Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
Thank you. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
The Umar generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human. | ||
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom. | ||
Americanism, not globalism, not globalism, not globalism, not globalism, not globalism, | ||
I'm sorry. | ||
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it. | ||
You're an e-girl. | ||
You know the rule. | ||
No e-girls. | ||
Who's got the clip? | ||
No e-girls. | ||
Never! | ||
Hashtag never e-girls. | ||
Not even once. | ||
I've never heard of Mick. | ||
What is that? | ||
Americanism, not globalism. | ||
Will be our freedom. | ||
I've never heard of Mick. | ||
What? | ||
Who's that? | ||
The Homer's generation. | ||
They, they see America merely as a vessel. | ||
for the human being. | ||
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom. | ||
They, they see America merely as a vessel. | ||
I mean, only, only a class of people so rootless in their position would view America in such a way as merely a vessel for abstractions, right? | ||
We're gonna smash your brain in with the Bible, idiots. | ||
We're going to smash your brain in with the Bible, idiot. | ||
And I'm addicted to the serotonin rush. | ||
Where's enough enough, babe? | ||
Where's enough enough, babe? | ||
Just eat a Big Mac, you stupid bitch. | ||
Stranger, you can move a country in a peaceful place. | ||
The money has to stop tonight. | ||
It's not a lesson. | ||
I feel like you can move a country in a peaceful place. | ||
The money has to stop tonight. | ||
It's not a lesson. | ||
I feel like you're not allowed to make jokes anymore. | ||
We're not allowed to make jokes. | ||
It's not funny. | ||
Sipping wine. | ||
Having some pasta. | ||
Having some pizza. | ||
Oh. | ||
I'm weird. | ||
I'm normal. | ||
I'm the father. | ||
I'm normal. | ||
I'm a virgin. | ||
I'm original. | ||
All right. | ||
I'm an original. | ||
What? | ||
What? | ||
One person raised his voice. | ||
The teacher couldn't believe it. | ||
in the classroom, couldn't believe it either. | ||
But in the end, he had logic on his side. | ||
And at the end of the day, he proved his point. | ||
And at the end of the day, he proved his point. | ||
And at the end of the day, he proved his point. | ||
And at the end of the day, he proved his point. | ||
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings. | ||
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom. | ||
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster. | ||
And at the end of the day, he proved his point. | ||
It's not interesting. | ||
I'm sorry. | ||
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it. | ||
You're an e-girl. | ||
You know the rule. | ||
No e-girls. | ||
Who's got the clip? | ||
No e-girls. | ||
Never! | ||
Hashtag never e-girls. | ||
Not even once. | ||
Guy, I've never heard of him think, why did he do that? | ||
I've never heard of him think, why did he do that? | ||
I've never heard of him think, why did he do that? | ||
I've never heard of him think, why did he do that? | ||
They, they see America merely as a vessel. | ||
disaster for the human being. | ||
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom. | ||
They, they see America merely as a vessel. | ||
I mean, only a class of people so rootless in their position would view America in such a way as merely a vessel for or abstractions, right? | ||
We're gonna smash your brain in with the Bible, idiots. | ||
We're going to smash your brain and live the Bible, idiot. | ||
And I'm addicted to the serotonin rush. | ||
Where's enough enough, baby? | ||
Where's enough enough, baby? | ||
See? | ||
Just eat a big mac, you stupid bitch. | ||
Stranger, you can't move a country in a peaceful place. | ||
No money has to stop your life. | ||
It's not a lack of life. | ||
Stranger, you can't move a country in a peaceful place. | ||
You can't move a country in a peaceful place. | ||
It's not a lack of life. | ||
It's not a lack of life. | ||
You're not allowed to make jokes anymore. | ||
We're not allowed to make jokes. | ||
It's not funny. | ||
Sipping wine. | ||
Having some pasta. | ||
Having some pizza. | ||
Oh. | ||
I'm weird. | ||
I'm normal. | ||
I'm the quality. | ||
I'm normal. | ||
I'm a poor kid. | ||
I'm original. | ||
All right. | ||
I'm an original. | ||
One person raised his voice. | ||
The teacher couldn't believe it. | ||
but the classroom couldn't believe it either. | ||
But in the end, he had logic on his side. | ||
And at the end of the day, he proved his point. | ||
And I'm Dickie and Sarah Taylor. | ||
And I'm Dickie and Sarah Taylor. | ||
And I'm Dickie and Sarah Taylor. | ||
And I'm Dickie and Sarah Taylor. | ||
It's going to be only America first. | ||
America first. | ||
The American people will come first once again. | ||
With respect, the respect that we deserve. | ||
From this day forward, it's going to be only America. | ||
America first. | ||
Good evening, everybody. | ||
You're watching America First. | ||
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes. | ||
We have a great show for you tonight. | ||
Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Tuesday. | ||
We have a lot to talk about tonight. | ||
Lots to get into. | ||
unidentified
|
Big show. | |
Our featured story tonight, we're talking about the brutal defeat of Jamal Bowman, the Democrat representative from New York's 16th District. | ||
I don't care that much about him or his loss, and basically he's an anti-white piece of shit. | ||
Okay, so I'm not a fan. | ||
But, Jamal Bowman, what is notable about him and about his loss is that he was defeated at the hands of AIPAC, which we have talked about a lot on the show lately and AIPAC has been getting a lot of attention for their lobbying, particularly this year where they have committed to spend over a hundred million dollars targeting anti-Israel politicians in this cycle. | ||
And so what is interesting about this particular race is that this is actually an historic race. | ||
This is the race in which, take a guess, the most outside money has ever been spent in any congressional election ever. | ||
And that is because AIPAC spent $14.5 million. | ||
In a Democratic primary for Congress to unseat Jamal Bowman. | ||
It's a huge amount of money. | ||
It was many multiples of what he spent, and they were successful. | ||
It's a crushing defeat. | ||
It was not even a small margin. | ||
It was total blowout. | ||
So we'll talk all about this race. | ||
Pretty incredible stuff. | ||
And then we'll also be talking tonight, if we have time, About the New York Times profile of Miriam Adelson as she prepares to, on her part, spend $100 million of her own money to support Donald Trump for president, probably towards the end of the year, in the fall, just before the election. | ||
And they say that Miriam Adelson, like her dead husband, is fiercely pro-Israel. | ||
But unlike her husband, she was actually born in Israel, speaks fluent Hebrew, and has an Israeli accent. | ||
Okay. | ||
I feel like I'm going crazy. | ||
Because for my whole adult life, and especially lately, You may have noticed that I have been accused of being obsessed with Israel and the Jews. | ||
And I suppose it is true that I am fixated on this issue. | ||
Certainly, I'm preoccupied and I do pay a lot of attention to it. | ||
unidentified
|
But that's only because that's what's going on. | |
This is a political show. | ||
It is an election year and they are the ones putting up all the money in the cycle. | ||
Hundreds of millions of dollars. | ||
Just look at the names and look at the people involved. | ||
So It's a political show. | ||
It's an election year. | ||
I talk about who's putting up the political funding for the election and the broader undercurrents and everybody says, well you're obsessed with Israel. | ||
You're a Fed. | ||
All you care about is Jews because you're a crazy anti-Semite. | ||
It's like, have you seen the news lately? | ||
It's kind of like, what's going on? | ||
And it's not just me. | ||
I mean, go to the front page of the New York Times. | ||
Right now! | ||
Do it! | ||
Not, obviously, later it will change. | ||
But if you go to the archive of the New York Times front page from today, you're gonna see these two stories. | ||
100 million from AIPAC, 100 million from Miriam Adelson. | ||
And they're Jewish, and they're pro-Israel, and it's Israeli money, and that's all they care about, and it's controlling our government right now. | ||
Next month, Bibi Netanyahu is going to be giving a speech in Congress. | ||
Right now, there is all kinds of lobbying happening behind the scenes because Netanyahu has accused Biden of slow-walking the foreign aid to Israel. | ||
So all the big business leaders, we were going to cover this yesterday, the CEO of Pfizer, CEO of Citadel, the hedge fund, Blackstone, an alternative investment fund, they're all going to Capitol Hill to demand that the Senate give Israel more money. | ||
It's like everywhere you look. | ||
And we've covered a multitude of these stories over time. | ||
I'm not going to give a preview of every single one. | ||
But it is so blatant right now. | ||
It always was, but especially now. | ||
It's so in your face, and yet no one talks about it. | ||
It's the biggest thing happening right now. | ||
It's defining this political moment right now. | ||
Yes, domestically, and we'll explain exactly how with this story, because I think, you know, like a lot of these things, this is a perfect case study But it's defining everything right now, and yet with all these political talkers, political commentators, pundits, none of them talk about it. | ||
I wonder why. | ||
I wonder what accounts for this omission. | ||
We all know. | ||
And so everybody says I'm crazy. | ||
I'm not crazy. | ||
I'm the only one that's really bringing the truth on this topic. | ||
One of the few people on the right. | ||
On the left they're talking about it, but even on the left they're pulling their punches. | ||
I'm the only one that's really bringing it, and I'm the only one that can, because I'm the only one that's independent. | ||
And at the end of the day, that's what it is. | ||
But I'm the only one that's outside of it, and as such, that's why I'm the only one that can really talk about the whole field. | ||
Everybody else is like pro-Trump or pro-Biden or... They're getting money from somebody. | ||
And... Anyway. | ||
So, you know, I'm doing this show lately and it's... The gaslighting is crazy. | ||
Normally I don't believe in gaslighting. | ||
But in this case it's real. | ||
I'm gonna get my phone out just in case the stream goes down. | ||
I know this is in my pocket. | ||
So yeah I just want to say that before we start the show because I'm like reading the news today and I'm like this is all that matters right now. | ||
And yet, you know, I cover this all the time and people say, oh, well, that's just like, that's the only thing he cares about. | ||
unidentified
|
It's like, well, it's kind of all that's going on in politics. | |
And the next big thing, I think we'll cover this tomorrow or Friday, is this war in Lebanon that's about to happen, but we'll save that for later. | ||
Before we get into the show tonight, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble and Cozy to get a push notification whenever I go live. | ||
Also, Thursday is going to be the first general election debate between President Trump and President Biden. | ||
unidentified
|
Very early this year, I feel like. | |
I don't know historically how early it typically is, but I know that in 2020 and 2016 the debates did not happen until the fall. | ||
So, it's a bit weird that it's happening this early, but we are going to have our coverage of the first general election debate Thursday. | ||
