America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - RUSSELL BRAND CENSORED??? UK ORDERS Rumble To BAN Accused Rapist | America First Ep. 1221RUSSELL BRAND CENSORED??? UK ORDERS Rumble To BAN Accused Rapist

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 21, 2023 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:53:07

RUSSELL BRAND CENSORED??? UK ORDERS Rumble To BAN Accused Rapist | America First Ep. 1221RUSSELL BRAND CENSORED??? UK ORDERS Rumble To BAN Accused Rapist | America First Ep. 1221

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:34:33

streamlabs matthew tts

07:18

Appearances

Clips

alex jones

00:23

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		We got the Southern Cortesito We got the Southern Cortesito Americanism,
		not globalism, will be our not globalism, will be our credo In the end It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		America first. America first. America first. America first. America
unidentified		first. America
		first. America first. America
		first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first.
		you you you you you you you you you
		you you you you - Good evening,
		everybody. everybody.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Wednesday.
		We have a lot to talk about tonight.
		Lots to get into.
		Big show.
		Big featured story tonight.
		We're once again talking about Russell Brand, which I didn't really want to do, but...
		Kind of a big deal.
		We talked about Russell Brand earlier this week who's been accused of rape by four women.
		And you guys know it's my default position.
		I think that all women are liars.
		I never believe an allegation.
		And I also think that most rape is just not even real.
		So...
		Of course when the allegations came out I swiftly defended Russell Brand before even knowing any of the facts.
		And I also said that most likely all these allegations are politically motivated because Russell Brand is now a right-wing activist.
		Or you could say an anti-establishment activist.
		Maybe that works better.
		So we covered that and it's really just another one of these things.
		It's another Trump, Kavanaugh, whoever.
		It's another Me Too type situation.
		But now there's a new development which I think is pretty interesting.
		I've never even heard of something like this.
		So Russell Brand was accused of sexual assault in the media and today YouTube demonetized all of his channels.
		So he hasn't been charged with anything.
		He didn't get charged with rape.
		He didn't get convicted of rape.
		He was merely accused in the media and a police inquiry began.
		So YouTube in response demonetized all his channels, said that he can no longer make money on any channel on the platform.
		Because I guess he has like four or five channels and he makes thousands of dollars per day every video that he posts They say he can make up to 4,000 pounds, British pounds that is, but as of today he can't make any money on the platform just because of the allegations.
		Nice going.
		So that happened and then there was a request made to Rumble, the platform I'm streaming on now, by the British government For him to be demonetized on Rumble as well.
		So, we find out that not only is Big Tech coming after him, YouTube has demonetized him, but we've also found out the apparent source of the censorship, which is the British government itself.
		And the British Parliament put out a letter to Rumble insisting that they demonetize his channels on there as well.
		So that he would be unable to make a living Which is just like... I've never heard of anything like that.
		And there might have been isolated cases of this before.
		It sounds like vaguely familiar.
		I feel like there might have been another instance like this in the past.
		But I don't think it's ever been quite like this.
		Where the government reached out to a platform he hasn't even been charged!
		And they're asking the platforms to stop him from making money because of a hit piece in the media.
		Just insane.
		So we'll talk about that.
		It's just a new level of censorship.
		And we'll also be talking tonight about the war that has apparently just ended between Azerbaijan and Armenia.
		You could say that it's the Third Nagorno-Karabakh War, which is over a disputed mountainous territory in Azerbaijan, but populated by Armenians.
		A lot of people were asking me my thoughts about this last night, and you know, I didn't feel that it was honestly a very pressing story, because it's really... I really don't care that much.
		There's really not too much going on there that affects our interests, necessarily.
		Not directly, that is.
		I mean, indirectly, it has a lot to do with Russia and Iran and Israel and Turkey, but not too relevant for America.
		At least not at this point.
		Nevertheless, we'll cover it.
		This week, Azerbaijan launched a major offensive against the Armenians in the Karabakh region after a nine-month blockade.
		And a ceasefire was quickly put into place and enforced by Russia.
		And it looks like it's over for Armenia.
		For a long time there was basically an effort to have that region secede from Azerbaijan and make it become part of Armenia.
		But it seems that that is now over.
		It was really realistically over in 2020, but now it's definitely over, and it looks like that's just it.
		They're never leaving Azerbaijan, and as a matter of fact, the people in that place may be leaving.
		Rather than that region seceding, it looks like perhaps the 150,000 Armenians there will be ethically cleansed.
		and forced to flee to Armenia.
		So we'll talk about that too and just go over all the details, the background and everything.
	It's actually an interesting situation if for no other reason than it's sort of peculiar where different countries in the region have sided with one or the other.
	So we'll talk about that too.
	Should be a pretty good show.
	Before we get into it, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Cozy to get a push notification whenever I go live.
	Follow me on Rumble.
	I'm live every night on Rumble as well.
	So follow me on both.
	Make sure you're on both Cozy and Rumble.
	Because I think Cozy is better for live.
	I think Rumble may be better for replays.
	Because Rumble hosts the replays for us indefinitely.
	Cozy, I only keep five up at a time, so you gotta be following me on both.
	Also, follow me on Telegram, and all the links are down below.
	I think that's all our announcements.
	Not too much else going on.
	Yeah, pretty slow day.
	Kind of a boring day today.
	Another slow day in the news and no interesting stories today.
	I know last night I went off on Jim Goad and Oliver Anthony again.
	I just can't get this guy out of my life, but nothing really to say about that tonight.
	So I guess we'll just dive in.
	Normally it's like I feel like I do half of a show about something that isn't even what the show is supposed to be about.
	And then I run out of time.
	So I guess we'll just dive in because we have a couple of big things tonight.
	So our first story is about this.
	It's not even really a war.
	It's more just like a offensive by Azerbaijan.
	And I don't know how familiar anybody is with this.
	I would guess that it's pretty obscure for most people.
	But Armenia and Azerbaijan are two countries in the Caucasus.
	And they're situated between Russia, Turkey, and Iran, between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea.
	And they have had conflict there for a long time over this disputed territory between them called Nagorno-Karabakh.
	And the reason it's so contentious is because it has always been territorially a part of Azerbaijan, but the population is ethically Armenian.
	And so that's the gist.
	There are two small countries bordering each other and there is a mountainous region situated between them that has always been part of Azerbaijan but populated by Armenians.
	And it's a very contentious relationship between the Armenians and their neighbors because their neighbors are all Muslim and ethnically different from them.
	And the Armenians are, of course, one of the oldest Christian settlements in the world.
	So it's an ethnically, religiously charged conflict with this problematic region where you've got, I mean, normally it wouldn't matter necessarily that you have an ethnic minority in one part of the other country, but in this case it's a problem.
	And they fought two major wars before over this region.
	The most recent one was in 2020.
	And in 2020, the Azeris overwhelmingly won with a totally superior military.
	Specifically, they had superior air capability, which was supplied by Turkey and Israel.
	They had very sophisticated drones, which turned the tide of the conflict.
	And so there was a short war in 2020, that was the most recent one, where the Azeris won and largely forced a ceasefire on their terms.
	And the last three years, it was basically never resolved, where both sides had been escalating, both sides militarizing the border, neither really accepting the results.
	And nine months ago, the Azeris began a blockade of Azerbaijan, There's just a small road, a small corridor that leads from Armenia into Nagorno-Karabakh.
	Did I say Azerbaijan?
	Azerbaijan blockaded Nagorno-Karabakh because there's just a small road where Armenia can supply Nagorno-Karabakh through.
	Azerbaijan cut that off nine months ago.
	And finally, Azerbaijan went in.
	They crushed, to the extent that there was any kind of military in Karabakh, they destroyed it.
	And they are going to send a diplomatic delegation there to negotiate the integration of the ethnic Armenians living there into Azerbaijan.
	So this is a story from today.
	It says, quote, Authorities in Nagorno-Karabakh accepted a ceasefire proposal made by Russian peacekeepers on Wednesday, a day after Azerbaijan launched a military operation in the disputed territory.
	Azerbaijan on Tuesday began what it called an anti-terrorist campaign against separatist forces in Nagorno-Karabakh, which local officials said killed hundreds by Wednesday night.
	The death toll had reached at least 200, including 10 civilians and more than 400 injured, although Azerbaijan says it was more like 40 that were killed, so it's disputed and neither of the numbers have been verified from either side.
	Nagorno-Karabakh is a landlocked region that lies within Azerbaijan's borders.
	It is internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, but is home to ethnic Armenians who make up the majority of its population and reject Azerbaijan's rule.
	The region has its own de facto government backed by Armenia, but it is not officially recognized by Armenia or any other country.
	Azerbaijan's defense ministry said it had agreed to suspend its operation and that officials would meet representatives of the Armenian community on Thursday to discuss integration under the constitution and laws of Azerbaijan.
	The Nagorno-Karabakh presidency said its forces were outnumbered several times over as it attempted to defend the region from Azerbaijani troops on Tuesday.
	It's really like a border dispute between these two countries, and contentious between them, not so relevant for anybody else, because there's really nothing going on in that region.
	You know, typically, when you look at these kinds of border disputes, it's a big problem because of resources.
	Like, for example, the war between Russia and Ukraine, a big part of it is motivated by resources.
	Because there are large natural gas deposits in the Black Sea, and there is fertile farmland and grain on the plains of Ukraine, and there's a lot of other energy resources recently discovered there.
	I think it's shale.
	And so, when Russia goes in, there's another dimension to the conflict, which is that there's a lot of resources.
	There's also the aspect of the NATO alliance.
	And how far they'll be able to expand their military footprint and project power against Russia.
