All Episodes
Sept. 7, 2023 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:29:25
TRUMP BARRED FROM RUNNING??? Lawsuit Seeks To REMOVE Trump From ALL BALLOTS | America First Ep. 1212TRUMP BARRED FROM RUNNING??? Lawsuit Seeks To REMOVE Trump From ALL BALLOTS | America First Ep. 1212
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:12:29
s
streamlabs matthew tts
05:03
Appearances
Clips
a
alex jones
00:20
d
donald j trump
00:24
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
donald j trump
It's going to be only America first.
unidentified
America first.
donald j trump
The American people will come first once again.
unidentified
With respect, the respect that we deserve.
From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
alex jones
America first. America first. America first. America first. America
unidentified
first. America
first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first.
Thank you.
nick fuentes
Good evening everybody.
You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Wednesday.
We have a lot to talk about.
Lots to get into.
Big show.
Is today Wednesday, by the way?
I don't even remember what day it is.
Wednesday, Thursday...
Okay.
This is Wednesday's show.
It is Thursday, but it is Wednesday's show.
Okay.
It's tough to keep things straight these days, but just because it's so... What a world, right?
But anyway, I want to get into our featured story tonight, which will be about Donald Trump and his access to the presidential ballot.
It looks like liberals are now changing up their strategy, or adding things to it.
We've talked for the past few weeks about all the indictments that Donald Trump faces from the DOJ and in New York and Georgia and even some civil suits which are not as publicized but nevertheless still add to the legal trouble.
But there's now a new campaign that's being waged against Trump's 2024 campaign which is to get him removed from the ballot in various states.
And so far there has been action in the state of New Hampshire and in the state of California, and now a lawsuit is being brought in Colorado, and all of these moves are trying to get Trump off the ballot.
So that even if he runs, even if he becomes the nominee, even if he makes it to the general election, people will not be able to vote for him on the ballot.
And this is because of a provision inside the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which says that if a person has an insurrection against the government, if there's any kind of taking of arms, or taking up arms I should say, a rebellion or insurrection against the government, they are prohibited from running for federal office.
Historically, it comes from the Civil War.
And the statute hasn't been invoked since 1869.
The point of it was to prevent people who had served in the Confederacy from then going on and holding office after the conclusion of the war.
So it literally has not been used up until this year since 1869 because that was the initial reason for it and that was the application.
But now they're saying that January 6th constitutes an insurrection and therefore the 14th Amendment would disqualify him.
And so in various states they're seeking to use that provision to prevent him from appearing on the ballot, which would guarantee that he would lose.
If he's not on the ballot in any of the states that he needs to win, and no doubt this will not affect him most likely in any red state, But if, for example, they could get this across in a state that he would need to get to 270 votes, it would prevent him from winning, which would be a big problem.
So we'll talk about that.
We'll also be talking tonight about this new action by the Department of Justice.
They're moving against the state of Texas.
In Texas, the state government has made some efforts, although not enough, not nearly what is required, But the state government in Texas is attempting to mitigate the illegal immigration at the southern border and one of the actions they've taken is to put a barrier inside the Rio Grande River.
And so it's a system of buoys which are holding up some sort of barrier and this is preventing people from swimming across the river or fording the river to get to the United States.
And presumably that has kept some illegal immigrants out of the country.
But now the Department of Justice is suing the state of Texas to get that removed and injunctive relief has been provided and the state of Texas has been ordered to remove the barrier.
And that's a good sign that when a final decision is made, it will be official that a court will decide that they cannot deploy any kind of barrier like this because of the threat to the lives of the people that would attempt to cross.
So we'll talk about that too.
It should be a pretty good show.
I have like a hair in my face.
I keep blinking and I don't know if it's an eyelash.
But it's gonna be a good show.
Kind of a slow news day, but that's okay.
It'll still be good.
Before we get into the news, I want to remind you to smash the follow button here on Cozy to get a push notification whenever I go live.
Follow me on Rumble as well.
I'm live on Rumble every night at the same time.
And follow me on Telegram.
The link is down below.
Also, check out our Trump mugshot merch at Fuentes.store.
We're going to be closing that off pretty soon, probably by the end of the week.
Or next week so make sure you get it while you can Fuentes.store And with that I guess we'll dive into it I don't really have too much else to say we've been covering the ADL like every day this week and Thursday and Friday last week Not a lot of major developments today other than what I've been saying the last last couple days So I don't really have an update there for you I guess all eyes are just on Elon Musk.
We're waiting to see if there's going to be action on this lawsuit or on the data dump, which he has committed to doing.
And we'll see if anything comes of it.
I am excited though, because it seems that he's still interested.
He's still engaging with it as of today.
Although these activist groups are catching on.
There's been a few hit pieces about me now about this from ADL themselves, and now from a few others, from this Angry White Men website, and Media Matters is coming after me now.
And it's not even me!
I'm not even the one that invented this!
They won't even name Keith Woods.
Why not?
I mean, hey, I'll take some of the credit.
Hey, I will humbly accept some of the credit, because it's been a phenomenal operation, but we all know I didn't start this, so if someone's going to get arrested over this, it shouldn't be me.
I'm just saying, look, hey, I'll take some of the credit.
I definitely helped in a big way, and I deserve a percentage of it, but if anyone's going to jail for this, if anyone's going to be targeted as a result, It's got to be Keith Woods, because he was the one, he started it.
He put the first post, he started the hashtag.
Blame him!
If you're looking for credit to give, I definitely get some.
But if it's somebody's fault, we all know it's his fault.
So, I just want to put that out there.
Because I know a lot of people are getting thrown in jail these days.
People are getting locked up for 20 years.
And this time, just like the other time, I can't take all the credit, so... Nah, I don't think anyone's gonna go to jail, but... It is kind of BS.
How come he doesn't... Why doesn't he get his name in there?
It's just people keep... I didn't even do this one!
I get attacked anyway.
That's okay, but... We're gonna move on.
I want to get into the news here.
Our first story's about this barrier in the Rio Grande.
And it's just amazing.
The southern border is just open now.
I mean, and you thought it was open before.
You thought it was open under Obama or under Trump.
It's just open.
There's no border anymore.
Because they just come through without even being obstructed.
Like nobody even attempts to stop them from coming in.
There's no barrier.
They've even taken parts of the wall and cut them out so that people can come through the wall.
Have you seen this?
Where even the 500 miles of fence that Trump built, they're cutting holes in it so that people can get easy access and get into the country.
The numbers are worse than ever.
Literally, that's a factual statement.
They are worse than since we started keeping track of them.
And I gave Trump a lot of crap in 2019.
Because at that time the number of crossings was the highest it had been in 20 years, 19, 20 years.
It's even higher than that.
It's significantly higher than that at this point.
And like I said, there's no effort even to apprehend or stop these people.
They show up at the border and the legal Framework has been dismantled, which would allow for law enforcement to keep them on the other side of the border, or turn them away, or remove them.
And the physical barriers are quite literally being deconstructed.
And this is the latest example of it.
Today, an injunction was given in a lawsuit that was brought by the Department of Justice, which will now force the state of Texas to remove a barrier that they had imposed in the Rio Grande River.
And this is a story that says, quote, A federal judge ordered Governor Greg Abbott on Wednesday to move a barrier of floating buoys in the Rio Grande that was placed by the state of Texas to discourage illegal crossings from Mexico, concluding that it was an impediment to navigation on the river and a threat to human life.
Go figure.
That's kind of the whole point, is to deter people from entering the river, you know?
