Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 25, 2024 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:54:21

CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS??? Texas DEFIES Supreme Court, Showdown With Feds IMMINENT | America First Ep. 1282CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS??? Texas DEFIES Supreme Court, Showdown With Feds IMMINENT | America First Ep. 1282

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:41:15

streamlabs matthew tts

05:44

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening everybody.
		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Wednesday.
		We have a lot to talk about tonight.
		Lots to get into.
		Big show.
		Big featured story tonight.
		Finally we get to talk about this.
		I actually wanted to talk about it A couple days ago, but there's just been so much other stuff happening.
		Our featured story tonight, we're talking about the Supreme Court decision on the Texas border and a brewing constitutional crisis.
		Earlier this week, the Supreme Court ruled that the state of Texas would have to allow U.S.
		Border Patrol under the jurisdiction of the federal government Access to a park near the border where illegal immigrants cross.
		The Supreme Court says that Texas has to let them into the park so that they can cut illegal, well, what the government wants to get rid of, but barbed wire that has been installed by the Texas National Guard.
		But now the Texas military, which would be the Texas National Guard and other forces, are refusing The Supreme Court order and it will not allow the Border Patrol to access this park in order to take down the barbed wire.
		And so this is in effect a defiance of the Supreme Court.
		And now many other states are taking sides including Montana, North Dakota, Virginia, Georgia, Oklahoma, and Florida who are now all supporting the state of Texas in their defiance of the federal government.
		So many are hyping this up and saying this may be the, if not a, prefigurement Or prefiguration?
		I don't know what the noun would be, but perhaps this is either the one or this prefigures the constitutional crisis between the federal government and the states, which may set a new precedent if we're unable ever as Republicans to win national elections ever again.
		And more on that idea later tonight.
		This is something actually that I've talked about for years.
		And I'd have to go and look through my telegram and through my show archive, but I have said for a long time that the day is approaching fast.
		And it's probably inevitable if it hasn't already arrived, although it could have.
		And that's the day when Republicans are no longer able to win national elections or national power.
		And this has everything to do with the demographic change.
		The same demographic transformation which has made California a blue state is also happening to Texas and it's happening to Georgia.
		It's happened already to Colorado and Virginia and Nevada.
		There will be a day when the map changes and Republicans can never win the presidency, will never be able to control the Senate or the House ever again, and it's this idea of a permanent Democrat majority, basically a one-party state.
		I've been saying this for as long as I've been doing the show.
		That's, among other things, the demographic time bomb.
		It's not the only one, but that is a major consequence of the demographic change.
		You look at the way these people vote, I'm talking about non-white people, and the majority of them vote for Democrats.
		If enough of them come here in specific states, it's over.
		And you see that it compounds.
		Biden becomes the president and he lets 8 million people in.
		See how that works?
		Now, the Democrats are even stronger the next time, and so on.
		So what do you do as whites, as Republicans, if there's a permanent Democrat majority, and they just keep letting people in, and they open the borders, and things just keep getting more liberal, and the society drifts left?
		Well, maybe the only solution is that you can get control of one state, or maybe 20 states, or 26 states, And there is some degree of, I use this term I think on Monday, salutary neglect, which is what described the situation right before the American Revolution, where maybe the federal government allows greater autonomy for the Republican states.
		Maybe there's some degree of defiance.
		Is there a hard clash between the federal government and the states?
		Can the states assert greater autonomy?
		If the federal government won't change the demographics, can the states?
		Can the states do what the federal government cannot?
		Can a confederacy of states do that?
		And that's not a wink to the Confederate States of America, but that is what you would call it.
		So, I've said this for a long time, that may be the only path, and as I said, this is either The beginning of that moment, or it prefigures a moment like this in the future, and I think the latter is more likely.
		So we'll talk all about that tonight.
		It's a really important topic.
		Again, I don't think this is the big one, but it's important to have this conversation because, especially after 2024, whatever the outcome, it's going to be really important.
		Because this is our future, probably.
		Unless Trump gets elected and becomes a dictator, which, fingers crossed, hopefully that happens, you know, but if it doesn't, this is the conversation.
		So, we'll talk about that.
		We'll also be talking about the state of the 2024 race.
		Speaking of that, speaking of Trump's prospects of becoming the dictator, Last night, of course, we had our big coverage of the New Hampshire primary.
		Huge stream!
		We had about 14,000 last week.
		We had like 13,500 this week.
		So basically just as big.
		Huge stream last night covering the New Hampshire primary results.
		That was last night.
		A lot of fun.
		And last night it was Donald Trump versus Nikki Haley.
	A two-man.
	They ran a two-man on New Hampshire.
	Just the two of them.
	And Donald Trump won.
	I don't actually even know the final margin.
	I didn't even check.
	It doesn't really matter.
	But it was something like 10.
	I think it was like 8 or 10.
	It doesn't matter so much.
	But Nikki Haley lost.
	She's 0-2.
	Next up on the schedule is Nevada.
	That's February 8th.
	And then after that is South Carolina, February 24th.
	But Nevada's a done deal because I don't even believe she's on the ballot.
	So all eyes are really on South Carolina and then Super Tuesday, March 5th, when a number of states vote.
	But maybe the bigger story even than the New Hampshire results, which we'll get into that a little bit.
	Honestly, the election streams, I get so sick of it because you really just have to say the same thing for like six hours.
	That's all it is.
	When you tune into any of the live election viewing party, when they watch the results, when you watch these streams...
	They just kind of say the same stuff for seven hours.
	They have like 10 talking points, and they just kind of find different ways to say them, and then they have other people say them, and... It's very monotonous.
	It's very repetitive, but... So, you know, you've probably heard it all, and, you know, Hampshire was so important because of the moderates, and the Democrats crossed over, and blah blah blah.
	We'll do a little bit of that tonight.
	But the big story, which is new, that I'm covering tonight, Is that Reid Hoffman, one of the major billionaire donors for Nikki Haley, is not funding her anymore.
	He says she's 0-2, she lost Iowa, she lost New Hampshire, so he's pulling her money.
	He won't support her anymore.
	And on top of that, Donald Trump, I'm sure taking that as a signal, came out on True Social today.
	And said that anybody that gives any money to Nikki Haley after today is blacklisted from the MAGA camp, which would be a powerful disincentive for any maybe would-be Republican donors to back Haley after the New Hampshire primary.
	So we'll talk about that.
	The interesting thing about Reid Hoffman is that he's a Democrat.
	So last night, the big story, Is that in the New Hampshire primary, it's an open primary, which means that anybody can vote for any candidate.
	Democrats can vote in the Republican primary.
	And they did!
	Republicans, or rather Democrats and many independents, voted in the Republican primary for the Republican nomination, and they nearly all voted for Nikki Haley.
	She got like 13% of her voters were Democrats.
	In the Republican primary.
	70% were not Republicans.
	And everyone said, and this was notable, they said the Democrats were crossing over last night to vote for Haley and they're not going to vote for a Republican in the general election.
	They're Biden voters.
	They will vote for Biden.
	But they voted for Haley in the primary because they think that's a way to keep Trump off the ballot.
	So some people were saying, well, Haley is winning independents.
	Don't you want to win independents?
	But they're not.
	She won voters.
	In the primary that will not vote for a Republican in the general.
	Those people that voted for her last night are not independents that are on the table.
	These are not people that can be won over.
	They will vote for Biden.
	They participated last night because they know that if Haley wins a nomination, then Trump cannot be the president.
	So, there was a lot of talk about this, and the thing about Reid Hoffman is he's exactly the same way.
	Reid Hoffman has said openly, I'm only giving money to Nikki Haley because that will keep Trump off the ballot.
	He says that he supports Democrats, he wants Biden to win, but the only reason he's giving money to Haley is just in the event that she would beat Trump.
	Pretty unbelievable.
	And she's taken his money.
	Of course.
	And it tells you what we're up against.
	She represents the whole GOP establishment.
	Fox News is behind her.
	New York Post is behind her.
	Those are both Murdoch properties.
	A lot of the GOP, like all the Wall Street donors are behind her.
	The Israelis, the Jews are behind her.
	And so are the Democrats.
	Because at the end of the day, it's like I say all the time, They would prefer a Republican neocon hawk over Trump.
	They're all in that together.
	So, we'll talk about that as well.
	Should be a pretty good show.
	Before I get into it, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble and on Cozy to get a push notification whenever I go live.
	Make sure you're following me on both.
	I had a huge stream earlier today.
	I already went live.
	I did a three or four hour stream this afternoon.
	I reviewed the Ben Shapiro Destiny Debate.
	And it was painful, man.
	I mean, it was brutal.
	So if you missed that, be sure to check it out.
	I just streamed it a few hours ago.
	So I think it's three, maybe four hours.
	And I reviewed most of it.
	Honestly, I tapped out at the end.
	I tapped out with like 20 minutes to go.
	I think I just sped through the last 20 minutes of it.
	But it was a two and a half hour debate.
	That was pain.
	And it's not really any surprises.
	Somebody told me today they're like, oh I missed the stream.
	I'm like, you're lucky.
	That debate sucked.
	I mean you should go and watch it.
	That's not, I'm not helping myself when I say don't watch my content, but it sucked.
	And you know Shapiro just outclassed him.
	Completely outclass destiny as much.
	I don't like either of them.
	I don't agree with either of them but Ben Shapiro is just on another level because destiny is a retard and I disagree with Shapiro But he's smart destiny is not smart and everyone needs to know that so we went over that debate.
	It was okay So follow me on rumble so you don't miss streams like that.
	I see people are like I never know when he goes live and I know I go live at different times every day but that's why you gotta follow me then you get the notification.
	So follow me on Cozy and Rumble.
	The other thing I wanted to say just really quickly before we move on into the news.
	I saw today that Tucker Carlson is in Canada and I said this on Telegram and I want to preface by saying look I'm not a hater.
	I'm really not.
	I don't hate anybody and I don't want to come across like I'm ankle biting or anything like that.
	I'm not trying to be on anybody's case.
	But this is a really important observation.
	I saw Tucker Carlson was in Canada today and I was thinking about it and this guy has only been independent since June of 2023.
	So what is that?
	Seven months?
	And I think about it and he's been now to four countries outside the United States doing shows, doing events, four foreign countries in seven months.
	So he was at Fox News for years.
	Excuse me.
	And he had a primetime show since 2017 or maybe I think even a little earlier.
	So he had a show there for five, six years, a primetime show.
	He got lifted out of Fox & Friends.
