Nick Fuentes analyzes the ADL's removal of its hate glossary under pressure, framing it as a victory against an oppressive force while warning that groups like Beitar USA will replace them. He critiques Trump and Netanyahu's Gaza peace plan as a sham enabling permanent Israeli control and discusses alleged Israeli collusion in the 2016 election to scuttle the Iran nuclear deal. Fuentes promotes his "Christian futurist" ideology, arguing for an independent nationalist movement outside the two-party system controlled by Jewish interests, while addressing censorship struggles and conspiracy theories regarding globalist media dominance. [Automatically generated summary]
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and, in some cases, quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
Our corpses paved the way for you now to walk over.
And you can't give us acknowledgement.
Now you want to slam the door on us.
It's not right.
unidentified
It's not right.
I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us.
For the creation waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed.
We know that the whole creation has been groaning, as in the pains of childbirth, right up to the present time.
Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption to sonship, the redemption of our bodies.
For in this hope we were saved.
But hope that is seen is no hope at all.
Who hopes for what they already have?
But if we hope for what we do not yet have, we wait for it patiently.
There is something involved where we have to forgive them.
We do have to forgive them for their ignorance.
We do have to forgive them for their misunderstanding.
And we have to embrace them and say, better late than never.
Welcome to the right side of history.
Welcome to our massive vision, our massive and ambitious vision for how we want the world to be.
He's like, this is probably pretty cool for you.
I'm like, yeah, it is.
unidentified
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God.
And the word was God.
Through him, all things were made.
Without him, nothing was made that has been made.
In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind.
And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers.
He will crush your head.
And you will strike his heel.
Jesus said to her, I am the resurrection and the life.
The one who believes in me will live even though they die.
And whoever lives by believing in me will never die.
Do you believe this?
I am sending you out like sheep among wolves.
Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.
Then Jesus came to them and said, All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.
Jesus Christ's Future00:03:02
unidentified
And surely I am with you always to the very end of the age.
We have to want it more than they do because if there are thousands and millions and tens of millions and hundreds of millions of Christians ready to meet their final destiny, then nothing can stop us and nothing will.
unidentified
When I get home, I want you I got places to be Evening everybody You're watching America First.
that america was different because we are different palantir is an ai data analytics company
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithms, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so, many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
It's unstoppable.
unidentified
And the reason why is because it's not new to shift for big businesses.
It's not new to shift for Israel.
Too much paper on your side It's just a I'm a bad, that's all God.
Like I'm right, it's in the dark.
They're not gonna know they get my heart.
And all my brothers locked up on the yard.
Can't Let My Family Call00:05:25
unidentified
You can still be anything you wanna be.
Went from one to four to one and three.
Third people in the gatt end of just a week.
Be a new commander and a chief.
Definitely.
I fear and never got when you can move the fear.
You create fear and love of everything else.
You're talking to somebody right now that only fears God.
Narrative is not one of some sudden looming bolt of lightning out of the blue.
It was a slow and steady, unrelenting stream of blips and blinks, glimmers and glares, low beams and high beams of light, some of which I did not want to see.
I think it was because I fiercely came out during the Groica Wars of 2019 when so many of these brave young men were on college campuses challenging the likes of Zio Shield Dan Crenshaw, questioning him about his undying loyalty and of course defending Nick Fuentes and so many of the stars of the burgeoning America First Movement who, through an increasing amount of activism, are really going to ensure the future and the success of that movement.
If we don't have freedom on the internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind raped every day forever.
Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geolocation, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you sleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
You have a smart home, economy of things.
It's like total, like, rape of everybody by the system forever.
My life is like a first-person video game, you know?
And I think our ancestors smile on us right now while we're doing it.
unidentified
Cheers.
In the beginning was the word.
And the word was with God.
And the word was God.
Through him, all things were made.
Without him, nothing was made that has been made.
In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind.
And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers.
He will crush your head.
will strike his heel.
Jesus said to her, I am the resurrection and the life.
The one who believes in me will live, even though they die.
And whoever lives by believing in me will never die.
Do you believe this?
I am sending you out like sheep among wolves.
Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.
Then Jesus came to them and said, All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.
And surely I am with you always to the very end of the age.
We have to want it more than they do because if there are thousands and millions and tens of millions and hundreds of millions of Christians ready to meet their final destiny, then nothing can stop us and nothing will.
I mean, this is part of the sad thing about Happy Canada as far as I'm concerned.
The sad thing is, and I know that no one who watches him will believe me.
Pat does raise issues that I think are important.
Doesn't mean everything he says is false.
It doesn't mean he's not talented.
He's enormously talented.
Doesn't mean he's a bad person.
I'm attacking him personally.
I mean, I think that, you know, the sovereignty of the American military, et cetera.
I mean, these are not just crank issues.
It's young white men who've been totally cut out of our economy, attacked mercilessly.
I mean, they really are the victims and they're desperate and no one speaks for them.
So they go to Fuentes because he's like incredibly articulate and they think he's our leader.
But unfortunately, Pat Buchanan raises them in a way that I think is discredited.
But he is clearly part of a campaign to discredit non-crazy right voices.
Pat Buchanan is part of the reason it's so hard to have that conversation because he discredits it by his presence.
That's a campaign to destroy credible voices on the right.
And Fuentes is part of it.
And that he believes in conspiracies and that he believes that the Jews are this sinister, secretly organized force trying to affect American politics.
And those aren't discussions I think normal people, sober people should be having.
Anyway, like, who is this kid exactly?
And maybe it's just an accident that the guy goes after exclusively goes after people who are in the same, roughly the same.
And then he gets up there and he's like, you know, making Holocaust jokes.
When attacked, he can always fall back on the line, well, the, you know, the tiny cabal that controls American politics doesn't like me because I speak truth to power.
This is actually, incidentally, almost verbatim, what he said the other day, that I offend the plutocracy, that I'm a wanted man by the inside the beltway people, and in every sense, cast himself as a victim who is sort of a Karen Silkwood of politics, someone who's so truthful that he's being hunted down by the conspiracy that runs Washington.
But then when it comes to me, I'm one of the real disaffected white people.
You want to talk about me and them?
I am them.
He says Nick Fuentes is leading all of the disaffected young white men.
I am a disaffected white, young white man.
I was a precocious, intelligent, young white college student who went to Boston University, who was pro-Trump and red-pilled by Trump and animated by Trump's message of America first.
And I asked questions about Israel and I was punished for it.
I did it years before Tucker Carlson started talking about Israel last year.
And I sacrificed and I was targeted by the ADL, by the SPLC, by the federal government, by the conservative movement that both Candace and Tucker were a part of.
He's lonely.
He's weird.
He lives in a basement.
That's a lot of people because of the problems you claim to care about.
Do you care about Kwarna and people going into debt to order pizzas and home ownership being impossible?
Or do you think that's a contemptible, low-status thing to be ridiculed and mocked?
What is wrong with being from Chicago?
What is wrong with being weird?
What is wrong with living in your basement?
I'm the inauthentic person.
I am that person.
I am a spokesman for the disaffected white man because I am one and you two are not.
My dad didn't even graduate college.
My mother's father was a garbage man in Chicago and he committed suicide.
What makes Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us.
An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children, even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
canary mission is an israeli-funded blacklist which since july 2025 has been confirmed to be used by the trump administration to target students professors and professionals who oppose israel and reside in the united states This idea is part of an initiative created by the Heritage Foundation, the same group responsible for the infamous Project 2025.
2016 Election Fallout00:06:25
unidentified
In their initiative, titled Project Esther, they state that students participating in pro-Palestinian protests and activism are supporting Hamas, a group that the United States designates as a foreign terrorist organization.
Therefore, pro-Palestinian students are considered to be supporting terrorism and are subject to the revocation of visas, frozen bank accounts, asset seizures, and the denial of basic constitutional rights.
In effect, the Canary mission serves as a means to circumvent constitutional protections, allowing the federal government to engage in intelligence gathering activities that would otherwise be considered unlawful.
But the Canary mission is not alone.
Palantir, another company closely aligned with the state of Israel, uses AI-driven analytics to maintain private databases on U.S. citizens and currently works with four federal agencies.
While government contracting with the private sector is long-standing, the prominent influence of Jewish groups within these increasingly powerful organizations warrants careful examination.
I renew the call for all able-bodied young American men, all of our elite human capital, all of our geniuses, warriors, intelligent people to dedicate themselves to American sovereignty and independence as Christians, as Americans, as white people, as citizens of the United States.
And anybody that settles for anything less is just as much of an enemy.
I would actually consider them worse than our oppressors.
So on Independence Day, it's important to reflect on the fact that we are an occupied nation.
Now, just like then, we're being ruled by a small country across an ocean, serving itself at our expense.
And as long as that is the case, I will always be obsessed with that.
As long as that is the case, I will always be speaking out against that and fighting against that.
And I will always be anchored, understanding that that is the fundamental struggle.
As long as our presidents have to kiss the wall in Israel and wear a small hat, as long as they have to say that we want to make Israel great again and they're the greatest country ever, I will never be okay with that.
Barack Obama created the joint comprehensive plan of action, the JCPOA, or the Iranian nuclear deal.
And Barack Obama brought together China, Russia, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the European Union to enforce a nuclear deal that restricts Iran's enrichment of uranium.
The early talks were conducted in secret, and the Israelis were furious, furious about this.
They hated Obama.
Netanyahu went to a joint session of Congress and gave a speech in defiance of the American president and its nuclear deal, and Congress gave 37 standing ovations.
This is the background of Trump's first election.
2016 election happens.
Trump gets elected with the help of the Israelis.
You don't believe me?
There's a whole article about it.
It's an excerpt from James Bamford's book, Spy Fail.
It goes into great detail about the hidden collusion in the 2016 election.
It wasn't Trump and Russia.
It was Trump and Israel.