I will be live all day. | ||
All day coverage, getting ready for it. | ||
So make sure to tune into my Rumble channel on Thursday. | ||
Trying to get some big numbers. | ||
I think I'll get some big numbers for people that watch my reaction to it. | ||
Although, I heard that CNN, which is hosting the debate, is not letting people stream it on YouTube. | ||
So I don't know if that will affect me or not. | ||
I really hope it doesn't because that's gonna suck. | ||
If I can't stream this, Like, the level of getting cucked is just insane. | ||
So... But I do plan on doing that, but I just saw a rumor today that they're not letting people stream it. | ||
I don't know the details on that, but... Because I just heard of this today, but... I think most likely it should be fine. | ||
Thursday, all-day coverage here on Rumble exclusively. | ||
Rumble.com slash NickJFluentes. | ||
So make sure to tune in. | ||
Tomorrow I will be on the Alex Jones Show at noon Central Time. | ||
And I'll be joining him remotely. | ||
And yeah, Alex Jones is calling us white supremacists because we're against the H-1B visa scheme. | ||
You know, and I like Alex, as you know. | ||
I think he's a good guy. | ||
But I'm just getting sick of being called names. | ||
I'm being... I'm sick of... It's ironic. | ||
I am obsessed with politics. | ||
To talk about politics, you have to talk about Jewish power. | ||
Because that's the money. | ||
Follow the money. | ||
And don't even take my word for it. | ||
Go to OpenSecrets, the campaign finance website, and look up the top individual contributors in like the last three cycles. | ||
unidentified
|
22, 20, 18, 16. | |
And look at the top donors. | ||
18, 16 and look at the top donors top 25 donors it is what it is but But whenever Alex Jones talks to me or about me, it's always the Nazis, Hitler. | ||
It's like, I'm really... If you watch this show, you know we never talk about Hitler. | ||
Hardly ever. | ||
I just don't. | ||
I'm not like... You know, I don't have this day of rage thing or whatever against Hitler like everybody does. | ||
But whenever he talks about me, it's always Hitler this, Nazis, white supremacist. | ||
And so, as you know, me and all my followers have been very critical of Donald Trump and this, we talked about it last night, this new policy he promised to the Silicon Valley CEOs. | ||
He said he wants to staple a green card to the diploma of every foreign student, even if they're in a junior college, like a two-year degree program. | ||
And as I said last night, this is just like open borders with extra steps, basically. | ||
Because you can imagine if anybody can get a green card and all they have to do is go to a two-year program, how many firms are going to set up students to go to fake two-year programs to get the workers in the country and to get them the green card? | ||
It's basically a license to import as much labor as these big firms demand. | ||
As much as they want. | ||
A two-year degree program? | ||
A junior college? | ||
That's nothing. | ||
So it's a major boon to the universities and firms, particularly Silicon Valley. | ||
And we talked about it last night. | ||
I don't think we even talked about race last night, but Alex Jones said you're a white supremacist if you don't support this. | ||
If you don't support the best and brightest from everywhere coming in here. | ||
And I do think it's a racial issue, but you can oppose this on really any grounds. | ||
Cultural grounds, economic grounds, national security, any way that you cut it. | ||
Mass immigration is not good for us. | ||
I mean, the argument they always make is it's about economics, but if you look at the economics of mass migration, it's not good for Americans. | ||
We talked about this last night. | ||
It benefits somebody, But the question is whom? | ||
It does not benefit American workers. | ||
It doesn't benefit Americans in the capacity of Americans living within a coherent society. | ||
I don't think it's beneficial to have a ton of racial diversity, actually, in a given community, school, workplace. | ||
So it's not beneficial to the worker financially. | ||
It's not beneficial in a non-economic way. | ||
It's beneficial to the immigrants and the firms that employ them. | ||
We covered that all last night. | ||
But Alex Jones says you're a white supremacist if you have a problem with it. | ||
Fundamentally, they could be white, they could be Asian, they could be whatever color, but it's about us. | ||
It's not about them, it's about us. | ||
It's about, does the United States have the right To maintain an immigration program and a level of immigration that is beneficial to the native people, to the citizens. | ||
That's the question. | ||
There is no question whether immigration benefits the immigrants. | ||
Of course it does. | ||
But the government of the United States represents the citizens of the United States, not the citizens of other countries that would benefit by coming here individually. | ||
What's more, I believe the best and brightest are in America. | ||
The best and brightest are not in China or India. | ||
The best and brightest in the world are here. | ||
And we should cultivate and fully employ and fully take advantage of the aptitudes and the talents of our own people first, and then If there is need for highly specialized people or maybe world-class talents, we can bring those people in in small numbers. | ||
They always point to a guy like Elon Musk, but These are not Elon Musks that are being brought over in every way, shape, or form. | ||
Whether it's H-2B, H-1B, O-1, whatever program you want to talk about, these temporary, permanent, work visas, family migration, none of these people are Elon Musk. | ||
So, maybe we'll talk about that tomorrow, I'm not sure, but I saw that and I didn't appreciate it. | ||
I mean, and honestly, even saying white supremacist at this stage is really just unacceptable. | ||
If you're saying white supremacist in any way other than in a descriptive way to talk about a very, very small... Because there are, I believe, legitimate white supremacists. | ||
I would call them like Nordicists or something. | ||
There are legitimate white supremacists. | ||
I think they're very few in number. | ||
I'm not really one of them. | ||
But I think using that in this leftist context as a pejorative, anybody that's pro-white, anybody that wants white people to have rights, anybody that believes America should be a homeland for white people or culturally white, To use that pejorative against that kind of position is just unacceptable. | ||
I mean, I don't even think the left uses that as much anymore. | ||
I know I just called that... It's so funny, I got called that the other day by AOC, and then Alex Jones a few days later. | ||
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez calls me a white supremacist, and then three days later Alex Jones calls me a white supremacist. | ||
I love everybody. | ||
You know, I think everybody is created by God, but we don't want an unlimited amount of immigration from Asia here. | ||
Like, yeah, we just don't. | ||
It's got nothing to do with hating them or thinking we're better than them. | ||
We don't want them here. | ||
They don't want us there, and we don't want them here. | ||
That is Asia. | ||
This is America. | ||
If you love India and Indians, go to India. | ||
If you love Japan and Japanese, go to Japan. | ||
And if you love white Americans, then you should come to America. | ||
But this kind of unlimited immigration scheme is making it so that, as always, we're the only group that isn't entitled to what everybody else is entitled to. | ||
They have a homeland. | ||
They get to live among their own, among their race, which is their extended family. | ||
They get to live in a culturally... Of course, India is not monocultural, but they do have their own cultural identity in India. | ||
And for some reason, if we believe that we're entitled to the same thing, well, that makes us evil haters of other... cruel haters of other groups, prejudiced. | ||
So I'm getting really sick of that. | ||
I don't appreciate that and I feel like we've been very supportive of Alex Jones lately Especially in light of what he's been going through for him to turn that around so dishonest and say we're white supremacists I don't think we mentioned race even one. | ||
I mean, maybe we mentioned it a little bit last night, but I said it on Twitter. | ||
Federation for American Immigration Reform, Center for Immigration Studies, Migration Institute. | ||
These are all mainstream, right-wing, immigration restrictionist think tanks. | ||
And they have all been against this policy for like 15 years. | ||
Are they white supremacists? | ||
Is Mark Krikorian a white supremacist? | ||
Is Michelle Malkin a white supremacist? | ||
Give me a break. | ||
So, and Tucker Carlson, he said the same thing when Charlie Kirk was saying the staple green cards to diplomas, Tucker said the same thing about it. | ||
Excuse me. | ||
So, anyway, but I'll be speaking with him tomorrow. | ||
We'll see if we get into that. | ||
But yeah, I feel like the immigration conversation, I thought that was sort of over, but I guess there's some people that are still on this like I'm a libertarian. | ||
We gotta bring in as many people as we can. | ||
Like what? | ||
No. | ||
Anyway. | ||
But that's that. | ||
I want to move on. | ||
I want to get into our featured story tonight which is about this Jamal Bowman from New York. | ||
And there was a major election today in New York, statewide primary race in New York State. | ||
And the big story is that this far-left, progressive, black member of the squad in the Democrat conference in the House has been dealt a decisive defeat by an AIPAC-backed candidate in the Democratic primary. | ||
So, Jamal Bowman is good friends with AOC, and Cori Bush, and Rashida Tlaib, and Ilhan Omar, and that whole group of, like I said, far-left progressives in the Democrat conference in the House. | ||
And, like some of them, he has been vocally opposed to the war in Gaza, or the genocide in Gaza, since October 7th. | ||
As a result of this, AIPAC, the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee, has pledged $14.5 million to unseat him in the Democratic primary. | ||
This makes it, the historic election, the most outside money ever spent in a congressional election. | ||
This one. | ||
And by outside, that means a PAC. | ||
That means not given political campaign and from money that's coming from outside the district. | ||
This is not money that's coming from the actual constituents of the district. | ||
It's not coming from the people that are doing the voting. | ||
It's coming from an outside pack. | ||
It's coming from somewhere else. | ||
It has to do with other issues. | ||
And that's notable, of course, because to provide a little bit of context with What this even is, as you know, the House of Representatives is the people's house. | ||
It is the only chamber of government that under the Constitution is supposed to be directly elected by the people. | ||
That changed with the 17th Amendment, now the Senate is as well. | ||
Presidency is effectively that too, but according to the Framers, the House of Representatives is the lower chamber, one half of the bicameral Congress, which is supposed to be Directly answerable to the people. | ||
And as such, representation is allocated based on population. | ||
The Senate, every state has two senators. | ||
So it's allocated based on each representative represents a state. | ||
The House, each representative represents a tangible number of people. | ||
And there is a minimum, that's why states like Wyoming will have a few representatives. | ||
And so there are less and more depending on the size of the state. | ||
