America First - Nick Fuentes·Aug. 23, 2023·2024 REPUBLICAN DEBATE: Trump To BOYCOTT First 2024 Primary Debate | America First Ep. 12022024 REPUBLICAN DEBATE: Trump To BOYCOTT First 2024 Primary Debate | America First Ep. 1202·
2024 REPUBLICAN DEBATE: Trump To BOYCOTT First 2024 Primary Debate | America First Ep. 12022024 REPUBLICAN DEBATE: Trump To BOYCOTT First 2024 Primary Debate | America First Ep. 1202
Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Tuesday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight.
Lots to get into.
Big show.
And a big week here on the show.
Our featured story tonight will be doing a little preview of the first GOP presidential primary debate, which will be tomorrow.
So it's gonna be a big week.
Because we have the debate tomorrow which I will be live reacting to.
I'll be streaming it here and on Rumble.
Here on Cozy and on Rumble.
And then Thursday we have the Trump arraignment in Georgia which will be recorded on video.
So we'll be able to stream that as well.
So it's a big week.
Lot going on.
Lot of big events.
Big streams, I hope.
And tonight, like I said, I'll be doing just a preview of the debate.
Tomorrow's the first ever 2024 GOP presidential primary debate.
It's gonna be at 8 o'clock Central Time, 9 o'clock Eastern Time, so I'll be starting way earlier than I normally do.
And it'll be two hours.
There will be eight candidates on the stage.
Donald Trump will not be one of them.
That's the big announcement.
I think that It was just published a few days ago.
Because he had been going back and forth on it up until last week.
But it's now confirmed that Trump will not be participating.
So tomorrow is just... And honestly, I don't even know how it's 8.
I don't even know, like, 4 of the guys.
I have to go to my notes.
Because I know Vivek and I know DeSantis and Chris Christie and Pence.
I don't know the rest of them.
I don't know who these people are or how they qualified.
There's someone from North Dakota.
There's Asa Hutchinson.
I don't even know.
I think Nikki Haley and Tim Scott.
Those are the other two.
So I do know them.
It's just a guy from North Dakota I don't know.
But it's a totally lame lineup.
No Trump.
But it'll be content.
We'll watch it anyway.
And we'll talk tonight about that debate.
I'll give you a little preview and talk about why it's a good thing that Trump declined to attend.
Because I know that was, in some ways, a controversial decision.
And I have to say that selfishly, I wanted him to do the debate.
Because I want the entertainment.
I want to see him beat everybody.
But at the same time, it is a strategically brilliant ploy.
To boycott the debate, and probably all future GOP primary debates, and I'll get into why that is.
That'll be probably the main commentary on that tonight.
And we'll also talk about the broader dynamics of the race.
But that'll be our main story tonight.
So, tomorrow, 8 o'clock Central, 9 o'clock Eastern Time, I'll be covering the debate.
So tune in, Cozy.tv slash Nick, and Rumble.com slash Nick J. Fuentes.
That'll be tomorrow.
And I'll probably stay on a little bit longer and give some commentary after the debate too.
So it's going to be a long show tomorrow and live coverage.
And then the day after, I think it'll be in the morning or afternoon, I'll be covering the arraignment of Donald Trump in Georgia.
Because we've just learned today that that will be televised.
So that's our schedule.
I'll also be talking tonight about Ukraine and this counteroffensive which was supposed to have been underway for a long time, but it started super late.
It was a total flop, total disappointment, and it's just getting worse.
And the big update today about Ukraine They put out a piece in the New York Times, and this is how you know that the coalition is beginning to break down.
Because the New York Times is like the state-sponsored media.
It's like the Pentagon's newspaper.
And there was a big front cover piece in the New York Times today which said that the American generals are very confused about how the Ukrainian generals are running their operation.
They say that they're misallocating their resources, they're mismanaging what's been given to them.
And if you know anything about this, if you've been following it at all, you know that when a piece like this goes out, this is a signal.
This is meant to communicate the wishes or the agenda of the foreign policy establishment in Washington.
So when they run a story where it says, oh the generals aren't happy with what's going on in Ukraine, you know this is coming from the Pentagon.
You know this is coming from the American national security apparatus.
And what that says to me is they are seeding people's minds.
They're preparing people.
for a break with Ukraine.
What that sounds like to me is they're already putting the blame on Ukraine.
This thing is not going to work.
They are going to lose the war.
The counteroffensive is not going to happen.
And so when I see a front page story here in August That says that there is no confidence on the part of our generals in how they're running their war in Ukraine.
That sounds to me like they are getting ready to shift the blame and declare the whole thing's over.
So we'll see, but we'll cover that story tonight as well.
I'm going to talk about the debate first, and then if we have time we'll get into Ukraine, because it's not the biggest thing.
And that'll be our show.
Should be a good show tonight.
Kind of a slow day.
You know, nothing's really going on these days.
We're in the middle of a presidential race, but it almost feels like it's not even happening.
I don't know.
Feels like ever since 2020, these presidential races, they're not as prominent, if that's the right word.
I feel like I just don't even hear about it.
When's the last time Trump did a rally?
I feel like I don't even know when the last time he did a big... If he has, I feel like I've missed it.
Or maybe he just hasn't.
It's a strange time.
And we've talked about that a lot with all these indictments.
It's a very peculiar election, so... Anyway, so not a lot going on tonight, but tomorrow it's gonna be a big program.
Before we get into the show, I just want to remind you, smash the follow button here on Cozy, get a push notification whenever I go live.
Create a Telegram account, follow me here, smash the follow button, get notified whenever the show starts.
Follow me on Rumble, because I'm live on Rumble every night as well.
And follow me on Telegram.
Links are down below for those.
And with that, I guess we'll get into the show.