And why was Israel so hell-bent on getting a Republican elected in 2016?
To scuttle the Iranian nuclear deal.
And that's exactly what happened.
That was the ask.
unidentified
The United States will withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal.
In 2018, Donald Trump declares the IRGC, the Revolutionary Guard, which is the military of the regime, a terrorist group.
Greenlights that group for sanctions, for attacks.
Now the United States is in a shadow war with Iran.
It culminates by January 2020 in the assassination of Qasim Suleimani.
Suleimani was the architect of the axis of resistance.
Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Suleimani built all of it.
Are you starting to see Obama had this solved?
He made the deal.
The Israelis hated him for it.
They colluded with Trump to get him elected so that Trump would do maximum pressure and create a ladder of escalation, pulling us out of the deal, declaring the IRGC terrorists, then killing its leader, putting sanctions on the regime.
This is a war that started a long time ago, that Trump made hot in 2018.
And it's been going on for seven years.
That's the nature of forever wars.
Just like in Iraq, which went from 1990 until today.
Just like Libya, which went from 2011 to today.
Syria, which went from 2011 to today, and Iran, which went from 2018 until today.
That's the nature of forever wars.
And if you're not paying attention to those underlying forces, you're gonna fall for it again and again.
You're gonna be surprised and confused and coping over and over.
And people are just tripping over themselves to do it again.
unidentified
Let's water down Mr. Cuehn, I don't know why Tell me what this morning make a bonus dream.
Love One Another00:02:12
unidentified
It hated me.
If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own.
As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world.
That is why the world hates you.
Remember what I told you?
A servant is not greater than his master.
If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also.
They will treat you this way because of my name, for they do not know the one who sent me.
Why do you call me Lord, Lord, and do not do what I say?
A new command I give you.
Love one another.
As I have loved you, so you must love one another.
By this, everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.
You have heard that it was said, love your neighbor and hate your enemy.
But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven.
He causes his Son to rise on the evil and the good and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.
If you love those who love you, what reward will you get?
Are not even the tax collectors doing that?
And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others?
Do not even pagans do that?
Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly father is perfect.
Never Be On The Planet00:04:43
unidentified
I stop playing ghosts.
And at any moment, I can hit that yay button.
This is Everything my promise is Tuesday.
I can never be on the planet.
Not my words, not my rules.
I can endorse them, alright?
America's first, bitch.
Take a second train, girls.
Stop the track.
See, Ricky said, Do you like the party?
Don't wanna pull you.
If you run the ball, you get a wood.
Okay, so having backward consciousness.
It's the way one hobbies know it's still before the story.
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
unidentified
I got places to be keeping everybody You're watching America First.
Reipers and all the alt-riders that got banned, all the alt-riders that got slandered, even people that killed themselves.
Our corpses paved the way for you now to walk over.
And you can't give us acknowledgement.
Now you want to slam the door on us.
It's not right.
unidentified
It's not right.
I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us.
For the creation waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed.
We know that the whole creation has been groaning, as in the pains of childbirth, right up to the present time.
Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption to sonship, the redemption of our bodies.
For in this hope we were saved.
But hope that is seen is no hope at all.
Who hopes for what they already have?
But if we hope for what we do not yet have, we wait for it patiently.
There is something involved where we have to forgive them.
We do have to forgive them for their ignorance.
We do have to forgive them for their misunderstanding.
And we have to embrace them and say, better late than never.
Welcome to the right side of history.
Welcome to our, our massive vision, our massive and ambitious vision for how we want the world to be saying
to me, he's like, this is probably pretty cool for you.
unidentified
I'm like, yeah, it is.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God.
And the word was God.
Through him, all things were made.
Without him, nothing was made that has been made.
In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind.
And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers.
He will crush your head.
will strike his heel jesus said to her i am the resurrection and the life The one who believes in me will live even though they die.
And whoever lives by believing in me will never die.
Do you believe this?
I am sending you out like shield among wolves.
Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.
Then Jesus came to them and said, All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.
And surely I am with you always to the very end of the age.
But this country can no longer be held hostage by a small minority that doesn't include the mission of our movement is to make this country a Christian country.
The mission is to create a Christian future in our time.
The only way we're going to do it is not by infiltrating, not by subverting, not by lying, which is what a lot of people do.
The only way that we're going to make this happen is with the boldness of a real Christian.
We have to want it more than they do because there are thousands and millions and tens of millions and hundreds of millions of Christians ready to meet their final destiny.
No one's allowed to say that the blood is a quintessential part of this, that the blood of our people is something that is essential.
That we are different.
that America was different because we are different.
Palantir is an AI data analytics company.
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithms, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
narrative is not one of some sudden booming bolt of lightning out of the blue.
It was a slow and steady, unrelenting stream of blips and blinks, glimmers and glares, low beams and high beams of light, some of which I did not want to see.
I think it was because I fiercely came out during the Groiber Wars of 2019 when so many of these brave young men were on college campuses challenging the likes of Zio Shield Dan Crenshaw, questioning him about his undying loyalty and of course defending Nick Fuentes and so many of the stars of the burgeoning America First movement who, through an increasing amount of activism, are really going to ensure the future and the success of that movement.
Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Wednesday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight.
Lodge to get into a big show.
Our featured story tonight.
We're talking all about the full assault on the ADL, which honestly I have some mixed feelings about.
I know that might sound surprising, but I'll tell you why I feel that way.
Major, major breakthrough and development.
First, the ADL received a ton of pushback and public pressure because they listed on their glossary of hate groups and individuals.
This is a feature on their website where they catalog who they consider to be racists, anti-Semites, white supremacists, and other categories of extremists.
They had listed on the website, Turning Point USA, as well as a faction of Christian identitarians or a so-called Christian identity movement.
And a lot of people said, is this not the type of vilification of conservatives, which led to the assassination of Charlie Kirk and all these attacks on Christian churches, which we've seen over the past few years, especially.
That was the first big push.
So they took down the glossary of hate.
And then almost immediately afterward, the director of the FBI, Cash Patel, announced that the FBI would no longer work in collaboration with the ADL, which is a huge deal because the ADL has collaborated with the FBI for something like 80 years.
And a lot of people said, this is an amazing development.
And I agree.
This is a truly remarkable, a notable and remarkable development.
And I would say it is unambiguously positive.
The ADL is a massive, oppressive force that works on behalf of Israel, that works on behalf of the transnational Jewish community.
And it seems that their primary activity is the reputational destruction of anybody that criticizes Jews or Israel.
And it goes further than that.
They not only work to destroy the reputation of the perceived enemies of Israel and the Jewish people, but also anyone they consider to be insufficiently guilty for being white, anybody that is too proud or chauvinistic about being a Christian.
They engage in reputational destruction, targeted career destruction, and censorship.
Maybe most notoriously, they are responsible not only for the data that informs legislation and government action that leads to censorship, but they also actually design the censorship policies and even the software themselves.
When Facebook, YouTube, formerly Twitter, when they were banning people, often they were banning people on the ADL's recommendation using ADL-designed trust and safety guidelines, and in some cases, even using ADL software to flag the posts or users that the ADL wanted banned.
So this is huge that the ADL is losing a lot of power.
But as I said, I have some mixed feelings about it because there are certain people who you might be surprised to find out are celebrating this alongside us, and they're not our friends.
It's people like Ben Shapiro.
It's groups like the Zionist Organization of America, Beitar USA, among others.
And one way to look at this is as a victory for the Israel-critical right wing or left-wing for that matter, but in particular, the right wing.
Another way to look at this, another lens, is that this might represent Jewish infighting, infighting between Jewish groups within the international Jewish community representing different factions of Jewish interests.
And we'll flesh that out in great detail tonight as we are always reminded, Jews are not a monolith.
They don't all think the same way.
They don't all act the same way.
There is a Jewish right and a Jewish left.
There are Jews in Israel.
There are Jews in the diaspora in America and Europe.
And they don't all agree.
They don't all agree on everyday matters.
They also don't all agree even on matters pertaining to their own community and to their own interests for that matter.
The major pushback on the ADL seems to be representative of a broader shift that is taking place within the Jewish community.
And I think there's benefits for us, but we should be cautious about what this really means.
I think it's a good thing for us unambiguously, but the question is who will now fill that void?
Who may have already filled that void?
That's a pertinent question.
So we'll talk all about that.
That'll be our main story.
Finally, tonight, we are going to get to the Gaza peace plan.
I know we've been putting it off.
It was announced on Monday.
We're going to talk about it Monday night.
We were going to talk about it yesterday, but we just keep running out of time.
There's too much going on this week.
But I think tonight we're finally going to get into it and we'll talk about the specifics of the deal.
We'll talk about how, as always, the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, has sabotaged and undermined the peace process yet again.
The president really thought this was the one.
This is the deal that is going to finally bring an end to the conflict.
And at the last minute, Netanyahu insisted on some modifications to the deal, potentially poison pilling the deal.
In other words, making it so that Hamas could not, would not accept it, and then therefore prolonging the war for another indefinite amount of time.
I think that's exactly what happened on Monday.
And we'll talk about that as well.
Should be a pretty good show.
It's good to be back with you guys.
Before we get into it, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble, smash the like button, leave a comment.
You're going to want to get all three: blue, black, camo.
You're going to need these, okay?
Because when we go out and deploy in the midterms, when we deploy in 28, we got to have the Groipers wearing the hats.
So check them out, Fuentis.store.
Subscribe at AmericaFirst.plus to get access to my archive, every piece of content I've ever done.
I was talking to some friends of mine the other day.
I've been broadcasting for literally 10 years.
It's almost 10 years to the date.
I think it's in, or to the day.
It's in November.
10 years ago in November is when I started my high school TV show on my high school TV station.
And it was the first show I ever did.
And that would later become this show.
That show, as well as every episode I've ever done, is on AmericaFirst.plus for $15 a month.
