
And this is part of a pattern.
Do you know that every confrontation with Iran has been orchestrated by Israel?
We don't need to go through the whole timeline.
Let's just go back to October 7th.
In April 2024, under President Joe Biden, Israel launched an airstrike in Syria.
They targeted a consulate building owned by Iran in Syria's capital, Damascus, and Israel killed seven Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps commanders.
Israel launched that airstrike.
Israel killed Iranian personnel in a diplomatic building in Syria.
And so Iran had to retaliate against Israel.
Iran, in response, launched 50 ballistic missiles at Israel in a largely telegraphed symbolic response.
But what happened before Iran retaliated?
Joe Biden sent two aircraft carriers into the Middle East to deter Iran from retaliating too strongly.
And those carriers, with their destroyers in tow, they intercepted those missiles.
It was U.S., French, American, Jordanian, Saudi forces that shot down those missiles in April of 2024.
And so what did Israel do two years ago?
They provoked Iran by killing their personnel in a diplomatic building in Syria, triggering Iran to attack them.
And an attack on Israel invites the United States into the theater to defend Israel.
And then we find ourselves in the region.
Then we find all these assets in the Middle East, and we find ourselves engaging Iran in a defensive context.
Now you have U.S. and Gulf and European forces shooting down Iranian ballistic missiles.
That was April of 2024.
Joe Biden kept us out of that war.
Joe Biden didn't bomb Iran.
He deployed carriers to deter them and shot down their missiles and then left.
What did Israel do three months later?
Well, at the end of July 2024, Israel assassinated the political leader of Hamas in Tehran, Iran's capital.
And not just on any day, but after Iran's president mysteriously died in a helicopter crash, Ebrahim Raisi, they were inaugurating their new president, Masood Pazeshkian.
It was on the inauguration day of their new president that Mossad went into Iran's capital, blew up the safe house for Hamas's political leader, Ishmael Haniah.
Another provocation, assassinating a foreign leader on Iranian soil on the inauguration day of their new president.
And we did it all over again.
Joe Biden deployed two aircraft carriers to the Middle East, and the Iranians put in place true promise again.
And they retaliated this time against Israel with over 100 ballistic missiles.
And once again, we shot them all down.
This was in October of 2024.
And Biden kept us out of the war.
But once again, same thing.
What do we see?
We see that Israel provokes Iran.
This is the pattern.
Israel goes into Iran's capital, provokes them, triggering Iran to retaliate, and that invites us into the theater to defend them yet again.
Then Trump gets elected, inaugurated January 2025.
Netanyahu is the first foreign leader to visit the White House.
February 4th, 2025.
Netanyahu comes to the White House, and do you know what he's asking for?
He's asking us to go to war with Iran like clockwork, okay?
Iran hits Israel on October 24.
In February 25, there's Netanyahu saying, hey, time to pay up.
We got you elected.
Now you need to bomb Iran.
And you know what else?
Our national security advisor, Mike Waltz, at that time, he was pushing on behalf of Netanyahu for Trump to go to war in Iran as well.
And for several months, there was a heated debate inside the administration whether and when and how to attack Iran.
And so February goes by, March goes by, April goes by.
Netanyahu returns to the White House a second time, a week after Liberation Day with tariffs.
And once again, Netanyahu pleads with Trump to bomb Iran.
Trump says we're going to give Iran 60 days.
He announces this during the joint press conference with Netanyahu.
They've got 60 days to negotiate.
And if we can't reach a deal, then we will bomb Iran.
60 days passes.
Netanyahu is sabotaging the diplomacy throughout.
On the 61st day, one day outside of the deadline, June 13th, 2025, what does Israel do?
They launched Operation Rising Lion, an all-out attack, preemptive attack on Iran, hitting Iran's nuclear facilities at Natans, Fordo, Esfahan, but also hitting elsewhere.
They actually started the attack with drone and missile attacks from inside the country.
And they launched them against the Iranian military and the civilian leadership.
They launched a massive cyber attack.
And then Iran's Air Force came in and they bombed Iran.
Once again, they launched the attack, a preemptive attack.
They hit Iran.
But oh no, what happened after Israel hit Iran and claimed victory?
Well, Iran started hitting Israel back.
And for nearly two weeks, Iran was raining missiles down on Israel, volleys of hundreds of ballistic missiles.
And again, the intercept rate was about 86%.
So many of those missiles were getting through in the desert where the nuclear plant is, at the Mossad sites, at other military sites.
It also turns out that Israel by itself was not able to destroy Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
And they knew they couldn't because Iran's nuclear infrastructure is famously deep underground and fortified by mountains and actually thousands of feet of earth.
So Israel hit all these facilities knowing they could not achieve their objectives.
They hit Fordo.
They hit Natans knowing that they would not actually finish the job and destroy those sites.
It triggered an Iranian retaliation, and they knew it would.
And they knew that in a protracted war of attrition, they would not be able to shoot down all these missiles.
So famously, what did the United States have to do?
Well, we had to show up and bail them out.
We had to show up and shoot down the ballistic missiles, just as we had to in April 24, just as we did in October 24.
Same pattern.
Israel provokes Iran, triggers a retaliation.
We got to shoot down the missiles.
In all three of those cases, except this time, we also had to go in and finish the job.
Israel hit those nuclear sites.
Nuclear weapons are called strategic weapons.
You can't attack another country's strategic weapons.
That's an all-out act of war.
And if Israel hits Iran's nuclear sites and they are not destroyed, what's the first thing that Iran is going to do?
Well, they're going to race towards a nuclear bomb because either the sites will eventually be destroyed or they will produce a nuclear bomb to deter that from happening.
So, in other words, Israel started a war it knew it couldn't win or finish, least of all achieve its objectives.
They started a war that they knew would trigger an Iranian retaliation that is not survivable.
And they also knew that not only could they not achieve their objectives, but actually it would accelerate the Iranian nuclear program.
By not finishing off those sites, it might actually accelerate the timeline for Iran to acquire a bomb.
So that required the United States not only to defend Israel, but also to finish off the nuclear sites offensively, which is what we then did.
And on the final day of the war, we went in with B-2 stealth bombers and we dropped the bunker buster bombs, 35,000-pound bombs, on Natans, on Fordo, and we launched Minuteman missiles at those sites and Esfahan as well.
