Nick Fuentes dissects Charlie Kirk's final letter to Netanyahu, debunking claims of blackmail while asserting Kirk remained a pro-Israel operative until death. He condemns Matt Walsh and Candace Owens as traitors within a Zionist enterprise, arguing that figures like Josh Hammer and Mark Levin advance Israeli interests at America's expense. Fuentes rejects assassination theories, citing DNA evidence, and insists the Talmud contains coded anti-Christian intent. Ultimately, he frames the US as an occupied nation controlled by a Transnational Jewish Syndicate, urging Christians to embrace martyrdom for their faith against this perceived global oppression. [Automatically generated summary]
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day.
Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
Ripers and all the alt-riders that got banned, all the alt-riders that got slandered, even people that killed themselves.
Our corpses paved the way for you now to walk over.
And you can't give us acknowledgement.
Now you want to slam the door on us.
It's not right.
It's not right.
unidentified
I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us.
For the creation waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed.
We know that the whole creation has been groaning, as in the pains of childbirth, right up to the present time.
Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption to sonship, the redemption of our bodies.
For in this hope we were saved.
But hope that is seen is no hope at all.
Who hopes for what they already have?
But if we hope for what we do not yet have, we wait for it patiently.
There is something involved where we have to forgive them.
We do have to forgive them for their ignorance.
We do have to forgive them for their misunderstanding.
And we have to embrace them and say, better late than never.
Welcome to the right side of history.
Welcome to our, our massive vision, our massive and ambitious vision for how we want the world to be saying
to me, he's like, this is probably pretty cool for you.
I'm like, yeah, it is.
The Word Was God00:03:44
unidentified
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Through him, all things were made.
Without him, nothing was made that has been made.
In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind.
And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers.
He will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.
Jesus said to her, I am the resurrection and the life.
The one who believes in me will live even though they die.
And whoever lives by believing in me will never die.
Do you believe this?
I am sending you out like sheep among wolves.
Therefore, be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.
Then Jesus came to them and said, All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.
And surely I am with you always to the very end of the age.
We have to want it more than they do because if there are thousands and millions and tens of millions and hundreds of millions of Christians ready to meet their final destiny, then nothing can stop us and nothing will.
unidentified
When
I get home I got places to be Evening everybody You're watching America First.
that America was different because we are different.
Palantir is an AI data analytics company.
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithms, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
unidentified
And the reason why is because it's not new to shift to big place.
It's not new to shift on Israel.
It's not.
It's gay.
Hey, you put too much for favor on your side.
And just to make your words save your eyeball.
I took a sad change, but that's just bad.
I'm a bad, that's all bad.
Like I said, Reddits in the dark.
People never know they get my heart.
And all my brothers blocked up on the yard.
You can still be anything you wanna be.
But from one to four to one and three.
Thirty people in the gatt end of just a week.
Being your commander and the chief.
That's the highest fear and love of God.
When you remove the fear and love of God, you create fear and love of everything else.
You're talking to somebody right now that only fears God.
narrative is not one of some sudden booming bolt of lightning out of the blue.
It was a slow and steady, unrelenting stream of blips and blinks, glimmers and glares, low beams and high beams of light, some of which I did not want to see.
I think it was because I fiercely came out during the Groiber Wars of 2019 when so many of these brave young men were on college campuses challenging the likes of Zio Shield Dan Crenshaw, questioning him about his undying loyalty and of course defending Nick Fuentes and so many of the stars of the burgeoning America First Movement who, through an increasing amount of activism, are really going to ensure the future and the success of that movement.
If we don't have freedom on the internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind raped every day forever.
Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geo location, because your phone also has a GPS.
They know where you are at all times.
They know where you go and when.
They know what you buy.
They have access to your bank account.
AI will literally know everything about you.
Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you're asleep.
They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
They know your resting heart rate.
They know how many calories you consume.
Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
You have a smart home, economy of things.
It's like total, like, rape of everybody by the system forever.
My life is like a first-person video game, you know?
This is like, this is my primary.
This is me like walking, walking down the hall.
This is my primary weapon.
Press circle to interact.
Press circle to interact with this item.
At the end of the day, here's the question.
Is it worth it to save the country?
Does the country matter?
Is it worth it to preserve our civilization?
Is it worth it to preserve our religion?
Maybe bigger than that.
Is the truth worth it?
What is the truth worth to you?
What is telling the truth worth to you?
Is it worth something, nothing?
What are you willing to give to tell the truth?
All you need is Jesus.
All you need is prayer.
These material appetites, they will never be satisfied.
And even if they are, it'll never be an adequate substitute for communion with our Holy Father, with somebody, with the author of the world.
Every mother and father understands the love for a child.
And that is how we were made.
We were designed that way.
Because through that experience, we could understand by analogy God's love for us.
It says in Revelation that God will wipe away every tear.
And that's like, to me, it makes me want to cry when I read that.
People experience these things in their lives.
We've all been there where you feel like the whole world's against you, the walls are closing in.
And you read something like that that says that God, like our Father, our Creator, is going to wipe your tears off your face.
And I think our ancestors smile on us right now while we're doing.
unidentified
Cheers.
In the beginning was the word.
And the word was with God.
And the word was God.
Through him, all things were made.
Without him, nothing was made that has been made.
In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind.
Embrace Bold Christian Boldness00:10:34
unidentified
And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers.
He will crush your head.
will strike his heel jesus said to her i am the resurrection and the life The one who believes in me will live, even though they die.
And whoever lives by believing in me will never die.
Do you believe this?
I am sending you out like sheep among wolves.
Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.
Then Jesus came to them and said, All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.
And surely I am with you always to the very end of the age.
We have to want it more than they do because there are thousands and millions and tens of millions and hundreds of millions of Christians ready to meet their final destiny.
I mean, this is part of the sad thing about Happy Canada as far as I'm concerned.
The sad thing is, and I know that no one who watches him will believe me.
Pat does raise issues that I think are important.
Doesn't mean everything he says is false.
It doesn't mean he's not talented.
He's enormously talented.
Doesn't mean he's a bad person.
I'm not attacking him personally.
I mean, I think that, you know, the sovereignty of the American military, et cetera.
I mean, these are not just crank issues.
It's young white men who've been totally cut out of our economy, attacked mercilessly.
I mean, they really are the victims and they're desperate and no one speaks for them.
So they go to Fuentes because he's like incredibly articulate and they think he's our leader.
But unfortunately, Pat Buchanan raises them in a way that I think is discredited.
But he is clearly part of a campaign to discredit non-crazy right voices.
Pat Buchanan is part of the reason it's so hard to have that conversation because he discredits it by his presence.
That's a campaign to destroy credible voices on the right.
And Fuentes is part of it.
And that he believes in conspiracies and that he believes that the Jews are this sinister, secretly organized force trying to affect American politics.
And those aren't discussions I think normal people, sober people should be having.
Anyway, like, who is this kid exactly?
And maybe it's just an accident that the guy goes after, exclusively, goes after people who are in the same, roughly the same.
And then he gets up there and he's like, you know, making Holocaust jokes.
When attacked, he can always fall back on the line, well, the, you know, the tiny cabal that controls American politics doesn't like me because I speak truth to power.
This is actually, incidentally, almost verbatim, what he said the other day, that I offend the plutocracy, that I'm a wanted man by the inside the beltway people, and in every sense, cast himself as a victim who is sort of a Karen Silkwood of politics, someone who's so truthful that he's being hunted down by the conspiracy that runs Washington.
I mean, it's all a bit much.
unidentified
My love has got no money, he's got his strong beliefs.
My love has got no power, he's got his strong beliefs.
My love has got no fame, he's got his strong beliefs.
My love has got no money, he's got his strong beliefs.
Want more and more, people just want more and more freedom and love.
What he's looking for, want more and more.
People just want more and more freedom and love.
What he's looking for, freed from desire.
There is something involved where we have to forgive them.
But then when it comes to me, I'm one of the real disaffected white people.
You want to talk about me and them?
I am them.
He says, Nick Fuentes is leading all of the disaffected young white men.
I am a disaffected white, young white man.
I was a precocious, intelligent, young white college student who went to Boston University, who was pro-Trump and red-pilled by Trump and animated by Trump's message of America first.
And I asked questions about Israel and I was punished for it.
I did it years before Tucker Carlson started talking about Israel last year.
And I sacrificed and I was targeted by the ADL, by the SPLC, by the federal government, by the conservative movement that both Candace and Tucker were a part of.
He's lonely.
He's weird.
He lives in a basement.
That's a lot of people because of the problems you claim to care about.
Do you care about Kwarna and people going into debt to order pizzas and home ownership being impossible?
Or do you think that's a contemptible, low-status thing to be ridiculed and mocked?
What makes Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the bearing of suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us.
An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children, even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
The Canary Mission is an Israeli-funded blacklist, which since July 2025 has been confirmed to be used by the Trump administration to target students, professors, and professionals who oppose Israel and reside in the United States.
This idea is part of an initiative created by the Heritage Foundation, the same group responsible for the infamous Project 2025.
In their initiative, titled Project Esther, they state that students participating in pro-Palestinian protests and activism are supporting Hamas, a group that the United States designates as a foreign terrorist organization.
Therefore, pro-Palestinian students are considered to be supporting terrorism and are subject to the revocation of visas, frozen bank accounts, asset seizures, and the denial of basic constitutional rights.
In effect, the Canary mission serves as a means to circumvent constitutional protections, allowing the federal government to engage in intelligence gathering activities that would otherwise be considered unlawful.
But the Canary mission is not alone.
Palantir, another company closely aligned with the state of Israel, uses AI-driven analytics to maintain private databases on U.S. citizens and currently works with four federal agencies.
While government contracting with the private sector is long-standing, the prominent influence of Jewish groups within these increasingly powerful organizations warrants careful examination.
I renew the call for all able-bodied young American men, all of our elite human capital, all of our geniuses, warriors, intelligent people to dedicate themselves to American sovereignty and independence as Christians, as Americans, as white people, as citizens of the United States.
So on Independence Day, it's important to reflect on the fact that we are an occupied nation.
Now, just like then, we're being ruled by a small country across an ocean, serving itself at our expense.