$100 a month club, you get that.
And you get to talk to me in a group chat, which I was active in today, giving a preview about the show.
If you're interested, AmericaFirst.plus, check it out.
All right, what else?
One other thing before we get into the show, just a couple of things before we get into the news.
I want to talk a little bit about Tucker Carlson's latest show, which I found very interesting.
And I didn't watch the entire thing, but today Tucker Carlson released an interview with Jeffrey Sachs, who is a liberal Jew and a major critic of Israel.
And Tucker weighed in on this phenomenon, which we had been calling the Great Awakening, the Great Red Pilling, whatever you want to say.
And he did this lengthy introduction, which he posted in full as a separate video on his channel, where he talks about how America and Israel can rebalance their relationship.
And he goes through some of the basic facts.
A lot of things we talked about last night.
He talked about how Israel is really an insignificant nation, and that makes it conspicuous why the United States has done so much for them.
He says that given that we do so much for such an insignificant country, they need to act differently than how they're treating us.
They're insignificant.
We pour aid and support.
We're the lifeline for this country.
And not only are they not grateful, but they actually humiliate us.
They act like they control us.
Netanyahu is bragging that he controls the president.
He says, and what's more, in America in particular, we have a Christian theology that makes us overlook these facts because many Protestant Christians believe literally that Israel can do nothing wrong.
There's a religious conviction based on what they perceive to be revelation that we have to do everything Israel says.
And so he lays this out very thoroughly, very thoroughly and factually and in a compelling way.
Some of the things he said later in the show, just to kind of flesh it out.
During this 30-minute introduction, he also says that it is one thing to criticize the government of Israel.
He said it's another thing to say that this has anything to do with Jews as a group.
He said, if you think this has anything to do with Judaism or Jews as such, he said, you are a David Duke level anti-Semite.
You are crazy.
You are hateful.
You are a bigot.
And not only that, he said, but probably you are being backed by a foreign country to hurt America.
And there's sort of like two points there.
There's an intellectual point, which is you can criticize Israel.
That's legitimate.
But connecting the relationship or dynamic with Israel to Judaism or the Jewish community in itself, he said, that's illegitimate.
He said, and not only is it illegitimate, but if you're doing that, you're a bad person.
You're evil, you're hateful, you're insane, you're not rational, and probably you're not even organic.
That's being promoted by America's adversaries.
And I didn't like that.
I thought that was a bad statement because I think there is a lot of, I pointed this out a couple of weeks ago.
There is a lot of so-called low IQ anti-Semitism online.
People that anything negative about Jews, whether true or false, they will amplify it.
And they don't really know what they're talking about.
And they don't really discern anything.
There is a strain of that.
And there are people we all know, they just go on Twitter and just say, fuck Israel every day.
And it's like, I don't know how helpful that really is without bringing the facts, without bringing an argument.
That maybe goes into the realm of being a little pathological.
But I don't think that everybody that's doing that is a hateful person or a foreign operative.
I don't think they're crazy.
I think that this is a topic that has been suppressed forever and viciously, vigorously suppressed.
Like for many years, if you expressed any doubt or any alternative opinion about any of it, Israel, the Holocaust, the Jews, the media, any of this, they ruined your life.
In many ways, it's still like this.
It's still like this.
And one, that inherently breeds suspicion.
And two, it makes it very difficult for people to discern what's real and what's fake.
Because if every criticism, every like Israel critical or skeptical or Jewish critical or skeptical word, if all of that is called anti-Semitism and the information is censored and suppressed, then how does an ordinary person find reputable information?
Ordinary people, average IQ, who are not political experts, maybe don't have deep background on any of these subjects, they're on an intellectual journey to discover the truth.
And they don't know who to trust and they don't know what's real and what's fake and they're trying to learn.
They're trying to figure it out.
And so ordinary people that maybe don't have degrees and maybe aren't news broadcasters and aren't in bed with the CIA or their dad didn't run the CIA.
They never been to Afghanistan or Cambodia or whatever.
They're just trying to figure out what's up.
And many of them are on the right track and many of them are trying to find the language or discern what's real and what's fake.
We're all kind of doing that.
And to sort of cast aspersions on that and say, well, those people are David Duke.
First of all, I don't even agree necessarily with the vilification of David Duke.
And I don't know why we need to use that kind of language even.
Let's just characterize it as what it is.
Let's just say, we don't want cruelty.
We don't want hatred.
We want the truth.
I'm okay with that.
But to say that certain questions are insane or hateful or foreign-funded, I don't like that.
And then the second thing he said in the interview with Jeffrey Sachs in the second part, Jeffrey Sachs said, this has nothing to do with the race of Jewish people.
This is only about the state of Israel.
And Tucker agreed and said, yes, we must deracialize the conversation and de-escalate.
This is about the state of Israel.
And you see this over and over and over again.
Even Marjorie Taylor Greene, she says the same thing.
She keeps saying the secular state of Israel, the secular state of Israel.
Why do they keep saying that?
Why did they explicitly say deracialize?
Because they are insistent on divorcing our criticisms of Israel with the criticism of the Jewish nation.
And I don't agree with that.
Israel, and I'll say it today, I said it earlier this week.
I've said it my entire life, or my entire career for the most part.
Israel is not like every other country.
They're not like any other country.
They are unique.
And our relationship with them is unique.
And our relationship with the Jews is unique.
And Jews are unique.
I'm a Christian.
I'm a Catholic, actually.
And if you are a Christian, you do believe that Jews are unique.
In a sense, they were God's elected tribe and nation at one point in time, although no longer.
And so their identity, their relationship with Revelation, it is unique.
They are a remarkable or exceptional people in the sense they are an exception.
The fact that they have people all over the world, powerful people, but also they have this country based on this blood and soil nationalism, based on their ethno-religion.
All of this is unique.
There's no other group in America like the Jews.
There's no other country with a relationship to America like Israel.
It's just not honest to compartmentalize these things and say, you've got Israel and you've got America.
No, you don't.
You've got Jews and everybody else.
You have American Jews that have a special loyalty or attachment to Israel because they are Jewish.
And Israel is the Jewish state.
And this is such a persistent connection because of the power and the strength.
And in some sense, the enduring truth of the Jewish identity and the Jewish story.
There's no other group that is unassimilable like Jews are.
Every other group on some level assimilates with a greater degree than the Jews do.
The Jews didn't have a state for 2,000 years and they never assimilated.
Do American blacks have any connection to Africa?
No.
There are third or fourth generation Hispanics like me that have no connection to Mexico.
Italians that have no connection to Italy.
Russians that have no connection to Russia.
It goes on and on.
American whites that have no connection to England, yet Jews never assimilated.
And they're here and they have this enduring loyalty to their nationhood, to this foreign country that is unique.
And the basis of that unique relationship, or I should say it this way, that unique relationship is the basis of America's relationship with Israel and many of these problems, many of these issues that he raised on the show.
And so I don't know why he continues to insist this is about decoupling the American state and the Israeli state.
It cannot be done because the American society is infiltrated by Jews loyal to Israel and they were born here and they speak perfect English without an accent.
Many of them, some of them still have an accent.
Many of them aren't even religious.
Like Larry Ellison, Larry Ellison is not a religious Jew.
He was born in America.
He was adopted by Jews in Chicago.
And yet he's got a special friendship and relationship with Israel.
He's the second richest man in the world and he's manipulating our country on Israel's behalf.
How does that fit neatly into this idea that it's about the Israeli government and nothing else and American society?
It doesn't fit and it doesn't make any sense.
And I don't like that they're insisting on something that isn't true.
And they will never debate this.
I would love to talk to Tucker about this.
I'd love to talk to any of these people about this.
And it's also weird that Candace Owens insisted upon the same thing.
When she finally invited me on her show in June, I just found this interesting.
She raised the same exact issue.
She said, it's got nothing to do with being born Jewish.
It's got everything to do with whether you're a Zionist.
And I said, that's just not true.
It's demonstrably not true.
And she and Tucker are the two most influential conservative figures right now in the mainstream.
And they're both perceived as Israel's worst enemies, but they're also both pushing this calculated line.
So that is an intellectual disagreement.
And I would even frame it as a disagreement.
They're either ignorant or they're lying because what they're saying is not true.
And people need to understand this to understand the scope and the depth of the problem here.
And we raised this in the debate with Dinesh D'Souza.
A lot of people say Tucker proposed this.
He said, we should register AIPAC as foreign agents.
He said, we should get rid of all the dual citizens in America.
Okay.
Excuse me for that burp there.
He says we should register APAC under Farah.
We should expel the dual citizens.
What do you do about the American Jews that do not have dual citizenship that are still loyal to Israel?
How do you explain that?
You've got Jews that are born in America.
They're 100% Jew.
They're proud Jew.
They don't have another citizenship.
They can't be registered under Farah because they're not being paid directly by Israel.
But yet they only care about Israel.
What do you do with them?
How do you fit that into your explanation?
How do you fit that into your narrative?
It doesn't fit.
It doesn't work.
It has everything to do with that.
It's got everything to do with Christians and Jews, Rome and Israel.
It always has had everything to do with that.
Anyway, so I don't want to spend too much time on that, but I just found that interesting because he led the show by saying, we all need to stop being obsessed with Israel.
We all need to stop talking about Israel so much.
That's not healthy.
Well, we'll stop talking about Israel when they stop running our affairs.
Isn't that a kind of a good rule of thumb?
How could we reasonably stop talking about Israel when we're paying for their genocide and it's hurting us when we're being dragged into their war with Iran?
When their oligarchs are buying our social media, when their operatives are taking over our Ivy League universities, everywhere you look, there it is.
Everywhere you look, there they are, meddling in our affairs, influencing our society.
So if that were no longer the case, we would have no reason to talk about it.
If there were some other external force or an internal force that was directing our affairs, we could or would talk about that, but it's this.
