IRAN WAR IMMINENT??? SECOND Aircraft Carrier EN ROUTE To Middle East | America First Ep. 1642
Nick Fuentes (America First) warns of an imminent U.S.-Iran war, fueled by Israel’s demands—no nuclear enrichment, no missiles, no proxies—while dismissing Iran’s 2025 concessions as insufficient. Two aircraft carriers (Gerald Ford, Abraham Lincoln) and strategic forces are deployed, but past airstrikes failed to cripple Iran’s defenses: a million-man army, thousands of missiles, and regional proxies. Fuentes claims Israel sabotages deals to force regime change, predicting prolonged strikes or invasion unless U.S. priorities shift from corporate/foreign interests to "America first." War looms as talks collapse under irreconcilable terms, with Iran’s leverage growing monthly despite past setbacks. [Automatically generated summary]
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithm, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
Thank you so much, everybody.
Can I just say, are you trusting your plan for that?
unidentified
Seems like my eyes grow better like the other.
I want nothing but all right, you call me like you're not a little faithful.
When I get home, I want you.
I got places to be Evening everybody You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Quentis.
Have a great show for you tonight.
You got that back, that's a dungeon.
You got that back, that's a dark bump.
You winning, son?
It broke shit on my boots.
Oh, yeah, fluffin' all over, cause I'm young, till I'm hungry.
If we don't have freedom on the internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind raped every day forever.
Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geolocation, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you're asleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
You have a smart home, economy of things.
It's like total, like, rape of everybody by the system forever.
My life is like a first-person video game, you know?
We do have to forgive them for their misunderstanding.
And we have to embrace them and say, better late than never.
Welcome to the right side of history.
Welcome to our massive vision, our massive and ambitious vision for how we want the world to be.
unidentified
I got places to be Evening everybody You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Flentis.
Have a great show for you tonight.
You got that back, that's a racket bump.
You got that back, it's a funny bump.
You got that back, that's a bump.
You got that back, that's a racket bump.
Listen to the cure, I listen to the cure, listen to the cure, and then it cry.
All the things you're all the things that run into my head, running through my head, running through my head.
All the things you said, all the things you said, running through my head, running through my head, all the things you said, all the things you're saying.
I can't get me all the things you said, When can we expect a real victory?
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
Because they voted for Kamala Harris.
People do not stab young girls on trains because they're born black.
People do not shoot Palestinians in the back of the head or cheer it on just because they're Jewish.
The people that do this are lost.
They have to be isolated and segregated out.
A new consensus must emerge.
Are you in favor of a society with meaning?
A society where life is sacred.
Where life has sanctity, where people's lives and their dignity and their integrity is respected?
Or are we going to live in a society that is a never-ending war between nihilistic tribes, warlords, savages, pagans?
I see an emerging consensus.
And I think that the mature people that actually love America, actually love our children, the people that recognize the division, the peril that we're in, we need to fortify a new consensus and rally the people of conscience, the people of decency, the people of humanity, the people of charity towards their fellow man,
against those that want to kill us, against those that laugh and celebrate when innocent people are harmed.
For any reason, for any ideological reason.
Against the people that are cruel, the people that are hateful.
And by that, I mean the people that are really cruel.
Not the people that say things you disagree with, not the people that are provocative, not the people that are sometimes angry, but the people that are really cruel and really evil.
What makes Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the bearing of suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us.
An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children, even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
That is what makes us different.
Canary Mission Blacklist00:12:42
unidentified
The Canary
Mission is an Israeli-funded blacklist, which, since July 2025, has been confirmed to be used by the Trump administration to target students, professors, and professionals who oppose Israel and reside in the United States.
This idea is part of an initiative created by the Heritage Foundation, the same group responsible for the infamous Project 2025.
In their initiative, titled Project Esther, they state that students participating in pro-Palestinian protests and activism are supporting Hamas, a group that the United States designates as a foreign terrorist organization.
Therefore, pro-Palestinian students are considered to be supporting terrorism and are subject to the revocation of visas, frozen bank accounts, asset seizures, and the denial of basic constitutional rights.
In effect, the Canary mission serves as a means to circumvent constitutional protections, allowing the federal government to engage in intelligence gathering activities that would otherwise be considered unlawful.
But the Canary mission is not alone.
Palantir, another company closely aligned with the state of Israel, uses AI-driven analytics to maintain private databases on U.S. citizens and currently works with four federal agencies.
While government contracting with the private sector is long-standing, the prominent influence of Jewish groups within these increasingly powerful organizations warrants careful examination.
I renew the call for all able-bodied young American men, all of our elite human capital, all of our geniuses, warriors, intelligent people to dedicate themselves to American sovereignty and independence as Christians, as Americans, as white people, as citizens of the United States.
And anybody that settles for anything less is just as much of an enemy.
unidentified
I would actually consider them worse than our oppressors.
So on Independence Day, it's important to reflect on the fact that we are an occupied nation.
Now, just like then, we're being ruled by a small country across an ocean, serving itself at our expense.
And as long as that is the case, I will always be obsessed with that.
As long as that is the case, I will always be speaking out against that and fighting against that.
And I will always be anchored, understanding that that is the fundamental struggle.
As long as our presidents have to kiss the wall in Israel and wear a small hat, as long as they have to say that we want to make Israel great again and they're the greatest country ever, and I will never be okay with that.
Ever.
And it doesn't matter what they offer me or us.
It doesn't matter how they might try to placate us or appease our interests, the concessions they'll make.
Barack Obama created the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the JCPOA, or the Iranian nuclear deal.
And Barack Obama brought together China, Russia, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the European Union to enforce a nuclear deal that restricts Iran's enrichment of uranium.
The early talks were conducted in secret, and the Israelis were furious, furious about this.
Netanyahu went to a joint session of Congress and gave a speech in defiance of the American president and its nuclear deal, and Congress gave 37 standing ovations.
This is the background of Trump's first election.
2016 election happens.
Trump gets elected with the help of the Israelis.
You don't believe me?
There's a whole article about it.
It's an excerpt from James Bamford's book, Spy Fail.
It goes into great detail about the hidden collusion in the 2016 election.
It wasn't Trump and Russia.
It was Trump and Israel.
And why was Israel so hell-bent on getting a Republican elected in 2016?
In 2018, Donald Trump declares the IRGC, the Revolutionary Guard, which is the military of the regime, a terrorist group.
Green likes that group for sanctions, for attacks.
Now the United States is in a shadow war with Iran.
It culminates by January 2020 in the assassination of Qasim Suleimani.
Suleimani was the architect of the axis of resistance.
Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Suleimani built all of it.
Are you starting to see Obama had this solved?
He made the deal.
The Israelis hated him for it.
