GREENLAND TACO DEAL??? Trump CHICKENS OUT On Greenland At Davos | America First Ep. 1625
U.S.A. QUARTER ZIP NOW AVAILABLE
https://fuentes.storeShow more Subscribe to the America First Archive!
https://americafirst.plus
Send a superchat:
https://entropystream.live/nickjfuentes
Support the America First Foundation:
https://americafirstfoundation.org/donate
https://x.com/AmericaFirstFdn
Support the show using crypto:
https://nicholasjfuentes.com/donate
Follow Nicholas J. Fuentes:
X: https://x.com/nickjfuentes
Kick: https://kick.com/nickfuentes
Telegram: https://t.me/nickjfuentes
Follow Fuentes Updates on X for clips and more:
https://x.com/fuentesupdates
Follow America First HQ for news:
X: https://x.com/AmFirstHQ
Telegram: https://t.me/AmericaFirstHQ
Watch the show on Cozy:
https://cozy.tv/nick Show less
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day inadvertently with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
say that the blood of our people is something that is essential.
That we are different.
that America was different because we are different.
Palantir is an AI data analytics company.
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithms, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
If we don't have freedom on the Internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind raped every day forever.
Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geo location, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you're asleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
You have a smart home, economy of things.
It's like total, like, rape of everybody by the system forever.
My life is like a first-person video game, you know?
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
People do not stab young girls on trains because they're born black.
People do not shoot Palestinians in the back of the head or cheer it on just because they're Jewish.
The people that do this are lost.
They have to be isolated and segregated out.
A new consensus must emerge.
Are you in favor of a society with meaning?
A society where life is sacred.
Where life has sanctity, where people's lives and their dignity and their integrity is respected?
Or are we going to live in a society that is a never-ending war between nihilistic tribes, warlords, savages, pagans?
I see an emerging consensus.
And I think that the mature people that actually love America, actually love our children, the people that recognize the division, the peril that we're in, we need to fortify a new consensus and rally the people of conscience, the people of decency, the people of humanity, the people of charity towards their fellow man,
against those that want to kill us, against those that laugh and celebrate when innocent people are harmed.
For any reason, for any ideological reason, against the people that are cruel, the people that are hateful.
And by that, I mean the people that are really cruel.
Not the people that say things you disagree with, not the people that are provocative, not the people that are sometimes angry, but the people that are really cruel and really evil.
What makes Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the bearing of suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us.
An overflowing of love.
An overflowing of self-giving love.
So much of it, it cannot be contained.
An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children, even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
is an Israeli-funded blacklist which, since july 2025, has been confirmed to be used by the Trump administration to target students, professors and professionals who oppose Israel and reside in the United States.
This idea is part of an initiative created by the Heritage Foundation, the same group responsible for the infamous Project 2025.
In their initiative, titled Project Esther, they state that students participating in pro-Palestinian protests and activism are supporting Hamas, a group that the United States designates as a foreign terrorist organization.
Therefore, pro-Palestinian students are considered to be supporting terrorism and are subject to the revocation of visas, frozen bank accounts, asset seizures, and the denial of basic constitutional rights.
In effect, the Canary mission serves as a means to circumvent constitutional protections, allowing the federal government to engage in intelligence gathering activities that would otherwise be considered unlawful.
But the Canary Mission is not alone.
Palantir, another company closely aligned with the state of Israel, uses AI-driven analytics to maintain private databases on U.S. citizens and currently works with four federal agencies.
While government contracting with the private sector is long-standing, the prominent influence of Jewish groups within these increasingly powerful organizations warrants careful examination.
I renew the call for all able-bodied young American men, all of our elite human capital, all of our geniuses, warriors, intelligent people to dedicate themselves to American sovereignty and independence.
As Christians, as Americans, as white people, as citizens of the United States, and anybody that settles for anything less is just as much of an enemy, I would actually consider them worse than our oppressors.
So on Independence Day, it's important to reflect on the fact that we are an occupied nation.
Now, just like then, we're being ruled by a small country across an ocean, serving itself at our expense.
And as long as that is the case, I will always be obsessed with that.
As long as that is the case, I will always be speaking out against that and fighting against that.
And I will always be anchored, understanding that that is the fundamental struggle.
As long as our presidents have to kiss the wall in Israel and wear a small hat, as long as they have to say that we want to make Israel great again and they're the greatest country ever, I will never be okay with that.
Ever.
And it doesn't matter what they offer me or us.
It doesn't matter how they might try to placate us or appease our interests, the concessions they'll make.
Barack Obama created the joint comprehensive plan of action, the JCPOA, or the Iranian nuclear deal.
And Barack Obama brought together China, Russia, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the European Union to enforce a nuclear deal that restricts Iran's enrichment of uranium.
The early talks were conducted in secret, and the Israelis were furious, furious about this.
They hated Obama.
Netanyahu went to a joint session of Congress and gave a speech in defiance of the American president and its nuclear deal, and Congress gave 37 standing ovations.
This is the background of Trump's first election.
2016 election happens.
Trump gets elected with the help of the Israelis.
You don't believe me?
There's a whole article about it.
It's an excerpt from James Bamford's book, Spy Fail.
It goes into great detail about the hidden collusion in the 2016 election.
It wasn't Trump and Russia.
It was Trump and Israel.
And why was Israel so hell-bent on getting a Republican elected in 16?
In 2018, Donald Trump declares the IRGC, the Revolutionary Guard, which is the military of the regime, a terrorist group.
Green likes that group for sanctions, for attacks.
Now the United States is in a shadow war with Iran.
It culminates by January 2020 in the assassination of Qasim Suleimani.
Suleimani was the architect of the axis of resistance.
Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Suleimani built all of it.
Are you starting to see that?
Obama had this solved.
He made the deal.
The Israelis hated him for it.
They colluded with Trump to get him elected so that Trump would do maximum pressure and create a ladder of escalation, pulling us out of the deal, declaring the IRGC terrorists, then killing its leader, putting sanctions on the regime.
This is a war that started a long time ago, that Trump made hot in 2018, and has been going on for seven years.
That's the nature of forever wars.
Just like in Iraq, which went from 1990 until today, just like Libya, which went from 2011 to today.
Syria, which went from 2011 to today, and Iran, which went from 2018 until today.
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and, in some cases, quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
Palantir And Data Insights00:02:54
unidentified
Hello, I got places to be Good evening everybody You're watching America First.
say that the blood of our people is something that is essential.
That we are different.
that America was different because we are different.
Palantir is an AI data analytics company.
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithms, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
La na If we don't have freedom on the internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind-raped every day forever.
Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geo-location, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you're asleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
You have a smart home, economy of things.
It's like total, like, rape of everybody by the system forever.
My life is like a first-person video game, you know?
In the end, it was only to themselves they had lied.
unidentified
whoop diddy whoop scoop Poop poop scoop diddy whoop whoop diddy scoop whoop did he scoop My love has got no money, he's got his strong beliefs My love has got no power, he's got his strong beliefs My love has got no fame, He's got his strong beliefs.
My love has got no money, he's got his strong beliefs.
Want more and more.
People just want more and more freedom and love What he's looking for.
Want more and more.
People just want more and more freedom and love What he's looking for, Freedom desire, Mind and senses purified, freed from desire.
There is something involved where we have to forgive them.
We do have to forgive them for their ignorance, We do have to forgive them for their misunderstanding And we have to embrace them and say, better late than never, Welcome to the right side of history.
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and, in some cases, quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
Because they voted for Kamala Harris.
People do not stab young girls on trains because they're born black.
People do not shoot Palestinians in the back of the head or cheer it on just because they're Jewish.
The people that do this are lost.
They have to be isolated and segregated out.
A new consensus must emerge.
Are you in favor of a society with meaning?
A society where life is sacred.
Where life has sanctity, where people's lives and their dignity and their integrity is respected?
Or are we going to live in a society that is a never-ending war between nihilistic tribes, warlords, savages, pagans?
I see an emerging consensus.
And I think that the mature people that actually love America, actually love our children, the people that recognize the division, the peril that we're in, we need to fortify a new consensus and rally the people of conscience, the people of decency, the people of humanity, the people of charity towards their fellow man,
against those that want to kill us, against those that laugh and celebrate when innocent people are harmed.
For any reason, for any ideological reason, against the people that are cruel, the people that are hateful.
And by that, I mean the people that are really cruel, not the people that say things you disagree with, not the people that are provocative, not the people that are sometimes angry, but the people that are really cruel and really evil.
What makes Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the bearing of suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us.
Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Wednesday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight.
Lots to get into.
Big show.
Our featured story tonight, we're talking all about this Greenland deal.
Dude, every single time.
Trump always chickens out.
That's the only thing you can count on this guy to do.
Every time you get excited for something, every time you think it's going to be good, chickens out.
Our featured story is about the meeting in Davos, Switzerland today, the World Economic Forum.
Trump attended, gave a speech.
He met with the Secretary General of NATO, and they discussed this Greenland issue.
And we will talk about some of the back and forth.
As you know, Trump threatened to impose a 25% tariff on all goods from a select number of European countries, which would hit in June.
In retaliation, the European Union has suspended the implementation of a 2025 trade agreement with the United States.
Well, after negotiations today, Trump says there is a framework deal for Greenland.
Here's what we know about it.
The red line for Denmark and for the rest of the European Union, for the European NATO countries, is that the United States can never own Greenland.
That's their red line.
We're never going to get it.
We're never going to have it.
So what does the deal look like?
Well, they say it will mirror a security agreement that the United Kingdom has with Cyprus, where parts of Greenland will be sovereign U.S. territory, and we will have veto power over whether China and Russia invest in their minerals and other projects in Greenland.
We don't actually get it.
We don't actually have it.
So what the fuck are we doing?
We'll talk about it and we'll get into some of the geopolitics.
Honestly, it seems that Trump just messed this one up.
Too aggressive, galvanized Europe and Greenland against the acquisition, basically made it impossible.
And now we have to settle for something that we sort of already had.
It's really just codifying the existing arrangement where we have almost total freedom to operate inside Greenland and we can apply pressure to prevent them from making agreements with other countries.
Just that now it's going to be written.
Okay, so what?
So we'll talk about that.
We're also going to talk tonight about the giant military buildup in the Middle East.
And there's a new report from the Wall Street Journal.
