TRUMP INVADES GREENLAND??? Rubio Prepares $700 Billion Bid For Greenland | America First Ep. 1622
NEW MERCH JUST DROPPED Don't miss out!
https://fuentes.storeShow more Subscribe to the America First Archive!
https://americafirst.plus
Send a superchat:
https://entropystream.live/nickjfuentes
Support the America First Foundation:
https://americafirstfoundation.org/donate
https://x.com/AmericaFirstFdn
Support the show using crypto:
https://nicholasjfuentes.com/donate
Follow Nicholas J. Fuentes:
X: https://x.com/nickjfuentes
Kick: https://kick.com/nickfuentes
Telegram: https://t.me/nickjfuentes
Follow Fuentes Updates on X for clips and more:
https://x.com/fuentesupdates
Follow America First HQ for news:
X: https://x.com/AmFirstHQ
Telegram: https://t.me/AmericaFirstHQ
Watch the show on Cozy:
https://cozy.tv/nick Show less
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
No one's allowed to say that the blood is a quintessential part of this, that the blood of our people is something that is essential.
That we are different.
that America was different because we are different.
Palantir is an AI data analytics company.
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithms, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
If we don't have freedom on the Internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind raped every day forever.
Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geolocation, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you asleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
You have a smart home, economy of things.
It's like total, like, rape of everybody by the system forever.
My life is like a first-person video game, you know?
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
People do not stab young girls on trains because they're born black.
People do not shoot Palestinians in the back of the head or cheer it on just because they're Jewish.
The people that do this are lost.
They have to be isolated and segregated out.
A new consensus must emerge.
Are you in favor of a society with meaning?
A society where life is sacred.
Where life has sanctity, where people's lives and their dignity and their integrity is respected?
Or are we going to live in a society that is a never-ending war between nihilistic tribes, warlords, savages, pagans?
I see an emerging consensus.
And I think that the mature people that actually love America, actually love our children, the people that recognize the division, the peril that we're in, we need to fortify a new consensus and rally the people of conscience, the people of decency, the people of humanity, the people of charity towards their fellow man,
against those that want to kill us, against those that laugh and celebrate when innocent people are harmed.
For any reason, for any ideological reason.
Against the people that are cruel, the people that are hateful.
And by that, I mean the people that are really cruel.
Not the people that say things you disagree with, not the people that are provocative, not the people that are sometimes angry, but the people that are really cruel and really evil.
What makes Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the bearing of suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us.
An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children, even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
That is what makes us different.
That is what makes us good.
unidentified
Canary Mission is an Israeli-funded blacklist, which since July 2025 has been confirmed to be used by the Trump administration to target students, professors, and professionals who oppose Israel and reside in the United States.
This idea is part of an initiative created by the Heritage Foundation, the same group responsible for the infamous Project 2025.
In their initiative, titled Project Esther, they state that students participating in pro-Palestinian protests and activism are supporting Hamas, a group that the United States designates as a foreign terrorist organization.
Therefore, pro-Palestinian students are considered to be supporting terrorism and are subject to the revocation of visas, frozen bank accounts, asset seizures, and the denial of basic constitutional rights.
In effect, the Canary mission serves as a means to circumvent constitutional protections, allowing the federal government to engage in intelligence gathering activities that would otherwise be considered unlawful.
But the Canary Mission is not alone.
Palantir, another company closely aligned with the state of Israel, uses AI-driven analytics to maintain private databases on U.S. citizens and currently works with four federal agencies.
While government contracting with the private sector is long-standing, the prominent influence of Jewish groups within these increasingly powerful organizations warrants careful examination.
I renew the call for all able-bodied young American men, all of our elite human capital, all of our geniuses, warriors, intelligent people to dedicate themselves to American sovereignty and independence.
As Christians, as Americans, as white people, as citizens of the United States.
And anybody that settles for anything less is just as much of an enemy.
I would actually consider them worse than our oppressors.
So on Independence Day, it's important to reflect on the fact that we are an occupied nation.
Now, just like then, we're being ruled by a small country across an ocean, serving itself at our expense.
And as long as that is the case, I will always be obsessed with that.
As long as that is the case, I will always be speaking out against that and fighting against that.
And I will always be anchored, understanding that that is the fundamental struggle.
As long as our presidents have to kiss the wall in Israel and wear a small hat, as long as they have to say that we want to make Israel great again and they're the greatest country ever, I will never be okay with that.
It doesn't matter how they might try to placate us or appease our interests, the concessions they'll make.
As long as that is the case, it is unacceptable.
And that's what it means to be an American.
How did we get here?
This is not a timeline going back to 1948.
What had just happened before the 2016 election?
Barack Obama created the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the JCPOA, or the Iranian nuclear deal.
And Barack Obama brought together China, Russia, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the European Union to enforce a nuclear deal that restricts Iran's enrichment of uranium.
The early talks were conducted in secret, and the Israelis were furious, furious about this.
They hated Obama.
Netanyahu went to a joint session of Congress and gave a speech in defiance of the American president and its nuclear deal, and Congress gave 37 standing ovations.
This is the background of Trump's first election.
2016 election happens.
Trump gets elected with the help of the Israelis.
You don't believe me?
There's a whole article about it.
It's an excerpt from James Bamford's book, Spy Fail.
It goes into great detail about the hidden collusion in the 2016 election.
It wasn't Trump and Russia.
It was Trump and Israel.
And why was Israel so hell-bent on getting a Republican elected in 2016?
In 2018, Donald Trump declares the IRGC, the Revolutionary Guard, which is the military of the regime, a terrorist group.
Greenlights that group for sanctions, for attacks.
Now the United States is in a shadow war with Iran.
It culminates by January 2020 in the assassination of Qasem Suleimani.
Suleimani was the architect of the axis of resistance.
Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Suleimani built all of it.
Are you starting to see Obama had this solved?
He made the deal.
The Israelis hated him for it.
They colluded with Trump to get him elected so that Trump would do maximum pressure and create a ladder of escalation, pulling us out of the deal, declaring the IRGC terrorists, then killing its leader, putting sanctions on the regime.
This is a war that started a long time ago, that Trump made hot in 2018 and has been going on for seven years.
That's the nature of forever wars.
Just like in Iraq, which went from 1990 until today, just like Libya, which went from 2011 to today.
Syria, which went from 2011 to today, and Iran, which went from 2018 until today.
That's the nature of forever wars.
And if you're not paying attention to those underlying forces, you're going to fall for it again and again.
You're going to be surprised and confused and coping over and over.
and people are just tripping over themselves to do it again.
I'm like two seconds out from just joining the Jews at this point.
It's like I started out like the Jews are oppressing us, then it's like, no, no, the Jews are oppressing all of you.
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and, in some cases, quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
Anyway, I'm joking a little bit there, but it's also kind of true.
It speaks to the mindset.
People are so, they are the raped.
You know, you're like a white guy in the 21st century fantasizing about the Roman Empire, fantasizing about a return to greatness for America, for the West.
You start to talk about America taking overseas colonies and the spiritually and physically raped say, but what about when they vote?
Even the based chuds, you talk about overseas expansion.
They say, but what about when those other people vote?
It's like, I don't even want us voting here.
You think they're going to be voting there?
You've got it all twisted.
You have a lack of imagination.
You know, where we're going, we don't need votes, okay?
Votes, where we're going, we don't need voting.
It's not going to be like that.
You know, what part of 1,000-year Trump and Reich don't you understand?
What part of vote one more time and then never again?
There's not going to be elections.
No, but we're obviously joking.
So we'll talk all about Greenland.
We're going to talk about Trump's potential invocation of the Insurrection Act in Minneapolis.
I wish he would.
I wish he would.
He keeps talking about it amid the unrest and riots in Minneapolis in response to the ICE deployment.
By the way, nobody has been arrested.
Do you know that?
There have been all these riots happening in Minneapolis.
Last night, you have an ICE agent.
I think actually it happened this afternoon.
He shot a Venezuelan illegal because he was trying to arrest this guy and a bunch of agitators came out and hit him with shovels.
And so ICE barged in, arrested everybody.
But in Minneapolis, there's straight up riots going on.
They're shooting fireworks at cops, taking over hotels.
It's mayhem.
And you see the videos by Nick Sortor and these other guys.
It's all over Twitter.
Do you know that Minneapolis police arrested zero people last night?
So when you see these videos of fireworks blowing up and cops getting beat and the absolute anarchy that's unfolding, nobody's even getting arrested.
So Trump says, I'll invoke the Insurrection Act.
Bro, do it.
Do some things to stop chickening out.
I'm just tired of the idle threats.
We're going to bomb you.
We're going to tariff you.
We're going to invoke the Insurrection Act.
Always chickens out.
Just do it.
You're the commander in chief.
He does it every time.
He did it during the BLM riots.
He did it during the LA riots.
Please pull the trigger.
Please kill them, Mr. President.
Please just kill them.
Not actually.
I don't actually, I'm not actually wishing for violence, but please send in the military and restore order.
This is your country.
You are the commander in chief of the armed forces.
You are the chief executive over this country.
And it is lawless.
Take some responsibility.
Take the reins.
Send in the military.
If this Jewish communist running the city won't arrest these people, if this gay cuck governor, Tim Walz, doesn't do it, send in the military.
That's why you were elected.
I don't get it.
This happened the last time in Minneapolis, BLM, Summer of Love.
Trump kept threatening, I'll send him in.
I swear I'll do it.
I'll invoke the Insurrection Act.
Do it.
Throw these people in jail.
They are trash.
Seriously.
It's bad enough that they're rioters, which by itself, we should have zero tolerance for it's one thing if you want to protest.
I'm a huge believer in the First Amendment.
You have a right to speak.
You have a right to assemble.
You have a right to the press, all of that.
You have civil liberties.
But going out after midnight and establishing an autonomous zone and forming barricades in the streets and breaching private businesses or police headquarters, stealing weapons from the police.
I have one question for Candace Owens, and this is the only thing I care about.
One question.
What the hell happened to those Egyptian planes?
Because we heard about the Egyptian planes every day and every night for like a month.
I think she did 25 shows, 25, standing on the grave of Charlie Kirk, making up this nonsense about Egyptian planes.
She said that these Egyptian military planes are following Charlie Kirk.
She put together a table of everywhere that Charlie Kirk was.
