All Episodes
Previous Next
May 23, 2024 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:53:38
MASSIE DEFEATS AIPAC??? Israel Lobby Spends $400k, LOSES In Major Upset | America First Ep. 1333MASSIE DEFEATS AIPAC??? Israel Lobby Spends $400k, LOSES In Major Upset | America First Ep. 1333
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:24:45
s
streamlabs matthew tts
08:47
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
We're going to smash your brain and read the Bible, idiot.
And I'm addicted to...
When's enough enough, eh?
When's enough enough, eh?
Where's enough enough, man?
It's sick.
Just eat a Big Mac or something, bitch.
Stranger, you can move a country in a peaceful park.
The money has to stop your life.
It's not a last of life.
Stranger, you can move a country in a peaceful park.
You're not a last of life.
It's not a last of life.
You're like, you're not allowed to make jokes anymore.
You're not allowed to make jokes.
It's not money.
Sipping wine.
Having some pasta.
Having some pizza.
Oh.
I'm weird.
I'm normal.
I'm not normal.
I'm a Christian.
I'm 40.
I'm original.
All right, I'm an original.
One person raised his voice.
The teacher couldn't believe it.
in the classroom couldn't believe it either.
But in the end, he had logic on his side.
And at the end of the day, he proved his point.
And I'm Dick Deena, Sarah Sarah Taylor.
And I'm Dick Deena.
The Boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
Americanism, not globalism, will not globalism, will be our freedom. will be our freedom.
I'm sorry.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
unidentified
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
No e-girls.
unidentified
Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
I've never heard of it.
What is that?
Americanism, not globalism. Americanism, not
globalism, not globalism, will be our credo. .
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
With respect, the respect that we deserve.
From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
America first.
you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you
you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you
you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you
you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you
you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you
you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Good evening, everybody.
You are watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Wednesday.
We have a lot to talk about, lots to get into.
Big show!
Our featured story, we're talking all about the Representative Thomas Massey from Kentucky and his blowout victory in his primary election last night.
It's a huge deal because he was the only Republican holdout and vocal opponent of a series of pro-Israel bills earlier this year and late last year.
In response to this, AIPAC, the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, put up $300,000 in a super PAC against him in the primary.
And last night he cleared and won the primary by 75% of the vote.
So it wasn't just a minor win, but a major victory.
So we'll talk about the race and the whole situation.
What may be, I think, more disturbing about this story, it's a little bit funny, AIPAC comes out last night, totally defeated, and they say, and I'm not making this up, they come out and say, well, we weren't even trying to win.
That was the cope.
AIPAC spends all this money and they come out and say, well, we weren't even trying to beat Massey.
We were just trying to shed a light on how anti-Israel he really is.
And fair enough.
Maybe they didn't think they had a shot at winning.
They actually went, and if you look this up, you'll see this is true.
They went and forced every news media outlet to correct their coverage of the story.
And I know that because I read all about it yesterday, and it said that Thomas Massey won, he defeated the AIPAC challenge.
I read the same story tonight, and they had all been updated with a note at the bottom that said it was updated to reflect the fact that AIPAC was not actually trying to win at all, so he didn't beat AIPAC.
So they want everybody to know it wasn't a loss.
This did not sacrifice their 100% win rate.
And who they support and who they oppose.
It was just a message.
And it's very funny, but it's disturbing because what they have said is that this is priming the population for if Massey decides to seek higher office in the future.
Many people consider Thomas Massey as a future contender for the U.S.
Senate seat in Kentucky.
And AIPAC says they're simply laying the groundwork to prevent his ascendancy, to prevent that from happening.
And that might be true, and it might be extremely effective.
So, we'll talk about that aspect of it, just goes to show another way in which our politics is totally controlled.
We'll also be talking tonight about the recognition of Palestinian statehood by three European countries, Spain, Ireland, and Norway, which happened yesterday morning.
And it's a major rebuke of Israel.
Problem is, many of the European Union states cannot follow suit.
The European Union will not be changing its position on Israel anytime soon.
Why?
Because the European Union runs on consensus.
And although virtually every European state has condemned Israel's conduct in the war, There are exactly two holdouts, Austria and Hungary.
Based?
Far-right Hungary!
Viktor Orban, the Christian nationalist, the Christian Democrat.
The two holdouts, Austria and Hungary, will not condemn Israel.
They're the only two countries in the European Union defending Israel.
So some of these more minor states in the EU, and I don't say that in a nasty way, but it's not Germany, it's not France.
The more minor states like Norway, Ireland, and Spain, it's symbolic and it's I think a positive gesture.
But the European Union will not anytime soon change its course, which was prior to the war, towards further integration with Israel because of these two holdouts which seem to be in a stranglehold by the Likud party in Israel.
We'll talk about that.
It's kind of complicated because it's positive on the one hand.
Like I said, it's a good thing, it's a good step that these three states have recognized Palestinian statehood.
At the same time, it's not France or Germany.
And also, you're never going to get an EU course correction on this because they've locked it up with two of these countries.
And this is more evidence of what I've been talking about for a long time, which is that this alliance that the far right seems to have with Israel in all these other countries, in Argentina, in Brazil, in Hungary, in these opposition parties in Western Europe, Spain, France, Germany, This is not good.
And it's not benign.
It's not innocuous.
I've been saying it for a long time.
Why do you think it is that Geert Wilders, and Vox, and Marion Le Pen, and AFD, and Viktor Orban in Hungary, and Bolsonaro, and Noboa in Ecuador, and Bukele in El Salvador, and Millet in Argentina, why are they all pro-Israel?
Maloney in Italy.
Why do you think it is?
You think this is a coincidence?
You think they're doing it because it's good for their health?
No.
They are all pro-Israel because they're all being paid.
And they are being paid because there is some benefit.
There is some value that Israel sees in backing these parties.
So, where there's value, there's interest.
And this is kind of where we are now with what's happening in Europe.
We'll get into all that.
Should be a pretty good show.
Before we get into the news, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble and Cozy to get a push notification whenever I go live.
Smash the follow button.
Smash the like button.
And let me just double check and make sure I'm live.
Like I said, some of these... When I do a show late at night, I'm always like, man, I hope I'm actually live.
Okay, so we're good.
So make sure to smash the follow button, like the video.
What else?
Remember to get your AFPAC tickets.
Link is down below, afpac.events.
Excuse me, we're selling out fast.
I think we're all out of VIP tickets.
Which means the only way that you're going to get to the after party is if you fork over thousands of dollars with our sponsorship packages.
So, if you're rich, make sure to get a sponsorship package.
You get a lot of VIP benefits including dinner with me.
Personal dinner.
As well as other VIPs you actually get to talk to me and see what I'm really like in person and ask me whatever super chat question you want to ask and I will be obligated to not insult you and to listen attentively and be friendly.
So the tickets are almost all gone.
The VIP tickets are gone.
Get them while you can and if you got a little more If you got a little more dough, hey, support the movement with a sponsorship package and there's some pretty great benefits.
All that is down below afpac.events.
What else?
I guess that's it.
Yeah, I suppose that's it so we can get on with the show.
Kind of a dramatic day today on Twitter.
I got into it a little bit with Steve Saylor again.
This guy's gotta hate me.
I'm just giving this guy a hard time.
Honestly, I'm just giving him a hard time.
And I don't trust him.
At all.
I'm putting the screws in this guy big time, because I think he's totally astroturfed.
I think his whole program, I think his stupid book, I think his tour, I think it's totally astroturfed.
And honestly, I am really sick of these philosemite, mishling, Zionist Jews who are racist.
Pretending that they are the vanguard of dissent in the United States.
You're freaking not.
Okay?
There's nothing dissident about being a secular philosemite rightist who believes in human biodiversity or crime statistics.
I'm just over it.
This whole V Dare, Steve Saylor, Passage Press, Lomez, Peter Thiel, Curtis Yarvin, Kostin Alomaru, J.D.
Vance, Jack Posobiec thing.
I think the whole thing is a big fucking deception, and I've just had it.
I posted a big, kind of a, I don't want to say an essay, but I posted some of these breadcrumbs on my telegram earlier today, and just kind of laid out some of the connections.
And I know for a lot of people it might be difficult to follow along because I know a lot of people maybe don't know all the players involved and maybe haven't heard of everybody involved.
But I've been doing this for a long time.
I've heard a lot of rumors.
I'm aware of a lot of intel on this kind of stuff.
And I'm noticing a pattern here, which is that it seems to be a very deliberate and concerted effort To prop up another phony right-wing that is controlled by Jewish people.
And look, I know that it sounds like hammer and nail.
You know, if you're a hammer, every problem's a nail.
I know that's what it sounds like, but that's also what it is.
Okay, I don't want to sound like a broken record.
I don't want to sound like it's a one-word answer to every problem.