And as long as that is the case, I will always be obsessed with that.
As long as that is the case, I will always be speaking out against that and fighting against that.
And I will always be anchored, understanding that that is the fundamental struggle.
As long as our presidents have to kiss the wall in Israel and wear a small hat, as long as they have to say that we want to make Israel great again and they're the greatest country ever, and I will never be okay with that.
Barack Obama created the joint comprehensive plan of action, the JCPOA, or the Iranian nuclear deal.
And Barack Obama brought together China, Russia, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the European Union to enforce a nuclear deal that restricts Iran's enrichment of uranium.
The early talks were conducted in secret, and the Israelis were furious, furious about this.
They hated Obama.
Netanyahu went to a joint session of Congress and gave a speech in defiance of the American president and its nuclear deal, and Congress gave 37 standing ovations.
This is the background of Trump's first election.
2016 election happens.
Trump gets elected with the help of the Israelis.
You don't believe me?
There's a whole article about it.
It's an excerpt from James Bamford's book, Spy Fail.
It goes into great detail about the hidden collusion in the 2016 election.
It wasn't Trump and Russia.
It was Trump and Israel.
And why was Israel so hell-bent on getting a Republican elected in 2016?
To scuttle the Iranian nuclear deal.
And that's exactly what happened.
That was the ask.
unidentified
The United States will withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal.
Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Monday.
This time for real.
I was fixing my notes at the last second.
I hit the wrong button.
But we do have a big show.
Lots to talk about.
Lots to get into tonight.
Our featured story, we're going to be talking all about this letter.
All about Charlie Kirk's letter to Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel.
Ah, yes.
The infamous letter.
Well, as it turns out, we now finally have the letter in our possession, and we know the contents of the letter.
For those that don't know what I'm talking about, shortly after Charlie Kirk was assassinated nearly three weeks ago, the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, went on television and claimed that Charlie Kirk was a supporter of Israel until his death.
And part of the evidence of this is that Charlie Kirk sent him a letter in May of this year.
Now, Netanyahu claimed or insinuated that this was a positive letter, a pro-Israel letter.
Candace Owens came out the same day and effectively called Netanyahu a liar.
And she claimed that Netanyahu was misrepresenting the contents or the tone or the purpose of the letter, insinuating that maybe the letter suggested that Charlie Kirk was not pro-Israel after all, or that he had criticisms of Israel, or that the contents of the letter foreshadowed maybe a turn against Israel.
She threatened to release the letter, implying that she was in possession of it.
If, hang on one second, my audio is low, I'm being told, if, are we good now?
Well, we'll see in a minute.
If Netanyahu continued to misrepresent the contents of the letter.
Well, now we actually have it, courtesy of the New York Post.
So, in any case, we have the letter now from the New York Post, not from Candace Owens after all.
And this is what we have.
We don't know 100% if it's real.
All we know is that the New York Post is claiming that this is the infamous letter.
And tonight we're going to go through it.
I'm not going to read it to you in its entirety because it's about seven pages, but I'm going to read it almost in its entirety.
I'm going to read significant portions of it, and we'll go over the contents.
You can tell me what you think.
I will say at the outset, it is clearly not an anti-Israel letter.
Contrary to all of the conspiracy theories, contrary to some of the insinuations, it is a very pro-Israel letter and is extremely consistent with Charlie Kirk's pro-Israel politics throughout his entire life.
And for someone like myself, it contains no surprises.
But we're going to work through it.
We'll talk about how it arrived in the public.
We'll talk about, like I said, what's in it.
We'll read through most of it and we'll discuss the significance of the letter in the context of the theory.
We're also going to talk tonight about the Gaza peace plan, which was unveiled by President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu today in a press conference at the White House.
And it's not great.
It's basically the same plan that we have seen for the most part every single time for the past year, year and a half.
And so we'll talk about what's in the new peace plan.
I'll give you my position on it.
Spoiler alert: I do not believe this is going to end in a Palestinian state.
And honestly, at this point, what would you even call the peace process?
A couple weeks ago, Israel tried to kill the negotiators on the other side.
They failed.
They have already violated every ceasefire that they've ever agreed to.
And both the Trump administration and the Israeli government have proven that they are not trustworthy.
They're not honest.
So what exactly are we doing here?
They talk about the peace process.
They talk about ceasefire proposals and plans for peace and all this.
I just doubt the integrity and the legitimacy of the whole process, the whole entire thing.
So we'll talk all about that too.
I was trying to decide actually tonight which is the bigger story.
And unfortunately, I think people are even more interested in the Charlie Kirk conspiracy than in what's actually happening in the Middle East, which contains sort of an irony.
But we'll talk about all that.
It's going to be a packed show.
Before we get into it, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble, smash the like button, leave a comment, let me know what you think about the show.
Also, make sure to check out my collaboration with Glenn Greenwald.
Earlier tonight, I appeared on system update with Glenn.
And this is a collaboration which is a long time coming.
We've talked about it for months and tried to get it together for a little while.
And finally, we made it happen.
It was a great conversation.
I talked to him about 7 o'clock Central Time, I think.
We did about an hour and we covered a lot of different stuff.
We talked about my generational run.
We talked about Charlie Kirk.
We talked about the usual suspects, Israel, the Jewish Zionist right-wing, all that kind of stuff.
And it was a great talk.
And I will say about Glenn and about Michael Tracy, who sometimes hosts his show.
I have to say, because I've now done that show with both of them.
I did it with Michael Tracy last year.
I did the show with Glenn tonight.
They are probably some of my favorite interviewers or hosts because we actually have a disagreement, but it's an intelligent, thoughtful disagreement.
I find that so many shows that I go on, it's one of two things.
It's either I'm explaining the Jewish issue to them.
They either agree or disagree.
And I'm in the position of basically telling them how it works because they don't know or they're a shill or they're pro-Israel themselves.
Or if you're talking to somebody on the left, it's like a hysterical, they're calling you a Nazi.
They assume that you're a racist, that you hate all non-white people or something like that.
They just assume you're lying.
And so when I talk to Glenn and Michael Tracy, they are progressive.
They are left-wing, but they know the relevant facts.
They know the score.
They're not going to dispute that Israel influences the country.
They're not going to dispute that Jewish Americans are influential.
And they're also not hysterical Democrat partisans.
They're not trying to convince you that every Republican president sucks and every Democrat president is awesome, like a Harry Sisson or a Dean Withers.
So I actually really enjoy my conversations with them.
It's pushback, but it's smart.
It's thoughtful.
It's not, you know, they kind of know the same information that we know.
So it's a very good conversation.
Really appreciated it.
And Glenn, you know, he's a pretty mainstream figure.
So still takes a little bit of courage to have me on the show, even though I'm more popular than ever.
It still is commendable.
So make sure to check it out to support him.
It's on system update.
It's on his channel on Rumble.
I also uploaded it as well.
What else?
Just a quick thing.
I'm not going to be here on Friday.
I have some major collaborations planned over the weekend.
So I'll be here until Thursday, Friday.
I'm not going to be doing a show.
I got a few things lined up into the weekend and into next week, which I think you're going to be excited about.
So no show on Friday.
And one other thing before we get into the news, this is what I was pulling up when I accidentally went live right before the show, kind of having some technical difficulties here.
One thing I wanted to touch on just before we get into the news, and I hope I don't spend too much time on this.
Sometimes I get a little talkative here, but I did just want to touch on this briefly.
I discussed it actually with Glenn during the interview.
I saw this tweet today from Matt Walsh, which I really think needs to be discussed.
And I'm on my timeline today, and I see Matt Walsh, who you know from Daily Wire.
And as you know, Matt Walsh is Catholic.
He's white.
He's not Jewish, but he works at Daily Wire for Ben Shapiro.
And as we now know, since Candace departed Daily Wire, Candace Owens, that is, it is basically a condition of working for Daily Wire that you are not against Israel.
You can't talk about Israel too much.
You can't oppose Israel.
You cannot talk too much or oppose Israel's influence in America.
It seems the most you can say at Daily Wire about Israel is that you're not an Israeli.
To the extent that you can be critical of Israel, you can say things like, I am against all foreign aid.
I am against all foreign wars.
I only like America.
I'm not an Israeli.
That's about the extent of it.
Go any further than that, you're going to get fired.
You're going to lose your job.
You're going to run into problems.
And Matt Walsh, for that reason, he's known as basically being an ideological white advocate or something like this.
It seems that the only issues he talks about are the race relations between whites and everybody else.
Blacks, Indians, Hispanics, Asians, immigrants, but never talking about the race relations between Jews and whites or Jews and everybody else.
And I find that to be pretty curious.
I think it's pretty obvious what's going on there in light of what we know about Daily Wire.
And I wanted to talk about one thing he said in particular today on Twitter, which I think maybe shines a light on this.
Today on Twitter, Matt Walsh posted this.
He said, quote, the mayor of Dearborn, Michigan is Abdullah Hamoud.
The guy running against him in the mayoral race is Nagi Al-Humdeghi.
The mayor's chief of staff is Zaneeb A. Hussein.
The police chief is Issa Shaheen.
He oversees the commander of the patrol division, Madhou Bazi.
The public health director is Ali Abbazid.
Don't forget city council members Kamal Al-Sawafi and Mustafa Hamoud.
Question, he says, is this what our founding fathers had in mind?
That's a question that the residents of Dearborn can consider as they awake at 5.30 a.m. to the Muslim call to prayer blasted over the loudspeakers by the local mosque.
They can keep thinking about it as they get in their cars and drive to work down Osama Siblani Street.
Is this America?
If the entire country resembles Dearborn in 50 years, in what sense will America still exist?
And, you know, I see this tweet.
And of course, I directionally agree with the sentiment.
And the sentiment is, of course, broadly speaking, that America is radically changing because of immigration, specifically non-white immigration.
Non-white immigration from the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia is rendering America unrecognizable because there are so many immigrants coming in in such a short amount of time, and they form ethnic enclaves.
And they basically then graft their old country onto our country.
And if this process continues ad infinitum, it's a valid question.
Will all of America look like a patchwork of ethnic enclaves, Muslims, Indians, Chinese, Latin Americans?
