TUCKER EXPOSES HUCKABEE??? Israel Ambassador CONDEMNED By Middle East | America First Ep. 1645
Nicholas J. Fuentes critiques Tucker Carlson’s interview with Mike Huckabee, who defended Israel’s biblical claim to Nile-to-Euphrates lands, sparking Middle East backlash. Fuentes dismisses Ashkenazi Jews as "real Jews," mocks anti-Semitic conspiracy theories like Khazarian descent, and alleges 30–40% of U.S. officials are pro-Israel "Groypers." He ties this to AI surveillance, economic decline, and a looming U.S.-Iran war, blaming liberal politicians and foreign influence for domestic chaos while urging listeners to reject "globalism" in favor of radical Americanism. War with Iran is framed as inevitable, with the U.S. prioritizing foreign conflicts over border security and law-and-order, exposing what he calls a systemic betrayal of national identity. [Automatically generated summary]
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
No one's allowed to say that the blood is a quintessential part of this, that the blood of our people is something that is essential.
That we are different.
that america was different because we are different palantir is an ai data analytics company
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithms, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
Thank you so much, everybody.
And I just say, are you trusting the plan for that system?
unidentified
When I get home, I want you.
I got places to be Evening, everybody You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas Jay Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
It's a thinner bump.
You got that back.
That's a thunderbolt.
You got that backpack.
That's a backup.
Are you winning son?
You a boy with the party.
This song don't ask me, I'm too big, bro, shit, this song I'm hungry.
If we don't have freedom on the Internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind raped every day forever.
Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geo location, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you're asleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
You have a smart home, economy of things.
It's like total, like, rape of everybody by the system forever.
My life is like a first-person video game, you know?
We do have to forgive them for their misunderstanding.
And we have to embrace them and say, better late than never.
Welcome to the right side of history.
Welcome to our massive vision, our massive and ambitious vision for how we want the world to be.
unidentified
Hello, I got places to be Evening everybody You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas Jay Quentis.
Have a great show for you tonight.
You got that back, bad, dance for that.
You got that back, bump, that's a lack of bump.
Listen to the cure, listen to the cure, listen to the cure, and then I cry.
All the things you're all the things I've had, running through my head, running through my head, running through my head.
All the things you had, all the things you had, running through my head, running through my head, all the things you had, all the things you had, my mistakes, and all the things you had, When
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and, in some cases, quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
People do not stab young girls on trains because they're born black.
People do not shoot Palestinians in the back of the head or cheer it on just because they're Jewish.
The people that do this are lost.
They have to be isolated and segregated out.
A new consensus must emerge.
Are you in favor of a society with meaning?
A society where life is sacred, where life has sanctity, where people's lives and their dignity and their integrity is respected.
Or are we going to live in a society that is a never-ending war between nihilistic tribes, warlords, savages, pagans?
I see an emerging consensus.
And I think that the mature people that actually love America, actually love our children, the people that recognize the division, the peril that we're in, we need to fortify a new consensus and rally the people of conscience, the people of decency, the people of humanity, the people of charity towards their fellow man,
against those that want to kill us, against those that laugh and celebrate when innocent people are harmed for any reason, for any ideological reason.
Against the people that are cruel, the people that are hateful.
And by that, I mean the people that are really cruel.
the people that say things you disagree with not the people that are provocative not the people that are sometimes angry but the people that are really cruel and really evil
what makes christianity and christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the bearing of suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us An overflowing of love.
An overflowing of self-giving love.
So much of it it cannot be contained.
An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children, even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
That is what makes us different.
That is what makes us good.
Canary Mission Blacklist00:11:51
unidentified
Canary mission
is an Israeli-funded blacklist which, since july 2025, has been confirmed to be used by the Trump administration to target students, professors and professionals who oppose Israel and reside in the United States.
This idea is part of an initiative created by the Heritage Foundation, the same group responsible for the infamous Project 2025.
In their initiative, titled Project Esther, they state that students participating in pro-Palestinian protests and activism are supporting Hamas, a group that the United States designates as a foreign terrorist organization.
Therefore, pro-Palestinian students are considered to be supporting terrorism and are subject to the revocation of visas, frozen bank accounts, asset seizures, and the denial of basic constitutional rights.
In effect, the Canary mission serves as a means to circumvent constitutional protections, allowing the federal government to engage in intelligence gathering activities that would otherwise be considered unlawful.
But the Canary Mission is not alone.
Palantir, another company closely aligned with the state of Israel, uses AI-driven analytics to maintain private databases on U.S. citizens and currently works with four federal agencies.
While government contracting with the private sector is long-standing, the prominent influence of Jewish groups within these increasingly powerful organizations warrants careful examination.
I renew the call for all able-bodied young American men, all of our elite human capital, all of our geniuses, warriors, intelligent people to dedicate themselves to American sovereignty and independence as Christians, as Americans, as white people, as citizens of the United States.
And anybody that settles for anything less is just as much of an enemy.
I would actually consider them worse than our oppressors.
So on Independence Day, it's important to reflect on the fact that we are an occupied nation.
Now, just like then, we're being ruled by a small country across an ocean, serving itself at our expense.
And as long as that is the case, I will always be obsessed with that.
As long as that is the case, I will always be speaking out against that and fighting against that.
And I will always be anchored, understanding that that is the fundamental struggle.
As long as our presidents have to kiss the wall in Israel and wear a small hat, as long as they have to say that we want to make Israel great again and they're the greatest country ever, I will never be okay with that.
Ever.
And it doesn't matter what they offer me or us.
It doesn't matter how they might try to placate us or appease our interests, the concessions they'll make.
Barack Obama created the joint comprehensive plan of action, the JCPOA, or the Iranian nuclear deal.
And Barack Obama brought together China, Russia, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the European Union to enforce a nuclear deal that restricts Iran's enrichment of uranium.
The early talks were conducted in secret, and the Israelis were furious, furious about this.
They hated Obama.
Netanyahu went to a joint session of Congress and gave a speech in defiance of the American president and its nuclear deal, and Congress gave 37 standing ovations.
This is the background of Trump's first election.
2016 election happens.
Trump gets elected with the help of the Israelis.
You don't believe me?
There's a whole article about it.
It's an excerpt from James Bamford's book, Spy Fail.
It goes into great detail about the hidden collusion in the 2016 election.
It wasn't Trump and Russia.
It was Trump and Israel.
And why was Israel so hell-bent on getting a Republican elected in 2016?
In 2018, Donald Trump declares the IRGC, the Revolutionary Guard, which is the military of the regime, a terrorist group.
Green likes that group for sanctions, for attacks.
Now the United States is in a shadow war with Iran.
It culminates by January 2020 in the assassination of Qasim Suleimani.
Suleimani was the architect of the axis of resistance.
Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Suleimani built all of it.
Are you starting to see Obama had this solved?
He made the deal.
The Israelis hated him for it.
They colluded with Trump to get him elected so that Trump would do maximum pressure and create a ladder of escalation, pulling us out of the deal, declaring the IRGC terrorists, then killing its leader, putting sanctions on the regime.
This is a war that started a long time ago, that Trump made hot in 2018 and has been going on for seven years.
That's the nature of forever wars.
Just like in Iraq, which went from 1990 until today, just like Libya, which went from 2011 to today.
Syria, which went from 2011 to today, and Iran, which went from 2018 until today.
That's the nature of forever wars.
And if you're not paying attention to those underlying forces, you're going to fall for it again and again.
You're going to be surprised and confused and coping over and over.
And people are just tripping over themselves to do it again.
I'm like two seconds out from just joining the Jews at this point.
It's like I started out like the Jews are oppressing us, then it's like, no, no, the Jews are oppressing all of you.
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and, in some cases, quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day inadvertently with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
unidentified
Hello, I got places to be Good evening everybody You're watching America First.
that america was different because we are different palantir is an ai data analytics company
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithm, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
Thank you so much, everybody.
Can I just say, are you trusting me in that sense?
unidentified
I want nothing but a red and out of patience.
She told me I'd be shutting in the limit.
When I get home, I want you.
Hello, I got places to be Good evening everybody You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas Jay Fuentes.
Have a great show for you tonight.
Are you winning son?
This song don't let me promise you to somebody America first.
If we don't have freedom on the internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind raped every day forever.
Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geo-location, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you're asleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
You have a smart home, economy of things.
It's like total, like, rape of everybody by the system forever.
My life is like a first-person video game, you know?
In the end, it was only to themselves they had lied.
Lied, lied.
whoop diddy whoop scoop Poop poop scoop diddy whoop whoop diddy scoop whoop diddy scoop My love has got no money, he's got his strong beliefs My love has got no power, he's got his strong beliefs My love has got no fame, He's got his strong beliefs.
My love has got no money, he's got his strong beliefs.
Want more and more.
People just want more and more freedom and love What he's looking for.
More and more People just want more and more freedom and love What he's looking for, Freed from desire, Mind and senses purified, freed from desire.
Mind and senses purified, freed from desire.
Mine and senses purified, freed from desire.
There is something involved where we have to forgive them.
We do have to forgive them for their misunderstanding.
And we have to embrace them and say, better late than never.
Welcome to the right side of history.
Welcome to our massive vision, our massive and ambitious vision for how we want the world to be.
unidentified
Good evening, everybody.
You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas Jay Quentin.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Listen To The Cure00:02:45
unidentified
You got that back, bad, that's a bump.
You got that back, but that's a bump.
Listen to the cure, listen to the cure, listen to the cure, and then I cry.
Running through my head, running through my head, running through my head.
All the things you had, all the things I've had, running through my head, running through my head, all the things you had, all the things you had.
All the things that had, all the things you had, all the things you've had, all the things you had, all the things you've had, all the things you had, all the things you had.
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and, in some cases, quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Monday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight, lots you get into.
Big show.
Our featured story tonight, we're going to be talking all about Tucker Carlson's interview with Mike Huckabee.
Have you guys seen this?
Or I should say, did you see it before it was taken down?
And we'll get into that a little bit.
Actually, it seems that the original interview was actually removed because Tucker Carlson made potentially a libelous allegation against the president of Israel, said that he was on Epstein Island.
He, in fact, was not, or at least he claims he wasn't.
So they actually wound up having to pull it.
But in any case, there was a huge interview.
We may get into that later in the show.
I don't think it's that important.
We're going to be talking all about this wide-ranging interview between the U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, and Tucker Carlson.
Some very interesting stuff.
And obviously, it was a bombshell.
The biggest aspect of it that I want to get into tonight is about this claim regarding Greater Israel.
And I got to give credit where it's due.
You know, I'm not Tucker's biggest fan, and we have kind of a feud going lately.
But I will say, the biggest single aspect of this interview is that it exposed, I think, explicitly, maybe for the first time, the Greater Israel project.
