America First - Nick Fuentes - DID ISRAEL KILL CHARLIE KIRK??? The Conspiracy vs The Official Story

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 16, 2025 - America First - Nick Fuentes

04:34:48

DID ISRAEL KILL CHARLIE KIRK??? The Conspiracy vs The Official Story | America First Ep. 1564

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

03:22:06

streamlabs matthew tts

06:47

Appearances

tucker carlson

02:20

Clips

candace owens

00:05

donald j trump

00:10

kanye west

00:26

michelle malkin

00:56

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		But as soon as people start playing games, I stop.
		I stop playing games.
		And at any moment, I can look back on the floor.
		One, two, stop the track.
		See, Ricky said, to the left, party, don't wanna pull you.
		If you run the roll, you get a one-on-one.
		This nigga was a bad one.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I can enforce it, alright?
unidentified		They said, trust no man.
		Trust no hope.
		You're so rubber.
		They said trust to me.
		Warming, I'm everybody who dared to roll.
		And I've been making games with me from the stall kick out.
		It was pretty sick, too, tight.
		First, you go.
		We're daddy said, trust to me.
		Girls in the public.
		One, two, stop the track.
		See, Ricky said, to the left, party, don't wanna pull you.
		If you run the roll, you get a one-on-one.
		Okay, slop.
		Keep the code inside your bricks, don't have it back with the buttons.
		This nigga was a bitch.
		They said trust to me, double slippin' to believe your day was out of power.
		Mama said, trust no hope, use a rubber.
		They said crushed tooth baby, double slippin' to believe your day one.
		Warming, I'm everybody dared to roll.
		Then your mama ain't cheap, cause petty this sheet.
		And I've been making games with me from the snow kick out.
		It was pretty sick, too tight.
		Only dropped jewels when we floated y'all jump.
		On the way, cause they say the crop fake notes cut out.
		This one, yeah, America's first bitch.
		They said push tooth baby, public to believe your day once in the car.
		Get everyone warming, I'm everybody who dared to roll.
		Then your mama ain't cheap, cause petty this sheet.
		I'll see you next time.
		Only dropped jewels when we floated y'all jump.
		On the way, cause they say the crop fake notes cut out.
		Jesus is the way and the life and the King of Israel.
		We just lead with love.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We're really at a crossroads here.
		Look around you.
		It's drag queens in schools.
		It's 18-year-olds joining OnlyFans.
		It's the filth on TikTok.
		It's this country not having a border.
		It's the idea that our kids and we, this generation, are never going to own anything.
		Think about it.
		Never making an income to support a family.
		Never being able to have a family.
		People being corrupted before you're even a teenager by things on their phone.
unidentified		Sick addiction to technology.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The future is so bleak, but that has changed the calculation.
kanye west ▲ ● ▼		God is using me.
		He's breaking me down.
		Removing all of the, you know, richest person, all of this, so I can serve him.
unidentified		I think they've been extremely unfair to you.
kanye west ▲ ● ▼		Who is they, though?
kanye west ▲ ● ▼		We can't tell you what they is.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		There is no future if we do nothing now.
		There is nothing to lose.
		People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
		It's all going.
		It's all going away.
		This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
		We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
		And we're killing ourselves every day.
		Inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
		People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
		People have got to start to get courageous.
		And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
		And the alternative is that there will be no country.
		Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
		Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
		It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
		It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
unidentified		I got places to be Evening everybody You're watching America First.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Roypers and all the alt-riders that got banned, all the alt-riders that got slandered, even people that killed themselves.
unidentified		Our corpses paved the way for you now to walk over.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And you can't give us acknowledgement.
		Now you want to slam the door on us.
		It's not right.
unidentified		It's not right.
		I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us.
		For the creation waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed.
		We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time.
		Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption to sonship, the redemption of our bodies.
		For in this hope we were saved.
		But hope that is seen is no hope at all.
		Who hopes for what they already have?
		But if we hope for what we do not yet have, we wait for it patiently.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		There is something involved where we have to forgive them.
		We do have to forgive them for their ignorance.
		We do have to forgive them for their misunderstanding.
		And we have to embrace them and say, better late than never.
		Welcome to the right side of history.
		Welcome to our, our massive vision, our massive and ambitious vision for how we want the world to be saying
		to me, he's like, this is probably pretty cool for you.
unidentified		I'm like, yeah, it is.
		In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
		Through him, all things were made.
		Without him, nothing was made that has been made.
		In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind.
		And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers.
		He will crush your head.
		strike his heel.
		Jesus said to her, I am the resurrection and the life.
		The one who believes in me will live even though they die.
		And whoever lives by believing in me will never die.
		Do you believe this?
		I am sending you out like sheep among wolves.
		Therefore, be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.
		Then Jesus came to them and said, All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
		Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.
		And surely I am with you always to the very end of the age.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You can't go back to the past.
		That's what people always say, isn't it?
		They say, can we really go back?
		And the answer is, whether you're conservative or liberal, right wing or left wing, the answer is no.
		We're never going back.
		It's done.
		It's gone.
		All of that is gone.
		So I would call myself something like a Christian futurist instead.
		Because Jesus Christ was our past before any of us were born or conceived.
		Jesus Christ is our present now.
		And Jesus Christ is our future after we die on Earth.
unidentified		We want this century to be the most Christian century in the history of planet Earth.
		We love everybody.
		And we love people that convert really more than anything.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But this country can no longer be held hostage by a small minority that doesn't even believe in the hell.
unidentified		The mission of our movement is to make this country a Christian country.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The mission is to create a Christian future in our time.
		The only way we're going to do it is not by infiltrating, not by subverting, not by lying, which is what a lot of people do.
		The only way that we're going to make this happen is with the boldness of a real Christian.
unidentified		It's the only way.
unidentified		We have got to be willing to die for Jesus Christ.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We have to want it more than they do because if there are thousands and millions and tens of millions and hundreds of millions of Christians ready to meet their final destiny, then nothing can stop us and nothing will.
unidentified		When
unidentified		I get home, I want you to be Good evening, everybody.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Quentis.
		Have a great show for you tonight.
		That we are different.
		that america was different because we are different palantir is an ai data analytics company
		They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
		If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
		Palantir comes in and interprets the data using algorithms, using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
		That's what they are.
		And so, many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
		Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
unidentified		It's unstoppable.
		And the reason why is because it's not new to shill for big business.
		It's not new to shilling Israel.
		How you put too much vapor on your side And just to measure what you That's all God.
		Got nights and right as in the dark.
		People must know they got my heart.
		And all my bugs like the phone and card.
		You can feel me anything you wanna be.
		Fuck from one to four to one to three.
		Thirteen gotta end to just a week.
		Be a new commander and a chief.
		Definitely.
		I fear and never got when you remove the fear and love is God.
		You create clear above everything else.
		You're talking to somebody right now that only fears God.
		Jesus wants victory, bro.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		This is a Christian nation.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		This is a miracle.
unidentified		No, I cannot let my family call.
		I go home, I just go.
		We brainwashed out here, bro.
		Come on, man.
		Three men talking.
		And I just say, are you trusting me again?
		I'm fine.
		You seem to my eyes are the first time.
		You seem to my eyes going better.
		Like the other side.
		You go get high patience.
		I want nothing but a rider that I'm patient.
		She told me that she's not a little bit.
		When I get home, I want you.
		Hello, hello, hello, hello.
		Hello.
		Got places to be Evening everybody You're welcome You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Quentis.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Have a great show for you tonight.
unidentified		You got the hat back on the phone.
		You got that backpack, that's a bump.
		You got the hat pot, that's all the phone.
		You got that hat back on the phone.
		If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first.
		If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own.
		As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world.
		That is why the world hates you.
		Remember what I told you: a servant is not greater than his master.
		If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also.
		They will treat you this way because of my name, for they do not know the one who sent me.
		Why do you call me Lord, Lord, and do not do what I say?
		A new command I give you.
		Love one another.
		As I have loved you, so you must love one another.
		By this, everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.
		You have heard that it was said, love your neighbor and hate your enemy.
		But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven.
		He causes his son to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.
		If you love those who love you, what reward will you get?
		Are not even the tax collectors doing that?
		And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others?
		Do not even pagans do that.
		Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly father is perfect.
		The
michelle malkin ▲ ● ▼		narrative is not one of some sudden booming bolt of lightning out of the blue.
		It was a slow and steady, unrelenting stream of blips and blinks, glimmers and glares, low beams and high beams of light, some of which I did not want to see.
		And then finally, a point of no return reckoning.
unidentified		Why are you called Mommy Melkin?
michelle malkin ▲ ● ▼		I think it was because I fiercely came out during the Groika Wars of 2019 when so many of these brave young men were on college campuses challenging the likes of Zio Shill Dan Crenshaw, questioning him about his undying loyalty and of course defending Nick Fuentes and so many of the stars of the burgeoning America First Movement who, through an increasing amount of activism, are really going to ensure the future and the success of that movement.
unidentified		We can't be held hostage by this country forever.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		When will it end?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		When will any leader put their foot down and reassert American sovereignty?
unidentified		Do we run the world or does Israel?
unidentified		Do we even run our own country?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Do we control our own military?
unidentified		Do we control our own government, or does Israel?
		And who's going to deliver it?
		JD Vance?
		If they repeal birthright citizenship, his wife wouldn't be a citizen anymore.
		No other thing.
		This is my...
		He's got his strawberries.
		My love has got no power.
		He's got its strong beliefs.
		My love has got no fame.
		He's got his strong beliefs.
		My love has got no money.
		He's got his strong beliefs.
		Want more and more.
		People just want more and more freedom and blood.
		What he's looking for.
		One more and more.
		People just want more and more freedom and blood.
		What he's looking for.
		Freed from desire.
		Mind and senses purify.
		Freed from desire.
		Mine and senses purified.
		Freed from desire.
		Mind and senses purified.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		If we don't have freedom on the internet in the age of AI, we are going to be mind raped every day forever.
		Think about anything you've ever said or done in the vicinity of your phone's camera or microphone, everything you've ever put into your phone, and even things that are not necessarily so scandalous, but even things like your favorite restaurants, your geolocation, because your phone also has a GPS.
		They know where you are at all times.
		They know where you go and when.
		They know what you buy.
		They have access to your bank account.
		AI will literally know everything about you.
		Everyone you know, your relationship to them, your tastes, your preferences, your habits, your whereabouts, your routines, your schedule, when you're asleep.
		They know how much REM sleep you're getting.
		They know your resting heart rate.
		They know how many calories you consume.
		Think about the ways that they can manipulate you.
		You have a computer in your refrigerator, computer in your car, computer in your home security system, computer in your everything, computer in your clothes, your watch, your glasses, your VR headset, your alarm clock.
		You have a smart home, economy of things.
		It's like total, like, rape of everybody by the system forever.
		My life is like a first-person video game, you know?
unidentified		This is like, this is my primary.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		This is me like walking, walking down the hall.
		This is my primary weapon.
		Press circle to interact.
		Press circle to interact with this item.
		At the end of the day, here's the question.
		Is it worth it to save the country?
		Does the country matter?
		Is it worth it to preserve our civilization?
		Is it worth it to preserve our religion?
		Maybe bigger than that.
		Is the truth worth it?
		What is the truth worth to you?
		What is telling the truth worth to you?
		Is it worth something, nothing?
		What are you willing to give to tell the truth?
		All you need is Jesus.
		All you need is prayer.
		These material appetites, they will never be satisfied.
		And even if they are, it'll never be an adequate substitute for communion with our Holy Father, with somebody, with the author of the world.
		And every mother and father understands the love for a child.
		And that is how we were made.
		We were designed that way.
		Because through that experience, we could understand by analogy God's love for us.
		It says in Revelation that God will wipe away every tear.
		And that's like, to me, it makes me want to cry when I read that.
		People experience these things in their lives.
		We've all been there where you feel like the whole world's against you, the walls are closing in.
		And you read something like that that says that God, like our Father, our Creator, is going to wipe your tears off your face.
		Christianity is love.
		Our God is love.
		I mean, only, only a class of people so rootless in their transition view America in such a way as merely a vessel for abstractions, right?
		We're gonna smash your brain in with the Bible, kiddie.
unidentified		And I'm addicted to the serotonin rush.
		When's enough enough, babe?
		When's enough enough?
		That's it.
		Just eat a Big Mac, you stupid bitch.
		It's not a lie We're not allowed to make jokes anymore.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We're not allowed to make drinks.
unidentified		It's not funny.
		Sipping wine, having some hot tab and some pizza.
		Oh.
		I'm weird.
		I'm normal.
		I'm the, well, not normal, but I'm a soldier and I'm 14.
		I'm original.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		All right, I'm an original.
unidentified		One person raised his voice.
		Teacher couldn't believe it.
		The classroom couldn't believe it either.
		He had logic from this.
		And at the end of the.
		What you think for me, the girl, she be rolling on the grace.
		Put the gang through the game for the feel like the Nero Focusino.
		Couldn't got the sun in Fortocino.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm addicted to the territory right now.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		This is America.
unidentified		I fear and love God.
		When you remove the fear and love of God, you create the fear and love of everything else.
		You talking to somebody right now that only fears God.
kanye west ▲ ● ▼		Jesus has won victory, bro.
kanye west ▲ ● ▼		Like, this is what you like.
unidentified		Like, trying to live life right.
kanye west ▲ ● ▼		Who really know you feels like type right?
kanye west ▲ ● ▼		This is like the movie for the skilly living type light.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Every single night, right?
kanye west ▲ ● ▼		Every single tight right.
kanye west ▲ ● ▼		I was looking at the camera.
unidentified		I don't need the tight light.
unidentified		I was screaming at my daddy.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So be in it.
unidentified		Christ like I was screaming at the clip.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We just tight mic.
unidentified		You're full of bright lights.
		Legal with your life like riding on the white light.
		Spending like a tight bike.
kanye west ▲ ● ▼		Pressing on the gas.
unidentified		Here's an overflow type.
		Screaming at my dad, and he told me any Christ-like.
		But nobody never tell you me and Christ.
		Only ever seeing the key to me.
		I can tell the parry thing.
		Now you want to be a freak.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Now you want to see it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Next to see you through your peace.
unidentified		Tell me what you like by turns down great night.
		I look at my dad and he told me it ain't Christ-like.
		I'm just trying to find another for a new way.
		Just really trying not to break through the blue way.
		I don't have a food to keep on my best though.
		Back up on the texto.
kanye west ▲ ● ▼		That's it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		No texto.
kanye west ▲ ● ▼		Find another word, better picture or a testimony.
unidentified		Wrestling with God, I don't really want to rest so.
		Fucking with my dad and he said it ain't Christ-like.
		America.
		And the reason why.
		It's not a shilling.
		It's not.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		This is a Christian nation.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		This is America.
unidentified		I fear and love God.
		When you remove the fear and love of God, you create the fear and love of everything else.
		I'd like to propose a toast to our people.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'd like to propose a toast to the voipers, to white boy summer, white boy century, to the reaction and the reclamation of the United States.
unidentified		Cheers, everybody.
		That's gonna happen.
		They kick me off the plane, you know what that means?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		White boy summer road trip.
unidentified		They give us lemons, we make lemonade.
		They throw me behind bars and I start throwing baseball up against the wall.
		And now I'm playing catch.
		Because you know what?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The only time that they win is when they triumph over our spirit, but they never can ever take that away from us.
unidentified		Because I believe in God and I believe in America and I believe in what I'm doing.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We are still enjoying.
unidentified		White boy summer is still on.
		I don't care if I have to drive there.
		I don't care if I have to get in Lake Michigan and go all the way around the Panama Canal.
		Nothing is going to stop White Boy Summer.
		Nothing is going to stop America first.
		America first, bitch.
		There's always a way.
		This country wouldn't exist without white people.
		Wouldn't exist without white people.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Oh And I think our ancestors smile on us right now while we're doing it.
unidentified		Cheers.
		In the beginning was the word.
		And the word was with God.
		And the word was God.
		Through him, all things were made.
		Without him, nothing was made that has been made.
		In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind.
		And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers.
		He will crush your head.
		will strike his heel.
		Jesus said to her, I am the resurrection and the life.
		The one who believes in me will live, even though they die.
		And whoever lives by believing in me will never die.
		Do you believe this?
		I am sending you out like sheep among wolves.
		Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.
		Then Jesus came to them and said, All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
		Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.
		And surely I am with you always to the very end of the age.
		We can't be held hostage by this country forever.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		When will it end?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		When will any leader put their foot down and reassert American sovereignty?
unidentified		Do we run the world or does Israel?
unidentified		Do we even run our own country?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Do we control our own military?
unidentified		Do we control our own government, or does Israel?
unidentified		My name is Nicholas J. Quentis.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Have a great show for you tonight.
		Something involved where we have to forgive them.
		We do have to forgive them for their ignorance.
		We do have to forgive them for their misunderstanding.
		And we have to embrace them and say, better late than never.
		Welcome to the right side of history.
		Welcome to our, our massive vision, our massive and ambitious vision for how we want the world to be back
		to the past.
		That's what people always say, isn't it?
		They say, can we really go back?
		And the answer is, whether you're conservative or liberal, right wing or left wing, the answer is no.
		We're never going back.
		It's done.
		It's gone.
		All of that is gone.
		But I would call myself something like a Christian futurist instead.
		Because Jesus Christ was our past before any of us were born or conceited.
		Jesus Christ is our present now.
		And Jesus Christ is our future after we die on earth.
unidentified		We want this century to be the most Christian century in the history of planet earth.
		We love everybody.
		And we want people to convert really more than anybody.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But this country can no longer be held hostage by a small minority that doesn't even believe.
unidentified		The mission of our movement is to make this country a Christian country.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The mission is to create a Christian future in our time.
		The only way we're going to do it is not by infiltrating, not by subverting, not by lying, which is what a lot of people do.
		The only way that we're going to make this happen is with the boldness of a real Christian.
unidentified		The only way we have got to be willing to die for Jesus Christ.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We have to want it more than they do.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Because if there are thousands and millions and tens of millions and hundreds of millions of Christians ready to meet their final destiny, then nothing can stop us and nothing will.
unidentified		Nick's winning.
		Nick Fuente.
		Jesus Christ was our past.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Jesus Christ is our present now.
unidentified		And Jesus Christ is our future after we die.
		century to be the most Christian century in the history of planet Earth.
		Supposed to be here tonight.
		I'm supposed to be here.
		I want that shot off of our souls on to a child of how my voice has nothing but a scream of fire.
		Stretch my hair, but my coat, just cause I
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening, everybody.
		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		Have a great show for you tonight
unidentified		They have total control.
		That a lion could from his courage be pride over every single thing.
		That the lion himself would learn to kneel.
		They pull the string.
		The lion would not care, even if his line died.
		Things have to change, Jay.