And then we called an end to the war.
Now, as I said, after that conflict, do you really believe that that war only lasted 12 days?
Of course not.
The war with Iran has been going on for 15 years, maybe longer, depending on where you want to draw the lines.
The war with Iran has been going on for decades.
And many people said that was the beginning and the end, that the war with Iran started when Israel bombed them and it ended when we bombed them.
Well, it didn't start then, and it surely didn't end then either.
That was only the climax at that point in time of an already ongoing conflict, of an already established pattern.
As a matter of fact, the war between Israel and Iran had been crescendoing.
Again, going back even further, going back to the assassination of Qasem Suleimani in 2020, going back to Israel's cyber attacks and industrial sabotage and assassinations in 2021 and 2022, October 7th, and the provocations against Iran in 2024, and then the bombing in 25.
That was only the latest and greatest operation.
And so, if you were to solve for X, if you're to finish the equation, well, what's going to happen after Midnight Hammer?
Is that just the end of the war?
Iran is going to give up their ambitions for a deterrent capability.
Is Israel going to give up their quest for regime change?
Or are we going to get the same pattern, which is that Israel will provoke Iran, they will trigger a conflict, it will force the United States to intervene, and that pattern will keep playing out until the Iranian regime is defeated.
Well, that's how I predicted that we would be back here, because that has been the pattern up until now.
And that is apparently exactly what happened.
Israel came to the United States in December 2025.
This was Netanyahu's fifth visit to the White House, okay, to the United States.
He came in February 25, April 25, July 25, September 25, and then Netanyahu returned just before New Year's in 2025.
He came to Mar-a-Lago.
And what he asked for from Trump was another war with Iran, echoing that meeting in February of last year.
Netanyahu came to Mar-a-Lago and said, Well, we've taken out their nuclear program.
Now we need to take out their missiles because they're building 300 missiles every month and they're all pointed at us.
And Trump didn't make a firm commitment.
Trump said, Well, if they build their nuclear, we'll surely attack them.
If they rebuild their missiles, we'll consider it.
That wasn't good enough.
So what happened?
Well, Netanyahu came back.
And Netanyahu came back to the White House again in February, this month, February 2026.
Then Netanyahu informed the president that Israel would go to war.
Israel was going to launch a war before the Jewish holiday of Purim to celebrate the Jews' victory over the Amalekites over their enemies, and that it was really just a question of whether we're in or we're out.
And again, this was going to be whether they did it alone or we did it the way we did it, it would have been the same outcome.
Israel basically told the U.S., we're going to rerun the playbook from last year.
We're going to bomb Iran.
Well, again, if they bombed Iran without us on Friday, Iran would have launched its missiles at our bases in Erbil, in Iraq, at Al-Udaid, in Qatar, in the Emirates, in Saudi Arabia, in Jordan, all over the region.
And if Israel hit Iran and then Iran counter-attacked us, we probably would not be able to intercept all the missiles.
And so many Americans would die.
So again, they did something that triggered us to go in.
And now we're in.
And it begs the question: why is it that Israel is able to do this?
They have orchestrated all of this.
They have orchestrated every aspect of this from the beginning.
They orchestrated the elimination of the Iranian nuclear deal in 2018.
They orchestrated the Al-Aqsa flood on 2023.
They orchestrated the attack in 2025.
And they orchestrated this.
Again, they control the timeline.
They control the tempo.
They control the ladder of escalation.
And what role does the United States play in this?
What we are told about the relationship between the U.S. and Israel is that they are our ally and that we are their patron and they are our client.
We furnish them with $3.8 billion per year in military aid.
Last year, the Congress authorized $26 billion.
Forgive me, that was in 2024 in the spring.
$24, $25 billion in additional U.S. military aid for Israel.
We furnish them with F-35s.
We tolerate their nuclear program.
We protect them in the international community from condemnation in the Security Council, from sanctions from European countries.
And yet they seem to be able to act alone.
Think about how warped this dynamic is.
Netanyahu comes here and tells us how it's going to be.
He comes here over and over.
Well, this is what we're doing.
This is what we're doing.
We, who's we?
You're our bitch.
You take money from us.
Like, we should own you.
You wouldn't exist without us.
You would have never existed in the first place.
You could have never declared independence.
There would have been no Zionist movement without American Jewry, without America's weapons.
You'd have no nuclear arsenal.
You wouldn't have won your war against the Arabs.
You would have never won any of your wars for that matter.
Your adversaries would still be standing.
And they come to the White House and tell our president, hey, this is the way it's going to be.
We're going in with you or without you, with you or without you.
Who's the boss here?
Who's in control of this relationship?
Who is the superpower?
Trump or Netanyahu?
And of course, we all know that Israel is the boss.
Israel controls our country.
Now you know it for a fact.
Because what is a bigger decision?
Do you know the actual definition of sovereignty?
So what it means to be sovereign is to have the authority to control what happens in your borders.
That's what sovereignty is.
The king is the sovereign of the United Kingdom because he, at the end of the day, gets to control what happens inside the country.
Sovereignty comes from the peace of Westphalia when the German princes are able to decide whether they're going to be Protestant or Catholic.
Hey, you're the prince.
It's your decision for your realm.
That's the idea.
Now, in political science, we say that the essence of sovereignty, according to Carl Schmidt, is the ability for the government to tell its citizens to kill and be killed.
That is actually what, effectively, what sovereignty means.
Theoretically, definitionally, sovereignty means you control what happens in your borders.
But what it means to be sovereign is you can command your subjects or your citizens to kill and be killed, to go to war.
That's what politics is.
We are going to raise an army.
We are going to get a bunch of guns and you're going to go and fight those people and you're going to have to kill them and you might have to be killed for the sake of us, for the sake of our political entity.
That's what sovereignty is.
So if Netanyahu can come to the White House and say, you're going to die for us, these are the terms under which you're going to kill and be killed.
We're attacking Iran.
And if we do, your soldiers are going to die.
So if you don't want them to die, then you're going to have to kill Iranians.
And some combat troops will be killed too to prevent that from happening.
Again, if they have the authority to tell us what to do for those matters, then that means they're our boss.
What are the real decisions that a government makes other than when to go to war and when to make peace?
Other than the government's ability to tell its volunteer army, you're going to die.
