IRAN WAR IMMINENT??? Trump Vows To "SAVE" Iranian Protesters | America First Ep. 1620
NEW MERCH JUST DROPPED Don't miss out!
https://fuentes.storeShow more Subscribe to the America First Archive!
https://americafirst.plus
Send a superchat:
https://entropystream.live/nickjfuentes
Support the America First Foundation:
https://americafirstfoundation.org/donate
https://x.com/AmericaFirstFdn
Support the show using crypto:
https://nicholasjfuentes.com/donate
Follow Nicholas J. Fuentes:
X: https://x.com/nickjfuentes
Kick: https://kick.com/nickfuentes
Telegram: https://t.me/nickjfuentes
Follow Fuentes Updates on X for clips and more:
https://x.com/fuentesupdates
Follow America First HQ for news:
X: https://x.com/AmFirstHQ
Telegram: https://t.me/AmericaFirstHQ
Watch the show on Cozy:
https://cozy.tv/nick Show less
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
Dad Seems Different00:02:54
unidentified
I got places to be Good evening, everybody You're watching America First.
It's allowed to say that the blood is a quintessential part of the blood of our people is something that is essential.
That we are different.
that America was different because we are different.
Palantir is an AI data analytics company.
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithms, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
If we don't have freedom on the internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind raped every day forever.
Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geo-location, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you're asleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
You have a smart home, economy of things.
It's like total, like, rape of everybody by the system forever.
My life is like a first-person video game, you know?
There is something involved where we have to forgive them We do have to forgive them for their ignorance We do have to forgive them for their misunderstanding And we have to embrace them and say better late than never Welcome to the right side of history.
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
Because they voted for Kamala Harris.
People do not stab young girls on trains because they're born black.
People do not shoot Palestinians in the back of the head or cheer it on just because they're Jewish.
The people that do this are lost.
They have to be isolated and segregated out.
A new consensus must emerge.
Are you in favor of a society with meaning?
A society where life is sacred.
Where life has sanctity, where people's lives and their dignity and their integrity is respected?
Or are we going to live in a society that is a never-ending war between nihilistic tribes, warlords, savages, pagans?
I see an emergent consensus.
And I think that the mature people that actually love America, actually love our children, the people that recognize the division, the peril that we're in, we need to fortify a new consensus and rally the people of conscience, the people of decency, the people of humanity, the people of charity towards their fellow man,
against those that want to kill us, against those that laugh and celebrate when innocent people are harmed.
For any reason, for any ideological reason, against the people that are cruel, the people that are hateful.
And by that, I mean the people that are really cruel, not the people that say things you disagree with, not the people that are provocative, not the people that are sometimes angry, but the people that are really cruel and really evil.
What makes Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the bearing of suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us.
An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children, even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
That is what makes us different.
unidentified
Canary Mission
is an Israeli-funded blacklist, which, since July 2025, has been confirmed to be used by the Trump administration to target students, professors, and professionals who oppose Israel and reside in the United States.
This idea is part of an initiative created by the Heritage Foundation, the same group responsible for the infamous Project 2025.
In their initiative, titled Project Esther, they state that students participating in pro-Palestinian protests and activism are supporting Hamas, a group that the United States designates as a foreign terrorist organization.
Therefore, pro-Palestinian students are considered to be supporting terrorism and are subject to the revocation of visas, frozen bank accounts, asset seizures, and the denial of basic constitutional rights.
In effect, the Canary mission serves as a means to circumvent constitutional protections, allowing the federal government to engage in intelligence gathering activities that would otherwise be considered unlawful.
But the Canary Mission is not alone.
Palantir, another company closely aligned with the state of Israel, uses AI-driven analytics to maintain private databases on U.S. citizens and currently works with four federal agencies.
While government contracting with the private sector is longstanding, the prominent influence of Jewish groups within these increasingly powerful organizations warrants careful examination.
I renew the call for all able-bodied young American men, all of our elite human capital, all of our geniuses, warriors, intelligent people to dedicate themselves to American sovereignty and independence.
As Christians, as Americans, as white people, as citizens of the United States, and anybody that settles for anything less is just as much of an enemy, I would actually consider them worse than our oppressors.
So on Independence Day, it's important to reflect on the fact that we are an occupied nation.
Now, just like then, we're being ruled by a small country across an ocean, serving itself at our expense.
And as long as that is the case, I will always be obsessed with that.
As long as that is the case, I will always be speaking out against that and fighting against that.
And I will always be anchored, understanding that that is the fundamental struggle.
As long as our presidents have to kiss the wall in Israel and wear a small hat, as long as they have to say that we want to make Israel great again and they're the greatest country ever, I will never be okay with that.
Ever.
And it doesn't matter what they offer me or us.
It doesn't matter how they might try to placate us or appease our interests, the concessions they'll make.
Barack Obama created the joint comprehensive plan of action, the JCPOA, or the Iranian nuclear deal.
And Barack Obama brought together China, Russia, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the European Union to enforce a nuclear deal that restricts Iran's enrichment of uranium.
The early talks were conducted in secret, and the Israelis were furious, furious about this.
They hated Obama.
Netanyahu went to a joint session of Congress and gave a speech in defiance of the American president and its nuclear deal, and Congress gave 37 standing ovations.
This is the background of Trump's first election.
2016 election happens.
Trump gets elected with the help of the Israelis.
You don't believe me?
There's a whole article about it.
It's an excerpt from James Bamford's book, Spy Fail.
It goes into great detail about the hidden collusion in the 2016 election.
It wasn't Trump and Russia.
It was Trump and Israel.
And why was Israel so hell-bent on getting a Republican elected in 16?
In 2018, Donald Trump declares the IRGC, the Revolutionary Guard, which is the military of the regime, a terrorist group.
Green likes that group for sanctions, for attacks.
Now the United States is in a shadow war with Iran.
It culminates by January 2020 in the assassination of Qasim Suleimani.
Suleimani was the architect of the axis of resistance.
Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Suleimani built all of it.
Are you starting to see that?
Obama had this solved.
He made the deal.
The Israelis hated him for it.
They colluded with Trump to get him elected so that Trump would do maximum pressure and create a ladder of escalation, pulling us out of the deal, declaring the IRGC terrorists, then killing its leader, putting sanctions on the regime.
This is a war that started a long time ago, that Trump made hot in 2018 and has been going on for seven years.
That's the nature of forever wars.
Just like in Iraq, which went from 1990 until today, just like Libya, which went from 2011 to today.
Syria, which went from 2011 to today, and Iran, which went from 2018 until today.
That's the nature of forever wars.
And if you're not paying attention to those underlying forces, you're going to fall for it again and again.
You're going to be surprised and confused and coping over and over.
And people are just tripping over themselves to do it again.
Okay, I'm like two seconds out from just joining the Jews at this point.
It's like I started out like the Jews are oppressing us, then it's like, no, no, the Jews are oppressing all of you.
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and, in some cases, quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
Blood Of Our People00:15:35
unidentified
Hello.
Got places to be This evening, everybody You're watching America First.
to say that the blood, the blood of our people, is something that is essential.
That we are different.
that america was different because we are different palantir is an ai data analytics company
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithms, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Tuesday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight, lots to get into.
Big show.
We're going to be talking tonight all about the imminent U.S. attack on Iran.
And I will just say at the outset, I don't really believe there is going to be a military strike anytime soon.
At least it's not immediate.
And who knows?
We'll see how it plays out over the next day or two.
I'll tell you my reasons why.
But tonight, we're going to go into it.
Obviously, there has been a lot happening in Iran, and we'll talk about all of it.
There has been a massive wave of protests in the country over the past few weeks, starting in December, carrying over into the new year.
It has a lot to do with the collapse of the currency and some of the banks over there.
So there's been a major uprising.
In response, the government has cracked down, allegedly indiscriminately shooting protesters, killing thousands.
They shut down the internet in the country.
And in the middle of all of this acrimony, the chaos, Israel and the United States are talking about bombing Iran.
Bomb Iran, Iran.
Lindsey Graham says he hasn't slept in a week because he's waiting for the United States to finally bomb Iran again for the second time in this administration.
And so Trump has gathered together his cabinet earlier this evening.
General Raising Keynes was there, Joint Chief of Staff, among others.
They're discussing options to respond to Iran.
Initially, it seemed like that was imminent military action.
Now it sounds a lot more like a non-kinetic option, meaning a non-military option.
Maybe a cyber attack, maybe something else.
Maybe it's economic.
And it seems that as the tide has turned against the protesters, now Israel even and the Gulf countries and the United States are reluctant to go in.
They say maybe there will be a better time later.
So we'll talk all about that.
We're going to cover everything in a comprehensive way.
And it should be a pretty good show.
Before we get into it, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble, smash the like button, leave a comment.
Let me know what you think about the show.
Check out our store at Fuentes.store, 10% off discount this week because I'm back for the new year.
Check out our subscription website, AmericaFirst.plus, $100 a month.
You get access to the group chat with me, $15 a month.
You get access to the entire archive of content with MP3 listening as well for all the videos, shows, everything I've done.
So check that out.
I got to tell you, I'm not feeling so good.