And to his credit, Tucker flipped this whole narrative about Israel's right to exist on its head.
And it's something actually that we've discussed on this show at great length.
Whenever you talk about Israel, whenever you talk about Palestine, the war with Iran, any of this stuff, and specifically whenever anybody criticizes Israel, you get hit with this question.
People say, well, does Israel have a right to exist?
And then that's typically followed by, well, if Israel has a right to exist, does it have the right to defend itself?
And that's typically followed by, therefore, Israel can do whatever it wants.
They can genocide people, kill civilians, preemptive strikes, you name it.
And we've talked about that actually specifically on the show last week.
What was amazing in this interview is that Tucker actually got to the center of that question, Israel's right to exist.
And where does that actually come from?
And the answer was very interesting.
Mike Huckabee had a two-part answer.
He said, in the first place, there's international law, which makes sense.
Modern countries and borders and states are established by international agreements, peace agreements after wars, diplomatic conventions.
But the big one, and this is what makes Israel unique, Israel's right to exist, they claim, derives from the Bible.
There is a God-given right for Israel, according to the Jews, according to the modern-day Zionists.
What's interesting, though, about that claim and about that God-given legal right to exist is that it isn't just for the modern territory that Israel controls.
It's actually for like the entire Middle East.
It's for half of Egypt.
It's for the Sinai.
It's for some of Saudi Arabia, some of Iraq, all of Jordan, I think all of Lebanon or most of it, right up through into central Syria.
And so what's very interesting in the interview is Tucker said, okay, well, if Israel has this right to exist, and where does that right come from?
If it comes from the Bible, then who is to say that Israel doesn't have a claim to the whole territory, to the whole Middle East?
Mike Huckabee's answer was even more interesting.
He said, well, they do have a right to it.
As a matter of fact, Israel has a right to everything west of the Jordan River.
So that's modern-day Israel and the occupied territories of Palestine.
But also, Huckabee seemed to be saying they also have a right to the rest.
And the rest is, like I said, all those countries.
That's like most of the modern Middle East or something like half of it.
And it seemed that very quickly he recognized the problem.
He recognized the mistake he made and he tried to walk it back and said, well, you know, I don't think they're really going to do that.
And I don't think they're going to go for that.
That's not really in the cards.
But it doesn't change the fact that that is actually what a lot of Israelis believe.
That's what the founders of the state of Israel believe.
There's actually a whole ideology named after this.
It's called revisionist Zionism.
And they believe that Israel is everything west and east of the Jordan River, everything from the Nile to the Euphrates.
And if that's the basis of Israel's statehood, this biblical claim, well, then this is an intellectual problem that Zionists have to deal with when they're defending Israel.
Who is to say that they don't have a claim and that they might not lay claim to it or pursue that claim in the future if it comes from the same place as this right to exist?
So that was truly spectacular.
And we'll talk about it tonight.
This has drawn condemnation from almost all the countries in the Middle East, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Qatar, the Arab League, organization of the Islamic Conference.
This has provoked now an international incident.
So, credit where it's due, I think Tucker did a phenomenal job, fantastic job.
It wasn't, I don't think, as good as it could have been.
I'll be a little bit, I'm going to nitpick a little bit.
But I do think that by itself is a massive victory and a very important development.
It's a very important refinement in the conversation about Israel because it's a question that needs to be answered.
If Israel has this right to exist, what actually does that entail?
What are they entitled to in terms of security guarantees, weapons, land, support, all of it?
That's a question that needs to be answered by the pro-Israel camp.
Now, here's the second thing we have to get into.
And I think this was a serious mistake.
I don't think this is nitpicking.
And this is also having to do with the interview.
During the interview, and this didn't provoke as much of a response, but I think it raises an eyebrow because this is a narrative I see everywhere now.
And I see it being promoted by some of the most prominent critics of Israel.
During the same interview, Tucker raised the question of, and this is again related to the claim of Israel's right to exist.
Tucker questioned whether the modern day people of Israel, those who claim to be the Jews, the same Jews with continuity going back to the Old Testament, and therefore that claim that was given to Abraham for all this land, Tucker questioned whether the modern day Jews are those same Jews.
Are they the same people?
Is the modern day state of Israel comprised of the same people with the same ancestry, the same patronage, or I should say, I don't know what the word would be for that, but you understand they descend from those people.
And then therefore, is this the same Israel?
Is this actually the same kingdom they're seeking to establish from the Old Testament?
And he said about this, and specifically regarding Bibi Netanyahu, he said that these people that have moved to Israel from Central and Eastern Europe, these so-called Ashkenazi Jews, he said they are from Poland.
He said they're not from the Middle East.
They're not Middle Easterners.
And so the implication is maybe they're not the real Jews.
Maybe they're not the real people of the book.
Maybe they don't have actually a claim to the land.
And this is a question which I see being raised not just by Tucker, but also by Candace Owens and Ron Uns and by Alexander Dugan and many others in the Israel critical space.
This is something you see and hear all the time.
They say that Israel is not made up of real Jews.
And by real Jews, again, they mean people that come from the Middle East.
They mean the people of Abraham and Moses, the people that fled Egypt, the people that established the kingdom of Israel that were expelled by the Roman Empire.
There is this persistent narrative that those people are lost.
And the people in Israel now are interlopers.
And how exactly they came to identify as Jews, that's a matter of contention.
And some say they are Khazarians.
Khazarians are this Turkic steppe people from Central Asia that came to identify as Jewish during the Middle Ages.
And they settled in Central and Eastern Europe.
And this is from where the Ashkenazi Jews came.
This is one of the ideas.
Other people say maybe it has nothing to do with the Khazarians, but Ashkenazi Jews just aren't Jewish at all.
And it's some kind of elaborate LARP.
It's some kind of case of mistaken identity.
And not only is this false, this is totally false.
This is just scientifically disproven.
There has been now a massive amount of literature created on this.
There's been a lot of genetic testing and a lot of science.
And there's a lot of data out there which show that Ashkenazi Jewish people have Levantine DNA.
They do have the same DNA as people from the Middle East 2,500 years ago.
So this has been debunked.
This is not any theory which is supported by evidence.
There's no intellectual rigor there.
This is something that was invented about 100 years ago.
And now that we have modern genetic testing, which is widespread, this has been thoroughly debunked.
And not only is this false, but I think it's a very pernicious and harmful narrative.
And I also question if there's a political motivation there.
Because if the people in Israel are not the Jews, well, then what does that make them actually?
I guess then they're just white people.
And I really don't like the implication there because you hear this in a lot of left-wing circles.
In a lot of left-wing anti-Zionist, anti-racist circles, guys like Max Blumenthal and some of the other usual suspects, this narrative is very popular.
And they say that what Israel really is, is a settler colonialist project by white people.
If Netanyahu is just some Polish person, well, then he's just some white person from Europe who doesn't belong there.
Then he's just another colonizer.
He's just another white colonizer that is oppressing indigenous brown people.
And you hear this, again, this is very common among the left anti-racist, anti-Zionist circles, because this is part of their broader narrative, which is anti-white and anti-colonial.
So they will say that Netanyahu is just another white supremacist who's lost, just another white supremacist settler from Europe who doesn't belong in the Middle East.
And not only does that then become an attack on white people, but it takes away from what Israel really is, which is Jewish supremacy.
Netanyahu is a Jew.
The Israelis are Jews.
The Ashkenazim are Jews.
The Zionist project is based on Jewish mythology.
And the way in which they treat the native people is based on Jewish chauvinism, which is sourced from the Old Testament.
It comes straight out of the Jewish Bible.
It comes straight out of the Talmud.
When the Hebrew Bible is telling them, genocide, Amalek, kill the women, kill the children, kill everybody.
And the Talmud says you have to spit on idolaters, kill idolaters, all that sort of stuff.
And then in the modern state of Israel, they're murdering civilians.
And Netanyahu says that's Amalek.
Palestine is Amalek.
Well, you can see there is a genetic lineage that goes back to Israel and there is an intellectual lineage that goes back to the Jews.
So I don't like this.
This is not true.
And this is a deception.
This is a false narrative.
And I don't think that's innocent.
I don't think that's a mistake.
That's not an oopsie.
So we'll talk more about that.
But that'll be our big story for tonight.
I was going to talk a little bit about the tariffs.
We're probably not going to get into that because we have a ton of stuff to talk about.
I do want to also talk a little bit about the war in Iran, which seems to be upcoming.
We're not going to spend a ton of time on this tonight because we spent all week talking about Iran.
There's really not much more to add right now.
We'll talk a little bit about it at the beginning of the show, and then we'll spend the bulk of the time talking about this Tucker Huckabee interview because it's a big deal.
But before we do, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble, smash the like button, leave a comment, let me know what you think about the show.
Check out our merch store at Fuentes.store.
And I actually have, finally, so we have the hats.
We have the America First hat.
We have the Groyper in Abundance hat.
We have the Goyam in Abundance, Grouper Intelligence Agency hat.
And we also just got this in.
We have our beware of foreign influence flag.
And it's a little big, kind of cumbersome, but I'll try to show it to you.
So we also have our brand new, you know, we've had these on the store for a long time, but I didn't have one myself.
First thing I want to talk about is about the situation with Iran.
And we've been talking about this for the past couple of weeks.
It's very obvious where this is headed.
You see what is happening.
We currently have, according to the experts, 45 to 50% of our deployable air power in the Middle East right now.
Half, half of our, not all of our air assets, but half of all of our deployable air power is in the Middle East right now.
And if you go on any of the Newswire channels, you see the buildup.
It is refueling aircraft.
It's cargo aircraft, strike aircraft, bombers.
It's two aircraft carriers, 13 missile destroyers.
It's a lot of hardware.
And it's pretty clear what's up, which is that we are mobilizing for war.
Now, as we've discussed over the past couple of weeks on this show in great detail, the question remains whether we are going in, when we're going in, to accomplish what and how ground power or air power, or both.
Is it a regime change, decapitation strike, or is it a sustained operation to degrade their capabilities?
Or is it some kind of narrow, limited strike to get them to the table?
And what is the goal?
Is it to extract a deal?
Is it because we are now set on toppling the regime?
There's a lot of questions about this.
And I'm not going to actually contribute anything more to that conversation tonight.
We haven't learned anything new over the weekend.
There's been some discussion.
They now say that there may be a third round of talks on Thursday in Geneva in Switzerland.
They say that the ambassador from Oman will be delivering a response to America's demands from Iran within the next 24 hours.
So it's a very dynamic situation.
It seems like there still is some negotiation occurring, or at least there's a dialogue, but not much has changed.
We continue to see, again, massive deployment, massive mobilization, and all signs point toward there's going to be some kind of a military action.
Again, the question is just timing, mode, and the goal.
All that being said, I put this out on Twitter today.