They say, well, this barrier's gonna kill people.
That's sort of the point.
And it's not that we want people to die, but we want people to show up there intending to cross, see the barrier, and say, damn, we can't cross.
Guess we shouldn't, and leave.
That's sort of the point.
And probably some people will attempt it anyway and maybe they'll drown, but they're committing an illegal act.
So, maybe somewhere along the line there has to be a consequence or a penalty.
And if the federal government doesn't want that to happen, maybe they should let Border Patrol return these people from where they came.
Just an idea.
They say, this barrier's gonna kill people.
We gotta get rid of it.
It's like, that's the whole point!
We put it there to kill people.
We put it there rather to deter people from entering.
That's like why you build a moat.
It's why you build a wall.
It's why you might have a gun.
Like, so that if people try to intrude on your property or the premises or whatever, your castle, They can be turned away, that's the point.
Anyway... It says the Justice Department filed suit in July arguing that the barrier violated a federal law that prohibits structures and navigable waterways without federal approval.
It said the barrier placed in a section of the river in the border city of Eagle Pass endangered migrants, hampered the operations of the Border Patrol, and harmed diplomatic relations with Mexico.
Although they say that it's hampering the operations of the Border Patrol, Border Patrol can't keep people out of America legally.
Do you understand?
Illegal immigrants, they intend on encountering Border Patrol.
That's the point.
They surrender to Border Patrol.
They want to be apprehended.
And this is because of an abuse of a federal statute regarding asylum seekers We're basically any person can cross the border illegally, be apprehended, and declare that they're seeking asylum.
And under the federal law, we have to allow them to reside here while we adjudicate their request.
And in the meantime, they get released into the country.
That's illegal immigration now.
That's the minors and that's the adults.
They come here seeking asylum.
And every country where they're coming from is messed up.
So there's some legitimacy to it.
And in many cases there are non-profits or even the governments themselves We'll educate these people on exactly what to say and the requirements necessary so that they can exploit this loophole in our law.
That's why when Donald Trump said, when Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best, he meant they're literally sending their people here.
They are telling their people, go north and tell them this.
Give them the script.
And if they read that script to our law enforcement officials, then they have to remain.
So it says it's preventing Border Patrol from doing their job.
The law is preventing Border Patrol from doing their job.
I mean, theoretically, their job is to patrol the border and turn people away who are not legally permitted to cross, but the law doesn't allow them to do that.
And this is a big part of the Trump administration.
Border policy was to build up a legal regime which would allow Border Patrol to do their job.
And they used COVID regulations and they used other things and over the course of the first term they had made it so that illegal immigrants could be turned away.
They would be forced to remain in Mexico while their asylum was processed and And they made all kinds of other changes that allowed Border Patrol to keep them on the other side, but that has all been dismantled.
It's like I said, they dismantled legal and the physical barriers.
So, when they say, well, the Border Patrol can't do their job, they already can't do their job.
This is doing the job that they're not permitted to do.
The article goes on and says, Judge Ezra of the U.S.
District Court in Austin ordered the state to move the roughly 1,000-foot barrier to the U.S.
banks of the river by September 15th while the legal case proceeded.
In issuing the preliminary injunction on Wednesday, the judge found that the federal government was likely to prevail on the merits of the case whenever there was a full trial.
So the injunction forces Texas to do this, even though the case isn't finished.
Although the judge assumes the government will win.
The federal government, that is.
It says, the court found that the problems posed by the barrier, which federal authorities said included a risk of drowning by those trying to cross the river, outweighed the interest that Texas had in controlling migration into the state.
The judge's order also halted any new floating barrier construction.
So in other words, they're literally saying that the interest of the drowning migrant takes precedence over the interest of the state in controlling migration.
And that may be like the most perfect summary of all of our laws that we've seen to date.
Where you have this invasion going on which is destroying the country.
Even the mayor of New York City today, who's black, People say that it's about, it's racist, it's about race hatred.
This just demonstrates that this is a, in addition to being actually a racial problem, on a fundamental level it's just a logistical problem.
The mayor of New York City, who's a liberal, democrat, black, he said today that the illegal immigration will literally destroy the city.
He literally said that.
He said they're gonna go into the neighborhoods and they're going to destroy the city.
And it's true.
The same thing is happening in Chicago where black residents are freaking out at their black mayor because of the burden that illegal immigration poses to the city.
So Trump was saying it in 2016 and they said, oh you're a racist, you hate Mexicans.
They were airing these revolting videos of Mexican children flipping him off and everything.
And now it's eight years later and even the black people, even the black Democrats I'm like, okay.
What's with all the illegal immigration into the country?
And this is how, in other words, severe the state of affairs is.
That's how bad things are.
And yet you've got judges, American judges, saying, well, the lives of the migrants are more important than that.
Even though they're committing a crime, even though they're literally invading the country and destroying it because of the volume of people invading the country, well, They still matter more.
And that's really the thesis statement of the government at this point is the foreigners matter more.
The immigrants matter more.
Israel matters more.
Ukraine matters more.
Like they all matter more than you do.
The suffering that they will visit upon you and your family and your neighborhood That's yours, and that belongs to you, and we can do nothing about it because it's really about them.
They are the priority.
I mean, that's what they're saying.
That's not me saying that.
That's not a far-right, radical extremist saying that.
That's a judge saying, and he's saying it in a legal way, but I think it's a pretty dramatic expression.
He says that the risk of drowning by those attempting to cross the river, and the only people that are crossing the river are illegal immigrants.
Nobody needs to get from Mexico to the United States by swimming across the river unless you're an illegal immigrant.
So they say, the risk of drowning by those attempting to cross the river, illegal immigrants, outweigh the interest of the state of Texas in controlling migration.
So, in other words, if people die trying to invade our country, we just have to let them in.
We have no legitimate interest in controlling the borders of our nation if the people attempting to invade could die while doing so.
So we're just giving up.
We're like, oh, this way that we control migration could kill them?
Let him in.
We'll figure out some other way.
Alright, you know, you got us.
Come on in.
We don't want to kill anybody.
Come on in.
And they come in and they're bringing drugs and they're criminals and they're just polluting the place.
They're just wrecking everything.
We can't make our cities into refugee camps.
We can't do that without destroying the quality of life and without introducing scarcity.
But we're totally unwilling to prevent it, even with, like, lethal force.
Oh, well, you didn't say those barriers were gonna kill him.
Alright, let him in.
Let in millions of people.
They're coming in by the millions.
We gotta start.
The government has gotta start doing things that would deter them from coming in.
Let's put it that way.
People would always say, but if we build a 30-foot concrete wall, they might fall off and die.
unidentified
It's like, well, maybe they shouldn't be up there.
nick fuentes
That's kind of the point.
They shouldn't be up there.
Either they remain on the other side, or if they get to the top, they will fall off and die.
On some level, that sends a message.
On some level, it's delivering a consequence.
The ground is being delivered to the person at the top of the wall.
With a crushing force of gravity.
And that's sort of the whole point.
Do we take our borders seriously enough to let illegals die?
And honestly, it even extends to everything like that.
It's even like George Floyd.
People say, well, he didn't deserve to die over a counterfeit bill.
It's like, yeah, but he was resisting arrest.
And people say, but they put their knee on his neck and he couldn't breathe.
And it's like, yeah, but you can't fight the police because the police enforce the law and the law is what keeps everything orderly and stable.
So you can't do that.
So eventually people have to be killed by police.