It says that Trump is asking about decisive military options against Iran.
You know what that means?
That word decisive, it means they want to topple the regime.
They want to use military force to bring down the government.
Trump is asking his aides, how can we do something decisive there?
He means how are we going to overthrow the government of Iran and have regime change.
To that end, he is putting an aircraft carrier strike group in the region.
He's deploying all kinds of military transport aircraft, a number of aircraft that will help with defending Israel and U.S. bases, deploying radar systems, missile defense systems in anticipation of potentially wave after wave of airstrikes against Iran.
So it looks like we're going back.
And if you look at the betting markets, they're putting it a 70% chance.
It's actually really more like 90% chance that we're going back to war in Iran before the end of the year.
So we'll talk about that too.
Should be a pretty good show.
Before we get into it, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble, smash the like button, leave a comment, let me know what you think about the show.
Check out our merch store, Fuentes.store.
We have a brand new item for sale to commemorate the birthday of Jeffrey Epstein.
We have our brand new USA quarter zip on sale.
Hey, take a look at it.
Just take a look.
Just go to the website, go to the store, just take a look, check it out.
Fuentes.store, we have our USA quarter zip.
Very patriotic.
It's actually quite patriotic.
It's blue.
It has a little red logo that says USA.
It's got an American flag patch on the sleeve.
Very patriotic.
Very sharp.
Very in right now.
And actually, so many people tried to buy it last night.
It crashed the website.
It's our number two seller already for the month.
And it's only been on sale for about 24 hours.
Crashed the site.
We've sold hundreds of them already.
Get yours while you can.
And by the way, I did check.
People were saying, oh, it's probably all polyester.
I believe it's 80% cotton, 20% polyester.
So it's a high-quality material.
Make sure to get it.
They ship in two to four weeks.
I think I'll have mine sooner, and I can't wait to wear it on a casual Friday.
All kinds of people were freaking out.
People were saying, I can't believe he's selling this shirt.
Harry Sisson did like a 60-second promo for it.
I saw on TikTok, Harry Sisson made a big stink.
He said, we're glorifying Jeffrey Epstein.
I said, Jeffrey Epstein's cool.
Harry Sisson said, well, he's actually very fucking a monster.
I said, okay, well, still has drip or still has aura.
So Harry Sisson actually put up the website with the link.
I appreciated it.
He put up the link to the store where people could buy it.
All the comments were like, this is fresh.
We like it.
We like this shirt.
They're going to buy it.
So check it out.
We're going to give Harry Sisson a promo code, promo code 17.
All caps.
That's a joke.
It won't actually work.
Remember also to check out our subscription website, AmericaFirst.plus, $15 a month.
You get access to the entire archive, every show, every commentary, stream, debate, speech, all of it, going back 10 years, as well as in MP3 format, RSS feed.
It's all up there, AmericaFirst.plus, $100 a month.
You get into the group chat with me.
I'm going off in there all the time, doing bonus content, 30-minute voice messages, inside baseball, drama, details, everything you want, but it's only for rich people.
If you're poor, don't apply.
It's only for ballers.
It's only for the aspirationally rich, the actually rich.
That's the only people I want to see in there.
No brokeies.
Okay.
No brokeies, no dirtbags, $100 a month.
And you get to chop it up with the nigga.
So that's AmericaFirst.plus.
Without, we're going to dive into the show.
Kind of a slow news day, honestly, outside of this Davos thing.
Before I get into the news, I do want to talk a little bit more about the club acost is what they're calling it.
The club of cost song a cost.
This is like close in terms of how horrific it is to the Holocaust.
They're calling it the club of cost.
This is my first trip to the club when a song was played at a nightclub in Miami Beach, which offended Jewish people everywhere.
Six million ears were accosted by the song in what is being called the club of cost.
We're entering like day five of this.
We got some updates for you.
Get a load of this.
The mayor and the commissioner of the city of Miami Beach have now invited the owners of the Vendome Club that I went to on Saturday to make a trip to the Holocaust Museum of Miami Beach.
I'm not making this up.
That's their move.
There's an anti-Semitic incident.
They bring everybody to the Holocaust Museum.
Write a book report.
So the mayor of the city is bringing the club owners of Vendome to the Holocaust Museum for a lecture, for a book report.
And I wanted to talk a little bit more about that Patrick Bed David interview from yesterday with Andrew Tate, because I actually had a chance last night to sit down and watch the entire thing.
And I want to make something very clear about that whole situation.
So as you know, I went to the club on Saturday for the first time with my niggas, with Clav, Sneeko, Myron, Fresh, Andrew and Tristan Tate, Justin Waller.
We go to the club.
We got a great time.
Have a great time.
We're singing, dancing.
Red Bull is flowing.
And as you know, the infamous song by Kanye West comes on.
The DJ plays it, Heil Hitler by Ye.
Now, Miami Beach is a very Jewish city.
Everybody is offended.
There's all sorts of political pressure, fallout.
Everybody's getting in trouble.
Everybody's blaming each other.
Following day, Andrew Tate goes on Patrick Bed David's podcast.
Actually, I believe it was on Monday.
He goes on the podcast.
And everybody says that Andrew Tate is selling out, that he backed down, that he kissed the wall, all this kind of stuff.
Andrew Tate goes on the show and says, well, hey, I didn't play the song and I didn't like it.
And it's not my fault, and I'm being blamed for it, and so on.
And everybody is criticizing Andrew Tate.
Everybody is saying that he caved.
That's not top G, you know, that's matrix behavior, et cetera.
And I said yesterday on the show: you got to keep in mind that Andrew Tate is under the gun in a few jurisdictions, in Romania, in the United Kingdom, in the United States.
If he's not careful, he will go to jail.
Okay, he will go to prison for like 10 years at least.
He is up a creek without a paddle.
He really cannot afford to take a lot of risks.
And so, for that reason, I sympathize.
But you know what?
I watched the entire interview last night, and I actually got to sit and see the whole thing in its entirety.
And I think the real person to blame in all of this is Patrick Bett David.
I watched the whole thing.
And if you watch the entire thing, you see Andrew Tate goes on the show and they bring this up and they talk about it for a couple of minutes.
And Patrick says, I don't want to talk about this for too long.
We should just move on.
Two minutes in.
It drags on for 50 minutes.
50 minutes that Patrick Bett David and his two co-hosts, mind you, these are all guys that are pushing 50 years old.
Okay.
They're all 50.
These are grown men, supposedly serious businessmen, supposedly anti-woke, pro-Trump businessmen.
They're crying for 50 minutes about a song.
And I said this on Telegram.
Take a step back for a second.
Take a step back.
Forget all of your assumptions, all your prejudices, everything that you know about the way the world works.
Take a step back.
What actually happened on Saturday night?
A song was played in a nightclub.
That's it.
Nobody got hurt.
Nobody got stabbed, shot, trampled, stampeded.
Nobody got raped, molested, drugged.
Nobody did any drugs.
A group of guys went to a nightclub, played a song for 30 seconds with controversial lyrics.
Song ended.
Everybody went home.
Everybody was fine.
Objectively speaking, this is not a big deal.
This doesn't matter.
Nobody was even affected.
Nobody was hurt.
It is not a big deal.
The reason that it is a big deal, the reason it is elevated to a crisis is because it offended the wrong people.
Because Jews run the city of Miami and Miami Beach.
They control South Florida because they are very powerful there, like gangsters.
And they are so over the top and so oppressive that they will not tolerate being offended even for a minute.
And they are using emotional blackmail and guilt tripping and crybullying to punish anybody that has a problem with them.
Anybody that dares to make a joke at their expense or offend them, they're abusing their ill-gotten power through gangster cartel tactics to now penalize those people, punish those people.
And the message is clear: you don't insult Jewish people in this city because we run this town.
And we're in our feelings about a song and nobody offends us in this town.
We run this place.
That's the message.
And that's bullshit.
This is America.
America is run by the people, of by and for the people with God-given, constitutionally protected rights.
And that goes above and beyond freedom from government persecution.
It means a climate of free speech.
So we should be free from intimidation.
We should be free from cartels and gangsters.
We should be free from this kind of ethnic, clannish, gangster-type behavior.
The only reason anybody is talking about it is because We all know there's a double standard.
You can't offend these people.
They're the biggest cry bullies in the world.
They have all this power.
They're the most brutal, unscrupulous people in the world.
They defend genocide.
They defend brutality, the murder of women and children.
But if you play a song that offends them for 30 seconds, they're going to cry and play the victim.
We're the victim.
We're powerless.
We're hurt.
Now we're going to use all our power to punish everybody.
It's so over the top and so ridiculous and woke.
Nobody should stand for it.
And honestly, Patrick Bed David, you should know better.
You're a grown man.
You claim to be a patriot.
You're a 47-year-old man.
And you have this whole shtick.
I'm an alpha male.
I'm a businessman.
I'm no nonsense.
I'm not woke.
You're buying into this crap.
You're buying into this.
What a joke.
You should know better.
Everybody should know better.
And you should have your friends back.
Andrew Tate is your friend.
He's been on your show for years.
He is being unfairly attacked.
And he is forced to defend himself because he is vulnerable.
Why are they going after him?
Because he is vulnerable, because he is a political target.
He's vulnerable because he's in between jurisdictions.
He's one of the most wanted men in the world.
And you know, as well as anybody else, this is completely over the top.
It is an overreaction.
It is purely political.
It is not proportionate.
It's not fair.
It doesn't make sense.
It is woke.
And they're coming after your friend and they're making him crawl on his belly because they know they got him by the balls.
Because they know he's in trouble.
And you, as a man and as a patriot, as a guy, should understand that.
And you should see that.
And you should have your friends back.
If you want to tell them behind the scenes, man to man, hey, that wasn't really a good idea.
You've got a promising career.
That was childish.
You want to tell them that man to man out of concern?
You do that behind the scenes.
You do that off camera.
In front of the camera, you present a united front.
I think they gave him less of a hard time about being a war criminal than Andrew Tate playing a song.
Yeah, think of that.
Benjamin Netanyahu is a wanted war criminal.
He is charged by his own government for corruption, credibly accused of committing a genocide.
You have him on the show.
You barely press him about that.
Andrew Tate comes on the show.
You press him for 50 minutes because he was present while a song played in a nightclub in South Beach.
Really?
Does that make any sense to anybody?
