All Episodes
Previous Next
May 11, 2023 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:40:43
ZOGGED: Speaker McCarthy Throws ANNIVERSARY PARTY For ISRAEL | America First Ep. 1160ZOGGED: Speaker McCarthy Throws ANNIVERSARY PARTY For ISRAEL | America First Ep. 1160
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:28:27
s
streamlabs matthew tts
05:44
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
First.
The American people will come first once again.
With respect, the respect that we deserve.
From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
America first.
America first.
you you you you you you you you you you you
you you you you you you you you you
you you you you you you you you
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
good evening everybody you You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Glad to be back with you here tonight on Wednesday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight.
Lots to get into.
Big show.
Big stories tonight.
Both about the Congress.
And our featured story tonight is about a big party that Kevin McCarthy is throwing in the United States Congress for Israel.
Which is amazing!
I mean, that's just what we needed, was another one of these.
I was just thinking, when's the last time we celebrated Israel?
It's been way too long.
And so if you've been following the story, there was actually supposed to be a separate event being held in Congress by Rashida Tlaib, which I think that's how you pronounce that, I'm not sure.
She's from Michigan and she was supposed to hold an event that commemorated what's called, I believe it's the Nakba, which is what the Palestinians call the day that Israel was founded.
And the day that Israel was founded in 1948, the Jews drove the Palestinians out of their homes.
In many cases they committed massacres, burned down people's homes.
It was a terrible day and they call that the catastrophe.
The Palestinians say that that day, the day the independence was declared, and when the Jews made their move to take over because of the massive refugee crisis and the violations of human rights that occurred, they call it the catastrophe.
And so there was supposed to be an event in Congress today commemorating that, or rather later this month, But Kevin McCarthy caught wind of it, cancelled that event, and now is instead holding a celebration of the 75 year anniversary of the founding of Israel and the US-Israel relationship.
Awesome.
And he really showed those liberals he totally owned them by celebrating a foreign country.
And so we'll talk about that.
It's actually an interesting point.
It's something we've talked about over the last few weeks on the show, ever since Netanyahu was almost overthrown for the judicial reform, which is that there is a false dialectic, a false dichotomy on this issue, which only favors the Jews, it only favors the Zionists.
And you see it right here.
On the one side, you've got the Arab Muslim Democrat who's a hardcore progressive who basically hates whites and hates Christians, but she's anti-Israel.
And she's anti-Israel because of Israel's treatment of the Palestinians.
On the other side, you've got the Republicans.
You've got Kevin McCarthy.
Who is a white leader of the more conservative opposition party in America, and he's pro-Israel.
And he's pro-Israel insofar as, well, he's compromised by Israel.
But the argument goes something like this, that Israel is an ally of America, and they're an ally because of shared values, and particularly the Likud government, the Netanyahu government, is right-wing, And that's the basis of an ideological identity and affinity between the conservatives and the Zionists.
Both positions, though, are wrong.
Both positions have nothing to do with Americans.
I'm against a relationship with Israel, but that doesn't make me on the side of the Palestinian, pro-indigenous, progressive, anti-colonial side.
But just because I don't like them, it doesn't, of course, necessarily make me in favor of Likud and Netanyahu, so...
We'll talk about all that tonight.
That'll be our featured story.
We'll also be talking tonight about the war in Ukraine.
Very interesting statement was made today by the European Union foreign minister.
He said that the only reason that the war in Ukraine continues is because of aid from the United States.
He said that if it wasn't for military aid from the U.S.
and from NATO, that Ukraine would have to surrender.
Now, he's not saying that We should do that.
He's not saying that as a recommendation, although it might sound like that.
He is saying that to highlight how fundamental and important it is for us to supply Ukraine with aid.
But it's very interesting because I remember, and maybe some of you remember, that six months ago there was a promise made from Kevin McCarthy, now Speaker of the House, but then before the midterm elections awarded the Republicans with a majority, McCarthy said that we would not support a blank check for aid for Ukraine.
That's a very important promise, because if Congress does not give Ukraine everything that they ask for, or want, or need, the war can't continue.
The war would end almost immediately, within days, if the United States stopped supplying aid.
And in spite of the fact that McCarthy made the promise before the midterms that we would not give Ukraine a blank check, We still very much are in effect giving them a blank check.
And as a consequence, as a direct consequence, the war continues.
And this is another broken promise from McCarthy about what a Republican majority and what his House Speakership would look like.
It just goes to show you cannot vote for these people!
You can't vote for them in the elections, and certainly nobody should have voted for McCarthy to become the Speaker of the House.
I don't know why anybody capitulated on that.
And we'll get into that area as well as touch on some other areas, too.
Of where McCarthy has betrayed what he promised.
To the surprise of nobody who watches this show.
So, we'll get into all that.
That's our news for the night.
Before we do though, I want to remind you to smash the follow button here on Cozy to get a push notification whenever I go live.
Follow me right here.
Also, follow me on Rumble.
I'm live every night on Rumble as well.
Follow me on Gab Telegram and True Social.
Links are down below.
And I think that's everything.
One other thing, which is really interesting before we get into the news, my name came up a lot this weekend with this mass shooting in Texas.
Earlier this week this Mexican guy went into a store, into a mall, And shot and killed a few people and everybody in the media said that this was somehow a white supremacist targeted attack even though the guy who committed it was not white at all.
Visibly not even light-skinned but a straight-up visibly Mexican guy who was actually involved in Mexican gangs and didn't even like white people.
Nevertheless, the media went all out on Sunday and Monday saying that, of course, a Mexican could be a white supremacist because look at Nick Fuentes.
Of course this makes perfect sense.
Even though he's visibly not white, of course he could be a white supremacist because of all these other Mexicans who are white supremacists, like Nick Fuentes, the well-known white supremacist.
Well, recently there were some photos posted of the killer's manifesto which was handwritten, and he actually did mention me by name, but talking about how much he hated me!
So why don't they publish that?
And I have an excerpt here from his writings, from his journal, and I'll read a portion of it.
It says, this is the killer, The so-called white supremacist who murdered people in Texas.
He writes, I have to tip my hat off to William Travis, James Bowie, and David Crockett.
They were definitely worthy adversaries.
That's why white America might beat Mexico in the Second Mexican-American War.
If Mexico takes over the United States, I really don't want to share the spoils with these other loser races.
I don't even want to share the spoils with other Latinos, like the Cubans and Puerto Ricans.
Latinos, stand up my ass.
I'm a child of the corn that likes to munch on beans and tortillas.
I remember hearing some loser white White-hating Mexican guy telling Hispanic men to get with a white girl so they don't have white babies.
Stupid motherfucker.
That's the dumbest shit I've ever heard.
I'm not taking one for the team and getting with the bitch from a race I don't like.
What's going to happen when you have dozens, hundreds, or thousands of Nick Fuenteses running around?
Then what the fuck are you going to do?
Straight from the journal of the killer.
So can I get a retraction please?
Maybe a little money or something?
Maybe a defamation lawsuit?
Everybody, I saw tweets with millions of impressions this weekend saying, well of course this guy's a Mexican white supremacist and of course that's possible and makes perfect sense because of Nick Fuentes.
And I said on Monday, put a picture of me next to a picture of this guy.
Of course we're not from the same race.
He's brown with brown eyes and black hair and he looks Mexican.
I have white skin, green eyes, brown wavy hair, and if I walked in his neighborhood I would immediately be identified as a white person.
But they said, oh of course it's possible and there's no contradiction because of this guy.
Well, you even go into his own journal and he says that whites are a loser race, he doesn't want to share America with us.
He mentioned me by name saying, what are you gonna do when you have thousands of Nick Fuenteses running around?
Which I actually like the idea of that, to be honest with you.
Good question, bud.
Good question.
You piece of shit.
Yeah.
What is going to happen when you've got a thousand Nick Fuentes' running around?
I guess it's going to be a big problem for you, huh?
I think I would spell the end of this little fantasy of Mexico taking over America.
But that's just a little fact check for all these liberal Jew types insinuating that I'm like this killer.
The guy didn't even like me.
The guy mentioned me by name doesn't even care for me.
Go figure.
Not really a surprise.
So... I just thought I'd put that out there.
I don't really have too much to comment on it.
I didn't even really watch that too closely.
I'm kind of over the mass shooting thing.
What more is there really to say about it?
But... Everybody brought my name up for reasons I don't even really know.
I mean I... I suppose I understand what they were getting at.
Not that it made any sense, but... Now I think that's been officially debunked.
It also just goes to show there is not a white supremacist problem in the country.
Almost every time, without fail, that you see one of these shootings, it's fake in almost exactly the same way.
Similarly with the Walmart shooter back in August 2019, I think it was.
In El Paso, they never were able to connect the shooter to the apparent manifesto that was posted on 8chan.
Similarly, they accuse this guy of being a white supremacist because I think he liked conservative content, but clearly has no affinity for white people at all, let alone thinks that whites are superior Or even considering himself white for that matter.