It's just this, it seems.
Or at the minimum, this seems to be the most powerful external force being exerted on our country.
So I don't like that he said in itself, well, it's not good that we're all talking about Israel so much.
Yeah, I don't agree.
I think that we sort of have to.
We've been forced to.
Believe you me, it's sort of ironic, and I'll just say this briefly, then we have to move on.
When I got started doing my show in 2017, I didn't start out only or mostly talking about Israel or even talking about Israel a lot, but I got canceled for talking about it.
And they call me an anti-Semite for years.
And you begin to notice how they move and how they influence our affairs.
That's like we all woke up one day and had this big problem.
As you and I, as everyone on this journey understands, it didn't start this way.
We have been forced to respond in this way.
And anyway, that's that.
But I do want to move on.
We're going to get into our news.
And our first story, we'll talk a little bit about the Gaza peace plan just so we could get this out of the way.
Then we'll talk a little bit about the ADL.
And like I said, this is the peace process from actually Monday, which we were not able to cover.
I'm sure you all saw it as it happened.
On Monday, President Trump unveiled in a press conference with the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, his 20-point plan for peace to bring an end to the war in Gaza.
Now, this is a peace deal, which they had been working on for weeks.
And last week, Trump said, this is the deal.
This is the deal.
This is going to be the deal, which finally ends the war.
And he's been promoting this and talking this up now for two weeks, saying any day, two weeks, we're finally going to bring it to an end.
Okay, well, they presented it on Monday.
And it's worth pointing out, this was the prime minister's fourth visit to the White House.
Fourth.
He came here in the beginning of February.
He came here in the beginning of April.
He came here in the beginning of July.
And then he came here again at the end of September.
That's four times in eight months so far in the second administration, which is crazy to think about.
There's no other head of state that has been to America four times.
I don't think there's been a head of state that's been here more than twice so far this year.
In any case, but Netanyahu came here, had a meeting with Trump.
They did a press conference and they presented the plan.
Very briefly, I'll read through this news story about it from the New York Times.
Then we'll talk about where we are in context, where this peace process is, where this peace deal came about, in what context.
This is a story from the New York Times that says, quote, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu agreed on Monday to a U.S.-backed deal to end the nearly two years of war in Gaza amid a fresh push by President Donald Trump.
The initiative agreed to Monday was notable because it appeared to have high-level Israeli buy-in, along with assent from neighboring Arab nations.
But it remained unclear whether Hamas would agree to a deal that would lead to its own disarmament and potential exile from Gaza.
The deal, which the White House published on Monday, foresees hostilities ceasing immediately and hostages being released within 72 hours of both sides agreeing to the deal.
A senior Hamas official told Al-Arabi TV, quote, we do not wish for the war to continue.
We will examine any proposal that does not conflict with the interest of the Palestinians.
But Netanyahu hedged with details that could make it difficult for Arab nations to sign on.
And they always do that, don't they?
Pledging to maintain an Israeli security presence inside Gaza for the foreseeable future.
The 20-point agreement released by the White House on Monday would pull Israeli forces back from Gaza in phases.
Hamas members who commit to peaceful coexistence with Israel and hand over or destroy their weapons would be given amnesty, and members who choose to leave would be granted safe passage to other countries.
There would be a broader effort to demilitarize Gaza.
Many of the points in the agreement lack details, potentially giving Israel opportunities to slow or halt the process of handing Gaza back to full Palestinian control.
Even as Netanyahu lavished praise on Trump, he peppered his support for the plan with conditions that appeared to aim at addressing his far-right coalition partners who don't want him to stop the war.
He said Hamas will be disarmed.
Gaza will be demilitarized.
Israel will retain security responsibility.
Israel will conduct further withdrawals linked to the extent of disarmament and demilitarization, but will remain in the security perimeter for the foreseeable future.
He added that if Hamas doesn't agree to the deal, he would escalate Israel's effort to eliminate any possible security threat from Gaza.
Now, there's a ton of other details, and we'll work through some of them.
But it's important to understand why this deal came about, in what context.
We'll set the stage.
A lot of people sort of forgot about this or may not be aware of this because it was overshadowed by the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
But this huge push from President Trump to bring an end to the war in Gaza started because of Israel's attack on Qatar the day before Charlie Kirk was killed.
It was on September 9th, the morning before Charlie Kirk was killed, the day before, that Israel launched an attack, a surprise attack, on the negotiators working for Hamas inside of Qatar.
And this was unprecedented, extremely aggressive, and totally infuriated the United States.
Qatar is a close U.S. ally under the Trump administration, and they always have been.
We have our largest military base in the Middle East in Qatar, and Qatar is the mediator between the United States and Iran, between the United States and Hamas, for that matter, between Israel and Hamas.
And that is the source of Qatar's influence in the region, is that they are the go-between.
Unlike the Emirates, unlike Saudi Arabia and some of the other Gulf countries, the reason that Qatar is so influential is because they have inroads with the Iranians, but they also have a relationship with the United States, the Gulf countries.
And so, because they have a balanced foreign policy, that is why they are credible mediators.
The nation of Qatar is also made up of a lot of Iranian exiles.
There's a major connection there as well.
And so, Qatar, being in the role as the mediator, of course, has to have safe harbor for the negotiators.
Hamas's negotiators are living in Qatar.
They couldn't be living in the Gaza Strip because Israel would kill them.
Israel would go in and hang them.
And so, how could they negotiate with this militant faction or its representatives?
So, Qatar gives them safe harbor to negotiate.
Three weeks ago, almost to the day, Israel went into the Red Sea.
They launched missiles over Saudi Arabia's airspace, and they tried to decapitate the Hamas diplomatic team, and they failed.
Almost everybody in the Hamas delegation survived.
But this infuriated Qatar, the United States, and basically every Muslim country in the region.
After the attack, the Arab League and the Organization for Islamic Cooperation got together in a joint meeting, and they were all furious, but they could do nothing against Israel and the United States.
And they put out a letter condemning the attack and calling for further integration and cooperation between Muslim and Arab countries.
That was the Arab-Muslim reaction.
Trump was even more furious because he has connections with Qatar.
He visited Qatar.
Qatar is a U.S. ally.
We're counting on them to sort of work on our behalf, mediating many of these conflicts that Israel's involved in.
This happens at the same time that we hear word that the prime minister of Israel is going around telling everybody, I control America, I control the United States, I control Donald Trump.
Within days of the attack on Qatar, Israel began its invasion of Gaza.
And they reworked their plan a bunch of different times, but they moved in on Gaza City, which is the last remaining stronghold of Hamas, they claim.
There's still hundreds of thousands of people living there.
It's the most major city and the most major city in the north, which they're trying to empty out of infrastructure and Palestinians.
And over the past two weeks, the Israeli army has been raising Gaza City to the ground in an effort to push all the Palestinians to the coast and then expel them.
So this is the context.
This is the context of the Palestinian peace process in the past several weeks.
Israel is moving in on Gaza City to expel the Palestinians.
They're bombing an American ally.
They have turned the entire Middle East against them.
Egypt is now calling Israel an enemy.
And Egypt is Israel's first treaty ally out of all the Arab Muslim countries.
Back in 1979 is when it was signed.
So it's in response to these developments that Trump is furious with Netanyahu.
And of course, last week, Trump famously said in the press conference, he said, I will not allow Israel to annex the West Bank.
This is in the middle of the General Assembly in the United Nations, where France, Canada, the United Kingdom, and other countries recognize Palestine.
Netanyahu says, we disregard that.
We're going to annex the West Bank and Gaza.
Trump says last week, I've had enough, enough with this guy.
And he literally used the word.
He said, it's enough.
It has to stop.
I am taking control.
I will not allow it.
So Trump makes this huge push to finalize the deal.
Netanyahu is in America.
He's in New York City for the UN.
He's got a scheduled trip to the White House on Monday.
And this is where Trump gets Netanyahu in the room with Steve Witkoff, his envoy, with Jared Kushner, his son-in-law, with Ron Dermer, Netanyahu's aide, and Netanyahu himself.
And Trump says, I want a yes.
I don't want a yes, but I don't want a conditional yes.
He said, listen, motherfucker, this war is going to end.
Enough is enough.
I'm the boss, not you.
I want you to sign on the dotted line.
Now, over the past week, Trump has put together a 21-point plan with the Arab partners, with Egypt, with Jordan, with Turkey, with Qatar, with Saudi Arabia.
Trump has put together this deal with backing of all the Muslim countries, all of them, Indonesia, Pakistan, all the important players from the Middle East to Asia, all the Muslim Arab countries are all in on the deal.
And Trump calls in Netanyahu and says, this is what it's going to be.
Now, originally, this was a 21-point plan.
Point number 21 is that Trump wanted Netanyahu to call Qatar and apologize for the attack, which Netanyahu did.
And Trump released a photograph of this.
Trump is holding the landline handset, and Netanyahu has the phone and is calling up Qatar and apologizing.
That's point number 21 crossed off.
And Trump forces Netanyahu to agree to the 20-point plan.
Brought Netanyahu in himself and said, this is the way it's going to be.
All the Muslim countries agree.
I'm taking charge on this.
That's how it's going to go.
Now, what is the general shape of the deal that was presented hours later at the press conference?
These are the contours of the deal.
It says that Hamas is going to give up all the hostages within 72 hours.
It says Hamas is going to lay down their arms and then they'll be given safe passage to another country.
But they have to go.
They have to go into exile.
Hamas and all the other Palestinian groups will not have any presence in Gaza or have any leadership role in the administration of Gaza in the future.
After this is done, the Gaza Strip will be completely demilitarized.
There will be no weapons.
There will be no, the Palestinian Authority will not come in.
Hamas will not be there.
Instead, some kind of Palestinian police force will be created, trained by the Israelis.
And Gaza will be put under the control of a technocratic government led by Donald Trump himself and the former British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Israel, for its part, will withdraw in phases.