They colluded with Trump to get him elected so that Trump would do maximum pressure and create a ladder of escalation, pulling us out of the deal, declaring the IRGC terrorists, then killing its leader, putting sanctions on the regime.
This is a war that started a long time ago, that Trump made hot in 2018 and has been going on for seven years.
That's the nature of forever wars.
Just like in Iraq, which went from 1990 until today, just like Libya, which went from 2011 to today.
Syria, which went from 2011 to today, and Iran, which went from 2018 until today.
That's the nature of forever wars.
And if you're not paying attention to those underlying forces, you're going to fall for it again and again.
You're going to be surprised and confused and coping over and over.
People are just tripping over themselves to do it again.
I'm like two seconds out from just joining the Jews at this point.
It's like I started out like the Jews are oppressing us, then it's like, no, no, the Jews are oppressing all of you.
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see, people have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
unidentified
Hello, I got places to be Evening, everybody You're watching America First.
That America was different because we are different.
Palantir is an AI data analytics company.
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithm, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
Thank you so much, everybody.
Can I just say, are you trusting your hands?
unidentified
When I get home, I want you.
Got places to be Good evening, everybody You're watching America First.
If we don't have freedom on the Internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind raped every day forever.
Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geolocation, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you asleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
You have a smart home, economy of things.
It's like total, like, rape of everybody by the system forever.
My life is like a first-person video game, you know?
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
Because they voted for Kamala Harris.
People do not stab young girls on trains because they're born black.
People do not shoot Palestinians in the back of the head or cheer it on just because they're Jewish.
The people that do this are lost.
They have to be isolated and segregated out.
A new consensus must emerge.
Are you in favor of a society with meaning?
A society where life is sacred, where life has sanctity, where people's lives and their dignity and their integrity is respected.
Or are we going to live in a society that is a never-ending war between nihilistic tribes, warlords, savages, pagans?
I see an emerging consensus.
And I think that the mature people that actually love America, actually love our children, and the people that recognize the division, the peril that we're in, we need to fortify Americanism, not globalism, will be our Twitter.
Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Tuesday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight.
Lots to get into.
Big show, our featured story.
We are talking tonight about the latest round of Iranian nuclear negotiations, which took place earlier today in Switzerland.
And it's not looking good.
There are some developments on this front.
This morning, U.S. and Iranian negotiators met in Switzerland for the second round of talks.
First round of talks was about a week and a half ago.
And as we talked about, those first round of discussions, it wasn't even a real negotiation.
All that was is an agreement to negotiate and a framework for negotiations, but that's it.
Now, this morning, they actually talked about the substance of the negotiations, which is the nuclear program.
And the big story that everybody is talking about is that Iran is ready to make some concessions.
Specifically, Iran is going to agree to stop enriching uranium for three years, and they are going to forfeit their stockpile of highly enriched uranium to a third country, probably Russia, or maybe some other country.
Here's the problem, however.
All of this falls short of what the United States and, more importantly, Israel are both demanding.
And so, while these negotiations are going on, and we'll talk about the exact status of the negotiations and where this is headed, there's an agreement that the two parties will be texting each other.
There will be a dialogue happening in the background, and there will be a third meeting within two weeks.
While this is happening, there is a second U.S. aircraft carrier headed to the Middle East.
It's our largest, most advanced carrier, USS Gerald Ford.
At the same time, you've got a ton of U.S. aircraft headed over there.
Soldiers are on their way.
It looks like almost certainly there's going to be another confrontation.
And now the only question is what form that is going to take, whether it's going to be airstrikes, whether it's going to be a full-on assault, ground war.
I don't think it's outside the question, not completely.
So we'll talk about all that.
We'll talk about where we are, what the U.S. is doing, what Iran is doing.
Again, the status of these negotiations, what's at stake here.
But I think ultimately where all this is headed is another full-fledged war.
And it's a little surprising because nobody's even talking about it.
I am hardly seeing anybody and anywhere.
Nobody is talking about this.
It's in some of the papers, of course, but this is not the discourse on social media at all.
It's everything else.
And I feel like this is looking exactly like that first round of strikes where for everybody else, it came out of nowhere.
If you were watching this show, you knew exactly what to expect, when to expect it.
If we have time, we're going to talk a little bit about this Warner Brothers-Netflix merger.
We haven't talked about this in a little bit, but this has been an ongoing saga.
Last year, as you know, Paramount Pictures merged with Skydance.
Skydance is David Ellison's studio.
That's the son of Larry Ellison, who is the CEO and chairman of Oracle.
Ellison family is Jewish, pro-Israel.
They are as Zionist as it gets.
And they are making a play to create the biggest media conglomerate in the world.
So to that end, last year, Skydance acquired Paramount Pictures, which includes Paramount Plus, CBS News, among other properties.
Then they set their sights on Warner Brothers Studios, which includes the Warner Brothers Film Studios, HBO, HBO Max, CNN, among a number of other media properties.
That offer triggered a bidding process.
Warner Brothers went up for sale.
And in the end, it was Netflix that actually inked the deal.
And so Netflix offered them, I believe it's $72 billion to buy out the entire company minus CNN and one of the other properties.
Warner Brothers has the deal with Netflix.
But basically, ever since that deal was made, Paramount Skydance, the Ellison family, have been trying to thwart this deal.
And they've tried to get the Trump administration involved.
And they have kept trying to sweeten the deal, offering more money, higher price per share, all kinds of other stipulations and contingencies, and they just won't quit.
Now, once again, it's in the news because, once again, Paramount Skydance has found a way.
They still have their foot in the door.
And there's going to be another week where they can make yet another bid for Warner Brothers.
And we'll talk about some of the details of the deal.
Netflix does have a signed deal backed by the board, voted on by the shareholders with Warner Brothers.
But they've given Warner Brothers a seven-day waiver where they can actually talk to Skydance Paramount, and they'll determine whether they're going to accept that offer.
And so it's pretty amazing.
This is still in flux.
If that deal goes through, then this is like a media conglomerate we've never seen in history.
It will be the complete vertical integration of U.S. media, everything from the studios to distribution, all the way to the television stations, news networks, and ultimately TikTok, which is owned by Larry Ellison, owned, managed, data stored, algorithm managed by Larry Ellison's Oracle.
And that is the 8th Front pro-Israel project that they've been working on for a few years.
So, like I said, if we have time, we'll talk about that too.
Should be a pretty good show.
We got some news finally.
Yesterday was a very slow day.
Everybody was mad because I talked about clavicular for a half hour again.
Okay, sue me.
But tonight we got a little something to talk about.
Before we get into it, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble, smash the like button, leave a comment, let me know what you think about the show.
Check out our merch store, Fuentes.store.
Get your America First hats, quarter zips, sweatshirts, t-shirts, flags.
I still have to get that Native American beware of foreign influence flag.