And then in what sense will America be the same country as it once was?
Valid question, directionally correct.
Here's the issue, though, that I take with it.
In the first place, is America being invaded by Muslims?
Europe is being invaded by Muslims, no doubt.
The United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, most of the migrants pouring into these European countries are sub-Saharan Africans from Africa and Muslim Arabs from the Middle East.
And so to the extent that you have a foreign-born or non-white population in Europe, mostly these are African sub-Saharan blacks and Arab Muslim North African and Middle Easterners.
But that's not really the case in the United States.
In the United States, it's mostly Hispanics from the Northern Triangle of El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.
It's Venezuelans.
It's people from South and Central America.
And it's Indians and Chinese that are coming in on worker visas.
It's really not so much Muslims.
And, you know, case in point, Dearborn, Michigan is not a huge city.
To the extent that you have Somalis in Minneapolis, Minneapolis is not one of the bigger cities.
But cities like Chicago, it's a third Mexican.
Cities like LA, I think it's mostly Mexican at this point.
Cities like Miami, New York, significant Hispanic Asian populations.
So why always attacking Muslims then?
Well, Glenn Greenwald responded, and it's sort of interesting.
I did his show tonight, but I saw this on Twitter today.
Glenn replied to Matt Walsh's tweet and sort of said the same thing.
He said, people who try to convince Americans that the primary threat to their lives is Muslims are almost always, one, those eager to convince Americans they have the same enemies as Israel and must thus unite with Israel in its wars, or two, those who work for people with that agenda.
So either people like Ben Shapiro or people that work for Ben Shapiro, people like Matt Walsh.
And it only makes common sense.
The Jews in America want America to fight Israel's wars against Iranians, against Hamas, against the Houthis, against Hezbollah.
But Americans don't care about Muslims.
Hamas is not a threat to America.
Iran is not a threat to America.
So what you see ceaselessly on Zionist-controlled Fox News, on Jewish-controlled Daily Wire, on Jewish-controlled Blaze, etc., is the endless fear-mongering about Sharia law and Muslims.
Do we want America to have Sharia law?
No.
Do we want America to be Muslim?
No.
But are they a significant immigrant group?
Not really.
More so in Europe, less so here.
And is the real reason they're pushing that line, is it because they really present a clear and present danger to taking over America?
Or is it because that sort of thinking makes us sympathetic to Israel's wars against Muslims and Arabs?
Matt Walsh replies to Glenn Greenwald.
He says, you got me, Glenn.
I'm opposed to building an Islamic state in the middle of the American heartland because of my love for Israel.
It couldn't just be that I'm concerned about my own country.
Your Israel fetish has rotted your brain, Glenn.
You're obsessed with Israel, Glenn.
Now, I've got a really big problem with this.
I've got a really big problem with all of that.
Because what you're starting to see and what you've been seeing for the past couple of years is that people like Matt Walsh and even people like Charlie Kirk until the day that he died, people like Steve Saylor, many of the Bronze Age pervert crowd, these people like Raw Egg Nationalist, Lomez, et cetera.
They are really ramping up the nativist rhetoric to sort of compensate for the fact that they will never criticize Israel or the Jews.
And let's think about this in terms of systems here.
When we talk about whites and Muslims, whites and blacks, whites and Hispanics, we're talking about identity politics.
We're talking about the politics of immutable essential identities.
What does it mean to be an American?
What does it mean to be white?
What does it mean to be an immigrant?
This is the politics of identity.
And it's the politics of these immutable, essential characteristics like race, religion, whether we're native or foreign-born, what language we speak, all the things that come with being a white American versus a non-white foreigner.
And if that's the way we're thinking about politics, and I think that's the way we all are thinking about politics, why then does that never extend to Jews for somebody like Matt Walsh?
In other words, we can talk about Muslims bringing Sharia law, and we can all agree that as white Americans, that's undesirable.
And we could talk about how Muslims are taking up too much space and too much power in certain cities.
Do we want a city to be all Muslim?
Do we want to live in a city with a Muslim mayor, health commissioner, police commissioner, the signs or an Arabic script?
Of course not.
That's the relation between white and Muslim people in America because of mass migration.
But why then do the same people that are so eager and so vocal, so incendiary, these people that are the biggest culture warriors, the toughest talkers about Muslims or blacks or immigrants or illegals or Hispanics or Indians?
Why do those people never talk about Jews?
Why do they never talk about the race relations between whites and Jews or Jews and everybody else?
In other words, you're willing to say that the mayor of Dearborn is Muslim and the municipal government of Dearborn is too Muslim.
But how come you never talk about how America's government is too Jewish?
Why are you willing to talk about one but not the other?
You talk about our black crime problem.
You talk about the Muslim Dearborn problem.
You talk about the Hispanic illegal immigrant problem.
And by the way, those are all problems.
That's all legitimate.
But you never talk about the Jewish running media, academia, Hollywood, government, finance problem.
Why not?
You're willing to list all the Muslim-sounding names and their call to prayer in Dearborn.
Why don't you say the same thing about all the Jews in Surfside, Florida?
Or how about all the Jews in Brooklyn, New York?
Or how about all the Hasidic Jews that have basically created colonies in New Jersey, all over New York, in LA, in South Florida?
How about, forgive me, how about all the Jewish names in Hollywood, in the financial industry?
How about the five out of eight Ivy League universities that have Jewish presidents?
How about the endless talk about the Holocaust and playing the shofar and hearing the Torah and the Talmud and all this?
We never hear that from Matt Walsh.
We never hear that from all these conservatives.
Why not?
And I'm just getting really sick and tired of conservatives that pretend to be, and what they're doing is compensating, pretending to be based by punching down against black people with no agency, illegal immigrants with no legal standing, Muslims who are foreign in every sense of the word, but are absolutely terrified and cowardly when it comes to confronting Jewish power.
And that would be punching up.
And it's not to say that we don't have a problem with black crime.
It's not to say that we don't have a problem with illegal Hispanics or others for that matter.
It's not to say we don't have a problem with Indians on work visas.
It's not to say we don't have a problem with this Muslim invasion of certain specific communities and townships.
But when you look at the overarching problem, when you look at the overarching foreign influence in America, it's not coming from any of these localized groups.
That's not coming from any of these low-agency third world groups.
It's coming from the Transnational Jewish Syndicate, which is really in the big leagues.
And so, you know, for somebody like Matt Walsh, hey, man, just answer the question.
I tweeted at him today.
You're willing to say all the Muslim names in Dearborn on some level.
Who gives a fuck?
It's Dearborn, Michigan.
Jews run America.
Hello?
And I'm not saying, by the way, before anybody jumps in, I'm not saying I'm glad that Dearborn, Michigan is a Muslim colony.
I'm not happy about that.
But it's Dearborn, Michigan.
Yes, Dearborn, Michigan is a colony of Muslims.
Washington, D.C., New York City, Los Angeles, Miami are colonies of the Jews.
Are you going to talk about that?
Because unless and until you're willing or able to talk about all those Jewish names, all those foreign-sounding names with their foreign religion, their foreign desert religion and culture, then don't try to pretend like you're some sort of pro-white advocate.
Don't pretend like you're brave or courageous or some kind of culture war, some kind of patriot.
You're not a patriot.
You are an accommodationist.
You work for Ben Shapiro.
And by the way, this is the same guy who three weeks ago said, we just need to bring the whole right wing together.
We need to unite the right.
Unite the right against what?
Dearborn, Michigan's mayor?
How about uniting the right against the Jewish mothership controlling America?
Then we can deal with Dearborn.
Then we could deal with Minneapolis.
Why don't we start with the ADL, APAC, B'nai Brith, Hillel, the Israeli Foreign Ministry, the fucking U.S. State Department?
Why don't we start there?
BlackRock, Blackstone.
I mean, why don't we start with the actual institutions that have power, which are being influenced by a foreign country or foreign influence?
So I saw that tweet today, and it is just another reminder that it is as important what someone does not say equally as much as what they are saying.
So someone like Matt Walsh goes on Twitter naming the Muslim, naming the Muslim mayor of Dearborn.
Hey, good stuff, Matt.
When are you going to talk about the Jewish mayor of America?
Hello, his name is Prime Minister Netanyahu.
And it never ceases to amaze me, these kind of gruff, middle-aged white guys.
And yes, I'm calling out my fellow white men.
It never ceases to amaze me these gruff, middle-aged white guys with beards, drinking their black rifle coffee, wearing their flannel shirts, rolling up their sleeves.
You know, they got so much to say about the blacks, about the Muslims, about the immigrants.
They will never say boo about the Jews.
And that's just cowardly, as far as I'm concerned.
That's just cowardly and sad.
Matt Walsh's show, every single day, is a screed.
I don't think that's hyperbolic to say.
I watch his show.
Every day it's a screed.
Foreigners, Somalis, Arabs, illegals, savages, animals, I want heads on pipes, communists, et cetera.
That's his show every day.
Every day.
It's rage porn.
It's invective.
And once again, don't get me wrong, agree on most of it.
But who is the author of most of it?
Who is the author of communism, Matt?
Who is the author of transgenderism?
Who is the author of The Melting Pot?
Who is the author of The Open Society of America?
Who is the author of these things?
Will you answer that question on your show?
Day in, day out, screed against these Browns and blacks and this, that, and the other.
And look, and I get it.
But that's sort of low-hanging fruit.
Let's talk about the big picture here.
Are we afraid to do that because of who's down the hall and to the left in the big chair in the executive suite?
Well, and what's ironic even about that, Ben Shapiro isn't even down there in Nashville.
Because you would say something like, hey, Matt Walsh, maybe before you criticize Israel, why don't you walk down the hall and clear it with your boss?
But Shapiro's not even in the same office building.
All the Daily Wire staff are in Nashville.
Shapiro's in South Florida in the Jewish colony.
If that doesn't say it all, I mean, so anyway, I saw that tweet.
This was my reply.
I said, quote, you constantly talk about how cities like Dearborn or Minneapolis are run by Muslims, which is a problem.
Why don't you ever talk about government, academia, media, Hollywood, finance being run by Jews?
Did the founding fathers intend on that?