And every time he traveled, an Egyptian plane intersected with his plane.
She put together this spreadsheet that Charlie and Erica Kirk were being tailed by these Egyptian planes.
Well, maybe you didn't hear, but it was uncovered before Christmas that all of that data is completely fake.
It's literally all fake.
She got 66% of all the data wrong, just straight up wrong.
There was a YouTuber that did the actual research.
He paid thousands of dollars to get the data from the relevant sources.
He put it together on his own spreadsheet and he found that not only was most of the data wrong, but that it was extremely wrong.
That in many of the cases, not only were the Egyptian planes not in the same place as Erica Kirk, they were in another continent.
So it's not like the plane was two hours away or in the same state where you could chalk it up to an oversight.
No, they were in another continent.
They were on another part of the planet.
This was revealed in the second week of December.
It was all fake.
She came out to address this on December 16th, 2025.
This is 30 days ago.
On December 16th, 2025, she uploaded a video and she said, I'm aware there's some problems with my data.
She said, and people misunderstood it.
She didn't get it wrong.
People misunderstood.
She said, and there was a little sleight of hand there too.
She said, the Egyptian planes are following turning point faith events that sometimes Erica and Charlie were at.
So now it's turning point faith.
Now it's not Charlie.
It's not Erica.
It's them plus the organization.
And she made a commitment.
She said, I've been working on an incredible document, an interactive map.
She said, I'm uploading it to my website this week.
And it is going to show you everything about the Egyptian planes because this is a God thing.
And this was placed in my lap.
And I, we don't know, but we know that this is the center of it.
This is going to blow the lid on everything.
It's been 30 days.
30 days.
30 days.
No interactive map.
No timeline.
Where's my timeline?
No timeline.
No incredible document on a website.
Nothing.
Actually, I don't even think it's been mentioned since.
So she did a whole show about me.
And look, I am a fan.
I'm a standis.
I'm a fandis.
I'm a standis of Candace Owens.
And I, like all the other schizos, I'm waiting for my incredible document.
Where's my interactive map?
Where's my timeline?
Don't tell me Nick Fuentes is a Fed for the six millionth time.
Don't tell me Nick Fuentes was at January 6th.
Yeah, it was awesome.
I gave an awesome speech.
I rallied the troops.
We failed to take over the government, but we tried anyway.
That's a joke.
FBI, that's a joke.
President Newsom.
Yeah, okay, we've heard that before.
It's been 30 days.
I want my interactive map.
But I think that this is the beginning of the end for Candace Owens.
Credibility shot.
Credibility is imploding.
None of this stuff is adding up.
The Egyptian plane is a stinker.
It's totally fake, totally bullshit.
The Fort Wakachuka thing totally fell apart.
Your witness is unreliable.
He's a complete freak and an idiot.
Now we've resorted to yesterday.
I don't even know what we're doing.
Now she's talking about time travelers.
I actually went back and watched her show from yesterday.
She said that when Charlie Kirk was a student in high school, he would jog down the street and streetlights would flicker as he passed by because he had some kind of telekinetic ability.
He had some kind of energetic ability.
And I wish I was making that up.
That's real.
I couldn't even believe it.
Somebody sent it to me and I went through and I watched the show.
Now the theory, forget the Egyptian planes.
We're just going to blow past that because I guess that's fake.
Forget Mitch and Fort Wakachuka.
That's fake.
Now she's saying that Charlie Kirk was groomed since he was a little boy by lizard agents of the Matrix because they determined he was a psychic.
She said, he texted me that he was a time traveler.
Why would he say that if he wasn't telling the literal truth?
She said, he used to tell me that when he jogged down the street, streetlights would turn on and off.
Okay, so what are you saying there?
What's the implication that Charlie Kirk is some kind of Tesla coil?
That Charlie Kirk as an entity is some kind of disturbance in the space-time continuum.
What exactly are you saying now?
The electric field is distorted when Charlie walks by.
They knew that.
Some kind of transdimensional force knew it.
And now it's onto me.
Now I'm part of it.
Yes, yes.
Brigitte Macron, Netanyahu, the Stanford prison experiment, the French Revolution, Sigmund Freud.
And yes, and I'm part of it too.
And so is Alex Jones.
And we're all, it just gets bigger and bigger and bigger.
And look, you can't, this one you can't blame on me.
And the reason that blacks cannot create successful societies is because on average, they have a much lower IQ.
And IQ is the predictor for everything.
I mean, you can actually map what kinds of jobs you can do onto your IQ quintile.
So for example, people that are like 90 IQ, they can do menial tasks, repetitive tasks.
With some training, they can do repetitive tasks, things that you do over and over with your hands.
At 115 to 120 IQ, you can do tasks that require reasoning and critical thinking.
And so this is why a society of people with an average IQ of 100 can industrialize and create a complex, large civilization with bureaucracy and institutions and this sort of thing.
And that's why a society of people where the average is 85 cannot cannot do the, cannot develop a middle class, cannot do these things.
Let's talk about what you talk about on your show, which is Egyptian planes.
We're not getting into a diversion.
We're not getting into some other realm where you're going to throw it all back on me.
Well, you can throw it all back on me, but like in that way, let's get back to what actually matters.
You said for months that Egyptian planes were following Charlie Kirk.
You said you were going to release an interactive map and then you just never followed up.
Why?
Where is it?
Where's the accountability?
Either admit you were wrong or shut the fuck up and log off forever.
Seriously, because that is like the bar is on the floor in terms of journalistic integrity.
You gassed everybody up.
You got everybody whipped up into this paranoid schizophrenia.
People are talking about maroon shirts and beekeepers and secret transgenders and trapdoors and energy weapons.
And this thing about Egyptian planes, you fucked up.
Admit it.
You got all the information wrong because you're a fucking idiot.
You can't read a table because you're a low IQ idiot and you messed it up.
You staked your career on this.
You hung your hat on that.
That was the foundation.
It became the foundation of the whole conspiracy.
You fucked up.
You didn't do your due diligence.
You didn't run it by your white producers who are men.
You didn't run it by the Supreme Court, your husband.
You messed up.
You made yourself look like an ass.
You destroyed your credibility.
If you want to build your credibility back, fess up and admit your mistake, but you're not going to get away with it.
No one's going to forget.
Nobody is going to move on.
You're not going to create a big diversion and pivot to attacking me or onto the next thing.
22 episodes talking about Egyptian planes.
You said you knew.
You said that's the proof.
Tucker, your buddy, who's best friends with Kevin Spacey, said, I happen to know that for a fact.
That's weird because it's all fake.
So what do you mean?
You know, that's like Tucker Carlson's favorite thing.
He loves to say that.
I can't tell you how I know, but I know that's really because the emperor has no clothes.
You have been caught with your hand in the cookie jar.
That's all bullshit.
Somebody paid $950 for the data and reassembled the table for you, and it's all fake.
So where's our interactive map?
I can't wait to see it, but something tells me we're 30 days out.
We're never going to see it.
She launched this huge attack on me today.
And I replied, she said, I want to debate you on whether the world is run by satanic pedophiles like Brigitte Macrone and Sigmund Freud and this, that, and Aleister Crowley.
I said, I'm really more interested in the thing you've been talking about for the past three months, which is Egyptian planes.
She didn't answer that on her show today.
Would have been so easy.
She just pretended like it was never even mentioned.
So we need to start a daily count.
30 days overdue on the interactive map.
Next update tomorrow.
We're 30 days out from the interactive map.
When are we going to get it?
How many days?
100 days, 500 days?
When are we going to get our map about the Egyptian planes?
Because, you know, until we get that, this is a completely unserious person who misled the entire country.
She embellished and fabricated claims to blow up her show.
She was searching for something, anything to keep the soap opera going, and she didn't do her journalistic due diligence.
And now she wants to pretend like that never happened.
Well, we're not going to let her pretend that that never happened.
It happened.
Egyptian planes, you live by it, you die by it.
Your credibility lives and dies by that.
Where are they at?
Where's the map?
Where's the timetable?
You're not going to throw that on me.
We want to see the map.
So, anyway, so that's my response to that whole thing.
And if you have this brilliant sub-Saharan IQ that you're so proud of, well, then let's see it.
You know, put it together for us.
But that's that.
We are going to move on.
We're not going to spend too much time on that.
Like I said to Alex Jones, the problem with crazy bitches is that if you spend too much time thinking about them or talking about them, you become crazy too.
That is because women are irrational.
They don't use arguments.
They don't talk about stuff.
They play on your emotions.
They talk about relationships.
They get into stuff like that.
And you're never going to win an argument when you get into it with a psycho-gaslighting woman.
Anybody knows that.
You know, it's that old axiom about, you know, arguing with your wife.
If she's right, she's right.
If she's wrong, she's right.
Happy wife, happy life.
You just cannot engage on that level.
So we can't get too much into that.
But I do, but you know, she's in the man's world.
All right, you want to play dress up?
You want to LARP as an influencer.
I'm putting on my pants suit.
I'm a little political influencer.
Okay, okay, little girl.
Okay, little miss girl boss.
Where's our map?
No, you can't, you know, throw a glass of wine on me.
No, this is not a soap opera.
You need to do your job and show us your evidence.
Show us all this research you've been conducting.
Super sleuth, mommy sleuth, isn't that what they call themselves?
All right, little girl.
All right, little mommy sleuth.
Where's our data?
You want to play in the man's game?
Where's your research?
We're not playing all that other stuff.
You want to go and sit in the knitting circle and talk about the other bitches about drama.
Go ahead.
That's your prerogative.
But you want to play in the man's world and talk about conspiracies.
And I told you on Monday we're going to get into all the biggest stories from the past couple of weeks.
I don't know that Greenland was really in the news today, but it's been back in the news in the past couple of weeks.
And it's been talked about, especially since Trump got back into office, that this administration is seriously looking at a way to acquire Greenland, either by purchasing it, through negotiation, through military force.
And finally, today, there was an announcement, this is from Fox News Digital, that the State Department is preparing a package to purchase Greenland from Denmark for $700 billion.
That is the latest.
And this is a story from Fox.
It says, quote, President Trump's push for the U.S. to acquire Greenland could carry an estimated price tag of $700 billion.
The estimate reported by NBC News was said to have been calculated by scholars and former U.S. officials involved in early planning discussions surrounding Trump's interest in acquiring the island as a strategic buffer in the Arctic against adversaries such as Russia and China.