	In this case, though, there's really nothing going on in that particular, and when I say this region, I'm talking about Nagorno-Karabakh.
	It's only contentious because it's Azerbaijani territory, but it's Armenian people.
	There is significance for the surrounding region, though, and the way that it stacks up is kind of interesting.
	The reason that Azerbaijan was able to win this war is because effectively Russia gave up on Armenia.
	For three decades Armenia has relied solely and exclusively on Russia for its security because they're both Eastern Orthodox countries or both Orthodox Christian nations.
	And they have long-standing historical ties.
	And so since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia has been the guarantor of Armenia's security, specifically against Azerbaijan.
	And for example, in 2016, Azerbaijan attempted an offensive against Armenia, and Russia quickly intervened with peacekeepers and enforced a ceasefire.
	And that was the program for a long time.
	But that was only the program because Armenia had a pro-Russian government.
	It wasn't until one of these color revolutions happened in Armenia in 2018.
	They called it the Velvet Revolution.
	When the pro-Russian regime in Armenia was overthrown, and a new Prime Minister was put into power, who has gradually shifted Armenia's loyalties to the West, they said that this Velvet Revolution was European in character, quite like Ukraine, like the Euromaidan, like other color revolutions in Central Asia or Eastern Europe.
	They recently attempted one in Belarus.
	And so in 2018, during this Velvet Revolution, they overthrew the pro-Russian government, put in place a more pro-Western government, and in recent years, the Armenian government has brought in the United States to do joint military drills, and they've brought in the United States to do other things, which Russia doesn't like.
	And so, basically, in this situation, Armenia was begging and pleading for Russia's support, and Russia effectively allowed Azerbaijan to go in and invade, and refused to lift a finger.
	They said, okay, you want support from the West?
	You want a realignment?
	You want democracy?
	Well, then the United States can help defend you.
	The problem, of course, is that Azerbaijan is an ally of NATO.
	Azerbaijan is closely aligned with Turkey and Israel.
	And of course, Turkey is a NATO member and Israel is our closest ally.
	And Armenia has been a member of a treaty organization with Russia for 30 years.
	So, it's a classic case of Armenia caught holding the bag.
	They abandoned Russia before they were really able to get any kind of guarantees or anything meaningful from the United States or from the European Union.
	And so without Russia to intercede in 2020 or without them to intervene quickly in this situation to make it acceptable for Armenia, Azerbaijan was able to go in and just take what they wanted.
	And so the outcome now is probably that these Armenians will leave.
	They're basically at the mercy of Azerbaijan.
	Azerbaijan doesn't want them there.
	And so, more than likely, a large number of them, or maybe all of them, will be forced to leave, and the region will be ethically cleansed.
	And right now, all the Armenian people are protesting at the Russian Embassy in the Armenian capital, and they're protesting the current Armenian government.
	They want the Prime Minister overthrown because of this terrible disaster here.
	And that's the situation and it basically puts an end to a 100-year conflict where they tried to get this region in Azerbaijan under the control of Armenia.
	Looks like it's never going to happen.
	And that's probably over.
	So that's the outcome.
	I don't, again, really think there's too much significance for the United States necessarily.
	Uh, like, strategically it's not very important.
	It doesn't seem, uh, this region in particular.
	Um, so I don't know that there's really a big tie-in.
	It's funny, because everybody was asking me about it last night.
	It's like, I don't know, man.
	It's kind of like what's going on in Niger.
	Who cares?
	Or what's going on elsewhere?
	I guess the only connection you could draw is that in some ways it's similar to what's happening in Russia, or rather with Ukraine.
	Same story.
	Ukraine has a pro-Russian leader forever, and they're in the Russian sphere of influence, the government's overthrown, NATO tries to put their footprint there, and then Russia invades.
	This is not quite the same thing, although it's similar.
	You know, it rhymes.
	2018, probably a Western-backed coup.
	I think that's plausible.
	Anywhere there's a color revolution, you bet that's what's going on.
	Pro-Russian government's overthrown.
	And although Russia hasn't gone in to invade or anything, now they're making them pay the price in a different way.
	And Russia's passivity on this issue is basically the pro-Azerbaijan position because without Russia to intervene, Armenia is far weaker than Azerbaijan so they were able to come in and do what they want.
	And of course, I mean, I don't... If I were to take a side just because I would be on Armenia's side because they're Christian, but they also kind of got what they deserved.
	They threw Russia to the curb even though Russia was their patron.
	And then they got pressed.
	I mean, I don't know... What can you really say?
	It's cause and effect.
	I don't know that you can really be mad.
	Azerbaijan has the superior air force, so... Without Russia, what are you gonna do?
	We see the answer today.
	Nothing.
	They're just gonna take it.
	So, that's the situation over there.
	And it's a crying shame, but they got what they voted for.
	They wanted the West, they wanted... I think it was just five days ago they were doing military drills with the United States.
	Some help that turned out to be, right?
	Now the United States can't help them.
	So, I of course also don't support Azerbaijan because they're backed by Israel.
	And they have a very suspicious relationship.
	Where Azerbaijan is like this with Israel.
	And they make these weird statements.
	The president of Azerbaijan said that their relationship was like an iceberg because so much of it was under the water.
	And you see that a lot in the Middle East.
	It's a lot of these countries that are the beneficiary of their relationship with Israel.
	With security ties, with energy ties, economic ties.
	But they don't want the rest of the Muslim world to know because the people would hate them for that because they all hate Israel.
	Same can be said about Saudi Arabia.
	But Azerbaijan is vital to Israel because it supplies a large percentage of their oil.
	So it's not really based in any kind of ideological religious affinity.
	It's more just self-interest.
	It's about the oil.
	So anyway, I mean, I guess that's that.
	I feel like I had more to say about that, but not really.
	I mean, I think it's pretty cut and dry.
	They lost their little territory and that's it.
	But it just goes to show the United States is not a reliable ally anymore.
	The United States just is not what it used to be.
	I don't know why anybody would want to be allied with the United States at this point.
	When you look around the world at the people that we back, we're really not helping them other than Israel.
	All of Europe, it's been catastrophic.
	Our alliance with Europe has just been a disaster for them.
	And I'm not talking about the grand scheme of things, but just in recent times, we blew up the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which is the biggest act of civilian sabotage ever, probably in the history of the world, maybe.
	This was a massive multi-year project that cost a fortune and we were the ones that destroyed those pipelines and that severed Germany from Russia.
	They can no longer get the natural gas they need and they really have no alternative for that either.
	They're disassembling their nuclear and we cannot replace the natural gas from Russia with liquefied natural gas that it's very costly.
	We have to send it over on ships as opposed to through a pipeline.
	So not only did we destroy their investment, but we also hurt them with energy and now they're de-industrializing because of the high cost of energy.
	So that's Germany's friendship with us.
	You look at Ukraine, we're just shredding their population.
	Watch what's going to happen in Ukraine.
	Whenever this war ends, that country is going to be raped by blacks.
	And I don't mean to be provocative when I say that, but this is how it goes.
	Ukraine is going to be shredded down to the last fighting-age male.
	And a lot of people aren't thinking about what comes after the Russia-Ukraine conflict because it seems like it will never end and it's sort of this impasse right now.
	But in the near future, whenever the conflict ends, you can bet there is going to be a call, screenshot this, where they're going to say we have to replace the population we've lost with immigrants.
	Which is such a shame, because you look at Eastern Europe, which has been less affected by mass migration than Western Europe over the years, And you could say that that may be the gateway for all these Sub-Saharan African migrants and Middle Eastern migrants.
	To start entering into that part of Europe.
	I mean, I don't think that's a crazy prediction.
	Because our alliance with Ukraine is doing nothing for them.
	They're not going to recover Crimea.
	They're not going to recover Donbass.
	They're probably going to lose even further more territory east of the Dnieper River.
	And when all is said and done, they're going to have no men left.
	They're going to have no No working-aged males left in the country.
	So that's a problem in itself.
	And then they'll get the even worse compound problem, which is migrants to replace them.
	So that's them.
	And then with Armenia, they switched over in 2018.
	Now they lost their 100-year secession battle.
	So I mean, what's really the benefit at this point?
	Those are just three examples recently.
	There's your pal, the United States.
	Meanwhile, look at all the countries allied with Russia, or China for that matter.
	You look at Syria, and if it wasn't for Russia, Syria would look like Libya right now.
	Of course, NATO and the United States tried to do to Syria what they did to Libya.
	They went in in 2011, and they deposed Muammar Gaddafi, and the country has been a failed state ever since for 12 years.
	There still isn't essential government.
	It could split into two separate countries, and it's been warlordism ever since, which is just literally the worst case scenario.
	That's worse than having a dictator.
	And we tried to do that in Syria to Bashar al-Assad under Obama and under Trump.
	And if it wasn't for Russia, it would have succeeded.
	Thanks to Russia, they've maintained their central government.
	So that's your alliance with Russia.
	And then, as far as these countries in West Africa, I guess it remains to be seen if their prospects will be better with Russia as an ally as opposed to France.
	And we'll have to wait and see all these other countries that are awaiting their entrance into the BRICS or Shanghai Cooperation Organization.
	But all these other countries in the last one or two years that have announced their intention to join BRICS, we'll have to see if they accrue any benefit from allying themselves with this anti-US coalition.
	And those would be Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Egypt, Brazil.
	So, we'll see.
	But needless to say, this is another case.
	It's another scenario where we see the changing world order.
	And you know, I was thinking about it the other day.
	I said recently that it was the Ukraine War.
	And really, it was the withdrawal from Afghanistan.
	Even though I supported the withdrawal from Afghanistan, when you look at that event, it seems like that is what catalyzed Everything that is happening now.
