All Episodes
Jan. 23, 2025 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
02:26:24
DEI IS DEAD??? Trump FIRES Every Diversity Hire, Ends Affirmative Action | America First Ep. 1442
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:45:24
s
streamlabs matthew tts
08:30
Appearances
d
donald j trump
04:12
Clips
m
michelle malkin
00:23
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
But as soon as people start playing games, I stop.
I stop playing games.
And at any moment, I can click that yay button.
I stop playing games.
I'm going to go first.
Catch.
See, Ricky said, I'm going to let the bottle.
I'm going to blow you.
But they want to blow you in a world.
Okay.
Rock it.
Who takes a damn set?
You take me to my first show.
I go, they only drop jewels way before they drop shadow.
Oh, God.
American first, bitch.
And people don't realize what they have.
Thank you.
And then nowadays, I am so upset that the things we did and the things we fought for and the boys that died for it, it's all gone down the drain.
Our country's gone to hell in a handbasket.
We haven't got the country we had when I was raised.
Not at all.
Nobody will have the fun I have.
Nobody will have the opportunity I have.
It's just not the same.
Jesus is the way and the life and the King of Israel.
We just leave with love.
nick fuentes
We're really at a crossroads here.
Look around here.
It's drag queens in schools.
It's 18-year-olds joining OnlyFans.
It's the filth on TikTok.
It's this country not having a border.
It's the idea that our kids and we, this generation, are never going to own anything.
Think about it.
Never making an income to support a family.
Never being able to have a family.
People being corrupted before they're even a teenager by things on their phone.
Sick addiction to technology.
The future is so bleak.
unidentified
But...
nick fuentes
That has changed the calculation.
unidentified
God is using me.
He's breaking me down.
Removing all of the, you know, richest person, all of this, so I can serve him.
I think they've been extremely unfair to you.
Who is they, though?
We can't tell you they is.
nick fuentes
There is no future if we do nothing now.
There is nothing to lose.
People that are scrambling, trying to protect their ever-shrinking share of what they have are foolish.
It's all going.
It's all going away.
This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
We're being slowly poisoned and, in some cases, quickly murdered and assassinated.
And we're killing ourselves every day, inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
People have got to start to get courageous.
And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God and to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
And the alternative is that there will be no country.
Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
michelle malkin
My own narrative is not one of some sudden looming bolt of lightning out of the blue.
It was a slow and steady, unrelenting stream of blips and blinks, glimmers and glares, low beams and high beams of light, some of which I did not want to see.
And then finally, a point of no return reckoning.
unidentified
Why are you called Mommy Malcolm?
michelle malkin
I think it was because I fiercely came out during the Griper Wars of 2019 when so many of these brave young men were on college campuses challenging the likes of Zio Schill, Dan Crenshaw, questioning him about his undying loyalty and, of course, defending Nick Fuentes and so many of the stars of the burgeoning America First movement who...
unidentified
through an increasing amount of activism, America is a nation of believers, dreamers, and strivers that is being led by a group of censors, critics, and cynics.
donald j trump
These interests have rigged our political and economic system for their exclusive benefit.
unidentified
My message is that things have to change and they have to change right now.
My soul and exclusive mission is to go to work for you.
It's time to deliver a victory for the American people.
We don't win anymore, but we are going to start winning again.
So to every parent who dreams for their child, and every child who dreams for their future, I say these words to you tonight.
donald j trump
I am with you, I will fight for you, and I will win for you.
unidentified
Saying to me is like, this is probably pretty cool for you.
nick fuentes
I'm like, yeah, it is.
unidentified
I will do it.
I will fight for you with every breath in my body, and I will never, ever let you down.
A new droiper war.
We ride to certain death!
We trust our successors to do the sting for us!
Because my soldiers do not buckle or yield when faced with the cruelty of this world!
My soldiers push forward!
My soldiers scream out!
My soldiers RAISE! We're never going
back.
It's done.
nick fuentes
It's gone.
unidentified
All of that is gone.
nick fuentes
But I would call myself something like a Christian futurist instead.
Because Jesus Christ was our past before any of us were born or conceived.
Jesus Christ is our present now.
And Jesus Christ is our future after we die.
on earth.
unidentified
We want this century to be the most Christian century in the history of planet earth. - Come on.
We love everybody.
And we want people that can burn really more than anybody.
But this country can no longer be held hostage by a small minority that doesn't believe in the real world.
The mission of our movement is to make this country a Christian country.
The mission is to create a Christian future in our time.
The only way we're gonna do it is not by infiltrating, not by subverting, not by lying, which is what a lot of people do.
The only way that we're gonna make this happen is with the boldness of a real Christian.
It's the only way.
We have got to be willing to die for Jesus Christ.
We have to want it more than they do.
Because if there are thousands and millions and tens of millions and hundreds of millions of Christians ready to meet their final destiny, then nothing can stop us and nothing will.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
nick fuentes
by, and more importantly, hire Americans.
But in June of 2024, during the All In podcast hosted by his donor, David Sachs, he committed that he would not only expand work visas, but he would staple green cards to them.
I cannot support this.
And I will not encourage my followers to turn out in November to vote for this or campaign for this.
It is not an unreasonable demand to say that we will not vote for a candidate that promises to import more legal immigrants.
And it is not unreasonable because for the first time in 20 years, it is the majority opinion that there are too many legal immigrants coming into the country.
Ask yourself this.
If not Donald Trump, if not now, then when?
So they may say mass deportations.
They may say illegal immigration.
It's not enough.
It's not enough.
And Americans need to get used to saying that.
Native Americans never get what they ask for because they're always telling themselves and negotiating with themselves.
We need to hear the words, immigration moratorium.
No more immigrants.
unidentified
No more.
nick fuentes
Not since he announced his re-election campaign in November 2022 have I told anybody to vote for Trump.
When pushed for details on the policy, clearly they're...
Repeating the same script as every other Republican, and they show that they're really not serious about mass deportations.
For that reason, I actually don't believe that illegal immigration will fall to historic lows.
And this is your America First policy.
We need the people.
We need limitless green cards.
And by the way, once they come in, you can't deport them.
So people, when confronted with this reality, first they said it was a throwaway remark.
They said he didn't really mean it.
Well, he's doubled down on it many times.
He doubled down on it in June, August, last week.
Now they say, well, so what?
Even if he means it, he said it last time.
No, he didn't.
Last time he was against H-1B visas.
Like, you thought you were going to tap the screen?
unidentified
To pressure Trump, except one problem.
Elon owns the platform.
nick fuentes
But now the check marks are being removed, which means people are being de-amplified.
And it's being manipulated.
unidentified
They're manipulating the conversation.
nick fuentes
And Elon retweeted today, or reposted, Trump saying in June, staple the green cards to the diplomas.
unidentified
And that's a reminder, hey, this is what we got.
nick fuentes
This is the deal.
I put in 277. I bought the platform for you.
I made Trump win, and now Trump's gonna deliver.
And if you're against it, well, there goes your checkmark.
If you voted for him, you are a sucker.
I expect apologies.
I want apology forms.
I want you to—I'm sorry, Mr. Quentus.
unidentified
I should have supported Groyper War II. Years
donald j trump
from now, some of them may look back and ask themselves whether they've made the right choice, whether they've made the most of the opportunities they've been given.
Together, we have the same mission.
Over the course of your life, you will find that things are not always fair.
You will find that things happen to you that you do not deserve and that are not always warranted.
But you have to put your head down and fight, fight, fight.
Never, ever, ever give up.
Don't give in.
Don't back down.
And never stop doing what you know is right.
Nothing worth doing ever, ever, ever came easy.
And the more righteous you fight, the more opposition that you will face.
In your hearts.
Are inscribed the values of service, sacrifice, and devotion.
Now you must go forth into the world and turn your hopes and dreams into action.
America has always been the land of dreams because America is a nation of true believers.
When the pilgrims landed at Plymouth, they prayed.
When the founders wrote the Declaration of Independence, they invoked Our Creator four times.
Because in America, we don't worship government.
We worship God.
It is why our currency proudly declares, in God we trust.
And it's why we proudly proclaim that we are one nation under God.
The story of America is the story of an adventure that began with deep faith, big dreams, and humble Beginnings.
The next generation of American leaders.
Never, ever give up.
There'll be times in your life you'll want to quit.
Never quit.
Never stop fighting for what you believe in and for the people who care about you.
Carry yourself with dignity and pride.
Demand the best from yourself.
The more people tell you it's not possible, that it can't be done, the more you should be absolutely determined to prove them wrong.
Treat the word impossible as nothing more than motivation.
Relish the opportunity to be an outsider the more that a broken system tells you that you're wrong.
The more certain you should be that you must keep pushing ahead.
unidentified
You must keep pushing forward.
donald j trump
And always have the courage to be yourself.
America is better when people put their faith into action.
Pray to God and follow his teachings.
Today, each of you begins a new chapter as well.
When your story goes from here, it will be defined by your vision, your perseverance, and your grit.
You will build a future where we have the courage to chase our dreams no matter what the cynics and the doubters have to say.
You will have the confidence to speak the hopes in your hearts.
And to express the love that stirs your souls.
As long as you have pride in your beliefs, courage in your convictions, and faith in God, then you will not fail.
As long as America remains true to its values.
unidentified
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!
America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
With respect, the respect that we deserve.
From this day forward, it's going to be only America First.
America First. America First. America First. America First. America First. America First.
Thank you.
America First.
nick fuentes
You are watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Wednesday.
We have a lot to talk about, lots to get into.
It's going to be a big show.
Our featured story tonight, we're talking all about the new executive orders on DEI and affirmative action, which came down yesterday and today.
It's actually pretty good stuff.
Yesterday, Trump ordered that all DEI programs are going to start to close in the government.
And he said that all DEI employees are, as of today, put on indefinite paid leave.
So they're all going to get fired.
Everybody that was hired as a diversity hire to meet a diversity quota in the whole federal government.
Apparently, we'll be let go by the end of this month, by January 31st, which is great.
And then today, he repealed an executive order which was passed by Lyndon Johnson in 1964, which mandates that all federal contractors implement affirmative action.
And we'll get into the specifics of the executive order which he repealed, but this is one of the big first steps.
That can be taken to begin disassembling affirmative action nationwide.
It's a huge deal.
It's not all the way.
There are some things he can still do.
We're going to need a repeal of the Civil Rights Act or roll back certain parts of the Civil Rights Act to really finish the job on dismantling affirmative action, but this is a big step in the right direction.