But everywhere you look, you just see, it's like I always say, you just find more of it.
So like with Steve Saylor, I didn't trust this guy to begin with.
And I could, I had a feeling that V Dare, who has promoted Saylor for decades, I had a feeling they were maintaining distance with me.
And then I hear some of the stuff that's going on like Amanda Milius is over there and Ryan Gerduski's over there and they're asking Ashley Sinclair to be the speaker.
And then I read Steve Saylor's blog post from 20 years ago.
He says that he believes that he's Jewish and he performed a DNA test and confirmed it and he's effectively a philosemite and pro-Israel.
And it's like...
Okay, but why does it always have to be like that?
If it wasn't like that, well, I would say as much.
But it's always like this.
Same thing with the Lómez guy.
I got told behind the scenes, oh, Lómez actually likes you.
He's never talked about me once, ever.
The only time he talked about me two years ago was to say that I'm talented, fact, but that I need someone to restrain me.
I've heard that one before.
Oh, I need someone to restrain me.
What, like a handler?
You know, he's tweeted, I don't know, tens of thousands of times, been in the space.
Apparently he's a Jew, but he's apparently a big fan.
He gets all his money from Peter Thiel.
He promotes Curtis Yarvin, another Jew.
No, but he's one of the good ones.
He's a big fan.
Only time he's ever said my name is to say, well, he's gotta be, somebody's gotta hold this guy back.
And then you go through his timeline, he doesn't have nothing to say about Israel, nothing to say about Jewish people, nothing to say about any of this stuff.
Then he gets doxxed, and he makes the rounds on Steve Bannon and Jack Posobiec.
And Darren Beatty says, cancel culture's over.
It's like, yeah, not for Groipers.
unidentified
When Groipers get doxxed, they just get screwed.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
They don't get invited on shows, they don't get invited on Steve Bannon, they don't get a promo code, they just get screwed.
And they can't get work, and they get fired by wherever.
So, I think cancel culture is only over if you have patronage from billionaire Peter Thiel, who is a federal informant and a contractor for the intelligence community, and if you're a Jew.
I think those are the people for which cancel culture is over.
Not so much for any loyal Americans, or Christians for that matter, And then Jack Posobiec's Human Events.
You know, Jack Posobiec is doing this kind of cutesy thing.
I don't really know what the play is, but you know, he's playing these games where he's pretending like he's saying Talmud and stopping himself.
And playing these other- I don't know, he must think he's really clever.
He's the senior editor at Human Events, which must have changed hands from Will Chamberlain and Raheem Kassam at some point.
And today they publish a big hit piece about me from Rabbi Barkley, the same rabbi that called Candace Owens a Jew-hating anti-Semite.
And they publish an op-ed saying, Donald Trump should disavow Jake Shields and Nick Fuentes and Kanye and the Groypers.
From Rabbi Barkley, like I said, the smear merchant who was attacking Candace Owens a few months ago.
And Jack Posobiec's the senior editor.
And I put a tweet out and I'm like, hey, WTF?
Mr. Good Morning Christ is King.
You're gonna publish a rabbi attacking a fellow Catholic?
The same one attacking your bestie, Candace Owens?
And Jack Posobiec is the one who's pushing Steve Saylor with Charlie Kirk.
Posobiec is the one who interviewed this Jonathan Keeperman, Loméz, Who runs Passage Press that published the Steve Saylor book and runs the book tour.
And it's just endless like this.
And... You know, I'm just getting really tired of this, like, Jewish clique.
It's AIPAC, it's Shapiro and the Daily Wire, it's the ZOA, it's the neocons, it's the neoreactionaries, it's these people.
I've just had enough!
Like, I don't want any more forced, based, red pill people that are going to omit and refrain from talking about Jewish influence.
Like, I just, I can't stomach one more farce like this.
We don't want any more, you know, based immigration restrictionists.
Yeah, we got it.
Yeah, we don't want the world to be overrun by the third world hordes.
Got it.
We know.
Yes.
Did you know blacks commit more crime?
Yep.
Yeah, everyone does.
Did you know immigrants are stupid?
Yeah, they don't even speak English.
Yeah, we know.
Their countries are broken.
We got that.
Everyone agrees immigration should be restricted at this point.
Everybody does.
We got it.
But when are people going to talk about what I did last night, the show, the Washington Post story about how every Jewish billionaire is in a group chat talking about how they're going to convince America to go to war for Israel again.
Nobody wants to talk about that.
Mike Benz, who runs cyber in the State Department for Trump, who I like.
I mean, I've met him.
He's like a smart guy.
It's not personal.
But he has now built this e-celebrity profile for himself talking about the deep cut Intel stuff talking about Gladio and the Vatican and the CIA and censorship and spy rings and cartels never talks about Mossad.
Look at me.
I'm the expert.
I'm the expert on intelligence operations and organized crime.
I'm the expert on censorship.
I'm the expert on all this secret Shadow War stuff.
Oh, but I will never talk about the Mossad.
Ever.
I'll go and search his Twitter.
I'll never mention the Mossad.
What?
And we're supposed to believe that this is not deliberate?
It's crazy and I'm like and I'm that makes me the psycho because I'm the only one.
I'm Charlie Day from Always Sunny.
I'm the one referencing you know all the threads on the cork board and showing the connections and I'm the lone psycho in the woods.
Yelling that, you know, J.D.
Vance has this Jewish chief of staff from the Tikvah Fund, and from the same constellation of groups that they're all from.
And he's probably going to be tapped to be the vice president, and he's also with American Moment and NatCon, where he's speaking in July, which is run by Hazoni.
I mean, like, I'm the only one pointing this stuff out!
And I'm not wrong.
I'm not crazy.
None of those people will engage with it.
They won't debunk it.
Because it's all true!
And anyway, I don't want to sound like rambling and crazy, but you know, between the Steve Saylor thing and the Jack Posobiec thing, and the Bronze Age Perfor thing which is now going on for a long time, there's clearly a huge calculated deception just like there was 50 years ago.
Which is to skin suit the real right-wing with this Jewish invasion of the body statures, neo-reactionary movement.
Like, to put it succinctly, that's what it is.
They are pretending to be 2019 Groipers, but actually they're Jewish, atheist, pro-Israel, neoliberal types.
You know, they want to push now this colorblind meritocracy.
It's like, so let me get this straight.
You're all pro-Israel.
You all want war with China.
All you talk about is how much you hate communism.
You're free market neoliberals.
You cheered on Millet, who's like a CIA, DoD, Mossad plant.
It was in favor of the Austrian Chicago School of Economics, which you apparently support.
You're in favor of colorblind meritocracy, meaning we're going to have a multiracial country, but we're just not going to have affirmative action.
It's like, how is that any different from an average conservative?
When you take that platform and put it together, how is that even slightly different from an average conservative?
We're gonna tack on Steve Saylor noticing and do tough on crime.
What, like Rudy Giuliani?
Really freaking based.
Anyway.
So, I see all that stuff and I'm just like, how stupid can we be?
Like, this is just true Goyim stuff.
It's just Gentiles who have not a clue.
About how politics works and how to you know, it's like that famous baked Alaska Screenshot, you know, we deserve it.
We're we are too stupid.
It's true.
It's true I look around at some of these dupes who buy into this stuff and I'm like We deserve it.
We we are too stupid.
We deserve it at this point you know Now, I don't operate that way effectively, but sometimes I think that.
Man, we are too stupid.
You got these people that are being tricked into this raw egg thing.
This Jewish guy told me that we're gonna win the war for our country by drinking raw eggs and posting softcore porn of, like, these girls eating a bowl of yogurt and berries and they're reading Greek poetry.
Crazy.
Anyway, but I want to move on.
So that's what I've been getting into lately on Twitter with Posobiec and Steve Saylor.
The problem is that what they are offering, to put it in a way that's maybe understandable, The problem is that what this fake right wing, this skin suit right wing, is pushing is very simple and agreeable.
And if you try to expose this, like, vast network behind it and these calculated omissions, it's just more complicated.
And I think whatever is more simple is what wins.
So they have this message where it's like, hey man, what we're about is vitality and working out, and we kind of are racist a little bit.
And then I'm like, okay, so Peter Thiel is wanting this one, and he likes Curtis Yarvin, and Curtis Yarvin won here, and it's just too complex.
Not even that it's difficult to understand, but it's just more, it has more complexity.
And you're just never going to convince a ton of people of something that's more complex.
So I feel like that's why we have to lean into more simplistic... That's why I kind of do a little... I mix up the tactics a little bit.
I mean, because I put out all the receipts, but then I also push something very simple, which is just like, you are Jewish.
That's my version, you know.
unidentified
They're like, we're Nietzschean, we're Greek.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
It's all Straussian crap.
unidentified
And I just get in replies and I'm like, yeah, but you're Jewish.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
They're like, but we're based.