It's important to take a step back and really consider the entire situation.
I like to say on the show all the time that everything is related to everything else.
And I think about what this says about the Trump administration.
Because at the same time that we have half of our Air Force in the Middle East, and we have two carrier strike groups, we have the Patriot missile batteries and the FAD systems, and we're moving our military all over the place, pulling out of Syria, moving our troops out of Iraq.
We are literally moving heaven and earth here.
And the latest is that Trump is furious that our military capabilities are so limited.
He wants to go in heavy and hard, and he wants to topple the government in a short amount of time with a massive use of force.
And he's frustrated that it seems that we have a limited ability to do that.
That however we go in, it's going to be a protracted conflict.
There's going to be other additional elements that will have to come into play, like some kind of ground force.
And it's going to be very complicated.
But you take a step back and consider.
At the same time that we have this Herculean effort to overthrow the government in Iran, think about what cannot be accomplished in the United States.
We had 3,000 ICE agents and border patrol in Minneapolis.
Think about this.
How many National Guard did we ever deploy to any of the Democrat cities?
I think we had 300 in Chicago at one point.
We had a few hundred in Minneapolis.
Couldn't even sustain that.
So I said this on Twitter.
At the same time, that half of our armed forces is in the Middle East for yet another regime change war for Israel.
We can't even deploy 5,000 National Guard and Border Patrol put together to liberate an American city.
Minneapolis is controlled by Somali scammers working with the Democrat Party machine in the city, working with the shithead radical left communists that are agitating in the streets.
Hollywood, the media, they have control over Minneapolis.
Who runs one of the nicest states in the country with the best health care and education and government efficacy?
Who runs that state?
Well, it's Jacob Fry who said, get the fuck out of our city, ICE.
And it's Tim Walz.
And it's a bunch of Africans that are Muslim that shouldn't even be here and illegal immigrants and communists, like those idiots that got killed by ICE and Border Patrol.
That's who runs America.
That is a sampling of who runs our country.
Who runs Chicago?
This militant black communist, Brandon Johnson, and the gangbangers and the burglars and the carjackers and criminals.
Who runs New York?
Muslim socialist, the fucking homeless that are everywhere, that are in the subway, that are leaping over the turnstiles, won't pay the fare.
That's who runs.
This is who runs America.
This is who runs the United States.
And for most of the country's population, that is who runs your government.
That is who runs your economic center.
Most of the population lives in these Democrat shitholes or near them in a big Democrat state controlled by a major Democrat city with a huge Democrat state government.
And that's who's pulling the strings there.
Liberal billionaires, city machine politics, these deadbeats that work for the Democrat Party, radical college students, and the illegal immigrants, the foreigners.
This is who runs America.
This is where all the tax dollars go.
Apparently, that is who controls the major cities.
They have veto power over borders and immigration law.
And you can't deploy a thousand National Guard to even one of them.
You can't deploy a few thousand Border Patrol and ICE to even one of them.
Tried it.
Sent the National Guard and ICE and Border Patrol to some of the cities.
And what happened?
They got bitched.
They got resisted.
They got shoved out.
And ultimately, they retreated and surrendered and said, you know what?
You have it.
That's what happened in LA with the riots.
That's what happened in Chicago when people rioted outside the detention facility in Broadview.
That's what happened in Minneapolis.
So Trump tried to fight for regime change in our country, where maybe we would be able to walk the city streets at night safely from criminals and vagabonds, where we could have borders, not be inundated with illegal immigrants, so we could fight corruption, not have all our tax dollars stolen by African Muslims that are here on TPS.
That didn't work.
And Trump gave up after a year.
And I say that, by the way, as a resident of a suburb outside Chicago.
And I had some expectation.
I didn't vote, so I didn't have very high expectations that Trump might actually use our military and security and police power to restore order in America, in Chicago, in LA, in Minneapolis, in New York.
And not just the law and order and the public transit, but also on the immigration front, you know, that we would actually have a country.
But year in, we don't have it.
At the same time, and this is really the gut punch, at the same time that we are being told by our America first president, no, we can't restore order in Chicago, too complicated.
We can't restore order in Minneapolis.
The protesters are too fierce.
We have half of the fucking military in the Middle East again.
Really?
How insane is that?
Go and look at a globe.
Go on Google Maps and look at how big the oceans are.
How big is the Pacific Ocean?
How big is the Atlantic Ocean?
And we have half of our military on the other side of the planet, locked and loaded, getting ready for this huge undertaking, so expensive, so complicated, so risky, so unnecessary to topple another government, you know, because like 10 wasn't enough.
Wasn't enough to do Iraq, Syria, Libya, Lebanon.
None of this was enough.
Egypt, twice, Afghanistan.
Now we got to go into Iran for the benefit of Israel.
What Israel wants, Israel gets.
This has been their mission for 45 years.
They have been pushing us to do this for the last quarter century.
Think about how messed up that is and what they are willing to do.
Get Minneapolis under control?
Can't do it.
Impossible.
Too difficult.
Tim Walz and Jacob Fry and Antifa.
We got to draw this down.
We're going to stick to deporting only the criminal legals.
This is too difficult.
Oh, but the 1 million man Iranian Revolutionary Guard and military country and 90 fucking million people on the other side of the planet.
Well, it's going to be tough, but no one ever said it would be easy.
What?
How can anybody claim at this point, seriously, that this administration is America first?
I just don't even know how you could say that with a straight face.
And I see it on the timeline all day long because I'm complaining about this.
I've been talking about this on my show, on Twitter.
I say, look, MAGA is dead.
It's over.
This was supposed to be a movement for the forgotten men and women.
We got forgotten.
It was supposed to be about putting America first and redirecting our attention inward towards our problems as citizens rather than outwardly towards the world's problems and other countries' problems.
All you need to do is look at what is happening here.
Leaving Minneapolis, deploying to the Persian Gulf, couldn't hack it fighting Antifa, fighting that nurse and the lesbian poet.
You know, that was too dangerous.
But we're over there fighting Iran's million-man army.
All you need to do is look at what's happening.
And yet you have Trump's biggest defenders on Twitter every day saying, don't blackpill.
If you're not on board with this, well, you're not serious.
Grow up.
That's not how politics works.
Tell me then, please, how politics works.
I'm waiting for Trump's biggest defenders, for JD Vance's biggest defenders.
Tell me how politics works.
At what point do we get what we want?
We voted for law and order and borders how many times since 2016?
Voted for that in 16, 18, 20, 22, 24.
We're coming up on 26.
When do we get it?
When is that even a priority?
When are they even going to try?
I'm really unhappy with what we're getting.
I'm growing impatient.
You tell me now I'm not serious.
I just don't know how it works.
I need to grow up.
We can't just burn it all down.
Okay, well, you tell me at what point do we liberate the country?
At what point do we stop liberating the Middle East and we start liberating us?
We're talking about Iranian protesters and Iranians' aspirations for freedom and Iran.
And okay, what about Minnesota?
What about New York?
What about Illinois?
What about California?
Can we liberate this?
And they say, well, we can't do that.
Surely it's possible.
Surely.
If you could kidnap Maduro, if you could go into Iran and bomb Fordo with a 50,000-pound bomb, if we could have half of our Air Force over there, surely we could handle Minneapolis and St. Paul.
It's not even that big of a city.
Like that's a start.
You know, how many Somalians even live there?
Like 90,000?
Seriously?
So how many are in the Revolutionary Guard?
Half a million?
You can't deport 90,000 Somalis that are just idiots.
They're just like disorganized idiots.
They got bows and arrows.
They don't even have a legal right to be here.
Can't do it.
You know, they're setting up an autonomous zone.
Renee Good, the lesbian, and the other guy, the male nurse, they're setting up an autonomous zone with a couple of garbage cans in the intersection.
Oh my, no, we can't send ICE in there.
Too dangerous.
Yeah, but let's go and fight the whole Middle East again.
Let's go and fight Hezbollah, the Houthis, the PMF, IRGC, the Ayatollah.
They're not even trying.
You know, they're just not even trying to make the case anymore.
And that's when I say I'm out.
I'm for America first.
No regime change in Iran.
Let Israel figure it out.
Let them fight their own war.
Let's figure out what's going on over here.
We should not even be thinking about the Middle East until there are zero Haitians in Springfield, zero Somalis in Minneapolis, zero Venezuelans in Houston.
Then we can figure out, you know, everybody else's issues.
We have the situation in Mexico.
The whole country just blew up, cartel violence.
We have our hands full over here.
So, like I said, I don't really have too much to add in terms of predicting the outcome here.
We don't have a ton of new information.
And we spent all week breaking down the force posture over there and what that indicates about where it's headed.
But at what point do the middle American radicals that served as the base for Trump's movement, at what point do we wake up and realize we are being screwed?
We are not getting what we wanted.
And we have to get up and say that loudly.
We have to let them know.
Who?
The GOP.
Let the Republican Party know.
I'm a voter.
I'm a registered Republican.
I'm not me in particular, but you.
I'm a registered Republican.
I'm a conservative.
I'm a white male.
I'm a Christian.
Maybe I voted for Trump once, twice, three times in the past.
This is bullshit.
This is not what we were promised.
We've been fighting this battle for 10 years now, and we still don't have a border wall.
We have more illegals here now than we did 10 years ago.
That's insane.
If anything, the cities are worse after the summer of love with George Floyd.
Cost of living, it's all worse.
At what point are people going to take their own side, stand up and say, I'm not getting what I voted for.
I'm not voting again.
You didn't earn my vote.
Sorry, you sold me something in 2024.
You didn't deliver it.
I'm not coming out in 2026.
Now, you can figure out what to do after that loss.
GOP has to get obliterated in 26.
They have to be annihilated.
You got to send them a message.
I saw somebody say recently, they said, the GOP is not going to be hurt if you don't vote and they lose their majority.
Yes, they will.
Yes, they will.
And we need to send them home.
Send them home, hurt the GOP, and let them know in 2028, we need a regime change in the Republican Party.
That's the only thing that's going to work for us.
I'm not voting.
I'm not working for the GOP if this is the outcome.
And again, I say that.
I'm a real human being, okay?
I'm a real 27-year-old male paying taxes, white guy, very conservative, partially Hispanic, okay?
Full disclosure, living in Cook County.
Okay, I'm an American.
I'm a constituent.
I'm a citizen.
And life has not gotten better for me in the past 10 years.
There is not any more law and order.
Economy is not better.
There's still tons of illegals.
I am not satisfied.
I'm not happy.
And I should be.
Democrats get elected and look at what they do for their people.
That's all you need to know.
Democrats get elected and they say, how are we going to make health care more affordable for our voters?
I know.
Let's make the Republicans pay for it.
Hey, why not, right?
That's what Democrats do for their people.
Democrats say, we're just going to forgive your student loans.