Trump wrote on Wednesday, quote, the United States needs Greenland for the purpose of national security.
If the United States doesn't act, Russia or China will.
He added that anything less than U.S. control of Greenland is unacceptable and argued that the Arctic territory is vital to American defense interests, including the Golden Dome missile defense system in development.
Trump's renewed push has increased tensions with Denmark and other NATO allies.
Troops from several European countries deployed to Greenland on Thursday for a two-day mission aimed at boosting the territory's defenses.
France, Germany, Sweden, and Norway are participating in the exercise, according to Fox News, with leaders saying the mission is intended to demonstrate NATO's ability to deploy military assets into the Arctic quickly.
Greenland is the world's largest island and has a population of roughly 56,000 people, with most living along its ice-free coastline.
About 80% of the territory is covered by ice caps and glaciers.
So, of course, this has been a discussion for years.
Ever since Trump's first term, there has been this ambition for the United States to, in some way, acquire the Greenland, excuse me, the Greenland territory.
And I know that for a lot of people, this sounds completely random.
Most people don't think about Greenland, don't know anything about Greenland, don't know where it is, whose jurisdiction it's under.
And so, for a lot of people, this is like completely random, completely out of the box.
And if you have paid attention, there has been much discussion.
At this point, I think it's almost trite about the benefits.
So, for those that don't know, Greenland is situated in the Arctic Circle, in the northern Atlantic or in the Arctic Ocean.
And it is technically under the control of Denmark.
It is self-governing, but it's under the jurisdiction of the Kingdom of Denmark.
And it's been this way for a long time that they've had a relationship with the Danish government.
Trump is interested in either buying it, conquering it.
And much has been said about the benefits of this.
And we could talk about some of them.
First and foremost, people talk about the mineral wealth of Greenland.
Greenland has a lot of uranium in the country, or in the territory, I should say, which might be important for future nuclear energy, nuclear weapons.
And like with all critical minerals and raw materials, it's a zero-sum game.
If we don't have it, then another country will.
China has expressed interest in mining the raw materials in Greenland.
And so if we don't have them, then China will get them.
China will get the uranium.
Greenland is also rich in rare earth minerals, which China has a near monopoly on sourcing those and processing those.
So people say if we acquire Greenland, we get the uranium and we get the rare earth minerals, which we need for iPhones and for other technology.
And that will help us circumvent China's monopoly on some of those critical minerals.
Bigger than that, people say, is that in the future, the Arctic is going to become an area of strategic competition.
As it stands right now, the North Pole and the Arctic is mostly covered by thick sheets of ice.
And this makes it impassable by normal commercial vessels or military vessels.
And so as such, there is not a lot of commercial or military activity happening there.
If you want to send a cargo ship through the Arctic, you need an icebreaker to go through it.
And Russia has more icebreakers than anybody.
Other countries have very few or none.
And most countries don't build them at all.
So for the past century, there's not a lot of activity happening in the Arctic.
This is not an area of strategic importance for that reason.
In the future, however, it is anticipated that due to climate change, whatever you believe, if it's anthropogenic climate change or if it's natural climate change, it is anticipated that in the future, as the polar ice sheet shrinks, then this area is going to open up.
And the Arctic Ocean, like all the other oceans, is going to become a place where there will be significant commercial activity.
And so there will be commercial vessels sailing on Russia's north coast.
They call this the northern sea route.
And so vessels will be moving goods in and out of Siberia in northern Russia to China, to Europe.
And this will circumvent the other sea route, which of course goes through the Suez Canal.
There's also a major sea route across the Arctic.
And then there's a major sea route on Canada's north coast.
So this is anticipated to become, again, due to climate change, polar ice sheet melts, there's going to be a lot of commercial shipping there.
And then, of course, that becomes an area of strategic competition as well.
If you want to control the movement of goods and people, and what goes with that is military personnel and supplies, submarines, you're also going to need to have a military presence there as well to oversee the shipping lanes, to control key choke points.
And so, just like we talk about the Taiwanese trade, just like we talk about the Panama Canal, the Suez, this is going to become another area where competition is going to start.
And so, they say for the purpose of projecting American power in the Arctic, it's important to get as much territory there as possible.
In particular, to oversee these shipping lanes, to control choke points where Russian submarines might move in these choke points between Greenland and Iceland, Iceland and the UK.
And so, it has to do with sea routes.
Now, the other strategic importance, which has been talked about a lot, and maybe this is the biggest one, is how it pertains to missile defense.
So, for those that don't know, most of Russia's missile silos are around Finland.
They're in the north of Russia.
And if a Russian intercontinental ballistic missile were to launch at the United States, they're not going east, they're not going west, they're going north over the North Pole into the United States.
And Trump explicitly talks about this.
He says that we need Greenland for the Golden Dome.
What is the Golden Dome?
Well, it's obviously a reference to the Iron Dome.
Iron Dome is an anti-missile system or an anti-rocket system.
It's meant to shoot down projectiles and protect a particular geographic area.
The difference, however, is that Iron Dome is meant to protect a very small area from very primitive rockets launched at short range.
And so, this has to do with a small area looking at a particular trajectory of shorter, primitive munitions, like those fired by Hezbollah on Israel's border in northern Israel, southern Lebanon, and like Israel's border with Gaza and southwestern Israel.
Golden Dome differs from this because this is a true anti-ballistic missile system.
Golden Dome, unlike Iron Dome, is meant to cover a very large area of the entire continental United States.
Iron Dome might protect a city from a small rocket.
Golden Dome is meant to protect the continental United States from an intercontinental ballistic missile.
So the territory is bigger, but also the type of projectile is different too.
And how do they differ?
A rocket has a very low arc.
It goes up, it comes down, and it's pretty simple.
It's about how you would imagine it to work.
Intercontinental ballistic missile goes up into outer space and then comes down some of these hypersonic missiles so fast or undetectable.
And so it's critical when you're intercepting an intercontinental ballistic missile, if it's even possible or reliable, is that you detect it where and when it launches.
You get an early warning, and it's strategically located near where the missile is being launched.
So if Russia is launching missiles at the United States, you want an anti-ballistic missile system forward deployed closer to where the missiles are being launched.
And if you look at Greenland, it is right in the middle of where those missiles would have their trajectory in outer space.
It's right in the middle.
If you look at it from the top of the globe rather than looking at a normal globe or looking at the Mercator projection of a normal map.
So they say the real strategic reason and putting the strategic in strategic defense, having to do with strategic weapons, which are nuclear weapons, they say we need Greenland to have early warning systems.
We need Greenland to have anti-ballistic missile systems forward deployed against Russia so that we could detect an incoming ICBM.
They say that's the reason.
So these are kind of the big three reasons they say.
And it's like with everything, there's always multiple reasons, multiple justifications given.
Like with Venezuela, it's oil.
It has to do with Cuba.
It has to do with whether Iran, Russia, and China are involved.
It has to do with a lot of things.
Similarly, Greenland, you've got critical minerals and uranium.
You've got these Arctic sea routes, which are going to become competitive.
And then you've got missile defense.
In my opinion, however, the biggest thing is that Greenland is just close to the United States.
It's close to Canada.
It's close to the United States.
It's close to Iceland.
It's close to the United Kingdom.
And it is true that in the future, if the North Pole melts and it opens up to commercial and naval vessels, then this is going to become a very relevant piece of territory.
And if we do not own it, if we do not have it, it is true that other countries will take it.
They will try to take it, and they already are.
China published a white paper in 2018 about this.
China wants to get into the Arctic Council.
Even Russia doesn't want this.
There's an Arctic Council of all the nations that have claims in the Arctic.
China applied for membership.
And Russia even said, Arctic Council, you don't border the Arctic.
You're 1,000 miles away from the Arctic.
And China said, well, we're a near Arctic power and we're going to become an Arctic power.
So China wants to project power there.
Russia wants to project power there.
We are engaged, as I said on Monday, in a strategic competition with great power rivals.
Whether we like it or not, that is the case.
Russia and China.
And in particular, we are engaged in a competition with them in this emerging theater of competition and conflict.
If we do not take it, they will.
They are interested in it.
And it is in their interest to take it.
China has already made overtures to Greenland, trying to invest in mines, airports, research stations.
Why do you think that is?
It's the same reason that China took an interest in South and Central America.
It's the same reason that China built a space station in Argentina.
It's the same reason that China is building deepwater ports in Ecuador and Peru, in Jamaica.
It's because this is an area where they could potentially threaten the United States.
This is an area where they can gain intelligence on the United States.
They could forward deploy military assets near the United States.
They could disrupt U.S. commercial activities.
It's for the same reason.
China wants the territory.
They want to build stuff there, which is dual use, so they can plant a flag, so they can start bringing their personnel, so that they could start bringing their people, so that they can make Greenland dependent on them, so that one day maybe they could build a military base there.
And so, this is where when Trump says we have to have it, it's not enough that we have our troops there.
It's not enough that we have access to it.
There is no substitute for ownership.
And here's why.
If America puts its flag down and we say this is now America, this is ours.
This is our territory.
Then there's going to be no Chinese anything.
There's going to be no Chinese research station.
There's going to be no Chinese anything.
And if we wanted them out, we could kick them out.
And if they didn't listen, well, it's backed up by the U.S. military.
It will defend its own people and personnel and infrastructure.
So in the future, China has designs on Greenland.
Russia has designs on it.
They're getting pushy.
They're being sneaky.
They're writing up plans about it.
If it's in Danish hands, well, who knows what's going to happen?
Maybe the next president is out to lunch.
Maybe in the future, that NATO Article 5 commitment, maybe it's a little bit less ironclad.
Who knows what could happen?
China might test.
They might test that.
Is this a real tripwire?
Can we intervene here?
And will it trigger U.S. intervention?
Is the U.S. going to go to war for a Danish protectorate or something, a Danish vassal, a self-governing member of the Danish kingdom?
They might test it.
They will test it.
And if they will test it and contest it, then they might eventually have it.
And that is unacceptable.
It is unacceptable for China or Russia to have that piece of territory and be right in the middle, right in the middle of effectively the Atlantic, right in between the United States and the United Kingdom, right on the doorstep of Canada and North America.