No, you're Jewish.
And that is what frustrates them.
Because they see that I've created the more simple, the better message.
And they're like, you can't just say you're Jewish.
unidentified
These Mexicans, these brown people are just calling us Jewish.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
And we're like, okay, but you are Jewish.
You are Jewish though.
Okay, but you are Jewish.
Ugh, this is low IQ antisemitism.
I can't believe Nick Fuentes has ruined the timeline.
They just call everybody Jewish.
Okay, but you are Jewish.
Okay, but you are.
And that's a problem because Christ is King.
And then they're like, we hate Catholics.
Okay, but you are Jewish.
Christ is King, you know?
unidentified
So... Anyway, these are just some notes.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
These are just some notes, but anyway, so that's that.
I want to move on.
I want to get into the news.
Featured story tonight, we're talking all about Thomas Massie, who defeated AIPAC last night.
For those that don't know, Thomas Massie, the representative from Kentucky, you know, he's cringe on some things, like he doesn't support Trump, but he's based on other things, like he wants to end the Federal Reserve.
So he's kind of a mixed bag.
He's like a libertarian.
Excuse me.
But what he has been really solid on lately is that he has called out the influence of the Israel lobby over the U.S.
government and its reaction to October 7th and Israel's campaign in Gaza.
And for that, he has been attacked by AIPAC, which is some would say the central or one of the most important nodes in the Israel lobby.
American Israel Public Affairs Committee has a long history in the United States.
And Thomas Massie voted against one of these pro-Israel bills at the tail end of last year.
And AIPAC dedicated itself to overthrowing him in his primary.
And they've done this across the United States in this election cycle.
They have said that they are really spending a lot of money this year to depose anybody, especially Democrats, who has vocally spoken out against Israel's campaign in Gaza, and Thomas Massie is one of them.
APAC spent over $300,000.
I think the final number was well over that.
I think it was $400,000 in Thomas Massie's Republican primary and they spent that money through their super PAC and they ran ads on television and radio talking about how Massie is anti-Israel and an anti-Semite and he opposes the Holy Land and so on and it was Very public.
And Thomas Massey very publicly opposed them.
He talked about it, tried to raise money against that, although he didn't raise even close to as much as AIPAC wound up spending in the primary.
But last night he was victorious.
He won 75% of the vote in the primary.
Totally no contest defeating AIPAC.
And this is the story.
It says, quote,
The United Democracy Project and APAC have noted that UDP was not wading into the primary, but AIPAC said in a tweet that it was shining a spotlight on his atrocious anti-Israel record and making sure every Kentuckian knows that Representative Thomas Massey votes with AOC Rashida Tlaib, Tlaib?
I never know how to pronounce her name, and Ilhan Omar against, against pro-Israel bills.
UDP has suggested it's looking to set the record straight on Massey's record, noting the possibility of Massey seeking higher office in the future.
And this is a story about the campaign.
This is from several months ago.
It says, UDP spokesperson Patrick Dorton said the group is not playing around in Massey's May 21st primary election, where he faces no serious primary opposition.
The group is making an initial buy of $300,000 in TV airtime on all Fox affiliate channels in Kentucky.
He said, quote, we are shining a spotlight on Thomas Massie's atrocious anti-Israel record.
We are going to make sure every voter in the state of Kentucky knows how bad Thomas Massie is on Israel.
Massie, a libertarian-minded Republican generally opposed to foreign aid, is seen as a potential contender for Kentucky Senate seat in 2026.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who has faced health issues and recently announced plans to step down as leader, is not expected to run for re-election.
The 30-second advertisement asserts that Israel is under attack by Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, and Congressman Thomas Massie.
Republicans are trying to help Israel, but one Republican is standing in the way, says the narrator.
Fifteen times in April, Massie was the only Republican voting with anti-Israel radicals.
Massie's votes, helpful for Iran, harmful to Israel.
Anyone who cares about the Holy Land needs to know, Tom Massie is hostile to Israel.
The Super PAC previously ran a series of TV, radio, and digital ads last year targeting Massie's votes on Israel issues.
So APAC spends, like I said, I believe the final number was well over $300,000 through a super PAC called United Democracy Project.
It's like totally dystopian.
I know that's trite, but you've got the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee Which is most likely bankrolled by the actual state of Israel.
And actually that was the source of a major political scandal 60-70 years ago that the initial body, I think it was the American Zionist Council, which prefigured AIPAC, It was doing all the same activities that AIPAC does now, but it was receiving money directly from the state of Israel.
So the federal government said, hey, the Israeli government can't bribe American politicians to support Israel.
They said at the minimum you have to house these political lobbying activities in a different entity.
Like, at least try to make it a bit more discreet.
You've got this committee.
You've got this American Zionist Council.
They're getting money from a foreign government and then they're taking that money and giving it to politicians and I'm...
Being a little bit reductive here, but they're giving it to politicians.
The government said, hey, we got to hide this a little bit.
We have to make this a little bit more, at least make an effort.
Try and show that you're doing a little something to obscure what's happening here.
So they separated it out and they made it AIPAC.
Although I think it is safe to assume that AIPAC is receiving some form of assistance indirectly through the state of Israel.
AIPAC is pouring money, we're talking tens of millions of dollars, every cycle into these elections in very targeted ways.
And politicians will say that they will throw money in favor of a candidate that supports them.
They will throw the same amount of money against a candidate that opposes them.
And so, in effect, the money is doubled.
If AIPAC is giving a candidate that supports Israel $200,000, but that candidate goes against Israel and then they shift the money to the opponent and give the opponent $200,000, the differential is $400,000.
thousand dollars the differential is four hundred thousand dollars AIPAC has an office in every congressional district even though the Jewish community is only concentrated in like seven or nine states in the entire country there's like no Jews in South Dakota There's like no Jews in most American states.
Not only do they have an office in every single state, They've got an office in every single district.
So there's 100 senators, 435 districts.
They've got offices in every state, in every district, monitoring the positions of every congressman, even, for example, like a congressman in Northern Kentucky.
And they are prepared to put up large sums of money to everyone that supports them, and if a candidate opposes them, they remove the money and give it to the opposition.
And like I said, in the 1950s they were getting the money directly from a foreign state.
Why does that matter?
Because foreign governments have a lot of money.
Foreign governments, well in particular a foreign government like the State of Israel, gets money from the United States.
But in general, foreign governments have a lot of money because a state has the ability to tax.
So a state, unlike a private individual or a private entity, can tax its population and all the economic activities of a country.
And so they have a very large budget.
The budget of the foreign ministry of a country is much larger than the lobbying budget of almost any private entity in the world.
That's why it's a big problem.
It's also a problem because states are far more interested parties.
America is the military that runs the world.
Foreign governments have an interest in influencing that military and that diplomatic mission that controls the world and all its institutions through force and through other forms of soft power.
But in particular in the case of Israel, it's especially malicious because one of AIPAC's biggest priorities is they want to see American representatives support foreign aid to Israel.
So here's a perfect example.
In 2016, the U.S.
Congress passed a bill called the Memorandum of Understanding that increased annual foreign aid to Israel from $3.6 billion to $3.8 billion per year.
And as I said, this is one of AIPAC's major policy priorities.
They will support or oppose candidates on the basis of whether they support ever-increasing and perpetual foreign aid to Israel.
Well, if AIPAC's lobbying activities are, in some indirect way, subsidized by the State of Israel, you can see the conflict of interest.
You can see that the money moves In a circle, AIPAC gives a politician $200,000 to win their election.
That representative then votes on a bill that gives $3.8 billion to Israel.
Israel uses a fraction of the $3.8 billion and gives it to AIPAC.
And AIPAC gives it to the representatives that vote for foreign aid to Israel.
The aid goes to Israel.
Israel gives it to AIPAC.
This is a big problem.
This is why John F. Kennedy tried to register AIPAC as a foreign agent.
That was scuttled after he was assassinated by Lyndon B. Johnson, who permitted AIPAC to reorganize its activities in a different entity and resume and grow in lobbying power in Congress.
So this is this perverse situation.
It's the most rank and blatant corruption that you can imagine.
It's foreign.
It's alien.
It's treasonous.
And they go into these congressional districts.
They go into the American heartland in a place like Lexington, Kentucky.
And they create a super PAC called... What is it?
United Democracy Project?
And they put ads all over Fox News for all these boomers dying of, like, fentanyl, dying deaths of despair, their city has been hollowed out by deindustrialization, their kids, if they have any, are trans or gay, their wives have left them, and they're sitting there watching Fox News, and here comes an advertisement from the United Democracy Project,
That says, Thomas Massie is working with Hamas and Iran to hate Israel.
Vote against Thomas Massie.