		That the lion himself would accept such a deal.
		And they have to change right now.
		In the end, it was only to themselves they had lied.
		Lied, lied.
		I
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		mean, this is part of the sad thing of Happy Canada as far as I'm concerned.
		The sad thing is, and I know that no one who watches him will believe me.
		Pat does raise issues that I think are important.
		Doesn't mean everything he says is false.
		It doesn't mean he's not talented.
		He's enormously talented.
		Doesn't mean he's a bad person.
		I'm not attacking him personally.
		I mean, I think that, you know, the sovereignty of the American military, et cetera, I mean, these are not just crank issues.
		It's young white men who've been totally cut out of our economy, attacked mercilessly.
		I mean, they really are the victims and they're desperate and no one speaks for them.
		So they go to Fuentes because he's like incredibly articulate and they think he's our leader.
		But unfortunately, Pat Buchanan raises them in a way that I think is discredited.
		But he is clearly part of a campaign to discredit non-crazy right voices.
		Pat Buchanan is part of the reason it's so hard to have that conversation because he discredits it by his presence.
		That's a campaign to destroy credible voices on the right.
		And Fuentes is part of it.
		And that he believes in conspiracies and that he believes that the Jews are this sinister, secretly organized force trying to affect American politics.
		And those aren't discussions I think normal people, sober people should be having.
		Anyway, like, who is this kid exactly?
		And maybe it's just an accident that the guy goes after exclusively goes after people who are in the same, roughly the same.
		And then he gets up there and he's like, you know, making Holocaust jokes.
		When attacked, he can always fall back on the line, well, the, you know, the tiny cabal that controls American politics doesn't like me because I speak truth to power.
		This is actually, incidentally, almost verbatim, what he said the other day, that I offend the plutocracy, that I'm a wanted man by the inside the beltway people, and in every sense, cast himself as a victim who is sort of a Karen Silkwood of politics, someone who's so truthful that he's being hunted down by the conspiracy that runs Washington.
		I mean, it's all a bit much.
unidentified		My love has got no money.
		He's got his strong beliefs.
		My love has got no power.
		He's got his strong beliefs.
		My love has got no fame.
		He's got his strong beliefs.
		My love has got no money.
		He's got his strong beliefs.
		Want more and more.
		People just want more and more freedom and bluff.
		But he's looking for more and more.
		People just want more and more freedom and love.
		What he's looking for.
		Freed from desire.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		something involved where we have to forgive them.
		We do have to forgive them for their ignorance.
		We do have to forgive them for their misunderstanding.
		And we have to embrace them and say, better late than never.
		Welcome to the right side of history.
		Welcome to our massive vision, our massive and ambitious vision for how we want the world to be.
		Good evening, everybody.
		You're watching America First.
unidentified		My name is Nicholas J. Quentin.
		Have a great show for you tonight.
		You got that back, bad, that's a light bump.
		You got that back, that's a lack of bump.
		Let's do it.
		Running through my head, running through my head, all the things you had, all the things I needed.
		I can't get it.
		All the dinner had, all the things you had.
		All the things you had, all the things you had.
		All it's interesting, all it's interesting And who's going to deliver it?
		JD Vance?
		If they revealed birthright citizenship, his wife wouldn't be a citizen anymore.
		I know no other country.
		This is my home.
		How can you call it a movement when you have no motion?
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		You just interviewed Nick Fuentes.
candace owens ▲ ● ▼		I did.
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		Or had a conversation with him.
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		What did you think of that?
unidentified		What do you think of him?
candace owens ▲ ● ▼		My experience with Nick Fuentes is that he's a terrible person and a terrible human being.
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		But he is clearly part of a campaign to discredit non-crazy right voices.
candace owens ▲ ● ▼		I can confirm he's dishonest.
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		Child, this weird little gay kid in his basement in Chicago, young white men who've been totally cut out of our economy.
		I mean, they really are the victims and they're desperate and no one speaks for them.
		So they go to Fuentes because he's like incredibly articulate and they think he's our leader.
unidentified		But in one of the saddest ironies of all, like he's acting against your interests, actually.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But then when it comes to me, I'm one of the real disaffected white people.
		You want to talk about me and them?
		I am them.
		He says, Nick Fuentes is leading all of the disaffected young white men.
		I am a disaffected white, young white man.
		I was a precocious, intelligent, young white college student who went to Boston University, who was pro-Trump and red-billed by Trump and animated by Trump's message of America first.
		And I asked questions about Israel and I was punished for it.
		I did it years before Tucker Carlson started talking about Israel last year.
		And I sacrificed and I was targeted by the ADL, by the SPLC, by the federal government, by the conservative movement that both Candace and Tucker were a part of.
		He's lonely.
unidentified		He's weird.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		He lives in a basement.
		That's a lot of people because of the problems you claim to care about.
		Do you care about Kwarna and people going into debt to order pizzas and home ownership being impossible?
		Or do you think that's a contemptible, low-status thing to be ridiculed and mocked?
		What is wrong with being from Chicago?
		What is wrong with being weird?
		What is wrong with living in your basement?
unidentified		I'm the inauthentic person.
		I am that person.
		I am a spokesman for the disaffected white man because I am one and you two are not.
		My dad didn't even graduate college.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		My mother's father was a garbage man in Chicago and he committed suicide.
unidentified		He was a veteran of World War II.
unidentified		Who's the CIA cutout?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Who's the poser?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Who is America?
unidentified		I am America.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Chicago is America.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		What makes Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us.
unidentified		An overflowing of love.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		An overflowing of self-giving love.
unidentified		So much of it, it cannot be contained.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children, even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
unidentified		That is what makes us different.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That is what makes us good.
unidentified		The Canary Mission is an Israeli-funded blacklist, which since July 2025 has been confirmed to be used by the Trump administration to target students, professors, and professionals who oppose Israel and reside in the United States.
		This idea is part of an initiative created by the Heritage Foundation, the same group responsible for the infamous Project 2025.
		In their initiative, titled Project Esther, they state that students participating in pro-Palestinian protests and activism are supporting Hamas, a group that the United States designates as a foreign terrorist organization.
		Therefore, pro-Palestinian students are considered to be supporting terrorism and are subject to the revocation of visas, frozen bank accounts, asset seizures, and the denial of basic constitutional rights.
		In effect, the Canary mission serves as a means to circumvent constitutional protections, allowing the federal government to engage in intelligence gathering activities that would otherwise be considered unlawful.
		But the Canary mission is not alone.
		Palantir, another company closely aligned with the state of Israel, uses AI-driven analytics to maintain private databases on U.S. citizens and currently works with four federal agencies.
		While government contracting with the private sector is long-standing, the prominent influence of Jewish groups within these increasingly powerful organizations warrants careful examination.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I renew the call for all able-bodied young American men, all of our elite human capital, all of our geniuses, warriors, intelligent people to dedicate themselves to American sovereignty and independence as Christians, as Americans, as white people, as citizens of the United States.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And anybody that settles for anything less is just as much of an enemy.
unidentified		I would actually consider them worse than our oppressors.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So on Independence Day, it's important to reflect on the fact that we are an occupied nation.
		Now, just like then, we're being ruled by a small country across an ocean, serving itself at our expense.
		And as long as that is the case, I will always be obsessed with that.
		As long as that is the case, I will always be speaking out against that and fighting against that.
		And I will always be anchored, understanding that that is the fundamental struggle.
		As long as our presidents have to kiss the wall in Israel and wear a small hat, as long as they have to say that we want to make Israel great again and they're the greatest country ever, I will never be okay with that.
unidentified		Ever.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And it doesn't matter what they offer me or us.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It doesn't matter how they might try to placate us or appease our interests, the concessions they'll make.
unidentified		As long as that is the case, it is unacceptable.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And that's what it means to be an American.
		How did we get here?
		This is not a timeline going back to 1948.
		What had just happened before the 2016 election?
		Barack Obama created the joint comprehensive plan of action, the JCPOA, or the Iranian nuclear deal.
		And Barack Obama brought together China, Russia, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the European Union to enforce a nuclear deal that restricts Iran's enrichment of uranium.
		The early talks were conducted in secret, and the Israelis were furious, furious about this.
		They hated Obama.
		Netanyahu went to a joint session of Congress and gave a speech in defiance of the American president and its nuclear deal, and Congress gave 37 standing ovations.
		This is the background of Trump's first election.
		2016 election happens.
		Trump gets elected with the help of the Israelis.
		You don't believe me?
		There's a whole article about it.
		It's an excerpt from James Bamford's book, Spy Fail.
		It goes into great detail about the hidden collusion in the 2016 election.
		It wasn't Trump and Russia.
		It was Trump and Israel.
		And why was Israel so hell-bent on getting a Republican elected in 2016?
		To scuttle the Iranian nuclear deal.
		And that's exactly what happened.
		That was the ask.
unidentified		The United States will withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		In 2018, Donald Trump declares the IRGC, the Revolutionary Guard, which is the military of the regime, a terrorist group.
		Greenlights that group for sanctions, for attacks.
		Now the United States is in a shadow war with Iran.
		It culminates by January 2020 in the assassination of Qasem Suleimani.
		Suleimani was the architect of the axis of resistance.
		Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Suleimani built all of it.
		Are you starting to see Obama had this solved?
		He made the deal.
		The Israelis hated him for it.
		They colluded with Trump to get him elected so that Trump would do maximum pressure and create a ladder of escalation, pulling us out of the deal, declaring the IRGC terrorists, then killing its leader, putting sanctions on the regime.
		This is a war that started a long time ago that Trump made hot in 2018 and has been going on for seven years.
		That's the nature of forever wars.
		Just like in Iraq, which went from 1990 until today, just like Libya, which went from 2011 to today.
		Syria, which went from 2011 to today, and Iran, which went from 2018 until today.
		That's the nature of forever wars.
		And if you're not paying attention to those underlying forces, you're going to fall for it again and again.
		You're going to be surprised and confused and coping over and over.
		And people are just tripping over themselves to do it again.
unidentified		Meaningless.
		What do you guys think?
		The children's twins are to be once more streamed.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our Tuedo.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		It's going to be only America first.
unidentified		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening, everybody.
		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas Jay Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Monday.
		We have a lot to talk about tonight, lots to get into.
		Tonight, we're going to be picking up on our coverage last week of the murder of Charlie Kirk, major political assassination last week.
		And it's been a long weekend.
		I didn't do a show on Friday.
		It's been a few days.
		But I actually think the timing is good.
		I think it gave everybody a chance to think on this a little bit and sleep on it.
		It is, I have to say, before we get into the topics tonight, just a general note.
		And this is something that maybe people haven't realized or thought about too much, but I was thinking about it this afternoon.
		We should actually be grateful, in a sense, for what we haven't seen so far, which is more political violence.
		I think about the last time we spoke, the last time I did a show, and it was my biggest show yet.
		We had a lot of people tune in to see what I had to say about it.
		And I struck a very conciliatory tone.
		As I said on Thursday night, Charlie Kirk is a former rival of mine.
		I considered him an opponent for many years and a rival.
		And I took the opportunity on Thursday to make my best attempt to lower the temperature.
		And I know that phrase is getting a bad rap.
		A lot of people want to do the opposite.
		They want to turn the temperature up.
		But on Wednesday and Thursday, when everybody was still reeling from the tragedy, I really do believe we were looking over the cliff.
		People recognize how significant what happened on Wednesday was.
		The feelings are very raw.
		The nature of it, I think, is unprecedented in modern times.
		And my honest to God expectation last week is that we would see retaliatory violence.
		We would see copycat attacks.
		We would see more bloodshed.
		And I have to say, before we even get into some of the analysis tonight, and like I said, trying to pick up where we left off on Thursday and talk a little bit more about what has happened, what has been happening, I do just want to say I'm very grateful, and I think we should all be grateful that we haven't seen any more bloodshed.
		And I really do believe that is a testament to the fact, the reality of what we talked about last week, which is that we, our side, is fundamentally different than the other side.
		And as time has passed and the days have gone by, we have had a chance to process the murder, this brutal, horrific public execution.
		We've had a chance to think about it and deal with it in our own way and cope with it.
		And I said on Thursday, I think the reason that this hit home for a lot of people, including and especially me, and honestly, I'm surprised that it did because I really did not like Charlie Kirk.
		The reason that it hit home is because we have been assaulted by wave after wave in America and outside of America, in Gaza, by graphic and visceral depictions of evil.
		That's what that is.
		If you were distraught or upset, shaken, disturbed, if you felt darkness, that's because we came face to face with pure evil last week.
		And I'm not just talking about the brutal killing, which took place in front of thousands of young people and then the whole world, but then we also saw the nihilistic justifications, celebrations, the indifference, the apathy.
		People that work as nurses, teachers, people in our community, next door neighbors, people in proximity to us, they celebrated the violence.
		There's a word for that.
		It's evil.
		It's a lack of charity.
		It's a lack of mercy.
		It's a lack of humanity.
		They are denying the humanity of innocent people.
		And that's why it was so devastating.
		And it is a poignant reminder about that dichotomy that the response to not only Charlie Kirk's murder, but also the shocking indifference, callous indifference to it by the left is faith.
		The response from our side, because unfortunately, that's what it is now, it's come to that.
		When it comes to issues like murder, there are sides.
		Our side, which still believes that human life is sacred and murder is wrong, and our neighbors' lives are not ours to take, even if we disagree with what they say.
		Our side that believes that our response to the brutality, to our encounter with evil, was prayer vigils.
		Prayer vigils.
		People turned out at state capitals, intersections, churches.
		The pews were flooded.
		People attended vigils that they volunteered to set up and create.
		People offered up their prayers.
		There were unbelievable numbers of young people signing up to create turning point chapters and get involved in other ways politically.
		And you compare that to the other side.
		So much comparing and contrasting, isn't there these days?
		When ICE came down in Los Angeles, what did they do?
		Burn cars, drop scooters on police cars, burn the American flag.
		When George Floyd died five years ago, what did they do?
	Loot liquor stores, phone stores, burn down the city.
	When Charlie Kirk was horrifically murdered for no reason at all, for no good reason, not that there is a good reason, but for such a ridiculous, petty reason because he did partisan debates at colleges when half the country seemed to rise up instinctually to justify and celebrate the violence.
	The right wing, by the way, would have been every bit justified, every bit justified in pursuing vengeance.
	A pound of flesh for a pound of flesh, an eye for an eye, because enough is enough.
	They would have been every bit justified.
	This is a big country of 350 million people.
	And you know what?
	The right wing has all the guns.
	The right wing makes up the majority of the police, the military.
	People could have sought retribution.
	And some were calling for that.
	I think most were calling for the opposite.
	But there was not one instance of reprisal, not one of retaliation.
	And even in the vigils for Charlie Kirk, which were interrupted by these shit-eating leftists who showed up to taunt and mock and ridicule the organizers, they were treated with mercy.
	They weren't beaten to death.
	They weren't killed on the spot.
	They were apprehended, but with restraint and with mercy, because that's who we are.
	And I think in many ways that was vindicating.
	And I felt a sense of reassurance actually this weekend when I saw that.
	Because I'm going to be honest, on Thursday, I didn't know how I would approach the show.
	I had a lot of mixed feelings, as I know you all did.
	I know, like you, part of me felt that there needed to be a crushing and brutal response that matched the gravity of what they did.
	And the other part of me, and some part of me felt like this was naive, but another part of me said, that's just not right.
	The gospel is so unequivocal.
	We forgive not seven times, but seven times, 70 times.
	Forgive them.
	They don't know what they do.
	It could not be more clear.
	And I talked a little bit on Thursday about why that is.
	And part of it is political.
	One of the things I thought about this past week is: is this how we solve problems?
	We disagree with each other, so we go out and murder and kill.
	Where does that leave us down the road?
	We're going to have a society of warlords, the most brutal, the most cruel, the most evil.
	They will be the strongest.
	They will rise to the top.
	What kind of society does that look like?
	It's a very ugly one.
	And I thought about Christianity in particular.
	And you think about how our religion has survived for 2,000 years.
	It's ironic.
	Some people clipped my show last week and they said I was sounding like a Muslim.
	How did our religion survive?
	How did our religion thrive under persecution in the period of the early church?
	And there's a one-word answer to that question.
	Our religion, just like this movement, which is inspired by our religion, it grows by witness.
	It grows by the witness of the piety and the faith and the love and the sacrifice of the Christians.
	And, you know, I said it on Thursday, and I'm going to double down on it again tonight.
	And some people said this makes me a hypocrite.
	This is contradictory with things I've said in the past.
	But we were a witness on Wednesday to Charlie Kirk being gunned down like a martyr.
	And look at what the witness to Charlie Kirk has turned into.
	When you see the real life testimonials, the videos from young people, from teenagers, from college students, from young men, from young women, and honest to God, I've been touched by it.
	All throughout the past week, I have seen countless Instagram reels, TikToks of young men and young women.
	And you know what they've said?
	They said, Charlie Kirk inspired me to go back to church on Sunday.
	He inspired me to be a better man.
	He inspired me to be more honest, to be courageous, to stand up for what I believe in peacefully.
	And so, whoever took his life on Wednesday, and we'll talk about that tonight.
	That's the subject of the show.
	Whoever took his life on Wednesday, I hope whoever it is, whether it's the suspect in custody, Tyler Robinson, who is innocent until proven guilty, or maybe it was some other force, or there were accomplices, whoever was involved, whoever cheered it on, I hope they see what they created.
	And I hope they see that what they did backfired.
	You killed one person who, by the way, I didn't even really care for.
	One person who, up until he was shot on Wednesday, I didn't even respect that much.
	And I doubted his sincerity.
	And I thought that what he did was silly.
	They shot one person, but then they inspired millions of people.
	And that's not an understatement.
	That's not rhetoric.
	The witness, the witness to his truth-telling, to his character, even if he was imperfect, even if he didn't live up to it all the time, even if there were contradictions, all people are filled with contradictions.
	All people do good and evil.
	All people are hypocrites.
	Life makes hypocrites of us all.
	And those that aspire to virtue will be hypocrites because we're flawed men and women.
	But the witness to who he tried to be, what he aspired to be, that has inspired millions more to grow closer to God and to suffocate and overcome evil with good, with light, not with retaliation,
	not by going to their level, not by murdering each other with our words or literally with bullets, but to suffocate and overcome hopelessness, cynicism, hatred with actual love, with actual benevolence, actual magnanimity.
	And so for anybody that thinks it was a lot of hollow words last week and a lot of sentiment, you know, what is real about what happened is the millions and millions of people who were touched by it.
	And believe it or not, that means something in itself.
	That in itself is a testament.
	And it's an important part of my monologue last week.
	And I said this last week.
	A lot of people have criticized me since.
	It's kind of shocking.
	Many people praised me for sort of putting our differences aside and saying nice things about Charlie Kirk.
	Other people said, well, you know, you didn't like him.
	Isn't it cowardly to not attack him now that he's dead or something?
	But I genuinely do mean it, that seeing how he has touched so many lives, and you never, sadly, you never realize that until someone's gone.
	And there's something heartbreaking about that all by itself, isn't there?
	We all had feelings about Charlie Kirk and his work.
	He had feelings about it.
	He'll never know.
	I hope he knows, but since he has died, he will never know.
	I hope he sees looking down from heaven just how much love there was for him, just how many people he touched.
	And now that he's passed, I've seen it.
	And I'm a witness to it.
	And that is real.
	So I think that out of this horrific tragedy, something that, like I said last week, it was just, it was the unthinkable.
	I can't shake it.
	What I felt on Wednesday, it was like a nightmare.
	That's the only thing I can compare it to it.
	It had the exact same texture, the exact same feeling that you have after you wake up from a horrific nightmare.
	And it's been a short time, but I hope you feel similarly.
	I feel a lot better today than I did last week.
	I feel a lot better.
	And my faith in humanity has been restored somewhat based on what we saw and what we did not see in the past five days.
	So I just have to open with that.
	It's important sometimes to look at the good also.
	Such a horrific evil, but the story of our religion and frankly, the story of our world is a fallenness and evil that is redeemed by love.
	That's actually the beauty.
	And on some level, that is actually the ultimate meaning of our religion, which is a victory snatched from the jaws of defeat, which is a redemption from evil, from brokenness, which is even greater than the original position.