Like Trump said on Friday, soldiers are going to die.
Okay, but who are they dying for?
Who's telling them to die?
For what?
Whose decision is that?
Is it the president elected by the people of the United States of America?
Is it the chief executive of our constitutional representative democratic government?
Or is it the prime minister of Israel?
And what gives him the ability or the right or the authority to do that?
Well, obviously, Netanyahu's authority proceeds from the fact that our country is run by organized Jewry.
Jews have all the power in America.
They are the gatekeepers.
They are the middlemen.
They have so much financial leverage, so much political leverage that they cannot be opposed.
Look at the media entity that was just created.
Skydance, Paramount, Warner Brothers, TikTok.
Larry Ellison, friend of Netanyahu, controls all of that.
Let's say you want to be an actor in the entertainment industry.
You offend the Jews.
Well, Larry Ellison owns the largest media conglomerate in America.
So if he blacklists you and says, hey, we're not going to work with that guy and we're going to cut contracts with anybody that does, you can't work.
They control it.
And the same is true of finance.
Who runs BlackRock?
Larry Fink, a Jewish Zionist.
Bill Ackman, who runs his own financial fund, he goes to Larry Fink after the protest from October 7th and says, we need to blacklist every student who protested against Israel in finance.
And Larry Fink, running BlackRock, says, okay, BlackRock is the largest asset manager in the world.
Trillions of dollars in assets under management.
If Larry Fink says you can't work in finance, you can't work in finance.
They don't need to run all of it.
They don't need to run every financial firm, every media firm.
They need to own enough of it and be willing to use it.
Same thing with the ADL.
Does anybody want the ADL breathing down their neck, canceling their Adidas contract, their GAP contract, getting their money frozen?
Of course not.
It's all like this.
And so people have said, well, the reason President Trump couldn't refuse is because he knows they would kill him.
That's what Tucker Carlson said today.
He said, you can't say no to Israel because the last president that did is JFK.
And he's referring to the fact that in 1963, John F. Kennedy, the U.S. president, was in a dispute with Ben-Gurion, the president of Israel, the prime minister of Israel.
And at that time, Israel was producing a nuclear weapon, very similar to Iran.
And JFK, his policy was nonproliferation, inherited from Eisenhower.
Eisenhower, in fact, told JFK about this during the presidential transition in 1961.
He said, you got to watch the Israelis.
And so JFK wanted inspectors.
He wanted the IAEA and the United States to inspect Israel's nuclear facilities to determine that they were not making a nuclear weapon.
And JFK's demands kept growing stronger until eventually JFK told Ben-Gurion: Look, if you don't do what we say, you're cut off.
JFK sent him a letter in June of 1963 and said, if you don't give us inspections twice a year and we get to see all of your facilities, then we're cutting you off from foreign aid completely and we'll back the Arabs.
Ben-Gurion resigned the day after he got that letter.
And five months later, on November 22, 1963, JFK was assassinated.
Lyndon B. Johnson is elected.
And under his presidency, Israel went nuclear.
About a year later, Israel got a nuclear bomb, successfully tested a nuclear device.
And not only that, but U.S. foreign aid to Israel, not only did it increase threefold, but the composition of it changed also.
Whereas foreign aid to Israel from 1948 to 1964 was mostly economic and humanitarian aid, after Lyndon Johnson became president, it's almost all military aid, almost all of it.
And they start getting the most advanced U.S. equipment, tanks, guns, you name it.
So the implication is a U.S. president can't say no to Israel because they control our system and they have penetrated our country so thoroughly they will literally kill you.
In the same way that we were able to kidnap Maduro and we were able to assassinate the Ayatollah, Israel could simply take out the top of the United States.
And you know what?
Here's the problem with that line of thinking.
The whole point of electing Trump is that he was going to be brave enough to say no.
Isn't that the fight?
Isn't that what it is to be America first?
Is to stare death in the face and say no, America first, America first or death?
Is that not what George Washington did when he crossed the Delaware?
Was say America first or death?
We would rather live free as Americans than we'd rather die freely as Americans than lived as subjects, as colonies in the British Empire.
That's what it is to be American.
Is that not what Davy Crockett did at the Alamo?
Is that not what the Texans did when they made their stand?
That's who we are.
That's what we're supposed to do.
That's what it is to be an American.
It is to be independent.
It is to be free.
It is to die on our feet, not live on our knees.
That is why we elected Trump to be a leader that would look at all the foreign special interests, to look at Israel in their face, at their hook nose, to look at India, to look at the multinational corporations, to look at the transhumanists in big tech, and to tell them, no, I'm the boss.
Could Israel fight 90 million Iranians and 300 million Americans and 500 million Europeans?
I don't think so.
But that is where Trump has failed us.
Trump is not able to tell them no.
And this is why we are now at war.
This is now why real courageous Americans are giving their lives.
Think about that.
Well, Trump can't say no because, you know, the Israelis might kill him.
So send all those disposable people to die for Israel.
Send all those disposable little people, all those soldiers.
They can go and die in Iran.
How ridiculous.
You're a U.S. soldier stationed in Kuwait.
You've been hit by a ballistic missile from Iran.
You are dead.
The real best and greatest and the most valorant among us, they are dying in a war of choice, a war of aggression for Israel because Trump is afraid or stupid, because Vance is afraid or calculating.
So those Americans will die.
Just as thousands of Americans died in Syria and Iraq and Yemen and everywhere else.
Those are the ones who will die.
This is where Trump has failed us.
That's your job.
America first implies the existence of America last.
Well, who's being put before America?
Now you know.
Now you know.
America wanted a peace agreement.
America wanted to make a deal with Iran.
And we had one and we did.
But Israel wanted war.
Israel wanted a war at any cost because they want to destroy Iran.
Why?
Not because Iran poses some existential threat.
How could they?
Israel has 300 nuclear warheads.
How could Iran possibly pose an existential threat?
Israel has Jericho missiles.
They have nuclear submarines.
If Iran launched any kind of attack on Israel, they talk about Iran as this apocalyptic nation.
Israel could nuke them.
Iran did not have nuclear weapons.
They weren't building them.
And if they were, they were all destroyed in Midnight Hammer.
So Iran was not an existential threat to Israel.
Why, then, did Israel want regime change?