	I mean, I would say that the American intervention in Ukraine is the most direct cause of this changing balance of power, which is to say that in 2021, it was it was realistically the same balance of power in the world that it was in 2000.
	Not in terms of numbers, but in terms of how the political players were acting.
	2021 was maybe the last year of the unipolar moment.
	And Joe Biden pulls us out of Afghanistan in August 2021.
	And six months later, February 2022, seven months later, you get Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
	And that is the direct cause of all these rebellions we see around the world against the U.S.
	dollar, joining BRICS against the United States or its allies in other ways.
	And we've cataloged all of them over the course of the last year and a half.
	We've talked about how the vote to sanction Russia or condemn its actions in the United Nations are failing.
	Most of the world's population live in countries That are not voting in the United Nations diplomatically to condemn Russia, are not participating in sanctions economically against Russia.
	And we talked about how the weaponization of the United States dollar and the global currency system is backfiring.
	And how a number of countries are moving to denominate their trade now in Chinese yuan, including India and Brazil and Saudi Arabia.
	We've talked about the adverse effects that are happening now in Europe.
	And these calls as a result from that for strategic autonomy, where the German economy is de-industrializing because of the high energy prices.
	And so now you've got the president of France and even leaders in Germany that are talking about courting China.
	And they're saying that we might need a break with the United States and pursue a more autonomous path.
	All the way up through into the most recent developments, like I said earlier, were Saudi Arabia and Iran.
	Have normalized relations in Beijing, something that would have been unthinkable two years ago, and China was the one that facilitated that.
	And the announcement of all these other groups coming into BRICS, countries that are our allies with us, Brazil, Emirates, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Among others.
	And then now finally this, where you see that Armenia has chosen the United States and then immediately got crushed.
	Like, not immediately, but kind of.
	I mean, although they had put a pro-Western government into power in 2018, it was just a week ago that they started doing, for the first time, joint military drills with the United States.
	And then their hopes of Karabakh secession were dashed a week later, a hundred year project over, practically overnight.
	And so I guess the only significance of this is really when you zoom out on a global level and look at the big picture, as well as I forgot even to mention what's going on in Africa.
	All these coups and revolutions against French neo-imperialism in Niger, Burkina Faso, Guinea, Mali.
	You take it all together and this is a different world order, which is actually kind of... For me, for a guy like me, it's an exciting development.
	And probably for all of us, it will wind up being a good thing as American dissidents.
	But it is a pretty spectacular development, the ways in which everything is changing.
	You know, I mean, this is a seismic shift in international politics like we haven't seen in, like, my entire lifetime.
	The balance of power that has basically prevailed since the mid-1980s, more or less, is over.
	You could say that it's like 1991 when the Soviet Union fell or 89 when the secession started.
	But I would say really it's Reaganism. - The world has been one way for 40 years, and now it's going to be completely different and never the same ever again.
	Moreover, with the addition of China, it's completely different than it's been for 500 years.
	Understand, because prior to the unipolar moment where the United States was number one, who were the leaders?
	It was the United States and the Soviet Union.
	And prior to that, it was Great Britain and Germany.
	And before that, it was Great Britain and France.
	And before that, it was the Netherlands and Spain and Portugal.
	In other words, it has been a European-dominated world, or Slavic for a short time.
	It has been a European-dominated world for 500 years, literally.
	Since 1492, the world has been led by European hegemons, and the great power conflict happening on the European continent is the great power conflict that has been playing out in the entire world.
	And now, for the first time in five centuries, it's going to be a great power conflict between posses of different countries that include Other players like China, India, Pakistan, the Middle East.
	Africa is going to be the chessboard.
	I don't know that any country in Africa is going to be a superpower.
	But this is a seismic shift, not just the last 40 years, but really the last 500 years that's playing out right now.
	And the problem is that it's a very fluid situation.
	That's what makes it so dangerous.
	And a lot of people pointed out that In the last 24 hours, this conflict in Armenia and Azerbaijan could have escalated into a regional conflict.
	Iran said that if Turkey got involved, that Iran stood ready to invade Azerbaijan, that would have been a very big deal.
	And you're seeing more and more that small conflicts are very quickly at risk of becoming great power conflicts.
	You have these tripwires everywhere and you've got great powers operating everywhere in a proxy way.
	And so this transitional stage is very dangerous as the periphery of the United States world order recedes and as the periphery of the Chinese world order expands.
	There is a lot of opportunity for disaster and it's only going to be when things settle down when things are sort of if China slows down once China reaches a plateau of sorts.
	Yeah, we're they sort of expand to a reasonable limit.
	Then things I think are going to get a little bit more predictable and stable, but we're living in this transitional period where China and Russia are pushing and the United States is pushing back, but they're they're getting pushed.
	And that's where the danger is.
	That's where the problems are.
	So it's a very it's a very tricky situation that's why stuff like this I guess becomes newsworthy because it's in situations like this where it can draw in other players and turn into a big problem and you know we talked about this earlier in the year I think there was one point
	Where there would have been three simultaneous wars on three continents, where we were looking at the war in Ukraine between Russia and NATO, and there was supposed to be a coalition war in Africa, and then there was going to be a war between Israel and Lebanon, which may happen still.
	And so we'd be looking at, and I think that still may be on the menu for 2023, Great power proxy wars on three continents all at the same time, which hasn't happened in that way since the Cold War.
	And that says something, you know?
	If we're backing France fighting the Russian-backed government in Niger, while we're backing the Ukrainians against Russia and Ukraine, while Israel's at war in Lebanon, and that has certain risks of escalation as well.
	And in the meantime, you've got China conducting larger and larger drills off the coast of Taiwan, which is yet another theater which may go hot within the next five years.
	So, that's a very dangerous time.
	But Nagorno-Karabakh doesn't matter that much.
	That much we know.
	But it does play into this larger trend so so anyway so that's that that's just some I'm just thinking out loud here about the whole situation but I mean this isn't really such a big deal it's just another one of these ancient border disputes from the 20th century that basically had just yet to be resolved.
	And honestly, that's all you could really say about it is, I mean look, you got these secessionists, they're in the country, there's two ways that's gonna end.
	Either they're gonna secede or they're gonna get kicked out.
	Azerbaijan has more guns, so they're getting kicked out.
	That is what it is.
	But I'll bet Armenia's regretting their color revolution now.
	Not so bold anymore, but that's that.
	I want to move on.
	I want to get into Russell Brand and talk about the situation with him.
	And I didn't think that I would talk any more about it because, like I said, I don't really follow him very closely.
	I'm not the biggest fan.
	I think he's a smart guy.
	I like some of what he says, but I said on my show the other day, I guess my reason that I'm not so interested in his content is because He's just not that edgy.
	And I have always had a problem with people who pretend to be edgy, but they're not.
	And not for edginess sake, but I have a problem with people that they wave the bloody shirt and they pretend to be truth-tellers, martyrs.
	They're making a real sacrifice to bring you a concealed truth.
	And then you watch their show and it's not anything that you couldn't find on TV.
	And people want to say, well, but so-and-so has the right position on COVID or on the World Economic Forum or whatever.
	And it's like, they talk about that on Fox News.
	How controversial is that really?
	How threatening to the power structure is that really, if they're able to talk about it on TV?
	Not very, I don't think.
	So if you want to go out there and put forward a mild critique of the system, I actually support that.
	I just don't love when people dress it up and say, oh I guess I'm a politically incorrect conspiracy theorist.
	It's like you're really not.
	You're really just like an honest liberal, rather than these liberals that only act as apologists for everything the government does.
	You know, when I listen to Russell Brand, I mean, he's pretty clever and he says some things that I agree with, but his critique of the system comes from a liberal point of view.
	So it's not really an earth-shattering thing.
	Anyway, we covered this already.
	He's been accused by the British press of rape.
	Four women have come forward and accused him of rape or sexual assault.
	And I covered it on my show and I said it looked to me very plainly like this is political in nature because the allegations go back 10 and 20 years.
	They say the allegations are from a time period 2006 to 2013.
	And I'm always suspicious when the allegations are like 10 years old.
	But they're especially suspicious when they're 10 years old and they only happen to see the light of day when the target of the allegations became a right-wing sensation.
	Because that always seems to be the timing, doesn't it?
	Like Brett Kavanaugh.
	It wasn't until Brett Kavanaugh was put up to be the Supreme Court nominee that suddenly this woman emerged from 40 years ago to accuse him.
	It's like, I would be skeptical enough if she came out and accused him in the 90s, or in the 2000s, or in the 2010s, but she comes out and accuses him 40 years later.
	Oh, but only when he's being confirmed as Supreme Court Justice?
	Clearly there's a pattern there.
	And we see that happen with a lot of people.
	Donald Trump, Roy Moore, Brett Kavanaugh, many others.
	And this is only the latest.
	So the accusers had nothing to say for 10 years.
	And in fact, not only did they have nothing to say, but even in the accusation they admit that they were effectively dating him.
	And that's the other aspect of it.
	Not only with these allegations do they come 10 years later, and conveniently, they come much later, but they arrive when that person becomes a right-wing sensation, and when you look at the content of the allegations, it's never really a rape.
	Ever.
	I don't think any single one of these allegations has ever been that a woman has been completely raped.
	It's always something like, well, we were drunk at a party.
	Well, we were dating.
	Well, we were on a date.
	And then it went too far or he did something I didn't like.
	And so that...
	When you get through to the end of all those things, all those qualifications, I just don't even care at that point.
	Why should any of us be expected to care?
	Of course, if somebody had an accusation that Russell Brand held a woman down and raped her against her will, and she had evidence in a police report, and she came forward in a timely manner, and it was proved in a court of law, then yes, obviously he should go to jail for rape.
