America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - MARK OF THE BEAST: Mr. Beast ENDORSES Trans Cohost CHEMICAL CASTRATION | America First Ep. 1144MARK OF THE BEAST: Mr. Beast ENDORSES Trans Cohost CHEMICAL CASTRATION

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 7, 2023 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:56:20

MARK OF THE BEAST: Mr. Beast ENDORSES Trans Cohost CHEMICAL CASTRATION | America First Ep. 1144MARK OF THE BEAST: Mr. Beast ENDORSES Trans Cohost CHEMICAL CASTRATION | America First Ep. 1144

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:37:47

streamlabs matthew tts

09:16

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		- Good evening, everybody.
		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Thursday.
		We have a lot to talk about tonight.
		Lots to get into.
		Big show.
		Featured story tonight we're talking about Mr. Beast.
		And we've heard a lot of things about Mr. Beast and the name and the logo and the miracles and it all seems to come together in an unsettling way and for a long time I didn't really attribute too much to that but the big news today is that Mr. Beast and I don't really watch the videos but one of the guys on the show, his co-host, is trans.
		I guess this just came out today although people have been noticing for a long time.
		But his best buddy on the show came out and said that he's on hormone replacement therapy.
		This is a guy who's married, he has kids, but he started painting his nails, he grew his hair out, he's wearing makeup, now he's on HRT.
		Number one YouTuber in the world by the way and big with the kids.
		Now, I'm an old guy.
		People younger than me are into it.
		And so we'll talk about this revelation tonight.
		Not good.
unidentified		Not good.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And you know, I don't know.
		Maybe I was wrong.
		Maybe the trans thing has to be the battlefield.
		Because it seems like that's where everybody's meeting.
		That's where the right and the left are meeting these days.
		Although, and we'll talk about it tonight, it's gotta be better than just an appeal about the kids.
		That kind of argument isn't going to work anymore.
		It's got to be a wholesale rejection of the entire thing.
		No transgender at all.
		Not just for the kids, for anybody.
		So we'll talk about all that tonight.
		That'll be our featured story.
		Pretty crazy.
		Although not surprising.
		We'll also be talking tonight about the situation in Israel.
		Very predictable stuff here.
		Reminds me of the Syria strikes from six years ago.
		Same time, just about.
		I think it was around April 11th, 2017.
		But big development in Israel, and this happened at night in Israel, I believe it happened though this morning,
		That in response to some big arrests that have been happening at the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Israel, Palestinians and... I think it's Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and Palestinians in Lebanon with Hamas and with Hezbollah have launched missiles into Israel, very few of which were stopped by the Iron Dome.
		In retaliation tonight, Israel is conducting airstrikes against both the Gaza Strip and Lebanon.
		And the Lebanon airstrikes just took place a couple hours ago.
		Although it's very peculiar because nobody can really say why the riots started at the Al-Aqsa Mosque.
		And additionally, there were no casualties in the airstrikes.
		They say that three aircraft entered Lebanese airspace, fired a few missiles, didn't really do anything, and then they left.
		And this comes, of course, just a week, week and a half, after widespread rioting in Israel over the firing of Netanyahu's defense minister.
		And this is all about the judicial reform, about whether or not the Supreme Court will be able to remove Netanyahu from power.
		And so in the middle of all this, we get the worst hostilities between Israelis and Palestinians since 2006.
		What a coincidence.
		The timing's remarkable.
		As always, there's more to the story.
		So we'll talk about that too.
		Should be a pretty good show.
		Good to be back.
		Before we get into the news, though, I want to remind you to smash the follow button here on Cozy to get a push notification whenever I go live.
		Follow me on Rumble.
		Also, I'm live on Rumble every night.
		Also, follow me on Gab Telegram.
		Truth Social.
		Links are all down below.
		Aside from that, no other news to report.
		Remember, I won't be here next week.
		I'll be Oh, doing a big collaboration on Friday.
		Next Friday.
		So no show next Friday or Thursday.
		Do I do a show tomorrow?
		I always get confused when it comes to Good Friday.
		Can you work on Good Friday?
		I don't really know what the rules are.
		It always seemed to me a little bit of poor taste.
		But I don't know what the rules are.
		I don't know what the rules stipulate about all that.
		I'll probably be doing a show tomorrow unless Classical Theist hits me up and says, oh, don't do it!
		But it's Holy Week.
		Happy Holy Thursday.
		And we're looking forward to Easter.
		I'll still be doing a show though Monday through probably Wednesday next week, but I don't know about tomorrow.
		What do you think?
		Do I do a show on Friday?
		What are the rules on that?
		Let me take a look at live chat.
		What are the rules on Good Friday?
		Can you work?
	Can you stream?
	You have to work.
	I'm working.
	You should too, Nick.
	Just say it's cancelled.
	Hey, alright.
	I'm asking a question, alright?
	I didn't say I'm taking the day off.
	It's Good Friday now?
	Well, technically.
	Well, not really.
	It's 11.40 for me.
	Yes, alright, alright, alright.
	I'll do the show Friday.
	I'll be back here tomorrow.
	But not next Friday, not next Thursday.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		What else?
		The other thing I wanted to talk about, I just saw this in Revolver and I don't really want to do a whole show on it, but there was a big exclusive in Revolver and it totally reminded me.
		Whatever happened to the Capitol Riot footage?
		Do you remember this?
		Because a big part of Kevin McCarthy becoming the Speaker of the House back in January when they held I forget how many rounds of voting, but I think it was between 5 and 10.
		They held many rounds of voting as to who the Speaker of the House would be, very contentious because of the slim majority that the Republicans won.
		And one of the concessions that was given to the MAGA caucus, which consisted of Paul Gosar, Matt Gaetz, Jim Jordan, among others, Was that we were to gain access to the 40,000 plus hours of security camera footage that was collected on January 6th.
		And a little bit after that we saw some of it on Tucker Carlson and that was supposed to be a C-level story.
		Like that wasn't even supposed to be on the show.
		He did one show on it, it was never mentioned again.
		And now here we are in April And we were told back then that we were going to get all the footage.
		Well, they just have to edit some certain things out like, for example, some of the security camera angles showing the exits.
		It might be a security concern.
		So they said, well, they had to edit that out.
		Well, it's been three months.
		Where's the footage?
		And I just saw that on Revolver, they did a big exclusive piece on this and I totally forgot.
		But that's how they operate.
		That is always how they operate.
		In November, when the election took place, and shortly after, and there was a vote in the committees, or in the conference, about who was going to, whose name was going to be put forward for the speakership, well, there was all this talk about concessions, and, hey, Kevin McCarthy's not so bad, he'll be alright.
		It's different this time, guys.
unidentified		We're not going to get screwed over again.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's different.
		This time he's got the endorsement of Trump and of others.
		And so this time it won't be so bad.
		January, another protracted negotiation and all kinds of concessions were given.
		Hey, we're gonna make him the Speaker.
		We don't want to shut down the Congress.
		We got to get things moving.
		Okay.
		Well, it's April.
		We still don't have the footage.
		Still don't... I don't even really see any evidence that Republicans run the House.
		It's been three months.
		So we'll keep an eye on that now that I uh now that I took a look at that article and was reminded of it but that they count on that that they make these promises during and shortly after the election and then they never talk about it again and the media is on board with this and then you repeat the cycle wash rinse repeat The next time the election comes around.
		So I was one of the biggest opponents of McCarthy becoming the Speaker.
		I said that if we can't have a Speaker, or if the Democrats get the Speakership, then so be it.
		Like, let Congress be without a Speaker.
		Let the government be without the money.
		Let them figure it out.
		Kevin McCarthy should have never been elevated to the Speakership.
		He was one of the young guns!
		It's incredible.
		Donald Trump will go on the offensive against Ron DeSantis and say that he's a disciple of Paul Ryan.
		And he's right.
		And that's why, that's one of the reasons why DeSantis should be disqualified from seeking the nomination in the minds of the voters.
		But by the same token, so was Kevin McCarthy.
		Yet Kevin McCarthy is the endorsed Speaker of the House and cooperating with Mar-a-Lago on Republicans in Congress.
		And like I said, everybody was told back then, promises and deals and it's gonna be different, and I said, this is how they get us.
		It's how they get us every single time.
		That's how they got us in 2016.
		Not with Trump, but with everybody else on the down-ballot races.
		What did that produce?
		Two years of Republican majority in both chambers, with a majority in the court, with the White House, we couldn't even get a border wall.
		We could get $200 billion for Ukraine.
		We couldn't get $17 billion for a permanent 30-foot concrete border wall that's 1,000 miles long.
		They couldn't give us $2 billion.
		I think we got $1.3, $1.6 billion at various points for fencing in the Rio Grande Valley.
		I think we got $1.3, $1.6 billion at various points for fencing in the Rio Grande Valley.
		That was it.
		And people forgot.
		And then it was the midterms, and then it was 20, and then it was 22, and then it was the speakership, and every single time it's something like, Hold the line!
unidentified		Don't let the Democrats- The all-important court!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The most important election of our lifetime!
unidentified		Blah blah blah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Okay, well, here we are.
		Here we are again.
		Fooled, duped, with nothing.
		They have the deals.
		They have the speakership.
		They got what they wanted.
		We get nothing.
		We don't even have the footage.
		We don't even have it.
		Anyway, so, I just wanted to bring that up.
		There's not a whole story in there, but I saw that on Revolver.
		I totally forgot.
		How many of you totally forgot that that was going on?
		Because I completely forgot about it until I pulled up Revolver today and saw it.
		And I was like, oh yeah, weren't we supposed to get all that footage and finally get to the bottom of January 6th and, by the way, probably exonerate many of the defendants that were there?
		Guess it's not a priority, but...
		Anyway, so that's just that.
		Also, I posted something really good this morning from the latest Ron Unz article.
		Just an update about everything that's been going on with the emerging multipolar world order, Saudi Arabia drifting away, adoption of the Chinese RMB currency everywhere.
		Great article.
		I highly recommend everybody should read it.
		But I was blown away because I saw this... So Ron Unz cited an analysis by a French economist talking about the same thing that I've been saying for a year.
		Last year when the sanctions began against Russia, I said that in real terms Russia has a far stronger economy than any of the individual countries in Europe.
		I said, and that is because Russia traffics in real wealth, which is commodities.
		Russia has lumber, fertilizer, agriculture.
		It has platinum, nickel, natural gas, oil.
		It has things that a country needs.
		It has things that human beings use in construction, energy, to eat, for food, all of that.