It's the same reason they want regime change everywhere else, in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Egypt, Turkey, next.
They want regime change, and they spelled it out in their documents for one simple reason.
They want to dominate the Middle East.
They laid it out in Oded Yanon's 1980s Grand Strategy for Israel.
They said, we want to topple all of the powerful Arab and Islamist dictators.
This actually precedes the Iranian revolution, actually.
They said, we want to topple all the dictators.
We want to dismember all the states, fracture them along ethnic and sectarian lines.
We're going to take Syria and divide it up three ways, Alawites, Druze, Sunnis.
Take Iraq, divide it up three ways, Kurds, Sunnis, Shiites.
Take Egypt, divide it up a few ways.
Coptic Christians, Arabs, Bedouins.
Take Lebanon, divide it up five ways.
This is what they laid out 50 years ago.
They said the era of land for peace is over.
We're not giving up more land for peace with our neighbors.
We're aggressively going to confront them.
We're going to exploit their weaknesses, which is their diversity.
We're going to obviously infiltrate the United States and use them as the instrument to do it.
And we will create, as they said, a mosaic of tribes with flags.
We will basically disintegrate all the states into fiefdoms that could never challenge Israel.
Tiny statelets that can never create a powerful military that will always be dependent for energy or for access to the sea or other things.
They'll never unify.
They'll never oppose.
And they laid it out again in the Clean Break Report in 96.
It's all the same people in the Bush White House.
They said the same thing.
In the Clean Break Report, they said, we've got a problem on our northern border.
Hezbollah and all of these exiled Palestinians from the old days are gathered there.
They're being supplied by Iran through Syria.
Syria, like Iraq, is a Baathist state.
Iraq has all these missiles pointed at us.
So Israel said we need to take out Iraq, then Syria, then Iran.
And then we can secure our northern border.
And then you can push up and down and east.
That's the whole idea.
It's so that Israel can take more territory.
They can become energy independent.
They can take the Sinai, control that choke point at the Suez.
They can move north and they can control up to the Latani River to protect themselves there.
They're going to move up into Damascus in the suburbs, maybe cross the Jordan River or at least take the West Bank right up to the Jordan River.
And then they can dominate the entire region.
As we've been talking about with nuclear weapons, their qualitative military edge, that has been the plan from the beginning.
And that's what this war is about.
That's why they decided to go.
And now we're fighting for them.
We're fighting for them to achieve these ambitions.
Americans are dying for a greater Israel.
Americans are dying so that Israel can be a superpower, so that their empire can be born.
You are dying for it.
You're paying for it.
You're voting for it.
And by the way, when all this started under George W. Bush, you know who wrote the speeches for George W. Bush?
David Frum.
David Frum, he's the Jewish speechwriter, the neocon that invented the term axis of evil.
When George W. Bush said that there's an axis of evil, it's Iraq, Iran, and North Korea.
Do you know who wrote that phrase?
David Frum.
Do you know who JD Vance's first mentor was in the mid-2010s?
David Frum.
JD Vance wrote for David Frum's website.
David Frum wrote a tell-all for the Atlantic years ago saying that he would tell JD Vance, one day you're going to become president.
David Frum said this to Vance as he groomed him.
You're going to be president.
You're going to be a common sense Republican.
You're going to deliver the young people to the GOP by being a moderate.
Go figure.
After Trump won the election in 2016, JD Vance convened a meeting in January 2017, and David Frum was in attendance.
And they started to prepare a JD Vance for president campaign for the late 2020s.
This was in 2017.
Google it.
It's in the Atlantic.
David Frum, tell all about JD Vance.
Well, what is JD Vance's position on this war of choice?
His old mentor, David Frum, cheering on from the sidelines, who wrote Axis of Evil 25 years ago, arguably creating that justification for a war way ahead of schedule.
Well, according to the New York Times, JD Vance was all in favor of this war.
The New York Times did a big piece, you should read it, about how the decision was made to go to war.
And it says that when the administration was faced with this decision, do we join Israel or not?
Nobody opposed U.S. entrance into the war.
Nobody.
And as a matter of fact, JD Vance was pushing for a harder response to Iran.
This is from the New York Times.
It says, quote, Vice President JD Vance, a longtime skeptic of American military interventions in the Middle East, argued in a White House Situation Room meeting that if the United States was going to hit Iran, it should go big and go fast.
JD Vance said we should go to war.
This is not the first time this has been reported.
It's been reported for the past two weeks that Vance was in favor of U.S. intervention against Iran.
This is only the latest.
Vance was encouraging Trump to go to war.
The only person that was discouraging it was Tucker Carlson, to his credit.
And I have my beef with him, but to his credit, as far as we know, Tucker Carlson is the only one who went to the White House on February 23rd and tried to discourage President Trump from taking us to war.
And for that, whatever Tucker is, CIA, foreign operative, whatever, we owe him gratitude because he tried.
And for whatever reason, who knows what he really is, we should be somewhat grateful.
We have to give him the credit he deserves for that.
He was the only one.
But more to the point, JD Vance was pushing us to go to war.
Now, a lot of people say, yeah, well, that is a planted story by the New York Times.
I saw Marjorie Taylor Green on Twitter.
She said, oh, they must really not like Vance.
Who's they?
She goes, oh, the media must not like Vance.
That's why they're trying to pin the war on him.
So a lot of people are treating this like it's a fluke.
Oh, that's not real.
Vance didn't want the war.
Well, you want to know how we know it's true?
JD Vance said the exact same thing in July of 2024.
You want to know when he said it and where he said it?
Well, a week after Donald Trump was shot in the ear and Tucker Carlson, Elon Musk, and Peter Thiel called Donald Trump and encouraged him to select JD Vance as his nominee, the RNC was held.
And it was at the RNC where Trump announced that JD Vance would be his running mate that JD Vance conducted his first interview as the VP nominee with Sean Hannity.
His first interview at the Republican National Convention, the nominating convention in July of 2024, in his first interview, JD Vance sat with Sean Hannity and he said, we have to hit Iran hard.
We have to punch them hard.
You can't do these small strikes like Biden is doing.
You have to punch them in the face.
You have to hit them hard.
He actually volunteered that.
Sean Hannity didn't ask him about Iran.
He asked him about foreign policy in general.
And Vance said, well, for example, if you go against Iran, you got to punch him hard.