I don't really have too much else.
Not a whole lot.
I went off again today on Telegram about Vivek.
And maybe I'll talk a little bit about that tonight.
But just saying how it's really interesting because, and I guess we'll get into the debate, it's kind of a conversation about the state of the race as a whole.
So we'll get into the debate now.
I was going to go into, usually I like a little story before I get into the main stuff, but it's part of it, so we'll just dive in.
So our featured story, as I said, tomorrow is the first GOP presidential primary debate, but it's very weird because the frontrunner, by far, is not even going to be there.
And if you've looked at any of the polls at all lately, Trump only continues to expand his lead.
I believe the RealClearPolitics average has him up 41 points over the next highest polling candidate which would be DeSantis.
So he's leading by 41 points.
Which is itself more than twice what Ron DeSantis is polling at.
So, he's absolutely crushing the field and it's only been getting better.
You know, there was a time last year, I want to say in December, which is about when Ron DeSantis peaked in the polling.
I believe DeSantis was at about 30 and Trump was around 43 or 46.
And so it was just after the midterm elections from 2022 that it appeared that DeSantis might be in striking distance.
And there was this heavily AstroTurf narrative that DeSantis carried Florida by 20 points in the midterms.
And that was supposed to be a mandate.
That was supposed to signal that he is the future.
He can carry Florida by 20.
Trump won it by 3.
And so, if Republicans want an electable nominee in 2024, then they have to have a guy without the baggage.
They have to have Trumpism without Trump.
They have to vote for DeSantis.
That was the narrative.
Heavily astroturfed.
I don't think there was ever any grassroots support for that.
I believe that the support for Trump has basically been unwavering and unconditional for eight years, without any interruption.
Even though he went away for a time, I think in 2021 and 2022 he was not visible, or not as visible as he had been.
But his support never waned.
I think that was a total fabrication.
I think that was a rumor.
And anyway, after the midterms, It appeared.
There was this mirage that DeSantis might have stood a chance, and then he announced.
Then he officially entered the race, and all you have to do is look at the chart, you look at the average for the Republican primary polling, and he's just gone down.
The gap has only grown.
DeSantis was maybe within 10 or 15 points of Trump, but basically since he announced, that gap has doubled, has only increased, and continues to increase.
And you'd think that if he had a chance, he would change up his strategy, or maybe it would be a little more dynamic, but it isn't.
Trump has had a commanding lead for basically since he left office.
DeSantis almost got close to being close to being within reach, and then lost it, and then totally slipped, and has never even come close to where he was before.
And so, that's why the debate is weird.
You've got this race where you have a presumptive nominee.
It's not even safe to say he's the frontrunner.
He's the presumptive nominee because it's barring him being prohibited from running for office, he will be the nominee.
I would say that it is virtually impossible that any other candidate will We'll recover that 40 point gap.
Or more for everybody else.
That's just with DeSantis.
So he's not even the frontrunner, meaning that he's at the head of the pack.
He won.
It's basically like he's already won the race.
We know this.
But he won't be at the debate.
And this is a story from Fox News.
This is who will be there.
It says eight Republican candidates have met the criteria to take the stage and will participate in the first GOP presidential debate on Wednesday night.
The eight participants are the North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, former Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson, former Vice President Mike Pence, entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, and Senator Tim Scott.
Former President Donald Trump, the party's current frontrunner, has opted to skip the debate and instead participate in a pre-recorded interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson.
GOP candidates scramble to attract... I'm sorry, that's another headline, which I accidentally put in my notes.
The first debate, taking place in Milwaukee, will air on Fox News' platform at 9 p.m.
ET on Wednesday.
So these are the people in the race, and as I said, you really only have one guy who was arguably ever competitive, and that is DeSantis.
Everybody else has failed to breach 10 points on average, or really in any poll at all.
I don't even know who some of these people are, like Asa Hutchinson and Doug Burgum.
I don't know how they're even getting 1%.
The rest of them we're a little more acquainted with.
Tim Scott, Nikki Haley, of course Chris Christie, Pence, DeSantis, Vivek.
None of these people can't win.
And what's more, none of them can even be on the ticket.
Because I know that some have said that this debate is really like a tryout and it's meant to be an audition For the second place spot to be the Vice President on Trump's ticket, but none of these people would even be there, because they're all anti-Trump.
Nikki Haley, Mike Pence, Chris Christie, DeSantis... None of these people are gonna be on the ticket.
Doug Burgum, Asa Hutchinson aren't big enough.
And then Tim Scott and Ramaswamy, they're the only ones that I think Trump is friendly with, and I think there are maybe, honestly, and it's unfortunate.
Tim Scott might...
I think it's a remote possibility, but he might be on the ticket because he's black and he's from South Carolina.
Although I think he's got a lot of weaknesses, and I certainly think he's the worst Republican Senator in the United States Senate, but just because of this constant need for diversity on the ticket, you know, there is a chance he could be on there.
And Vivek, he's the only other one that is competitive next to DeSantis, and he's one that Trump has been positive towards.
As for the rest, though, I'm not buying this argument that it's a fight for number two.
None of these people are going to be number two.
And there's a slim possibility that two of them would be considered.
So what exactly are we doing here then?
It's a debate which, theoretically, the point of the debate is to allow the voters to discern who should be the president, but none of them are going to win.
None of them are even going to come close to winning.
So what are we doing?
It's like a total exercise.
And of course it makes perfect sense.
Donald Trump says that he is boycotting the debate because when you have a lead of 40 points, all you're doing by going to this debate is just giving everybody airtime.
I mean, let's just say some facts about this debate.
No one's gonna watch it if Trump doesn't go.
I mean, that's the biggest, that's the number one most pressing reality about this is that, and it's been like this for the last eight years, Trump is the show.