You understand, like, there's a principle at work here.
Things don't really matter unless you're willing to kill to protect them.
And that goes for everything.
That goes for your family, that goes for your religion, that goes for your nation, that goes for the borders, that goes for the law.
Now I'm not saying that people should feel emboldened to go and kill other people I'm not saying that.
But I am saying that as a society, that's really why we have a government.
Fundamentally, we are delegating the obligation to use violent force to a credible and legitimate source of authority.
That's what government is.
Rather than have everybody fighting each other all the time, or a war of all the individuals in the society against each other, against other tribes, We let the government do that.
And the government is the institution that will kill the criminals, or the invaders, or kill the enemies of the society.
And yes, they have to do that.
Prisons and graveyards.
It's an unfortunate fact of life, but we have to have both of them.
And on some level, it's not happening just even with the border.
It's happening with everything.
We don't want to deliver consequences on anybody for any reason.
It seems like other than being a Nazi.
People can invade the country?
Let them in.
Do we really want to do anything bad to them?
No.
BLM burns down the city?
Well, you gotta hear them out.
That's the voice of oppressed people for hundreds of years.
unidentified
Okay.
nick fuentes
And it goes with even what's happening in Chicago.
These people are doing their teen takeovers.
Ah, they're just kids!
They're kids!
We gotta fund schools so they can play sports instead of shooting each other.
Like, people are shooting each other because there's no ping pong paddles.
Because there's no footballs.
They didn't have a baseball!
Baseball's pretty cheap.
A baseball's like, what, $10?
I haven't bought a baseball in a minute, but...
How much does it cost to go and buy a baseball or a football or a basketball maybe would be more appropriate?
What am I even thinking of baseball?
We all know a basketball would be more appropriate.
How much does that cost?
You really think they're out there shooting people because the price of the basketball is too high?
We need the state or the city to provide more money so the schools can have programs and they could buy basketballs.
That's not why they're... that's besides the point.
But every step of the way, even something like sacrilege, even when they mock God and they do other perverse things, people are voluntary consenting adults and they can do whatever they like.
No they can't.
At some point the government's gotta go in.
Like this.
But we have our judges saying no they can't because the life of the immigrant takes precedence over the right of the state to enforce the law.
Isn't that a trip?
The article goes on, it says, Mr. Abbott's office issued a statement vowing to appeal the decision.
He said Texas is prepared to take the fight all the way to the Supreme Court.
The governor who has pushed the limits of state action on immigration appeared eager for the court fight over his authority to create a barrier along the border.
In a letter to President Biden in July, the government argued that he had the legal right to do so in part because of a clause in the Constitution dealing with state powers during an invasion.
The Justice Department in its lawsuit focused on what it said was Texas's violation of a federal law, the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act.
Dealing with federal jurisdiction over navigable waterways.
Its lawyers also pushed back on Mr. Abbott's assertion of a right to declare a migrant invasion, arguing that only the federal government could make a determination like that.
There's a lot to be said about this.
A lot of it I've already said.
But you understand that at this point in time, the law is a straitjacket for us.
I read a decision like this, and they're saying that the state of Texas, which is being subject to an invasion... Like, I know in theory this is a country, and so the people that are illegally crossing into Texas are then going everywhere else.
They're going into New York, they're going to Illinois, they're going to California.
But Texas is the state that's on the border.
So Texas is the state where these people, all of them, have to set foot first.
For the most part.
I know they cross in other states, but you understand the point.
If they're going to go to New York, they're in Texas first.
If they're going to go to Illinois, they're in Texas first.
They're going there first.
So they're dealing with the surge more than anybody.
And this is putting a strain on that state.
It's not, again, in theory, putting a strain on Montana or Kansas or Nevada, although the illegal immigrants will make their way there.
It is first and most intensely putting a strain on that state, on those cities in that state.
And so this is a perfect situation where the governor of that state would have a constitutional authority which is protected by the 10th or 9th Amendment Which would allow the state to protect its borders and prevent these people from ruining these cities, prevent Texas from becoming a stop along a long caravan route from Nicaragua to New York City.
You'd think that that would be the perfect opportunity for, and this is totally reasonable and sensible, For the state government to use its National Guard or its law enforcement and its means of defense to stop this problem.
This is where the federal law becomes a straitjacket.
Then comes in the federal government and says, well that violates the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act, which says that the federal government has to say what goes in all navigable waterways.
Seriously?
Does that even make sense?
But a judge is going to adjudicate this and say, well the statute says the federal government didn't approve these barriers in the Rio Grande and that violates the Rivers and Harbors Appropriations Act.
So it's gotta go.
So in this case, the federal government, number one, apparently they can control all rivers.
All rivers and all harbors.
Anything that goes on there, they can control.
So that means all trade, all international trade, all trade over a waterway, and all transportation over waterways and everything like that in the United States.
So states that live along navigable waterways, they have just forfeited their right.
So that would be every state along the Colorado River, along the Rio Grande, along the Mississippi River.
And every state with a harbor, which would be like the whole East Coast, the whole West Coast.
Every state bordering the Great Lakes, I suppose.
What does that leave you with?
So that's the extent of the federal government's control.
And then, of course, because the federal government, which is captured by interests in Washington, D.C., because they are okay with the country being invaded by illegal immigrants, they can go and defeat every state that wants to stop it.
And so in this case, and by the way, Greg Abbott is not doing a good job at all.
He's doing the bare minimum to prevent illegals from coming in.
It's outrageous the situation in Texas.
They have built migrant settlements.
Real estate developers have built ghost towns, and not ghost towns like it's an uninhabited town.
They have built towns that aren't on a map.
They're not incorporated.
They have these unofficial cities of illegal immigrants in Texas, which the governor allows because the people that benefit from and run them give money to Greg Abbott.
So he's not even a border hawk.
But this is just an example.
Here's a perfect case where it would be appropriate for a state government to take action on something like this.
And instead of the law helping the people, instead of the law helping the country, It's a straitjacket that hurts the country.
It's a straitjacket that, when read to the letter, will constrain the government from doing the right thing.
And you see this happen constantly.
Like with social media.
We cannot prevent the ADL from blackballing Twitter because the First Amendment doesn't have anything to do with private companies.
Oh really?
So that means that companies can be boycotted and divested from and subject to monopolistic practices by the app stores like Apple or Google?
In every case, the law is being used against the people.
Selectively, too.
Like we saw last night with the sentencing of Enrique Tarrio.
When it comes to BLM, well, the prosecutors can give them all a break and the DOJ is just not interested.
When Black Lives Matter burns down a city block in Minneapolis, again, the Department of Justice just simply is not interested in going after those people.
The Attorney General declines to even take an interest, much less investigate, much less look at surveillance footage or subpoena communications or anything like that.
And even the local prosecutors are not interested in charging these people.
But when it comes to the riot at the Capitol, whoa, the Department of Justice asked for billions of dollars, highest appropriations ever, and they hired 500 agents and 1,000 lawyers, and they're going to throw everybody in jail and send a message, and they're going to go for Trump, and you got this prosecutor in Atlanta who says, well, we're going to go after Trump and treat him like anybody else.
And that's when he realized the law is no longer real.
People say we're a nation of laws.
No, we're not.
No, we're not.
I said this last week when they indicted Trump in Georgia.
People think that we have a system.
We have institutions.
We don't.
We don't anymore because the system does not have procedures and laws and guidelines that are followed objectively or universally.
What we now have is a highly personal system.