Did they intend on people with Steen and Berg and Witz?
Were those people supposed to be running the banks, the news, the government, the State Department?
I don't think so.
Get real.
Get a grip, man.
You're a white Catholic?
Start acting like it.
Don't be such a coward.
And I will, I listen.
And Matt Walsh, when he is ready to just talk about the real issue, I will shake his hand.
I will apologize.
I will be right there with him.
But until that day comes, I have to call you out.
It's not personal.
I don't hate you.
I don't even think he's a bad guy, but he is being a coward.
You are being a coward.
I will hear no more chest beating, chest stumping by white men who are so cowardly they won't talk about who is really taking our sovereignty from us.
Don't you notice it's always these white men, and I'm going to vilify him in the other direction for a moment.
Pardon me.
It's all these white men beating their chest.
Our civilization explorers, pioneers, conquerors, these brown people could never.
Oh, really tough white man?
Oh, really big white man?
My ancestor.
The founding fathers would never.
What do you think the founding fathers would say about you working for Ben Shapiro, huh?
What do you think George Washington, the hero, the Titan?
What do you think George Washington or any of them for that matter would think about you working for Ben Shapiro?
What do you think about America going to war for Israel?
What do you think about, what do you think they would say about Jews running the Ivy Leagues, Jews running the media, Jews running our Congress, bribing our politicians, controlling the National Security Council, the State Department, the Pentagon?
The money, the printing of the money.
What do you think they would say about that?
What do you think they would say about you?
Do not even say, Founding Fathers, you don't have the right.
You have no right.
Keep their names out of your fucking mouth, Matt Walsh.
That name, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, keep those names out of your mouth as long as you're working for Ben Shapiro, you fucking traitor.
We need to unite against the left.
No, pal.
We need to unite as Americans for our sovereignty and independence.
It ain't a difference of opinion.
It's black and white, clear as crystal.
That is the predicament that we're in.
We are occupied.
And it ain't by Muslims.
It's by Jews, obviously.
And listen, they need to hear that from their right wing.
They need to hear that from their right flank.
I appreciate Glenn Greenwald and Michael Tracy giving these guys a hard time.
They need to hear it from someone on their right.
I'm not pro-immigration.
I'm not pro-any of this stuff.
So it's for your own good.
It's for your own damn kids, Matt.
I cannot stand it.
And I saw this clip the other day from Josh Hammer and Mark Levin.
Fuck these people.
Like, deeply, seriously, all real Americans, if you are a real American, if you were born in this country, I don't even care who you are, what you are.
If you are a real American that loves this country, you have generations in this country.
Your family or you fought for this flag, fought for the Constitution, fought for our church, fought for our civilization.
For all of you, I say about Josh Hammer and Mark Levin and Laura Loomer, fuck them.
Fuck them.
Deeply, seriously, get them the fuck out of our country.
I saw Josh Hammer and Mark Levin, now that Charlie Kirk was killed, they got together on their show where they're advocating for Netanyahu and war with Iran and more dead Americans, more dead young white men for Israel.
I saw them get together on their show and they said, Well, one concern we have about the death of Charlie Kirk is that who is going to keep the gate and prevent filth like Nick Fuentes from taking over.
Josh Hammer said, Who's going to prevent anti-Semitic filth like Nick Fuentes from taking over?
You're the filth.
Newsflash, buddy.
Hey, Josh Hammer, Mark Levin, you're the filth.
You are fucking scum.
You are traitors.
You do not belong here.
You are not American.
You're not home.
Remember that.
Never forget that.
You want to talk about this land was promised to us 2,000 years.
You ain't there.
You're not home.
Never forget that.
You get a little too comfortable.
You're feeling a little too comfortable here talking like that about Americans.
This is Josh Hammer, the same guy that said, Europeans have Jew hatred in their DNA.
That's what Josh Hammer thinks of us.
He says, Europeans have Jew hatred in their DNA.
We're supposed to go and fight their wars, though, and love them and love their country and love everything they're about.
They're filth.
They're Jew-hating filth.
You're filth, pal.
You are an alien.
You ain't home.
Don't forget that for one second.
It drives me crazy.
And whatever.
You know, on some level, that's who they are.
That's what they've always been.
And, you know, I think they should be treated with dignity and they should have rights and everything like that.
They should not be allowed to have the privileges to have power over Americans at all.
But to the extent that it's sort of like the scorpion and the frog, that's what they do.
That's what they're going to do.
That's what they've always done.
They're looking out for themselves.
Josh Hammer, Mark Levin, Laura Loomer, they're looking out for themselves.
And on some level, you can't really blame them.
They are doing what they always do for their own benefit, to advance their own interests, to take their own side.
Can you hate them for taking their own side?
If you were a Jew and you enjoyed the power that they have and you have the history that they had, I mean, maybe you'd act the same way.
What I cannot countenance is a white Catholic American man signing up to work for them.
That's what I can't abide.
Josh Hammer, Mark Levin, Laura Loomer, they do what they do.
They're doing their thing.
But Matt Walsh, Michael Knowles are working for them.
You got Christian white men working on their behalf.
That's the part that, like, that's the real problem.
That's a deep treachery.
And no, we can't, we can't actually table that topic.
You know, Matt Walsh wants to say, let's just table that and let's just get together and we'll defer that disagreement to another day.
It's like, you don't understand.
You work for Ben Shapiro.
We're never going to be able to unite on that basis.
Okay.
You work for an operative of a foreign government.
Ben Shapiro goes live every day to advocate for dead white Americans for his country and he hates us.
Do you understand that?
I'd almost prefer a communist.
I'd almost prefer a liberal.
Ben Shapiro goes live every single day to say more dead white Americans for Israel.
And they hate us anyway.
They think we're Jew haters in our bones because we're so jealous of them.
That's what they think about us.
They hate us and they want us to die for them anyway.
And you work for them.
Shapiro is the worst of all of them.
He is the worst scum-sucking traitor out of all of them.
Him, Mark Levin, Josh Hammer, they are the worst.
And you work for them against your own people.
And you think that if they give you a platform to spew invective against other aliens, that maybe you're going to have it better off?
You ain't American, pal.
You're not American.
You had American colonists that were working for the British.
At least the British were white and Christian.
You're worse.
At least the loyalists to the British crown when America was founded, hey, at least it was a Christian white monarchy.
You're loyal to some antichrist state in the Middle East.
So I, you know, I spent too much time talking on that, but I see that stuff.
And what is being done there?
We just need to call that out.
You can't get away with that, actually.
You can't get away with, we're going to crank up the hatred of Nogs so nobody notices that we never talk about Israel and I'm going to cover for them.
Like we're, you have to be called out.
We have to call it out for what it is.
You are an accommodator.
You are a traitor.
You are a collaborator.
You are working with the enemy.
It is 2025.
There are no excuses anymore.
It is 2025.
There are no excuses to be a white Catholic working for Ben Shapiro.
Do better, man.
White man to white man, Catholic to Catholic, American to American.
Do better.
Do better, please.
You have one life.
Do you want your legacy?
They're killing everybody out there.
God forbid.
I don't wish that on Matt Walsh.
Do you want your legacy to be guy that worked for Ben Shapiro?
Guy that helped Ben Shapiro shore up his dying credibility by being a goyish face for a Zionist enterprise?
Is that what you want to be remembered for?
I sure hope not.
That would be sad.
So I'm just beside myself about the whole, like the level of gaslighting, we're done with it.
I told you a couple of years ago, it's white ass niggas going hard as fuck.
No more games, no more playing around, no more gaslighting.
That's just how it's got to be from now on.
It's got to be only America first.
So anyway, you know, and as far as Josh Hammer and Mark Levin, in the climate of political violence, I don't want that to be construed as anything other than what it is, which is I'm just calling them out for being disgusting traitors.
I think that they should be lawfully deported to Israel.
I think they should lawfully have their citizenship revoked and returned to Israel.
But I'm not advocating any violence or any, I don't want that to be misconstrued.
We're in a very tense political climate, so you got to be careful when you get too hot about certain things.
But no, I think that Laura Loomer, Josh Hammer, Mark Levin, I think their rights and dignity should be respected as they're lawfully have their citizenship revoked and they're returned to Israel.
And they should be treated humanely.
I think that when they're seized by DHS, I think it should be done.
You know, like we don't need to send in the SWAT team.
They can wear plain clothes, knock on Mark Levin's door and say, listen, buddy, your citizenship's been revoked by Emperor Trump.
We're placing you in handcuffs.
You're going home today.
It could be on it.
It doesn't need to be a military cargo ship.
It could be a commercial jet.
I'm fine with that.
I think that's fine.
But something like that, at a certain point, it just, it has to happen at some point.
You know?
At a certain point, it just has to happen.
Because these are not Americans.
Mark Levin, like this guy's a, he's literally a foreign agent, as is Josh Hammer, as is Laura Loomer.
What are they still doing here?
You need to go home now.
It's time.
You have a country.
That country is, you know, making itself safe.
It's securing its right to exist by every means at its disposal.
It is time now for you to go there.
So anyway, that's that.
But I do want to move on.
I want to get into our news.
I didn't think I'd fly off the handle like that, but I just, Walsh really bothers me because he's so smug.
His whole demeanor is so smug.
And it's like, dude, you work for Ben Shapiro.
So wipe the fucking smirk off your face.
Wipe that.
Get rid of that smug attitude, that macho masculine thing.
You got to just leave that at the door when you punch in on the clock and you go to work for Ben Shapiro.
You got to leave that at the door.
You want to be smug.
You want to smirk.
You want to be macho.
You can do that when you're at home fishing.
When you clock in and you punch in at Zog headquarters, You got to leave that at the door because you ain't, you ain't him, man.
You are not him.
You are not that guy.
All right, well, let's move on.
I do want to get into our news, actually, for tonight.
And we'll start with our featured story.
Very similar, along a very similar line of argument here.
Our featured story tonight, we're talking all about the recently unveiled letter from Charlie Kirk to Benjamin Netanyahu.
Now, I want to say at the outset, we don't know if this is the real letter.
There is no date on the letter, but it is being presented to us as the letter.