And so what happens in the future when you have Chinese amphibious assault vehicles and Chinese tanks and Chinese drones and Chinese containerized weapons systems, and they go north through Siberia, out the port, they go across the Arctic and they bring them to Greenland.
And now they're right there again.
This is diminishing the distance between the United States and our strategic rivals.
So there's no substitute for ownership.
And what I would liken this to is Alaska, Hawaii, Cuba for that matter, Puerto Rico.
Could you imagine if there was a scenario where the United States did not control Hawaii, Guam, did not have a military presence in Japan, in the Philippines, in these other countries, we would lose control over the Pacific.
China would have broken out already.
They would control all that stuff by now.
They would have intimidated all these countries.
They would have military bases.
They wouldn't need to build them in the South China Sea out of nothing.
Could you imagine if Alaska was a Russian colony during the Cold War?
We never would have survived that.
Could you imagine if Puerto Rico was a colony of some other country?
And who knows if that were invaded, if Cuba was truly under the subjugation of a foreign power, 90 miles from Florida, it's the same thing.
And so acquiring Greenland right now seems like it's random or it's too ambitious or maybe it's unnecessary for us to actually have it.
But that is just simply short-sighted.
In 50 years, we will be engaged in a great power competition truly with China.
They do have their eyes set.
They have designs on these territories.
They are trying to pierce the armor in our hemispheric defense, our fortress in the Western hemisphere.
And if we leave that to like Denmark, it's a country with no military.
They're in NATO.
Russia is testing NATO.
Look at what Russia is doing in Europe, sending drones over every airport in Germany and Belgium and Denmark, in all these countries.
They are testing.
That NATO Article 5 guarantee.
They do it all the time.
In some ways, that's what Ukraine is about and what this collective security agreement is about with Ukraine.
China and Russia don't take Europe seriously.
And if that's Danish clay, if that's Danish territory, they're not going to take that seriously.
And all that is going to do is set the stage for a crisis down the line, literally no different than Ukraine.
Ukraine is another one where it's sort of like an ambiguous guarantee.
It was sort of understood in the Budapest memorandum that we would protect Ukraine, but they're not a NATO member, but they have this sort of collective security understanding with the United States and the West.
Russia contested that.
They tested the tripwire, and we were forced to come in after.
We were forced to try to rush to their defense, and it's not going to work.
Russia's going to have it.
And mark my words, the same will happen in Greenland.
So they're technically part of Denmark, but they have self-rule.
China's trying to buy their way in.
The United States is temporarily pushing that off.
Who knows what could happen down the line if the United States remains on top of that?
If China gains a foothold and they try something, once again, we're caught on defense.
So the thing about territory is it's like real estate.
They're not making any more of it.
There's only so much of it.
And every country wants to control it, especially in our neighborhood.
Our great power rivals want a slice of that.
It is a zero-sum game.
We want to control territory by them to contain them, to prepare for a potential attack, to blockade them, choke them off.
And the reverse is also true.
A lot of people say this is a vanity project.
Trump wants to grow the United States.
He wants to leave his mark by gaining more territory like James Polk or like other presidents that have expanded the United States.
And I think there's probably some truth to it.
I don't mind at all.
I think that is a healthy incentive.
I think America should be getting bigger.
We should have more territory.
Bring them in and build a military base on top of it.
It's in the Western hemisphere.
It's ours.
So broadly speaking, I like the imperial ambitions of the United States.
The Western Hemisphere is our fortress.
That is what we need to defend ourselves.
People don't realize we are in danger.
We are constantly in danger.
Russia and China are testing the waters.
They are pushing outward.
They do have global ambitions.
That is why China wants an Arctic Belt and Road initiative.
They want an Arctic Silk Road, just like they have in the Pacific, just like they have with Latin America, just like they have in the Indian Ocean.
They want the same thing in the Arctic because they have global ambitions.
And the way that we protect our survival and our economic defense interests is that we have to lock down the entire Western hemisphere.
So people wanted a leader.
That was part of the appeal of Trump in 2016 when he came down the escalator.
He said, we need a real leader.
Not like a small L leader, like, oh, he's the leader of our country.
No, we need like a capital L.
We need a leader.
We need a truly great leader.
And what is a great leader other than a leader that takes territory?
Other than a leader that gets victories.
You know how you're winning?
You have more territory than you started out with.
That's how you know you're winning.
So taking Venezuela, taking Greenland, taking the Panama Canal, taking Cuba.
I support these things.
Putting the American flag all over the map.
I like it.
I love that.
That's good.
That's good for us.
And it's good for you.
If you're a citizen with a U.S. passport, why would you be against your country getting bigger?
If you are a citizen of the United States of America, if you are a U.S. passport holder, why would you oppose your country getting bigger, richer, getting more resources, more stuff, planting our flag in more places?
You shouldn't.
That's good for us.
And what's good for us is good.
That's what America First means.
It means a survival and prosperity of the American people first.
And by the way, as far as Greenland is concerned, it really begs the question.
There are 55,000 people on this island.
55,000.
Do people realize what a small number that is?
There are 3 million people living in the city of Chicago.
55,000 in the largest island in the world.
That's nothing.
It's nothing.
They don't have a military.
They don't have industry.
They survive off of like fishing.
Okay.
These are like fishing villages in the Arctic, and there's no people and there's no industry and there's no military.
And people say, well, it's technically Denmark's.
Okay, who cares?
And how big is Denmark?
And what kind of military do they have?
How many people live in Denmark?
What kind of economy do they have?
What kind of military do they have?
And so what?
They showed up a couple hundred years ago.
Now it's theirs forever?
No, I don't think so.
Oh, and now we just have to let them have it.
No, this giant island with all the uranium and all the rare earths sitting in this strategically important region, it belongs to the 20,000 Eskimos.
No one can touch it.
No one touch it.
No one look at it.
It's theirs.
And technically, it's also Denmark's because, I don't know, they came there a little while ago.
What are you talking about?
Another bigger country is going to kick down the door.
If it makes China more able to destroy us, China will destroy them.
They will gobble it up.
Are you stupid?
If you are a giant island with fresh water, uranium, critical minerals, you're right next to the United States, and you got 50,000 people that cannot defend the island.
Do you think China is going to let that stand in the way of a platform to attack the United States?
Of course not.
If they could, they would take it in a heartbeat.
They can.
They have the capability.
It's just that right now it might not be strategically viable because it's controlled by a NATO country.
Maybe they don't want to challenge the United States.
But of course, it is a matter of national security for China or Russia to have it.
And they wouldn't, it wouldn't take them a second to think about whether they would devour that territory.
But we have to be the stupid people and think about national sovereignty.
And well, it's technically Denmark's.
And well, Denmark is going to let us.
Denmark is going to let us try and fucking stop us.
I love that.
Well, Denmark lets us put our military there.
Denmark lets us use Greenland for our military.
I would like to see Denmark try and stop us.
As a matter of fact, I would like to see all of Europe try to stop us.
They let us use Greenland.
They let us do whatever we want.
Try and stop us from doing whatever we want.
The difference is we spend a trillion dollars per year on our military.
The biggest other country in the European Union, in NATO, they spend $65 billion.
That's the difference.
I see all these idiot commentators in the UK, in Europe.
They say, this is ridiculous.
The United States doesn't need to have it.
We already let them use it.
Let us try and fucking stop us.
It's the opposite.
We let you have your countries.
We let you exist.
Who do you think was holding back the Soviet Union for 50 years, idiot?
What do you think was standing in the way of 100,000 Soviet tanks, which would have never stopped in Germany, by the way, if it wasn't for us?
What do you think was standing in between them and the whole rest of Europe for 50 years, preventing them from marching all the way from Berlin to Lisbon?
What do you think was standing in the way of them and then mounting an amphibious assault in the UK?
It was us.
That was the United States of America, which maintained the second largest nuclear arsenal, which built a strategic air force, which has the burden of a military-industrial complex.
That was us.
You let us use Greenland?
No, we let you exist as Europe.
You're welcome.
You should be grateful that we don't take a whole lot more.
We could take Greenland.
We could take Copenhagen.
We could take Portugal.
We could take Spain.
We could take all of it.
You think the United Kingdom could stop us?
Try.
Seriously, try.
They can't stop Russia.
They can't stop China.
You think they could stop us?
I'm getting really sick of this belligerence from the Europeans.
I don't know who they think they are.
They get together and say, well, we're demanding a collective security agreement for Ukraine.
We already let the United States use Greenland.
I don't know what they're on about.
They need to have it.
We need to have it because you can't defend it.
Denmark does not have a military-industrial complex.
As far as we're concerned, they don't have a military.
That's why we need to have it.
We need to have it because we can defend it.
You can't.
And you can't defend it because you've spent all your money on welfare for Africans.
That's the difference.
You can't defend it because for the last hundred years, we've spent all our money on bombs and planes and guns and tanks and aircraft carriers.
And you spent it on free health care and free education so that you wouldn't have the burden.
If it's a national security interest for us, then we must have it.
Enough with these like exercises.
We're going to pay obeisance to these like Western European countries with no military.
Hey, guys, could we buy this from you?
What do you mean?
It's totally crazy.
And I think on some level, that is part of the frustration.
It is that we pay for this giant military.
We have suffered from social atomization and we no longer get any of the benefits of any of it, right?
You and your parents and your grandparents have been paying for this giant military for our entire lives.
And we don't have any of the benefits of it.
We just get humiliated everywhere.
We lose everywhere.
We invade countries.
It really doesn't even matter to us.
It's not really, we do it on behalf of Israel.
So we have this empire, but like none of the benefits of it.
We don't have any of the decisive, tangible victories.
We neglect our own neighborhood while fighting in Israel's neighborhood.
And as it pertains to capitalism, we have this free market system, this international trade system, a fiat money system, and we're not even rich anymore.
And we're not even rich.
Nobody's even rich anymore.
People have roommates.
People are like 29 with roommates.
They're building these like tiny homes where you have to climb a ladder to get to a loft.
You have the shrinkflation at Chipotle and everywhere else.
So the spirit of our nation has been killed, like the vitality of our nation has been killed by empire and capitalism, but we don't even have the benefits.
We're not rich and we're not powerful.
So how do we reverse this?
We need to give a life-affirming spirit to our country and we need to enthusiastically embrace mercantilism, autarky, empire.
Let's breathe some life into the country.
Let's start taking some territory for ourselves.
Let's make it work for us.