Where it matters much more who is in charge rather than what they're in charge of, what the procedure or policy or law is.
And so now we have a system that's based on the personal discretion of the people who sit behind the desk.
And Enrique Tarrio BLM is a perfect example.
Where it mattered far more who was making the decisions of who to charge and make the effort to go after them rather than what the law actually said.
Because the same law that applied to Enrique Tarrio applied to BLM.
The same law, the terrorist sentencing enhancement, that equally applied to the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone or Minneapolis or Chicago as it did to January 6th, but it was never used.
And it was not used because, again, of what was written.
It was not used because of the personal discretion of the people that were in charge at that time.
So it's not a nation of laws anymore.
It is a nation of men.
Because it is the men, and this has always been the case, that's why it matters you have good people.
Because ultimately it's going to be good people that enforce the law objectively, blindly, in a just way.
So it's always been a nation of men, it's just that they were men that cared about the law.
Now it's people that don't care about the law.
And so now it's a system that whether it is criminal justice or these political matters like Trump and the Proud Boys, or it's these criminal matters in a big city like Chicago or San Francisco or L.A., or when it comes to the border and people pouring across the border, it matters who's in charge and what their agenda is.
Because at that point, then, the law is just an instrument for the execution of that agenda.
It doesn't stand for anything by itself.
Which is a big problem because the laws are created ultimately to protect the people.
And to protect their vital interests.
Which are not really up for debate.
When we think about what people want or need, everybody says it's a big debate.
It isn't!
What people need is to be safe, and they want prosperity, and They want to protect the value of the product of their labor, which means real estate and the stock market and things like that, which they invest in, or the interest rate, the solvency of the currency, or the viability of the currency.
It's basic stuff like that.
They want food.
They want healthy food, clean water.
They want shelter.
They want living space.
Like, these are really basic things.
And the law is supposed to guarantee them for the people through the government.
The government's supposed to regulate the activities of the people so that these social goods can be enjoyed by the people.
But when the law becomes this partisan instrument, now the interest is no longer like in this case.
Keeping illegal immigrants out of America is necessary.
For the public good.
It's necessary.
For people to be safe, we need to have a border.
That's like first and foremost. - First.
We don't know who they are.
So, as a matter of fact, we don't know if they're violent, we don't know if they're criminals, we don't know what their intentions are.
We have to assume that they are all those things, because we don't know.
If you knew they were all doctors and lawyers and something, I mean, then it would be a different story, maybe.
But that's just it, we have no idea.
It also happens to be the case that it is an illegal business.
Getting people to America from Mexico is a business that's run by coyotes and by drug dealers and smugglers.
So by definition, we have no confidence these people are hard-working.
If they were, they'd have a legal means of getting in.
If they were totally clean, if they were totally winners that we would want in our country.
What they are is some collection probably of economic migrants or peasants and scoundrels.
That's who's coming across.
Anybody that we would really need to have in here, that we really want or need, they would find some way to come here legally.
Or you know what?
They'd be better off where they are.
So the people coming in illegally are people with no options, who have nothing.
That's why they're able to flee.
And so they come here as, by definition, peasants or serfs.
And as a consequence, they're probably illiterate, don't speak English, they have no belongings, they have no education, they have no capital, and they're getting in here through their connection to organized crime, and they're doing it illegally.
So by definition, we have to keep these people out to keep the people safe.
We have to keep these people out so that we can have an orderly society.
We have to keep them out so that we can have a thriving economy.
Like, all these things go hand in hand.
But in this case the law is being abused so that we can't do that.
It's being used to prevent us from doing those things.
So in this case the law is killing the country.
The law which was created by representatives of the people is being turned around and used against them to benefit illegal immigrants.
The law is now benefiting illegal immigrants to the detriment of the people.
Just like it is in the case of Trump and the Proud Boys and BLM.
And that's why the strategy that we are using involves manipulating the lot in the same way to our benefit.
That's why I don't want to hear... When a bunch of black teenagers go to the store and steal everything and break the windows and shoot each other, it's a teen takeover.
Teen Takeover?
That sounds like, you know, Miley Cyrus is hosting a Teen Takeover at Just Us at the mall.
You know, that sounds like a joke.
You know, Charlie D'Amelio is hosting a team takeover at Claire's.
Not George Floyd is hosting an all-out ghetto ass-whooping.
And Humboldt Park.
Totally different kind of team takeover.
Mike Brown is hosting a straight-up ghetto-ass whoopin' nigga in the South Loop of Chicago.
And anyway.
I don't want to hear those arguments anymore.
Because we live in, just like I said yesterday, a society that has totally fallen.
And that means all options are on the table.
That means don't get caught.
I'm not telling people to beat criminals or do illegal activities.
What I mean is, breaking the law isn't necessarily a moral wrong at this point.
Massaging the law, breaking the law, at this point it's like, just don't get caught.
Because nobody's following the law and they're using it to their advantage to hurt you.
People are manipulating and abusing the law to hurt the country.
And at the same time, they're telling you, you're not above the law.
Well, if they're above the law, then we're all above the law.
Just don't get caught.
The illegals don't even have to worry about it.
They want to get caught.
It helps them.
If you get caught, they will screw you.
And I would say to most people, don't even take the chance.
Don't break laws.
Don't take a chance.
But I am saying that when it comes to politics, if we ever get people that are governors or congressmen or the president, if we're ever in a leadership position like that again, you have to keep this dynamic in mind.
That we're not out to win any Boy Scout badges here.
The goal is to use the law to deliver a political victory, and then we can restore society somewhat.
Then we can revisit the law in a way that makes sense.
But you see that right now, our enemy isn't even the illegals, it's the law.
Right?
Because the illegals are not the ones doing this to us.
I mean, yes, they are the problem in a certain sense that we all see, because they're the ones that are invading.
But we have mechanisms that we're supposed to be able to prevent it, and that is being weaponized against us.
So in some way, it's like, that's even the bigger problem.
If that were fixed, Border Patrol could do their job, and it would stop tomorrow.
So what's really standing in the way?
If you were tasked with solving this problem, how do you stop illegal immigrants?
Oh, I know!
Get an army together and put them on the border, and then get a bunch of engineers together and build a structure that prevents them from coming in.
Like, that's how you would solve that problem.
But not so fast.
The government, which is in charge of all of that, refuses.
So that's really the problem.
And it's not even that people aren't voting for it, because then you might say something like, well, get the people to vote to stop this.
Get the people to vote on referendums and get the people to vote for leaders who will do those things.
But wait, they did that.
They have done that consistently in the border states.
They've done that consistently at the federal level.
It's the leaders that don't do it.
And so that's where we're trying to find where the problem is, and the problem is that it is these giant financial interests that want illegal immigration to continue, because they benefit from it.
And that has to be defeated by a government that is supported by the will of the people, not by the money.
And the problem is, as time goes on, this is why the elections are so important, and the media too.
If all the media is propaganda, and if the elections are rigged, then we can never elect a Caesar.
We can never elect a leader who's going to put the national interest over money.
You understand how this all comes together?
Do you understand how it's all related now?
Because we could solve illegal immigration, but they don't want to.
And we could vote someone in who wanted to, but then they would get sabotaged and thwarted, because that's what happened last time, or overthrown.
How would you fix that?
You need someone in there who is not susceptible to the influence of money.
Because that is what's driving immigration.
It's these firm owners that desperately need ceaseless economic growth, population growth, and wages that are lower, a lower labor cost.
So you would need a leader who's in there who is going to break the backs of the big donors and fix the system.