We'll talk about these executive actions.
I have to say, on DEI, on affirmative action, this is one of the unambiguous bright spots so far of the Trump administration, but also just of the past couple of years.
It seems that the trend has been against DEI really since about 2021. And we could get into that a little bit tonight.
But this is one of those things it seems like it was almost a product more than anything of Trump losing in 2020. Or maybe the natural progression even after his victory in 2016. And all I mean by that is that many of these emergent trends which we're seeing now.
We're already in motion before Trump won the election, and things that come to mind are, for example, affirmative action being won.
The big pushback against critical race theory really started in the spring of 2021 after Biden won the election.
And that culminated in the decision in the Supreme Court that declared Harvard's diversity quotas, their race-based...
Qualifications for admissions were unconstitutional.
That happened last year.
Another thing that comes to mind is free speech.
The acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk in 2022. The rollout of platforms like Rumble and Kick, which are a bit more liberal with their terms of service.
That happened years before Trump won the election.
So it seems that the culture at large is liberalizing.
It is becoming more free, more libertarian, and I think you have to give Trump a lot of credit for that.
I think you have to give movement conservatism some credit for that as well, but they are welcome developments.
So we'll talk about that tonight.
On a bit of a lighter note, I know it's been very negative the past couple of days, but this is a bright spot, so we'll talk about that.
We're also going to talk tonight about the bishop.
A bishop that went off to Trump's face in church yesterday.
Did you see this?
Donald Trump and J.D. Vance attended a, I think it was an Episcopalian service in Washington, D.C., and some female bishop goes off on Trump about gay and trans people and illegal immigrants and all the usual stuff.
And I honestly thought we were past that.
When I hear things like that, it gives me flashbacks to 2016. I'm like, is this still going on?
I see these SJWs and radical feminists that are still around.
And it reminds me of that Japanese soldier.
That was stranded in the jungle and didn't know World War II had ended.
They found him like 20 years later and he didn't know the war was over.
That's what it feels like when you see, like I saw Bo Diddle, a conservative influencer, he interviewed some SJW screaming about white privilege saying, this is our white privilege.
And I said, when is this from?
Did I? Never see this?
Is this from 2017?
Is this from 2018?
You see these, like, radical feminists, SJWs?
The guy looked like AIDS Skrillex.
Remember AIDS Skrillex?
Trigglypuff?
I'm like, man, they didn't get the message.
The war is over.
You lost.
Okay?
The war is over.
In case you missed it, Trump won in a landslide.
Elon bought Twitter.
Some of the Groypers are back.
Many of them remain banned.
But it's over for you guys.
So I saw that and I'm just like, what the F? Why is this happening?
Honest to God, I would feel better if a person like that were just straight up arrested.
You should not be able to humiliate and embarrass the president like that.
That is unacceptable.
I know we live in a free country.
I know we have liberty and free speech.
But that would never fly in China.
Could you imagine?
Could you imagine if in China Xi Jinping were subjected by some spiritual leader to an admonition like that in public?
It would never be tolerated.
It would never happen.
Just out of plain fear of the repercussions.
But in this country, nobody fears the president.
Nobody fears the rightful leader.
So I think she should have been dragged out of there and arrested.
And, you know, maybe she gets a little bit of jail time or a fine or I don't know.
But it's totally unacceptable.
So we'll talk about that, too.
Should be a pretty good show.
Seems like things are kind of slowing down.
What happened to day one dictator?
I'm over here and look, I was very negative during the campaign.
I'm still very negative.
But I'm still even a little disappointed.
What happened to the day one dictator?
We didn't even get one day of dictatorship.
That was far too little.
I wanted like...
A lifetime, Trump's lifetime of dictatorship, like Emperor for Life.
And instead, we got promised day one.
We didn't even get one day of dictatorship.
All these executive orders are being challenged in the courts.
It's day three.
Nothing's even happening.
Where's the mass arrests?
We got a report today.
They said, actually, there were ICE raids yesterday.
They arrested 300 people.
And maybe that sounds like a lot, but if ICE arrested 300 people every day for the next four years, we would wind up with fewer than 500,000 deportations, which is nothing.
So it seems like we're slowing down a little bit, but hey, it's only day three, so I'm sure it'll get better, but it's Wednesday.
Third day in the Trump presidency.
And I feel like there's not even too much going on.
But that's all right.
We're going to get into the news.
Before we do, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble.
Smash the like button.
Leave a comment down below.
A couple of other things I wanted to get to.
First, maybe this is the only thing.
I did want to cover this tweet by Vivek Ramaswamy.
And it's a little bit funny what happened to him.
After Trump won the election, many people thought that Vivek would get offered a cabinet position.
That didn't happen.
Instead, Trump appointed him to co-chair DOGE, which is the Department of Government Efficiency, which is really a joke, a laughingstock.
And it's not even a real department.
It's not even a real committee.
It's sort of like an unofficial advisory board.
It doesn't even – it's not even part of the government.
So Vivek was appointed to co-chair a fake committee that is supposed to audit the federal government.
But it seemed that he fell out of favor after he weighed in to the H-1B debate at the end of 2024. And he wrote a long screed on X. About how Americans are falling behind in their competition against foreign workers because they are lazy.
Americans are lazy and they have too much free time, too much recreation.
American children are having sleepovers and having too much fun when, like the Indians and Chinese, they should be studying and extracurriculars.
Studying for standardized testing instead and basically said Americans don't deserve to prosper because we don't work hard enough.
Keep in mind Vivek is a foreigner.
His parents are foreigners.
He's a foreigner.
And he is arguing in defense of a program that imports foreigners to work here for lower wages.
And he's saying that that is their right.
He is saying it is the right of foreign nationals, people from foreign countries, to take opportunities and jobs from us, our wages, jobs at our firms that were built by our country, our capital markets, our rule of law, infrastructure, ancestors.
They're entitled to all of that because we are lazy and they work harder.
And if Americans want to prosper, well, we're going to have to put our nose to the grindstone and outcompete a billion Indians and Chinese people like it's the Industrial Revolution.
So he fell out of favor for those remarks and allegedly because he wasn't getting along with people.
But now he's back.
He hadn't really said anything for a few weeks since that all went down about a month ago.
And today, he tweeted something very interesting, or posted something very interesting on X. And he used a very particular phrase.
You may remember this.
He said, quote, Now that we've finally reached the promised land, it will be interesting to watch where the next wave of opposition comes from.
And there's a couple things to unpack here.
First, I'd like to point out that I was one of the first people to say that colorblind meritocracy is something that they would be pushing very strongly.
If you go through my Telegram, if you go through my Twitter, I have been warning you, if you watch the show, I have been railing against colorblind meritocracy for a very long time.
And when they use these phrases, this is not arbitrary.
He didn't pull this out of a grab bag.
This is a deliberate influence campaign.
When they choose words, phrases like this, colorblind meritocracy, that was written by a consultant.
Or a think tank.
And it is part of a deliberate campaign.
It comes out of a handbook.
It comes out of guidance that has been issued by a think tank, by a non-profit, a group.
When these politicians say these words, like for example, when we talk about foreign wars, you'll hear the phrase, boots on the ground.
Do you think people are just randomly saying that?
That is a concoction.
It is created by a class of people whose job it is to write things like that, and then it is put as guidance in a handbook, in a memo, and that becomes part of the lexicon.
And every one of those phrases is crafted in such a way to be deceptive.
It's crafted in such a way to contain a conceit.
So, for example, when they talk about boots on the ground, many times it's a misnomer.
We'll be heavily involved in a military intervention.
Often, we will literally have mercenaries who are not technically part of the military, but effectively are.
Officers, logistics, they'll all be there.
But when they say boots on the ground, they mean like a very specific like deployment of troops in a combat role.
And that's an example of a sort of euphemism.
It's a concoction.
And the words are carefully selected to contain in them a conceit.
And the language is chosen to be persuasive.
It has certain connotations.
And it's basically meant to get past the goalie.
It's meant to bypass a certain psychological block.
So, for example, if you were to say, you know, well, we're going to bomb Syria.
We're going to do this or that.
I don't know.
Maybe it wouldn't have the same effect.
Similarly.
They have been saying colorblind meritocracy for a very long time, and by they, I mean Tucker Carlson.
If you go back on Tucker Carlson's show, you will find many examples of him using the phrase colorblind meritocracy in contradistinction to DEI, affirmative action, and anti-white discrimination.
Now think about this.
We have a system that is explicitly set against white people.
That's what it is.
When these provisions were passed into law in the 1960s, the United States was 90% white and 10% black.
The demographics are very different now.
But when these provisions first came out in the first Civil Rights Act and as the amendments were added, this is a country that was black and white and it was far more white than it was black.
And they were passed to benefit blacks at the expense of whites.
And given that whites have been historically by far and away the big majority and the dominant race in the country, the effect of affirmative action for the most part.
Although it may incidentally affect Chinese people, although it may incidentally affect foreign students from Asia, primarily it is affecting the majority, the white people, the people that used to have those positions that are now going to black people in the context of the civil rights movement.
So Tucker Carlson on his show would say, we have a problem.
Certain people are being discriminated against.
But he would always sort of obfuscate it and say, well, it's whites and Asians.
There's DEI. There's affirmative action.
This isn't fair.
He would talk, for example, about the mass immigration into the country.
And he would say that this is transformative.
It's a great replacement.
But he wouldn't define it in a racial.
He would say that the great replacement is replacing native voters with foreigners who are going to vote a different way.
It's a voting issue.
And so in his mind, the answer to immigration, which is anti-white, the answer to affirmative action, which is anti-white, is colorblind meritocracy.
Well, that's interesting.
The answer to anti-white policies is not a pro-white politics.
The answer to anti-white policies is not to examine where that's coming from.
The answer to an explicitly and a majority anti-white system is colorblind meritocracy.
And what is that supposed to mean?
It's supposed to mean that if there are disparities in the country, We're going to accept them if the disparities result from a meritocratic system that is fair.
And so that means that, for example, in Harvard, if you get all Chinese students, we're not going to look at the fact that they're all Chinese.
We're going to consider whether they were the most qualified applicants at the admissions office.
And as the country is importing these high-skilled people, Indians, Chinese, and so on, Instead of getting DEI, where they artificially are selecting blacks and Hispanics who underperform, instead, we're going to be colorblind about all these Chinese and Indians, the top Chinese and Indians from a population of a billion people that are imported into the country.
That's a colorblind meritocracy.
And it's like, so wait a second, you know, that sounds good on paper.