So this has been his position.
We know he was saying that in the White House because this was his policy when he became the VP nominee.
And there's another instance.
Several months before that, he went to the Quincy Institute.
I'm sure you've heard me speak on this.
An anti-war nonprofit.
They pushed the foreign policy, which is called restraint, name of a book by Barry Posen.
And they push foreign policy restraint using American power, but in a restrained way.
JD Vance went to this conference, and according to the Jewish Post, he put a pro-Israel spin on America first, according to Jewish Insider.
And during the speech, JD Vance said, we have to arm Israel so they can bomb Iran.
He said, we treasure Israel as an ally.
We work on them with missile defense and they are the Holy Land and we should give them what they need to bomb Iran.
He went to an anti-war think tank and told them we need to bomb Iran for Israel.
Okay?
That's who JD Vance is.
That was in the spring of 24.
He gave that interview in July at the RNC in 24.
And this week, he encouraged Trump to go max on Iran, to go all the way.
Now consider, people are saying that Vance is normally anti-war.
Where exactly does JD Vance come from?
Well, like I said, he was groomed and he was the protege of David Frum, who is a Jewish neocon, former speechwriter for George W. Bush.
And if you read that article, it is very suspicious because somehow David Frum knew in the 2010s that JD Vance would be the president in the late 2020s.
And how did David Frum know that?
How did he get this feeling when JD Vance was just some former law student?
Well, he said he got that feeling because of Vance's biographical credibility, because of his book, his book, Hill Billy Elegy, which talks about how he's from the disaffected white working class.
And effectively, David Frum said he believes Vance will become the Republican president because Vance is going to be able to trick all the stupid white people.
Vance has this story.
He's got the biographical credibility.
He can go to the enraged middle American radicals, the white working class, and he can say, hey, everybody, I'm just like you.
I came from the Rust Belt.
I came from Ohio.
My me-ma's a drug addict or whatever.
My mom's a drug addict.
My meme maw helped me out.
And he's going to get all the white people back on the plantation if the Republicans lost him.
That's how David Frum knew.
It gets better.
In 2016, when Donald Trump launched the anti-war America First movement, Trump said, as we talked about earlier in the show, that the war in Iraq was a mistake, that there were no weapons of mass destruction, that George Bush knew there weren't weapons of mass destruction.
He let 9-11 happen on his watch.
Trump was saying all these things.
Trump repudiated David Frum's legacy, the Republican Party legacy, repudiated the Bush dynasty, destroyed Jeb Bush, single-handedly made support for Iraq actually a non-starter in the Republican primary.
And it wasn't before that.
It wasn't.
Most of those candidates were pro-Iraq war right up until Donald Trump said we weren't going to be that way anymore.
Where was JD Vance when that movement was born?
When the MAGA America First movement was born, when Trump came down the escalator and said, we should have never been in Iraq.
We don't even have it.
We don't have the oil.
You can't even go there.
They knew there were no weapons of mass destruction.
When he came down and said all that and he created this movement and inspired everybody, where was Vance?
He was handpicked by Bill Crystal from the Weekly Standard to run as a spoiler candidate against Trump.
So all the neocons like Ben Shapiro and Bill Crystal and others, Rupert Murdoch, they did not want Trump to win.
So how were they going to prevent him from winning?
Well, they were going to get a spoiler candidate to run as an independent in a state like Utah.
That's where Evan McMullen is from.
And they thought that if they could take enough votes away from Trump in a state like Utah, Hillary would win that state, and she would get a few of those electoral votes, and she might win it in a pinch.
That was the playbook by the neocons.
That was a playbook by the pro-war crowd, by Shapiro, by Bill Kristol.
Bill Kristol was the architect of this.
First, he had David French run from National Review, and he chickened out because he's a wimp.
And then they put in place the CIA officer, Evan McMullen.
And that's who JD Vance voted for.
Bill Crystal, for those that don't know, is one of the architects of the Iraq war.
Writing for the Weekly Standard, which is one of the big intellectual magazines of the 90s and 2000s, Bill Crystal was pushing the strongest for the war in Iraq.
He's part of that same generation as David Frum.
And his father, Irvin Kristol, is the godfather of neoconservatism.
That's who JD Vance voted for.
That guy's handpicked candidate.
Okay.
Now people are surprised that JD Vance pushed for a war in Iran.
Really?
The guy that was mentored by David Frum, the guy that voted for Bill Kristol's spoiler, Evan McMullen, the guy that told us at an anti-war think tank that we need to go to war with Iran in his first interview as the VP nominee said, we got to bomb Iran really hard.
Now people deny they're surprised that JD Vance was in favor of a war with Iran now.
Why?
You shouldn't be surprised.
That's who JD Vance is.
JD Vance is not a real anything.
He is whatever they need him to be.
He is what Elon Musk needs him to be.
He is what Rupert Murdoch needs him to be.
He is what Miriam Adelson needs him to be.
Is anybody surprised that a never-Trumper that was calling Trump a Nazi, that was grateful for Obama?
Is anybody surprised that this guy is now in favor of a war with Iran?
Wait a second, you're telling me he never had an ideological epiphany?
I thought that when he was ready to run for Senate and he needed Trump's endorsement, that coincidentally he got based and red-pilled.
You know, he was a never-Trumper.
He did vote for Evan McMullen.
He did call Trump a racist Nazi.
He did say Trump was an idiot.
He said that white people only hate Obama because they're jealous that a black man is smarter than them.
But, you know, magically in 2022, he just had this epiphany.
He got based and red-pilled.
Oh, yeah.
And also, he needed Trump to endorse him to win that Senate seat in Ohio.
But, you know, I'm sure that's just a coincidence.
I'm sure that timing was just really serendipitous for him.
He got lucky that he became Trump's number one cheerleader right when he needed his endorsement to win that three-way primary and then get his Senate seat, which would then propel him into the vice presidency and now the presumptive nominee for president in 28.
Yeah, that's not, that wasn't orchestrated and manufactured for 15 years by the CIA and the Israel lobby.
No, that's the story of how a white guy that's just like us realized, you know, learned to stop.
What's the movie?
Stop being afraid of Trump and learn to love America first.
Yeah, no, it's just a great big coincidence, isn't it?