	But that's never the case.
	Always the motivation appears to be opportunistic.
	It's someone coming forward after a long period of time and they arrive at a very convenient inflection point in that person's career.
	And the content of the allegation is never really that dramatic.
	It's always like in this case.
	There's a young girl who gives a story that she was dating Russell Brand for weeks and he put his penis in her mouth.
	Now you can imagine.
	That if Russell Brand is dating a woman and knowing what we know about him and what we know about men and women, they were having sex.
	So the allegation is like, they had sex at a moment when the girl wasn't into it or something?
	Like, I'm sorry!
	That's not a rape!
	And that's an example of one of the kinds of allegations that we hear.
	And anyway, so I said as much earlier this week, That I don't really believe any of the allegations and even if they were true, they hardly sound like anything arrestable or criminal or even all that bad to begin with.
	Even if any of that were true.
	What's interesting though now is we saw what happened this week and he was accused and many people came to his defense.
	It's the usual politically charged thing.
	Liberals are on the women's side.
	Conservatives are on the accused side.
	But now there's another wrinkle which has come out of this whole thing which is that in response to the allegations YouTube has demonetized Russell Brand's YouTube channels.
	Every single one of them.
	And on top of that the British government has put in a request or a demand to the live streaming platform Rumble for them to do the same thing.
	For them to demonetize Russell Brand.
	And this is a story from BBC.
	It says, quote, YouTube has suspended Russell Brand's channels from making money from advertisements for violating its creator responsibility policy.
	Creator responsibility policy.
	Nice.
	It says, meanwhile, the BBC said it had removed some programs featuring the comedian and actor from its streaming service.
	It comes after he was accused of rape and sexual assault between 2006 and 2013.
	He denies the claims, saying his relationships were always consensual.
	YouTube's decision to block his revenue stream applies to all channels that may be owned or operated by the 48-year-old.
	Author and chief executive Sarah McCorkadel of the Social Media Analysis Agency C.O.R.Q.
	estimated that Brand made about 2,000 to 4,000 pounds per video.
	She said, quote, he was probably making more revenue from YouTube than any other platform.
	Everything existed to drive people toward his YouTube channel so that probably was a significant revenue stream that has been paused.
	And they're saying it right there.
	They're saying it out loud, which is that that's the goal.
	Here's a guy.
	He's right-wing.
	Let's accuse him of rape.
	And everybody says, huh, that all you got first time?
	It's 2023.
	Everyone's been accused of rape.
	Everyone that's right-wing has been accused of rape.
	Nobody cares.
	So then they just went for his money.
	And they said, oh, well, we'll just prevent you from making a living.
	We'll ban you from making money.
	We will take your most profitable revenue stream and we'll just shut it off.
	Even though it has really nothing to do with what you're accused of.
	That's all that this is.
	And if you were uncertain before, you can be sure now that that's what this is about.
	That it's all coordinated.
	And you know it's coordinated because we know that the British Parliament is involved.
	And this is the other part.
	This is how we know it's coordinated.
	This is from another source.
	It says, quote, The UK Parliament tried to get an additional platform to do the same thing, but it refused.
	Chris Pavlovsky, the CEO of Rumble, the platform that is home to Brand's show, announced on social media that he received a letter from the British government requesting that he cancel the actor's show, meaning that he rip up their contract and demonetize.
	The letter invited the company to follow in YouTube's footsteps and to demonetize Brand's content as well.
	Pavlovsky took to Twitter to share the events.
	He posted the letter he received in Rumpel's response which refused to accept the request.
	So here's a relevant detail in all of this.
	The BBC is government media.
	So the British press, which is government-sponsored, does a hit piece about Russell Brand.
	The government-sponsored British press then goes to the British police and they begin a police inquiry.
	Then the British Parliament, which is part of the British government, goes to YouTube and orders them to demonetize his show.
	And then they go to Rumble and ask them to do the same.
	We can presume that they did it to YouTube because they did it to Rumble.
	And they didn't simply say that Rumble should demonetize, they said that his contract should be ripped up and his show cancelled.
	So, in a matter of 24 to 48 hours, the British government has written a hit piece, opened a police inquiry, and then ordered not just the termination of his show and censorship, but also financial sanction in the form of demonetizing his content so that he can't make money from it, even the content that already exists.
	So what are we supposed to make of that other than this is a government hit job?
	This is like an assassination without the guns.
	That's all that that is!
	They run with a story in the national press, go to their own police, the legislature goes to big tech to shut down the show and shut down the revenue stream, and it all happens in a period of one day.
	One day.
	They all got together.
	take some years to build a bridge or a factory or to pass legislation or to complete Brexit.
	But in one day, they can destroy this entire guy's life.
	Reputation, money, his catalog of content, because of course he's a media figure.
	So they banned all the media he's created on the BBC streaming service on YouTube and attempted to unrumble.
	What are we supposed to make of that?
	Meanwhile, and this is the best part, at the same time, the United Kingdom is a crime scene People are getting raped every day by Muslims.
	People are getting raped and their heads chopped off by Muslims every day.
	There's no go zones.
	People can't even go there.
	They carry around long swords and cut each other's arms off with them.
	But on one day, this rapist, the 10 years ago rapist, The rape somebody 10 years ago and never since and it was so bad that they didn't come out until today?
	That guy they can get in 24 hours and just crush him before the paperwork's even done with the police.
	Really?
	It just goes to show that this is how it works.
	For anybody that had any doubts that it's coming from the top, this is how it works.
	If you are a dissident, if you go against the government, this is what they do.
	They hit you in the press, and the press galvanizes the people, and then they say, oh look, the people are up in arms.
	Let's get the police on this guy.
	Let's get the federal law enforcement, national law enforcement on this guy.
	And so on and so forth.
	This is what they do.
	And this is the modus operandi everywhere in the Western world now.
	How many examples of this have you seen at this point?
	Alex Jones.
	Ricky Vaughn.
	Donald Trump.
	Andrew Tate.
	Nick Fuentes.
	Now Russell Brand.
	Tucker Carlson.
	They do this to everybody.
	Elon Musk.
	Justice Department just can't get enough.
	Going after Tesla and SpaceX.
	They don't hire enough refugees.
	Elon Musk received too many benefits.
	They discriminated against a black person at their factory.
	This is what they do.
	Securities Exchange Commission gets on his back.
	Think about all the people, think about all the biggest voices that are offering dissent, and really the most effective people, because it's not just anybody, it's the people that are really making a difference.
	And have any of them not had some degree of media hit piece, I mean at this point that's a given, censorship, and then government moving against them in some form?
	That's all of them!
	That's Alex Jones with the billion-dollar settlement that he has to pay to the Sandy Hook families.
	That's Musk with all these Justice Department investigations into his companies.
	It's Andrew Tate with the investigation in Romania.
	It's Donald Trump with the four rounds of charges in America.
	It's Ricky Vaughn for stuff he posted online.
	It's me with the no-fly list, FBI froze my money, subpoenaed by Congress.
	This is just what they do.
	And the thing is, which is important to remember, is that gives you an idea of the manner in which they go about these things.
	And that erodes the lie that we are any different from any other country because it's becoming more and more clear and actually it ties in sort of nicely with the story about Azerbaijan and Armenia.
	The narrative about Ukraine is something like the dictators of the world are on the march, the autocratic fascist dictators are invading the free world, so we have to rally the democracies and the pro-gay, pro-trans, feminist Workers of the world to fight them back.
	It's like the Avengers.
	Now, what's implicit in that narrative, which we hear on TV all the time, is that this isn't a interest-based conflict.
	Meaning that, you know, we want missiles there and Russia wants missiles there.
	So we're gonna fight it out over who can put the missiles in Ukraine.
	They say, no, it's about values.
	It's about ideals.
	We're not fighting Russia because we want the land and Russia's taking it.
	We're fighting Russia because Russia is evil and we're good.
	And Ukraine chose good.
	Ukraine chose us.
	We have to honor their decision because that's democracy.
	So we have to fight to honor their decision to choose us to put our missiles there.
	It's about good versus evil, and good versus evil as personified in these political systems.
	They are fascist, we're democratic.
	And what makes them fascist?
	Well, they don't have a free and fair election.
	They don't have a free and fair press.
	They repress dissent.
	When people oppose the government there, they get locked up, they get shut down, they get silenced.
	And so on and so forth.
	They use brutal repression tactics.
	They use coercion rather than listening to the voice of the people.
	That's the story.
	Now, when you see what's happening here with Russell Brand, you see that our governments do the same thing that Russia or China does.
	The manner in which they do them is just slightly different.
	They do it in a shadowy, cloak-and-dagger way.
	It's true.
	We don't do exactly what Russia does, where Russia may poison somebody or kill somebody or send them up and the charge is like, I don't know, they're against the government, you're in jail because you're against the government.
	At least that's the perception that's been cultivated in the West, that that's how it works there.
	But in the United States, we're doing the same thing, just in a slightly different way.
	If you oppose the government, yeah, they're not going to poison your food, but they will put out a hit piece in the mainstream court press that you're a rapist, and they will arrange for a civil or criminal case against you that will bankrupt you and ruin your life.
	They will censor you.
	They will take away your bank account.
	And even if you don't necessarily wind up in jail, you will be unable to go on in the same way because your life has been utterly destroyed.
	And then, when you turn it back on them and say, hey, like, I am under attack, they say, no, that the people spoke.
	The people did that.
	You know, the government didn't do that, the people decided.
	In this case, when you see the timeline is so short, it's almost like they forgot to pretend that they're responding to public outrage that they cultivated.