	It's the fruit being put back on the tree.
	It's the repairing of the world, the healing of the world through the sacrifice.
	And so I'm actually, I am actually touched by the outpouring of support.
	And I didn't expect that.
	And I think a lot of people didn't expect that, certainly people that are not into politics, people that are more on the outside.
	So it's been very reassuring.
	But anyway, that's just a little note about maybe an epilogue about the show from Thursday.
	But tonight I do want to move on.
	I want to talk about some more topical things.
	You know, of course, Thursday, I spent the entire show talking about the state of the country and giving a very general take on the entire tragedy.
	This is something that has rocked the country to its core.
	And it's difficult to say at this point what the ramifications will be, how far-reaching it will be, if there will be chain reaction.
	And in particular, everybody is on full alert about political violence and the polarization, the tit-for-tat, the potential for reprisal.
	I don't think we're out of the woods on that just yet.
	But tonight, I want to talk in much more detail about the actual killing.
	I think it's appropriate at this point, and I think it's worth talking about.
	Because, of course, we talked all about this on Thursday, and much has been said.
	So much has been said.
	So many takes and positions and plans, ideas.
	And what sticks out in my mind about all of it, for all this talk about civil war, for all this talk about national divorce and a conflict, a war of all against all in America, we still don't even know who fired the shot.
	Isn't that sort of interesting?
	One shot, one lethal shot rings out in Utah, taking the life of Charlie Kirk.
	And we think we know who fired it, but we're not sure.
	And like the American Revolution or like the Civil War, no one is really quite sure who fired the first shot.
	And people are racing, like I said, to their post to take these positions.
	Stephen Crowder is calling for violence, defensive violence.
	What's his clarification?
	There is a database of 60,000 liberals who celebrated the killing.
	Some people are blaming the Groipers.
	Other people are blaming Israel.
	It has been not a week and we don't know who fired the shot.
	And yet everybody is all ready to blame someone else.
	Everybody already has a narrative constructed how to interpret this event in the light in the context of other events and what this conflict in America is shaping up to actually be.
	We don't even know.
	And so I'd like to talk a lot about that tonight.
	We're going to talk about the different culprits.
	Tonight, we're going to talk about the prime suspect in the killing, which is a 22-year-old by the name of Tyler Robinson.
	He is the person of interest in custody who the federal government will be charging any day now.
	State of Utah has already charged him.
	He has pled not guilty.
	He is not cooperating.
	He has not confessed to the authorities.
	There's a lot of evidence that places him at the scene of the crime.
	DNA evidence, video, photograph evidence.
	There are witnesses, but he has not given a confession.
	So it's not so cut and dry.
	We'll also talk tonight about the Israel angle.
	Many people online are speculating that Israel and its allies in the United States had something to do with the killing of Charlie Kirk, that it was a state-sponsored conspiracy involving Israeli intelligence and the American government and maybe other forces to silence Charlie Kirk.
	And a Patsy was created.
	A left-wing person was elevated to take the blame for some purpose.
	We'll talk about that theory tonight as well.
	We'll also talk tonight about the left-wing conspiracy theory, which blames the Groipers.
	And this might be the most unbelievable one, and that's saying a lot.
	I've been accused of avoiding the Israeli angle.
	And I'll just say at the outset, I've done one show since Charlie Kirk was murdered.
	I think I've put on Twitter maybe a dozen tweets.
	I have not avoided the subject.
	Honestly, I didn't think it needed to be addressed because it, frankly, on its face seems ridiculous.
	But somehow there's an even more ridiculous theory that has surfaced, which is that this anti-fascist, trans chaser, furry who hated Donald Trump and thought Charlie Kirk was a Nazi was somehow a groiper or far-right or a Trump supporter secretly.
	And we'll talk about that conspiracy theory too.
	We'll talk about each of them and I'll evaluate them at the end of the show.
	And I'll give you a nuanced take.
	I hate that word typically because I prefer decisiveness and judgment.
	But it is important to be precise in our analysis and detailed and rigorous.
	I think people are owed that.
	I think that part of the problem with this assassination, like with every other tragedy or crisis in the past 10 years, is that nobody trusts the institutions.
	Nobody trusts the mainstream media.
	Nobody trusts the FBI.
	Nobody trusts the government.
	And to me, that is especially interesting because wasn't the whole conceit of the MA movement of the Trump election in 1620 and 24, this was supposed to be a remedy for that problem?
	What does it say about the Trump administration?
	That we are in the second Trump administration after his third election, 10 years into his political career, and people do not have the slightest inclination to trust the government, even on a matter like this, when a close personal friend and political ally of the president himself and many members of his government and a key lieutenant in his movement is dead.
	Still, nobody trusts the FBI.
	So you have to leave it to the podcasters.
	You have to leave it to Candace Owens, Michael Savage, Alex Jones, Ian Carroll, Nick Fuentes, Dave Smith to go through the evidence.
	And that's why I think, like I said on Thursday, people like me have a responsibility to tell you the truth.
	And not only to tell you my opinion, but to rigorously interrogate all the facts, all the angles, give you all the information, the preponderance of the evidence.
	And I will give you my sense, but I'll leave it to you to draw your own conclusions.
	So that's what we'll do tonight.
	Before we get into it, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble, smash the like button, leave a comment, let me know what you think about the show.
	And with that, we're going to dive in.
	First, I want to talk about the official story.
	Full disclosure, I think this is the most likely explanation.
	And I will lay out the evidence and I will tell you why.
	So first, the official story, question, who killed Charlie Kirk?
	We do have a person of interest.
	We do have a suspect that is in custody.
	As you know, his name is Tyler Robinson.
	And in the past five days, we've learned a lot about him.
	We've learned all of his information.
	We've learned about his online habits.
	We've learned about his boyfriend, his residence, his family, his collegiate record, academic record, all of it.
	And this is a story from the Washington Post today.
	This is about as crystal clear as it gets.
	I'll read it to you.
	This is the latest development.
	As of today, we have the most damning evidence yet that Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old Mormon student who was studying in an apprenticeship to be an electrician, was the actual culprit behind Charlie Kirk's murder.
	We have evidence today from Discord and from a friend of his.
	He admitted it.
	According to the Discord platform itself, as well as one of the recipients of this message, Tyler Robinson said the day after Charlie Kirk was murdered to a number of people that he did it.
	He confessed.
	He sent in a message to a number of close friends on the Discord platform.
	He said, bad news, guys, it was me.
	He said he would surrender himself to the authorities, and he thanked his friends for all the laughs and all the memories.
	Two hours later, at about 10 o'clock local time on Thursday, he was taken into custody by the FBI.
	This was reported today by the Washington Post, and this is a story.
	It says, quote, the 22-year-old suspect in Charlie Kirk's killing appears to have confessed to friends in an online chat shortly before turning himself into law enforcement, according to two people familiar with the chat and screenshots obtained by the Washington Post.
	He wrote, hey guys, I have bad news for you all.
	It was me at UVU yesterday.
	I'm sorry for all of this.
	The message was sent Thursday night, about two hours before officials said Robinson was taken into custody.
	A member of the group chat shared an image of the conversation with the Post and confirmed that it came from Robinson's account.
	Discord provided a copy of the message with the confession to authorities, according to a person familiar with the company's interaction with law enforcement.
	The message was sent from Robinson's account to a small private group of online friends.
	Discord has said that an internal investigation found, quote, no evidence that the suspect planned the incident or promoted violence on Discord.
	Authorities have said one of Robinson's family members reached out to a friend who then contacted law enforcement, saying that Robinson had confessed or implied that he committed the crime.
	Utah Governor Spencer Cox said over the weekend that Robinson's motive is still under investigation, but that the suspect appears to have held a leftist ideology.
	Officials say their interviews indicate that Robinson became more political in recent years and had criticized Kirk.
	The Discord conversation shared with the Post shows members of the group chat reacting to the shooting on Wednesday before the news broke that Robinson was involved.
	The group included about 30 people.
	The New York Times reported on a conversation in a different Discord chat group earlier the same day.
	In that conversation, Robinson joked that a doppelganger was trying to get him in trouble after law enforcement released images of a shooting suspect who resembled him.
	Cox confirmed the existence of that conversation on Sunday and said Robinson's friends did not believe it was actually him at that point.
	The person who provided other messages to the Post said they are from a different group.
	So this is the latest evidence.
	This is the most damning probably so far.
	We're getting them from two different sources.
	The Discord platform itself has turned over the messages to law enforcement, and this has been reported to the Post.
	So the actual platform, the medium shared those messages.
	They had them internally where Robinson texted a group.
	I don't know if this was in a group chat or in a server, but he said, it was me.
	I'm turning myself over.
	And apparently, one of the recipients of the message independently, they also shared the screenshot with the Post, and both the platform and the recipient verified that it came from Robinson's account.
	There's also other people, different people, that were in a different server.
	We don't know if the confession was in a group chat or a server, but we do know that Robinson was in a different room, whether it's a server, a separate group chat, where he said that his doppelganger was trying to get him in trouble.
	He said he would not go to McDonald's.
	That's a reference to Luigi Mangion, who got caught at a McDonald's.
	So we're getting evidence from across the Discord platform that he was being a loudmouth.
	Now, this raises some questions.
	This is not as cut and dry as people say.
	And I said this on Twitter yesterday.
	There are some inconsistencies in this official story.
	And the biggest inconsistency about this confession, well, there's actually a couple.
	The first is that on Thursday, Discord reported to law enforcement and publicly that this incident was not planned or discussed on the platform.
	Now they come out a week later and they present internally the messages that Robinson sent.
	Now, either somebody is lying here and Discord was withholding these messages or did not find these messages or maybe the messages were fabricated.
	But both cannot be true.
	Last week, Discord said there are no messages.
	Now they say there are messages.
	So what happened between Thursday and today?
	That last week, when the news of Tyler Robinson broke, when he was named as a person of interest, Discord washed their hands of it and made a public statement saying there was no involvement.
	And now today they're turning over the messages.
	Now, there's many explanations for this discrepancy.
	One explanation is that the messages were planted or fabricated.
	Another, maybe Discord did not find them.
	Maybe the most likely explanation is the nature of what Discord actually said, which is that the violence was not planned on the server.
	And maybe that's a weasel word.
	Although Tyler Robinson confessed shortly before being taken into custody, maybe there was no explicit reference to violence up until that point or at all.
	That might be one account for the discrepancy, but we don't know.
	That is an open-ended question for the FBI and the Department of Justice to answer.
	That is something that must be answered as the investigation is conducted, as this legal process is underway.
	Here's the other problem: the story goes that Tyler Robinson returns home and apparently evades law enforcement completely.
	Now, that by itself is the subject of a lot of scrutiny.
	How was the prime suspect able to evade this manhunt carrying a long rifle?
	How was he able to evade law enforcement on a college campus, which is loaded up with not just cameras on the campus facilities, but also surrounded by a neighborhood that has doorbell cameras and everybody has an iPhone these days?
	So there's a question of how did he evade in the first place?
	He returns home, apparently got away scot-free, somehow was able to get home undetected, three and a half hours away from the scene of the crime.
	So he leaps from the rooftop, runs through the neighborhood.
	We don't know how he gets from the neighborhood to his house three and a half hours away.
	Presumably he got to his car, maybe some accomplice, but he's able to get home undetected, escapes the radius of whatever manhunt was underway at that point, law enforcement checkpoints or surveillance, and immediately starts talking about it openly online.
	Does that sound right to you?
	If the first thing that happens, you successfully evade law enforcement, you got away, you're home free, you're going to get away with it.
	Maybe there's no, apparently, no video, no photos.
	They have arrested several other suspects that are not you.
	You go and start mouthing off on Discord.
	Now, if he's a first-time murderer, you could say he might act in an irrational way, but certainly that is an irrational way to behave.
	There's an explanation for that.
	22-year-olds that commit a murder in cold blood and then become the subjects of the manhunt, maybe they self-report, maybe they get nervous.
	But people that carry out a sophisticated attack like that without being apprehended or detected and able to evade law enforcement, does someone like that get nervous in that way?
	It's another good question.
	Now, here's the bigger question.
	Since he has been taken into custody, he has not confessed and will not cooperate with law enforcement.
	This is another story, believed from the New York Post.
	It says, quote, Charlie Kirk's alleged killer is, quote, not cooperating with authorities and has not confessed to carrying out the shooting.
	According to Utah's governor, the governor said among those cooperating with authorities was Robinson's roommate, who is also his boyfriend.
	He said the partner, Lance Twiggs, was transitioning from male to female.
	When asked by CNN, he said that authorities do not yet know if that is relevant to the investigation.
	Cox added that the partner did not have any knowledge about the alleged shooting and has been incredibly cooperative and was working with investigators.
	So the killer comes home, mouse off to his Discord friends, confesses, turns himself in, and then shortly after turning himself in, does not confess to law enforcement and does not cooperate.
	So he apparently confessed to his friends in writing, confessed to his father, who turned him in with his cooperation, but now will not confess to law enforcement.
	So when did he change his mind and why?
	Why was he confessing in writing, which you have to know will be used against you?
	It's the internet.
	It's in writing.
	Confessed to his father, turned himself in voluntarily, although the initial story is that he was on suicide watch, contemplating suicide before he was turned in.
	Apparently, now they say he voluntarily gave himself up.
	Now he won't admit it or cooperate.
	And let's now talk a little bit about the motive.
	They say that inside this community where he allegedly confessed to all of his friends, they were horrified.
	He said that, rather, the sources say in the Washington Post that in this group chat or server where he confessed to the killing, they said that the other members of the group chat were expressing their horror at Charlie Kirk's death.
	There were quotes from other members that said he didn't deserve it.
	We're praying for his family.
	He might have had bad opinions, but he didn't have that coming to him.
	They say that the transgender boyfriend was also appalled at the violence.
	Now, there's explanations for this too.
	Are they engaging in ass covering mode?
	Did they see what happened and feel the need to give themselves an alibi?
	Maybe they had instantaneous regret.
	Maybe the transgender boyfriend heard the death penalty and then sought to cooperate, or maybe was threatened with charges if he did not cooperate.
	Perhaps the suspect changed his tune when the death penalty came into the equation.
	These are possible explanations, but at this point, that's all they are: contingent explanations.
	They are by no means definitive, and by no means can we assume these things.
	All we know is that there are a lot of discrepancies about the story.
	Now, there's some other things that we need to get into about the actual carrying out of the attack.
	Now, to me, this is the least controversial part.
	They say that Tyler Robinson got atop a building about 200 yards away from Charlie Kirk.
	Others say the distance was actually much shorter.
	And if you look at a 3D mock-up of the facility, it was not a difficult perch to gain access to.
	Unlike the rooftop in Butler, Pennsylvania last year, the killer here did not require a ladder to climb to the top of the roof.
	This was accessible by a pavilion, by a pedestrian walkway.
	There was a staircase that led up to the perch where the killing shot was fired.
	What's more, eyewitnesses say that there was no security at this event.
	There were security guards and they were stationed in and around the tent where Charlie Kirk was present answering questions, but there was no security perimeter established.
	They did not control entry into the event or onto the campus.
	They did not check IDs.
	They did not scan tickets.
	And so this is the softest of soft targets.
	The nearest high point was not secured.
	This is a rooftop that anyone could have access to, did not require a ladder.
	The killer allegedly waltzed right up to the perch, set up the shot, took the shot, ran away.
	And if you view a three-dimensional mock-up of the facility, that looks perfectly possible.
	It looks easy.
	And it seems that if anybody knew where Charlie Kirk was going to be speaking, and if they scoped out the layout of the campus, it doesn't seem like this would be a difficult plot to put together and then to carry out.
	And it makes common sense.
	When you go to these events, people are paying attention to the event.
	People are paying attention to the spectacle.
	Apparently, there were spotters on the roof opposite where the killer was perched.
	Did they not see him?
	Maybe they did.
	Did the people on the ground not see him?
	These are some unanswered questions.
	But from what people say, it seems to be the case that this was a pretty easy setup.
	Without security, without checkpoints, he walked up, took the shot, walked right out.
	Now, the walking out has been the subject of a lot of controversy.
	People say that when Tyler Robinson or the gunman left the building, this is where it gets tricky.
	We don't know exactly how he gained access to the roof, if he climbed or if he took the staircase.
	But the surveillance video shows that he jumped off of the roof to make his escape, which was a high jump.
	And the video has been the subject of a lot of scrutiny.
	Some people say that the video does not show that he had his rifle with him.
	Why does this matter?
	Because, of course, the rifle was fully assembled when he took the shot.
	The rifle was fully assembled when it was recovered in a wooded area not far from where the shot was taken.
	Now, there's a video of him leaving the roof and making his escape through the wooded area where he discarded the rifle.
	Some people say that when he jumped off of the roof, they cannot see the rifle in his hands.
	Where would it be?
	It couldn't be on the roof because it was in the wooded area.
	If it wasn't visible in the video of him leaving the roof, that means it was either planted in the woods or he was concealing it somehow by deconstructing it in pieces.
	But if he deconstructed it in pieces, that would have been a time-consuming process that he probably couldn't have done in the allotted time.
	It would have been difficult to do.
	And even if he was somehow able to deconstruct the weapon on the roof, conceal it, jump off of the roof, the weapon was recovered after the fact in the woods, fully constructed.
	Which begs the question, did he then reconstruct the rifle in the woods to discard to pick up later?
	Why would he do that?
	That doesn't make any sense at all.
	The story would have to go something like this.
	He concealed the rifle when he walked up, put it together, took it apart, jumped off the roof, put it back together, placed it in the woods, and then ran away.
	But this would be too time-consuming, would require maybe more equipment than he had, which was a screwdriver and nothing else, and wouldn't make a whole lot of sense.
	With that being said, if you look closely at the video of him jumping off of the roof, it is a grainy video.
	It's difficult to see.
	There's no question about that.
	It is ambiguous.
	But if you look closely, I do believe you can see that he is carrying a straight object that looks to be concealed by the towel.
	It swings from his right arm as he jumps off of the roof and lands with it.
	That's a matter of interpretation.
	That's a matter of perspective.
	I'm not going to say it's definitive.
	That's what I believe I saw.
	But this is some of the evidence that people like Michael Savage and others are using to say that maybe he was not the gunman or not the only gunman or that maybe evidence was planted.
	That's been the subject of a lot of scrutiny.
	You can look closely at it to me.
	I feel like I can see an object that does not bend a straight long object that swings as he jumps down.
	But again, it's a matter of interpretation.
	Now, the other piece of evidence, and this to me is maybe the most damning.
	This is the detail that I don't think a lot of people have talked about, but it is also somewhat unreliable.
	This speaks to the motive.
	And this is going to get us to some of the other culprits in the killing.
	Of course, the big question is, these are most of the relevant facts.
	The question is, why would a 22-year-old who is by all accounts a brilliant, normal guy, why would he kill Charlie Kirk?
	It's a pretty radical action.
	A homicide of a high-profile stranger, a political figure in cold blood from a Mormon, from a Mormon Reddit guy who, according to his parents, had a 34 ACT score, which is very high percentile, 4.0 GPA, full ride scholarship to a local college.
	Family was allegedly conservative, although some say that that might not be the case.
	He had no criminal record, no history of murder or violence.
	So the question is: why?
	Why does a 22-year-old carry out an attack like this?
	Why does a bright young man with no record, with his future ahead of him, with, and by the way, no social media footprint, which is a little interesting detail?
	Why does this person decide to wake up one day and not just, by the way, carry out a random attack, but an orchestrated attack?
	And think about the difference here.
	There is all the difference in the world between a sloppy job, a sloppy passion of crime, where a nervous amateur, let's say for the sake of argument, walks up to the microphone, draws a pistol, and takes a shot.
	Because when I was told that Charlie Kirk was shot at a question and answer session, that is the first image that came to my mind.
	Before I saw the video, before we became acquainted with the details, if someone told you, and you know what these events look like, if someone told you that someone took a shot at Charlie Kirk, what would you imagine?
	I would imagine that when entering or exiting or when sitting stationary in the chair, someone would draw a short-range weapon from a short distance and take a shot, like Luigi Mangion.
	But this required planning.
	This required sophistication.
	All these things that we just talked about, all these details were premeditated.
	It's not just that you have a brilliant 22-year-old, maybe not brilliant, but a gifted 22-year-old with a high ACT score, a high GPA, a full ride scholarship.
	A person with no footprint, no record of transgressive behavior, of violence, of antisocial behavior.
	As far as we know, no mental illness, no digital footprint of political extremism.
	Not just why does this person wake up one day and take a shot, which might be explainable by impulsiveness or passion or youth, wake up, he's at my campus, reach for a gun, take a shot.
	He drove three and a half hours from his home.
	He cased the location.
	He cased it.
	He scoped it out.
	He looked at a map.
	He scoped out where Charlie would be on the campus.
	He looked where he could take a shot.
	He thought about the choice of weapon, what would be reliable, what would have the requisite velocity, the scope.
	This is a marksman.
	He had experience with firearms.