I was so excited.
I came back ready to go.
Big show last night.
A lot of people watching.
I have a fever again.
And if you're joining me this week, I had the flu a week before Christmas, and it was the worst flu I've ever had.
It was brutal, and it took me like a week to get over it.
It was horrible.
And now I'm sick again.
Yesterday, I was saying to some people, I just can't shake this chill.
I'm cold.
I'm having these body aches.
I thought it's because I did some push-ups.
I take my temperature.
I have a fever.
So what the fuck?
I'm sick again.
But I don't care.
I'm going to do a show the whole week.
I'm just going to hang in and be a trooper and just get it done.
This is the year of the lock-in.
So we're not fucking around.
We're not playing.
Okay.
I don't care if I'm a little bit sick.
I'm doing the show.
But I feel like crap.
Fever, headache.
You know, you just don't feel right.
You know what I'm talking about?
You just feel like your skin is crawling a little bit.
It's a nasty flu season.
He got a lot of this stuff going around.
So anyway, so I'm not feeling 100%, but that's okay.
Other thing, before we get into the story tonight, did you see this?
Trump goes to some kind of, I don't know what it was.
I guess he went to like some car factory or something.
And he's doing a press pool and a photo op and everything.
I think he gave a speech there.
He said some auto thing.
And he's on his way out to leave.
And one of the people on the line on the floor yells up to him, You're a pedo protector, pedo protector.
And Trump, this is what it looks like, points to him and goes, fuck you, and then flips him off.
Did you see this?
You know, just when you think you're out, he pulls you back in.
Just when you think you're done with this guy, and you know me, I'm very frustrated with this administration and all of it.
But you can't lie.
Like some of the stuff he's been doing, it's kind of just auraful.
After he kidnaps Maduro, he calls into Fox News and he says, Nobody has the capability we have.
And we'll do it again.
Nobody can stop us.
And it's like, this is some, like, I'm kind of getting some energy here.
I'm getting, I'm picking up on something here.
And then he goes to this auto place and some blue-collar hicclib.
Hey, you're a pedo protector.
He goes, fuck you, fuck you.
And then he gives him the middle finger.
It's like, okay, that's based.
We have to admit, we don't have to love it.
We don't have to love everything that's going on.
We don't have to put the MAGA hat back on, but it's like, okay, that's kind of awesome.
And honestly, the pedo protector thing is really dumb.
Here's the problem with Epstein.
The problem with Epstein is that he is a Jewish spy.
That's the problem.
This whole pedo thing, it's like, isn't it really pedophilia?
Don't want to be the one that has to say it, but I guess I'm being forced to say it.
It's not really pedophilia, okay?
They weren't trafficking five-year-olds.
It was like they were technically not legal.
Big difference, in my opinion.
I know that's a controversial take, but that's not really the issue there.
Okay.
The issue is not that they were barely legal teens, which is what it is.
It's horrendous.
It's awful.
It's pedophilia.
Okay, relax.
No, the issue is that Epstein is a Jewish spy, probably working with Israel.
That's the dilemma there.
He's working with Israeli intelligence.
So I see these shitlibs at the ICE protests in Minneapolis, and they're yelling, pedo protector.
They're saying to ICE, you're with the pedo protector, pedo president, and this idiot in the in the factory, they're saying this.
It's like, that's not even really the issue there, goof.
Let's not, it's really striking to me, and I hate to say this, but it feels like so sticky that if you criticize Trump in any way, you can't get away from the left.
Do you know what I mean?
It feels like you start to criticize Trump, and what's my problem with Trump?
My problem with Trump is not that he's Hitler, okay?
My problem with Trump is that he is not Hitler, all right?
You have all these left-wing people saying, why do I agree with Nick Fuentes?
It's like I'm criticizing Trump because there's not enough deportations.
There's not enough ICE brutality.
There's not enough National Guard.
Sort of a big difference.
You have Pumpkinhead throwing herself in front of a ICE vehicle because she literally wants to lay down her life to protect Somali scammers.
I am criticizing Trump because I want all Somalians out of America immediately.
Like there's kind of a big difference, but it's hard to criticize Trump and galvanize an audience and rally without finding yourself standing shoulder to shoulder with some left-wing idiot, with some pussyhat liberal, some leftist yelling, pedo protector.
He's a pet.
Really, bro, like you're a card-carrying Democrat idiot.
Are you kidding me?
It's, and it has nothing to do with that.
It's that he's an Israeli spy.
That's obviously the problem there.
So, so I saw that and I'm like, what an idiot, these like disgusting chuds rising up.
And it forces you.
It feels like you're forced to make a decision.
You're either with left-wing scum or you're with Trump.
And it's like, I want to be with Trump, but he has these people that have captured his administration that are making it impossible to support.
But I'm really not on the left either.
So it puts you in a pickle.
It puts you in a tough situation.
So, and I said as much the other day with regard to Venezuela.
And we'll talk about ICE.
I think we'll talk about the ICE protests either tomorrow or Thursday.
We're going to save it for a later day.
But it's the same thing.
It's like all these people that are criticizing Trump and Israel, they're now saying ICE is like terror capitalism.
I saw Blumenthal say that.
Like they don't like that ICE is deporting people.
It's like, okay, so what is this actually?
I'm not with this.
Like I want the illegals out.
And I said it the other night.
This is the last thing I'll say about it.
Then we'll move on.
America first is the rallying cry.
is not like Israel's an apartheid state.
It's not free Palestine.
It's not, no, the rallying cry is a positive vision that says we're putting America first against all foreign influence.
And you cannot be in favor of America first, ejecting AIPAC and ejecting the Israel lobby and the neocons, but then turn around and say, we need millions of people here that have no legal standing to remain in our country because these are both forms of foreign influence.
10 million illegal Venezuelans anchors away having children.
That is a form of foreign influence.
That is a form of putting America last, just like it is when they bribe Congress.
It's six of one, half a dozen of the other.
You can't complain about $4 billion to Israel every year and then throw yourself in front of an ICE vehicle because they want to investigate these Somalians that are taking millions of dollars from the taxpayer because it's arguably it's the same thing.
What do you think the Somalians are doing?
They're taking that money for themselves and they're sending it back to Africa as a remittance.
It's the same thing.
Now, it is distinct in some meaningful ways.
They have less agency.
They work with the left-wing architecture.
They work with the Democrats.
But in principle, it is putting America last.
So we have to differentiate ourselves.
I said it the other night, but this is a year of refinement.
We can't let the movement slip into this kind of, like I said, left-wing women's march.
You're not going to see me at the women's march ever.
Like, I'm never going to wear the hat.
I'm never going to be out there yelling, pedo protector, ICE is too brutal.
My only issue with ICE is you cannot perform brutality without being brutal.
My problem is the brutality is fake.
No, no, we want them to actually shut down the country and actually get these people out.
And we want them to downplay it.
The problem is they're not doing what they're supposed to be doing.
They're playing it up because they want us to think they're doing their job.
And by that, I mean they're putting out these edits of ICE kicking everybody's ass because they want the base to think they're getting mass deportations when in reality, the administration has no intention of doing it.
And I'm saying we need the opposite.
Keep it quiet.
Actually put a media blackout on it.
Suppress how much you're doing and do a lot more of it.
Shut down the whole neighborhood and just go door to door.
So anyway, and that's a far cry from these other people that are crying about a dead protester.
You know, we're trying to get 30 million fucking people out of our country.
You think we're not going to step on some toes?
Like, what do you think is going to happen here exactly?
30 million people are here and they don't want to go.
Like, what do you think is going to happen?
So the government needs to be willing and able to do what it needs to do.
And now you have all these Israel critics coming around and saying, oh, well, I'm like anti-big government.
Big government sucks.
And I don't like police brutality.
And the IDF trained ICE.
It's like, okay, so you're just a left-wing idiot then.
Okay, so you're just like some leftist scum.
Like, you know, I don't even know at that point.
It's like, well, what are we?
The Ron Paul movement now?
Like, I'm not a Ron Paul libertarian, okay?
I'm not a Ron Paul guy.
I'm not Obama.
I'm not a liberal.
Okay.
I'm a reactionary.
We need decisive action from a powerful executive to radically change the country.
We need like a reset.
You know, the country needs to be put first, and that means a lot of stuff is going to have to change.
And people that don't want to lose their jobs are going to have to lose their jobs.
And people that don't want to leave the country are going to have to leave the country.
And the left will lash out and they need to be put in jail for it.
And if they resist, well, that's what happened to George Floyd.
You know, like anyway, so that's that.
But I do want to move on because I saw that thing.
I saw that little video, pedo protector, and I'm like, this guy just sounds like some stupid hicclib.
Gross.
But I want to move on.
I want to get into our featured story about these Iran strikes.
As you know, I've been talking about this for years.
And we're going to talk all about the current situation as it's unfolding.
I do want to get into a little bit of the background here because just like with Venezuela, you can't really understand the issue if you're looking at it narrowly.
You can only really understand what's going on if you look at it broadly.
And that means you need to know what is happening in that neighborhood.
And you need to know the recent history.
You need to know what has been going on.