We got to order a few for the studio.
I don't think I have one yet, but you should get yours.
That's Fuentes.store.
If you want to support the show, subscribe to AmericaFirst.plus, 15 bucks a month, get access to the entire archive.
$100 a month, get access to the group chat.
And I was in the group chat today, dropped another mini show in there, and I gave everybody a little preview.
Because honestly, in the group chat today, I just talked about Iran and maybe it's a little bonus content, a little bonus material.
But for the most part, it was just kind of like a preview for the show.
Some days there's not a ton of content, okay?
Some days I don't have a lot of things to say.
I find it so hard on Twitter.
I don't know about you, but the content on Twitter has been shit for like weeks.
Generally speaking, it's been bad for a long time, generally.
But man, the past like week, there is nothing, there's nothing on Twitter.
They take our support, our money, and then they stab us in the back.
And then they lie about it.
They gaslight us.
They say, oh, well, we'll get them next time.
So that's actually more evil.
You've heard this expression before.
You'd rather have an enemy than a traitor.
It's actually better to know what you're dealing with than to have people that are lying to your face, pretending to be your friend, stabbing you in the back.
It's actually preferable to be with an enemy.
At least you know what you're getting.
And so I said last night, look at this administration.
It's a complete disaster.
And you can't even blame it on outside forces.
It's the Epstein files, which they made the conscious decision to cover up.
Tried to do it, half-assed it, then totally backed down.
And they're backing down not just under political pressure from the Democrats, which is pathetic, but they also never even intended to keep the promise.
They won't raid job sites because their donors employ the illegals.
And the message for 28 is you better figure it out.
You either get it together and maybe someone in the party rank becomes viable, or else someone else needs to run.
A dark horse, someone we haven't heard of, an outsider.
Someone needs to redo what Trump did in 16.
So I say this last night.
This is my point.
I'm arriving at my point.
I say all this last night, and the clip goes out on Twitter, and the clip goes viral this afternoon.
It gets like a million impressions.
And I put out a similar tweet, and I'm getting thousands of replies.
Laura Loomers in my replies.
And you know what's so funny?
So I do this show, and I have paid the price to do this show.
I'm not going to play the world's smallest violin, but you know, a small sample of some of the things that have happened to me: assassination attempt, cancellation, ostracized, blacklisted, banned from banks, banned from airplanes, you know, all that kind of stuff.
And my message has always been very clear.
Why am I doing this?
Why have I taken up this cross?
What is the purpose of this battle?
From the very beginning, hey, it's the name of the show.
Over Israel, over world Jewry, over the capitalist class, the billionaires, multinational corporations, the free traders, over these foreign intelligence agencies, over domestic intelligence agencies, Wall Street, Silicon Valley, immigrants, foreigners.
The purpose of the show is to empower you, Americans, American citizens, the forgotten men and women, the white people, the heritage Americans, you know, the people whose ancestors built the fucking country.
This is our inheritance.
It's for our posterity.
The purpose of the show is to create a political consciousness among the American people.
That's what this country is, of, by, for the people, so that we can take back our sovereignty, declare independence, and put our people first, put the American public first.
Obviously, that is not happening.
Mass immigration is not putting Americans first.
Supporting Israel, not putting Americans first.
Supporting the labor needs of Silicon Valley and Wall Street, not putting America first.
Now, to that end, to that end, we have identified that the Republican Party is not putting America first, like the Democrats as well.
And so the Democrats, like the Republicans, they both need to be put in their place.
And I support anything, independence, who knows what you get on the left, maybe something on the right.
But I support any independent-minded America-first person who's going to promote those types of policies.
We're not getting that in the GOP.
And what I tell people on the show all the time is that we have to take our own side.
I'm not taking the Republicans' side if they don't take my side.
If the Republicans are going to be soft on illegal immigration because they're working for big agriculture in Silicon Valley and Wall Street, they're not taking our side.
So I'm not taking their side.
If the Republican Party is going to cover up the Epstein files, they're taking the side of Peter Thiel, who's in the files.
They're taking the side of Ronald Lauder, Leon Black, Les Wexner.
They're taking the side of those people.
They're not taking our side.
So why would I take their side?
Why would I go and vote for them?
This is the message of the show.
Take your own side.
Put America first.
Put yourself first as an American.
Put the American public first.
And if the GOP doesn't do that, don't take their side.
There'd be no crisis of confidence if the DOJ released all the Epstein files unredacted.
There'd be no crisis of confidence if we weren't going to war with Iran.
If mass deportations were continuing apace and expanding.
You know, none of these issues would be happening if they just did what they said they would do.
But they want everyone to be convinced that if only I was not doing this show, oh, well, then they wouldn't have these problems.
If only I wasn't doing the show, well, then the Democrats would not be defeating them in the midterms.
It's obviously not the case.
This is a power struggle.
They do not want you to have a political consciousness.
They don't want you to have power.
And that's really what this is about.
It's about me riling up the people that should not have a say in anything.
You are, I've said this my whole career.
They expect all of us stupid white people, all of us stupid men, Christians, whatever, they expect all of us to shut up, pay all the taxes, do all the work, and dutifully vote in all the elections, make all the donations while everything is taken from us.
The GOP is sucking up all the votes, all the money.
These candidates that are in there, they are the rallying point for all of us white people, right-wingers, anyone that's opposed to the left.
The GOP is sucking up all that support.
And anyone that's against the left is going to fall in line behind the GOP.
That's the problem.
The GOP needs to be absolutely blown up, destroyed, and a vacuum must be created.
And it will be filled.
A vacuum must be created so that it can be filled.
A space has to open up so that something else can come in, something else that isn't the same bullshit, lesser of two evils, traitor, Wall Street, little tech party.
The next thing they want us to get in line for is JD Vance.
Why would you expect anything different?
They want us to put all of our hopes and all of our dreams and JD Vance on the offhand chance that, you know, maybe he'll be different.
Let's just roll the dice again.
No, I don't, I don't play not to lose.
I play to win.
And that's how we have to operate.
You have to know when to walk away from the table.
If you can't walk away from the table, you always lose.
That's the first rule of any negotiation.
If you cannot or will not walk away from the table, you will get fucked every time, period.
And that's what they're telling us.
They're telling us you can never not vote Republican because if you do, then the Democrats will win.
So we can never get up from this table.
This negotiation between its voters and the party, we can never get up from that table because if we do, the sky will fall.
Well, if that makes me an accelerationist, then so be it.
I got contacted by Chris Ruffo last week from Manhattan Institute, and he's doing a hit piece about me.
And they asked me for comment.
It's all the laundry list of things you've heard a million times before.
All you need to know about Chris Ruffo is that he's from the Manhattan Institute.
They held an event two weeks ago where they gave Ben Shapiro some kind of award.