All these college students and young people that voted for us, yeah, we're just going to eliminate their debt.
Is that good for the country?
I mean, probably not.
I don't know.
But they do things for their voters.
They get elected on affordability, things like that.
They say, We're going to make healthcare affordable.
We're going to wipe out your loans.
We're going to create reparations for blacks.
We're going to allow your immigrant relatives or your foreigner relatives to come in under chain migration.
We're actually going to tangibly do things for you.
Again, I'm not a Democrat.
I think that's ruining the country.
It's not sustainable long term.
But that's just like a taste of what it is to vote for your own interest.
And over here on the GOP side, we make excuses for why we're getting screwed royally.
They're selling us a war with Iran while they're telling us we can't deport people.
But the judges, but the Democrats, but the protesters, you know, problems, always problems.
Topple a government with 90 million people and a million soldiers.
You know, no one ever said it would be easy.
But where there's a will, there's a way.
It will be done, Prime Minister.
It will be done.
Like we are being screwed here.
So people should not lose sight of things.
The timing is very interesting, isn't it?
Pull out of Minneapolis, go to the Persian Gulf.
Yes, just what we ordered, right?
Just what this whole thing was always all about.
Isn't that the conceit of MAGA and Trumpism and America First, ignoring the actual quality of life of native-born people to go fight foreign wars for special interests in Israel?
If that's the program, why didn't we just vote for Jeb Bush?
Why didn't we just vote for Marco Rubio the first time?
What was the point of all of it if this is the outcome?
Am I crazy?
They can spin it any type of way, but there is no border wall.
There are no mass deportations.
We don't even have the tariffs.
What we do have, Assad is gone.
Iran is going like that.
That is what we do have on lock.
Harvard has a Jewish president.
I can sleep easier at night knowing Shabbos Kustenbaum, his conscience will not be offended by the protests against the genocide in Gaza because Harvard now has a Jewish president.
Thank God.
So, anyway, that's the situation in Iran.
But like I said, no other major developments.
We will be watching that very closely throughout the week.
And one thing I will say about it.
So I told you on Thursday, there have been these reports, first in the Wall Street Journal, I believe on Thursday, and then today in the New York Times.
So these are two different reports, but they both say the same thing.
I think in Axios as well.
They say that Trump is considering a limited, narrow strike on Iran to extract capitulation.
Hit Iran very lightly, very softly, in the hopes that Iran will agree to a deal.
And by that, I mean agree to the ultimatum, which is to give up their nuclear enrichment, give up everything, and surrender to the United States.
And then, if that doesn't work, then Trump is considering a more thorough, sustained strike, which is aimed at toppling the government.
And that would be weeks long.
We're talking weeks of heavy, hard air power all the time, blowing up their missile launch platforms, blowing up their Air Force, air defense, government, military leadership, all this stuff, in the hopes that eventually the regime just crumbles.
And that's not really going to work.
I don't believe in that option, but that's sort of the idea.
The only thing that's new is that Trump has now publicly denied these claims.
So this is being said in the Wall Street Journal, in the New York Times, I believe elsewhere too, but these are some exclusives.
And they say Trump wants to do this limited strike.
And then if that doesn't work, then he's going to do more.
Now Trump has said on True Social, that is false.
He said there are no doubts within his camp.
There's no reservations.
He said everybody is on board.
And if we go to war with Iran, then we're going to war.
It's not going to be a wait and see approach.
It's not going to be a surgical strike and then see what happens.
Trump has confirmed it's a deal or it's nothing.
We're either getting a capitulation or we're going to war.
And as you know, as I've said over the past couple weeks, I don't think we're getting a deal.
There's been so much, again, so much talk in the papers about these negotiations and concessions being made and last-ditch diplomatic efforts.
Long story short, when you strip away all of the rumors and hearsay and all this stuff, what you'll find is that at the bottom of it all, the fundamental positions have not changed.
Washington has a red line on enrichment, and so does Iran.
They're just the opposite.
Washington's red line is that Iran must give up enrichment completely.
No token enrichment, no three-year restrictions, none of that.
Washington is demanding give up your entire stockpile and give up enrichment, and that's it.
We can do a consortium in Saudi Arabia.
We can export enriched uranium to you so that we can control it, interdict it if necessary, but we are not letting you have that native capability.
On the flip side, Iran says we are never giving up enrichment.
It is our right.
It is our pride.
We're never giving it up.
The most that they have offered is that they might give up half of their stockpile of highly enriched uranium, and they might agree to temporary reductions in the level of enrichment.
But that is as far as they have taken it so far.
Now, if there's going to be a deal, one of these positions has to change.
Either Iran is going to have to surrender, capitulate, this is the word that Witcoff used, and they're going to have to just give it up and make themselves completely vulnerable and defenseless.
That's one scenario.
Then you have a deal.
In the other scenario, Washington will have to agree to something less than zero enrichment and a total forfeiture of the stockpile.
They're going to have to agree that Iran can enrich at a low level for a period of time in exchange for sanctions relief and monitoring and compliance.
Now, this is how you know that a deal is never going to happen.
At least this is my heuristic.
And I guess time will tell.
This is my insight.
How do you resolve this equation?
The reason that Iran will never give it up is because if they do, they can expect that Israel will go to war anyway.
And that is liable to happen.
Israel will sabotage any deal like that, any deal that doesn't include missiles and proxies.
Israel's going to sabotage anyway.
If Iran gives up its nuclear hedge, that just gives Israel the opportunity to strike Iran with impunity.
And they might do that anyway.
So I don't think it's in the cards that Iran is going to fold.
On the other side, the United States cannot accept anything less than zero enrichment because in 2015, when the United States made the initial Iranian nuclear deal, it was the same program.
Confrontation Over Israel's Representation00:14:39
It was sanctions relief, monitoring and compliance in exchange for temporary reduction in the level of enrichment for uranium.
That was the protocol in 15.
We'll relieve the sanctions.
We'll get your economy going.
But in exchange, we need to ensure that you're not enriching uranium past a certain limit.
That was the original framework in 15.
Now, in the interceding 11 years, Iran has been significantly weakened.
Their proxies have been neutralized.
Their nuclear program has been set back years.
And their missiles, well, we don't know the status of them, but perhaps their offensive and defensive capabilities have been degraded as well.
So the United States cannot, after 10 years, after all this time and all this fighting and sabotage and everything, with Iran much weaker than they were then, cannot now agree to the same deal that allows Iran to have a native enrichment capability.
That will be seen as a strategic defeat.
If we scrapped the original deal because it wasn't good enough, and then we went to war with Iran and we bombed them and sanctioned them and did all these things to them, and they survived and in the end, they got a deal that is as good, if not better than when they started, then that is a major strategic defeat.
And in the end, Iran will be able to claim victory.
We didn't give up our enrichment.
We didn't give up our nuclear program.
We endured the worst of maximum pressure, the worst that the U.S. had to throw at us, and we got what we wanted.
So we cannot come off of that red line.
It's never going to happen, in my opinion.
And that leaves us to a war with Iran.
The question is just when.
When and how and in what way?
That's the only question.
Will there be a decisive air campaign now?
That seems less likely because I don't even think that's possible.
But will there be imminent military action?
That is very likely.
The question is just when does that decisive confrontation occur?
Do we hit Iran really hard now, set him back many years in terms of missiles, nuclear, and the rest of it?
Do we decapitate the regime?
And then maybe a period of time passes where Israel and the United States are backing secessionist groups, anti-government groups of different stripes, liberal groups, maybe different ethnic factions, royalist factions.
You never know.
Maybe we go in, we degrade their security apparatus.
That allows CIA and Mossad to come in, stir the pot, and then you get another round of protests.
And then we topple.
But the point is, a decisive confrontation, military confrontation is all but inevitable.
Again, the question is just what's the timeline?
What's the strategy?
What is the level of U.S. commitment?
And I guess we'll see in the next two weeks what that's going to look like.
But that's the situation in Iran.
Like I said, we'll monitor that.
I do want to move on.
I want to get into our featured story tonight, which is about Tucker Carlson's interview with the U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee.
And this is a very important narrative.
You might not think it's a big deal.
You might not think it's a big news story, but it is a really big deal.
Because as I've said for the past couple years, one of the biggest things that is happening in the world and in the United States is that the American public and the world are turning against Israel and maybe turning against organized Jewry as a force.
And here's the thing about this show: this is maybe the only show that deals in reality.
A lot of people look at my show and they think, oh, that's the Jew show.
That's the show where they talk about Jews and they think Jews run everything.
And that's the flavor of the show.
And I reject this.
That is how someone who considers themselves to be objective or mainstream might look at it.
I look at it almost in reverse.
This is the objective and mainstream show where we talk about the fact, okay, the proven fact that organized Jewry controls the West.
That's not really controversial.
It's not like it's a secret.
They're not hiding it.
It's just true.
Okay.
When you look at the TikTok deal, you see their fingerprints all over it.
It's Larry Ellison.
When you look at the Warner Brothers Paramount acquisition, their fingerprints are all over it.
It's not subtle.
When you look at Harvard, University of Pennsylvania, Columbia, again, they're all over that.
When you look at who propelled Trump into office, almost everything to do with October 7th.
The examples like this are countless.
CBS, APAC, foreign aid, you name it, ADL, trusted flaggers, censorship.
Now, the reason that most shows don't talk about this is because there is a infrastructure in place.
It's like a racket where anybody that acknowledges this or talks about it, I should say, in a bad way, gets utterly destroyed.
They get flagged as an anti-Semite, a Jew hater, isolated, neutralized.
You talk about this topic, you acknowledge its reality, you express that you're unhappy with this predicament or you're critical of it.
Maybe you're just a goy.
Jews can talk about it all day.
If you're a Jew in Hollywood, you can write in the LA Times, Jews run Hollywood.
And they do, and they did.
And you can Google that.
There's an article like that from 15 years ago.
But if you're a goy and you talk about this, big problems.
So you know how the story goes.
You talk about this, you get destroyed.
Consequently, almost no one talks about this.
So why am I discussing this?
Because one of the biggest developments in the past couple years is that people are starting to become aware of this predicament that we are in.
For many years, there was a silence and Omerta around this subject because of censorship, blacklisting, cancel culture, whatever you want to call it.
You know what it looks like.
You know what it is.
And now all of a sudden, everybody is aware Jews run the West.
China runs China.
Russia runs Russia.
Muslims run Iran.
Jews run the West.
They run America.
They run Europe.
And you can't fuck with them because they have all the power.
And if you have a problem with them, they destroy you.
They use that power to hurt you.
And it's only recently that people are becoming hip about AIPAC and Israel's wars and the influence of Mossad and Jewish billionaires and their predilection for their motherland, for the mothership, and the cancellation apparatus, which is a part of it also.