Nevertheless, This is basically like local government. | ||
These are the representatives of Westchester County in New York City that go to the National Congress to represent the interests of those particular people. | ||
And yet, this election was decided by 15 million dollars of outside money which basically came from the State of Israel. | ||
So, go figure. | ||
There's like 200,000 people in this district. | ||
I think it's like 150,000-200,000 people in this district. | ||
Westchester County is one of them. | ||
I forget the name. | ||
It's two counties. | ||
Relatively small population. | ||
And this election was decided by the Jewish State of Israel in the Middle East. | ||
And the money was spent in this district because of the position that their representative took on a conflict that was happening in the Middle East. | ||
So, it's got nothing to do, in other words, with the people in the district. | ||
It's not their money, it's not their war, and fundamentally, it's not even their representative. | ||
Because if the money influenced the outcome of the election, and the money came from Israel rather than the people in the district, then really that's Israel's representative in our Congress for the 16th District of New York. | ||
For Westchester County in New York City. | ||
Go figure. | ||
And remember, if you have a problem with this, you're anti-semitic. | ||
If you have a problem with this, you hate Israel, you support Hamas, you are holding Israel to a higher standard, you are a conspiracy theorist, And you're obsessed with Jewish people, if you see anything wrong with this. | ||
And of course the reason this is notable is because this is part of a much larger story. | ||
AIPAC has committed to spending over a hundred million dollars in this cycle, particularly targeting various members of government that have been critical of Israel since October 7th. | ||
We last covered this. | ||
When AIPAC put in, I think, $300,000-$400,000 in Representative Thomas Massey's district in his primary. | ||
Thomas Massey is too popular for AIPAC to unseat him in the primary, but it didn't stop AIPAC from spending money not only in his district, but statewide, in the entire state of Kentucky, running negative ads against him to try and preempt Any attempt that he might make to run for governor or run for Senate in the future. | ||
So AIPAC is spending money on both sides. | ||
They're spending money in Republican primaries, in Democrat primaries. | ||
They're spending money in Kentucky, in Pennsylvania, in California, in Michigan, in New York. | ||
APAC, which represents the interests of Israel, is targeting critics of a foreign country in a foreign conflict, statewide, both parties, to the tune of $100 million, making them one of the biggest contributors in this entire cycle. | ||
And this story tonight is specifically about Jamal Bowman. | ||
I'll read a little news clipping here from the New York Times. | ||
It says, quote, Representative Jamal Bowman of New York, one of Congress's most outspoken progressives, suffered a stinging primary defeat on Tuesday. | ||
Mr. Bowman was defeated by George Latimer, the Westchester County Executive, in a race that became the year's ugliest intra-party brawl and most expensive House primary in history. | ||
The most expensive House primary ever. | ||
More money than in any House primary in history. | ||
It began last fall when Mr. Bowman stepped forward as one of the leading critics of how Israel was carrying out its war with Hamas. | ||
Funny. | ||
The most money ever spent, the most contentious intra-party conflict, And it was over criticism of a foreign war. | ||
Had nothing to do with the district or America. | ||
It's about Israel. | ||
Mr. Bowman, the district's first black congressman and a committed democratic socialist, never wavered from his calls for a ceasefire in Gaza or left-wing economic priorities. | ||
He repeatedly accused his opponent of racism and used expletives in denouncing the pro-Israel group as a Zionist regime trying to buy the election. | ||
Which is what that is. | ||
Israel is the Zionist regime and they made it the most expensive primary in history because they bought the election and had to spend a ton of money. | ||
A super PAC affiliated with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel lobby, dumped $15 million into defeating him, more than any outside group has ever spent on a House race. | ||
The movement once held up Mr. Bowman's upset win in a Democratic primary in 2020 as proof of the assent of the political left. | ||
Now with the pendulum swinging back toward the party center, he is the first member of the House's squad of young left-wing lawmakers of color to lose a seat. | ||
And isn't it interesting how much American society has moved to the right since October 7th? | ||
This is something I've talked about for a long time. | ||
You need to pay very close attention to this. | ||
There was an article, I think in the New York Times, in like November 2023, and it talked about how after the October 7th attack, the Israeli left, the political left in the state of Israel, basically evaporated overnight. | ||
There used to be, and for a long time, you have to understand, Israel was basically founded by socialists and run by leftists for like the first 20 years of its existence. | ||
And for a long time since then, there has been a coalition of left-wing Israelis that support a two-state solution, meaning a Palestinian state on the border with Israel, and full civilian control over the territory, and human rights for them, and so on. | ||
But after the barbarism of the October 7th attack, and I say barbarism because, of course, Gaza was a concentration camp for 15 years and is now being deliberately starved to death, so it's always interesting how words like that are thrown around in one direction, but they say that because of the barbarism of the attack on October 7th, now there is no political left in Israel. | ||
There is effectively no opposition to the right wing that says there should be no Palestinian state, there should be no Palestine, there should be no Arab population on the border with Israel. | ||
And I was one of the first people, and one of the few people, to call out how The change in Israeli domestic politics was casting a shadow on American domestic politics. | ||
Israeli society shifted to the right, and because Jews and Zionist Jews and Israeli Jews are so influential in American elite society, I said that that is causing a secondary effect, which is that America is now shifting to the right. | ||
It's not organic. | ||
It's not spontaneous. | ||
It has nothing to do with what's happening in America. | ||
America is moving to the right because its Jewish elites are moving to the right. | ||
And they move to the right because of the effect of October 7th on the global Jewish consciousness. | ||
And there are a few very obvious examples of this. | ||
Bill Ackman is one of them. | ||
Bill Ackman was a lifelong Democrat and a lifelong donor to the Democrat Party. | ||
But after October 7th, he committed to supporting Donald Trump. | ||
And he wrote an open letter to his university, Harvard, saying that the October 7th attack opened his eyes about cancel culture and the excesses of leftism. | ||
And he made a concerted effort to decapitate the leadership of Harvard University, which was the president, Claudine Gay, who was too tolerant of pro-Palestinian protesters. | ||
So that's one example of a Jewish Zionist elite, a billionaire hedge fund manager in America, who was moved to the right because of what happened in Israel, and as such moved America that much further to the right. | ||
The same is also true of Jacob Helberg. | ||
And we talked about him last night. | ||
Jacob Helberg is Jewish. | ||
I believe he's a billionaire, but he's very rich. | ||
He's gay, married to Keith Raboi, who's friends with Peter Thiel, part of the PayPal Mafia, venture capitalist. | ||
Jacob Helberg's Jewish, Zionist. | ||
In 2020, he gave money to Pete Buttigieg. | ||
In his life, he raised $2 million for the Democrats. | ||
After October 7th, he became the main connector that moved money from Silicon Valley to Trump, away from Biden. | ||
And Jacob Helberg himself gave the maximum amount to one of the Trump PACs, one of the Trump funding committees, which was nearly a million dollars. | ||
So that's another example. | ||
A gay Jewish Democrat who gave money to Pete Buttigieg, now giving money to Trump and raising money for Trump. | ||
Just like Bill Ackman. | ||
And the reason that they moved to the right, both of them, is because of what happened on October 7th. | ||
And this is what is happening here too. | ||
Years ago, the progressive left was ascendant. | ||
But ever since October 7th, now, Jamal Bowman and Cori Bush are vulnerable because of Jewish money, specifically in this case AIPAC, in their Democratic primaries. | ||
So when the New York Times says the pendulum is swinging back, And I think other people are noticing the same political trend. | ||
They imagine that this is spontaneous, this is organic. | ||
They imagine this is a bottom-up reaction to leftist overreach. | ||
They envision that real Americans like you and me, that have nothing to do with Israel, Have had enough of Biden and had enough of pronouns and whatever. | ||
But that is not it at all! | ||
What has precipitated the pendulum swinging? | ||
The pendulum did not passively swing. | ||
Passive language. | ||
It just happened. | ||
No, it didn't just happen. | ||
It was pushed. | ||
It was driven by events in a foreign country that affected the consciousness of our foreign interloping elite Who have then used their money and their influence in media and politics to shape a new political consensus. | ||
That is what happened. | ||
Jamal Bowman didn't get pushed out because the people had enough. | ||
He was pushed out by Jewish money. | ||
Because he took the wrong position on a crisis, an event, that happened on the other side of the world. | ||
That is what happened. | ||
Now don't get me wrong. | ||
I don't support Jamal Bowman. | ||
I don't support AOC. | ||
And they don't support me. | ||
They probably hate my guts. | ||
And AOC has even said as much. | ||
She called me a white supremacist. | ||
She said that there is no small difference between us. | ||
We have irreconcilable differences. | ||
And right back at you. | ||
Absolutely, she dreams of a multiracial liberal democracy. | ||
I dream of like an empire, like an illiberal Catholic empire. | ||
We couldn't be further from each other. | ||
It's true. | ||
And I don't support them. | ||
But I can stand back objectively and say that this is what has transpired. | ||
And I would question, and this is an important thing, I would question how beneficial it is. | ||
Because some people say, well, it doesn't matter how the pendulum swings, what matters is that the pendulum swings. | ||
It doesn't matter how the far left is being disempowered, it matters that the left is being disempowered. | ||
I would argue that it matters quite a bit. | ||
I think it matters very much how and why. | ||
Because, as we talked about last night, if the power remains in the hands of Jewish Zionists, or Jews in general, and they are the ones controlling how and when and how much the pendulum swings, then this is the only political problem. | ||
Because it shouldn't be up to them. | ||
It should be up to us. | ||
It should be up to Americans. | ||
It should be up to Christians. | ||
It should not be up to people that don't believe in Jesus Christ. | ||
It should not be up to people that are not loyal to America. | ||
So I actually don't think it's absolutely beneficial that the far left is being defeated by a foreign lobby. | ||