Does that even make sense?
And it's on the men because you expect, especially the older guys, you expect the older guys to be able to call balls and strikes and say, you know what, this is woke garbage.
This is PC.
This is emotional.
This is over the top.
You expect grown men to be able to call out the nonsense, not to drink the Kool-Aid, not to buy into it.
He's going to go and participate in this humiliation ritual.
I'm watching this roundtable of guys that are lecturing me, lecturing me.
You're childish.
You're immature.
You need to grow up.
You shouldn't say these things.
This is a roundtable.
These guys are pushing 40, pushing 50, crying for 50 minutes about a song because that's what everyone's supposed to do because the Jews are mad.
Really?
Where's the courage?
And that's really what it comes down to in this country.
Everybody knows what is going on, but everybody is afraid to call these people out on their crap.
That's really what it is.
Everybody knows Netanyahu has us by the balls.
Everybody knows APAC has us by the balls.
Everybody knows there's this double standard.
We all get offended all the time.
We are all offended all the time.
The sensibilities of every group, every ethnic group, every religious group, the young and the old, the men and the women, we're all offended.
Everyone has a grievance.
Everybody else has to suck it up.
People are putting out rhetoric against any other group.
Hey, man, suck it up.
Free country.
It's not that big of a deal.
Oh, these people get offended.
It's literally an international incident.
We're invoking the Holocaust, et cetera.
And just don't build your brand on fighting PC and woe garbage if you're going to give into it when it actually counts.
So they did him really dirty.
Everybody's blaming Andrew Tate.
Andrew Tate's in a shitty situation.
I don't envy him at all.
He found himself in this unfortunate controversy that no one really could have seen coming.
It's one of those things that just happens.
Is it preventable?
Yes, but then you can't really live your life.
He can't really double down because he's in sort of a contentious situation.
And his buddy should really have his back.
His buddy should be firing at all cylinders.
And you don't have to defend the actual action, but defend your guy.
They're going to give him a little talking to.
He's in the principal's office.
You should have left the car.
Why'd you think that was okay?
You should have turned the song off.
Oh, come on now.
Really?
I mean, it reminds me literally of when I was in middle school.
It reminds me of the kind of crap that you and your buddies would get called into the principal's office for in middle school.
You're in there with your other 12-year-old buddies in the principal's office and they're saying, who played the song?
Our code of conduct says we keep our hands and feet to ourselves and we respect everyone at all times.
I mean, really?
These are 50-year-old men, 50-year-old, anti-woke.
Hey, I'm a no-nonsense business guy.
Get so real.
Shame on you.
Shame on you.
You should know better.
There is no excuse.
But these guys are just like NPCs.
They're just enforcers of the political order.
You know, if all you care about is money, if that's all you care about is money, career, status, then you're going to get thrown for a loop by this stuff.
Does anybody care enough to stand on business to defend the principle of the matter?
That's the question.
You know?
Because the whole lecture was like, hey, Andrew Tate, you know, you make all this money.
You know what Patrick told him?
He said at this college basketball game or something, Trump is in the box with Dana White and Jake Paul.
He goes, you belong in that room.
So is that really what it's all about, man?
It's all just about making money and posing for pictures in a box seat at a fucking sports game.
That's what it's all about?
Hey, man, I know you're living your life having fun and everything like that.
But if you don't kiss the wall, if you don't wear your kipa and kiss the wall and pretend to give a shit about the Holocaust, like it's not all load of crap, you know, you'll never be able to aura farm in the box with Trump.
And everyone on social media is going to say, oh, Tom G is with Trump at the Indiana Miami basketball game.
Is that really what it's all about for a bunch of douchebags to dap each other up?
Dana White and this guy tapped each other up in the box at the big game.
Come on, man.
It's got to be bigger than that.
It's got to be deeper than that.
Does anyone even care enough to defend the principle of the matter?
That's the difference.
It's like, you know, I get these lectures all the time.
And me, I care about freedom.
Freedom to live your life.
Freedom to do what you think is right.
Freedom to make jokes.
Freedom to say what you want.
Yeah, go ahead.
Fucking cancel me.
Because at the end of the day, you could be very rich and have a lot of status, but if you're living in fear of this kind of stuff, you can't go out with the guys and make a little joke without living in fear.
You know, are you really free?
Are you all that powerful?
Are you just kind of like the biggest slave on the plantation?
Are you just being paraded around and dressed up as a regime puppet for the puppet show?
Oh, here we go.
Here's this one and this one.
And here they are in the box.
And we dress them in the finest linens and all the, we furnish them with a lavish house and lifestyle.
And these are your appointed leaders.
I mean, yeah, count me out of that whole thing.
But that was the appeal.
That was sort of the funny thing.
unidentified
He goes, you know, you belong in that room with those guys.
You're the company who keeps, I mean, it would be the same thing, wouldn't it be?
A bunch of shrieking harpies.
It would be indistinguishable from the club.
We're in the club smoking cigars, blue label only.
You know, we're all big shots.
Well, why don't you play this song?
Come on now.
Are we better than that?
Gosh, you know, but nobody has the courage of their convictions to just say, I don't feel guilty.
I don't feel ashamed.
This is stupid.
This is ridiculous.
This disgusting freak that is the mayor of Miami Beach.
Just look at him.
Just look at him.
The mayor of Miami Beach is a disgusting, ugly freak.
And so are the city commissioners.
They're disgusting, ugly freaks.
And they don't even belong here.
You want to know where the mayor of Miami Beach comes from?
He left his position at the SEC because he was constantly being accused of being a pervert.
So that was plan B. Plan B, after you get chased out for being accused of being a pervert, is then you go and you run Miami Beach on behalf of the Jewish interest there with the other commissioners that are children of Israelis.
I've been very critical of the personnel, the policies, Trump's refusal to follow through on anything.
And as you know, I got very excited about this Greenland deal.
And I went into it in great detail, I believe, on Thursday or Friday.
And I said that the reason I love the idea of taking Greenland by force or whatever, but basically expanding America, growing America, I said, is because this is what gets Americans excited about the future.
The arrow is pointing up, expansion, increasing, that America is dreaming, America is getting bigger.
I like this conceptually.
The idea that there is still history to be resolved here, you know, that we're still a part of history.
I like this.
And so when Trump was pushing this so hard the past couple of weeks that we were going to go in and take Greenland and we have to have it and we're going to get it and we'll stop at nothing, I really supported it.
And I made my case very systematically on Friday.
And I will restate it very briefly now.
The reason that we need to actually have Greenland, well, let's start with why Greenland is strategically important.
Greenland is a part of the Western Hemisphere.
Greenland is what connects North America to the other NATO countries.
If you look at it, it is on the Northwest frontier, is what they call it.
It's on our northern frontier.
It borders Canada, Iceland.
Iceland borders the United Kingdom.
The United Kingdom borders France and Denmark.
Greenland connects this entire Atlantic alliance.
This is very strategically important territory.
And as the northern ice sheet melts, the Arctic Ocean becomes an area of strategic competition.
All kinds of things are happening there.
Commercial shipping routes, submarines are moving through there.
Potentially naval vessels are moving through there.
And if we engage China or Russia with strategic weapons, ICBMs will be flying over Greenland.
They can be detected and intercepted over Greenland and Canada.
So long story short, Greenland is very important territory, controlling choke points between Greenland and Iceland, Iceland and the UK, controlling these future shipping routes in the Arctic Ocean.
Situated in the middle, 2,000 kilometers from DC, 2,000 kilometers from Moscow, in the middle of that trajectory from where ICBMs will strike the United States.
This is why it's strategically important.
Maybe you could say succinctly, because of its proximity.
It's close to us.
It's close to Canada.
It's close to us.
If someone gains control of Greenland, they gain access to Canada.
They gain access to Canada.
They gain access to the United States.
And so it's comparable in value to Alaska.
It's comparable in value to Canada, Puerto Rico, Cuba.
It's very valuable strategically.
Now, why do we absolutely have to have it?
The reason is the northern ice sheet is going to melt over a period of decades.
It will take time for these developments to come to bear.
It's not a strategically important region now, not as much as it will be in the future.
And a lot of things might change in these intervening 10, 20, or 30 years.
Leadership changes in the United States, in Canada, in Europe.
The balance of power will change between the United States and China.
The alignment will change, perhaps, between Europe and the United States, between Russia and China, between China and East Asian countries.
Nothing is guaranteed.
And so, if when this strategic area becomes active in a few decades or a couple of decades, as long as that territory is controlled by Denmark, well, Denmark will never be able to defend this territory ever from China or Russia or the United States.
Any interested great power who would need it, and it's a zero-sum game, Denmark is never going to be able to repel an incursion.
All of Europe will never be able to repel an incursion.
And Russia and China know that.
And so, in 10, 20, 30 years, this is very vital territory.
The region becomes active.
Denmark and Europe cannot repel an invasion.
China and Russia might test the boundaries here.
And they might try to gain a foothold.
Who knows how?
By investment, some ruse that there's a commercial project.
Maybe they land some troops there.
Who knows?
And once it's done, it can't be undone.
Once they gain the foothold, it can't be undone.
And you can't scramble the troops there.
China or Russia will have already established a beachhead.
And we're not going to go to war over Danish territory.
We're not going to go to war over a semi-autonomous Danish province or something, some protectorate.
It's questionable whether those Article 5 protections will be invoked.
And so then we just lose it.
Now, what makes it viable for China or Russia to test the waters?
What makes it viable for China and Russia to test and see if that's a tripwire?
What makes it viable is that it is technically sovereign Danish territory.
And as long as all that shoreline and all that territory is technically Danish, they know that the United States is less than likely to defend it.
Compare that to California.
China knows that if they set foot in California, it's fucking war.
You're in a war.
You're in a shooting war.
You're in a full-scale total war until that is undone.
And everyone knows that we'd be perfectly justified in going to war.
So what's the difference?
Well, if Greenland is our territory, they won't test it.
They won't push.
They won't try because they know that if they set foot in Greenland, it's war.
So there's a very black and white binary.
If you're not in Greenland, you're not at war.
If we invade Greenland, it's on.
That's the difference.
And it doesn't matter if it's commercial, if it's espionage, if it's an overt military action.
They know if they land there, it's on because it's U.S. clay.
If it's a Danish protectorate, well, then who knows?