Now, how we talk about this issue is almost just as important as the fact that we are talking about it.
It's very important, in other words, that we get it right.
How do we unring the bell?
How do we undo this situation?
How do we get to a point where Americans are in control of America?
America First Patriots are in control of America.
Well, we have to identify the problem, and then we have to become conscious of it and organize politically against it.
That's a solution from a very stripped down point of view.
Now, to this point, we have this interview between Tucker Carlson and Mike Huckabee.
And as you know, Tucker is one of the most prominent critics of Israel.
And many people consider him to be a force for the truth and a force for good.
He's bringing awareness to the subject.
He's driving this conversation forward.
He has a massive platform, a lot of credibility coming from Fox News.
And he's using that platform to shine a spotlight on this issue.
He's talking about it in a very frank way.
So people say he's one of the good guys.
Now, to that end, he had this interview with the U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, and Tucker really put the screws in him.
As you may or may not know, Mike Huckabee is a Christian Zionist.
So from the point of view of his theology, he is literally a religious zealot.
Even though he's a Christian, he worships Israel, worships the modern Jewish state of Israel, worships modern Jews.
He believes in a certain interpretation of biblical prophecy.
He believes that the people that call themselves Jews today have some special role in the end of the world.
And so we basically have to treat them as though they are our betters.
And it doesn't matter what they do and what they say and how wicked they are and how much they hate us or take advantage of us.
We have to look at them as God's chosen people.
And even though we have problems with them now, in the end, the prodigal son, they're going to all come back and they're going to be reconciled and it's all going to.
And so this is their belief.
Now, think of it.
This is actually a very perverse situation when you consider it.
Because the purpose of an ambassador is they're supposed to represent our interests to that other country.
We have an ambassador in France.
They're supposed to represent American interests in Paris.
We have an ambassador to the United Kingdom.
They're supposed to represent our interest to that country.
But if our ambassador to Israel has a religious idolatry of Israel, well, like, who's this guy working for?
Is he working for us or is he working for them?
Is his job to represent the interest of Americans to the Jews in Israel?
Well, if he's a Christian Zionist and he literally worships the Jews in Israel, I don't know.
Seems like they're kind of his boss.
Seems like they kind of outrank the government here.
And so in reality, his job is to represent Israel to us.
And you can see that in the way that he talks and the stuff that he does.
And this is some of what Tucker highlighted during the interview.
This is well known in these circles.
If you know anything about Huckabee, he's from the South.
He's from Arkansas.
He believes in this dispensationalist Christian theology.
He's from Fox News like Tucker.
And so we know what he's about.
Tucker is shining a spotlight on this very perverse situation.
It's actually a scandal.
And no matter how you cut it, it's deeply wrong and messed up.
And you could say that as a first principle, our government represents our interests.
And insofar as our constitutionally created representative government hires, nominates ambassadors, secretaries, other personnel, you know, those people, their job is to represent us too.
So whether that ambassador is to Israel or anywhere else, his job is to represent our representative constitutional government.
It's not an Israel thing.
It's not a Jew thing.
You could say from a first principle, this is all wrong.
Our ambassador to China should represent us.
Our ambassador to Japan, Brazil, Mexico should represent us.
You don't get some Mexican flag waving Mexican patriot who is still mad about the Mexican war with America to represent us in Mexico City.
No, no, you get an American.
Similarly, it follows with Huckabee.
So Tucker does this interview to shine a light on this, and he does a pretty good job, I think.
He is really putting the screws in Huckabee.
The pressure's up.
He's asking intense questions.
And one of the best parts of the interview is this.
We'll talk about some of the good things and some of the bad things.
I think the highlight is that Tucker highlighted one of the, he highlighted this arrangement in general.
But more than that, he highlighted something which is very interesting about Israel.
You know, when you talk about Israel, you can't talk about it like any other country.
If we were to talk about Germany and Italy and Denmark, right-wing people like to say, well, those are their own countries.
They have their own problems.
They should defend themselves.
NATO should maybe increase their defense budget.
If they're so afraid of Russia, they should field their own army.
They should make their own tanks and missiles and airplanes and so on.
When it comes to Israel, however, and our obligation to defend them, and when it comes to Israel's conduct in war and diplomacy, people like to say, well, they are special.
They're different.
And what you tend to hear when you talk about this is, well, Israel has this right to exist.
That is their go-to.
That is literally their playbook.
And I'm not making this up.
They have a playbook.
They literally do market research.
How do we deal with these conversations?
Who's we?
Any Jew.
How do pro-Israel Jews deal with these conversations?
When the Goyim ask us, you know, why are we defending you?
Why are we fighting your wars?
What do we say?
Well, the Jews, like a science, they figured out, here's how we short-circuit that discussion.
They say, yeah, well, but does Israel have a right to exist?
And you kind of go, wait, I don't know.
Let me think about that for a moment.
Because if you say no, then what are you saying?
That Israel should be annihilated?
Do you think that they should be genocided and wiped off the map?
I don't think anyone supports that.
I don't think I should say almost anybody supports that in America, at least.
I don't think most people would say, yeah, they should all be annihilated with nuclear bombs.
So you go, I don't know if the answer is no, but you also don't want to say yes, because if you say yes, then it's like, now am I involved in a chain of questioning?
Clearly, they're not asking that question in good faith.
Well, does Israel have a right to exist?
Well, I don't really know what that means to affirm that.
I mean, does anyone have a right to exist?
Do I have a right to exist?
What does that entail?
I have a right to exist.
You're making me nervous.
Can I now kill you?
Can I slit your throat because I feel uncomfortable?
Is my right to exist limitless?
Is it not bounded by anything?
Like, how do we think about these things?
So it's sort of, but now we're thinking about everything else.
Whereas we were talking about the genocide and the massacre and all these kinds of things.
Now we're thinking about this abstract question about natural law.
And so they say, does Israel have a right to exist?
And you go, I guess.
And they go, okay, well, then they have a right to defend themselves, don't they?
Palestine doesn't think they have a right to exist.
And then you're walking down this path towards if Israel has a right to exist, then it can defend itself.
If it can defend itself, then it can do whatever it thinks is necessary for its security.
And maybe that means deporting every Palestinian, and maybe that means killing everybody.
And maybe that means a genocide.
And they, in a perverted, twisted logic, they get you to this point where you're saying, oh, well, you know, maybe it's okay.
Well, Tucker flips that on its head.
And Tucker presses Huckabee and says, okay, so he's pressing Huckabee on these questions.
What is a Christian Zionist?
What is a Zionist?
And Huckabee falls back on the old classic.
Huckabee says, well, does Israel have a right to exist?
I'm a Christian.
I'm a Zionist.
What is a Zionist?
It means Israel has a right to exist.
Do you think Israel has a right to exist?
And Tucker throws it back on Huckabee, pause, and says, well, what does that mean?
Where does this right come from?
And now Huckabee is on the back foot and says, oh, well, you know, it comes from international law.
And Tucker goes, oh, international law, really interesting.
You know, those things that Israel breaks all the time.
Funny you mentioned that.
International law.
Oh, you mean those things that Israel like breaks constantly since they came into existence?
You sure about that?
Huckabee goes, well, you know, there's like these conventions and there's the Balfour Declaration and there's this and this and stumbles all over that answer.
And then Huckabee arrives at maybe the more important question, the central question.
Huckabee says they have a biblical right to exist.
It's a God-given right.
Why?
Because God told the Jews in the Old Testament, this is all yours.
And so that's their promised land.
We were promised this land six million years ago.
So it's ours.
Now we can kill anybody that gets in our way because of that.
We were promised this land.
Now get the fuck out of the way or we'll kill you.
As a matter of fact, we'll kill everybody.
We'll kill the whole world because it's ours.
Who cares?
We haven't been here for 2,000 years.
We're here to collect.
So Huckabee says it's because God promised Abraham this land.
Be fruitful and multiply.
This land belongs to your descendants.
And Tucker points out a problem with this land grant from God.
He says, well, you know, actually in the book of Genesis, there is a deed that God gives the Jewish people, and it talks about the specifications of the land.
If you say that Israel has their right to exist from God, well, let's talk about God's right that he gave them.
Because if you read the fine print, what it says is that Israel is entitled to everything from the Nile River in Egypt all the way to the Euphrates River in Syria.
So do they have a right to all of that?
If Israel has a right to exist and its right to exist comes from the Old Testament, well, if the Old Testament says their right is good from these two rivers, from the Nile to the Euphrates, then where does it end?
Do they have a right to the modern-day state of Jordan and Lebanon and Syria and Iraq and Saudi Arabia and Egypt?
Because if that's where you're sourcing this land claim, then clearly you would have to say that they do.
It's the word of God, after all, isn't it?
It's the inspired scripture.
And this is the story.
This is from Politico.
It turns out that the Arab countries didn't like the answer.
Mike Huckabee says, well, yeah.
He says, yeah, they do.
Israel does have a right to all of that.
Israel has a right to all those countries.
And Tucker goes, Really?
Huckabee goes, Well, you know, I don't think they're going to take that.
And that's not really what they're talking about now.
Tucker says, Well, you just said they have a right to it.
And now, understandably, almost every Muslim country mentioned in this has condemned the U.S. ambassador to Israel.
This is from Politico.
It says, quote, pardon me, I actually have the wrong story up.
It says, quote, Arab and Muslim nations condemned comments by the U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, who said Israel has a right to much of the Middle East.
Huckabee made the comments in an interview with Tucker Carlson that aired on Friday.
Carlson said that according to the Bible, the descendants of Abraham would receive land that today would include essentially the entire Middle East and asked Huckabee if Israel had a right to all of that land.
Huckabee replied, quote, it would be fine if they took it all.
It would be fine if they took it all, he said.
However, Huckabee added that Israel was not looking to expand its territory and has a right to security in the land that it legitimately holds.
Really, they're not looking to expand its territory.
So, what do you call civilian settlements then?
What has Israel actually done other than expand since 1948, since 1900, since 1893?
What are you talking about?
Israel's not looking to expand.
Do you mean like that far yet?
What do you mean Israel's not looking to expand?
That's all it does.
That's all they, what did they do in 67 other than expand into Gaza, the West Bank, the Sinai, the Golan?
That's all that they do.
What do you call a civilian settlement in the West Bank other than expansion?
What do you call what they're doing right now in Syria when the Assad regime fell and they blew up all their hardware and then Israel just kept going into the suburbs of Damascus and into the Druze-occupied southern Syria?
What do you call that other than expansion?
What is it when they're bombing Iran, bombing Iraq, bombing Syria, bombing Yemen?
What else would you call that?
So he goes, Well, they have a right to it, but they're not looking to expand.
And the little qualifier that he left off is: well, they're not looking to expand to those places right now.
But he's effectively acknowledging if they wanted it, he would defend their claim to it.