It's a $250,000 spend to get a seat at this fundraiser.
It's funded by Paul Singer, a pro-Israel Jew.
They got Trannies on the team.
He's married to an illegal immigrant.
He's on Timpool talking about he can't wait for white people to go extinct through intermarriage and for America to be a brown cappuccino colored country.
And it's going to be every one of these types of people from now until 2028 that's going to be churning out this crap.
Don't listen.
Whatever you do, don't listen to the show.
Whatever you do, do not listen to the show.
You might think he's making a good point, but he's a weird guy.
Yeah, I'm a weird guy.
Okay.
You, you may agree with what he's saying on the show, but what about this group chat gossip from 10 years ago?
What about he was being on Fortnite to his friend?
I'm not, you know, you're passing around the collection plate.
You're passing around the cup again.
You didn't do what you said you would do the first, you know, seven times, however many times it was.
No, I think we're good this time.
We'll burn it down in 26.
Let them lose.
Let them get destroyed for the next two years.
And I hope Vance gets dragged to hell with it.
And then in 28, maybe we could get a real leader.
Maybe we could get a real leader, something different.
Who knows?
Who knows where it's going to come from?
But it can't come from this administration, which is a joke.
And I think everybody knows that.
But anyway, that's that.
I do want to move on.
I want to get into our featured story tonight, which is about Iran.
I mean, hey, consistent with everything I just said, our featured story, we're talking all about this imminent confrontation with Iran.
And the latest is that earlier today, there was a second round of negotiations between the United States and Iran, second round this year.
About a week and a half ago, the U.S. and Iran met in Oman.
And this is in the middle of a massive U.S. military buildup in the Middle East.
Trump has given Iran an ultimatum.
And the ultimatum is surrender or die.
Either they capitulate to our demands or we are going to war with Iran.
Trump has said repeatedly he is looking for a decisive military option.
Translation, regime change.
The ultimatum is either Iran is going to accept all of our conditions on nuclear, as well as Israel's conditions on nuclear missiles and proxies, or else we are in another regime change war in the Middle East.
So there's a huge military buildup.
It is a loaded gun pointed at Iran.
And as this is happening, the United States has engaged Iran in a last-ditch effort to reach some kind of compromise, some kind of deal.
To that end, they met about a week and a half ago in Oman, and a framework was created for negotiations.
And as we've talked about, that framework simply means Iran needs assurances that we're only looking for compromise on the nuclear file.
They don't want to talk about missiles.
They don't want to talk about proxies.
They only want to talk about nuclear.
Today, the Iranians met with the United States in Switzerland, and they actually got down a brass tacks about what this deal might look like.
And the big news is that Iran has apparently given some concessions.
And that concession is that they have agreed that they might give up enrichment for three years and that they will forfeit their stockpile of highly enriched uranium to a third country like Russia or another ally of theirs.
And that is said to be the jumping off point for future negotiations.
Now, this is a story.
This is from the Wall Street Journal.
We'll read through this and then we'll talk a little bit about what we can expect here.
It says, quote, U.S. and Iranian officials said that Tuesday's nuclear talks in Geneva made progress following Tehran's willingness to compromise around the edges of its nuclear program, including moving its near-weapons-grade uranium offshore.
As the negotiations resumed, Iran sent a veiled threat carrying out military exercises in the Strait of Hormuz.
The question remains whether the proposal and threat will move President Trump.
Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei warned in a speech on Tuesday ahead of the talks that Iran was prepared to retaliate against any American strike.
Until Tuesday, much of the diplomacy had focused on talking about the scope of negotiations.
That's that framework I keep mentioning, what the negotiations will be about, what's on the table.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragshi said that Tuesday's talks were more substantive, however, and that both sides in Geneva presented ideas aimed at crafting an agreement.
He said Iran and the U.S. agreed to exchange texts to create the framework for a deal before a date for new negotiations is decided.
However, a U.S. official gave a more circumspect readout from the negotiations, which took place at the Omani ambassador's residence on the shore of Lake Geneva.
That official said, quote, progress was made, but there are still a lot of details to discuss.
That official placed the onus on Tehran for taking the next steps, saying the Iranians agreed to come back within two weeks to address some of the open gaps in our positions.
And what that means is the United States is not coming off of its demands.
And we'll talk specifically about what that means, but this official, speaking on behalf of the White House, is saying, we're not budging.
So we met last week to talk about what's on the table and the scope of these talks.
We met this morning to come up with some ideas about an agreement to craft maybe some creative solution.
Iran has come down.
They're making some concessions.
The U.S. official is saying, yeah, well, they got about two weeks to agree to what we want.
They have two weeks to close the gap.
Here's what we want.
Iran is over here.
We're going to give them two weeks to find their way over to our position.
But it's very clear from what the U.S. government is saying that this is not really a negotiation.
This is an ultimatum.
And to the extent that they are meeting, who knows what the real purpose of this is?
Maybe it's building rapport.
Maybe it's just communicating the message.
But it seems that the White House is being very clear that this is a surrender or die situation.
Either Iran is going to agree to everything we're demanding or it's going to be a war.
And that's really it.
It doesn't sound like there's a lot of wiggle room here.
But like I said, more on that in a moment.
The article goes on, it says, at the previous meeting in Oman, Iran told the U.S. it was open to sending that highly enriched material, which would be enough to fuel 12 nuclear bombs abroad, possibly to Russia.
Iranian officials have signaled in conversations with other diplomats that they might offer to pause uranium enrichment for up to three years, according to diplomats.
That promise, however, wouldn't change much.
Iran is believed to have stopped enriching uranium after U.S. strikes last June, and it also falls short of U.S. demands that it halt enrichment altogether.
Some regional diplomats are thinking bigger and pushing a multi-point plan that includes everything from non-aggression commitments to business deals.
The White House is also under pressure from Israel to constrain Iran's ballistic missile program.
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, who met Trump last week, said Sunday a good deal would require the dismantling of Iran's nuclear infrastructure and limiting the range of its ballistic missiles.
The Pentagon last week redeployed the Navy's most advanced aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald Ford, from the Caribbean and sent it toward the Middle East.
It actually just entered the Atlantic earlier today from the Caribbean.
It will join another aircraft carrier, the USS Abraham Lincoln, and a host of other U.S. warships, warplanes, and air defense systems across the region.
On Sunday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said expectations for a deal weren't high.
He said, no one has ever been able to do a successful deal with Iran, but we're going to try.
So once again, we find ourselves in exactly the same position that we have been in for eight years, actually.
Okay.
And we can talk once again about the fundamental dynamics here.
Israel, since 1979, has been pursuing the overthrow of the Iranian regime.
That is their endgame.
And it is very important to understand this.
Israel does not care about nuclear weapons at all, not in and of themselves.
