SPANISH SUPERBOWL??? Latino DEGENERATE SOILS Sacred HALFTIME TRADITION | America First Ep. 1637
Nicholas J. Fuentes dismisses mainstream outrage over Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show as overblown, calling it a harmless Latino cultural celebration while mocking Kid Rock’s divisive "Turning Point USA" alternative. He warns of Israeli-funded surveillance via Palantir and Canary Mission, framing the U.S. as an "occupied nation" through collusion like Trump’s 2020 Suleimani assassination and Heritage Foundation’s Project Esther. Fuentes urges secrecy over overt activism, mocking critics like Matt Walsh while pushing for Epstein files’ full disclosure—despite DOJ redactions—to expose alleged accomplices. The episode blends conspiracy claims with provocative humor, ending with a call for "Americanism" over globalism, prioritizing sovereignty through discreet, long-term infiltration. [Automatically generated summary]
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
No one's allowed to say that the blood is a quintessential part of this, that the blood of our people is something that is essential.
That we are different.
that america was different because we are different palantir is an ai data analytics company
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithms, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
If we don't have freedom on the Internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind raped every day forever.
Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geolocation, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you asleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
unidentified
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
People do not stab young girls on trains because they're born black.
People do not shoot Palestinians in the back of the head or cheer it on just because they're Jewish.
The people that do this are lost.
They have to be isolated and segregated out.
A new consensus must emerge.
Are you in favor of a society with meaning?
A society where life is sacred, where life has sanctity, where people's lives and their dignity and their integrity is respected.
Or are we going to live in a society that is a never-ending war between nihilistic tribes, warlords, savages, pagans?
I see an emerging consensus, and I think that the mature people that actually love America, actually love our children, the people that recognize the division, the peril that we're in, we need to fortify a new consensus and rally the people of conscience, the people of decency, the people of humanity, the people of charity towards their fellow man,
against those that want to kill us, against those that laugh and celebrate when innocent people are harmed for any reason, for any ideological reason.
Against the people that are cruel, the people that are hateful.
And by that, I mean the people that are really cruel.
Not the people that say things you disagree with, not the people that are provocative, not the people that are sometimes angry, but the people that are really cruel and really evil.
What makes Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the bearing of suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us.
An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children, even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
That is what makes us different.
Canary Mission Revelations00:12:10
unidentified
The Canary
Mission is an Israeli-funded blacklist, which, since July 2025, has been confirmed to be used by the Trump administration to target students, professors, and professionals who oppose Israel and reside in the United States.
This idea is part of an initiative created by the Heritage Foundation, the same group responsible for the infamous Project 2025.
In their initiative, titled Project Esther, they state that students participating in pro-Palestinian protests and activism are supporting Hamas, a group that the United States designates as a foreign terrorist organization.
Therefore, pro-Palestinian students are considered to be supporting terrorism and are subject to the revocation of visas, frozen bank accounts, asset seizures, and the denial of basic constitutional rights.
In effect, the Canary mission serves as a means to circumvent constitutional protections, allowing the federal government to engage in intelligence gathering activities that would otherwise be considered unlawful.
But the Canary mission is not alone.
Palantir, another company closely aligned with the state of Israel, uses AI-driven analytics to maintain private databases on U.S. citizens and currently works with four federal agencies.
While government contracting with the private sector is long-standing, the prominent influence of Jewish groups within these increasingly powerful organizations warrants careful examination.
I renew the call for all able-bodied young American men, all of our elite human capital, all of our geniuses, warriors, intelligent people to dedicate themselves to American sovereignty and independence.
As Christians, as Americans, as white people, as citizens of the United States, and anybody that settles for anything less is just as much of an enemy, I would actually consider them worse than our oppressors.
So on Independence Day, it's important to reflect on the fact that we are an occupied nation.
Now, just like then, we're being ruled by a small country across an ocean, serving itself at our expense.
And as long as that is the case, I will always be obsessed with that.
As long as that is the case, I will always be speaking out against that and fighting against that.
And I will always be anchored, understanding that that is the fundamental struggle.
As long as our presidents have to kiss the wall in Israel and wear a small hat, as long as they have to say that we want to make Israel great again and they're the greatest country ever, I will never be okay with that.
Ever.
And it doesn't matter what they offer me or us.
It doesn't matter how they might try to placate us or appease our interests, the concessions they'll make.
Barack Obama created the joint comprehensive plan of action, the JCPOA, or the Iranian nuclear deal.
And Barack Obama brought together China, Russia, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the European Union to enforce a nuclear deal that restricts Iran's enrichment of uranium.
The early talks were conducted in secret, and the Israelis were furious, furious about this.
Netanyahu went to a joint session of Congress and gave a speech in defiance of the American president and its nuclear deal, and Congress gave 37 standing ovations.
They colluded with Trump to get him elected so that Trump would do maximum pressure and create a ladder of escalation, pulling us out of the deal, declaring the IRGC terrorists, then killing its leader, putting sanctions on the regime.
This is a war that started a long time ago, that Trump made hot in 2018 and has been going on for seven years.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and, in some cases, quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
unidentified
I told you so.
When I get home, I want you.
Hello, I got places to be Good evening, everybody You're watching America First.
to say that the blood, the blood of our people, is something that is essential.
That we are different.
that america was different because we are different palantir is an ai data analytics company
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithm, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
If we don't have freedom on the Internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind raped every day forever.
Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geo-location, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you're asleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
unidentified
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
People do not stab young girls on trains because they're born black.
People do not shoot Palestinians in the back of the head or cheer it on just because they're Jewish.
The people that do this are lost.
They have to be isolated and segregated out.
A new consensus must emerge.
Are you in favor of a society with meaning?
A society where life is sacred, where life has sanctity, where people's lives and their dignity and their integrity is respected?