	You understand?
	With Russell Brand, or even like Andrew Tate, it was the same thing.
	When they speedrun and in 24 hours they go, hit piece, police, censorship, took away your bank account.
	It's like they forgot the part where they have to pretend that they did all of that as a response to the will of the people.
	Normally they're like, well, you know, look we found out that this guy's terrible.
	Public outcry.
	In response to the public outcry, we will take action.
	Now it's like they forgot that part and people realize, oh, okay, so this is an assassination.
	It happened so quickly.
	How could it be anything but?
	Why does YouTube care if some woman says he's a rapist 15 years ago?
	How does that even make any sense?
	YouTube, which is a video platform, says we were going to prevent you from making money on our platform, not because of the content you posted on our platform, but because some woman said you groped her in a non-consensual way while you were dating in 2008.
	Really?
	And people buy this?
	People think that sounds right?
	Yeah, that checks out to me.
	That sounds like a logical and sane policy, and that's why they banned him.
	No other reason.
	You know that censorship, the reputational destruction, even to the extent the police get involved, these are all different tools that the same people at the top are using against dissidents.
	So there's really no difference then at this point.
	In Europe, they say that the European Union has a democracy deficit.
	You know what that means?
	It means it's not democratic.
	They don't call it fascism, do they?
	They don't call it an oligarchy, like in China, like the Standing Committee.
	They don't call it an autocracy, like Russia.
	They call it a democracy deficit.
	Because, as it turns out, the European Parliament members cannot create legislation.
	They can only vote on the legislation that is put forward by the European Commission, which is not democratic at all.
	So that's a deficit of democracy.
	Well, that's a nice way to say it.
	I guess you could euphemistically refer to the Soviet Union as having a democracy deficit, or Saddam Hussein's Iraq as having a democracy deficit.
	Oh wait, no, in those cases, those are dictators.
	When it's them, they're dictators.
	When it's us, it's a democracy deficit.
	And same thing with Donald Trump.
	When Donald Trump says he wants to investigate Hillary Clinton, well, that's because he has an affinity for dictators, and he's a tyrant and a fascist, because he wants to lock up his political opponent.
	When Joe Biden's Justice Department charges Donald Trump with a hundred things and he's put up for 5,000 years in prison, well, no one's above the law and that's justice.
	Because when we do it, when they do it, it's evil.
	When the Biden government, when the West, when the democracy does it, well, it's something else.
	It's something entirely different.
	At the same time that we are at war with Russia because they're dictators, we're currently negotiating a security guarantee for Saudi Arabia.
	Think about that for a second.
	Think about all the propaganda we've seen over the last 18 months about Russia is the autocrat capital, and fascism is on the march, and China, Russia, and Iran, they're the autocracies of the world, and democracy is pushing back.
	The free world rallied behind Ukraine.
	At the same time that we are pouring billions of dollars over there to defend democracy against autocrats, we are literally signing a deal with Saudi Arabia that will give them the same security guarantee that we have with Japan and South Korea.
	So how does that make any sense?
	Well, Saudi Arabia's not a bad di- I thought it was about dictatorships.
	So in the case of Russia, we have to go to war with them and counter them everywhere.
	In the case of Saudi Arabia, we may go to war with them, for them, if they're attacked.
	If Iran attacks Saudi Arabia, we will have to go to war with them.
	So what's it really about then?
	Is it about values or is it about money?
	Is it about values or is it about guns and money and oil and Israel and things like that?
	Because of course the reason they're doing that deal in Saudi Arabia, why?
	Is so that Saudi Arabia will normalize ties with Israel so that a giant railway can be built from the United Arab Emirates to Israel So that goods from India can go through the Indian Ocean, through the Arabian Peninsula, through the port at Haifa, and into Greece, and into Europe, and enrich Israel.
	That's why we're doing that, by the way.
	So, is it about trade routes, goods and services, money, oil, guns, or is it about values?
	You tell me.
	And of course it's all related.
	That's our system.
	That's our society.
	We just lie about it.
	Every other country talks in plain terms about interest, and about reality, and about the balance of power.
	And in our country, we talk in terms of comic books.
	We talk in terms of Star Wars, and the Avengers, and Iron Man, and superheroes.
	That's what we talk about.
	Vladimir Putin talks about whether or not it's acceptable for the United States to station medium-range ballistic missiles in Kiev.
	And the United States says that Putin is like Thanos, and we are like Captain America, and they're like the Hulk.
	And that's the difference.
	But we're fundamentally the same.
	We'll go to war for a dictatorship.
	If they're allied with us.
	And we'll go to war against them if they're not.
	And the same is true with Russell Brand.
	If Russell Brand is a political dissident, in Russia, if it's a political dissident, they're a hero.
	Give them a book deal.
	Put them on CNN as a contributor.
	Give them a verified Twitter account.
	Give them a megaphone.
	Because we're standing up for democracy.
	When it's a dissident in the United Kingdom or America, the government puts in a request to our free and fair press that you're gonna set him up on a rape allegation and take away all his money and ban him from Twitter and YouTube.
	That's how it goes.
	So the system has gone totally mask-off in recent years, you know that.
	I just don't know how it's defensible.
	I would love to see somebody defend this.
	I would love to see... And here's what I mean by that.
	When you see that the British Parliament is begging YouTube to demonetize its channels, and YouTube does, and they dress it up with this, what do they call it, creator responsibility policy, that's just bullshit.
	But I would love to see like a Stephen Bunnell or any other liberal, because that's all liberals really are anymore, is they just defend whatever the government does, whatever it is.
	It doesn't matter what it is, they will support it regardless, whether it's the mask, the vaccine, the war in Ukraine, censorship, charges against Trump, whatever.
	They're not even of, it's not even a values-based identity.
	It's now just loyalty to the state, that's it.
	And to the Deep State.
	And so in this case, you can see this YouTube policy and say, how does that even make any sense?
	So now you could be banned from YouTube because of things you do in your life?
	So if I'm like a bad husband, YouTube can ban me?
	What's the line?
	How does that make any sense?
	What's more, this is an instance of a guy who's being accused of something.
	Not that he's been found guilty and did it, or he self-identified as doing something like that.
	He's been accused of it.
	So if any person accuses any other person of bad behavior at some point in time, somewhere, YouTube will ban them?
	That just doesn't even make any sense.
	Can I call YouTube and say, Uh, Jackson Hinkle was mean to me.
	Oh, okay.
	Well, under our creator responsibility policy, we have to ban him.
	Where's the line?
	What's the basis?
	How does that even make any sense?
	According to whom?
	What's the standard?
	If the media does it?
	What if the media lies?
	What if the allegations are not true?
	What if a person gets found innocent of a crime if it's something that's even criminal?
	Do they get back pay?
	Do they get back pay plus interest?
	I mean, this is just like a policy that's totally insane.
	There's no way to make sense of it other than it's about retribution.
	That's it.
	YouTube did this at the behest of a foreign government because they don't like the guy.
	And they can't look at the content and say, oh, he got accused of rape?
	Well, now your content violates the policies.
	So they said, well, it's the creator's behavior.
	But of course they didn't find an issue with that until the government asked them to ban him, and they were all too eager to comply.
	And that's political.
	A regular liberal would say that a person deserves their day in court, to be punished by anybody for that matter.
	By the press, excuse me, by their employer, Let alone by the government.
	The government took the steps anyway.
	And that's the other aspect of it.
	Let's set aside this policy for a second.
	Before he's even been charged with anything, the government is punishing him.
	Because it's the government that is pleading with the big tech companies to ban him.
	So even though he never even got sentenced, convicted, or charged, he's just a guy that's been attacked in the press.
	The government is working to destroy his life.
	Which is insane.
	Then you package that all together with everything else that's going on in the country and you realize just what a joke it is.
	A guy like Donald Trump is being set up for 500 years in prison.
	The state of Illinois just made it so that if you go and commit a second-degree murder, you don't necessarily have to be detained before your trial.
	And that's the kind of thing that goes on every day.
	Murderers, rapists, illegal immigrants.
	Illegal immigrants are getting free bus rides, free housing.
	They got an entire community built for them in Texas with the help of a Republican governor.
	40,000 illegals settled in some unincorporated part of the state with trailer homes and roads built so they could go and work, presumably, for the people that have built all of this.
	So that's fine.
	Migrants get a police escort to their free housing and criminals are being taken care of and let out of jail and given second chances.
	But the President and Alex Jones and Russell Brand, the government is going to get those people fucked up as soon as possible because we're a democracy and not like Russia.
	It's just like, you know, the hypocrisy knows no bounds, the lies, the inconsistencies.
	You're seeing the beginning of the end here.
	And in some ways the United States is better positioned, but this looks like the end of the Soviet Union.
	It's the same, like, Insanity going on at the top.
	Loss of confidence in the regime.
	Complete loss of legitimacy.
	And there was a good article in UN's review this past week that made that comparison.
	And in many ways it looks a lot like that.
	It's this empire that's falling, supply chain issues, allocation issues, military weakening relative to the other powers.
	But our regime is maybe a little better positioned than theirs was, but that's what it looks like.
	It's like an empire in free fall, and it's happening at a rapid pace.
	Like I said, we've got this 500-year seismic shift happening, and it's coinciding with this internal battle.
	At the same time that America's failing in the world, and America's having to attack its allies, and losing support from people that might be on the periphery between us and China, at the same time that's happening, there's a rebellion in the streets going on, and they have to be killing their dissidents, metaphorically, because so many people are rising up and critiquing the government and calling for revolution.
	Like, it's over.
	Things are going to get very ugly in the next 10 or 15 years.