		I said, and so when you have one economy that is dependent on the other, and that's the finance economy, it has the services and it has the banking, And those sorts of things, and when you have on the other side of that dependent relationship a country that has the stuff, in other words, like in Germany, Russia needs Germany's money, Germany needs Russia's gas.
		I said, well when that relationship becomes contentious, who's the winner?
		The country with the cash or the country with the gas?
		The cash or the gas?
		That's gross.
		I had to say that though.
		The country with the cash or the country with the natural gas?
		Of course it's the country with the gas.
		Because when winter happens and it gets cold, people need gas to burn to heat their homes.
		You can't burn cash to heat your home.
		And that's what it is.
		It's not even gold anymore.
		It's just paper.
		That's all there is, is just cash.
		It's not even a metallic standard anymore.
		So it's not like there's some big stockpile of gold or silver or something.
		It's just paper.
		And that's just one example, but when these countries which are dependent on trade and their deficit economies, Germany is a little bit closer to Russia and more industrial, but when you look at these countries like the United States, United Kingdom, Italy, France, their economy is all services, and they're all deficit countries that import everything that they actually use, well, who will be damaged when they sanction the countries that make everything?
		Or that make a lot of their stuff?
		Or critical things?
		Well, it's going to be those countries.
		And so I said that a year ago.
		I said that a long time ago before it was borne out that Russia would be seemingly impervious to the sanctions.
		But there was a really good Academic analysis of it, like I said, cited in this article by Ron Unz, by a French economist, and it compared how we would consider the Russian economy, which is in terms of GDP, to a different way to measure the economy, which is comparing economies based on their productive sectors.
		meaning measuring their economy by the percentage of their GDP or their purchasing power, which comes from agriculture, construction and industry compared to services.
		And when you look at that metric, you'll find that China has a industrial economy that is three times the size of America.
		When you add up the proportion of Chinese GDP, which is industry, agriculture, construction, it's three times bigger than the comparable sectors in the American economy.
		And the Russian economy is bigger than the German economy when you do the same thing.
		So last year they were talking about how Russia could be isolated because, well, that's the 10th biggest economy in the world.
		It's roughly the size of the Portuguese or Spanish economy.
		It'll be no big problem.
		But in wartime, and when sanctions are put in place on critical things like gas, It doesn't matter so much how you denominate it in cash, what the theoretical value of services would be in cash, it matters how much a country can produce.
		How much food, energy, building materials, and other productive things, what can a country produce?
		So, anyway, I just thought that was interesting because I called it a year ago, and a year later the prediction's right and people are looking at it a little more scientifically, but But that is the case.
		So anyway, so those are just a couple things I wanted to touch on.
		Some interesting things I was looking at today, but I want to move on.
	I want to get into our first story here about Israel, and this is an interesting one.
	You're not going to hear this from the news because they're not going to report this, but this is my theory, okay?
	So bear with me.
	It's important we set the stage.
	Last week I did a long show, I think it was last Monday, about these widespread riots in Israel.
	There were a hundred thousand rioters out in the streets blocking the highway in Tel Aviv last Monday.
	And the unions were calling for a general strike to shut down the economy, the schools were closed, the airport was closed, the Israel diplomatic mission was threatening to resign at the New York consulate, IDF said that the Israeli military might not be prepared to defend the country.
	So last Monday the country was Disintegrating.
	Falling apart at the seams.
	And all of this was surrounding Bibi Netanyahu's judicial reform.
	Bibi Netanyahu is currently embattled.
	He's being investigated by the top prosecutor in the country, by their Attorney General.
	And it looks like they're poised to remove him from office.
	They made a deal with him last year when he formed a coalition to govern that even though he's under investigation and even though he could be removed from office he could still stay on as the Prime Minister so long as he wouldn't intervene in the judicial reform where there's a conflict of interest.
	If Netanyahu is the subject of an investigation from the top prosecutor, it's a big problem then if Netanyahu tries to reform the national judicial system.
	He's the subject of it.
	He's being investigated by the judicial system.
	And so Netanyahu has proposed that the Supreme Court be subordinated to the Israeli Parliament, to the Knesset.
	Which the Prime Minister and his governing coalition has almost total power over.
	And so specifically what that would mean is that Netanyahu and his Likud party would be able to expand the civilian settlements in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip without opposition from the courts.
	It also means that potentially Netanyahu would be able to prevent the Supreme Court from removing him from office.
	That the Likud coalition could step in and they could change the composition of the court and put in more of Netanyahu's allies, or they could change the rules governing whom the Supreme Court could remove from office.
	So this is a naked power grab.
	This is just corruption at its finest.
	And so this was the cause of all of these riots.
	They were actually triggered by the firing of the defense minister by Netanyahu for speaking out against the judicial reform.
	So the Israelis took to the streets, the military protested, the consulates protested, the schools, the unions threatened a general strike.
	The country was on the brink of collapse last week because of this power grab by Netanyahu.
	And then Yahoo was able to avert disaster by promising to postpone the judicial reform until this summer and to make some changes to it.
	He also brought back on the fired defense minister.
	And so the unions called off the strike, schools reopened, the airport reopened, the rioters went away, and so things seemed like they were okay until this week.
	So that's the background here.
	Keep in mind that last week the Israeli state was about to disintegrate.
	In effect, it was a coup.
	They were on the cusp of overthrowing the Netanyahu government, which by the way, does not rule with a majority.
	Netanyahu's Likud party rules with a plurality.
	They want a plurality of the vote, not a majority.
	No country can win, or rather no faction or no party can win a majority.
	There's been several rounds of elections in the past couple of years trying to find a government since Netanyahu lost in 2019.
	And ultimately, Likud regained power in, I believe, 2021.
	So, that's the background here.
	Now, fast forward until last night, and there's all this Drama going on around the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, which is one of the I believe it's a third holiest mosque in Islam behind the Mecca and Medina mosques.
	Very important mosque.
	And so the other night there were all these reports about riots by the Palestinian Muslims who were there.
	They should have been there praying for Ramadan.
	And there were reports that they were rioting at this mosque.
	And so the Israeli police came in and started breaking up the riots.
	They came down really hard on the Palestinians.
	That's the report from yesterday, although it's very unclear where all of this started and how all this came about.
	Today it was reported that Hamas and the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and working with Hezbollah in Lebanon are launching rockets into Israel, many of which struck civilian targets.
	Only a fraction of them were shot out of the sky by the Iron Dome.
	So mortars and missiles launched by Hezbollah and Hamas working with the Palestinians in response to the Israeli crackdown on the Ramadan worshippers at the Al-Aqsa Mosque.
	They're shooting rockets and missiles into Israel.
	In response to this, Israel conducts airstrikes tonight in the Gaza Strip and in Lebanon.
	And this is a story from Russia Today.
	This is a quick recap and then I'll elaborate on my theory here.
	Which I think you can probably begin to understand.
	It says, quote, There are no reports of casualties so far.
	Videos shared on social media showed explosions.
	Netanyahu said on Thursday, quote, we will strike our enemies and they will pay the price for any act of aggression after some 34 rockets were fired from southern Lebanon.
	No one took responsibility for the attack, but the IDF blamed Hamas, a militant Palestinian group headquartered in Gaza.
	Israeli media called the attack the most serious escalation since 2006 when Israel attempted to dislodge Hezbollah from southern Lebanon.
	That war is widely considered a Hezbollah victory.
	According to local media, Hamas and Hezbollah have placed their long-range rockets on high alert and may strike at central Israel in response to the IDF bombing.
	Defense Minister Gallant, whom Netanyahu fired last week but reinstated after public backlash, has instructed the IDF to prepare for all possible options of retaliation.
	All IDF personnel were reportedly recalled from leave in the units near the border with Lebanon placed on high alert on Thursday.
	Earlier this week, Israeli riot police arrested hundreds of Palestinians at the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, disrupting services during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.
	Some Palestinians had flocked to the mosque after reports that Israeli settlers were planning to ritually sacrifice a goat there.
	Okay?
	Previous clashes at Al-Aqsa in May 2021 triggered an 11-day conflict between Israel and Hamas.
	it eventually ended in a ceasefire mediated by Egypt.
	Just last week Netanyahu faced mass protests organized by the liberal opposition which called for his resignation over the proposed overhaul of Israel's Supreme Court.
	So, last week Israel is about to overthrow Netanyahu.
	They're about to Basically shut down the entire country in order to achieve this.
	The economy, the schools, the airports, the embassies, the military, they're going to his house.
	Protesters were breaking through the police line and they were going to Netanyahu's house because they wanted to drag him out of there and overthrow this government.
	Which Israel is a developed, rich, Democratic country.
	So for this to happen is a pretty shocking turn of events.
	That was last Monday.
	Today, Thursday, Israel's on the brink of war with Hezbollah and Hamas, the worst hostilities in 17 years.
	And they say that ultimately this series of events, which has taken place very rapidly today, was triggered by a rumor
	About a goat being sacrificed in Jerusalem by the Israeli settlers, which then attracted rioting Muslims, which then called for Israeli police to arrest a hundred of them, which then called for a retaliation from Hamas, which now calls for a retaliation from Israel, which now will invite retaliation from Hezbollah and Hamas attacking central Israel.
	Which then will call for retaliation by Israel, which then may drag Egypt into the conflict.
	Egypt says they're very concerned about what's happening.
	They used to be a mediator.
	Now it seems like they're acting as a partisan.
	May drag Iran into the fight or some other country.
	Jordan and the United Arab Emirates have said they're reviewing their relationship with Israel.
	But forgive me if it sounds conspiratorial.
	What this looks like to me is just classic realist politics.
	This is your classic Reichstag fire.
	It's your classic false flag.
	This is Netanyahu triggering what could be a region-wide war.
	I mean it could get that far.
	I mean we don't know where it's going but at least for today it's local.
	And it's localized in the Gaza Strip in southern Lebanon, which is right there on the border of Israel.
	But this is a situation which is spiraling out of control, it seems, almost by design, to provoke or catalyze some kind of response by the Israeli public to rally around the flag and, in effect, rally around the Netanyahu government.
	Is that crazy?
	Is that cynical?
	But it seems to me that clearly that's what it is.
	This isn't the only development like this.
	Earlier this week the Finance Minister of Israel went out and gave a speech.
	And he gave a speech on a podium that showed a map of Greater Israel.
	The Finance Minister, which is one of the highest ranking cabinet members, ...said that the Palestinian people are not a real people, that is a fiction.
	That's not just some radical Jew saying this, this is the finance minister in the Israeli government.