So, what is that?
And what does that say about our foreign policy?
U.S. foreign policy says and dictates we want stability in the Middle East.
What is our end game in the Middle East?
Well, considering that there is so much energy there, oil and natural gas, our interest is that that region is stable so that commerce is uninterrupted.
Trade routes are uninterrupted in the Red Sea and in the Persian Gulf.
We want the Strait of Hormuz clear.
We want the Bab el-Mandeb and the Suez Canal clear, and we want the oil to flow.
And to that end, we want stability.
What's more, our real geostrategic interests are now in the Indo-Pacific.
Now it matters far more defending the first island chain in the Pacific.
The Strait of Malacca is more important now, maybe than the Strait of Hormuz.
And so we're actually looking to extricate ourselves from that region through collective security arrangements.
Same thing in Europe.
We want to hand off deterrence against Russia to NATO in Europe.
We would like to hand off stability, anti-terrorism in the Middle East to our allies there.
And Israel is not our only ally.
As a matter of fact, they're not even the most important ally.
We're handing off those obligations to Egypt, to Saudi Arabia, to Qatar, Turkey, which is a NATO country.
So there are other countries in the Middle East.
To the extent that we have an ambassador in Israel, he should be in lockstep with our foreign policy, which is we want to end conflicts.
We don't want adventurism.
We don't want revanchism, expansion.
We don't want revision.
We want status quo.
And so our end game should be: we want Syria to stabilize.
We want Iraq to stabilize.
We want those borders to be fixed and defended and permanent.
So in other words, if there are people in Israel, and there are, that have designs and aspirations to go to war with all their neighbors and expand their territory, that is against our interests.
To go to war in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Egypt, wherever else, to dominate the region, that is destabilizing.
That is contrary to our interests.
For Israel to be unchained, to pursue regional hegemony is destabilizing.
That is diametrically opposed to what is best for us and what we want.
And yet, our ambassador to Israel seems to have not just Israel's foreign policy, but literally the most expansionist version of it.
Think about that.
It's not just that Huckabee is gung-ho about taking Gaza and taking the West Bank, which he is.
He says, we shouldn't even say Gaza and West Bank.
We should say Judea and Samaria.
We shouldn't even say Palestinian.
You know, that isn't real.
So he not only has Israel's foreign policy in the things they're currently doing, he has Israel's foreign policy in all the things their most radical members want to do in a long timeline.
In other words, that would be like if Israel's ambassador to the United States was like some manifest destiny nutjob like me that wants to invade the entire Western hemisphere.
That's my Cuckabee.
He says, well, they have a right to take Iraq, the Sinai, Egypt, Saudi, Jordan.
They have a right to all of that.
And I would support them taking it because it's theirs, because God gave it to them, you know, but they're not doing that right now.
So why even talk about it?
Why talk about it?
What are you doing working for us?
Isn't that insane that you're an Israeli partisan?
You're a Jewish nationalist.
And this is the tension.
Are you a Jewish nationalist or are you an American nationalist?
Because these are two different nations.
And when I say Jewish nationalist, do not mistake what I mean.
I don't mean Zionist.
There is a Jewish nation.
It is transnational.
Jewish nationality, feelings of peoplehood, feelings of togetherness.
This is transnational.
And it is not exclusive to Israel.
It's not restricted to Israel.
As a matter of fact, it's independent of Israel.
Feelings of Jewish nationalism, pride in Jewish identity, Jewish culture, Jewish chauvinism, Jewish peoplehood.
This exists in the Jewish community worldwide, in America, in Europe, in the Middle East.
And these people are loyal to each other.
They see themselves as distinct from everybody else.
And they see themselves as exceptional, better than everybody else.
And they also see themselves as under siege.
So they're at war with everybody else.
Okay.
That's a Jewish nationalist.
I'm an American nationalist.
Where does America come from?
America comes from Europe.
America is a Christian country.
That's our theology.
That's our heritage.
What are we influenced by?
In Washington, D.C., we are influenced by Rome.
We are influenced by Greek, by Greece.
We're influenced by Greek Hellenistic culture.
That's the architecture.
That's our constitutional system.
That's free speech.
That's our separation of powers, checks and balances.
It comes from Europe.
It comes from Hellenistic culture.
It comes from the Roman Empire.
It comes from Christianity.
And Christianity is its own thing.
It's distinct, altogether separate from the Talmud and Jewish mysticism and Zionism and all this kind of stuff.
We are our own civilization.
I'm an American nationalist.
I see the influence of Spain, of Portugal, of England, of France, of the Germans, the Irish, the Roman Empire, the Greeks.
Their story is about how they defeated the Persians and the Babylonians and the Assyrians.
And then the Romans took their land.
And they hate the Romans, hate the Romans that destroyed their temple and kicked them out.
And they hate the Catholic monarchs, hate them, hate the Catholic monarchs that try to suppress their religion with the Inquisition, burning their holy books, expelling them.
They hate the Tsar, the third Caesar, the Caesar of Russia.
They hate the great European empires.
They hate the Germans.
They hate the Spanish because of Philip II.
They hate the French because of Louis XIV.
They hate the English because of Edward.
They hate the Romans because of Titus.
And they hate the church because they see the church as idolatrous.
And so when you see a Joe Lonsdale, he's a Maccabean.
He's a Hebrew.
He's a Jewish nationalist.
And he sees Rome as just another in a long line of empires and peoples and nationalities destroyed by the Jews.
And isn't that kind of the whole, isn't that kind of the whole thing?
Do you know what Goyim actually means?
It doesn't really mean cattle.
Goyem means the nations, the nationalities.
The Jews are a nation.
A nation up until recently without a state, without a territory.
A nation, a people, a tribe here, there, everywhere.
It doesn't matter.
And they are exclusive and they are their own.
We are a nation.
We are the nations.
They are the Jews.
We are the Goyim.
We are the other nations.
I'm part of the American nation.
The American nation is formed out of other nations.
Discovered by Italian explorers, Spanish, Portuguese explorers, settled by English settlers.
Wilderness tained by the French, the English, the Spanish, built by the Germans, the Irish.
Yes, the Slavs, the Polish, the Czech, Swedish, Finnish, Norwegian, Russian.
Okay?
And all of our theology, all of our philosophy, our culture, it comes from the Greeks, the Etruscans.
It comes from our nations.
We are a distinct nation.
So Mike Huckabee is on the side of the Jewish nation.
The Jewish nation's story, their chauvinism, their exceptionalism, their ambitions for a greater Israel.
You know, everybody dreams of a greater whatever, okay?
Serbia dreams of a greater Serbia.
Russia dreams of a greater Russia.
Italy dreams of a greater, you know, they want Slovenia.
Serbia wants Kosovo.
Russia wants Ukraine.
And yes, Israel wants their whole Middle East.
Whose fucking side are you on?
I want a greater America.
I don't care about a greater Israel.
As a matter of fact, make Israel as small as possible because they are a threat.
They're a threat because their Jewish nation reaches into ours.
And it doesn't go the other way.
The Jewish nation transcends borders and their people that they count among the ranks are powerful.
And they have a vast reach.
The Jewish nation reaches into the core of our country, into all of its organs.
That's a problem.
And they also have their own home base.
They also have their own headquarters.
That makes them a threat.
They've got 300 nuclear bombs.
They've got missiles.
They've got an intelligence apparatus.
And they've got their people everywhere.
The Jewish nation reaches into Russia, into Europe, into America.
Whose side are you on?
You can't be a Jewish nationalist and an American nationalist.
You have to pick one.
Now, you can be Jewish and be an American nationalist, but that means you need to assimilate.
You need to recognize America as your only home.
You need to burn the boats.
But if you're one of these Jews that has a chip on your shoulder and you're worried about Israel and you're worried about all this other stuff, and you talk about how Europeans have anti-Semitism in their DNA, you're not on the team.
How could you possibly be America first?
And this is our own ambassador.
Our own ambassador is not America first.
He's not even an American partisan.
He's not even part of the American nation.
Firmly part of the Jewish nation, advocating for the Jewish nation.
And that's not what we are about at all.
This is America first.
This is what our allies had to say about it in the Middle East.
His comments sparked immediate backlash from neighboring Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, Organization of Islamic Cooperation, and the League of Arab States.
Saudi Arabia's foreign ministry described the comments as extremist and unacceptable.
Egypt's foreign ministry called his comments a blatant violation of international law, saying Israel has no sovereignty over the occupied Palestinian territory or other Arab lands.
Huckabee has long opposed the idea of a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinian people.
In an interview last year, he said he does not believe in referring to Arab descendants of people living in British-controlled Palestine as Palestinians.
In the latest interview, Carlson pressed Huckabee about his interpretation of Bible verses from the book of Genesis, where he said God promised Abraham and his descendants land from the Nile to the Euphrates.
Now, think about it in terms of what is best for us.
Like I said, we actually have other allies.
Egypt is our ally.
Saudi Arabia is our ally.
Qatar, the Emirates, Turkey, Armenia, these are our allies.
Armenia is a Christian country to boot.
What about them?
And what about us?
What is best for us is that the Middle East is stable.
What is best for us is that the militant elements of the Palestinians are pacified so that there can be a two-state solution, and then we can leave.
There can be a two-state solution.
Israel can make treaties with Saudi Arabia and other countries, and then we can leave.
And we could get the oil from Saudi Arabia, and we can get the money in their petrodollar facilities into our economy, and we can focus on other problems.
That's what we want.
What Israel wants is to take the West Bank and Gaza and then terraform the region.
Egypt is mobilizing in the Sinai because they're worried about this, digging tunnels.
And Turkey is getting worried.
Now they extend their arm into Syria.
Saudi Arabia says they won't make a deal unless there's a two-state solution.
The Middle East is destabilizing because of Israel's revisionist Zionist ambitions, because of these greater Israel ambitions.
And again, our ambassador supports this to the detriment of our own foreign policy.
And by the way, this Greater Israel thing, it is as Jewish as it gets, and they want it.
The revisionist Zionists, going back to the foundations of the state of Israel, revisionist Zionists like Zeev Jabotinsky, who founded the Israeli military or elements of it, they believed that Israel should take all of Jordan.
They believe that Israel should be as big as possible.
The revisionist Zionists, which founded the Laikud party, they believe this also.
They believe Israel should have the Sinai.
They believe Israel should have the Golan, southern Lebanon.
They believe they should have the land east of the Jordan River.
They believe they should have it all.
As a matter of fact, Israel's contemporary ministers in government believe this.
Their national security minister and their finance minister, Ben Gavir and Smotrich, they both believe in this.
They have given speeches in front of podiums that depict a greater Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates.
So it's not like this is some conspiracy theory or some fringe view.
These are the foundations of the state of Israel.
And there are contemporary, powerful political parties in Israel.