Would the United States go to war with a nuclear great power to protect a Danish protector?
It's not even Danish territory.
It's a semi-autonomous part of the Danish kingdom.
Would the United States go to war with China over that?
We don't know.
We don't know.
China doesn't know.
We don't know what they're thinking.
They don't know what we're thinking.
And that's where the testing comes in.
That's where the testing comes in.
That's where they start to encroach gradually, incrementally.
That's where they might do something minor, an incursion, and they'll have plausible deniability.
And it is not an automatic tripwire activated active war.
That's why we have to have it.
That's why there is no alternative to literally owning it.
Sovereignty is the key word.
If it's anything short of that, they're going to try something.
And that could mean anything.
That could mean they fund a political party that breaks from Denmark.
That means they could send Chinese spies and do military surveillance or sabotage.
That means, who knows, maybe they have some illicit agreement, some kind of private contract.
Circumstances change, or they just land a boat there.
Okay?
That's the difference.
That's why we need it.
And so when Trump said that, I was totally on the same page.
I said, he's right.
Maybe we don't need it today, but we absolutely will need it by 2050.
And we need it to be our territory.
And it is a small price to pay, whatever it was, $700 billion now to have it in the future.
Because there's only so many islands and continents.
They're not making any more of them.
And the great power strategic competition is only intensifying.
This is an area which will become active in the coming decades.
It would be absolutely essential to have it.
It would be no different than if, you know, we could have Japan as a colony or like the Philippines still as a colony or something.
Like there's no price tag on it.
It's sort of invaluable.
So Trump said that, and I was in complete agreement.
I said he totally sees the big picture here.
I don't know how anyone could even make the case that that has something to do with Israel.
People said that's neocon.
Okay, so now like everything is neocon, by the way.
You know, if we, it sort of exists on a spectrum.
If we go to war with Iran, obviously that is a war for Israel.
You know, that is like a 1.0 on the spectrum.
That is the clearest cut, no uncertainty.
That is a straight up war for Israel.
If Israel didn't exist, it wouldn't happen.
If Israel didn't exist, we would actually have good relations.
We're going to war because of them in their neighborhood for their interest against their number one adversary.
Like there's no ifs, ands, or buts.
Then you get maybe closer to the other side of the spectrum, Venezuela.
And you go, okay, this is in our neighborhood.
It's a dictator who's anti-American.
He is a socialist.
They have these resources that we need.
It's a staging ground for our enemies, like China and Russia.
That being said, Maduro is somewhat supportive of Palestine.
So you could say, well, Israel's like, they're not unhappy about it.
They might be a little happy about this.
Then you have Greenland, which is like a 0.1.
And it's like, so it's not even a war at all.
There's not going to be any fighting.
There's no population there.
It's north of Canada.
It's a territory that no one really cares about.
They're not anti-Israel at all.
They're not pro-Palestine.
They're kind of just nothing.
And we're taking it and it'll make us richer.
And people are saying, yeah, but like, you know, Ronald Lauder has some projects.
Yeah, I mean, the American economy is run by Jews.
So, you know, like anything that America does is going to involve the Jews that control America.
I see some people saying that.
It's like, okay, so how does that even factor in?
But anyway, we're on the same page.
Trump goes to Davos.
He goes to the World Economic Forum today in Switzerland.
He negotiates with the NATO Secretary General, the other European counterparts, and they come out of the meeting with a framework agreement.
And it involves that we will not own Greenland at all.
We won't own it.
It won't be ours.
We don't know the details of it, but the framework that we have so far is that it might mirror, according to some reports, a security agreement between the UK and Cyprus, where some parts of the island are technically sovereign British territory where they have military installations.
And so I guess it's an indefinite deal.
The United States will be able to veto investment from other countries.
We'll be able to expand our military footprint there.
And parts of Greenland, which will become military installations, will be sovereign U.S. territory.
That's what the framework agreement is looking like.
And this is a story from the Washington Post.
It says, quote, President Trump said Wednesday that he had reached the framework of a deal on Greenland, backing away from his earlier demands to acquire the Danish territory.
Declaring that he would scrap planned tariffs on Europe, Trump said talks were underway with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutta about bolstering security in the Arctic.
The president offered few details, but the deal was likely to fall far short of the full sovereign possession that he previously demanded.
Denmark's top diplomats said the United States would not own the island.
Trump removing the tariff threat takes the heat out, said the Danish foreign minister.
He said the United States will not own Greenland.
That is a red line.
So for them, they say we refuse any deal where the U.S. is going to take the territory.
Discussions will focus instead on ensuring Arctic security, said the NATO spokeswoman Allison Hart, including talks among Denmark, Greenland, and the United States, aimed at ensuring that Russia and China never gain a foothold economically or militarily in Greenland.
Shortly after his remarks concluded, the European Parliament suspended ratification of the EU-U.S. trade deal that Trump reached last year.
In a statement, the chair of the Legislative Trade Committee said U.S. threats against Denmark and Greenland had left lawmakers no choice.
The pending trade deal would have eliminated European tariffs on all U.S. industrial goods while leaving products from Europe facing a 15% tariff imposed by Trump, a structure that analysts said favored Washington.
The European Union is the nation's largest trading partner.
Total two-way goods trade each year is roughly $1 trillion.
On the overnight flight to Davos, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles told reporters that Trump will travel next week to Iowa for a speech tailored to energy and the economy and will make weekly trips ahead of the midterm elections.
Great.
So this is the framework agreement.
And what we can say with certainty is that Trump has chickened out.
As always, Trump always chickens out.
Trump chickened out.
He said for weeks, he said all year.
He said, we're going to have it.
We're going to take it.
It's got to be ours.
We need it.
There's no alternative.
We simply have to have it.
He said, we'll take it by force.
We will do anything.
There's no limit to what I'll do to take Greenland.
He's posting on social media trolling maps of Greenland with the U.S. flag on it.
But the deal says we're going to have a base there.
And we're not going to let China and Russia gain a foothold.
Hey, guess what?
That was already the arrangement.
That's been the arrangement for 70 years.
That we can do what we want there.
We have military installations.
We got troops there.
That has been the arrangement for almost a century.
And we don't even have the agreement.
It's not even in writing.
It's not signed.
And Trump comes away and says, okay, well, you know, we got this framework and this is terrific and so on.
And here's what happened fundamentally.
Trump has no strategy.
It's all tactics.
All he knows how to do is talk on social media, give speeches, issue these maximalist threats.
And what this is meant to do is keep his opponents off balance.
So, example, when it comes to Greenland, Trump comes out and says, I'm going to invade Greenland.
We just have to have it.
This makes the Europeans nervous.
It makes Greenland and Denmark and France and Germany and NATO nervous.
And they start to panic and they start to talk amongst themselves.
That's all Trump knows how to do is stir the pot.
All he knows how to do is to push them off balance, make them uncertain, make them insecure, so that they start to talk, so that there is some activity.
And then maybe there's a starting position in a negotiation.
And they come back and they say, well, we're not going to do it.
And then he ups the ante.
Oh, you're not going to sell me Greenland?
Well, then we'll invade.
And they go back and talk amongst themselves.
Well, we can never defend Greenland.
Well, we can never do anything.
We don't want to fight with the United States.
Well, what happens when they call his bluff?
He keeps upping the ante.
Well, we're going to have it.
Well, we're going to buy it.
We're preparing an offer.
If you don't accept the offer, we're going to invade.
We need it.
You can offer us concessions, but we need to own it.
Well, what happens when Europe calls his bluff?
And they say, if you're invading Greenland, we're deploying troops there.
We're putting French and Norwegian and German troops there.
And Canada sending troops.
And we're not going to let you take it.
And we'll all leave NATO and the trade agreement is off.
What happens when they call your bluff against these maximalist threats, against these scare tactics?
Bluster, bluffing, issuing empty threats.
What happens when they call you on it and they say, okay, time to show your cards.
Let's see what you got.
They put the troops out there.
They say, we won't let you take it.
The Danish, or rather the Greenlanders, host a giant rally in the capital.
What happens when Trump goes to Davos and says, well, we need to have it?
Trump backs down.
He folds.
He says, ah, yeah, you're right.
We can't invade Greenland.
Ah, yeah, you're right.
We're not going to invade.
I was making that up.
I'm full of shit.
We weren't going to invade Greenland.
We were never prepared to do that.
We're not going to potentially be fighting Europeans in Greenland.
We're not going to break apart NATO.
Yeah, no, we're actually not going to do all that.
We lied.
We'll take your first offer.
That's the story of the Trump administration.
What happened is that, like with everything, he issued the threat.
And like I said, that's the tactic to stir the pot.
And instead of buckling to the demands, all he did was galvanize opposition.
By trying to bully them, the Europeans rose to the occasion and said, you know what?
You're faking it.
You're bluffing.
And we don't want you to take Greenland.
We're not going to get bitched out by you.
And they actually rallied.
It had the opposite effect.
He thought that they would crumble.
He thought that they would falter.
They rallied.
And they stood unified and they said, you know what?
No, you can't touch Greenland.
And you want to come and try and take it.
Well, we're going to up the ante too.
So we actually rallied.
Now it's a red line.
Maybe they would have negotiated before.
Who knows?
Who knows if the United States could have prepared a better offer?
And who knows what that looks like?
But if they did it more diplomatically, who knows what could have been possible.
But all he did was stir the pot.
It had the opposite of the intended effect by insulting the Europeans, by daring them.
He galvanized them rather than forced them to cave.
And when they stood up to Trump, now it has become non-viable.
Now they're saying, no, our red line is you can't own it.
You said your red line is owning it.
Well, now our red line is you can't own it.
And you can't invade it without overturning the whole world order, practically.
Macron goes back to Paris and says, we need more investment from China.
Canada makes a trade deal and says, we're going to take 70,000 EVs from China.
European Union gets together and says that trade agreement is off.
Okay, so they called your bluff.
You can't do it.
Now it's over.
And now we get no Greenland.
Now we're in the same spot that we were before.
This is the story over and over again.
And I'm really disappointed because that was the whole appeal of Trump is that he's supposed to be the art of the deal, the deal maker in chief.
I know what I'm doing.
I'm more competent.
We have stupid negotiators, this, that, and the other.
I mean, where is that here?
We don't have it.
We're not getting it.
So this was the one thing that I was actually excited about.