If the far left was being defeated because Americans became more Catholic and more patriotic, That, I think, would be great. | ||
But the far left is basically being scammed. | ||
They're basically being gypped because Israel has come in with boatloads of cash to overthrow them because they're criticizing a foreign conflict on our involvement in it. | ||
I don't think that's a good thing, actually. | ||
And I question how much we really reap the benefits. | ||
I'll give you one last example, then we'll finish the article. | ||
Last year, Geert Wilders, the Dutch nationalist, won the plurality of seats in the parliament in the Netherlands. | ||
And for those who don't know, Geert Wilders is an immigration restrictionist, and he's anti-Muslim. | ||
And he has ascended in Dutch politics because he says that Islam is taking over his country and he wants the Muslims out. | ||
He wants the mosques shut down, he wants the call to prayer to end, and he wants the Muslims to stop invading. | ||
Something I absolutely support. | ||
But Geert Wilders is also Jewish. | ||
And Geert Wilders is also involved with Israel, and with Netanyahu, and with the Zionist network that's involved with all the right-wing populist movements like Trump, Millet, Orban, Bolsonaro, Vox in Spain, and so on. | ||
Geert Wilders, when he won the election, was photographed inside of his office with an Israeli flag behind him. | ||
A lot of people said that's innocuous. | ||
A lot of people said this is a great victory for immigration restrictionists. | ||
Geir Wilders is talking about the Islamification of Europe, or the Islamicization of Europe. | ||
He won. | ||
The right wing is ascendant. | ||
And you're mad because a flag was in the background? | ||
You're mad because of some dubious connection he may or may not have with an organized Jewish political network in the world? | ||
Look at the bright side. | ||
This is a victory. | ||
It didn't take long before Geert Wilders, the immigration restrictionist, with the Israeli flag in the background, bagged down from his proposal to ban mosques and ban the Quran. | ||
Just three months later, he said, I no longer submit the proposal to ban mosques and the Quran. | ||
It gets better. | ||
Just this week, Geert Wilders said that, according to his party, I think it was a spokesman for his party, Forum for Democracy, they said, if you believe that there is a great replacement happening in Europe through migration, you are a racist. | ||
Geert Wilders' party So I question how beneficial it really is when Jews and Israelis are the ones triumphing over the left. | ||
It's not us. | ||
Don't be mistaken. | ||
Just because the left lost doesn't mean you won. | ||
And that's so important. | ||
We have to take our own side. | ||
Israel winning an election is not America winning an election. | ||
Israel winning an election is not Christians or whites or right-wingers winning an election. | ||
It's Israel winning the election. | ||
It's on their terms. | ||
It's with their money. | ||
It's with their influence that they wield in our media. | ||
So don't be mistaken for one second. | ||
I question and I seriously doubt whether there is a benefit at all to the far left being defeated by these foreigners. | ||
It wasn't beneficial in Europe. | ||
I hardly think it's beneficial in America. | ||
It certainly isn't beneficial here. | ||
So anyway, the article says the pendulum has swung back to the right, which is a shadow, it's a reflection of the shift to the right in Israel, and that tells you something about our elites. | ||
When there's a shift to the right in India, nobody notices. | ||
When there's a shift to the right in Niger, Nobody notices. | ||
When there's a shift to the right in Austria, nobody notices. | ||
But when there's a shift to the right in Israel, America elects Trump. | ||
Trump is acceptable now. | ||
The squad is taking their first L. What does that tell you about who runs America? | ||
Follow the money. | ||
Anyway, the article goes on. | ||
It says, Mr. Latimer, who is now the nominee for the Democrats in this district, Mr. Latimer, a more traditional supporter of Israel, entered the race in December at the urging of local rabbis and a Westchester County Democratic establishment that never moved past their grudges from 2020. | ||
Raphael Rosen, Take a wild guess at his ethnicity. | ||
a kidney doctor from New Rochelle said, This is one of the constituents. This is one of the constituents. | ||
Because the American representative didn't see the Jewish and specifically Israeli experience, he's got to go. - No. | ||
Nice. | ||
But remember, it is now the lawful definition of anti-Semitism to say that Jews are loyal to Israel. | ||
According to the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, Which has now enshrined this definition in the Department of Education. | ||
It is anti-semitic to say that Jews have a special allegiance to the State of Israel. | ||
But this is a constituent of the 16th District in New York, a Jew, saying he had to go because he doesn't understand the Israeli experience. | ||
Specifically, Israeli. | ||
Nice. | ||
Do you think these people support America First in any way, shape, or form? | ||
That's why this slogan is so important. | ||
This credo. | ||
Because they don't believe it. | ||
He added, a lot of strong Israel supporters supported him in 2020 and I've heard all of them kind of say that was a big mistake. | ||
APAC's involvement further inflamed the race, a bipartisan group dedicated to advancing Israel's interests in the United States. | ||
It has taken an increasingly active role in electoral politics to stamp out growing skepticism for Israel among Democrats. | ||
Mr. Bowman presented not only a vulnerable target, but an opportunity to send a message. | ||
The group bundled $2 million in contributions directly to Mr. Latimer, while its super PAC, United Democracy Project, spent seven times more than Mr. Bowman's allies combined. | ||
Seven times more. | ||
The ads almost- and get this, this is the best part. | ||
These ads, 15 million dollars worth of ads paid for by outside money from Israel, never mentioned Israel itself. | ||
Instead, they attacked Mr. Bowman as a disloyal Democrat for voting against President Biden's landmark infrastructure bill and a bipartisan deal to avert a debt crisis. | ||
And this is so important It never presents itself as overt or explicit. | ||
When AIPAC puts their money in the race and they buy a negative advertisement, it doesn't say, vote against Jamal Bowman. | ||
He doesn't like Israel. | ||
Paid for by Jews for Israel. | ||
It's never overt. | ||
It says Jamal Bowman is not loyal to Joe Biden. | ||
He didn't vote for the infrastructure bill. | ||
Paid for by United for Democracy. | ||
But United for Democracy is a PAC that is paid for by AIPAC and AIPAC gets their money from Israel. | ||
So if you just turn on the television you see what appears to be By all appearances, it's masked as an appeal to Democrats from the left about American left-wing priorities. | ||
We have to vote against Jamal Bowman because he didn't vote for the infrastructure bill. | ||
He wasn't loyal to Biden. | ||
Paid for by United for Democracy. | ||
And if that's all you see on television or YouTube, that's what you perceive it to be. | ||
But if you go and follow the money, you see that United for Democracy is a front for Israel. | ||
And you see that this whole election was about Israel. | ||
As a matter of fact, the Democrat primary challenger was urged to run by rabbis. | ||
And his support in Westchester County came from the 135,000 Jews in the district who felt that Bowman was not loyal enough to Israel. | ||
So this was a race about Israel. | ||
A challenger who was urged to run by Israel. | ||
It was the most expensive race in history because of money from Israel. | ||
It was the most outside money ever spent in a primary by Israel. | ||
And he lost because he wasn't loyal to Israel. | ||
But the advertisements said it was about infrastructure in America. | ||
And the group that bought the ads called themselves the Democracy Project. | ||
And this is how they mask their pernicious influence in politics. | ||
And if you pay attention, you'll see a lot of this. | ||
It was the same thing in Kentucky with Thomas Massey. | ||
It's the same thing with Candace Owens with Daily Wire. | ||
It's the same thing with Bernie Sanders and what's happening with Bibi Netanyahu. | ||
It's the same thing that happens with me. | ||
They never say, we don't like Nick Fuentes because he's not loyal enough to Israel. | ||
They say, well, Nick Fuentes is against Trump. | ||
Nick Fuentes is disloyal to Trump. | ||
It's the same thing. | ||
Laurel Loomer doesn't attack me. | ||
Laurel Loomer, who's a Jew Zionist that's connected to the Zionist Organization of America. | ||
Laura Loomer doesn't attack me and say Nick Fuentes isn't loyal enough to Israel because she knows how that would come across. | ||
Instead, she says Nick Fuentes isn't loyal to Trump. | ||
Nick Fuentes is a bad Republican because he's not supporting President Trump when he needs it the most and he is not about the border. | ||
When Bronze Age Pervert and Curtis Yarvin, a network which is deeply connected to Silicon Valley, which is deeply connected to the State of Israel, when they attack me, they don't say Nick Fuentes doesn't support Israel. | ||
They say I'm a low IQ anti-Semite. | ||
I'm actually brown and this is a multi-racial movement and I don't support immigration restriction anymore. | ||
It's always masked. | ||
And that's why you need to follow the money. | ||
So when people say to me, well you're looking for any connection, no matter how dubious, it's not that at all. | ||
It's about following the money and seeing what is actually motivating these attacks. | ||
What's actually moving politics? | ||
What's actually moving the donors? | ||
In this case, the pendulum did not swing because of public opposition to the left. | ||
The pendulum swung because of AIPAC. | ||
Bowman didn't lose the election because of infrastructure, he lost the election because of $15 million in outside money. | ||
And the money came into the district because of Israel. | ||
That's who sent it, that's what they were motivated by, and that's what it was about. | ||
But you sound crazy if you tell an average person that who only saw the ad that made it seem like it was about Biden and the debt ceiling and infrastructure. | ||
And this is politics. | ||
That's why when you turn on Fox News, which is owned by News Corp, which is owned by Lachlan and Rupert Murdoch, who are personal friends of Netanyahu, they're talking every day about Biden and Trump and Pelosi and McCarthy and this and that. | ||
They're not talking about Jacob Helberg. | ||
They're not talking about David Sachs. | ||
They're not talking about Bill Ackman. | ||
They're not talking about AIPAC. | ||
They're not talking about Miriam Adelson. | ||
They're not talking about the money. | ||
And that's why, you know, I kind of let off the show at the start saying this is like gaslighting. | ||
That's exactly what it is. | ||
You watch this show and say, what the heck? | ||
All he talks about is Jewish money. | ||
When we think that politics is about Republicans and Democrats. | ||
But the Republican and Democrat stuff is really a front. | ||
So much of what you see is really just a front and a mask for these elite battles between different factions. | ||
And this last story we'll talk about, there's a good excerpt here that I think Explains that a little bit further our last story tonight, and then we're we're gonna have to move quickly and then take a look at the super chats is about Miriam Adelson and As you know Miriam Adelson She is the widow of Sheldon Adelson Sheldon Adelson was a casino magnate | ||