Let's make ourselves rich and powerful again.
Let's take Greenland.
Let them worry about it.
You want to protect Ukraine?
You start spending some money on your military, pussy.
Europe has been getting free health care and free pot and free education because we defend them.
Now you want us to defend Ukraine on your behalf.
You pay for your military.
We're pulling up the drawbridge to Fortress America here.
We take Greenland.
So anyway, that's a truly America-first mentality.
And people need to get more in the spirit of that.
That is what America is.
People need to get comfortable that that is what America has always been.
When has America ever stopped expanding?
Question.
You know, all these people want to talk about heritage Americans.
I'm sorry, are we still 13 colonies?
People talk about founding stock.
Well, what happened after we founded the country?
We just kept expanding.
Always.
More, more, more territory, more war, more conquest, more settlements.
And when we took the whole continental United States, we went into the oceans, more, Puerto Rico, Guam, Philippines, Cuba, Alaska, Hawaii.
And then after World War II, we built a global empire.
We built U.S. bases in Japan and Germany, everywhere in the world.
This is what we always do.
So people say we need to get back to this time when America's a republic and we just hang out within our own borders.
No, wrong.
We need an imperial presidency for an American empire.
We've been in one for a long time, but we don't call it that.
We've done it for everybody else.
It's been this altruistic empire.
We need to become an empire that is America first.
We need to start getting some of the benefits.
So take Greenland.
Take Greenland.
You can buy it.
Fine.
Buy it.
You don't want to upset the Europeans.
I understand that.
There's arguments behind that, which we could flesh out at another point.
You know, buy it, do it through the, in a way that's legitimizing, but acquire Greenland, acquire Canada, acquire Venezuela, acquire Cuba, acquire Colombia.
And a lot of people disagree with this.
They say this is a terrible idea.
We want to add all these people to our country.
We have to reimagine everything.
And I said it at the top of the show kind of jokingly.
I said, you know, on the show, I'm always talking about how America should expand.
And people say, well, if you expand America, you're just throwing your borders around more brown people.
And then they're going to vote for Democrats.
Who said anything about letting them vote, giving them electoral representation?
Nobody said that.
Nobody said that at all.
And we didn't even say necessarily we would formally annex them, but just take control over the situation.
It's staggering how many people just negotiate against themselves.
And this is why I do have some admiration for these autocrats in other countries, because they just go and do it.
China is just building ships 400 times more tonnage than we are even capable of.
They're just doing it.
They want to contest the border with India.
They just build whole new towns on the border with India.
They send a bunch of people there.
They build highways, bridges, airports.
They build whole cities and nobody even lives in them.
And that's not like a good economic policy, but they just do it.
They build islands in the middle of the South China Sea.
It's totally illegal.
They do it anyway.
They just have this can-do mentality.
And I wish we had that in America.
Instead, we have this very small thinking.
We got to get away from a petty, small version of American nationalism where it says like, hey, man, we just want to take over the government to leave everybody alone.
We want to withdraw all our bases and, you know, we just want to close the borders and we just want to hang out and be chill.
We need to embrace a larger perspective of what America first can be.
And that means putting ourselves on a global scale.
So I'm totally in favor of it.
And that doesn't mean giving women the right to vote in Afghanistan.
It means like take the minerals that we need.
Like, why would we be in a hostage situation over rare earths with China just going invade the other countries that have them?
You know, I'm not worried about building a democracy in Afghanistan so that women have the right to vote.
I'm worried if we have the critical minerals that we need, the antimony and, you know, rare earths and bauxite and copper and lithium and uranium.
And we want the things that we need.
Those are the kinds of interventions that we need.
We need territory to defend the Western Hemisphere.
We need platforms to control international trade.
We need to control the choke points.
We need to have a reliable source of energy, not just fossil fuels, but everything else.
Like, this is what we need to do.
We need to win the race in the 21st century.
So I love it.
And I just love the spirit of it.
I really am a huge believer.
This is the last thing I'll say about it.
I really am just a believer in the vibe.
I see these edits on TikTok and Instagram.
They play around the world, that old song, that like electro pop, like Europop song from the 90s around the world.
And it's a map of the U.S. flag in America, Greenland, Cuba, Venezuela.
And I'm like, this is changing the consciousness.
It's surreal.
This feels like the future is being brought forth.
Because for so long, my entire life, you grow up in America, and there's this suffocating sense of dread that the best times are behind us.
Doesn't it feel like that?
That the best times are not only behind us, but they're long gone.
We are on the other side of the hill, and all that is left for us is to see our country slowly die and deteriorate and then cease to exist.
That is the consciousness that we grew up in.
People say it's a late stage empire, late stage republic.
All that is waiting for us is ruin.
It's a slow, inexorable descent into extinction.
And all the good stuff is behind us and it's just over.
And on top of that are these feelings of guilt and shame.
This feeling that we are not capable of doing anything.
We're weak.
We lost.
We were in control and now we're not.
We had all the power and now we don't.
It was our time and now it isn't.
Now it's someone else's turn.
We are at the back of the line and the future belongs to every other country.
The future belongs to China.
The future belongs to India.
We used to have a rule of the roost and now it's our turn to shut up, get put in our place and listen to the UN.
Like that has been the feeling our whole lives as a society, as a civilization, and it weighs on us as individuals.
Why would anyone dream big?
Why would anyone have dreams, aspirations if this is our country?
What's the end game?
Go and get some office job, see a movie, go on vacation, wait to be replaced by Indians and Hispanics and Chinese people and Muslims.
And here we are in the 2020s.
And you sort of raise your eyebrow.
You go, oh, oh, what's that over there?
America's getting bigger.
Colonialism isn't over.
We can actually just do things.
We can kidnap a dictator.
We can take Greenland.
America's growing again.
There's a spirit of revival.
There's a spirit of growth.
There's a spirit of adventure.
There's a sense of confidence, taking what we want, doing what is in our best interest.
We can stick up for ourselves.
Our survival and prosperity matters.
We can fight for it like every other nation does.
We're in the fight still.
We're still in the game.
I like that feeling.
I like the idea.
Yeah, Greenland.
Didn't know about it.
Now it's ours.
Never heard of it.
Know nothing about it.
It's the latest U.S. territory that our strong and powerful and respected president just annexed.
Maybe I'll go there sometime.
I don't know, because I can.
I like that.
I like that idea.
I like that feeling.
And even if, again, I think Trump is very incompetent.
I think that, you know, there's a lot of things he's not doing well.
But I've always said that he really embodies, even if he is not the fulfillment of it, even if he is an imperfect instantiation, he embodies something powerful.
He's tapping into something powerful, a strong leader, American revanchism, self-confidence on the world stage.
It's not something I think that we have a lot of opportunities to get.
You know, this doesn't come around a lot.
And I think we're getting less of it all the time.
So I do embrace it.
There's something really remarkable, especially where we came from, because I think it's very important that I grew up in the Obama years.
Like my childhood was in the Obama years.
And so as a very young boy, you grow up with the Iraq war being a disaster.
We're in the recession.
And the idea is that America is the bad guy.
We're the evil empire.
We're criminals.
Our leaders lied us into a war.
We're just a big, corrupt, stupid country.
I think about that Jeff Daniels monologue from the newsroom.
That was like, oh my gosh, that was like the viral clip of my childhood.
That clip from Jeff Daniels in the newsroom where he says, when you say America's the number one country in the world, I don't know what you're talking about.
The only thing America leads the world in is people in prison, military spending, and people that believe in angels.
And many of the Jews on the left made us feel this way.
They made us feel like Jon Stewart made us feel like dumb Fakistan.
He made us feel like we're a big country of dumb Christians and corrupt politicians that went to war for oil and we're the bad guys.
We terrorize everybody.
We're the real invaders.
We are now the evil empire.
And then Obama comes in with all these other smartass liberals.
And they were telling our country, your time is over.
America's not exceptional.
America's not great.
The Monroe doctrine is over.
We have to ask the UN.
We're ready to bow to every other country.
We're ready to bow to the president of Cuba.
We're ready to bow to the whole world and just surrender everywhere.
So compared to where we came from, to where we are now, we have a president that's flipping people off and they call him daddy in Europe and he's pulling dictators out of bed and throwing them in jail.
He wants to invade Greenland.
I love it.
I have to be honest with you.
I love it.
I don't like bombing Iran.
I think that's a bad idea.
And I don't think the mass deportations are happening enough.
But the energy, if, and here is, this is the last, the real last thing I'm going to say.
So here's the trick.
We have to get in the middle of these feelings.
What do I mean by this?
Trump is phase one.
Trump breaks down the door, shatters the Overton window.
He wakes everybody up, defeats the media, political correctness.
But he does not complete the mission.
He does not fulfill the aspirational promise of MAGA and America first, but he lights the fire.
He sparks the embers.
How do you get in the middle?
The question is about succession.
We're fighting for control of the narrative about Trump.
And there's a few narratives.
One, Trump is a sellout, a con man, a failure.
He was always a con man.
He was always a failure.
He was compromised along the way.
We throw his legacy in the garbage.
It's nothing.
That's one narrative.
The other narrative in the middle: well, you know, Trump is doing a really great job and we got to keep America great.
We got to vote for JD Vance, his vice president.
You know, Trump started it, and we got to keep it going.
Trump is the greatest president, and we got to keep the winning coming.
And we got to keep these moderate solutions going.
Narrative number three: Trump has the right idea.
America first, make America great again, saying Merry Christmas again.
These are powerful ideas, but they're ideas that cannot be fully realized in one presidential term, in one decade, by one man.
He started the fight, but he was limited by the circumstances of his time.
We're frustrated with the lack of progress.
We're frustrated with how he was sabotaged, subverted, in some ways, perhaps compromised.
But we have to build upon his legacy.
We have to take the torch, the true inheritors of America first, and deepen it, expand it, carry it forward.
We have to get more radical, not less.
We have to be right-wing progressives.
We have to take it further than Trump did.
Trump says, I want to deport the illegal gang members.
I say, take away the naturalization of people that have no allegiance to the country.
Trump says, we'll administer Venezuela, appoint a viceroy.
Take the oil.
Restrain Israel.
Forget about bombing Iran.
Restrain Israel.
Trump is going to cut down waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal government, eliminate entire departments, entire agencies, build new ones, build new systems, new agencies, new departments.
