All Episodes
April 1, 2023 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
02:00:33
GLOBAL REVOLUTION??? GLORIOUS CHAIRMAN XI DECLARES END TO JEWNITED SNAKES | America First Ep. 1140GLOBAL REVOLUTION??? GLORIOUS CHAIRMAN XI DECLARES END TO JEWNITED SNAKES | America First Ep. 1140
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:52:38
Appearances
Clips
a
alex jones
00:22
s
streamlabs matthew tts
00:18
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
With respect, the respect that we deserve.
From this day forward, it's going to be only America.
alex jones
America first. America first. America first. America first. America
unidentified
first. America
first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first.
Thank you.
Good evening, everybody.
nick fuentes
You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Friday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight.
Lots to get into.
Big show.
It's a big show that we've been waiting for for a long time.
Well, you've been waiting for it.
I've been pushing it back.
But our big show tonight, we're going to be covering a lot of recent developments in geopolitics and foreign affairs.
I've wanted to do a show like this for a long time, but things just keep coming up.
The Trump indictment, the terror attack in Nashville,
Civil War in Israel, a lot of stuff going on lately so we just really haven't had one good day to spend the whole show on this but our featured story tonight we'll be talking about a number of different developments and they're all pertaining to the changing global landscape in the last really just in the last two or three weeks we've seen a lot of major developments among them concern Saudi Arabia and China and it's not the first time that we've talked about this
And what I'm referring to broadly is that Saudi Arabia is moving further and further away from the United States and closer towards Russia and China.
And so the story broadly is about how the Russian-Chinese relationship is laying the foundation for a multipolar world.
A world where there isn't just one superpower, which is so much more powerful than the other countries that they can't even be spoken of in the same sentence as that power, which we would call that a unipolar world order.
One pole, one superpower.
But it's going to be a world order where there are multiple poles exerting power on the world and countries like Saudi Arabia or Turkey or Brazil or others will be between multiple poles and sometimes drifting towards one and sometimes towards the other.
But it's a more democratic world that's not led totally by one country, the United States.
So, that's the big idea.
The big idea is that, as a result of this war in Ukraine, we have pushed Russia into the arms of China, they have now forged an unbreakable bond, and it is through that partnership that they will dominate the Eurasian landmass in this century, and that's going to change how the entire global political dynamic works, especially with these regional players like, for example, Saudi Arabia.
We're also going to be talking specifically about how that is affecting the relationship with Saudi Arabia, being a very good case study in this.
Saudi Arabia is one of our most important allies, America's most important ally in the Middle East.
And just in the last couple of weeks they have signaled a major shake-up that they're apparently breaking entirely with the United States and now moving towards Russia and China.
And there are two or three major developments that signal this.
The first was a deal that China brokered to normalize relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which apparently their relationship is now as good as it's been since 1979.
Which is when the Islamic Revolution happened in Iran.
And this came as sort of a surprise.
They just announced it a couple weeks ago.
The other big development this week is that Saudi Arabia will be becoming a dialogue partner in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which is a Chinese-led group of countries in Eurasia, and it includes China, countries in Central Asia, includes Russia, Iran, others.
And so Saudi Arabia joining that signals that they're cozying up to China.
But all of this is really solidifying a trend which has been going on now for over a decade and specifically what's been happening with Saudi Arabia for the last year.
We covered this a lot last summer when we were asking OPEC and Joe Biden was specifically calling on Saudi Arabia to produce more oil to offset The effects of the war in Ukraine, which was sending fuel prices in America very high, and Saudi Arabia refused to do that.
And not only that, but they actually cut production.
That was seen as a flagrant move against not just the United States, but specifically against the Biden administration.
And now, a year later, we see it's full-blown, you could call it a diplomatic rift.
And this signals some very big shake-ups to come.
We'll talk about all that.
That'll be our main story.
I know a lot of people have been asking about it, and we're finally talking about it.
It's very tedious.
I like it, though.
I mean, I love foreign relations.
It's my favorite thing, but... I've said this before on the show.
Everybody's always asking for these kinds of shows in the Super Chats.
Then I do them, and then nobody watches them.
I've been doing this show for six years.
I would know.
And I've... This is my passion.
I love international relations.
But every time I do a show on foreign affairs like Afghanistan, for example, I did a number of shows about that.
Nobody watches the show.
But then everybody asks for it.
But then they don't watch it.