Who was a multi-multi-billionaire and for 15 years since Citizens United was one of the biggest contributors, one of the biggest individual donors in politics. | ||
He gave roughly a hundred million dollars in 16, a hundred million dollars in 2020. | ||
He died shortly after. | ||
He's a single-issue voter. | ||
It's all about Israel. | ||
And people largely believe that Sheldon Adelson's $100 million contribution to Trump and subsequent contributions are what pushed Trump to move the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. | ||
So the big story in the New York Times today is a profile on Miriam Adelson, the widow, who is now recommitting another $100 million to Trump in 2024. | ||
And this is the story. | ||
It says, quote, she is poised to become one of the biggest donors in the presidential election. | ||
Okay, biggest donors in the presidential election. | ||
I wonder who it is. | ||
I wonder what individual would be so influential and so powerful in the vast and powerful country that is the United States and the election which appoints the most powerful office in the world. | ||
I wonder who that person is that's going to have so much influence with their money. | ||
It's as if Mr. Trump wins one of the most powerful private citizens with a say in American foreign policy. | ||
Fiercely hawkish on Israel, she was deeply unnerved by the Hamas attack on October 7th, and would be likely to shape a second Trump administration posture on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. | ||
Miri, as friends call Dr. Miriam Adelson, a physician who specializes in drug addiction and is known for her distinctive highlighter blonde hair and pink tinted glasses, is one of the wealthiest women in the world. | ||
She is in some ways a political carbon copy of her husband Sheldon Adelson. | ||
Intensely pro-Israel, rabidly partisan, and a believer in the nobility of using her money, north of 30 billion dollars, and her media empire to buy influence and shape the world. | ||
Sorry, who wrote this? | ||
unidentified
|
Is this, uh, is this Mein Kampf? | |
Is this Dr. David Duke? | ||
No, sorry, this is the New York Times. | ||
Okay. | ||
And it's all factual. | ||
Dr. Miriam Adelson is intensely pro-Israel and a believer in the nobility of using her $30 billion and media empire to buy influence and shape the world. | ||
Unlike her husband, she was born in Israel, speaks fluent Hebrew, her English marked by a heavy Israeli accent. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay? | |
Let's rewind. | ||
Poised to become one of the biggest donors, the most powerful private citizen with the say in foreign policy, fiercely pro-Israel, likely to shape a second Trump administration's posture on the Israeli conflict. | ||
Fiercely pro-Israel, believes in the nobility of using money and her media empire to buy influence and shape the world. | ||
Born in Israel, speaks fluent Hebrew, English marked by a heavy Israeli accent. | ||
A former officer in the Israeli Defense Forces, she spends most of her time these days not in her longtime home in Las Vegas, but in Israel, where she holds dual citizenship. | ||
I'm reading from the article. | ||
Her Israeli nationalism has tethered her to Mr. Trump, especially since October 7th. | ||
She has argued that people who criticize Israel or offer only qualified support are dead to us. | ||
Anyone that criticizes Israel or supports Israel but with qualifications is dead to her. | ||
Okay. | ||
The Adelson's bond with Trump was etched into stone when his administration moved the United States Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv. | ||
They sat in the front row at the opening ceremony. | ||
And would later pay $88 million for the Mediterranean Villa in Herzliya, where the ambassador had lived before the embassy move, helping to ensure that a future administration could never reverse it. | ||
So in other words, they gave Trump $100 million to move the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. | ||
They sat there in the front row of the opening ceremony when it opened. | ||
Then, they spent another $100 million to buy the villa where the American ambassador to Israel used to live in Tel Aviv. | ||
So that if another president came in and said, no, we're moving back, they couldn't. | ||
Because the Adelsons bought it. | ||
And now she lives there! | ||
This is our country. | ||
I just read that part. | ||
This year, Dr. Adelson does not have a specific wish list for Mr. Trump. | ||
Her spokesman, Andy Abood, denied a recent report that Dr. Adelson was urging Mr. Trump to support an annexation of the West Bank. | ||
Dr. Adelson's bets don't always pay off. | ||
She and her husband enjoyed an extraordinarily close relationship with Prime Minister Netanyahu of Israel, who even prevailed upon them to start their own newspaper in Israel, which enthusiastically promoted his administration. | ||
But her relationship with Mr. Netanyahu is virtually non-existent now, and the paper's coverage has grown more critical of his leadership. | ||
Now, when Jewish people say, we don't control politics, they usually say things like, we're not a monolith! | ||
Jewish people are not a monolith, and you are ignorant to call such a thing as Jewish power. | ||
But when they refer to disagreements between Jews, this is what they mean. | ||
They mean that the fiercely pro-Israel billionaire Jews that control the media and politics with their money to influence our foreign policy to support Israel disagrees with the President of Israel. | ||
When they say Jews aren't a monolith, that's what they mean. | ||
Those are the contours of the disagreements. | ||
You see, it is totally ignorant to describe such a thing as Jewish power. | ||
After all, Jews are not a monolith. | ||
It would be ignorant to suggest that Jews work in a coordinated way. | ||
And here's a perfect example. | ||
The top contributor, the top individual contributor in politics for 15 years, who are single issue voters, only care about Israel, use their media control and money to get America to support Israel, you know, they sometimes disagree with the President of Israel. | ||
So, there is no Jewish power. | ||
You're an anti-Semite for suggesting that. | ||
They disagree on a lot of things. | ||
unidentified
|
It gets better! | |
The article goes on. | ||
Ike Perlmutter, the billionaire former chief executive of Marvel Entertainment, started a pro-Trump super PAC and his team made a particularly forward effort. | ||
He spoke with Dr. Adelson, his longtime friend, multiple times over the last year and tried to persuade her to join forces with him. | ||
The Adelsons have long had a reputation as lone wolves and Dr. Adelson was always more likely to donate to a group that she could control. | ||
So Ike Perlmutter is another Jew-Zionist friend of Adelson who has given Trump 10 million dollars. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
So this is American politics. | ||
AIPAC, American Israel Public Affairs Committee, spends $100 million to unseat anti-Israel Democrats and Republicans. | ||
They overthrow Jamal Bowman with their money because he wasn't sufficiently pro-Israel. | ||
Bill Ackman goes from Democrat to Republican and gets the president of Harvard and UPenn fired by using his media and money. | ||
Jacob Helberg, a gay Jewish Democrat, goes from Democrat to Republican and raises millions of dollars for Trump and gets all the Silicon Valley CEOs on Trump's side giving him money because Trump will support Israel. | ||
Maria Madelson commits $100 million to Trump because he will support Israel and anyone that doesn't support Israel unquestionably is dead to her. | ||
Ike Perlmutter, a Jew-Zionist, friend of Adelson, gives Trump $10 million. | ||
The CEOs of Pfizer, Citadel, Blackstone go to the Senate to lobby the U.S. | ||
Congress to continue the flow of foreign aid to Israel. | ||
Candace Owens gets fired from Daily Wire, the $100-$200 million-a-year conservative media empire, because she was critical of Israel. | ||
It goes on and on and on and on and on. | ||
If you're not talking about this, you are not talking about anything. | ||
This is politics. | ||
You think I'm obsessed with this? | ||
This is politics. | ||
This is what drives it. | ||
This is what pays for it. | ||
This is what it is. | ||
is what it is. | ||
And this is the only distinction that matters. | ||
If you're a Christian, if you are loyal to America, the alarm bells should be going off. | ||
If you're a loyal American, This is an urgent, all-important crisis that our whole country is being controlled by outside Jewish money. | ||
It's being controlled by people that are not Christian, and they're not loyal to America, and their money is driving everything. | ||
Their money is driving politics, their money is driving the media, the media influences politics, and politics is what controls our military, our investment, our economy, our border. | ||
If you're not talking about this, you are controlled opposition or you're ignorant. | ||
Either way, you are not talking about anything serious. | ||
This is not a small issue. | ||
This is not negligible. | ||
This is not ignorable. | ||
Hundreds of millions of dollars being injected into politics With one overriding purpose and influencing everybody with the chilling effect on Capitol Hill and the bureaucracy and the private sector, it's not negligible. | ||
As far as I'm concerned, they're a single-issue voter one way, I'm a single-issue voter the other way. | ||
And it's not the fate of the West Bank, it's whether America controls its own destiny. | ||
The Jews are single issue voters. | ||
They want America to support Israel. | ||
People say I'm a single issue voter because I want, like, Gaza to be free. | ||
I do want Gaza to be free, but... | ||
My single issue is I don't think that interested parties, special interests, specifically this fifth column of Jewish billionaires that are aligned with Israel, should be controlling our government and foreign policy. | ||
That's my single issue. | ||
I'm not obsessed with Israel. | ||
I'm not obsessed with the West Bank. | ||
I'm not obsessed with Jews. | ||
I'm obsessed with America. | ||
And my obsession with America is such that I think Americans should control the destiny of America. | ||
Americans should control the foreign policy, and the war-making policy, and the economy, and the trade, and the border policy of America. | ||
That's my single issue. | ||
And what is in the way of that are all of the Jewish billionaires aligned with Israel that they want to control those policies. | ||
They want to control the immense resources and influence and power of our country. | ||
And that has set us into a conflict. | ||
A direct conflict. | ||
Unavoidable. | ||
Impassable. | ||
And that's where we find ourselves right now. | ||
And the question is, who is on Team America? | ||
And you do have to choose. | ||
People say they're our closest ally. | ||
Obviously they're not. | ||
They're in direct contradiction with America having sovereignty. | ||
So people need to choose. | ||
There is no excuse anymore. | ||
Ignorance is not a plausible excuse anymore. | ||
Complacency is no longer acceptable. | ||
You have to speak out against this and oppose this if you are loyal to America. | ||
Almost nothing else matters at this point other than this. | ||
And people say, oh you mean the war? | ||
No, I don't mean the war. | ||
I mean whether our most critical resources, like software, like chips, like surveillance, our foreign policy, our most important offices, the most important positions in the American elite, at the elite universities, at the biggest and most important firms that control the most strategic companies, contractors, For the surveillance state and for the national security state and the state itself, they have to be American. | ||