	And in the past seven months, this is since he started the show on X, he got booted in April and started the show in June, he's been to Argentina, Hungary, Spain, and Canada.
	And in every case, interviewing their right-wing populists there.
	Interviewed Millet before the election in Argentina.
	Interviewed Orban, and I don't know if that was connected to an election, but interviewed Orban in Hungary.
	Interviewed, I forget the guy's name, but the Vox far-right party in Spain.
	And now he's going to interview this right-wing candidate in Canada.
	And I was thinking about it and I thought, isn't... I think that's a little bit conspicuous.
	That's a conspicuous amount of foreign activity.
	Why is he going to all these other countries?
	Because the big idea for Tucker, for a lot of people, was that, well, once he leaves Fox, then he's gonna go unchained and unload on everybody, and then he's gonna really red pill everyone.
	And that hasn't really happened.
	In fact, it's the opposite.
	I think everyone agrees that his show, since leaving Fox, if anything, it's more tame.
	If anything, it's more mainstream.
	He's doing shows about UFOs.
	He did an interview with Cat Turd.
	He did an interview with Obama's gay lover.
	This is just, like, bizarre, weird stuff.
	Did a show with Kyle Rittenhouse.
	I mean, that's a throwaway.
	Remember that guy from four years ago?
	Who really even cares?
	So the shows about our country, about the United States, have really kind of not been very hot at all.
	Did a show with Alex Jones, which was just ridiculously bad.
	But he's all over everywhere else, and he's all over interviewing these other right-wing people.
	And as I pointed out, a lot of these guys are spooks.
	Like Malay, Malay ran in Argentina and when he won the presidency there, the first thing he did was visit the 770 Chabad headquarters in Brooklyn, which we just covered.
	That was where the tunnel scandal happened.
	And he met with Bill Clinton, the IMF, and the Chabad Lubavitch rabbis.
	Then he went to Israel.
	Then he said that Argentina would not join BRICS.
	Argentina was set to join the BRICS alliance.
	That's Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa.
	And Argentina was one out of six countries that were set to accede to BRICS membership this year.
	With Iran, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Egypt, and Ethiopia.
	So, Malay gets elected after Tucker visits him.
	And this guy is backed by a billionaire who has a Holocaust museum.
	And he talks about how, in Malay, he says he wants to be Jewish, he wants to convert, he has a rabbi, his rabbi is Chabad Lubavitch, he gets elected, he goes to Brooklyn to meet with Chabad, meets with Bill Clinton, the IMF, says he's gonna start selling everything off to the IMF, then goes to Israel, then meets with Zelensky and expresses his support for Zelensky in Israel, then says that Argentina will no longer join BRICS.
	Which is in the U.S.
	interest.
	Now U.S.
	is engaged in basically a new Cold War with China, and the battleground for that, among others, is Latin America.
	And specifically the BRICS partnership, where you would have had Brazil and Argentina joining, soon maybe Venezuela.
	So, Malay is tight with Israel and knocks them out.
	Very interesting.
	And Tucker goes to Vox, which is very pro-Israel.
	He goes to Orban, and Orban is in the pocket of Israel.
	Orban loves Israel.
	They get great support from Netanyahu.
	And so he's going to all these countries and interviewing all these pro-Israel people where Likud and Netanyahu and the Israeli right are never far behind.
	It's very strange.
	And, you know, under normal circumstances it might be less strange.
	Let's say this was anybody.
	I would say maybe it's organic.
	Like, I think it's plausible it is.
	But then you factor in that Tucker Carlson's father is a CIA spook.
	He ran the Voice of America CIA propaganda outlet for six years during the Cold War.
	He ran the CIA's Information Warfare Division.
	He traveled abroad and supervised South Africa's elections.
	He was in Albania in the 90s.
	And now he's a lobbyist for Orban.
	He's a lobbyist for the Hungarian embassy.
	He was in one of these State Department NGOs.
	He had a little stint there.
	So, I mean, his father, Dick Carlson, has been everywhere.
	Acting basically as a spy.
	He's like a U.S.
	or some some kind of spy.
	Tucker applied for the CIA, never got in.
	He was in Nicaragua with the Contras, which is again tied with Israel and Reagan and the CIA.
	And now that he leaves Fox, which is owned by Murdoch, which is tied with Netanyahu, now he's traveling all over and interviewing Malay and all these others.
	He's with Yair Netanyahu and interviewing Yarvin.
	So I find the whole thing very Strange.
	I find it very bizarre.
	And I'm not, listen, and I'm not a hater, I'm not... The message is not, I hate Tucker Carlson.
	I just don't know what to make of any of this.
	I'm saying it's conspicuous that he's taking all these foreign visits.
	For a guy that says, I'm so interested about America, and I don't care about Israel, I care about America.
	Spending a lot of time in other countries.
	And not even countries that you might think.
	If he was just a journalist, maybe he would be in Essequibo.
	Maybe he'd be in Egypt.
	Maybe he'd be in Niger.
	Maybe he'd be in Taiwan.
	Maybe he'd be in Ukraine or Russia.
	But Spain?
	Argentina?
	Canada?
	Why?
	He's showing up to all of the American allies like trying to whip them into shape or something.
	Like he's going over there to kind of interfere on behalf of the right.
	It's very bizarre.
	So I just want to throw that out there again.
	No hate.
	If you like Tucker, that's fine.
	I like some of the Tucker stuff.
	And I don't know, I mean, maybe he's an okay guy, but that kind of stuff just stinks to me.
	A lot of these connections.
	He's tight with Joe Kent, CIA operative for 20 years.
	tight with Peter Thiel and that whole network, and Thiel was over there in Israel with Palantir.
	And the CEO of Palantir, some Jew, was in Israel saying that Venture Capital and Palantir are now working together because they all support Israel.
	It's very bizarre stuff.
	So, it's like I always say, you start digging, and you'd be surprised how much of the stuff you find.
	But anyway, I don't want to do a whole story about that.
	I just want to throw that out there.
	He's in Canada, and he does this glib video.
	We're going to liberate Canada and give him the fragrance of freedom.
	I don't even know what that act even is.
	It's like, are you trying to be funny?
	Is this supposed to be dry humor?
	I don't find it very funny.
	I think it's just kind of...
	I don't know.
	Maybe it's a generational thing.
	It's not really landing with me.
	I don't find it funny, but the whole thing's weird.
	So, anyway.
	So that's that, but I want to move on.
	I want to get into our big story tonight.
	We'll start with the Texas border story, because to me, this is like the biggest thing.
	And I want to say at the outset, I don't think anything will result from this.
	I think everybody's gonna back down.
	And you'll know what I mean by that in a moment.
	But as I said before, I think that this story prefigures the future.
	This is a prefigurement of what the right, the ordeal that the right will have to go through once there is a permanent Democrat majority.
	So I'll read through this story first and then I'll explain what I mean by all that.
	So the story here is about the Texas border.
	As you know, Joe Biden has effectively stopped enforcing the border.
	They ceased building border wall, which was underway when Trump left office.
	They ended the Remain in Mexico policy, which had asylum seekers who were having their asylum requests processed or applications processed, they had to remain on the Mexico side of the border.
	Because of course, we have a catch-and-release policy.
	These illegals show up, they're apprehended, they're detained, and then they're released in the United States because we don't have the facilities to detain millions of people simultaneously while we process, which we're obligated to, their asylum applications.
	So Trump had them remaining in Mexico rather than being caught and released here.
	Biden ended that.
	He ended another provision, I think it was Title 42 or something like that, which during COVID allowed us to refuse entry to illegals.
	He effectively stopped deporting any illegals at the border or within the United States.
	And as a consequence now, people are flowing Literally at a higher rate than any time in history.
	Like this is not hyperbole.
	It's not a figure of speech.
	It is more people than ever by far and it's always going up.
	So they're projecting now it's going to be six to eight million illegals will have entered the United States under four years of Biden.
	Eight million.
	That's as big as New York City.
	That's a population of illegal immigrants As big as New York City or the Chicagoland metro area.
	So if you draw a line around Milwaukee, Chicago, Naperville, Gary, and that's a pretty big swath of land on the map, all the people that live there, that's the amount of illegals in just four years.
	And those are just illegals, not even legal immigrants.
	So they've been pouring in.
	And the governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, under immense political pressure within his state, is now making a gesture that he's attempting to secure the border.
	And he's been doing a lot of things.
	He's been sending the illegals by bus to Chicago, to New York, to other places.
	It's actually funny, they're sending them close to me.
	Texas is sending illegal immigrants to Hinsdale, Illinois.
	Which is one of the wealthiest suburbs in America because Chicago is refusing them.
	So it's so funny they're showing up in Hinsdale which is super liberal and posh and they don't want him there.
	And anyway, so he's been doing that and he's also had the Texas National Guard installing barbed wire along the Rio Grande River where a lot of the illegals are crossing.
	So the United States Department of Homeland Security said, well we're going to go in and take all the barbed wire down.
	Texas keeps putting it up.
	So there was a big challenge in the courts and it eventually worked its way up to the U.S.
	Supreme Court and the Supreme Court ruled a couple days ago that the state of Texas has to allow the U.S.
	Border Patrol Under DHS to come in basically and remove the barbed wire.
	But now Texas is refusing.
	They're saying that according to their interpretation of the ruling, the Texas National Guard doesn't have to permit Border Patrol to come in to the border area and remove the barbed wire.
	They're saying that only under specific circumstances does the Supreme Court ruling Say that they have to be let in.
	So this is the story.
	This is from New York Times.
	I'm sorry, this is from Salon.
	It says, quote, the Texas National Guard and state troopers are still rolling out concertina wire and preventing Border Patrol agents from accessing most of Shelby Park, a 47 acre Eagle Park, Eagle Pass Park that sits on the bank of the Rio Grande, where thousands of migrants have crossed.
	Those continued efforts have come despite the U.S.
	Supreme Court earlier this week vacating a lower court's decision that prevented Border Patrol agents from cutting the state's concertina wire to apprehend people who already crossed the river.
	The Supreme Court's 5-4 order didn't give any reason and didn't explicitly say that Border Patrol agents were allowed access to the park or that the state had to remove the wire.
	So the state has doubled down and some Republican lawmakers have said Texas should defy the Supreme Court's ruling.
	According to NBC News, the Department of Homeland Security sent a letter to the Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton demanding that immigration officers be allowed to access the park.
	The Texas Military Department's top officer signaled quiet defiance in remarks made to agency staff during a Tuesday morning meeting, according to a source familiar with his comments.