But in order to elect somebody like that you need to bypass the money-controlled media and the fake elections.
That's why it really comes down at this point to we need to win the media game and we need to win the election game.
Because we elected a guy like Trump and that was supposed to be the solution and there were all kinds of problems and then they set us back by rigging the election and rigging the media like never before.
We elected Trump, and that should have been the moment when, okay, we got a leader, now we're cooking, we can build a border wall, we can fix things.
But money retaliated.
And they said, well, we'll censor everybody.
So that nobody even knows what's going on, and nobody can form the right opinions, and we're just gonna fake the elections.
So you can't even elect somebody that we don't like.
So they set us back.
And that's really where we are.
So that's that.
But I want to move on.
I want to get into our featured story, which is related.
And this is about Trump in 2024.
And we might as well...it's actually a nice segue because talking about how illegal immigration, it's this generational problem that they refuse to solve.
And Trump is a big part of the puzzle here.
So now the new effort that they're undertaking to prevent Trump from winning in 2024, aside from these huge rounds of charges which they have thrown at him in different jurisdictions, they now want to simply take him off the ballot and make it so that people can't vote for him.
They say, well, people still want to vote for him.
They're still going to select him as their nominee.
They say, so we'll just prevent people from being able to cast their vote for him.
And this is from the New York Post.
It says, former President Donald Trump disqualified himself from holding public office and his name should therefore be stricken from 2024 Republican primary ballots, argues a lawsuit filed Wednesday in a Colorado district court.
The suit, filed by the liberal nonprofit group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, cites the 14th Amendment's disqualification clause, which bars any person who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution from holding federal or state office as the basis for the 77-year-old's White House ineligibility.
The president of this group, Noah Bookbinder, said in a statement, If the very fabric of our democracy is to hold, we must ensure that the Constitution is enforced and the same people who attacked our democratic system not be put in charge of it.
We aren't bringing this case to make a point, we're bringing it because it is necessary to defend our republic today and in the future.
The complaint was filed on behalf of six Republican and unaffiliated Colorado voters represented by Crewe and two other law firms and Specifically seeks to bar Trump from the 2024 Colorado primary ballot over his alleged role in recruiting, inciting, and encouraging a violent mob that attacked the Capitol on January 6, 2021, in a futile attempt to remain in office.
The group said, quote, based on its laws, the calendar, and our courageous set of plaintiffs and witnesses, Colorado is a good venue to bring this first case, but it will not be the last.
The seldom-used disqualification clause was included in the post-Civil War 14th Amendment as a means to prevent former Confederate officials from becoming elected officials and taking over state governments and the federal government.
Efforts by the liberal non-profit Free Speech for People to use the 14th Amendment to prevent Marjorie Greene and Madison Cawthorn from appearing in 2022 midterm ballots failed last year.
However, the group successfully sued to remove Cowboys for Trump founder Coy Griffin from the Otero County Commission in New Mexico after he was convicted of trespassing for entering the Capitol during the January 6th riot.
The group says its case against Griffin is the only successful disqualification clause to be brought since 1869.
So they want to remove him from the ballot in the primary.
Which would be a big problem.
Because if Trump couldn't appear on the ballot in a significant number of primary states, that doesn't benefit Biden, it benefits DeSantis.
If Trump can't appear on the ballot, let's say in Colorado, that means all of Colorado's delegates will basically go to DeSantis.
And it's like DeSantis wins Colorado even though Trump would destroy him.
DeSantis will get all those delegates.
So if that succeeds there, they will try it in other states.
If they try it in other states and succeed, they may put Trump in a position where he can't win the necessary number of delegates to make him the nominee.
I don't think that's likely to happen.
But that is a scenario that could play out.
And it says it in this article that they weren't able to succeed in bringing this sort of this clause to work against Marjorie Greene or Madison Cawthorn.
But neither of them were there on January 6th.
They weren't there in the crowd.
But this guy in New Mexico was.
He was inside the Capitol.
And it worked against him.
They prevented him from running.
And Trump has been charged, not with insurrection, but he has been charged with conspiracy and with things that are close enough that maybe a judge might grant that.
And if that happened, it would be a big problem for him, obviously.
And once again, we're in the situation where, like with the indictments for the classified documents, or January 6, or Manhattan, or Fulton County, They do not want him to be on the ballot.
That's what this is ultimately about.
They certainly don't want him to win, but they especially don't want him even to be the nominee.
By charging him, I think a big part of the calculus is it hurts him personally, and it hurts his campaign, and it's going to hurt this argument that he's even eligible.
I know a lot of voters are probably going to say, If Trump is in jail, can he even win the general election?
If he gets convicted next March during Super Tuesday, is he going to be in jail when the general election happens?
They have to assume that people are going to start to think that.
And if they start to think that, it's going to hurt his chances of even being nominated.
So this is a big problem.
And it all goes back to the fact that we really don't have a free country anymore.
You know, because Trump is our guy.
Trump was the guy in 16, and he won fair and square great.
In 2020, they just rigged it.
They just straight-up rigged it, and they rigged it in every way.
They rigged it at the ballot box, they rigged it in the media, they rigged it with the COVID lockdown, and everything.
The way that Congress sabotaged him, and I'm not just talking about the Democrats, I mean Republicans too.
And the impeachment, and the special counsel, and all of it.
And like we've been saying, he was undeterred by all of it.
He still came back.
The people still support him.
And by the way, he's like the presumptive nominee.
If the primary was held today, he would win.
If it was held next year without interference, he would win.
So he still represents half the country.
And that's true if you look at the polling.
It's true if you look at the head-to-head Biden vs. Trump, head-to-head DeSantis vs. Trump, Trump vs. the field.
And this is about unelected Activists getting in the way and saying you you can't vote for him.
So it's bad enough that you can only vote for two people to be the president.
You can really only vote for a Democrat who's totally controlled or a Republican who is basically controlled every time except for Trump.
Now we have an election where the Trump should be the nominee but they're getting in and saying nope try again it can only be Biden or DeSantis.
So we really can't pick, then.
There's really no choice.
Trump is the people's choice.
Trump is half the countries behind him.
And they're saying, well, we're just gonna take that option off the ballot.
Do you see how it's escalated?
In 2016, they said, don't vote for him, please.
People said, fuck you, we're voting for him.
In 2020, they rigged it.
And they said, well, you could vote for Trump or Biden, but I'm just letting you know, it's going to look like Trump is winning and then after we count ballots for a month, he's not going to win.
Now in 2024, they're saying, yeah, you can't even vote for him.
We're not asking anymore.
You can't vote for him at all.
His name isn't even on the ballot.
You just can't pick that.
So what are the options then?
It's Biden and DeSantis.
Two guys that totally support Israel, two guys backed by Wall Street, two guys backed by the Jews, two guys that are in favor of immigration, two guys that'll support Ukraine, two guys that... They're basically the same.
They're the same, with like 5% that doesn't overlap.
And so what's the message?
The message is that this is not our country.
That as much as we call it the free world and everything, it's very limited.
What they mean by free world is you can be gay.
That's it.
You're free to be gay, and you're free to be trans, and you're free to get an abortion, and you're free to be a slut.
Like, that's what the freedom means.
It doesn't mean that we are self-governing, which is what it was supposed to mean initially.
Initially it was supposed to mean that the people could determine the direction of the country through their state legislatures, through their vote, through other means.
And the Constitution would regulate the relationship between the people and the federal government.
That was the idea.
But now it's totally different.