They either descend from that tradition or they uphold it still.
And they believe in this project.
And that leads me to this other part about Tucker's interview.
You know, everything that we're talking about has to do with the Jewishness of Israel.
Suffice to say, Israel's right to exist, where does it come from?
The Bible.
So Israel's Jewishness is really at stake here.
What it is, what that means, is it legitimate, right?
Where does the legitimacy of the modern state of China come from?
It doesn't come from the Bible.
It comes from this diplomatic thought in the 70s because of the result of a civil war in the 40s.
Where does the People's Republic of China come from?
Well, Mao Zedong won the civil war and eventually the U.S. made a deal.
And like, that's where it comes from.
Now, on some other level, they have their legitimacy from Confucius and from this idea that they are the middle kingdom, they're this 5,000-year-old culture.
So there's this legal framework about the current regime, and there's this civilizational framework about their history in this region around this river and all the rest of it.
It's, you could say, the Chineseness of China.
And the same goes for other countries.
Where does the sovereignty of a country like the United States come from?
Well, the revolution and the Constitution and the Declaration and this sort of thing.
When we're talking about Israel's right to exist and why we have to defend them, excuse me, my nose is itching.
What makes them special?
It has to do with the Bible.
As we just laid out, where does that claim come from?
Well, they say that the God of the Bible gave them the land.
And even though they weren't living there for 2,000 years, they came back to collect on that.
They got kicked out by the Romans.
And so they lived in exile as a diaspora for 2,000 years.
And now they're coming back.
And what legitimized this return to their land?
The Bible.
So at stake here is really that claim.
If they're coming back to Israel, if they're coming back to this territory and claiming it, well, the question is, what does the Bible actually say?
And about who and what people?
And this is the part of Tucker's interview that I did not like at all.
And I've heard this said a lot in the same conversation.
People like to say, well, if Israel's right to exist is built upon this biblical claim, they want to attack the continuity of this biblical people.
So if Israel has this right to exist because God told Abraham, your descendants get this territory, and people claiming to be Jews from Central and Eastern Europe came there in 1900 to make good on this.
Well, some people like to attack the continuity, the through line.
And they like to say, well, are the modern Jews really those descendants of Abraham?
In other words, are they really the beneficiary of that land grant?
We might say, in ancient history, God gave this ancient people this land.
Well, now some people showed up and they say, we are those people.
And guys like Tucker want to say, okay, well, are you really the same guys?
Do you have that lineage?
If you do, well, then I guess we have to litigate that.
But if you don't, then you have no claim.
Maybe you're some kind of interloper.
And maybe somewhere along the way, some other people wanted to hijack this and get in the middle of that process and say, well, we have this heritage.
We're claiming it.
And we're claiming the land that comes with it.
And so in the same interview, and sort of along, you can maybe see the continuity here, along exactly the same line where Tucker says, where does Israel get its right to exist?
What is that right?
Tucker also questions the continuity of the Jewish people.
And he says to Huckabee that all the Jews in Israel are Ashkenazi.
And the Ashkenazi come from Central and Eastern Europe.
That's actually what Ashkenazi means.
It means German.
And Yiddish is form of German.
Or it's, I should say, it branched off of German at one point in time.
And so Tucker says, the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, is Polish.
He's from Eastern Europe.
What does he have to do with the Bible?
What does he have to do with the people of the book and Abraham?
And this is a story from Times of Israel.
This is the quote.
It says, Carlson also questioned whether modern Jews were the same nation as Jews in the biblical era.
Carlson said, quote, God promised this land from modern-day Iraq to modern-day Egypt to this people, the Jews, Abraham's descendants.
He said, the current prime minister's ancestors weren't from here.
Netanyahu on one side, his family's from Poland.
They're from Eastern Europe.
So how do we know that he has a connection to the people who God promised the land to?
And this I didn't like because as a matter of fact, let us just say this at the outset.
It is a matter of fact that the Jews in Israel descend from the Middle East.
The Mizrahi Jews, Sephardic Jews, and Ashkenazi Jews, they all descend from the Middle East.
How do we know that, Tucker?
Well, if this wasn't a rhetorical question and you actually bothered to ask, we have genetic testing.
We do have modern genetic testing, which shows that Ashkenazi Jews have Levantine DNA that goes back 2,500 years to the Middle East.
How do we know?
There's no way to know.
Well, we have science.
We have genetic tests.
And these people do have Levantine DNA.
They did mix with Europeans.
They have Eastern European DNA.
They have Central European DNA.
But they also have Levantine DNA.
So these are not a people that are completely separate from Israel.
They do have a legitimate claim that they are from the Middle East.
So to pretend like we don't know or that it's even contestable is not true.
And it's almost to the point of a reckless disregard for the truth.
It's almost a lie of its own creation, a lie of its own type to say, we can't possibly know.
How do we know?
Nanyahu comes from Poland.
Okay, and, you know, so what?
Anglo-Saxons come from modern day northern Germany and Denmark.
Okay, so what?
Yes, people from Poland also came from elsewhere.
And some Polish people are native and some Polish people came from the Middle East.
And they are Jews.
And to pretend as though we don't know that, to cast aspersions on this, and actually to insinuate that they have no Jewish DNA or that there's no way to know or that we don't know is irresponsible.
And honestly, I think it's a lie.
To say this as a rhetorical question, asking, how do we know Nenyahu comes from Poland?
It obfuscates the truth.
Ashkenazi Jews have been proven scientifically with genetic testing to be descended from the Middle East, to be Levantine, to be Jews.
So what are you really getting at here?
Don't play dumb and stop asking rhetorical questions.
They are Jewish and we know they're Jewish.
And this is something that I see all the time now.
There's all sorts of different narratives coming from different places.
Some anti-Zionist Jews or anti-Zionist leftists will use this argument.
I see Muslims make this argument.
They say these people in Israel are Europeans.
They say it like it's a bad thing.
They say Nenyahu's Polish.
He's not a real Jew.
Now, how do they characterize Israel?
They characterize Israel as another white supremacist colony.
That's where that goes.
It's Muslim third worldists, leftists.
And how they characterize this with that narrative is they say that Israel is just another example of white supremacist colonialism.
They think we don't know any better.
They say that Muslim, indigenous brown people are being displaced by whites from Europe.
And their Judaism, well, that's just an elaborate facade for age-old white supremacy.
And they think they're tricking everybody.
That's that narrative.
And I see this all day long.
They say those aren't real Jews.
Those are Europeans.
And what does this do other than serve to vilify white people?
Huh?
What does that actually do other than blame white people for what Jews are doing?
Nanyahu is a Jew.
Epstein is a Jew.
Okay, Edelson, Ronald Lauder, these are Jews.
They're visibly Jewish.
They have Jewish lineage, Jewish DNA, and they are part of the Jewish nation.
And to suddenly say, oh, no, no, they're Polish, they're German, now you're just blaming white people.
And this is a way of maybe offloading the guilt onto a people we're more comfortable blaming.
Haven't white people been blamed for enough of the world's problems?
It's sort of like when conservatives used to love blaming white liberals for everything.
BLM rioting.
No, no, that's not black people looting the liquor store.
That's white liberals pretending to be black.
Remember that one?
Because we're not comfortable blaming black people for problems.
Only white people are ever the problem.
Oh, you want to know who really runs the world?
It's rich white people.
Yeah, it's rich white liberals like Bill Gates.
Because we're more comfortable blaming our own kind, our own rich people, our own women, our own young people.
Yeah, blame the white college students.
Blame the white women.
Blame the wealthy white people.
Blame the white hipsters or hippies.
What does that serve to do other than offload guilt from one ethnic minority to white people yet again?
For leftists, for third worldists, for Muslims who can say Israel is a creation of the British Empire.
It's a remnant of Sykes Pico.
It's a remnant of the old days of European colonialism.
That's all that does.
And I don't like that.
Netanyahu's not a white guy.
Netyahu's a Jew.
Okay?
That's one.
Now I hear this other narrative all the time that they're Khazarian.
You hear this one?
Everybody says, you know what's really red-pilled?
They're not really Jewish.
They say that in the Middle Ages, the Khazarian Turks from the Central Asian steppe invaded Europe and then they became Jewish.
Why did they do this?
To what end?
Who knows?
How this happened without being recorded in history, anybody's guess.
There's no rigor here.
Nothing matters.
Somewhere along the way in the Middle Ages, some Turkic mountaineers, some Turkic riders, horsemen from Central Asia came here, put down roots, and became Jewish.
And so they're trans-Jewish.
They're like transgenders.
Now they're Jewish.
And for whatever reason, they were just some minority in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and then got kicked around a bunch and then I guess deluded themselves into thinking they're Jewish and decided to create Zionism.
I don't even know what the idea is there.
But that's the big idea is that there was a break in the continuity that somewhere along the way in the Middle Ages, some other people identified as Jewish.
And the modern Jews are sort of a construction, a modern construction.
And some other group of people engaged in constructivism and said, well, we're Jewish now.
We have the Jewish identity.
Now we're Israelis.
And some people say, no, the really red-pilled thing is that this is the Khazarian Empire.
This is some obscure Central Asian Turkic kingdom that became Jewish and has just been living the lie for 1,300 years.
And now they're in Israel for some reason.
I hear this one too.
And once again, you have to wonder, what is even the point of that?
And then you realize who is the number one beneficiary of both of these narratives?
It's Jews.
Who is the number one?
If you go out there and say, oh, Netanyahu's not a real Jew, as a matter of fact, none of the Israelis are.
Who's the number one beneficiary of that narrative?
Well, it would be Orthodox Jews, maybe the Lubavitchers.
It would be some group of Jews who believe that they are the real Jews.
And they feel that they are being blamed for what Israel is doing or what Netanyahu is doing.
Doesn't that sort of fit neatly?
Tucker always likes to say, well, the problem isn't Jews.
That's crazy.
Don't talk about Jews.
That's anti-Semitic.
Tucker says the problem is neocons.
Forget about Judaism, Jewishness, the Jewish nation, Jewish.
No, no, nothing to do with that.
He literally sat face to face with me and seriously said that Judaism has nothing to do with Israel.
Judaism has nothing to do with neoconservatism.
Okay?
The problem is neocons.
The problem is Netanyahu.
And Netanyahu is not even a real Jew.
He's Polish.
Interesting.
And Candace Owens says it's Khazarians.
Oh, Israel's an evil state, but Israel's all Kazarians.
None of them are real Jews.
So who's the beneficiary of this?
Well, it's all those Israel-critical Jews, all these Orthodox Jews, conservatives in America, that they don't want to be blamed for what Netanyahu is doing, for what Israel is doing.
But this is a lie.
Like I said, genetically, these people are Jewish in Israel and Netanyahu too.
And maybe more importantly, everything that Israel is doing, it doesn't come from people say it's these Frankists.