He even doesn't like other Latinos.
He doesn't even like Puerto Ricans or Cubans.
Which is typical actually of Mexicans, but... Anyway.
So that's that.
I just had to clear my name real quickly.
Obviously had nothing to do with that.
Even Destiny!
Threw that one out there which was really interesting given that Destiny fought tooth and nail for like six months with everybody saying that I was not a Nazi.
And then he turns around and says, oh of course you could have a Mexican Nazi like Nick Fuentes.
It's like, do you think everybody just forgot about that little arc?
Or he got in a big fight with Mr. Gurro and like with half of his community saying that I'm not a Nazi?
Go figure.
Anyway, so that's that.
I want to move on.
I want to get on into the news here.
Just wanted to touch on that a little bit.
But we'll get on with it and get into our news.
Our first story is about Congress and specifically their support for the war in Ukraine.
The first part of the story, though, is about a minister in the European Union.
Who says what we all know already and what we've known for a long time, which is that the war in Ukraine is only continuing because of the support of the United States.
Probably sometime around May of last year, May 22.
Which is when the United States made the strategic decision to give them an unconditional guarantee of security, which is to say offering increasing levels of support, escalating qualitative kinds of support from ammunition to heavy vehicles to logistical support, officer support, intelligence, you name it.
It was somewhere around that time that the intervention of the United States prevented the war from ending.
Because as we know, Ukraine would not be able to stand up to Russia on its own for this much time, and certainly not for a prolonged period of time.
It was that decision and that decision alone, which was made by the Washington national security apparatus, Which is why the war is still going on today.
And much has been said about that over the last year.
It's been now a year since that has happened.
And obviously Russia is having some difficulty in defeating Ukraine because of it.
And today a minister from the European Union echoed that sentiment.
They never would have said this a year ago or even six months ago, but as they're reaching an impasse, they're now freely admitting it.
And this is from Russia Today.
It says, quote, The conflict between Russia and Ukraine can be ended in just several days, according to the European Union Foreign Policy Chief Joseph Borrell, which he claimed to the Spanish broadcaster La Sexta on Wednesday, arguing that it all depends on Western military supplies to Kiev.
He said, quote, I know how to end the war immediately.
Stop providing military aid to Ukraine, and Ukraine will have to surrender in a few days.
That's it.
The war is over.
He is the top diplomat for the European Union.
He acknowledged that would not be the outcome that the European Union and other Western nations want.
The bloc's foreign policy chief claimed that an immediate end to the conflict on these terms would see Ukraine occupied and turned into a puppet country deprived of its freedoms.
So, this is not something that he's recommending or encouraging, but he, like everybody else at this point, has to acknowledge the reality, which is that Ukraine fell a long time ago.
And if it were not for this unprecedented level of support, we're talking about nearly $200 billion from the United States, And somewhere around 20 to 30 billion dollars from other NATO powers.
If it was not for this unprecedented level of financial, military, diplomatic, strategic support from NATO and the United States to a country that isn't even in the Defense Alliance, Ukraine would have fallen over a year ago.
And nobody can argue otherwise at this point.
That is the reality.
In spite of this, surprisingly, All of the NATO and European leadership and all of the American leadership are steadfast in their support for the war.
They refuse to relent.
They refuse to allow the war to come to a close.
And this is a big problem.
There are serious risks with the war continuing.
With regard to Ukraine, of course, Their country is being destroyed by this.
Every day that this goes on, their country is being irreversibly and irreparably damaged.
Their people are being killed.
Their infrastructure is being destroyed.
They are the biggest loser in all of this.
After them, it's the Europeans.
They, every day, carry the risk of this conflict branching out further and other European countries being dragged into it.
It's a serious deficit or a serious liability, I should say, to their economy.
It's a serious strategic issue for all of them.
We've seen the impact on their industry caused by the rise in the cost of energy and agricultural products.
They're probably the second biggest loser.
And then after that, it's the United States and everybody else.
It's a serious liability for us in terms of cost.
It also carries the risk of a full-on nuclear war.
The longer the war in Ukraine goes on, every day we are risking a one-on-one confrontation between the United States and Russia.
Because unbeknownst to most people, we do have Americans in Ukraine.
We probably have thousands of Americans in Ukraine.
We've got American mercenaries fighting there, we have got officers fighting there, and I'm sure there's no shortage of other kinds of personnel that are working in Ukraine all the time.
And as we've seen recently, we've got our ships deployed, we've got all kinds, all manner of military equipment there, and certainly American ammunition and missiles are killing Russian soldiers.
And so every single day that this situation persists, the risk and the likelihood of this war escalating between us only goes up.
That's not in anybody's interest.
And maybe the fundamental fact, which is the most important, is that we're never going to achieve a settlement in Ukraine.
That we saw it from the beginning.
There is no scenario where Russia does not get the bare minimum of what they wanted before the conflict started over a year ago, which is that Russia will retain control over Crimea, Luhansk, Donetsk, and Ukraine most likely will be precluded from ever being a part of NATO.
What's more, Ukraine has been completely demilitarized, their military has been shredded, And probably the leadership will be ousted immediately after the war concludes.
So that seems to be almost certainly the outcome, no matter how much longer this takes, no matter how much longer the war drags on.
And those are, as I said, the bare minimum conditions that Russia has been looking for since the beginning and even before the war started.
And so, with that in mind, what is the United States trying to achieve here?
Ukraine is being destroyed, which I don't care too much about that, but if you do, Ukraine is being destroyed.
Europe is suffering a terrible loss economically and militarily and risking quite a bit.
The entire world is at risk of being destroyed from nuclear war.
It's a massive run on the United States Treasury.
That's $200 billion in just over a year, which is remarkable.
That's a third, close to, maybe a little bit less than a third, of the United States annual military budget spent not even on anything for our own country, but just giving it away, burning it, throwing that out the window for a foreign country.
And again, risks dragging us into the first nuclear confrontation ever.
All of that to achieve basically nothing.
All of that to achieve the same outcome that Russia wanted a couple years ago.
And the only reason that this goes on is because the leadership in Washington says that it has to go on.
And it has to go on because they seek regime change actually in Russia and they want to degrade the conventional military power of Russia.
And there are so many other implications I haven't even gotten into with the rest of the world, which is how this impacts the dollar and how it impacts foreign relations with countries like Saudi Arabia or India or Brazil.
But it's a large topic.
Now we have leadership in the European Union saying, and they're even acknowledging it too, although they're not saying we should change course, that this horrible war, which is really doing nothing for us, and which, by the way, Republicans, the Republican base does not care for, this war goes on because of us.
Well, back before the midterms, In October 2022, the then House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy said that we would not give a blank check to Ukraine.
In other words, and I called this out at the time, they never said at any point that we're going to stop supporting Ukraine, but they said we're just going to impose reasonable restrictions.
But this was said back before the midterms to try to win over the Republican base.
Because the war is very unpopular with the Republican base.
And certainly it cannot be justified if you're some fiscal conservative that this should go on in exactly this way.
So before the midterms, before everybody goes out and votes, Kevin McCarthy says, well, we're not going to give a blank check to Ukraine.
We're going to, some said at that time, we're going to audit the aid that we give to Ukraine and we're going to stop the aid that we give to Ukraine.
Republicans win a slim majority in the House.
There is a short but intense battle over the Speakership and Kevin McCarthy finally comes out on top.
That was in January.
Well, here we are in May 2023, and how is there any reasonable or discernible difference between the United States government policy towards Ukraine before the midterms, before Republicans gained control of the House, before Kevin McCarthy became the Speaker, and after all of those things transpired?
Before the midterms, we were told that Republicans would audit the aid.
It wouldn't be like it has been, or like it was, from February until November 2022.
They said that they would suspend the aid, or audit the aid, or at the minimum it wouldn't be such a blank check, these ridiculous numbers that we've seen.
Well, it's now been Over four months of a Republican majority in the House of Representatives, which happens to have, as you know, the power of the purse.
Which is that all American spending, all federal government spending, has to originate, all appropriations bills, have to originate in the House of Representatives, which Republicans now control.
Which Kevin McCarthy, as Speaker of the House, now governs.
And yet there's been no change, and the war goes on.
And this is a story from Axios a couple weeks ago talking about this change, which is not as accidental or coincidental as you might think.
It says, quote, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy rebuked a Russian reporter who questioned his support for Ukraine, delivering his most full-throated defense of Kiev's war efforts since Republicans won the House majority in November.
McCarthy's comments and other recent developments indicate that institutional Republican support for Ukraine is stronger than some of the loudest voices on the party's right flank have suggested.
At a press conference in Jerusalem, where McCarthy addressed the Israeli Knesset on Monday, the Russian reporter began his question by stating, quote, We know that you don't support the current unlimited and uncontrolled supplies of weaponry and aid to Ukraine.
Which is what he said in November and October.
McCarthy shot back, did I say I don't support aid to Ukraine?
unidentified
No.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I vote for aid in Ukraine.