Have to take it further.
Have to go harder.
And the reason why the latter is the best is because if you go and tell everybody, hey, the last 10 years was all terrible, it's very demoralizing.
It also puts you at odds with a lot of people that did fight and sacrifice for this very big and successful political movement.
Whatever you want to say about it, Trump tapped into something, won these two huge elections with 60 million, 70 million voters.
And there's a lot of people that are emotionally, professionally, personally invested in it, and to turn around and say, oh, it's all bad.
It's all awful.
It's all a mistake.
It puts you at odds with those people.
It makes it as though it were in vain.
It's very demoralizing.
And I also think it's just wrong.
I don't think that everything Trump did was a mistake.
I think that on net, Trump is good, defeating political correctness, getting people to think of America first, changing the conversation on immigration.
10 years ago, nobody was talking about mass deportations.
Nobody was even talking about like building a border wall.
It just wasn't there.
Now, that's where the new right-wing consensus is.
Build a wall, mass deportations, not good enough.
Restrict legal immigration.
So I also just think it's wrong.
On net, there's many good things about Trumpism.
It's just that, like with any movement, it is subject to constraints, limitations, political realities.
And so our job is to take the baton and carry it forward and really just be inspired by that energy.
That is so much of the battle is just waking up and believing that we can do the impossible.
And that means dreaming.
It's very important to dream big, dreaming of an American empire.
It's important to imagine what we want.
And what I don't want is like some wholesome chungus republic.
No, we're not living and fighting and dying so that you can work in a nail factory like your grandpap did and marry some, you know, Midwestern mid and have a couple of kids out on the like, no, that that's actually not aspirational.
So many of these people, the heritage Americans, they say, you know, there's plenty of cheap property in like rural Indiana.
And if you work at the nail factory that's polluting the river, you can buy a $100,000 two-bedroom shanty and find some gas station mid.
Or better yet, you could run a subway franchise.
And it's like, we want a Roman Empire in space.
That gets people excited.
This does not get running a subway franchise does not get people excited.
So it's important to dream.
It's important to think big.
It's important to understand that, you know, we need people to really, the power of belief cannot be overstated here.
So anyway, so that's that.
But I do want to move on.
We'll take a look at our super chats.
That's my take on Greenland.
But let's see.
We'll see what you guys have to say about all this.
I'm going to get set up here and we'll listen in.
I don't know how anybody doesn't relate to that.
I guess it's a generational thing because I noticed that when I was supporting the intervention at Venezuela, it was all like Gen X people that were like, duh, we can't go to war.
But all the Zoomers loved it.
All the Zoomers on Instagram and TikTok, they love it.
It's the Gen Xers that are like, hey, bro, this is like the Iraq war.
Millennials and Xers, they don't get it.
All right, but let's take a look at the super chats.
Let's see what you guys have to say about all this.
John Porter sent $55, W. Alex Jones, offering his daughter for marriage to you, just the way it should be and the way it's always been up until recently.
Imagine the kind of uproar the media would be.
And if you someday get into the White House and your wife was the child of the OG conspiracy theorist of the 21st century, it would fix the space-time continuum.
It's clear Candace has an inferiority complex as a black woman.
I think your genuine anti-feminism and the race slash IQ debate broke her when she realized she might actually be low IQ after she thought she was a genius for discovering the JQ in her 30s.
Hence why she always attacks you for your views on women on race.
Dude, I love the Infowars advertisements because every time I'm on the show, they're blasting in my ear and it's like you're being brainwashed.
It's like, so I memorized all of them.
My favorite InfoWars ad is the George Soros Macy's Day Parade float.
Whoever makes that stuff is a genius.
Whoever's making the InfoWars, what do they call those like liners and other stuff?
It's genius.
But yeah, I love the testimonial.
The hats are very high quality.
Thoughts on cars?
I think it's awesome.
I wish I knew something about cars.
I'm an idiot.
I have no idea about cars at all.
I wish I had a technical expertise.
It never sticks.
I'm not passionate about it.
You know, when I was a little kid, I was really into science.
And so I read about technology and I read about, I really wanted to be a doctor.
So I read all about like medical stuff.
Then I fell in love with politics.
And honestly, I just can't retain any information.
So I don't know anything about cars or machines.
I wish I did because it's very cool and good.
And I wish I did.
It's awesome.
And cars are awesome.
And cars are like, that's the most American thing to have a car, I feel like.
I know it's been said before, but the freedom in America is the ability to just get in your car and go anywhere.
We have this huge country, wide open, everything and anything you can think of.
And you could just get in your car and just go.
And there's something so beautiful about that.
Get in your car, go, hit up a gas station.
And the best is like you could drive for 30 hours and you start in one place, end up in another, and it's like you could still go to a gas station and get a Coke.
They took the 600,000 deportations they have, which is 300,000 removals and 300,000 arrests.
I hope you know that.
They've arrested 300,000.
They have removed 300,000.
They're adding that number to the 1.4 million self-deportations.
And they got that number from the American Community Survey, or I think it's the Family Survey.
It is a mid-decade survey put out by the U.S. Census.
So 2025 was halfway through the decade.
They survey 65,000 households, 65,000.
And from that survey, they determined that there were 1.5 million fewer illegal immigrants in the country, fewer foreign-born people with no residency.
I forget exactly how they determine that.
But of course, if Trump is elected and he says we're locking everybody up, be aware, ICE is deporting everybody.
And you put out a survey and say, hey, are you an illegal immigrant?
Do you think illegal immigrants are going to answer the survey and say, yeah, I'm an illegal immigrant.
Here's your survey back?
Of course not.
So you have a bias in the data.
It's a small sample size and there is a bias in the data.
The people that are answering that call are not going to answer honestly, or they're not going to answer it at all if they're illegal.
So, you know, they're extrapolating this 1.6 million number from this small survey that they did, and there is a non-response bias in the data.
So everybody's citing that.
Federation for American Immigration Reform.
What's the other one?
CIS, Center for Immigration Studies.
They're all citing this bullshit study.
Dude, DHS doesn't even believe it.
Okay.
I can tell you for a fact, people in Homeland Security, they don't even believe that number.
They know it's fucking bullshit.
Homeland Security, they know it's horseshit.
They're putting that out as propaganda because they want to reassure the base that they're doing more than they are.
So the number that we need from DHS is the number of deportations.
What number, you might ask?
The number of deportations.
Did you know that the federal government keeps track of every single deportation they carry out?
They know the exact number to the single person, how many people have been removed by ICE.
Do you know that there are reporting requirements for ICE?
They have to put out a quarterly report and actually also weekly reports how many people are deported.
Do you know they have not put out those numbers since Trump got into office?
Why do you think that is?
Why do you think they have the number of deportations?
They won't put it out.
They're actually suppressing that information.
They're hiding behind this bullshit number from the census that they don't even believe of self-deportations.
Why do you think that is?
It's because the number of deportations is low.
It's too low.
And they know it.
And they know people won't be happy.
So they say, well, we've deported 2 million.
They're padding that.
They're padding that.
Like 75% of that is padded by some bullshit survey.
You know, I told you that's the direction it was going to go in.
I don't believe in wearing costumes, LARPing as Nazis.
And people don't seem to understand the difference.
People always like to say, yeah, well, you talk about Hitler and you supported Kanye and blah, blah.
There is all the difference in the world between appropriating Hitler for our political purposes, which is what we're doing, and cargo culting Hitler.
You understand the difference?
Cargo culting means we're going to dress like them.
We're going to talk like them.
We're going to act like them.
And maybe we'll get the same outcome that they did.
And that is just like a logical error.
Like the Nazis didn't succeed because they wore black.
They didn't succeed because they gave an angry speech.
Like they succeeded because of the particular material conditions that existed at the time, which were very specific to Germany, post-unification, in the interwar period, the peace that was imposed, certain, you could say, intrinsic attributes about the German world sense.
You know, this is some anti-German people say this, like, and other historians like AJP Taylor.
They say it was inevitable that the Germans would like National Socialism.
And there are some people that say, well, if we dress like Hitler, if we act like Hitler, we'll be like Hitler.
What we are doing is appropriating the narrative about Hitler for our present time.
So Hitler is a bludgeon against anybody that's pro-white, Israel critical.
And what we are doing is re-examining that, reframing it in that context and saying, well, why does the Holocaust matter for Americans in the 21st century?
We're sort of delegitimizing the narrative they've built up around him.
And we're saying, we're going to take the symbol of Hitler.
We're going to take even the name Hitler.
We're going to take all these things and we're going to pantomime them.
We're going to throw them in your face.
You don't want us to say it?
And we're going to say it.
We're going to stretch it out and we're going to blow it up.
And we're almost, excuse me, going to become a parody of it.
Nigga, Heil Hitler.
It's like a ridiculous statement.
A black guy saying, I'm a Nazi, I'm white, nigga, Heil Hitler.
Don't you understand the contradiction?
Nigga, Heil Hitler?
It's a ridiculous statement.
You know, hey, nigga, Heil Hitler.
It's a ridiculous statement.
And it is meant to say something edgy and funny to break the taboo.
And the taboo has been created to suppress those particular ideas.
Pro-white, Israel-critical.
That's the sacred cow.
That's the religion.
That is what is sacrosanct.
Why is it important to do this?
Because for so long, if you were ever pro-white or Israel critical, people say you're a Nazi.
And this has extraordinary emotional power.
Because when people hear Nazi, they think about, oh, those poor, oh, that movie, that show, my experience at the museum, blah, blah.
So when you're called the Nazi and it has any kind of credibility, this has emotional weight with people and it turns people off.
But if people start to say, Nazi, come on now, get real.
Oh, that again.
I don't know.
It's kind of funny.
You know, nigga, Hal Hitler.
Like, why are we still talking about this?
Well, now you've de-fanged one of their biggest weapons.
That's the difference.
So people say all the time, it's like in the dark night.
Kind of made it, kind of made it better, actually.
You know, I don't know if she's watching or she'd ever see this, but she was cute.
She was cute and she was nice.
But you know what?
She was just too crazy.
She had like this crazy look in her eyes, which was kind of hot.
And she was kind of like, you know, I'll say this much.
She was a little bit loopy in a way that was kind of attractive.
Like, I'll never forget, I was in my dorm sleeping, and she was pounding on the door, pounding on the door.