I'm shocked and surprised that he's actually not a die-hard America firster and that he wasn't telling the president to restrain Israel.
And you know what this says, by the way?
As I said on Friday, we are sentenced to this forever if you don't make a change.
And by that, I mean, you can't vote for these people in 28.
Sorry, this is disqualifying.
You do understand that Vance's career has to be finished after this, right?
Because if it isn't, then we are all slaves, okay?
Then we are all slaves to Israel.
If you vote for JD Vance and Marco Rubio, after they killed Americans for Israel, they didn't oppose this.
They could have.
They could have said, Mr. President, let's not bomb Iran.
Let's restrain Israel instead.
They didn't do that.
They have power.
Vance got votes.
Rubio is the Secretary of State.
Where are they on this one?
Where are they?
Well, they're actually pushing for the war.
You can't vote for these people because these are the times for choosing that determine the character of a leader.
Okay.
And we've seen Trump fail and now we've seen these people fail.
Now we have the information we need.
It was a time for choosing when COVID appeared and we had a decision whether to lock down the country.
Trump could have chosen not to lock down the country.
Other countries chose not to.
Trump didn't.
That was a time for choosing.
That's the moment when the world is falling apart and you need a leader that's going to say, look, we're not shutting down.
He did.
BLM was another one.
The rioters took over the cities.
They looted.
They vandalized.
They torched.
Trump didn't lift a finger to stop it.
Sean Hannity told him it would play better in the election if people saw Democrats and black people wrecking all the cities.
So Trump stood down.
That's another time for choosing.
So is this.
If you're in favor of this debacle, this catastrophe, yeah, I'm not voting for you.
And think about if you are a voter, what would be disqualifying for you?
Someone takes us to war in Iran.
That's not disqualifying.
So what would they actually have to do to lose your vote exactly?
I understand if Midnight Hammer wasn't disqualifying.
I get that one, actually.
Sort of.
If you didn't really see where that was going to go, if you didn't really understand the trajectory, maybe, maybe.
Killing Qasem Soleimani, maybe.
We're in a regime change war with Iran.
This is like number one on Israel's wish list.
Has been for 20 years.
Everyone knows that.
Last thing that we need, if Trump, Vance, and Rubio take us to war and you vote for them again in 26 and 28, is there any limit to what you will tolerate?
Oh, well, we can't deport people from Minneapolis.
That's killing our approval ratings.
Oh, ground troops in Iran.
I don't give a shit about approval ratings.
We'll do whatever's necessary for Israel.
And I still see people on the Trump side making excuses.
They say, well, it's a four-dimensional play.
This is about China.
I assure you, this has nothing to do with China.
You want to know why?
We're pulling FAD systems from South Korea to put them in the Middle East.
We pulled an aircraft carrier from the Sea of Japan to put it in the Persian Gulf.
That's why you know it has nothing to do with China.
Give me a break.
This has everything to do with Israel.
I see people saying, well, I voted for Trump, so I trust him.
Trump said no new wars, peace president, golden age.
How did this whole thing start?
He said we opposed the war in Iraq.
You know that war for Israel sold to us under the false pretense they had nuclear weapons when they didn't.
Yeah, so he lost his mandate when he betrayed his promise.
Now you don't need to support him anymore.
What at this point is the excuse?
And people are getting ready now to vote for Vance and making excuses for him already.
This has to be the breaking point.
This is the breaking point for the GOP coalition.
You buried the Epstein files.
There is no border wall.
You didn't deliver on mass deportations.
You cut corporate tax rates for the rich by cutting Medicaid again.
No infrastructure bill.
No middle class tax cuts.
You got to refund the tariffs.
And now we're in a regime change war with Iran.
That's the breaking point.
I'm out.
I'm done.
I am off the Trump train.
I am not voting in 26.
If Rubio or Vance are on the ticket in any form in 28, I'm voting for a Democrat.
Say whatever you, say whatever you want.
Do your worst.
Hey, Carpe Donctum and Cat Turd and all you fucking idiots.
Cat Turd is, or I'm sorry, Carpe Donctum is a friend of mine, actually.
But all of these plan trusters, Trump supporters, worshipers, Republicans, say whatever you want.
You are a fucking cuck.
You are a bitch.
You are voting for a party that is raping you.
You are voting for a candidate that is screwing you.
They break every promise.
They lie to your face.
They betray you.
And our lives aren't getting any better.
How does a regime change war with Iran make us safer?
How does that make our lives better?
You can't deport the Somalis from Minneapolis, but you can go to war with a million man army in Iran.
Give me a break.
Say whatever you want.
People say, but the Democrats do all these other things.
I don't give a shit.
Maybe if a Democrat were in office, we wouldn't go to war with Iran.
Joe Biden kept us out of a war with Iran.
We didn't have a war with Iran under Joe Biden.
And some people say, well, you would have gotten it anyway.
Okay, so then voting doesn't matter.
Is that what you're telling me?
People tell me, well, it doesn't matter whether we vote for the Democrat or the Republican, we get the same thing.
Okay, so then what does it even matter?
If we're going to get a war with Iran all the same, if we're going to get H-1Bs and foreign students all the same, then why is this the most important election of our lifetimes?
Because you can't have it both ways.
You can't have it both ways.
You can't at once tell us, we got to be good little plan trusters.
The best we can hope for is, you know, we'll be a little bit better than the most progressive Democrat in history.
They say, well, he's better than Kamala Harris.
You mean the most progressive Democrat in history?
He's better than the mixed race woman with a Jewish husband and that freak show family who wants to abolish the police and let in 10 million illegals and is in favor of, oh, he's marginally better than her.
Oh, great.
That's what the MAGA movement was all about, right?
Trump came down the escalator and said, we're going to be marginally better than the worst Democrats ever, right?
That was the battle cry.
Yeah, I must have, that must be a false memory.
When Trump said it's time to deliver a real victory for the American people, I will fight for you.
I'll win for you for every child that dreams, every parent that dreams for their child.
I must have just, that's in my imagination.
He came down the escalator and said, well, we're not going to import 10 million illegals.
We're going to have net negative migration, kind of.
So I'm out.
I'm out.
This is the plan.
The GOP must burn in 2026.
Shut it down.
Shut it down.
Yeah.
It's called playing both sides.
Not just for the Jews, folks.