I was excited about taking Venezuela, taking Cuba, taking Greenland, Canada.
I was excited about that.
Now we don't even have it.
Trump chickens out on literally everything.
So let's just stop with the LARP.
Trump is not Caesar.
Trump is not some kind of world historical figure.
In that way, it's all a ruse.
It's all vaporware.
So that's that.
I want to move on, though.
I want to talk a little bit about what's happening in Iran.
Now, you want to talk about a neocon war.
This fits the bill.
Well, everybody was complaining about Venezuela and Greenland.
There's actually a real war with Iran that is brewing.
And we'll talk about this briefly as I've been live for an hour already.
Then we'll take the super chats.
So as you know, a couple of weeks ago, there was a lot of talk about the United States returning to Iran.
In light of anti-government protests that took over the western part of the country, the media was embellishing the story.
There were calls for the United States to intervene, calls by Israel, by the Gulf countries, by the protesters.
And we could talk about what that really entails and what that really means.
But there was this pressure for the United States to go into Iran, bomb the Iranian regime, save the protesters, and topple Iran's government.
What happened, as a matter of fact, is that we did not have the requisite force package to intervene during the protests.
We just didn't have enough boats, not enough boats, not enough planes, not enough missile defense.
At the peak of the protests, one, they did not come close to toppling the government, which is a huge problem for this plan.
Two, we didn't have enough guns there, even if we wanted to.
Even if the protesters were getting ready to topple the government, and they weren't, but even if they were, we didn't have enough guns in the region to finish the job.
So they pushed it back.
So the Israelis and the Gulf countries, Saudis, Qataris, Turkey also, they pleaded with the administration.
They said, actually, you know what?
Don't go in.
They said, because the protests are effectively crushed, it's over.
It's going in the wrong direction for them.
And two, they said if you go to war with Iran, if you initiate hostilities, you will not be able to defend your own position and Israel's.
You bomb Iran, you don't topple the government.
That's one.
Two, they're going to fire back.
And when they do, you're not going to have enough air power, sea power to be able to shoot down every drone and ballistic missile that Iran inevitably launches at U.S. bases and at Israel.
So Israel and these Muslim countries are pleading with Trump, not yet, later.
And that's what the Trump administration does.
It calls off the strikes and then immediately starts sending this massive force package to the Middle East.
A carrier strike group starts moving to the Middle East.
That's an aircraft carrier equipped with all kinds of fighter aircraft.
And it's also destroyers, which have missile defense systems, radar systems on there.
And we start sending military transport aircraft, a number of other things over there, literally saying, all right, just wait a little bit.
Help is on the way.
We're going to get in position and then we'll go to war with Iran.
Well, here's the big story from yesterday.
Wall Street Journal is reporting that Trump is asking his aides for decisive options to confront Iran.
Now, for those that don't know what that translates into, when he says he wants a decisive military option, he's saying, I want to do something to Iran that topples their government.
That's what decisive means.
It doesn't mean we're degrading their abilities.
It doesn't mean we're diminishing their abilities.
It doesn't mean we're attacking a strategic target.
When he says decisive, it means we are going to defeat them completely.
There will be a different government.
So the Trump administration is now openly talking about regime change and has been for the past couple of weeks.
This is a story from the journal.
It says, quote, after pulling back from strikes on Iran last week, President Trump is still pressing aides for what he calls decisive military options as Iran appears to have tightened its control of the country.
The discussions are happening while the United States sends an aircraft carrier and jet fighters to the Middle East.
Those deployments may be just the start of a broader buildup that would give Trump the firepower to strike Iran should he choose to use them.
Trump has repeatedly used the word decisive when describing what effect he would like any action to have on Iran.
He has yet to order the strikes, and what he ultimately will decide remains unclear.
But the continued discussions show Trump has not ruled out pushing Tehran, or rather punishing Tehran, for killing protesters in the midst of Iran's spiraling economy.
Asked Tuesday about whether the U.S. may yet strike Iran, Trump noted that the regime heeded Washington's warnings and canceled plans to execute 837 people last week.
He said, we're going to have to see what happens.
The larger question for the administration is whether a foreign regime can be dislodged through air power alone.
The White House must also grapple with whether the administration is prepared to carry out a sustained military campaign that might last weeks or months should protesters again take to the streets and appeal to Trump for protection.
David Deptullah, a retired Air Force lieutenant general who played a key role in Desert Storm, said, there are things military options can and cannot do during a human rights crackdown.
You can deter some regime behavior on the margins.
If you are really signing up to change the regime, that will require significant air and ground operations, air and ground.
As the administration discusses next steps, the U.S. military has rushed more assets to the Middle East.
U.S. F-15E jet fighters landed Sunday in Jordan.
The aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and its strike group, which includes destroyers, F-35s, and other jet fighters, and electronic jamming aircraft, were spotted by maritime traffic trackers sailing west from South China Sea toward the Persian Gulf.
Additional air defenses will be brought to the region, including Patriot and Thad anti-missile systems, which would be essential for fending off any Iranian counterblows.
As the administration weighed a potential strike on Iran last week, the U.S. did not have enough military assets or air defenses to launch a sustained bombing operation or defend American troops and allies from an Iranian retaliation.
So this is the plan.
They're moving a carrier strike group in.
They're moving military hardware into the region because we are going to war with Iran.
And I told you, in the last week of December, Netanyahu came to Mar-a-Lago and said, we want to go back to war.
We want to go back to war in Gaza.
We want to go back to war in Lebanon.
We want to go to war in Iran.
Netanyahu said they're building up their missile infrastructure all over again.
It threatens us.
They might preemptively strike us.
We're seeking the green light to hit them first.
A week later, you get a run on the bank.
One of Iran's largest state-owned banks crashes.
The currency crashes.
Everybody takes to the streets, imploring Trump to help.
And let me tell you something about those protests because it can't be said enough.
Those are not protests.
That's an armed insurrection, okay?
When you see the women's march, that's a protest.
When the women's march happens in the United States and all these women take to the streets with signs and hats, that's a protest.
Those are Americans organizing on social media with their grievances.
They assemble in public.
They get their message out.
They go home.
That's a protest.
This is an armed uprising.
There are reports coming out of this country from the Financial Times, from other sources.
Eyewitnesses on the ground in Iran said that there are men dressed in all black, armed with light weapons, meaning assault rifles, automatic weapons, and they were attacking government facilities.
That's not a protest.
Okay?
And where are the protests occurring?
They're happening in western Iran, in Kurdish-majority provinces.
Well, the Kurds are a transnational group.
You've got Kurds in Turkey, in Syria, in Iraq.
And all of these territories have a relative degree of autonomy.
In Syria, there's a major clash right now because the new Syrian government in Damascus is trying to take back control over Syrian Kurdistan, which they call Rohingya, I think.
It has a name that's, I think it's like Rojava or something like that.
It has a similar sounding name.
Northeastern Syria is Kurdish Syria.
It's controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces.
That is a Kurdish force.
In Iraq, in northern Iraq, in Iraqi Kurdistan, they have autonomy from the government in Baghdad.
They have their own parliament.
They have their own security force.
Are you seeing a pattern?
The government in Baghdad does not have control over Iraqi Kurds.
The government in Damascus does not have control over Syrian Kurds.
What does that mean?
The Kurds are also allies of the United States and Israel.
The United States and Israel armed the Kurds and fought alongside the Kurds in their war against ISIS, which took place in Iraq and Syria, obviously.
And so the CIA and Israeli intelligence, the Pentagon, and the Israeli military, they have a line-in to the Kurds in Iraq and Syria.
The United States just finished its withdrawal of U.S. soldiers from Iraq.
That's not entirely true.
They just moved them to their base in Iraqi Kurdistan.
You see?
So you have these protests in Iran.
They're very bloody, very deadly.
Eyewitnesses on the ground say, well, the protesters are dressed in all black.
They have machine guns.
They're attacking government buildings.
They appear to be coordinated.
All the protests are happening in western Iran, which are Kurdish-majority areas.
And they share a border with these semi-autonomous Kurdish territories and Iraq and Syria, where those semi-autonomous governments maintain military and intelligence ties with the U.S. and Israel and have been armed by both countries for over a decade.
So what do you think is happening here?
Well, it's obvious.
This isn't a protest.
This is an invasion.
This is not a spontaneous uprising of the people because they're mad about the economy.
No, this is a CIA and Mossad-backed invasion.
They're clearly trafficking weapons to Iranian Kurds, probably through Iraq.
They're coordinating using Starlink internet from Elon.
They're coordinating with the help of the CIA, maybe trained by them.
Maybe you got State Department NGOs on the ground.
You got CIA on the ground.
Maybe you have some of these mercenaries on the ground, some PMC, some private military corporation.
And that's not a spontaneous demonstration.
Oh, the people are crying out.
It's a bottom-up revolution.
No, this is a provocation.
That is an armed insurrection backed by the West.
And I told you the other week, this is how this works.
So the United States has been operating in this territory for a long time, funneling weapons, training people, organizing them, facilitating the cross-border transfer, whatever.
They give them the green light.
All right, it's go time.
Uprising.
These Kurds storm government buildings in Western Iranian provinces.
That's where the action is happening.
Western media starts to report.
New York Times, Washington Post, The Journal, CBS News, they say, oh my gosh, Iran's security force is killing all the protesters.
Well, the protesters are armed insurrectionists.
The protesters, it's an armed uprising with foreign backing.
So yeah, they're killing them.
Yeah, they're shooting at them.
It's not like they're shooting at the million man march in D.C.
It's not like they're shooting at, you know, they're walking across the bridge like MLK.
They're shooting at what is effectively foreign mercenaries.
But the Western media does their part and they embellish it and they say, deadliest crackdown, brutal crackdown, indiscriminate killing, screams and people crying out, body bags line the street.
It's the worst violence ever.
This is then amplified on social media.
And then the opinion makers come in and they say, well, you know what?
It would be better if Iran was a democracy.
It would be better if Iran was a monarchy.
Well, wouldn't it be better if the Islamic Republic fell on the right and the left.
On the left for the human rights, on the right, because they say it's based, that we're bringing the Shah back, and, you know, this is an Islamist government and so on.
And then this call for action makes its way up to the White House.
And now Trump is being told, you know, the protesters need your help.
Amazing.