That's okay.
But we'll cover it tonight.
It'll be good.
We'll also be talking tonight about these two bills.
We were gonna cover this yesterday.
Ran out of time.
We're gonna cover these two bills.
Which are being proposed in the U.S.
Congress, which will give the Biden administration the power to ban TikTok.
Problem is, both of them do a lot more than that, as is always the case.
They're passing these bills, they say, so that Joe Biden will be empowered by the legislature to move against TikTok, which is a private business.
And that is the idea.
That's what they've been saying and everything, but that's not what's in the bill.
There are two bills.
One is called the Data Act.
One is called the something else act, I forget, the Restrict Act.
The Data Act and the Restrict Act.
And both of them have very far-reaching provisions about the executive branch's control over software and over American companies that do business with China.
For example, some provisions in one of the bills would make it illegal to use a VPN.
If you use a VPN, which is Virtual Private Network, it conceals your IP address.
That would be a highly illegal act if one of these bills was passed.
And you may go to jail for that!
So that clearly goes above and beyond banning TikTok.
It also has provisions that would, for example, Make it so that the Biden administration could shut down any company that does business with China.
Which is like every company.
Nearly, well not every, but a lot of companies.
So this bill goes above and beyond what people want.
And what's more we've already talked about why banning TikTok for starters is a bad idea.
We don't even want that to begin with.
So we'll talk about all that.
Should be a pretty good show.
But before we get into all that, I want to remind you to smash the follow button here on Cozy to get a push notification whenever I go live.
Follow me on Gab Telegram, true social, links are down below.
We're also live on Rumble every night, so check us out on Rumble.
And all the replays of my show are available on Rumble, so if you want to watch an episode from last week or two weeks ago, it's all there.
We also have the remastered Fuentes Rally there, too, if you missed it.
So that's that.
What else?
Well, it's Friday.
Thank God it's Friday.
I'm getting tired of doing these shows, I gotta tell ya.
unidentified
Whoops.
nick fuentes
I gotta do something else.
I was saying this before I went on a hiatus to go to LA.
I was saying that I want to change things up, and I still do.
I want to change the format of the show.
It's just everything sort of hanging in the balance right now where I got called into action, you know?
But anyway, I just have to work myself up to it.
I feel like there's a better format.
We'll get there.
I'm not gonna stop the show anytime soon, but... I don't know.
I just wish... You know what I think I need?
I need like a producer.
I need a set.
All of that was in the works before 2021, then the Capitol happened.
And then I got banned from everything, and I lost all my money, and I lost my income.
So it took a long time to recover from that.
And then, right when we were about to start to make moves, I get drafted to go work in LA with Ye, and you're not gonna say no to that.
And I'm still sort of embroiled in that But of course in Chicago, so I don't really know what the future holds for this year But I'd like to I'd like to move in that direction just I got so many people Trying to get my attention these days.
It's crazy.
I was just thinking today before I started my show It's like I'm writing up this one-pager for yay I got my mom texting me.
I got my friends texting me.
I got... I'm involved in a meeting.
We're building a website.
Then I get in a meeting and we're doing some other project for the nonprofit.
Then we're doing a meeting about AppPack and it's just like I'm getting pulled in every direction.
I'm trying to make breakfast.
I'm trying to like take care of myself, but also...
It's not easy, it's not easy being a... And then I gotta do a show, then!
I work all day, then!
Everybody's, hey, where's my show?
People don't even superchat and they're like, hey, where's my show?
You people are like gluttons, it's disgusting.
Hey, where's my show?
It's like, hey, pardon me, when's the last time... And don't get me wrong, people send in superchats, but it's always the people that don't send the superchats that are complaining.
It's like, hey, excuse me, Anyway, so then I got it and then I show up late and everyone's mad at me.
So it's busy.
That's how I'm doing.
It's busy over here.
A lot of work.
A lot to do.
A lot of demand for this brain, for this mind, for this charismatic genius empowered by glucose.
Brought to you by the power of refined sugar.
Now that I'm on this sugar diet, I'm like a superhero.
Everybody wants a piece.
Now that I've been eating ice cream, I was always... Now that I'm eating more ice cream than ever, everybody wants a piece.
I'm supercharged.
I'm more productive than ever, making phone calls, writing memos, doing projects, reading, coming up with insights all the time, making everyone laugh.
And this is your brain on this Ray Peet diet, the ice cream diet.