	Now, maybe if you're a hunter, this sort of thing comes naturally, but I believe that hunting wildlife is different than killing a human being in a political assassination.
	So he premeditates this plot to drive three and a half hours, set up on a perch, take the shot, drive home.
	Why does a 22-year-old do such a thing?
	And the explanation is that he hated conservatives.
	He hated Christians.
	He apparently had a transgender boyfriend, a male to female transsexual boyfriend that was living with him.
	And we've learned a little bit about the transsexual boyfriend whose name is Lance Twiggs, kind of a ridiculous name.
	And they say that Lance Twiggs was a similar aged young white man, also from a Mormon background, who was kicked out of his household by his parents when he came out as transgender and would not accept conversion therapy or reparative therapy or prayer from the Mormon church.
	And so circumstantially, people say, well, he's left-wing.
	He is dating a transsexual.
	Clearly, this was like dog day afternoon.
	He was motivated by his love for his transsexual boyfriend and the rhetorical violence being inflicted on the transgender community by conservatives like Trump and Charlie Kirk to take a shot.
	And part of the story is this.
	An eyewitness, a neighbor from down the street says that they were live-in roommates, they were partners, and what's more, that prior to the shooting, this is the most important detail as far as I'm concerned, there was a crowd at his house that showed up in cars with out-of-state license plates.
	And the neighbor said that these people gave him a bad vibe and insinuated they were transgender, maybe radical leftists.
	Out-of-state license plates.
	Now, what could this look like?
	Maybe this is a Discord tranny meetup.
	This is an extreme, let's act like detectives.
	This is an extremely online young man.
	His classmates described him as a Reddit kid.
	His Facebook photos show that he was a gamer.
	He had thousands of hours in video games, spent time in online communities on Discord, chatting with his friends while they played video games.
	Maybe he was gay.
	Maybe he was queer himself.
	He was dating a transsexual.
	Maybe he was passionate about LGBTQ causes.
	Maybe before Charlie Kirk showed up on campus, they invited the online community.
	And the thing is about online communities, they're not proximate.
	They're not local.
	You meet people online.
	They're from all over.
	Did his transgender furry community from Discord drive to his house to toast the imminent attack?
	An attack committed out of passion, out of love for the transgender boyfriend?
	Perhaps.
	But that seems a bit presumptuous.
	That is one explanation.
	Another is that out-of-state license plates, could these be bad actors?
	Rental cars, maybe other bad faith actors.
	Who are these people?
	Who are the people in his community?
	And you know what's interesting about all of these incidents every single time?
	There's always a small, tight-knit community.
	You ever notice that?
	The shooter in Minneapolis, the shooter in Wisconsin, the shooter in Buffalo.
	They always have a small, tight-knit online community of Satanists, of mass shooting enthusiasts, of racists, of trannies.
	And yet, we never hear of other arrests, do we?
	We never hear of a crackdown.
	We never hear about a network.
	And isn't that the sort of thing that you would need to see?
	Not just the least bit because you're bringing accomplices to justice, but also to create a deterrent against other people that might not say anything, that might not speak up when they witness a crime that might be forthcoming.
	So that's why I say we don't have all the information here yet.
	There are a lot of discrepancies.
	There are a lot of unanswered questions.
	Were there people with out-of-state license plates?
	Was that this neighbor's imagination or was that real?
	He said they gave him a bad vibe.
	Certainly, if out-of-state people that do not belong in St. George, Utah, if they're showing up to this killer's house in the week before the shooting, they should all be persons of interest.
	And it raises a lot of questions.
	And we can't assume that they're just tranny furries from Discord or something, although that is a plausible explanation.
	Now, there's some other problems with the theory.
	If our going theory is that he's some political extremist, what is really notable, it's not just what we see, it's what we don't see.
	What we see now are a collection of curated Discord messages.
	We see one Discord message that he sent confessing the crime and a handful of others from a server shortly after the crime was committed.
	We're supposed to believe this is a radicalized leftist, took the shot, et cetera.
	But you know the thing about young radical political people on the internet?
	You know, they tend to broadcast their opinions.
	Have you ever met extremely political, extremely online young people?
	They have a tendency to not be able to keep it in their pants.
	Take it from me.
	Take it from anybody.
	Where's the TikTok?
	Where's the Instagram?
unidentified		Where's the Twitter?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You're telling me there is no digital footprint?
		A person feels so strongly that allegedly they've been harboring this hatred, political extremism for a long time.
		It's been festering.
		It bubbles over into a deadly attack.
		One day, all of a sudden, but this happens completely in private?
unidentified		No one knows.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The only evidence of an interior transformation on the part of the killer is testimony about a family dinner where allegedly Charlie Kirk's forthcoming college visit was discussed and liberal opinions were expressed at the dinner table.
		That's it.
		No tweets, no Instagram, no TikToks, no, no nothing.
		And you know what that reminds me of?
		It reminds me a lot of Thomas Crookes, the shooter at Butler.
		Remember that 18-year-old high schooler that shot Trump randomly in Butler?
		Another political extremist with no digital footprint.
		That's pretty, you know, one, you might say it's possible.
		But two, the person that shot Trump in the head in the pursuit of political extremism had no digital footprint, no political digital footprint.
		The person that shot Charlie Kirk in the neck and killed him, also zero digital footprint other than a steam collection.
		Seriously, it's a bit strange.
		Now, there is a plausible explanation for this.
		And other people have pointed this out.
		And I don't think this is inappropriate to say.
		When you look at this person's face and when you hear the testimony from people that knew him, he strikes me as an autistic loser, basically.
		He had thousands of hours logged on video games.
		He's got a Facebook picture from when he was in grade school receiving computer accessories for Christmas, playing on the computer.
		This was an extremely online Zoomer.
		And being an extremely online Zoomer, I can tell you, and you, if you're a Zoomer, you know what I'm talking about.
		There is a species of extremely online Zoomer that actually is discreet.
		There are gamers, there are autistic gamers out there that are not good looking, that are not sociable, and they're obsessed with politics and they're obsessed with video games.
		And they do only have a Discord, let's say.
		They don't actually have an Instagram.
		They don't have a Facebook.
		They don't have a Twitter account.
		They do exist.
		There are these people, and it's a different species of extremely online Zoomer, but they might just have a Reddit.
		They might just have a Discord.
		They might, because they're ugly, quite frankly, and not popular.
		Why would they be posting on Instagram?
		They're not good looking.
		They probably did not have a social circle in high school.
		What are they going to post?
		The pictures of parties they never went to, trips they never went on, for who?
		Their zero followers?
		That is, I happen to know, being on the right-wing side of things, there is a species of autistic, anti- or asocial Zoomers that do not maintain a lot of public-facing social media.
		It's possible.
		To me, it's very conspicuous.
		It's very strange, but it's not impossible.
		And what I am curious about is what social media footprint does exist.
		We need to know.
		If there is a footprint, we need to know what it is.
		What accounts did he have?
		Which accounts did he have that he might have deleted?
		Did he have public posts?
		What were they?
		He was clearly in Discord servers.
		According to Steven Crowder, who apparently has a pipeline to the intelligence community, the Mug Club knows Al-Qaeda's next move for some reason.
		They know everything that the NSA knows.
		According to Steven Crowder, who's been vindicated on these things before, he was involved in communist groups in Utah, communist far-left servers on Discord.
		And that has also been seconded without much detail from law enforcement.
		So it is possible.
		Now, this is the portrait of the killer.
		The last piece of evidence to me, which is maybe the most damning about the killer, is this.
		We have all seen that there were multiple people who were local that seemed to have had advanced knowledge of the attack.
		There were not just a few people who on X and on TikTok, on TikTok, seemed to have telegraphed the attack in advance.
		And there were multiple posts from different users, users that were connected in one way or another to the killer that said, if Charlie Kirk shows up, he will be liquidated.
		Something will happen big tomorrow.
		Don't show up to the campus.
		Now, if someone had advanced knowledge and they were broadcasting it that confidently and that openly, that's a sloppy job.
		That is a sloppy job.
		And that does look like there was a tranny furry meetup at Robinson's house.
		Maybe they had a big tranny orgy and they toasted their ally who was going to take out the Nazi Charlie Kirk.
		What a ridiculous sentiment.
	Charlie Kirk was anything but a Nazi.
	And then they could not help themselves.
	They bragged about it.
	He took the shot.
	They felt remorse, put out their alibi.
	He drove home, got nervous, opened up his big fat mouth, went and turned himself in, and then heard they were talking about the death penalty, maybe talked to a public defender.
	Now he doesn't want to cooperate.
	Maybe he thinks he could get a deal.
	That is certainly one story.
	But here is the thing about the official narrative.
	We cannot take any of these things for granted.
	These are the questions that need to be answered.
	These are the discrepancies.
	What did Discord know?
	When did they know it?
	Why did they say that there were no messages?
	Is it because they were being weasel-y and the attack was not coordinated on Discord, even though clearly the killer was talking about it on Discord?
	Is that what they meant?
	Or did something change in the past week?
	We need to know that.
	Who were these out-of-state license plates at his residence prior to the attack?
	What were these posts that seemed to have had advanced knowledge of the attack?
	Who were the people that he confessed to on Discord?
	And who was involved in the Discord communities with him?
	What were the names of the communities?
	We need to have all of the available footage, all of the security cameras, all of the ring cameras.
	We need to see the footage.
	How did he get from point A to point B?
	How did he get from his house to the campus and from his campus back to the house?
	We need to see that chain of custody.
	We need to see all of the evidence.
	Otherwise, we cannot take any of it for granted.
	With that being said, I do believe that is probably the most plausible explanation.
	I'm a rational person.
	And like I said, looking at the layout of the campus, unfortunately, when you realize that security is not always competent, these are things that sometimes do happen.
	There is a left wing in this country.
	It is extremely radical.
	There are young people in this country that are being radicalized on the internet.
	That's real.
	It happens all the time.
	The same day as the shooting against Charlie Kirk, there was a school shooting in Denver by a 16-year-old white male who was obsessed with Columbine.
	And that had nothing to do with Israel.
	And that had, to the extent that we know, that had no geopolitical ramifications.
	And that was on the heels of a transsexual that shot up a Catholic church in Minnesota last week.
	And a black fellow that shot up people in Tennessee in January, and a tranny that shot up a Catholic school in Wisconsin a few months before that.
	There is a problem here.
	There is clearly a problem, as everyone has admitted, of These communities on the internet, young people that are spending way too much time on them, carrying out acts of violence in the name of various ideologies, irony, nihilism.
	And maybe this was a part of that.
	Certainly, these are things that happen.
	It's an explanation that's worth entertaining.
	But we do need to iron out all those inconsistencies and discrepancies.
	We need all the information.
	I want to move on to the theory that Israel was somehow involved.
	I'm going to be upfront with you.
	I find this to be unconvincing.
	And I will explain in rigorous detail why.
	When we implicate Israel, or I should say, when Israel implicates itself in various conspiracies, there's usually a reason why.
	I believe fully that Israel was involved, and the organized Jewish community was involved in many of the great conspiracies of the past 200 years.
	And I could tell you in one sentence why for each of them.
	I don't look at a crisis or a tragedy and assume that Israel did it.
	Contrary to what people like Ben Shapiro say, that I trip on my shoelaces and blame the Jews.
	I don't rush to judgment and think that Israel is behind every crisis or every disaster or anything.
	I do believe that Israel was involved in JFK's assassination.
	Why?
	Because Lee Harvey Oswald had CIA handlers.
	James Engleton was running that team of handlers.
	Many of them were Jewish.
	And James Engleton is mourned in Israel.
	He managed the Israeli desk at the CIA.
	He traded U.S. nuclear secrets to Israel for intelligence on the Soviet Union.
	Jack Ruby, a Jewish mobster connected to Meyer Lansky that ran guns to Israel, killed Lee Harvey Oswald.
	Why do I think Israel was involved?
	That's why.
	How about the USS Liberty?
	Well, Israeli fighter jets blew up the ship to cover up their activities in the six-day war in 1967.
	Nuff said.
	And 9/11, why do we believe Israel was involved?
	Because they were arrested on 9-11.
	Because a 9-1-1 call was placed, and according to FOIA requests, at least four, but up to six Israeli intelligence operatives were arrested filming the towers collapsing in free fall, apparently with prior knowledge of the attack.
	And later in the day, Urban Moving Systems was apprehended by police with explosives in their van and they were released without any incident.
	When we look at just a survey of the biggest conspiracies of the past seven years, these are just three.
	There's always a connection.
	We don't start with Israel did it.
	Now here's how we can make it work.
unidentified		We start with the evidence.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And we survey the evidence.
		And if we can find a motive, and if we can find a connection, then we can plausibly create a conjecture or postulate that Israel might be involved.
		What was Israel's motive in JFK?
		He was going to deprive them of their nuclear capability.
		What's the connection?
		James Engleton, Jack Ruby, Nuff said.
		USS Liberty, what was their motive?
		Conceal their maneuvering in the six-day war.
		What was the connection?
		Well, they blew up the ship.
		Nuff said.
		They blew up the ship.
		Enough said.
		9-11.
		What was the motive?
		Get America into Iraq and then Syria and then Iran and everywhere.
		What was the connection?
		They were dancing.
		You had thousands of art students apprehended in federal government buildings.
		Went to war the next day.
		The war plans were on Bush's desk the day before.
		Enough said.
		But this is why I'm skeptical about Charlie Kirk.
		I said on Thursday that I didn't like Charlie Kirk.
		He was my opponent.
		A lot of people that have never seen my show before said, why was Charlie Kirk your opponent?
		Well, six years ago, I had my first interaction with Charlie Kirk in 2019.
		In the summer of 2019, I was banned from speaking at any turning point USA chapter or any turning point USA event.
		I didn't know why.
		I attended a party with Ashley St. Clair in September of 2019.
		I took a photo with her.
		She was a Turning Point ambassador at that time.
		When Turning Point caught wind that she was in a photograph with me, they terminated her from the ambassador program.
		I attended the Politicon event in, I believe, October 2019.
		I was physically removed from the event by a dozen police officers at the behest of Charlie Kirk.
		I had no idea why.
		In 2019, my followers began to attend Charlie Kirk's Q ⁇ A sessions at his college tour.
		We were much younger back then.
		He was younger.
		I was younger.
		It was six years ago, almost to the day.
		And my followers would approach Charlie Kirk and ask questions like, Google dancing Israelis.
		Why did Israel blow up the USS Liberty?
		They would say, should it be America first or Israel first?
		And they would press Charlie Kirk, among other things, on why he supported Israel.
		Now, in 2019, there was a very different Charlie Kirk than there is in 2025.
		In 2019, Charlie Kirk visited Israel and said he loved the food, the people, he wore the hat, he kissed the wall.
		In 2019, he went to donor events and said that, you know, the people, the land in America, they really mean nothing.
		America is about the Constitution.
		And if you gave a desert island with a desert island population the Constitution, that would be America.
unidentified		He said, but Israel, Israel's different.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Their land, their people is holy and sacred, and their nationalism must be respected.
		This is what mainstream conservatism was in 2019.
		And there were very few people pushing back against it.
		I was one of them.
		Michelle Malkin was another.
		The Groupers led the charge in the Grouper War.
		And the Grouper War, unlike these far-left people or others, was a war of ideas.
		Our greatest aspiration, maybe my greatest professional aspiration for the past six years was to debate Charlie Kirk, to confront him in a debate on this issue in particular.
		That was my grievance with Charlie Kirk.
		And for years, my perception of him, and this was also the reality, is that although I believe his heart was in the right place, and I think that he was the defender of the truth on some other issues, or came to be a defender of the truth on other issues, I do believe that he was complicit in the Israeli capture of the right wing for a very long time.
		And that is unfortunately just the truth.
		And as much as we can grieve and as much as we can mourn and we can say that obviously he did not deserve what happened to him, we cannot fall into the trap of creating a mythology that does not reflect reality.
		It is true that for year after year, Turning Point USA grew and grew with sponsorship from Israeli, pro-Israel, Jewish, Zionist donors.
		And they did this because Turning Point USA was an extremely pro-Israel organization.
		And anybody that has ever been in Turning Point USA will tell you that same thing.
		They give you a box of stickers and buttons and posters, and many of them say things like, socialism sucks and enjoy capitalism.
		And many of them say, support Israel.
		Many of them say, I heart Israel.
		And as we all know, Turning Point USA was part of the conservative activist enterprise, which was funded to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars by Jewish donors to indoctrinate young American conservatives with a pro-Israel ideology alongside Prager University, alongside Daily Wire, alongside many other similar projects.
		That's the pretext under which it was founded with Foster Fries' money.
		And that's how it was right up until last week and to today.
		So this is why I say I find it very unconvincing and very unlikely that Israel killed Charlie Kirk.
		And the reason why I find it almost ridiculous is, as I said, because for the past six years, that has actually been the cleavage issue.
		That has been the subject that I have fought Charlie Kirk in Turning Point USA on for the better part of my career for nearly a decade.
		That is why I was not permitted into his events.
		That is why he refused to debate me.
		That is why he characterized me as a bad faith troll, among other things.
		That was the reason for our initial conflict.
		And I don't want to relitigate all of it, but this has become the subject of careful scrutiny.
		There is a question now: who killed this man?
		Was it his enemies on the left?
		Was it his enemies on the right?
		Was it his enemies closest to him?
		Perhaps the Zionist donors.
		I don't say any of this for any reason.
		Obviously, dead men tell no tales.
		I do not say this to speak ill of the dead.
		I do not say this to get my two cents in.
		I say this for the record.
		This is the record of history.
		That was our ideological and professional conflict.
		That was our feud.
		And the tragedy on Wednesday, it doesn't change that history.
		That was the basis for it.
		So to me, it is very unlikely that the Israelis had it out for him because, well, why would they?
		Charlie Kirk was a steadfast ally of Israel for his entire career.
		Charlie Kirk was pro-Israel explicitly, publicly, steadfastly for years, right up until his death.
		That is the sober and realistic fact.
		So the question is: why does everybody believe that Israel was implicated last week?
		Well, there is a narrative that has been promulgated that Charlie Kirk was on the verge of a great conversion.
		The narrative is, in light of the record of history and where Charlie Kirk was in his journey, the argument goes that this year, recently, in response to recent developments like the turning of Candace Owens,
		the turning of Tucker Carlson, the genocide in Gaza, and the beating of the war drums in Iran, that Charlie Kirk was undergoing a change of heart and that there was an interior and a private struggle that Charlie Kirk was changing his mind.
		And as a result, he was chafing with his Jewish donors.
		There was a tension.
		He was created by Jewish donors.
		He was funded by Jewish donors.
		Jewish donors were his patrons.
		And so the story goes, like many of us, we are all in a different place in our journey.
		And some have awakened later than others.
		Charlie Kirk, like anybody, was discovering the truth.
		And he was having a faith awakening, maybe converting to Catholicism, recognizing the tension between religious Judaism and Christianity, or the brutality in Gaza with the tenets of the gospel.
		And also an ideological conversion, realizing that an Israeli capture of American foreign policy is in complete contravention of an America-first foreign policy, which he advocates for.
		And so the story goes, Charlie Kirk was changing his mind on these issues.
		He was expressing it privately.
	He was telegraphing or signaling that the ship would be righted and that he was beginning to resist the most zealous, fanatical demanding Israel-first donors and the prospect of someone so powerful like Charlie Kirk,
	particularly among the young right-wing conservatives of America, it was too much of a risk for Israel to tolerate.
	So they took him out before he could leave the pro-Israel plantation and take all the young conservatives with him.
	The story goes that they eliminated him and perhaps set up somebody like Ben Shapiro to take his place.
	So that when the false flag occurs, and it will, You hope it doesn't, but it looks likely.
	When the call for a war in Iran becomes deafening, they will have someone reliable, someone predictable, someone that they have certainty.
	Why take a chance?
	Someone that they are certain will tow the line and push America and its youth to support a war.
	That's the story.
	Now, what is the evidence for this narrative?
	Well, there are some public examples.
	There is a video from October 2023, two years ago, where Charlie Kirk takes out his frustration at secular Jewish donors that support left-wing causes like mass immigration and social liberal causes.
	And then they expect that young white conservatives will turn around and support the Zionist cause.
	This is a clip from two years ago.
	There are other clips like a recent interview with Megan Kelly in August, where Charlie Kirk is clearly frustrated, visibly frustrated and perturbed at how he has been a defender of Israel, considers himself still a defender of Israel.
	And yet there is a powerful chorus of stakeholders, leaders in the pro-Israel movement who are not just disagreeing with him, but viciously attacking him and impugning his motivations, calling him an anti-Semite.
	In other words, Charlie Kirk is saying, is it not good enough that I'm an ally?
	I'm listening.
	I've supported you for years.
	Not only is it not good enough, but now you attack me.
	You say I'm evil.
	How dare you?
	I'm an American.
	What do you expect this relationship is supposed to be?
	And so Charlie Kirk seems to be in a moment of candor, venting his very real frustrations.
	And you can only imagine Charlie Kirk is a young, extremely powerful, ambitious guy.
	And for better or for worse, he is an American.
	Born and raised in Arlington Heights in the suburbs of Chicago, is a Protestant Christian.
	And while he might have cut deals or made compromises or went with the program before, now that this Israeli agenda is truly coming into conflict with what it means to be an American and a Christian, now he starts to buck the expectations of his foreign patrons or handlers.
	There's a bit of moxie.
	There's a little bit of he seems to be emboldened.
	If you're a young, powerful guy, you don't want to take orders from people.
	If you're Charlie Kirk and you're 31 and you got the world on a string, you're the bag man for the GOP.
	You run with the president.
	You travel the world.
	You run the conservative movement.
	There's a little bit of swagger.
	There's a little bit of a chip on your shoulder.