They have to be Christian. | ||
That's the most important thing that matters more than anything else. | ||
But no one else wants to talk about it. | ||
And like I said, it's gaslighting! | ||
To convince you that anything else is worth talking about. | ||
They want to talk about Biden has dementia, and Tic Tacs cost more, and the Cheesecake Factory menu is more expensive, and the price of gas, and you know, whatever. | ||
This is what matters. | ||
But that's that. | ||
I wanna move on. | ||
We're gonna take a look at our Super Chats. | ||
We'll see what you guys have to say about all this. | ||
I'm gonna read the ones that I didn't get to yesterday because my internet cut out last night. | ||
So I wasn't able to get to everything. | ||
So let me take a look. | ||
We'll see what you guys have to say. | ||
Let me see if- is my coffee still hot? | ||
Ugh, it tastes like shit. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm not gonna drink that. | |
I'll drink water. | ||
I thought it would still be hot. | ||
Dammit. | ||
Whatever. | ||
I'll get coffee later. | ||
Anyway. | ||
Alright, but let's take a look. | ||
We'll see what we got here in the Super Chats. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's see. | |
How's the duplicate? | ||
- Vask terrorists sent $15. | ||
The powerful Archbishop of Miami, Thomas Wenski, ethnic Jew, was appointed to-- - Duplicate from yesterday. - Boy Moe Groi percent $5. | ||
Anglin fall off needs to be studied. | ||
Chad champion, my favorite chatter, skier. - You know what? | ||
He's honestly just sus. | ||
I don't even want to go there. | ||
I feel like I'm beefing with everybody. | ||
Everybody's attacking me lately. | ||
Like I say, it's like when you're playing Civilization V. You start to get close to the victory condition. | ||
Everyone declares war on you. | ||
Um... | ||
So I don't even want to go there, but the guy is sus. | ||
And honestly, that was the source of the beef. | ||
Luke the Evangelist sent $10. | ||
I was born to make propaganda. | ||
God bless you, Nick. | ||
Hey, thank you, man. | ||
God bless you, too. | ||
We appreciate all your work. | ||
You're pretty awesome, man. | ||
And you're doing great. | ||
RyanMCZoowski3 sent $5. | ||
16-year-old Framil here just made my friend based. | ||
He's applied to about 40 places and hasn't gotten a single job. | ||
I've been trying to make him based for a while now and sent him a clip from the stream TN about immigrants and he's starting to get it. | ||
Hey man, thanks for the super chat. | ||
16! | ||
unidentified
|
Can't get a job, can't get a job. | |
You're 16! | ||
It's okay. | ||
Yeah, that's the problem. | ||
I mean, you know, in the old days, you used to be able to get a job as a high schooler, as a 16 year old, and that is what we would call cheap labor. | ||
The kids would do, they would work at the fast food places, they would work in, they would do service work, or they would work on the farms and whatever. | ||
Because kids can accept a low wage. | ||
Kids don't have skills, kids don't have capital, kids don't have expenses. | ||
So it used to be the case that kids would then take those low wage seasonal jobs that, you know, temporary employment, not illegals. | ||
But now they bring in illegals. | ||
And illegals do all the jobs. | ||
And every kind of employment Americans are being replaced by cheaper and more pliable foreigners from other countries. | ||
The high-skill labor, the low-skill labor, everything in between, it's all being replaced. | ||
Now, what we're talking about with stapling the green cards to diplomas, we're really only talking about skilled labor. | ||
College graduates being replaced by foreign college graduates, but you're right. | ||
I mean, in the sense that the low-skill labor is being imported as well. | ||
But I appreciate it, man. | ||
Don't work too hard. | ||
unidentified
|
You got your whole life to work. | |
You got your whole life to be an adult and work hard. | ||
I mean, you should get started, though, but I wouldn't be too stressed about it. | ||
You'll find something. | ||
Don't sweat it. | ||
SauceGroIper sent $5. | ||
Still hearing it's Vance or is there truth to the Burgum rumor? | ||
Thanks for the show. | ||
unidentified
|
Shit. | |
Spilled on myself. | ||
I haven't heard any new insider information. | ||
I heard that he's leaning away from Vance since the last thing that I heard. | ||
But now it's anybody's guess. | ||
Some people are saying it could be Youngkin or Vivec. | ||
I have no idea. | ||
So we'll see. | ||
Ruler14 sent $5. | ||
This Trump stuff is infuriating. | ||
Thank you for speaking the truth even when it comes to your heroes. | ||
My only hero is Jesus. | ||
I mean, I have heroes, but I understand that Jesus is the only flawless person. | ||
Everybody else will have their flaws. | ||
Greekoid sent $5. | ||
Poop? | ||
Thanks for that. | ||
Thank you, man. | ||
Glad you like the show. | ||
Yeah, I mean, no one else is just on this level, I feel like. | ||
Nobody else sees this sort of stuff, and that's why I'm NJF4L. | ||
Thank you for all that you do. | ||
Thank you, man. | ||
Glad you like the show. | ||
Yeah, I mean, no one else is just on this level, I feel like, or at least very few people are. | ||
Boogly Woogly sent $10. | ||
Trump could have had a W of pardoning Assange. | ||
Now Biden stole that with a plea deal. | ||
How this will play into the election in voters' minds remains to be seen. | ||
Nobody cares. | ||
Nobody cares about Assange. | ||
I mean, your average voter does not care about Julian Assange. | ||
People like me care about Assange. | ||
So, I don't think it will have any significant effect on the outcome, but it's just another betrayal. | ||
You know, Julian Assange helped him win the election. | ||
Trump appointed Rick Grenell. | ||
Rick Grenell got Julian Assange extradited. | ||
And imprisoned and Rick Rennell will be in the next Trump administration. | ||
Meanwhile Biden gave Assange the plea deal. | ||
So it's just shitty. | ||
It's disloyal. | ||
Opium grow I percent six dollars. | ||
Bronze age shot he wants you bro. | ||
Maybe you should lock in the for the one time. | ||
JK. | ||
But someone should take one for the team. | ||
I nominate John Dave Irving. | ||
I don't know the guy but streets are saying he's him. | ||
unidentified
|
She's too dark. | |
Let's go! | ||
Donovar Croy percent $5. | ||
I am writing in Nicholas J. Fuentes at the ballot box. | ||
Let's go. | ||
America first. | ||
Yeah, maybe I'll win. | ||
Ibra Ibrax sent $10. | ||
All in pod hosted Sheryl Sandberger and Sachs purposefully ghosted not wanting to be an accomplice to Israeli propaganda. | ||
He's been amazing on foreign policy with his strong pro-Russian stance and even criticizing Israel. | ||
So, surprisingly Sachs who's Jewish is the least bad of the pod. | ||
Yeah, I don't know if I buy that, to be honest with you. | ||
We just talked about that, exactly. | ||
- All right, we just talked about that, exactly. - Hi. - Hi. - Luther Blissett sent $10, 11,000, and he said, "I'm gonna go to the office." - Yes, he did. - All right, he said, "I'm gonna go to the office." - All right, all right, he said, "I'm gonna go to the office." - All right, all right, all right, all right. | ||
Electoralism is a futile strategy. | ||
As long as both parties are controlled it's just a charade and popular sovereignty doesn't exist. | ||
Changing the culture must be the priority. | ||
Well, I wouldn't, I mean it's not an ism. | ||
Electoralism I don't think is a word even, but it is definitely not primary. | ||
That I agree with. | ||
It is more important to change the culture. | ||
It's more important to raise up good people than it is to win elections. | ||
There will always be another election. | ||
Every two years another election. | ||
What's more important is The longer arc which is raising up competent loyal Ideologically aligned solid people getting them in in good positions placing them It's which and that is connected to electoral politics. | ||
It's more important to win the battle of ideas on social media, you know when you consider that like Elon buying Twitter was more important than anything than like any election and In the past 10 years, that's when you start to understand politics. | ||
Elon buying Twitter is doing more for the right wing than any victory they've had in the House, Senate, White House in the past 14 years. | ||
Farahanian sent $10. | ||
Since my teenage years, they've been talking about incrementalism and compromise to get what we want. | ||
What gains have we made? | ||
The strategy of the lesser of two evils has never worked. | ||
Keep hammering on the enemy, Nick. | ||
This is the only way forward. | ||
Well, the premise is just wrong. | ||
Because the whole, you know, the presupposition that incrementalism makes, or maybe the flaw in the logic is that If you are talking to people that have a liberal frame, that have a fundamentally liberal worldview, the only way that they can change in increments is to be more of a right-leaning liberal. | ||
So if you go to somebody that fundamentally believes in democracy, somebody that fundamentally believes in pluralism, tolerance, diversity, and so on, There's no incremental way to get them from that to where we need them to be. | ||
The only increments you could get is more or less liberal. | ||
More or less. | ||
But you're never going to get them to be not liberal. | ||
You're never going to get them to be like, you know, whatever. | ||
So, it turns out that over history, it's revolutions. | ||
Like, Iran didn't become an Islamic society or an Islamist society incrementally. | ||
It was a revolution. | ||
There was a radical, outspoken, powerful minority that boiled over. | ||
Even though there was no economic crisis, even though there was no structural problems, and they delivered an Islamic revolution. | ||
In Russia, they didn't incrementally become socialist, they didn't become liberal and then capitalist, constitutionalist, then liberal, then capitalist. | ||
They threw off the government because of 40 years of malaise, and then the strongest faction, the Bolsheviks, won. | ||
And the same thing, you know, so these are the kinds of things that happen. | ||
It kind of bubbles over. | ||
It doesn't happen in like a linear increment. | ||
It's kind of this, like, bubbling over. | ||
It's actually a theological concept, but it's also true that I think in politics things bubble over. | ||
And for things to bubble over, there needs to be this, like, heat. | ||
There needs to be, like, an intense heat that is very hot and over time manipulates the volume, the fluid. | ||
And then the fluid changes state. | ||
But there needs to be that heat underneath it. | ||
There needs to be this persistent, intense pressure. | ||
Rather than this like, oh hey, well, we'll come back tomorrow, we'll win a little bit today, and we'll win a little bit more tomorrow. | ||
You know, that like Reagan-Tippin' the Gipper shit. | ||
Oh, they negotiated, they were bipartisan, they debated their differences, then they had a beer afterward. | ||
It's like, no. | ||
That is not how a revolution happens. | ||
That is not how a total transformation in thinking happens. | ||
You know, like, you don't, you didn't gradually get from, like, Roman Empire killing and raping to, like, Christians. | ||
Didn't happen that way. | ||
And it won't happen this way now. | ||
So I, I just don't think that's how, sociologically, that's how things work. | ||
So I'm just totally against this incremental idea. | ||
I just think it's flawed. | ||
Hmm. | ||
Crocheter sent $30. | ||
No message. | ||
Hmm. | ||
Thank you for that. | ||
Dalton Claude Felcher sent $200. GN less than three. | ||