All this money coming from the Middle East, coming from the other side of the world, on your television screen, under the name, United Democracy Project.
To trick boomers into thinking that this is somehow in their best interest.
And as I said, I know it's trite, but this is literally dystopian.
People read about this stuff in, like, grade school.
Again, I know it's trite, but you read, like, 1984, you think about what happens in the Soviet Union, or these overt forms of political propaganda.
This is it!
You know, that's what it looks like.
And anyway, in this particular situation, it was pretty funny.
Thomas Massey is one of the only Republicans, as a libertarian, who is willing, and I think has a plausible excuse, to go after the foreign aid to Israel.
And so, he's one of, like, nine Republicans, or rather, nine representatives.
The only Republican that is consistently voting against these pro-Israel bills.
So, he gets targeted.
Unfortunately for AIPAC, Thomas Massey is very popular in his district.
It's a very red district.
There are no other viable contenders.
So they know he's going to win.
They put up all this money.
They can't leave the challenge to Israel's influence unanswered.
Thomas Massey clears it.
He wins 75%.
And then they come out.
AIPAC comes out and says, well we weren't trying to beat him anyway.
And as I said earlier, I'm not making this up.
If you go to any news report about this race, you will see they have all been corrected in the last 12 hours to reflect AIPAC's position.
Because last night, the story was Thomas Massey beats AIPAC.
This afternoon, the story was, well, AIPAC was not trying to win.
Look it up.
Few news sources even reported on it.
But the ones that did all got corrected, they all were updated to reflect AIPAC's statement that no, we didn't lose, we weren't trying to win.
Oh, okay.
You put up over $300,000 to not win.
To not flip the seat, right?
But maybe it's plausible.
And this is what I was alluding to earlier, which is a bit disturbing.
AIPAC is now saying, well, no, we were not trying to win.
They say we were only trying to shine a spotlight on Thomas Massie's anti-Semitic voting record and commentary.
And they say that this may be a hint at future attacks if Thomas Massie seeks higher office.
And you realize that even someone like Thomas Massie, who's got a safe seat Probably that seat is his until he retires or dies.
And so you might say AIPAC can't do anything to mess with this guy because his seat is locked in.
It's his.
They tried it.
They put money in the district.
He won 75%.
He's not going anywhere.
But then you consider that the incentive for political people... Politicians don't want to remain a representative forever.
They don't even want to remain in the same station as a representative forever.
Every politician, when they're in Congress, wants prestigious committee assignments.
They want to get in the leadership.
And they want that so they have more influence, so that they have some sway over what bills get out of committee, and they're able to determine what bills get voted on, and so on.
They want to make more money, whatever.
And a lot of them, of course, have ambition to rise to state-level office.
They want to run for governor.
They want to run for senator.
They want a spot in a Republican administration.
They want to be in the future President Trump's cabinet.
And so in order to rise through those ranks, then, you're no longer talking about your district, you're talking about, now I have to make an appeal to the Republican leadership, which represents Republicans nationwide.
And as such, requires national-level money.
We're not talking hundreds of thousands, we're talking hundreds of millions of dollars.
We're not talking the politics of Northern Kentucky, we're talking the politics of the whole United States.
And if you want to win a statewide office, again, you're not just talking any longer about the district in North Kentucky, you're talking about the whole state.
And if you want to get in the administration, you're talking about the pressures that are on a president.
And so you might think, oh well, AIPAC's power stops where a really loyal congressman is able to reliably win his primary or win his seat.
You're wrong.
Because even if AIPAC can't unseat every representative like Ilhan Omar or Marjorie Greene or Thomas Massey or Rashida Tlaib, what they can do is impose a very low ceiling.
An AIPAC can go to Mike Johnson, or Kevin McCarthy, or Elise Stefanik, and they can say, this Thomas Massie guy?
Yeah, he can't rise through the ranks in Congress.
He can't have no committee assignments.
Because if he does, we are going to create big problems for the Republicans in this cycle on a national basis.
And they can go in, and if they can't flip, like I said, the particular seat, they can say, hey, Thomas Massey, looks like this is as high as you will ever ascend in your political career, because if you try to run for statewide office, we're gonna put millions to stop you in a potential governor's race, where it's more competitive, or a potential senator's race, in a primary, in a general, and you'll never move beyond your lowly spot as a representative.
And this is where their power comes from.
It's all a question of scale.
And so this is where you realize the extent of our problem.
And you realize this is why things are the way that they are.
Because the most that someone that opposes Israel can ever hope to do is become a representative at most.
And only those representatives who have been around for a long time in a reliably red district, or blue for that matter, With a loyal constituency, probably earned rapport with the voters for years, only they can express a moderate, counter-Israel position.
And they'll still be punished, and that's as high as they will be able to climb.
And this is our political system.
So, it's a big win for Thomas Massie.
It's great that he has brought awareness to the issue, but the message is crystal clear.
And the message is, AIPAC is on your ass now.
APAC is going to be there every cycle, putting in money against Massey.
And if he ever tries to rise above wherever he is, they're going to be there and they are going to sabotage any more ambitious career prospects that he might have thought that he could ever have.
That's the problem.
And you see that everywhere.
You see that with Marjorie Greene.
I think that's why she cucked out.
Marjorie Greene wanted to be the vice president.
It was never going to happen, but that's why she made a deal with Kevin McCarthy.
She thought, I don't want to be the nut job representative who gets made fun of on SNL and is totally ostracized by the leadership.
She said, I want to be a player.
I want to be vice president.
I want to be a senator.
So she said, I got to clean up my act.
It's time to go national.
It's time to go statewide.
This is what happens.
And it goes without saying, but it's totally perverse.
It's like we talked about last night.
I don't think anybody would be able to defend this arrangement, where a foreign government is pouring millions of dollars into these lobbying firms, and their sole issue, their highest priority, is to lobby on behalf of that foreign government.
And they seem to have this national reach, national influence.
They're one of the most influential and richest lobbies in DC, which makes them the most powerful.
And they're going out to bat in favor of a foreign government, and in doing so, creating a system of incentives and disincentives so that nobody in American government opposes them.
You know, but like I was talking about at the top of the show, These guys like Jack Posobiec and Steve Saylor don't want to talk about it.
Like, why not?
Like I said, they want to talk about how immigration is bad.
Like I said, we know immigration's bad!
Everyone knows immigration is bad!
Do people know that this is the way our politics works?
That we went to Iraq for this?
We spent trillions of dollars in Iraq because of this arrangement.
We're there now!
They're talking about a war with Iran right now because of this.
And by the way, you want to see the connection?
This is the last thing I'll say, then I'll move on into the European Union.
So take, to really bring it home for you, to help you understand, people might say, well so what?
What's the problem?
Other than that it's totally humiliating and we have no sovereignty and we're being raped by a foreign country.
Let me bring it home for you and spell this out simply.
We've been talking throughout the past nine months about the gridlock in Congress.
Back on October 1st, 2023, there was a deadline when Kevin McCarthy was still the Speaker of the House to pass appropriations bills for the military.
And if the Republican House didn't pass a spending package to the Senate for approval by Joe Biden, the government would shut down.
But there were a few members of the House Freedom Caucus within the Republican conference that said, we will not vote for any military appropriations bills, thereby shutting down the government, unless the Democrats in the Senate and the White House agree to border security.
The Republican leadership said no way.
The Republican leadership in the House said to the Freedom Caucus, no way.
We are not shutting down the government over border security.
The Republican Freedom Caucus overthrew the Republican leadership.
They ousted Kevin McCarthy.
They said, yes, the F we are.
We are going to shut down the government to get border security.
They said, we're not going to give Biden a cent of foreign aid for Ukraine.
We're not going to give Biden one appropriations bill for the military until they can commit to serious border security because the border's out of control.
Because you got 30,000 illegals getting apprehended at the southern border every single day.
And cities like New York and Chicago are going bankrupt trying to house, feed, provide for these people.
This impasse over Ukraine and military appropriations in exchange for border security went on for six, seven months.
Kevin McCarthy was overthrown.
Mike Johnson was almost overthrown.
There were dozens of compromises negotiated, floated, proposed.
It was a complete impasse.
Until Israel was attacked by Iran.
April 15th, Israel was attacked directly after they bombed Iran's embassy in Syria.
They were attacked with over 400 projectiles from Iran.
Missiles, suicide drones.
The day, the day after Israel was attacked, the Republicans dropped their opposition to everything.
They dropped their opposition to the Ukraine foreign aid.
They dropped their opposition to the military appropriations.
They completely gave up their insistence that there would be border security in this package, and they passed all of it.
They passed $60 billion for Ukraine, $7 billion for Taiwan, and $26 billion for Israel and gave up on border security.
Why?
Because after Israel was attacked, they really needed the money.
So for anybody that says, oh so what?
unidentified
So what?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
They support Israel.