	And he said that in front of a podium with a map of Greater Israel, which is an Israeli state that stretches from the Nile River in Egypt all the way to the Euphrates River in Iraq, which then covers the sovereign state of Jordan also.
	Understandably, the state of Jordan said that they're going to review their relationship with Israel.
	In addition, another Israeli cabinet member said that they don't like the United Arab Emirates.
	They don't want to go back because they don't like their cities and the United Arab Emirates said that they're going to put normalization on hold.
	They're going to put some of the terms of the Abraham Accords on hold because of the offensive remark.
	Do you think that all of this is a coincidence?
	Provoking the Evangelical Christians.
	Provoking Jordan.
	Provoking Egypt.
	Provoking the United Arab Emirates.
	Provoking the Palestinians.
	Provoking Hezbollah.
	Provoking Hamas.
	In order to trigger what it seems is a situation that can go as far as it needs to to shore up the reign of Netanyahu.
	That's what it looks like to me, very clearly.
	It could be limited to a short exchange with the Palestinians in Gaza and southern Lebanon, or it seems like something that could threaten to undermine years of diplomacy that took place during the Trump administration.
	Or even going back to the Camp David Accords.
	Finance Minister goes up and says we want to build greater Israel?
	That's a tacit threat.
	That's like saying we're going to invade Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Syria, You think that's a coincidence that the Finance Minister, you think that's a faux pas?
	That the highest, one of the highest ranking cabinet members next to the recently sacked Defense Minister Gallant would go out there with a map so provocative like that?
	They don't talk about those things publicly.
	They don't talk about Greater Israel in public unless they want to catalyze some kind of response.
	Is that all just a coincidence that these events are taking place at the same time?
	It seems like it may also be an attempt to drag the United States into the conflict because of course Joe Biden was hanging Netanyahu out to dry last week.
	Now you've got Saudi Arabia drifting away from the United States.
	Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Turkey, Egypt seeking membership in the BRICS coalition.
	Is this some move by Israel to shore up that alliance?
	Make sure that we're isolated with them?
	It's gonna be Russia, China, Egypt, Turkey, the Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iran against who?
	Us and Israel?
	That's crazy!
	But it seems like that's what they want.
	So there's something really peculiar going on over there right now.
	Reminds me a lot of 20...
	2018 Right around the time of the Las Vegas shooting I haven't seen this much activity in the Middle East since the fall of 2018 if you remember there were rumors about a Saudi invasion of Jordan and It was I believe the president of Lebanon that was under house arrest in Saudi Arabia That was right around the time of the Vegas shooting when the crown prince Was that the Mandalay Bay Hotel when all of that went down?
	Seemed like some kind of arms deal or something.
	So there's a lot, a lot going on over there with Israel.
	We've got to pay very close attention to how this is going to escalate because this isn't the end of it.
	It seems very clear that probably this rumor, which brought all these Palestinians to the mosque, was started by the government.
	The government wanted them there so that it would then move on and arrest them and then provoke a response and so on and so forth.
	It seems like even these airstrikes may be a part of it because both airstrikes did no casualties.
	No casualties.
	It seems like very little damage.
	Very few missiles at all were fired.
	So, how do you make any sense of that?
	Rockets are blasted into Israel and most of them, or some of them, shot down by the Iron Dome.
	Israel responds with this tepid, impotent airstrike.
	Clearly, this is not organic.
	Clearly, this is not all a coincidence.
	This is the design of somebody, most likely Netanyahu.
	And what would be the motivation?
	It would be to scare all the Israelis into rallying around the flag.
	And there was a lot of rhetoric about this last week.
	They said, for the first time, Israel is in danger.
	For the first time since the Yom Kippur War, Israel is actually in mortal danger.
	And people said, we need to think about how grave the danger is because we're Jews.
	After all, everybody wants to kill us.
	We fought for this fledgling state, now it's going to blow up over judicial reform?
	A week later, very convenient reminder about that dilemma with all these countries turning against them and with airstrikes going on.
	It was relatively quiet for a long time until now, until a week after they almost overthrew the government.
	And this will have major implications for the United States because it was in response to these kinds of security threats, which is why we were involved in Iraq, why we were involved in Syria, why they now want us to go to war with Iran.
	And this is why, by the way, it's a good thing to tie it back in with what we talked about at the top of the show.
	This is why it's a good thing that this multi-polar world order is coming into fruition.
	Because when we had a world order that was dominated by the United States, I'm sure it's not lost on anybody that Israel was probably the number one beneficiary of that arrangement.
	Was it the United States that ran the world order or was it Israel?
	And it's interesting because I saw a tweet from Scott Greer a few weeks ago where he said something like, look at our policy on Ukraine.
	How can you explain Our policy on Ukraine, if you believe that the State Department is occupied by Zionists.
	I'll tell you how.
	Who are some of Russia's closest allies in the Middle East?
	Iran and Syria.
	Who are the number one targets of Israel since the fall of the Saddam Hussein government?
	Iran and Syria.
	It was largely due to Russian intervention that Assad was able to win the Syrian Civil War and regain control of his country, which is not what Israel wanted.
	And it's due to Russia's support, and increasingly Chinese support, that Iran has not collapsed under the weight of punitive sanctions from the United States.
	It's Iran that's been taking over the region.
	It's Iran, according to Israel, that is sponsoring Hezbollah in Syria and Lebanon.
	It's Iran that is putting Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps arms depots and bases in Iraq and Syria.
	So people say, what do the Zionists have to gain from supporting Ukraine?
	Well, insofar as you have hardcore Zionist Jews supporting all of this.
	There's a great article by Kevin MacDonald about this which came out yesterday.
	Insofar as you have Zionist Jews and neocons in the media and in the Biden government that are supporting this, it's pretty clear what the agenda is.
	Weaken Russia, and by extension, weaken Iran, weaken Syria for the benefit of Israel.
	And as the world transitions away from American dominance, it's also transitioning away from the kind of unilateral power that Israel could summon through the United States.
	Was the United States using its unilateral, hyper-power status to go to war on behalf of its own interests?
	When you had these neocons arguing for democratic globalism, were we going and spreading our democracy in Sub-Saharan Africa?
	Or in Eastern Europe?
	Or in Asia?
	Or was it all in the Middle East?
	Or was it all in countries that are neighbors with Israel?
	And so as that subsides, that'll be good for everybody.
	As that moment passes, With a coalition of China, Russia, Iran, Syria, potentially even Saudi Arabia now in the cards, Egypt, the Gulf States, now you've got a world where finally the Zionists can't do whatever they please.
	That's a good thing for everybody, actually, not just us.
	So, those are the developments in Israel.
	As always, it's all connected.
	The biggest mistake that you can make when you look at these things Is to look at them in compartments, looking at Israel, Palestine, Russia, Ukraine, China, Taiwan, because they're all connected.
	I mean, they're literally all connected on the same continent.
	And the trade is all connected.
	These military alliances are all entangled and connected in various ways.
	The personnel is all connected.
	When you look at Victoria, Newland, and Ukraine, And now she's in the Biden government and you look at these people that were the architects of overthrowing Ukraine and how they're supportive of Israel and the neocon agenda, how they supported the war in Iraq.
	It's all connected.
	So we'll keep covering this because I'm sure this isn't the last of this.
	We'll probably have more tomorrow when there's a response from Hezbollah in Hamas, if not then on Monday.
	We'll be following this very closely and we'll pay a lot more attention to what's happening with Russia and China.
	Big meeting today, or this week I should say.
	Taiwanese delegation was sent to the United States, then at the Reagan Library in California, United States sent a delegation to Taiwan.
	So things are heating up all over the globe.
	It's all bad, okay?
	It's all good in a certain sense.
	It's all good for us that the dissidents are winning, that the opposition is winning.
	It is all bad, though, because it all could end in a total war scenario.
	Not good.
	That's the part that's not good.
	So, anyway, we'll probably follow up on this tomorrow or Monday at the latest.
	But that's that.
	That's what I think is going on.
	I think it's being driven by... As always, it's being driven by this country.
	It's driven by this one guy in this country.
	It is about his security as the head of state.
	It is about the state's security in this region.
	And that is dictating all of this global warfare.
	We probably could have a very good relationship with all these countries if it wasn't for that.
	To tell you the truth, when you look at the rhetoric between Putin and Xi Jinping, how they're best friends, we could have had that.
	Donald Trump could have been president.
	Pat Buchanan could have been president.
	Pat Buchanan could have been president.
	In 1992 and he could have been friends with Putin and well I guess that's before Putin's time and it's before Xi's time, but we could have had real statesmen.
	We could have had Buchanan, we could have had a President Trump in the year 2000.
	Could you imagine Trump, Xi, Putin all becoming dictators in this century and all being best friends and we all go to Mars and create a moon base and we all invent new technology and we all This is what could have been possible.
	Maybe that's the role the Jews are playing.
	If it wasn't for them, we could have built another Tower of Babel.
	Things could have been really good.
	And the Jews are here to throw a wrench into everything.
	As always.
	Because that's the kind of cooperation that would be unlocked if it wasn't for them.
	The Cold War was over 30 years ago.
	It could have been over.
	It could have been over.
	It could have been an era of peace and friendship for everybody.
	A true and good human race coming together, but they had to jump in and say nope.
	Not good enough.
	So anyway, so we'll... but that's besides the point.
	We'll keep covering that.
	I want to move on though.
	I want to get on into the story about Mr. Beast.
	And this is sort of a black pill in a lot of ways.
	Kind of a sad story.
	And I'm sure a lot of you have seen this.
	Now, I don't follow Mr. Beast too closely.
	I watch some of his videos from time to time, but I'm not like a fanboy or anything.
	And I like him.
	I think he's a good guy.
	I don't know too much about him, but he's upbeat, he's positive, he's entrepreneurial.
	I like that.
	But anyway, So Mr. Beast has been catching a lot of heat today because apparently one of his co-hosts came out today as trans, and that he's on HRT.
	For those that don't know, Mr. Beast is the number one YouTuber in the world.
	Number one by far, I believe by subscribers, and one of the richest.
	One of the most viral, one of the most talked about, and he's been under fire a lot lately for a lot of the philanthropy.
	I never had a problem with that.
	But today, one of the co-hosts on this show comes out as having used hormone replacement therapy.
	It's a guy who's married with kids.
	Who now wants to become a girl.
	Wearing makeup, painting his nails, growing his hair out, and taking estrogen.
	And this is a story from Yahoo.
	It says, quote, Chris Tyson, a popular content creator who frequently appears on YouTuber MrBeast's channel, revealed on Twitter today that they are taking hormone replacement therapy.