Now, if anybody is aware of the existence of a different letter like Candace Owens, then she should contribute the information that is relevant to the public discourse.
But until or unless that happens, this is what we have to work with.
And we have no reason necessarily to believe that this is a phony letter.
If the letter is phony, clearly Candace Owens has a copy of it because she said that if the letter is misrepresented, that she would come out and say something.
So I would encourage her to come forward with her version of it if such a thing exists.
Unless that happens or until that happens, this is what we have to go by.
And what letter am I talking about?
Well, about three weeks ago after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, of course, the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, went on television and to support his claim that Charlie Kirk was a supporter of Israel until he died,
something which is being questioned, something which has been scrutinized over the past several weeks, Netanyahu held up a physical copy of a letter which Charlie Kirk allegedly sent to Netanyahu in May.
And he said, Charlie Kirk sent me a letter and I invited him to Israel.
And he said this to prove that Charlie Kirk remained a supporter of Israel until his death.
Ever since Charlie Kirk died, people online, people like Tucker Carlson, Max Blumenthal, Candace Owens in particular, have insinuated that they are aware of some private epiphany that although Charlie Kirk supported Israel his entire life, his entire professional career, publicly until his death, they claim that privately Charlie Kirk was evolving on the issue.
They claim that Charlie's Jewish pro-Israel donors were furious with him.
There was tension, maybe outright hostility.
They believed that he was anti-Semitic.
They believed that he wasn't doing enough to support Israel.
Charlie Kirk was clearly frustrated by those accusations.
He maintained that he is pro-Israel, but that because he was insufficiently pro-Israel, in other words, he wasn't pro-Israel enough, that they were very aggressive towards him, which he did not like, and he felt that they were ungrateful for his prior support.
So this is the narrative, of course, that's been going around.
And for that reason, people are implicating Israel in his assassination.
The narrative goes something like this.
They say that Charlie Kirk was becoming one of the most powerful conservatives in America.
And he was empowered in that way by pro-Israel Jewish donors.
They lavished his organization turning point with millions of dollars.
And they frequently collaborated on birthright trips, sponsored trips to Israel, and Turning Point USA, as well as Charlie Kirk, were extremely publicly pro-Israel and vocally pro-Israel in conservative politics.
The argument goes that in the aftermath of Israel's war in Gaza, their push for America to enter the war in Iran, the disclosure on Jeffrey Epstein and his involvement with Israeli intelligence, that Charlie Kirk was beginning to change his mind.
And the argument goes that Israel was so threatened by the prospect that such a powerful person, formerly a client of theirs, would turn against them that they had to eliminate him.
He would pose too great of a threat.
Running the youth organization for the right wing, being a potential presidential candidate, having the ear of Trump, and of course, seeing it as a great betrayal of his former patrons, they said it was unacceptable to let him continue living, so they publicly executed him, not only to silence him, but also to send a message to everybody else and chill any Israel critical speech on the right wing.
That's the argument.
Now, Benjamin Netanyahu came out very quickly and said, that's not true because I have this letter.
The same day, Candace Owens, who is a proponent of that aforementioned theory, Candace Owens came out and said, Netanyahu is misrepresenting the letter.
He claims the letter indicates that Charlie Kirk was pro-Israel, that it was a friendly letter, that it expressed support, that the sentiment of the letter was pro-Israel.
Candace implies that Netanyahu is misrepresenting the actual substance or tone of the letter and is completely distorting the sentiment or the meaning of it.
She seemed to imply that the letter was critical of Israel or anti-Israel, or maybe foreshadowing that Charlie Kirk would one day turn on Israel.
So after Netanyahu held up the letter, she said, if you keep saying that, I will reveal the letter.
Well, she never did.
It's been three weeks.
She has not shown us the letter.
She has not told us anything in it.
She has not told us the contents of the letter, the tone of the letter.
She has not given us a copy of it.
She has confirmed its existence.
The existence of such a letter is not in dispute, but we have gotten nothing from her.
So that leads us to believe that either she was lying and does not actually have the letter, or she is withholding the letter for some reason.
I can't imagine why.
If the letter contained evidence that Charlie Kirk was turning against Israel, then surely that would be relevant and of extreme public import, because that would be written, hard evidence that Charlie Kirk was against Israel, and that would give us some evidence as to a motive of why the Israeli government might want to take him out.
So either she never had it and she lied, and all she knew about the letter was hearsay, and she exaggerated what she knew about it, but either didn't have it or maybe didn't exactly know what was in it, and that's why she falsely called Netanyahu a liar, or she's withholding it for some reason.
In which case I would say, and I reiterate, I don't know why people are telling me I'm covering things up.
I'm doing the opposite.
I want to put the pressure on Candace Owens.
Give us all of the evidence that you have.
If Israel killed Charlie Kirk, then like we need to go to war with Israel.
If a foreign government assassinated a powerful American on U.S. soil because he opposed America's entry into their war, everyone needs to know that.
The public needs to know that.
The government needs to know that.
And if the government is engaging in cover-up, then the public needs to know to expose the cover-up.
So I am once again reiterating, I implore Candace Owens, if you have a copy of the letter, a different version of the letter, or maybe it's this letter, you have to release it immediately because the public will move on from this.
The further we get from the assassination, the less public interest, the less public pressure.
And if there is some cover-up, the more they will be able to cover up their tracks or produce misinformation or disinformation.
So if you have a copy of the letter, which is not this letter, then you have to release it.
We need to see it.
I need to see it.
The public needs to see it.
The world needs to see it.
Now, with that being said, today, the New York Post released what they are claiming is the letter.
We have no reason to believe that this is some fabrication.
From reading it, it sounds like Charlie Kirk.
It sounds like it would be hard to forge this.
There are certain details in the letter, the tone of the letter.
It's sort of a strange tone if it was a fabrication.
What's more, the New York Post is a pro-Israel publication.
If Netanyahu has a copy of the letter, then surely, and if it exonerates him, it would find its way in the front page of the New York Post.
If there's a different version of it, then Candace can really blow the lid on the whole thing.
If they are putting out a false version of the letter and they know that other people have it, someone like Candace Owens, then this would be really shooting themselves in the foot.
Because if an alternative version of the letter were produced and it made them out to be liars, then it would not only prove that they had a motive to kill Charlie Kirk, it would actually prove that they're fabricating evidence for their cover-up.
So if they produced a fabricated letter, knowing that Candace has the real one, I think that would backfire.
That would be shooting themselves in the foot tremendously.
It would be easily disprovable and catastrophically such.
Not only would it destroy their credibility, but it would actually prove they're covering it up.
So anyway, those are my qualifications for what we're about to talk about, because it is important when we talk about the evidence.
You know, we have to talk about how we acquired the evidence and where it comes from and the logic behind it.
Like I said, the New York Post published the letter in full.
It is seven pages.
It is dated from early May 2025.
It is a letter from Charlie Kirk to B.B. Netanyahu.
This is what the New York Post says about the letter.
It says, quote, Charlie Kirk wrote to Netanyahu in this May 2nd missive that he was alarmed by anti-Israel and anti-Semitic trends hitting record levels on social media because one of his greatest joys as a Christian is advocating for Israel and forming alliances with Jews in the fight to protect Judeo-Christian civilization.
It says, Netanyahu first mentioned the letter in a September 18th video address, eight days after Charlie Kirk was shot and killed, to dispute monstrous falsehoods that Israel was somehow behind the killing.
Right-wing pundit Candace Owens and others have claimed that Kirk was being blackmailed into making firm defenses of Israel in public while privately questioning U.S. support for the Jewish state.
Bill Ackman later published private text messages disputing that characterization.
And by the way, those text messages have not been disputed.
As far as we are aware, those are real.
Now, this is the letter.
I'm going to read it to you.
I took some liberties with it.
You can find the entire thing.
It's on the New York Post website and multiple people have tweeted it.
But I will read to you the most important parts.
I kept most of it in here.
I'm going to read to you most of the letter.
This is Charlie Kirk to Benjamin Netanyahu on May 2nd, 2025.
He writes, One of my greatest joys as a Christian is advocating for Israel and forming alliances with Jews in the fight to protect Judeo-Christian civilization.
Most recently, I am proud to have taken over Ambassador Huckabee's show on TBN, where we continually support Israel and the Jewish people.
As Mohammedism spreads into Western societies, it is critical that Jews and Christians stay united in the effort to contain and roll back radical Islam and Sharia law.
I regret to report that anti-Israel and anti-Semitic trends are at record levels on social media.
My team and I have spent months analyzing these trends and debating ideas that could help you and your country push back against these disturbing developments.
Anti-Israel sentiment can undermine American support for Israel.
Wouldn't want to do that.
The purpose of this letter is to lay out our concerns and outline potential remedies.
Everything written here is from a place of deep love for Israel and the Jewish people.
I think it's important to be brutally honest with those you love.
It's tough love.
In my opinion, Israel is losing the information war and needs a communications intervention.
I started to compose this letter to you on Easter.
I should have been focused on my family, but I was getting bombarded with messages about the Israeli army making it difficult for Christians to access church in Jerusalem on Easter.
At the time, I did not see any official statements pushing back on this narrative.
It was frustrating because pro-Israel surrogates like me, pro-Israel surrogate, by the way, should not be in charge of fact-checking every piece of anti-Israel misinformation that pours onto social media.
And it wasn't just Easter.
On my recent campus tours, half the questions I get are about Israel, and they're all negative.
I often spend half my time on these campus tours defending Jews in Israel, which I'm proud to do because I love Israel and love the Jewish faith.
I spent endless hours with Dennis Prager over the years studying the Torah.
Sometimes it feels like I'm defending Israel in public more than your own government.
I'm accused of being a paid apologist for Israel when I defend her.
However, if I don't defend Israel strongly enough, I'm accused of being anti-Semitic.
I know you've got a seven-front war, and my kvetching pales in comparison.
Kvetching is Yiddish for complaining.
But I'm trying to convey to you that Israel is losing support even in conservative circles.
This should be a five-alarm fire.
I've often asked myself, why is Israel killing so many innocent, or excuse me, I'm often asked, why is Israel killing so many innocent civilians in Gaza?