Have a great week, man. | ||
Hey, thank you for the big super chat, man. | ||
I appreciate it. | ||
We love you, Dalton, you bitch. | ||
We love you, man. | ||
When are you gonna invite me on your show, man? | ||
We gotta get your guy back on there. | ||
And then I gotta get on the show, man. | ||
But thank you for the big super chat. | ||
Oh, seven. | ||
I don't know anything about him. | ||
I don't know him. | ||
The modern monarchist sent $10, a well-deserved vacation you needed, and you took it. | ||
I spent a little time on the balmy central coast of California, the salt air and sun is good on the health. | ||
You are right. | ||
We need a modern monarchy. | ||
Crush them. | ||
Crush them all. | ||
Complete tax on tips. | ||
Even fast food joints want tips. | ||
Ah yeah, that's very true. | ||
Absolutely. | ||
Roley Gonzalez sent $5. | ||
That was my American flag at the impromptu rally in Detroit. | ||
I hope you thought it was a good addition. | ||
I thought it made it very photogenic. | ||
Hope I can get it signed by you at FPAC 3 plus 1. | ||
Thank you for bringing that. | ||
It was awesome. | ||
Peak Optics. | ||
Very good. | ||
Thank you for that. | ||
John Richards sent $10, we can't be fooled by these people America first is inevitable. | ||
NJF 2036 RKD for NJF. | ||
Absolutely. | ||
James sent $5, Zerkaa said on Sneeko's stream recently that one of the big reasons you're so successful is because you've never had sex and retained sexual energy, thoughts on this? | ||
Yeah, I don't know. | ||
I mean, people talk a lot about semen retention. | ||
I think that's probably right. | ||
I think scientifically that's probably true. | ||
But I would say it's more... I don't... I mean, yeah, maybe it's that. | ||
I would also say maybe it's more that I don't have that... I haven't had sex because I don't really have the desire to have sex because I'm focused on... | ||
Other things. | ||
I'm focused on politics. | ||
I'm focused on... So it's really more, I think, about the focus. | ||
Because I would say there are a lot of people that are sexually very hedonistic and are successful. | ||
Look at, like, Vince McMahon. | ||
Look at, like, Vince McMahon and the text messages he was sending to that hooker that he was sleeping with. | ||
And the guy's, like, 100 years old and he was texting her the raunchiest stuff. | ||
So I don't know if I necessarily buy some of that bro science stuff. | ||
I think it's just about focus You know some people some people for them sex is a release Like like a Vince McMahon or whatever and then some people it's that's they're just like oh, they're all consuming focus and when they imagine their fantasy their fantasy is like a sexual fantasy and It's not a power trip. | ||
It's not a power trip. | ||
It's not about money. | ||
It's not about, you know, whatever. | ||
It's about, well, I want wheat fields and even if it's wholesome, even if it's wholesome, you know, but that's the difference. | ||
I think your average person, their biggest aspiration is like some wholesome, you know, wholesome 1000 chungus, like, I want to have a | ||
I want to marry the girl of my dreams and have a big farm and kids and like that's not my dream I don't my dream is not about domestic life When I go to sleep and have a fan a true fantasy my fantasy is not about Domestic life where we're like at the dinner table. | ||
You know, I mean, I think don't get me wrong. | ||
I think that stuff is great I love that stuff but my fantasy my where my brain is that where my head not my heart, but where my brain is at and It's in the realm of ideas. | ||
It's in the realm of stuff. | ||
When I really think about the things I'm intensely passionate about, the things that really get me going, it's accumulating, it's building, it's exploring, it's adventuring, prospecting, it's going out there! | ||
Most guys are not like that. | ||
I've known people that have not been successful in this movement, Because they were mediocre. | ||
Their aspiration was mediocrity. | ||
They're like, I don't want to be rich, I don't care about politics, I don't want power, I don't even care about anything. | ||
unidentified
|
All I want is just a girl to pat me on the head and go live in the... | |
In the woods! | ||
And it's like, yeah, I think that's kind of the difference. | ||
Some people are really... Some guys are really into, like, drama, with, like, they become girls themselves. | ||
Some guys have, like, a 700,000 snap score, and they're just into, like, gossip and drama and who's sleeping with who and chasing girls and fucking bullshit. | ||
Most guys, that's, like, their thing. | ||
They may not say it, but that's their thing. | ||
And my thing is not that, and that's why... | ||
I think that's why I'm successful. | ||
Guys whose thing, the thing that they can't live without, the thing they can't breathe without, if their thing is like cooking, or business, or cars, or politics, those are the people that are at the top. | ||
You look at like Gordon Ramsay. | ||
Gordon Ramsay eats, sleeps, and breathes cooking and restaurants and entertainment. | ||
And he's the GOAT. | ||
You know, and Donald Trump eats, sleeps, and breathes business and real estate and publicity. | ||
And he's at the top. | ||
And those are the people. | ||
You know, you look at a guy like Quentin Tarantino, Christopher Nolan, they eat, sleep, and breathe movies. | ||
And that's why they'll always be ahead. | ||
That's why they'll always be at the front. | ||
Always on top. | ||
And, you know, so I think it has very little to do with, you know, people always make it about this other shit. | ||
It's really just about, you know, what are you, and the aptitude also, but what do you really love? | ||
And most people, if they're being totally honest, they eat, sleep, and breathe petty, ridiculous bullshit. | ||
They like to be comfortable, you know, they want to sleep all day, they want to, you know, They want a little drama or romance to play out in their simple little life. | ||
And it's fine. | ||
You know, that's most people. | ||
But I think that is the difference, to be honest. | ||
- Albert Castro sent $8. | ||
If the election was rigged against Trump with the Israeli lobby backing, how can you expect him to win without it? | ||
Maybe he's pulling a Trojan horse? | ||
Thoughts? - Yeah, I think that's just totally unsupported by any evidence and just a fantasy. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, what if Trump is like, once he wins, he's gonna be like, ta-da! | |
I was lying the whole time, like, not gonna happen. | ||
DS sent $100. | ||
More people need to speak about the tip in question. | ||
Visited for Italy and noticed that the service offered for the expected 20% tip was terrible. | ||
Between 15 to 20% of $1 trillion spent annually in the restaurant industry is siphoned off to people who do not deserve it. | ||
Well, it's basically just become part of their wages and kind of like built into the cost. | ||
But thank you for the big super chat. | ||
It's true, though. | ||
The service is just bad. | ||
The service sucks now. | ||
You're expected to... I don't tip a lot anymore. | ||
I mean, I'll tip 20%. | ||
I think that's customary. | ||
But more and more, if someone's doing a bad job, I'll just tip like 5-10% because it's getting really rough out there, man. | ||
Everywhere the service is terrible, and you're right. | ||
I mean now they're flipping the iPad around everywhere you go You go to like a coffee shop. | ||
It's counter service. | ||
They flip it around for a tip like I'm sorry I go to this one coffee shop. | ||
They don't even say hello. | ||
They don't even look up You walk in there. | ||
They don't say hi. | ||
I'll be with you one minute They just they're kind of like they don't know where they are and then they you finally go there, and they're like You know they're looking at you. | ||
You're like okay. | ||
I want the coffee blah blah blah and And they flip it around. | ||
It's like, I'm sorry. | ||
Like, I'm paying for the coffee. | ||
You're not even friendly. | ||
You're not nice. | ||
You're not friendly. | ||
Like, what am I tipping for? | ||
And that's counter service that they expected now. | ||
unidentified
|
No. | |
London Wog sent $20. | ||
Do you think that Project 2025 is all that it's hyped up to be? - No. - All the BA tards on X use it as their rationale for supporting Trump. | ||
But I feel like you know people that work for Heritage who say otherwise. - I have no reason to believe that it is going to be successful. | ||
And you know, I'm not knocking them. | ||
There are some good people that are involved There are a lot of good people that are involved that are running it that are part of it And I you know, I don't want to get too detailed on that. | ||
But yes, there are some good people there But I think that The people that are really going to be controlling the staffing. | ||
It's just not really even gonna matter Because all the top-level positions are going to be bought out. | ||
And so if anybody is trying to be based on the low, I think they're going to get kicked out. | ||
So... I think people are... I think it's a little bit like wishful thinking to think that it's going to make a whole difference or anything. | ||
You know? | ||
Because, yeah, they're recruiting all this personnel, but who's going to be selecting the personnel? | ||
It's going to be someone terrible. | ||
And the personnel is going to fill up the cabinet, but who's going to be running the cabinet? | ||
See what I mean? | ||
So you could have all the best people in the world. | ||
I mean, you could be a base guy at Starbucks. | ||
You're making coffee. | ||
You know what I mean? | ||
You could be as based as you want in these various departments and agencies, but you're working for somebody cringe. | ||
And so I think it's dubious if that will really have a major impact. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm hopeful, but I'm not optimistic about it. | |
Pankrus sent $10. | ||
Why do you think this generation is so obsessed with aid gaps? | ||
There's such an aversion to anything beyond a two-year gap that you get lynched. | ||
I don't think there was a point in American history where this was ever a thing. | ||
What's the big play here? | ||
I think it's because... Well, I've always said that, like, my theory is that these older women are just triggered by it. | ||
You know, all women hate all other women. | ||
Because they're constantly in sexual competition with each other and they're all, like, unequal. | ||
You know, so all older women hate every woman that's younger than them. | ||
And so I think there's, like, this whole generation of, like, women that are now getting ready to settle down. | ||
They're entering their late 20s, 30s, and they are looking for a smaller pool of men who are six feet tall and successful and want to date them. | ||
And all the hot, successful, tall guys want a hot, untouched, young woman. | ||
You know, look at the most successful people in the world. | ||
They all want young women. | ||
You know, when Kanye gets married, does he marry some, like, 40-year-old woman? | ||
No, he marries, like, a woman that's my age. | ||
When Leonardo DiCaprio dates girlfriends, they're 18, they're 19. | ||
Jerry Seinfeld dates 18-year-olds. | ||
I mean, it is what it is. | ||
Because that's Everybody knows that's what's hotter. | ||
Okay It's hotter because there's more fertile more beautiful skinnier younger, it's better everyone knows that and So I think it's it's basically this like Older women hate it and younger women have bought into this lie because they're like Some of them do. | ||
I don't really know. | ||
I'm not really in touch with women, so I don't know, but I feel like younger women, it's really more about creepiness. | ||