Anyway, so it's been busy, busy, busy, but still got time for you niggas.
Still got time for the niggas, for the boys, for the groips.
So we're gonna do the show.
Hey, a lot of stuff going on.
So much going on.
First of all, big congratulations to Baked Alaska.
Can we get a round of applause?
Can we hit the applause button?
Big round of applause for Yoba, who has been liberated from his illegal incarceration.
God bless him.
He's in good spirits.
I talked to him today.
I congratulated him.
And it's so good to see that this part of the ordeal is over.
And I talked to him about this a lot before I went in.
I said, you know what?
I said, going to jail is actually... and I don't mean to... I'm not trying to speak out of place here because I wasn't there.
But I said, going to jail is almost going to be the easier part in a certain respect.
And here's why.
He got a 60-day sentence, which, by the way, is more than anybody got for what he was charged with.
He was charged with parading.
And the vast, vast, vast majority of people that got charged with parading did not even get jail time at all.
You can look this up.
So some people I know were saying, he got off easy.
With what he was charged for, he got off worse than almost anybody.
That's one.
Two, the median sentence is 60 days.
And that's for people that were in the Senate chamber, that's for people that beat up cops, that's for people that were charged with a felony, conspiracy, or obstruction of an official proceeding of Congress.
So, he didn't get off easy.
But people see the sentence and it's bad enough that he's in jail for 60 days and he was actually in solitary confinement for 16 days because of some vindictive prison guard.
But what people didn't see over the last two years is the torture that we were all put through, which is the uncertainty, this ordeal of being subject to government persecution as a result of Stop the Steal.
And this, we all have had a taste of.
I didn't go to jail, thank God.
And I prayed for baked Alaska while he was in jail.
But we both went through the ordeal, and me, I'm still undergoing it to some extent, of the uncertainty.
Will there be charges?
What will they be?
Paying for lawyers, the financial pressure that it causes, the pressure on the family, and him in particular, getting subpoenaed, getting his parents' phone records subpoenaed, having to bring on a lawyer, negotiating with the feds, going through these different trials.
It's a brutal, excruciating thing and so, the 60 days is almost just the, that's like the icing on the cake.
A lot of you watched January 6 unfold on TV two years ago.
But the people that were there, and specifically the people that went to jail, have gone through this ordeal and have had to think about it and have been under pressure and been stressed about it every single day since for two years.
It's almost like, in a sense, being in jail for two years.
With him literally!
Because he had to be locked up and had to be under house arrest.
And then even still was under a tremendous amount of pressure.
So I'm just so happy for him that this is over and now he can move on with his life.
There's still some things.
He's got a parole officer.
He can't stream.
He's still gotta do some time and that may be negotiated for his charges in Arizona, which are unrelated.
But finally it seems the worst of that is behind him and so I'm so happy for him.
God bless you, Baked Alaska.
And I talk about this a lot.
He really is one of the strongest people I know because that guy has just had a really rough time over the last six, seven years.
People don't even realize.
People forget that what him and I and Millennial Matt all have in common is that we were all at Charlottesville.
That's where we all met.
The three of us.
We all met at Charlottesville in August 2017 and that was like the original January 6th.
Except there was no sympathy from anybody.
Not like there was a whole lot of help this time, no thanks to Donald Trump.
But in 2017 it was less so.
The conservative machine joined up with the left and Antifa to kill everybody that was there and ruin their lives.
And of course, Baked Alaska was, disguised like Forrest Gump, he was there too.
And that's where I met him.
He got bear-maced at point-blank range, almost destroyed his vision for the rest of his life.
He was doxxed.
He was fired.
He was totally cancelled.
And that was years ago!
And he tried to rebuild and eventually got to the point where, in 2020, he was one of the biggest streamers in America.
And he was a massive IRL streamer on DLive and he was making a ton of money and an entrepreneur and a lot of people weren't a fan of it.
A lot of people gave me a hard time.
They're like, how could you be friends with this guy?
He's attacking service workers.
Then service workers made us all wear masks.
Now we don't like him so much anymore, huh?
I guess he was right about that.
Do you remember that?
Everybody who's always concerned trolling.
He's making a scene in Burger King.
He's a terrible person.
Then We enter a global pandemic and all the Burger King and gas station attendants are making us wear masks.
So I guess he was right.
Anyway.
So then he gets banned off DLive.
That gets blown up.