So Western intelligence and military backs an uprising.
Iran puts it down.
Western media embellishes it and floods the zone on social media.
They need your help.
So now Trump is going to go in and help the protesters, bombing them with F-35s, bombing them, bombing their internal security service, which protects the regime from these armed protesters, bombing Iran's missiles as Israel wanted so that Iran can't retaliate.
And what this does ultimately, and let me tell you, here's what happens next.
This doesn't topple the regime, okay?
This is what is happening.
Now, let me tell you something about regime change.
It does not happen from a popular uprising alone.
Okay, we've seen this.
How did the government in Afghanistan fall?
We invaded them on the ground with 100,000 troops, airstrikes, overwhelming force.
How did we defeat the regime of Saddam Hussein?
300,000 coalition troops on the ground.
Shock and awe, airstrikes, superior intelligence, you name it.
How did we topple Assad?
15 years of civil war.
U.S. troops on the ground backing the Peshmerga, backing the Kurds, backing al-Nusra, you know, all these other groups that became ISIS, airstrikes.
And it took 15 years to dislodge Assad.
Now, Iran is a country of 90 million people.
This is multiples, many multiples the size of Iraq, the size of Syria.
You think a few airstrikes are going to dislodge this government?
It's the country's a fortress.
The country's a fortress.
It's all mountains.
And they built cities underground, not primitive tunnels, cities underground that build ballistic missiles that enrich uranium, that do all these things.
Fortresses underground.
They have a million-man army.
They have the Revolutionary Guard.
They've got air defenses, Air Force, Navy.
They've got proxies.
You think a few airstrikes and some street protests are going to topple the government?
It won't happen.
You need a rival group that can rally the country to its side.
You're going to need a ground force, whether that's local or it's foreign-backed.
You're going to need a sustained air campaign.
A lot is going to go into this.
This is not something where you go in, get out, you topple the government.
This is a big commitment.
And while you're going to war with Iran, they're going to be lobbing missiles at everybody.
They have ballistic missiles that you can't intercept, and they're going to be launching them at Israel.
They're going to be launching them at U.S. bases.
They'll be launching them, who knows, at every country that participates in this, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Qatar, you know, who knows?
And those countries know it.
They're going to stay out of it.
So what does this do for our allies?
If we go into Iran and we're bombing them and this creates all this instability, you know, Saudi Arabia is being pushed into the arms of Pakistan, Turkey, Iran.
It's pushing all these other countries away, causing problems.
And yet this is what we're signing ourselves up for.
We're sending over a carrier strike group so that we can do a sustained air campaign.
And when those forces arrive on January 23rd or 26th, I think is the window.
I think the earliest that this USS Abraham Lincoln arrives is on the 26th.
When this force package arrives in the next week, maybe you're going to get more protests.
Trump is implementing these secondary sanctions, 25% tariff on any country that does business with Iran.
This southern spear operation is taking these oil tankers.
Many of them comprise Iran's shadow fleet.
So we're increasing the pressure on their economy.
Surely the CIA is active.
Surely Mossad is active.
We're moving a carrier strike group into position.
Don't be surprised in February when you see our maximum pressure campaign will yield more unrest.
And then we'll be there, guns loaded, locked and loaded, to go in and answer the call of the protesters and bomb the besiege, bomb the missiles, bomb government positions.
And do you know what will happen?
It will not be decisive.
There will be nothing decisive about it.
You know what's going to happen?
It will turn into Syria.
We will be able to degrade the government.
We can weaken the government.
We won't destroy it.
And all that will happen is we'll render Iran defenseless, take out their anti-aircraft, their air force, their missiles.
And once they are defenseless and vulnerable, then it becomes an open airspace for Israel and the United States to bomb at their leisure.
That is effectively what happened in Syria.
That is what they want to happen here.
They don't need to seek decisive action.
They don't need to destroy Iran's entire governance structure.
They need to render Iran defenseless so that Israel can just have free reign in that airspace, so that the jets can fly over Iraq all the time.
And they could fly over Syria.
Once this Jolani government makes peace with the Kurds there, they'll fly through Syria, through Syrian Kurdistan, Iraqi Kurdistan, and it will be a highway dropping bombs on Iran indefinitely as an armed conflict takes shape.
And I imagine the country just destabilizes.
And maybe Iranian Kurdistan becomes a base of operations and the breakaway Balochistan province becomes a theater of conflict.
Maybe it looks something like this.
And this is Israel's endgame ultimately, is to decisively confront Iran, knock them off.
They don't care if it takes five years, 10 years.
They want to defeat Iran.
They want regime change in Iran.
They want to install a friendly government.
At the minimum, they cannot have Iran projecting power in the region as an Islamist middle power.
That's what it is.
And that's what we're going for.
And this, John Mearsheimer said it, and it went viral on, I think, Piers Morgan.
He said, look, Iran is an Israel problem.
They are not an America problem.
The U.S. would have good relations with Iran if it were not for Israel.
And that is 100% true.
And we are absolutely shooting ourselves in the foot here.
There's another scenario where the United States brings together Turkey, Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and we control this region with these Muslim countries that are all coming back together.
But instead, you might have, they're talking about a strategic mutual defense treaty between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.
Turkey wants to be in on it.
You're creating a Muslim NATO without us, probably aimed at Israel.
And it is backed up by Pakistan, which is China's Israel.
Pakistan is China's closest ally.
So we're sort of giving the Middle East to China.
We're giving it to Israel.
We're giving it to China.
The Emiratis are warming relations with India.
They're putting stuff in Sudan, in Somaliland.
They're working with Israel.
This is what is emerging in the Middle East.
None of it is good for the United States.
So, you know, people call me a neocon now.
Look, I support intervention in our hemisphere.
I support intervention so we can get oil, drive China out of our hemisphere, get Greenland, put a golden dome early warning system in Greenland.
Yes, that is America first.
That has to do with our security.
A protracted regime change war against Iran, keep us out.
As a matter of fact, prevent it.
Trump should use his clout and leverage to bring Israel back from the brink.
Stop Israel.
That's what we need to do here.
That's America first.
Throw our weight around against Israel.
Get Europe to help.
Israel is totally isolated from everybody.
China's making Israel-critical statements.
The Muslim world is anti-Israel now.
Even their relationship with Egypt is fraying.
Their relationship with Europe is destroyed.
Get together with Europe and the Muslim countries.
Put those sanctions on Israel.
You want to put a 25% tariff on Iran?
Put a 25% tariff on Israel.
Say, stop.
Stop in Gaza.
Stop in Lebanon.
Stop in Iran.
What is in our interest is to stabilize the region.
But instead, we're going to war again.
We're literally doing it all over again.
And I would bet you a lot of money that this is going to happen before the end of March.
As they want to get this party started before the midterms.
And the midterms are really going to kick off, you know, at the end of spring, beginning of summer.
So if I had to guess, I would say before the end of March, we're back.
We're back there.
And it's very clear: Trump is putting all these assets out there.
And you know, they're going there for action.
There's not going to be a nuclear agreement.
It won't happen.
Because even if somehow Trump was able to re-engage Iran on a diplomatic level, as he threatened to do about a week ago, Israel would sabotage it just as they did a year ago.
So that seems to be where we are inevitably headed.
The only thing that topples an entrenched regime is if there is a violent opposing force that can rally more people, has weapons, fights a fucking war, and wins.
That is what dislodges regimes, not popular dissatisfaction, not the people have had enough, not a couple of airstrikes.
Certainly it would help.
So people are acting like, oh, you know, it's a done deal.
I support Casey Push, but I don't think he can win.
And I think that here's the problem: if we put all our resources behind a primary candidate that can't win and he loses, then people are going to say, all right, well, now you got to support Vivek.
Or worse, we support Casey Push.
He wins, and then he loses in the general.
And then we look like assholes.
So honestly, I think the best case scenario is that Vivek wins the primary and then loses the general.
And then we could say, okay, well, we did it your way.
Your guy won the primary and he lost.
And I think we need to just actually punish the GOP.
I think Vivek needs to lose in the general.
So my mind is: I'm not going to intervene in the primary.
I'm going to intervene in the general.
If Casey Push can pull it off, I wish him luck.
God bless.
But Vivek has endorsements from everybody, from Trump, from Vance, from everybody up and down.
I think he's got it.
He's got money.
I think Vivek is almost a shoe-win for the primary.
We got to get involved in the general and say, stay home.
The GOP needs to learn a valuable lesson, which is you endorse and you nominate anchor babies that insult American citizens.
You're going to lose.
We're going to take the state from you.
And that'll hurt Republicans, and I hope it does.
Fuck them.
They appointed Vivek to do this.
Shouldn't have done it.
Lieutenant Governor could have ran.
They filled Vance's Senate seat to clear the way for Vivek.
They shouldn't have done that.
Big mistake.
So no.
I think that Vivek has to lose in the general.
That's the message we need to say, that we need to send.
I know a lot of people that go to Europe and they come back and they say it's noticeable how diverse our country is.
And Europe has some diversity problems, but people come back here and they're like, wow, you come back to the United States and it's the ghetto, especially in the airports.
I know you have soft hands, but can you please put them to work?
My hoodie still hasn't shipped.
Get in the back and start packing the order now and start working on that Groor Pet merchwall.
Justin Popiel sent $50.
Hey, Nick, 21-year-old electrician and first-time super chatter.
I've come to the conclusion that Candace Owens was Charlie's assassin because Charlie Kirk was actually Brigitte Macron in disguise and infiltrated her organization.
When you think about it, there's no evidence to contradict that Candace was the shooter.
So today on her show, she said that she got a cease and desist letter from Turning Point and she reads it on the show.
Do you know that she has a non-disclosure agreement with Turning Point USA that contains a non-disparagement clause?
Okay, what are we doing?
So this entire time from the day Charlie Kirk died until today, you're telling me the entire time she was under NDA with a non-disparagement clause that whole time.
So she's going live every day for the past four or five months, getting 3 million views per show, saying Turning Point killed Charlie, turning points filled with rapists, turning points stealing money, this, that, and the other.
You're telling me the whole time she had a non-disparagement agreement?
She's fucked.
And in the cease and desist letter, it says we reached out to her on December 2nd and December 14th and we reminded her that she has a non-disparagement agreement and she acknowledged it and she kept saying it anyway.
What are you doing?