This doesn't come from Jacob Frank.
This doesn't come from the Central Asian steppe and it doesn't come from Poland.
You know where this idea comes from that they have greater Israel?
It comes from the Hebrew Bible.
You know where this idea comes from that they're going to wipe out all their enemies?
It's the story of Amalek.
It comes from the Hebrew Bible.
In a word, it comes from Judaism.
Where did Jews get the big idea that they can kill everybody that is an idolater?
It comes from their Talmud.
It comes from their fucking holy book.
You don't need to invent some esoteric, satanic cult.
You don't need to invent some interloping other ethnicity.
This is who they are.
They have the lineage to the original Jews who rejected and killed Christ, who were corrupted, who rejected their own Messiah and were punished for it by being kicked out of their temple and their land.
And all of these perverted ideas, well, that's just the Hebrew Bible without Christ.
That's just the law without Christ.
That's the Pharisees without Christ.
That's where they get the idea that everybody that stands in their way should not be shown mercy or love.
That's where they get the idea that they're going to wipe out the women and the children in pursuit of their birthright, in pursuit of their land.
It comes from Judaism itself, this perverse, bastard religion that did not accept the Messiah.
That's what Judaism is.
It is a bastard religion.
The Hebrew Bible had its fulfillment in Christ.
That's what it is.
That's who the prophets were.
That's what the mark was on the doors in Egypt.
That's what it's all pointing towards.
That's what it was all for.
That's what they paved the way to have in the end from Adam and Eve through Noah, through Abraham, through Moses, David, Solomon, all the way through to Christ.
And now it's done.
What exists now, what they call Judaism, halakhic, what they call the law, the Talmud, is a bastardization.
It's effectively a form of a heresy.
So who are we trying to protect when we say it's not those real Jews?
I'm sorry, what's a real Jew?
The Pharisees that put him on the cross?
That's a real Jew.
We're supposed to be okay with that?
No, no.
I see somebody say, Candace Owen said the other day.
She goes, God's chosen would never do this.
Hey, I have a news flash for you.
It was God's chosen that put him on the cross, genius.
What do you think happened there?
Calvary, whatever happened there.
She goes, God's chosen people would never be this heinous.
I'm sorry, did you miss the ending there?
Did you fall asleep before the end of the drama of the gospels?
That's the whole story.
God's chosen people rejected their own Messiah, their own gift.
They traded him for Barabbas.
They demanded he be executed and crucified.
He was betrayed by his own brother, his own disciple.
And then you say, I can't believe they're doing this all the time.
Well, what do you think happens?
2,000 years without the light of Christ.
They've got the Mishnah, they've got their commandments, they've got their traditions, their synagogues, their rabbis, but they don't have their temple.
It was taken from them.
They don't have the veil, the land, it was taken from them.
And they don't have the Logos.
They don't have the Christ.
They don't have the light of God.
So how could it be anything other than corrupted and perverted?
And people are trying to go out and say, it's the Polish, it's a white supremacist thing.
They derive their supremacist ideology, their national feelings, chauvinism from this text.
And we have to be very clear about that.
No, I'm sorry, we're not going to blame white people for Israel.
Not going to happen.
And we can't be deluded about the nature of the real issue here.
And the reason I say it's an issue, it ties back into Jewish nationalism.
When Joe Lonsdale says that young men should look up to Cyrus, the Jewish Messiah, you'd see this guy has not let go of his Jewish national feelings.
When Steve Saylor says that if the Goyim ever found out that Jews were smarter than them, we would come for them with the pitchforks and torches.
They have not let go of their Jewish nationalism.
Same with Curtis Yarvin and his little lackey.
Same with Alex Karp, who's afraid the Christians are going to throw him out of a window.
Okay, we have to be realistic about what is going on here.
And we can't say that all these people are just Kazarians living a lie or they're Frankists keeping this dynastic secret that they're a cult.
And we can't blame white people for them either because that's not what it is.
So in many ways, the interview is very good.
In other ways, the interview is deeply flawed.
And this, ironically, or maybe not ironically, is Tucker's contention with me.
When you see Tucker calling me an anti-Semite all the time, and when he goes and qualifies everything that he says by saying it has nothing to do with Jewish, with Jews and Judaism and Israel, you know, keep this in mind.
They want to keep the conversation on Netanyahu and neocons in Israel, and they don't want to talk about the bigger issue here.
It's a story of peoples.
It's a story of nations.
And these things have a draw on us.
Our mythology, our story, our parents, our nationality, it tugs on the heartstrings of men.
And so to look at our country, which is being influenced and controlled by Jews, by a Jewish class, you have to look at their affinity for their Jewish nation and stop pretending it's all ideological, looking for, you know, ideas to blame.
It's the neocons.
It's people that feel a certain way.
It's this group.
And unless we get a handle on that and we promote a version of Jewish identity that is compatible with America, you know, we're not really addressing the root cause here.
And I'm not saying that people can't be Jewish.
And I'm not people, I'm not saying that people can't embrace their Jewish identity, but it has to be done in a way with some deference to the country they reside in.
And if they can't do it, then they can't have power over us.
You want to be a Jewish supremacist?
I don't care that much as long as you just live far the fuck away from me and you don't have $50 billion to spend in my elections.
That's a problem.
And you want to be Jewish and celebrate that and everything?
Okay, good for you, but you better put America first.
You got to look out for everybody in this country and you got to recognize this is a Christian European country.
That goes every way, shape, and form, not just for the immigrants.
I see guys like Stephen Miller, they say, oh, you know, these brown people need to assimilate.
No, you need to assimilate, you arrogant Jew.
You need to assimilate.
Stephen Miller with his Jewish wife and his Jewish kids and all they talk about is how Jewish they are and they're pro-Israel.
And Stephen Miller, people want to give him kudos because he's against brown people and black people, telling them to assimilate.
Hey, you first, pal, you arrogant Jew, you assimilate.
Then we'll talk about the rest of these people.
Here's the difference.
Illegal immigrants, they're running a, I don't know, they're running a corner store.
You're the deputy chief of staff.
So who's really the issue here?
People talk about, oh, you know, these immigrants need to assimilate.
Hey, I agree.
I agree with you.
I agree with you.
But illegal immigrants, okay, they're picking berries.
They're on a farm somewhere.
Miriam Adelson is spending $100 million per cycle.
So where's really the urgency?
I mean, it's actually a little bit hard to pick, but the difference is one group seems to have a lot more agency and power, and you can never say this to them.
And the other group, people have a field day.
So those are the flaws of the interview.
And I see this narrative being promoted.
Don't be deceived by this.
Don't be deceived.
They do it with Epstein.
They do it with Netanyahu.
They want to say Epstein wasn't really Jewish.
He's a vampire, cannibal, Kazarian.
Netanyahu's Polish.
He's a dude from Poland.
What is that?
I don't, that's not true.
And I think it's a very deceptive narrative.
Wonder who's really behind that?
Because it's being promoted.
It's being promoted by Alexander Dugan.
It's being promoted by Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Ian Carroll, Ron Uns.
I don't like it.
And it seems very Russian.
That's my feeling.
It seems very Russian.
Seems like the Orthodox Jews like that little narrative.
So Americans need to get hip.
Okay, we need to get wise.
Figure out what the real situation is.
But that's that.
We're going to move on.
This is a two-hour monologue.
So we got to move on and get into the super chats.
Like, I care about Italians, Germans, French, British, Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese, you know, but it's like all these little niggas fighting over there.
Hey, Nick, with a straight of Hormuz slash Belfaman restricting trade due to the inevitable U.S. strikes, are there any critical imports from UAE, Saudi, Qatar, Kuwait, etc. that will affect the average U.S. consumer slash businesses?
What would the second or third order consequences be whenever this happens?
Matt U.S. sent $20 with the Democrat filibuster and threat of a Democrat filibuster preventing Trump and the Republicans from pushing any major legislation through.
Why don't the Republicans employ the nuclear option more frequently?
Do they just care that little about their constituents or their other implications?
Notice that X has become one rifter after the next attempting to purity spiral, denouncing any and everyone as predators, pedos, rumors for virtue, clown and cash.
The civilizational pound line has reached another milestone for stupidity.
If you, as a Mexican, get to marry a white girl, then I, as a white man, should be allowed to marry either a full Asian or a half Asian with a white mom.
Gavin Newsom says something based about black people being retarded or whatever, and the right is doing this pathetic attempt to discredit him by calling him racist.
Sneaker thinks Epstein ate kids and Charlie Kirk was martyred by Israel Nick.
Dude, imagine the conversation that Jeffrey Epstein and Charlie Kirk are having right now, rolling on the floor laughing emoji.
That was kind of Budman sent $20.
Hey, Apple.
Ruby 2.19 cent $20.
Ariel Pink talks some mild trash on you for two minutes in this censored.tv interview starting at 1220 saying you're an agent of division and Charlie was off because he wasn't.
Remember in Breaking Bad when Walter White threatened to kill his wife over the phone because she was being investigated and it made her look innocent.
Might as well cite the Talmud if you use theory from KJ Tranny Dr. Hirschfeld and the definition from the DSM, which could diagnose you for your anti-Semitism.
To say that Masa Chambo wasn't a pedophile.
The Greek properly translated extends through adolescence.
But stick to your guns and point them the right way.
I came across one of your earlier speeches in your career that was given at the 2017 social contract writers workshop in D.C. Like the closing story: two weeks in the barracks, a not hired cause, limit and emoji.
They just had a big turnover with their military leadership and they're having problems of their own.
I don't even think they're prepared for it.
So I think they're waiting to see how it plays out.
And that military shakeup, it might push that timeline back a couple of years because Xi Xinping just sacked a good percentage of the military leadership.
Dead Rants and Libra start reposting your clips attacking Trump, but then you drop the honest slash slash funny truth of women, mothers, whores, and nuns.
They begin to call for you to be curved.
Us Mexicans won't allow it.
P.S. You're definitely top five influential PPL in Chicago.
Imagine being some Negro shoeboard throwing trash out of your car like normal, then all of a sudden the seventh most powerful man in Chicago pulls up beside you and is convertible and tries to explode you with his mind.
There's a massive community of Jews in Lakewood, New Jersey that abused the welfare state and charitable orgs to make bank.
If you've ever heard of Cars 4Kids, 100% of the money they raise is funneled into the Urall Foundation that sends Jewish kids on trips to Israel, Jewish summer camps, and the first time.
As a result, they are currently being buried, Evalaism, Spenglerism, Conservatism sent $21.
Feel like after you get so caught up in all the infighting and civil wars within the right wing after Tucker had you on, you then zoom out and look at the other side and see the left and realize it's so blatant.
Grow Hyperball sent $20.
Fishback vs. Donald's is confirmed as of right now.