What does Israel have to do with America?
What does America's support for Israel have to do with the border?
It has everything to do with the border.
It has everything to do with everything else.
Republicans completely capitulated after six months of gridlock on both Ukraine and the border.
Why?
Because Israel needed the money.
And AIPAC cracked the whip.
Why do we not have a border?
Because Israel needs the money.
They need the money more and Israel's really in charge.
So you might think, oh well, so what?
You know, we can disagree with each other and we can have multiple priorities.
When push comes to shove, In other words, when these priorities clash, it matters how they're ranked.
You might say, well, a Republican can be in favor of border security and they can be pro-Israel.
Well, certainly that's true.
But how they rank those issues is what matters.
And how they rank those issues is directly affected.
One could say it's controlled by who provides the money for the next campaign.
Because whether or not that politician has a political future depends upon who, or if, money will be put up for the next campaign.
So if AIPAC comes around and says, you need to let go of this border thing to give Israel the money, because if you don't, we're going to put $300,000 in favor of a primary opponent or a general election opponent, then it forces, it concretizes the priorities.
Now all of a sudden, that Republican who was in favor of border security and Israel, well today, he's just in favor of Israel.
Today, on April 16th, the day after the attack, when Mike Johnson split up the bills into four separate bills and voted on them piecemeal, well on that day, we're only pro-Israel.
The border, we'll consider that later.
But that's the day that it matters.
That's the day when actually it makes a difference.
And six months of political theater, this impasse, this gridlock, this coup within the party against Kevin McCarthy, it's all for nothing.
All in vain.
All a farce.
Because when it mattered, when the confrontation was forced, Their real allegiance lied with Israel, not with the United States.
That's a day when border security and foreign aid to Israel is a mutually exclusive proposition.
It might not seem like it every other day, but on days like that it is.
And there's days like that, many days like that, over the past 50 years.
That's why our country sucks.
Because whenever it comes between Israel and America, America always comes second.
Because Israel puts up the money, and these politicians know they can sell out America and continue to rise, but they can't sell out Israel and have a political career.
To bring it all home for you, just so you understand, people say, well, you know, even if Israel disappeared tomorrow, America would still have a border problem.
You know, I don't think so, actually.
Hypothetically, theoretically, if Israel and its lobby and this fifth column in our country cease to exist, I think actually there would be a direct correlation, a direct effect on how quickly we could secure the border.
If we didn't have to stop and pledge allegiance to Israel every three weeks and pass another anti-anti-semitism law, another holocaust remembrance law, another foreign aid law, another replenishment of the Iron Dome, another disavowal of the Iranians, and so on, I think actually we could get it done.
Look at the Trump administration.
What do we remember about Trump 16?
Build the wall.
Did it happen?
unidentified
No.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Did the embassy get moved?
Yes.
Did Israel get their sovereignty over the Golan in Jerusalem?
Yes.
Did the IRGC get labeled a terrorist group?
Yes.
Was the JCPOA torn up?
Absolutely.
Guess who put up $100 million in 16 and 20?
It wasn't the American people that voted for the wall or the RAISE Act.
It was Sheldon Adelson who wanted the embassy to be moved.
But you think that one didn't have something to do with the other?
I'll give you one more example.
I know I'm just kind of rambling here, but I'll give you one more example.
When Trump got in, in 17, when he was inaugurated, he had a Republican House, a Republican Senate.
In the May 2018.
Omnibus spending bill.
Five months before the midterm elections.
He wanted border security.
He shut down the government in January 2018 because his own Republicans said $17 billion for a border wall, $6 billion for additional border security.
Can't do it.
Then Speaker Paul Ryan, then Leader Mitch McConnell.
They looked at his $23 billion border security proposal.
They said, can't do it.
Can't do it.
Republicans.
So Trump shut down the government.
When all was said and done, they gave him $1.6, $1.3 billion for a fence in the Rio Grande Valley.
He asked for $23, he got $1.6 for a fence in the Rio Grande Valley.
unidentified
Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
After the midterm elections, after November, during the lame duck session between the election and when the new Congress with the Democrat House was seated in January, Trump shut down the government again.
Longest government shutdown in history.
Almost threatened the State of the Union.
He said, I will not reopen the government until these Republicans, before they lose their majority, give me money for a border wall.
You know how it ended?
Another $1.6 billion for offense.
unidentified
Okay?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Republicans did reduce the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%.
Republicans did every other thing you can imagine for Israel.
All the same things that you see now.
They couldn't give $23 billion.
Right now we could give $200 billion for Ukraine.
We could give $26 billion for Israel in addition to all these other arms sales.
$9 billion to Taiwan.
I mean, you name it.
They couldn't spare.
$17 billion.
For a while.
When we had a majority in both chambers.
But tell me these things aren't related.
Tell me it's not related.
Mike Johnson gets in last year, Israel says jump, he says how high.
They say foreign aid, he says how much.
You tell me these things aren't related.
That Trump gets elected for a border wall, he can't get more than $4 billion for an eternal, permanent border security solution the Republicans voted for for 50 years.
But Israel could get its embassy and its sovereignty and its enemies crushed and the deal ripped up and the latest tranchevade in this cycle.
But they're not related.
So anyway, do not be fooled.
Do not be so stupid as to think that whether or not Americans have control over our own government is a negligible afterthought, which is how it's treated.
People say, well, you know, we're going to go and we're going to beg these right-wing Zionist Jews to let us have a secure border.
It doesn't really matter who gets to dispense the favors.
What matters is, you know, we're being pragmatic.
Do not let them trick you into thinking that whether or not we have control over our own government is some sort of afterthought.
That it's benign.
That the Zionists are clearly in control.
That the Jews are clearly in control.
It's not an afterthought.
It's not an afterthought on April 16th.
It wasn't an afterthought in the first half of the first Trump term.
It's not going to be an afterthought in the future, in the second Trump administration.
So only when we reclaim control over our country from these people are we going to be able to do anything.
Border, economy, crime, like you name it.
But that has to come first, not second.
So anyway, that's that.
We're out of time!
We're gonna move on.
We were gonna talk about the Ireland, Norway, Spain thing, but maybe we'll get into that tomorrow.
We gotta take a look at the Super Chats because it's been over an hour.
unidentified
Long monologue.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
And I don't have any water here.
We'll take a look at the Super Chats.
We'll see what you guys have to say about all this.
Totally outrageous, man.
I'm gonna put that in a tweet.
I'm cooking tonight.
But I'm gonna put that in a tweet maybe tomorrow morning in a few hours.
All right, let me get set up here.
I'll take a look.
unidentified
All right.
All right.
Hey!
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
What's NYC?
I don't know what that is, but thanks for the big super chat!
AF 24-7-369 Mick will be at AF we sponsored two tables Nick the Knife USA USA USA What's NYC?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I don't know what that is but thanks for the big super chat I appreciate it I don't know what that is Is that... I'll have to go and check.
I don't look at all the ticket sales that go in, but I appreciate the huge super chat.
God bless, man.
I really appreciate the big support.
I don't know what it means.
I hope it's not something weird or some kind of troll, but I do appreciate it.
You can never... I mean, after what happened last week, you could just never know, but I really appreciate it, man.
Thank you very much.
God bless.
Excuse me, I will see you at AFPAC.
It's gonna be tight, man.
You know, the vision's really coming together.
The creative direction, the rhetoric, the team, you know, the alliance, the coalition.
It's really coming together.
So, I think you're gonna be very happy with the presentation at AFPAC.
But thank you very much.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
I don't support it because I think it's directionally wrong.
I think if you're using the Nazis as your bound, as your parameter, I think that's a problem.
wars or is it anti-white?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I don't support it because I think it's directionally wrong.
I think if you're using the Nazis as your bound, as your parameter, I think that's a problem.
That's conceding so much to the left because the left says, you know, the worst thing it The worst evil is a Nazi.
And if you say, well, then the Israelis are Nazis, it's kind of like this Dems are the real racist thing.
You're conceding this moral paradigm.
Where you're saying, you're correct, Nazis are the worst thing, but the real Nazis are the people we don't like.
You're never gonna win that, because if you are like a white, identitarian, if you are illiberal in any way, in favor of authoritarian or fascist government, any form of nationalism, Any opposition to Jewish power.
All of that has a strong connotation with Nazism.
So you will always be more plausibly the Nazi.
I mean, it was created that way by design.
You will always be more plausibly and convincingly called the Nazi than if you try to say, oh, you know, these liberals or these Jews are the real Nazis.
I mean, it doesn't work.
So, no, I think it's horrible.
I think it's a terrible idea.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Dark type cowboy sent $5.
I don't trust crypto or banks.
Do you think I could pay for my FPAC ticket at the door?
I'll pay double.
Maybe there's a secret code?
Before you ask, I used a prepaid visa to send this chat.