And I was, and she woke me up and I was like trying to fall back asleep.
And then she wakes me up.
She's in the room yelling at me.
I'm like, how the fuck did you get in here?
My roommate let her in.
I'm like, why would you do this?
But you know, that kind of persistence kind of turned me on.
I can't lie.
It was kind of, it was kind of attractive.
So I forget that that happened.
So that was so long ago.
But yeah, she would take us out to eat.
We go to T. Anthony's.
We'd go to Tasty Burger.
We go to Cheesecake Factory.
And this was big.
She was like my sugar mommy because I was broke.
She was loaded.
Her parents were loaded.
Her parents were loaded.
They were from, I don't, I don't want to give out all her information, but like her parents were loaded.
And so she got this big allowance.
She was taking us out all the time.
Me and my buddy.
That I, well, I don't, again, I don't want to dox everybody involved, but she, you know, she would take me out, take me and my friend out, and we would get T. Anthony's mozzarella stick pizza.
The last day I was in Boston, just me and her went to legal seafood at the Prudential Center.
She took us to Cheesecake Factory and she bought us Cheesecake to take home.
And I was broke as a joke.
I had no money.
I was hungry.
Like I was literally a hungry ass nigga.
And she was buying us food.
It was insane.
And she kind of had a crush on me.
But here's the thing.
You know what she was always doing?
And this is how she kind of psyched me out.
She was always saying, like, oh, I have multiple boyfriends and oh, this and that.
And that's why I was kind of like, I'm never going to date you because she kind of gave off the vibe that she was like, you know, that she got around a lot.
But she was cute enough.
She was buying us food.
She was persistent.
So I was like, you know, fuck it.
Another round of cheesecakes.
But yeah, then we got in like a big fight a year after college.
I believe in the gas chambers because Nazis also hurted villagers into barns to burn them in one stroke.
So it's the same tactic as gas chambers, but they used what was at hand.
The last revolutionary sent $20.
I know it wasn't your main point, but feminists have completely dominated men with the word pedo.
They took what was natural male sexuality for all human history and conflated it with child fucking to shame men away from artifact and increase the sexual value of hags.
And listen, you niggas are not ready for that conversation, but Jeff Epstein, not a pedophile, but you're not ready for that conversation.
All of his victims, 14 to 17.
That's not pedophilia.
But y'all niggas ain't ready for that conversation.
People say that's normalizing pedophilia.
No, that's defining pedophilia.
Pedophilia is sex with children.
Children are people that are before the age of sexual maturity.
Now, you can have your opinion and your taste and your ethics and your morals, but after the age of 14, that is past the point of sexual maturity, just period, biologically.
And all of these feminists and all of their accomplices, the simps, they all want to say there's only two genders.
They want to talk about reproduction and genitals.
Okay, let's talk about reproduction and genitals.
When do men and women reach the age of sexual maturity?
It ain't 18.
It isn't 20.
I've seen women say, a 20-year-old girl is a literal child.
No, sorry, she's not even a figurative child, let alone a literal child.
Do you know what canon law in the Catholic Church says?
It says the minimum age to get married is 14 for women, 16 for men.
That's the canon law of the Catholic Church.
So you want to pull rank on me with morality, I would take you there.
And by the way, that's how it was for thousands and thousands and thousands of years.
Do you know when age of consent became a thing?
Like 30 years ago.
That is a second wave feminist artifact.
But you people are not ready for that because ultimately, feminism is the matrix.
And that is how women have browbeaten men with this, you know, pedo, rapist, misogyny, all these words, all these words to prop up women's rights.
That's ultimately what it's about.
It's about women completing high school and going to college.
That's what it is.
You know, the only reason, and let me tell you this: I'm not in favor of like everybody go have sex with 14-year-olds.
I'm not saying that.
I'm saying that the only reason that people are so horrified when people talk about like 16 and 17 not really being immoral, it's because we have a culture of casual sex and pornography and hookups and prostitution.
That's why.
Why is it considered completely depraved at age 17 and a half versus 18?
Because we hate the idea of young, vulnerable girls being preyed upon by strange men, by pimps, by pornographers.
That's why it is abhorrent.
Because there is something true about that.
If you are grooming a child into sex, if you are, or I should say a teenager, if you're grooming a teenager into sex, if you're grooming a teenager into prostitution, pornography, that is especially wicked because teenage girls are vulnerable.
Teenage girls arguably cannot make those decisions.
But that is only because we live in a society where that kind of predation is happening.
And that's where it starts to make sense when women say a 19-year-old is a child.
Well, no, a 19-year-old isn't a child.
However, a 19-year-old teenage girl might be just as susceptible to grooming as a 17-year-old.
That's why it seems arbitrary.
A 19-year-old teenage girl, an 18-year-old teenage girl, might be just as susceptible to manipulation and grooming as a 17 or 16-year-old girl by a man who only wants sex from her without marrying her, by a man that wants to pimper out, that wants, you know, whatever, all these things that are happening in our society.
So, what are we really talking about?
What we're talking about is women being taken advantage of.
And we're saying that it is especially heinous when a younger, more vulnerable girl is taken advantage of.
Consent is not, I don't think that's really a real thing.
I think that's like a feminist construct.
And these like legal limits, I think that's very arbitrary.
What we're talking about is younger girls that are sexually mature being taken advantage of.
But take that up with a society that doesn't value marriage.
Here's the difference.
In the old days, girls would get married at 16.
And I think far fewer people would object to that.
Girls that get married at 15, 16, 17, but you recognize that that's different.
If they're in a marriage where they're being provided for, they're going to have kids, they're going to become a mother, they're going to build a life with a man who's going to love them.
That's different, actually, than the society we have today.
And the only reason you need age of consent is because we have a society that's built on the pill.
We have a society that's built on birth control.
We have a society that's built on abortion, pornography increasingly, all these other things.
And so now when we think of like sex and women, we think, oh my gosh, make the age of consent 21.
Because why would we want an 18-year-old girl to have her 18th birthday and then get on OnlyFans?
It's insane.
Why would we want a girl to turn 18 and be able to become an escort or sleep with any and every guy in college?
It's gross.
But that's only because we hate the idea of women being taken advantage of.
But you know what?
Women can be taken advantage of at any age because women are emotional, trusting, more so than men.
Women are easier to manipulate and younger women easier than more mature women.
And that's really the issue.
So don't take it up with, you know, people love to say pedophilia.
That's really the wrong lens.
No, actually, that's not pedophilia.
And I think that there is such a hysteria about that and obsession with that on the right.
And I think, like everything else, it defines down what a heinous crime pedophilia really is and what a perversion it really is.
And I'm not like raising a flag for child marriage or something, but I'm saying, let's just get our history straight and let's start to understand sexual immorality.
Let's start to understand some of these sexual issues.
Why do you think we are such a sexually dysfunctional society?
It's because men and women become sexually mature and active years, years before they're even supposed to consider getting married.
You're setting them up for failure.
Men and women are able to have sex, and by that I mean reproduce, want to have sex far earlier, years earlier.
And we're telling them it's not even lawful to do that for years and don't even consider doing it licitly until way after that.
What's the average or median age couples get married in the United States?
It's like 28.
Does that make any fucking sense?
So if a man and a woman reach the age of sexual maturity in their teens, we're telling them you have to wait 10 years.
And what?
They're going to be chased that whole time?
What are they going to do for those 10 years?
When are women most fertile?
It's not a 28, I'll tell you that much.
And we wonder why we have a fertility crisis.
We wonder why we have all kinds of other sexual dysfunction.
And that is the uncomfortable truth that nobody wants to talk about.
That is second wave feminism all day long.
That is all this bodily autonomy, you know, all of that is basically first and second wave feminism.
Because if you go to the old world, if you go to Europe, it ain't like that.
And if you go to the Catholic Church, it's not like that.
If you go to the history in Europe and basically every other society, it isn't like that.
And people say, well, you just really want a child bride.
You know, if or when I get married, it's not going to be to a 15-year-old.
It'll probably be to somebody that's in their 20s, honestly.
You know, that being said, I am a tireless defender of the truth.
And, you know, a lot of people don't like this.
It's an unpopular take, but it is the truth.
So, and that is a feminist issue.
So, and people don't even realize they're peddling feminism when they say this.
That's a literal child.
Oh, my God.
It's like, no, it's actually not a literal child at all.
You can say that they're vulnerable.
You could say that they should be protected.
And I would agree with you.
You could say it's particularly heinous that a teenage girl is trafficked and groomed.
Absolutely.
It is downright evil, millstone, and everything.
I'm in absolute agreement with you.
It is particularly heinous because they're more corruptible.
I agree with you.
You could say, well, it's still illegal.
And I agree with you there too.
But when people say it's pedophiliates, a child, as if there's no distinction, well, that just fucking isn't true at all.
And it's creating hysteria.
And you know what?
I also think it's hurting society in general.
I feel like, and I'll just say as a guy, you feel like society is becoming so paranoid because of this obsession with pedophilia.
How can you really have a family-based society if every guy is terrified of being called a pedophile or a rapist?
And that's kind of the society that we live in.
Don't you think?
I mean, and I don't think I'm the first one to say this either, but you really cannot have a society that has any kind of communal fabric or anything like that.
If every man lives in a constant state of terror that they will be accused of being a rapist, of being a pedophile.
You know, how can you have a society where like, you know, there's many generations of people all living among each other, all over the place.
You can't even talk about these issues.
People are terrified.
People are terrified to even say it.
It dare not say it out loud.
People are terrified because of, you know, this hysterical stuff that goes on.
And then people wonder why we're such an anti-life society.
It's because we are puritanical about this kind of stuff, puritanical in a feminist way about this stuff.
And now we have a society where when and where is sex supposed to occur?
I guess it's supposed to happen after college or something.
When everybody's ready to settle down, after women have gone to high school and gone to college and they're all having sex anyway and hooking up and women are being liberated, you know, it's totally insane.
So no, we have to deconstruct all of feminism.
Not just, oh, well, you're a blue-haired raging feminist.
Okay, you're a woman with a talk show screeching about pedophilia and misogyny and all like, how are you literally any different?
But this is why Western civilization is dying.
Every decadent civilization that gives itself over to feminist women dies.
And I think it dies because it becomes impossible to fight against.
And the reason nobody wants to fight against it, because if you're a man and you go against the matriarchy, the gynocracy, you are ostracized.