If Trump's not there, people don't watch.
Love him, hate him.
He is a magnet for all of the attention, and he is living rent-free in everybody's minds.
He's very powerful.
That's really the source of his power, is he's this mimetic force that if he is not involved, honestly nobody cares.
And it's not just because he's the frontrunner.
He's the frontrunner because that is true.
Which is kind of a curious thing.
A lot of people might say, well, no one will watch the debate because they can't win, because Trump is the frontrunner and he's not there.
But of course, he is the frontrunner because he has this memetic quality.
And has had it for years.
And nobody can touch it.
And nobody can harness it.
On either side.
That's why I've said for years it's a one-man race every time.
Because even the Democrats that oppose him, they're not even running as themselves, they're running against Trump.
They're running as NOT Trump.
Which I've said many times.
So, that's the biggest and most salient fact about this is that no one cares and no one's gonna watch if Trump isn't there.
And as a consequence, if Trump shows up, he's just giving all these people free airtime.
He's just giving them an in-kind contribution.
Why would he do that?
Everybody already knows and likes Trump.
Everyone knows him, everyone knows how they feel, and the majority of Republicans now support Trump.
So why would he go up on the stage To get criticized and attacked and scrutinized by people who are not known and who are not liked.
And what's more, he's making an in-kind contribution in terms of attention.
No one would pay attention to these people other than Trump.
So why would he give them not just the opportunity to undermine him, which is what they'd all be doing, naturally, and some are more vocal about it than others, but Chris Christie is there to stick it to Trump.
He's there to embarrass Trump.
Why would Trump go and subject himself to that from someone who's polling at less than 5%?
And secondarily, but related, why would he go there and share, not just subject himself to these attacks, but share the attention and basically give an in-kind contribution in terms of media to all these people who wish to attack him?
It doesn't make sense.
And then maybe the other angle is this.
Consider that it's Fox News hosting this debate.
Which, if you've been following this story from the beginning, Fox News has been nothing but uncharitable towards the President.
When he was running the first time, during his first term in office, in the post-presidency, they have been nothing but critical.
And a lot of people don't even realize it was at the first Republican primary debate in 2016, where Roger Ailes personally, who was the then CEO of Fox News, he personally saw to it that Megyn Kelly tried to sabotage Trump on the first night.
And at this point in time, it's ancient history.
But the first Republican primary debate in 2016 was in August 2015,
Hosted by Fox News, and this is the first time that people saw Trump on the stage, and it was, I think it was there were nine other candidates in the primetime debate, and I feel like this was more common knowledge back then, but maybe people forget, but Roger Ailes, who has since died, the then kingpin of Fox News, he personally put up Megyn Kelly to ask Trump that question.
about you've called women fat pigs, slobs, dogs, etc.
And that was supposed to be a kill shot.
Because Fox News didn't like him.
Fox News, Roger Ailes, all the anchors, they did not like Trump.
They didn't want him to win.
Even though they created him.
Because Trump had, Trump as a political figure, preceded Trump's first run.
Trump had been a regular on Fox News for years.
And had been at the, had been at CPAC, had been to these GOP meetings, going back decades.
So he was very familiar with that scene, but in 2015 they tried to knock him out because all the usual suspects said, well, he's not a real conservative, he's bad for our brand, he's against immigration, he's against the media.
So, this is why we talk about all the time, Trump is not just against the left and the Democrats, he's against everybody.
He's against the entire establishment.
Because even Fox News, which was, during the Obama administration, synonymous with far-right, extremist, whatever, even they were out to get him.
And it is perfectly reasonable to say that, because the leader of Fox News had it out for him, personally.
And personally oversaw A deliberate attempt to undermine him at the first debate with his girl, because Megyn Kelly was a creation of Roger Ailes.
And so anyway, that's really how it started.
And Trump knows that.
That Fox News tried to take him out, and like everything, it's a classic story.
Trump, when he was president, should have punished Fox News.
He should have.
Deprive them of interviews and exclusives and things like that.
He should have made Fox News his bitch.
But instead he just helped them.
Fox News did nothing but try to stab him in the back throughout the first campaign.
And when Trump was in office he just continually rewarded them.
Calling into their shows and giving them exclusives and doing interviews and all this.
And they were not terrible to him because he was the kingmaker at that time, but as soon as he got out of office, they were the first ones in the 2020 election, for example, to falsely start calling swing states like Georgia and Arizona.
If you remember, I think Fox News was the first to call Arizona before any other station, before they finished counting.
They didn't finish counting for weeks, but Fox News called it first for Biden.
It might have been George.
It was one of them.
So before he had even lost the election, they were already stabbing him in the back.
And there were a number of high-profile defections like Shep Smith and the other gay guy who was there, I think.
A lot of people fleeing Fox News.
Negative coverage.
Negative coverage about the Capitol, about his denial of the 2020 election.
All this to say, Trump is not just sticking it to all the other candidates by boycotting the debate, but also it's long overdue that he stick it to Fox News.
Fox News desperately needs Trump to be there for this to be profitable, and for this to be For this to get any kind of viewership.
And if Trump were to go, and also, by the way, they're demanding all these conditions.
They're saying, well, Trump has to pledge to support the eventual nominee.
It's like, are you kidding?
This is Trump's show, not yours.
You're just the stage.
Trump is the show.
So not only did Fox News mistreat him for close to a decade, and constantly betray him and constantly backstab him, When they need him for this debate, but then they're also going to demand all these preconditions.
One of them being that every contestant in the debate has to sign a pledge to support the eventual Republican nominee.
Which is the same bullshit they tried in 2016 during the primary.
So it's absolutely the right move.
Trump should totally ignore this.