I know Israel goes to great lengths by dropping flyers and even calling civilians to clear out areas about to be bombed.
I know Israel posts maps showing which areas should be evacuated.
I know that Hamas uses civilians as human shields.
But 90% of the younger generations get their news from social media and podcasts.
And there's very little pushback for fact-checking by the Israeli government and or pro-Israel supporters in the media.
I strongly suggest Israel not always depend on subcontracting their information war to surrogates in America.
Mr. Prime Minister, I urge you to revamp your information warfare from top to bottom.
Sometimes the impression is given that Israel thinks everyone hates them, so why care about winning over hearts and minds?
If there's truth to this impression, I urge you to consider that social media and podcasts is where you fight for the hearts and minds of the younger generation.
Obviously, all this negative Israel propaganda on social media translates into pro-Hamas, free Palestine sentiment on many campuses.
Here are some unsolicited recommendations my team and I suggest if you're open-minded to a communications reset.
One, for starters, you need a rapid response media team.
President Trump does this very effectively.
You are an eloquent defender of Israel, but you need a team of information warriors pushing back every day in real time.
When you don't push back, anti-Semitism and anti-Israel propaganda fills the void.
A pro-Israel friend recently asked me, do Israelis even care how the world perceives their country?
Two, I strongly recommend putting together a team of pro-Israel experts who can fact-check misinformation in real time for Israel.
Israel needs to take the lead.
No more dependence on subcontractors.
Israel never asks for American troops because Israel does its own fighting.
Is that so?
I suggest the same approach for the information war.
You lead and people like me will follow and provide supplemental support.
If you're open to revamping your communication strategy, my team and I will assist.
Three, you need something perhaps like an Israel Truth Network or ITN, which can include social media channels and a one-stop source of information website where, for example, all the negative Israel questions I get can be debunked.
I would love to refer students to such a website.
This website could be a conduit to groups like Hillel and Jewish educators like Dennis Prager.
There could be links to books, podcasts, media personalities, and pro-Israel thought leaders.
The website can be a place where Judeo-Christian leaders and groups can share information and form closer alliances in the fight against Islamic fundamentalism.
The Israel Truth Network social media can post pro-Israel, pro-Judeo-Christian video clips, breaking news and articles.
It could potentially be a news aggregation site for all news pertaining to Israel and Judeo-Christian efforts to preserve Western civilization.
Have you ever considered inviting some of the released Israeli hostages to go on a speaking tour in the United States?
This could be very effective.
We're like halfway through the letter, by the way.
This is who Max Blumenthal and Candace Owens want us to believe was the second coming of Hitler.
Israel needed to kill this guy because he was about to blow the lid on the whole operation.
They couldn't bribe him, couldn't blackmail him, couldn't negotiate with him.
You need a one-stop shopping resource where Israel's platform and beliefs can be spelled out.
I know it's common to think social media is a waste of time, but TikTok algorithms have changed.
I have increased my followers on TikTok from a million to six million in the last year.
There's that number again.
We get billions of views on TikTok.
My campus tour last fall received 5 billion impressions.
Elon Musk is a friend to Israel, so X offers a great opportunity to make inroads on social media.
Israel should not sit back and allow its enemies to define her.
A recent Pew Research poll showed 53% of Americans have an unfavorable view of Israel.
U.S. support for Israel is precarious.
A new media strategy is urgently needed.
I understand social media as well as anyone in the world.
That's certainly true.
From my vantage point, Israel has retreated from social media without a fight.
How are you going to win over younger generations if you're starting out in retreat?
Mr. Prime Minister, stop this retreat.
Get in the information war fight.
The front lines of this information war are on social media.
Other than a few guerrilla warfare operations, there's little Israel-created content.
Is that even true?
I saw Israel has increased its Hasbara budget by 20 times, which is great news.
There's great news.
There's also hundreds of millions of dollars raised by private pro-Israel groups.
Some of this money should be directed into creating pro-Israel original content.
Next, promote this content on Israel-operated social media channels and websites.
Use the funds to start the Israel Truth Network.
To sum up, you should consider reshaping your Hasbara department into a political campaign headquarters with narrative experts.
Hasbara could be the mothership hosting Israel Truth Network, where the messaging campaign can be created and distributed to pro-Israel groups and thought leaders.
Israel is the Silicon Valley of the Middle East.
Israel has an abundance of brain power and technological expertise.
The question is whether Israel has the willpower to step up its game.
From my vantage point, the status quo is not working.
Israel is getting crushed on social media, and you are losing younger generations of Americans.
In my opinion, you are losing the information war, which will translate into less political and military support from America.
The Holy Land is so important to my life, and it pains me to see support for Israel slip away.
Contact me on my private number below if you'd like to discuss this further.
Okay.
So that was Charlie Kirk's letter, allegedly, to Prime Minister Netanyahu.
Now, if the letter is fake, then Candace Owens, please tell us.
Candace Owens, if you can hear us, please.
If the letter is fake, then tell us.
But we are going to have to assume that if Candace Owens goes live tomorrow and she does not give us an alternative letter, or if she does not dispute the accuracy or the legitimacy of this letter, we're going to have to assume this is real.
This is a pretty unambiguous message.
And it pretty unambiguously says and indicates that Charlie Kirk supported Israel until the day that he died.
This is consistent with other evidence that has surfaced in the past several weeks.
If the New York Post is claiming this is the letter, then this kind of seals the deal.
Then probably Charlie Kirk did not have an epiphany on Israel if this is what he was writing.
If this is real and these were his thoughts and this was his real idea, very clearly he was not breaking with Israel in any meaningful way, obviously.
So I'm going to assume that if she does not come out tomorrow, she or Blumenthal or Tucker or any of them, if the veracity of this letter is not disputed within 24 hours, we're going to have to assume that's because they can't dispute it.
They won't dispute it because it is real.
Now, if the letter is real, what does this tell us about Charlie Kirk?
It tells us that Charlie Kirk was the same person on September 10th that he was on September 9th, that he was on May 2nd, that he was in 2019 and before that.
To the extent that he was publicly chafing with some of his pro-Israel donors.
Why is that?
It is because in the past two years, the entire world has awakened to the evil doings of Israel.
The whole world, and especially the younger generation.
What is Charlie Kirk's profession?
Charlie Kirk runs the largest conservative campus organization in the country.
Charlie Kirk, as the face of that organization, is on the front lines.
He has to go to 100 campuses every year and beyond that has to go to major conventions and dinners and fundraisers and events with the leadership of his organization, who are college-aged students.
He has to be on the front lines facing the younger generation that is awakened on Israel.
And what do you think they're talking about?
What do you think they're asking about?
When Charlie Kirk goes and interfaces with the younger generation, as he writes in this letter, and as you can assume, even without it, he is being asked about Israel.
And it's always been like this, but it's especially been like this in the past couple years.
Students are coming to his events, and as he claims in the letter, half the questions he's asked are about Israel.
Now, as we know, Charlie Kirk in Turning Point USA, like all of Con Inc., is pro-Israel.
Daily Wire, Fox News, The Blaze, the Republican Party, the Trump administration, these are all pro-Israel institutions.
Turning point is no different.
And Turning Point is part of the same constellation.
Turning Point works with all of those.
There is cross-contamination and overlap with all of them.
It is part and parcel of the conservative movement.
The difference between Charlie Kirk and the rest of them is because of Charlie Kirk's role, he actually has to face the young people in a way that Fox News hosts do not, in a way that the Blaze, Prague or U, Daily Wire does not.
None of them interface with the young people as much as Charlie Kirk.
So was Charlie Kirk turning against Israel, or was Charlie Kirk conveying to the Israelis that they have a crisis with the young people?
Was Charlie Kirk being made uncomfortable that, look, the Zionist donors want him to peddle this propaganda?
And they get to do that from their mansions in Beverly Hills, their mansions in South Florida, their mansions, wherever they reside.
But Charlie Kirk is the one that actually has to step into the arena.
And when you've got former soldiers, when you've got veterans, when you've got 20-year-olds with MAGA hats and rosaries coming up one after the other and saying, Do you support genocide?
Do you support Israel controlling America?
Charlie Kirk is made uncomfortable.
He's going to his donors and saying, Hey, man, I can't be expected to do all the heavy lifting.
I'm getting killed out here.
You know, and I don't say that to be funny or glib, but you know, you understand the expression.
It's tough out here.
I'm on the front lines interfacing with these kids.
You're losing the battle.
Nobody likes you.
I got to peddle this nonsense.
So can you help me?
Point being, was Charlie Kirk having a legitimate change of heart?
Was he a good faith actor who loves America, was changing his mind, grappling with the donors in fear for his life, trying to do the right thing?
Or is he a patron or rather a client of the donors being forced to sell crap and being frustrated about it, wearing his ass on his head and sending the Netanyahu a letter saying, Look, man, I love you.
I love Israel.
I support Israel.
I want America to support Israel.
But you got to help me.
You got to meet me halfway because, look, you're losing the battle.
And if you're losing the battle, I don't want to go down with the sinking ship.
Now, what did, here's why the timeline matters.
This letter was sent on May 2nd.
A week later, Charlie Kirk reached out to Bill Ackman himself.
Charlie Kirk texted the pro-Israel liberal Democrat Jewish billionaire Bill Ackman from Wall Street.
And Charlie Kirk initiated a dialogue and said, we should do something.
And they together planned an influencer retreat in August, which was the subject of all this acrimony.
Charlie Kirk made the guest list, invited the attendees, created the schedule, organized it at a hotel, invited many pro-Israel influencers.
They debated about Israel, and then they all went to Israel on a sponsored trip.
That was a turning point event.
Now, in the context of this letter, does that not make sense?
That Charlie Kirk was negotiating with the Zionist lobby, telling them, listen, I'm a partner.
I want to help you, but you're losing the information battle.
I have to defend this.
If I don't defend absolutely everything, you're attacking me.
I'm trying to be part of the solution.
So Charlie Kirk is reaching out to Jewish billionaires and saying, let's make an influencer retreat and let's train them in Hasbara talking points.
Because that's who was invited.
Xavier DeRusso, who was unloading cringe pro-Israel content, he was at that Hamptons retreat organized by Turning Point.