The reason that Israel hates nuclear weapons is because nuclear weapons protect countries from Israel.
So this is why in 1981, Israel bombed Iraq, because Iraq was developing a nuclear arsenal.
This is why Israel bombed Syria in 2007, because they feared that Syria was developing a nuclear arsenal.
Why did they drop the bombs?
Why did they carry out the strikes?
Because Israel had already wanted to destroy those regimes, and a nuclear arsenal would deter them from doing this.
So it's no coincidence that after 1981, Iraq was defenseless when the U.S. invaded in 1990, and then again in 2003.
It's no coincidence that after Israel bombed Syria in 2007, soon after in 2011, Syria underwent a civil war, and the U.S., Israel, and other countries backed proxies that overthrew Syria's government.
Here we are again, 2025, Iran's nuclear program is attacked.
What do you think happens after that?
So Israel is seeking the destruction of Iran's regime.
Iran knows this.
So to defend itself, Iran is hedging its bets by creating a latent nuclear arsenal.
They have the ability to create nuclear fuel for a bomb, but they haven't made enough.
They haven't enriched it to the point that it could be used in a bomb, and they haven't made the bomb.
That's also why they have ballistic missiles, because ballistic missiles are uninterceptible in enough numbers and at certain speeds.
And that is a conventional way to deter Israel, just like how North Korea has artillery lined up and pointed at Seoul in the same way that they have a nuclear program also.
And Iran has its proxies.
If Iran doesn't make it, if they get nuked by Israel and the United States, then the proxies could carry out the retaliation.
Such is the underlying dynamic in the Middle East.
And now that Iraq has been defeated, now that Syria has been defeated, the only rival left for Israel, maybe not the only, but the next in a long line, is Iran.
Israel wants to destroy Iran, but Iran has this nuclear capability.
And again, let's be clear about what that capability is.
They have the ability to enrich uranium.
They have centrifuges.
Centrifuges enrich uranium.
And if they have this native ability, if enrichment is happening in centrifuges that are inside of Iranian territory, and if those centrifuges are fortified underground and inside mountains, then theoretically, on a certain timeline, Iran could create nuclear fuel for a bomb, and then they can make a bomb.
And this is really the subject of the negotiations.
Now, here comes the United States, and the United States does not want Iran to have a bomb.
We don't necessarily have a problem with them having a peaceful nuclear program, having reactors.
But to fuel a reactor, you don't necessarily need the centrifuges.
You don't need that native ability to make enriched uranium.
You just need to be able to import it from another country.
So this is why the United States is preoccupied with having Iran limit its enrichment activity to a very low level, or, and I think this is the demand now, to take away their enrichment ability.
And we'll let them have enriched uranium, but only at a low level, and we can't let them enrich it any further.
So you can have your centrifuges in another country's territory so we can shut it down and we can watch it and have oversight over it.
And we could prevent you from getting more material or enriching material beyond a safe limit.
That's where we stand.
Now, at a certain point, Iran began enriching uranium to a level that can be used in a bomb.
This is at the center of our strategic dynamic with Iran.
We want to take their enrichment ability or put a ton of restrictions on it.
And we want to seize that stockpile of already highly enriched uranium, which they could take and with very little effort, turn it into material for a bomb.
That's what we are concerned with as the United States.
Now, last year, we negotiated with the Iranians, and we said we want to come up with a framework for a deal where, again, we take away that enrichment ability and we take away the stockpile.
And for Iran, this is a red line.
They will not give up enrichment.
They will not give up their stockpile of enriched material.
So in the middle of the negotiations, Israel started bombing Iran.
Then the United States went in and we bombed their centrifuges.
How did this change things?
Well, by bombing their centrifuges, it made it so that effectively they can't enrich anymore.
For them to be able to enrich again, they will have to rebuild.
Now, they have the expertise.
They have the infrastructure.
They have the blueprints.
On a long enough timeline, they will rebuild the centrifuges and they will be able to enrich again.
But by bombing the centrifuges, we may have set them back by years.
So we have effectively stopped them from doing this.
At the same time, that stockpile of highly enriched uranium, we don't know where it is, but we suspect that it is in the same place as those destroyed centrifuges and probably inaccessible.
So they probably can't use this stockpile, although we're not certain, and they probably can't enrich because although they say they have undeclared, more primitive centrifuges elsewhere, their most advanced and modern ones are buried under rubble.
And it will take time for them to be able to further enrich their stockpile, access the stockpile, and again, for them to rebuild those centrifuges.
Now, why is this relevant?
So we return to these negotiations a year later.
All of this played out in 2025.
We negotiated with Iran for 60 days, and this was the impasse.
For Iran, the red line was, we will not give up enrichment.
We're not going to give up our stockpile.
And for the United States, we said you have to give up enrichment.
It can't happen inside your territory, and you have to turn over the stockpile.
Couldn't come to an agreement.
Israel forced our hand and we wound up bombing them.
Well, here we are now a year later.
And once again, the United States is building up its force posture in the Middle East.
We've got now two aircraft carriers on the way, a massive amount of aircraft, like actually a worrying amount of strategic aircraft and strike aircraft and fighter jets.
And we've got a lot of naval ships.
We got a lot of stuff over there.
And once again, we are telling Iran, you're going to give up enrichment.
You're going to give up the stockpile or else it's a war.
Now, the development today in these negotiations is that Iran is apparently making concessions.
As I just read out in this article, Iran is willing to turn over the stockpile to a third-party country.
They'll give Russia that highly enriched uranium, and they're agreeing not to enrich for three years.
Well, why is this not really an actual concession?
Because they probably can't enrich for the next three years anyway.
Now, we don't know that for sure.
Iran claims that their centrifuges were not completely destroyed.
They claim that they have undeclared centrifuges elsewhere.
And again, they're not as sophisticated.
They're not as advanced.
They say this.
We don't really know that for sure.
But they certainly cannot enrich to the extent that they were before at the rate that they were before anytime in the near future.
And they probably can't even access the highly enriched uranium either and further enrich it.
If they could enrich, and if they could access that material, then it actually would be fairly easy for them to make weapons-grade uranium and then make a bomb.
We're not sure about this information, though.
The point is, these concessions that Iran is making, they're not real concessions.
We're promising not to do the thing that we can't really do.
We're promising that we won't do this thing for the next three years that we probably couldn't do anyway for the next three years.
We're going to give up our stockpile of enriched uranium that we probably can't do anything with anyway.
They want to get integrated into the regional economy.
More than anything, they want to buy time.
Because the more time between now and the next confrontation, that means they can build 300 more missiles per month.
So even if it takes them, even if it buys them six months, that's 1,800 more ballistic missiles they can throw at Israel.
And they can rebuild their centrifuges and rebuild their nuclear complex.