	Air Force Major General Thomas Swelzer was appointed by Abbott to oversee the Texas National Guard and Texas State Guard as the agency's adjutant general.
	He told staff that he believes the ruling only permits Border Patrol to cut through obstacles to retrieve stranded migrants, the source said.
	Swellser added that his troops will repair any obstacles destroyed by federal agents and that his troops won't allow the feds to set up migrant processing centers in areas they've blocked.
	He said, quote, the Texas Military Department continues to hold the line in Shelby Park to deter and prevent unlawful entry into the state of Texas.
	On social media, U.S.
	Representative Chip Roy said that Texas should ignore the ruling on behalf of the agents represented by the Border Patrol's rank-and-file union.
	Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the Biden administration in October claiming that the Border Patrol illegally destroyed state property when its agents cut through concertina wire on the banks of the Rio Grande to assist migrants to illegally cross the border.
	The Biden administration said agents cut the wire in order to arrest migrants that were already inside the United States.
	District Judge Alia Moses, a George W. Bush appointee, eventually ruled in favor of the Biden administration, saying Border Patrol agents didn't violate any laws by cutting the wire.
	Texas appealed, and the 5th U.S.
	Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the lower court's ruling until a panel of judges could hear arguments.
	The Biden administration took the case to the Supreme Court asking federal judges to vacate the appeals court's ruling, which they did.
	So if you're following this, the border was open, so the Texas governor had state troopers and National Guard go in to install barbed wire.
	Well, the Biden administration then sent Border Patrol to destroy the wire.
	So the Texas State National Guard, the state forces, sued the Biden administration and said, you can't destroy our wire.
	The lower court said, yes they can.
	The appeals court said, no they can't.
	Now the Supreme Court has weighed in with the final decisive ruling and said, yes they can.
	Yes, the federal authorities can come in and destroy the wire that was set up by the state authorities.
	So that's how we got here.
	But the thing to understand is it's a clash between state and federal authorities about the constitutional authority to control the border.
	So this is a constitutional matter.
	It's about who has supremacy on the issue of the border.
	Can the state government with the state troops, the state National Guard, Can they control the border?
	Or does the federal government control the border?
	And can, even if the federal government is abusing their jurisdiction to allow illegals into the country, because that is what they're doing.
	The state authorities are building barbed wire to keep illegals out.
	The federal government is coming in and destroying the barbed wire to let the illegals come in.
	So the question is, does the state government have to allow the federal government to come in and basically unsecure the border?
	Do they have to do that?
	The Supreme Court ruled that they did.
	But now the Texas authorities are basically refusing the Supreme Court's order.
	And now they're being supported by many other U.S.
	states, including Montana, North Dakota, Virginia, Oklahoma, Georgia, and Florida.
	All of those states have voiced support for Texas in defying the Supreme Court, as has their head of the Texas military, which is a National Guard, and the troopers, as has Ken Paxton, the Attorney General, and so has some of the Texas congressional the Attorney General, and so has some of the Texas congressional They've all said they support Texas defying the Supreme Court.
	So this is now a showdown between the state of Texas and the federal government, between the Texas National Guard and the Border Patrol, which is under And the Supreme Court saying you have to let the federal government come in to open the border.
	And again, it's the federal government wanting to open the border and the state government wanting to close it.
	And the Supreme Court saying you have to let the federal government come in to open the border.
	In this case, I think what will happen, I think what is most likely, is that the Supreme Court will clarify the decision and say, yes, you have to let the troops come in.
	And And then I think Texas will relent and I think they will let the federal government come in and destroy the wire.
	I don't think they will actually defy the Supreme Court.
	But as for what happens next, it is a little bit unprecedented.
	Because this is a true constitutional clash where the state government's authority with its own military and its own Attorney General and its own everything are coming into conflict with the federal government and their authorities and their military and their Supreme Court.
	And what happens when the state government defies the Supreme Court on a constitutional matter?
	Well, if it truly comes to defiance, if the state government is truly defying, it's not just that they interpret it differently, which is what they're saying.
	The state government of Texas, specifically the state military, they're not saying we're defying the Supreme Court.
	They're saying the way we interpret the Supreme Court says that we don't have to let them in, which is a big difference.
	The Texas National Guard is not saying, we're just resisting, we're rebelling against the Supreme Court.
	They're saying, well, we don't think that's what the Supreme Court said.
	Which implies that if the Supreme Court clarified it, they would abide by what the Supreme Court says.
	Which means it's not really a clash.
	It's more of a misunderstanding.
	But, this is why I said earlier, it prefigures the future.
	Because it raises the question, well what would happen?
	Let's say the Texas National Guard, the Texas state government, did defy the Supreme Court.
	Let's say that hypothetically, or in the future, that did happen.
	What would the federal government do?
	Would it arrest the governor?
	Would it arrest the National Guard?
	Would it fire on the National Guard?
	Would there be an armed confrontation?
	What would that look like in the 21st century?
	Would the Attorney General of the United States and the DOJ go after the state authorities?
	Would they have to hold new elections?
	How exactly would all of that work?
	That's kind of the big question.
	And then the even bigger question would be this.
	Let's say, hypothetically, in this scenario, that it wasn't just Texas defying the Supreme Court, but that other states pledged their allegiance to support Texas.
	Like, let's say, like in this case, Georgia, Florida, Oklahoma, others, Idaho.
	Not, in this case, Idaho doesn't support, but let's say they did.
	There's 25 or 26 states with Republican governments.
	Let's say 25 states got together and said, we all stand in solidarity against the federal government, against the Supreme Court.
	Does the federal government arrest everybody?
	Do they open fire on citizens?
	Do they take control of the state governments?
	Is there cyber warfare?
	Is there drone warfare?
	Are there raids?
	I mean, what exactly happens?
	Does the federal government take control of all the state governments and shut down the cities?
	Does this look like a civil war?
	And then, how would the people react?
	Would the people allow that to happen?
	These are all open-ended questions.
	And maybe it wouldn't be worth it for the federal government.
	Maybe the federal government couldn't force a confrontation like that because it's too weak.
	Would the military defect?
	Would the United States federal law enforcement and military, would they even abide by an order from the federal government to detain or arrest or fire upon the state officials or state troops or citizens involved in something like this?
	And how would the world respond to this?
	How would the world respond if the United States of America were divided?
	Maybe 15, 20, 25 states in solidarity in a constitutional crisis against federal government, or maybe the military's compromised in some way.
	Or that there would be, of course in a lot of these states, key U.S.
	military bases or assets or resources inside the states that are rebelling.
	You know, what does that look like?
	And what is the political solution to that look like?
	What does the diplomacy look like?
	Does the federal government let the states basically do what they want to avoid that scenario?
	That is the big question.
	And so when people look at the situation on the border, And what's happening with Texas, it prefigures this happening in the future.
	Because like I said at the beginning of the show, and I've been saying this for a long time, we have a lot of political problems.
	The chief among them, the big problems, are that we have a Jewish elite and that whites are being replaced in America.
	And that's changing everything.
	But maybe one degree lower in terms of political problems is the fact that as the country becomes less white, it becomes more Democrat.
	California went from red to blue.
	California voted for Nixon as governor and president.
	It voted for Reagan as governor and president.
	Now it goes 20 points at minimum for Democrats.
	That's because of demographic change.
	That's because of domestic and foreign immigration into the state, which has turned it blue.
	The same thing has happened to Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada.
	It's happening to Arizona, Texas, Georgia, Florida, Virginia, some would say it already happened in Virginia, and other states.
	And what will happen soon, maybe this cycle, maybe the next one, or maybe the one after, Is that it will effectively become impossible for Republicans to win elections.
	If the majority of non-whites vote for Democrats, and these states become more and more non-white every year thanks to immigration, then eventually you're going to get an impossible electoral map where Democrats will always win the presidency, and they'll always control the Senate, and they'll always control the House.
	And that doesn't mean you'll never have Republicans, but they will never win the White House again.
	That means that they will never control the Supreme Court once the conservatives start to die off from this generation.
	They'll never control the Senate or the House.
	So you get one party rule, permanent Democrat majority.
	And that seems like it's baked in, regardless of the outcome in this election.
	So what do you do?
	If the non-white people are having children and they've already, it's already 50-50.
	In 2012, half the newborns were white and half were non-white.
	And it's been like that roughly for the last 12 years.
	So what do we do now?
	Some say that if we can't control the national government, we can control the state governments.
	And if you look, we actually control quite a few of them.
	Republicans control state governments from Idaho down to Florida.
	You got Idaho, Montana, the Dakotas, Wyoming, Utah, Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, Kentucky, the whole South.
	You got a lot of them.
	Sometimes even Maryland, sometimes Maine, sometimes these other ones.
	Florida, of course.
	So if you have all these state governments, then maybe you can get a governor, a very strong governor, to unite all the other Republican governors and state legislatures.
	And if you can't get the federal government to do what you want, you can get the state governments to do what you want.
	And if the federal government opposes, you can get a confederacy of Republican states to defy the federal government.
	That's the idea.
	Like, let's say in an alternate timeline, DeSantis was like a real man, and he said, I'm gonna get all the states together, and we're gonna say no to abortion, and we're gonna say no to gay marriage, and no to marijuana, and we're gonna shut down our borders, we're not gonna accept illegals, we will deport the illegals to other countries, And basically started to operate as a country.
	What would happen?
	And it would seem that that would put the federal government in checkmate.
	That Washington would be put in a bit of a checkmate.
	Because at that point, if that were to happen, hypothetically, even though what would be required is that the military go in and, like, arrest all these people and try them for sedition or something like that, the question is, could they?
	Could they marshal the armed forces to do that?
	And would the people stand for that?
	If there was a rallying point around the state government, around maybe law enforcement and National Guard in these states, would it be as cut and dry as just arresting some political opposition?
	Because then you're putting the federal government and its forces against the state governments and their forces.
	And it becomes a question, how sympathetic would elements of the federal forces be?
	It becomes truly, I don't know that it becomes a true civil war, but it does become a true constitutional crisis.
	And it would seem that the federal government would not be able to brute force compliance from the state governments.
	There would have to be some negotiation.
	Because that kind of turmoil and that level of uncertainty and chaos inside of this country as the seat of the world empire would be a big problem.
	It would be a completely untenable problem.
	Because we're talking about a scenario 10, 20 years down the road when there is a BRICS alternative to the SWIFT system.
	There is an alternative to the dollar.