	Does a young man like that want to take orders and be lectured and berated and attacked?
	Meanwhile, he's getting it from the other side.
	He's getting every groiper and every 18-year-old asking him about dancing Israelis 100 times a day.
	I'm sure at that point, he's extremely frustrated.
	And that shined through in his Megan Kelly interview in early August of this year, just a month ago.
	People take that as evidence.
	Just a couple of days before he was gunned down, he interviewed Ben Shapiro.
	It's actually just the day before.
	He interviewed Ben Shapiro about the situation in Gaza and asked some interesting leading questions.
	He asked Shapiro if we can trust what the media says about Israel.
	He asked if what Israel is doing can be considered an ethnic cleansing.
	He asked if Israel created a PR problem for themselves in America and why can't they end the war more quickly?
	And so people say that there was clearly this public inquiry.
	If he wasn't taking an explicitly anti-Israel stance, he was signaling.
	He was becoming candid.
	He was becoming emboldened.
	He was venting that he did not like what the Israelis were pushing and he did not feel like the Israelis had the authority to push him.
	So there was this quiet rebellion that was happening maybe inside of his interior life.
	Maybe he was having private conversations with his friends like Steve Bannon and Candice Owens and Dave Smith and others who have intimated that there were similar conversations like this and that this was starting to express itself outwardly in these media appearances.
	What's more, famously, at his SAS student leadership conference in the summer this year, he hosted a debate on Israel.
	between one of the Israeli Zionist propagandists, Josh Hammer from Newsweek, and Dave Smith, who was calling Israel warmongering genocidal maniacs at a turning point conference.
	He hosted Tucker Carlson.
	And at this conference, they both admitted that Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad agent.
	That's the public evidence.
	There's also private evidence of a revelation.
	Privately, there is a piece by Max Blumenthal at the Gray Zone.
	This is the only source for it.
	Max Blumenthal, a Jewish leftist at the Gray Zone, has reported that private sources, anonymous sources, allegedly friends of Charlie Kirk, have come forward since his death.
	And they say that Charlie Kirk was becoming afraid.
	He did disagree with the Israel lobby on the Iran policy, on the Gaza policy.
	He wanted to go against the program, but he was afraid.
	The Israelis were not happy with him.
	They were offering him money.
	He turned it down.
	They invited him to Israel.
	He turned that down too.
	They talk about a meeting in August where Bill Ackman, a billionaire Jewish donor who is connected to Israel and Jeffrey Epstein, they say that Bill Ackman effectively gave him an ultimatum.
	This is how this is being characterized.
	I'm not claiming this.
	But Candace Owens and Max Blumenthal have characterized this meeting based on conversations they had with him and other attendees of the meeting.
	That in early August, Charlie Kirk met with Bill Ackman, a Jewish billionaire, and others like Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee, Josh Hammer, and they staged what they characterize as an intervention, where they berated Charlie Kirk for his resistance to the pro-Israel agenda.
	And they say that Charlie Kirk felt as though he might be blackmailed in the future, that they were going to play dirty.
	And so there is this narrative that Charlie Kirk, although we know him as in the pocket for Israel, he was clearly a willing and complicit client of the Israel lobby for his entire career.
	They say that like all of us, based on recent developments, which are a true inflection point in America and Israel's relationship, that he, like everybody, was starting to get sick of the Israeli capture and Israeli influence over our government.
	Did not agree that we should go to war with Iran.
	Did not agree that children should be genocided in Gaza and was getting sick of defending it.
	He was signaling that in public.
	He was openly discussing it in private.
	And it seems that the Israelis were becoming increasingly frustrated and intimidating and menacing and threatening.
	And what started out as offers to buy him turned into potentially intimidation and threats.
	And they say evolved ultimately into a bullet.
	They eliminated him because they realized they couldn't control him.
	That is the narrative.
	And this is a story from the Gray Zone.
	I will read the important parts of it to you.
	This is what they characterize as the moment when Charlie Kirk was intimidated.
	It says, quote, the gray zone has spoken to five people with intimate knowledge of Charlie Kirk's meeting with Bill Ackman, which was held in early August.
	According to one source, Kirk was left upset after the gathering turned into an intervention where he was hammered for his increasingly skeptical views on the U.S. relationship with Israel and for platforming prominent conservative critics of Israel at his turning point events.
	Since publishing the report, the Gray Zone has learned from one attendee of the Hamptons event that Ackman convened the influencers under the auspices of a discussion about Zoran Mamdani and the supposed threat that he posed to the West if elected mayor of New York.
	But the meeting went off the rails when Ackman personally confronted Kirk about his views on Israel.
	An unknown British woman joined in the argument and began screaming at Kirk, according to the attendee.
	When his host presented him with a detailed list of every offense he supposedly committed against Israel, Kirk was horrified, said one attendee.
	Ackman also allegedly demanded that Kirk rescind his invitation for Tucker Carlson to speak at the upcoming America Fest 2025 in December.
	The Gray Zone reported on September 12th, citing a longtime associate of Kirk, that Netanyahu had offered to organize a massive infusion of pro-Israel money into Turning Point, and that Kirk refused.
	Another longtime friend of Kirk has told the Gray Zone that the conservative activist also rejected an offer Netanyahu delivered two weeks before his death to meet with him in Jerusalem.
	Kirk, according to one person with inside knowledge of the meeting with Ackman, said he left feeling as though he'd been subjected to blackmail.
	In a series of text messages, Ackman described his account of the meeting with Kirk as totally false.
	He pledged to release a public statement providing his own account of the event, but refused to clarify any further details.
	He said, I can easily put this to bed.
	I have receipts.
	But he did not abide when asked to provide the receipts to the reporters.
	So this is some of the substantiating evidence.
	They say, and these are really the two big things.
	They're two separate things.
	They say that Charlie Kirk was offered an infusion of $150 million by Israel.
	Okay?
	That would double Israel's budget, or excuse me, Turning Point USA's budget.
	Turning Point USA has an annual budget of $140 million.
	Netanyahu offered Turning Point $150 million for one purpose and one purpose only, to shill for Israel harder.
	Turning Point USA is already pro-Israel.
	They're not anti-Israel.
	They've never been anti-Israel.
	Charlie Kirk has in the past criticized B.B. Netanyahu.
	He has criticized secular left-wing Jewry in America.
	He has criticized a war with Iran, the famine in Gaza.
	He has never opposed Israel in itself.
	He has never explicitly opposed Israel.
	Israel offered him $150 million to be more pro-Israel than they already were, to be harder in their support for Israel, and in particular, to support regime change in Iran and to support their ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza.
	And Charlie Kirk refused the money.
	And I have independently confirmed that, by the way, I've heard that from four people.
	Four people that I trust that are in the know.
	So this is coming from Candice Owens, a friend of Charlie Kirk.
	This is coming from Max Blumenthal, who purports to have a source.
	And I have heard from a handful of people independently of those sources that this offer was real and that Kirk turned down the money.
	After Charlie Kirk turned down the money, Netanyahu asked if he would come visit Jerusalem and give him the re-education tour.
	The Holocaust Museum, the burned babies, the beheaded babies, the one that Elon Musk took, the one that our Speaker of the House took.
	Anyone that's ever criticized Israel has been subjected to, he refused that as well.
	They offered to bribe him.
	They tried to re-educate him.
	He refused both offers.
	That's one.
	Two, they say Bill Ackman, the Jewish pro-Israel billionaire, hosted this event at his house in the Hamptons where they staged an intervention.
	And he, along with other pro-Israel mouthpieces, pro-Israel traitors and shills, berated and screamed at him for not supporting Israel enough.
	And whatever they say about it, whatever other people say about it, Charlie Kirk's friends intimate that he felt scared.
	He felt as though he was being intimidated and blackmailed potentially.
	Well, he's dead now.
	So he can't tell us what really went down.
	All we know is what the people who berated him allegedly felt about it, but we don't know his perspective.
	Now, since this report has been published, Bill Ackman has responded on Twitter.
	And I'll read his response in full because we have to rigorously analyze all the facts.
	This is what he says.
	He said, quote, I connected with Charlie when he DM'd me in late May of this year and expressed interest in meeting me.
	We were unable to find a time to meet, so we scheduled a Zoom on June 11th.
	So Charlie texted Bill Ackman first.
	They got on a Zoom in June.
	Charlie explained to me that young conservatives were getting tired of defending Israel and this was very concerning.
	He suggested it might be useful to convene a group of young conservative influencers on a host of topics that could include Israel to get a better sense of how the community was thinking about Israel and other relevant issues.
	He suggested that recruiting a group of junior Charlie Kirks who could host open mic sessions on college campuses could be an effective way to encourage debate.
	We thereafter scheduled a series of conference calls and Zooms with Charlie, Turning Point, and members of my team in an effort to assemble a diverse group of influencers so that we could convene for a day and a half session.
	We chose the afternoon of August 4th.
	And Charlie and members of my team worked to put together an invitation list.
	I offered to host the sessions in Bridgehampton and cover the costs so that I could attend some of the sessions.
	Charlie sent out the invitations and about 35 or so influencers accepted.
	Charlie estimated that the influencers who attended collectively had more than 100 million followers.
	Charlie and Turning Point put together the agenda for the meeting.
	Charlie asked me to moderate the economic future discussion, which I did, and I thereafter hosted a Q ⁇ A session with the participants.
	The discussion of the convergence of East and West included a discussion of immigration value systems, the U.S. approach to foreign policy in Israel.
	While I wanted to attend that panel, I had a board meeting that conflicted with that session.
	Those who attended that session said that the Israel discussion was similar to the others, with attendees expressing varying points of view as well as explaining the views of their followers.
	Some were critical of Israel and others were supportive.
	The sessions are punctuated by meals.
	I attended one group lunch and a dinner where I sat with Charlie and others.
	At the end of the event, I sat with Charlie and members of my team and we discussed the events of the convening.
	Charlie believed he had identified a number of potential turning point ambassadors who could launch open mic events on campus and that he would follow up with them.
	We agreed to keep in touch thereafter.
	We corresponded by text over the next few weeks on a range of topics, not including Israel, and the next thing I knew, he was gone.
	In short, this was not an intervention to blackmail Charlie Kirk.
	It was nothing of that sort.
	Candace replied and said, Candice Owens, she said, I was clear Charlie felt blackmailed by the offer to fund Turning Point, which he refused.
	Not that you, Bill Ackman, blackmailed Charlie Kirk.
	She said people in attendance described it as an intervention.
	Josh Hammer and Seth Dillon were disappointed that Charlie was frustrated with B.B. Netanyahu and what would happen if he publicly criticized him.
	Nothing else in your response disputes that Charlie was pressed by you and others about his viewpoints on Israel and about Tucker or Bibi's phone call.
	As a follow-up, do you know anything about the alleged $150 million Bibi offered for an anti-Tucker campaign?
	Now, Candace's response, if you've been following this, let's just piece it together quickly.
	So Blumenthal and Candace are claiming that Bill Ackman corners Charlie Kirk in an intervention at his house in August for a struggle session.
	And people are screaming at Charlie Kirk and Charlie Kirk is, there's this climate of fear.
	And what is intimated is that there is some menacing here.
	The message is you better get in line.
	It's hostile.
	It's over the top.
	There's an intervention.
	They're telling him you better ship up or shape out.
	You better support Israel or else.
	That is how this is characterized by Blumenthal and by Candice Owens.
	What Bill Ackman puts forth is that actually Charlie initiated contact with him.
	Charlie and he set up the event.
	Charlie and he arranged the venue and invited the influencers.
	Charlie had very little FaceTime with Ackman.
	And Ackman says that the Israel session was similar to all the others.
	Now, these are two completely different accounts.
	One by Blumenthal and Candace is filled with insinuations and is not telling the whole story.
	They create, it's almost like a dream-like characterization.
	You never know how you get in the middle of a dream.
	We just wake up and you're there.
	So they say Charlie happens to be at this event.
	Apparently, it's an ambush.
	It was supposed to be one thing.
	It turns into an intervention.
	People are screaming.
	He's afraid.
	They're telling him, get in line or else.
	Well, Bill Ackman answered the charge.
	And he said, on the contrary, this was not a random event that Charlie happened to come to where we staged an ambush.
	Charlie reached out to Ackman.
	Charlie and Ackman set up the event.
	It was a turning point event.
	It was funded by Ackman, but Charlie made the guest list.
	The point was to groom influencers to be turning point representatives.
	Ackman didn't attend most of it.
	Apparently, it was cordial.
	Some were pro-Israel, some were critical of Israel.
	And discussions of Israel was on the docket.
	It's not like they caught him off guard.
	That was part of the routine.
	When Candace replies to the correction, she effectively concedes all of that and says, well, some woman was screaming.
	She says that people were disappointed.
	She said, for example, that Seth Dillon and Josh Hammer were especially disappointed at Kirk's views.
	Well, wouldn't they be their extreme Zionists?
	But expressing disappointment is different than menacing.
	It was characterized in the gray zone piece and in Candace's show like they were bringing down, they were pointing a gun at him.
	Like they didn't say that, but the characterization is that this was an intervention.
	There was a culture of fear.
	There was an implicit threat.
	That's how they insinuated this went down.
	It was an ambush.
	In reality, it was not an ambush.
	If anything, Charlie knew what he was getting himself into.
	They said they were screaming and berating.
	Now, Candace concedes, well, these Zionists who were invited by Charlie were disappointed.
	Well, I mean, wouldn't they be?
	She says, well, I never said you blackmailed him.
	I said he felt blackmailed about something else.
	Okay, well, seemed like you insinuated that, but that's subjective.
	She says, and anyway, this is really about the phone call with Netanyahu and Kirk.
	Okay.
	So if you're only thinking of this, you have two separate accounts.
	Candace is Candace and Max Blumenthal are characterizing this one way.
	Bill Ackman is laying out the facts with dates.
	And he says, Charlie sent the first text.
	This is when he texted me.
	This is when we called.
	This is who set it up.
	This is where it took place.
	This is how many people came.
	This is who came.
	This is, these were the discussion sections.
	This is how long we talked, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
	She didn't dispute any of that.
	She didn't dispute any of those details.
	So she's effectively conceding that, yes, Bill Ackman gave an accurate account.
	And that just sounds like a regular run-of-the-mill fundraiser.
	That sounds like a regular run-of-the-mill political get-together where tactical and ideological disagreements are discussed, but it's overall cordial.
	And it's not some big catastrophe or something.
	She didn't dispute any of those details other than to say, well, but wouldn't you say that Josh Hammer was disappointed?
	Okay, but Josh Hammer is like on the payroll of the Israelis.
	You might as well say that Netanyahu is disappointed that Charlie Kirk criticized Netanyahu.
	It comes with the territory.
	That's different than people screaming, people berating and intervention.
	That's the only detail that she had any qualms with.
	And then very quickly pivots to what about the phone call?
	Now, so I have a big problem with that because that's dishonest.
	Blumenthal and Candace, unless they produce receipts, unless they produce evidence to the contrary, it seems like they mischaracterized that meaning entirely.
	It seems like they lied about that.
	That they were, at the minimum, disingenuous, because again, two very different portrayals.
	One had actual information.
	The other seemed to rely on insinuation and implication.
	And when the facts came out, none of the facts were disputed.
	So unless Blumenthal or Candace can produce receipts to the contrary, it seems like they got caught with their hand in the cookie jar.
	And I watched Candace's show in full.
	I read the piece in the gray zone.
	And Bill Ackman's account of that event, it just devastates the implications they made about it.
	And unless they can refute the facts that he provided, it seems like they intentionally were disingenuous in characterizing the event.
	And then when they got caught, Candace pivoted to the other thing.
	Like I said, there's two things.
	There's Netanyahu offering $150 million to buy them out.
	And then there's this seemingly innocuous meeting.
	Now, why didn't she lead with the phone call?
	If the big evidence is that Netanyahu made this offer and the meeting was really secondary or ancillary or not what it's cracked up to be, why'd you even bring that up?
	That hurts your credibility.
	That hurts the credibility of the case because very clearly they're not telling the whole story there.
	And Bill Ackman is.
	He's telling parts of it that they did not.
	But let's talk about the $150 million because to me, this is a big problem.
	Let's briefly talk about the predicament that Israel is in.
	Israel, as stated by the ADL and by their own representatives, has a generational problem.
	They don't have an ideological problem.
	They have a generational problem.
	It's not that the left hates them.
	It's not that the right hates them.
	It's that the young people are becoming indifferent to the cause of Israel.
	The left is overwhelmingly, at this point, pro-Palestine, more so than they are pro-Israel.
	The younger generation, in particular, is radical.
	They believe that Israel is a settler colonial state.
	They're carrying out an ethnic cleansing.
	They're genocidal.
	The left wing is radicalized.
	They are enthusiastic.
	They're angry.
	Needless to say, Israel has lost the left, and they've especially lost the youth on the left.
	But on the right, increasingly, it's not much better.
	They still have the boomers, and they still have the millennials to some degree.
	But the Zoomers are becoming completely apathetic about Israel.
	They do not care.
	They're becoming indifferent.
	And many of them are becoming anti-Israel.
	Now, that is something that poses an existential threat to Israel.
	Because this Generation Z on the right and the left, they will grow up.
	They will go to the selective schools.
	They will graduate those schools.
	They will enter the pipeline in the State Department, in the top positions in the elite fields in our country, in finance, in law, in media, and they will not be sympathetic to Israel.
	And when that happens, Israel will lose its most important patron.
	So that spells a big problem for them.
	Because what you need to understand about Israel and our special relationship, if you understand nothing else, is this.
	Much has been said about our special relationship, our closest ally, and how conspicuous this is and how unique it is, for better or for worse.
	But what you need to understand, if nothing else, is that America is indispensable to Israel.
	America is inseparable with Israel.
	In many ways, America and Israel are literally inextricable.
	They cannot be separated one from the other.
	And this is by design.
	It has been this way from the beginning.
	Israel could not have been settled, founded, defended, maintained, would not have survived without unconditional, constant, overwhelming support from America for over 100 years.
	Now, people say Israel was declared in 1948.
	It goes back further than that.
	It goes back further than that.
	Without the American Jewish community supporting the Zionist project, even in the first half of the 20th century, there would be no Israeli state.
	It has been like this from the beginning.
	America is indispensable to Israel.
	And why?
	Because when Israel was fighting its Arab neighbors, America was legally and illegally providing the conventional weapons, the nuclear weapons.
	When Israel was faced with foes like Saddam Hussein and Bashar al-Assad and Muammar Gaddafi, the United States was fighting the wars Israel could not win.
	When the international community began to turn against Israel and its occupation of the West Bank in Gaza, the United States vetoed the Security Council resolutions condemning it.
	The United States is indispensable for Israel's survival.
	And have you ever noticed that that is the lingo that they use?
	Israel has a right to exist.
	Israel has a right to defend itself.
	That is the dogma.
	It has a right to exist.
	It has a right to defend itself.
	Well, if America is indispensable to Israel's existence and Israel's self-defense, then that means that Israel is entitled to American support.
	Do you understand how that works?
	If Israel has a right to exist, but its existence is contingent on American support, then that means that Israel has a right to American support.
	If Israel's self-defense is absolutely contingent on American support, then it has a right to American support.
	And what kind of system do we have in America?
	An open society, a democracy, a liberal society, some might say an oligarchy, a capitalist society.
	For Israel to secure this existential support, this indispensable support from America, they must secure influence over America's system, over its democracy, over its government, over its society.
	And how does it do that?
	It must regulate broadcasting and dissemination of information.
	Because as long as people vote and as long as candidates are staged for the political parties, then Americans, American citizens, still have some sovereignty and some say in what the government does.
	So it's not enough that the Israelis penetrate our government and Wall Street and other things.
	They must penetrate the media and regulate the medium, that's where media comes from.
	The medium of the dissemination of information.
	They must control the broadcasting of information.
	How do you control these elections, our open society, our democratic government?
	By controlling the minds of the masses through the public square, through the centralized mass media, which was television, radio, and print, and is now social media.
	And if Israel has a right to exist and its existence is contingent on support from America, then they see it as their right to control and influence and manipulate our system.
	Understand that logical progression and think about these questions of survival.
	Do you take your survival seriously?
	Do you take the survival of your wife and kids seriously?
	Would you do anything to protect your wife and kids from destruction?
	Would you lie, cheat, steal?
	Would you kill to defend and protect yourself, your wife, and your children?
	Of course you would.
	Now, what is the mindset of the Zionists?
	What is the mindset of Jews?
	I know that sounds a certain way, but this is a fairly obvious question.
	I'll tell you what the mindset is.
	They have been persecuted for 2,000 years.
	The Romans put them down in a series of rebellions and killed thousands of them according to their narrative, expelled them from their land.
	And for 2,000 years, they were forced to dwell in exile, being chased from one kingdom to another, facing inquisitions, segregation, facing cruelty, discrimination, prejudice, hatred, pogroms, massacres, the Holocaust.
	So they founded Israel, a place where they can finally be safe, where they would never live in fear of extermination, being at the mercy of a hostile totalitarian regime, where they could exist, where they could thrive.
	Now, stay with me here.
	It follows.
	If you as an individual would lie, cheat, steal, maybe kill to protect yourself and the ones you love.
	Put yourself in the mindset of the leaders and the stakeholders of the Jewish community.
	Would they lie, cheat, steal, and kill to protect their race, to protect their people?
	Think about their story.
	They see themselves as the vanguard of God, of God's law, of God's law given to Moses in the Torah, in the oral tradition, in the mystic tradition.
	They see themselves as the vanguard of God, of God's word, of God's law.
	They see themselves as repairing the world, putting the shards containing God together to save the world.