And it almost works doubly so because now it's like not only is nobody going to watch it and nobody cares, but this entire debate stage just looks like the loser club.
It just looks like the kids table.
This is the list of literally who also ran.
The only person this is going to be good for is Vivek.
It's bad for DeSantis because he can't confront Trump.
It's bad for everybody else for the same reason.
The only person it's good for is Vivek who's going to get a bigger stage.
And that's what I wanted to talk about tonight.
Because it's interesting about Vivek.
He's an interesting phenomenon.
He's a child of immigrants from India.
I think his parents are from India and they moved to Ohio.
And he became a self-made, nearly a billionaire.
I think he's got a eight-figure net worth, nine-figure net worth.
I read on Wikipedia he's got $950 million.
She's a self-made, nearly-a-billionaire, first-generation Asian immigrant who, as far as I know, didn't really have much of a public profile or any kind of a political presence and just took the country by storm with a viral social media campaign.
I think people just like what he says.
At least that's what it appears to be.
And he's been controversial.
I think a lot of people like him.
I think even people that don't like him have commended him on his campaign, which has been successful.
He's competitive with DeSantis.
DeSantis had a bigger war chest than Trump.
He had a bigger war chest than any governor in the United States has ever had.
I think he had raised $200 million in the last cycle.
And he had the support of the Jews and Israel and all his money and he's the governor and he is maybe the next best known politician in the race next to Trump and governor of a major state and so in other words he's got all these advantages and this other guy who really started from scratch is now competitive with him.
And I'll say too it is unfortunate his look because you know I know that probably a lot of Republicans are not totally on board with, like, a Hindu Indian.
And I'm not making any kind of comment on that.
I think that's just how things are.
Just like with Bobby Jindal or some of these other guys that ran When I see an Indian guy running with a name like Vivek Ramaswamy, let's not pretend.
I think that's also a disadvantage for him probably because the Republican voter base is all white.
It's 90% white and I know that they're They undertake great pains to convince the world they're not racist, or xenophobic, or something like that.
But, you know, I'm sure they are not in love with that idea.
Quite frankly, I'm not in love with that idea.
I want a Christian to be president, not a Hindu.
And I also would prefer a president whose name I could pronounce, like Joe Biden, not Vivek Ramaswamy.
But, it's the 21st century, we could look at his ideas.
We could look at his ideas.
And also people have said that maybe he's a plant.
People have said, well, he's got these spurious, or I should say suspicious, ties to the World Economic Forum and he took a Soros grant to fund his education in law school.
And he did some suspicious things with his biotech company.
He got vaccinated.
I think he pushed for vaccine mandates.
So people have pointed out there's some allegations that maybe he's not, maybe he's an industry plant.
Regardless, regardless of all that, because I just want to make sure I put it all, I put everything on the table here.
Putting all that aside, I think it is interesting.
Maybe that's the next most interesting thing about the race outside of what's going on with Trump and the indictments and everything, is that this is the second presidential election where you have an Asian entrepreneur, an Asian first-generation immigrant entrepreneur, self-funder, with a viral social media campaign, Because we saw the same thing in Andrew Yang in 2020.
Andrew Yang is not nearly as rich.
I think he's got a net worth of a million or two million dollars.
So just in a totally different bracket.
And a slightly different story, but he's also a first-generation immigrant.
Parents came from Taiwan.
He's from New York City.
Went to great schools.
Became an entrepreneur.
Became rich off of, I think, a medical company.
And then, just like Vivek, got involved, although on the left, with a social media presidential campaign, with no name recognition, with no institutional support, no money.
He was able to take the election by storm, get on the debate stage.
The performance is neither here nor there.
I think he performed far worse than Vivek.
And I think he made some very specific mistakes, which are the reason for that.
But, In two elections, you've had this same phenomenon.
Like I said, they both have these things in common.
They're both first-generation Asian immigrants, very high IQ, very educated, eloquent, well-spoken, and they're really kind of like a new breed of politician.
All the other politicians in this race are like classic politicians.
Like Chris Christie.
Chris Christie is not smart.
He's a politician.
And so when you watch his performances, it's the usual canned political rhetoric, like Political Science 101.
Very conventional.
And it's really more about... It's really more like an advertising pitch.
It's like a marketing pitch.
It's the perfect stereotype of a canned used car salesman political pitch.
That's what they're all like.
Mike Pence, Chris Christie.
You could say they're full of shit.
That's how I would characterize it.
They're another full of shit, conventional, polished politician.
And they also all went through the steps.
They're won statewide elections.
You know, they're all governors or senators.
Chris Christie, Nikki Haley, Asa Hutchinson, Burgum, DeSantis.
They're all governors.
Tim Scott's a senator.
And they have that canned, full of shit, polished political thing.
Both Yang and Vivek, not only are they not white, they're Asian, children of immigrants, but there's also something that characterizes them that they're kind of like a new type of campaign where it's super smart.
When you listen to Vivek, it sounds a lot more like a podcast.
It sounds a lot more like a polemical commentator like me, or like Tucker, or like whoever, like Alex Jones for that matter, although that's a specific sort of thing.
But maybe you understand what I mean.
They're almost talking like... They're talking to American people who have a higher IQ.
They're not like Chris Christie who goes out there and says, I want you to feel safe, I want you to feel secure, blah blah blah, you know, whatever.
They're almost talking past that kind of thing and talking to a different audience.
Maybe like a more educated, more affluent, higher IQ demographic like Like, let's say more of a Wall Street Journal audience than a Fox News audience.
Let's say more of like an NPR audience or a Joe Rogan Experience audience than a Sean Hannity audience.
Or than a Rush Limbaugh audience, even, if that's not sacrilege.