He undergoes a period like this.
Another brutal reset.
And through it all, he's kept his faith.
Whenever I see him, he's warm.
He's upbeat.
He's optimistic.
And he's older than me.
He's 10 years older than me.
It's very difficult.
for uh for him and in spite of that he still manages to be a really a great guy so it's a it's a real triumph of the american spirit triumph of the american will so god bless him we love this guy he's an animal and he's ours we love him so we're glad he's home and i'm gonna try my best to get out there and see him as soon as i can and uh just check in on him and see how he's doing i
I don't think he's able to stream so we can't make content but I'm gonna check in on him and see what's up.
But at the same time that that's going on it's sort of a weird timetable.
So today Baked Alaska is let out of jail.
It's the same day that Ricky Vaughn was convicted Which is a huge deal and he now faces up to 10 years in jail for a meme!
He posted a meme telling black people they could vote by text.
He's being prosecuted now because that apparently deprived people of their rights because they tried to do that.
He took away their voting rights by making a joke on the internet.
Facing 10 years.
Guilty as of today.
It's the same day that Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate have been freed in Romania.
And I believe they're still facing charges, but they've been released back home.
And that's another situation where these people have been in prison now for something like a month.
The charges haven't even been revealed.
Imagine that.
You get thrown in jail.
We don't even know what they're being charged with.
And then of course, the big one, it's the same day that Donald Trump is being indicted in New York.
So all across the board, you see the lawfare is alive and well, and honestly, it makes me afraid.
I'm not afraid of anything, but I guess I shouldn't say it makes me afraid.
It makes me nervous.
Because we're now getting to the point where they are just killing people and throwing people in cages.
If you question the legitimacy of the election, if you go against the regime, if you are too big, too honest, too successful, they just try and throw you in jail.
Make an example out of you, or throw you in jail for your own sake.
And that is clearly what is happening in every single case.
These are all people that nobody can even really articulate what they did wrong.
And in all these cases, it's very creative prosecutions.
We're going to go after Ricky Vaughn.
How?
Oh, I know.
Oh, I got it.
I found this tweet.
And we talked about this a lot when Alex Jones was charged over the Sandy Hook situation.
And we talked about what that meant.
It's all political.
It's weaponization of the judiciary, weaponization of the law.
And they're making an example out of him.
They want to deprive him of his business and take billions of dollars from him that he doesn't even have so that we can't talk.
And they're building up, if they can't get it through the Supreme Court, they're building up a legal precedent and a political precedent that you don't have free speech.
They don't have to pass a bill in Congress that says you aren't free.
And they don't have to thereby get something like that past the Supreme Court, because they are creating a political and a judicial precedent by charging people in these cases.
Where if you're Alex Jones, and you say the Sandy Hook parents are crisis actors, that is now a billion dollar defamation suit.
Seriously?
Those are considered private individuals, so we can't talk about mass killings, we can't talk about civilians involved in political issues, lest we be Charged and given a billion dollars in punitive damages?
Seriously?
That's a year ago.
Ricky Vaughn posts a meme.
They prosecute him for taking away civil rights.
That's added to the stack.
The Alex Jones defamation case, the Ricky Vaughn civil rights case.
Add to that the people at the Capitol who weren't even trespassing!
They couldn't charge Baked Alaska with trespassing because he was allowed to be there by the cops.
So they charged him with parading.
So now, and by the way Charlottesville is somewhat a precedent there too, because of course we were deprived of our First Amendment right to assemble there.
So then you get Charlottesville and the Capitol on top of that.
Then you get Donald Trump who runs for president, wins, gets overthrown, they can't find anything on him, So then they just dig through his business records and they find some transaction, and they find some convoluted way to make it about campaign finance, and they charge him.
Add that to the stack.
Tate was prosecuted in Romania, so that's slightly different, but you could say in theory that it's all really the same thing.
But strictly speaking for the American process, we are now at a point where in the last five years the landscape has radically changed.
These things were unheard of years ago.
And now not only do you have an incredible censorship regime, and an incredible debanking and financial sanction regime, but now you have a legal regime.
And so we're at a point now where political dissent has thoroughly Become impossible.
It has thoroughly been challenged and suppressed.
At first it was a technological censorship, then it became a financial sanction, and now it's straight-up criminalized.
And we're not just talking about speech.
Everybody says freedom of speech, freedom of speech.
Donald Trump is not freedom of speech in this situation.