Nice try trolls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I don't know.
We might sell tickets at the door.
I'm not sure yet.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Well hey, it was very well done.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Really excellent stuff.
We might have to get you in our video team, because that was seriously impressive.
I think with some direction and some mentorship from some of our guys, I think you'll be one of the finest clippers.
Not knocking you, but I'm saying that was some really excellent stuff.
I don't think I've seen anybody animate like that in our scene, so we might be able to get you plugged in with some of our guys and show you some tips and tricks and maybe we can make that happen.
I was very impressed.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
PrettyFlyWhiteGuy sent $5, 353.
What inspired your work for WorkSync Telegram message?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Well, you know, I've been doing this for a long time.
That's a quote that a friend... It's a quote that a friend of mine has said to me before.
You know, I've been doing this for seven years and it's been a lot of ups and downs and highs and lows.
The thing that I've learned is that you really can't care about the outcome at all.
You cannot be outcome dependent.
You have to worry about doing your duty.
Doing it well.
Caring about, you know, you really have to think about what you're doing.
Execute it to the best of your ability, for the right reasons, and not worry about the outcome.
You might lose.
You might lose for 20 years.
and then win.
Or you may die and never see the fruits of your labor.
But that is how we have to think of these things.
We have to think about it in a truly selfless way, in a way that's kind of outcome independent.
And that doesn't mean that we shouldn't be trying to win.
But I think that people that are too fixated on the outcome or the kind of flow of the battle, I think this gives way to short-term thinking and shortcuts and ethical or moral compromise.
You know when I started doing this I really made a gamble on myself and on this approach and on this message Because I believed in it.
You know, I really believed in it and I just did it for a long time and Sometimes it looked like it was working.
Sometimes it looked like it was a total failure and There were some very dark times in my career and I don't want to get into the you know crying about you know my emotional mental state or whatever but you know there were some very dark times there were some times when I thought it was over and I was a total failure and You know, various times throughout, take your pick.
Sometimes you thought, you know, I'm at the top of the world, it's happening for me.
I'm also somebody with a ton of, like, raw ability, so there's pretty high stakes.
If you're just some guy that doesn't have, you know, anything going for you, it's like, whatever.
But, I mean, me, I was at a great school, I had a lot of raw ability, I was being scouted by the establishment.
So, throughout this saga over the past seven years, there was a lot of Expectation a lot of disappointment highs lows like I said all of it And people have come and gone Based on how they thought it was going at the time or what you know whether they thought it was really gonna win or something and I was able to see it through over a long period of time.
I was able to, from a very young age, dedicate myself to a project that I had no idea if it would succeed or not, persisted through everything that anybody could imagine being thrown at them.
Censorship, debanking, the federal government on your case, betrayal, intrigue, scandals, humiliations, reputational destruction, personal fallings out, you know, everything you can imagine.
And saw it through, I think, to a true success.
And the point was to say, well, now that it's successful, you can't say necessarily, oh, OK, now everything's good.
It's like, no, I anticipate and expect there will be more challenges.
There will be more disappointments.
There will be more hurdles.
And you really have to be there for all of it.
You have to be equally committed and equally into it and believing in it.
Whether you're at your lowest low, your highest high, whether you're an abject failure, whether you're considered the breakout star, whatever it is, you got to be with it.
So, you know, people that really are in love with the fruits of it, which is the credit, the notoriety, the money, the fame, Status, prestige, legacy, even victory itself.
People that are too married to that, I think they'll never do anything worthwhile.
So, um, it's kind of like reminding everybody, hey, we're up, but never forget, you know, and you have to say it when you're up.
If you say it when you're down, it seems like a cope.
If you're losing, and you're like, hey, it doesn't matter, you know, then people say, oh, that's a cope, you're a fucking loser, and you're just saying, hey, it doesn't matter.
So you have to say it when you're winning, because if you say it when you're winning, it's like, oh, wow, he must really believe that, you know?
If you say it when you're, instead of gloating, instead of saying, hey, I'm the best, I'm the guy, I won.
Instead of gloating, you say, well, we can't, the victory doesn't even belong to us.
unidentified
Then people could say, okay, so it's legit.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
So that's how I feel about that.
You really have to be...
I've always said it, content is king.
I genuinely do this because I just love it, and I think it's the right thing to do.
People always ask me, you know, why do you do it?
unidentified
It's like, because I just love the work.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm curious.
I'm fascinated with the truth.
I'm a righteous person, or I'm self-righteous, I guess.
I want to see things improve.
You know, and whether I'm, you know, if my account loses $500,000 overnight, I'm right here on the show, the same as if I had just met with Trump and Kanye, you know, the previous week.
I'm there on the show at 10 o'clock, reading the stupid superchats, talking about politics.
So, you know, if something's worth doing, then it's worth doing for its own sake.
Not because it's gonna necessarily have a particular outcome, but Dumb question.
That's why I love that quote.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Nicholas sent $10.
Thoughts on Catholic post-liberalism versus integralism?
Does this hinge on the concrete reality of JQ slash liberal political economy, simply making integralism more pragmatic?
Or are there generic reasons you regard integralism as more true?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Dumb question.
Moving on.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
King Lorinox sent $50.
love from the uk been a fan since 19 and it's been incredible to see you overcome all the obstacles put in your way i'd like to encourage all the uk grow ipers to get involved with the reform party in the lead up to the ge it's not perfect but we have grow ipers in many key positions and a great opportunity to make the party ours god bless the re i don't know what the reform part i don't follow uk politics i saw they're calling for a new election on july 4th
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
but um but i haven't been following it I heard that like the Conservative Party is gonna lose every seat.
It's like the worst blowout in a hundred years, which is pretty funny.
But yeah, I mean I would encourage anybody to get involved in politics here or in the United Kingdom.
Are there Kruipers in the UK?
I feel like I don't...
I don't really, uh... I'm very bearish about European politics.
They're all getting, like, arrested over there, but it does seem like there's a lot of groipers in Europe.
Every time I... somebody I know goes over there, they text me.
They're like, oh, they're all groipers over here.
So...
I mean, good luck to you guys, I guess.
unidentified
I guess.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Brown Robin Williams sent $20 more subversion.
Johnny Sterreker, Bruno Hazard, and Gregory Baum were three racially Jewish Catholic priests and the sole authors of the Nostra Ete Declaration of Vatican to which reversed centuries of doctrine that Jews killed Christ and that they are rejected by God.
If they do not accept him covered on war strike episode 30.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Yeah, I, I, I was watching that classical theist, Timothy Gordon video about it.
He was talking about... What was it?
This proposed draft encyclical document in like the 1930s under Pius XI that's Humanae Generis Unitas.
Yeah, it's a pretty deep red pill.
It's pretty interesting, this aversion that happened there.
And I guess they had to keep revisiting, I mean, with...
I don't know how to pronounce it.
Nostra Aetate.
They had to revisit it in the 70s, the 80s, in 2015.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
the 80s and 2015 i think they got it wrong black grow i percent twenty dollars half adding to my comment from yesterday needing a unified monoculture like east asia america can achieve it in our current state with a return to de facto segregation american asians indians hispanics caribbeans africans etc tend to thrive in their own communities here american blacks only complain because.
unidentified
Beep.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Black grow a percent, $20, two halves.
Our sense of community has long been destroyed by welfare, drugs, criminality, and fatherlessness.
The most militant anti-white blacks are ironically segregationists.
There's definitely common cause in addressing the diversity problem with these types of unlikely allies who have their own version of ethnic nationalism.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Yeah, I think that something like that emerges in the absence of forced integration.
You know, I think that it's happened in spite of forced integration, You look at a city like Chicago, it's totally segregated.
And I don't think that's... I mean, it is true that partially how the city was designed was intended to create segregation, like where they put the forest preserves and the metro stations and things like that, but...
But I think you've seen segregation even persist in spite of attempts at integrating people with Section 8 and other things.
I mean, the whites tend to clump together, the Hispanics do, the blacks do.
I think that's just how it goes.
unidentified
So... Yeah, I think you're right.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Steve P. sent $5.
You are very anti-Semitic, dude.
We Jews do not run the world.
Avi Owen sent $10.
What do you think about Save Europa?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I don't know what that is.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Nathan Lynch sent $5.
Happy to report that some clips of your documentary I was posting on TikTok got upwards of 5 million views before the account was banned.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I saw that!
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Almost all positive comments.
Can't wait for FPAC 4.
The edits are going to be insane.
unidentified
RKD4NJF Thank you, man, and nice work.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Yeah, I saw that.
Your channel was huge.
People were sending that to me.
So I appreciate it.
Nice work.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Johnny Bravo $0.075.
Great show tonight, Nick.
The Daily Wire is now attempting to use comedy and memes in order to discredit the narrative of Jewish control of media and Hollywood.