When I hear Yang and I hear Vivek, although I don't agree with all of it, I can engage with it on a higher level, on like the level that I could with another commentator or a podcaster, like a real political nerd, in other words, rather than some politician where it's all platitudes, it's all lowest common denominator, you know, mass marketing appeals sort of stuff.
So it's also a different kind of campaign.
It's like Yang and Vivek, I think, In almost like a post-Trump way, they're capitalizing on social media and the ability to use long-form video, audio content, podcasts, even like TikToks, to speak to a different kind of demographic and to kind of elevate the conversation a little bit.
The other thing they have in common is they're both sidestepping the race issues, they're sidestepping the culture war, And they're really using these ad hoc, like, culture war band-aid type positions where they're like, hey man, I want opportunity for everybody.
Hey man, we want, like for example, Andrew Yang, his big push was the UBI, Universal Basic Income.
You have all these black people that say, we need more money for them programs.
We need more money in them schools for our kids.
And Angie Yang had a way of sort of sidestepping that and saying, well, we'll give money to everybody.
And same thing with Vivek.
He was on The Breakfast Club and they're saying, well, we don't need just reparations.
We need money and invest in our community.
And Vivek said, well, I agree, but let's ignore race and let's distribute the money According to means, and we'll means test the money that we give to the schools.
And so both of them are sort of, they're diffusing the cultural, racial stuff, and their big agenda, their big vision, is this prosperity agenda.
Which is, let's make America work.
Let's make the economy good.
Let's make the streets safe.
And it's truly like a neoliberal, technocratic approach.
Like you see in Macron, would maybe be the closest analog.
Is, let's not engage in a left-right, which is even when Andrew Yang says, I'm not left or right, I want forward.
So, put up these ad hoc solutions, kind of just sidestep these, the polemical discussions, and propose something that works.
Just make our society work again.
And it's interesting that we've had that now in two elections, and it worked both times.
It's two different guys, although very similar.
Like, very similar.
Both Asian, both educated, both healthcare entrepreneurs that became millionaires, children of immigrants, And again, similar pitch, although on different sides.
And they've also angered the establishment on their respective sides in different ways.
Andrew Yang, I think this was the big mistake he made, he came out there with a pitch that everybody liked.
But of course the left hates conservatives.
So you can't have that.
You can't have a Democrat nominee who doesn't want to kill white people, who doesn't want to kill conservatives.
So Andrew Yang, initially, he said, well, we're going to give a UBI to everybody.
I'm not left or right.
I'm just kind of in the middle.
I like math.
I just want the country to work.
And I think he got a lot of hate from the left.
They said, no.
And specifically, it was during George Floyd.
They said, well, what about, nah, man, what about George Floyd?
Nah, nah, that ain't good enough.
What about George Floyd?
And I think his big mistake in the first debate is he went out there as a never-Trumper.
If you remember Andrew Yang's first performance in the 2020 Democrat presidential primary, his first performance, which that was his big push, was to meet the donor threshold to get on the stage.
He goes out there and says, well, I hate Trump and Trump sucks.
I think he swore.
I think he said, you know, Trump's an asshole or something like that.
And I think in that moment he lost the basis of his appeal, which is that he was really speaking to everybody like Ted Kennedy is doing now.
Ted Kennedy's getting Republican support because he's actually talking to the right, which Republicans are slaves.
They have a slavish impulse.
They want so desperately to be accepted or heard by the left.
So you just have to give him crumbs and eat that up.
And Andrew Yang, the moment that he said he was anti-Trump, I think he lost what made him different.
He became just another Democrat.
Anyway, though, they did have a problem with him in the initial stage because they said, well, he's not really with the left-wing orthodoxy.
He's not anti-white.
That was actually one of the big hang-ups.
They said that if you eliminate all welfare and refashion it into a universal Negative income tax, or universal basic income.
They said, but then white people are gonna get it.
That was literally their objection.
They said, wait a second, time out.
You're telling me that white people are gonna get the welfare too?
You're telling me that rich people get welfare too?
Because of course everybody would get the thousand dollars, even if it was just taking it off your taxes.
They said, no, that's unacceptable.
We, the black people, need more.
Whatever you give the white people, we have to have more, otherwise it's racist.
So, in other words, Andrew Yang, as a high IQ, model minority, Asian immigrant who comes in with a unifying prosperity agenda, that idea crashed.
Like a wave on the rocks of the Democrat orthodoxy, which is, it doesn't work in that political reality where their base is anti-white.
It doesn't work with this current political reality where the only thing holding the Democrats together, or even distinguishing them from Republicans, is they hate white people.
So, it didn't work.
And he very quickly fell out of the race.
And now you have Vivek.
And something similar happened, which is interesting.
Now you can clearly tell that Vivek is supported by some interests.
How do you know that?
Every so often he goes out and he lists his creed, all the things he believes.
And one of them, I think it's like the second or third one, is like, fossil fuels are required for human prosperity.
It's like... Okay, so that was brought to you by the oil and natural gas lobby.
And that's okay, but... You know, he clearly has got some... There are some interested parties there.
But he did say something this week And who knows if he'll walk this back.
I'm expecting maybe he'll do that tomorrow.
But this week, Vivek said that we shouldn't give special treatment to any country.
Somebody asked him, what do you think about Israel?
He said the only North Star for our country should be America.
Which is like...
Totally against the law.
Do not pass GO.
Do not collect $200.
You said that we should put America before Israel?
Straight to jail.
Do not collect $200.
We have confiscated all your hotels and you are in jail until the end of the game.
You can't do that.
And that sounds so crazy and that should be just like a little subtle red pill for everybody if you're new to the show.
Maybe you're just watching this.
You can run for the head of state position of America and you will be knocked out if you say that America should be put first.
Because they said, what do you think about Israel?