They're not going to withdraw all at once.
They're not going to withdraw fully.
They are going to partially withdraw in phases over time.
And eventually, when they're completed, their withdrawal, they're still going to control a security perimeter within Gaza's borders, spanning the entire border.
So in other words, Israel is not leaving the Gaza Strip.
They're going to be there permanently.
They're going to control the perimeter of Gaza inside of Gaza, probably forever.
And because Gaza will be demilitarized, Israel will have security control over the entire thing.
What's more, this phased withdrawal is conditioned upon the demilitarization of Gaza.
And Israel can veto the withdrawal at any time.
In other words, Hamas is being told, lay down your arms and leave.
That is without conditions.
You must agree to give up your weapons and get out or we'll kill you.
If you agree to that, then we're going to maybe leave in stages, but not fully.
And at any time, we could reverse it.
At any time, we could stop withdrawing and actually go back in.
So that's a pretty raw deal, don't you think?
You're being told, give up all your leverage, give up all your hostages, give up your ability to fight back, all your weapons.
The leaders and the fighters that are defending the strip, they got to go too.
They have to leave the country and give up their arms or be killed.
And in exchange, you know, we're going to partially withdraw over time in phases.
We're never fully going to leave.
The most you're going to get is that we're only going to control a significant portion of your borderlands and we're going to have security control over the whole thing.
And at any time, we could veto the withdrawal and we could come right back in just as hard and keep doing what we're doing.
What's more, the deal contains no provision for an eventual Palestinian state or even Palestinian leadership of Gaza.
It says the Palestinian Authority is not going to come in from the West Bank unless they're re-educated.
It says Hamas has to go.
No other Palestinian group is going to be in charge.
There's some vague reference to eventually there'll be a discussion about a Palestinian state, but no details, nothing concrete, no timeline, no nothing.
Now, even in a vacuum, this is a raw deal.
Even without any context, without knowing any of the facts, this is a pretty rotten deal.
Who would agree to this?
Unconditional surrender on one side and sort of like conditional withdrawal that could be vetoed at any time on the other.
You give up all means of defending yourself.
All your fighters and the leaders of the fighters, they got to go.
And we might withdraw, but we could decide not to whenever we'd like.
And you might get home rule, but that's a discussion for later after we take everything.
Not a great deal.
But bear in mind, the Israelis always lie.
There have been ceasefires.
Israel has broken all of them.
For example, Israel agreed to a phased withdrawal back in January, a three-phase deal where Israel would partially withdraw.
There would be a six-week ceasefire in exchange for some of the hostages.
Then they would go back to the negotiating table and work out a deal with Hamas that would lead to a permanent end to the fighting and a total permanent withdrawal of Israeli forces.
Well, Israel took the six-week ceasefire.
They got $12 billion more from the United States.
They got 2,000-pound bombs from the United States.
They fortified their military.
And then when the six weeks was over, they said, yeah, we're canceling the deal.
They reimposed the blockade, started bombing again, reinvaded.
They lied.
They had no intention of following through.
They went back on their word.
Also, what is the war?
This is a war of extermination.
What they're doing in Gaza City right now is they're literally raising the city to the ground.
It's not like they're going block by block and killing terrorists, which is how they're representing it.
They're going block by block, taking the city back from Hamas.
No, they're taking control of the city and the parts they have, they're leveling all the infrastructure with bulldozers.
They're bringing in heavy construction equipment and they're demolishing everything.
So clearly their intention is to just take all the land, reset it to zero, declare it as theirs, and then they're going to build a new city there for the Jews.
They're going to bring back the settlements.
Jewish settlers will plant their flag and they're just going to call it Israel.
That's obviously what they're doing.
So think of it.
They always go back on their word.
They've broken every deal they've ever agreed to.
They lie as a point of their policy.
And what they're in the process of doing right now is razing the entire territory and planting their flag.
And Hamas and the Palestinians are supposed to agree.
They're supposed to lay down their weapons and split and trust that Israel will not veto their own partial withdrawal.
It makes no sense.
Now, what if I told you that those most egregious points of the deal were not part of the deal last week?
That conditional withdrawal, partial withdrawal, those were last-minute modifications that Netanyahu insisted upon on Monday.
So Trump gets this snake in the White House with the whole team and says, I already have the backing of every Muslim and Arab country.
They are all in agreement.
Hamas is favorable to this.
Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, Jordan, Indonesia, Pakistan, everyone agrees.
Now you need to sign on the dotted line.
Just say yes.
No conditions.
Well, it's Israel.
So of course, they could do whatever they want.
Netanyahu insists that we include that veto and partial withdrawal, the conditional withdrawal with veto power that is only partial.
This is a last-minute modification.
Trump doesn't run it by everybody.
Cutter finds out about the modification and says you can't release this.
We don't agree.
Qatar says this is not the deal we agreed to.
This is not what was shown to us.
This is not what we conveyed to Hamas, which is happening at the exact same time simultaneously.
Cutter says, you can't release the deal.
We got to workshop this.
This is unacceptable.
Trump ignores them and takes it live with the press conference an hour later.
Another screw.
This is what they do.
This is how they operate.
And this is all reported, by the way, in Axios.
I'll read this article to you.
It says, quote, the Gaza peace plan that President Trump presented on Monday contains significant changes requested by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, infuriating Arab officials involved in the negotiations.
The deal now before Hamas is significantly different than the one the U.S. and a group of Arab and Muslim countries previously agreed upon due to Netanyahu's intervention.
He managed to negotiate several edits into the text, in particular on the conditions and timetable for Israel's withdrawal from Gaza.
The new proposal ties Israel's withdrawal to the progress of disarming Hamas and gives Israel a veto over that process.
Even if all conditions are met and three phases of withdrawal are completed, Israeli forces will still remain within a security perimeter inside Gaza until Gaza is properly secure from any resurgent terror threat, which could be indefinitely.
So it's a phased, timed withdrawal.
Even when it's completed, it's only partial because they'll still be inside of Gaza.
And at any time, Israel can veto this and go back in.
Even when all is said and done and it's all finished, they can always change their minds and go back in.
That was your last-minute modification.
It goes on.
It says, officials from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and Turkey were furious over the changes.
The Qataris even tried to convince the Trump administration not to release the plan on Monday over those objections.
The White House released it anyway and pushed the Arab and Muslim countries to support the plan.
And in the end, the Arab and Muslim countries, they did not endorse the plan.
They said, well, we welcome the plan.
I said, we welcome the plan.
This is as good as it's going to get, but they stopped short of fully supporting it.
Over and over, this is the same story over and over again.
This is the rigmarole when you deal with Israel and the Jews.
It's always like this.
And what's amazing is that this has been going on for like 80 years.
This has been going on since the 1948 ceasefire.
It's been going on since the 1967 to 73, no peace but no war.
It's been going on since Camp David, since Oslo.
This is how they have always been.
This is how they always operate.
But it is obfuscated by the fact that it's so detailed.
In a year, are you going to remember these details?
No, and nobody's going to.
It's going to fade away into the long history of Israel-Palestinian conflict and negotiations.
And Zionist opinion makers, Zionist sources will lie about what happened on Monday.
They're going to say Israel offered peace, but they rejected it.
And over time, it'll fade away.
And people forget that, no, everyone agreed to the peace plan.
They changed it last minute.
They poison-pilled it.
Hamas will not agree.
And now that's going to justify continuing the war.
Hamas can't agree to this deal.
The Arabs and Muslims don't agree with this deal.
And Netanyahu's going back to Israel.
Oh, slipped through our fingers again.
Trump tried to nail him down, but he slipped through our fingers again.
Now he's back in Israel.
And what do you think they're going to do?
Well, we already know.
After this deal was presented, Israel comes in and they're bombing Gaza harder than ever.
They're bulldozing the city, waiting to hear back from the Palestinians.
The Palestinians will reject it.
All this stuff takes time.
And once they do, Netanyahu will see that as a green light to keep pushing their offensive and working towards their ultimate goal, which is to expel all the Palestinians, not to have them live in peace side by side.
This is how they operate.
And this is why I said last week, Trump says in the press conference, he says, I will not allow them to annex the West Bank.
On Monday, he forces Netanyahu to apologize.
And of course, Netanyahu did it because these people will say anything.
Don't you understand that by now?
Saying something and doing something are two completely different things.
And here's how I picture that going down.
Netanyahu said, if you want me to apologize, I will.
All right, all right, you got me.
I'll pick up the phone and apologize if that's what it takes to make you happy.
But now I want some modifications on the deal, and I won't agree to anything.
I'm going to throw the whole thing in the garbage.
And Netyahoo picks up the phone and says, oh, I'm so sorry.
And it means nothing.
They're not sorry.
They're not sorry.
Yes, Trump made them bend the knee.
You need to realize by now, these people are shameless.
Bending the knee means nothing.
They are intentionally deferential.
They give a false deference to this president.
They flatter him.
They tell him, you're the most pro-Israel president.
America's the greatest because they're without shame.
That is how they operate.
They will tell you what you want to hear.
They will prostrate themselves.
They will defer.
They talk, they talk, they talk.
Then they go back to Israel and they do whatever the fuck they want, whatever they were going to do before.
So you can extract these statements and apologies and commitments and promises, and they may even give you a secret agreement, a secret handshake.
They will never honor it because they have no honor.
Because they're the only ones that are taking any of this seriously.
They are deadly serious about expanding their territory.
When they say we will never accept a Palestinian state, they mean it.
And what could possibly be the state of affairs other than a dual state?
Other than a two-state solution.
It said Israel will effectively or legally annex all the territory, either in effect, in reality, or in law and by name.
It doesn't matter.
They're going to take it.
They're going to take it by force.
That's what this war is about.