	They, by the way.
	HRT and it's only been two months he posted on Twitter quote tweeting a Mr. Beast fan who shared a screen grab of them in the youtubers most recent video commenting on their change in appearance.
	In a follow-up tweet on their alt account Tyson who says on Twitter they go by any pronouns clarified their stance on gender-affirming hormone replacement therapy quote tweeting a fan who suggested Republicans are trying to erase the trans community.
	Tyson wrote quote Informed consent, HRT, saved my and many others lives.
	The hurdles GNC people have to jump through to get life-saving, gender-affirming health care in a first-world country is wild to me.
	Just let people make informed decisions about their own bodies.
	GNC stands for gender non-conforming, by the way, not global nigger communism.
	Gender non-conforming.
	Not to be confused with the Jewish diversion acronym GNC, which is supposed to get people to stop saying Zog.
	No, it's gender non-conforming.
	He says, the hurdles gender non-conforming people have to jump through to get life-saving, gender-affirming health care in a first world country is wild.
	They always push this line.
	How many times have you heard this expression?
	Life-saving, gender-affirming care.
	Life-saving, gender-affirming care.
	I have heard that expression.
	They come up with their own language.
	And he put out another tweet, it's later on in the article, but they come up with their own language, with all these buzzwords, and when you really think about it, what they're saying is that it saved his life to cut his dick off.
	That's your life-saving, gender-affirming, So you're a guy that wants to be a girl, so when you cut your penis and balls off, that affirms your real gender.
	It affirms your real gender by giving you a vagina.
	Giving you a neo-vagina because you're actually a girl.
	So it affirms your gender by making your physical body consistent with your mental idea, your mental self-conception.
	Which by the way doesn't that sort of fly in the face of everything they say?
	Because I've argued with Destiny and I think Vegan Gains and some other lefties on this issue and I say look you got guys and girls and we know this because we got penises and vaginas and we got testosterone and estrogen it's pretty clearly That's pretty clearly a dichotomy.
	It's pretty clearly you've got two sexes.
	And they say, well, but sex and gender are different.
	I know that there are people with penises and vaginas.
	I know there's people with estrogen and T. But there are people who have a gender which is different than their sex.
	And the gender is how they express themselves.
	And it's like, okay, so if you're a biological male, your sex is male, but your gender is female, Then why would you need to change your biological parts to conform to your gender?
	If gender is something that's totally divorced from your biology, why do they got to cut their penis and balls off?
	Why do they have to transform themselves with hormones?
	That doesn't even make any sense.
	And that's just it.
	The whole thing doesn't make any sense.
	We know that.
	But it sort of flies in the face of everything they say.
	I'll just throw that out there, because I've heard that before.
	They think that they've got us stumped when they say, well, you just don't know that gender and sex are different.
	Really?
	So then why do you have to cut all the boys' penises off to make them girls, then, if gender doesn't even make any sense?
	But that's besides the point.
	Gender-affirming, is that what we're calling it now?
	Gender-affirming care.
	And by the way, it's also lifesaving.
	To cut a guy's balls off and to put him on estrogen is to save his life.
unidentified		Why?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, because he would have naturally committed suicide otherwise.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Normal people, by the way.
unidentified		If I don't cut my balls off, I'm going to kill myself.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that's like a totally normal reaction.
		Normal reaction.
		Listen, I know a lot of stuff is low-hanging fruit, but we have to point out the language.
		We know transgender is crazy, but what I'm getting at here is the language.
		The devil is always in the details.
		They say, life-saving, gender-affirming care.
		It is not life-saving.
		It is not gender-affirming.
		We're talking about amputations.
		We are talking about skin grafts.
		They want to amputate parts of your body, and then they want to create these Frankenstein experiments, cutting skin off of your arm, rolling it like Play-Doh into a cylinder, and sewing it on your crotch, and calling it a neo-penis, calling it a neo-genitals.
		They want to cut a guy's balls open, take his, they want to cut a scrotum open, take his balls out, They want to invert the penis and push it through a hole so that the penis head is in the back of a neovagina to retain the sensitivity of the penis head.
		But inside of a newly constructed vagina?
		Like this is, this is, when they say gender-affirming life-saving care, this is what they're talking about.
		They're talking about slicing a chunk of your arm off, rolling it up like this, and sticking it on a woman's crotch, and calling it a neopenis.
		And they say, we just... And then, and then the surgeon is gonna take his gloves off and go into the waiting room to the parents and say, well, Your son's going to be alright.
		The neopenis has been successfully created and attached to your transgender son's genitals and we expect that he's going to make a full recovery and he'll live.
		Oh my gosh, thank you so much.
		You saved his life.
		Life-saving care is like a heart transplant.
		Life-saving care is like chemotherapy.
		Life-saving care is, I don't know, I'm not a doctor, but it's those kinds of things.
		It's not, it's not that.
		That didn't say, you were a perfectly normal healthy person, and then they chop your penis off and they say, doctor you saved my life.
		By affirming my gender.
unidentified		Now I don't have to commit suicide anymore.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The logical next step.
		You saved me from myself.
		Now I don't have to commit suicide.
		Well doctor, I was gonna commit suicide, but then you cut my penis off.
		And now I'm not in mortal danger anymore.
		Verified Twitter user, co-host of the biggest YouTube channel in the world, receiving acclaim and applause from all the media and celebrities.
		This is what goes on.
unidentified		Life-saving, gender-affirming care.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You saved me from myself.
		Logically, I would have taken my own life.
		Until you created a neopenis for me.
		Until you cut off my penis in balls and cut my balls out of my scrotum and inverted my penis.
		Listen, I know that's gross, I know that's graphic, but I have to say it that way because that is what we are talking about.
		They create these euphemisms and they don't show you just how horrifying this stuff is.
		And it is.
		It's...
		Try and sit through watching a video of one of these procedures.
		Years ago I saw some graphic, some animated video of what these surgeries look like.
		It makes you want to throw up.
		You cannot watch it.
		It's not even real.
		It's an animation.
		You can't even watch it, what they do to these people.
		And then they go on and on about Dr. Joseph Mengele.
		You know, they go on and on about the Nazi scientist.
		It's like, this is human experimentation!
		This is what we're talking about.
		How is that different?
		Anyway.
		Well, one was based.
unidentified		No.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's a joke, of course.
		That's a joke!
		They're both... human experimentation is wrong.
		In all cases.
		Okay?
		That was a joke.
		It goes on here.
		The article goes on.
		It says, in response to Tyson's post, Both Donaldson and Mr. Beast cameraman Carl Jacobs, who regularly appears on the channel, posted supportive messages.
		Gotchu, wrote Jacobs with two heart emojis, while Donaldson wrote gotchu with three heart emojis.
		I did one more heart than Carl because I'm a better friend, he wrote.
		So we're all patting this thing on the back.
		Hey, good job.
		Tyson's revelation of their gender journey coincides with an onslaught of anti-trans rhetoric in the right-wing media and a slew of bills and state legislatures targeting trans youth.
		In January, former President Trump announced that if re-elected, he would abolish gender-affirming care for minors, referring to it as child sexual mutilation.
		Many fans of Tyson and Mr. Beast responded to Tyson's announcement by parroting such rhetoric with one tweeting, Tyson has a two and a half year old child named Tucker.
		won't be able to look up to.
		Tyson has a two and a half year old child named Tucker.
		In response, Tyson wrote, this is just more dog whistling that somehow trans and GNC folks aren't safe around kids.
		Tucker begs for me to come back when I leave for like two days to film.
		He is so loved and happy.
		Kids aren't born with hate.
		It's taught by people like you.
		and my child will only know love.
unidentified		This is where we are.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And this tweet too, I love how they always say folks.
		I hate people that say folks.
		That started with Obama.
		I was gonna call him something else.
		That started with Obama.
		You remember that?
		Folks?
unidentified		Well, we just think that folks at the bottom end of the economic thing should make as much as folks at the top.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Folks is like an anti-human, it's like anti-distinction.
		Because anybody could be a folk.
		They don't mean folk like Ancient hill people rituals and superstitions like oh, that's like a folk ritual when they cut the guy's head off every harvest When they say folks, this is a stand-in for, like, humanoid.
		This is like a stand-in for, like, economic unit.
		Transgender folks, and rich folks, and black folks, and white folks... Folk is supposed to just be a stand-in for non-differentiated, undifferentiated human person, is what that's... It's equivalent, almost, of, like, birthing person, those kinds of things.
		It's a completely generic, neutral, Again, it's anti-differentiation.
		Because when we talk, we address people in terms of ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, guys and girls, Jews and Gentiles, just as an example, WNs and NS.
		We distinguish, we differentiate, people have essential characteristics.
		This is more egalitarian.
		This is like French Revolution talk.
		This is like, it's all human beings, man.
		We're all blank slates.
		We're not differentiated.
		We're all the same.
		So that's another thing, just as far as the language goes.
		The rest of it, though, here's what I'll say about it.
		What can be said that hasn't already been said?
		Transgender is evil.
		It's unnatural.
		It's sick.
		It's barbaric.
		It's disgusting.
		What more can be said on that front?
		It's being normalized.
		It's being pushed on children.
		These are very influential people for children.
		These are people that influence an army of children and the culture and they're promulgating this transgender stuff how how much more can be said about that and the harm this is causing and the danger and how this is corrupting the youth i think it's all been said i think it's all pretty obvious and it's wrong what i have to say about it
		is this is why it has to be rejected wholesale you cannot compete with this by saying protect the children - Okay.
		Why?
		Because this person, this guy, who's transitioning, who's on hormone replacement therapy, is not a kid.
unidentified		This guy's not a child.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So, Mr. Beast and all his friends can stand by their guy and say, hey man, you do you.
		We're supportive of your decisions.
		When this guy goes out there and says, hey, I'm just trying to do my thing with my body.
		It's my choice.
		Let me just do what I want with my own body.
		He says.
		And what's the rebuttal from these other types who have been saying for the last year or two years that it's about children, it's about Drag Queen Story Hour, it's about children being put on hormone replacement therapy?
		They might say something like, well he shouldn't PUSH IT ON US!
		But what does that mean?
		What does that mean at the end of the day?
		That this guy should transition, his friends should support him, he should carry on and do his thing, but just not push it?
		To a particular demographic?
		What exactly does that mean?
		Because he could just as easily say, well, I encourage children not to transition until they're 18.
		Would that make any of this okay?
		To create a generation of children that they want to transition now, or maybe they say, well, I'm gonna wait to transition like this guy did.