He was sent to Israel in the weeks after that retreat.
Is that not consistent with what's in the letter?
Is that not consistent with the texts that Charlie Kirk exchanged with Bill Ackman, which we've now seen?
Is that not consistent with Charlie Kirk's entire career?
Let's not forget what that whole operation is about.
Lest we forget, the Trump administration, as B.B. Netyahu said today, is the most pro-Israel government in history, and it's not even close.
Those words came out of the prime minister's mouth this afternoon.
The Trump administration is the most pro-Israel administration in history, and it isn't even close.
And what was Charlie Kirk's role?
He was the head of students for Trump in 2020 and 2024.
He was close to everyone in the administration.
He was the administration's biggest cheerleader, and they had all the same donors.
There was virtually zero, zero daylight between the Trump administration and Turning Point USA.
Zero zip.
And Trump has always been that way, and Turning Point has always been that way.
The only difference is that Charlie Kirk was a bit more of a shrewd strategist, and he actually had to go and face the music.
Charlie Kirk going out day in, day out, he was not immune from the reality, which he did not create, which he did not lead.
The reality that millions of people are waking up on Israel.
And he's coming to campus defending it regardless.
And it made him uncomfortable that it was hurting his brand.
He reaches out to Netanyahu and says, listen, man, I'm losing this debate.
It's an unwinnable debate.
You got to help me.
Does that represent a change of heart?
Absolutely not.
Do you know what the real predicament that we are in actually is?
It's not that Israel does not have a more competent information warfare program against America.
As articulated by Charlie Kirk, that's not the problem.
Let me tell you the problem.
The problem is that Israel is genociding Palestinians and then sending them here.
The problem is that Israel is dragging us into a war in Iran.
The problem is that by defending Israel's conduct and all of this, we are losing reputation around the world.
The problem is this arrangement is guaranteed by an Israeli influence operation on our soil.
The problem is they are able to have that because we have dual loyalist Jewish billionaires that were born in America that are more loyal to Israel than the United States.
The problem is we have tolerated this because we're an open society.
That in a nutshell is the problem.
Now, if you're somebody like Donald Trump or Charlie Kirk or Matt Walsh or any of these people, there is no excuse to not be aware of it at this point.
I'm hard-pressed to believe they don't see that.
And if you know this is happening, it's your obligation to fight against it.
The president has the power to stop Israel.
These commentators have the power to change the conversation.
It matters very little if in 2025 you're having a private change of heart that you're telling nobody about.
If Charlie Kirk is writing a letter to the Prime Minister of Israel, begging him to assault Americans with foreign propaganda, do you think that's like a good position to have?
Glorious Prime Minister, many blessings upon Israel and the Jews.
I proudly defend you every day, but I beg you to assault my country with foreign propaganda more effectively.
Does that sound like foreshadowing a radical reversal on Israel?
In his infamous interview with Megan Kelly in August, where he said that he was tired of being called an anti-Semite, did Charlie Kirk say I'm done supporting Israel?
Did he say I criticize Israel?
His words exactly were: if I keep getting called an anti-Semite, you're, well, you're never going to lose me, he said, but you're going to dampen and deflate your biggest warriors.
That was from August.
That's the interview where everybody said he was red-built.
In May, he's begging Netanyahu, please do a better job raping my country with pro-Israel propaganda.
In July, he's hosting a focus group.
Well, we could criticize Netanyahu, but you know, we don't support Hamas.
We all still love Israel.
And maybe we could agree not to talk about it anymore, right?
In August, if you keep calling me an anti-Semite, well, you're not going to lose me, but I'll be a deflated warrior for Israel.
It's very clear what was going on here.
And the letter just makes it unambiguous.
Every single argument that has been made about Charlie Kirk turning on Israel has basically just been exposed.
And the only reason people say you're covering, you're arguing so hard in defense, it's because it is simply not true.
It just is not true.
And what I think the GOP is doing is they're trying now to bring the Israel-critical side into support for the GOP, pretending that Charlie Kirk was some kind of secret martyr for the pro or excuse me, the anti-Israel cause, when in fact he was not.
Every aspect of this theory, from they said Bill Ackman intimidated him, screamed at him, blackmailed him.
We saw the text messages.
Charlie set up that event.
They said Netanyahu offered him a $150 million bribe.
In his letter, he was really going hard on Netanyahu.
Okay, did you read the letter?
Glorious prime minister, please, you're losing the information war.
Get better at Hezbara.
I mean, come on now.
So I am open to any counter argument.
I am open to all evidence.
If this is not the letter, please show me the real letter.
If this is not the letter, please tell me this is not the real letter.
And I'd be willing to investigate that.
I'm curious where the letter came from.
I'm curious what the source is from the New York Post, but I have no reason to believe it isn't real.
It's consistent with the rest of what they've produced, which has not been disputed by the people pushing this theory that there was some sort of turn in the works or that he had to be eliminated because he could not be intimidated or influenced.
It just is not true.
And now we have the letter.
So this past three weeks has felt like Bizarro World, the way that people are lionizing Charlie Kirk as though he was a martyr going up against Israeli influence in America when we all knew.
On September 9th, on the morning of September 10th, we knew what he was.
We knew what he was about.
We knew his positions.
We were set in opposition to him.
And then it's like he got shot, tragic as it was, and everybody turned upside down and it turned into he was, I mean, you don't even know what they're comparing him to, like a Pat Buchanan-esque figure, like he was taken out in defense of America against Israeli influence.
It is the most strange, bizarre case of mass hysteria I've ever seen.
And I don't even necessarily think it's a bad thing that that was everybody's gut reaction.
I said this on my show last week.
At this point, I don't necessarily think it's a negative sign that everybody's first instinct was to blame Israel, even though it wasn't true.
I think that's maybe a healthy correction because, of course, before, you could never implicate Israel in anything and they were blameless and they were the eternal victim.
So maybe this is like a healthy corrective, but it's been three weeks.
Now we can be honest, the guy was not about to turn and this letter proves it.
So last thing I'll say, once again, reiterating, if anybody, and for those that say it's a fake letter, why are you pushing this Israeli propaganda?
If someone has the real letter or knows this is a forgery, please tell us that information.
Share with us the proof because this would be an extraordinary cover-up if they forged a letter.
And wow, what a bold forgery it would be for it to contain such pro-Israel sentiment if apparently the letter contained something to the contrary.
So we're still waiting on that.
I'm sitting here.
It's been three weeks.
And we've heard from Max Blumenthal, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens.
There's all this evidence that he was being blackmailed, bribed.
He couldn't be controlled.
He had this letter.
And every passing day, this narrative is just getting blown up and it's making those people lose credibility.
And I'm just starting to question what they were trying to do with that.
What was the plan there?
I don't even get it.
Charlie Kirk was their top goy.
What do we gain by pretending that he was anything other than that?
He was Israel's top goy right up until the morning that he died when he was practicing Hasbara with his rabbi, not making it up.
That's real.
When he was interviewing Ben Shapiro the day before, I don't even know what the point of that would be to pretend otherwise.
So anyway, that's that.
But I do want to move on.
I want to get into, you know, we might have to save it for tomorrow already an hour and a half into the show.
We might have to save the Israeli peace plan for tomorrow because we're just out of time and it's a huge subject.
I want to do it justice.
So I might save the, I'm going to save this story about the Gaza peace plan for tomorrow.
We're just out of time tonight.
90 minutes in.
We haven't even started.
Like I said, it's a 20-point plan, so it is a lot to cover.
We have to talk about the press conference, what is in the plan, prospect that it's going to be agreed upon by all the parties involved.
So I think we'll just save it tomorrow.
We'll save it for tomorrow.
We'll stop here.
We're going to move on.
We'll take a look at our super chats.
We'll see what you guys have to say.
I'm curious what people are going to say about my take on the letter.
To me, this is not a surprise at all.
You know, the way that people have characterized Charlie Kirk since he died, it's like, do you know anything about politics?
I mean, no offense, but I look at these guys like Ryan Mata and others who have been on top of this from the start.
And I don't know who half these people are.
It's like, do you know anything about politics?
Are you just a complete ignoramus?
Because I've been doing this for, it'll be nine years in a few months, nine years, almost a decade.
And my ascendance coincided with Charlie Kirk's exactly.
And of course, we had very different paths and came into conflict for most of that decade.
And that entire time, basically the entire basis of our conflict is that he was in the pocket of Israel and I was against.
And so, you know, people go, well, you're covering for Israel.
You're acting like their defense attorney.
It's like, no, I'm just trying to set the record straight here.
As the nemesis, I knew this man.
I watched him vigilantly like a hawk.
It was our mission to delegitimize his positions, his whole operation.
And I can tell you with authority and with confidence that if there was any give on that subject, if there was a change of heart, we would know about it.
We would have been talking about it.
We would have felt it.
We would have sensed it.
A disturbance in the force.
It wasn't there.
And anyone that believes otherwise is either completely ignorant or it's wishful thinking or they're just stupid or they're trying to use it to parlay that into, you know, kind of a bigger statement about politics.
But as I understand it, like I said, based on that letter, it seems to me that he was caught in the middle.
His organization is a pro-Israel Zionist organization.
That is what it has always been.
That is his whole staff.
That is his donor base.
That's just what it was.
They were, it was Talking Points USA.
They were unloading pro-Israel talking points to the young.
You sign up for a turning point chapter, you get a sticker that says, I love Israel.
That's not, I'm not making that up.
That's literally true.
You sign up, you make a turning point chapter, you get a box of shit, and 50% of it is stickers and buttons and pins and banners that say, I love Israel.
I support Israel.
That's what it was.
He was caught in the middle.
And, you know, the reason that I'm really going in on this, this is the last thing I'll say, just because we're not going to get into the other story.
I'll talk a little bit longer.
Why am I jumping all over this?
Because there's very clearly a concerted effort to steer the mass awakening, okay?
It is a fact.
It is an undeniable fact that everyone is getting red pilled and they hate that.
But why are people getting red pilled?
People are getting red pilled on Twitter and on TikTok because Elon bought Twitter in late 2022 and TikTok has been relatively free from some of the pressure of these Jewish advocacy groups.