And in the letter, it says, we are still calculating the damages, which are significant and still accruing.
So it looks like she's in for a world of trouble as far as the legal liability is concerned.
She had a non-disparagement agreement.
Can you imagine?
And for months, every night, they killed him.
They knew they lied.
They stole money.
They're molesting people, this, that, and the other.
You're under an NDA.
She goes on the show.
She's like, so I have a contract with Turning Point for when I did speaking gigs with them.
And, you know, I have an NDA with them.
It was terminated on December 2nd, but the NDA covers them for another 12 months.
So she's like everything she has said is in violation of this agreement.
And she's bitching about it.
She goes, well, God is the only judge.
I don't care about courts.
Well, okay.
I hope God is on the jury then.
I hope God intervenes in this one because damn, that looks pretty cut and dry.
And I told you, people said, well, why did Erica Kirk meet with Candice Owens?
I think I said this on the show.
I definitely said it in our Telegram group chat.
I said, the reason that Erica is meeting with Candace Owens, probably with an attorney, is so that they can prove actual malice.
Because the standard for defamation for a public figure, it's called actual malice.
If you sue me for defamation and you're a private person, let's say I'm talking about my neighbor and I say, you know, my neighbor's a murderer, my neighbor's a thief, and my neighbor's a private person.
My neighbor can sue me and say, this isn't true.
And I'll be liable.
If I say about a famous person, Trump is a murderer, Trump is a thief, and Trump sues me for defamation, he has to prove what is called actual malice.
It means that I knew that what I was saying is not true, and I said it anyway with an intention to hurt him.
And then he would have to prove the damages.
So it's a much higher standard to prove if you're a public figure.
So why did Erica Kirk meet with Candice Owens?
Well, she met with her so that she could furnish Candace with all the documentation and say, you're wrong about this, you're wrong about this, you're wrong about this.
Here's the evidence with an attorney present.
And that's what Candace said.
She said that they have a whole binder, papers.
Candace verified all the information on her show.
She said, yes, so we met and their attorney was there and they gave us all this info.
Why did Erica do this?
To set her up for future litigation so that when Candace comes back and starts lying about Turning Point again, they can say, well, she knew.
How do we know she knew and when she knew it?
Because we told her.
How do we know that Candace knows she's lying?
Because we gave her the receipts in person.
And she acknowledged that she saw them and she said it anyway.
And so that's why Turning Point says we told her about her non-disparagement on December 2nd.
We told her about it on the 14th.
We had a meeting with her.
She's in contact with Turning Point if she has any questions.
So we did our due diligence.
And yet she lied anyway.
The cease and desist letter is part of this.
The cease and desist letter is building their case saying, all right, now stop.
We told you once, we told you twice.
We're telling you a third time.
You can't talk about this anymore.
This non-disparagement clause is active.
You're in breach of it.
We're calculating the damages.
Probably going to sue her anyway.
But now they want her to be quiet.
So it'll be very interesting.
Does she ever talk about Turning Point again?
I'd be very interested to see.
Because if she comes back tomorrow, Friday, Monday, and she don't talk about Turning Point, then it's clear she's shit in her pants because the CND, I mean, that's a tune-up.
She knows what's coming.
So I, you know, if you saw the show, it's like, wow, that's totally insane.
How does anybody let her do that?
Does she have a lawyer?
Her lawyer's just got to be, what's this guy doing?
She's out there every day attacking Turning Point, like basically committing defamation as such every day for months.
She's under this agreement and the lawyer never speaks up and says, you know, you really shouldn't be doing this.
And she's deputizing her followers to do it too.
So there's just no limit to it.
So anyway, yeah, I don't know if you saw the latest development.
Why should American nationalists favor an aggressive imperialist foreign policy over a neutral soft power approach?
Is the goal to create a safe civilization for white families or to wage infinite wars and send young white men to die in pursuit of endless territorial expansion?
Why should American nationalists favor an aggressive imperialist foreign policy over neutral soft power approach?
It's the goal to create wholesome chungus civilization for families, for families in sundresses and little kids that are eating ground beef and local honey?
Or is the goal infinite war sending white men to die?
Clearly, you don't watch the show.
It's actually not a choice.
We are a great power.
We don't choose to be one.
We are one.
We are in a competition.
We didn't choose to be in the competition.
We are in the competition.
The competition concerns our vital strategic interests.
We need them.
So, you know, contrary to libertarians, there is no way to opt out.
You don't withdraw all your troops and then everybody leaves you alone.
That's not how the world works.
People think, oh, if only the United States would stop bothering everybody, you know, then we could pull up the drawbridge to Ford America and no one would give us a hard time.
That's not true.
Okay.
Every area that we abandon will be quickly taken over by some other country.
And then when we try to secure our interests for goods or supply chains or raw materials or whatever, strategically important territory, they are going to have the advantage.
And we're not going to get our way.
And we will have less leverage to get what we want.
So, you know, and that's life.
Unfortunately, you don't get to choose.
We're born into this.
We are in a predicament.
We are in a security dilemma with other countries.
It's sort of like saying if we destroyed all our nukes, maybe everybody else would.
No, they would keep their nukes.
And actually, they might tend to use them then.
We get rid of our nukes, make ourselves defenseless.
We have a giant conventional army where they say, oh, America's chill now.
No, they'd probably annihilate us.
And they'd say, now we're safe.
So that's just idiotic.
If you want to have, and this whole thing about it's about safe white families.
Yeah, okay, dumb fuck.
Everybody wants safety.
Everybody wants prosperity that allows people to have families.
Question is how you achieve it, you fucking idiot.
And identifying prosperity and safety with an isolationist foreign policy, that's just a mistake.
You know, it's a question.
How do we achieve prosperity and safety?
Is it with isolationism or is it with intervention?
And that's actually a question that you have to solve.
It's not easy to say, well, if we just stop terrorizing the world, then, you know, we would be rich and safe.
Well, that's actually a foregone conclusion.
It's not a foregone conclusion that that would be the case.
So sending young white men to die.
You think we would not have a military?
We would still have a military.
It would be filled with men, white men.
And yes, sometimes they would die.
And that's the world.
The question is, what are they going to die for?
White men will die if you enforce the law, okay?
Police officers die all the time.
It's tragic.
You hate that it happens.
But when you enforce the law, people die.
We're going to not have police.
Should we continue to have an aggressive interventionist police force where white men are dying?
Are we going to have safe, wholesome, chungous white families where we bake sourdough bread?
In order to do those things, you need white men to die, actually.
You need courageous and brave white men to die.
The thin line between order and chaos.
One secures the other.
And that's the world.
Are you an idiot?
Are you some pussy liberal?
If only we just got rid of the jails and the cops, if only we got rid of the guns and the sticks, and everybody would live happily ever after.
We'd be skipping in wheat fields.
No, it's not how the world works.
So, no, we would still have a military.
It would still be filled with men, mostly white, and they would still die.
Even if you're just steering aircraft carriers around, they'd still be falling off the fucking boat.
They'd still be crashing the planes.
And from time to time, they would still need to intervene places and some of them would die.
It's almost like dressing up like Nazis accelerated that.
You know, it's almost like if you go around with a sign that says deport niggers, not guns, and you go around beating people up and all black and screaming slurs and intimidating everybody.
It's almost like it actually creates the opposite of the intended effect.
So I'm sorry that happened, but you would have more of a leg to stand on if you guys were plain clothes, clean-cut Australian nationalists.
If you just wave the flag and you just looked apart, it'd be a lot harder for them to do stuff like that.
Simple things, the purest bliss is like when I'm in Florida and I'm driving with the top down and the weather's perfect and my favorite song comes on and I go to the burger place and I get my favorite burger.
To me, that is as good as it gets.
Go to the hot tub on a cool day and I'm in the hot tub with my AirPods in and I'm just, that's peak.
Some people, because you know what I found is that I've achieved a lot of what I wanted out of my life.
A lot of excitement.
I live an interesting life.
It's an exciting life.
But what I found is that it's all the same.
You chase these things in your life.
You dream about things in your life.
You experience the ups and the downs.
The downs are not deadly unless it's like you're a drug addict or you're involved in organized crime.
The downs are not ultimately that bad unless you really fuck up, unless you get in trouble with the law.
Like I said, like really bad stuff.
And the peaks are not, they don't really do it for you.
You achieve what you want and then you realize you wake up the next day in a bed.
You achieve everything you ever wanted.
You know, you meet your hero.
You make a million dollars.
You become one of the most famous people.
You're at the top of your field.
You get the interview, whatever.
And you know what happens?
You get in your car, you drive home, you get undressed, you jump in bed, you fall asleep.
You wake up the next day, check your phone, brush your teeth, eat your breakfast.
It's just another day.
Just another day.
And you got the same problems, you know, the same list of problems.
You know, you got a family member that's got an issue.
Oh, you know, you got a disgruntled somebody causing problems for you.
Oh, you got, you know, you got to do chores.
You got to pay this.
They do this, whatever.
It's all just life.
It's all monotonous.
It's all repetitive.
It's all menial.
It's all dull.
And this is why people are always chasing, chasing novelty.
They want to get a change of scenery.
They want a mind-altering drug.
They want a romance.
They want a fling.
They want whatever.
They think that's going to get them to feel happy.
But, you know, you do these things and then you're just back.
People talk about travel.
It's like you're a miserable piece of shit.
You're going to go over there and you'll be a miserable piece of shit over there.
You know?
Just a matter of time.
So anyway, that's just some advice for young people and people in general.
I'm a big believer in acceptance.
You should work hard.
You should fight every day for what's right.
You should have goals and be ambitious and fight for your seat at the table and stick up for yourself.
I believe in all of that.
I also believe in an inner peace, which is just acceptance about we're not in control.
Life is what it is.
None of it is ours.
You can't hang on to any of it.
And if you can really just enjoy today, then you're good.
You know, if you, whatever your station, wherever you are in the journey, if you can take a deep breath and step outside and just enjoy what life is, then you'll be okay.
Even if you're miserable.
But it's these other people that have these expectations.
I feel like that's when you get into trouble.
That's when people start to, you know, there's this dissonance about, you know, what they think things should be like or whatever.
Life is pretty predictable.
And the things that are unpredictable kind of fit into a familiar list of things that are fairly predictable.
You grow up, you get a job, you get sick, people you love die, you die.