Playing both sides, it ain't just for the Jews anymore.
Iran is hitting all the Gulf countries with missiles, hitting their airports, hitting their hotels, in a bid to get the Gulf countries to pressure Washington to stop.
Tucker Carlson says it's got nothing to do with Judaism.
Really?
This Jewish war of aggression by the Jewish state for greater Israel on the Jewish holiday of Purim against the Jewish enemy, the Amalekites, has nothing to do with Judaism?
I guess, bro.
Okay.
I guess.
I don't think so, little bro.
I don't think so.
He goes, it's Netanyahu, bro.
It's not Netanyahu.
Netanyahu's opposition.
Do you know, just real quick, for anyone that would say it's Netanyahu, do you know that Netanyahu's opposition in the Knesset, the leader of the opposition party, wrote an op-ed in the New York Times late last year, and he literally said on the front page, said, It's not just Netanyahu, it's all of us.
I'm not making this up.
Okay.
I believe it was either Yair Lapid or Benny Gantz, the leader of the Israeli opposition, okay, the guy that's running the party against Netanyahu, took out an op-ed in the New York Times and said, don't blame this on Netanyahu.
He said, this is the bipartisan security consensus of all of Israel, and most people support this here.
So that's not me.
When I say it's the Jews, it's Israel.
That's me quoting them.
I'm not really saying that.
I'm quoting them.
That is what they claim.
So if you're out there saying it's just Netanyahu, he's the problem.
It's not even Israel.
It's not even the Jews.
Look at the polling.
70% of Israelis supported Israel bombing Iran.
Okay?
The vast majority of Israelis support this war.
And there is a wartime cabinet.
The opposition was included.
They're on board with this whole plan.
They've been on board with it.
All of the vital members of the Knesset are on board with this and support it.
So the idea that there is some, you know, significant pushback, it's not demonstrable of the entire Jewish community, or I should say, representative of the whole Jewish community.
Where are they getting this stuff?
That's just rhetoric.
They would like that to be the case, but it isn't.
This is the only show that will talk about the Jewishness of all this from where all this comes.
Everybody's either lying or they're afraid or they're just misinformed.
Not the Kazarians, not the Masons.
It's not just Netanyahu.
Contrary to Tucker, Candace, Jang, all these other people.
Only this show is going to tell you the power matrix that has brought us to this war.
It makes me fear for my life.
When you see what the Israelis have done in Beirut, what they've done to the Tezboh and Lebanon, when you see what they've due, what they've done to Iran, it's a little bit terrifying, but it's what it is.
So anyway, that's that.
All right, we're going to move on.
We'll take a look at our super chats.
We'll see what you guys have to say.
Yeah, for all those people that said I sold out, these rumors of my fall off have been widely exaggerated.
You know, yes, did I support what happened in Venezuela?
That is our hemisphere.
Okay.
Do I support a pro-Western government in Venezuela and Cuba?
Absolutely.
That's our clay.
That's our turf, man.
Do I think Israel killed their number one cheerleader, Charlie Kirk?
Absolutely not.
People say Charlie Kirk died because of this.
What are you talking about?
What the fuck are you talking about?
Charlie did not die for opposing the war in Iran.
Google his tweets.
Go on Twitter and search his tweets from June of 2025.
When the U.S. bombed Iran last year, Charlie was out there defending it.
Let's just be honest.
When Israel was bombing Iran and we were getting involved, Charlie said, you know, just turn your phone off and just stop paying attention to politics.
He literally said that.
I'm not making that up.
Now, privately, he was lobbying the president and saying, I don't think it's such a good idea.
But publicly, he's defending it.
He was telling everybody, you know what?
We have to trust our president.
When Trump went on True Social last year and said, I want regime change in Iran, Charlie Kirk defended it.
He said, well, listen, guys, there's a big difference between a top-down regime change and an uprising that comes from the bottom up.
He said, I totally support the latter.
It's like, okay.
When Trump buried the Epstein files, Charlie Kirk said, I just trust him.
So, no.
No, no.
But people said I was compromised because I didn't believe that Israel took him out.
He was on their team, bro.
He was on their team.
And if Israel is going to take out anybody, they would have taken out Tucker Carlson, probably.
You know, I guess they missed one.
Tucker's in the White House telling Trump to stop.
You think Charlie Kirk would have made a difference?
He wouldn't have.
So anyway, just to have to throw that out there.
Everybody, because I didn't buy into the kookery, look, this is real shit.
Put away the talk about astral projecting and psychics and monsters.
And this is real shit, okay?
This is real stuff.
This is war and peace.
This is life and death.
This is about the rise and fall of nations and empires.
If Sneko says that the Ayatollah is going to be at the highest level of heaven, he's going to be with 72 virgins.
That was kind of funny.
I'm not even going to lie.
Roseanne Barr said, POV, you're a dead Iranian.
You have your 72 virgins and it's me.
It's kind of funny, okay?
That's a little bit funny.
But yeah, I don't know how that works.
So I'm not the expert on that one.
It is ridiculous when they say, dude, how does anyone still take Scott Ritter seriously?
Scott Ritter says the Ayatollah won.
He wanted to die.
And when we killed him, he trapped us.
Okay, that's insane.
Okay, like that's just totally.
Do you even believe that?
Seriously?
When you kill your enemies, they win.
Like, that's really that's just next level.
So, what happened to a few days ago, they were saying if we go to war with Iran, they're going to blow up an aircraft carrier with a hypersonic missile.
I guess they'll settle for their leader being assassinated instead.
You know, it's like two weeks ago, Iran was posting hype videos.
We're going to drop a hypersonic missile on an aircraft carrier and we're going to rain missiles on all these bases.
There's going to be hell to pay.
But if we can't do that, I guess we'll settle for our leader being killed instead.
I found this guy on YouTube who has an exhaustive list of Catholic commentary on a JQ I thought was worth sharing, biblical commentary, church fathers, et cetera, all the way to Nostray.
Have there ever been Iranian terrorist attacks on U.S. soil?
So the Islamic Revolution was in 1979.
That was, what, 47 years ago?
Has there been even one Iranian terror attack on U.S. soil?
Go ahead.
Shout them out.
No.
Allegedly, they planned an embassy bombing in Washington, D.C., 20 years ago.
didn't happen.