I support aid for Ukraine.
I do not support what your country has done to Ukraine.
I do not support your killing of the children and I think you should pull out.
I don't think it's right and we will continue to support because the rest of the world sees it just as it is.
Which is not true, by the way.
The vast majority of the world did not put sanctions on Russia for this.
The majority of the world's population lives in countries that did not vote against Russia and the United Nations, that did not sanction them for this, that, as a matter of fact, has not changed their relationship with Russia at all.
So that's not even true.
But the article goes on.
It says McCarthy and Ukrainian President Zelensky spoke by phone for the first time last month after a rocky start to the relationship.
The April 18th breakthrough came two days before 19 House and Senate Republicans sent a letter to President Biden demanding an end to unrestrained aid to Ukraine.
McCarthy helped kickstart fears of a splintering bipartisan consensus when he told Punchbowl News weeks before the midterms that the House GOP was not going to write a blank check to Ukraine.
So, here's the thing.
This is how it always goes.
This is how it's been forever.
Now, I've been watching politics for the last six years.
I've been doing the show for six years.
I wrote articles every day before that.
So, I've really been watching politics in a very focused way every single day for 7, maybe 10 years.
And, it's gone on longer than this, but even in my short life, I have watched for 10 years, and I've seen many election cycles, where it happens exactly like this.
Midterms, presidential election years, on years, off years.
The Republicans will go out and promise that it's going to be one way.
Like in this case, Kevin McCarthy goes out weeks before the election, weeks before everybody votes, and he sounds like Tucker, or he sounds like Trump, or he sounds like somebody that we actually like.
And he goes out there and says, we will not give a blank check to Ukraine.
The Republican House will not give a blank check to Ukraine, which is a big deal.
This is probably one of the biggest, most important things going on in the world In this decade, maybe in this century, this is an inflection point in world history after the Cold War.
And this is something that concerns the Republican base deeply and which we all care about and which we disagree with the Washington establishment on we don't want now me.
I'm more extreme.
I support Russia, but at the minimum Republicans do not support this blank check 200 billion dollars is far too much far too costly We are far too entangled in a conflict which really has nothing to do with us at all And McCarthy goes out there two weeks before and says, we will not write a blank check.
I've seen it happen every time.
In spite of this, Republican pundits and commentators go out and say, we need to go out and vote for Republicans.
It doesn't matter that McCarthy is likely the speaker and all of his history.
It doesn't matter that Republicans suck and never hold their promises.
And it doesn't matter that Republicans betrayed Trump in 2020.
It doesn't matter that Republicans are the reason we didn't build the wall.
We have to hold the line!
We gotta go out and vote for them because the alternative would be far, far worse.
And so Republicans get in.
We don't hear anything else on the subject after that point.
In January, there's a battle over the speakership.
And there is a significant portion of the Republican electorate that says we do not want Kevin McCarthy to be the speaker.
Kevin McCarthy was a part of the conspiracy to overthrow Trump in 2020.
He's terrible.
He's the reason we got Paul Ryan.
to deny a border wall between 16 and 18.
Kevin McCarthy has been in it with Eric Cantor and Paul Ryan from the beginning.
He's terrible.
He's the reason we got Paul Ryan.
It was his disgusting extramarital affair, which is why he didn't become the Speaker before Trump even ran.
In spite of this, we were told, again, by Republicans that we all had to just grow up and be adults and make a deal and put McCarthy in as the Speaker.
Marjorie Greene told us that.
Remember Marjorie Greene?
She's the loudest one, hooting and hollering like a monkey for the Republican base on Fox News and on TV.
But she was the first one that struck a deal with McCarthy.
And the first one to go out and try to dissuade the MAGA coalition in Congress from resisting Kevin McCarthy for completely legitimate reasons.
She was right among them saying it's time to grow up and make a deal and this was really more about her spinning this so that she could look more moderate so that Trump might consider her for the vice presidency.
That's really what it was about.
Nevertheless, She went out there, like Ryan Gadusky and all the others, came out and said, you have got to support McCarthy.
And eventually, even the best Republican congressmen, who make up the America First or MAGA caucus, capitulated.
I'm talking about Matt Gaetz, I'm talking about Paul Gosar, among others who I like.
But they then capitulated and voted for McCarthy.
But they said, we've got provisions, we made a deal.
Well, now here we are months after the fact.
It's May.
The election's over.
McCarthy has a speakership.
The Republicans have the majority.
And yet, the unabated, unlimited support for Ukraine continues.
And not only that, but McCarthy is going to go out and get on a phone call With Zelensky and say we totally guarantee that your support and your money will not be held up and then he goes out in a press conference two weeks later in Israel of all places and says I never said anything of the support of the sort.
I completely support Ukraine.
I never said that we should stop sending the country aid and we disavow Russia and the war crimes and all the rest of it.
Who could have seen this coming?
Wow, what a shocker.
And it's no surprise.
It's the same thing on the Capitol riot footage, of which there are supposed to be 40-45,000 hours of footage captured from security cameras at the U.S.
Capitol building.
That was one of the terms of Kevin McCarthy becoming Speaker, was that he was to release, because the Capitol has jurisdiction over this, the House has jurisdiction over this, Speaker McCarthy made a promise that he would release the 40,000 to 45,000 hours of footage which very well could exonerate hundreds of people who have been thrown in jail.
And what do we get?
We got a little bit of footage that Tucker Carlson aired and then we never heard about it ever again.
And Marjorie Greene who helped broker the deal goes out on Twitter like she had nothing to do with it.
This is last week.
And says, when we made a deal with Kevin McCarthy, he promised to deliver all those thousands of hours of footage.
Now where is it?
Hey bitch, you made the deal.
She was out there with the rest of them selling us, selling her own base and the Republican constituency on the deal.
She made it her responsibility to deliver the footage.
She said, I will deliver the footage.
You can't go out months later and say, oh gee, it's not my fault.
I don't know where, hey McCarthy, where's the footage?
Hey, how about you?
Where's the footage, you bitch?
You're the one that made the deal first.
But people are surprised.
Some people aren't even paying attention.
They're just focused on the next thing that Fox News puts in front of their face.
Because it's literally an attention game.
And I've seen it happen every single time.
In 2018, right before the midterms, Trump went out there and said, I'm going to start calling myself a nationalist, and I'm going to send troops to the border, and I'm going to do...
The midterms happened, and then the troops came back from the border, and we never heard him call himself a nationalist again, and then he tried to shut down the government during the lame-duck period, and Kushner sealed the deal right before the State of the Union would have been postponed, and we never got a border wall.
We never got the money for that.
And the same thing happened in 2020, and the same thing happened in 2016, and it happens every single time, and every time I tell people, hey, stop voting for Republicans.
Why would we vote for Republicans if they don't do the things that we vote for them to do?
Presumably, Setting restrictions on aid, or perhaps auditing or altogether canceling the aid to Ukraine, was one of the most important things that the Republican base elected Republicans in the House to do in the last cycle.
And yet, even though that was explicitly the promise by the Republican leader in the House, all this time later, and it appears that he completely reversed his position and is now supporting unlimited aid.
And same thing with the footage.
That was another big feature.
We have got to look at all the footage and exonerate the rioters and get to the bottom of it.
Has that happened at all?
Have we gotten any footage other than the crumb of footage that Tucker Carlson aired maybe a week after the Speaker's election?
Nope.
And everything else has remained the same.
And I say it every time.
We have one guy, and that's Trump.
And that's it.
Marjorie Greene, not our guy.
All these other Republicans, not our guy.
Now, I like Gosar.
I like Gates.
I'd vote for them.
I'd vote for maybe some of the others in their caucus.
And I'd vote for Trump.
And that's it.
I didn't even vote in the midterms.
I didn't even vote.
And I think other people should not vote either because you see what we get.
We do go out and vote, and they take that for granted.
And that's why they know that they can get elected, and they can just not do anything, because they can count on a year and a half from now, everyone will have forgotten, and they can say whatever they need to say to sweep up the votes a week before the next election, and the cycle will repeat itself.
So, I mean, in my opinion, the real problem, it's not even McCarthy-McChuliffe, McCarthy's gonna do and say whatever he needs to say to get elected and to make deals.
The real problem are these populist types.
I look at a guy like Ryan Gurdusky, it's like, really, dude?
He was out there to sweep up shit for the Republicans in Georgia in 2020 in the Senate midterms, or the, rather, the Senate runoff.
He was down there rallying the troops.
He was saying, if you don't vote for Loeffler and Perdue, you're an idiot because then the Democrats will have free reign over the Senate.
Really, dude?
And then what happened?
10 Republicans joined with the Democrats to make gay marriage a federal law.
Last summer.
So if Loeffler and Perdue were there, you're telling me what?
Maybe there would have been 12 votes for gay marriage from the Republicans.
Really?
I mean, they went and gave the Democrats the supermajority they needed to prevent the Supreme Court from overturning gay marriage.