Now it means that we're like a more liberal autocracy.
We're like a more liberal oligarchy.
We're an oligarchy like China.
It's just that the values are different.
We're just as democratic as Russia, or China, or Iran.
It's just that we're a little bit more promiscuous as a society.
So, no, you can't vote for the opposition.
No, you can't vote for anything against us.
No, we will never have another Trump elected to office.
No, we will not have citizen journalism.
We will not have a free press.
But, you can be a homosexual.
But, the good news is, you can be a slut.
You can wear yoga pants in front of children.
That's all that that means anymore.
And that's not even an exaggeration, it's just true.
How is it different?
We make jokes about Russia, about how the opposition doesn't stand a chance, and the media is all controlled, and the opposition will do protests and everyone gets arrested.
That's what happens here now.
All those things happen here now.
The opposition is stricken from the ballot, or they try to.
We all know who's gonna win because they basically rig it.
All the media supports the regime, and opposition media is interfered with in a number of ways.
If the opposition protests, they get beat up by these shock troops like Antifa or whoever, or they get arrested.
So we're basically as democratic as Russia.
The only difference is that in Russia, they have a conservative culture.
So in Russia, they don't like the homosexuality too much, and they don't like the feminism as much, although there is a little bit of that from the Soviet Union days.
The difference is that in America, it's just a different kind of societal culture, but the politics is totally tyrannical.
And I wouldn't care as much if it was a good system.
We're locked in with these people that are making the country degenerate and foreign and evil.
That's the problem.
So that's Trump.
I don't know what you do in this case.
If he gets kicked off the ballot, what are you going to do?
If they can't count ballots with Trump's name on it, what are you going to do at that point?
What can you do?
We'd have to come up with a totally different playbook.
We're just not ready for something like that.
It should have been taken care of when Trump was president or shortly after he was removed, but it didn't happen.
So that's where we are.
But that's that.
I want to move on.
We'll take a look at our Super Chats and see what you guys have to say about all this.
And I'm going to keep it brief because I'm starving.
So I need breakfast, but...
Let me get set up here, let me get my water, get my headset on here, and we'll take a look.
unidentified
Okay.
nick fuentes
Let's see.
streamlabs matthew tts
Chicago land grow a percent twenty dollars.
Do you think Obama spending - Sending 65K to cater Chicago pizza and hot dogs for a DC party outside the realm of possibility or was the guy just desperate for a good slice? - You know, it's possible it was just for a good slice, but it seems like it was sex trafficking.
It seems definitely like it was prostitutes. - Pretty_fly_white_guy sent $3.
233.
unidentified
Have you seen Ahsoka? - No, but I might watch it.
nick fuentes
I've just lost all interest in Star Wars.
After Obi-Wan, I'm like... I can't do it anymore.
I've watched so many of their bad series and I... I'm just not interested anymore.
Which is really sad because I love Star Wars and I really had a stomach for a lot of the garbage just because I love the... I love the... What do you call it?
I guess I love the old movies.
I can't really even say I love the universe anymore because they've ruined that.
But I was willing to watch a lot of it just because I'm such a fan.
But after 7, 8, 9, Solo, Rogue One, Andor, Boba Fett, Mandalorian, Obi-Wan, I watched all that and none of it was good.
Absolutely none of it was good.
It all sucked.
The sequel trilogy all sucked.
Solo and Rogue One sucked.
Unpopular opinion, but it's true.
Mandalorian sucked.
Unpopular opinion, also true.
Boba Fett and Obi-Wan both sucked.
Andor sucked.
Andor is a little better.
Andor is maybe the best thing they've made, I guess.
So, at this point I'm like, uh...
I'll get around to it when I get around to it.
Maybe I'll see it.
I want to watch it at some point, but I'm just... Can't do it.
I think they're out of chances for me.
I'm also just not interested in Ahsoka at all.
I'm not interested in all these girls.
It's like a girl show.
She's a girl.
And she's not even part of Star Wars.
I know she was in Clone Wars and everything, but she wasn't in any of the movies, and her lore is not very compelling to me, so...
No, thank you.
streamlabs matthew tts
I agree.
Yeah, I'm a fan.
I don't know.
The Magamoya guy on Twitter is so cool he's like Pantherdin but better.
nick fuentes
I agree.
Yeah, I'm a fan.
streamlabs matthew tts
Dimitom Dres sent $3.
Are Jewish hospitals a form of image washing for the Jewish people?
nick fuentes
I don't know.
I'm not really red-pilled on Jewish hospitals.
streamlabs matthew tts
J-Pol sent $3.
To your point from last night about decline, a large Wawa, kind of like a convenience store, near my house now needs a security guard.
Apparently our dusky friends like to fight there. - Wow, I've never heard of that.
You're telling me for the first time. - Irish Hogs sent $20.
I'm engaged and had to go to a Catholic couple's retreat.
The instructor couples were nice people and practicing Catholics, but both husbands agreed to give up career opportunities plus hobbies.
The wives, nothing.
One even got her husband to do the dishes cuz sometimes she's just too tired.
Tragic.
nick fuentes
Yeah, man.
A lot of these religious people are simps.
And somebody needs to say it, but they just are.
They're simps.
We gotta grow balls, men.
Like, just because we believe in marriage doesn't mean that we don't believe in... I don't understand.
Like, I don't know how you can be a Catholic and simp for your wife.
But you know what it is?
It's a simp culture.
They just happen to be Catholic.
It's a total simp culture and these guys just happen to turn into simp husbands as Catholics.
And they worship their women It's crazy.
Not all of them, but a lot of them do that.
It's very sad.
unidentified
Oh, I get it.
streamlabs matthew tts
We gotta play Among Us again.
Floyd sent $3.
Crewmates try to repair their ship while subversive imposters, who look similar, control over the ship's systems sabotaging them, all just to kill the crew.
Come sabotage anyone?
Seems familiar.
nick fuentes
Oh, I get it.
We gotta play Among Us again.
I haven't played that game in so long, I kind of miss it.
streamlabs matthew tts
Labcraft sent $5.
No, No one superchat tomorrow so Nick can have a peaceful start to the weekend.
nick fuentes
Well tomorrow's Thursday.
streamlabs matthew tts
ChristisKing sent $3.
Hey Nick.
God bless you brother.
Are we going to get more appearances of you on other shows?
I think you on Saucecast was only a win for you and your brand.
We need you on more YouTube videos.
nick fuentes
I hate when people talk to me like this.
Are we getting?
We need you.
Who's we?
Who's we?
Who are you talking about?
Who's we?
We need, we need this.
It just goes to show that you don't actually care about me.
That's it.
You only care about the content that I make.
You don't actually care about me as a person.
And like, I'm a commodity to you.
So when you say stuff like, we need more content, you sound like a fucking golem.
You sound like Gollum from Lord of the Rings.
You know?
And I'm just like your commodity.
I just go and I create this content.
You're like milking me for content.
It's just being extracted from me.
And I'm the golden goose or the content cow.
And that's all that you really care about.
We need this!
Are we gonna get more?
We want more!
Fuck you.
How about that?
And yeah, I'll be doing some more appearances But not because not because you're gonna you're getting them because it's important and I have a message and I need to express myself We need you on more YouTube videos.
Hey, shut the fuck up.
Okay back the fuck off hands off hands off of me right now You know they do it in this friendly way.
We need more of you get your fucking hands off me Okay, get away from me I'll do it when I do it and you'll be grateful.
Don't give me this, we need this, we need that.