Using October 7th, they got an inch to justify taking miles and miles of territory in Gaza, in the West Bank, in southern Lebanon, in the Golan, in southern Syria, and to launch attacks on all of their enemies.
The Houthis, the Shiites, the IRGC, Iran.
That's what this is.
And they take that very seriously.
So these statements they give, like I said, proclamations, commitments, promises, it means nothing.
And they've been playing this game throughout this entire war and long before that.
They did this with the Biden administration.
And I know because I covered the whole thing.
They did a ceasefire in late November 2023 and early December.
Then they broke it.
They made a ceasefire in January 2025.
Then they broke it in March of 25.
The United States thought that Israel had agreed to a peace proposal last May in 2024 until they just didn't, until Israel just didn't agree to anything.
And they left the American president in the previous administration and in this one telling the Washington Post about it, planting stories about how the American president is furious.
He had a very mean phone call with Netanyahu.
And they say that in private and in public, they're best friends because the president has no power over Israel.
No leverage, no power, no will or no ability to influence that country at all.
So this peace proposal that, again, Trump said it, I think, a couple weeks ago.
He said, this is the one.
We're going to have something in two weeks.
We're going to get it buttoned up.
And he's talking about, we won't allow them to do this.
Enough is enough.
It's got to stop.
Here's the deal.
And Hamas will reject it, even if they accepted it.
Israel would do what they're going to do regardless.
That's your peace process.
So that's that.
We'll see how this evolves over the next couple of weeks.
The next shoe to drop is what's happening in Iran.
That's the other fake peace process.
So the war in Gaza will continue and the war against Iran will continue.
And it will be as if the United States is just not even a party to any of it because we might as well not be.
But that's that.
We're going to move on.
We're going to talk a little bit also about the ADL and some major breakthroughs on that front, apparently.
Today, or I should say this week, it was announced that the ADL is taking down their hate glossary, which is a list that they maintain on their website of who they consider to be hateful organizations and individuals, those that are racist, anti-Semitic, white supremacist, extremist.
And at the same time, the FBI announced that they are no longer partnering with the ADL to combat anti-Semitism.
This is a story about that from Reuters.
It says, quote, the FBI said on Wednesday that it cut ties with the Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish group that tracks anti-Semitism, after conservatives criticized the group for including the slain activist Charlie Kirk's organization in a glossary on extremism.
In a social media post, the FBI director Cash Patel said the Bureau won't partner with political fronts masquerading as watchdogs, a political front masquerading as a watchdog.
Patel's announcement followed criticism of the ADL by right-wing voices, including billionaire Elon Musk, over its inclusion of Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA in their glossary of extremism and hate.
After that criticism, the ADL removed the entire glossary from its website.
It said that Turning Point USA had a history of bigoted statements, a charge that the group rejects.
ADL's website says it works closely with federal, state, and local law enforcement in fighting extremism.
It also notes that the FBI had turned to it for data and research as far back as the 1940s.
Civil rights advocates criticized Kurt for rhetoric they called racist, anti-immigrant, transphobic, and misogynistic, citing his remarks on black, LGBTQ, Muslim, and immigrant communities.
So this is a pretty significant development.
The ADL is maybe the preeminent Jewish organization that is involved in censorship, reputational destruction, career destruction of those that are considered to be far-right radicals, whether they be Christian radicals, white radicals, anti-Semitic radicals.
It is a decidedly left-wing organization.
It is a Jewish organization, and it has been engaged in many of these sustained and targeted attacks on right-wing groups and individuals using the bully pulpit, using censorship, using their connections in Wall Street and in mainstream media to suppress anybody that is outside the mainstream and the right wing.
So it is unambiguously a positive development that this group is taking a hit.
They're forced to take down their glossary of hate, which was used to debank, censor, and target people that the ADL disagreed with.
And they lost their partnership with the FBI, which is massive, because the FBI was basically working on their behalf.
The FBI was investigating and, in a sense, persecuting the political opponents of left-wing American Jewry represented by the ADL.
And let's just first talk about what the ADL is.
Let's just talk about who they are and where they come from.
They're called the Anti-Defamation League, which is a bit vague and a bit strange also.
Many groups, they sort of contain the fundamental conceit in their name.
The Republican Jewish Coalition, the RJC, is a coalition of Republican Jews.
And APAC, American Israel Public Affairs Committee, is a public affairs committee that is in favor of the U.S.-Israel relationship.
It's right there in the name.
Anti-Defamation League.
They're a league that is against a defamation.
Defamation of who?
Defamation in general?
Of what?
Of who?
They were created because of the accusations against an American Jew by the name of Leo Frank, who is accused of raping and murdering a little girl in America.
And this is a time of many charges like this against Jews, like the Dreyfus affair in France, Leo Frank affair in the United States, where Jews, like blacks and like other minority groups, were being accused of things.
And those respective communities claimed that these were, this constituted a defamation.
The charges against Jews or blacks or other marginalized groups constituted a form of defamation.
That's what they said.
I'm not saying that.
That's what they said.
That's where the name comes from.
They said Leo Frank was defamed as a killer, pedophile, rapist because he was Jewish.
That was a defamation of Jews as a group because they're marginal.
And the same way that blacks are defamed, in the same way that other ethnic, racial, religious minorities were attacked on the basis of their minority status, they're being defamed as criminals, rapists, murderers, whatever.
Of course, Leo Frank was most likely guilty, but that is where the name comes from.
So the Anti-Defamation League is born, and it is a subsidiary of the B'nai Brith, which is an international Jewish society.
It's a Jewish group.
But Jewish is not in the name.
It is a Jewish group.
And if you read their mission statement, it says that they're dedicated specifically to fighting anti-Semitism, building up the Jewish community, and defending Israel.
And they're explicitly born of the international Jewish community, part and parcel of the Jewish community.
They're considered a Jewish group and a constituent member of the Organization of Major American Groups.
Okay?
That's what the ADL is.
Now, let's also consider the context.
You have a lot of Jews in America.
Where do they come from?
As we all know, Jews started pouring into America in the late 19th and early 20th century through Ellis Island from Eastern Europe.
They were segregated.
They were persecuted.
There were pogroms in Russia.
There was the pale of settlement.
They were separated from everybody, and they were poor.
So they came to America, like the Slavs, like the Southern Europeans.
That's where they came from.
And during this time, there was a lot of anti-immigrant sentiment.
There was a lot of racist sentiment against all the immigrants, against the Jews, against the Italians, against the Irish, against blacks.
This era of Jim Crow, this is the era of the Ellis Islanders versus the nativists.
And at this time, there was legal discrimination against the Jews.
They were kept out of universities with quotas.
They were excluded from other organizations, fraternal organizations, other parts of elite society.
Why does this matter?
Jews were an alien element.
They were outsiders.
And unlike the Italians or the Irish, they could not assimilate with the native whites because they weren't Christians like them and they weren't ethnically European like them or not considered that way.
So the Jewish experience in America is that they became very liberal.
They come from Russia and many of them have socialist ideals, progressive left-wing ideals.
They're pro-union.
And they're in favor of liberal universalism, the idea that they are just as American as anybody.
Because they say that being American is not about being English or Anglo.
It's not even about being European.
It's not even about being Christian.
They start to say that we're as American as anybody, even though we're ethnically and religiously Jewish, because of the values we all share.
And that's the real beauty of America.
They say the real beauty of America is that we're a rich melting pot where all these people from around the world can come together and we all become part of America with shared values.
A Jewish playwright named Israel Zangwill, he came up with that idea.
Melting pot comes from him.
Those are his words.
So as a marginal group facing discrimination, legal and real discrimination, they start to identify as liberal, left-wing, socialist, universalist.
And they start to identify with the civil rights cause.
And in the 1950s and 1960s, the ADL and other left-wing Jews are leading the charge in the civil rights movement.
They're partnering with the NAACP.
They're partnering with the black civil rights activists, giving them legal representation, fighting for them in politics.
Why?
Because these Jewish leftists, these immigrant Jewish communities, they understand that a rising tide lifts all boats.
In other words, the more civil rights, the more liberal, the more multicultural that America gets, the better it is for them.
If the legal standard is that there's no discrimination, no racism, if race is not even part of our society, then that's really good for them because it allows them to ascend.
No quotas at Harvard, no quotas at General Electric, no quotas.
or restrictions at the country club.
It gives them more opportunities, more rights, more access.
So they find a common cause with all, with immigrants in general, with American blacks, with even Muslims for that matter later on, with all these other communities.
That's why Jews are so left.
That's why like 80% of American Jews are left.
That's why Jews are behind so many of the left-wing causes.
Whether it's women's rights, civil rights, gay rights, that's why they're, and there's other reasons too, but that is a big reason why they're behind a lot of it.
Because liberal universalism is essential to them having privileges and opportunities and rights in America.
They have this political interest in redefining what America is.
And that's where the ADL comes from.
Now, in 2015, the ADL gets a new president, Jonathan Greenblatt.
He's from the Obama administration.
But as we know, the Obama administration is very progressive.
And it's made up of these really militant progressives from the 60s and 70s.
These guys are communists.
They're from Nation of Islam.
They're black nationalists.
Many of them believe in liberation theology.
They're radical communists.
And around the same time, in the 60s and 70s, the international left starts to see Israel as a racist state.
They start to see Israel to the extent that it was aligning with the United States as capitalist because it was becoming capitalist, as racist, as nationalist.
And so these radical progressives, even many of them Jews, start to hate on Israel.
An Obama admin official becomes part of the ADL in 2015.
And all of a sudden, the ADL is perceived by many pro-Israel Jews as getting too close to this progressive left that hates Israel.
The ADL forgives Ilhan Omar for saying it's all about the Benjamins.
The ADL under Greenblatt is very tight with the Democratic Party, which is being run by Obama and all of his people, who the pro-Israel Jews in America consider to be Israel haters.
They think that Obama is a Jew hater.
They think Obama is an Israel hater.