So nobody wants to do it.
Nobody wants to upset their wife, girlfriend, daughter, prospective partner.
Nobody wants to offend.
Nobody wants to offend their friend's wife, you know, because women are the gatekeepers of society.
And so then nobody wants to say it because they don't want to be that guy.
But, you know, I'm already that guy.
So I'll say it.
So yeah, I mean, look, Epstein, baller ass nigga.
And look, yeah, okay, criminal.
But when people say, oh, he's a, he's this pedophile, satanic, Candace Owens put out this tweet.
She said he was given triplets.
That is a fabrication.
That was made up by Virginia Juffrey, a serial fabulist who makes up a ton of shit, not a reliable person at all.
It just isn't true.
But you're a fucking dumbass who believes everything you hear on the internet.
No, Virginia Juffrey, not everything she said is true.
What was proven in court is that the victims were between the ages of 14 and 17.
Yeah, that is evil.
I mean, don't get me wrong.
It's absolutely evil grooming vulnerable girls from broken homes who are younger than they should be into prostitution.
It's like one of the most evil things.
I never for a second defended it.
I didn't say it wasn't evil or criminal.
I said, but it's not ritualistic, pedophilic, satanic abuse.
It's a different category.
And the reason you even make the distinction is because one has to do with like magic.
One is like, oh, they're sacrificing infants to baal to drink their blood for adrenochrome because they're just that sick.
Another is like, why are they looking for underage girls for blackmail?
Obviously.
Why are they scouting out the youngest girls?
Because it's illegal.
Because it's barely illegal.
Why does that matter?
So that they pass, so that you can trick people, so that you can blackmail them.
That is the purpose.
So people say you're defending it.
I'm not defending it.
It's still evil.
It's still heinous for all the reasons you think.
But the reason you draw a distinction is because the kind of abuse that was occurring is bound up with the purpose of it.
Why were they selected from that cohort?
Why were there none younger than 14?
Why was that?
Why were the majority of them in that age bracket?
Because it was a blackmail ring.
If you can find girls that are on the cusp of being legal, you can get someone on Lolita Express to have sex with them, record it, and then blackmail them because that's what Epstein was.
And that's the point, which I said yesterday and I said the night before, not to get it twisted and get hysterical and sensational.
The claims about Epstein just get crazier and crazier.
He was given triplets to rape for the devil and blah, blah.
And it's ritualistic, satanic abuse.
And no, no, one person claimed that.
She's a serial liar.
She made tens of millions of dollars in settlements.
None of that has been proven.
What was proven in court why Jeffrey Epstein was charged and convicted based on interviews with hundreds of people is that the age bracket was 14 to 17.
They're filming everything because they're running a blackmail ring.
And so it's important to understand what you're talking about.
It's not to say that it isn't bad, evil, predatory.
Obviously it is.
Of course it is.
No one would suggest otherwise.
But women, man, oh man, so touchy about that subject.
And why do you think it is?
Because women are vulnerable.
And so they're very sensitive about any subject like that.
And so as a result, they try to attack everything.
Everything is rape and pedophilia.
Okay, so how are young men supposed to get along in this day and age?
You know, it's crazy.
Because the amount of hysteria about abuse, think about how abuse has been redefined.
If a guy is like, if a guy is shitty to his wife, he's an emotional abuser.
He's a blah blah, she leaves.
If a guy has sex with a woman and she doesn't want it 10 years later, it's rape.
I have seen it recently.
If like a 21-year-old guy is in a relationship with a 17-year-old girl, he's a pedophile.
And he's like a, he's like a snarky, he's like a snarky little guy, too.
After me and Ye went on Tim Pool, he was the next guest and he went on and did some little routine about, oh, I'm a Jew and I'm on after Nick and Kanye.
There's like a famous guy in Chicago that goes around punching women in the face.
Black, of course.
And the guy's just like on the loose.
So people are saying, hey, be careful.
There's this guy walking around punching women in Chicago.
And he's just out there.
I do, I will say this much about him.
You got to wonder, maybe, maybe, just maybe, is that going to wake some of them up?
Because these women are all voting for their boyfriend, George Floyd, to get out of jail.
You hope that maybe they're walking down the street, they get clocked in the face by one of these people.
And then, I don't know, they vote for Trump.
Like, you never know.
I don't support it.
I think it's terrible.
But, like, hey, maybe if there's anything good to come out of it, if there's how can we make a negative into a positive, maybe they'll learn something.
So, yeah, it's crazy.
And they never, a lot of the time in Chicago, it's always no suspect in custody and they never say the race.
And I was like, cooked, cooked, not going to make it.
I'm joking.
I love Alex, but like, dude, I feel like if I had a wife, it would be like that.
If I had a wife, I could never differentiate between pedophilia and ephebophilia because she would divorce my ass.
If I did a show and I was like, Jeffrey Epstein wasn't technically a pedophile, she's going to be like, you really need to stop this or I'm going to leave you.
I couldn't go on the show and make jokes about kicking women's asses.
I couldn't go on the show and make jokes about fucking all different kinds of women.
I literally started flirting with another black woman, and boom, Candace Owens is on my case, tweeting at me, doing shows about me, crying about me like clockwork.
When they said that Tyler Robinson created a million Charlie Kirks, I didn't think they meant that literally you would see 1 million Charlie Kirks everywhere, like his face everywhere.
And you would have to literally not know anything about World War II to not know what that is.
Because why did France fall so quickly?
Because of Blitzkrieg.
Why?
Because of their speed, because of their combined arms, tactics, and speed at overcoming all of the defenses.
That's why.
And so it's like, that's like 101.
That's like a push.
That's not even a push.
That's like remedial world history.
Or I guess that'd be like AP global history, EU history.
You know, but that's like remedial history.
That's like a vocab word on an eighth-grade World War II test.
What strategy, lightning warfare, allowed the Germans to overcome?
Like, that's 101, man.
And I remember a year ago, she did a show.
She said the Russian Revolution was in the 1870s.
Once again, I've said it before.
If you think the Russian Revolution happened in the 1870s, it shows you have no idea like anything that was happening in that 100-year period.
Because if you don't know that the Russian Revolution happened during World War I, how do you not know that?
Or if you did, then it means you don't know when World War I took place.
You see what I mean?
Like you can't not know one without not knowing the other.
If you think the Russian Revolution happened in the 1870s, then you either don't know when World War I took place or you don't know that the Russian Revolution happened during World War I. That's a big one.
And you could spin that a hundred different ways, you know.
If you can't place that, then you can't place a lot of things that were going on.
So I heard that and I was like, wow, this person like literally knows nothing about anything.
Doesn't know anything about World War II.
Doesn't know anything about she's talking about the Soviet Union.
You don't even know when it happened.
You don't even know the timeline.
You couldn't pin it in a 50-year timeline.
50-year time, you couldn't get the right fucking century.
That'd be like saying World War II started in 1895.
what's wrong with that let's not cope here i'm probably the only white broker general jimbo is a japanese redditor and that asshole paul town needs to be put down like the dirty polish dog he is is that the real beards Michael Kidby sent $20.
Nick, would you rather golden dome or iron dome after a date?
Christian sent $20.
Why hasn't Candace checked where these Egyptian planes have gone after Kirk's death and if they are still following Erica?
Age for Snipper Kitty 43 cent $20.
Hey, Nick, turning 28 today and feel like an old-ass Groyper now.
My friends and father are finally getting black killed to the truth.
I'm very pleased that the first time I ever read into your live stream was a few days ago and you read my username out at the end and said that sounds like an interesting person.
The pain that you feel from reading these super chats is only a fraction of the pain that we feel when we interact with these cattle.
Would you drop the Jew hate if we got Ben Shapiro to say sorry?
Sarah Palin's box sent $25.
Next, your doubters will say the Germans were fighting wars for Israel when they invaded Poland, France, Belgium, Holland, Denmark, Norway, Yugoslavia, Greece, Slovakia, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, and Russia.
But hey, at least the people long live the United Empire of America.
I'm a Canadian and my ancestors have been so for four generations, considering getting dual citizenship with the U.S. because our country has gone down the drain in a handbasket.
I work in NS, so I've been monitoring the situation hard in the common lip slash hero case against says that Trump is only trying to break NATO because Putin tells him to.
Have to last cause Russ wants US and Greenland like US want China in South America.
That's funny.
Greenland should be our payoff for all the aid and involvement we've poured into Ukraine.
Honestly, we could just let Putin march through Europe.
That would give a solid pretext to seize it.
Just like what happened during World War II.
Why didn't we even hand it back to Denmark after they fell to the Nazis?
Nick Fuentes, you're my favorite Mexican-American.
Europeans made up roughly half the population at the time of American independence, yet the nation remained predominantly Christian, which shaped our identity.
How can we realistically return to our Christian roots while honoring our country's established racial diversity?
This whole Epstein thing reminds me of when Cody Ko went to a house party and had sex with Tanemon Joe, and 10 years later, we found out she was 17 and he got canceled.
I don't, I don't actually have, I'm a polite and respectful person.
I'm, the worst you could say about me is I'm moody.
But women are like, I hope he tells me to shut the fuck up and get in the kitchen.
Like, I'm going to be like, all right, hey, hey, bitch.
Like, I'm going to, like, I'm going to meet some girl for the first time and be like, ha ha, hey, what's up, bitch?
I feel like there's going to be a huge disconnect between the caricature, the like rape fantasies that women have, these like weird abuse fantasies that women have.
They see me as this like Nazi caricature that's going to like shove their face in the ground.
And then they meet me in real life and I'm like, hi, nice to meet you.
They think that I'm going to pull up and be like, hey, bitch.
The last time I was at the Cheesecake Factory was at the Grove in LA with Jackson Hinkle because it was one of the only restaurants that was open at the Grove.
And other than that, time before that was probably college.
Remember to smash the follow button on Rumble, smash the like button, leave a comment.
I'm on the air Monday through Friday.
Thank you to our top super chatters.
Special thanks to Big Red, Sexy and Unique, Real Mock, Antioch, Requia, Michael Kidby, Nordic, Germanic Blood, on My Way, Not Andy, BRD, Look, Average John, Rooster, Drunk, Costanza, Groyper, Jiri, Bibi, and CYD.
Special thanks to them.
Thanks to all our super chatters, everybody that watches.