Or are we going to live in a society that is a never-ending war between nihilistic tribes, warlords, savages, pagans?
I see an emerging consensus.
And I think that the mature people that actually love America, actually love our children, the people that recognize the division, the peril that we're in, we need to fortify a new consensus and rally the people of conscience, the people of decency, the people of humanity, the people of charity towards their fellow man,
against those that want to kill us, against those that laugh and celebrate when innocent people are harmed.
For any reason, for any ideological reason.
Against the people that are cruel, the people that are hateful.
And by that, I mean the people that are really cruel.
Not the people that say things you disagree with, not the people that are provocative, not the people that are sometimes angry, but the people that are really cruel and really evil.
What makes Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the bearing of suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us.
An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children, even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
That is what makes us different.
Canary Mission Sanctions00:09:33
unidentified
The Canary
Mission is an Israeli-funded blacklist, which, since July 2025, has been confirmed to be used by the Trump administration to target students, professors, and professionals who oppose Israel and reside in the United States.
This idea is part of an initiative created by the Heritage Foundation, the same group responsible for the infamous Project 2025.
In their initiative, titled Project Esther, they state that students participating in pro-Palestinian protests and activism are supporting Hamas, a group that the United States designates as a foreign terrorist organization.
Therefore, pro-Palestinian students are considered to be supporting terrorism and are subject to the revocation of visas, frozen bank accounts, asset seizures, and the denial of basic constitutional rights.
In effect, the Canary mission serves as a means to circumvent constitutional protections, allowing the federal government to engage in intelligence gathering activities that would otherwise be considered unlawful.
But the Canary mission is not alone.
Palantir, another company closely aligned with the state of Israel, uses AI-driven analytics to maintain private databases on U.S. citizens and currently works with four federal agencies.
While government contracting with the private sector is long-standing, the prominent influence of Jewish groups within these increasingly powerful organizations warrants careful examination.
I renew the call for all able-bodied young American men, all of our elite human capital, all of our geniuses, warriors, intelligent people to dedicate themselves to American sovereignty and independence as Christians, as Americans, as white people, as citizens of the United States.
And anybody that settles for anything less is just as much of an enemy.
I would actually consider them worse than our oppressors.
So on Independence Day, it's important to reflect on the fact that we are an occupied nation.
Now, just like then, we're being ruled by a small country across an ocean, serving itself at our expense.
And as long as that is the case, I will always be obsessed with that.
As long as that is the case, I will always be speaking out against that and fighting against that.
And I will always be anchored, understanding that that is the fundamental struggle.
As long as our presidents have to kiss the wall in Israel and wear a small hat, as long as they have to say that we want to make Israel great again and they're the greatest country ever, I will never be okay with that.
Ever.
And it doesn't matter what they offer me or us.
It doesn't matter how they might try to placate us or appease our interests, the concessions they'll make.
Barack Obama created the joint comprehensive plan of action, the JCPOA, or the Iranian nuclear deal.
And Barack Obama brought together China, Russia, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the European Union to enforce a nuclear deal that restricts Iran's enrichment of uranium.
The early talks were conducted in secret, and the Israelis were furious, furious about this.
Netanyahu went to a joint session of Congress and gave a speech in defiance of the American president and its nuclear deal, and Congress gave 37 standing ovations.
They colluded with Trump to get him elected so that Trump would do maximum pressure and create a ladder of escalation, pulling us out of the deal, declaring the IRGC terrorists, then killing its leader, putting sanctions on the regime.
This is a war that started a long time ago, that Trump made hot in 2018 and has been going on for seven years.
Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Monday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight, lots to get into.
Big show, our featured story.
We are once again talking about the Epstein files, major new disclosures.
And it looks like there's going to be a lot of news about these files in the coming days and weeks.
And the big story today, if you haven't heard it, actually just broke, I think, minutes ago, a couple hours ago.
But we have now learned that the Jewish billionaire Les Wexner, billionaire owner of Victoria's Secret, L Brands, other companies out of Ohio, has been named by the Department of Justice as an accomplice, an unnamed accomplice to Jeffrey Epstein.
And this is a part of the files that was redacted when the files were released a couple weeks ago.
But after this particular document came out, heavily redacted, the DOJ has decided to release the information.
And this is part of actually up to six unnamed accomplices that the DOJ talks about in the files that could be charged, but their names are redacted.
So our news for today is that the representatives Thomas Massey and Rokana, a Republican and Democrat, respectively, they are pushing the DOJ to name those people.
And if the DOJ doesn't do it, they may use the floor of the House of Representatives to name these people themselves.
Because on the floor of the House, they are privileged to say whatever they like without civil or criminal liability.
There's been a little bit of a development on those files.
Last week, there is, I suppose it's a concession from the Justice Department.
They say that congressmen will be able to view the files fully unredacted, but in a highly controlled setting.
They have to give advance notice up to 24 hours.
They're not allowed to record anything, photograph anything.
They need to make an appointment, but we might be able to get some more information, answer some questions.
Because as I said last week, the file dump that we have really creates more questions than answers.
And the way we can do that is through our congressmen.
So we'll talk all about that tonight.
And I think that actually fits perfectly with what I've been saying about the files.
And I'll tell you what I mean by that.
That'll be our big story.
If we have time, we're going to talk about these negotiations with Iran, which took place on Friday in the capital of Oman.
And that's a very interesting story.
I don't know if I'll get to it tonight because there's really so much to say.
And I might need to just save it for tomorrow.
There's been a few new developments.
We had this big negotiation on Friday, as you know, and this was widely viewed as a take it or leave it, all or nothing, sudden death round of negotiations, where the United States presented a list of demands, and Iran was given the option either to totally capitulate or there's going to be a war.
Now, both sides say that the talks were productive.
The Iranian president said the talks were good.