And who knows?
Maybe they could even further enrich uranium that is undeclared.
So Iran is in the business of buying time.
They're not serious.
They're not serious negotiators.
And even if that was a real concession, it's still not what the United States is looking for.
The U.S. is demanding that there is no enrichment on Iranian soil.
Not that they're going to voluntarily restrain themselves for a short period of time that sunsets.
The U.S. says you cannot have the infrastructure.
You cannot have the ability to do this.
And that's really the sticking point.
And fundamentally, Iran has never showed willingness to negotiate on this part.
Iran says it is their right as a nation.
Iran says it is the pride of their nation that they have developed this capability.
And the reason they're so insistent upon this is because they don't trust us.
They don't trust that we're even able to execute an independent foreign policy.
They know that if they give up enrichment, if they give up this nuclear hedge, that within 10 years, Israel is going to foment a civil war in their country and they're going down.
And the only thing that is protecting them is that they have all this nuclear material.
And that is why it is in the best interest of the United States that Iran does not collapse.
That is why it is actually in the strategic interest of the United States not to get into a war with Iran in the event that Iran develops a primitive nuclear device and then, God forbid, uses it as the ultimate deterrent.
So that is the impasse and nothing has changed.
Now, on the side of the United States, as we talked about, this official and Marco Rubio and the other negotiators, Donald Trump himself, they are saying, look, we're not actually here to compromise.
We're not here to negotiate.
These are our demands.
And our demands are you can't enrich and you can't have the stockpile.
And you can take your concessions and you can blow them out your ass.
If you don't agree, then we're going to war.
And it really seems to be that simple.
And the reason the United States is saying this is because if Iran has enrichment, you actually have to rewind even a little bit further.
Rubio says that no one has ever been able to make a deal with Iran.
That's not true.
Barack Obama and John Kerry made a deal with Iran in 2015.
There was an Iranian nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in 2015.
And what that deal did is it restricted Iran's enrichment for 10 years.
And there was oversight and regular inspections and 24-7 cameras and there were sanctions relief attached to compliance with those restrictions.
That was a successful deal and it was working.
Iran was abiding by it.
Iran was certified by the IAEA, by America.
We were doing our part.
The EU was doing their part.
The deal was going along for three years until Trump pulled us out of the deal.
And Trump pulled us out of the deal in 2018 unilaterally at the behest of Israel.
And the reason that Trump pulled us out of that deal is because he said we cannot have a nuclear deal that sunsets.
He said, as long as the JCPOA expires in 2025, which it did in September, he said, as long as the deal expires, well, then Iran can just simply resume unrestricted enrichment.
He said, if the deal sunsets after 10 years, well, those restrictions are lifted.
And then it doesn't matter what the deal says.
And then we're in the same boat that we were before.
So why is this relevant?
Why does this matter?
It matters because this administration in particular, Trump himself as a man, he cannot accept anything less than no enrichment capability.
Why?
Because if he accepts anything less, then this deal is just as good or as bad as the JCPOA.
You see the psychology?
So Trump goes in 2018 and says, this deal isn't good enough.
I could get a better deal.
This deal is too soft.
What did that deal say?
That deal said you can keep enrichment under certain limits for a certain amount of time.
If Trump comes back and gets an identical deal, which is we're going to limit enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief and it sunsets in a certain amount of time, well, then what does that say?
Now here we are on the other side of your second term and you're going to get a three-year commitment with restrictions on enrichment and you're going to give a ton of sanctions relief and business deals and investment.
It's as bad or worse than the JCPOA.
Trump will never go for it.
Now, what is the better deal?
And what was the impetus behind ripping up the first deal?
The better deal is that Iran cannot enrich at all.
No sunset, no time limit, no voluntary restraint.
It is that we overseed the destruction of Iran's centrifuges.
This just so happens to be also what Israel wants.
This is what Netanyahu wants.
This is what the Edelsons want.
And why do they insist upon that in particular?
Because they want to destroy Iran, and they cannot with any confidence destroy Iran if Iran still has centrifuges.
If there is any doubt or any concern that Iran has some centrifuges left and they're enriching and they're going to make material for a bomb, then Israel cannot confidently bring us into a war where Iran might have a nuclear deterrent, where they might credibly develop a nuclear arsenal.
It's not just a negotiation between these two parties of the United States and excuse me and Iran.
I'm getting ahead of myself.
It's a three-party negotiation between the United States, Iran, and Israel.
And so other people have pointed this out.
It's sort of interesting.
A deal between the United States and Iran is eminently possible.
It actually would be relatively easy.
Iran is not our enemy.
And actually, Iran has been integrating into the region.
They have made peace with Saudi Arabia.
They have made peace with Egypt.
They are making peace with Turkey.
They are making peace with all these countries.
We could theoretically normalize ties with Iran, and Iran could be normalized in the community of nations.
And maybe they'd even be willing to do things they otherwise would not be willing to do.
But the complicating factor in all of this, the big wrinkle, of course, is that Israel is insistent that Iran render itself defenseless without a nuclear hedge and taking it further without missiles, without proxies.
And these are things that Iran doesn't even want to talk about.
These are things that Iran says are not even on the table.
They're not even going to go there.
So with all that in mind, it is almost an inevitability that there is not going to be a deal.
Can be no compromise.
These are irreconcilable positions.
You cannot simultaneously have enrichment and not have enrichment.
And if there's no deal, what do you get?
You get a war.
And this is why I say war is almost certainly where we are headed.
The question now that is upon us is just what kind of war it's going to be.
I don't think there's any question that there's going to be a U.S. confrontation with Iran imminently.
In almost every Middle Eastern country, this is not a war that you're going to win by doing a few airstrikes.
Not like last year, not even like what we did in Syria.
If you want a decisive confrontation with Iran, you need some kind of a ground force.
And that either means you're going to have to have the protesters take to the streets and then armed, armed militia, separatist, outside groups, or you're going to need some kind of U.S. invasion force.
Anything less than that, it's not going to be decisive.
It's not going to be a true decapitation.
And so that's really the question.
Now we're in this bind where we can't win the negotiation.
We have to go to war.
Well, we can't win the war without a ground force, but that also seems unthinkable.
And so it seems like maybe in the end, we're going to get perhaps waves of airstrikes that will degrade Iran's defenses.
And what we will be engaged in is a protracted multi-year engagement, just like what happened in Syria, where you've got sponsorship of groups inside the country, where you've got basically an open front in the air inside of Iran, waves of airstrikes degrading Iran's air defenses, degrading its internal security, degrading its military and leadership.
And this happens over a long period of time.
Give me just one second here.
unidentified
I stop playing games.
And at any moment, you hit that yay button.
I'm gonna pull you.
If they wanna burn you, they don't want to hold my mouth.