	And China may be the... I don't know if they'll ever be number one now, but they'll be scraping at the number one spot, and they'll be taking Taiwan, and you know, all these other conflicts may get hot.
	And then you'll have this cutting right down the middle of the country.
	It could be a big issue.
	So that's why I say I don't think anything's going to happen now.
	I don't think this is it.
	And I think that most likely Texas will back down one way or the other, whether they get a clarification from the Supreme Court or eventually They just relent.
	I think that eventually they're going to back down.
	Excuse me.
	And there won't be a big crisis over this.
	But these kinds of issues will crop up in the future.
	You're going to get more partisan right-wing governments in the states.
	And they're going to butt up against very liberal national governments, permanently liberal Democrat federal governments, administrations, you know, Congress.
	And so this is really the beginning.
	And it's, in a way, it's sort of terrifying to think, but it's also terrifying because you realize we actually would have a chance in that scenario.
	And I'm not encouraging that.
	I don't... Hey, if that's illegal, I don't support any of that.
	I'm just talking about ideas here.
	I'm talking about the future.
	I'm talking about hypotheticals.
	But that's why everyone's talking about this.
	Because this is the prospect.
	It's a true showdown between some Confederacy of States.
	And again, not being glib.
	I'm not being glib when I say confederacy.
	I mean that that would be approximately what it would look like is a loose alliance of different states.
	So I don't mean like, oh, it's gonna be like the the real Civil War in the 1800s.
	I don't mean it like that.
	But that's that.
	I want to move on.
	We'll maybe talk about Haley briefly.
	We're almost out of time here.
	So I kind of want to just get to Super Chats, but... Let me see, when did I... Yeah, I could probably finish up.
	Let's talk about Haley.
	So, the other big development from today, and last night as well, Also we got to clear out, can we get, can we automatically clear out these superchats?
	It seems like the super chats does someone manually have to clear them or do they all because it's like now they're I mean we got super chats here from Tuesday.
unidentified		So but anyway.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's a little annoying but anyway I mean if it's if it's manual you got to remember to clear them if it's not manual then you know maybe they're automatic or there's a window where I can adjust it but anyway I'll talk to the devs later so the big story about Haley of course yesterday we covered the New Hampshire primary And Trump won.
		Trump won by, I think it was, again, I didn't ever look at the final vote.
		I think it was eight or ten points.
		But widely expected, Trump won last night.
		So this is the second defeat for Nikki Haley.
		She came in third in Iowa.
		And the DeSantis and Ramaswamy dropped out.
		She came second in New Hampshire by a pretty tall margin.
		And a lot of people thought that that was the only state that she even had a chance at winning.
		However small.
		Or even a chance at coming close, which she really didn't.
		So we covered those results last night, but the big story today is that one of Nikki Haley's biggest donors is now no longer going to support her going forward.
		They're giving up on her.
		They say she's cooked.
		She's done.
		No more money.
		And this is a story on that.
		This is from NBC.
		Billionaire Reid Hoffman does not plan to give any more money to Nikki Haley's presidential campaign after her loss in New Hampshire's Republican primary.
		Hoffman is one of Haley's first wealthy donors to start heading for the exit after she said Tuesday she will remain in the GOP's nomination contest against former President Trump despite failing to beat him in New Hampshire or in the Iowa caucus.
		The person who told CNBC that Hoffman didn't have immediate plans to help Haley again declined to be named in order to speak freely about the matter.
		A Republican fundraiser told CNBC on Wednesday that three clients who each helped Haley raise up to $100,000 for her campaign are now opting out of further financial efforts for the former United Nations ambassador.
		So it's Hoffman plus at least three others who helped her raise up to $100,000.
		Other fundraisers said Wednesday that while they plan to speak out publicly in support of Haley, they are not convinced they will be able to raise much money for her campaign because of her 0-for-2 record so far.
		Hoffman, a LinkedIn co-founder who has for years mainly financed causes in line with the Democratic Party, gave $250,000 to a pro-Haley super PAC last year.
		Hoffman said in December that while he is a supporter of President Biden, he believed that Haley had the best chance of beating Trump in the Republican primary.
		He noted that he gave to the super PAC after listening to JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon.
		Who urged a crowd of business leaders at the DealBook conference to support Haley.
		So we talked a lot last night.
		This is the relevance here.
		We talked a lot last night about how New Hampshire is an open primary.
		Which means that anybody can vote in the Republican primary in New Hampshire.
		And the Democrats didn't really have one.
		Joe Biden is going to be the nominee basically no matter what.
		So that means Democrats didn't have to vote for anybody in their primary last night.
		So a lot of them, many people said, would vote in the Republican primary.
		Even though they have no intention of voting for a Republican, they're not Republican, they're not even conservative, they're not even leaning Republican, they're Democrats.
		They will vote for Biden.
		They would have voted for Biden if there was a primary, but there wasn't.
		But many said that they would vote in our primary, in the GOP primary, so that they could influence the outcome of the Republican contest and prevent Trump from being on the ballot.
		So many Independents and Democrats crossed over They had no primary to vote in for their own party, so they said, let's vote for the Republicans and let's vote for Haley, because if she has a good finish in New Hampshire, there's a chance that maybe she'll be the nominee and not Trump.
		And they're gonna vote for Biden anyway, but they'd rather Biden run against Haley than Trump.
		And that turned out to be a significant portion of her support.
		I think it was 13% of her support came from Democrats.
		Only 30% came from Republicans.
		And a lot of people said, isn't this indicative of the fact that she is a liberal?
		That she gets no Republican support?
		Trump, 70% of his voters yesterday were Republican.
		70% of Haley's supporters were not Republican.
		And some people said, in defense of Haley, they said, well, if she's winning Independents and Democrats, then that shows her crossover appeal.
		If Democrats and Independents crossover to vote for her, that shows that she's palatable to them in the general.
		But that makes the mistake of assuming that those people are voting for a Republican.
		They're not.
		They prefer her over Trump.
		They don't prefer her over Biden.
		So, this is indicative of the fact that she is the Democrats' choice as the Republican nominee, not as the President, which is a sign against you.
		Because that doesn't mean she's going to win over independent support, it just means that she's more liberal than Trump.
		They like her because she's more liberal.
		She's less offensive to them if she wound up winning.
		If, in the worst case scenario, she and not Biden became the President.
		And so there was a lot of talk about that last night.
		It did happen.
		Her support did come from Democrats.
		And then you find out her support monetarily also comes from Democrats.
	The head of JP Morgan, which is the biggest bank, Jamie Dimon, comes out and says, oh, all of Wall Street should back Haley.
	And Reid Hoffman, who's a Jew, Jumps in line and says, okay, I'll throw a quarter of a million behind Haley last year leading the charge.
	He was one of her first big donors.
	And you remember, I said this a couple weeks ago and some people didn't like this explanation.
	I said, but this is how you know that Trump is not a part of the system.
	Because when you look at this Republican primary, This is the first open primary, of course, since 16.
	2020, no one was gonna run.
	In the first Republican primary in nine years, Wall Street was racing.
	They were tripping over themselves to back literally any other candidate.
	When DeSantis was the apparent alternative for Trump, all of Wall Street supported DeSantis.
	And we talked a little bit about Ken Griffin from Citadel and we talked about the Adelson's last week.
	Because a lot of people say, why do you support Trump?
	He's an Israel shill.
	The establishment wants him and all this kind of stuff.
	But it couldn't be further from the truth.
	From the start, they were all against him.
	Wall Street, Israel, Fox, the conservative establishment, they were all against him in this cycle.
	That's why Fox News was always gassing up.
	If you paid attention earlier this year, Fox News and the New York Post were endlessly pro-DeSantis.
	And those are both Murdoch properties.
	New York Post and Fox are both, I think, News Corp, which is under the Murdoch brand.
	And they were both supportive of DeSantis.
	Then, during the debates, at the end of the summer, when it became apparent that DeSantis had run out of steam and Haley was going to be the establishment choice, they were endlessly pro-Haley.
	And Fox was always anti.
	Fox was anti from the beginning when Roger Ailes put up Megyn Kelly.
	I was going to say Nikki Haley.
	Roger Ailes, when he was alive, put up Megyn Kelly in 2015 to try to sabotage Trump in the first primary debate that was hosted by Fox News in August 2015.
	This cycle, same thing.
	They had to be nice to him in 2020 because he's the president, so they get the big ratings by kowtowing to the president and having him call into their morning shows.
	But as soon as Trump left office, Fox immediately resumed its anti-Trump posture.
	Fox and the Post immediately resumed the anti-Trump position, supporting DeSantis, then Haley.
	Same thing with Wall Street.
	I talked about it last week.
	There's a huge story right before the midterms in 2022 about how Ken Griffin and all the New York Wall Street Republican donors were switching from Trump to DeSantis.
	And they said, well, we don't want Trump.
	We want DeSantis because he won't rock.
	I mean, this is literally their words.
	They said he won't rock the boat.
	He's just going to cut taxes.
	He's not as incisive.
	He's not fighting the culture war.
	He's just going to cut taxes and cut regulations and that's it.
	That was Wall Street's pitch for DeSantis.
	They've all since switched over to Haley.
	Again, led by JP Morgan's Jamie Dimone and now Reid Hoffman from LinkedIn.
	And again, these guys are not Republicans.
	These are not conservatives.
	They're not Christians.
	Most of them are Jews, actually.
	They're not Christians.
	They don't support DeSantis' effort to fight wokeism.
	They don't support the culture war.
	They don't even want to secure the border.
	That was another thing.
	Ken Griffin specifically said, I don't support Trump's rhetoric on illegals.
	I don't support his rhetoric on Mexicans and immigration.
	So they don't want to secure the border.
	They don't want to fight the transgender and gay stuff.
	They don't want to fight abortion.
	They're Democrats.
	They support Republicans because Republicans cut the corporate tax rate under Trump.
	And they deregulate.
	And they're good for the stock market and they're good for energy.
	And that's why they're openly saying they support Haley.
	And same thing with the Israelis.
	Right before DeSantis announced, he goes to dinner in Israel with Miriam Adelson, Sheldon Adelson's wife, and a couple of other high-powered Jewish donors, Republican donors, one from Colorado, one, I forget where he's from, and then he goes and announces he's running for president with David Sachs, who's a spook, and Elon Musk.
	So, This just vindicates, in case anybody was wondering, yes, Trump is still the dissident candidate.
	Trump is still, even though, you know, don't get me wrong, I get all the criticisms of Trump.