White House says talks were good.
They say Iran wants a deal.
What is different this time, different from last year, is that now you have the intercession of six Arab countries, six Muslim countries that are really pushing for a deal.
And they are Turkey, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Pakistan, and perhaps the United Arab Emirates.
Oman is also present and pushing for a deal.
Now, Israel's getting a little bit worried because the talks went well on Friday, and there's a huge push now, more than ever, from many of America's traditional allies in the Middle East to make this deal happen.
So Israel is lobbying the United States in turn not to make a deal.
To that end, the prime minister of Israel is coming back to America, yes, again, for the sixth time since Trump was inaugurated last year.
The sixth meeting.
Previous one was on December 29th in Mar-a-Lago.
Netanyahu is coming back to Washington on Wednesday for a closed-door working meeting, no media.
And his goal is to lobby the president not to make a deal and to insist that in these negotiations that Trump push the issue of ballistic missiles and proxies, mostly ballistic missiles.
Now, with regard to Iran, Iran's conditions are that there can be not even a discussion of missiles or proxies.
They only want to negotiate on the nuclear file.
And to the extent that the talks are going well, it seems that both sides continue to persist in their red line.
Neither side has come down.
And Iran insists that they keep nuclear enrichment.
The United States insists that they cannot have it.
Iran will not relinquish its stockpile of highly enriched uranium.
For the United States, this is a precondition that they give it up.
So there are some things that are different about these negotiations.
Some things are exactly the same.
Just like before, you have the same positions, irreconcilable, intractable.
Israel playing the role of saboteur, U.S. pointing the guns at Iran, force package, forward deployed, Iran stalling, trying to buy time.
However, unlike the last time, you do have all these countries trying to make it happen.
So, like I said, I don't know that we'll get to it tonight.
We might save it for tomorrow because there's really a lot of ground to cover there.
But the big news is going to come on Wednesday when we see the result of this meeting.
But it's all very interesting.
So, like I said, if we have time, we'll get to it.
Before we get into it, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble, smash the like button, leave a comment, let me know you think about the show.
Remember to check out our merch store, Fuentes.store, get your USA quarter zips.
Is there anything kind of worth hanging on to there?
It's kind of a rough thing.
And I said this on Telegram and it was a little controversial, but let's be honest.
The Bad Bunny halftime show, let's be perfectly honest, it wasn't a militantly woke show.
It just wasn't.
The way that conservatives were talking about it, I thought it was going to be Drag Queen Story Hour.
The way that conservatives were fear-mongering and creating this anxiety about this halftime show, they're like, it's going to be an anti-ICE, anti-Trump.
They're going to burn the American flag.
He's going to be cross-dressing.
It's not what it was.
And let's take a step back and not look at it through the lens of being a Chud that is obsessed with politics.
Let's take a step back and look at it through the eyes of a normie.
It's like a Latino-themed show.
It's like a different theme.
And yeah, it's in Spanish, got it.
And yeah, it's very Puerto Rican.
It's very Latin.
But if I'm a Normie and I'm watching this, it's basically just an inoffensive, Latin-themed show.
And it's not really that political.
Obviously, there's a political subtext, and we can get into that.
The significance of it is not lost on anybody that in the middle of this ICE thing, in the middle of the mass deportations and the phenomenon of ICE removals, which heavily target Hispanics.
The significance is not lost on anybody that you have this celebration of Latin America and it's in Spanish.
And we know this artist's politics, this bad bunny character.
I don't think any white Americans know who he is.
Listen to him.
This is an artist for Latin Americans in the United States, outside the United States.
And so to have this guy, and also we know his politics in particular.
He said, fuck ice at the Grammys and all that.
And then at the end, he comes out with all the different flags from Latin America, love, triumphs over hate.
Of course, there is a subtext.
I understand that.
But if you step outside of yourself as a chud that, like I said, you're obsessed with politics and you go into the big social outing of the year, the Super Bowl watch party, and you can't stop thinking about politics and Trump and, you know, this kind of stuff.
If you're a Normie and you're watching it, it's basically inoffensive.
It's not explicitly political.
It's implicitly political.
It's not actually antagonistic.
I didn't feel, and I say this as a right-wing white American, as really a far-right white nationalist, whatever you want to say.
I did not feel antagonized by the show.
I didn't feel like the show was taunting me.
I didn't feel like it was antagonizing me.
I didn't feel that it was defiant.
I didn't feel like it was militant or anti-American.
I think that it was actually, and I say this from the point of view of what it is propositionally, it's positive.
And I don't mean by that that it's good.
I mean that it was a positive message.
And the message was the U.S. and Canada and all the countries of the Americas were celebrating all the people.
And so, whereas maybe different expressions of wokeism in the past were very negative, it was about saying, fuck white people, fuck America, and conservatives and Christians.
And it was about giving them the middle finger and deliberately taunting them and antagonizing them and reveling in how antagonistic they were being.
This, it was almost like the mirror image of that.
And rather, it was celebrating the diversity of the Latin Americans.
And it was a propositionally positive message.
And arguably, there was even, you could say, an olive branch saying, God bless America.
Arguably, that's a political thing in itself, but waving the U.S. flag, throwing that in there, not having it loaded up with degeneracy, not having it completely loaded up with, you know, LGBT type stuff or feminist stuff.
You could argue that something like an olive branch.
In a way, it's inclusive towards Chuds.
Like a normie who is not aligned or a Chud could actually watch it and plausibly not feel like they're being attacked.
Now, why do I point this out?
A lot of people are not going to like me saying this because people are going to say, well, you know, what are you talking about?
It's in Spanish.
It's about its cultural imperialism.
They are brown and they're speaking Spanish and that's anti-white, et cetera, et cetera.
We have to reconcile and come to terms with the fact that the left is a different animal today than it was five years ago.