Well, why do I say this?
So what is happening in the past few weeks are these massive protests.
Well, they want us to believe they're massive.
This massive popular uprising in Iran.
Iranian protesters have taken to the streets.
They are taking over government buildings.
And the Iranian regime, which is paranoid and violent, is cracking down hard, shooting the protesters with automatic weapons indiscriminately, stacking up the bodies, thousands dead, internet blackout to break the back of the protest.
This is the story.
And now there are urgent demands for the United States to intervene on the side of the protesters.
But how did we get here?
We have to take a step back.
As you know, I have been predicting this for a long time.
In 2023, after October 7th, I said eventually Israel's campaign in Gaza and Lebanon and elsewhere will culminate in a regime change in Iran that will involve the United States.
And I said that for many years.
I've said that, I guess now it's two, two and a half years or something, two years and a few months.
I said from the very beginning that this was the long-term strategic goal or intermediate term goal for Israel was to, they were going to take it in detail.
They were going to take it piece by piece.
And by that, I mean they were going to dismantle Iran's proxy network.
They were going to dismantle Iran's nuclear hedge, which is its nuclear centrifuges and stockpile of highly enriched uranium.
They're going to take out Iran's missile capability, their missile launch platforms, of which they have thousands of missiles.
And that ultimately, once this has been achieved, the pathway will be cleared for a decapitation strike, a color revolution, an invasion, some form or another of regime change.
And I said that, as you know, for those that have been watching the show years ago, it wasn't, I don't think, really the most unpredictable thing because the Israelis were saying it.
The Israelis after October 7th were saying this.
They said that after October 7th, we have to just change the status quo.
We need to reset the balance of power.
We need to reset the regional order that has persisted for 50 years.
And they're alluding there to the Yom Kippur War and the land for peace negotiations since then, tolerating a Palestinian state, the rise of Iran and Islamism.
In no uncertain terms, they were gesturing towards and telegraphing regime change.
Now, why does this matter?
It's because if you're only watching the headlines, if you're only watching the news, then these things are coming at you very fast and they're happening all of a sudden.
I remember I was talking to a Trump supporter in 2024, and I said, I'm not voting for Trump because he will take us to war in Iran.
And I remember this guy said, you know, dude, I just don't see that happening.
And I said, well, of course you don't see it happening because you're not paying attention to what's happening in the region.
You are not paying attention to the news at all.
You are sitting around and waiting for the big story to break.
You're waiting for the crisis to boil over.
And that is when it appears in your For You page.
That's when it appears on your timeline.
And then it seems like it came out of nowhere all of a sudden.
And maybe more importantly, it feels sporadic.
When the United States and Israel attacked Iran last June, it felt like it came out of nowhere.
And then as quickly as it arrived, it went away.
And because it wasn't in the news, people stopped paying attention.
And so because NPCs struggle with object permanence, for them, it just stopped existing.
The region stopped existing.
The crisis stopped existing.
It was resolved in the war.
And I remember after the 12-day war, when Israel and the United States bombed Iran last June, everybody said, well, no harm, no foul.
All Trump did was drop a couple of bombs on a couple of nuclear facilities.
They said it's really not a big deal.
They said, because this isn't a war and it's not nation building and it's not regime change, they said this was actually brilliant because it was a targeted, limited, restrained strike only on Iran's strategic hedge, its nuclear centrifuge, its nuclear infrastructure.
They said, so now that the conflict is over, we can all forget about it and we can say mission accomplished.
Like George W. Bush, it had like an 80% approval rating within the GOP, those strikes, and everybody moved on.
So why does the context matter?
Because we have been at war with Iran for many years.
Arguably, our present conflagration with Iran started in 2018 when Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal.
And where does the Iran nuclear deal come from?
Where does that come from?
It comes from 2015, when Barack Obama and John Kerry negotiated the joint comprehensive plan of action.
They got Russia, China, UK, France, Germany, Italy, all the major players together as signatories to agree to relieve Iran sanctions if they give up some elements of their nuclear program and have some oversight and transparency about it.
We pull out of the Iranian nuclear deal unilaterally in 2018, hit the sanctions back on Iran hard.
We force the Europeans to put the sanctions back.
2020, we kill Qasem Suleimani, their top general.
We declare their paramilitary group, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, a terrorist group.
And then what starts in 2021, 2022, it's actually just an escalation, is that Israel starts assassinating Iran's nuclear scientists again.
And Israel starts launching cyber attacks on critical Iranian infrastructure.
And Israel starts conducting industrial espionage in Iran, blowing up factories, some military, some commercial, blowing up ports, attacking their utilities, their power grid, all of their critical infrastructure.
And of course, that fed into what happened on October 7th and Israel's systematic confrontation with Iran's proxies, and then ultimately Iran throughout 2024, and then in 2025 with the 12-day war.
And now here we are again in 2025 with these protests and all this talk about bombing Iran.
And I'll reiterate it again for people that don't watch my show a lot or if you haven't seen my coverage of Iran.
The only thing you need to understand about Iran and Israel and the United States is the different strategic objectives that are at stake here.
What is Israel's strategic end game in the Middle East?
They're very clear about this, and they have been ever since Laikud, which is Netanyahu's right-wing party, ever since they came to power in the 70s, they have been absolutely transparent about what they want in the region.
And how they describe it is they want a mosaic of statelets, mini states, mini governments, a mosaic of them.
What does that mean exactly?
It means that through war, through subversion, destabilization, through military intervention, regime change, they want to take all of the powerful Muslim countries or Arab countries in the Middle East, and they want to dismember them.
They want to divide them up into many different territories.
So take Iraq, for example.
There was a time when Iraq was a major military power, and it was united under Saddam Hussein and his fascist Baathist ideology.
And they wanted to unite the Middle East under this ideology.
With his oil wealth, he built a military, had dreams of developing a nuclear arsenal or an arsenal of chemical and biological weapons.
This is inherently threatening to Israel because Israel, in order to feel secure, needs it to be the case that there are no other countries that threaten it in the region.
So Israel had the United States invade.
Wasn't good enough that we oversaw the destruction of their WMDs.
We had to overthrow Saddam in 2003.
And what they ideally wanted for Iraq was to divide it up into three different countries.
They wanted a Kurdish country, a Shiite country, and a Sunni country.
Same story in Syria.
They looked at the Assad regime, another Baathist regime with a pan-Arab ideology, secular government.
And they wanted to divide Syria up into an Alawite country, a Sunni country, a Kurdish country, a Druze country.
Because if you can take the whole Middle East and turn it into 100 different tiny states, tribes with flags, none of them will have the population or the economy or the military might to threaten Israel.
And systematically, that is, as you know, what has happened to Iraq, to Syria, to Libya.
Every country has been subdued in one way or another.
And their last remaining foe is Iran.
And Iran is a big one because this is a serious country, huge population, huge middle class.
They have a lot of specialists and experts.
They have a lot of universities.
Like, this is a country with some serious potential.
But it is being led by an Islamist regime.
And what that means is that it is a theocracy.
Islam is not just a religious or ceremonial law.
It's also the civic law or the civil law.
Islam is the law of the land.
It is the rule by jurists, by theocratic jurists, chief among them, the Ayatollah.
And they have this ideology, which theoretically could be expansionist.
They could get Shiites in other countries to follow this ideology, like in Bahrain or in Iraq or in Syria or in Lebanon.
And those create allies for Iran.
It allows them to challenge Israel.
And so for as long as this Islamic regime has been in place, which is since 1979, Israel has sought regime change.
They want, as we talked about yesterday, what is a regime change?
They want a different kind of regime.
They do not like a revolutionary Islamist government in such a powerful, big, populous, oil-rich country.
Because a country like that, one, as I said, is powerful enough to challenge Israel, but two, empowered by this ideology, by these ideals, could motivate other groups in the Middle East to work against Israel's interests.
And that has historically been the case.
So Iran is one of Israel's mortal enemies.
But Iran knows this.
Iran saw the fate of Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi and Bashar al-Assad.
And they know that they're next.
They know that what Israel wants is a regime change so that they can pacify, subdue, or dismember Iran.
Well, what is the one thing, what is the only thing in the world that is an absolute check that prevents a country from interfering in your affairs?
It's a nuclear arsenal.
There's a reason that we kidnap Maduro and not Kim Jong-un.
There's a reason that we will bomb Iran with impunity, but we don't think of bombing Russia.
We don't think of bombing China.
When there is even talk of going to war with Russia, people freak out.
Why?
Because Russia has 5,500 nuclear warheads, because China has nuclear warheads, because North Korea has nuclear warheads.
So we don't play with North Korea, even though we could squash them, even though we could win a hypothetical war, we don't even play.
Because at the end of the day, a nuclear bomb is an enormous complication.
And we know that if we intervened in North Korea to try to decapitate the regime or overthrow the government, whatever it is, they have their finger on the trigger and they could nuke South Korea or Japan or Hawaii or California.
So we think twice.
Iran also understands that if you start to build a nuclear arsenal, this invites aggression too.
It's sort of a paradox.
The one thing that protects you from regime change is a nuke.