Obviously, that's...
In some respects than DEI, we're elevating incompetent people, but is it really better if we're trading places instead of rewarding underperforming native minorities?
We're rewarding overperforming imported foreigners?
But according to colorblind meritocracy, that is something that would be fine.
That would be an acceptable outcome.
And so this is one reason I've always critiqued this as insufficient, but Tucker Carlson always used this phrase, colorblind meritocracy.
Bronze Age pervert used the term colorblind meritocracy last January.
Dr. Koston Alamaryu, who normally is talking about TND and how billions must die and things like that, he was saying last year it's only going to be colorblind meritocracy.
Saurabh Sharma from American Moment, now the deputy at PPO, colorblind meritocracy.
And by the way, this is not even the first iteration.
They used to call it multiracial working class populism.
I guess that was just too long.
That was too much of a mouthful.
But in the end of the first Trump term and shortly afterward, they would say it's multiracial, working-class populism.
Then it became colorblind meritocracy.
And this is now the line.
So I first want to point out that this is something that they are pushing.
There is a concerted effort.
It is not arbitrary.
This is a carefully crafted buzzword, and this is meant to be the conservative movement's answer to DEI. And they have set up a dialectic.
You have DEI on one side, you have colorblind meritocracy on the other.
DEI says we are going to distribute the seats at Harvard University.
We're going to distribute the board seats at a Fortune 500 company.
We're going to distribute the executive roles at companies listed on the stock exchange according to the racial proportions of the country.
If there's so many black people in the country, there should be so many black people at Harvard and on the board and so on.
And that is set up as one side of it, and then on the other side of the dialectic, you have a colorblind meritocracy where we're not going to look at race at all.
We're only going to look at qualifications.
Now, here's the problem with this.
Here's the problem.
This is a false dialectic.
It's a dialectic which actually doesn't serve our deeply held values.
Because there are multiple problems with DEI. There's a few problems.
DEI is not only problematic because it rewards incompetent people.
It's also problematic because of course DEI is a cultural agenda.
It is a racial agenda.
The advocates of DEI are not...
The reason they are advocating for DEI is because of their racial self-interest.
On some level, they rightly consider that those who attend Harvard, those who have the board positions at the most valuable companies, have the power.
They seek power selfishly for themselves and collectively for their race.
And they identify with their race more so than with the nation as a whole.
And they believe that they are in a racial competition with white people.
They view white people with distrust.
They view white people as the other.
They view white people with caution.
And they seek to secure their benefit and their privilege and their power defensively or in some cases vengefully and offensively against white people.
And that is why they push DEI. So let's be very clear about what has taken place.
There is a malignant, malevolent element in the country which does not like white people.
...
unidentified
...
nick fuentes
grievances against white people and wishes to exploit white people and redistribute white people's wealth and privileges and rights and power out of some sense of historic justice, some sense of social justice to correct iniquities from the past.
In other words, white people enslaved the blacks.
So now the black people are going to take power and take from the whites.
They're going to take reparations.
They're going to take tax money.
They're going to take jobs.
And they think that's fair.
They think that's just.
If white people were cruel towards the black people, now the black people want to be cruel towards the white people and offend them and upset them and replace them.
And they couldn't be more transparent about their feelings about white people in Hollywood, in the media, and even if you know many of them in regular public life.
So that's what DEI is.
And yet they're defining DEI down to just be a misguided program where they were valuing identity over merit.
But that's not really the whole story.
And now they've situated on the other side a colorblind meritocracy where we're removing really only one part of the problem and saying, well, now we're not going to look at race at all.
We're only going to look at qualifications.
Well, it's interesting that someone like Vivek and Saurabh Sharma would favor a colorblind meritocracy because as it so happens, not only have we been importing refugees and Economic migrants and illegal immigrants and asylum seekers from poor,
low-IQ peasant countries and elevating them through DEI. At the same time, we've also been importing high-IQ, highly specialized, high-skilled people from Asian countries like India and China or even other places like Nigeria and Iran.
And we're selecting for the best and brightest.
Out of massive population pools, there's a billion and a half people in India, a billion people in China, hundreds of millions in Nigeria.
And we're taking the top people from there.
And if we have a colorblind system in America, then they are going to have power over us, the native people, over us, the white people, the Christians, the inheritors of a Christian European civilization.
And so here's a perfect example.
If we allow a complete colorblind meritocracy, you will find very quickly that UCLA and Harvard and MIT will be overrun by Chinese foreign students.
Very quickly, they will be overrun by Indian students on a visa.
If we're only looking at strictly merit rather than any other consideration, we're going to be overrun with foreigners.
Now, is that better than DEI? I think some would say in a narrow sense, yes, there are some benefits.
The bridges won't collapse.
You can trust your doctors more.
The planes won't fall out of the sky.
But is this in the best interest of the Native Americans?
Is this in the best interest of the country?
Is merit really the only consideration?
For example, when I vote for President of the United States, if the candidate is a Satanist, but maybe they have a high IQ and all the qualifications, and the other candidate is a Christian but maybe less qualified, am I purely going to look at the qualifications?
If I'm hiring somebody for my company, am I going to pick somebody that aligns with my values?
And is maybe less qualified?
Or am I going to pick somebody that on paper is more qualified but doesn't align with my values?
There are other considerations.
Yes, actually, like race being one, but also nationality, also values, also morals, also loyalty.
There are other things that apply as well.
So we're trading, as far as I'm concerned, six of one for half a dozen of the other.
We went from having a small proportion of Hispanics and blacks who had no business to be permitted into elite law schools and top universities.
We're trading that in exchange for Chinese and Indians coming in and taking the prestigious positions, and they're not even from our own country.
Is that better?
Not by much.
And that's why it's a false dialectic, something that a person like Vivek Ramaswamy or Elon Musk or David Sachs or Jacob Helberg would promote.
One is an Indian immigrant.
One is a South African immigrant.
One is a Jewish immigrant.
And one is a homosexual.
Can we see why those marginalized groups?
Can we see why those types of people would favor something that is meritocratic and about efficiency more than about anything else?
Obviously.
So they're pushing this colorblind meritocracy.
This actually does not address the fundamental problem, which is the dispossession of Native Americans.
That was the problem with DEI. The problem is not necessarily always that they were incompetent.
The problem is that the purpose of the program was to dispossess and disenfranchise white people of their wealth, power, influence, privileges by a hostile group within our borders.
By a group which is by definition hostile and distinct.
We're getting all of that and then some with a so-called colorblind meritocracy.
What's more, I'll add, the idea that these immigrants are so valuable is a myth.
It is a myth that Indians are more skilled than we are.
It is absolutely a myth that they are smarter, that they are more skilled, that they have more potential.
That is absolutely not true.
And here's a perfect example.
Vivek Ramaswamy.
He's a billionaire, and everybody believes he's a very intelligent guy.
But what did Vivek Ramaswamy ever build?
How did he make his fortune?
Did he invent anything?
Did he improve the lives of people?
I believe he's basically a scammer.
I believe he's basically something like a swindler, like a lot of people in...
or in these startups, in these funds.
Vivek has not built anything and neither have so many of the Indians that have come in.
Your experience on Google and YouTube, has that improved over the past 10 years?
Google has brought in many H-1B Indians and currently the CEO is an Indian.
Has Google gotten better or worse?
Has YouTube gotten better or worse?
Since Indians, with their ethnic nepotism and their busybody culture, has the experience gotten better or worse?
These people are not worthy of merit.
These people are people.
They're not robots.
They're not widgets.
They're not machines.
They're not interchangeable with white people.
They may score highly on a test.
They may demonstrate certain qualifications for college admissions or to have lower wages at a tech firm, but they are different than us, and they are not playing by the same rules that we are.
India, unlike America, does not have a culture of trustworthiness, does not have a culture that is based on shame.
They do not have a culture in India that is based on altruism and universalism.
They're clannish.
They still live in a rigidly hierarchical society that is based on class and previously was based on race.
And we expect that because they score highly on a test that they have more merit than a native-born white American?
Or a native-born, any kind of American for that matter?
It's totally ridiculous.
Now, Vivek says in the tweet, I wonder where the opposition will come from next.
And by that he means, who will oppose this content of character versus color of skin?
Who will oppose the colorblind meritocracy now that the woke left has been defeated?
And to ask the question is to answer it.
To ask...
The question presupposes the answer.
He says, where will the opposition to the colorblind meritocracy come from next?
After the woke left has been defeated.
Implication is the woke right, which is an idea they have been memeing for a long time.
That people like James Lindsay and Chris Ruffo and the Babylon Bee.
They say that there is a distinct group of people on the right who are woke because like the woke left, they believe that race is important or essential.
Like the woke left, they criticize Israel.
Like the woke left, maybe they favor a strong government that tries to benefit its people.
And so...
Do you understand now where they're going with this?
What colorblind meritocracy does is it entrenches and it fortifies the idea that America should be multiracial.
America was white, isn't any longer, and is now being led by foreigners.
And all colorblind meritocracy does is say that we should be led by more talented foreigners.
We should be led by more talented non-white people that don't like us and don't understand us and think our country belongs to them.
That's all it says.
It doesn't do anything for us.
And people are cheering for this idea, and I support the downfall of DEI, but not if it's replaced by something that is really just a stronger version of DEI. It's still a mandate for diversity.
It's still a mandate for racial diversity because the proponents of colorblind meritocracy say we want the best and brightest from around the world.
Well, best and brightest is a code word for better diversity.
They want diversity, but just better.
They want diversity, but just from their countries.
Instead of diversification, which is a code word for anti-white in the form of plucking black and Hispanics.
With low test scores and putting them in the boardroom, now we're going to scout out the best and brightest Indians and Chinese.
It's just better diversity.
And I don't want diversity.
I think the country doesn't want diversity.
I think diversity still isn't our strength.
And it's very simple.
India has 1.5 billion Indians living in it.
China has 1 billion Chinese people living in it.
Mexico has 150 million Mexicans living in it.
Can not America and Europe be who we are?
Can America and Europe not be American and European?
Do we have to be Indian too?
Do we have to be Mexican too?
Chinese too?
Why can we not be American?
America and Europe are inextricably connected with a genetic heritage as well as a cultural heritage.
That gives them a distinct identity, which has created the world's institutions, which has created the liberal, democratic, Western culture that...
Previously was dominant for the past few decades.
Can we not continue to express that in peace?
Why do we have to have diversity?
I don't want it low-skilled.
I don't want it high-skilled.
It's like green eggs and ham.