He said, well America should really be the only North Star.
And now they're calling him anti-Semitic.
Now they're saying he's anti-Israel.
Now all the Jewish Zionists in the commentary class are saying, that answer is unacceptable.
I posted on Telegram Mark Levin's response.
Mark Levin said something like, our relationship with Israel is special and you know, you should treat them just like Yemen.
And it's like, yeah bitch.
What difference does it make whether they're Yemeni or Israeli?
They're not us.
They're Jews who love the Jewish state, so they don't feel that way.
Anyway.
So just like Andrew Yang, being a part of this Asian elite comes in and steps on everybody's toes.
Uh-oh!
Forgot to hate white people, forgot to be a histrionic nutjob about neo-Nazis in Charlottesville and the Holocaust.
Uh-oh!
Disqualified.
They heard that from him and they said, nope.
We need someone who's going to run against Richard Spencer in this race.
That's what Joe Biden did.
Joe Biden's announcement was about Charlottesville.
So they said, oh, you're not a histrionic philosemite who hates whites, etc.
Disqualified.
And same thing with Vivek.
I feel like maybe this is coming.
Vivek comes in and says, listen, I believe in a creedal nation, and I want colorblind meritocracy and fossil fuels, and transgenderism has gone too far against the tyranny of the minority, etc.
But then when he says, well, Israel cannot be our North Star, now he's going to run into some issues.
I know that's not going to earn him any support from the establishment, Although he's doing better than Yang did.
And either way, both of these guys, that's another thing they have in common.
As I said on Telegram, they signal how America is changing.
Because, of course, we have all these different groups here now.
We have a black minority, which is a true underclass.
That's just what they are.
And that's not politically correct to say, but that's why they're so mad all the time.
Because by every metric, they're at the bottom.
Educational attainment, income, wealth, you name it, they're persistently, chronically at the bottom.
And that's why there's all this push for affirmative action, diversity.
And we know that is because of who they are.
That is because they are from Africa.
And their behaviors and their culture and their IQ and all these things are genetic.
It's intrinsic.
It's essential to who they are.
We also have had a lot of Hispanics and for a long time, when we think of immigration, we think of immigration across the southern border.
We think of our contiguous border with Mexico.
And all these people that are pouring over, jumping the fence, swimming across, that speak Spanish, and mow the lawns, and do these kinds of jobs.
But there's another kind of elite, or rather, there's another kind of group that's coming into America, and increasingly there are as many, or more, than the Hispanics.
The Asian immigration increasingly is outpacing the Hispanic immigration.
And so as time goes on, the Asian minority in America is growing, but they're a fundamentally different kind of minority.
Unlike the blacks, unlike the Hispanics, they're very high IQ, and they're very educated.
Their IQs are comparable or greater than the native white people.
As is their educational attainment, as is their work ethic, as is their family formation, other things.
And so, Vivek and Andrew Yang represent this new dimension of the demographic change, which is that we are increasingly getting a new elite.
We're not just getting a new underclass in the form of Hispanics that are pouring across to do the cheap labor.
We're also getting a new overclass, with all the Chinese and Indians that are pouring in on work visas, education visas, or family-based migration.
And these people are getting the good jobs, they're in leadership positions, and as time goes on, they're going to become the leaders of the country.
Because they're smart.
They're smart, and they work hard.
And as a consequence, like we see at these Ivy League universities, or the public universities in California, They comprise a larger and larger percentage of the student body of the elite schools.
And that's a crystal ball.
If they represent a large portion of the student body, that means they will be a large portion of the scientists, of the lawyers, of the CEOs, of the everything.
Now here's where it gets interesting.
The Chinese and the Indians Do not have the same relationship to the existing elite class, which is the Jews, that the whites do.
Because, of course, the same thing happened a hundred years ago with the Jews.
We had a white elite.
We had a white, we had a WASP, white Anglo-Saxon Protestant elite in America.
They were the majority in the Ivy League schools.
They were all the presidents and politicians and billionaires and everything like that.
And then after World War II, after all the Jews had come in in the first half of the century and after World War II, in the 50s, 60s, and 70s, the Jews took over all the elite positions.
And the Jews initially were able to do that because they were, at that time, very competent.
They did excel in school.
They did pursue excellence.
And they were hard workers, and they were also nepotistic at the same time.
So they excelled, but they also helped each other out.
Double whammy.
They took over the American elite.
And that's why, over the last 50 years, we are now living in, frankly, a Jewish society.
That's why it helps Israel.
That's why it embraces Jewish values.
That's why things like abortion and homosexuality are tolerated, pluralism.
That's why we have this anti-white culture.
All the Jewish priorities, all the Jewish values, the Jewish culture proceeds down from our newly crowned Jewish elite.
But Jews and whites have been going at it for 2,000 years, of course, and even longer.
So the Jews that came here have this religious and racial tension with the pre-existing whites.
They don't like whites because whites expelled them repeatedly in Europe, segregated them, discriminated against them, in many cases killed them.
So the Jews came here with racial animosity but also religious animosity because a lot of those things were done for religious reasons.
So they come to America and they say, okay, well there's going to be no more whiteness and there's going to be no more Puritan stuff because we're in charge now and now it's our turn.
That's really been the dynamic.
That's another reason why it's been so toxic.
But these Asians that are coming here now, they haven't lived on a continent with Jews for 2,000 years.
They haven't been together for all that time.
The Chinese and the Indians didn't put the Jews in the Pale of Settlement, didn't Holocaust them, didn't put them in ghettos, didn't expel them for 300 years, didn't force them to wear badges, didn't force them into their own corporate enclaves.
And as a consequence, they have a totally different consciousness.
They don't care about the Holocaust.
They don't care about anti-Semitism.