But if you pursue a nuke, and there's really no way to conceal this, it invites regime change.
If a country starts to pursue a nuclear bomb, it attracts the attention and then the aggression of the United States.
So this is why they've created this hedge, a middle ground.
They want to have the ability to make a bomb, if they so chose, without actually racing towards one.
And so that way, they can have their cake and eat it too.
If it was necessary, they could maybe build a bomb in a short amount of time and then protect themselves.
And the United States would have to think about that.
If they're going to win a war or if they make a move towards a war, they're going to have to move quickly.
Without having the bomb, there is no legitimate pretext for a preemptive strike, necessarily.
And Iran knows that the United States might not do that.
It's not actually strategically valuable.
So Iran has this nuclear hedge.
As I said before, Iran has its proxies all over the Middle East, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria.
Iran also has these intermediate-range ballistic missiles, thousands of them, which they used during the 12-day war last year.
And so, this is basically the matchup as it stands.
Israel, after October 7th, made a decision that they were going to move towards finally and decisively confronting Iran.
They made the decision after Hamas crossed the border that they could no longer tolerate the existence of Palestinians on their border.
They could no longer tolerate the existence of Shiite Iranian-backed forces on their border in Lebanon with Hezbollah, in Yemen with the Houthis, in Iraq with the Popular Mobilization Force, and in Syria with the Assad regime propped up by the Revolutionary Guard.
So, Israel makes this strategic decision.
We cannot abide the status quo, but in order to change the circumstances, we are eventually going to have to go for the head of the snake.
We're going to have to fight Iran directly because Iran is funding all these groups.
But Iran is protected.
They have this layered defense.
If you make a move against Iran, they race towards a nuclear bomb.
If you attack Iran, they have this missile arsenal that they will rain down on you.
If you attack Iran, their proxies will attack you with cheaper, more primitive, but more numerous munitions, smaller rockets from Lebanon, from Yemen, from Iraq, from Gaza, from the West Bank.
And so, this is a layered defense.
You can't just go in and make a move on Iran, because if you do, a few things are going to happen.
Hezbollah hits the button, 1,000 rockets hit Israel.
The Iranian Revolutionary Guard hits the button, 2,000 missiles hit Israel from Iran.
And underground, at Fordo and Natans, they start to build a primitive nuclear device.
And maybe that breakout timeline is three months.
Maybe in two or three months, they have enough highly enriched uranium for a nuclear bomb or a dirty bomb.
And they can declare to the whole world they've withdrawn from the nonproliferation treaty.
They've got a nuke.
And now they're untouchable.
Because all it's going to take is a couple of nukes to destroy Israel.
It wouldn't take much.
So what does Israel do?
This has been the crisis for the past two years, going on three now.
First, they systematically destroyed Iran's proxy network.
They encircled Hamas with their blockade, airstrikes, ground invasion.
They confronted Hezbollah with the Pager attack, of which there were several waves, then thousands of airstrikes, then an invasion, and they compelled a surrender from Hezbollah about 13 months ago.
Then they made their move in Syria.
They collapsed the Assad regime.
The new regime kicked out Iran, shut down the supply lines to Hezbollah, so Hezbollah can't rebuild.
They bombed some critical infrastructure in Yemen, and there is some talk about disarming the popular mobilization force in Iraq.
So they took out the proxies.
What did they do in the 12-day war last year, in June of 2025?
They attacked Iran, invited the United States into the conflict, and they had the United States bomb Iran's fortified nuclear infrastructure at Ford and Natans, which were heavily fortified underground inside mountains.
The United States dropped these bunker-busting 50,000-pound bombs with B-2 bombers, and we took that capability out.
But during that 12-day war, Iran bombarded Israel with hundreds of missiles at a time.
And this was ruinous for Israel.
Israel actually demanded that the United States intercede and bring an end to the conflict because they were getting hit really hard.
Israel is a small country with a small population and they're vulnerable.
So getting hit with hundreds of missiles every day, if Iran is being precise with them and wants them to hurt, it's going to hurt Israel very badly.
They can't fight a sustained war with Iran.
They can't shoot down all of the missiles in perpetuity.
So Israel had to sue for peace.
Now enter December 29th, 2025, just a few weeks ago.
I wasn't here, so we didn't get to cover it.
And it didn't make too many headlines.
But Benjamin Netanyahu made his fifth visit to the United States at the end of December of last year.
And he went to Mar-a-Lago and he was with Trump for it looked like about a week, maybe half a week.
He was at the New Year's Eve party.
They met a few days before that.
And what did Netanyahu go to Mar-a-Lago to ask for?
It's the same thing he's been asking for every time he's gone there in 2025.
He made a visit in February.
He made a visit in April.
He made a visit in July.
He made a visit in September.
He made a visit in December.
And every single meeting, do you know what he asked for?
War with Iran.
Every single one.
When he went to the White House in February, 2025, a week after the inauguration, he was asking Trump to bomb Iran immediately.
When he came in April, after Liberation Day, he asked Trump, are you going to bomb Iran's nuclear program?
That's what gave us a 60-day timeline to negotiate.
When he came in July, he came to celebrate the bombing of Iran.
When he came in September, he came to talk about the Gaza peace plan and a timeline for war with Iran.
And in December, widely reported in the Israeli press, he came with some requests.
And he said a few things, actually, which can be summarized by this.
What Netanyahu asked for in this December meeting with Trump in Mar-a-Lago is escalation on all fronts.
Escalation on every front.
Netanyahu wants to fight in Gaza again.
Netanyahu wants to fight in Lebanon again.
And Netanyahu wants to bomb Iran.
Specifically, in September, we had this widely praised Gaza ceasefire, Gaza peace agreement.
And if you recall, I said at the time, it does not actually constitute a meaningful agreement.
The Gaza ceasefire in September, the terms of it, there were 20 points.
But the agreement in September was only on two parts of it, which is a temporary withdrawal of his temporary partial withdrawal of Israeli forces and a prisoner exchange.
Other than that, there's really no agreement.
And so just like the other ceasefire, which was agreed to around this time last year, which you might remember, a week before the inauguration, there was no agreement on whether there's going to be a Palestinian state, a timeline for Hamas to disarm, no agreement on what the transition is going to look like.
There is no agreement.
In principle, there is no agreement in the letter of the contract what this is going to look like.
And as it stands right now, Hamas is refusing to disarm.
They're not giving up all their weapons.
They said, we're not giving up our machine guns.
We're not giving up our light arms.
And so what does Israel want to do?
They want to go on the offensive.
And now, Hamas doesn't have any hostages, so no leverage.
Israel says we're going to let the Palestinian refugees come into the yellow zone that we control, and then we're just going to kill everybody.
And he's asking Trump for permission to do it.
In Lebanon, Netanyahu has been lobbying the United States and the Lebanese government to disarm Hezbollah.
They want the Lebanese military to take weapons from Hezbollah.
And this is a very difficult political situation.
Israel says that it's not happening fast enough.
Israel wants to go back to war.
Ceasefire was agreed upon in December 2024.
Israel wants to restart operations in Lebanon.
They want a major offensive in South Lebanon.
And finally, most importantly, Israel wants the United States to bomb Iran's missiles.
And this is the big one.
Israel's claim is that after we went to war with Iran last June, that Iran has been buying all these cheap materials to build as many missiles as possible.
They have fully replenished their stock of ballistic missiles and cruise missiles, and they're getting ready to attack Israel.
So, Israel says we need the United States to greenlight an attack or participate and support an attack on Iran's ballistic missile platforms.
Now, again, this goes back to: are you paying attention?
Because if you're paying attention, you saw this coming the entire time.
The goal, going back many years, is regime change in Iran.
And understand there's an important distinction here.
Israel wants regime change, but what they're selling us was denuclearization, right?
In June, how they sold it is they said Iran is two months away from a bomb.
They're going to get a nuclear bomb.
They could use it against the United States.
So Trump needs to take out their nuclear bomb program, right?
They use the nuclear issue, but these are two different things.
Denuclearization and regime change are two different things, but they go hand in hand because you cannot do regime change without denuclearization.
And so why does that inform us about what is going to happen next?
Because bombing Iran's nukes was only one of the steps in a much more ambitious program.
It's not about their nukes.
It's not about their proxies.
It's not about their missiles.
It's about all of those things because all of those things protect the regime from outside intervention.
But everybody, all the normies, all the NPCs, they say, well, we got to take out their nukes.
Oh, well, now we got to take out their missiles.
Their missiles, who cares about their missiles?
Their missiles can't touch the United States.
And here's the thing.
You can make the case that it is in America's interest to pursue the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.
It's not good for America for other countries to have nukes.
We want as few countries to have nukes as possible.
Ideally, we'd be the only ones that have them.
But that is not their endgame.
And look at how quickly they did the bait and switch.
Last June, it was take out the nukes, take out the nukes.
Now it's take out the missiles, take out missiles.
Who cares about the missiles?
That's not our problem.
You're afraid of the missiles?
Well, you should talk to them about that.
Israel should just talk to them.
You want to know why?
Because Iran is a huge country, huge territory, 90 million people, as we all know now, with oil wealth.
They have a 1 million man army.