I don't want it in a plane.
I don't want it on a train.
I don't want diversity.
I don't want these people in this country.
And I'm Catholic.
I think they're human beings.
I think they're created by God.
I think their lives have value.
I think their culture has value.
But let them express their identity.
Let them express their culture.
Let them express their genes in their own country.
And let us express ours in our country.
That is not too much to ask.
I don't want diversity, equity and inclusion.
I do not want the best and brightest.
I want Americans.
In America, I want a country of Americans, by Americans, for Americans.
I want the best and brightest Americans.
I want inclusion for Americans.
I do not want inclusion and best and brightest from India and China.
Thank you very much.
If I wanted to live among Indians and Chinese, I would have a great time living in India or China.
It just isn't fair.
An Indian can move here and create their own neighborhood, their own transplanted expat community, and they still have their home.
But they're setting up their community in our home.
That's not right.
And I know that's difficult for someone like Vivek.
Vivek was born here, and yet he's an Indian.
He married an Indian.
He has Indian kids.
He will not convert.
He is still a Hindu.
And you know what?
Fine.
But you must recognize that Americans come first.
Vivek sounds like a regular American.
He's from Ohio.
You know what?
Fine.
But you cannot show up here and expect that we're going to bring in all of your cast members.
You cannot come in here and bring in everybody from India now.
They are telegraphing.
Mark my words.
I'm one of the few people paying attention.
I'm one of the few people that has called everything right in the past 10 years.
Just like I said, colorblind meritocracy was their big play.
When Vivek says, I wonder who will oppose colorblind meritocracy next.
They're telegraphing their assault.
On the identitarian right.
They're telegraphing their assault on nationalism.
When that debate happened over H-1Bs, it prefigured what they're now talking about, what they're foreshadowing now.
When Vivek and Elon and all those Silicon Valley guys, David Sachs and Sriram, Krishnam, When they all came out fighting the MAGA base, calling them racist,
lazy, hateful Americans for opposing H-1B, and now they say, I wonder who will oppose H-1B, colorblind meritocracy next, they're telegraphing the hostile takeover of the Republican movement, the conservative movement, repurposing it.
Expelling anybody that values the historic identity of America, which is white and Christian.
And you know what?
This is the last thing I'm going to say and then we're going to move on.
Let's just be so honest.
I want to live in a white country.
I just do.
And if you're white, you probably do as well.
And there's nothing wrong with that.
That's how I grew up.
I grew up in a white suburb.
I went to a high school that was 95% white.
I like it.
I like being in a place where the people look like me.
I'm partially Mexican.
People say that.
But I have white skin.
I have green eyes.
I have brown hair.
I have three 100% white grandparents.
I have 150% white grandparent.
I like living in a neighborhood where all the people look like my parents, my grandparents, where they look like me, where they talk like me.
I like living in a community where they share my values.
I like living in a community where we all descend from a common heritage, share a common culture.
We're all Christians or deeply influenced by Christianity.
I like that.
It's extremely valuable to me.
And if I were to live in another kind of community where people didn't look like me, it would degrade my spirit immensely.
It would degrade my quality of life immensely.
I wouldn't like it.
It wouldn't feel like home.
It wouldn't feel familiar.
It wouldn't feel comfortable.
Given that this is my home, I have a right to feel comfortable.
I have a right to feel familiar.
I have a right to feel that way in my own country.
It is essential to my well-being.
Is it not the job of the government to secure the well-being of its citizens, which is not just material, but is deeper as well?
And I know many people, many people even in Illinois, that went to high schools.
They went to grade schools where they had a big population of Indians and Arabs with names we don't know how to pronounce.
I remember when I competed in Model UN or in Speech Team, we would go to other schools and their whole team would be Indian.
And they would all have foreign-sounding names.
And they were very cliquish and clannish.
And they would get together and they eat different food and they're not Christian and they speak with accents and they...
They can all relate to each other as first or second generation immigrants.
And they're different than us.
They're different.
And if I had to be surrounded by that, if I had to be buried in that kind of diversity, it would be deeply uncomfortable.
And I absolutely prefer being among people that look like me.
And we have to just start saying it plainly.
I recognize that this country is not going to be majority white forever.
And I recognize that much of the diversity is baked into the cake.
But let white people live among themselves.
Let white people turn off the spigot of diversity.
Let us turn off the glut of foreigners that are pouring into our country.
We don't like it.
It's totally, and it's so outrageous that you can't speak plainly about this.
But that is, it makes me so deeply upset and bothered.
People say that's petty.
People say, oh, you're triggered by people that don't look like you.
You know what?
Yeah, I kind of am.
It's called, you love your home.
I like my home.
I like things that are familiar.
There is truly no place like your home.
I don't want to be an alien in my own country.
And the great irony is that this is something that they don't experience.
When Mexicans come here in droves and they create these segmented neighborhoods and parts of the city, it's like Mexico.
They come here and they set up enclaves that are ethnic and they're more homogeneous than where we live.
So they're not even experiencing it to the same degree in a certain sense.
So anyway, so that's the last thing I'm going to say.
But this is what they're trying to push and jam down our throat.
Let's just go through the list.
It's like J.D. Vance married an Indian.
Vivek is an Indian.
Chris Ruffo married an illegal Asian immigrant.
David Sachs is Jewish.
Sri Ram Krishnam is Indian.
Peter Thiel, Elon Musk are immigrants.
Like, these people are all foreigners.
They are all foreigners.
They are making our decisions for us.
And it's like Elon Musk said.
Elon said, I wouldn't be in America if it wasn't for the H-1B program.
That's why I'm pushing for it.
He still identifies as an immigrant.
That is not assimilation.
That is not assimilated.
He's still thinking as a foreigner rather than as a native.
He's still advocating for immigrants as an immigrant based on his self-interest.
And he's in charge.
They're in charge.
This is wrong.
It is wrong.
That foreign interlopers, foreigners who are foreign in every sense of the word are ruling over us and making the decisions and changing our way of life destroying our culture jamming it down our throats And then attacking us when we resist, when we say, no, actually, we don't want you.
We don't want you.
We don't want your fucking gi down the drain.
We don't want these crazy sounding names.
You don't want these foreign languages.
We don't want these foreign gods, temples, monuments built to deities that we don't recognize.
We don't want that shit in our country.
And they tell us you're a hateful racist and you're out.
It's wrong.
And everyone knows deep down in their conscience that it's wrong.
And next they're going to browbeat us with this woke right crap.
Who could oppose a colorblind meritocracy?
Isn't that what MLK Jr. believed?
MLK Jr. was also a virulent communist and a racist who did not like white people.
So I actually don't believe in MLK's vision at all.
I believe in the vision of the founding fathers.
I believe in Federalist No.
2, written by John Jay, which says one people, one continent, one religion, descended from one race, believing the same thing, similar in manner, similar in custom, speaking one language.
That's who I believe in.
That's my vision.
I believe in the vision of Alexander Hamilton and John Jay and John Adams.
Not MLK Jr., not Vivek Ramaswamy.
Anyway, so that's that.
So that's Vivek.
No good, you guys.
This is not good.
And the grand irony is that Trump was supposed to be a nativist.
Trump was supposed to be a nationalist nativist against globalism.
And look at who he has empowered.
Elon Musk, an immigrant.
Vivek, an immigrant.
David Sachs, an immigrant.
Peter Thiel, an immigrant.
They're all immigrants.
unidentified
And they're all globalists.
nick fuentes
Best and brightest, all this sort of stuff.
So, this is why I'm so critical, because...
Everything that America First and MAGA was supposed to be about has become a Trojan horse.
Make America Great Again and it's led by foreigners and they want to bring in these people and elevate them above the natives.
And they're doing it in the name of nativism.
It's like unbelievable.
They're doing this in the name of nationalism.
It's perverse.
So that is why we have to be very on guard and think about what comes next, how we're going to develop a right wing that is set opposed to what's going on now.
We need to have a wing of the right wing that's a faction within the right wing that says no, no H-1Bs, no foreigners, no colorblind meritocracy, America first.
Not colorblind meritocracy.
How about Americans first?
Because you can't have a colorblind meritocracy that is America first if you're importing more people to rule over us.
That's what makes it incompatible.
So, that's that.
But I want to move on.
I do want to get into our story.
I want to get into our news for the night.
And our featured stories about these executive orders that Trump passed today and yesterday.
Which roll back some of the DEI and affirmative action policies.
And the first part is an executive order which he passed yesterday, which says that all DEI employees in the federal government will be put on paid leave and will most likely be terminated within a couple of weeks.
And this is a story.
It's his quote.
The Trump administration on Wednesday threatened federal employees with adverse consequences if they failed to report on colleagues who defy orders to purge DEI efforts from their agencies.
Tens of thousands of workers were put on notice that officials would not tolerate any efforts to disguise these programs using coded or imprecise language.
Emails sent out which were based on a template from the Office of Personnel Management The template sent to the agency heads said,
quote, The message also said these programs divided Americans by race, wasted taxpayer dollars, and resulted in shameful discrimination.
The warnings were a dramatic escalation of Mr. Trump's war on diversity programs that seek to reverse decades of systemic inequities and make the federal government look more like America.
They were also part of a broader assault on the federal workforce, which the president has long viewed as a bloated bureaucracy in need of large-scale reduction.
He has pledged to eliminate departments and has ordered remote workers back to the office.
On Tuesday night, the Trump administration released a memo that employees working in DEI offices across the government would be placed on administrative leave by 5 p.m.
on Wednesday, the first step toward shutting down those offices and programs altogether.
Agencies were ordered to devise plans to lay off all their members by January 31st.
So this is a pretty big deal.
He's essentially firing anybody that was hired under DEI. Every diversity hire, every racial quota hire is going to be fired by January 31st.
Which is pretty great and pretty surprising.
You know, I never thought we'd see the end to the affirmative action regime in America, but this is a big step towards it.
For as long as I've been alive, it was a deeply unpopular policy that everybody recognized was not fair.
And now it seems like it's gone without...
A shot being fired without too much resistance even.
And this is good because not only are DEI employees incompetent, but they're also malicious.
And this is, again, getting to what I was saying a moment ago.
These people that have been selected in the government, it's really a form of patronage.
If you hire...
Based on subjective qualifications like race rather than merit, not only are you picking people who are a certain race, black and Hispanic, and they have a certain politics.
I mean, who's studying public policy that's black and Hispanic that's under the age of 35?
These are all militant progressives.
So you're already selecting for a certain type of person.