	And their story is of slavery at the hands of the Egyptians, captivity at the hands of the Babylonians, persecutions, pogroms, genocide.
	When they say we have a right to exist, we have a right to defend ourselves.
	That's a battle cry.
	And it says, we will do anything.
	We feel entitled.
	We have a right to anything.
	And you think a couple of Europeans are going to stand in our way?
	You think some punk from Arlington Heights, you think some Spanish government, some Irish government, you think the Western Europeans, you think American conservatives, you think skinhead, trailer trash Nazis, whatever they say about us, you think they're going to stand in the way of us?
	We take what we want.
	We say what will help us.
	We kill who opposes us.
	When they say they have a right to exist, they're saying we have a right to control American society to secure our existence.
	Now, if the youth are being lost, this poses an existential problem to Israel.
	And if in particular, the youth in the right wing of America becomes indifferent to Israel, then they are truly alone.
	They have lost China, Russia, the whole Muslim world, Europe, Africa, Latin America.
	Who do they got?
	It's just us.
	And what is America's support conditioned upon the Republican constituency in America?
	If we're up to the Democrats, we wouldn't support Israel.
	If it was up to the Zoomers, we wouldn't support Israel.
	It's Republican boomers that are keeping it together.
	Without America, they are alone.
	And without the boomers, they don't have America.
	So they need the young people in America.
	They need the right wing in America.
	Do you think that's why Netanyahu offered Charlie Kirk $150 million to support Israel?
	Do you think that's why it mattered to them so much?
	Netanyahu was going to open the floodgates according to these reports and unleash $150 million of Israel-controlled money that would probably come from America.
	It wouldn't come from the Israeli treasury.
	It wouldn't come from their finance ministry.
	Netanyahu would order it, and it would be Jewish American billionaires that actually dispense the cash.
	He would double their money.
	Do you know how much money $150 million cash is?
	Charlie Kirk would overnight become a very rich man.
	He could be president.
	He could be kingmaker.
	He was offered a deal.
	All you got to do is work for Israel.
	Work for the genocidal state that is subverting our sovereignty in our country.
	And why was it of such great importance to Israel?
	Because they knew that if they had Charlie Kirk, they would have the young right-wing men.
	Because Charlie Kirk, he's not just a live streamer.
	On the contrary, he's not just a debater.
	Charlie Kirk has a personal relationship with Trump.
	Charlie Kirk is the bag man for the GOP.
	And Charlie Kirk runs the largest youth organization for the conservatives in America.
	So he's a very powerful man.
	He's a very important piece on the board.
	If you got Charlie, you got the young, you got the money, and you got Trump's ear.
	Maybe you're a kingmaker.
	Excuse me.
	Maybe you're a kingmaker in 2028.
	That's why it was worth $150 million to Netanyahu.
	So they offered to give him all this money.
	He declined because he knew the money came with strings attached.
	That was a double or nothing.
	Look, the Zionists gave him all this money thus far.
	He's having doubts.
	Well, we will sweep aside those doubts by dropping literally a pallet of cash.
	Double or nothing.
	Will you work for us?
	Yes or no?
	He said no.
	They said, come to Israel, meet with me.
	Charlie Kirk said no.
	Now he's dead.
	Now, what about Bill Ackman?
	What about Bill Ackman and his fundraiser in August?
	Who the fuck is Bill Ackman?
	Bill Ackman is a Wall Street Jewish billionaire.
	Do you know?
	Do you know that he is friends with Larry Fink, the head of BlackRock, the largest asset manager in the world managing $10 trillion in assets?
	Do you know that Larry Fink is going to run the World Economic Forum in the stead of Klaus Schwab, who's retiring after a Me Too scandal?
	Do you know that Bill Ackman got the president of Harvard University fired because there was an anti-Israel protest on the Harvard campus?
	Do you know that Bill Ackman's wife is Israeli?
	She was born in Israel.
	And not only that, but she received money from none other than Jeffrey Epstein.
	And after October 7th, Bill Ackman shifted to the right.
	He put a million dollars behind Trump and became very active in Republican politics, even though he's a lifelong Democrat.
	Bill Ackman hosted the fundraiser, or excuse me, the convention on August 4th or 5th of Turning Point Influencers.
	Here's the smoking gun that really brings it all home.
	Because, and I'm going to be really honest with you.
	When people said that Israel was behind Charlie Kirk's assassination, I said, don't be ridiculous.
	Charlie Kirk, and rest in peace, God bless his soul.
	Charlie Kirk, we all know, was supported by pro-Israel Jewish patrons until the day that he died.
	He never recanted his support for Israel.
	Publicly and openly, he defended the administration's cover-up of the Epstein files.
	He defended the administration's bombing of Iran.
	In the same interview with Megan Kelly, he said, you're never going to lose me.
	I will always support Israel.
	Be that as it may.
	After Netanyahu offered to give him all this money, and he refused, Bill Ackman hosted an event at his home where Israeli mouthpieces like Seth Dillon, a Jew, and Josh Hammer, a Jew, Israeli mouthpiece working for Ben Shapiro in a previous job listing.
	Charlie Kirk refused to listen.
	He was offered a trip to Israel.
	He refused.
	When the FBI could not locate the alleged gunman on Wednesday, do you know who stepped up and offered a $1 million reward for information leading to the arrest of Charlie Kirk's assassin?
unidentified		Bill Ackman.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And just who do you think that $1 million will be paid out to?
		It looks like it will be paid out to the alleged killer's father.
		Tyler Robinson was allegedly turned into law enforcement by his father.
		His Mormon father, the Mormon father who turned in his gay son dating a tranny who killed Charlie Kirk, is going to get a $1 million payout from Bill Ackman, the man who, according to friends of Charlie Kirk, menaced him for not taking Netanyahu's money and supporting Israel's war in Iran.
		Do you think Bill Ackman is just generous?
		He's a vigilante.
		Put another way, the Jewish billionaire that allegedly threatened Charlie Kirk, the Jewish billionaire married to an Israeli who took money from Jeffrey Epstein, who is by all credible observations working on behalf of Israel in some context.
		The guy that apparently menaced Charlie Kirk is the same guy who will pay a man a million dollars for turning in his gay son, implicating him in the murder of Charlie Kirk.
		Anybody find that a little bit suspicious?
		This is a tweet, a real tweet that Bill Ackman put out last week.
		He said, Quote, a number of people have reached out and/or posted expressing concern that Tyler Robinson's father may collect a $1.2 million reward for turning in his son, which inspires a few thoughts.
		First, in order for rewards to be effective in finding criminals, the rewards need to be paid, even if the recipient is a crook or worse.
		That said, in this case, if the father is found to have been involved or otherwise acted negligently in contributing to Charlie's death, civil litigation or criminal prosecution will reverse unjust compensation.
		I've also seen reports that suggest Tyler's family intends to waive its right to any reward.
		So, yes, we will pay the reward if it is earned to whomever the FBI indicates provided the information that led to Tyler's arrest.
		To me, that might be the smoking gun.
		That might be the connection that slipped everybody's attention.
		So, Bill Ackman allegedly menaced Charlie Kirk over Israel.
		Now, Bill Ackman is paying a million dollars to a Mormon man turning in his gay son dating a tranny, implicating him in the killing of Charlie Kirk.
		I see a bit of a conflict of interest there.
		Now, with that being said, I'm not running with that.
		I'm not stating that as fact.
		I'm saying that requires careful scrutiny.
		It's not, at the minimum, there is the appearance of impropriety.
		That's not a good look.
		And that needs to be investigated.
		And I credit that observation to Arthur Bloom, who's being investigated in Virginia for calling somebody an Israeli spy, go figure.
		He put me onto this.
		I'm not going to pretend I came up with it myself.
		But at the minimum, that needs to be investigated.
		And I'd be very interested if the father receives that payout.
		If he doesn't, then maybe there's nothing there.
		But I find that to be very conspicuous.
		Now, we're running out of time.
		I don't know if I'll be able to get to the Groiper angle.
		Maybe I'll talk about that tomorrow.
		I didn't anticipate spending two hours on all of this.
		We haven't even gotten into the super chats here yet.
		But that is the official story.
		That is the Israeli conspiracy.
		And as I said, I will leave it to you to draw your own conclusions.
		I continue to be convinced that it is probably more likely from where we're sitting now that Charlie was killed by some leftist.
		But we don't know that.
		We do not know that.
		And all these inconsistencies and discrepancies, these things need to be explained to us.
		And whether Israel was behind the killing or not, we have to get to the bottom of this alleged payment.
		And I would implore Candace Owens, release all the receipts.
		You have to release all the receipts immediately.
unidentified		Don't play games.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Do not play games.
		If you have receipts, you need to release them fast.
		And the reason you need to release them is because they have time to put together their alibi.
		They have time to put together their story.
		Do not drag it out for the sake of your show.
		You know, I watched her show today and I was honestly disappointed.
		She promised receipts.
		We have seen no receipts from Max Blumenthal or Candace Owens.
		We've seen a lot of hearsay, unnamed sources, anonymous friends of Charlie Kirk.
		If Netanyahu offered $150 million and he turned it down, we need to see the documentation, if there is such a thing.
		If Charlie Kirk sent a letter to Netanyahu resisting his advance, we need to know the contents of that letter.
		If there is information to the contrary, we need to see it immediately.
		You cannot withhold that information.
		I did not know Charlie.
		I never worked for Turning Point or Daily Wire or Fox News.
		So I do not have this privileged insider information from the Jewish club.
		But if anybody has that information, it must be released.
		If you have receipts, you can't play games and say, we've got the documentation.
		You better release it or else.
		No, no, it doesn't work that way.
		You need to put the information out.
		Otherwise, it's irresponsible.
		And we need to get to the bottom of this.
		And by the way, we all need to demand that our Trump government, they have to get to the bottom of this.
		If it was Israel, if it was leftists, we need to know what threat we face.
		If Charlie Kirk is being gunned down for not taking money from a foreign state to support their war, that's a problem.
		If Charlie Kirk got gunned down by a terrorist cell of insane left-wing trannies, we need to know that too.
		And what we're getting from the government is not good enough.
		Trump is playing golf.
		Cash Patel is at dinner.
		They don't seem to know what they're doing.
		Trump is posting on True Social about football.
		Allegedly, one of his close friends, one of his important allies, is laying dead.
		And we don't know the killer.
		And we have no idea what's going on.
		There could be reprisals.
		There could be copycats.
		Where's the leadership?
		Where's the press conferences?
		And by the way, I am sick and tired of seeing the worst governor in America, Governor Cox from Utah, this pro-trans, left-wing, anti-Trump scumbag, constantly jumping in front of the cameras and giving campaign speeches.
		I have had enough of him.
		This country did not elect that dirtbag.
		This country elected Trump to appoint a DOJ and an FBI director that would get to the bottom of things like this.
		And where are they?
		See you in Valhalla.
		Fuck you.
		Posting about the NFL rules?
		Fuck you.
		Where's our vengeance?
		If we can't get justice from the government, you're going to get vengeance from the people and it's going to be ugly.
		And I don't want to see that.
		I'm not encouraging that.
		That's not a threat.
		That is an observation.
		If you deprive the people of justice, if the enemies of society are not deterred by the government, there will be more bloodshed.
		And we're just not getting it.
		Where is the leadership?
		Where's the messaging?
		Where's the information?
		Where is the whole of government effort to get to the bottom of this, keep the American public apprised, to deter future attacks, and to ensure that this will not happen again?
		Where is it?
		And shame on all of the Trump shills for not calling this out.
		They will praise anything.
		The Cracker Barrel logo.
	The Department of War, the Gulf of America.
	And honestly, I was, and I'm not just trying to politicize this, but I was genuinely disturbed by Trump's reaction to Charlie Kirk's death.
	Isn't this your friend?
	They asked him about it the day after, and he said, yeah, yeah.
	Anyway, so we're building the new East Wing.
unidentified		Are you serious?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You got shot.
		This is your 31-year-old friend who supported you for years.
		You know him by name.
		Your son is friends with him.
		He could, it doesn't seem like he could be bothered.
		He didn't go to the memorial.
		He's golfing.
		He's dancing at a sports outing.
		He said he got the news about Charlie Kirk.
		Oh, and I was in the middle of building the beautiful new ballroom.
		Really, man?
unidentified		What a disaster.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So it's not actually my job or Candace Owens' job or Max Blumenthal or it's not our job to get to the bottom of arguably the worst political assassination in America in the century.
		It's the job of our elected leaders, our appointed leaders, the head of the FBI and DOJ.
		I'm sorry, wasn't Cash Patel supposed to be on the money, no pun intended?
		Wasn't he supposed to be the MAGA FBI director that would clean house?
		Wasn't it supposed to be different?
		What is going on?
		Enough is enough already.
		It is ridiculous.
		And they're wheeling out this douchebag in front of us, giving campaign speeches about unity.
		You know, Governor Cox, go fuck yourself.
		I don't want to see you anymore.
		I want to see the president.
		I want to see the FBI director.
		I want to see the attorney general.
		I want to hear a plan.
		I want to hear a message.
		I want to know that the enemies of society are going to be investigated and brought to justice, whoever they are.
		And not the least bit for politics.
		You think at the minimum, because this is a friend of the president, but I guess even that means nothing.
		So, as it stands, we don't know.
		And regardless of whether Israel is implicated or not, at the minimum, this shines a spotlight on how this society works.
		And whether they kill them or not, it's scary that we don't even know, isn't it?
		We all know they're capable.
		We all know they're willing.
		We all see the motive.
		And the motive is a ground war in Iran and that the cleansing of Gaza.
		It's deadly serious.
		And the last thing I'll say is this.
		For all these people that say, I don't care about the Middle East.
		Who cares about Gaza?
		Who cares about Israel?
		Is that the only thing you can talk about?
		What about immigration?
		What about everything else?
unidentified		I care about America.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And I'm going to say this respectfully to people like Matt Walsh, who extended an olive branch, it seems.
		I'm going to say this respectfully because I've heard Matt Walsh and Michael Knowles and their ilk.
		I've heard them say this.
		And I'm going to assume that maybe they don't know better.
		And I'll be respectful how I say this.
		You may not take an interest in Israel, but Israel takes an interest in you.
		Israel takes an interest in you and you and every American.
unidentified		As long as we have a voice in America, as long as we have a vote in America, as long as we Americans have a say over our lives and our society and our government and what it does with its money and its military, and as long as that is indispensable to helping this country evade accountability for its actions, they will take an interest in you and your family and what you have to say and how you vote and even what you think.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So you may not care that much about Israel and you may think that's one issue among others and that doesn't matter and we need to just get off that subject and talk about domestic issues, but they don't see it that way.
		They take an interest in you and you must realize our country is besieged on all sides by foreign intelligence and manipulation.
		And in some ways, that's the only issue there is.
		That's politics.
		What if it was a tranny?
		What if it was some random tranny?
		Think about what a sick fucking joke that is.
		You have Charlie Kirk, a moderate Christian conservative, and some enraged tranny with Mormon parents gunning one another down.
		And it's not one another, but you understand.
		Meanwhile, the Senate voted not to release the Epstein files.
		Meanwhile, Congress gave another $650 million to Israel.
		Meanwhile, Israel bombed Qatar and is gearing up.
		The tanks are rolling through Gaza City and they're getting ready for a war with Iran.
		So congratulations, you fucking idiot leftists.
		Congratulations, you stupid fucking faggots.
		And I say that somewhat affectionately.
		Congratulations, LGBT leftists or whatever.
		You shot some moderate conservative.
		Meanwhile, our country's being raped.
		Congrats.
		Good job.
		Now everybody's focused on internacine fight.
		Now we're doing the culture war.
		Now it's Christian parents fighting with their gay kids about fucking porn.
		Meanwhile, we have no independence.
		We have no sovereignty.
		So, you know, and here's the funny part.
		If there is it's funny in a sick way, here's the ironic part.
		Over the past few months, I have been making a concerted effort to unify liberals and conservatives.
		I really have.
		I tried, I really made a concerted effort to speak in a language that liberals might understand.
		I tried to demonstrate my objectivity.
		I tried to bring liberals into the fold.
		I tried to appeal to their animosity, their legitimate criticisms of Trump, their legitimate animosity towards Israel.
		I leaned out of the culture war intentionally.
		When a tranny shot up the school in Minneapolis, because it was the truth, but also out of sensitivity, I said, let's not blame the left or trannies.
		Let's look at this as nihilism because I genuinely feel that's what it is.
		And you know what Hassan Piker said?
		He said, oh, this guy's just lying.
		He's cynical.
		And then glorifies violence against conservatives.
		Hey, Hassan, you idiot.
		Hassan, destiny.
		Hey, idiots.
		Do you know that this Zionist-backed Republican government would love nothing more?
		They're waiting, they're begging for the opportunity, for a reason to wipe the far left off the map.
		And not for the reason you think.
		Not because you support trans rights, but because the leftists protest Israel.
		Okay?
		That's why.
		Alex Karp is making products for Israel to murder people in Gaza.
		They are waiting, they're waiting, begging for an excuse to whip up the far right into a frenzy and to create a mandate to bring the government down on the far left.
		And you just gave them what they wanted.
		And instead, like your uncle, Jank, instead, like your uncle of recognizing that, you play right into their hands.
		Right into their hands.
		Because you just can get your mind off of sex.
		Because for the far left, those are the only issues that exist.
		Trans rights and gay marriage.
		Forget about, you know, immigration, forget about health care, forget about what's happening in Ukraine and Israel.
		So nice going.
		Nice job.
		And it may be a leftist.
		And, you know, the left is, I mean, they have their problems also.
		But it's just a little bit of perspective there.
	It's not to say the left doesn't exist.
	It's not to say they don't have nut jobs that want to kill us.
unidentified		Obviously, they do.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But you must recognize that we are we.
		And by we, do not mistake what I mean.
		We as American patriots, we as God-fearing Christians, people that actually love the living person Jesus Christ on the cross, we are fighting a multi-front war against a sophisticated adversary.
		Do not for one second think it's all or nothing, right versus left, or Christians versus Jews, or America first versus Israel first.
		This is a multifaceted war.
		And the right position is we can't have all these illegal immigrants here.
		We can't have black super predators stabbing people to death.
		We can't have left-wing nut jobs burning vigils of Charlie Kirk and wanting to murder conservatives.
		And we can't have Israel running our country.
		And that's an agenda I think people can get behind if we can just put forward a candidate, a party, a movement that says all the above.
		And I'm willing to compromise on other things, but that needs to be the ticket.
		You want this country to be stable?
		We need borders.
		You want this country to be affordable and economical?
		We need fucking law enforcement.
		You want the country to stay together?
		We can't have political violence like this.
		We can't have radicals egging on and glorifying terrorism, obviously.
		And if we want to be a nation, if we want independence, we have to stand up to Israel and resist the division that they don't create, but which they exacerbate.
		And the only way to overcome that, I'll reiterate my call last week, we must be not just innocent, not just merciful, not just forgiving, benevolent, magnanimous, charitable.
		Not just those things, but we must be those things.
		We must also be wise, clever, cunning, smart.
		Do you understand?
unidentified		We must be both.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And you can be both.
		We can be humane.
		We can be loving.
		We must be those things.
		We can be charitable towards our enemies.
		We can let God's love shine through us.
		It doesn't mean we need to be suckers.
		We need to be cunning too, for our sake and for the sake of our families.
		We're in a multi-front war.
		We need to destroy the left, the radical left that seeks to murder us.
		We need to make our country safe.
		We need to keep the Israeli foreign influence out of our country.
		It's a multi-front war.
		And the consensus needs to be against them both.
		It needs to be against these sicko freak nihilists that are okay seeing the country get invaded and people get murdered for no reason and people get shot for their opinions and also against the people that are doing that same thing in Gaza.
		We need something like a Christian right wing and liberal fusion against the, you know, they want to rally conservatives against the woke left and the Muslims.
		I want to rally.
		I want to rally liberals and conservatives against the radical far left and against the Zionists that want to influence America.
		That's the ticket.
		And it's not going to be this cracker barrel, nicky knack, conservative culture war slop.
		And it's also not going to be this third worldism either.
		Anyway, so that's that.
		But I do want to move on.
		We're going to take a look at our super chats.
		We'll see what you guys have to say, but this is why I'm demanding accountability.
		This Trump government needs to give us the answers.
		Until then, we must be very vigilant.
		And, you know, Sam Hyde said this today, and he said this in his video.
		I think Sam Hyde's video was remarkable.
		His last thing I'll say.
		He said, we really must be cautious.
		And I'll reiterate that.
		We must be cautious and tread carefully lest we be used by the devil, by sophisticated adversaries that might be beyond our comprehension.
		Let us be prudent.
		Let us pray for prudence and temperance and caution and to guard our path, to guide our path, watch our step so that we, you know, forget about one thing or another.
		We do not want to be unwitting instruments of the people that seek to oppress us.
		I'm always more worried about that.
		Anyway, but that's that.
		We're going to move on.
		We'll take a look at our super chats tonight and we'll see what you have to say.
		It's been a minute since we did super chats, but hey, you know, the show must go on.
		All right, let's take a look at the super chats.
		We'll see what you have to say about all this.
unidentified		Let's take a look.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		This might be a long night.
		And I'm going to have to filter and read the big super chats because I'm getting a lot of them, okay?
		So I apologize in advance if I don't get to your super chat because we got a lot of them to go through.
		So I'm going to filter them down.
		I think I'll read the top 50 super chats.
		All right, let's take a look.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Dylan Sherlock said $100.
		Hey, Nick, I first heard of you back around 2018.
		Didn't really think much of it.
		Just heard Alex Jones or others mention you.
		I fully went to Groiber a few months ago and recently purchased a mug and had a few weeks back.
		I just want to say thanks for all you do.
		Thanks for standing for it with us all.
		We are with you.
		God bless you.
		God bless America.
		God bless us all.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, man.
		God bless you.
		I appreciate it.
		Thank you for the support.
		And thanks for the big super chat.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		And Agaris has sent $400.