Thanks a lot, Republicans.
But he'll go out there dutifully in 22 and he'll be back in 24 to tell everybody, don't be an idiot, don't be immature, just go and shut up and vote for Republicans.
I am not a Republican.
I'm not a Republican, I'm not a Democrat.
It's no different than Tyler Boyer, who I got on a Twitter space with a couple weeks ago from Turning Point, and he says, it's so important that we support Turning Point because we are going to replace the members on the RNC with people that are far better.
I said, really?
How are they going to be better?
On what issue will they be better?
He couldn't name a single issue.
And that's always how it goes.
Just shut up, go to the Turning Point Conference, just shut up, vote for the Republicans in the midterms.
That's what this is all about.
It's about finding a nice compromise.
And getting these revolutionaries back buying into the system.
I've said this for years.
Trump started a revolution.
He said, vote for me.
Go with me.
I will make this country great again.
And if the Republicans won't have me, then I'll run as an independent.
I love that.
But he is a revolutionary in the truest sense.
He's not A party guy.
He's not a party loyalist.
Maybe he is to some extent now.
When he lost the official results in 2020, he went out there and said, meet me at the Capitol because we are going to make our voices heard and we will not accept the results of the election.
That's a revolutionary.
And the job of the Republican Party is to say, hey, hey, calm down.
All right, all right, all right.
Their job is to be this sort of sniveling Jewish middleman and be in the middle and say, oy vey, all right, all right.
You can have your border wall.
unidentified
Just vote for us one more time and then we'll build it, I promise.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
And then they get in and then they go, ha, ha, ha, ha.
You voted for the wall.
How about gay marriage?
That's what they... Every single time!
Every single time!
But it's just about getting people to buy back in.
It's about... They will lie, cheat, steal.
They will do the most shameless... They will go out there and tell an absolute knowing lie and say, Hey, God bless you for supporting me.
I promise that when I'm elected, I will support And then they'll go back and they'll say, you fucking idiot.
I can't believe they fell for that.
And they'll go in and they'll vote for endless warfare, endless immigration, endless everything else.
That is 100% what they do.
But it's just about people, they just need to get the base that is ready to burn down the White House.
They just need to get the base to say, alright, I'll vote for you this time.
Okay, you know, well, what are we gonna do?
unidentified
Those Democrats are far worse.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
That is the mentality which is why we will never win anything.
unidentified
Ever.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Until that mentality stops, we will continue to get treated like this.
I mean we made Kevin McCarthy the Speaker.
The year is 2023, okay?
Donald Trump won the nomination seven years ago, okay?
Seven years ago.
Eric Cantor got defeated, what, like 15 years ago?
Or something like that, maybe a little bit less.
How many times are we going to do this?
How long does this have to go on?
How many times do we have to get fooled?
Donald Trump won the nomination seven years ago, and it's 2023, and Kevin McCarthy is the Speaker of the House, and Mitch McConnell's the Senate Majority Leader.
That's how it was supposed to be before Trump even announced he was running.
It was supposed to be a McCarthy speaker and a McConnell majority leader.
That's literally how Congress would have looked if it wasn't for McCarthy's affair before Trump even decided he was running.
But we're right back where we started now, aren't we?
Right back where we started.
unidentified
So... That's that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Don't vote in the next election.
I'm gonna vote for Trump.
That's it.
I'm gonna vote for Trump, or whoever the nominee will be, and then that's, or, well, I shouldn't say that.
If it's DeSantis, I won't vote.
If it's Trump, I'll vote for Trump.
If it's Ye, I'll vote for Ye.
But that, that's all, those are the people I'm gonna vote for.
And that's it.
I'm not gonna vote for whoever's running in Illinois.
And if I were anywhere else, I don't think I'd vote for anyone else.
I'd vote for Gosar, I'd vote for Gates, I'd vote for Trump, I'd vote for Ye.
End of list.
And that's all.
Because anybody else just clearly doesn't have our interest in mind.
Maybe these 20 Republicans that wrote that letter, that's it.
But anyway, so that's that.
I want to move on.
I want to get into our featured story tonight, which is similar, it's on a similar note, but I have a different idea here.
And so you might have seen this, maybe not, but Rashida Tlaib, the Arab congresswoman from Michigan, Was supposed to have a celebration or rather, I don't know, some sort of event in Congress coming up this month to commemorate what the Palestinians call the catastrophe, otherwise known as the day that Israel declared independence.
And as I said at the top of the show, they have a word for it.
It's called the Nakba.
Palestinian term for the day that Israel declared independence in 1948, and they call it that.
It translates into catastrophe.
Because the day that Israel declared independence, they drove millions of Palestinians out of their homes, out of their villages, which they had inhabited for hundreds or thousands of years, and into neighboring Jordan, into Lebanon, and it was brutal.
There were many massacres, killing of civilians, children, Destruction of ancient infrastructure.
They call that the catastrophe.
And that immediately started a war between Israel and a coalition of Arab states.
But this is how it's regarded in Palestinian history.
They say that this was the day when their present troubles started.
And it's true.
I mean, this is a serious geopolitical shakeup.
This did create sort of the modern Geopolitical situation in the Middle East.
This is why you now have Hamas.
This is why you have Hezbollah in Lebanon.
This is why Lebanon is a pariah state to Israel.
This is why Jordan was against Israel for a time.
It was nothing short of a catastrophe for those people there.
We know that.
So Rashida Tlaib was supposed to hold an event commemorating this in the Congress and she got a lot of blowback from Jewish groups.
And Kevin McCarthy retorted and said that he would cancel her event and instead hold a different event which celebrates the 75th anniversary of Israel's independence.
And this is a story from Fox.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy canceled an upcoming event at the U.S.
Capitol hosted by Rashida Tlaib that would have decried Israel as a catastrophe for Palestinians and the world.
Tlaib had sought to reserve space at the Capitol Visitor Center to mark the Nakba, a Palestinian term for the 1948 founding of Israel, which translates to catastrophe.
McCarthy decried her plans as anti-Semitic and used his seniority to reserve the event space for himself instead.
The event will instead commemorate Israel's 75th anniversary, which will land on May 14th.
He said, quote, this event at the U.S.
Capitol is canceled.
Instead, I will host a bipartisan discussion to honor the 75th anniversary of the U.S.-Israel relationship.
Neither McCarthy's office nor Tlaib's immediately responded to a request for comment from Fox Digital.
So this is the story and the whole thing is pretty gross to be honest with you on frankly on both sides.
Number one, I find it very amusing that white Christian Americans view this as a win.
They're like, yes!
McCarthy BTFO'd this Muslim woman and now we're gonna celebrate the founding of the Jewish state instead.
unidentified
Yes!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
He really got her.
Because that's not a win for us at all.
And to be honest with you, neither positions have anything to do with white Christian Americans.
It's got nothing to do with our country.
And here's my view on this little exchange in our Congress.
On the one side, you have got a faction on the new left, which is made up of brown people.
They call them people of color.
And so you've got your blacks, your Hispanics, your Arabs, your Asians.
And they are animated by this third-worldist, anti-colonialist, Marxist, grievance politics.
And you see it in their coalition of the squad.
Ilhan Omar, Tlaib, AOC, the black one.
They're from all different groups.
Omar is Somalian.
Tlaib is some Arab, I think.
AOC is Puerto Rican.
The black one is black.
So they come from all different groups.
They're all women.
And although they're from all different groups, they all agree on one thing, which is they hate the historic American nation.
They're not Christian, they're not white, they don't like Christianity, they don't like white people, they don't like our white Christian American founders, and they don't like our country.
And so this squad, the four of them, represent this new left phenomenon that I'm talking about.
It's younger, it's more female, it's browner, it is aggrieved, it is third-worldist, meaning that it supports the so-called indigenous animosity against the European settlers or colonialists in all the continents of the world.
And it has this progressive Marxist strain of thought.
AOC also is a Jew.
She's got some Jewish ancestry, which is very typical.
Now, a big phenomenon in the New Left is that a lot of them are led by Jews, because Jews benefit from this.
Jews have an historic hatred for Europeans, and they have an historic hatred for Christianity.
Jews were treated badly by Europeans for 2,000 years.
They were discriminated against.
They were expelled from countries.
They were forced to convert to Christianity.
In some cases, they were killed.
Now, in a lot of cases, it was totally justified because they were very cruel and used Christian blood in their rituals.
And they did a whole host of other things.
I've said it before, if you get kicked out of every country you're ever in, it's kind of your fault.
At some point you gotta say, why do these people keep getting kicked out of places if they're such a blessing upon the world?
Why does everybody keep kicking them out?
They get kicked out of everywhere for the same reason every time.
Despite being separated by geography and language and culture and religion.
It's like weird, but every single country keeps coming up with the same list of grievances totally organically.
Must be them.
Must be the hosts, right?
Now, in any case, Jews have this historic animosity for Europeans and For Christians.