Something changed five years ago.
The culture began to shift.
And I think it started around 20, excuse me, around 2021.
After Joe Biden was inaugurated, and this is in the middle of the pandemic, and it's after BLM and the riots.
And you have the Ukraine war, which starts a year later in 2022.
You have a lot of criticism of critical race theory.
It's right around this time that I think the culture fully shifted or began to shift.
And it began to shift because people saw the contradictions inherent in wokeism.
And what were those contradictions?
So they had everybody posting the black square, Black Lives Matter, BLM, he can't breathe.
But then at the same time, everybody saw the riots and the summer of love and the crime.
And they saw what abolishing the police looks like.
They also saw a lot of anti-white hatred.
And so people started to say, wait a second, to the extent that a normie believes in wokeism, which is equality and anti-racism and kumbaya and all this, tolerance, pluralism, people said, this doesn't really work.
Because on the one hand, we are saying equality and tolerance and this sort of thing.
I can't breathe.
At the same time, in effect, it is anti-white and it's crime.
And it's actually just making everybody out to be a hypocrite and making everybody out to look stupid.
Here everybody was sympathetic, raising the fist, taking the knee, posting the square.
And what did these black people do?
They then burned down the city.
And actually, the BLM organization was stealing from everybody.
Not only did they burn down the city, but they actually burned down their own city.
So on the one hand, you're arguing that we need a better quality of life for black people.
They saw the Democrat politicians were having dinner in restaurants while they were forcing everybody to mask.
They saw the lunacy of the double maskers, the fake science.
They found out many of the conspiracies were true.
Then with Ukraine, people saw that we're raising the flag for democracy and liberalism, but you're putting all this money behind a totally corrupt government.
They don't hold elections.
So there was sort of this cultural moment in 2021 and 2022, I think when people became disenchanted and disillusioned with woke left-wing liberal hegemony.
They saw what we saw years before, what many of the disaffected young white men saw in 2016 with the first Trump election, in 2017, in 2018, all of this futurist female, anti-white, global citizen type stuff that we saw then, I think the normies caught up about five or six years later.
And they saw the censorship, the foreign wars, the lockdowns, the BLM crap, the anti-whiteness.
And I think slowly but surely, people started to turn against it.
Now, the left has adapted.
And I think you're starting to see what I would call a post-woke leftism.
And they have sort of synthesized the critiques of wokeism.
And you see this in the rise of dark woke and the dirtbag left and these guys like Cometown, where they're able to say racial slurs in an ironic way.
And you got guys like Shane Gillis.
I actually consider Shane Gillis to be like a post-woke left-wing comedian where they can present as a chud.
They can present as maybe culturally, racially insensitive, in reality holding liberal politics.
And maybe he's a bad example.
Maybe he's not a Democrat.
But he shows how it's possible to be still liberal, still maybe holding a woke politics, but not with that overbearing, over-the-top, woke demeanor, the kind of censorship and blue-haired, triggered SJW type stuff from the years before.
I also think about Kamala Harris's election.
Now, Kamala, she was the vice president.
There was a machine that propelled her into the nomination after Biden stepped down.
But when she picked a vice president, she picked Tim Walz as basically an olive branch to white people.
They said, we need a white football coach from the Midwest, from Minnesota, to get white men on board.
And I think that we have to deal with the fact that if the left stops being militantly anti-white, they actually become formidable again.
In a word, if the left stops being militantly, explicitly, aggressively anti-white, in other words, if they sort of live up to their own values, they start being formidable again.
Because there's a lot of people out there.
I think about guys like Dan Bilzerian, who's a friend of mine.
And Dan Bilzerian, I mean, he's probably as right-wing as it gets.
He's got like libertarian politics.
But if a Democrat in the future, like a Ryan Grimm or a Max Blumenthal or a Glenn Greenwald, that sort of person steps up and says, you know, I'm kind of like a libertarian on guns.
And I'm kind of a libertarian on social issues.
I think that's a culture war.
But I'm left-wing on economics.
I want to eat the rich.
And I'm a non-interventionist on foreign policy.
And I'm Israel critical.
And I don't hate white men, but I'm just sort of tolerant of the diversity in the country.
A Democrat with that kind of program can win a guy like Dan Bilzerian, can win a guy like Joe Rogan, can win a guy like, you know, maybe many of the people that were watching that halftime show.
And I think that it would be a mistake for the right wing to run the same playbook in 2026 that they did in 2016.
This kind of Matt Walsh, grumpy, spiteful thing, it's not going to work.
Because I watched the Super Bowl halftime show from the point of view of a normie.
It wasn't a, you know, if anything, the Kendrick Lamar show was more woke.
The Kendrick Lamar show was, of course, they got Sam Jackson as Uncle Sam, and it's a whole thing about racism.
If anything, every black performance is way more woke, defiant, anti-American, aggressive, sort of challenging white people.
This was not like that.
And what did we see in the Turning Point All-American halftime show?
If anything, it was self-ghettoizing.
It was taking our ball and going home.
Everybody's enjoying the Super Bowl.
135 million people are enjoying the big game and the Latin halftime show and whatever.
And then you have all these conservatives that took their ball and went home.
Turning point USA, this like political group, puts on some other show with Kid Rock.
And what's even the point other than to say, you know, well, we're just protesting all of that.
Why?
Because it's in Spanish.
And by the way, it's a totally contradictory message.
The Heritage Foundation had a Super Bowl ad where they have like a Jewish family and a black family and an Hispanic family and an Asian family and a white family all being Christian eating at dinner.
And so it's like, what's the Republican message?
It's like, well, we're not white nationalist and we're not white identitarian.
We're inclusive, but you can't speak Spanish.