		Is that any better?
		As I've said many times before, it is for reasons like this that it has to be refuted fundamentally.
		I'll also say this.
		Mr. Beast is a guy who is at the pinnacle of the media landscape.
		One of the richest, most influential, most popular on YouTube.
		60 million views on his latest video.
		60 million.
		You know how big that is?
		Tucker Carlson peaks at 3 or 4 million viewers on his primetime show on cable news.
		Mr. Beast got 60 million views in one 10-minute video that came out a few days ago.
		60 million!
		And Tucker Carlson's the number one rated cable news host in the history of cable TV.
		To give you an idea, it's a different scale.
		And this is a guy who Naturally, as a consequence of this, we'll be surrounded by these types.
		We'll be surrounded by somebody, invariably, who's going to become transgender.
		And in order to retain his position, he's got to go along with it.
		Does Mr. Beast have any latitude to disagree?
		He can't go out and fire this man.
		He can't go out there and say something negative.
		He can't say anything less than supportive.
		And so that means that prior to, during this, and after, him retaining his platform is contingent on him supporting a satanic transgender agenda.
		What does this say about our society?
		If Mr. Beast, one of the most influential, richest, biggest YouTubers, is beholden To this transgender social agenda.
		Everybody says that it proceeds from the top down.
		Well, Mr. Beast is a hostage in this case.
		Even if he wanted to, he couldn't oppose it without incurring a massive penalty, without a massive backlash, scandal, debatably career ruination.
		And if it's happening now, that means it was only a matter of time.
		If he had said something anti-trans before, and I think he had, he was cancelled for it then, it means that this is now the new normal for everybody.
		All the people in media, and even the way these articles are written, they have to bow to the transgender agenda.
		And why?
		Because what is the argument against transgender as a liberal?
		When this guy goes out there, I'm talking about the transgender person, when he goes out there and says, I will teach them only love, not hate.
		Hate is not taught.
		It's only pushed by people like you.
		This is the refrain we hear all the time.
		Anybody that opposes so-called social progress is a hater, a bigot.
		They're backwards because social progress in their mind is licentiousness.
		It's permissiveness.
		We just have to permit and tolerate and give license to more things.
		What is hatred?
		It's any intolerance.
		And people might say, well tolerance is a virtue.
		What would we want to be intolerant of?
		Evil?
		Evil, things that are gravely sinful, things that are injurious to an individual or to the community.
		Those are the kinds of things we would want to be intolerant of, naturally.
		But social progress is predicated on tolerating everything, even things that are disgusting, even things that shock and offend our conscience, anybody's conscience, even a liberal.
		Even somebody who thinks they are a liberal, their conscience will be offended by seeing a drag queen story hour.
	But social progress dictates that the ultimate end is to permit everything.
	Which means, yes, gay people stripping naked in front of prepubescent children in schools.
	Yes, even that must be permitted.
	That is arguably the end goal, or the end stage of social progress to them.
	To oppose that is to hate people for being who they are.
	To oppose that is to be bigoted, to be backwards.
	To be a malicious bad person.
	And so it is this framework and it is this infrastructure that means that this is how things go indefinitely.
	Who can resist the transgender agenda in media and on what grounds could they do that?
	If Yahoo wanted to write an article calling this guy by his real pronouns, calling Chris Tyson a guy, on what grounds could they do that?
	And would they survive?
	They have no grounds.
	They couldn't survive.
	What would they appeal to?
	What frame of ought and should would they appeal to to say that a person ought not or could not transition?
	What would be the rules?
	What would be the authority they would appeal to?
	We're all just people.
	We're all just stardust.
	You might as well have a good time.
	You'd have no leg to stand on.
	There'd be no foundation.
	And what's more, if you did it for some reason that you couldn't articulate as a liberal, you'd be cancelled anyway.
	If Mr. Beast found some reason to oppose, he would be cancelled for it anyway, even if he couldn't articulate why his conscience opposes this.
	And so this tells us that the only answer to any of this It's not populism.
	It's not anti-woke.
	It's not barstool conservatism.
	The only answer, the only alternative, is Christianity.
	That's it.
	Otherwise, you get this.
	What else could you say in opposition?
	You don't like it because it's weird?
	You don't like it because it triggers your disgust reaction?
	You don't like it because you don't believe men and women can swap places?
	Well, What authority over another individual who thinks they can does that give you?
	None, they say.
	None, says liberalism.
	And that's really the problem is that we're like fish swimming in the ocean with liberalism.
	A fish doesn't know it's in water because water is just the state that it's in.
	It doesn't even know it.
	It's not aware of it day to day.
	Until it's taken out of the water.
	And the same is true of us with liberalism.
	Liberalism is so pervasive and liberal attitudes about conduct and about how society should be governed and about authority is also so pervasive that we can't think outside of it.
	We don't know that we're in it until we see outside of it.
	And it's the same thing here.
	What is the rebuttal from a conservative that says, well hey listen, just don't go after the kids?
	And somebody says, well I'm a consenting adult.
	Why can't I pay a doctor money to perform this surgery on me?
	What gives you the authority to say I can't?
	What's a conservative going to say?
	A Catholic is going to say, because God says so.
	And our job is to obey God.
	And the job of government is to facilitate people obeying God.
	So we're going to ban people from doing things They're going to harm their souls.
	Because there's not just sins against other people, you can also sin against yourself.
	There's also sins you can commit on your own.
	That's what a Catholic would say.
	That's what a Christian would say.
	What can a conservative say in this situation?
	What could an impotent, loser conservative say in this situation other than, just leave our kids out of it!
	And they might.
	They won't.
	But even if they did, it wouldn't matter.
	You still get the same society.
	What do we want?
	All our kids to become trans once they reach some arbitrary age of sexual maturity?
	Is that it?
	We don't want kids to learn about homosexuality until they're in 4th grade?
	We don't want kids to transition until they're 18?
	Or 17 in some jurisdiction?
	Who decides?
	Is that really what it's about?
	We want to create regulations on this?
	So I've been saying this for a long time.
	The culture war will not be won.
	Until it becomes a religious war.
	Because that's what it is.
	It's not a culture war.
	Being trans is not a culture.
	And being anti-trans is not a culture.
	It's got nothing to do with culture.
	Because you have trans people in LA.
	You have trans people in Arkansas.
	And a lot of times what you'll find is that these southerners or hillbillies or people from the interior who grow up queer you know they're either like gay or trans or whatever.
	Guess what?
	In this day and age They go to some liberal school, and then they move to some big city, and then they live a lifestyle which is totally undistinguishable from any other liberal that grew up in that city that they're in.
	So it really has nothing to do with culture.
	Look at, like, Lady Magga.
	That guy's a Mormon.
	That guy came from a hardcore religious Mormon family.
	It's not about culture.
	It's about religion.
	And the people that are pushing transgender, their religion is no religion.
	Their religion is... and by religion I don't... no religion.
	I don't mean an absence of religion.
	It's a rejection.
	It's a repudiation of religion.
	It's an anti-religion.
	That's what liberalism is.
	We reject morality.
	We reject moral authority.
	We reject the notion that anybody could say one ought to do one thing or another thing.
	And the best that these right liberals can offer is extending the same tolerance to Nazis.
	We're gonna tolerate trans and we should tolerate right-wingers.
	We're gonna tolerate liberals and we're gonna tolerate conservatives.
	Well, I think that's sort of what we have, isn't it?
	To some extent.
	I don't think anybody's happy with what we have.
unidentified		So...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You realize that in a situation like this, the only way to be is Christian.
		What else could Mr. Beast be?
		This is a guy who is going along with it because if he didn't, he would be cancelled.
		And even if he wanted to go against it, how would he articulate other than that he is appealing to an absolute objective morality that has authority?
		What else could be said about a friend who undertakes something like this?
		What else could be said?
		So you're either with Jesus, as always, as usual, or you're not.
		It's that simple.
		I realized that a long time ago because we all know that this is wrong.
		We all know it.
		We don't need to debate it.
		We don't need to argue it.
		I don't need to prove it.
		We all know in our heart of hearts.
		We all know in our conscience that it is wrong.
		And it is enabling to allow somebody to cut their genitals off because they think they're another gender.
		A man cannot become a woman ever.
		A woman cannot become a man ever.
		It cannot happen.
		We also, and the same thing goes, by the way, these arguments have gone out of fashion, but the same thing is true about homosexuality.
		A man and a man and a woman and a woman cannot have sex.
		Now they try.
		They can try and they do and they can imitate it, but it's not sex.
		It's not the same thing.
		It's sodomy in every case.
		It's called inputs and outputs.
		We all know in our heart of hearts cannot happen, does not happen.
		It's wrong.
		It's something that offends.
		We know that in our conscience.
		And so, rather than working around the societal structure, which says, well, but we have to tolerate everything, but everyone's an individual that can make their own choices, and who are we to say?
		I work around my conscience.
		My conscience knows.
		My conscience knows what's right and wrong, and I go from there.
		And that's what will lead everybody, that's what will lead the right wing into a place where they become a fully Christian movement.
		They give up this culture war business, this politics is downstream from culture and whatever, and start talking in a language of right and wrong.
		And what God says and what God doesn't say and what we are ordered to do, you know, how we should be living our lives according to a law that was given to us that we have to abide by, as opposed to making these recommendations and suggestions and arguments.
		That's all conservatives want to do, is make arguments.
		Well, the studies show that transgenderism is like a mental illness so that means we shouldn't tell kids to do it.
		It's wrong.
		We don't need to...it's wrong.
		It's obviously wrong.
		We want to have a moral society.
		We want to establish a moral law.
		That's based on the real God.
		And anything less will eventually become this.
		Anything less is this or moderating this in some paltry way.
		That's what you get.
		That's what you have.
		That's why every other one of these, even I would say the Red Pillars, they joined Islam so they could do polygamy.
		Really?
		And every other one of these guys like Full Send or people that might ostensibly be on our side, you know, they're bar stool conservatives because they're anti-woke.
		That is all a matter of taste.
		That is all a matter of taste.
		That is all a matter of convenience and expediency for them.
		What is their taste?
		What is their preference?
		What is their tolerance for this kind of thing?
unidentified		So...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's that.
		But anyway, so Mr. Beast, very disappointing.
		And he's backing him up.
		Totally backing him up.
		And the kids are going to watch this.
		And how many kids are going to see this and start to think that they are trans?
		It's good to see that there's a lot of Zoomers that are anti-trans these days and they're against it.
		And I think a lot of young people are going to be radicalized by things like this.