	I agree with a lot of them about his hiring choices, his personnel, some of the audacious things he does, the fact that he's maybe not fully redpilled.
	I get all that.
	There is a connection through Kushner to Netanyahu, which is worrisome.
	But when you consider that Wall Street, Israel, Fox, Murdoch, they're all against Trump, you realize he's the guy.
	And these people would rather have Haley than him.
	And you can see how the gulf between them.
	I said it a couple weeks ago, I'm kind of reiterating that monologue, but Haley has said about Israel, we got to give them what they want, when they want it, no questions asked, and They don't need us.
	We need them.
	We just got to do everything and we got to do everything for Ukraine.
	The world's on fire.
	I mean, she's a straight-up neocon.
	She's a straight-up warmonger neocon.
	She wants to open the border.
	She is a liberal.
	She took down the Confederate flag in South Carolina.
	Lest anybody forget, in 2016, she said that Donald Trump's rhetoric influenced Dylann Roof to go and shoot up a church full of black people.
	That's how liberal she is.
	And they hate her there.
	She said that Donald Trump influenced and inspired Dylann Roof.
	She took down the Confederate flag shortly after that.
	Then she supported Right to Work and killed the unions in South Carolina on behalf of Boeing, who built a plant there.
	And then she worked on the board of Boeing.
	Between her stint as UN ambassador and now her running for president.
	She's supported by Wall Street, Israel, she's a neocon, she supports Ukraine, she supports Israel.
	She's not going to close the border.
	She says we shouldn't call them illegal aliens.
	That's too divisive.
	It just goes on and on and on.
	And that's a reminder of what a real establishment Republican looks like.
	Trump goes up there and says Hezbollah is smart and then Yahoo is a traitor and he didn't protect his people.
	And he goes up there and says if I was president there'd never be a war and we're going to shut it down with Ukraine.
	All this other stuff.
	He never worked for Boeing.
	And he set up our withdrawal from Afghanistan.
	I mean, Biden gets the credit, for better or for worse, for the withdrawal.
	But Trump set that up.
	Trump drew down the troops in Syria and Iraq.
	And Trump wanted to pull our troops even out of Germany and South Korea.
	Trump did detente with North Korea.
	So Trump really truly was a great president, a great America first president.
	By the end of his first term he had brought illegal immigration or I think legal immigration down 92%, built 500 miles of wall, did build a legal regime to keep illegals on the other side of the southern border, He was fighting and winning a trade war with China as well as our allies.
	Like, people really underestimate the fact, and I think maybe don't talk too much about this, that Trump was a truly exceptional president, even in spite of all of the pushbacks.
	It wasn't everything we wanted.
	We could have done a lot more if he had just done... I mean, there were a lot of unforced errors.
	But even with all the nonsense, he was a very effective president and truly America first.
	And that's why they oppose him.
	Because they know that if he gets elected, we are shutting the border down.
	We are shutting down the spigot of money to Ukraine.
	Probably there will be a deal in the Middle East with Israel to rein them in.
	in.
	So there's no difference between these people The Biden people even support Nikki Haley.
	That's why it's Trump or nothing.
	And by the way, this is a preview of what it's going to be after Trump.
	Unless Trump gets a successor in place who is good and a fighter, this is a preview of 2028.
	Because think about it.
	If Trump had served a second term and he wasn't running this year, this would be the primary.
	Primary would be Mike Pompeo, Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley.
	These would be your candidates.
	That would be it.
	Mike Pence.
	Those would be your big four.
	And maybe Chris Christie.
	Although he was never very competitive.
	But those would be your big four candidates.
	If Trump wasn't running this year, let's say he won in 20, or rather he took office.
	If he had been the president for the past four years, it would be Mike Pence, Nikki Haley, Ron DeSantis, and Mike Pompeo fighting for the nomination and that's all there would be.
	And maybe Ramaswamy.
	And Ramaswamy would do just as badly.
	And that would be it.
	And then we'd get Nikki Haley and they would backslide the GOP right back to where we started in 2016.
	So that's why it is imperative that Trump wins this time and that he sets up a successor, because otherwise it will all have been for nothing if we just go back to the same stuff, which is kind of where we are now if Trump wasn't still in the race, miraculously.
	So that's that.
	I want to move on.
	We're gonna get into our Super Chats.
	We'll see what you guys have to say about all this.
	Let me take a look.
unidentified		Okay.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Let's see.
unidentified		Oh, a burp?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Okay.
unidentified		Let's see.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We got...
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I'll just go through these. - Noma sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		The first time you smiled this stream was when you started talking about sucking dicks.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thanks for that.
		That was from... Okay, that was from the stream.
		That's a great first Super Chat to start.
		That was from the stream this afternoon when I said Destiny sucks dicks.
		This is a girl.
		She got mad at me because I said Operation High Jump is fake.
		Stupid fucking bitch.
		This is why I hate women.
		If you don't agree with a woman's theory about Antarctica, she calls you gay.
		Fucking bitch.
		That's what women do.
		They're fucking sick like that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		- Ethiopian Groiper sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I think the big ramp up on censorship on X's directly caused with the Jewish tunnels because since then, oh, Tom Groiper, Hoplite were suspended.
unidentified		I even got locked out temporarily my account for a meme. - I think it coincided more with the Elon visit to Auschwitz. - Liberang Zero sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		One of the autistic guys on Love on the Spectrum, newest season, dates an Israeli woman and rejects her because she seems like she is from another planet.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Even our retards can sense something.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's like when a dog knows a hurricane is coming.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, even people with Downs, they know Jews are aliens.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Slot sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Hello sir, it will be $100k for my client Brandt Wiggins to speak at FPAC 4.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, I think that's gonna blow a big part of our budget for this year, but I think it's worth it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We'll make that back and then some if we can put him on as a headliner.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Savion.
		Sent $3.
		I'm gonna send you pictures of my cat.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Fuck you.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Jotrap sent $10.
		What is your opinion on the Patriot Front?
		It seems like any of their protests get a lot of MSM attention.
		IMO it's honey pot up and controlled opposition to demonize alt-right grassroots movements.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, I have spoken about this extensively.
		And, you know, there are a lot of Patriot... I'm told there are a lot of Patriot Front people that support me.
		And I've even been told that Thomas Rousseau is an admirer of mine.
		You know, it's funny, I kind of got kicked out of the white nationalist club because they all like Jews too much.
		It's sort of hilarious because I in the early days I was considered kind of a part of that little because there is like a like a white nationalist club in the United States they've been around forever and it's these guys from like I'm not gonna say the name of their gay little club but it's like the guys from Stormfront are in there and The Political Cesspool, and Regnery, and VDARE, and Ameren.
		And you know, some of them I like, some of them I don't even really know or anything.
		Like, I like Jared Taylor, and I like Brimelow, and I like some of these guys.
		But they invited me to one of their little club meetings in 2019, and then I never got invited again.
		And I think that's because... The funny thing is, because there is like this white nationalist club that's been around for decades.
		It's the same people for decades.
		And they do these conferences.
		They all go to each other's conferences every year.
		But the thing is that you have to understand about their club, is that they only care about being white.
		If you start to push anything other than that, they kick you out.
		Like, if you don't like gay people, they kick you out.
		If you attack women, they kick you out.
		If you're too Christian, they kick you out.
		If you're too anti-Semitic, they... Like, all they care about is white.
		If you push the Christian thing, they say, well, what about pagans?
		It's like, pagans?
		What?
		What the fuck are you talking about?
		That's only a thing in your cla- I want to go to these people and say, you're talking about alienating pagans, what, all 10 of them?
		That don't suck dick?
		I mean, how many pagans are there in the United States?
		A thousand?
		And I think 900 of them are in polycules, smoking pot, in Oregon.
		And the rest of them are- and then maybe 10 of them are like you guys, they got a swastika tattoo.
		You know, but that's how it is.
		It's like if you go in there and you push Christianity, they're like, oh, what about pagans?
		And if you go after the Jews, they say, well, you know, a lot of their groups are funded by Jews.
		I'm not gonna, this is not a diss, but a lot of their groups are funded by Jews.
		And they think Jews are white.
		It is what it is.
		They don't want to push Israel too hard.
		And then you start attacking women and they say, well white women are part of our struggle.
		That's divisive.
		It's like women are still stupid bitches, white, black.
		Latino or Asian they're still fucking dumb bitches And anyway, so I kind of got kicked.
		I don't know why I got kicked out of that club I don't know who made the call if it was if it was fucking Greg Johnson at counter currents I don't know who it was But somebody in that club doesn't like me because I never got invited back But you know what?
		I was the only one that made something on my I mean listen, I don't mean to diss them I shouldn't say that because I like I do like some of those people but I They never let me in the club.
		They kind of kicked me out of the club.
		And it's like, you know, you would think that they would love me because I'm young and I bring the young people.
		But they're like, oh, we don't, you know, he's a little too rambunctious, he doesn't do things our way.
		I mean, you should be rolling out the red carpet for me, honestly.
		You should be rolling out the red carpet and begging Nick Fuentes to come to your thing with the young people.
		But they're like, but they shun, and they say, nope, we'd rather the same group of 300 old people, the remaining Neo-Confederates, Whatever anyway again, I don't feel that way about all of them.
		Some of them are great, you know, I've I've Been very positive towards and I have a good relationship with some of them But I feel like I've been kind of excluded from that club and I don't like that.
		I think that's sort of bullshit But like a lot of the I really like Kevin Deanna's brilliant Jared Taylor is brilliant Peter Brimelow and his wife brilliant you know, but some of them I can tell don't like me and Because I'm a whippersnapper.
		Because I'm a young, rambunctious whippersnapper.
		But that's okay.
		I'll let them do the right thing.
		I'll let them come to their senses and do the right thing eventually.
		But anyway, what was that?
		So anyway, I don't know why I got on that tangent, but I heard, because somebody went to one of those things, and they said that Thomas Russo had nice things to say about me.
		He's the guy that runs Patriot Front.
		And be that as it may, I mean, listen.
		Everybody should have positive things to say about me because I'm awesome like I'm doing the right thing The thing is about Patriot Front I do think it's a honeypot and No matter how you cut it Anybody that is doing these costumed menacing marches after January 6th You're either an idiot, or you're a fag.
		You're either in on it, or you're too stupid to know the role that you're playing.
		Either way, it cannot be supported.
		And I really think that if you were doing that after Charlottesville, you're pretty dumb.
		And here's the thing about this.
		What these groups represent People can look at the marches and say, oh that looks cool, or oh they're doing fitness or something like that.