It's more like women are putting themselves out on social media and they get unwanted attention from like creepy older guys. | ||
If like a 29-year-old like buff, 6'3", finance bro was hitting up a 19-year-old, it was like, hey bitch, you're kind of hot. | ||
You think they'd be like, this is so creepy. | ||
No, they'd be like, oh my gosh. | ||
Can I, like, get in your car? | ||
Like, oh my gosh, you have a G-Wagon? | ||
Do you live in the Hamptons? | ||
Like, obviously. | ||
So, it's like this conspiracy. | ||
It's like older women, younger women, hating on, like, Different factions for different reasons. | ||
But yeah, I agree. | ||
The age gap thing is not a problem. | ||
It is not a problem at all, okay? | ||
The highest value women are the most fertile, most beautiful, youngest. | ||
And the highest value men are like the richest, most physically solid. | ||
So it's typically like a late 20s, 30s, affluent, facially attractive male. | ||
Those are the you know, that's the highest tier of both categories. | ||
So like, you know the ideal Setup is like a 30 year old guy 19 year old girl. | ||
Sure. | ||
Let's say that 19 is something like that is probably like a Looks-matched couple. | ||
It's gonna be something like that So yeah, I think that in historically, if you're like a king, if you're like the king of a country, you're like a prince. | ||
Is the prince gonna go and find like some mature woman who's been around the block and slept with like the tavern keeper and the ironsmith? | ||
No, the king is gonna sleep with like some young girl, okay, who's gonna give him an heir. | ||
Like that's just what it is. | ||
Everyone knows that and it makes sense. | ||
Bobby Johnson sent $5. | ||
Hey Nick, does your prediction of J.D. | ||
Vance winning VP still stand? | ||
Anyway, God bless. | ||
Well as of my prediction, that was a source that I heard from and that person's less confident now. | ||
Libertarian Control Act sent $25. | ||
Half I fully agree with your criticisms of Trump. | ||
However, as Kevin Deanna recently pointed out, what did we gain from sitting out the 2018 midterms, or 2020 presidential, or 2021 Georgia runoff, or 2022 midterm elections? | ||
No matter what, if the GOP loses, the fault is always placed at the feet of America first. | ||
I don't think that's true. | ||
unidentified
|
That there's fault. | |
Libertarian Control Act sent $25. | ||
Two halves if Trump loses. | ||
We'll be right back to Nikki Haley's GOP. | ||
If Trump wins, even if he completely capitulates to the establishment, it will show that the revolution still has legs, albeit requiring a new champion. | ||
No, totally wrong and you're totally overthinking it. | ||
No, show me where America first was blamed for 2018-20 or 2022. | ||
It wasn't. | ||
And here's the problem. | ||
If Trump wins in 2024, Trump has been assimilated into the establishment, in case you haven't noticed. | ||
He is no longer controversial. | ||
He is no longer provocative. | ||
They no longer fear him. | ||
And that is because he has changed. | ||
And he now represents the interests. | ||
He has changed on immigration. | ||
He's changed on foreign policy. | ||
He's changed on nearly everything. | ||
All it does is it gets people to buy back into the system. | ||
Guess what? | ||
America First has energy behind it. | ||
That's why Trump won in 2016. | ||
That's why People like myself are successful on social media. | ||
That's why Charlie Kirk is moving to the right. | ||
That's why Candace Owens is moving to the right. | ||
If Donald Trump wins after totally assimilating into the establishment, all it does is get normal Americans to buy the GOP hype again. | ||
We're going to get Nikki Haley regardless. | ||
Nikki Haley is going to be in this administration, dipshit. | ||
Who do you think is going to be in this administration? | ||
Rick Grinnell, Tim Scott, Nikki Haley, Lindsey Graham. | ||
It's going to be all neocons. | ||
Kevin McCarthy. | ||
So, after Trump leaves office, these people are going to be fighting for the succession. | ||
And all this is going to do is get people to buy back in. | ||
So, no, I think your read on this is exactly like the opposite. | ||
It's totally wrong. | ||
They need to lose. | ||
So... And you're wrong about that. | ||
In 2022, when the Republicans had a smaller majority, Kevin McCarthy didn't easily get the gavel. | ||
And a handful of, like, America-first Republicans had more leverage. | ||
They just didn't really use it that much. | ||
So, I totally disagree with that. | ||
I think the Republicans need to lose more. | ||
Hey, thank you for the big super chat. | ||
I appreciate it. | ||
Thank you for the big super chat. | ||
- Yeah, I appreciate it. | ||
- Spence sent $100, no message. - Thank you for the big super chat. - Rape Caviar sent $5. | ||
Do you know how to swim? | ||
Yes or no? | ||
- Yes. - Terry Davis sent $50. | ||
Can't believe I wasted so much time in high school watching self-help content when all I needed was a spiteful mutant to teach me that the only thing that matters is my relationship with God. | ||
Honestly, thank you, Nick. | ||
unidentified
|
07. | |
Very true. | ||
Thank you, man. | ||
Shero sent $10. | ||
Estrogen pills? | ||
Taken. | ||
Thigh high socks? | ||
On. | ||
AF stream? | ||
Live. | ||
Yay, it's a good Wednesday morning. | ||
Great. | ||
Thanks for that. | ||
Chad Champion sent $5, what's your opinions on The Walking Dead and what's your favorite quote from the show? | ||
I never saw it, looks dumb. | ||
Nathan Lynch sent $5, Team Cookie King or Team Santa Cruz? | ||
Team Cookie. | ||
Bask Terrorist sent $5, half my retard self double sent the Holocaust Miami Archbishop Super Chat yesterday, then the replay cut off on your answer. | ||
Tragic loss for the New Florida Republic of Tel Aviv. | ||
Basque Terrorists sent $7, two halves everyone must listen to the 1979 disco hit there but for the grace of God go I. Lyrics, the Bronx ain't fit for a kid to grow up in. | ||
Let's find a place somewhere far away, with no blacks, no jews and no gays. | ||
I'll make a groiper rem- Fuck off. | ||
Suck ass. | ||
Sabian sent $100, we stand with Dr. Disrespect. | ||
Yes we do, well no he apologized, he totally cocked. | ||
So I don't support him. | ||
But thank you for the big super chat. | ||
I appreciate it. | ||
Harry and Zoomer sent $50. | ||
Hey Nick, you inspired me to join the Catholic Church and I start RCIA in a couple months. | ||
I wanted to say thank you for leading me to the church and educating me on Israel slash Jews. | ||
Christ is king. | ||
America first. | ||
You're welcome, man. | ||
Thank you for the super chat. | ||
Glad to hear it. | ||
Mandelbrot sent $10. | ||
Just because the left lost doesn't mean you won. | ||
Fire. | ||
He's right, you know. | ||
James sent $5. | ||
Hey, Nick, advice for grow-ipers who work with interfered Jews? | ||
And for the political infiltrators, should they lay low and then become more radical with the more power they get? | ||
Yeah, hide your power level, hire your friends, you know, use it to network, use it to build your network, and do as much as you can get away with. | ||
Mandelbris sent $5. | ||
What's the over-under on Alex saying you should get married and have kids tomorrow? | ||
Shut up, like, we're not friends. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, what's the over-under? | |
Dude, shut up. | ||
Will Smith sent $20, Hi Nick, I'm a huge follower of yours in Ireland for a long time. | ||
You inspired me to find my Catholic faith again. | ||
And I have since got married and had a baby. | ||
Thank you for everything. | ||
You're one of a kind. | ||
And I would love to see you visit Keith in Ireland sometime smile less than three. | ||
Oh, you'd love to see that? | ||
Oh, well, let me let me hop on a plane right now, because you would love to see I would love to. | ||
I'd love to do whatever you want me to do, because you control my whole life. | ||
And, you know, I have nothing else going on. | ||
I want to do what you would like to see. | ||
No, I'm kidding. | ||
But hey, congratulations on the family. | ||
I'm glad to hear you became Catholic again. | ||
Good for you. | ||
You gotta get Keith on board with that. | ||
He's gotta drop this hippie shit, get a job, and become Catholic. | ||
Thanks a lot, man. | ||
We love Ireland. | ||
You guys are leading the charge on immigration. | ||
It's pretty based. | ||
I think that's just because there was a... Shit. | ||
I think that's just because there was an ad in it. | ||
You fucking retard. | ||
Obviously. | ||
has hashtag paid partnership at the end of the x post on tucker's page lmfao who paid tucker to have steve on his show i think that's sailor himself shit i think that's just because there was an ad in it you fucking retard obviously kobe bryant sent five dollars breaking news trump declares himself king of the jews okay fuck off These are so bad and I just hate all of this. | ||
Whole stupid thing. | ||
George Santos sent $5. | ||
Shalom from Tel Aviv. | ||
Thank you for that. | ||
Awesome. | ||
Greekoid sent $10. | ||
On BAP's recent stream he said that a baby stork bird is worth more to him than all the little Palestinian children in Gaza. | ||
Also I read 1984 and was so unimpressed I took a piss on it. | ||
Love you dog. | ||
Playful face. | ||
Who cares? | ||
Who cares? | ||
He's a Jew. | ||
Thanks. | ||
What's the deal with this geezer Jew brother Nathaniel? | ||
He's been going nuclear cringe on X. | ||
Spaniard Groeper sent $5. | ||
Thoughts on Dr. | ||
Disrespect's situation? | ||
Avion sent $5. | ||
Any good books to recommend right now? | ||
Dragon sent $5. | ||
All it takes to realize who controls Republicans is look at the retard ogre senator from PA and Federman. | ||
All the neocons called him a brain-dead fat moron before the election and now since he supports Israel he's moo-most based senator ever du- Very true. | ||
It's a good point. | ||
You have to heat up. | ||
You have to be heated. | ||
like don't work too hard or else you're going to burn out and emphasize a healthy work-life balance will never be able to achieve excellence and be forever stuck in mediocrity. | ||
The greatest men are absolutely consumed and obsessed with their craft. | ||
Everything else comes later. | ||
You have to heat up. | ||
You have to be heated. | ||
The only way to be the best is to be heated and to be at such an intensity that you could spontaneously combust. | ||
People say, don't burn yourself out. | ||
You must burn yourself out. | ||
Over and over. | ||
That's the only way to get better. | ||
That's for, like, people that just want to, you know, coast. | ||
And just kind of set themselves up in a modest way. | ||
That's advice if you want to do that. | ||
You're right. | ||
I'm banned on TikTok, obviously. | ||
Look up my name on TikTok. | ||
Let me know what happens. | ||
Okay, all right. | ||
That's our last super chat. | ||
Sheesh, dude. | ||
That's it. | ||
Thanks for watching. | ||
Remember to follow me on Rumble and Cozy. | ||
I'm on the air Monday through Friday as always. | ||
Thanks for watching. | ||
Thanks to our Super Chatters. | ||
In particular, special thanks to Benedict, Zoomer, Sabian, Dalton, Cinderblock, Groyper, Wampus, Rapist, Werewolf, Black, Groyper, DS, Silver, Nitrate, and Spence. | ||
Thanks to all our Super Chatters, everybody that watches the show. | ||
We love you and I will see you tomorrow. | ||
Until then, have a great rest of your evening. | ||
unidentified
|
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo. | |
It's going to be only America first. | ||
America first. | ||
The American people will come first once again. | ||
With respect, the respect that we deserve. | ||
From this day... | ||
From this day forward, it's going to be only America first. |