What are some effective arguments that can be used to shatter through these deceptive tactics?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Dude.
The whole show is making these arguments.
What do you mean?
People go, what are some effective arguments?
That's what the whole show is about.
Watch the show.
Oh, brother.
What are you even talking about?
I saw the stupid clip you're referring to.
It's one throwaway joke.
Normally, they never talk about it.
What a dumb question, man.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Some people need help.
unidentified
I swear.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Thanks a lot.
May Jesus be with us all.
Thank you, Nick.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Thanks a lot.
I appreciate it.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Clayton sent $5.00, End of the show and your fat ass is definitely getting hungry.
What's your Portillo's order?
Are you a gene and juice nigga?
Favorite pop?
It's the longest form of hatred.
unidentified
07.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Fuck off with this chummy.
Stop trying to be chummy with me.
unidentified
Alright, what's your Portillo's order?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Fuck you.
unidentified
Die?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I don't go to Portillo's sucks.
Also, this is just like inane water cooler talk.
You're trying to be chummy with me.
unidentified
Favorite pop?
See, I said pop because I'm from the Midwest too, like you.
Oh, you said pop.
You must be from the Midwest, like me.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Fuck you.
Fuck you.
Stop trying to get chummy with me.
unidentified
I reject this.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I reject this attempt to sidle up next to me and befriend me.
Get the fuck away from me.
Are you a genius?
unidentified
Oh, every self-respecting Chicagoite joins the genius dudes.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Shut the fuck up.
Gosh, I don't know why that... I hate that so much.
I don't know why it bothers me, but it just does.
That just irritates me.
Portillo's is trash.
Nobody goes to Portillo's anymore.
unidentified
Everyone knows that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Hey, thank you, Modern Monarchist!
Good to hear from you, buddy.
It's been a minute.
What's up?
The Old Modern Monarchist.
Hey, thank you, Modern Monarchist.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Good to hear from you, buddy.
It's been a minute.
What's up?
The old Modern Monarchist.
That's a name I haven't heard in a long time.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Q.O.S.
I did.
You seen the state of Nick Rikita?
Groyper curse strikes again.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Oh, it's too bad.
Yeah, Nick Rikita never had anything nice to say about me.
Now he's an alcoholic who was... You want to know what it looks like when you get caught jerking off on camera?
That's what it looks like.
Crazy.
That was insane, dude.
Groyper curse for real.
It comes for everybody.
The Groyper curse comes for everybody.
So yeah, that's a shame.
Yeah, that's a shame.
You hate to see it.
unidentified
Okay.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Alright.
Thank you.
Thank you for that.
Imagine if we skeeby dee lobby where we advocated for everyone to goon and edge and we could have Kai Sennett and Duke Dennis run for office of governor of Ohio and everyone in the movement could mu and mog chuds and Stacey's.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Thank you for that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Chad Champion sent.
unidentified
I'm not even reading that one.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
I want to buy a sponsorship package for a pack, but I don't have anyone to go with.
What do I do with the extra tickets?
Am I going to be sitting alone at my table or something?
Oh, and are cell phones allowed?
Only for selfies in the after party.
I know doxing is a concern.
Thanks.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Why don't you send us an email?
If you go to our website, you could submit a support ticket.
There's logistical things.
I don't know.
We'll have to figure these out.
Okay.
I appreciate the big super chat, but we will talk to you about that in a private form of communication.
If you send us a support ticket or a support email, we'll be able to help you out with that.
Cell phones not allowed you can't have your cell phone out just for OPSEC concerns So we'll have people walking around the event making sure people don't have their phones out Because for obvious reasons we don't want people snapping pictures.
We don't want people to be photographed there.
It'll be pretty dark anyway, so You know that's never happened that's never been a problem in the past but We are going to be monitoring that.
In terms of a sponsorship package, if you don't want the extra tickets, you could just forfeit them and we could seat you at a table with other sponsors, you know?
So it's not a big deal.
We could figure it out.
If you want to give the extra tickets away, we could do that, you know?
But you gotta shoot us an email.
We'll figure it out and we'll find a solution that's accommodating.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Probably the green one.
parents sent ten dollars love your rant on advertising last night i've been thinking the same thing for a while now and guess who's the worst offender ben shapiro's videos are unwatchable each one has three to five ad reads plus youtube ads jews loving money is an unsubstantiated low iq anti-semitic trope favorite jolly rancher probably the green one green or purple um yeah well you know
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
and there's this idea that it's like we just gotta make everything as profitable as possible and i understand that is like true to an extent in the business world i I think we should move away from that, though.
This, like, squeezing value out of everything, it's ruining our society.
Like, yeah, you can make more money putting ads in everything, and in a cynical way, it's like people aren't really gonna care that much.
But I also think that's wrong.
I feel like...
The juice isn't worth the squeeze.
Like, yeah, firms are getting more money by squeezing every last dollar out and they could do more with it and it's like more efficient and stuff, but is that the society we want to live in?
Do we want to live in a world where everything has to be interrupted like Harrison Bergeron with an ad read, a five-second advertisement, skippable advertisement?
I don't think so.
I kind of want to go back to Different time where you know, maybe things are less convenient and it's less instant gratification and maybe we we have less But everything's better You know, I don't think people realize that so much of what we have.
It's just really to accommodate waste and instant gratification You know like we could probably tolerate Less material abundance and, you know, we have to wait for certain things or whatever and make the economy less efficient.
To have these, like, standard of living upgrades.
Like, for example, you can go to the store and have any kind of fruit year-round.
Why?
Is it so wrong to suggest that we would only have fruit that's, like, in season at the store?
Why do we have to have fruit year-round?
Everyone knows the oranges taste better in the summer than they do in the winter, but why do we have to have oranges at the supermarket in the winter?
Can't the supermarket just say, hey, they're not in season?
You know, such and such is out of stock.
Maybe that's not a perfect example.
I don't know the economy of grocery stores, but you get what I'm saying.
Everything is built so it's like you could have as much of what you want, whenever you want it, instantly.
And I feel like in order to achieve that, so many liberties have been taken in overall quality of life.
And I don't know, maybe we could just wait a little bit.
Excuse me.
And maybe tolerate a little bit less.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
A B sent $100.
Great show.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Thank you for the big super chat.
I appreciate it.
Glad you liked the show.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Greekoid sent $7.
Are you a gentle young or a few hula toogan?
Thoughts on David Duke rising up Bradsky Hill?
Great show tonight.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Wow, thanks a lot.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Ibra Ibra sent $10.
Do you ever think about doing something like Manect where people can pay to message or speak with you?
I'm sure a lot of people would pay for that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hmm, I don't know.
I don't like selling my time like that.
It makes me feel like a whore.
I guess it kind of like makes sense from a business point of view, but I never like doing that, you know?
At least with the Super Chats, I don't have to read them and I can reply however I want.
These are like donations because people like the show.
They give money.
They leave a comment.
I can react.
I could choose not to react.
I can be mean.
I could be nice.
unidentified
So, I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Maybe.
This is really the only format that works for me.
Otherwise, I'm not a huge fan.
But maybe.
We'll see.
I never heard of that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
So what?
So they're not based or something?
UK drops candidates over alleged racist comments.
The charity Hope Not Hate claims it found tweets by Jonathan Kay and Mick Reno making derogatory comments about Muslims and black people.
unidentified
So what?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
So they're not based or something?
What's the point?
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
John Daver.
Wow, thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
That's great.
Thank you very much, John T.
Irving. - Yeah.
Great stuff as always.
Can't wait for that.
Can't wait for these born-again virgins to be brought in at AFFPAC.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
We'll have a little baptismal.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I don't think I have any.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Big if true!
Well, glad to hear that.
Very cool.
I hope you guys do well in the next election.
- Big if true, well glad to hear that.
Very cool.
I hope you guys do well in the next election.
That's good to know.
- Dude.
- What's your favorite go-to argument against nihilism? - Dude. - What's your favorite go-to argument against nihilism? - Dude. - What's your favorite go-to argument against nihilism? - Dude. - What's your favorite go-to argument against nihilism? - Dude. - What's your favorite go-to argument against nihilism? - Dude. - What's your favorite go-to argument against nihilism? - Dude.
It's a frustrating debate I find myself in with friends who think life has no intrinsic value other than their own meaning.
Love your work mate!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Listen, I'm not really getting in a lot of arguments about nihilism with people.
I think a lot of political debates are basically futile.
These are like my least favorite questions when people are like, What's your go-to argument when you're in political debates about the political compass and whether God is real and stuff?
It's like, I'm not really getting in those debates really that often because I think it's kind of stupid.
I think people are basically open to it or they're not.
It depends on the person.
It depends on the course of the argument.
It depends on who you're arguing with.