They're not even Christian.
So this blood libel stuff, they don't even know what that's about.
And just like the Jews from a century ago, these Indians and Chinese are very high IQ, very hard workers, and they're also very nepotistic.
When various Asian ethnic groups come here, they help each other out.
They bring over.
If an Indian gets into a software company and they get in a position to hire people, they bring over their entire cast from India.
And other Asians do a similar thing, although Indians are really known for that.
And so what's happening now is that, and I think this is a good thing, these Asian people are really competing with the Jews for market share over the American elite.
It's playing out in the universities, but the university is highest up the river.
From the elite.
Because, of course, the elite are produced by the university.
So, when you see this battle going on in Harvard over how many Chinese people they're gonna let in, how many Asians they're gonna admit, what that's really about, like we talked about months ago with the Supreme Court decision, is to what extent will we have an Asian elite, rather than a Jewish elite, or white elite.
And this scares them.
Because the Chinese and the Indians don't care about the ADL.
They don't care about the priorities of the Jews.
They don't care about those things.
The Chinese and the Indians are like a perfect technocrat because they don't have ideology.
They just want to make things run on time.
They're mathematical.
So they want to go there and they want to fix things.
Ahmed brought a clock to the White House.
They just they want to tinker.
They want to fix things.
The Chinese and the Indians are here to help us.
They're here to make money.
They're another kind of merchant.
At least the Chinese are.
They're another kind of merchant.
They want to come in.
They want to make America wealthy.
They want to make America work.
They see a problem like like an autistic person and they just want to fix it.
They don't care about Jewish people crying about anti-semitism or black people crying about police.
They like math and they like science.
And so they're like the artificial intelligence robot that can't tell the difference between black people.
They can't detect it.
And so this scares the Jews because increasingly you're getting this elite that is just bursting through the seams.
You can't keep these people out of Harvard.
You can't keep them out of UCLA.
You can't keep them out of these institutions.
You can't keep them out of the race.
You can't keep them out of the presidency, out of wherever.
And like I said on my telegram, I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing.
It's not ideal.
Ideally, we'd have no immigration.
But if we're gonna have immigration, and we're gonna bring over all the world's poor, it may be beneficial to have a high IQ elite in America who the fledgling white population can team up with.
For common sense.
Because, you know, you see the Chinese people getting punched by blacks on the subway, And you see that they just want to make money.
They want to probe business culture.
I know a lot of the younger ones are very liberal in everything.
But I think a lot of Asians are smart enough that whether they feel the fire of European blood or the Christian faith, I think they can see very plainly that the left does not offer solutions that America needs.
I think they could see that this sort of like, uh, mestizo, socialist, Chavez thing is just a disaster.
In other words, I think that that can look at an AOC and say, this is a retard.
Like, this is a retarded person.
And a person like that can't get in control of America.
All these retarded Bolivarian Hugo Chavez Castro types are just going to destroy the country.
So maybe there's something there where the Andreangs and the Vivecs team up with the whites of America, like Vivec is doing in the Republican Party, to salvage what we have here.
And maybe it's not going to be ideal, but it'll be better than Brazil.
So that's my take on this Vivek phenomenon.
I feel like nobody else is talking about that, that you've got this Yang, and then you've got Vivek, and in many ways they're so similar, and they're saying the same thing, and they're really only talking to white people, and I think a lot of people in the middle.
And it's representative of how the elite is changing, and the Jews don't like it one bit.
Because the Asian elite is going to care a lot less about Israel, and they're going to care a lot less about the Jews.
And they won't be Jews.
So, if I had to pick between some Zionist, if I had to pick between some Jewish whatever, and some Indian guy, I mean unfortunately I'm going to pick the Indian.
Unfortunately I'm going to pick the Chinese guy.
I wish there was some white, Irish, Catholic, Italian guy, Who could really, you know, maybe that'll be me in the future, but for the time being, I'll take the Chinese over the Jews.
I'll take the Indians over the Jews.
Because the Indians don't have a blood feud with us.
They don't have a blood feud with white Christians like the Jews do.
And if the money goes to India, then fine.
That's fine.
That's the price we pay to not have to save us from Israel.
So that's that.
But I think we're out of time.
We don't even have time to get into Ukraine.
But that's sort of my take on the state of the race.
That's maybe the only other interesting thing that's happening.
You got this soap opera with Trump, which has really just now taken on a life of its own.
Now you have this debate, which is really not even worthwhile.
But it is interesting that Vivek has done so well.
Maybe part of a pattern.
These, like, smart campaigns, using social media, talking to high IQ people, coming from these Asians, our new elite.
I like them.
Because they're not full of shit.
You know, the Jews are all, they're all full of shit.
Because you know they all just love Israel.
You know they're all just loyal to Israel above everything.
So at least these Asians and these, you know, like, Vivek is not a white nationalist.
Like, he doesn't want America to be a white ethnostate either, just like the Jews don't.
But he's also not gonna lie to your face with this, uh, my closest ally, you know, and that kind of thing.
We're your closest ally.
Remember the six million?
They're not gonna do that kind of thing.
They're not building museums in my neighborhood.
They're not building museums in my fortnight.
They're not building a museum in Tilted Towers for us.
They're chillers.
Maybe they don't believe in the right God and maybe they're, uh, Maybe they're not white, but they're chillers, and they just want to build our bridges.
They just want to build our airports.
They just want to solve equations.
They just want to make a little money.
And that's fine with me.
And honestly, that's fine with me.
Maybe that's what it's gonna take to preserve the white race, is an alliance with the Asians.
Then we can get back on our feet and we'll have another great 500-year run.
But for now, we need him.
We need him.
Who would you rather have?
Africa is going to have 10 billion people at the end of the century.