October 7th was in 2023.
So basically, right around even before October 7th, and then of course, immediately after that, there has just been this rapid pivot.
And then, like, you know, months later, after her maternity leave, then she started saying stuff about it.
And then immediately she started saying, actually, it's not Jews, it's the Frankists.
Do you remember that?
That was immediate.
So she got on the train when everybody else did.
And then immediately started trying to call the shots and say, it's not Jews, it's Frankists.
Don't blame Jews.
My producer's Jewish.
It's Satanists pretending to be Jews.
They're actually Sabbate and Frankists.
And same thing.
When did Tucker start criticizing Israel?
About the same time?
When did Charlie Kirk's epiphany happen?
A year after that?
Like, let's be very clear.
The people are waking up.
Israel's freaking out.
The Republican Party's freaking out.
They're trying to talk the masses in off the ledge.
Because what are the masses saying?
The masses are saying, you killed JFK.
You did 9-11.
You're responsible for all the wars in the world.
The Talmud says you hate us.
Like, okay, so the masses are, they went zero to 100 in a year and a half.
And then in come Candace and Tucker to say it's not the Jews, it's the neocons, it's the Frankists, it's maybe some of the Zionists.
What did Tucker say last week that we covered?
He said, if you're obsessed with Jews, that's not healthy.
We should treat Israel like every other country.
I love Israel.
Okay?
Like, that's what they're saying.
And somebody like Charlie Kirk is caught in the middle of it.
He's in the middle of this mass awakening.
It's like he's caught in the wrong place at the wrong time.
There's this anti-Israel riot happening on the campus.
His job is to defend Israel on the campus.
He's just getting, you know, these blistering attacks.
He's sweating, going into his donors and saying, dude, help.
I have to go and defend this genocide.
I'm defending this genocide more than you're defending your own genocide.
You got to help me out.
I'll help you, but you got to help me.
That's not an epiphany.
He's not leading the charge.
He's not a visionary.
He's not even pushing the envelope.
He's still acting as a gatekeeper there.
So it's part of this broader thing that's going on.
And like, look, I would sit down with Tucker Carlson and talk with him about this.
Maybe I have the wrong idea.
Maybe I'm paranoid.
I would sit down and talk with him about this, but I disagree.
When he says we should treat Israel like every other country, I disagree with that completely.
And that sounds like bullshit.
Same goes for all them.
It's like you have the mass awakening, which you cannot overstate the importance of that, the gravity of that.
And there seems to be this secondary thing, which is trailing just behind it.
It's offbeat.
It's dragging behind just a little bit that's trying to retard this development and steer it.
You know, even Tucker, he goes at turning point.
This was the controversy.
Tucker goes to turning point and says, we in Washington, D.C. need to acknowledge Epstein was Mossad, because if we don't, then we're going to look like liars and everyone's going to look at these anti-Semites and they're the only ones talking about it.
Like that's what it couldn't be more clear what they're saying to you if you read between the lines.
It's not even in between the lines.
They're just saying it.
So this whole line that Candace, Tucker, and Blumenthal are leading the charge that Charlie Kirk was a martyr against Israel, it's first of all, it's not fucking true at all.
Second of all, that they are a part of this whole thing makes me very suspicious too, because they all attacked me.
Blumenthal and Tucker started the rumor that I'm a fed in 2023.
Candace and Tucker then did a show shitting on me saying that.
And all three of them say it has nothing to do with Jews.
It's just neocons, Frankists, Zionists, you know, some assorted other thing.
So the whole, the whole operation there, first of all, it seems like an operation.
Second of all, it stinks.
So I have a pretty strong bullshit detector.
I smell bullshit.
Don't tell me Charlie Kirk was a martyr against Israel.
That is not true.
And it's the same triangulation pushing at Blumenthal, Tucker, and Candace.
Very suspicious.
Anyway, but that's that.
I want to move on.
We're going to take a look at our super chats now.
unidentified
We'll see what you guys have to say, but that's just a little extra.
Cuban Bay of Pigs Hero sent $20, embedding on you to be president on Polymarket in 20 years.
When you do, will you back Rubio and the rest of the Cubans in Miami with their support this time so that we can take back Cuba from the communis and get the fuck out of here once and for all?
I thought he was a sociopath before because the guy's a total fake.
Everything about him, he's media trained.
He's doing that.
He's like wrote a stupid fucking book.
Another book, you know, his book is called One Generation Away.
It's from that Ronald Reagan quote.
The Ronald Reagan quote, freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
One generation away, how Gen Z is being like gay and pro-Israel.
He's on Fox News every week.
He's like the fakest human being I've ever seen.
And then he did that.
I was like, wow, like that's bold.
I thought he was fake before.
That's like next level.
Next level.
That's like some next level sociopathy grifting conserve.
Like Charlie Kirk, maybe that is his successor because that is some serious next level social climbing, manipulation.
So I was sort of impressed.
But yeah, Brylon, the old Brylan Hollyhead, I can't wait to see him get pressed on Israel.
Everybody's going to be the next big conservative star until they get pressed by the Groiper saying like, hey, what do you think about Jews running America?
And you get some yokel from Alabama who's like, Israel's our closest ally.
Israel's our greatest friend in the Middle East.
Y'all, y'all, Israel's like that old neighbor you can always count on.
You know, when you're pushing your tractor and you run out of gas and you go to your neighbor and you're like, hey, can I borrow some sugar from my, can I borrow some sugar from my pancakes?
And they're like, sure, neighbor, we're doing things different around here.
Israel's sort of like that when they need missiles.
Like that shit does not fly when you're when it's fucking 100 groipers deep asking you about dancing Israelis and like Jewish billionaires.
This doesn't work.
Sorry, pal.
That whole country bumpkin down down home aweshucks thing.
It just doesn't work.
Sorry, bud.
You're going to have to have to get a little more sophisticated.
You're going to need to download a little more internet.
You're going to internet a little harder.
In the words of Candace Owens, maybe I internet too hard.
Brylan Hollyhand is about to find out the hard way.
What happens when you don't internet hard enough?
Bro is not bro was not born of the trial by fire on the fucking far-right internet on Twitter on 4chan.
It's going to be a rude awakening, okay?
He's giving like serious homeschooled by his grandparents energy.
Like the Walmart yodeling kid.
He's like homeschooled by Mima.
And it just isn't going to fly, dude.
Like your classmates, half of your classmates are part of a satanic cult.
I once hearing for an alliance with the anti-Israel, anti-billionaire, and eco-friendly element of the left wing.
Consequently, their deliberate action to Charlie Kirk's execution has been very black, pearling, and depressing to see, considering what could have been a positive marriage of convenience with him.
And what is the point that, um, yeah, I don't, I don't really understand what you're saying.
They're they're defending the Talmud or what?
They're they're defending that reading of the Talmud, saying that to say it's Jesus is subjective, but you could interpret it any other way, I think is what you're getting at.
I'm I'm not really sure I'd have to watch it, but that kind of misunderstands the intention of the authors when they wrote it is that it's about Jesus.
So the Talmud, unlike the actual Torah, it's just the word of rabbis.
And the rabbis are debating and, you know, the authors of the various versions of the Talmud are compiling the teachings and the disputations of the rabbis.
And their intention is very clear.
It is about Jesus.
And to the extent that it's ambiguous, it's because they're hiding things from censors.
They don't want the Christians to know it's coded language.
But it is not subjective.
That the intention of the authors is that that's what they say about Jesus.
So, no, that it's completely the hermeneutic for the Talmud is different than for the Bible.
Hey, Nick, you've amassed many new followers recently.
I think if you consider doing a 30-minute segment, doing a deep dive using the Bible to prove why Christians are not bound biblically to support Israel, it would be beneficial for all the new people and for Christians to better understand.
Just ordered a hat.
God bless.
Dirty Jew sent $30.
Love watching you while ripping my big ass bong.
Keep all the Jew hate coming.
Love listening to the shit while working.
Arden Tarkarion sent $20.
L recent super chats.
Time to up the cost?
That super chatter from last episode trying to get me to tell veterans to rise up was a total fed.
Like, because we sort of talked about low frequency traders sent $25.
The guy who keeps sending super chats complaining that the headband size on the America first hats is too small is actually the biggest clue that Charlie Kirk is still alive.
It is unfortunate that the people of Palestine have been the sacrificial lamps that have enabled the normies of the world to see the extent of Jewish influence in our government.
Every Republican, liberal, a political person I know has turned on Israel.
My Fox News dad, who I love with all my heart, has turned on Israel.
Leonard El Groiper sent $20, mentally ill-spiritually ran through women, handshake emoji, incel chuds.
Dash talks about this.
Mike Gazarian sent $25.
Hey, Nick, love the show.
Given all.
The downward change in the last 40 years.
If all Jews were evaporated from existence by a Thanosnap, do you think our world would slowly start to get better?
Maybe.
Jesuit Groeper sent $25.
Speaker Johnson said Judea and Samaria belongs to Israel.
After Trump, to counter the wave of anti-Israeliness, said the opposite.
Israel has 666 strategies from Sunday to secure the West Bank eventually.
Michael Hinton sent $20.
I live in Houston.
When I grew up, there was maybe one or two noticeable mosques.
Now, they're literally everywhere.
I would rather have Catholics invading my country, instead of seeing Dawak people preying on the ignorance of our Christian women and damning them to hell.
Three IDF soldiers testified before the Knesset Committee about a leaked recording instructing them on the morning of October 7th to not conduct patrols along the Gaza border from 5:20 a.m. to 9 a.m., calling it unusual and strange.
Google Shanker Shalom.
Of the 230,000 buildings in Gaza in 2022, around 800 remain today.
D's international sent $20.
Hey, Nick, excellent points tonight.
One question, though.
Do you have a stylist?
The Thai has been crooked these past couple nights and it makes it hard to focus on the big JQ.
Scooter liberal chat sent $20.
Liberals are gay, but at least their policy helps white Americans like students loan forgiveness, housing, and pushing back on Israeli influence.
Meanwhile, Trump fills his admin with obese neckbeards and Jews.
So even if the end goals are different, how willing would you be to work with political enemies to reach your goals?