But add to that, You can really hire anybody that's your friend.
So all these DEI positions, not only are they going to militant, progressive POC hires, militant, progressive, Hispanic and black, millennial and Generation Z women, women and girls, but they're also going to the loyal allies of previous Democrat administrations.
So you're getting basically people who...
By virtue of them being hired, they're going to be out to get conservatives.
And these people are running the agencies and departments.
So you're getting LaQuisha.
You're getting LaTanya.
You're getting these people at the IRS. You're getting them at ATF. You're getting them at important federal departments and agencies that have power over your life.
And again, just by virtue of the selection bias.
Young, non-white, public policy professionals, they're going to be progressive, and then they're probably allies of the Democratic Party on top of that.
So for Trump to go in and fire all of them is very aggressive, and I have to say this is really solid action.
I don't think this is the biggest priority.
But I think that broadly speaking, reshaping the executive branch and exercising executive power is always a plus.
Clawing that power back from the bureaucracy and putting it in the hands of the elected president is a good thing.
All these people that have been entrenched in D.C. carry over from one administration to the next.
These people are never going to help us.
They are never going to deliver.
An agenda that is favorable to our interests.
So the more of them that you can fire, the better.
And the more that the president can take the power to terminate them, the better.
So I think this is great.
Very ambitious, very aggressive, swift, sweeping, and broad.
I think it's great.
But he didn't stop there.
There was another executive order today where he rolled back affirmative action.
And this is the story.
It says, quote, LBJ's order gave the Secretary of Labor the authority to ensure equal opportunity for people of color
and women in federal contractors' recruitment, hiring, training, and other employment practices.
It required federal contractors to refrain from employment discrimination and take affirmative action to ensure equal opportunity based on race, color, religion, and national origin.
Trump's order directs all executive departments and agencies to terminate discriminatory and illegal preferences, mandates, policies, programs, guidance, regulations, enforcement activities, consent orders, and requirements, and it extends out to the private sector.
He said, quote, I further order all agencies to enforce longstanding civil rights laws to combat illegal private sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, and programs.
It goes a step further and orders agencies to compile lists of public companies, universities, and large foundations for civil action over their DEI programs.
And this is Executive Order 11-246 that is being repealed, which mandates affirmative action for contracts over $10,000, compels large contractors to draft compliance plans for affirmative action.
So this is another very ambitious, very aggressive, solid policy, and it just goes to show we do have the power to change society.
This is one of the biggest mental obstacles that's holding us back.
A lot of people believe that society is the way it is because that's the way people want it to be.
Or that there is some sort of intractable, unfixable system that makes it this way.
DEI and other similar policies or symptoms of our culture, they literally proceed from the federal government.
Why do we have DEI? Because the government started to say that if you don't have affirmative action, you can't get a government contract.
And think about it.
We have this arbitrary distinction, public and private sector.
Well, the government can be as liberal as it wants, but in the private sector, you can really do what you'd like.
But the federal government is the biggest spender in the economy.
So if the government mandates that not only does the whole government, which is the biggest workforce, but also all federal contractors, which is a massive amount of money.
If all of the government and all of the government's contractors are forced to adopt these, really their social regulations with economic effects, if the government's mandating all of them to do that, society then becomes the Affirmative Action Society.
And people say this is just how it is now.
Oh, you know how it goes, diversity quotas and black.
Well, not if the government says we'll do business with you even if you don't have those policies.
So it's great to see that it seems like the head of the snake is being cut off by undoing some of these regulations.
Hopefully it'll have a sweeping and far-reaching effect, although it seems like that had already been the case for a couple of years.
Like I said at the beginning of the show, there was a high-profile case which undid Harvard's racial quotas.
It seemed like there was a huge backlash against CRT in Virginia a couple of years ago.
And so maybe this is the culmination of a few years and...
On some level, Trump's election in 16, I'm not really sure, but this is something that's been in the works for a long time, and it seems like for the first time in a long time, the culture is just different.
A lot of people are talking about this, that unlike last time, it does feel like society genuinely has shifted to the right.
20 years ago, this would be unthinkable.
We were at the peak and the pinnacle of woke, DEI, all this kind of stuff.
10 years later, It's vanishing.
The ESG and DEI is being removed at the biggest companies, at the universities.
Voters, even in purple or blue states like Virginia, are coming out in droves against it in schools and education, at the school board meetings.
And now at the stroke of a pen, it's being undone in the entire federal government and four federal contractors.
So this is a pretty consequential victory for Trump to have won the election.
It does solidify this cultural shift and it makes something that was happening in effect.
It now makes it formal.
And it does feel like there's some finality, like we've turned the page and that chapter is just over now.
That chapter of hysterical censorship.
Although there's an important caveat, that chapter on DEI, it really does feel like after Trump's victory that that's just over and we do now have a far more liberalized culture like a Joe Rogan Reddit culture where people are just kind of cool with things.
And that doesn't mean everybody's a racist and it doesn't mean everybody's a conspiracy theorist or far right.
And certainly people are still against, I think, a lot of that.
People are still very much in favor of recreational drug use.
People are still very much in favor of gay marriage or casual sex, non-normative sexual relations.
People are very much in favor of pornography and it's still a very much liberal society.
But there's a liberalized attitude about people that don't agree.
And certainly that's an improvement.
If it doesn't deliver our nationalist vision, at the minimum it allows room for nationalism to grow.
Without the oppressive liberal boot on our neck, with the intense censorship, with the DEI, with all this ESG stuff, People who disagree with liberalism are able to express themselves, make their arguments, make money.
Then it does provide fertile soil for a true alternative to grow and expand and eventually take power.
But here's really the – so this is sort of a statement on the whole situation.
And a lot of people might say, duh, that's why we voted for Trump.
Of course it's a good thing.
But here's something.
That's kind of the corollary to what I just said.
In order to realize the potential of this development, of the change that I've just described, this cannot be the final destination.
So for all the people that are celebrating, we got rid of woke DEI. It's a premature celebration.
All the people that are saying this is tremendous, it's a victory, this is great.
It's not really a victory because we're not where we need to be.
Let's try to imagine for a moment what our ideal society looks like.
Our ideal society is far more Christian than this one.
Your average person today is woke.
They may not be a hard-on about it anymore.
But wokeism, I mean, let's be honest, wokeism effectively succeeded.
30 years ago, in the 1990s, people were against homosexuality.
They were against race mixing.
Most people went to church and were Christian.
Most people back then did not approve of drug use.
It was a far more conservative country 30 years ago.
And guess what?
Racial attitudes were different too.
People were more racist.
They wanted English.
They wanted a far more traditional culture.
And now, after wokeism has died, it seems like wokeism transformed our country.
And that's why it's now able to dissipate.
It's sort of like training wheels.
It's sort of like when you put a flea in a jar.
And you put a piece of paper over it and the flea will jump up and hit the paper.
You take the paper away and they will never jump higher than where the paper used to be.
Now that the oppressive, suffocating culture of wokeness has dissipated, people say we're free.
And yet, everybody is an anti-racist.
Everybody is an LGBT ally.
Everybody is...
A recreational or habitual drug user.
Everybody is a feminist.
Everybody is a secularist.
Everybody is against the stodgy moralism of the Catholics or the Christians.
So, did wokeism really go extinct or did it just serve its purpose?
And now it goes away.
Although the suffocating, maybe worst aspect, the broad brush, the broad oppression of wokeism is gone, we now have a situation that is still less than ideal.
We are still fighting an uphill battle where people do not care about race, do not speak in moral terms, do not talk about national identity.
Same people still run our country, and although the broad censorship has abated, Narrow censorship remains.
I remain banned on Facebook and Instagram.
I remain banned from payment processing.
And although people like Piers Morgan can call themselves uncensored, he still won't have me on his show.
And when you get TikTok after it was brought back online, you can't say Free Palestine.
And although you can...
Not have affirmative action as a federal government contractor.
You can't not support Israel as a federal government contractor.
And so I would say that the extent to which the boot has been taken off of the neck of the radical right has been very much overstated.
The boot has been taken off of the neck of Barstool.
So you're a frat guy, beer-chugging idiots.
They can feel emboldened to make edgy jokes while they watch sports and drink beer and be a degenerate.
And your average Redditor who wants to make an uncouth joke or a gamer who wants to see gore or tits in a video game, maybe they feel the boot lifted from their necks.
But somebody who is critical of Israel, somebody who is critical and observant about Jewish power, someone who is a race essentialist, an ethnic nationalist, I think the extent to which we will get any kind of salutary neglect, the extent to which we will get any kind of relief, we'll get some, and we already have, but I think we're definitely not in the clear.
And I would add, on top of that, that we also have our work cut out for us.
Even though I'm speaking to you on Rumble and X, which is more than I could have said a few years ago, we're also facing an uphill battle now fighting against, I think, a more powerful idea, a more powerful liberal idea.
In the same way that Best and Brightest is a supercharged version of DEI, In the same way that best and brightest is like an improved steel man version of diversity is our strength, so is this techno-libertarianism.
On some level, progressivism was always going to go bankrupt.
This bio-Leninism, progressivism, far left, those people are always going to get on everybody's nerves.
It was always going to go bust because it rewarded incompetence and failure.
Deficiency and deformity.
Now we're fighting against people that are actually competent.
They're actually pushing fairness, ostensibly, something that they're calling fairness.
And it's almost like now we're fighting a more powerful version of liberalism.
Instead of fighting a left progressive version of liberalism, we're fighting a right libertarian version of liberalism.
Which is actually agreeable to people, and it's more efficient, and it's more functional.
And in a sense, it may represent a more formidable foe.
Because although it is, and it's like I said, Trump is going to make things better, it's going to make it in some ways easier for us, but it's still liberalism.
It's still going to deliver demographic change, multiracialism, degeneracy, secularism.
Yes, I'm allowed on X, but so is a ton of pornography.
Yes, we're going to get best and brightest at our universities, but they're going to come from India.
You see?
So, I support these policies.
I think they're good.
But it's sort of like two cheers or one cheer for Trumpism.
Short of the full three cheers.
It's good, but let's also understand that politics has other effects.
We can't always think so simply in terms of what's good or bad.
You know, people say Trump is a lesser of two evils.
Best and brightest is a lesser of two evils.
This and that is a lesser of two evils.
And it's sort of like a one-dimensional way of looking at things.
It ignores the fact that in politics, it's a dialectic.
It's not just about what's dominant.
It's about the dynamic.
It's about two poles or a few poles playing off of each other.