What's more, Jews have also deftly calculated that if a country is strong, if it has a strong homogeneous composition, then Jews stick out like sore thumbs, like aliens.
If you have a country of all one ethnicity and all one religion and they all have the same ancestors, And then you have these Jewish people that look different, practice a different religion, different ancestors, they have their own enclaves.
They're gonna stick out like a sore thumb.
And Jews calculated that's a big part of why they were kicked out of England in 1290.
That's why they were kicked out of Spain in 1492.
That's why they keep getting kicked out.
That's why they were put in the Pale of Settlement.
That's why they were ghettoized.
That's why the Holocaust happened, they say.
Because a country that has a strong ethnic religious identity will view them as alien.
So the more multicultural, the more multiracial, the more international a country is, the better it will be for Jews.
The safer it will be for Jews, the easier it will be for them to thrive.
If you look at the most successful Jewish families, like for example the Rothschilds, the reason the Rothschilds were able to amass Such a large fortune is because they were able to send their family members into every center of finance in the European continent.
And so whereas the English could never do that, or the Germans could never do that, the Jews, having no home, having no people of their own, being diaspora people, they could have satellites in every country.
And they could work together, where all the other countries were working against one another.
And so, moreover, a country and a world that is more global, more international, more liberal, more accepting, more tolerant, it's not only going to be more tolerant of Jews domestically, but it'll be more tolerant of Jews internationally, working together.
So, that's a big part.
People talk all the time about how the New Left is anti-Semitic.
Well, it's really only made possible by the Jews.
If it wasn't for them, white people would say, why do we have all these minorities who hate us, agitating against us in our country?
How ungrateful.
But it's these, it's people in Jewish media, it's the Jewish New Left, it's these Soros-funded types, Open Society Foundation.
Why do you think it benefits George Soros to have an open society?
So that it's open to everybody.
Now that's the New Left, and this is the New Left faction.
And so the New Left says, being consistent with their anti-colonial, anti-Western views, they support the indigenous Palestinians against the Zionist settlers, because Israel is a settler nation.
At the turn of the last century, Jews accounted for 1% of the population in Palestine.
Now they're a majority in that part of the land.
And that is because the Jews settled that territory in the first half of the last century.
And it's a project that has gone on in the second half as well, but primarily in the first half.
So the New Left views the indigenous Palestinians as brothers, the same way that the indigenous Americans here see the United States as a settler nation, the same way they see Somalia as being taken advantage of by colonial powers, they see the Palestinians as being Colonized as being an apartheid state like the Africans, Americans, Arabs, Asians, so on and so forth.
So that's why Tlaib is hosting this event.
And that's why she has support from the New Left.
That's why the New Left is said to be anti-Israel and therefore anti-Semitic.
Because it's this, like I said, third world, this brown anti-colonial Marxist force.
The rebuttal from the right
Which is compromised by the State of Israel, but the ideological rebuttal from the right, which we're now hearing articulated increasingly by guys like Yoram Hazoni and Kostan Alomaru, who are both Jewish Zionists, in addition to others, of course, they're now saying that the answer to the third-worldist, anti-colonial New Left is to assert a nationalist, ostensibly pro-white, reactionary ideology.
That says that no, we're not going to be bossed around by AOC, Omar, and the rest.
We support settler nations.
We support nationalism.
Nationalism is a virtue.
Yoram Hazoni, who's a dual citizen in Israel, says that there's a virtue in nationalism.
And they say that that makes the United States and the Western European nations and the Various nationalist causes in Europe that makes us natural allies of the state of Israel because we're all fighting the third worldist.
The Israelis are fighting the Palestinians.
The Europeans are fighting the Arab Muslim immigrants.
The United States is fighting an increasing share of foreign-born in our own country.
So the argument goes.
But I want to slice through all of that and say both positions are wrong.
It's a false dialectic because We are nothing like Israel.
The similarities are superficial.
America was settled by European settlers, that is true.
And we drove indigenous American Indians off of the land and conquered the rest of it through warfare or through purchases and we made this a country.
But America has been a 90% white country for 300 years.
It's been like this for a long time, and what's more is that in recent years we've made attempts to integrate the minority populations and so on, and now our chief problem is not so much the people that are here now.
The problem is immigration.
The problem is foreigners who want to come to our already settled, already existing nation.
It's not the case in Israel.
Israel was only just settled a hundred years ago and it's not even fully colonized.
There is distinctly two nations living within the same border.
You have a distinct Jewish Zionist nation which just arrived in the last century and then you have surrounding it and in its crevices a totally separate, totally existent Palestinian Arab Muslim nation that has been there for hundreds of years.
So it's just not the same.
And what's more is you've got separate jurisdictions with separate claims to sovereignty, and you do have what amounts to a realistic apartheid regime over the still unsettled situation, which is who will occupy this parcel of land west of the Jordan River.
It's still an unresolved question, very much so, in a way that just doesn't exist in the United States.
So it's a very superficial similarity.
What's more is that the United States is a Christian nation.
So what unites Americans and Europe is not the fact that we're all nationalists.
It's that we're all Christian.
That's the thing that we have in common.
And historically, there was never such a thing as Europe.
Even Bismarck said as much.
The idea of a Europe is an historical fiction.
There's a continent called Europe, but the idea that there's any similarity between these nations, and although there is when you contrast it with perhaps Africa or Asia or America, there's similarities.
The one thing that bound them together for centuries was that they were Christian.
For the last 2,000 years, that is the thing that they had in common, was that they were Christian.
What were the similarities between the Slavs and the Franks?
That they're Christian.
Although they're Orthodox or Catholic, they're both Christian.
They both believe in Jesus Christ.
That's the glue.
That's the thing that holds them together.
Israel does not have that in common with Europe or the United States.
That's where they come up with this fiction of Western.
Have you heard that a lot?
They say Western.
Now, they have to say Western.
Western is very much like Judeo-Christian.
Western is very inclusive.
Because if they say White Civilization, it excludes the Jews.
If they say Christendom, it excludes the Jews.
So that's why they have to say Western Judeo-Christian.
Because any nation can adopt Western values.
Any nation can claim that they're descended from Western civilization if all it is is a matter of believing the right things or having a certain form of government.
Is Brazil a Western nation because they've got a democracy?
I don't think so.
And what's more, even though Jews were considered outcasts in Europe, were considered altogether separate from Europe, although they were within Europe for thousands of years, somehow they've been shoehorned in and now it's a Judeo-Christian civilization.
These are two kinds of ideas that just bring the Jews in, bring Israel into the equation.
We're Nationalists, we're Western, we're Judeo-Christian.
We are not white European.
We are not Christian.
We are not in any way constituting a pan-European or pan-Christian empire.
We're nationalists for all nations except for Russia, China, Palestine, Iran, etc., Syria.
We're not nationalists for Syria.
Syria is a fiction.
We're not nationalists for Iran.
Iran's being held hostage by the Mullahs.
We're not nationalists for...
And so you see how there has been a false dialectic created with all of these kinds of ideological contrivances.
About ideas, about the historic legacy of the West, or of Judeo-Christian people of the book.
Nobody would ever call it a Judeo-Christian Islamic civilization.
Nobody would ever say that it's all of Christendom and all of the Muslim world and Israel against China.
Like, no one would ever say that.
No one would say our Judeo-Christian Islamic values were all from Abraham.
Like, that doesn't even make any sense.
These things have been created to justify the US-Israel relationship.
So I want to cut in the middle and say, here's a new idea.
I don't care about your Nakba.
I don't care about the catastrophe.
And also, I don't care about your Jewish state that is trying to outlaw the Gospel.
There is one position, which is the Christian-European position.
That Israel is a hostile foreign power.
They spy on us.
They conduct espionage and foreign influence inside of our country.
All of that should be expelled.
And what's more, tasked with figuring out how to settle this question of Jews or Muslims controlling the Holy Land, how about Christians?
How about instead of having Jews who spit on Christians or Muslims who are not Christians, Control that territory?
Why don't we have it administered by Christians?
It's not so long ago the Christians controlled that territory.
Why did it go from Christian to Muslim to Jewish hands?
It should be restored to Christians.
I think that would be the more appropriate position if we're going to get into who should rule over that territory.
But this idea that because the New Left supports Palestinians that it is therefore natural or inevitable that we as a Christian European civilization would stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Jews who hate us and hate our God as nationalists in all nations?
Hey, I know you hate us and Jesus, but we're all nationalists, right?
I don't think so.
And that's not what Kevin McCarthy is saying, that's what a very pernicious group of populists are now saying, and other influencers are saying.
But both positions are not America First, and both positions are not Christian.
We need an American right wing that cancels their Nakba third world event, and instead has an event, I don't know, for Jesus?
Or I don't know, for Europeans?
Instead of for this country that spies on us?
That should be the face.
That should be the central idea behind our party.
They say, we're going to cancel your Nakba event and totally get shit on because we're going to have a pro-Israel event instead.
How is that a win for us?
They were trying to outlaw the gospel two months ago and now we're celebrating our glorious relationship.