	Because all around you can see that the old system, the American-led order is dying and the American government, which is at the core of that, the nucleus of that, is decaying as well.
	So this is a very volatile situation, but...
	I mean that's of course how Russell Brand plays into the whole thing.
	It's just such a, it's incredible.
	The UK Parliament getting involved.
	If that doesn't tell, if that doesn't show you the whole story and vindicate everything we've been saying for years, I don't know what does.
	Because for so long they try to pretend like if you got a hit piece written about you, it's cause you're a freaking asshole.
	If the media called you a racist, sexist, anti-Semite, rapist, Nazi, whatever, It's called Don't Be an Asshole.
	And it doesn't matter who you are.
	Even liberals would get canceled and they'd say, hey, just don't be a freaking asshole.
	And when people got censored, they said the same thing.
	Well, don't break the rules.
	If you don't want to be censored, you shouldn't have said this, that, or the other.
	It was your fault.
	And...
	Now we see government, media, and big tech all working together as one, in coordination, rapidly, to just select a target and fucking pull the trigger and take them out.
	That's just what happened here.
	And they did the same thing with Andrew Tate, and they did the same thing with Donald Trump, and the same thing with Alex Jones.
	This is what they do to everybody.
	So, that's that.
	And it's because of what he said.
	If you thought, like I said, if you thought a couple days ago, hey, maybe these allegations are true, now you know.
	It's bullshit.
	But that's that.
	I want to move on.
	I want to take a look at our Super Chats and see what you guys have to say about all this.
	Let me get set up here.
	And I'll take a look.
	Pretty crazy stuff.
	But I mean, none of it really surprises me because I've lived it, you know, and we've been saying this for a long time, but it's outrageous the way it's happening.
	Okay, let me get my water.
	Okay, let's take a look.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I don't know.
		I haven't really looked into that specifically, but probably the usual suspects.
		There's all sorts of NGOs that facilitate this.
		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I haven't really looked into that specifically, but probably the usual suspects.
		There's all sorts of NGOs that facilitate this, all sorts of international NGO groups that facilitate this migrant invasion.
		And I'm sure they're in cahoots with the locals.
		So I'm But I haven't looked into that specifically.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		No.
		I absolutely disagree with that.
		No, I don't think so.
		I think Trump was very unique.
		down to some other celebrity type like Vince Vaughn or Jim Caviezel.
		This will be the last boomer election cycle and traditional politicians will be less common.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I totally disagree.
		I, I, I absolutely disagree with that.
		No, I don't think so.
		I think Trump was very unique.
		That's a, that's, I'm sorry, but that's a really stupid opinion.
		I've heard that from a lot of people.
		They say, like, celebrities are going to run.
		Here's the thing.
		Most celebrities do not have what it takes to be in the national spotlight in politics like that.
		They just don't.
		They just don't have it, in my opinion.
		I think that a lot of people look at Trump and they severely underestimate His political acumen.
		They see him as a celebrity turned politician, but he's always been a politician.
		He's always been an ambassador, so to speak, for his company.
		And so, I think people underestimate him and they sell him short when they say, well, he's just a TV guy that ran for president.
		Yeah, not quite.
		He happened to be an extremely unique and extremely competent Celebrity who happened to run for president.
		He was also a developer and he had also had an interest in politics for 30 years, even longer really.
		So no, I totally disagree.
		I think maybe someone will try.
		I think someone may try to emulate Trump's success.
		I think that no one will have the success that he has had because Trump is really a hybrid figure.
		Trump was well known in the GOP for decades before he ran.
		He spoke at CPAC.
		He was a regular at Fox News.
		He had talked about running several times and with differing levels of seriousness.
		He had been to New Hampshire.
		He thought about running on the reform ticket.
		I think he even announced in 2000.
		And he was a national figure and so he was sort of hybrid in politics, in business, and a celebrity at the same time.
		That's not the case with these other people.
		And none of them had the kind of star power that he had.
		He was really, truly a massive celebrity with huge staying power.
		So he was extremely unique.
		And not only was he unique in terms of all those variables, but also just as a guy.
		He turned out to be one of the most exceptional human beings in the world.
		Just a completely unflappable, stoic monster.
		No one else is like that.
		No one else in politics is like that.
		There's no one else like that in the world, arguably.
		Let alone some celebrity.
		So if you look at Trump and say, oh he's a celebrity, you're fucking wrong.
		He's Donald Trump.
		He happened to be a celebrity.
		You know, so when you say that, you just sound like an idiot.
		I'm sorry.
		You say that like you know.
		This guy says it like he's an expert.
		This is going to be the last election where traditional politicians are running.
		You're fucking wrong, dude.
		You're just wrong.
		If anything, because, and by the way, look at every presidential election since.
		Were there any other celebrities on the right or left in the last eight years?
unidentified		No.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		There weren't on the Republican or Democrat side in 16, there weren't on the Democrat side in 20, and there aren't any in 2024.
		Who is it?
		Nobody on the left, nobody on the right, with the exception of the only outsider is Vivek.
		I think if anything, that is going to become more common.
		I agree with you that it will be more common to see outsiders involved, but I think they'll come from business.
		I think they'll be these social media types.
		I think it's going to be these more personable, kind of niche ideology types.
		They're really sort of like neoliberals.
		Um, like Macron.
		Like Macron is really the model, because Macron was from the banking world before he became the president.
		And Macron was not quite like a Vivac or a Yang, but he's a neoliberal, similar, I think in a lot of ways a similar disposition.
		So I think, if anything, you're going to get more like that.
		You're going to get more Viveks.
		You're going to get more Andrew Yangs.
		And Donald Trump, to the extent that he illustrates a future pattern, it's because he came from the business world.
		So, Trump...
		Trump, Bloomberg, Yang, Vivek, although Bloomberg is a very different kind of guy than Vivek.
		Still, I think that's where the outsiders will come from.
		The involvement with guys like Peter Thiel and Elon Musk, these Silicon Valley guys, these tech entrepreneurs who are younger and more energetic and visionary, they have more of a political mind than these old-school Wall Street finance types.
		I think that's the future, if anything.
		I don't think it's gonna be more, uh, it's a lot, I don't think Vince Vaughn is gonna replace Trump.
		Genius.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		- Pretty_fly_white_guy sent $3.
		240, put the Trump crocodiles on the border. - Yeah, that was awesome. - J-Pole sent $3.
		Maybe it's a naive thing to say, but I've always wondered how much of the corruption is explicit and how much is a wordless understanding.
unidentified		The later might explain why wokeness gets so much purchase. - Sorry, I wasn't paying attention.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And how much is a wordless understanding?
		A lot of it's very explicit.
		You'd be surprised.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I haven't heard that theory.
		So I don't know.
		I don't think so.
		that the U.S. Pentagon was intentionally designed to look like a satanic pentagram, or is that fake?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I haven't heard that theory.
		So I don't know.
		I don't think so.
		I think, you know, maybe there's some story about it.
		I saw on TikTok some story about how the Pentagon was created.
		And I think they wanted to, like, maximize surface area or something like that.
		They want to maximize floor space.
		I Make it like a big secure building so they have these concentric buildings.
		So, you know, some of that I believe, some of that it's like, okay, I mean, realistically it's fucking shapes.
		If a triangle and a pentagon are like demonic shape like a hexagram a pentagon and a triangle are all suspicious It's like so any building that isn't a circle or a square is demonic.
		Is that what you mean to tell me and any building that has that has less than or more than four sides is demonic Right?
		Because if it was a hexagram, people would say it's demonic.
		If it's a pentagram, people would say it's demonic.
		If it's a triangle, people might say it's demonic.
		You know, so... I don't know.
		I feel like you can't make a building anyway that's not a square or a rectangle without people insinuating that.
		So, you gotta be... Listen, dipshit.
		You gotta be a little bit discerning.
		Like, if you want to come on this show and say, well, uh, you know, here's an explanation.
		Like, for example, when you look at the Large Hadron Collider, and it has a statue of Vishnu outside, it's like, okay, yeah, that's a little weird.
		That's a little bizarre.
unidentified		But when you say, DUH, THE PENTAGON ISN'T A PENTAGRAM!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's like, well, I mean, we have to be a little bit discerning.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You can't just take everything you hear and be like, Is this the devil?
unidentified		Is this the devil?
unidentified		Is this the Jews?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Like, you know, we got to have a little rigor here.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So, I mean, I don't know, but if there's a story out there where they said, okay, we're going to build the Pentagon to worship the devil and this and that, it's like, okay, I'll look at your, I'll look at your sources.
unidentified		But if you're just going to say, look at the Pentagon, the devil thing.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't know, dude.
		I don't, I don't know.
		Maybe it's just a Pentagon.
		Sometimes it's just a Pentagon, you know?
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Devin Higgison sent $50.
		Someone who says that they will never be great because of circumstance, have already stopped their ability to be great before they even gave it a chance.
		With Jesus we can do great things.
		With Jesus we should have no fear and no doubt.
		For he is more powerful than any circumstance.
		Thanks for the awesome show.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So true.
		Absolutely.
		Thank you for the super chat man.
		I appreciate it.
		Although, listen, Jesus is not a self-help manual, okay?
		I don't like when people say, you know, oh, well, I believe in Jesus, so I think I can do it.
		It's like, I don't think that's appropriate, you know, because some people are just gonna have a miserable life and, you know, being a Christian is not going to change that in the sense that Like, I don't believe in this prosperity gospel that says, believe in Jesus and you will get rich.
		Believe in Jesus and you will have a big house.
		You will want for nothing.
		You will be happy all the time.
		Like, that's not, the gospel doesn't say that, okay?
		The Bible doesn't say that.
		So, um, I agree with you.