They think that the United Nations is out to get Israel.
Amnesty International is out to get Israel.
They think that the far left, the progressives, are out to get Israel.
And they say the radical left is taking over the Democratic Party.
And so there begins to be this inter or rather intra within Jewish battle between the pro-Israel Jews and the ADL.
And you see this all over the place.
Ben Shapiro hates Greenblatt and what the ADL has become.
You have people like Joel Pollock, the editor at Breitbart, he says the same thing.
You've got Ezra Levant, he was on Infowars today, said if all the Jews were like the ADL and Shmuly, I would hate the Jews too because they're so left-wing.
But let's think about this for a second.
Why do we oppose the ADL?
Why do we oppose the Jewish left?
We oppose the ADL and the Jewish left because we believe that America is particular.
It's not a melting pot.
That's not what makes America great.
We believe that America has a distinct identity rooted in its European heritage, that it's white, that it's Christian.
And our American culture proceeds from our Christian heritage and our European heritage.
And in some sense, our European genetics.
So we believe that that's what America is.
And to the extent that Jews come here and they're not the same racially, they don't share our religion.
In many ways, they don't share the same values.
They're like socialists and communists.
We're saying, no, you can't redefine what America is.
You can't come here and tell us what our country is.
Our country is one thing.
And, you know, you can try and force yourself into it, but you're never going to change what America is.
This is the tension between the white right and the ADL, the Christian identity movement and the ADL.
This is why the ADL hates the far right.
Because the far right, to the extent that it's made up of traditionalists, traditional Christians, traditional Americans, white identitarians, we're trying to preserve America.
And we're saying that what America is, is white and Christian.
And the ADL, to the extent that they're an advocate for the Jews and the marginalized immigrant Jews and all the other marginalized, racial, ethnic, religious minorities, the ADL is saying, no, that's an extremist viewpoint.
America's for everybody.
It's not just for whites.
It was never for whites.
It's not just for Christians.
It's for everybody.
And this is why the ADL is working to make America less white and less Christian.
Because the less white and less Christian it is, the weaker that that claim will become that America is or should be or ever was white and Christian.
This is why the ADL is set against the far right.
And that's why the ADL is branding white identitarians, Christian nationalists, and critics of Israel as hateful, fanatics, extremists, and is seeking to get them censored and banned and destroyed and their reputations and lives ruined.
That is our opposition to the ADL.
That's why the ADL considers us to be beyond the pale.
Because for 100 years, they have been advocates for a multicultural, multiracial, multi-ethnic, religiously pluralistic American society on behalf of the immigrant Jews, on behalf of the eternal wanderers, those that are not assimilable.
And to the extent that they're speaking on behalf of blacks and Muslims and gays and women, it's again because the rising tide lifts all boats.
They want to push back in as broad a possible way a united front against the dominant white Christian majority, which has the ability to keep all those groups down.
But here's the rub.
So the ADL is kicked out of the FBI and they're forced to destroy their hate glossary.
But this development is being celebrated by Jews.
I'll give you a quick list of them.
A group called Beitar USA celebrated the announcement.
This was their tweet about it.
They said, quote, today we note with satisfaction that the ADL has removed its so-called glossary of hate, which listed Beitar as the only Jewish radical extremist hate group.
We were placed alongside groups like Turning Point and others, a company that further exposed the ADL's bias.
It is shameful and reprehensible that the ADL ever labeled Beitar, one of the world's leading Zionist movements, a hate organization.
In truth, the ADL is a radical left-wing woke organization that opposes strong Zionism and fuels division and hate in America and worldwide.
We agree with Elon Musk.
The ADL is a hate group.
At the World Zionist Congress, we will advance resolutions to formally declare the ADL a radical hate group hostile to the state of Israel.
Founded by Zeev Jabotinsky in 1923, Beitar has stood proudly for Jewish pride, Zionism, and self-defense for more than a century.
The ADL is a Jewish group in defense of the Jews against defamation, legal restrictions, quotas, etc.
But other Jewish groups are calling the ADL anti-Israel, hostile to Israel, labeling Israeli Jewish groups as hateful.
How do you make sense of this?
Well, it basically comes from within the Jewish community, two ideas of how the Jews are going to survive in a world that hates them.
And that's their perception.
Two competing ideas.
There are Jews in America that say, look, we like America.
We want to live in America.
We want to live in Europe.
And yeah, we want to live in Israel too.
And in order for the world to be safe for Jews, we need the whole world to embrace this liberal universalist ideology.
How can we inoculate the world against anti-Semitism?
What's the solution to the Jewish question?
We have to make the whole world post-racial, liberal, religiously tolerant.
Because if the whole world, led by the United States, shares these global values, then we will be safe.
We can ascend.
We can protect ourselves through the legal process.
That is how we can be safe.
But the Zionists, in particular, the religious Zionists, the revisionist Zionists, they have an altogether different opinion.
They have a very skeptical view of the world.
They say the world is always going to hate us.
Any liberal consensus is only short-lived.
Eventually, on a long enough timeline, they're going to try and kill us again or persecute us again.
They believe the only way for Jews to be safe is for them to have a strong country, for them to have their own country in the Middle East, for them to have nuclear weapons, a powerful military, a big, in terms of population and land mass, a big, strong, powerful country, a country defined as a Jewish nation, an ethnostate, a country of, by, for Jews, a powerful country.
And that's the only way we're ever going to be safe is to be nationalistic and muscular.
Now, you are starting maybe to see the tension because there's a contradiction.
They can't really do both.
Because in order for Israel to be strong and powerful, they have to embrace a particular Jewish identity to the exclusion of all the others.
The Israeli government has to say this is a place for Jews, only for Jews.
This is a Jewish nation.
It's not a liberal nation for everybody.
It's a nation for Jews, by Jews, for Jews, Jewish values, ethnic Jews.
That's who it's for.
And we're going to kick everybody else out.
And if you're not on board with that, we're going to kick you out.
And we're going to violently and aggressively pursue our interests, like in the West Bank, like in Gaza.
We're going to push you out.
We're going to take more land.
We're going to bomb our neighbors.
We're going to make you submit to us.
Meanwhile, in America, the ADL is saying America's for everybody.
America's liberal.
We don't agree with the particularism like that.
We don't agree with ethno-nationalism.
There's this tension.
And that is why many of these pro-Israel groups are so happy the ADL is receding.
That's why they're calling them woke.
Because in their own words, they say the ADL is hurting strong Zionism.
And why do you think that is?
It's because the American left and even the European left, they're backing the Israeli left.
The Israeli left that wants to make Israel left-wing like America, liberal like America.
It's a division that runs through American Jewry and Israel also.
And there's even a big debate about this in a forum for Jewish organizations.
This is a story from the Times of Israel in 2018.
It says, quote, last year, the conference of presidents of major American Jewish organizations updated its secret rules to ban insults, ad hominem attacks, and name-calling among member organizations and instituted a special committee to consider complaints in strictest confidence.
The committee met to hear complaints.
All parties agreed.
The session, all parties agreed, devolved into insults, attacks, name-calling.
Three U.S. Jewish organizations, the National Council of Jewish Women, the ADL, and the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, accused the Zionist Organization of America of inappropriately criticizing them.
The ZOA filed complaints against member groups that have yet to be scheduled for hearings.
The complaints range from differences about who is responsible for anti-Zionist signs at rallies to intimations of corrupt intent to allegations of violence.
Jewish politics is nasty, but rarely is the infighting in public.
The charges and countercharges demonstrate the ways that ZOA President Morton Klein gets under his colleague's skin.
So you have three liberal Jewish organizations, the Organization for Jewish Women, the ADL, and the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, fighting with the Zionist Organization of America.
And the basis of the fight is that the liberal Jewish organizations are soft on progressives that hate Israel.
And they're too tough on pro-Israel groups that they call racist or nationalistic or xenophobic.
The pro-Israel right wing in America and in Israel hates the American Jewish left because they say that the Jewish left is not pro-Israel enough.
They don't recognize the threat the Palestinians oppose to Israel.
They're trying to destroy Israel by opening up Israeli society to Arabs, Muslims, and foreigners.
And that is the basis of the tension within Jewish politics.
And they're talking about this openly.
Ben Shapiro has said, my problem with the ADL is that it's become a partisan left-wing group and hospitable to Jew haters like Ilhan Omar and too tough on pro-Israel guys like myself, Shapiro says.
Joel Pollack said, the ADL used to be good, but now they're calling everybody that's right-wing anti-Israel and they're failing to isolate the real haters of Israel, like Nick Fuentes, like all these other guys.
So in other words, let's summarize here.
We, the white right, those that are in favor of a white America, we, the Christian nationalist movement that's in favor of a Christian country, Christian values, we are Christian.
Those that are critical of Israel's influence in politics, we are against the ADL because the ADL is a pro-Jewish group, is trying to redefine American identity to make it safer and more hospitable for their own group, and because they represent Israel influencing our country.
And on that basis, they're censoring, suppressing, fighting against traditional Americans, traditional white America, Christian America, independent America, independent from Israel.
But these people like Ezra Levant, Ben Shapiro, Mort Klein, they hate the ADL because they say the ADL is too friendly to the new anti-Semites on the far left and too critical of the most extreme right-wing Israelis and the Netanyahu government in Israel.
So our criticisms of the ADL and the right wing of American Jewry, their criticism of the ADL are two different things.
Now, why does this matter?
Because the ADL is not going to be vanquished here.
What is most likely going to happen is that Jonathan Greenblatt will be fired and replaced with a more pro-Israel president.
I'm sure that the constituent members of the ADL's board or its donors, they're going to say, look, you're ruining the ADL.
The ADL used to be all-powerful.
You're ruining it.
We need to get somebody in that's not a leftist, that's not from the Obama admin, that's not with the institutional left wing in America.
So that might be one of the things that happens.