And so people say, well, I'll take what Trump is doing over what Kamala is doing.
Let's entertain if Kamala won and things were still bad.
At the minimum, a real right wing could raise up a challenge and say, hey, we are the answer to progressivism.
We are what should succeed progressivism.
Instead of...
Them getting libertarianism.
So now libertarianism is super strong and super viable and now we have to fight against that within our own party.
Is that easier or more difficult than fighting against the dying ideology of progressivism?
But that's strategic thinking.
So regardless, it's a better situation but we do have to be thinking about how we're going to Create the society that we want because this still isn't it.
I mean, this is better from a total nightmare, but it's still worse than where we were.
It's still worse than the civilization we used to have.
So, I mean, just look at something like Twitter.
Yes, yes, Twitter was bad 10 years ago when they were banning all right-wing people.
But when you spend time on Twitter today, do you really like it?
I mean, so think about Twitter in a nutshell.
Twitter as this techno-libertarianism in a nutshell.
Are you glad that I'm back on Twitter?
Certainly, yes.
Are you glad that Twitter doesn't enforce the rules as much?
Certainly.
But the experience on Twitter is still not good.
It's all this spam.
It's all this porn.
It's all this violence.
The algorithm still being manipulated.
And people could say, well, it's a lesser of two evils.
Okay, but at a certain point, we want to be in a position to create a society that is actually desirable.
But it's a lesser of two evils.
It's like, okay, but it still sucks.
So is that really the goal?
And I'm not dissing Twitter necessarily, but you understand that that in a nutshell is sort of what we're getting.
It's like, yeah, we replaced the Mexicans and blacks with Indians and Chinese.
Lesser to evils?
I mean, maybe.
Maybe not.
But point is, we're still not at the so-called promised land, like Vivek said.
So anyway, so that's my feelings on the affirmative action, the DEI. It's good.
I think they should roll it back.
They should terminate it.
It should not exist.
At the same time, I think people should recognize that a culture is emerging that may be better, but it's still deeply affected by wokeism, and I still think it limits what we're trying to do.
In many ways, it might be more dangerous for us, but that's that.
I want to move on.
I want to take a look at our super chats.
We'll see what you guys are saying about all this.
I hope that makes sense because I know...
Honestly, a lot of people are just too stupid to put on their thinking cap.
A lot of people are really stupid and just get frustrated.
When you ask people to think beyond, like, DEI is bad, they got rid of it, so that's good.
And you go, yeah, but, I mean, let's examine the second-order effects.
And they say, what the fuck are you talking about?
It's good.
They should take the victory.
And it's like, yeah, I mean, no one's disputing, like, we don't like DEI, and some level we're gloating that it's gone, these people suck, they don't have a job.
But we have to think about when, when and how are we going to get the society that we really want?
So that's the message for tonight.
But we're going to move on, take a look at the Super Chats, we'll see what you guys have to say.
Yeah, they're all coming at me now because I'm blackpilling, right?
Somebody called me today and they're like, everybody says you're so negative now.
You got to stop being negative.
And it's like, we talked about it last night, but they really hate when you rain on their parade.
But we have to do it.
Okay.
All right.
But let's take a look at these super chats.
We'll see what you guys have to say about this whole show.
Thoughts?
streamlabs matthew tts
What is that, a thousand questions for five dollars?
nick fuentes
I feel like every night we're...
Dealing with this question, how could you be a Christian but also not want your race to die?
If you look, the Catholic Church promulgated a couple of documents in the 1930s, and we're actually close to publishing one, but I believe they didn't release it on this question.
There's actually a good account that...
Talks about this.
It's called American Reform on Twitter.
If you follow him, he writes a lot about this.
The Catholic Church has always said that race is a part of who we are.
It has always said that it is an important...
Now, the Catholic Church says we cannot idolize our race.
Our race isn't our God.
And the Catholic Church says that all people have dignity and are created by God.
But the Catholic Church also says that...
Race should be afforded the same kind of value as nationality and other things.
It's an essential part of who we are.
Just as we're male and female, just as we own allegiance to our government, we're also created as a part of a particular race.
And the Catholic Church values our heritage and our culture and our language.
Our vernacular language and who we are.
So there's no papal encyclical that says we must secure the existence of our people.
But if you read Aquinas, if you read the catechism and what they say about immigration, if you read some of the papal documents promulgated in the 30s, if you read what some of the popes said about the Muslim invaders, it's very clear.
And it's not ambiguous that the Catholic Church, it is supportable as a Catholic to say that we don't want mass immigration to change the character of our country.
streamlabs matthew tts
Oh my goodness!
nick fuentes
Yeah, he's a comedian.
I think that's actually a funny joke.
Honestly, I'm just so sick of just conservatards.
Was that supposed to be like a mic drop?
Yeah, I saw that monologue.
That's funny.
You know, are we now going to be against edgy humor?
streamlabs matthew tts
I don't think that's true, but I did love the tweet.
nick fuentes
You know, I saw some of the stuff she was saying, and then I saw she was talking all this shit about me back in June.
And I don't know if that was real, but, you know, I see this girl from Turning Point.
She's making these TikToks.
And I go, oh, that's nice.
A girl is saying nice things about me.
But then somebody showed me some tweets from my rally in June, and she's talking all this trash.
So it's like, I don't know what to believe here.
What's going on?
But it's always never e-girls.
streamlabs matthew tts
That's a duplicate.
nick fuentes
I just read that.
streamlabs matthew tts
David N. Lincoln sent $10.
Saw from a found ring on X that the name Michael Knowles is an anagram of I'm a Shackle Clown.
nick fuentes
That's funny.
I'm sure that's intentional.
streamlabs matthew tts
Not a Chinese dentist sent $5.
Bro, your girl Dr. Anastasia Maria Lupus is getting cringe AF. All she talks about is her checkmark.
I know it sucks, but Elon doesn't give a fuck.
nick fuentes
Look, you know what?
You don't have to like it, but Elon is destroying these people's accounts.
Their engagement has been utterly destroyed.
Because either the algorithm has been changed against them or because the checkmark has been taken away.
But that is a form of censorship.
And so it's bullshit.
I don't blame her for talking about it.
Obviously, you know, some people didn't talk about it at all.
They said, well, that's not really worth bringing up.
But it is worth bringing up because that is a form of censorship.
These people might as well be banned.
Suleiman, Myron, Lupus, Stu.
Sam Parker, 1984, Jake Shields.
Their engagement has all been utterly destroyed because Elon took their checkmark and penalized them.
And so it's like they got banned.
And no one's going to talk about it because they technically didn't get banned.
And that's bullshit.
So I get it.
Why is she talking about it?
Because she effectively got censored.
Yeah, well, if you know the deep lore on that guy and the kind of circles he was running in, it's very weird stuff, and there is a lot of Fed honeypotting with that element.
streamlabs matthew tts
It's pretty freaky.
Thank you for the big super chat.
nick fuentes
I appreciate it.
He never told me his secret plan for deportation.
I don't know what you're talking about.
So, I never said anything like that, and that's because he never told us his grand...
Did I ever say that?
He never told us his grand plan, his secret plan.
Now that it sucks, could you...
I don't know what the fuck you're talking about, stupid.
Thank you for the...
I shouldn't be mean.
Thank you for the $100, me, a total jerk.
I just get annoyed when people act like they know what they're talking about and they don't.
There's something about that that really triggers me.
Now that the election is over, could you tell us what he really...
Get the fuck out of here.
Like, what are you talking about?
What the fuck are you talking about?
Could you tell us?
Who the fuck is us?
Could you tell us more details?
Could we get more gossip?
Could we get more details?
First of all, I don't know what you're talking about.
Second of all, he never told us a secret plan on immigration.
I don't know what you're referring to.
But thank you for the big super chat.
Sorry for being a jerk, but I have no idea what you're talking about.
I love when people act like they know what they're talking about and then they have absolutely no clue.
streamlabs matthew tts
Pretty Fly White guy sent $5.
Funny to watch Protestants cope when a female pastor is inevitably retarded.
nick fuentes
Yeah, yeah, it's awesome.
streamlabs matthew tts
He's boost!
nick fuentes
Why congrats?
streamlabs matthew tts
Thank you for the huge super chat.
nick fuentes
Yeah, I saw a picture of this guy.
So in case you missed it, there was a black guy who shot up a high school in Nashville, and he was totally crazy.
And he named me in his racist manifesto.
His manifesto says that he's a black guy that hates black people and all this stuff.
And he says that Turkey Tom, Ethan Ralph, me, Candace Owens, Mr. Beast inspired him to do this shooting.
It's like obviously this is a crazy person, ironic manifesto.
And of course, even though he blamed like a dozen people, everybody says, oh, he was inspired by Nick Fuentes.
And so people who hate me are saying, oh, this is a Nick Fuenches-inspired killer, blah, blah, blah.
And my Groypers are on the timeline saying, no, that's not true.
He named a dozen other people.
He said Turkey Tom inspired him, blah, blah, blah.
And then they start posting a picture of a black guy wearing t-shirts with my face on it.
And I'm like, ah, fuck, like, damn it.
This is not going to look good because I'm thinking it's the guy.
Well, it turns out this is a different black guy.
It's this guy.
This guy that just sent that super chat is a black Groyper who makes homemade t-shirts with memes of me on them like he did this every day for a week.
And there was a picture of this guy who's alive and didn't do the murder-suicide earlier today.
And so I saw that at first I saw the picture and I'm like, oh, damn it.
This mass killer had pictures of me on his.
He was making homemade Nick Fuentes T-shirts.
I was like, that's really not good.
Then I find out, no, it's just a different.
It's just some other black guy who happened to be a Groyper wearing a ski mask, making homemade fan T-shirts.
So that was kind of funny.
I thought that was pretty good.
So thank you for the big super chat.
I get a really big kick out of your.
Your profile.
It's very funny.
I love the Yay and Nick t-shirt.
That was my favorite one.
So, nice work.
You made me freak out a little bit, but I'm relieved.
streamlabs matthew tts
Pellegrino sent $5.
I don't think I can keep stomaching retards who spam.
Well, at least Kamala isn't president after every Trump failure.
They legit will never get it unless the country is literally burning to the ground and they're the only white people remaining.
nick fuentes
Literally, dude.
Yeah, well, at least Kamala...
Well, Kamala wouldn't have done that.
Oh, so we should just vote for every Republican forever, I guess, right?
Any Republican would be better than almost any Democrat.