		We have to put our faith in God, but let's not, let's not think that, uh, You know, God is going to deliver us from all suffering because, like, we're supposed to suffer.
		That's why we're here.
		So... You know... There's two things there.
		Like, you have to believe in yourself to accomplish your goals.
		You also have to believe in God.
		You know, but... I don't know that one necessarily has everything to do with the other.
		Like, Jesus is not a productivity application, you know?
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Wonder Pets Patriots sent $5.
		The Reconquista started from a Christian country half the size of Vermont.
		The Italian state's pre-unification faced French and Austrian domination.
		Germans had every hope crushed after Versailles.
		Half.
		Thanks, buddy.
		Thank you.
		Very true.
		You're right about all that.
		Two halves all of these rose above their lot, faced down the odds and took control of their own destiny.
		You're right about the noble poor sickness infesting the right wing today.
		Thank you for rooting it out, Nick.
		Thanks, buddy.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you.
		Very true.
		You're right about all that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Devin Higgison sent $50.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Someone who says they will never be great because of circumstance has already given up their ability to be great before they even tried.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's a duplicate.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I don't know.
		I think that the United States government has been reluctant to intervene.
		So... I don't see that changing anytime soon.
		with Haiti a few days ago.
		Do you expect a Western intervention there soon or will it remain the Somali of the Western Hemisphere? - I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I think that the United States government has been reluctant to intervene.
unidentified		So I don't see that changing anytime soon, but we'll see. - Adrian Blair sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		King, have you considered recruiting a sports show to Cozy?
		Would recommend Sports Wars or Dreamers Pro.
		Would add some diversity to just politics.
		Thanks King, I will rape, die, and kill for Nick Fuentes.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		No, I will never, I will never invite a sports show onto this platform.
		You know, I forget that sports even exist until I'm occasionally reminded that that's going on.
		Literally like I'll just forget that that's even happening and then someone will Enter and remind me that there are people in the world that are like that care Deeply about sports like I remember one time.
		I told the story before but it was just so funny for me and I went out to get dinner with my dad and the waitress was actually a friend of one of my friend's moms in grade school so we knew her and Anyway, so we stopped and said hello.
		And somewhere in the conversation, you know, it's small talk.
		Oh, what are you up to?
		Whatever.
		What's going on with you?
		And she made some comment about like football.
		She's like, oh, like the season is starting soon.
		And I got to watch my whatever, my Ravens, whatever team it was.
		And in that moment, I was like, I was like, wait, I'm like, what?
		I was just like, well, what are you talking about?
		Then I was like, oh, wow.
		Oh, yeah.
		I forgot about, I was like, I forgot about football.
		I'm like, I forgot that that's going on.
		And it's just so insane to me.
		I see these commercials, these commercials that are marketed towards sports viewers.
		And it's these commercials, you know what I'm talking about?
		It's like a guy in a jersey, like watching the game on the couch.
		And I'm like, I just can't imagine that people are out there doing that.
		That's so alien to me.
		I just can't imagine.
		And no, my entire childhood was about escaping that, was about escaping sports.
		So no, we're not going to bring that on this platform.
		You know, eventually we may open the platform so anyone can stream here, and then if someone wants to do that to me, they could do that.
		But I will never, in this beta period of the website, bring on a sports show.
		I don't know how people watch it.
		The white noise is poison to me.
		Sometimes my dad will be watching it in the other room.
		I hear it when I'm doing whatever and it's just and then he'll like turn it off and I'm like I like wake up I'm like whoa wow I didn't realize that was going on I don't know how people sit there and it's every sport has that golf, NASCAR, football, basketball there's just like this constant white noise and it like disrupts all thinking I don't know how people sit there for like hours and watch this shit It's not for me.
		It's another thing that just isn't really for me.
		You know, I'm not a fan.
		So, no.
		No sports.
		Anything but that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Pete sent $20.
		Nice tie. - Thank you. - Boogly Woogly sent $5.
		Do you know anything about the US government aiding or somehow influencing the cartels?
		Aside from Fast and the Furious.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		- Yeah, they're in bed with all the, yeah, that's how they make their money.
		The intelligence apparatus is deeply in bed with organized crime throughout the world.
		And they will launder it in Las Vegas.
		They will launder it through the shadow banking system in the Caribbean or in other island nations.
		And that's a big part of how they can build up an income that is not appropriated by the government.
		You know, because all these intelligence agencies have their own operations that are off the books and they need funding for that off the books.
		So they'll funnel a lot of money through organized crime to do these kinds of unofficial activities, if you will.
		So they're very involved.
		There's a great book about it called Super Mob.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Farid Lukovic sent $20.
		I saw your Telegram post a few days ago of you reading Thus Spoke Zarathustra.
		Can't remember if you ever talked about it.
		What's your takeaways from the book?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I wasn't really a I mean at the time I was very impressed with it because I was like 18 or 17 or something And it's been a long time since I read that book seven years ago seven or eight years ago But Honestly, I never found anything Nietzsche said to be all that profound, to be honest with you.
		That's why I'm a Catholic.
		Because this whole idea of self-overcoming, be the best you can be, loving your fate... I don't know that I can love fate.
		I mean, I've resigned myself to fate, but I mean, how does the doctrine of loving your fate apply To like a seven-year-old that gets leukemia and dies.
		How can you love fate in that situation?
		And this like self-overcoming.
		Again, this really is assuming a lot.
		I don't know how any non-religious theology or non-religious philosophy can work with so much of the randomness and suffering that goes on in the world.
		I just...
		I don't know how you could square that.
		So, I think it's appealing for a very specific kind of person.
		But it's not, it doesn't seem to describe a universal experience.
unidentified		So.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I don't know what that means.
		You know, there obviously is a difference between being in love and loving people.
		You know, there obviously is a difference between being in love and loving people.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I think that being in love, as someone who has never been in a relationship before, But I think that being in love is one of the great feelings that a person can have.
		That being said, you have to recognize that that is... it's not even really love.
		I mean, people call it that, but I would say it's more accurate to say it's infatuation.
		And infatuation is not real.
		Do you understand?
		Infatuation is not rational.
		It's not lasting.
		It's not real.
		It's a trick.
		Your brain is playing a trick on you.
		And a person becomes infatuated.
		This is like, this is, in my opinion, a biological trick so that people will procreate.
		Because when you think about sex, and your drive to have sex, It is a purely biological drive because it diminishes when your hormones get lower.
		When your testosterone diminishes, when you get older, your sex drive goes down.
		When you have raging hormones, when you're an adolescent, your sex drive is going crazy.
		And this tends to go with infatuation.
		And we find that we're infatuated with people for illogical reasons.
		You know, sometimes we look back and we're like, oh, you know, Really?
unidentified		Her?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, that sort of thing?
		And you can look at other people and say, really?
		You're infatuated with them?
		And so, I think that when you're a guy, you have to be able to, you have to sort of be of two minds about it.
		I think you have to enjoy it, but at the same time, you also have to understand it for what it is.
		You know, that's why they call it like puppy love when people are young when they're teenagers and they fall in love and they think it's like Romeo and Juliet.
		It's like a world ending thing when you get your first crush.
		But then you get older and you're like, you realize, okay, so it's actually not that important.
		That's actually just a feeling and that's it.
		And that goes with anything.
		You can't make long-term decisions or be a slave to any feeling.
		You can enjoy feelings.
		You know, I like feeling my feelings.
		I like my moodiness.
		I'm a very moody person.
		I'm happy.
		I'm sad.
		I'm angry.
		And I like to feel my feelings, but you can't make like bad decisions based on them You have to make decisions based on sound judgment and that goes even a lot of people have difficulty when it comes to sex because it's the strongest most overwhelming one it's all consuming for a lot of people and so when they have that feeling of
		They say, fuck everything else, you know, I'm in love, I'm infatuated, and that's a big problem for guys these days, I feel like.
		So, you know, feel it, enjoy it, use it to get married, but don't, do not ever relinquish your judgment because it'll kill you in the long run if you are a slave to your impulses and passions.
		You see it happen all the time.
		A lot of people do that.
		But anyway, yeah.
		So, no, I don't think that you shouldn't be.
		You should be in love.
		You should be in love with your wife.
		You should be in love with a woman.
		And you should love them.
		But, being in love with them, you know, there's a lot of hazards that come with that.
		Like, you'll find that, you know, and you see this all the time as well.
		Often the people that we're indifferent to, and this goes with anything, anything and anyone, the things or the people that we're indifferent to, they tend to be the things that you attract the most of, and the things that you chase are the most elusive.
		You ever find this?
		I feel like this is true of everything in life.
		The things that you have, that you are completely disinterested in, you attract, and yet the things that you pursue They elude you.
		And I think that being in love is one of those classic cases, although sometimes you hear these stories about people, they're persistent enough and, you know, maybe sometimes the opposite is true.
		But I think what Myron is saying is that when you're in love, you give more control to the woman.
		That's what he means.
		When a guy is in love, he becomes a simp.
		He becomes deferential.
		He becomes his girlfriend's bitch and that you can never allow.
		No matter how much you're in love or love a woman, you can never let her be in control.
		Because it's like with anything else.
		You set an expectation.
		And what happens with a lot of guys is they're in love with a woman.
		And they will make all these accommodations for her.
		Because the woman really wields all the power in a certain respect.
		And they'll be in a relationship.
		And then they'll get married.
unidentified		Excuse me.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And the rules and expectations that were set in the honeymoon phase when the guy was head over heels.
		Those are the expectations and the standards that endure afterward.
		And so this is where a lot of guys set themselves up to fail because they get married and they're total simp pussies and they bend every woman's demand, they will bend to it, and then three years later they wake up and they're like, they're like, wait a second, I'm a prisoner in my own home.