A woman will never be able to have this conversation because a woman looks at any young girl, even if she's 19 or 20 or 21, and she'll say, that's a vulnerable girl.
That's a child.
And you go, no, it's not.
No, sorry.
19's not a child.
20 is not a child.
18's 17 is really not a child, strictly speaking.
But they can't handle it because for them it is personal.
And because it's personal, it makes them emotional because they're a young girl and many young women, it's hard to be a young girl.
I empathize deeply, actually.
I empathize totally.
And men need to, I feel this way about Jews.
I feel this way about women.
I can't empathize.
And I see your side, which is that, you know, women do live in constant fear.
Man, many, many young girls don't want to speak up.
And, you know, they're worried about dating.
They're worried about being alone with men because men are more powerful.
And women get scared easily.
You know, they don't stick up for themselves.
I get that.
And I get why women get charged up and that's why they freak out.
But you know what?
That's why a woman's testimony counts for a fraction of a men, of a man's in court because women are not rational.
And we can be empathetic and we can understand why they feel the way that they feel.
But we have to be logical.
And we can't be emotional about these topics.
We have to be where the truth is, like this and every other subject.
And, you know, it's no coincidence that the fertility crisis coincides with deferring childbirth.
And why do you think people are deferring childbirth?
Because of modernity, because of feminism, because of attitudes about sex, because of the Industrial Revolution.
And all of this goes hand in hand with pushing that age back further and further.
So, you know, I think in an ideal world, men and women are getting married in their teens.
I think it's crazy that men and women are waiting until they're 28 to get married.
And I know that's hypocritical because I'm 27 and I'm not married, but I live in this world and I'm in a particular set of circumstances.
But that's the age when men and women are sexually active and fertile.
And I think that's when you start building a marriage.
So no, I don't think that's crazy that you have like a 21-year-old guy with a job and who's established marries a younger girl who's 17.
I don't think that's insane.
What's insane is a girl finishes high school, goes to college, sleeps with six or seven guys, then gets a fucking job, moves out of her parents' house to an apartment, goes to bars in the city, fucks a bunch more guys.
And then when she's ready to settle down at 25, then she considers marriage.
Okay, well, what does that look like for you now?
You're 25, you're past your prime, infertility, in looks, your used goods.
Now, what are your prospects?
A 25-year-old and above man, well, what man who's got money and status at the age of 28 is going to want to marry some used up 25-year-old mid-20s girl?
No, a 28-year-old guy is going to want to go for a younger girl with a lower body count and who has not been weathered by time.
And so these women are in a trap.
Okay, now you're 25.
Now you're 26.
Now you're 27.
Now you're 28.
Now you're 30.
Now you're 35.
And it just gets worse.
And then what happens?
You know, a desperate guy and a desperate girl get married at age 30.
They have one kid.
And they're both cynical.
The guy's been in 100 relationships.
The girl's been in 100 relationships.
They've done it so many times.
They've been through the process initiating and falling in love and, you know, building a life and then breaking apart.
And then, and they get cynical, set in their ways and cynical.
And then it's just not the same.
And then that's why they get divorced.
You're not ready for that.
People are not ready for that.
People want to bitch and moan about rape, pervert, pedophile.
But it's always women with the shame stuff.
And it starts with men saying, shut up.
Shut the fuck up.
We need to rebuild society.
It starts with rebuilding the men and the women.
And we got to change those attitudes.
No, it's ridiculous.
It's ridiculous.
Women being in school until they're 22.
And then what do they do?
You know, okay, you've been to school your whole life.
What are you going to do?
You're going to be a stay-at-home mom?
No one thinks that makes sense.
They got to get a job just so they could say it wasn't all a waste of time.
Tell me I'm wrong.
Tell me I'm wrong.
The women are being pushed into college for four more years of education.
It's exorbitantly expensive.
They get out at 22.
And then what are they going to do?
Be a stay-at-home mom?
They can't.
They say, look, I got my paper.
It's all been leading to me getting a job in the city.
And then that's what they do.
And they got to, just to go through the motion, they got to LARP as a working woman for a few years at least.
And then they're going to settle down.
Okay, well, now you're in your late 20s.
Is that a child?
When is it not a child?
When they're fucking 50, when they hit menopause?
I mean, come on.
So, but women are so touchy about it because they're a vulnerable population.
So that's why they can never handle an adult conversation about rape, about, you know, teenage marriage, that kind of thing.
And once you understand that, you realize, well, what is Epstein doing?
Like, is the crime that he is attracted to something that you should absolutely under no circumstances be attracted to?
No, categorically not.
Sorry, 17-year-old girls are attractive.
Hate to break it to you.
14, if you're 60 and it's a 14-year-old, you know, that's pushing it, obviously.
That's sick.
But 17, you're, you're, you know, you're kind of over that hump at that point.
And it's a little creepy.
You might have, it's distasteful if it's a huge age gap like that, I think.
But the problem is that they're doing it.
They're preying on young girls because they're vulnerable.
That's the problem.
They're preying on young girls because they're the most vulnerable.
And they're trafficking them so that they could get blackmail.
And that's what is going on there.
Anyway, I know a lot of people disagree.
You're wrong.
I know a lot of people, you know, they call me names.
Fuck you.
You're wrong.
You know, and people think they're going to shame me.
You're, you know, you're this, you're that, you're the other.
You know, that, sorry, that's not an argument.
You're calling me a name.
Go fuck yourself and kill yourself.
I didn't get into this show because I'm going to listen to some emotional idiot NPCs that can't critically think about issues.
If I did that, I would have never talked about Jews.
So you can go and cry about it with the girls.
You can go and bring your tampons and you can go and bring your pussy hat and you could go cry about, you know, every, yeah, every guy's a pervert.
Regarding Tate's apology, everybody's acting tough about free speech and Hitler.
Yet, how about this?
Romania's been run by Jews since 47, imprisoned our elites, and recently passed in December law of Exler number 241, where any anti-Semitic team content gets you three years minimum behind bars.
I knew Patrick Bett David was an Israel shell when my buddies, and I went to his election party and outside the event were stationed two Israeli fighter jets with IDF soldiers.
The boys and I got bored during it and started watching your stream.
The chat is for rich people because that's your quality control.
It's called economy.
We could open up a group chat for five bucks a month and every numbskull with the $5 bill would be in there trolling, carrying on, being fucking annoying.
You make it $100 a month.
You get far fewer people, still hundreds of people in there, but you get fewer people.
It's a selection bias.
It's a filter.
How much is it worth to you?
If you can scrape together $100 to talk to me, you're worthy.
If you can't scrape together $100, I don't know what to tell you.
I tell everyone to, but that's just like a beta male cop-out.
Whenever you do anything edgy, whenever you do anything toxic or iconoclastic, you get these carpet-munching losers with their dry-fit t-shirts and like their giant cross necklace and snapback baseball cap.
I do not believe in healthy lifestyle alternatives.
I think that is gay.
I think that is cringe.
I think that doesn't work.
If that shit worked, then high-performance athletes would do that.
If you were training for the Olympics, training for the Olympics, training for the NFL, training for the MLB, and you wanted to be the optimal athlete, you wanted an edge on your opponents, if that shit worked, you would get on the carnivore diet.
If that shit worked, Lance Armstrong would be getting his, he'd be at the farmer's market getting raw milk.
Lance Armstrong busted with the fridge full of raw milk, cooking up some delicious farm-fresh pasteur-raised eggs that he got from his local farmer's market.
No, but he didn't.
But Lance Armstrong, one of the greatest athletes in the world, didn't get busted with raw milk and pasteurized eggs.
He got busted with steroids.
Because steroids work.
Because if you want to be the ultimate beast, you get on steroids and amphetamines.
That's what you would do.
When the Kyrgyzstanis send their terrorists to the Moscow Bolshoy Mall, they don't put them on the carnivore diet.
They put them on amphetamines from Syria.
That's the difference.
Okay.
When ISIS K is ready to give their life against Russia's theater, they don't get amped up by eating local honey and organic ice cream.
They're not peaty.
They get on meth.
So that's what I look at.
That's what I look at.
Who are what's your model?
If I'm Patrick Bet David, what's your model for performance?
Well, let's see.
The highest performance fighters and athletes and everybody else, they just take drugs.
They take hormones.
They take steroids.
They're not at the farmer's market.
You don't catch, you're not going to catch an Olympian and an ISIS fighter and a U.S. Marine and a WWE entertainer at your local farmer's market.
No, you're going to catch them at the pharmacy.
That's where the gains are made.
The gains are not made in the kitchen.
The gains are made in a Chinese laboratory and everyone knows it.
Why is every Paris Morgan debate just him saying, well, that's not funny or something along the lines of, why would you think that? said Face Emoji, all in a bitchy feel sorry for me, a British accent.
Does he actually have any political knowledge that's relevant in today's world?
And when will the boomers realize their politics are irrelevant?
I got the gold sponsorship because at the pinnacle of Mark Levin's feud of Tucker Carlson, at the peak of that, the gold sponsor said, I don't like Mark Levin anymore.
He's a Gentile.
He said, I like you.
So it was literally an F you to Mark Levin for crashing out on Tucker.
But people make shit up.
That's why I stopped believing in a lot of conspiracies because of how uncharitable people are to me and how much people think they know what they're talking about, how fucking ignorant they are and so confident.
So that was offered to us four months ago at the peak of the Mark Levin crash out on Tucker.
It's a Gentile company.
They said, we're so frustrated with Mark Levin.
Nick is right about him.
We're going to give it to you instead.
That was the conversation.
And people say, oh, he doesn't know.
It's, oh, it's Jewish.
You don't even know what it is.
You don't even know what company it is.
Not every gold company is run by Jews.
And this one isn't.
You don't even know the story.
But of course, people take that and they say, oh, he got.
And the fraud.
And I don't even know what you're talking about.
Curious Joel.
I don't even know what that is.
Oh, these Hasidic Jews.
Oh, give me a break.
Who fucking cares?
Yes, I want them to be arrested, but that's just what about is.
They uncovered something in Minneapolis.
They said, oh, what about the Jews over here?
The fraud that's being perpetrated in America is about the, we have a Jewish oligarchy.
Yeah, I'm only talking about the structural problem of Jews having power in America.
You didn't talk about these Hasids that are skimming a little bit of welfare money or something.