So if we're going off of the bare minimum and, you know, the lesser of two evils, then that means you have to vote for Republicans every single time, no matter what, if we're following that logic.
streamlabs matthew tts
Tim Treadstone sent $5.
All right, Scott, I stopped watching the NFL. When do we save the white race?
nick fuentes
Dude, Scott and that whole crew has just lost the plot entirely.
streamlabs matthew tts
Thank you for the big super chat.
nick fuentes
I appreciate it.
Look at that.
No message.
$250 and no message.
Thank you so much, man.
I really appreciate it.
God bless.
The big super chat of the night.
I appreciate you.
streamlabs matthew tts
Well, and Sovereign House is run by Nick Allen, who's a Ethereum guy, allied with Peter Thiel.
nick fuentes
He's also involved with CIA. And...
It's Passage Press is funded by Peter Thiel.
Passage Press publishes Curtis Yarvin, publishes Steve Saylor.
They put on an event at Sovereign House.
They hosted the Coronation Ball Party.
The connections are everywhere.
You know, Kostin Olamar, you worked with Bari Weiss in college.
Bari Weiss.
As an Israeli spy, she attended the Shalem Center, which is run by Yoram Hazoni.
Yoram Hazoni runs National Conservatism, which is in a partnership with Saurabh Shwarma's American Moment.
He's a deputy personnel chief.
Yoram Hazoni founded the Princeton Tory, which was subsidized by Irvin Crystal and the same group that funded the Stanford Review, which was created by Peter Thiel.
Stanford Review went on to hire Joe Lonsdale and everybody from the Founders Fund, and Founders Fund funds all these companies.
Bari Weiss is backed by Marc Andreessen.
Marc Andreessen works with Ben Horowitz.
Ben Horowitz is the father or the son of David Horowitz.
David Horowitz mentored Stephen Miller.
So it's like it's Stephen Miller got married in a ceremony officiated by the ambassador to Israel under Trump.
Or the guy that published his book, I think.
But it's like the connections are literally everywhere.
streamlabs matthew tts
sent five dollars.
It seems like Trump did reinstate schedule F.
They'll probably be fighting in the courts for a while, though.
unidentified
I didn't see that.
Hmm.
nick fuentes
I'll take a look at this later, but that would be good if they could hire 50,000 people.
streamlabs matthew tts
$5.
Been watching the show nightly for three years and didn't start super chatting until yesterday.
I owe you a ton of back pay.
Thanks, big.
Big guy.
Did we get any update on deportations today?
Seen rumors on X about ICE agents in Chicago, but nothing solid.
Oh, seven.
nick fuentes
Yeah, the update is they arrested 308 people, which is like nothing.
streamlabs matthew tts
Zulu master who sent five dollars.
The woman Episcopal minister proves we should always judge a book by its cover.
Also, huge foul up by Trump's team arranging the attempted humiliation of the president.
nick fuentes
So, yeah, how do you keep making these mistakes, man?
streamlabs matthew tts
It's terrible.
I did, yeah.
nick fuentes
It's really sad.
streamlabs matthew tts
Because that would have been based!
nick fuentes
No, it's true, though.
It's true.
But yeah.
streamlabs matthew tts
Cybertruck sent $5.
It seems like hosting a podcast with Paul Town is the kiss of death.
unidentified
Oh, yeah.
nick fuentes
Well, no, Beardson's doing better than ever.
You look at his Twitter lately.
He just owns Twitter now.
He runs Twitter.
streamlabs matthew tts
So I don't know about that.
My heart goes out to you.
Heart.
nick fuentes
Hey, guys, my heart goes out to you.
Good evening, everybody.
You're watching America First.
My heart goes out to you.
We got a great show for you tonight.
Imagine that's how we greet each other in Trump's America.
My heart goes out to you.
Hey, how you doing, man?
Oh, great.
Yeah, I'm doing all right.
Crazy weather we're having, huh?
How about these temperatures?
Warm-up is on the way here.
It's going to get up to 20 degrees tomorrow.
Anyway, my heart goes out to you.
I'll see you tomorrow.
I'm loving it.
You know what?
Maybe we should have voted for Trump.
If we're going to get the greeting, if we're going to get that, you know, drive up in the cyber truck.
Cyber troopers, robot soldiers pulling up in the cyber truck.
My heart goes out to you.
Awe, true to Donald.
True to Donald.
My heart goes out to you.
I am kind of loving that.
I like that my heart goes out to you is like disarming.
It's like it's not a Roman salute.
I'm giving my heart to you.
My heart goes out.
streamlabs matthew tts
I don't believe in all that astrology stuff.
nick fuentes
That's a bunch of crap.
But thank you for the big super chat.
Wow, we got another person doing the pretty fly white guy thing.
streamlabs matthew tts
$5.
The attempt on my life has left me scarred and deformed, but I assure you my resolve has never been stronger.
Me, for real.
Hey, buddy.
Yo, yo, yo, sent $5.
Indians have a big grudge against Whitey, especially the 100 IQ ones that are pouring in.
They don't have the testosterone to wear their grievances in your face like a crazy black person, but based on online discourse, there is clearly a ton of it.
nick fuentes
Yeah, they're obviously mad.
streamlabs matthew tts
Chad Champion sent $5.
What is your opinion on the Yes Squad betraying Santa Cruz Medicinals?
Also, have you ever doomed to fruit snacks?
unidentified
John Drew sent $5.
streamlabs matthew tts
Colorblind meritocracy would be semi-tolerable if everyone was whitewashed and Catholic.
Otherwise, you still get race loyalty and eventually oppression of whites.
Get ready to smell curry all day, sir.
07.
nick fuentes
Dude, the Usha Vance glazing is out of control.
And they're setting him up for 2028 already, and they've been doing it.
Every glaze post you see of Vance, be aware they're pushing him for 28. That's why they're glazing him so hard.
unidentified
Oh, every picture he's in, he looks like I'm gonna fucking kill you.
And his wife is beautiful.
Oh, if I would live in Ohio and be poor just to get a chance with Usha.
nick fuentes
Get you a girl that looks at you like Usha looks at JD. It's like, seriously, dude.
Oh my gosh.
It's just downright offensive and insulting.
streamlabs matthew tts
Matthew P sent $10.
I think Indians come from poop like flies.
Courage sent $10.
Did you see the X poll?
Would you rather have illegal Mexicans or illegal Indians?
unidentified
Definitely, I prefer the Mexicans.
streamlabs matthew tts
Thank you.
They all called it.
nick fuentes
They all called it.
Pope Francis, Ted Kaczynski, Spengler, Evola, McLuhan.
Jacques Ellul, Heidegger, they all said this.
I mean, they all didn't say exactly the same thing, but Lincola, they all said this.
So I do think we need to embrace a tech-critical position.
That's going to be really, really important.
Humanity First by Andrew Yang was a brilliant innovation.
We should embrace that totally.
And we should embrace the Pope's encyclical that came out last month or a couple months ago.
That is 100% the future.
streamlabs matthew tts
code CHADCHAMPION to get 20% of your SARM order.
nick fuentes
Yeah.
streamlabs matthew tts
BocaGroi sent $5.
After the election, Libhards were so angry and all that anger was directed towards you for the Your Body My Choice tweet.
Now after the inauguration, they're angry again but this time the anger is at Elon with the salute bullshit.
Seething never stops.
It's true.
I probably prefer Indians over Haitians.
Justin B84 sent $30.
What is so bad about Russia being a major power?
They look like a white Christian nation to me.
nick fuentes
Well, here's why.
Here's the problem.
If Europe, what I meant by it was this.
Power exists in the world.
There's effectively two poles.
You've got Russia, China.
You've got the United States.
Europe is totally dependent on the United States.
If the United States falls, they're at the mercy of Russia and China.
They need the United States.
So if the United States becomes like this – if the United States is no longer white and if the United States is like total communist, Jewish, left-wing, whatever, then they will be dependent on the United States still.
That's the point.
In other words, there's no scenario where the US becomes – But Europe gets to be white nationalist.
There's no scenario where the United States becomes a shithole, progressive dump, or whatever you want to call it, and Europe is unaffected.
There's no scenario where Europe gets to be based independently of the United States.
That's the point I'm trying to make, because Europe isn't independent.
So right now they're dependent on the United States.
If we go down, they go down.
If they were to try and find another superpower, sugar daddy, it's going to be Beijing.
It's going to be Beijing and Moscow.
And Beijing and Moscow are not going to let Europe be independent and strong.
Certainly with China's global south communist ideology, they're not going to let Europe be strong demographically and in other ways.
So the point is...
The only shot that white people have to be sovereign is if they control an empire.
They don't control the Chinese empire.
They can't control an American Atlantic empire.
That's the point.
But they're dependent on us for their defense.
If it wasn't for us, Russia would invade them and it would be not a good situation.
So that's why they have to be.
streamlabs matthew tts
New Hickory sent $10.
Dasha has practically gone from I just want free healthcare, honey, to the reading rats in Venezuela.
This flip needs to be studied.
nick fuentes
Dude, she just says what she's told to say.
I mean, it's a woman.
Let's be honest.
streamlabs matthew tts
Thanks for the advice.
nick fuentes
Thank you.
streamlabs matthew tts
One out of three?
Really, nigger?
nick fuentes
I've been trying not to say nigger this year, but we're having a hard time.
streamlabs matthew tts
All right.
nick fuentes
I like the Tates.
As far as Dave Smith goes, it's just so obvious now.
And look, I like Dave Smith.
Okay, I like him and everything, but it's so obvious that he is being...
And he can say, well, I'm being brought around for my ideas.
It's like you're being brought around because you're a Jew.
Why is every Israel debate Dave Smith and another Jew?
Two Jews.
A Zionist Jew and a Zionist critical Jew, and it's always Dave Smith.
So he's like being brought around to all the different shows.
He's on YouTube.
And it's like, could it get more obvious that like you can't debate Israel unless it's just two Jews debating it?
streamlabs matthew tts
He's an FBI informant.
nick fuentes
He's with the FBI. But thank you for the big super chat.
I appreciate it.
streamlabs matthew tts
Then next, Democrat, president is going to roll them back in by executive order.
We end up with a dieter-totter that toggles every four to eight years, which is what is happening with the Paris climate BS.
unidentified
True.
streamlabs matthew tts
We trade us at $5.
How did Elon succeed in skating around the H-1B debacle and F your own face, where it seemed to be what killed Vivek?
Rumors that Vivek has been canned while Elon remains at the front.
nick fuentes
Because Trump owes Elon immensely.
The difference is Elon gave Trump $300 million.