Yeah, they're going to have missiles.
Missiles are cheap.
Missiles are cheap.
That is the meta.
That is the defensive realist tactic now.
Yes, you're going to have missiles.
So if you have a problem with the missiles, you talk to them about it.
Get Saudi Arabia, get the Emirates, and you talk to them about the missiles.
That's not a problem for Washington.
Their missiles can't hit the United States from all the way over there.
And why would Iran want to hit us with missiles?
Leave them alone.
This is about helping Israel, not for them to feel safe, but to clear the way to expand and escalate the war.
Take out the nukes.
Now take out the missiles.
So this is the meeting that happens in late December.
Suffice to say, Netanyahu makes these requests of Trump.
He says, I want to go back to war in Gaza.
They're not abiding by the deal.
They're not disarming.
I want to go to war in Lebanon.
I want a comprehensive escalation there because the Lebanese government is not disarming them.
And we need to take out Iran's missiles.
And if you recall, what did Trump say at the meeting?
Trump said, if Iran rebuilds its nukes, we'll definitely bomb them.
He says, if Iran rebuilds its missiles, we'll look strongly at bombing them.
And so according to sources that were briefed on this, they didn't agree to a timeline or any specificity, but Trump was not adamantly against this.
Okay, so Trump is open to expanding the war.
Sure enough.
Wow, what a coincidence.
Sure enough, days after this meeting between Trump and Netanyahu, you get these giant protests.
Giant protests grip Tehran and grip the west of the country.
And now they're saying the regime is cracking down and murdering people.
This is what the New York Times said about it.
It said, quote, as the Iranian authorities impose a total communication blackout on a country convulsed by mass protests, the government is waging one of its deadliest crackdowns on unrest in more than a decade.
Eyewitnesses say government forces have begun opening fire, apparently with automatic weapons and at times seemingly indiscriminately on unarmed protesters.
Hospital workers say protesters have been coming in with pellet injuries, now arriving with gunshot wounds and skull fractures.
One doctor called it a mass casualty situation.
In videos uploaded by opposition activists on social media, families can be seen sobbing as they huddle together over bloodied corpses and unzipped bags.
Those who still support Iran's theocratic government and those in the streets calling for its downfall agree.
These are days of brutality, unlike anything they have ever seen.
Multiple American officials say that U.S. intelligence agencies have conservatively estimated that more than 600 protesters have been killed so far.
The agencies have noted that both the current protests and the crackdown are far more violent than those in 2022 or other recent uprisings against the government.
A senior Iranian health ministry official speaking on the condition of anonymity said about 3,000 people have been killed across the country but sought to shift the blame to terrorists fomenting unrest.
So the week after Netanyahu is in Mar-a-Lago again for the fifth time, the fifth time, visiting Trump, begging him to go to war with Iran, all of a sudden.
And this is from the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, all these papers, it is just atrocity propaganda.
It is just one thing after the next.
Body bags stacking up, protesters shot with automatic weapons, indiscriminate murder.
This is from CBS News.
It says information trickling out of Iran suggests that a crackdown by authorities to end two weeks of widespread anti-government protests is far more deadly than activists outside the country have reported.
With phone lines opening back up, two sources, including one inside Iran, told CBS that 12,000, maybe 20,000 have been killed.
Okay, so which is it?
So some are saying it's 500, okay?
Some are saying 500.
Some are saying 3,000.
CBS News, which is run by Barry Weiss, says could be 12,000, could be 20,000.
Why not just make it an even million?
Why not just make it an even 7 million, a 10 million, 100 million?
Like seriously.
So some 500, it's anywhere between 500 and 20,000.
Really?
You have no idea, no clue.
So it could be 5,000.
It could be 500,000.
We really have no way of knowing.
And so some are saying the official number says 500.
Some sources say 3,000.
Barry Weiss at CBS News, well, she's got a source in the country that no one else knows that says it could be 20,000.
Okay.
And it's in this context that now they're begging Trump to make a move here and intervene in Iran to support the pro-democracy protesters.
Everybody's whipped up.
And here's another thing about Iran.
There have been massive protests.
There have been uprisings in Iran for as long as the Islamic Republic has existed, and especially in the past 15 years.
They had their Green Revolution.
They had major protests in 2019, in 2022, in 2025.
And again, now, they have protests all the time.
This is just what happens there.
I will add, where the protests are occurring, this is all happening in the west of the country, in a lot of Kurdish-majority areas.
And so just like with Iraq, just like with Syria, once again, you have the Kurds, which are very much in bed with the Israelis, which have this cross-border connection with the Kurds in Iraq.
They seem to be stirring up a lot of the violence.
They seem to be stirring up a lot of the chaos.
A lot of these cities that had the worst protests and disproportionately represented among those that have been arrested and died, it's all Kurds.
In other words, it's all an ethnic minority.
It's an ethnic minority that has their own ambitions or aspirations for statehood, peoplehood.
In other words, they want their own country.
And it's those people, it seems, that are taking up arms, those people that seem to be responsible for a disproportionate amount of the violence.
So is this a spontaneous demonstration?
Is this a spontaneous uprising?
People are mad about the economy.
No doubt people are mad about the economy.
No doubt.
The currency collapsed.
One of their major state-run banks collapsed.
Iran is in real trouble.
But how did we get here and why?
It is because of 15 years of sanctions, industrial sabotage.
We have been in a state of war with this country.
We will not literally not let them exist.
Now you have all these protests.
And it's in this context now that there is talk about airstrikes against Iran.
This is where we are right now.
So so far, Trump has announced 25%.
Effectively, they are secondary sanctions.
He's calling them tariffs.
Trump has announced a 25% tariff on all countries that continue to do business with Iran.
This is a report on that.
It says, on Monday, President Trump announced he would impose a 25% tariff on any country doing business with Iran, which, if enforced, could add to the economic pain among Iranians that sparked large-scale protests inside the country.
On True Social, he said, quote, effective immediately, any country doing business with the Islamic Republic of Iran will pay a tariff of 25% on any and all business being done with the United States of America.
The tariffs could affect China, Turkey, the Emirates, Iraq, India, and all major trading partners of Iran.
Now, we'll see if that even holds up.
It might be struck down in court and it might not even be enforced.
But he is tightening the noose around Iran.
This is part of a maximum pressure campaign to create chaos inside the country.
Then, Trump discussed potential options to strike today at a number of press pools.
He said that help is on the way for the protesters.
This is from the New York Times.
It says, quote, on two occasions on Tuesday, President Trump told Iranians protesting against their government that help is on the way.
The latest sign that the U.S. might soon take action against a regime that mounting evidence shows has killed thousands of demonstrators during a popular revolt.
The message indicated that Trump is on the verge of a fresh intervention in Iran, potentially wading the U.S. into a confrontation with the country to support an uprising against state repression and a flailing economy.
Make Iran great again, he said after visiting a factory calling the situation fragile.
Trump for days has received briefings from top members of his team, including Vice President Advance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who have presented him with a suite of options ranging from diplomacy with Tehran to military strikes.
Many of the options are non-kinetic, meaning non-military, officials say.
If Trump does decide to authorize an attack, his options to do so are limited by the shift of military personnel and equipment to the Caribbean, which is kind of nice to hear.
There are currently only six U.S. Navy warships in the Middle East, three littoral combat ships, three destroyers, versus 12 in the Caribbean.
Twice as many ships here as there are there.
There is no aircraft carrier strike group either since Trump ordered the Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group from the Mediterranean to the Caribbean in October.
Well, Sometimes I guess Groupers know what they're talking about, huh?
Go figure.
So listen to this.
We might not strike Iran because all of our ships are in the Western Hemisphere and not in the Middle East.
Wow, it's almost like a foreign policy of hemispheric defense is inherently America first.
It's almost like a foreign policy that puts our U.S. military assets inside of our sphere of influence is an inherently America first position.
Go figure.
So we have all our ships in the Caribbean to pick up Maduro to take his oil, and we have none of them over there to bomb Iran for Israel.
Says the Pentagon could still order Tomahawk missile strikes from destroyers in the Middle East, as well as send bombers and jet fighters stationed in the region equipped with long-range weapons, protecting American troops.
Stationed in the region also becomes more precarious without an aircraft carrier and its accompanying destroyers, which are equipped with the Aegis combat system that provides the ability to shoot down incoming missiles.
So here's the thing: a few things.
You have these protests.
And let us just say, first and foremost, this is all exaggerated.
You are in a media distortion field right now.
Just know that.
When you watch the news, when you read the news, and they are talking about atrocities and violence and crackdown on the protesters and all this, this is propaganda.
This is a media distortion field.
They are distorting reality because the U.S. government and its other institutions like the U.S. media are in the business of democracy promotion.
They are in the business of democratic globalism.
They want a regime change in Iran.
It is their wet dream that a secular, liberal, Iranian revolution, a white revolution, overthrows the Islamic Republic and creates a Persian democracy or a Persian monarchy.
So when you're seeing all this stuff, like what I just read from Barry Weiss, Israel-controlled CBS News, from the New York Times, from the Rupert Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal, from any of them, this is all being exaggerated.