I believe, well, obviously they did the barracks bombings in 83, but that was in Lebanon.
They have not done a single act of terrorism on our soil.
Meanwhile, how many Saudi-backed Sunni terrorists have launched attacks on our soil?
Al-Qaeda, ISIS, other groups?
How many of them are Egyptian nationals, Saudi nationals, Iraqis, Afghans, whatever?
Well, that's all of them.
That's all of them.
You know, Israel's done more terror attacks against the United States.
Israel had foreknowledge of 9-11.
Israel attacked the Liberty.
So, you know, that's just not boring.
People say these things because they say, oh, well, Iran is Muslim.
Muslims are terrorists.
Well, Iran has been a Shia theocracy since 79, excuse me.
And they just don't do this.
Okay.
All the Islamic terrorism in Europe and the United States comes from Wahhabist, fundamentalist, Salafist clerics that were sponsored by the Saudi state until recently.
That's where it's coming from.
So that just isn't true.
If that was going to happen, it would have happened.
And people say they're this apocalyptic regime.
They could have built a nuclear bomb.
They have had the blueprints for decades and they have had the know-how and they have had the material.
They could have done it.
They could have done it if they pursued a weapon.
And people say, well, they're going to use it against everybody.
They wanted it for the same reason that Israel wants it as a deterrent.
Here's your 30 pieces of silver, you fucking whore.
How about Patrick Casey, huh?
What a fucking loser.
What a fucking loser.
Loser.
Bro, jumped off the Groyper bandwagon.
This guy is like the biggest nothing in history.
Biggest nothing that has ever breathed on this earth.
He was running Identity Europa, this like white nationalist group, had nothing going for him, made no money, had no bitches, is a dweeb.
Bandwagoned onto my thing.
Even though he had a big problem with me, had a big ship on his shoulder, had all this animosity for me.
When he saw the Groyper thing taking off, he jumped right on the bandwagon, jumped right on the bandwagon and started doing flips and tricks on it like it was nobody's business.
Then when things got a little bit heated, he switched sides like grilled cheese.
Things got a little bit heated and he switched sides.
And so when the government came down, oh, he was running for the Hills.
Oh, extremist politics is over.
And he started trying to get published in Chronicles with Paul Gottfried.
And now it's like, okay, so what are you?
Now you're like a Republican shill.
So you're like pushing 40.
You have no wife, no kids, no money, no income, no job.
Nobody takes you seriously, no legacy.
And you're what?
Now you're a cheerleader for the GOP.
You're not even a radical?
So I look at these people with utter, utter and complete contempt.
They are nothing.
They are nothing.
I don't even think about him.
I see his tweets on the timeline.
I roll my eyes.
They are nothing.
At least John Doyle still has time.
Doyle is still young.
He's a complete moron, but he has time to get it right, get it back on track.
Patrick Casey, what a joke of a human being.
I'll never forget that, by the way.
A lot of the Groypers don't even know what I'm talking about because they all came aboard a year, two years ago.
I'll never forget that.
So amazing.
They could have gotten in on the ground floor of the true revolutionary movement.
We believe in this stuff.
Now he's a cheerleader for the GOP.
He didn't even get his payout.
He said, I got to leave this movement.
I'll never find a wife and I'm broke.
So what?
Does Chronicles pay really well?
How about your buddy Matt Kipta?
Well, I don't know what the DC young Republicans used to pay, but I understand he got let go.
So how's that going for the two of you?
Hey, Matt Kipta, did you get a job in this Trump administration?
I know you couldn't cut it last time, even though you got an interview from your friends.
Did you cut it in this one?
Or what's the next move after DCYR?
Is more money from mommy and daddy in South Carolina?
Fucking loser.
Fucking loser pushing 50.
Anyway, going off a little bit, but it's true.
I got betrayed.
I was backstabbed by my closest friends when shit got heated.
You never forget that.
That's why, you know, people say I'm paranoid, distrusting, crazy.
Well, you know, that's what happens.
That's what happens when you get betrayed by everybody.
Today at work, I had a guy say the entire world is ringing for Trump and the only people that are mad about the war are liberals crazy that strangle hold Fox News and GOP is on people.
I'm not really involved in that controversy because I'm an adult man, you know?
So I see it on TikTok where you get all these man children and they're like, these smart bricks in the new Lego sets.
They talk about play features.
I love the lingo.
I love when you're watching adult men play with toys and they pause and they say things like, it's got play action.
They got great play features like a launchable projectile, but I don't like the smart bricks.
This new Lego set, it's like, brother, you're 35.
Why are we playing with toys?
So I am familiar with it.
These like smart bricks, I guess it's making everything more expensive and they make sounds, but the sounds aren't authentic.
All the fans are bent out of shape because the X-Wing doesn't sound like an X-Wing.
The motion-based sound effects are not movie accurate.
It's just like, I don't know how you become that person.
Yeah, I like Legos when I was a kid, okay?
And I built a set during the pandemic because it was fun.
But people that are like, have a display case full of toys, Funko Pops, and Legos and lightsabers.
It's just like, come on, guys.
We got to grow up a little bit here.
I just don't get that.
I also, when people use Lego as like singular, people say, like, there's this new piece from Lego.
It's Legos, bro.
Yeah, I don't know, man.
That stuff really gets to me.
I don't know how a person like finds themselves in that situation where they wake up one day and they're in a bedroom full of toys and they're an adult.
Do you foresee China making a move in the Indo-Pacific as we transfer resources to Middle East and burning through years through our interceptor missile stockpiles?
My biggest fear is the sleeper cells that may have come from Iran into the United States during Biden's open border, putting American lives at risk now.
NCG sent $200 except today's monologue on the Iran war explicitly insisted that the war has nothing to do with Jews, but it's just good old-fashioned Dashak's geopolitics.
Not shock and awe, because the purpose is not to shock or to awe.
The purpose is using every domain.
It's multi-domain operations, MDO, using multiple domains, cyber, space, air, naval, and ground.
It's using all the intelligence, this fifth-generational warfare, to basically disintegrate all the material, all the personnel in a very short amount of time to prevent a war of attrition.
What are your thoughts on John Kariako saying Israel threatened nuclear war if we didn't intervine further on Iran's nuclear development and Trump slash our military attack to avoid nuclear war slash railways?