		What that is, through the eyes of the government, is a group.
	It's a list of names.
	If you join a group, if you say I'm in Patriot Front, you know what that means?
	You're on a spreadsheet somewhere.
	Your name, you're on that list.
	You're a card carrying member, you're a uniform member of a group.
	Now, if you're like a non-profit, that's one thing.
	If you are a sports team, that's one thing.
	If you are, I don't know, a book club, that's one thing.
	But if you're joining a group and the purpose is to wear masks and do political protests with defensive implements, this does not look good.
	In terms of the eyes of the law, because what has been happening lately is anytime a group like this shows up and does something in public and something goes awry, like at Charlottesville or like at January 6th, it is a gift to government prosecutors because they can take everybody that was in attendance and they can say, because you are in a group, you all conspired.
	Or, they can say, if members of the group have engaged in criminal activity, they can say, this is a racketeering organization and it's a RICO charge.
	Or, they can even abuse obscure statutes like the KKK laws and say, oh, a group carried a torch with the intention to intimidate?
	Well, we're going to charge you under the KKK statute.
	And so basically anytime a uniformed members group gets together with masks and holding something in their hands, you're just giving the prosecutors a gift.
	You're saying, please charge me.
	You're saying, please charge me with the most expansive statute that you can imagine.
	And by the way, that's exactly what happened at Charlottesville.
	They were either criminally or civilly held liable.
	That is what destroyed Identity Europa, that is what destroyed TRS, that is what destroyed a lot of those groups, is that even the ones that didn't get charged criminally, they got sued in civil court for damages.
	And that's because things happened outside of their control.
	It was really nobody's fault with the organizers.
	The Charlottesville cops were at fault.
	Antifa was at fault.
	I mean, everybody else was at fault, but they said, look, this was your rally.
	And so a lot of people got charged criminally with assault or other things.
	Many people were sued in civil court.
	And then some people are still being arrested today under the KKK statute.
	You know, five or six years later, they're saying, you carried a torch.
	That violates the KKK law, you're going to jail and they're being extradited back to Virginia.
	That's Charlottesville.
	January 6th, of course, another instance where things got out of control.
	Due to nobody's fault, really, I mean, there were probably provocateurs, there were instigators, there was maybe some blurred lines about what was legal or illegal.
	People that weren't even in the city are being thrown in jail for 25 years because they were in a group.
	People that were in the Oath Keepers, the Three Percenters, or the Proud Boys, it was because they were in a group, they were able to be charged with seditious conspiracy.
	Even if they didn't even conspire, even if they didn't engage in anything that bad, they got charged with conspiracy because they were in the group.
	And anything can constitute a conspiracy.
	You know, conspiracy is very broad.
	What constitutes an agreement?
	And being part of a group can constitute that in certain circumstances, can lend itself to that.
	So, here's the thing.
	After Charlottesville, certainly after January 6th, the idea that we should be out there in masks, in costumes, marching around, I just ask, what's the point?
	What is the point?
	I think that Thomas Rousseau has been asked that many times.
	People say, hey, why?
	And him, he was at Charlottesville.
	He was with Vanguard America.
	So he was there.
	That was the same group that the guy that drove through the crowd was a part of.
	They were Vanguard America, some fascist group.
	And so...
	People say, hey, bro, you were at Seville.
	You saw what happened with Vanguard America.
unidentified		Why?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Why are we doing this?
		What's the point?
		Why is everyone getting in costumes and masks and carrying props and marching around and giving?
		What's the point?
		Why are we doing this?
		And I've never heard, I mean he's answered that, but I've never heard like a good reason.
		It's something like, well we need to show people that we're in the street and blah.
		And it's like, what?
		What do you mean?
		We don't, we don't need to be in the street.
		We need to be in the halls of power, not the street.
		Why do we need to be in the street with vagabonds and homeless people?
		I mean, what do you think you're gonna do?
		And I think there is this flirtation among these types with this idea that Patriot Front is going to be some kind of street force, like they're going to be some kind of enforcement, or they're going to... And let me just tell you...
		If there's even a whiff, a whiff of rebellion by a group like that, the government will fucking rape you.
		Okay?
		So, there's this kind of cutesy, our revolution is our tradition, revolution is, you know, we're like the founders.
		If there is a fucking whiff that a mass group like that, with fascists calling out Zionists and saying whites are the only Americans, If you even, if you think you're gonna come close to being something like a street gang, because I think that's what it is.
		I think that on some level, they think they're gonna be like the black shirts.
		Like, let's just be honest.
		Somewhere in that consciousness, they think that they, it's a LARP.
		They're role-playing like the Mosley guys, or like the black shirts, or like the brown shirts.
		That, it's a, it's a role play.
		They're reenacting that.
		But different time, different place, different century.
		I think that's a part of it.
		And there's this idea like, you know, well we could keep the streets safe, or we're gonna clean up, or we're gonna do this.
		You can't.
		You can't.
		They know who you are.
		They got eyes on you.
		You're probably infiltrated.
		And by the way, if you have a group, it's infiltrated by the feds.
		You just have to assume that.
		If you're running a group of any size, of any significance, it's infiltrated.
		It's just like baked in.
		You just have to, you cannot filter it.
		You just have to assume it to some degree.
		You can do your best to filter it, but you'll never get 100%.
		And so it's like, they're on your shit, brother.
		They know what's up.
		And if there's even a whiff that you're going to be taking any kind of meaningful action, they will rape you.
		And the cops will help them.
		The National Guard will help them.
		Your family will help them.
		You are boned, okay?
		So what are we really doing?
		Because if it's not about fighting, and if it's not about, you know, What's the point of a costume parade?
		or a flirtation like that, then it really is just like a parade.
		It's really just like a costume parade.
		And I would say, what's the point of a costume parade?
		What's the point of that?
		You know, because I'm saying these are the risks.
		If you do one of these things and it goes wrong, you're screwed.
		Maybe you wake up and the federal government wakes up on the wrong side of the bed, you're screwed anyway.
		What is the point in telling people to sort of risk their lives by going out to these things?
		And there's a chance that they get unmasked and doxed, you know, because that is what happened in Idaho.
		They all got rounded up, unmasked, booked, photographed, and all those people got doxxed.
		And that's a lot of lives ruined if this turns into anything significant.
		And what's the point of that?
		When you talk about the risk profile, what's the benefit of parading around like this?
		I'm still wondering what the benefit of that is.
		Why are they doing that?
		And what's like a real answer?
	I want like a concrete answer.
	The risks do not justify this.
	Or the benefits, I should say, do not justify the risks.
	What people should... and then they'll say things like, well, we're doing this to get people active.
	We're doing it so that we can work out.
	It's for camaraderie.
	It's for X, Y, and Z. If that's what it's for...
	Then here's my advice.
	Do all of those things.
	Don't do the costume marches.
unidentified		Okay?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Because that's always, it's like, well they do other stuff too.
		Okay, good.
		Just do those things.
		If you want to do a book club, do a book club.
		If you want to network for business, network for business.
		If you want to volunteer in a local campaign, volunteer in a local campaign.
		You want to form a social club, form a social club.
		You can do all those things and then some without putting on a costume and marching around in the streets with flags and shields.
		And uniforms.
		Like, I don't know why that has to be a part of it.
		I don't know.
		But some people just can't let that go.
		You know, that doesn't work.
		Anybody that ever did that in the heyday of the alt-right doesn't do it anymore because it doesn't work.
		Putting up your fucking stickers and your stencils and marching around, it doesn't do anything.
		It doesn't do anything.
		This is the 21st century.
		It's not the 30s.
		We don't need to go out and hand out pamphlets and we're not going to gain control of the streets.
		This is insane!
		The best thing that you can do if you're a young man and you want to get involved, here's what you can do.
		Make an anonymous Twitter account and amplify propaganda.
		It's the 21st century.
		You don't need to put on a mask and a uniform and hand out a piece of paper at a pro-life thing.
		Go on Twitter because this is where people are being redpilled.
		Go on TikTok.
		Make videos that will redpill young people.
		You will reach far more people.
		You can either hand out pamphlets to 10 people or you can make a TikTok that will be seen by a million people.
		Do that.
		You want to get involved?
		Go to your local GOP meeting and go there every month for their monthly meeting and volunteer in campaigns and become a person of influence.
		Go to school.
		Go to your College Republicans.
		Gain control of a College Republican chapter and you're able to spend their budget.
		Run for office.
		Run and be a state representative.
		Become a lawyer and make a lot of money.
		Okay, these are all things that we can do.
		You can Make decent money and donate to people that are doing these things.
		Donate to a campaign of a state representative who's onside.
		Donate to a streamer that's creating effective propaganda.
		It doesn't even have to be me.
		You can donate to Keith Woods or somebody like that.
		You know, but basically any other thing would be more effective than this like, well, you know, Urban Paul Town, people are saying.
unidentified		Well, we got to put on costumes and like march around.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And at the end of the day, you know what I think it's really about?
		I think it is a cope for powerless people.
		I think it satisfies the urge of otherwise powerless people to do something.
		You have a lot of people that are maybe not that smart, no offense, but they're maybe not that smart, they don't have a lot of money, they don't really know what to do, but they want to do something.
		So they see a bunch of people marching around and they say, oh, I'm gonna do that!
unidentified		I'm gonna put on a mask and I'm gonna be a part of something bigger than myself!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, you're a fucking retard.
		I hate to break it to you.
		And I don't mean to insult those people in there, but that, that is not the kind of strategic, intelligent thinking that is going to have us win this asymmetrical battle.
		Okay, we cannot be hasty.
		We cannot be reckless.
		We cannot be racing into, you know, these people.
		It's so freaky.
		They join these groups and they take, like, immense pride in it.
		They're like, well, I'm doing something.
		I'm part of something bigger.
		These are my brothers.
		It's like, dude, you're marching around.
		You're in the back of a U-Haul van and you're marching around in the street.
		And then they go home and they're like, I'm like a soldier or something.
		You know, me and my friends, we boxed each other.
		We did a scrimmage in the woods.
		And then we jumped out of a U-Haul and we carried a flag.
		It's like, what did you do?
		What did you accomplish?
		You got real people that are in the freaking Trump administration.
		You got real people that are in Congress.
		You got real people that are... They got a hundred thousand followers on Twitter who are anonymous, blasting out propaganda to millions of people.
		So I would say resist that urge.
		Resist that urge where people say, Oh, I just got to do something.
		I just got to put on a costume and I'm going to get in their face.