And so it just takes us to a place where the white, the white right, the kind of white Republican response actually comes across as being overly political, bitter, resentful, spiteful, and just kind of sad and depressing.
And I watched, on the other hand, the all-American halftime show from Turning Point, and it's all country.
It's all like generic country music.
There isn't one star out of the whole group.
And the lyrics are all super political.
The lyrics are all like, I hate trannies.
And it's like, can't we make a song without it being about the culture war?
You know, if you translate some of the bad bunny songs, they're about like taking pictures with your friends at a party.
Then you get these country music songs and they're like, I can't be country no more because I'm getting canceled by the woke mob.
Nobody under the age of 40 knows a single Kid Rock song.
Nobody is listening to Kid Rock.
And anybody that is watching that is pretending to like it because they're spitefully sitting out and self-ghettoizing away from the real halftime show and honestly pretending to be offended.
It's literally fake outrage, self-ghettoizing, being overly political, pretending to like the things because of the values they purport to have.
In other words, we have become the kind of far left in a certain sense.
It's the same kind of behavior that I think alienated the normies from the left 10 years ago.
I'm like, if this is the best we have to offer, I think everybody's going to go with Latino futurism.
If the white right, if the best we have to offer is the sad, dying gasp of white culture, it's like some white trash country hip-hop artist from Detroit from the 90s.
If that's the best we have to offer, people are going with liberal hegemony.
And if liberal hegemony is not giving a middle finger in their face, people are going to go with it.
You know, in other words, white people are going to feel better being included in liberal hegemony and being included in Hollywood and included in the Super Bowl and included in the Grammys.
As long as white people feel like they're not actually being like deliberately offended and oppressed, they're going to prefer that.
So we need to come up with something different.
The kind of Matt Walsh grumbling about the halftime show every year like it's the end of the world.
So you can take that and you can do whatever you want with that.
You can say that, oh, I'm only saying that because I'm Mexican and I, you know, whatever.
You can cope, but that's the truth.
And I'll tell you something about Donald Trump.
The reason that Donald Trump was so successful is because that he understood this.
In 2016, we had just come up, we had come off after this string of defeats.
It was Mitt Romney, John McCain.
Who were the contenders?
It's people like John Huntsman, Ted Cruz.
Our bench sucked.
And the reason that Trump was able to electrify the movement is because he came from New York.
Okay.
He didn't come from the country music awards, no offense.
He came from New York City, an actual, real, respectable, world-class city.
And he came from Hollywood and he was famous and a billionaire.
And he talked like a celebrity and he looked like a celebrity and he had aura like a celebrity.
And for young people like myself and for young tech guys and young extremely online guys and trolls and libertarians, the reason that we were enamored with Trump is because he was progressive, forward-thinking, sexy, exciting.
Because he has a supermodel wife, because he has a skyscraper with his name on it that's made out of gold, because he has a fucking plane with his name on it, because he has a TV show, because he's been in Hollywood movies, because he's famous.
It was this idea that we were not dorky losers, that the Republican Party was bigger than these like really old people that show up to every Republican thing for the past 30 years.
That is why people like Trump.
It was that vision, make America great again.
And even the rhetoric, this like fiery, fresh rhetoric about nationalism and globalism, it was edgy, futuristic, forward thinking.
And to the extent that we have lost that cultural cachet, it's because we forgot that secret ingredient.
We forgot that that is what was behind the success.
And you think about where we are now compared to where we are a year ago.
A lot of left-wing people are taunting us.
Arguably a year ago, we had the culture and it took us 12 months to lose it.
A year ago, the right wing was ascendant.
And to be a Democrat felt like to be not cool, felt like to be a loser.
We had the comedians, the podcast bros, the live streamers, the celebrities.
If you want to derail liberalism, if you want to derail this machine, we need to be absolutely excellent.
We can't be phoning it in.
Kid Rock is not going to defeat liberal hegemony.
Okay.
If you think the fucking Super Bowl and the military-industrial complex and everything that America is, Hollywood, all of these world wonders that America creates, if you think that's going to be derailed by a kid rock concert and like, you know, if we just get enough of the silent majority of QA non-believers and alternative medicine believers and, you know,
weird Christian cultists that support Israel, you know, if we just get enough of those people in a stadium and enough red, white, and blue lights and stuff that we're going to win, you're wrong.
Well, I said this not last Friday, but the Friday before that.
And I said this last Monday.
The call to action is that we have to take the 3 million files that we have and these suggestive emails, the innuendo, the coded language, these really suspicious emails that we have questions about.
And we need to demand that the Justice Department do a full investigation.
Because here's the thing about something like this.
If Epstein is running a sex trafficking blackmail ring and he's got compromising material on foreign governments and powerful business leaders, and if these files were put together 20 years ago, the DOJ, the very same DOJ that is in on all of it, they're not going to release all the evidence, obviously.
If the idea is that there is a grand conspiracy and Epstein is protected by intelligence, like I said, he's got this unbelievable operation that spans different jurisdictions and private and public life, that's not going to be in the files.
And if it is, it's not going to be in the files they release.
And if it is, it's going to be redacted.
So people were saying two weeks ago, okay, we have these 3 million files.
Let's search through them and let's just take anything, anything that resembles wrongdoing, and let's put this out there like this is the end-all-be-all.
And I said, that's a big mistake.
Let's not overplay our hand because it's not the end-all-be-all.
We have to take what we find, bring it to the Justice Department and the relevant authorities, because unlike us, they have the actual government power to investigate.
Now, the big news today has to deal with this question.
So, of course, people have been going through the Epstein files, and there is a lot of stuff that is weird.
There is Pizzagate coded language talking about beef jerky and pizza and all that sort of stuff, which we saw from the Podestas and the WikiLeaks emails 10 years ago.
And you also have some suspicious emails.
They talk about torture.
They talk about young ages.