Seriously?
So, the only animating idea of the right wing should be that Jesus Christ is our King and everything follows from that.
Israel as a nation that is living in defiance of that should not have our support.
End of story.
So, you're not doing what you think you're doing.
If you're against, and don't get me wrong, I think that what the Jews have done to the Palestinians is cruel, but I feel the same way about that as I do about Ukraine, as I do about Sudan, or any other conflict.
It's not really our problem.
It's got nothing to do with us.
Why are we holding these events in the Capitol?
We've got these foreigners trying to take over our Capitol.
To grieve their home countries which they still have allegiance to and then it gets replaced by another foreign country which dominates our politics through money and influence.
Neither of these are America first.
We should be having a celebration for our own people and for our own God and our own heritage instead of everybody else.
But that's the present state of politics in a nutshell.
We've got to cut through both of them, both sides of that.
But that's that.
I want to move on and take a look at our Super Chats and we'll see what you guys have to say about all this.
Let me take a look here.
And we'll see what's your take.
Let me just get situated here.
unidentified
And we'll see. - Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
SmackDown's Raw 2006 Grow Eye% Hey man heard on last night's show you got in a car accident.
I work at an ER and you really should consider checking yourself in.
You may have internal bleeding lol.
unidentified
Fuck off.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I was at the hospital, stupid.
unidentified
Well, I work at an ER so, um, you got in a car accident?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I think you should see a doctor.
I know cause they... Yeah, I already did that.
Thanks though.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Dumbass.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Like I said, you know, I'm not really going to talk about the inside baseball, but I had a conversation with Ye today and, you know, when there is reason for me to issue a public statement, I'll issue one.
But, I mean, I haven't talked about things going on behind the scenes since, really, all this started.
So, when I say that, I mean November.
So, um, you know, unlike Milo, I don't go and go to the press and try to fight my internal battles in the media.
That's not how I roll.
So, anyway.
But, you know, if there's ever a reason to, then you guys will be the first ones to know, okay?
I'll issue a public statement whenever it's necessary.
But, for now, not necessary.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Hey, thank you man.
Yeah, you know, like I said, I made peace with that guy afterward.
Hey, thank you, man.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Yeah, you know, like I said, I made peace with that guy afterward.
But, um, pretty nasty.
I mean, I bumped into him in the street.
When I say bumped into him, I didn't bump into him.
We crossed paths on the sidewalk.
And as I'm walking past, he sucker punches me in the chest.
And then he takes off like a pussy.
So, I mean, I literally had, like, all my suitcases in hand.
We were just moving hotels.
I threw all my shit down on the sidewalk and booked it after him.
We chased him into the hotel.
And I say, I mean, he literally ran and hid behind the desk.
He literally ran and hid behind the hotel desk and then he tried to hide in the back area and they pushed him out.
And I confronted him.
And, uh, and then you saw, that's where that video unfolded.
No, I'm not a trained fighter.
I'm not a fighting kind of a guy, but... I confronted him and swung on him a couple times and he booked it for the elevator and...
That was that.
Now, then I later confronted him and he said, hey listen man, could you just leave me alone?
Like, I'm sorry, I don't know what you want from me.
And I'm like, hey, you punched me.
I think we might have that on video.
I mean, I'll have to go and see who all was there.
But there were a bunch of people at Republicans for National Renewal.
We chased him into that event later in the night.
And I got a picture of them and we hung out and we were cool.
But, um...
I wonder if anyone has video of that, cause that was pretty good too.
I'll have to ask around who all was there.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
But, uh, pretty good stuff.
unidentified
Yeah, I'm surprised that CNN would host him like that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I mean, it was really embarrassing for them.
Cause they just, the whole audience just laughed at them the whole time.
I mean and I was a little surprised because I first started watching when he talked about pardoning the January Sixers and they all cheered and I said okay so this must be a pro-Trump audience and the whole time they were just mocking her he's like pointing at her and laughing he's like he's literally like this and the whole crowd is laughing it was it was bad optics for them so yeah pretty good stuff I mean I really appreciated that Alula sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Thoughts on the Feezer sensation sweeping the timeline?
Next big gem rolled of 2023, or soon-to-be-forgotten Cole?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
The Teddy Feezer sensation.
I haven't heard of that one though.
Haven't heard of that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Simon Skula sent $5.
I am a surgeon.
I am a surgeon.
I am.
I am a surgeon.
I am a surgeon, Dr. Han.
I am a surgeon.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Okay, thank you for that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Black Swan sent $8.
Nick doesn't ask questions when Nick is act up he just throws an America Fist.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
America Fist, yeah there you go.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Wonder Pets Patriot sent $3.
Do you have a specific take on the US states trying to grow slash separate from other states?
Like the Greater Idaho Project or New California and the like?
Any realistic prospect for these things?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I think it's unrealistic.
It's interesting.
I just don't see it gaining any traction.
There's been a lot of discussion about that in the past, about like Chicago breaking off from the rest of Illinois, or California seceding, or Texas seceding, or Idaho forming greater Idaho with eastern Washington.
It just doesn't seem all that likely to me, but who knows?
Maybe that'd be one way to mix things up.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Yeah, there you go.
In a bizarro timeline.
- Sent $3.
There's an alternate timeline, Nick Fuentes, that is a Hispanic supremacist and that timeline's leftist's harp continually, but you have wavy hair, green eyes, pink bombs.
You're not Latino.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
- Yeah, there you go.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
And a bizarro timeline. - Josh the remover sent $3.
Nick, you beat that nigga like an unseasoned chicken.
Total W. - Yeah, well, you know.
Boxer Nick is an incredible W. Was that the same guy you chased down and later squashed the beef with?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Yeah, we chased him down and then we had a little second altercation and then we squashed it.
Let's put it that way.
Then we just had a little, then we squashed the beef and, you know, that was it.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Well, here's what I'll say about that.
Can you clear up any of the Milo criminal accusations slash rumors slash drama?
I don't care about him regardless because you and Ye are the true leaders, but transparency is always appreciated.
Why E24 Life?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Well, here's what I'll say about that.
I warned Ye about all of this last week when Milo was first brought back into the conversation.
The first thing I did was reach out to Ye because I had been aware of this.
I'm also aware of other things too.
And I said, I texted him.
And I said look yeah you know because that memo was going around in media and uh and I was literally texting yay that afternoon we were going back and forth about a few things and then TMZ is reporting that I had been fired and I'm like that's weird because I'm literally doing work for the for this right now you know so I'm going back and forth I'm like well how does this look oh that looks super fly now change this like okay how about this one it was oh yeah yeah more like that
Then I screenshot the article.
I'm like, hey, I said, is this true?
I said, or should I disregard this?
And so we had a quick conversation about it.
He goes, oh, let me speak to Milo.
I said, okay.
And so later on I hit him up and I say, hey, I said, just so you know.
And now I did give him a warning and I texted the lawyer also because Ye's got legal counsel now.
So I'm just putting this out there.
Because now I kind of have to protect myself legally.
But I said, look, I said, you're going to have a big problem.
I said, because Milo does not know FEC guidelines at all.
I said, he's not a campaign manager.
He's not an FEC guy.
I said, and he has committed a serious violation.
I said, it could disqualify you.
It's going to bring major legal scrutiny.
If you decide to run I said this is this is gonna be a problem I said and it's really Conspicuous that he's coming around now when all of this is just starting to circulate because it was only last week that Laura Loomer broke the story about the Website in the first place.
I said so it's a little conspicuous that he turns up now and In classic this is so classic and
Yay takes these messages and puts them in a group chat with the Yeezy business leader and which I was actually glad he did that because now I'm on the record okay now I'm on the record and there's a lot of he said she said but receipts tell all do they not so he puts me in a group text with the head of Yeezy and with one of the models and with the wife and with him and with Milo and
There was one other guy and he screenshots my text and puts him in the group chat and I said, listen yay.
I said, what I said is true.
I said, you should not bring Milo back for the following reasons.
I said, he's gay, still living with his husband.
I said, he's got this major FEC violation.
I said, he threw you under the bus with this statement about Back in January about the resolution calling you an anti-Semite at the RNC I listed a number of other things I said so that's what I'm telling you I said you're gonna have a problem and so that was that and I had called the lawyer even the day before and said look you're gonna have a lot of problems I'm just letting you know and anyway so the story broke this week the treasurer resigned because
I mean look I mean this is not me saying this is not me saying this is some guy I mean there's literally it's all there in black and white I mean people can say whatever they want people can go to the media and say anything but the record speaks for itself there's lit I mean literal and metaphorical receipts there's a big legal problem
And so the treasurer resigned because he took one look at that and said, yeah, I can't be anywhere near this.
I don't want to go to jail because the treasurer is responsible.
The treasurer is responsible for what happens.
So, you know, I mean, I'm there for Ye as a friend.