The other thing that has already happened is that the ADL is being replaced with a different species of Jewish organization.
What are they?
I'll give you examples.
Beitar is one of them.
Beitar was founded by Zeev Jabotinsky, and Beitar has been working with the U.S. State Department.
This is a Jewish group born in Israel.
They were terrorists in the pre-Israeli independence mandate of Palestine.
They're working with the U.S. State Department to make lists of anti-Israel college students to be deported.
So you get six of one, half a dozen of the other.
You get the ADL working with the FBI, or you get Beitar working with the State Department.
You get the ADL directing the FBI to attack white supremacists and racists, or you get Beitar to direct the State Department to deport the pro-Palestine guys, the Muslims.
Canary Mission is another.
Canary Mission creates lists of students that have protested Israel in favor of Palestine.
They're running those names up the flagpole to get them deported.
Canary Mission is an Israeli outfit.
Beitar is an Israeli outfit.
They have a line to Marco Rubio because Rubio is supported by pro-Israel Jews like Miriam Adelson, who's in bed with the Republican Party.
Now, I would say that on net, on net, it is probably a good development.
Kicking out the ADL.
Look, the ADL was suppressing white nationalists, white identity, Christian nationalism, the far right.
They were doing that in an ideologically liberal way because they're part of the American left.
These right-wing Zionist organizations, they're really going in more on the third worldists, the Muslims, the progressives, the far left that is specifically hating on Israel.
The far right sometimes hates on Israel.
A lot of the far right is quietist about Israel.
Guys like Jared Taylor, Peter Brimelow, they don't talk about Israel.
The Bronze Age Perver Network, they're sort of white nationalist, but pro-Israel.
So groups like Beitar and Canary Mission are going to leave those guys alone.
Now, it's then a question of, is it better to have the ADL target Israel critics and the entire far right?
Or Israeli organizations, they're going to leave the far right alone and only go after the Israel critics on the far right and on the far left.
That's an open question.
Is it better?
I think in some sense.
In another sense, it only makes them more precise.
And that's where we need to be careful.
Because what they really want is for the ADL to become more precise and only attack the true adversaries of Israel.
And I don't know that that's a good thing.
There's a consensus right now that woke is bad.
It's gone too far.
There's a consensus now that immigration needs to stop.
Blacks are out of control.
There's a consensus.
All this left-wing stuff has gone too far, even that Israel's gone too far.
And there's a general climate of free speech.
Now, if the ADL is reorganized and they become more precise and they say, you know what, you're right, we went too far.
Turning point's not anti-Semitic.
They're not haters.
But if they say Nick Fuentes is, and that guy's got to go, then there might be a new consensus that isolates the only people that are actually against Israel.
And you have a general climate of free speech that very quickly becomes a little less general.
And people think we have free speech, but in reality, the so-called real anti-Semites are being precisely targeted with laser precision and they're being punished.
And no one's going to talk about it because they'll say, yeah, well, the ADL used to go too far.
Now they're focusing on the right guys.
And that's a good thing.
And mark my words, that's what Shapiro, Pollock, that's what they're all saying.
They're saying we're not against the ADL censoring people.
Even Cash Patel, Cash Patel said they're political, masquerading as a watchdog group.
And inside of that is a tacit statement that watchdog organizations are necessary, that we need Jewish watchdogs, but this isn't one of them.
And a lot of people tell you the Jews are not a monolith.
That's true.
But one thing they're monolithic about is they're all in favor of their own collective interest ahead of ours.
So they have these disputes, excuse me, they have these disputes, but they keep them in the family.
At the end of the day, they literally all get together at conferences.
They literally all get together at international congresses and conventions and conferences, and they debate what is good for us.
How are we going to fight for our interest?
How are we going to fight for what's best for Israel?
What's best for Jews?
And if that's the question you're asking, then you really shouldn't have power over Americans because the only people that should have power over Americans are people that are saying what's best for Americans.
And maybe the Jews can have a say.
Maybe the Jews can petition the American government and say, hey, you know, this is making us uncomfortable.
I think that's their right.
They're human beings like us, and they exist in America.
They're not going anywhere.
And they exist in Israel, but they cannot have that final say.
They cannot have that authority.
They have too much power.
I'm sticking.
That's my problem.
They have too much power.
We need to take the power from them.
And it doesn't mean we're going to hurt them.
It doesn't mean we're going to be cruel towards them.
It doesn't even mean we're not going to listen to them.
But it means they just can't have that final say.
They can petition for their grievances like every other minority group, like every other special interest.
Special interests have a place in America.
You know, we want to hear from, let's say, black people.
Black people are a distinct part of America.
They're distinct from the rest.
So are the Jews.
So are, so are, in a sense, Catholics.
They should petition an all-American, all-Christian government about their grievances.
They should not have the veto power over who gets a Twitter account, who gets to exercise their right to speak freely, who gets to hold a run for office, and all the rest of it.
So anyway, so two cheers for the ADL's disempowerment.
It is unambiguously, in my opinion, a good thing, but mixed feelings about it.
You should see it as a red flag that pro-Israel guys are cheering this on because it only means they're going to get replaced by a pro-Israel group as opposed to a Jewish leftist group.
But they're not that different.
All right.
With that being said, we're going to move on.
We're going to take a look at our super chats.
We'll see what you guys have to say about all this.
Let's take a look.
Let me get set up here.
get my headset on.
All right.
Let's try not to crash out tonight, okay?
I'm going to do my best not to crash out, but I'm not going to make any promises.
If I go on Twitter and you open up the tab for premium and you choose your subscription, when I press that, it says, sorry, you are not eligible for premium at this time.
I can't, I'm not allowed to buy premium.
And if I'm not allowed to buy premium, I can't post videos longer than two minutes and 20 seconds.
I can't exceed the 280 character limit.
I can't edit my posts.
I can't get a check mark.
I can't, I can't monetize.
I can't access, I can't do two-factor authentication with the phone number.
So I have like a 100-character password because I can't get 2FA.
That's a premium feature.
Okay.
So people say you're not censored anymore.
I am still heavily censored.
I am banned on YouTube.
I am banned on Instagram.
I am banned on Facebook.
I am banned on TikTok.
My name and face and voice are banned on TikTok.
My set is banned on YouTube.
If you post clips from my show on YouTube, they'll be banned.
Other people can have me on, but I can't be on myself.
And the two places that I am allowed on Twitter, I can't have all the features everyone else can.
And on Rumble, they won't put me on the front page.
If I make an appearance on another show, they won't put me on the front page.
I can't monetize.
I don't get paid by Rumble.
I can't get paid by Rumble.
So I am available on two platforms.
And even on those platforms, I don't have the same privileges as everybody else.
I'm going to blow my, I'm going to blow my head off.
I'll finish that sentence.
Pause.
Whenever I'm saying that, you can just count on me.
So don't, don't, but don't push me, okay?
When you start saying, think of mac and cheese, think of cabbage rolls, it's like you're just going to bring out the beast.
Be careful what you wish for.
Do not summon the beast.
Say his name and he will appear.
Let's just don't let me forget about food because if I think about food too much, I'm going to get pissed off.
No, but good to hear from you, Christine.
Hope you're doing well.
I'm going to trust.
Trust.
The Groipers are coming with our appetites.
It's just, we got to, I got to come there with the SWAT team.
After the assassination of Charlie Kirk, we got to be very careful how we move, especially after your little, your little assassination attempt against me.
Your little plot that you called in.
You thought you were going to get me.
I survived.
Now you want to make amends because you know that hell is coming with me.
I see, I see right through you, Christine.
So we're coming in heavy.
We're coming in heavy.
If you think you're catching me off guard, it's not going to be no Israeli security.
You know, the rooftops are not secured.
Like we're going to be patting you down.
We're going to be waving you down with the wand.
We're taking no chances.
The pierogies are getting wanded down.
We are not taking any chances, Christine.
You thought, you thought, you thought we were going to come in, and I don't think so.
When you say something like, what is the alternative?
Look, the alternative is you step outside the system.
That's not a meaningful choice.
When you say Republican and Democrat, they're effectively doing the same thing.
And they're part of the same arrangement.
And they're both answerable to the Jews.
So the question is not: do you want one flavor or the other flavor?
You're getting the same brand, which is Jewish control.
So these are not alternatives.
These are the same thing.
It's the illusion that you're getting two different things.
A true alternative would be something outside of that.
So something infiltrating the Republicans, maybe a new thing.
Or you just don't look at politics as the sum of the political parties, but actually as a complex, interdependent web of institutions.
Your problem is you're ignorant.
Your problem is you think politics is Republican elected officials, Democrat-elected officials, when political science has been passed at for decades.
Even Political Science 101 has moved past this.
It is the complex interdependence of the moneyed interests, nonprofits and think tanks, which they support, media outlets like newspapers, but also the social platforms that host the news stories.
That's the real political system.
So when people say, why are you against Republicans?
It's like, it's not really about that.
We're getting into how you really play the game.
We're getting into actually how this system works and the anatomy of it and how we're going to succeed in the long term is not by voting.
It's by over time creating our own independent side, creating a distinct group.
which is not loyal to Republicans or Democrats, not conservative or liberal, but that is nationalist, that is Christian, that is identitarian, and a group of people, a cadre of revolutionaries that have some power.
Billionaires, influential people in the economy, influential people in academia, influential people in government.
That is going to be the side that we're going to take.
You're like, we need to be Republican.
We need to be Democrat.
It's like, we need to be an amorphous collective of people that hold these values that in time will march through the institutions and one day make a challenge.
We need to form our own distinct factions.
So you're just thinking about it wrong.
You're thinking about it like a child, like a third grade civics class, how a bill becomes a law.
You have like the schoolhouse rock interpretation of politics because you are fucking stupid.
It's easy to be against the satanic party that allows transgender couples to purchase boys, but why not support the normal gay couple boy purchase party?