They talk about a lot of things like this.
So people have raised to social media and to the government that these sorts of things are inside the files.
Finally, Representatives Thomas Massey and Ro Khanna have brought it to the attention of the government.
Now the Department of Justice says that they are going to open up the unredacted files only to members of Congress.
And there's some rules concerning this disclosure.
They have to make an appointment 24 hours in advance.
They can't take photos, can't do any kind of electronic recording, and they can only do it in like a guided tour.
So it's not like they can just ask for the documents and receive them by email.
They actually have to go in.
I don't know if it's at the DOJ building.
I don't know where exactly it's taking place, if it's going to be at the Capitol building.
But congressmen make an appointment 24 hours in advance.
They come in, can't record anything.
It's a limited amount of time.
They take a look.
They can take notes, and that's it.
So Thomas Massey and Ro Khanna are working on this, and they're working through it because under the actual legislation, which was passed by the two of them, they forced the hand of the House of Representatives to bring this bill to the floor that requires the DOJ to release the files.
It actually says that the DOJ may not be following through on what it says in the law.
The law says that you need to release everything related to Epstein, and they haven't released all the files.
And of course, the files they did release are heavily redacted.
So this is one of these concessions that the DOJ is offering up, but it is being currently litigated.
You have these representatives like Massey and Rokana.
They are saying we're not really getting what we're entitled to.
And the DOJ is giving this concession saying, well, we'll release the unredacted material, but only under supervision and only for members of Congress.
And again, there's all these rules.
Now, one of the things that has been found inside the files, and this has been brought to everybody's attention, is that the Department of Justice has actually found six unnamed collaborators with Epstein.
And so the DOJ can actually charge up to six people in connection with Epstein.
And it describes them as likely incriminated.
That's the word that is used.
This is in the files that are released.
The DOJ says there are six likely incriminated individuals, and these are collaborators.
These are accomplices to Epstein.
I believe one of them is Jelaine Maxwell.
Another one almost certainly is Les Wexner, the Jewish billionaire.
Thomas Massey and RoCanna have seen the names and they've given hints.
They say that one of them is a very prominent person.
No other details.
They say the other is a high-ranking member of a foreign government.
Again, no details.
But so the DOJ says there's six people that could go down, that could be charged.
These congressmen have seen the names, but they're redacted and they're not allowed to say the names.
And so this is a story.
This is from Axios.
This just came out today.
It says, quote, the Justice Department redacted the names of at least six men who are likely incriminated by their inclusion in the Epstein files, said Thomas Massey and Rokana after reviewing unredacted versions of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein.
The lawmakers said they want to allow the DOJ time to further unredact the files.
However, they're also put sharing the names on the House floor on the table.
This is a very poorly written article.
Some brown person wrote this.
They put sharing the names on the House floor on the table.
It's like, what monkey wrote this?
What kind of third world garbage wrote?
Somebody, this is actually how it's written.
This isn't, and I like Axios.
The lawmakers said they want to allow DOJ time to further unredact the files, but have also put sharing the names on the House floor on the table.
It's just like horrible writing.
Anyway, it says the lawmakers would be protected by the House's speech and debate clause if they were to read them on the floor, providing them with immunity from civil or criminal liability.
Massey told reporters that one of the men is pretty high up in a foreign government and another is a prominent individual.
The lawmakers didn't elaborate on what they meant or specify the conduct at issue.
The Justice Department agreed to let lawmakers access the full documents following a written request from House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin.
Democrats and some Republicans have argued that the DOJ is skirting its statutory requirements under the Epstein Transparency Act by withholding millions of documents and heavily redacting some of the files that they did release.
The documents will be available on computers in a reading room, excuse me, at the DOJ building in Washington, D.C. from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Members must give at least 24 hours notice and cannot bring in electronic devices.
And the files that we do have, we don't even have the complete documents.
Names and details and all kinds of other information is being withheld.
So this is why I said we cannot jump to conclusions.
And you want to know why?
If people take things that are fake or exaggerated or embellished and they promote these things, and we've seen it happen for the past two weeks, those things will be debunked.
What other reason would there be to redact it other than to cover up for people that have not yet been indicted?
That's really the only reason you would do that.
And so here is the call to action.
We have to insist that all the information gets out there.
Only then can we make a judgment.
Now, to that end, Thomas Massey and others are saying, we need all the files.
You are not following through on your obligations.
The Epstein Transparency Act says you need to declassify everything, all the files, all the information in the files.
What's more, they have looked at the unredacted files in the supervised setting, and they found that actually when you look through them, you'll find there are people named in the files that probably should be investigated.
So what do you do with this information?
Well, then you push the DOJ to prosecute those people.
The Trump administration engaged in a failed cover-up of the Epstein files.
Whatever is in the files, whatever we know about the files, let's put that on the back burner for just one second.
One thing is absolutely unambiguous.
Some of these emails are very suggestive, but vague.
And some of them are eyebrow-raising and suspicious, but they're not necessarily a smoking gun.
And I think that's why we need full transparency.
They need to be unredacted.
We need the rest of the files.
Putting that aside for just a second, here's something that we know absolutely.
And this is something that people are forgetting.
It's something people are overlooking.
What the Trump administration said specifically about the files last year is that there were no files.
Remember, this Attorney General, Pam Bondi, at the Department of Justice, she authorized a memo.
She signed off on a memo that said there are no Epstein files.
That was the official declaration of the Department of Justice.
They said the files do not exist.
The White House put out a press release that said the files do not exist.
Not only is that a lie, and it is, there are actually 6 million files.
Okay, so they lied.
They said the files don't exist.
And actually what they said is the only thing that we have in our possession is child sexual abuse material.
They said, we don't have documents.
We don't have emails.
We don't have anything.
They said, you've seen it all.
Everything that we have, you've got.