So Elon just changed the subject and everybody bought it.
All these assholes from Europe just let him get away with it.
Elon came on Twitter.
In case everybody forgot, Elon came on Twitter and said, if you don't want mass immigration, you're a hateful racist.
We're going to get rid of you and you can fuck yourself in the face and I'll ban you.
Then the next day, he said, Muslims, not Indians, not all Asians, but Muslims are a problem in the UK. And all the Europeans said, paste.
And they totally sold us out and threw us under the bus.
And they let him get away with that.
They let him pivot.
Elon just got done saying, I'm in favor of mass immigration.
If you're not, fuck yourself in the face and get lost and I'll ban you.
Then the next day he said, Tommy Robinson should be freed and Muslims suck.
And all these based people said, oh, all right.
unidentified
Well, you know, Elon's pretty good and, you know, maybe it's okay that it's all Jewish.
nick fuentes
Which is crazy.
streamlabs matthew tts
Read rate is sent $5.
Reagan is actually Biden.
And Nixon is the Trump before Trump.
Watergate is some shit they'd add to the 34 felonies.
unidentified
What?
streamlabs matthew tts
John Drew sent $5.
But sir, what if those DEI positions are replaced by Jews?
Rick Fuentes sent $5.
What will the far future look like for America?
Dude.
It's not gonna happen.
One of the first times I've seen his audience turn on him.
These people want white men to live in the dirt.
nick fuentes
Dude, Cernovich is just like an obvious grifter.
streamlabs matthew tts
Courage sent $5.
Piers Morgan said he would now have Tommy Robinson on after he is released from jail, but never you.
Tells you everything you need to know.
nick fuentes
Yes, it does.
streamlabs matthew tts
Numa sent $5.
Hey, big bro.
Is it possible that we might see a left lash in the near future as a response to how openly extreme people have become?
nick fuentes
Yeah, I think we're already seeing that.
streamlabs matthew tts
NJF updates grow a percent $5.
You should get up and teach them about properties in Egypt instead of just sipping Johnny Walker with chopped chino.
These kids learn face to face.
You're mad cause I'm pointing out the obvious to chop chin. - Right. - You're absolutely right about conservatives now needing to fight against libertarianism I know I'm right about that.
nick fuentes
That's what I've been saying.
streamlabs matthew tts
Mmm.
I think you might be right.
nick fuentes
Well, I'm off the McDonald's now, so you got to go and get me something else.
You got to go and get me...
I don't know what's open right now, but I'm off.
I'm trying to eat clean.
I'm trying to be healthy.
It's 2025. So I'm trying to build my summer body.
So we're going to have to get a different...
Can I see a different menu, please?
I know who he is.
I think he's a little ridiculous.
streamlabs matthew tts
Thank you for the big super chat.
nick fuentes
I'm glad you liked the monologue tonight.
Yeah, it really does matter.
It's kind of like one of the most important things.
streamlabs matthew tts
You know? - Bunny Boy sent $5.
Hop, hop, hop, three.
Yo, yo, yo, sent $5.
Do you like Ricardo Duchesne?
I'm reading his book, "Faustian Man in a Multicultural Age." It's very good.
I think he's Puerto Rican, but loves heights and he seems brilliant.
nick fuentes
Is Duchesne Puerto Rican?
I don't know.
It is racist.
But yeah, I'm a big fan of his.
streamlabs matthew tts
Alex Wells sent $5.
Hey, Nick.
Grew up in Chicago suburbs like you.
You nailed the chat earlier.
My app building became all Russian Muslims.
Nobody spoke English.
Signs in Russian.
Felt like my home was taken from me.
Really hit home when you talked earlier.
God bless you.
nick fuentes
I know, dude.
I went to this mall earlier today and there was all this Mexican stuff in there.
And it's like...
It was never like this when I was growing up.
You know, all these foreigners there.
It's like this is a place I went to as a little kid with my mom, and now it's unrecognizable.
It's completely unrecognizable.
It's like it was taken from me.
So that's what people are experiencing everywhere.
streamlabs matthew tts
Yeah, I've seen that.
It's pretty good.
nick fuentes
Thank you.
streamlabs matthew tts
Well, thank you.
nick fuentes
I appreciate that, man.
I'm glad you became Catholic.
streamlabs matthew tts
ugly.
nick fuentes
He's scum, dude, and he's Jewish.
streamlabs matthew tts
Base mode said $5.
Christine in Ohio hasn't super chatted since she tried to get you to open that bomb in your P.O. box.
nick fuentes
I feel bad...
I didn't want to say anything, but it's like I literally haven't been checking my mail because of that.
And she's like, hey, are you going to check the P.O. box?
I sent you something and I'm like, there was a bomb in my mail.
unidentified
There was a bomb in my mail.
nick fuentes
Or at least someone said there was.
So I feel kind of bad, but also it's like a sensitive security thing.
So I'll get around to it one of these days.
Yeah, her assassination attempt failed.
Her attempt on my life was not successful.
I was like, now I know why she really wanted me to, hey, Nick, you really going to want to check your PO box?
Really?
Yeah, I got something for you in there.
streamlabs matthew tts
Oh, awesome.
Because they won.
nick fuentes
Honestly, I don't know.
I have no idea.
I'm leaning no, but I wouldn't be surprised if she got in by the skin of her teeth.
Right now, the odds are 75%, so I know if you put money on it, you'd make a lot of money.
But I don't have any inside baseball on that.
unidentified
Yeah, we're just working on...
nick fuentes
Our manufacturer really fucked us because...
I mean, we pre-ordered these in September.
And they made about a thousand of them, and they fucked them up.
You know, they're supposed to have this red stitching on the side.
You see, there's an American flag with red stitching.
They made hundreds and hundreds, almost a thousand of these hats without the red stitching.
So we started getting his shipments in November, and we're like, yeah, one problem, no red stitching.
So we go, can you add it?
They said, no, we can't add it on.
We said, okay, we need new ones.
And they said, oh, we're all out of the royal blue fabric.
This is royal blue.
They were all out of the fabric.
So we can't make more.
We're like, okay, can you order more fabric?
They're like, well, yeah, but it's going to take months and we have all these back orders.
We said, well, do you have other colors?
They're like, yeah, we think we have this one.
Turns out it was the wrong one.
So we literally just had to find a different manufacturer.
Now we're getting new samples, but we should be ordering from a different company this week.
And then once we get them, then we can open it up again.
But we really just got screwed.
I mean, we have the black ones.
We have the camo.
We ship those.
But the blue ones, they...
It's just like I can just never catch a break.
Like we do AFPAC 4. We have a beautiful venue.
We spend all this money.
We're ready to go.
Oh, 12 hours before doors open?
Eh, we're not going to let you in.
Okay?
Do a hat pre-order.
Oh, we got a credit card processor.
They're ready to work with us.
They know who we are.
We sell all these fucking hats.
Actually, we're not going to process the cards.
We're going to let every transaction expire.
Okay, so we do crypto.
Buy the hats of crypto.
We pre-order them.
Oh, here's your hat, sir.
Oh, we forgot the red stitching.
And we don't have the right fabric.
And we can't order more.
So it's like you just can't catch a break.
People come to my house, try to kill me.
I get charged.
I get charged with a crime.
Someone shows up to antagonize me.
Someone shows up with a fucking gun.
No one's in trouble.
I get charged.
It's crazy.
We'll open it up once we get our blue hats.
Dude, they're just like, it's not all of them, but a lot of these Europeans are just really naive and gullible.
streamlabs matthew tts
Brian Lane sent $40.
Heard you mention Jockaloo last night and appreciate the monologue on the dangers of technology.
Have you read any Swerbena, the metaphysics of technology?
Thesis is that Techné is an autonomous force in the universe like the logos.
Interesting duality when you think of the Jesus as the logos embodied.
nick fuentes
No, I've heard of it, but I haven't read that book.
streamlabs matthew tts
Hunter Appreciator sent $5.
Regarding Europe needing an empire to protect them, is a strength in you not a realistic option?
nick fuentes
Nope.
streamlabs matthew tts
Grow Hyperjustice sent $14.
Instead of considering the U.S. and Europe as different entities competing or cooperating, have you ever considered them as just two camps of the broader Western Jewish Empire?
There is no national sovereignty in these nations, and instead you have them cooperating for international Jewish Empire.
nick fuentes
What a...
Okay.
Just, like, so stupid.
streamlabs matthew tts
It's hard to believe.
Bro, can you come save...
nick fuentes
Have you ever thought that it's, like, Jewish?
No, I never...
streamlabs matthew tts
Have you ever watched this show?
Bro, can you come save Canada as well?
We're so sick of these fucking Indians.
nick fuentes
It's like, sometimes stupidity is just too hard to deal with.
Canada's over.
streamlabs matthew tts
She's a liberal, dude.
I hope so.
Okay.
Yeah, I mean, maybe.
nick fuentes
How do you quantify that?
streamlabs matthew tts
It's kind of subjective.
Heart goes out to you.
Thank you.
Tyler Ventura sent $5.
You think Chicago's bad?
I grew up in Toronto, which is now unrecognizable.
Many neighborhoods entirely Indian.
You land at the airport and you literally feel like you're in India.
In the span of seven years.
Happens faster than people think.
Irreversible.
nick fuentes
Yeah, well, Canada's unique.
I mean, Tyler Russell's from there.
He said it literally changed in like 10 years.
Unrecognizable, population doubled, like literally a different country in 10 years.
And that's pretty unique because the population was small.
I think they had like 20-some million.
Now they have 40 million.
So they literally doubled the population in a quarter of a century, and it all came from India.
So that was pretty remarkable.
And it's odd to say that something similar didn't happen here, but I think it happened here a little more slowly.
streamlabs matthew tts
Repeal 13TH sent $10.
We'll wait patiently.
Thanks, bro.
nick fuentes
Thank you.
unidentified
Okay, that is our last Super Chat.
nick fuentes
That's going to do it for me tonight.
Well, we're back.
Super Chats are back, and they are what they are.
But that's all for tonight.
Remember to smash the follow button, smash the like button, leave a comment down below.
Let me know your thoughts about the show tonight.
I'm on the air Monday through Friday, 8 o'clock central as always.
Thanks for watching.
Special thanks to our top super chatters and world jury, Silver, Caesar Augustus, Echidna Groyper, and Broward Groyper.
Thanks to all of them.
Thanks to all our super chatters, everybody that watches the show.
We love you.
I'll see you tomorrow.
Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
Export Selection