I'm there for him as an advisor.
but i i told him last week and everybody knows that this is a fucking criminal i mean milo is a straight up criminal legally he's a dead man walking as far as i'm concerned it's just a matter of who is going to jail with him so you know marjorie kind of threw him under the bus And there were some problems with what she said.
There were some problems in the statement by Isaiah Wortman, who's not a big fan of mine.
Isaiah Wortman isn't.
And there were some problems in the statement.
I mean, maybe they just don't know how much is out there.
I guess that's a, you know, you should really understand the breadth of the evidence before you make any statements.
That's generally good advice.
So, we'll see what happens, but I spoke with Ye, All last week and over the weekend.
I spoke with him today and, you know, so we'll just have to see what happens.
We'll have to watch and see how it plays out.
But I have to tell you, I don't really feel good about Milo jumping aboard.
Sort of like the whole point of Ye 24 was supposed to be about challenging Jewish power, then you bring in a bunch of Jew-Zionists.
It's just sort of like, I don't know, but I'm still, you know, I'm still there for Ye.
He's still my friend and everything, but It's sort of contradictory, you know.
But I'll maybe... Depending on how things go, I may release a statement later.
But things are very dynamic.
They're very much in flux right now.
I may release a full statement later this week or next week, depending on how things go.
I'll let you know.
You gotta trust me.
You gotta trust me in my discernment and my judgment.
It's been a tricky thing because for a long time, you know, I've been a little bit tied up in what I can and can't say.
And it's very interesting, for months they said Ye24 is dead and you're lying for saying you represent it.
And then Milo comes out and is like, well I fired Nick and everybody's like... So immediately the narrative switched.
Right?
But back then I couldn't confirm it.
Now you know, now you know that Ye24 was not in fact dead for the last six months.
I couldn't confirm that then because You can't talk about these things for reasons that Milo doesn't understand because he breaks FEC guidelines flagrantly.
And in a similar way, I can't exactly talk about everything that's going on now for similar reasons.
But depending on how it goes, I'll let you know.
We'll see.
unidentified
Bye.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Well, you know, we'll see.
You just gotta trust the plan, okay?
You gotta trust me, trust that I know what I'm doing here.
And I'll say this much, you know.
Let's remember what this is really about.
Let's remember what this is all really about.
It's not about me.
It's not about Ye.
It's not about Milo.
It's about Jews and Christians.
I started my show because I didn't want to have to deal with Jews trying to ruin America anymore.
And I'll just say that that's still my position.
Okay?
I'll just say that much.
That's still my position.
So, um, anyway, so that's that.
But, like I said, that's about as much as I can say, and we'll just have to wait and see what happens.
There's just been so many problems since Milo came aboard, and I hope that Ye can survive it all, but we'll, uh, we'll see.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Pretty underscore fly underscore white underscore guy sent three dollars.
unidentified
183.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
I had an ice cream cone tonight.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Nice!
I had a little ice cream, too.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Dead Elephant Grow Iper sent $3.
It would be a shame if dirt poor pedophile worshipper Daniel Schmidt's TikTok were mass reported.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hey, come on now.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Boogly Woogly sent $3.
What do you think of the app Brandon is proposing to track illegal immigrants?
Seems like a great idea if actually implemented correctly.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I haven't seen that.
Is there an app to track them?
But that does sound like a good idea.
We should tag them.
We should tag them like fish.
You know how you... There's nothing wrong with catch and release as long as you tag them.
You know, like how fishermen will go out in the ocean and they'll catch a shark and they'll tag its tail so that they know that they've caught it before.
So maybe we can bring in Limitless Illegals and not process them immediately as long as we put a little... we put like a big yellow tag on their ears or something.
And then in 10 years there'll be a population of like 10 million people with like an unremovable yellow tag or they have like a missing earlobe and that's how you know they took their tag off.
And then it really doesn't matter.
Then we can elect a total dictator and he'll just send out the army and throw everybody with a tag out of the country.
I mean, catch him, throw him back in like fish.
They're like fish.
They're like fish.
Tackle him at the border.
unidentified
Ah, this is a big one!
Click.
You know, you put a big... Ow!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
You know, you put a tag on the ear.
unidentified
Alright, you son of a bitch.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Now go pick some strawberries.
unidentified
Dios mio!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
And then they go out there, they're working on the field, they grow old, they think we forgot about them.
Then, total dictator gets elected and somebody shows up and says, with a tracking device.
There he is.
Bag him.
Then they throw a big net over his head and they throw him back over the border.
unidentified
Now that we can do.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
As long as you keep track of them.
Because then they can't get away.
The problem is not catch and release.
The problem is we catch them, release them, and there's no way to keep track of them.
Then they're just out there, and you can't tell Pablo from Pedro.
But if you put a big yellow tag on the earlobe, and you can track them down and catch them, then we can guarantee that they'll all go back one day.
So, you know, not a bad idea.
What do you think causes people to be NPCs?
Jewish or illegal.
unidentified
I mean illegal.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Boogly Wooly sent $3.
Some Republicans like Massey are saying to verify his government overreach and might not vote for the immigration bill.
Lowlbertarian nonsense?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Yeah, absolutely.
Lowlbertarian nonsense.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Pubert Brogan sent $3.
What do you think causes people to be NPCs?
Do you think people have always been this way?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I don't know.
That's an interesting question.
I think that, I think that yes though, people have always been this way.
Probably there's like a spiritual, excuse me, there's got to be some kind of spiritual bifurcation.
Like clearly some people are different than others, meaning like fundamentally different.
Like some people Some people are conscious and then it seems like some people are almost less than conscious, like less than sentient.
So are they projections?
Part of me wonders if reality is of a different nature than we think.
Like did God create a lot of robots and there's like a lot fewer people than we realize?
Like there's maybe only a hundred thousand people but there's like eight billion projections.
There's like eight billion people that look like people but they're not actually.
Sometimes I wonder.
I wonder if every human being is really all soul and all flesh, or if maybe some of them are more like props, you know?
They're more like, you know how you play Call of Duty offline multiplayer and you can make bots?
Or you play Fortnite and they send in bots to fill up the lobby if they can't find enough players?
Maybe it's like Fortnite.
And you can kind of tell, can't you?
Like when you're at... I haven't played Fortnite in a long time, but when you encounter a bot, you can kind of tell.
Because they're not exhibiting the full range of possibilities that a human player would.
Even a bad one.
They're also not as bad as a bad human player.
There's some sort of uncanny thing in the middle where they're proficient with accuracy.
But they're not good at adapting or something like that, you know?
And so human beings are the same way where there's definitely some people you could tell and it's not even an IQ thing but they're just not all the way there.
So I don't know, did God create those as like obstacles?
Were they supposed to just make the game more interesting?
Are they extras?
Are they meant to test us?
I don't know.
But it seems like there's a lot more of them than there are of us!
Us people!
I don't know, but maybe that's just me, because I kind of have main character energy, so maybe that's just how I feel as a smart, famous guy.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Edward Saul sent $3.
Heck of a right hook, Nick.
Hope you're healing up well.
Great show, King.
unidentified
Thanks!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Yeah, I'll throw a right hook in my Yeezy.
In my Yeezy uniform.
I'll throw a right hook with my sunglasses on at night.
In the Balenciaga boots.
Here's the thing.
Here's the thing about that.
Look, I just, I don't back down from a confrontation.
I mean, people can critique my, my technique.
They can critique the technique.
But I got the dog in me.
That's what matters.
Okay?
Somebody steps in me, I blast them with the sprite.
I hit the wrong person, they turn around and I'm like, what?
Somebody punches me on the street, I chase him down, I get in their face.
I got that dog in me.
I'm a fighter, okay?
You need that as a leader.
You need a fighter as a leader.
I can fight online.
I'll fight in real life with the sunglasses on, with the Balenciaga boots.
I throw it out and that's what matters.
That's the important thing.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Bob H. sent $5.
Are tomboys based or are they gay?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Totally based.
Tomboys are absolutely based.
I don't care what anybody says.
I know that Beardson and Wurzelroot debated on this.
I don't know whose side... I didn't catch that episode, but... But I'm definitely pro-tomboy.
Tomboys are hot.
And anybody who disagrees is kind of... It's honestly kind of gay if you don't agree, to be honest with you.
And here's why.
Because...
If you don't like that, you're just kind of like a boring... And you're also sort of like afraid to like other things.
Why?
Why, are you actually gay?
Is that why you're afraid of seeming gay?
Because deep down you really are gay?
That's why you need to compensate?
That's why you need to compensate by saying you don't think tomboys are hot?
So I'm pro-tomboy.
Worsler Roots says we are so back.
Let's go.
Let's go.
You're telling me, so hang on a minute, hang on a minute.
Alright, pause.
You're telling me, that you see a hot skater chick, with her hair up, under the baseball cap, and she's skateboarding and everything, and she's got that kind of like cute, like, scrunched up face, you're telling me you'd be like, EW!
unidentified
EW!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
And you'd prefer what?
I don't know, some sundress?
Some sundress hoe?