This is all being embellished.
And then it is being amplified on social media.
How are protesters trying to get internet inside of Iran?
They're beaming up to Starlink.
They're beaming up to Starlink internet.
Why?
Because SpaceX, which puts Starlink satellites in the air, is a U.S. military project.
Elon Musk is one of the biggest defense contractors in America.
Because Starlink and Starshield, that is one of the biggest and best tools that only the United States has in Ukraine, in Iran, in other countries.
So are you surprised that SpaceX, Starlink owner Elon Musk, has on the X platform amplification of all this atrocity propaganda about Iran?
Elon owns the satellites that the protesters are using to organize, communicate, and resist.
He owns the platform where the rising itself is backed, funded, equipped by the CIA, by the State Department.
Okay, that is what the National Endowment for Democracy is for.
That is what USAID used to do.
And by the way, the State Department just absorbed a lot of USAID's functions.
People think USAID doesn't exist anymore.
That's not really true.
It just got absorbed into the State Department.
So the CIA, the NED, the NGOs, they're all operating in Iran.
They're all supporting this.
CIA is in Iran supporting this.
Okay, they're fully backing the protests.
The protests themselves are astroturfed.
Their complaints are fake.
Why is Iran undergoing a currency crisis?
Because we have a maximum pressure economic strangulation strategy against them.
We've embargoed their oil.
We have sanctioned their economy.
We have for years and put a stranglehold on it.
So between fomenting the subversion in the country, making the material conditions worse through industrial sabotage and sanctions, then on top of that, embellishing all of it in the Western media, all of this is meant to create a pretext.
This is meant to create a pretext to intervene.
If nothing was going on in Iran, if everybody woke up and it was just a normal day in Iran, there would be no impetus for the United States to drop bombs on them.
Time to launch a preemptive strike and destroy all their military capabilities.
Why?
We need an excuse to do it.
So last year, they said, well, Iran's on the verge of a nuke.
Now they're saying, well, these protests are engulfing the country.
But Iran is very good at putting down protests because they are brutal.
No doubt about it.
People are being killed.
But I imagine these are protesters that are armed, most likely foreign-backed.
These are not really nonviolent resistors.
These are armed, organized protesters, maybe with a foreign connection.
So Iran shut down the internet and they just started shooting these people.
And now it's over.
The regime has rallied.
The protests are over.
And so what is happening now?
Well, it seems that all of this zeal to intervene has evaporated equally.
Last week, they were saying intervention is imminent.
We're going to drop bombs any moment now.
There were a lot of conflicting reports coming out of the administration.
Some reports said that the United States and Israel want to postpone an attack until March when they can get ready.
They can move the necessary assets into the region, prepare the logistics, do what they got to do.
Others said that an attack is literally imminent.
We have to strike while the iron is hot.
We have to take advantage of the moment.
The government's on the verge of collapse.
And what would be the target of the strike?
It would be the besiege.
It would be the domestic security force.
Now, what is the goal of the strike?
If there are apparently these pro-democracy protests that are being crushed so brutally, and these are huge protests, they really have a chance at overturning the government.
Let me just say first and foremost, that is never going to overthrow the Islamic Republic, okay?
The Islamic Republic of Iran has a one million man army.
The Iranian Revolutionary Guard is massive.
The Iranian armed forces is massive.
And they're well armed and they're organized and they're experienced.
And above all, they're loyal.
They're true believers.
They're loyal to the Ayatollah.
They're loyal to the regime.
And so the idea that like thousands of protests are going to take to the streets and demand the end of the government, that does not actually overturn the government because Iran will just kill them.
That's what happened in Syria.
It took 14 years, or what is it?
Yeah, I guess it's 14 years for Bashar al-Assad to be overthrown.
And Assad was a fraction as powerful as Iran.
And that was with sustained armed resistance.
That was with your Syrian Democratic Force.
That was with your Peshmerga.
That was with the Kurds.
That was with this rally against ISIS, with ISIS Air Force, the United States.
That's with the Russian Air Force.
I guess the Russian Air Force was in favor of the regime, but you understand.
This was a fight.
This is a civil war between two armed groups, one with some ideas, with weapons, with foreign backing, the other being the regime.
The idea that Iran is going to be pushed over because thousands of protests came out and fought with the cops, they will just send in the army with the guns and start shooting these people and they'll just start dying and people start running away.
And then that's it.
So what was the Trump administration going to do?
Well, at one point, it was alleged, as I said, they were going to bomb Iran's domestic security forces, the besiege, which is like a militia.
These guys in particular are looking out for spies.
Now, would you guess that on the last day of the 12-day war in June of last year, these were the types of targets that Israel was pounding hundreds of times before the ceasefire went into effect?
When Israel attacked Iran last year, they targeted these government buildings.
They targeted the military leadership.
They targeted the domestic security force.
And as that deadline approached that Trump imposed for the ceasefire, they hit the besiege really hard, hit the domestic security really hard.
Why did they do that?
Did they do that because they thought the government is going to be overthrown tomorrow?
No.
They did that because this is part of a systemic effort to degrade Iran's ability to defend itself.
They want to make it so that they have this expression, they say they're trimming the grass, they're mowing the grass.
They want to keep Iran weak and off balance.
I don't think there's any idea that these protests are really going to lead to the end of the regime.
But will they justify more U.S. intervention?
Yes.
Will they allow Israel and the United States to take out missile platforms?
Will it allow them to degrade Iran's internal security, their domestic security?
Yes.
And what does that lead to?
Well, maybe the regime doesn't fall tomorrow, but it forestalls diplomacy.
The more that the United States has blood on our hands, the more that we intervene, the less willing they are to negotiate.
And if Iran is not willing to negotiate, then war is inevitable.
And that is what Israel wants.
Two, if we hit their missile platforms, if we hit their internal security, it makes them more prone.
The cancer can grow.
The cancer can spread.
More subversion, more infiltration, more destabilization.
Without the missiles, they're less able to defend themselves.
This is about creating a tempo.
It's about creating a rhythm.
Like I said, Israel has been doing industrial sabotage, cyber attacks.
Then in 2024, they provoked Iran twice.
They're blowing up Iranian Revolutionary Guard commanders in Syria.
And then they assassinated the leader of Hamas in Tehran on their inauguration day.
Then they launched a preemptive strike.
Now we want to do a democracy promotion strike and maybe hit some of their missiles too.
It's about this orchestrated escalation, which will lead inevitably to a decisive confrontation.
And what does that mean?
It means a straight-up war.
Because how are you going to decapitate the Iranian regime?
It's not like Venezuela where you kidnap one guy.
You can't just shoot their missiles from the air.
This is a hardened, fortified regime.
They are underground.
They build their missiles underground in underground cities.
And they're not these little tunnels like Hamas digs.
They're actually like cities.
These are fortresses underground and they are dug in.
You want to kidnap the Ayatollah?
We don't even know where he is.
Maduro, they clocked him.
They knew.
The Ayatollah, they couldn't find him last year.
So this is not Venezuela.
This is not Assad.
This is not Gaddafi.
This is a serious country with a serious capability and military.
And if you want to overthrow this government, it's going to involve armed resistance, probably from the Kurds, from Balochistan, from ISIS, from maybe some kind of liberal opposition, supplemented by U.S. air power, but even that won't be enough.
I really truly believe that in the end, it is going to demand some kind of U.S. ground force.
And I know that sounds crazy and it sounds unlikely, but you will not achieve a regime change without actually putting the boots on the ground.
You cannot defeat an army by just dropping some bombs.
If you can't do it against Hezbollah, you're not going to do it against Iran.
If you can't do it against Assad, you can't do it against Iran.
And what I'm worried about, again, is that we are set in this tid for tat reciprocal escalation for which there is no off-ramp.
And Israel is holding our hand, walking us down the road towards an inevitable war.
Now, what happened this week is that the protest got crushed.
And now it seems that if the United States bombs Iran, a couple of things are going to happen.
First of all, Iran is no longer completely vulnerable.
And if we hit Iran now, it might actually rally the pro-regime forces.
Bombing Iran's government might actually have the opposite of the intended effect.
So that's one.
Two, and this is really important.
If we bomb Iran, Iran will retaliate against U.S. bases, maybe against Israel, depending on who hits them and where and when.
Iran is going to strike back against Israel, certainly against U.S. bases.
And if they launch hundreds of missiles, if it is a legitimate retaliation, you're going to need an aircraft carrier.
You're going to need destroyers there to intercept and detect these missiles.
If you want to put on a competent, successful defense of Israel or Al Udaid and Qatar or other U.S. bases in the region, you're going to want actually a real force package, which we do not have.
There's no carrier strike group there.
We don't have enough boats over there.
Do you want to go to war with Iran or risk a war with Iran?
You need some element of deterrence.
And even in April 24, in July 24, when we were at risk of intervening against Iran, Biden brought out the big guns to deter, to deter a more forceful retaliation.
Without those military assets in the region, theoretically, we're pretty vulnerable.
Israel's pretty vulnerable.
So do they attack Iran, risk an escalation without the necessary force package?
You risk actually this reversal where you galvanize the pro-regime forces.