They said, all that we have left is sexual abuse material that we cannot release because it hurts the victims.
Remember?
The files do exist and they lied.
Then they came up with another lie to cover it up and they said, well, we can't release what is remaining because it's all just going to hurt the victims.
They said it would be irresponsible to release what is remaining because that would only compromise the victims' privacy or safety.
So that's actually an active cover-up.
That's not like they were misinformed.
They didn't exaggerate.
That's not a false promise.
The Trump administration engaged in an active deception and a cover-up.
They also said there are no people that we need to investigate.
They said there's no black book.
There's nobody else that we're interested in.
They said there are no other persons of interest or suspects.
And yet, inside their own files, which they said didn't exist, they say that there are people, and this is their terminology, that are likely incriminated.
So, how are you not interested in any further investigation?
There are no other persons of interest.
The case is closed, and yet there are six people that we know of.
We don't even know their names because they're redacted, but the DOJ acknowledges there are six people that we know of that are likely incriminated.
So they lied about that too, and they closed the case anyway.
I think this fits the bill for high crimes and misdemeanors.
You lied about the existence of the files.
You lied about unindicted collaborators and accomplices.
There are people that you acknowledge exist who are likely incriminated in the files that you said did not exist.
You lied in the furtherance of a cover-up.
Pam Bondi has to be impeached.
Kash Patel has to be impeached.
These people have to go.
They cannot keep their jobs.
How could we trust that Pam Bondi's DOJ, which covered up the files for a year and a half, is now going to faithfully follow the Epstein Transparency Act and release all the files?
How can the public have any confidence in this, that there's any propriety here?
Furthermore, how can the public have any confidence that Pam Bondi and this Department of Justice will actually investigate the people that are involved and bring them to justice if, again, they close the case knowing these people were likely incriminated?
You can't trust them to follow through.
You can't trust them to investigate.
You can't trust them to find the information.
And I would take it a step further.
How can you even trust President Trump?
He hired most of these people.
Ronald Lauder is named in the files 961 times.
His son-in-law is nominated to chair the Federal Reserve.
Leon Black is named in the files dozens of times.
He was one of Epstein's biggest benefactors by far.
His son is the head of the Development Finance Corporation in the Trump government.
Howard Ludnick is named in the files dozens of times.
He talked to Epstein after he was convicted, lied about this, and he is Trump's commerce secretary and also on the Development Finance Corporation.
So how are any of these people?
How is this Trump administration going to hold them accountable?
How is that going to work?
How can the public have confidence that he will do that?
You can't.
This Epstein scandal, this is like bigger than Watergate.
It really is.
In terms of its significance, in terms of the actual crime that was committed, this is like a Watergate-level scandal that mark my words, it's going to bring down the Trump government.
If there was any momentum, if there was any forward momentum in the first year of the administration, that memo alone ground it to a halt.
And now that we've gotten the files, this is something they're just not going to recover from.
This is a mortal wound because it raises so many questions.
It shows that they are liars and it destroys any confidence in what this government set out to do with its mandate, which is to drain the swamp and fight corruption and stand up for the forgotten men and women.
And I hate to say it, but this Joel Osoff in Georgia, he's coined the term, this is the Epstein class.
The Howard Luttnicks, the Jared Kushners, the Ronald Lauders, the Peter Thiels, these are the Epstein class fitting apropos, totally on the money.
And now that we have this information, it's only logical.
We're going to follow up on it.
It's a midterm election year.
The Democrats are going to win, and the Democrats are going to use this issue to blow up this administration.
And unfortunately, they have every right to do it.
Unfortunately, for Trump and the Republicans, they have the mandate to do this because it is necessary.
The people need answers.
We can't trust this government to deliver them.
And it's going to blow up the latter half of this administration.
And Republicans have only themselves to blame for all of it.
We'll see what happens if we get the names of these likely incriminated individuals.
We'll see what is released by the DOJ.
And I think the call to action is that if you believe there are any suspicious emails, raise this with Thomas Massey.
Tag him on Twitter.
Send it in an email to his congressional office.
Call your local congressman.
Congress has the discretion to look at the files.
They work for us.
They need to deliver.
If you have a question about this age 10 email, if you have a question about this beef jerky is frozen email, the sulfuric acid, all that kind of stuff, ask your congressmen to go and look at the unredacted files.
Let's get all that information.
Let's push for a full disclosure and then push for an investigation.
And pay attention to the people that don't want to do this.
There's a lot of people out there saying, oh, this is a Democrat hoax.
Stephen Miller's wife said this.
Stephen Miller, the Jew and his Jew wife, said, oh, it's all a Democrat hoax.
I wonder why they're saying, I wonder why they're saying that.
And all of Stephen Miller's dick riders on Twitter, they're all saying the same thing.
So this is just like the scandal to end all scandals, and it's not going away.
But I heard in Arizona, they just don't play around with that kind of stuff.
It just, I don't know, that doesn't seem like a big deal to me.
He used a fake ID.
He's in a club.
I think he had some Adderall on him.
Two felonies and a misdemeanor.
I think the people that charged him were probably ugly.
I think that's honestly.
You have to admit, they see like a young, good-looking guy, live streamer with some motion, and they want to take a guy like that and they want to humble him.
I feel like, you know, do I want America to be a white country?
Yes.
I'm pro-white, but the movement has just been captured by losers and idiots.
And I don't, I don't really, I'm kind of just done pandering.
I fucking hate these people.
That's how I feel about it.
You know, when I look at what the movement has become, like the kind of impulses that have captured it, it's just kind of depressing.
And I've always been forward-thinking and I've always been heterodox and I've always been progressive in a way.
And increasingly, I just don't feel like I fit in with that anymore.
You know, so no, no, I don't think I don't think I'm like you because now it's turned into it.