		It's like that.
		So then it's really not about the country.
		It's about you.
		It's about your sort of immature desire to impose yourself on the world.
		But a sort of an expression of it from a powerless person.
		You know, you don't have, you don't have ideas, you don't have money, you don't have initiative, but you can put on a costume and go and march around.
		Look at me, I'm marching around.
		Look at me, I have a flag and I'm marching around.
		I'm doing something.
		You know, other people are like doing very complex high-order strategies, like they're fucking running for office.
		You know, they're like in the state government And they're a state legislator, you know, or they're like in politics and they're producing films or they're doing like, because I know a lot of people who are as red-pilled as me and they're doing a lot of cool stuff.
		Or they're super rich or they're doing, you know, but they're players.
		They're making moves.
		And then he got these other people where they're like, I'm gonna march, I'm gonna march around.
		I got my hat.
		I got my mask.
		I got my cargo pants.
		I'm going to march around now.
		I'm going to carry my flag and march up and down.
		Is that all you can do?
		So, you know, so I think that it's, you're begging to be infiltrated by the feds.
		You're begging to be fucked by the feds.
		The second you do anything more than march around, you're raped.
		I mean, it's already inserted in there.
		The government's already so far up your ass, and the second, and I think there really is a flirtation with this, like, on some level they think they're being clever and they're like, well they don't know that we're controlling the streets.
		Do not be under any illusion.
		It ain't happening.
		It's not happening.
		Look what they did to Kyle Rittenhouse.
		Look what they did to the guy on the subway.
		Look what they did to Derek Chauvin.
		You're talking about some guy on the subway choked out some black homeless guy who was freaking out and they charge him with murder.
		Okay?
		And that was just some guy.
		That was just some random guy who was in a legitimate life-or-death situation.
		You think that when you take over the street, whatever that's gonna look like, they're gonna, like, accept that?
		They're gonna round you up yesterday.
		They're gonna round you up at 3 a.m.
		while you're jerking off, and they're gonna throw you in hell, and they're gonna rape you there.
	So, you know, if that's what you think you're doing, it's not happening.
	I mean, these militias, they're just, it's a problem waiting to happen.
	It's a RICO, it's a conspiracy, it's a KKK statute, it's a civil suit waiting to happening at one of these things.
	Otherwise, you're waiting to get doxxed.
	They know who you are.
	You know, or the whole thing's, I mean, either the whole thing is an operation or it's a lot of gullible people that are really being tricked.
	And I would say, maybe you don't believe that.
	Maybe you say, oh, you know, you're wrong for this reason or the other reason.
	Well, then I would say simply, what's the benefit of the marches?
	You want to be in a book club?
	Fine.
	You want to wrestle around in the woods?
	Fine.
	You want to go camping?
	Fine.
	You want to network?
	Okay.
	Do all that.
	Don't put on the costume and march up and down.
	People say, at least they're doing something!
	Not really.
	So, that's my long take on all that.
	Somebody was saying to me the other day, they're like, Monique, people in Patriot Front support you.
	I'm like, well, I would understand why.
	I probably redpilled half of them because I'm doing fucking something.
	You know, I probably created half of them because I redpilled people.
	That's because I redpill thousands of people because I am a live streamer.
	I have a show.
	I create persuasive, effective propaganda.
	And there are many people in government, there are many people, some of them billionaires, many of them millionaires, film producers, I mean you name it.
	There are many people that got red-pilled by me or agree with my ideas or watch my show to listen for my opinions and they're influential.
	And that's what happens when you think about your approach and how you're actually going to affect change rather than just, you know, I feel like a fucking powerless loser.
	I know what I'll do.
	I'm gonna stop at Lowe's and buy their uniform.
	So... I'm not trying to just trash them or anything, but... I think it's a very bad idea.
	I mean, Thomas Rousseau seems like a nice guy.
unidentified		Maybe.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I mean, I don't know if he's a fad.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't want to insinuate that maybe he is maybe isn't You know if he likes me that's great, but I I really I Don't understand it I did I seriously I have serious disagreements about his strategy so I'll just say that much But but that's my opinion on them Rape caviar sent $10.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Your prediction that Ben Shapiro lived in a South Florida Jewish community was totally on the money.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Made a clip with sources and screenshots if you're interested.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I saw that, yeah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		No surprise.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Kid Cuisine Detractor sent $3.
		Hi Nick, longtime viewer here.
		Big fan of the show, buddy.
		Really appreciate all the great stuff you do.
		O7 Christ is King.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hey, thanks a lot, buddy.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Appreciate it.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Okay, well, cringe analogy, but you're... I actually have noticed that.
		It's very bizarre.
		Why is that?
		amount of non-white genes are more based?
		Where are all the blue-eyed blonde Nazis?
		It's like God gave us a small dose of that black venom symbiote goo to fight off so we could become more based.
		True Spider-Man.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Okay, well, cringe analogy, but you're, I actually have noticed that.
		It's very bizarre.
		Why is that?
		You know, because there are a lot of people that say, oh, you know, oh, you're going to lead the white race.
		You're a fucking Mexican!
		I'm sorry, where are all the blonde-haired, blue-eyed guys doing what I do?
		I don't know of them.
		I haven't heard of them.
		And if they're out there, they're not on my level.
		So... This is what you got.
		You know, there's a great story.
		My grandma always used to tell this story about my uncle.
		You know, my uncle was a biker.
		He was big into motorcycles.
		He had tattoos up and down his arms.
		And this was before people... Now this is very popular, but back in those days it wasn't.
		And he had the whole... He was decked out in the motorcycle gear and the tattoos of the motorcycle.
		And one time there was this lady who had some trouble with her car.
		She was stopped on the highway.
		She had to pull over on the shoulder and She couldn't figure out what was wrong with her car and my uncle Pulls up behind her on the motorcycle Gets off the bike and starts walking towards her and she sees my uncle who's covered in tattoos and he's got long hair and the goatee and The gloves and the bike and everything.
		She goes, oh, please, dear God, please send somebody to help.
		And the famous story, the line, he says, well, sometimes you never know who God is going to send to help you.
		You know, he helped her fix her car and everything.
		And that's sort of like me.
		I'm like, I'm like my uncle.
		I'm like that guy.
		It's like, hey, you never know who God's going to send.
		The white race is praying.
unidentified		They said, please, please, we need somebody.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We're getting killed out here.
		And then I show up and they're like, this fucking short Mexican spic, this guy, this annoying Mexican child leader, are you serious?
		This Mexican?
		This is gonna be the guy?
		You never know who God's gonna send, I guess.
unidentified		But, uh...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And I was sent, truly, to save you sorry people.
		I was sent to save your miserable white asses.
		Because I don't see the- I mean, aside from I see Jimbo's in the chat, Jimbo counts.
		He's pretty Aryan.
		He's a true Aryan.
		But I mean, it seems like there are a lot of blonde hair, blue-eyed people.
		You know, but I'm standing at the front here.
		I'm standing at the front at the top.
		Sieg Heilig?
		No, not actually.
		I had to say it.
		I'm standing at the front.
		I'm at the top throwing up Romans, declaring love for- giving Hitler some love.
		And I don't see a lot of them.
		They all wanted to be a blonde-haired blue-eyed guy.
		Okay.
		I think they're all too busy over there letting the Africans into Sweden.
		I think they're all too busy smoking pot and, you know, putting dresses on.
		And don't get me wrong, I love them.
		I love the blonde-haired, blue-eyed people.
		I think they're amazing.
		I think they're a beautiful race.
		I think they should probably be ruling the world.
		But they're not stepping up!
		So I gotta step up.
		Little Italian-Mexican guys gotta step up to the plate.
		And, uh, and maybe I just gotta make, I gotta break the ice.
		You know, maybe once I come in and kind of break the ice, I kind of fire the first shot, maybe then, you know, a tall, blonde-haired, blue-eyed guy comes in and says, alright, alright little man, I'll take it from here, and I'll say, hey, where the fuck have you been?
		I've been waiting for you.
		Now I get to retire and eat dessert and drink coffee for the rest of my life.
		I'm good with that.
		I'm waiting to tag... Where is he?
		All these people that crit... You know, all these wig gnats that criticize me for being Mexican.
		I'm waiting to tag in the blonde-haired, blue-eyed Chad that's gonna do my job better than me.
		I'll go retire and I'll be eating... I'll be eating dessert and coffee and I'll have some pets and I'll... I'll live a nice life.
		I'll have my little hot dog stand.
		I'll let the blonde-haired, blue-eyed people come in.
		I'll say, hey, what can I get you?
		How about some hot dogs?
		How about a slice of pizza?
		You know?
		But, I will not be retired anytime soon.
		I will not be retired by these people because they're not here.
		So, you know, when that person is ready to step up, I'll tag them in.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Sabian, sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Are you talking broadly speaking or like a more general sense?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Broadly speaking.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Taking a macro view.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Is that true?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Is that true?
		I think maybe you're just... I don't want to believe it.
		I think maybe you're just making that up.
		Because he's my favorite Super Chatter.
		You're just trying to create enmity between me and my favorite Super Chatter.
		Who gave me the best advice I've ever heard.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		WonderPetsPatriot sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Would there be another wave of internet censorship if Trump wins in November like in 2016?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I think there will be a wave before.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Like before the election.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		PrettyFlyWhiteGuy sent $3.
		300.
		Renewing my Cozy Plus.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hey, thank you man.
unidentified		Appreciate the subscription.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		No, dude.
		We don't believe in their eschatology.
		We believe Jesus is going to win in the end.
unidentified		Whoa!
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		You're getting Elon Bucks, huh?
		Glad somebody is.
		saying their victory was already written in paper thousands of years ago frown.
unidentified		Thank you for your hard work, Nick07. - No, dude, we don't believe in their eschatology.
		We believe Jesus is gonna win in the end. - Boogly Woogly sent $35.
		You're cut of my Ellen bucks, sir. - Whoa, you're getting Elon bucks, huh?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Glad somebody is.
unidentified		Thanks for the money, I guess.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		All Jews hate Russia.
		New viewer, not sure if you've talked about this or not.
		What's the Jewish connection with Ukraine?
		I know Zelensky is a Jew, but what's the Jewish agenda in the East?
		Came to mind after the stream earlier.
		Thanks for all you do.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, they all hate Russia.
		All Jews hate Russia.
		Many of the Jews that live in the United States are Russian Jews that emigrated from Russia 100 years ago or 30 years ago.
		And they hate Russia because Russia segregated the Jews in the Pale of Settlement and was very bad to their Jews.