And so now Israel and all the Gulf countries are lobbying Washington to hold back on a strike.
And this is from the Times of Israel.
It says, quote, Israeli and Arab officials have suggested the Trump administration hold off on striking Iran for now, believing the Islamic Republic may not be sufficiently weak in order for an American attack to topple it.
The network says the Israeli and Arab officials prefer the U.S. wait to strike Iran until the Iranian regime is further stretched.
According to NBC, Israeli officials told their American interlocutors that they strongly support regime change and U.S. efforts to bring it about, but are worried that foreign military action may not be enough.
They also reportedly suggested the U.S. act in other ways to destabilize the regime and support the protesters who could do more to undermine the Islamic Republic until strikes could have a decisive role.
Among the actions that NBC says Israel proposed are assisting Iranians get around the communications shutdown, toughening economic sanctions, engaging in a cyber attack, or launching targeted strikes against specific senior leaders in Iran that could spur the regime's demise.
So now Israel and the Arabs don't even want us to intervene.
Notably, however, the United Arab Emirates seems to be ambivalent.
They seem to want us to do it.
But every other country is telling us hurt their economy more, ratchet up the pressure on sanctions, secondary sanctions, the 25% tariff against Iran's trading partners.
They're saying conduct cyber attacks, assassinate key figures, make it ripe for regime change, and then go in in March.
And here's the timeline: Israel and Trump are very conscious of the fact that this is a midterm election year.
You don't want to roll the dice right before the election.
You don't want to give the Democrats a layup and say that Trump is bringing us to war in Iran.
You don't want to take the chance.
So both Israel and the United States know that whatever we're going to do, if we're going to do anything, it needs to happen probably before the summer.
So I think the timeline for a U.S. strike on Iran is probably the spring, like March.
I think they're going to ratchet up the economic pressure.
There's going to be some kind of action will take place this week, I think.
Something's going to happen.
Well, I don't know if it'll be a missile strike, but it'll be something.
And they will use those other means, those non-kinetic means, cyber, economic, psychological, whatever.
They'll get it ready.
And then in February or March, when we put a couple of carrier strike groups in the region, that's when you're going to get another provocation.
Whether it's an uprising, Israel fears a preemptive attack.
You're going to get all that propaganda.
And rest assured, we're going back in.
And we're going back in because the tension has not been resolved.
Iran was building the nukes.
We bombed the nukes.
Okay, well, now they're rebuilding their missiles.
So we got to bomb the missiles.
Okay, well, they're going to rebuild them after that.
Once you neuter the regime, what do you do?
You topple it.
And what's really interesting is watching JD Vance squirm.
You know, the vice president is dying to become president.
JD Vance, more than anything, and so does everybody else in the GOP matrix.
They want Vance to be the president.
And Vance knows this stuff is going to absolutely destroy his chances in 28.
If we put Boots on the ground in Iran, he is fucked.
And so what has been absolutely delicious to witness is JD Vance distancing himself from this all the time.
You know, I saw this story in the Washington Post.
JD Vance says that he's very concerned.
He doesn't want Boots on the ground.
He's lobbying against interventions.
And his people are slipping those stories.
His people are planting those stories.
And they did it last year, too.
They want everybody to know JD doesn't want a war.
JD, lobby Trump not to go to war because he knows where this is headed.
He knows the road we're going down.
He knows it leads to a war.
And he knows he is going to absolutely own it in 28.
He is going to have to own it.
And there's nowhere you can run.
He's going to try to blame it on Rubio.
Come 27, 28, he's going to say, well, that was Marco's profile or that was Marco's portfolio.
Vance is going to say, I was handling all that other stuff like Charlie Kirk's funeral and mass deportations and cracking down on Antifa.
That's Marco's portfolio.
He managed the Venezuelan regime change and the war in Iran and all the other stuff.
And you can bet 100% that is the play.
Because I see this every day this week.
It's a new thing.
Vance says Vance is against it.
Vance is, nevertheless, he persisted.
He doesn't want a war with Iran.
Yeah, because he knows it's his fat ass in 28 if we get one.
So.
You know, he should be more concerned with just stopping a war with Iran than convincing everybody that he tried to, you know.
But we'll see.
So that's my prediction on Iran.
That's my outlook.
I think that something is going to happen this week.
I don't think it will be a missile strike, but I think we are going to increase the posture over there.
And we're going to get something in the next couple of months.
They got to get it out of the way before the midterms.
Israel's been asking for it, and they're going to get it.
Israel gets what they ask for.
And obviously, I oppose this.
I am not in favor of regime change in Iran.
Everybody calls me a neocon.
Let me put this very simply for you.
If it's an intervention in the hemisphere that our country is in, I'm probably in favor of it.
If it's an intervention on the half of the world that our country is not in, I'm probably against it.
People say that's a flip-flop.
People say that's a contradiction.
People say this is, you know, I say some good things, some bad things.
It's really very simple.
If the intervention is happening between the Pacific and Atlantic Ocean and the Americas, I probably think it's a good idea.
Greenland, Panama, Cuba, Venezuela, sure.
If it's an intervention on the side of the planet that we don't live in, that we're separated from by an ocean on either side that has nothing to do with us, probably against it.
War in Iran, war in Ukraine, war in Congo, probably against it.
But people are saying that's a flip-flop.
One day he says he's in favor of Venezuela.
The next he says he's against Iran.
Yeah.
It's called Monroe Doctrine, Hemispheric Defense, what we've always been in favor of.
Iran is all the way over there.
Doesn't really pose a threat to us.
Venezuela, Cuba, they're right here.
You could throw a rock and hit Cuba.
And they're getting their oil from Venezuela, like it's right here.
That's America first.
Anyway, so it goes without saying I'm against this whole thing.
I think that the country that needs to be restrained is Israel.
Israel is pushing this, the subversion, the destabilization, the march towards war.
This is what Israel wants.
This is in their best interest.
It really doesn't matter for us.
And look, Iran is pursuing a rapprochement with Saudi Arabia, with Egypt, with all these other countries.
We could work with Iran just like we worked with Saudi Arabia.
People say it's an Islamist country that kills women and gays.
It's like, dude, we are allies with Saudi Arabia for 100 years.
You think it's impossible to be allied with a theocracy?
Of course we could have a working relationship with Iran.
Of course we could.
It just has to be built up over time with mutual assurances, trust.
The country that is undermining that relationship is Israel because they want us to do their bidding.
They want to sabotage that and they want to take that off of the table so that our only option is a decisive military confrontation, which happens to be the only way Israel is going to get rid of Iran.
So I don't want Iran to have a nuclear bomb, but I also don't support regime change.
I like the nuclear deal.
Let them have a nuclear deal.
Build, you can build a balancing architecture between them and Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Arabia could get a nuclear program.
Iran has a nuclear program.
Just have some kind of trigger mechanism.
If Iran reaches a certain point, then the Saudis and the Emiratis activate theirs.
Like, wouldn't that be better than another ground war in the Middle East?
It's crazy.
But it is this country that has been trying to prevent that from happening.
They need to be restrained.
And if we could hold them back, then we could do what we want with Iran.
So, anyway, that's that.
But I do want to move on.
We're going to take a look at our super chats.
We'll see what you guys have to say.
Were we having some technical difficulties or something?
You read the replies of any post, and a lot of the anti-Semitic content is just like, it's just the lowest IQ stuff about Jews.
And they don't really care.
You know, it's just, it's literally just a grab bag of cheap, easy engagement farming, anti-Israel stuff.
Like when I'll give you an example, when Maduro was kidnapped, I went in my group chat and I said, watch, I could go and tweet something so facile, like, should have been Netanyahu.
100 trillion likes.
Easy.
I'll print them.
I literally said, I went on my group chat.
I said, if I went on Twitter and posted some completely facile, inane, cheap, obvious, if I made it about Israel in some way, I will print 400 billion likes, 400 trillion impressions.
And sure enough, that's what all these idiots were doing.
unidentified
We should do that to Netanyahu.
The regime change we should be doing is an Israel.
Every day, it's the same grab bag slop of the same.
It's like, we got it.
Do you have anything else to say?
You know, I thought I'm not, look, I don't want to put anybody on blast, but some of these people, they don't, they don't know anything about anything.
All they know is how to press that button.
You go to one of these people, you say, hey, what does Congress do?
What's the difference between the House of Representatives and the Senate?
Could you tell me?
And they would not be able to, they'd say, so the House is the Jews and the Senate is the House.
Mark Felton has a very cool video going into detail about the possibility that Hitler's actual charred remains may be in a known mass grave under the parking lot in the Fuhrer bunker vicinity.
The Bunkers SS soldiers were not dumb enough to dump their bosses and Ava's body in a hole directly in front of the bunker's exit.
Post-war.
Iron Wolf sent $50.
Post-war.
Spear stated that one of Hitler's biggest fears in his last days was that the Soviets would desecrate his Neva's corpses, like Mussolini's.
Hitler would have definitely had a plan in place to make sure his body wasn't captured.
Daniel Hakakot, you is an Islamic extremist who has come out in support of the execution of Christians who blaspheme Muhammad, child marriage, cousin marriage, and the Islamization of America.