It used to be the case that if you were against white genocide, if you're pro-white, if you're against immigration, like that is what it meant to be on our side.
Now it's like you have to be a Republican culture warrior.
I have to be spun up about the Super Bowl halftime show.
It's just so low IQ.
It's so low IQ.
It's so monotonous, so repetitive.
You're screaming at the halftime show because it's in Spanish.
Okay, I mean, am I supposed to do this performative outrage?
Ben Shapiro did an interview with David Rennick of the New Yorker that was released today.
David brought you up as a Nazi apologist and referenced your Tucker interview and dinner with Trump before they dove into rise and anti-Semitism within both parties.
Ben seems to struggle in defending Trump whenever your name comes up.
Did you hear Congressman Jean Wu's anti-white call to action clip that resurfaced from 2024, saying all minority communities will outbreed whites and unite against the white oppressor?
Nicket finally hit me over the weekend that your ongoing Epstein joke was an incredibly successful attempt to shake off the retards red pill during the generational run.
And lately, it feels like the right-wing are the ones not living in reality.
It's kind of depressing that, you know, as much as Ryan Grimm irritates the shit out of me when he says stuff like, Ilhan Omar is trying to liberate you.
As much as that irritates me, it seems like a guy like that actually has his finger on the pulse more than Tucker and Candace and basically everybody put together on our side who are just like unlikable, totally insane, in denial, delusional.
I'm telling you, dude, like, Joe Rogan is a litmus test.
He's not fucking with this stuff.
And look, that doesn't mean we need to like, oh no, Joe Rogan doesn't like it.
But he's a bellwether, and we need to live in reality.
We actually do want to attract normal people.
And so once you start getting way too far out there and start saying, that was the most woke Super Bowl ever, it's like it really wasn't, though.
The Super Bowl halftime shows are a perfect example of why the left always beats us in the end.
The left can be very subtle and subversive with their messaging when they need to be in order to appeal to the normies, but the right couldn't tone it down if their lives depended on it.
Ohio Ramanwarma seems pretty quiet since you put him on blast.
Any updates on his chances for attaining the governor's office?
Uk is stupid quiet too, which is outstanding content, sir.
Flexible.
I know you don't support the Iranian revolution, but would you be interested in doing a show with leaders of the revolution at least one live from Iran?
My roommate is totally convinced that the emails between Jeffy Epie and a professional chef where they talk about yummy beef jerky is clear proof that everyone is a Satanist cannibal.
Okay, or maybe across 6 million emails.
He actually just talks about eating actual food sometimes.
I was hopeful you better articulate why a Latin halftime show celebrating their culture was unacceptable for an American sporting event as iconic as the Super Bowl.
If you want to complain about the Super Bowl in Spanish, seriously, go watch Matt Walsh.
Okay.
Go watch Goyam TV, not the based one.
Go watch Goy Matt Walsh, who can never talk about the Jews and watch him shake his fist as an angry white man about how the Super Bowl's in Spanish.
You want your sweet release, okay?
You cuck.
Okay, you fucking white cuck.
You want your release.
You want an angry white man to say, I'm mad as hell that the Super Bowl's in Spanish.
Go watch Matt Walsh, the goy, and get your release.
Okay, that's that's my honest to God opinion.
It's like everything, you know, you're not telling us to vote for Trump.
You're not telling us that Israel killed Charlie Kirk.
You're not telling us that the Super Bowl halftime show should be in English.
Okay, go watch TV for Goyam then.
Okay.
And yeah, get mad at the Super Bowl.
Vote Republican.
Like, knock yourself out.
If that's what, if that is what you're interested in, which is reinforcing your opinions, Giving a release valve to your outrage about the latest cultural thing.
And the song comes on and they're like, hey, honey, this is kind of a good song.
Want to dance?
See, that's the difference.
That's the difference.
You're like headbanging with like a USA cowboy hat on.
Your bitch is fat because you're broke.
She has a bejeweled USA cowboy hat on and you're headbanging, pretending to like Kid Rock because your cortisol is spiked by Spanish at the halftime show.
Rich people are dancing.
They're not even paying attention.
They're eating caviar.
They're like, oh, honey, the halftime show's on.
Hey, this is kind of fun.
It's like Latin.
Remember when we were in Aruba?
Fucking losers.
I can't, I just can't breathe the same air as you people.
Ever since I got rich, it's like I just don't even know.
I admire your explanation about sticking up for your friends, even if they do something you don't stand for or approve of, and how loyalty is hard to find among us these days.
Commendable.
How come we cannot extend the same explanation for why Matt Walsh stands slash stays with Ben Shapiro?
The chutting out is what kind of is disgusting to me.
We have to all promise not to chud out.
You're spiking your cortisol.
You're chutting out.
You're like adjusting your glasses.
Imagine you're going to an actual social outing.
You're trying to like network and make money.
You're trying to start businesses.
You know, your friends talk about gossip.
My friends talk about the businesses we're starting.
You're going to the sports ball game, not because you actually watch goi ball, but because you're going to take Reddit True Tide together, lift weights, talk about money and business.
And imagine you're the guy at the party that's adjusting his spectacles and you're like, did you guys know that Robert Kraft owns the Super Bowl?
And it's like, dude, we're going to live in Puerto Rico because the taxes are $0.
Have you not heard?
Have you not heard that that's the new meta?
I live in Puerto Rico half of the year, so I could pay zero in taxes.
Did you not know that that's the meta?
I don't know.
That's the difference, I guess.
What is that expression about the two mice fell in a vat of butter?
It was a fun common word salad with cortisol dressing to say a Latin halftime show celebrating their culture is fine because the American Super Bowl doesn't really matter.
The country is 25% Latin anyway.
Kidrock sucks.
And Matt Walsh complained about it, so you should definitely have the opposite take.