		I'm a prisoner in my own life.
		I've become a colonized person.
		So, you gotta be aware of that dynamic.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		No, I don't think so.
		We're far from that happening.
		We're far from that happening.
		Nagorno-Karabakh does not pave, necessarily pave the way for that.
		Jezer corridor which would allow energy and military infrastructure to flow from Turkey to the Caspian to the rest of the Turkic world.
		This relates to eventual clash between Turkey and Russia which many say will be start to haunt World War III.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		No I don't think so we're far from that happening we're far from that happening Nagorno-Karabakh does not pave necessarily pave the way for that you're totally wrong about that we'll see I mean maybe I'll be wrong and Azerbaijan invades Armenia and it's a it's a full-on war but I don't think that's gonna happen.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		So... Attila underscore the underscore chud sent $10.
		The illegal immigration is pissing me off pretty bad.
		Especially after what's going on in Texas right now.
		Is it a bad idea to move to North Dakota?
		I figured Somalians wouldn't want to live out there.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Do whatever you want, man.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm not gonna make your life decisions for you.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I guess it depends.
		What would you say about Taiwan and the Baltic countries in terms of U.S. protection?
		Have these countries received a net positive benefit from their allegiance with the U.S.?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I guess it depends.
		With Taiwan, if there is a full-scale war with China, they will be the big losers.
		If the U.S. refuses to relinquish Taiwan, that's the only reason why they've not capitulated.
		China could force them to capitulate if it wasn't for us.
		And if that leads to a war, I think that will be very bad for Taiwan.
		As far as the Baltic states go, Probably Russia would have attempted something similar.
		It's possible, I guess.
		So, maybe they benefited.
		But these are very small states, so... Taiwan, obviously, far more important than the Baltics.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I don't know.
		I haven't looked at it lately.
		The force comparison.
		Turkey or Iran?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't know.
		I haven't looked at it lately.
		The force comparison but I would seem that Turkey would be stronger now That's my hunch, but I don't know.
		I haven't looked at a direct comparison.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Theophilus sent $5.
		Did anyone ever figure out what happened to Coach Red Pill?
		Wasn't he captured by Ukraine or something?
		I randomly remembered that today.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, he got captured.
		He's being... I think he got arrested in Ukraine.
		He's being tried.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Farid Lukovic sent $100.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Right-wingers can even receive some toppy without the Jewish media hating on a nigga.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hey, thank you for the big super chat!
		I appreciate it, Farid Lukovic.
		07's in the chat for Farid.
		I appreciate it.
		Yeah, true.
		He can't even get a little top from a 16-year-old.
		Isn't that insane?
		What a world we live in where you can't even do that.
		Now, you can go and your daughter can cut her breasts off and go on OnlyFans and do all that kind of shit, but a 16-year-old dating a celebrity and a little bit of top and they want to execute this guy.
		It's unbelievable.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Not that I support that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't even know any woman.
		I don't even know what woman could place herself in the same room as me in like years where a credible rape allegation could be made.
		Who would even do it?
		I don't even know any women.
		I literally don't even know any women.
		I can't even think of like one woman I've talked to In like years.
		Like on Telegram or Twitter or anything like that.
		So... Yeah, I don't think I'm in any danger of that anytime soon.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		House sent $3.
		Russell Brands built for BBC, British Broadcasting Corporation.
		Oh, yeah, yeah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's really mature.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, it's spelled SORDID.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		S-O-R-D-I-D.
		But yeah, exactly.
		Yeah, they don't care.
		If you're a liberal, they don't care.
		Someone like Destiny gets away with and how zero accusations get any traction and people even cheer for him and his sordid sexual life.
unidentified		Well, it's spelled sordid.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		S-O-R-D-I-D.
		But yeah, exactly.
		Yeah, they don't care.
		If you're a liberal, they don't care.
		If you're right wing, they kill you.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		That's pretty fun.
		Why Per sent $10?
		As if you have any agency or ability to do anything.
		As if when you say that someone raped you, anyone is gonna believe you.
		You dumb BTCH Sam Hyde women's stories.
		HW_047.
		That's pretty good.
		John sent $3.
		Russia mad over NATO.
		And Andrew Tate working with the wizard.
		Question mark.
		Farid Lukovic sent $20.
		You seemed a bit uninspired last couple of shows that I caught but feels like you're refocused.
		Hope you're doing well.
		The breakdown Armenian conflict and how it pertains to other global issues was masterful.
		Thanks for all the knowledge Nick.
		Love you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thanks.
		Hey, your last couple shows sucked.
		Oh, thanks buddy.
		Really appreciate it.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Adrian Blair sent $3.
		TRS Haven't run a show on Saturday for years.
		Did TRS take Shabbat as holiday?
		We all know Mike Enoch and Jesse Dunstein are enemy to radicalizer Jews and the only thing worse than a Jew is a landlord.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Why is anybody... Okay, first of all, that's not true.
		Okay, landlords are good.
		Second of all, why do people keep talking about TRS?
		Like, nobody cares about TRS other than the two people that keep super chatting about them.
		I don't give a shit about TRS even a little bit.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Thanks.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		- Thanks.
unidentified		Huh.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		- Thanks.
		- Johnny Bravo sent $3.
		What an awesome.
		Smile, great show tonight. - Thanks.
		- The Great sent $5.
		This brand story reminds me why you're the greatest dissident.
		Can't be destroyed with #MeToo.
		Already took on the cancellation.
		Also as to why we should stay faithful and celibate.
		07 King, thank you. - Thank you very much, you're welcome. - Thank you very much.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that's true.
		That is one benefit, is I'll never get accused.
		So that works, but... They'll just find some other way to kill me, I'm sure.
		Hopefully not my company.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		- My God, what?
		- My God, what? - Torn between disdain for women and preserving the white race.
		Help.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		- Shut the fuck up.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		- Kaka poo poo grow I percent $4.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		If falsely accused of rape, should a guy automatically sue for defamation?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		- Ah, no, not necessarily.
		Because, you know, that can be tricky.
		That can be pretty tricky and, You know, in a lot of cases, it's just a matter of interpretation.
		I mean, who's to say, like, you can't necessarily say it's defamation because it's really about what she says she felt like, you know?
		Like, he's not disputing the necessarily the course of the events, he's disputing whether or not it was non-consensual.
		And who can say other than the woman?
		What, are you gonna sue because it's like, no, but you liked it!
unidentified		I mean, that's not like...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		She said that she didn't like it but she liked it and how would you prove that?
		So I think it gets a little thorny when it comes to that.
		I'm very cynical about any kind of defamation lawsuit, honestly.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Christopher Williams sent $33.
		I agree with the super chatter yesterday.
		You should link up with Perry.
		He's an election lawyer in Chicago and a big Trump guy.
		He sued Yee's campaign in the 2020 election for having fake signatures.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't know who that is.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that was kind of based actually.
		No, no, I definitely don't.
		I don't at all.
		Calling India a terrorist state for killing a Sikh.
		Now they were crying and putting out useless travel advisories for Canada and returning all Pajits back to India.
		Barred is a gay named BTW.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that was kind of based, actually.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Josh, the remover sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		You ever miss having to listen to old logic?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		No, no, I definitely don't.
		I don't at all.
		I mean, yeah, what a clown.
		I remember that.
		That was always the... No, no.
		I'm not gay because I listen to logic because I listen to old logic.
		Oh, right!
		Yeah, the very tasteful opinion.
		Right, right.
		Yeah, that's valid.
		Okay.
		Oh, no.
		Listen, he's not a faggot because he listens to logic.
		He listens to old logic.
		Oh, why didn't you just say that?
		Yeah, that's not... Faggots don't listen to old logic.
		I mean that guy was just like the biggest piece of white trash ever and I unfortunately couldn't prevent him from fulfilling his destiny.
		I thought that I would take on an apprentice and we'd both become millionaires and we'd both become powerful.
		Turns out only one of us did that and I thought that you know maybe he could be a number two because he had no ambition But he violently reasserted his own destiny, which is to become white trash.
		So, you know, some things you just have no control over.
		It is what it is.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		White John sent $10.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		So awesome.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's great.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Zirkin sent $3.
		Vivek is 5'7".
		No one that short will ever be president.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Is he 5'7"?
		I thought he was taller.
		Okay, we got some Super Chats on Cozy.
		MilkTeaGroiper with the Super Chat, no message.
		And Leaf says, Hey Nick, I'm banned in chat.
		I was A-logging your uncertain start times, but I kneel.
		Okay, no, I don't... I don't think I will actually.
		I don't... that's not really how it works.
		No, you talk shit.
		If you don't deserve me... What is it?
		If you don't... What the fuck is the expression?
		If you can't handle me at 6 a.m., you don't deserve me at 9 p.m.
		Stay banned.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		One more.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Okay, thank you.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		- One more. - Johnny Bravo sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Casual stream, that is.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		- Okay, thank you.
		Okay, that's our last Super Chat.
		That's gonna do it for me.
		As always, remember to follow me here on Cozy.tv slash Nick to get a push notification whenever I go live.
		Follow me on Rumble and Telegram.
		Links are down below.
		I'm on the air every Monday through Friday, 9 o'clock Central, 10 o'clock Eastern.
		As always, thanks for watching.
		Thanks to our Super Chatters, including Farid Lukovic.
		Thanks to all our Super Chatters, everybody that watches the show.
		We love you and I'll see you tomorrow.
		Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
		Oh shit.
unidentified		Whoops.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First.
		First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First. First.
		Americanism.
		Americanism, not not globalism.
		will be our credo in It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.

▲