		But by the same token, there will be a lot of... this is going to be another lost generation.
		The last several generations were lost to things like contraceptives and divorce and abortion.
		And this generation will be lost to transgenderism and homosexuality.
		You'll have a large percentage of under 15 year olds that are going to make life-altering, life-ruining decisions based on this sort of thing.
		And they will be lost.
		They'll be lost to drug abuse.
		They'll be lost to HIV AIDS.
		They'll be lost to irreparable psychological damage, chemical castration, physical castration.
		You'll have a generation of people that are damaged and wounded and trudging through life like this waiting to die with no answer.
		That's the tragedy.
		And there's ripples of this is going to ripple In ways that we don't even understand.
		Just like divorce.
		Just like all the, you know, it sounded like a good idea a hundred years ago.
		Divorce, contraceptive, abortion, why not?
		Free love, this and that.
		And look at the damage that wrought to the children of divorce and the aborted people and the out-of-wedlock sex that produced single households or abortions and so on.
		And think about the ripple effects of all of this All of this confusion.
		Not good.
		Not good.
		And again, the only way, the only way to defeat this is to do the right thing.
		It's that simple.
		We all just went away from doing the right thing as a society.
		People didn't want to play by the rules, and now this is the end result.
		People have to start doing the right thing, they have to start going back to church.
		We all have to become Catholic, okay?
		We all have to become Christian.
		That's the only answer.
		And not everybody's gonna be perfect, and not everybody's gonna love it, but we need a society where, good, bad, or ugly, everybody is on the same page.
		Believing in God.
		Otherwise, it's gonna get worse.
		But anyway, that's that.
		I want to move on.
		I want to get into the Super Chats.
unidentified		We'll see what you guys are saying about all this.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We'll take a look.
		Disappointed.
		Disappointed, Mr. Beast.
		Come on now.
		Mark of the Beast, they say.
		Okay, let's take a look.
		Get my water and log in here.
		I am thirsty.
unidentified		Okay.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		It depends on a lot of things.
		So I percent thirty dollars.
		What is the best way to enter politics if I want to become an elected official?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It depends on a lot of things.
		Depends on how old you are and what kind of connections you have.
		I'd have to know a little bit more about you.
		But I would say for any beginner, I would say just start getting involved in your local GOP.
		Just start building up your Rolodex.
		Everybody I know that's in politics, they just started shaking hands.
		That's it.
		They start meeting people, and other people show you the ropes.
		Getting a communique from Groyper Intelligence Headquarters.
		Interesting, okay.
		On my phone.
		So I would go to your local GOP meeting, I would talk to local GOP officials, because every county has a GOP.
		Or go to the, if you're in some like rural county, I don't know, drive to the big metro area, go to their local GOP club.
		Volunteer for a campaign, start making connections.
		And it'll go from there, but As far as specific advice for you, I don't know what your network looks like.
		But not everybody can just become an elected official.
		It's not so simple.
		You know, you need to know people first.
		Because people don't just jump in, you know.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I don't know what the Catholic position is on contemporary worship music.
		I don't like it.
		It just doesn't do it for me.
		I don't know what the Catholic position is on contemporary worship music.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't like it.
		It just doesn't do it for me.
		It's just corny.
unidentified		So I'm just not a fan personally.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So, you know, the Catholic, I don't think the Catholic Church loves it and I don't like it either.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I think it's campy.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Leo Pius sent $3.
		Nick you are leading souls to hell with your takes on what's going on in the church.
		Francis is obviously not the Pope.
		You have been warned.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Is this another Protestant?
		Because you should consider converting back to Catholicism.
		It's very sad to see what happened to you.
		You were obviously led astray.
		And I feel sorry for you.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Trust.
unidentified		Trust.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Listen.
		I trust.
		I trust the plan.
		Joker 1 was good.
		Have you seen the pics of Lady Gaga in the new Joker?
		She looks ugly.
		Also, are you going to see the Barbie movie with Ryan Gosling?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Listen, I trust the plan.
		Joker 1 was good.
		I'm not going to judge.
		We got to wait and see what Joker 2 looks like before we dismiss it.
		Don't you have any faith?
		People are so quick to say oh I don't like it man listen just hey listen it's okay it's not coming out for a long time let's wait let's see how it is I trust who's the director of that one?
		I forget.
		But listen, I trust.
		I like Joaquin Phoenix.
		The first one was great.
		I'm putting it in the director's hands.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		NJF's most loyal grow I percent $10.
		As a fellow moon guy I appreciate your international relations stuff.
		Really scratches that autistic itch.
		I also really enjoy slash relate to your old head moon stories slash reminiscing.
		Except for the part about dancing with and kissing a girl at the delegate dance.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah you weren't the Chad of the economic and finance committee like I was.
		It's okay, listen.
		That was ten years ago, okay?
		That was almost ten years ago exactly, now that I think about it.
		It was April 2013.
		Wow, that was ten years ago.
		Oh man, I'm getting old.
		Time flies, huh?
		Yeah, that was crazy.
		Well, I'm glad you like the IR stuff.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I reject this whole language.
		One of the boys.
		I hate calling it the boys.
		I feel like the boys is another one of these infantilizing words that... It's like guys.
		I reject this whole language.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		One of the boys.
		I hate calling it the boys.
		I feel like the boys is another one of these, like, infantilizing words that, that, it's like guys.
		I hate guys.
		Guys is what girls call men.
		So I'm talking to this guy.
		Oh, he's with the guys.
		Guys, boys.
		To me, it's very, like, when white people say it.
		When Italians say it, when Italian people say it, wise guy, it's a little different.
		But, I feel like a lot of these words, to me, they give me this feeling of, they remind me of, like, a very feminized, like, frat type guy that drinks lots of beer and is fat.
		And is offended by racism and things like that.
		It's like a defanged man.
		It's like a man that has been totally defanged, declawed.
unidentified		I'm with the boys!
unidentified		Oh, we're with the boys!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Oh, you know how he is.
		He loves being with the boys.
		It's like a defanged, declawed man.
		I don't like that.
		One of the boys.
		Listen, I'm not a boy.
		I'm a man, okay?
		I'm a boy.
		I'm with the boy.
		Oh, just me and the boys, honey!
		Honey, me and the boys!
		That's like, it's once again putting the girlfriend as the mother.
		And it's seeing the, it's seeing the man as like a, as a boy.
		Seeing the man as an infantile Innocent boy, but men are not innocent.
		Men are not innocent.
		Men are not infantile.
		I'm just with the boys, honey.
		Honey, can I hang with the boys tonight?
		Honey?
		Oh, I'm with the boys!
		What the fuck is that?
		I hate that.
		I hate that whole... that whole program.
		I see it all the time on TikTok, this whole... vernacular.
		Boys and guys and all this.
		Where are the men?
		Where are the men at?
		Where are the men at?
		But really?
		But really?
		I feel like all these guys these days are just chuckleheads.
		They're just a bunch of chuckleheads.
		They're just unserious.
		They wear shorts.
		They go to these parties.
		They drink beer.
		Not serious people.
		They're very indulgent.
		I don't like it.
		Your whole attitude just stinks like that.
		Guys should be one of the boys and be attractive to women.
		Listen, but you're, you're... Once again, you just don't understand.
		You'll never understand.
		Don't... Well, being in a... You know, this guy coming in with his proclamations, being an incel is also cringe.
		First of all, no it isn't.
		Who are you?
		Second of all, you don't even know what you're talking about.
		Third of all, why don't you go crawl back up your mother in your womb where you belong, okay?
		Because that's clearly what this is about, you baby.
		Well, guys should be attractive to women too.
		If a guy is If a man becomes a man, he will be attractive to women.
		The idea that you would seek the approval of women.
		In one sentence you say, seeking female approval is cringe, but men should be attractive to women.
		So, your mentality is, I want to become attractive to women.
		If your mentality is, I want to be a man, you will be attractive to women, as a consequence.
		If you say, I want to be attractive to women, odds are you won't be.
		You might be, But fundamentally, and she'll smell it, you won't be.
		Not that you should even care.
		Because that's not the priority.
		You're putting the cart before the horse.
		It's like when it comes to money.
		People say, I want to be a millionaire.
		No, you don't.
		You don't want to put in the work.
	You don't want to make the sacrifices.
	You like the idea of being a millionaire.
	You like the idea of money.
	A millionaire says, I want to be productive.
	I want to do a productive activity.
	I want to solve a problem.
	I want to build an empire.
	The money comes.
	The guy with all the girls around him doesn't say, I want to be attractive to women.
	I want, I want cuddles.
	I want kisses.
	A guy says, I want to be the baddest.
	I want to be the best.
	I want to be a killer.
	The women arrive.
	This is what I'm trying to tell you, but which you'll never understand.
	But being an insult's also cringe.
unidentified		Guys should be one of the boys, but also be attractive to women.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Does that sound ideal for you?
		What do you have?
		Do you have a pink hat by any chance?
		Do you own a pink hat and shorts?
		By any chance, is that your wardrobe on weekends?
		You a weekend warrior?
		Faggot.
		This country's going to hell.
unidentified		I hate this country so much.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		What this country's producing.
		Ironically, Southerners are better.
		Ironically, even though I think Southerners are tacky.
		Southerners... Southern men tend to be real men because they'll kill you and they're actually proficient in things and they're capable.
		Hate to say it.
		Hate to say that.
		But I feel like Southern men are more independent and proficient.
		Now, they often are simps, but they're also... They also have this element of... They're able to be real guys.
		Hey, I hate to say that, you know, because you know I don't really like the South, but I feel like that's the case.
unidentified		Anyway.
		Thank you.
		Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Terrible.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		People still don't get it.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Favorite scene in The Aviator?
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		most loyal grow i percent three dollars what's your favorite part of the aviator mine is either when he meets the hepburn family or when he breaks up with kate and burns all the shit she had touched goes hard gn love you buddy less than three favorite scene in the aviator i haven't seen in a long time but well my favorite scene is at the end when uh he's with john c riley and he says uh who are those guys Do they work for me?
unidentified		And John C. Reilly goes, We all work for you, Howard.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And I feel like that sometimes when I go to CPAC or when I go to any event, I kind of feel the same.
unidentified		There's like a similar... Sometimes I'm like, Who are those people?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Are they interns?
		We're all interns, you know.
		So I kind of relate to that a little bit.
		But also, it's just awesome.
		It's just a cold-ass scene.
		I also like when he's at the dinner table with Audrey Hepburn's family, like you said, and he's trying to explain the airplane to them, and they keep talking over him.
		That's like me!