Some BPD?
5150 sundress, bitch?
Yeah, sorry.
Tomboy.
I'm going with the skater chick.
I'm going with the hot tomboy.
There's something about that.
I don't know what it is.
There's something about that.
What is it?
Is it that they're sort of like... I don't know.
Not me, but hey, but here's the thing.
I'm a little bit of a freak.
So maybe, so maybe that's just me.
I never claim to be totally, uh, you know.
unidentified
I never claim to be totally like, hey man, I just want my sundress wife and that's it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I mean, I've always said like, I'll do a little, hey, a little chocolate sin.
I hate that meme now because of fucking that other guy.
What's his name?
Um, uh, who was just in that big scandal with Daisy.
That guy ruined the meme.
So, but you know, I mean, hey, I like a little black girl action.
unidentified
I like Asian girls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I like a little of, you know, unconventional sorts of things and...
A tomboy falls into that category.
unidentified
Look, I'm a genius, okay?
I'm a... Hey!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm a genius.
I am an eccentric genius.
You think that I have, like, a completely weird life, but then in terms of my appetites, oh, but that's gonna be perfectly, like, normal.
I got something else to tell you.
Now, that doesn't mean that I'm not gonna find a totally normal life and have a totally normal situation.
Of course I'm gonna do that, because you have to.
It's them's the rules.
But I'd be lying if I said that that was like, oh, my fantasy is to marry my high school sweetheart and have a picnic on the lawn.
Yeah, it's a little bit different than that.
It's a little, I'm not gonna lie to you, it's a little bit different than that.
And, you know, these NPCs would never understand that.
I mean, let's just be honest, these NPCs, they would just never get that.
They would never understand what that's about.
unidentified
And that's okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
But these are just one of the things, these are among the things that you're just going to have to accept about having an eccentric genius.
If you want to have some mediocrity leading your thing, well then you're going to get the most vanilla piece of shit you've ever heard of.
But If you want a true creative, a true visionary to run things, you know, they're gonna be a little weird.
Hate to break it to you, they're gonna be a little bit weird.
So... Somebody says, bro, this sucks.
unidentified
You suck.
You suck!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Someone says, ladyboys?
Hey, it's not ladyboy, it's tomboy, okay?
That's okay.
I wouldn't expect you to understand.
You have to have an extremely high IQ.
To be fair, you have to have an extremely high IQ, so I wouldn't expect you to get it.
That's alright.
Beansoysilent.
Yeah, Beardson.
Well, Beardson's a millennial, okay?
So let's just... Let's just get that out.
Let's just get that out there.
He's a millennial who, you know, I don't want to pick on the guy, but Not that he'd really understand either.
Wurzel Roots is real.
Yeah, come on Wurzel.
Give me some backup here.
Give me some backup here.
I'm dying out here.
But yeah, totally.
Tomboy is based.
Tomboy is based.
And basically, really, it's all based, okay?
So there's that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
The modern monarchist sent $3.
You showed that squirming pipsqueak who was boss.
I understand why men speak of you either in fear and love, or hate and terror.
As a Polish-American, who is also a growiper, I fear and love you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hey, well thank you, my friend.
I appreciate you.
unidentified
It's true.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Inquisition growiper sent $3.
Ban politically provoked now.
No e-girls.
No exceptions.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Oh, for $3?
Sorry, pal.
It's gonna cost a little more than that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Thank you!
Hey, thank you, buddy.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
You're a little sus, though.
Hungarian?
unidentified
What are you?
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
You with Netanyahu? - The modern monarch is sent $3.
Luke Hogan, Daniel Schmidt.
True grassroots grow hyper versus mewling middle management future wannabe bureaucrat.
Get Daniel gone.
He sucks.
unidentified
I've seen crippled midgets with more charm than him. - Well, you know, he just, he failed the test.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
When we were hanging out with Ye, he was a total embarrassment and he refused to roam and salute me.
So, you know, you can have him.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Inquisition grow I percent three dollars.
Nick, I hope you check yourself into a hospital, Nick, for your accident.
It's only a matter of time.
Your insides are squirting blood like a fire hydrant.
It's over.
You're a goner.
I'm going to miss you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hopefully, hopefully so.
We'll see.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
AF Nolan sent $5.
You're a living white pill.
Love you, bro.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hey, thank you, man.
Love you too, buddy.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
AF Nolan sent $5.
Can't wait until you're back in Twitter.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Yeah, you and me, buddy.
You and me.
I can't wait to be back either, but I don't know if that's gonna happen anytime soon.
We'll see.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Indonesian Nigga sent $3.
Have you seen what's going on in Pakistan?
Long story short Alpha Male Prime Minister Imran Khan was overthrown by Zog-backed military.
They just arrested him, but his supporters aren't taking it like bitches.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I have not been paying attention, but maybe I'll cover that tomorrow.
Depending on if it's important enough.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
John Dave Irving sent $169.
If you overlay the soda throw and recent gate and video release of the fight, you see a very similar motion.
Would it be safe to say you're good at the game of whack-a-mohel?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Well you know he was sort of like grabbing me and kicking me so the way that I had to punch it was sort of I was trying to get around him but you see in a street fight it's not a boxing match it's a street fight so there's kicking there's punching you know so if you can't you're not always going to get a perfect jab sometimes you got to just you got to bring it you got to bring it in for a landing somehow on some trajectory so Anyway, but he was a bigger guy than me.
That's what people don't see because I'm in the big jacket, but he was like a big guy Bigger than me wait.
I'll use a big fat guy and I'd I had to do what I could in that instance, so... Anyway, but thank you for the big super chat, I appreciate it, and I have a throw!
The throw was good, it's just that it was a baseball throw.
When you throw a cup, you have to throw, you have to lob it from the bottom.
You know, but I was just pissed off, I mean, I just get nuked with ketchup, I was furious, I wasn't even thinking, I just picked it up and launched it across the room, and I had never thrown a cup before.
But you know, the contents come out of the lid.
There's no... Because there's fluid inside of it, it doesn't move through the air like a normal object, so I had to lob it.
Now, these are things you learn, but either way... Look, it's about, you gotta get the job done, which is what I did.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
John Dave Irving sent $10.
A mohel, or mohelet, is still trained in the ritual of circumcision according to the rules prescribed in classical rabbinic texts and subsequent law codes.
Alex K sent $3.
I'm glad you and ye are cool at least.
You've both been heroes of mine since middle school and it'd be heartbreaking to see you two at odds.
Sending love always.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I love him, you know.
I really do.
I think he's a great man and no matter what happens, I would never turn on him.
But as far as the poli... I mean, but politics is one thing, but as a guy, you know, I always love him as a guy, so... Yeah, maybe.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
The modern monarchist sent $3.
Catch and release?
More like catch and disease.
- Yeah, maybe, something like that. - John sent $3.
Nick, I love you.
Don't hate the messenger but conspicuous means to stand out as to be clearly visible or apparent.
Seems to me like you use it as a synonym for suspicious.
Love the show.
Keep it up.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
No, I don't think I have.
I think everything I've just... Show me where I've used the word improperly.
When I talked about Dick Carlson?
When I say that Dick Carlson is conspicuous?
Yeah, he's like visibly a fad.
So, no, I don't think that's the case.
I think maybe you need to learn how that word should be used, actually.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
Okay, no.
I mean, look, I won't go that far.
- Okay, no. - Okay, no. - Okay, wow. - I mean, look, I won't go that far.
People should not watch it because it's very scandalizing.
But, I mean, hey, it's a well-made show.
So what, I mean, it's a good show.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
- Okay, wow. - I mean, I'm gonna go that far.
People should not watch it because it's very scandalizing.
But, I mean, hey, it's a well-made show.
It's a well-made show.
You can't take that away.
You cannot take that away from Euphoria, so... I'm not gonna die on the hill.
I don't think people should watch it because there's a lot of nudity and it's probably not a good thing to watch, but... It was well-made.
Hey, I'm not... They can make movies.
I mean, these Jews, they make the wrong movies, but they're not bad at making movies and shows.
I'm just saying.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼
If you say so.
If you say so, I believe you.
But I don't know about that.
False allegation.
I swear I'm not with the Jews.
We don't like them.
Just our leadership is cucking to them.
B.C.
They are compromised.
We don't like Jews here.
We are more anti-Semitic than Germany 80 years ago.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
If you say so, if you say so, I believe you.
unidentified
But I don't know about that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Okay, we got one more.
unidentified
I'm not going to read that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Okay, that's our last Super Chat.
That's gonna do it for me here tonight.
As always, remember to follow me here on Cozy.
Smash the follow button to get a push notification whenever I go live.
Follow me on Gab Telegram, True Social, and Rumble.
Links are down below.
I'm on the air Monday through Friday, 9 o'clock Central, 10 o'clock Eastern Time.
As always, thanks for watching.
Thanks to all our Super Chatters, everybody that watches the show.
We love you, and I'll see you tomorrow.
Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
▲
Export Selection