Andrew Tate is not freedom of speech.
Bake Alaska is not freedom of speech.
Alex Jones isn't even, to a certain extent, freedom of speech.
More specifically, it is a freedom to dissent.
In all of these cases, these are people that, in an organized fashion, Dissented against the government.
They organized politically against the government with a dissident message, but it was really their organization.
People aren't getting charged as normal people for saying these things.
It's the internet celebrities, like the DOJ prosecutor said in January 21.
We want to get the e-celebs and do shock and awe to scare everybody so they won't show up on the inauguration day.
That's political.
That's not about speech.
That's about dissent.
That's about organized dissent.
And same thing with Alex Jones.
They go out and say, we want to make it so that Infowars doesn't exist.
So it's not about speech.
It's about how that's an organized, capital-rich media operation.
It's organized dissent.
Same thing goes with Trump.
He's not really being charged for anything he said.
Not technically.
But they are coming up with all these creative investigations to break apart his organized political operation which stands against the regime.
That's what this is about.
And so, one way to look at it is this intensification over the years in method, in tactics of how the regime is holding back a burgeoning resistance And like I said, you could really trace it back to Andrew Anglin getting banned from Twitter eight years ago.
You could probably go back further, but I believe that's really when it starts.
Is they go after Andrew Anglin, they ban him on Twitter.
That's your first Twitter ban, that's the first guy that falls.
And it proceeds from there with all these kinds of crises and events, and we've... I mean, I've witnessed it play out over the course of my adult life.
First, it's people getting banned on Twitter.
It had never been heard of.
People are shocked.
They're saying, what?
They can do that?
Guess so.
People try lawsuits and it doesn't work.
Then we see things like the Christchurch massacre and Charlottesville.
And so there goes your freedom of assembly in Charlottesville.
And after Christchurch, on Facebook, they then implement these rules against white separatism and white nationalism and talk of white genocide.
And it goes on and then you get these things in 2020 where between the George Floyd riots and the COVID epidemic, then they start controlling the narrative.
They undertake algorithmic and other forms of censorship so that they can explicitly control the political narrative surrounding important issues.
And then it's the election fraud and it's everything that comes with that.
Then you get the DOJ going after the rioters.
You get the Mar-a-Lago raid.
Then you get the Trump prosecution.
And so you could create a timeline of all these different things.
You could throw in the Alex Jones case.
You can throw in the Ricky Vaughn case.
You could throw in these things.
The Laura Loomer situation.
Wells Fargo banning people.
Chase banning Joe Biggs.
Me being put on the no flyer.
I could throw my story in there.
And you create a timeline where this has been intensified over the years, and what you see is that there is a revolution going on, and the regime has just escalated its tactics with every passing day, trying to disintegrate, disorganize all of that, and suppress it.
And so today is one of these days where it's like, people going in, people going out.
Two guys go in, two guys go out.
Ricky Vaughn and Trump are going into jail, and Baked Alaska and the Tate Brothers get out, but for how long?
And is this now what it's come to?
This revolving door?
What's the crime?
None of these people were charged with crimes before they became right-wing dissidents, but then, all of a sudden, now there's interest in Tate.
Now there's interest in Trump's payment from before 2016.
It's over 5, 7 years old.
Now they're interested.
Ricky Vaughn put that tweet out in 2016.
Oh, now they're interested.
unidentified
So... Anyway, so it's an interesting day.
nick fuentes
Well, we gotta take our wins where we can get them.
It's a good day that Baked Alaska and the Tate Brothers are out, but this is the unfortunate reality.
What started with a fun, silly meme war, and, oh, we're gonna get banned and we'll respawn, has now turned into people are being thrown in jail.
And I'll also point out that this is also the subject of infiltration and espionage as well.
And we know who the heroes are.
We know who the good guys are.
It's guys like me.
It's guys like Bait.
It's guys like Trump.
Yay!
Alex Jones, to some extent, even though we debated.
But it was interesting.
You know what we found out today?
And I think this is memory hold.
We found out that there was a mass shooter in 2020 in Denver, Colorado.
I totally forgot about this, but do you remember this?
Apparently, there was a mass shooter in 2020 in Denver, Colorado who was a micro-celebrity in Bronze Age Perverts community.
Was going on podcast talking about his book.
He was a straight-up stan and he goes and kills a bunch of people.
And that has never attracted attention from law enforcement or the SPLC.