		So, So there's this historic animosity between Jews and Russians in Russia, in the Diaspora.
		And the other thing, so there is this sort of like ancient hatred of the Russian, not ancient, but very old hatred of the Russians by the Jews because of the Pale of Settlement.
		It's just an ethnic beef.
		The other thing though is that Russia supports Assad and Russia supports Iran, which are the two adversaries of Israel.
		And the other thing is that Chabad comes from Ukraine.
		And there are a lot of Jews in Ukraine.
		So that that's a big part of it as well But those are really to put it very succinctly.
		Those are kind of the big reasons They all hate Russia and and people talk about this that a general What's his name?
		Who is that who is that good general general What's his name he did a thing with Tucker and he talked about this and How they all have this ethnic hatred of Russia.
unidentified		General... McGregor.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So, that's the beef.
		I mean, they hate the Russians so much they killed the royal family.
		They slaughtered even the children of the Winter Palace during the Russian Revolution.
		And that's why they enthusiastically carried out the Holodomor.
		They didn't care that there was this butchery going on in Ukraine because they hated these people.
		A lot of them were ethnic Russians.
		And the Jews were perpetrating it.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		So... Bluppel sent $5.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Is there going to be another FPAC?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Uh, yeah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		This year.
unidentified		Thanks.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Uh, both.
		Big fan of both.
		Thanks.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Both.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Big fan of both.
unidentified		That's a duplicate.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't think we know who that person is yet.
		I don't think there's anybody that's qualified that's like publicly known right now.
		I don't even know who it would be.
		So it's gonna be someone who's unknown right now or someone who will rise to the fore in the next four years.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		The rumbling sent three dollars.
		Destiny lost because he sucks.
		Shapiro lost because he was there.
		There isn't even discourse anymore.
		Worst timeline.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good point.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		St. Sugar the Conspiracy Cat official fan club sent $3, I wonder if Nick is legit or gaslighting when he says he never heard of docuseries Europe the last battle.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Surely if he's seen greatest story never told he must know of this revision edition 2.0?
unidentified		Okay, thanks.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		The rumbling sent $3, as cringe as the intellectual dark web was, at least there used to be substantial conversations among Pollya, Hoff Summers, Milo, and people of that ilk.
		You had randos like Donovan?
		Nothing now.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That was all fake All those people were Jews or paid by Jews.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Really?
		That doesn't surprise me.
		Lex Friedman's a Jew-Zionist.
		the destiny and shapiro debate as soon as it was posted i commented now have shapiro debate nick fuentes it got 130 likes within an hour it was then deleted from comments really that doesn't surprise me lex friedman's a jew zionist probably a fad so that's not a surprise at all breakfast burrito grow i percent three dollars People will kiss the growiper ring or fucking die.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That is, uh, not true because we don't support violence against anyone and we love everyone all the time.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Shendelman88 Papiro sent $6.
		Lions Township is a poor brown ghetto.
		Hinsdale Central is a real MAGA community.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Fuck off.
		Hinsdale's not MAGA.
		It's a bunch of liberal yuppies.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Breakfast Burrito Growiper sent $3.
		They should call regular burritos nighttime burritos.
		Thoughts?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Nice.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Luftwafer sent $15.
		Long time viewer.
		Appreciate the speech at the end.
		Whatever happened to Panther Den?
		He was a real one.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I heard he got arrested in Mexico because he was some kind of Hispanic.
		I heard, last we heard is that he was arrested for like rape in Mexico.
		That's the rumor.
		I don't know if that's true or not.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I don't really care that much.
		I think that we're all going to die one day.
		times won't happen until the Gentiles apostatize from the faith and Jews convert back on mass.
		There was an entire part of the old mass symbolizing this by the moving of the text.
		So no second coming yet.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I don't really care that much.
		I think that we're all going to die one day.
		So, and I think, I don't think there's anything in the Bible that indicates that we should pay special attention to the end of the world.
		I think it's about you should always live as though you're going to die because the Lord can return at any time.
		Isn't that the parable?
		That we're loaned the farm and the Lord goes away and we gotta just be taking care of it?
		Because He's gonna come back at any time?
		So we gotta be ready at any time?
		Because He could come back whenever?
		I think, if anything, the message of the Bible is you gotta be ready at all times.
		Not like, hmm, when is the world going to end?
		It's kind of like, well, the Lord can come back any time.
		You could die any time.
unidentified		So you should always be prepared to meet Him.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's about the imminence of Jesus' return rather than this like, you know, we're watching for signs and this kind of stuff.
		I mean, I understand people are curious about it.
		I've never been curious.
		Because the thing is, what difference does it make?
		I mean, either you're going to hear the trumpets and it's all over, or Like, an icicle falls from a skyscraper and kills you.
		Or, you get in your car and it fucking blows up.
		Or, you know, you get in a plane and the door falls off and you fly out the window.
		You know what I mean?
		You can die any day.
		You can die literally any day.
		People think, oh, I'll probably live 60 more years.
		No, you won't.
		You might not.
		Everybody goes about their life thinking, oh, I will probably die when I'm 90.
		And it's like, you know, you'll probably die before that.
		And you are not going to see it coming.
unidentified		But people are like, hmm, I wonder when the world will end.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's like, you got to wonder when your world is going to end.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Some nut on the net sent three dollars.
		Destiny to Ben Shapiro.
		There are some things in the Constitution that are like really, really, really blah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that was insightful.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Insightful remark.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Natsuk Grecoid sent three dollars.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		He was right, though.
		I get what he means.
		Like, there are a lot of things in the Constitution that are ambiguous, which he's right about.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		That's true, Nords aren't funny.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Nords are, uh, they're too nice.
		Nordic people are kind of like nice and they're just kind of like dry.
		Italians are fun!
		We're the real, we're the brother.
		Okay, it's Jews and Italians.
		These are the main characters.
		This is your, uh, Jacob and Esau.
		It's what they believe.
		It's what we believe.
		It's Rome and Israel.
		Rome and Jerusalem.
		These are the two twin brothers that are beating each other up in the womb and stealing each other's blessings and fighting each other.
		And everyone else's background characters.
		That's why we're funny.
		That's why Jews are funny and Italians are funny.
		That's why Jews are smart and Italians are smart.
		That's why Jews run the world and Italians ran the world.
		So, you know, Say what you want about the Nordics.
		They never, like, ruled the world.
		Unless you consider British people Nordics.
		I suppose they are.
		But they didn't rule it for very long.
		You had Rome.
		You had Spain.
		You had France.
		You had Portugal.
		Meds run this shit.
		I'm tired of people saying otherwise.
		Meds run this shit.
		Anglos ran the world for Couple hundred years, big whip.
		We discovered this place.
		We built Europe.
		We built this fucking place.
		We built everything.
		Rome built Europe.
		And then the Spanish and the Italians discovered this world.
		We built the old world.
		We discovered the new world.
		Don't forget it.
		We run this shit.
		This is our planet.
		This is our planet.
		You're just living in it!
		Then these British people come along and they're like, look at our freaking telescope, look at our stupid shit.
		Hey, shut up!
		We made you guys!
		We made you guys!
		And then they want to exterminate us?
		You know, then Hitler gets together with Madison Grant and they're like, huh, you know, these guys are short and stupid.
		It's like, hey, We made you.
		Fuckface.
		Don't forget.
		We made this place.
		There would be no Germany without Rome.
		There would be no England or America or any of it without Rome.
		Don't forget it, buster.
		Don't forget it, pal.
		They said, ah, we're gonna give it to the Nordics because they're a little bigger.
		They're a little beefier.
		Yeah, well, they're not funny.
		Well, they're not funny and they never discovered anything terrestrial.
		Maybe they discovered the moon and all that stuff.
		Or landed on it.
		Or maybe they didn't.
	Maybe nukes aren't even real and the moon landing's fake.
	What we do know is real is Rome made everything.
	And we know that for a fact.
	So anyway, I'm just teasing you guys.
	I love Nords.
	Nords are hot.
	Nordics are hot.
	Nordics are kind of like our, they're like our hot pets.
	They're like our hot, we're supposed to source them for beautiful spouses and science.
	You know, they're gonna make, they're gonna do the nerd stuff.
	They're gonna go wage out and have a blast in the lab and us Italians, we're gonna be drinking coffee.
	No, kidding, kidding, kidding, kidding.
	We love all whites.
	Pan, it's all white solidarity.
	Except for Slavs.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Pine Point Populous sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I looked up Canuck69's Twitter and I immediately regretted it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Okay, I think that's a joke, but... I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I have to check it out.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Blipple sent $3.
		I went to a few Aryan meetings, applied for a government job, got denied and the feds showed up to my house a few days later wanting me to be an informant.
		Safe to say I haven't been back there.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Is that a true story?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Wouldn't be surprised.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Breakfast Burrito Grower sent $3.
		I'm ready to kill and die for you.
		Just give me the word.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you.
unidentified		I will.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Luftwafer sent $3.
unidentified		St.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Paisios says Russia will retake Constantinople in World War II.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		How'd that go?
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		The Rumbling sent $3.
		I was trying to make that point.
		This isn't the end times.
		We aren't even close.
		Sorry I wasn't clear.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		No, but I'm saying I don't think we know.
unidentified		It is true.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I have had a pretty crazy longevity, especially considering I've been banned everywhere.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		It is true.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I have had a pretty crazy longevity, especially considering I've been banned everywhere.
		Because I've really been at it for, I mean, it's going to be seven years in two weeks, which is crazy.
		But it's been four years, four and a half years since Groyper War.
		And I've been going strong, man.
		I got, I'm pulling 10,000 viewers on the regular on Rumble.
		Who else does that?
		I was getting 10,000 on YouTube, banned on YouTube.
		I was getting 10,000 on DLive, banned on DLive.
		Then I went away for two years.
		I'm on Rumble, 10,000 viewers on Rumble.
		I'm that nigga.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		So, yeah, yeah, pretty epic.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		That's true.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		They were wampas.
		I thought they smelled bad on the outside.
		Okay, all right.
		Are you a wampa?
		That's gonna do it for me.
		Okay, that's a lot of streaming for one day.
		I think I've had enough.
		Remember to follow me here on Rumble and Cozy to get a push notification whenever I go live.
		And I'm on the air Monday through Friday at night, usually around 10 o'clock to 2 a.m.
		window.
		Thanks to our Super Chatters, everybody that watches the show.
		We love you and I'll see you tomorrow.
		Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.

▲