		I feel like every family gathering I go to, that is my... Now don't say you're just like me, because you're not!
		That is something that happens to me.
		It doesn't happen to you.
		Whenever I go to a family function, I'll be there and, you know, I'll just be sitting there, you know, quietly at the table.
		And sometimes there's a break in the conversation and some woman asks me, so what are you up to?
		How's your thing?
		And I'll start explaining it and then it's more inanity.
		They talk over me and I'm like, okay, you know, okay, fine.
		Nobody cares.
		Nobody understands my world.
		That's okay.
		So I relate to that.
		I like that scene a lot.
		I like... what else?
		I like when his peas get messed up.
		He's got his peas in a grid and they get messed up on his plate.
		Or when he's washing his hands and he runs out of paper towels.
		He has to wait for somebody to leave the bathroom to sneak out.
		Such a great movie.
		So relatable.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		NJF's most loyal growiper sent $3.
		And hey, one more thing.
		Fuck that stupid whore bitch Kate Hepburn.
		Total insult vindication DTW.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, absolutely.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Richard Percival sent $10.
		My sister visited home today and absolutely stinks of weed.
		I went to hug her and thought I was gonna get sick.
		I can't even pet her dog without smelling it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's disgusting.
		I hate women that smoke weed.
		Gross.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Facts!
		I don't know that song off the top of my head.
		problema.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Facts.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Misato's underscore armpits sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Do you like that song Drops of Jupiter by Train?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't know that song off the top of my head.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I like Train.
		Ari sent $3.
		This week, the market adjustment to Trump's odds of winning the nomination went from 5 to 6 to 4 to 5, and his odds of winning the presidency from 3 to 1 to 2.5 to 1.
		Why did his chances improve after indictment?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Because his This base will be activated.
		What you have to understand about politics is that a lot of it is a game of turnout and activation.
		This is how somebody explained it to me once.
		So, what Republicans want to do is they want to activate their side.
		They want to do things that will get their side mobilized, get them enthusiastic, get them angry to the polls.
		Think about something like overturning Roe vs. Wade.
		Activated the left.
		A lot of people said it was a good thing, and it was.
		But electorally, it was objectively a bad thing.
		Because winning on an issue like that doesn't activate the right side.
		It activates the left.
		When Republicans get a huge win, are they incensed?
		Are they charged up to go out and vote?
		No, they get complacent.
		When Roe vs. Wade is overturned, it activates the left because they go out there and say, our rights are being taken, we're furious, they crossed a red line, they crossed a Rubicon.
		So electorally, that was something that helped the left.
		On net, it helped the left.
		Same thing with this.
		On net, this helps the right.
		Indicting Trump does not activate the left, at all.
		But it does activate the right, because they go out there and say, our country's under attack, our guy's under attack, we gotta go out there, I gotta do something for my president.
		So it helps him win the nomination, and by helping him win the nomination, makes him more likely for him to be the president.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Ari sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Was the J6 shaman that just got released the same guy that approached you on stage at Stop the Steal in Oz and you told him, hey, you smell bad, go away?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that is the same guy.
		And yeah, he had a very pungent smell.
		But by the end of it, we were cool.
unidentified		We shook hands the next day, so we're good.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Absolutely.
		Shout out to the live chat.
		Whoa!
unidentified		Wow.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, thank you very much for the big super chat and God bless you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		live chat.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Classic American man sent $200.
		This Saturday I entered the Catholic Church.
		By your witness, I went from a liberal, porn addicted atheist to being saved by Jesus.
		God bless you, Nick.
		I love you in this movement.
		Christ is King.
unidentified		Wow.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, thank you very much for the big super chat and God bless you.
		I love to hear that story.
		Congratulations on becoming Catholic.
		I'm I love to hear that.
		It's always my favorite thing to hear.
unidentified		And I'm very humbled.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Whenever people say that, I almost don't even know how to respond, you know?
		That's probably the most humbling thing is when people say that they've become Catholic because of me.
		Because I feel like a very imperfect person.
		I'm just trying to give my testimony.
		I'm just trying to do the right thing.
		And it always feels very good when it's by that testimony that people are inspired to become interested in it and go back to church and investigate the faith.
		And when they cross the finish line, that's the best thing.
		So God bless you, man.
		I'm really happy to hear that.
		Good for you.
		And I appreciate the kind words.
		I love you too, buddy.
		And congrats.
		Happy Easter.
		That's going to be great.
		Good for you, buddy.
		And thank you very much for the big super chat also.
		Big shout out for that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Weezer sent $10.
		My mom just told me if she can't vote for Trump then she will vote for you or ye.
		Let's go.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Let's go.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Your mom's based.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Rusty sent $3.
		Sneeko is back streaming.
		He mentioned that he will double down on social and political commentary.
		He teased near the end of the stream that AF and the Tate crowd will be happy with it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, there'll be some interesting stuff.
		But yeah, we love Sneeko.
		07s to our guy.
		The man.
		He's one of these guys who He has no fear.
		He wasn't afraid of where it led him.
		And that's why I admire him.
		Everybody wants to hate on him, but it's because he's telling the truth.
		What does he have in common with me and everybody else?
		Everybody likes to shit on him.
		Everybody likes to attack him.
		Him and I are the ones telling the truth.
		They won't attack everybody else for Being sickos or degenerates or objectively bad people or for being immoral or wrong.
		But he gets the most flack because he's a righteous man.
		So we love Sneak Out.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Hey, thanks a lot!
		Well, you know why?
		$20.
		Thanks for all the shows.
		I love the IR streams best, I think, because you don't really get that perspective anywhere else.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		God bless. - Hey, thanks a lot.
		Well, you know why?
		It's because IR is completely interconnected with what happens in the world, because we are in the age of complexity where states are interacting with other states in multiple ways.
		It used to be the case that a government sovereign would contact another sovereign.
		That was the communication between the countries.
		In Shakespeare, the King of England and the King of France call each other England and France.
		They personify the country.
		That was the extent of their communication between the two nations.
		Now, you've got interaction between states at multiple levels.
		You have states talking to states, you have businesses talking to businesses, people talking to people, businesses talking to states, people talking to states, states talking to businesses, states Trying to influence people through intelligence agencies.
		And so the relationship between other states, this separation between the realm of foreign affairs and domestic affairs, the border is evaporating.
		It arguably already has evaporated.
		And so foreign governments, espionage, multinational corporations, foreign interests are just as prominent in America as anything that comes from America itself, anything native to America.
		So that's why you have to have a mind towards international relations to understand even what happens here.
		It's all connected.
		It's all related.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Catholic Gooba sent $3.
		The Mr. Beast thing sucks.
		I really thought he was our guy, or at least not theirs.
		Hess now telling 100 million kids that trans is not just tolerable, but good and normal.
		PewDiePie was better at number one.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Absolutely.
		It's very disappointing.
		I'm not really surprised.
		He never struck me as our guy.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Growiper sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Netanyahu should push through his reforms then swing a chicken around his head to transfer the blame to it so he can get away with it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Ah, very funny.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		BaseBudz sent $7.
		Thanks for coming on to stream even when you don't feel well or have a bad day.
		People got to realize you're a person with a life too.
		Even if you're late, sometimes we still love you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Oh, thanks.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Keep it pushing.
unidentified		Listen.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You don't have to make excuses for me.
		I know I'm late.
		I'm, uh... Listen, I'm Italian, okay?
		That's just... If we're gonna be race realists, let's be... let's be real, okay?
		Can we have a race reality moment?
		Can I get race real for you for a moment?
		I'm genetically late.
		If we're race realist, you can't get mad at me for being late.
		If you say that black people commit crime because of their race, you can't be mad at it for them.
		They can't help it.
		And if I'm late because I'm Italian, and therefore I'm not punctual and somewhat lazy, you can't be mad at me for that either.
		It's my genetic code.
		It's in my DNA.
		You gonna get mad at me for my DNA?
		You gonna get mad at somebody with Down Syndrome for being retarded?
		They can't help it.
		What, are you gonna get mad at them?
		Hey, why do you have such a little body?
		Hey, why do you have such a chubby little body, you little jerk?
		It's like, they can't help it.
		What, are you gonna get mad at me for being late?
		You gonna get mad at somebody for being born with no legs?
		Hey, why are you in a wheelchair, you fucking asshole?
		Get up!
		Why are you always rolling around everywhere?
		Show some respect!
		Stand up!
		What are you gonna get mad at me?
		I'm late.
		That's my DNA.
		It's genetic.
		Anyway, so I don't know what that remark is all about.
		It's a little racist.
		But hey, well, you know, I'm getting better, all right?
		We're bringing the time, the start time of the show down.
		I'm shooting for nine o'clock next week.
		I'm just getting situated.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Kenny sent $3.
		Hey Nick, I just got my AF hat.
		Hope to see you at FPAC 4.
		Your movement and yourself have had a big impact on my life.
		Am starting to go to church and overcame a huge depression.
		Much love.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hey man, glad to hear that.
		Yeah, I'll see you at FPAC 4.
		Glad you got your hat.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Kenny sent $3.
		To quote Kanye, the hat made me feel like Superman.
		God bless.
		I forgot what fear is.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Love that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I love that speech on SNL.
unidentified		I could put my Superman cape on!
unidentified		So true.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		He has such a way with words.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		He's really a poet.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Real human being sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		What, if anything, can a young architect do to steer my career in a direction so I can eventually help in creating Christian futurism?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't know you, so you have to figure that out yourself.
		I can't tell you specifically how to navigate your life because I don't know anything about you, okay?
		You'll have to figure that out.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Aquarium Growiper sent $5.
		Thoughts on the Blue Angels or Thunderbirds?
		Chandler sent $10.
		I appreciate the bluntness on my assc yesterday.
		I suppose I misunderstood the information thing.
		Anyway, how do you think we can counter the infantilization going on?
		The constant overstimulation.
		MrBeast's videos are this way and it seems to spread.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You just have to stop being a pussy.
unidentified		Holla!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hey, what's going on, Justin?
unidentified		Yeah, I think that it can be overcome.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		You sent $25.
		You had a conversation with Destiny a while back about race and IQ.
		You said you're a racial determinist.
		Do you think things are somewhat set in stone when it comes to genes and IQ?
		Or do you think niggas can evolve past the monkey IQ?
		Hundreds of years from now, so to say.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Holla. - Holla!
		Hey, what's going on, Justin?
		Yeah, I think that it can be overcome.
		I think that the beginning of reform is understanding.
		So if we understand our genetics, we can understand ourselves and why we are the way we are.