What the F?
That's spooky.
And a lot of people are saying, oh, so what?
He's Jewish.
So what?
He's a Holocaust survivor descendant.
So what?
He was mentored by the Israel lobby.
So what?
His brother works for Ian Bremmer.
Big deal.
So does everybody.
Now that's crazy.
That's crazy talk.
And then you find out he's not only not ever attracted any attention from the ADL, but actually one of his followers shot a bunch of people and nobody talks about this.
And still, to this day, if that were me, could you imagine?
Could you imagine if one of my followers did a mass shooting?
They would kill me.
I would never hear the end of that.
I would most certainly... They would find more things to ban me from, if possible.
Not this guy.
And anyway, there was one other thing I wanted to throw in here before I move on.
I saw this tweet today.
I just have to talk about it.
I put it on my telegram today, but you know, we've been really going in on BAP and we've been talking about the civil war in Israel, and here's the gist.
Here's why I keep going in on this.
I cannot stress this to you enough.
I know maybe people are rolling their eyes and saying, why does he keep talking about this?
What's the point?
It needs to be impressed upon you that this desk that I sit behind represents I am the king of the dissident right.
I am the undisputed, undeniable leader of the dissident right.
Clearly.
By far.
There's just simply nobody else in the same sentence.
There is no other AFPAC.
Where's the other AFPAC?
It doesn't exist.
There is no other CozyTV.
Where's the other platform?
It's not out there.
Where's the other face that's talking about the Israel lobby and Jewish power?
It's Ye, end of list.
Okay?
Me and Ye.
And, of course, there have been major efforts undertaken over the past year to discredit me, and to hurt my credibility, and to insinuate that I'm a bad actor.
Which, by the way, there's a word for that.
It's called bad jacketing.
That's a counterintelligence tactic where feds will come in and accuse everybody of being a fed.
Bad jacketing.
They come in overwhelmingly, so this guy's a fed, that guy's a fed, and they create disunity in the dissident movement.
So people have insinuated all kinds of terrible things about me over the last year.
Betrayals.
You've seen a lot of this.
I don't need to go into detail.
And so much of this is not an accident, so much of this is not a coincidence, it's literally coordinated.
And one of the most prominent people that coordinated these things is Kostan Alomar, you are a Bronze Age pervert.
He was one of the people amplifying the most salacious rumors about me in the last year.
And we take a look at a guy like that, who's an anonymous right-wing personality who should be supporting me if he purports to be some sort of pro-white Nazi, And yet, he's amplifying all these smears against me.
We dig into his background.
We find out he's Jewish.
We find out he's an immigrant.
We found out he's a pedophile, homosexual.
We find out that he grew up in Newton, Massachusetts, which is the most Jewish town in America.
His brother works for the Eurasia Group.
His dad, all his Facebook friends live in Israel, and he's a supporter of the IDF.
We found out that Costan Alamaryou has written articles throughout his academic life about how The Zionist state is amazing and how Palestinian identity isn't real.
In other words, we find out this guy is a Ben Shapiro wearing a Hitler mask.
He's Ben Shapiro, full-on yarmulke, cuboid face, he's got a cube wrapped around his fucking forehead, but he's just wearing a Hitler mask, wearing a Hitler mustache.
And this is the kind of thing I'm talking about.
We are at the precipice of a mass... Oh!
I think I'm getting swatted right now.
Hang on.
Let me change my screen real quick.
I'm hearing yelling.
unidentified
I'm hearing.
nick fuentes
Alright, turns out it was a false alarm.
I heard all this... There is some police situation going on, but it's not... wasn't a swatting.
I hear all this yelling.
I stick my head out the door and there's uh I don't know some some sort of scene.
I'm thinking here I'm thinking it's like it's 1 30 a.m it's a Friday night I'm like what could you know I hear police but it's uh thankfully he's got nothing something to do with the neighbor apparently but anyway anyway false alarm but I wanted to dive back into where where was I I was talking about Koston Alamaru and I forget exactly where I where I ended off there.
But I wanted to get on into this tweet that I posted on my Telegram.
This is the kind of thing I'm talking about.
Oh, I'm talking about how I'm the number one dissident.
So we're on the precipice of a mass consciousness awakening event where people are becoming aware about the Jewish issue, People are becoming aware about race.
They're becoming aware about Israel.
All these kinds of things.