But anyway, I'm seeing this play out and everything.
And whatever.
It is what it is.
But anyway, so I think this is where things are headed with Iran to pick up on where I left off.
I'm good.
I'm good.
Nobody, I know people get freaked out when I take a 10-second break or whatever, but everything's fine.
Picking up where I left off, this is clearly where things are headed.
I don't know that it's going to be, Sneeko texting me, you good.
Appreciate you, Sneeko.
I don't think it's going to be a full-scale ground invasion.
It's not going to be a major ground war.
At least never say never.
I mean, I don't know that that's going to happen right away, but I think what you're going to see maybe most likely is that it is going to be a successive wave of airstrikes on Iran.
And this is going to become part of maybe a, I don't want to say a longer term, but it's going to be a protracted military campaign in Iran to continually degrade Iran's defenses, degrade their political leadership, their military.
And in a sense, it's playing this game.
Iran is left to its own devices, building missiles, rebuilding their nuclear program.
They're rearming their proxies.
And the way to think about it is that Israel comes in, degrades everything.
The United States does a decisive strike.
Iran tries to bring it back.
Before they can bring it back to the previous levels, we hit them again.
And it seems as though we're going to be trapped in this cycle until either there's going to be a major ground war or eventually the Iranian regime collapses from the inside.
But I'll tell you what's not going to happen.
What seems to me at this point to be the least likely option is that Iran is left alone.
You have to understand the calculus here.
And the reason that I was able to predict last year that we would be in this position this year is because I was thinking in this way.
And I'll tell you precisely what I said in June of 2025.
After Israel and the United States bombed Iran, Iran booted all the IAEA inspectors.
After that happened, Iran refused to negotiate with the United States and even with the European Union.
They said, we can't trust the U.S. If we can't trust the U.S., we can't even trust Europe.
So actually, a deal became less likely after those strikes because the rapport was weakened.
And not only that, but Iran fully extricated themselves from any kind of enforcement mechanism with regard to their nuclear program.
So, what happens after Iran refuses negotiation, refuses inspections?
Well, we have to assume, and I think correctly so, that Iran is now preparing for war.
They see the writing on the wall.
They know that Trump is president.
They see that Netanyahu is holding on to power.
And they see the power that Israel has over the United States.
And so they know that that strike last year was not a one and done.
The U.S. and Israel are watching Iran build its missile arsenal back, building its nuclear program back.
The longer that we wait between the first strike and the second strike, it's like a mathematical function.
Every month after that initial strike, Iran is going to have more missiles.
With each passing month, they will have a bigger missile arsenal than they did the month before.
And all those missiles are aimed at Israel.
And though with every missile that is aimed at Israel, Iran increases its leverage.
It's more billions in the hands of Hezbollah to rebuild.
It's more missiles pointed at Israel.
It's more centrifuges put back online, maybe more enrichment, more uranium.
Now, if you understand that this is happening, then what kind of pressure does that put on Washington and Tel Aviv?
It means that we either need to make a deal or hit them again fast, because the longer that we wait, the worse the problem becomes.
Again, this is in terms of strategic thinking.
The more leverage Iran has to either hold out on a deal or to preemptively strike us or Israel or to hold out in a protracted conflict.
So it actually puts pressure on us to quickly resolve the problem.
Again, either through a deal or a war.
And again, a deal became less likely.
A deal is still impossible.
If Iran won't come to the table, there's really only one other way this can go.
And it's not like we're going to go to war eventually in 10 years, in 20 years, when we work up the political will.
We don't have that kind of dynamic right now.
Every month that goes by, according to Wall Street Journal and the Rupert Murdoch-owned Zionist media empire, according to Grossi at the IAEA, they're closer to the bomb.
They got 300 more missiles every single month.
So we have to act quickly is the mentality.
That's the mindset.
And here's, like I said, what's not going to happen, Israel in particular, but the U.S. and Israel in general, they're not going to let Israel go on indefinitely and in perpetuity amassing a larger arsenal, number one.
And number two, what they're definitely not going to let happen is a nuclear deal where Iran gets sanctions relief.
Because Iran gets sanctions relief, they rebuild their economy, and then they're never going anywhere.
Because what is the number one threat to the Iranian regime?
It is the prospect that there will be an uprising from inside the country.
That is fueled by economic insecurity.
Why were there protests in January?
Well, they were astroturfed, but they were amplified and exacerbated by the economic conditions, the collapse of the currency, runs on the banks, infrastructure problems, rolling brownouts, loss of running water, electricity, other critical infrastructure.
And so, in other words, if Iran, let's say they make a deal, let's say they go on without a deal.
Well, that gives them time to fix their internal problems, rebuild their defenses, and then they're not going anywhere.
Then they become impossible to dislodge.
And as we talked about from the very beginning, if Israel's strategic imperative is regime change in Iran, that's the last thing that they want.
And that is the only thing that you need to understand is that Israel will not tolerate a deal.
It's not that they don't want one.
It's not that Iran won't agree to one.
The only thing you need to understand is that Israel cannot accept one.
They literally cannot tolerate a deal.
It is an imperative that they sabotage any deal.
And as long as the United States is involved with Israel, that is exactly what is going to happen.
Israel is working against our interest here, and we have no control over them.
And to the extent that that is the case, we are never going to have peace with Iran.
There's only one way this is ever going to end.
And a lot of people have a hard time imagining that and how that's going to work and everything.
But all you need to do is fill in the blanks here.
All you need to do is understand these underlying dynamics.
And it is inevitable where it has to go.
Like I said, and the reason I phrase it that way, it sounds extraordinary that we would go to war with Iran.
It sounds unbelievable that we would have ground troops there.
The similarly playing into white supremacy taboos and comedically backing them up in a consistent louder energy on the show remind me of hearing my grandpa's giant AM radio's blaring rush limbo propaganda in the early 2000s.
They say that the reason why the nations means cattle is because they say that everyone that is not Jewish is not human.
You have the Jews and then you have the nations, the nations of the, you know, these other tribes that God did not elect.
And the Jews say about the nations that they are not actually people, that we don't have souls, that we are beasts, that we just look human, that we're idolaters.
So, uh, so the vernacular is that we're cattle, we're animals.
Also, the group chat is the best, but I work 12 to 14 hours a day, so I can never watch live stream on time, but I try to show my support wherever I can.
So he goes on with this other guy and he's like, okay, maybe I exaggerated.
And then he goes, you know, if Michael Tracy wants to differentiate between 15-year-olds and pre-pubescent girls, we should check your hard drive and people like that should be killed.
That's how we deal with these people.
And it's, and then Michael Tracy said, so you're saying I should die.
Sexual act actualizes the potential, makes a baby.
That is what they are made for that.
They're made to be bred.
They are made to have kids with.
Okay, they exist for sex.