		And then if we want to improve, we can come up with strategies for that.
		But the problem is a lot of people are in denial.
		You know, I'm this way because of circumstance.
		I'm this way because of I'm unlucky.
		I got a bad break.
		My parents were not... I didn't have good parents.
		Whatever.
		A lot of people's problems are genetic.
		A lot of people's... because people's behaviors, their habits, are genetic.
		And so if you can understand your predisposition, if you can understand your temperament, Then that can help you understand your own life and a lot of these situations, and you can begin to become conscious and aware of these things and compensate for it.
		You know, like, I have a lot of criminals in my ancestry, which means I'm a very impulsive person, probably takes a lot of risks, and so if I'm aware of that, then I can I can say to myself, well hey, take a step back, take a deep breath, I have a bad temper, I'm impulsive.
		You know, then you can begin to counteract it.
		Over hundreds of years, yeah, I think a lot of these things can be overcome.
		But through some kind of genetic engineering, not necessarily like a medical procedure, but by who you marry and that sort of thing over time.
		Easier said than done, though.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Pretty underscore fly underscore white underscore guy sent $3.
unidentified		$169.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Great show as always.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Thanks for the work you do.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hey, thanks a lot, buddy.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Edward Saul sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		We need some red fag laws.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Oh, yeah, right.
		Red fag laws.
		Good, yeah, yeah.
		Like red flag laws?
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Ari sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		What did you think of the iHippocrate versus Bryson Gray debate?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I thought they were a little disrespectful towards Bryson.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I didn't watch the whole thing, but I saw a couple clips and I thought they were being a little hard on Bryson, but I didn't see the whole thing.
unidentified		Whoa!
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		John Dave Irving sent $250.
		Based show.
		I hope folks share clips.
		The Zog DNC is trying to weaponize revelations all nations will come against Israel.
		I hope folks share clips.
		P.S.
		Making croissants saves lives.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Life-saving, gender-affirming.
		Pastry.
		Why is it so hard in a first world country to get a life-saving, gender-affirming Big Mac?
		A life-saving bone of beef.
		A life-saving french fry.
		I need a life-saving pint of vanilla ice cream.
		I need a life-saving concrete vanilla brownie chocolate fudge concrete.
		Why is it so hard in a first world country to get a life-saving ice cream?
		To get a life-saving fudge sundae?
		Anyway.
		Hey, thanks for the big super chat.
		I appreciate it, man.
		Let's get a shout out for John Dave Irving.
		Yeah, it's true.
		Zog is trying to create a prophecy.
		They're trying to end the world.
		It'll happen when the weather cools.
		Poll predicted this.
		But yeah, give me some life-saving... Give me a life-saving burger, please.
		I need my life-saving burger.
		Thanks a lot, buddy.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		lot buddy theophila sent three dollars do you think lifting weights is a meaningless activity do you see it as better or worse than playing video games or sports uh i i just hate the idea of it to be honest with you i don't want to do it i feel like i mean don't get me wrong it's like healthy and it's probably a better use of your time than video games but uh yeah i'm i'm
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		i'm not like a weightlifting fan by any means i think it's fine if people do it Nope.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		- CS sent $3.
		Half I'm a Southern Baptist.
		I hate the Christian infighting ignited by both Catholics and Protestants.
		We have a Jewish problem, not a different denomination problem, unless you're a Unitarian.
		CS sent $3. - Nope. - Two halves Romans 10:9 states, if you confess W-Y-H your mouth and heart that Jesus is your Lord and Savior and he rose from the dead, you will be saved.
		We're Christians, focus on those who hate Christ. - Nah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Nah, I don't like that.
		I'm very much against this, um, hey, we're all just Christians, let's all just unite against... There's a papal encyclical about this from... I forget which pope.
		It was from around the last century.
		And it talks about exactly what you're saying.
		And I don't like that premise.
		It's got to be... because it sort of undermines the authority of the Catholic Church to say, hey, well, let's just focus on what we all have in common.
		Even you could say it's like religious people against non-religious people.
		Now don't get me wrong, I think that it's probably better to focus on The Jewish world order as opposed to targeting Protestants, but I'm explicitly Catholic.
		I don't make that any... I don't make that... ambiguous.
		I'm explicitly a Catholic.
		And what you're saying is a Protestant belief.
		Well, Romans says, hey, if you confess that Jesus is your Savior, we're all saved, we're great.
		No, but we don't believe that.
		We don't believe that.
		So, I mean, don't get me wrong, I'm not going to go out of my way to attack Protestants, but I'm Catholic and the country should be Catholic, and these are not arbitrary differences.
		Protestantism is a big reason why we're in this mess, because it's not the true church.
		Are all these Protestants that are marrying gay people, are they going to go to heaven?
		Are all these Protestants that have transgender deacons and pastors, are they going to go to heaven?
		They're confessing Jesus is the Savior.
		Are they going to go?
		Are you telling me that our conduct has nothing to do with our reward in the afterlife as long as you confess?
		I believe the Bible also says that faith without works is dead.
		I don't know that that's enough.
		And, you know, this message that you have is a Protestant message.
		I'm not a Protestant.
		Oh, well, hey, we're all just Christian.
		Let's just focus on that.
		It's like, no, we're really not, actually.
		So, don't get me wrong.
		Like I said, I think that it'd be beneficial politically for Christians all to support a similar agenda, but That should not open the door for this idea that it doesn't matter what kind of Christian you are, it does.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		smiley the fed sent three dollars mr beast used to casually call people faggots in his early videos and now he has to pretend to be okay with his tranny friend the cost of youtube fame i'm sure he is okay with it because a lot of people use that kind of language and then when they grow older they just casually become assimilated into the status quo framework they they call their their friends
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		faggots are the n-word because it's it's transgressive because it's edgy or it's funny They don't do that because they actually have any, you know, any real conservative feelings.
		Um, and, and you'll notice a lot of those people grow up, they go to college, and then they, they fall in love with that stuff, you know?
		They, they enthusiastically support BLM or transgenders, uh, because they're like, hey, let's get real now.
		It's mature.
		That's what it means for a lot of them to get older and mature, is to realize that, uh, that all that stuff is actually okay.
		So I don't, I don't think that he's pretending.
		I think he probably believes that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Zoomer will send $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Are you gonna see the new Barbie movie with Ryan Gosling?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Uh, maybe.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I love Ryan Gosling, but Barbie, that's a little far.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		What's a Sigmund Freud rant?
		I don't know.
		I don't know if I've talked about that.
		- What's a Sigmund Freud rant?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't know.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I don't know if I talked about that. - Supreme Groeper sent $5.
		Bush Light Groeper. - Okay.
		It's not voodoo, but yeah, Jews commune with demons.
		Jews are polytheistic.
		They believe in many gods.
		I'm thinking the Jews might be dark sorcerers of some kind.
unidentified		They are.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Are they magic?
		Can they cast spells?
		I can hear them talking in the walls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's not voodoo, but yeah, Jews commune with demons.
		Jews are polytheistic.
		They believe in many gods.
		And I think a lot of them worship Baal or Baphomet or Satan himself.
		I think that a lot of Jews talk to demons.
		And that's what Kabbalah is.
		If you have any understanding of Kabbalah, it is something like spell casting.
		It's not quite that, but it's similar.
		And I would say the closest thing to voodoo that the Jews practice is these Kabbalistic practices they have.
		So, yeah, no, absolutely.
		They absolutely are involved with demons.
		A lot of them are straight up Satanists.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		The Unknown Soldier sent $3.
		Isaac Newton, incel.
		Thomas Aquinas, incel.
		Tesla, incel.
		Nick Fuentes, incel.
		Jesus himself.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, Jesus wasn't an incel, but... But the rest of them, absolutely.
		Absolutely.
		Hitler too.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Trapacolib sent $10.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Less than three.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hey, what's up?
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Good to hear it!
		- Milton_GrowIpercent3 dollars.
		I am also getting confirmed into the Catholic Church this Saturday thanks to you. - Good to hear it. - 07 King. - Congratulations, man.
		I appreciate it and good for you. - Peter ScullyGrowIpercent3 dollars.
		Giving these few bucks to you instead of the homeless person that was begging for it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I deserve it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So, I appreciate that.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		DeadElephantGrowWiper sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		In 2036, Nick Fuentes will run for President against Democratic Satanist Jimmy Donaldson aka Mr. Beast.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The Beast.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The Beast versus the Fountain.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Catholic Gooba sent $3.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I'm guessing you want stream on Good Friday tomorrow, so have a great Easter weekend, Nick.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm streaming tomorrow.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Okay.
		Thank you.
		Shut up.
		Hey, thanks a lot my man!
		Holla!
		Nick, do you have a happy trail?
		Would love a hair.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Okay, thank you.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Chandler sent $5.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Thoughts on how to stop being a pussy?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Shut up.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Justin sent $5.
		I was thinking the same thing.
		Thank you for answering.
		God bless.
		Try to have a good weekend.
		Ice cream and hot McDonald fries.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hey, thanks a lot, my man.
		Holla.
		Yeah, I'll have a good weekend.
		Got to take this stupid car in, though.
		I'm pissed about that.
		So I gotta get my other car.
		Which sucks!
		My other car sucks!
		It has like 150,000 miles on it.
		And it sucks.
		But the weather will be nice.
		I could throw the top off.
unidentified		Whatever.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, yeah, yeah.
		It's always something.
		But yeah, I'll have a good weekend.
		Thanks a lot, buddy.
		You too.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		I gotta start going to the gym.
		I'm getting into bad shape.
		Soteriology?
		I gotta start going to the gym.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm getting in the bad shape.
streamlabs matthew tts ▲ ● ▼		Soteriology?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I've never heard that before.
		Let's see.
		If you see this, your epics is what's the most Super Chats you would read in one night?
		Is there a limit?
		I don't know.
		I'd probably... Usually if the show goes to like three hours, I start just flying through them.
		Or whenever I get tired.
		Okay!
		Alright!
		That's our last Super Chat.
		That's gonna do it for me tonight.
		Remember to follow me here on Cozy.
		Smash the follow button to get a push notification whenever I go live.
		Follow me on Rumble, Gab, Telegram, True Social.
		Links are down below.
		I'm on the air Monday through Friday.
		9 o'clock Central, 10 o'clock Eastern.
		As always, thanks for watching.
		Special thanks to our top Super Chatters tonight, which are John Dave Irving and Classic American Man.
		Special thanks to them.
		Thanks to everybody that Super Chats, everybody that watches the show.
		We love you, and I will see you tomorrow.
		Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		America First!

▲