		There's a documentary about how God told a group of strangers who the false prophet is from the book of Revelation.
		They discovered he has a global cult.
		He's putting marks on people's bodies as the Bible prophecies.
		And he has a webpage telling his cult that he is this figure from the Bible.
		Also, Michael prophesied in Daniel 12.1.
		He's here.
		The Catholic Church is taking us seriously and investigating.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you for the huge super chat.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I appreciate it.
unidentified		Well, I've never heard of that before.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But that's, listen, I tend not to put too much stock in these kinds of things.
		And where is that sourced from?
		God told the group of strangers, so there's a private revelation.
		I tend not to put too much stock in these private revelations because I feel like that's been going on since the beginning of time.
		Isn't that what Islam is?
		Isn't that what Mormonism is?
		Hey, guys, I got a private revelation from God.
		So God said I can have 100 wives and God said I'm the leader.
		So, I'm naturally suspicious of all that kind of stuff, but I appreciate the big super chat.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		$1750.
		Hi, Nick.
		I'm seeing such disgusting behavior on the left over this.
		I found out 30 minutes into my workday from a co-worker.
		And when another coworker of mine, some boomer lady, heard Charlie supported Trump.
		She said, Yes.
		Good job.
		With a big smile.
		Made me sick.
		RIP, Charlie, and God bless his family.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It is.
		And you know what?
		Pray for them.
		Their hearts are so darkened.
		I mean, it is dark.
		And they don't know what they're doing.
		You really need to pray for these people because they're sick.
		Now, with that being said, we need to defeat them.
		Feel no sympathy.
		Get them fired from their jobs.
		Get them ostracized in any way that you can.
		Do not hurt them.
		Do not act violently against them.
		Don't even curse them.
		But get the fuck away from them.
		Get away from these people that hate you and make sure they're not in a position of power to hurt you.
		And that means removing them from the workforce.
		They must be penalized for this.
		It just can't be tolerated.
		It's no different than imagine if after Dylan Roof shot up that church, a bunch of people said, oh, they were black?
		Awesome.
		And they were celebrating publicly.
		Would anybody tolerate that?
		Because consider, it's not like people are writing in their diary, I didn't really like Charlie Kirk.
		No, they're on TikTok laughing and grinning and gloating that an innocent man got shot in the face, got shot in the neck.
		And I'm not the first person to point this out.
		They think that's okay.
		They think that's, they're so brazen.
		They think that's okay to celebrate openly, publicly, without a second thought, without shame.
		Could you imagine if Dylan Roof shot up a black church and people were on TikTok saying, oh, black people got killed?
		Let's go.
		And they expected not to lose their jobs.
		How is this any different?
		And again, you know, we're not saying ban them for not liking Charlie Kirk.
		We're not saying ban them for disagreeing with Charlie Kirk.
		We're saying you are glorifying terrorism.
		An American political leader got shot for no reason, and you're celebrating that.
		Sorry, that's outside the bounds.
		That's against the rules.
		You know, the rules of a free society is we cannot have terrorism.
		How can you have a marketplace of ideas, a public square, if it's being shot up by maniacs?
		And do you know how you get more maniacs shooting up the public square?
		People egging them on, cheering it on, lauding, idolizing those people, mythologizing those people.
		You get more of it.
		So, no, sorry.
		People saying that's censorship.
		What about free speech?
		How do you expect to have free speech if half the country thinks it's okay to kill the other half of the country?
		The soft targets where they're debating the ideas.
		Pretty soon you don't have a marketplace.
		Pretty soon you have two fortresses.
		So if you want a marketplace, there's got to be some ground rules.
		And the first rule is you can't kill everybody.
		And what goes with that is you can't explicitly, overtly idolize the killer the day after.
		And look, you know, people are trying to point out double standards.
		Just don't even believe the gaslighting.
		We all know what's going on here.
		Just, you know, pick up the phone, dial the number.
		This person's got to be fired.
		This is fucked up.
		It's not acceptable.
		This is not controversial.
		Do not let them gaslight you.
		So, yeah, it's sickening and it's disgusting, but we live with these people.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		JFB sent $100.
		Protect Nick Flint at all costs.
		God, please watch over him wherever he walks, sleeps, protect his family and friends, and ensure them all a long, healthy life.
		Love you, brother.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you for the big super chat.
		I appreciate it.
		And I do appreciate your prayers.
		And listen, while you're at it, pray for all of these people.
		Pray for Matt Walsh.
		And I'm not just saying this because he said he defended me on his show.
		If Charlie Kirk was indeed killed by a tranny, Matt Walsh is public enemy, number one of the trannies, without a doubt.
		What is a woman painted a giant target on his back?
		Pray for everybody that's going to be targeted.
		Matt Walsh, Michael Knowles, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Dave Smith.
		I mean, do you name it?
unidentified		Alex Jones.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		All of these figures, you have to pray for them because none of us are safe.
		Everyone knows that.
		So I implore you to pray, not just for me.
		I'm trying to be safe and I keep my wits about me.
		But all these people that are leading the charge, Ben Shapiro for that matter, all of them, because you know how it is out there.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		$50,500.
		It's your time to leave the youthnik.
		May God bless you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, let's not even go there.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I mean, I think that's inappropriate.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Captain Nathan said $108.
		Stay safe.
		Good bless.
		Vatican City emoji, Latin cross emoji.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you for the big super chat.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I appreciate it.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Love, grow 10% $50.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Thoughts on the Oracle Corporation and the Jew who replaced Musk as the wealthiest man in the world?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Larry Ellison.
		Well, it's he's a pretty interesting guy.
		Doesn't really surprise me.
		Part of a larger trend of recapturing the hill, it seems.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Grow up before life said $100.
		Saw so many Muslims celebrating Charlie's death.
		Daniel Pikachu said we shouldn't pray for him because Charlie wasn't Muslim.
		Saw another Muslim say he deserves to be killed for attacking Islam.
		Can't even have one day of prayer for an American.
		Just sick God, we pray for Palestine every day and they can't even reciprocate to us.
		Yes, that's the difference between Christ and Islam.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It is.
		Simply said, it is the difference.
		Thank you for the big super chat.
		That is the difference.
		That is why I am a Christian.
		Because unlike Muslims, we believe that God is love.
		We equate God with love.
		Now, Muslims say, well, Allah is loving.
		It's one of his attributes.
		Allah is not love in the way that God, that Christ is love.
		And, you know, these Muslims, they don't even understand the Trinity.
		The Trinity is the essence of it all.
		If you meditate on the mystery of the Trinity in a deep way, you understand the Christian religion is beyond our comprehension.
		It is magnificent.
		It is remarkable.
		And it is what separates us from every other religion.
		It is God.
		God is love embodied in the Trinity.
		The self-giving love of Christ on the cross, the overflowing of sacrificial love, it pre-exists the birth of Jesus.
		It pre-exists creation.
		God pours his love out into the Son reciprocally through the Holy Spirit, eternally, prior to creation.
		And we are joined into the loving embrace.
		God is our Father.
		God is love.
		We're bound to one another and to God by this eternal love.
		That's the gospel says there's no greater love than to lay down your life for a friend.
		The gospel says, pray for them.
		They know not what they do.
		The gospel says today you will be in paradise.
		That's not in the Quran.
		That's not in that tribal desert post religion of conquest and the rest of it.
		It's an idolatry and paganism.
		It's not there.
		So, yes, that is what separates us.
		That is what makes us better.
		And we'll pray for them too.
		We'll pray for them still.
		We pray for Charlie Kirk.
		We pray for the people in Gaza.
		We don't stop praying for Charlie Kirk because he was wrong about something, because he did something wrong.
		We all do something wrong.
		We're all wrong about something.
		That's the essence of the Christian religion.
		That's what distinguishes it even from Judaism.
		Because Christ writes our sins in the dust and blows it away like they never existed.
		He washes them away.
		It does not have the haughtiness, the pride of the other religions.
		So that is what makes us different.
		And I was disappointed, but not surprised to see that.
		I saw a lot of Muslims say, oh, but Charlie Kirk supported the occupation.
		And you support terrorism, you know?
		I mean, and you support Hamas, which takes hostages, which takes innocent civilians captive.
		I mean, only the Christians can say.
		Only the Christians can say we are against the killing.
		We're against the suffering because we represent that sacrifice every Sunday at the Mass.
		We see the result of human iniquity every Sunday on the cross.
		That's the difference.
		Anyway, so thank you for the big super chat.
		Absolutely the case.
		And listen, if you don't get that, you need to understand.
		You need to understand and get to know Jesus Christ in an intimate way.
		Read the Gospels.
		Understand the Trinity.
		People ask, where do I start?
	I mean, talk to ChatGPT about it or something.
	Go to Catholic Answers.
	Read Chesterton.
	Read Lewis.
	Read Balthazar.
	Read these authors.
	Read if you're into the Gnostic stuff.
	Read Wolfgang Smith.
	But learn the truth.
	Anyway.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Fed Handeman said $100.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Amazing.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Plum Girl I present $100.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Goatie Mochi.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you for the.
		I'm only going to read the ones with like messages here.
		So if it just says, like, stay safe, God bless.
		I'm respectfully going to skip those.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Chicago Groy percent $200.
		When the newsbrook girl in my comparative politics class started jumping up and down and said she was going to celebrate with a glass of wine, everybody looked at her like, what the fuck is wrong with you?
		She had such a genuinely evil look on her face.
		That being said, it was heartwarming to see all the people on my college campus praying.
		It felt like what I imagined 9-11 felt like.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, and you know, this is something that we all feel it so innately and intrinsically.
		You can call it vibes.
		You can call it, you know, feelings or something.
		And some people mock this and say it's sentimentalism.
		But there's something to be said.
		What characterizes the opposition?
		They are insincere.
		They're insincere.
		They're ironic.
		They're cynical.
		They're mocking, always mocking, always mocking, always ridiculing, chortling, chuckling, smugly laughing, fake laughing, defining down, diminutive.
		It's when you see these leftist pieces of shit, when you see these people talk, it's always, well, some fucking guy did a fucking thing.
		Well, you know, fucking conservative was a shithead fucking piss back.
		You know, everything these leftist cocksuckers say, it's so flippant, so flippant, so insincere, so prideful, so mocking, haughty.
		And you just, you just know, you just know in your gut.
		You know in your heart of hearts that that is wrong.
		That that is wrong.
		And listen, we're all sarcastic and we all make jokes, but we all know how it feels.
		We all know it feels when something is well-intentioned and we make jokes and we can be sarcastic.
		We all know, though, that it is actually good to be earnest.
		It is good to be loving.
		It is good to be honest.
		It is good to be hopeful.
		It is good to believe in something.
unidentified		It is good to want to build.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And we all know it is bad to take the piss for no reason.
		To deride, to abuse.
		We all know it's wrong to be cruel.
		We all know it's wrong not just to kill people, but even think about killing people with our words.
		Even think about how we degrade people.
		Even think about how we attack people, how we mock people, how we try to make them small, how we try to destroy them.
		We all know that's wrong.
		And we all know, we can all have an intuitive sense when we deal with people what kind of person they are.
		Do they have heart?
		Do they have a good heart?
		Do they give you a good vibe?
unidentified		Are they warm?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Are they fair in their dealings?
		Are they honest?
		Are they earnest?
		Do they show compassion?
		Do they show mercy to the weak, to the vulnerable?
		And then you have other people that are petulant, small, petty, endlessly sarcastic, mocking, ridiculing.
		You know, we've all encountered it.
		We've all seen it.
		And, you know, it makes me angry when I see it.
		It makes me, it actually just makes me beside myself.
unidentified		And I see it a lot.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's not all, look, it's not all women, but I see it a lot.
		This is just one example.
		I see it in the micro expressions of women.
		All these put-on mannerisms and fake mannerisms.
		You see this all the time.
		They make these faces like, you see these, you know what I'm talking about?
		You see these women on TikTok, the boomers tap out.
		You see these like Generation Z women on TikTok.
		They all have like the same mannerism, same personality.
		It's not like an anti-woman screed.
		This is an example of what I'm talking about.
		They're not the only group.
		But they make, they make these like faces like mimes.
		They wear these faces.
		They wear this character.
		And this character is like this, this like smug, like cocky.
		And I feel like we see that ugly face all the time in a Don Lemon, in a Hassan Piker.
		We see this face all the time.
		You know, like if Hassan, like these guys like Hassan and Destiny, I don't get any good feeling from them.
		I don't get any warmth from them.
		I don't get any good vibe.
		I've never seen destiny have a sincere, earnest moment, expression of compassion for the vulnerable, magnanimity or benevolence for a foe.
		I've just never seen it.
		And that's what we're getting tired of from the left.
		It's like these people are just like not human.
		They don't act like human beings.
		There's no sense of camaraderie.
		There's no sense of setting aside these material things and competitions and games for the sake of a universal human experience.
		You know, on some level, not to sound like a hippie or whatever, but we are all in a world that we don't understand, living our lives for the first time on a journey that we're all learning about one day and one step at a time.
		And every now and again, in a moment of strife or crisis, or there's a moment of levity, you're reminded of some of these essential things that we all have in common, that we get afraid, that we get scared, that we're uncertain, that we're nervous.
		You know, we laugh at stupid things.
		And to the extent that you can connect with people on that level, I guess that's what warmth is.
		That's a true loving your neighbor.
		And the extent that you can't get that from these people, the more you become afraid of them and what they might be capable of.
		You know, this, this idea that they don't see you as human.
		They deny your humanity.
		Someone dies and they deface the memorial.
		Isn't that the first thing that human beings do?
		Is they bury their dead, they honor their dead, and you desecrate the grave.
		You know?
		So there's something deeper here.
		It's not about like politics.
		There's something spiritual there.
		Anyway, so I know what you're talking about, that face of these like these smug, glib leftists.
		And it's not that they are leftists.
		There are leftists that, you know, probably disagree with us, but that would help you in a crisis.
		And there are leftists that see you get shot in the face and their instinct is to throw their arms up in celebration.
		Those people are scum, the latter.
unidentified		So anyway.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Not my handle set $100.
		Thank you for keeping the gospel at the center of tonight's show.
		When King Saul died, David mourned him, foreshadowing Christ's love.
		I'm reminded of this today.
		If David, a deeply loved man, could love the man who tried to kill him, we can also love our enemies, as you have said.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's very true.
		Thank you for the big super chat.
		I appreciate it.
		That is the Christian position.
		It's a radical position.
		It is a radical, idealistic, we have to love everybody unconditionally.
		And that doesn't mean let them hurt you.
		It doesn't mean let them kill you.
		But it does mean there are things we can and cannot do.
		We cannot hate them.
		We cannot curse them.
		We cannot retaliate.
		We can see justice.
		We can defend ourselves.
		We can pursue change.
		We can, you know, do what we need to do here.
		But that is the radical message of Christ on the cross.
		Many people don't want to hear that.
		People, and it's becoming a problem.
		They talk about this like, you know, masculine Christianity where, you know, Jesus is in the gym and punching, you know, trannies at the pride parade.
		It's like, there's just one problem.
		That's, that's not the Christ of the Bible.
		That's, it's actually sort of the opposite.
		You know, there is like a section of right-wingers that want Christ to break the cross that he's on and defeat his enemies.
		That, like, that's, you missed the whole point.
		The whole point is that he obediently drank from the chalice.
		Even though he could have, he didn't overpower them.
		And the witness to his obedience and unconditional love, that was the power of it.
		That is what defeated the devil.
		And, you know, if you don't, if you're not willing to live like that, then you are not a Christian.
		You don't understand why Christ came.
		You don't understand the mission here.
		So, anyway, not to keep just going in and out on that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Every video I ever saw of Charlie, he was putting Christ first.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I didn't agree with everything he said, but he was our brother in Christ, and we'll see him again.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Like I said, he was wrong about some things, but I believe his faith was sincere.
		People, you know, and it's so sick.
		This is what I'm talking about.
		I said this on the show on Thursday, and I said Kirk was a sincere Christian.
		People pull a clip where I said, You can't call yourself a Christian if you support the genocide in Gaza.
		Seriously, I saw Hassan say, What could have possibly changed in a month to make Nick say this one day and this the next?
		How about the guy getting shot in the neck?
		Ostensibly because he didn't think trannies should injure themselves and children.
		How about that?
		Is that good enough for you?
		So much cynicism, so much, so much cynicism and pettiness.
		We have to believe in good, we have to believe in each other, in the goodness in each other.
		And it's amazing how after this shooting, it's it is such a battle.
		There are so many people that are doing that, and so many people that are trying to just throw wrenches in it, accuse, accuse, you know, always with the lack of charity, always impugning the motivations of cynicism.
		We have to stop, we have to get away from that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Sam Salty Spy sent $100.
		I don't want them censored online.
		I want the demons to expose themselves, kick screenshots, and make sure everyone knows how evil they are.
		This heinous act has galvanized me like I'm sure it has with others.
		Time to get straight days, grind, and strategize.
		Christ first, America first.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Totally.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you for the big super chat.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		So sent $100.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Memento Mori.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Every day.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Everybody percent $100.
		Our struggle for institutional power is imperative to secure a future for our people.
		Thank you, Nick, for giving us calculated direction in this time.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm glad to hear that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Watching people celebrate Charlie's death reminds me of a C.S. Lewis quote: I hope that when I die, all of hell rejoices that I'm out of the fight.
		We're watching in real-time hell rejoice that Charlie is out of the fight.
		God bless you, Nick.
		Very interesting here.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well said.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I love that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Agent Groiper sent $50.
		One, CPA, future registered representative here.
		I believe I might have the connection to your questioning a few weeks back regarding how the Jewish Federal Reserve affects us as the American society.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We're just not doing this tonight.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		First, guys, we sent $100.
		Solar panels need to be kept clean, repaired, and only last 25 years before needing to be replaced.
		I don't see us maintaining electricity 500 years from now.
		Maybe a few hundred more if nuclear makes advancements.
		But eventually, no matter what we do, I believe we'll be riding on Donkeys Cooking with Fire Again.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Interesting.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I was in Normie in 2020.
		Got false red pilled by Shapiro and Weinstein Rogan.
		Listen to Daily Wire and Dimcast until Yay dropped Cuck and I checked out your show and never went back.
		Haven't missed a show since.
		Went to Latin Mass yesterday for the first time.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's good.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, Nick.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I pray for you and your family.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Love to hear it, man.
		God bless you.
		Thank you for your prayers.
		And I'm glad to hear you got back in church.
		People say, what can I do?
		That's the first thing you can do.
		Look at me.
		I'm not a perfect person.
		Many would say I'm an odious person.
		Some days I would agree with that.
		Maybe many days I would agree with that.
		But if you center yourself on that, you can give people something that is so powerful.
		And that is true belief, true conviction, true hope.
		And it's real.
		It might be supernatural, but it's tangible and it's real.
		And if you let God shine through you, it is powerful and it will endear and draw people to you and it will bring them to the right side.
		It will bring all of us in alignment with God's plan.
		It's all God's plan, but it makes us agents of it.
		So, you know, some people say thoughts and prayers.
		Well, if you believe God is real, then that is real also.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Rhetorical Kangaroo sent $50.
		What are your thoughts on Governor Cox reading all the bullet casings?
		I feel like these people add further humiliation to their victims and want them to be read.
		It's like super chats for psychopaths.
		I'm sure Tyler got a kick out of a boomerang reading 2010 memes.
		It's evil and muddy the waters and gave the left a chance to create a fake narrative.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, he shouldn't have read it at the press conference.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I agree with that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Shouldn't have read it.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		$1,000 for Charlie for America first.
unidentified		Wow.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you for the huge super chat.
		I appreciate it.
		Thank you very much, man.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Rochazi sent $100.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		God bless you and your family.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, man.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Leonardo DiGraperio sent $100.
		Did you see DA Courtyard where Charlie got shot?
		Was I shaped like Menorah?
		That means Mosad did it.
		Hashtag deportus on Piker.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that was crazy.
		Symbolism.