When are we getting this?
You'll get what you get, okay?
This is my self-expression.
Crazy.
streamlabs matthew tts
Christ is King sent $3.
Who are you?
Keith Woods.
Nice to meet you.
nick fuentes
Yeah, that was awesome.
streamlabs matthew tts
Are you retarded?
his king sent $4.
Did you hear about the new Tucker Carlson interview where this guy claims to smoke crack and have gay sex with Barack Obama?
Wonder how fast he'll either him or Tucker get into a freak accident.
nick fuentes
Are you retarded?
You really think people talking shit about Obama gets you killed?
Tabloid gossip about Obama.
Obama.
I hope they're okay.
unidentified
Oh my gosh, I hope they're okay.
nick fuentes
The elite does not want you to know that Obama is a faggot.
Dude, everyone knows Obama's gay.
Everyone been knew Obama was gay.
People knew he was gay when they elected him.
And this guy's full of shit.
I mean, I fully believe Barack Obama's gay.
Or bisexual or something.
But this guy's a liar!
He's on crack!
He's been saying this for 10 years.
Apparently he failed a lie detector test and he's a crack addict.
I mean, really?
There's no photos, there's no receipts, there's no nothing.
I mean, I have the same standard with all these people.
I felt the same way when they accused Jesse Lee Peterson.
It was the same thing.
Some crackhead was like, oh, me and Jesse Lee Peterson fucked on the DL for 10 years.
No receipts though, by the way.
Really?
Same with this.
Some crackhead says, oh yeah, me and Obama did it for a month 30 years ago.
Also, I'm on crack.
You know, I don't know if I buy that.
And honestly, you know, maybe there's a timeline where me and Tucker are cool again.
But this isn't hard-hitting stuff.
I'm sorry, but everybody told me for years that Tucker was going to be unleashed when he was off Fox News.
Oh, good thing he's off Fox News.
Now he can give us the real message.
I'm not seeing it.
He got fired in like May or April.
It's September.
He's done like 25 shows.
Not one of them has been based.
Not a single one.
which is like what's the hold up man and this this is like sean hannity level this is like obama era fox news when they're like oh obama's a gay muslim socialist like this is the opposite of base this is blue pill this is like hunter biden tier stuff i don't mean that in a good way And for all the people that say, well he's doing the best he can, look at what Elon Musk is doing.
That's pretty damn good.
What Keith Woods and Elon Musk are doing is the model for how you subversively red pill people.
Why couldn't he do a show like this three times a week?
Where he brings attention to the ADL, or he brings attention to something like that.
Oh, remember the guy who was president 8 years ago?
Well, 30 years ago he had sex with this crackhead.
Okay, I'm sorry.
Who cares?
And all these influencers like Mike Cernovich.
Cernovich goes and says, the right needs to do this to win.
A lot of Republicans don't want to get their hands dirty, but this is what it takes.
It's like, shut the fuck up, idiot.
Do you think this is helping anything?
It's not helping anything at all.
And I don't say that to defend Obama.
I mean, is Obama really even relevant right now?
It's 2023.
Who cares?
Yeah, the Republicans are gonna have to get their hands dirty and learn how to fight.
Yeah, let's dredge something up about Al Gore, I guess, right?
Let's do a hit piece on Al Gore.
Or Tip O'Neill.
That'll show him.
Let's do another hit piece on Maxine Waters.
That'll win the day.
streamlabs matthew tts
Attila underscore the underscore chud sent $10.
New grouper here.
Any sage advice for a mulatto with a mongrel complex?
81% normal, 19% demon blood.
nick fuentes
That's just weird, self-hating shit, you know?
That's just bizarre.
streamlabs matthew tts
Anonymous sent $6.
Hey Nick, what's your favorite Bible verse?
Have a great day!
nick fuentes
Thanks!
Uh, I don't know.
I don't really have one.
streamlabs matthew tts
Shittyator445 sent $10.
Woke up just in time for the show bc I fell asleep early.
Liking this new start time.
nick fuentes
Oh, thanks.
streamlabs matthew tts
Sabian sent $3.
Where can a MF like me get America first hat around here?
nick fuentes
We were selling them, but you missed it.
streamlabs matthew tts
Dirtyduck sent $3.
Oops, I farted.
Max Rhoades sent $5.
Hi Nick, do you think that there is any realistic scenario where a president, whether they be AF or not, could restore manufacturing, steel, auto, etc., as it existed 70 years ago?
unidentified
Yup.
streamlabs matthew tts
Sabian sent $3.
Thank you.
Line Rider sent $3.
So because the 14th Amendment didn't explicitly say INGRs are now citizens and no Confederate presidents we have faggots like Destiny pretending to be constitutionalists.
Sigh.
unidentified
That's funny.
streamlabs matthew tts
John Dave Irving sent $109.
Hey!
Illegal immigrants are just Brown Oliver Anthony's.
nick fuentes
Hey, thank you for the big super chat.
I appreciate it.
Yeah, they really are, but they're just singing it with an acoustic guitar in Spanish, right?
Like they do at a mariachi band.
I would even say the illegal immigrants are better because they just go to work.
They don't complain about there not being jobs.
Kind of a difference, right?
I know that's like a Bill Kristol talking point, but in some ways the illegal immigrants, they're coming to take our shit, man.
They're hungry.
They're coming here to kill whites and take our jobs and fucking cut our heads off.
And they're not singing in the woods like, man, the gringos took our land.
Mexico sucks.
They're marching over here and they're taking our shit.
unidentified
And white people are like, they're taking our stuff.
nick fuentes
But they're not even, they're not even saying that.
They're not even saying these n-words are taking our shit.
Let's go get them.
They're saying, there ain't no jobs because of the rich people.
Them illegals are fine.
They're just like us.
So it's worse.
It's even worse.
It would almost be better if Oliver Anthony was like, these fucking people take all our stuff, and this sucks, and I hate them.
That would almost be better.
But they won't even say that.
They're such bitches, they won't even... They're just crying in a puddle of their own piss about nothing.
Who's doing it to them?
I don't know.
Who's doing it to us?
I don't know.
Is it blacks and Hispanics?
No, they're bigger patriots than we are.
Is it Jews?
No, I like them.
Is it white people?
Yes!
Whites are the worst!
White liberals are worse than anybody!
It's like, okay, so we deserve everything.
We just deserve all of it.
Because they're coming to cut our heads off and take all our stuff and, you know, they're just drinking up our blood, metaphorically speaking.
And we can't even say what the problem is.
You know?
It's the rich men north of Richmond.
That's like the least specific thing ever.
He won't even say D.C.
He won't even say politicians or Democrats or billionaires.
Rich men north of... That's like the least specific way to say anything.
That's like saying human beings.
Those human beings.
Like bro.
streamlabs matthew tts
How would that nullify the charge though?
Morning shows are the best.
nick fuentes
Hey, thanks, buddy.
streamlabs matthew tts
Less than three.
nick fuentes
My man, PradaCell.
Big fan.
streamlabs matthew tts
John Dave Irving sent $88.
Regarding Trump, insurrection is the current attack, but to nullify the charge, he could prove election was fraudulent.
22nd Amendment says no person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice would also bar him.
nick fuentes
How would that nullify the charge, though?
I mean, it wouldn't make it not an insurrection.
Because here's the thing is, the election almost has no bearing on any of that.
Because the real election is when the electors cast the vote.
You see?
The electors cast the vote.