Women exist for sex.
That is why they are mothers or they are whores or they are nuns.
End of list.
Women are either mothers, whores, or nuns.
No other options.
There are no female philosophers.
There are no female inventors.
There are no female generals or billionaires.
They are mothers, whores, nuns.
End of list.
That's what you can be.
And people start getting into this like literally a child.
It's like, dude, women are childlike until they hit menopause, okay?
Women are so vulnerable they cannot consent to sex until they're 21.
Dude, women are retarded until they hit menopause.
Women are emotional psychos until they hit menopause.
You might as well just say, you know, because in the old days, you would say women, when they reach the age of maturity, that's when they become a woman.
In every traditional culture, that's when women are getting married.
In every traditional culture, up until modernism, up until, you know, what, 40 years ago, that is the age when a girl becomes a woman is when she's able to have kids.
Now, we are so on the other side of clown world that you might as well say the real age of sexual maturity is when a woman cannot have kids.
You can't touch a woman until she's at menopause.
You can't touch a woman until she has no more eggs.
You have to wait until she's 35 because that's when she's a woman.
It's like, dude, who is making up these fucking rules?
Oh yeah, it's childless divorced bitches and their orbiters and their simps.
So fuck feminism.
Feminism must be eradicated from the earth.
And yes, age of consent ideology has to go with it.
The law of the land is marriage.
When are women going to be getting married?
That's the question.
I don't believe in age of consent.
I believe in age of marriage.
When is it licit?
When does it make sense for a woman to get married?
And I think that age has nothing to do with age of consent.
So feminism must be utterly annihilated and destroyed, all of it, every vestige of it, the whole rape culture bullshit, the hysteria over this sort of thing.
Our fertility rates are crashing through the floor.
And that is because of feminism.
Is because women are being educated until they're 22 so they can get a job in an industrial technological economy, and they're not even thinking about fucking for the sake of having kids until they're 29.
And that's why they're having a kid if they're lucky.
That Rufo article claimed you were planning to move to Florida as a deal with Thiel's guy.
Funny.
I recall many of Super Chatter getting shattered for suggesting that you leave Chicago for any reason, but Rufo wants us to believe that you'll pick up and move across the country to run some special internet show.
They say he was there to get money from the Wilkes brothers.
That is so not what that was.
And same thing in Miami.
I mean, look, like I said, I meet with all kinds of political people, and then you get people that weren't even there that say, this was the purpose of this.
They want you to think that there is no legitimate critique of JD Vance, except I say it every single night.
The only reason anyone could have a problem with Vance is if it's sour grapes.
Really?
It has nothing to do with the fact that he was a never-Trumper, that he called Trump a Nazi, that he's a puppet of Peter Thiel, that he said we should bomb Iran at the RNC two years ago.
She gets promoted because she's on YouTube and Spotify.
I don't know why that is.
But yeah, look, I'm not going to moral fag and say, oh, I will say this.
It is a little bit freaky that when I tell me if you agree with this.
When I think of the Charlie Kirk assassination, I don't even think about Charlie Kirk anymore at all.
Isn't that weird?
When I think about the Charlie Kirk assassination, the only thing I think about is the Candace Owens show.
I was thinking about this the other day.
When I think about Charlie Kirk getting his head blown off on September 10th, I remember all the feelings that I had on that day and about Charlie and the funeral and everything.
Now, all I think about is Candace Owens.
When I think about that assassination, all I think about my mental real estate on that issue, it is just the battle between Candace and Turning Point.
The conspiracies, the infighting between them.
And that's kind of fucked up.
Not to moral fag about it, not to be like, you know, I mean, Charlie Kirk was not my best good friend or anything, but it is kind of sad, don't you think?
Charlie Kirk got shot and he probably was killed by Tyler Robinson.
And instead of going after the left-wing dirtbags that killed him or that celebrated his death, nothing even resulted from that because of this giant interference from her and the conspiracy theorists.
And now she has sucked all, she has literally cannibalized him.
Candace Owens has cannibalized Charlie Kirk.
She has devoured him.
She has literally devoured him and absorbed all of the clout and all of the attention from his death.
It's the sickest thing I've ever seen in my life.
Like a parasite, like a disease.
Like she has literally wrapped herself around like the animal kingdom, bro.
She has wrapped herself around the entire Charlie Kirk assassination and what a huge story that was.
And she has digested all of that clout to make herself bigger and stronger and more famous and richer.
It's like a Venus flytrap.
Like that whole thing, that nuclear bomb of eyeballs and everything that it was, she has just wrapped herself around it and it is making her more powerful.
Sucking all of that down and it is making her what she is today, which is kind of this like shamanistic phenomenon.
It's very disturbing, actually.
Just goes to show how narcissism is so all-consuming.
I'm a bioanthrolle student studying human variation in medicine.
Genetic differences across ethnicities can be measured precisely.
If a white and MSD so have a child, the data shows that there is enough deviation that a white parent will share more genetic similarity with another white stranger than with their own mixed ancestry child.
Can you go on a three to four day vacation so we can arrest Lee Wexner or broke her piece in the middle of his girlfriend and get attacked or something cool to send $20.
What are your thoughts on the I Miss the Old Kim t-shirt that Bianca Sensori made in Yeywar?
Tracy insists there is zero credible evidence Epstein's a pedophile, but not before posting the proof himself and simply adding that the child porn he was caught with once himself produced without skipping a beat on X on just February 7th slash ATH.
And, that was also only the 2019 search of just 85 GBs.
You say you welcome Republicans losing and everything that comes with it.
If we get a blue sweep in 28 that includes mass amnesty, what's the game plan for the right-wing getting back in power after 30 million illegals are now citizens that can vote?
My homies and their mom ignore the group chat where we fire off stickers that we cut out of your cute little face and resemble the live chat when the credo drops.
I get your stance on not blindly voting Republican, but I think you're downplaying or forgetting how bad it could be if Kamalo or her equivalent was president.
You'd probably be in court right now over your tweets or past clips.
Broy Protig sent $20.
Have you squashed your beef with the Moody family yet?
Seems like they were pivotal in helping Clav get released from jail and Oz.
Yo, Nick, the current background and said is so brown-coated.
Looks like some Aztec hut into Och Dee Lawn.
Bring back the green screen, bro.
Holy fuck.
Sherelle writes Earth Aides Fine sent $20.
Hey, man.
It's Spuffbub.
Thanks for slimaxing.
People don't usually slimax.
Texas Steel Groper per sent $20.
As a fellow Marine, the fact that Vance behind the president would approve of the possibility of another war where our brothers will sacrifice themselves for Israel is why I can't stand him.
I'm trying to keep it real, but sometimes, sometimes I just want to be a complete sociopath because you be authentic and then people are such complete jagoffs.