Are you even remotely thought that radical Islamists could be allies of Christians or America?
Dear Nick, given the recent wave of dark incarnations of political movements, X, Dark Mega, Dark Brandon, and most recently Dark Woke, what would need to unfold before a dark America first emerges too?
Now that Punishnik has finally surfaced, might the time soon be apostolic.
Gino sent $75.
You need a big crucifix or Catholic ornaments in your studio to represent.
Christopher Frex, have you seen Timothy Gordon's Catholic documentary on feminism?
Post-war consensus is death-changing.
More and more World War II movies and books from the German perspective last several of years.
Yeah, you see about the National Socialist Network.
Such a shame.
I'm surprised.
I thought that LARPing as Nazis would result in them taking over the government one day.
I'm truly shocked at the result.
Did you see this?
The National Socialist Network had to officially disband because the government outlawed like Hitler salutes and Joel Davis is like a political prisoner in solitary confinement forever.
It's unfortunate, but I have to say, I'm truly shocked and surprised.
You know, I thought their strategy of wearing all black and saying ban niggers, not knives.
I thought that would lead to them galvanizing most of the country to like take over the government.
And I'm surprised that instead the government simply made them illegal and threw them all in jail.
I'm really surprised at the result because they were all telling me like, you're a cuck.
You're an optics cuck.
I know you're trying to go mainstream, but that's not hardcore enough.
And I was like an idiot telling them, you're going to get thrown in jail.
That's never going to work.
I'm truly surprised that this has happened.
You know what's funny?
You know that clip when I say, how can you call it a movement when you have no motion?
Do you know I was talking about Joel Davis in that clip?
Because I was, he disagreed with me and I was trash talking him on Telegram.
And he replied, and he's like, you're being really mean.
I know the movement will have my back against this uncivil discourse.
And I said, there is no movement.
I said, I'm the movement.
I said, the movement will have your back.
There's no movement except for me.
How can you call it a movement when you have no motion?
That's where that came from.
And now, well, he's in prison.
So, and I'm not happy about that.
It's horrible what they're doing to him, but you know, he thought he was better than me.
He was so smug all the time.
Who do you think you are, big shot?
He's got the pit vipers on.
Like, you're an anti-social freak.
Who do you think you are?
So he was always talking to me so arrogant and smug.
It's like, so first of all, I'm successful and you're not.
Like, let's just start here.
I am one of the most influential people in the world empire on our side of this thing.
And you are in Australia doing retard rallies.
Like, so let's just start with a little respect.
Let's put a little respect on my name first.
And well, you know, this has been the debate, though, for many, many, many years.
You know, same as it ever was.
People long, the Goyam long to dress up in costumes.
The Goyam long to roleplay.
They just want to put on the costume and take a picture of themselves.
Stupid Goyam want to dress up like the Joker.
They want to dress up like Patrick Bateman.
They want to dress up like Hitler.
They want to dress up like the Nazis.
They long for the roleplay.
They want to get in a big field and play make-believe.
I saw you.
You're dead.
And we have to, as Goyam, we have to be better than that.
We have to move beyond.
Somebody says Joel was smarter than Nick.
Well, he's in prison.
So I don't know if he's that much smarter then.
We have to move beyond our infantile need to play dress up and play make-believe.
We have to live in the world in which we inhabit the real world.
Dressing up is not going to save anything.
Cargo culting, a German workers' party from 100 years ago is not the move.
The move is to analyze how power works in our time, the political system, the particular conditions, and to try to increase your power as much as possible through whatever means.
That's politics.
And if you're not ready, if that's not sexy enough for you, if that doesn't get you jazzed up, if that doesn't get a raging boner for you, well, I don't know, man.
I know you have apprehensions of doing in-person events, but we can't let the radical left win.
In-person events such as IPAC and expanding into local chapters are a very necessary evolution of this movement to the sense of community and growth it'll bring.
There's movement as all many young men have in their lives right now.
Some Libtard goes James O'Keefe style, films everybody.
They all lose their jobs.
Period.
End of story.
That's what happens.
We have Groypers all over the government.
We have an half-pack.
Some of them are inevitably going to go.
They get seen there, photographed there.
They all lose their jobs.
And like, we, you know, we can't afford all these setbacks.
We're building a cadre.
The word is cadre.
We are building a cadre of professionals, money people, bureaucrats, and we need them to all be, you know, waving the flag, but quietly, ideologically loyal, personally loyal.
We need them to do it discreetly, quietly, you know, underground, undercover.
And people are making advances, but if they raise their head above the ground, they're going to get their heads cut off.
You turn 18 and then your life just goes in a blink.
You know, everyone talks about this, but your childhood feels like it's forever.
And then you turn 18 and it's like, and it's important to just do something with your time every day.
Something, a skill, a hobby, education, whatever, but just don't waste time.
You will regret immensely all of the wasted time.
I've wasted so much time, but the one thing I do every day is I turn on the camera and I go live.
And if you do something like that every day and you put effort in and you work on it and you invest in yourself and, you know, it's different for everybody, but you do what you got to do.
And we all know what we got to do.
You will feel very good about where you are.
You will be farther along than you otherwise would have been.
So don't look at it.
I'm very against like the New Year's resolution thing because you have to change the habits.
People say, well, I'm going to change in the new year.
You have to change today.
Today is the same in 2025, 2026, 2027.
You just have to start to do it and get those reps and develop the consistency.
So you're 22.
You're young.
You know, you're not running out of time, but you should use your time.
Make time your ally by investing in yourself every day, you know, and whatever that means, your future in one way or another.
I've lost multiple friends in the past two to three months over me posting about how blacks and Mexicans have taken over our city, which used to be predominantly white, and how I feel like a minority in our city.
And my mom has not talked to me lately because I said I don't support Trump fully anymore and we are ran by Israel.
Hey, Nick, I find it super funny how I'm a traded American nationalist online, but her, I'm a light-skinned Dominican with a lot of black friends and pulls girls.
Hey, Nick, will the Grow Hipers be deployed during the primaries or would it be too risky for you and everyone else caused of current political tensions?
Nick, with Minnesota and Illinois suing over the federal invasion by ICE agents, the shooting in Minneapolis, and Trump sending hundreds more feds there, what do you make of blue states resisting mass deportations like this?
Is this the start of real pushback against the great replacement or just more kukri from sanctuary dems?
In November, Nigel Farage appointed his new global affairs advisor Alan Minoza, founder of the Henry Jackson Society, chair of UK Jewish National Fund.
His wife co-chairs the Jewish Leadership Council and works directly with bud slash WJC executive Phil Rosenberg.
Today, the Iraqi Kurdish UAE fixer Tori MP switched over to reform.
I'm hoping we get to see Nick featuring Tucker slash Candace Part 2 podcast, but this time they get on Rumble for some real unfiltered conversation.
Hey, Tucker, call JD Vance's wife Ajit.
Smiley face emoji.
Groit Bob sent $25.
So there's really no off-ramp for Iran, right?
Is there a chance denuclearization slash commitment to peace could diminish Western approval for war enough, or does that open up the door to false flags?
Israel does it anyway and they end up like Libya.
If he's sent $20, bro, did you see the debate between Anakas Parian and Pearl?
Did you see three weeks ago that former CIA agent John Kariako said that Nevada had threatened nuclear action against Iran and Trump didn't authorize the June strikes?
Also, do you think there is a growing chance that the GOP Matrix tries to get Trump a third term or Vancouver without an election through war or other means?
I give you seen these low IQ anti-Semites lately saying good goy to people supporting the chat that put down George Foyd because they're supporting America in any way and they perceive that as goyish, as if supporting lesbian anti-whites who want mass migration isn't the most goy decision ever.
Alex Pacheco sent $20.
You look so cute with your beard.
Also, you're invited to Lake Tahoe this summer.
Niggas love Tahoe.
Diddy Bobby02 sent $20.
Hey, handsome.
Love the beard, but definitely try the mustache.
Harry Moot sent $20.
Sneeko put Leafy onto you and I started watching your cozy TV through those laughy calls W Sneeko.
David Irving 88 sent $20.
George Foyd eating snooze in HellerN.
Just S0 Mess Pace Cowboy sent $20.
What do you think it will take or will Trump ever take any actions against the government officials threatening to use state, local and state troops against federal troops and dies?
Do you think this time around it's different with us going to war with Iran on behalf of Israel because most people see it for what it is unlike the war in Iraq?
Amazing, amazing stuff, guys, especially towards the end there.
It was just great.
Well, that's all I got for you.
Remember to smash the follow button, smash the like button, leave a comment.
I'm on the air Monday through Friday.
Check out the merch site, Fuentis.store, subscribe at AmericaFirst.plus.
Special thanks to our top super chatters.
Huge thanks to Midnight Squirrel, Leviathan, Toucan, Sexy and Unique, Callie Groyper, Hoplite, Iron Wolf, America First Groyper, Weaverising, T Muxum, JTED, Joe Biden's, Depends.
Amazing.
Average John and Moon Groyper.
Special thanks to them.
Thanks to all our super chatters, everybody that watches.