The country of Congo is going to have 50 billion people in it by the year 2027.
India is not looking so bad anymore, is it?
China?
These guys look incredible all of a sudden.
You know, a minute ago I was thinking, man, they eat like slobs and they flick their cigarettes in the stairwell and they spit, but then you see it's these people that eat human beings, then there's gonna be six trillion of them by the end of our lifetime.
Now I think I'll take them.
I think they're just as white as the Italians and Irish now.
Taiwanese and Indians.
unidentified
No, I'm being a little tongue-in-cheek, but you understand what I mean.
Some of the stuff I'll agree, but... No, I think it's... I think it's probably... Superior.
I guess it depends on what it is, but no, I think it's good.
In some ways it's predatory.
And... Clearly it's not the best for consumers, but...
I don't know then just don't don't subscribe to it you know because all the I feel like all the subscription options there is an option for you to just buy it like you could go to the iTunes store and buy every song you want and it's like do you want to pay $3,000 to download 2,000 songs or do you want to pay $10 a month to have limitless downloads and listens in perpetuity?
You know so what does that what does that cost you after 20 years?
You'll say it would have been more worth it to buy the songs?
Same thing with like Netflix you could go and rent every movie you could go and buy the DVD of every movie or you could pay $15 a month and get all the movies streaming there And you're also paying for the convenience, because a lot of these companies struggle with profitability.
And you're helping to shore up their profitability, which makes their revenue more predictable, which means they're able to keep going, and then you, you know, these things exist.
Then you can have the convenience of one-day delivery on Amazon.
Or, you know, 4K Ultra HD streaming.
I'm mobile with it with a wide selection of original content, you know, so I I disagree I think I think the subscription model has made things better I think like video content has gotten better.
I feel like music has gotten better.
unidentified
I Feel like everything's gotten better with that model Hot take so I don't think it's Jewish at all Fire underscore rises sent $5.
If you rebroadcast the debate on Cozy or Rumble, could Rumble ban you with the excuse that you're violating their exclusive streaming contract with the RNC?
I don't know if he's pretending not to understand that for rhetorical purposes, but it's crazy.
I want to pull it up specifically because it was just the most outrageous, and he's done that with himself too, when people criticize his relationship.
He goes, you're obsessed with my relationship.
No, you freak.
You freak.
Let me see.
Yeah, here it is.
The obsession with Logan Paul's fiancée is some of the saddest co-projection and insecurity I've ever seen in my entire life.
Imagine being so roped into someone else's relationship when you don't even have one yourself.
What?
What?
This guy is a retard.
Like, I can't believe anybody on earth thinks this guy is intelligent.
It was like we were on that show, and he was refusing to say that women find rich men more attractive than poor men.
Myron is saying, uh, if you want to attract women, you should be rich.
And Destiny's like, oh, but all the poor people are having all the kids.
And I'm like, no, idiot.
That's besides the point.
Myron is saying that if you want to attract a woman, being rich is more attractive than being poor.
And he's like, well, that's not what the data says!
I'm like, data?
You're talking about something else!
Whether or not people have kids is a completely different function.
It's a completely different variable.
We're talking about attraction.
I'm like, are you really gonna sit there and say?
That if there's one guy, there are two equal guys, all things being equal, and one's poor and one's rich, she's not gonna go for the rich guy?
He's like, well, no, I don't know.
I'm like, well, you're a fucking idiot.
Same thing with this.
Logan Paul's wife is being outed as like, being a total flooze, being a total whore.
And people are just laughing, oh, that's hilarious, his wife's a whore.
She withholds intimacy from him, but gives it for free to everybody else.
And he goes, you're obsessed.
This is cope.
This is projection.
This is insecurity.
You're roped into someone else's relationship when you don't have one yourself.
Like I said, that's just like the reasoning of a child.
That's like the reasoning of a middle schooler, like a butthurt middle schooler.
That's like some kid shitting his pants and saying, THIS IS THE SADDEST CASE OF COPE SCENE!
unidentified
THIS IS THE SADDEST CASE OF INSECURITY AND PREJUDICE I'VE EVER SEEN IN MY LIFE!
I feel like Asians are more susceptible to the cause because they are a productive high-achieving group and are more and more being discriminated against as years go by.
and bussin this nigga nick got the riz on god frfr oh shit i'm bout to buss that's not funny but that's not funny though farad lukovic sent twenty dollars as stupid as tarik nashid as i remember hearing him talk about the asian slash white alliance in his debate with jared taylor blacks because of race awareness are more awake on potential alliances that's true yeah they're meat watching blacks are meat watching because they're racist fish o'da
Yeah, and I, you know, I'm with you on all that, but... And it's not gonna smell like shit.
- I sent three dollars.
The Vic is an interesting prospect.
However, I don't want America smelling like New Delhi, shit.
Also as an Asian, I support AF and America and Europe being a white country and Catholic nationalism. - Yeah, and I, you know, I'm with you on all that, but...
These people are gonna help us fix our country. - Caesar says, "Sent three dollars." Why is it that Indians would look more normal if you made their skin white than if you would make a black person's skin white?
I remember in my... I don't know how specific I want to get, but I'll just say in one of my classes in high school, There was this, like, total Chad, like, jock in one of my classes.
Senior year.
And there was totally, like, a flirtation going on with him and the girl teacher who was younger and, like, small.
And I remember at the time thinking, like, being so puzzled by that, being like, wait, but she's a teacher.
But then I realized, no, wait, no, that could totally happen.
Like, that's totally plausible.
Maybe it happened, I don't know.
But yeah, he was always, uh, he's always risen up this to... I just said he's always risen up.
One of the teachers.
unidentified
And, uh, she was, uh, she was pretty receptive to it.