		I mean, look, some of the conspiracy stuff is, I do just disregard outright.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Francesco sent $150 in the most recent national and international crises.
		America, your supporters, and importantly, your enemies have turned to you for leadership.
		That was a heavy responsibility, and it was perfect.
		And a grouper should be proud to be a grouper.
		God bless you.
		Stay safe.
		And God bless Charlie Kirk.
		Thank you, Nick.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you very much, man.
		I appreciate the super chat.
		Yeah.
		Well, I try not to take myself too seriously, but I do recognize I have some responsibility now that I have a larger platform.
		And the rules of the game are different.
		When you are a smaller personality, it's not to say you shouldn't watch what you say, but the more people you influence, the more potent the ripple effect is.
		So, but I do appreciate that.
		Thank you for the money.
		It's a valid question.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Good boy sent $100.
		I will continue to support your brother.
		I hope this helps towards your future security at events.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, man.
unidentified		It does.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Throw away $12321 set $100.
		False flag attack to push censorship bill or to take away our guns.
		Hollywood blood pack used.
		Explains bulging shirt.
		No exit wound.
		No blood.
unidentified		That's ridiculous.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Diamond 2 sent $50.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Have you considered writing a book about your struggles?
unidentified		I have.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Throwaway 12321 sent $100.
		CX user Genghis Con three part video series breaking down Charlie Kirk shitting and use a Hollywood blood pack.
		All other theories are nonsense slash disinformation slash distraction.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that's just retardation.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Auto traumatic sent $50.
		If anyone thinks that they will ever get a straight answer or significant evidence out of Discord, they would be sorely mistaken.
		It is well known in the software engineer space that Discord is ran by a bunch of training slash very dead.
unidentified		That's true.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		So rest in peace, Charlie Kirk.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		He was a Wagman responsible for making me more right in the very early 2010s.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But that's why it's up to the FBI to get in there now.
		That's why it's up to the FBI to put down subpoenas and go to the headquarters and take all the computers.
		Because you're absolutely right.
		Discord is run by radical left types.
		And so they will try to cover up their crimes, or at least you have to presume that they would if you're law enforcement.
		This is why we're just not getting what we need to see, man.
		Like, you're right.
		I agree with you.
		I don't think the administration even knows what they're up against.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Roy Plutt sent $60.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Maybe they did.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Not sure if I've listened back far enough.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Are you someone who picked the Kazarian Jews slash 13 bloodline family slash and banking mob that runs the world slash on everything slash massive mega core?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's totally ridiculous.
		There's no evidence of that.
		Facebook.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Chase Mayor sent $100.
		If you saw this bit on the day Charlie was killed, Rabbi Shmuley made a go fund for himself.
		He made a post saying Crow Israel voices are under attack and he is taking donations to fund his security message.
		There are no words.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		He's a clown.
		I don't know why people pay attention to him.
		He's just scum.
		That's one where I'll say, you know what?
		I recognize he's not representative of all Jews.
		He may, in a strict sense, like literally represent a caricature of what Jews do, but I know he's a clown.
		I know they themselves are embarrassed by him.
		He's cheap.
		He's low-hanging fruit.
		He's nothing.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Horseshoe theory optimists sent $100.
		I think there's a motive for a GOP slash tech right slash fans conspiracy to take out Kirk because they needed a martyr with how terrible they've been doing this year.
		Weird events like Tucker implied that I was scared of Israel on the show today.
		But of course, you can't separate the GOP from Israel.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's a backwards rationalization.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		There's no evidence or connection there.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		JC Denton sent $100.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		What should be done with Reddit?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't know what that means.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Christie Skin said $100.
		Hey, Nick, I love the last show.
		The message of overwhelming love of Jesus and what makes us different from them and what makes good what makes us on God's side was so powerful and exactly what I needed to hear in that moment.
		You embody the truth and love of Jesus Christ.
		And as much as I love your funny and bombastic takes, we need more of that love to save this country.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, man.
		Yeah, I mean, it's like a buffet.
		You need many different tastes.
		It's like a tasting menu.
		You got to be multi-dimensional.
		You have to have a little bit, like, like any man, like any human, you have to have to have all the different flavors.
		So it's true.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Christie Skin said $100.
		I hope you realize the whole country is watching you now.
		I hope you take that seriously.
		I hope you need you.
		To be better, to be more charitable, to be less mean-spirited, which you displayed perfectly in the last show.
		Don't be a pussy, but you should really consider a lot.
		Charlie's followers will be watching you now.
		God bless you, Nick.
		God's Peace.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, I don't even know if I could help myself being less mean, but I'll try to be less mean.
		I don't try to be mean.
		I just get so irritated sometimes.
		But I have to work on that.
		You guys, it's great.
unidentified		Content.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You love it.
		I mean, the clips speak for themselves, but you're right.
		I should probably be more magnanimous.
		It's just hard, though.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Horseshoe Theory Optimists sent $50, plus Cash Pentel firing the lead FBI special investigator two weeks before the murder of Kirk was weird too, to add on to the GOP conspiracy.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's true.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Horseshoe Theory Optimists sent $50.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		FBI lead special investigator for Utah specifically.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		$630.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Hey, Nick, what's your take on Mrs. Kirk's speech?
		Especially speaking on VPs and Jewish friendship?
		Good show.
		07.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't think there's any meaning contained in the speech.
		It seems like they're setting her up to take over Turning Point USA, which is interesting.
		I got to be honest.
		I didn't find the fundraising text messages.
		I didn't think that was appropriate.
		But I'm not in a position to judge.
		It's her husband.
		It's their organization.
		Maybe that's their tribute to him.
		That's his baby.
		That's his mission.
		And the mission needs money.
		So, but I don't know.
		I thought that might have been a little bit in poor taste, but I don't think there was anything contained in the speech that I really found all that significant.
		I mean, it's just heartbreaking.
		It's tragic.
		And, you know, I saw this video of Charlie with his daughter.
		And this one, this one actually made me a little emotional.
		I'm sure you've seen it by now.
		But he's holding his daughter's hand, and she's got it made.
		She's got her puffy jacket on, and they're going shopping, and she picks out a doll.
		He buys it for her.
		And I see this still from the video where they're standing on the street corner.
		And he's a big guy.
		He's like 6'5 or something.
		And she's this little, she's this adorable little thing.
		She's got her big jacket on.
		She's got her hair done up.
		She's got her doll.
		She's as happy as a clam.
		You know, she's really made out like a bandit.
		And she's holding his hand.
		He's got his, he's bending down to hold her hand on the street corner.
		And it's like, you know, we're all going to move on from this in one way or another.
		We all move on with our lives.
		We get back into the scrum of our daily drama, our relationships and professions.
		That little girl is never going to have her father ever again.
		And everyone thinks it's political, but for her, it's her father.
		There are two fatherless children in the world after that.
		And, you know, think about your parents.
		Think about your father.
		Think about what she was deprived of.
		You know, to her, he was half of her whole world.
		And he was taken from her violently by some dirtbag.
		That's what really got to me.
		You know, say what you want about Charlie Kirk.
		I mean, whether you agree with or disagree.
		I mean, obviously, and he didn't deserve to die anyway.
		But on some level, you might say, and I'm in no way rationalizing or justifying it, but on some level, you understand as a man, you go into the world and there's danger in the world.
		You know that Charlie Kirk understood the risks.
		And I'm sure that he would still go out there and do it again, knowing that he would meet his end.
		Because I believe he was a courageous guy.
		But she had nothing to do with any of it.
		She's not political.
		She's a kid.
		That's the part that's devastating.
		And that will ripple through her real life.
		For all of us, we're like, oh, that's Charlie Kirk's daughter.
		Well, she's her.
		For all of us, that's Charlie Kirk, the live streamer's daughter, someone by relation to our favorite E-celebrity.
		That's her life.
		That's her dad.
		That's her whole life now.
		Her whole life is colored by this tragedy in an instant.
	She doesn't understand, but she will.
	That's when you have to take a step back and realize like anyone that would cheer for that is a fucking sick person and they just have to be ostracized for that little girl, if for no other reason, for that little girl that is standing there on the street corner holding her dad's hand with her with her big coat, her doll.
	She will never see him again.
	She will grow up without him.
	Think about the whole life that they had ahead together.
	Her first day of school, her prom, her going away to college, her having a family of her own.
	It's all foreclosed because of some asshole.
	You got to think about that when you think about these people losing their jobs.
	They have to pay.
	And I don't think violently, but there must be a penalty for this.
	Not political violence.
	I don't think we should kill them.
	But there must be some deterrent.
	Like you just can't feel comfortable celebrating such a horrific thing.
	You just can't.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Happy Dolphin sent $75.
		Hey, I was in line to ask Charlie about Qatar on Wednesday.
		Met a couple other grow happers in line and expected a fun time.
		Your stream last Thursday really helped me find some comfort after the event.
		Wanted to say thanks for that and for putting to bed all the Israel conspiracies tonight.
		They've not shown enough evidence yet to be saying all this.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, and I'm not putting it to bed.
		It's just giving some additional perspective on it.
		But thank you, man.
		I'm glad to hear it's a comfort, if nothing else, because these are really hard times.
		They really are.
		And what we see is challenging to us.
		And this is a time of disorientation and confusion.
		People just have no foundation.
		And, you know, to the extent that people are rooted in my show or looking to me for guidance, I'm happy that I'm rooted in God and kind of by the transit of property, maybe giving you some comfort in that.
		So I'm glad to hear it.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Sneeko the Sneaka Zero Sniko sent $50.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Nice show 07.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thanks.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Is that the real Sneeko?
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		So I had to show it.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		God bless Charlie Kirk.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, God bless him.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Thank you for the big super.
		The American people are with you, Nick.
		You are incredibly brave.
		God bless you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you very much.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Look single sent $50.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Blink if Mosai is holding you hostage.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I love that, by the way.
		I love when I don't immediately come out and blame Israel and people's first thing is like, first of all, I know it's real, but I'm not saying it.
		Right?
		Like, if I don't come out the day of and say Israel did it with no evidence, it's not that I it's not that I don't believe that, it's not that that's not happening, it's that no, I'm definitely know it, but I'm just withholding it for some reason.
		People say, no, Nick knows, but he just can't say it because he's afraid he got the call, he's avoiding it.
		Oh, I'm disappointed.
		It's like, miss me with all that.
		If that's you, just get away from me.
		I've had it with the low IQ conspiracy stuff.
		I put 90% of you on to the conspiracies, I put you on.
		And now, you know, people with their heuristic thinking, conspiracy, like high-level political crisis, Israel at fault.
		Like that's their thinking.
		Rather than a mental model where you say Israel influences our society, there are billionaires.
		They have this intelligence operation.
		They will capitalize or generate events for discrete interests.
		Rather than like that being the mental model, your mental model is something bad happened.
		It was Israel.
		That's the syllogism.
		9-11 was bad and Israel was behind it.
		Therefore, all bad things that happened, Israel are behind them or are presumed to be behind them.
		And I used to think that was just like a straw man that Jews made, but clearly that's how a lot of people think.
		They can't handle it.
		Now, everything that happens is a Palantir, MKUltra, limited hangout by Mossad.
		Half of you didn't even know about any of that until three days ago.
		And now it's like, oh, Trump is going to war of Venezuela.
		Is this about MKUltra and Palantir?
		And it's a limited hangout.
		It's like, no, not everything is that.
		But that's because probably 70% of the population is not even capable of critical thinking.
		So it's sort of like, do you ever see that movie Silence with Liam Neeson?
		It's a Martin Scorsese movement and a movie.
		And it's about Catholic missionaries bringing Christianity to Japan.
		And there's this young Christian priest and he thinks that he's bringing the Japanese to Christ, but the Japanese government's punishing him and making and killing him or his followers.
		And in the end, he meets up with Liam Neeson, who surrendered to the government a long time ago.
		And he says, these people don't even understand.
		When you're talking to them about the Son of God, they think you're talking about the literal son, like you're not breaking through to them.
		And it's like, that's how I feel.
		It's like, I think I have adherents and acolytes.
		They get it.
		They understand.
		And then something like this happens and they're like, Israel did it, obviously.
		And if you disagree, you got the call.
		It's like, okay, or why would they kill their top guy?
		Like, did anyone stop and think that Charlie Kirk was arguably up until a few months ago their top guy?
		Is there even room for skepticism that they would kill someone that was so steadfastly supporting them?
		In other words, if you don't automatically assume that they killed him, even though it's sort of far-fetched on its face, oh, well, that's because you're like a bad faith actor.
		Like, that's the part that I really hate.
		And I saw a lot of that.
		I saw people saying I was avoiding the topic.
		I'm not mentioning it because I'm afraid to.
		I believe it's true, but I'm being strategic about it.
		And to tell you the truth, we didn't have any information until a few days ago.
		The guy turned himself in on Thursday.
		We had some oblique insinuations that Israel and Charlie Kirk had some tension.
		There were rumors.
		There's this peace in the gray zone with anonymous sources.
		And so I kind of put the pieces together over the weekend.
		And I put together a picture for you that is really circumstantial.
		There's not really a concrete connection.
		There is no real link there.
		There's just some circumstantial evidence of things that coincided with this.
		And yeah, you can create a motive if you're committed to it, but it's by no means cut and dry or unambiguous.
		I don't really see a smoking gun here.
		There's some things that are conspicuous.
	Certainly you could see where, you know, they were upset with Charlie, but, you know, people jumping to conclusions, oh, it's them.
	And anyone that doesn't say it's them, they're lying.
	Like, okay, you didn't know what Palantir was three months ago, but now you're the expert.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And you're the expert because you just assume everything's Israel and I don't.
unidentified		Okay.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Jerman Jerse sent $55 in Thailand currently.
		Cried for two strangers, the Iran Kirk.
		Something changed, and I'm not really hiding what I think anymore.
		Last night I had an S Pulse tattoo on my wrist.
		Too much or not enough?
		I don't care.
		Lost half my friends after I defended Kirk.
		Stay safe.
		I don't want to hear about you on the news next brother.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's just retarded, man.
		That's just retarded stuff that normies do.
		What do you think getting a tattoo does to anything or anyone?
		That's like you might as well put a sticker on your laptop.
		What did you do next?
		Did you put a sticker on your laptop to signal group identity?
		I was really messed up about those two murders.
		So I drew on myself.
		So I put a sticker on my laptop that said, enjoy capitalism and solidarity.
		So I like, come on, man.
		This is the problem.
		Like, you know, if you wanted to do something, the thing to do would be to call an employer of some left-winger.
		The thing to do would be to go to church.
		The thing to do would be to say a prayer.
		I drew on my wrist.
unidentified		That shows I mean business here.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I cried and then I drew on myself.
		Was that too much?
		Whoa, dude.
		Hey, relax over there.
unidentified		Whoa, whoa, whoa.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Pump the brakes.
		Let's not get crazy.
		Wait, you drew on yourself?
		Well, you didn't say it was that serious.
		I mean, what's next?
		What's next?
		Are you going to wear a political t-shirt?
		Let's just not get carried away.
		I mean, come on, man.
		Like, let's come to reality, please.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Cally Groy percent $100.
		We will die for you.
		Christ is king.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, man.
		Hopefully, not the time yet, right?
		Hopefully, we don't have to go that way.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Base retard sent $50.
		Thank you for being a motivation, Nick.
		We are the same agent.
		I always find myself looking up to you, praying for your daily brother.
		Wang.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, man.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I appreciate it.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Sanderbrain sent $50.
		It takes a very principled and courageous and honest man to turn down $150 million.
		I don't think there are many people in the world that would do that.
		God bless his soul.
		Maybe it's good to say right now, but along with everything else I'm said, we'll never get to see you and Charlie debate.
		Thanks for what you do, Nick.
		Be safe out there.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, man.
		It really does.
		And if that's true, I want to see some documentation, but I've heard that's true.
		And if that's true, then he does deserve our respect, our immense and deep and eternal respect.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Women for Nick Jay Flint has sent $74.
		It's my first time tuning in.
		I have been in a really ignorance.
		His bliss mentality, and I want to get more into politics again.
		Any advice?
		Was on the left a few years ago, then the right.
		Now, I guess I'm just America first.
		My boyfriend, who is also named Nick Lowell, showed me your content, and we love you.
		Stay safe out here.
		Hashtag women4nick.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		All right.
		Hey, a woman fan.
		Welcome.
		We've never gotten one before.
		Hi.
		A female fan.
		Well, don't think there's a protocol for this.
		It's been so long.
		No, I appreciate it.
unidentified		Yes.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, I'm glad to hear that.
		Look, it's hard to identify.
		I mean, I would just say I'm a nationalist.
		I'm an American.
		I am an American.
		I am right-wing.
		I am a Christian, but I'm an American first.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I sent $90, Nick.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I mean, I'm Christian first, but I politically identify as American.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I sent $90, Nick.
		With your influences and religious wisdom, I have turned to God.
		Your responsibility falls on your followers.
		I have loved your content for years, but I will always support you.
		It'd take a bullet for you, my brother.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, man.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Love to hear it.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Callie Groy percent $100.
		You and Charlie were the greatest rivalry that never happened.
		Goku and Vegeta.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That is so real, though.
		I really, I really did.
		I mean, and for all those people, we'll touch on it tomorrow, but they said, oh, the Groipers killed Charlie.
		We wanted me to debate him.
		That is what the Groipers always wanted was a debate was to be let in the club.
		And it really does feel like Joker without his Batman, not to be, what would be the word, not to be insensitive or something, but he was my rival.
		He was my opponent.
		It's not right.
		I mean, I wanted to face him in competition, not like this.
		So there is something sad about that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Tyler 18 sent $50.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		How can I help push the AF movement as a 25-year-old due to his no clue where to start?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, you can't be super helpful with a question like that.
		I'm going to be honest.
		You got to figure out a way that you can contribute.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Diego the man sent $75.
		A veteran is calling for the grape of Charlie's two daughters.
		A supporter of ours sent us messages from him.
		He claims to be training to shoot at 400 yards for the next conservative.
		We are posting his info now on Brene 9th Demonic.
		We don't have the influence to get this out there.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's interesting.
		Well, you got to turn that over to law enforcement.
		I appreciate you bringing that to my attention, but tell that to law enforcement.
		I can't do anything with that information, but I don't know.
		Maybe send it to me.
		I'll take a look at it.
		I have not heard of this.
		Terrible.
		There's a lot of crazy people out there.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		All right.
		That's our last super chat.
		That's going to do it for me tonight.
		Appreciate everybody tuning in to the show.
		Remember to smash the follow button, smash the like button, leave a comment.
		I'm on the air Monday through Friday, usually around nine o'clock.
		As always, thank you to our top super chatters.
		Big special thank you to City Boy Farmer and Neurisis, Callie Groiper, Plum Groiper, Chicago Groiper, throwaway, Horseshoe Theory, Optimus, Christ is King, seeing the light, Jay Lindley, Francesco, Brandon Bailey, Captain Nathan,
		Dylan Sherlock, JAF Bay, Groiper for Life, Stat Handyman, DVZG, 2K Boot, Not Pigeons, Hernanius, Not My Handle, Sam Salty, Robert, Orange County Grouper, Asian Groiper, Purse Eyes, Bro, Shana See, Leonardo de Groypio, Something Year Old, Good Goy, Chase Minter, JC Denton, and Dirty Groiper.
		Special thanks to all of them.
		Thanks to all our super chatters, everybody that watches the show.
		We love you.
		I'll see you tomorrow.
		Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our Twitter.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		It's going to be only America first.
unidentified		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.

▲