So, if the ballots were messed up, and there was a false winner of the contest, and then the state legislature sent a slate of electors based on that false result, It's like it almost doesn't even matter, because then the state legislature sends the slate of electors and the electors choose the president, and then Congress counts them.
So even if the election was fake, that ship had sailed when the election was certified, it would have sailed when the slate was sent over, it certainly, that ship would have sailed by the time Mike Pence was counting the votes.
So, unfortunately, even if the election was proven to be rigged, the charges still stick.
And I know that sucks, but that's the process.
So how would the 22nd Amendment apply?
If he had been elected twice and then he couldn't run in 2024?
unidentified
If he proved it was fake?
nick fuentes
I mean, that wouldn't help us.
It also wouldn't apply because he didn't get elected.
I mean, he won the election, but he didn't win the electoral college.
So that means he wasn't elected.
You know what I'm saying?
So thanks for the big super chat, but I, you know, and I'm not a legal scholar, so that's just my thinking, but I don't think it would even have an effect if they proved, because he got, Biden got inaugurated.
Biden was chosen.
unidentified
So...
streamlabs matthew tts
Circus Peanuts sent $555.
So awesome.
nick fuentes
Okay.
streamlabs matthew tts
So awesome.
nick fuentes
Okay.
streamlabs matthew tts
So awesome.
nick fuentes
Hey, thank you for the huge super chat.
O7's in chat for Circus Peanuts.
The man.
Thank you very much for the huge super chat for supporting the show.
I really appreciate it.
God bless you, man.
That's pretty awesome.
Thanks for the peanuts.
This is the circus, I guess.
That's where the name comes from.
We need more appearances!
We need more come... We need this!
Shut up!
Just give me peanuts!
Just give me more peanuts!
I'm a circus elephant.
And this is a circus.
Welcome to the circus.
Just give me... Throw more peanuts.
Okay, I'm hungry.
I'm starving and I need more circus peanuts.
No, but thanks a lot.
I really appreciate it.
God bless you, man.
streamlabs matthew tts
Blackwell sent $10.
Nick, keep doing what you're doing.
You're one of the biggest patriots in America, and you're the most attacked because of it.
God bless.
Love the early morning shows.
Watching you on my commute starts my day off right.
nick fuentes
Hey, thanks man.
God bless you.
I appreciate it.
streamlabs matthew tts
Smarty sent $20.
Why does this end keep asking you to watch Ashoka?
It's trash so far.
All female leads.
Disney saw an orange alien main character and jumped to use a black woman actress with orange face paint.
nick fuentes
For real.
Real.
I don't mind the feminist stuff too much in Star Wars because it's like, you know, women in another galaxy, maybe they are badass.
Also, I'm not even necessarily opposed to women being badass.
It's just a way in which they're badass.
They can't do badass like a man can.
But they can be effective in their own way.
When I watch X-Men, Jennifer Lawrence, she's a good villain as a woman because she's sexy.
I have to say, when X-Men First Class came out, which I don't want to get too explicit, but let me just say, when X-Men First Class came out, maybe that's a little freaky, but like, you know, that was pretty hot, I'm not gonna lie.
I'm not even gonna lie, it was pretty hot when X-Men First Class came out and she was blue and naked in, what was that, 2011?
I was like 13.
Anyway, but that's gross.
But that's disgusting.
So, you know, we don't need to get too graphic.
But I recently watched the sequel to that, X-Men Days of Future Past, which came out in 2014.
And again, she's like Blue Alien.
She's naked.
But she uses the power of like her... Her superpower is like a... It's like a stealth superpower.
She's not like Magneto, where she's just throwing fucking missiles at people.
And she's not like Professor X, where she's a super genius.
But she's got, like, this stealth superpower.
It's kind of, like, sexy.
It's, like, you know... And I feel like that's appropriate.
Or, like, um...
You know, but there's like the idea of a femme fatale.
That, you know, that I can get into.
That, I can appreciate.
But like a female warrior?
Like a female charging into battle in the front lines?
Eh, that doesn't really work.
That doesn't really make a lot of sense.
unidentified
So... You know what I mean?
nick fuentes
That's how I feel about it.
So, but Star Wars is totally out of pocket because they're all like have blue hair.
They had the blue hair in Star Wars 8.
And what was that?
Revenge of the Jedi.
What was Star Wars 8?
I don't even know the name of it.
Force Awakens.
Rise of Skywalker.
The Last Jedi.
In the last Jedi, there was some pink-haired general, and in this one, all the Mandalorian women have funky colored hair, and I, you know, I just can't, I just can't do that.
That's just too, too bullshit for me.
It's too anime, too Tumblr.
At least make them hot.
At least make them Natalie Portman.
Remember Natalie Portman as Princess Amidala?
Now she was hot.
That I could work with.
Princess Amidala, let's go.
Princess Leia, let's go.
Or Queen Amidala, sorry.
But this new stuff is just too much.
I can't handle that.
streamlabs matthew tts
J&B sent $10.
Do you think if Trump manages to overcome his legal battles there'll be real change in the establishment or just more of the same?
nick fuentes
Well, that's hard to say.
That's really up to him.
streamlabs matthew tts
John Andrews sent $3.
The ADL have freedom to express, but not freedom to suppress.
nick fuentes
Clever!
unidentified
That's clever!
nick fuentes
Really fucking clever.
streamlabs matthew tts
Grand Admiral Fuckface sent $3.
Tales of the Jedi was the only Star Wars thing I've enjoyed in years.
Count Dooku's backstory was extremely well-executed emo.
nick fuentes
I agree, that was good.
streamlabs matthew tts
Pooh Vibe sent $3.
Balls.
Insurgent Honor sent $10.
My sleep schedule has been so jacked lately but I read somewhere that the most productive creative geniuses have erratic sleep schedules.
Power levels always rising.
nick fuentes
I'm not that productive though, I'm just all over the place.
streamlabs matthew tts
Farid Lukovic sent $20.
Oliver Planthony is a ginger and gingers have no souls.
Great show king.
nick fuentes
Oliver Planthony, yeah.
What is he planning?
streamlabs matthew tts
He's a burning man.
Factual.
I can't be the only one.
nick fuentes
I can't be the only one that saw that. - Yeah.
Okay.
Jennifer Lawrence naked?
Oh, but she's all blue.
Even better.
Even better!
Okay, anyway.
That's disgusting.
You don't need that image in your head.
That scandal.
Occasion?
Nah, we can't do that.
But look, I mean, it's so in your face!
Get your blue tits out of my face already.
Sheesh.
Wurzel says we all like alien bitches.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
Yeah, right.
The weirdness just added to it.
It just made it... Okay, whatever.
Okay, that's our last Super Chat.
That's gonna do it for me.
Okay.
Remember to follow me here on cozy.tv slash Nick to get a push notification whenever I go live.
Follow me on Rumble and Telegram.
Links are down below.
I'm on the air Monday through Friday, 9 o'clock Central, 10 o'clock Eastern Time.
As always, thanks to our Super Chatters.
Special thanks to Circus Peanuts and John Dave Irving.
Big shout out to both of them.
Putting the show on your back.
You're supporting me.
I really appreciate it.
God bless you.
07s to them.
All you cheap bastards.
How dare you?
These guys are holding down the fort.
Thanks to all our Super Chatters.
Everybody that watches the show, we love you.
I'll see you tomorrow.
Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
donald j trump
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
It's going to be only America first.
unidentified
America first.
donald j trump
The American people will come first once again.
unidentified
He's going to be only America first!
Export Selection