To me, that's something that's kind of like... I hate this whole culture of speed debating.
I get in Discord calls and debate other people on Discord.
I go on Twitter and argue with people on Twitter about politics.
Like, I understand people are into that.
I was into that when I was like a teenager.
You know, when you're like, when you're like 18, you want to debate with everybody about, you know, who was a better president, Trump or Obama?
Um, you know, but now that I'm older, I'm like, are people still doing, people are still like, what does that even mean?
We're getting, what's your go-to argument in the debate about nihilism?
I don't know.
It depends on the person.
It depends on, You know, what their position is, how it's going.
You know, the appeal has to be tailored to the individual person.
I don't believe in this, like, blanket, you know, well, the kill shot for why nihilism isn't true is blank.
I mean, for me, the biggest thing is everybody acts as though they are not nihilistic, which means that they don't really believe it.
I guess that, to me, is the most obvious thing.
If people were nihilistic, they would all act differently.
If you were really a nihilist, You would lie, cheat, kill, steal, rape, commit suicide, mass shootings.
Like, you wouldn't care if innocent people died.
You wouldn't care about such things like justice or ethics or fairness or anything.
You know, and then people always come with these ad hoc, well, I care about that because I'm, like, empathetic.
It's like, okay, but what is empathy?
Like, how do you know How do you know you're not a brain in a vat?
How do you know, you know, you don't even believe in realism?
Like, what do you mean you believe in empathy?
Like, how do you even know there are other people?
How do you know they are people?
How do you know they're conscious?
How do you know there is an independent reality we all share?
You know, and on and on and on.
It's like, you don't know that.
You don't act like you're a nihilist.
If you acted like a true nihilist, the only ethic that would even make sense is hedonism.
An extremely violent form of hedonism, probably.
Or suicide.
I've always said, like, if you were truly a nihilist, you would just commit suicide as soon as possible because life sucks.
You know, people come up with these cope responses.
They say, no, life is about the little things.
No, it isn't.
You want to know why?
What happens if you're a parent and your kid dies?
Is a can of coke and a slice of pizza gonna make up for the death of your child?
Fuck no.
Is the obligation to live for your other kids going to exceed the grief of losing a child?
No, it's not.
And maybe I have a different perspective on this because my family had a lot of tragedies, but life is miserable and at a certain point it peaks and it gets worse all the time.
You get older, uglier, you lose your hair, you get wrinkled, you lose your sexual function, your hormones diminish, you become frail, your mental state deteriorates, your senses degrade, your vision, your hearing, All of it.
Your ability to move, your mobility, your friends die, your family dies, things that you love disappear, your memories fade away, the richness of new memories deteriorates all the time, you know, so it's like life kind of sucks.
And then it's punctuated by sickness, Or a violent and sudden death.
And people want to stick around and wait for that?
Like, if you were a true nihilist, you would go out in a blaze of glory.
You would go out Grand Theft Auto style, or you would commit suicide, or you'd commit suicide when you turn, like, 29 or something.
I don't know.
But the idea that life has this great value proposition from a sensory point of view, it just isn't true.
Like, The things that you're attached to all go away.
Everything you're attached to goes away.
So there has to be something transcendent.
That's the key.
The key is that there has to be something that transcends all the temporary things that fade away.
And ultimately everything fades away.
You, your life, your body, your experiences, your memories, your senses.
You know, people like to say, well, I like to live because of hobbies and travel and new experiences and trying new things.
It's like, yeah, but eventually you run out of novelty and eventually the the pleasure or enjoyment you derive from each new novel experience is marginally less pleasurable.
And like I said, you experience so much profound grief And disability in your life and a profound sense of loss that like no amount of vacations are going to make up for that.
Sorry, the aesthetic emotion you feel when you look at like the beach doesn't satisfy someone whose kid died, doesn't satisfy someone whose wife died.
You know, a man gets married to his high school sweetheart Maybe they were old childhood friends.
They finally consummate their marriage.
She dies in a freak car crash the next day.
Where does that person find solace in a material world?
A person goes to the gas station, eats nachos, develops botulism, dies two days later.
The family's devastated.
Where's the solace?
Where's the rhyme or reason?
Well, you're gonna go to the Eiffel Tower?
Give me a break.
And what happens when the Eiffel Tower's submerged in third-world filth like it is now?
Then where do you go?
You know, it's not... None of this stuff is real.
None of this stuff exists.
So, that's like destiny.
Oh, well, I like life because of hobbies, really.
What hobbies does a person in Iron Lung enjoy?
What solace is there for that person?
What solace is there for the person that's born with no legs?
Or a six-year-old with leukemia.
What are you going to tell that kid?
Watch Dragon Tales?
Well, the good news is you get to eat unlimited ice cream.
Give me a break.
So, no, there has to be something transcendent and we long for that.
We have an appetite for that because it's real.
We have a vocabulary for it and we have a longing for it and an appetite for it and a sense that it must be because it is.
unidentified
So...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
And by the way, everyone acts like that.
People don't act like their loved ones are just chemical mating partners that we seek out because of evolutionary biology.
No, people act as though love is real.
People act as though they love their parents for real, or they love their loved ones for real.
People act as though they care about justice and fairness because it is real.
And yet, they believe it isn't.
And yet they must believe that these things are not real in any meaningful way.
That they're totally constructed and totally subjective and basically fallacious.
So, anyway.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Chad Champion sent $5.
We need more Growipers to post shirtless photos on the DL so we can beat BAP in the physique war.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Okay, let's not though actually.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Daniel TG sent $5.
How do you feel about a potential Black Pope?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I don't know, I don't feel very strongly about it.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Florida Groipa sent $5.
Will you have a stash for a pack 4?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
No, I probably can't grow one in three weeks.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
John Dave Irving sent $10.
You see it's more cushiny than ever before Charmin Ultra.
Less is more when you say less is more.
Yeah, less is more.
It's more absorbent than the regular Ripple brand.
For sure what you used to love, now you're gonna adore Charmin Ultra at a pack four.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Awesome.
Great ad read.
Thank you for that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
John Dave Irving sent $10.
These $10 Super Chats really get the bang for your bunk.
Don't know why I didn't think of this before.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Yeah.
No, this is great.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
AP Owen sent $5.
Are you gonna run for president when you're 70?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
When I'm 70?
Why?
What does that mean?
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
John Dave Irving sent $10.
Are you really going to leave us edging at your Portillo's order?
I mean I saw a Chicago dog without extra sport peppers on the timeline and I was kinda left me flaccid.
unidentified
Okay, this is...
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Clayton sent $5.
Hey bud, let's meet up at Portillo's.
You'll buy.
Your fat ass probably gets two big beefs dipped in a large bop.
Ope.
Sorry.
Didn't see ya there.
John Dave Irving sent $10.
Nick, it has been exactly 9 months since my super chat caused what is now termed Smegmagate.
Are you ever going to tell us how to minimize or at least mitigate the potential disastrous effects of Smegmagate?
John Dave Irving sent $10.
Hey Nick.
Yeah, I'm still here chilling.
What's up WU?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Yeah, me too.
I'm still here also.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
SN sent $10.
Like you, I lost a lot of friends because I criticized the Jews.
Given recent events, how do you handle forgiving normies who see that you're right?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Weird question.
No one's ever come to me and said, oh, you were right.
I mean, not a lot of normies have, I guess.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
John Dave Irving sent $10.
Nick, another option would be for us to bring bean bags or inflatable couches and move the tables over.
So on live and Christians or bean bags, what do you prefer?
Standing back and standing by.
unidentified
This is great.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
John Dave Irving sent $10.
Nick, I was locked on Twitter for seven days and I feel like you already moved on.
Do you even think about my past tweets?
Our memories?
Or are you seriously going to continue to like this WSG Freaks stuff?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Did you get locked out?
I didn't even notice.
I've been watching you for a long time.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
John Dave Irving sent $10.
Nick, someone mentioned Gary Grouper.
Do you know this guy?
I have never heard of him.
Should I block?
unidentified
I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I never heard of him.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Noah Cuxin sent $5.
Can we get some AF beanies?
Chad Champion sent $10.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
We're sending $10 now.
Very funny guys.
As always, very funny.
Very funny stuff.
Okay, that's our last Super Chat.
I gotta just end it now.
That's gonna do it for me.
Remember to follow me here on Rumble and Cozy to get a push notification whenever I go live.
I'm on the air Monday through Friday.
As always, thanks for watching.
Thanks to our super chatters.
In particular, NYC Network AB, Radigan Sorseel, John Dave Irving, of course.
Thanks to all our Super Chatters, everybody that watches the show.
We love you.
I will see you tomorrow.
Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!
It's going to be only America first!
America first!
The American people will come first once again.
With respect, the respect that we deserve.
From this day forward, it's going to be only America.
America First!
▲
Export Selection