You saw the success of AFPAC 3.
You saw how I was catapulted into the national spotlight last year.
And so the point is, there are very powerful, interested parties that do not want to see a guy like me spread my message.
They're very powerful, interested parties that want to ensure that the young people, the right-wing movement stays on the controlled, controlled right, foreign, foreign subverted path.
They want to stay on that message.
And so anyway, so that's why I've been talking about this all throughout the last week.
And we've really laid the groundwork on that.
We talked about the Israel Civil War on Monday and how Netanyahu is connected to like every major right-wing donor as well as many other billionaires in America.
How these groups like Claremont are in bed with him as well as like the entirety of the GOP.
We talked about some tweets and some other things on Tuesday and Wednesday.
And today I want to share with you this tweet from that network.
Because to me, this kind of stuff, if this doesn't prove that the right wing is totally subverted, and by right wing I mean the dissident right, is totally subverted, there's an active Jewish spy ring going on here, to me this is almost irrefutable, undeniable.
This is one of the BAP defenders.
We've been covering this story all week.
We've been blowing him up.
Their whole group is freaking out.
And this guy goes on Twitter.
He goes by the name Breast Milk Enjoyer.
So, you know, that's Kai Kliff's guys, I guess.
But this guy's a BAP guy.
He's in their group chat.
He's in their orbit.
And he goes out today and he tweets.
He writes, it's low IQ and imprecise to blame abstractions such as capitalism, the globalists, or even the Jews for historical events and today's problems.
Abstractions don't make decisions or exercise power.
People with names and addresses do.
That's, okay, so that's the opener.
This is one of BAP's guys.
That's the opener.
Okay?
It's low IQ and imprecise to blame the Jews for today's problems because abstractions like the Jews don't make decisions, people do.
Well, you know, I think the problem with that argument is because the Jews, unlike capitalism, are people.
So when we say that there are problems in the world, we're not saying an abstraction is causing them.
We're saying that Jewish people are causing them.
People are causing these problems, and if you look at the powerful people, two-thirds of them are Jewish.
So... But this is a super, super smart, lifestyle, funny guy, funny guy, funny Pepe.
Hey my fellow anonymous, white, disaffected, right-wing extremists.
I'm just like you.
Funny name.
Breast milk enjoyer.
Funny.
But my fellow whites, let us not blame the Jews.
That isn't precise and low IQ.
After all, that's an abstraction.
The people that are really doing the... Really?
He goes on.
He writes, and by the way, His spelling shows that he's not even American.
He writes generalizations, and it's spelled with an S. Generalize, G-E-N-E-R-A-L-I-S, instead of Z, meaning that he's not American.
Which is, I'm sure, that's not conspicuous at all.
He writes, generalizations by nature are low-resolution images of a larger picture.
To the extent that you generalize, you should also be able to particularize.
Or you've missed the details that matter.
Boy, they, uh, you're missing all the details that matter.
That's not, that's not the juice.
He writes.
Perhaps the dumbest thing one can do is assign people a tribal affiliation, often on flimsy evidence at best, and infer single-issue abstract motivations towards them.
Real people juggle a balance of competing interests and incentives.
People are not groups.
Bab's not Jewish.
He's an individual.
Content of character, not color of flag.
Be wary of sophistry based on this.
Is someone being rejected for their ideas or concrete impact?
Or based on tenuous links to some demonized abstract tribal identity?
That has got to be the most Jewish thing I have ever read in my life.
We find out, we got this guy dead to rights, man.
We got him dead to rights.
One of the most astroturfed Guys, in this scene, when I say astroturfed, I mean billionaires.
Gay billionaires prop him up.
Curtis Yarvin, who is the court philosopher, also Jewish, of Peter Thiel, the billionaire, who is the single biggest donor in the 22 cycle, $30 million, elected a senator, nominated others,
Curtis Yarvin, who's the court philosopher of Teal, convinced Claremont Institute, which is funded by Paul Singer, a Jewish-Israeli spy and a billionaire who funds Claremont, convinced Claremont Institute to push Bronze Age Pervert's book in their Claremont review of books.
That's who we're talking about.
Bapp is also a personal friend of Darren Beatty, who's Jewish, who I like Darren, actually, but also a Jewish academic type.
And Bronze Age Pervert then becomes astroturfed by Mike Cernovich, Jack Murphy, Jack Posobiec, all the usual suspects.
And we find out that this guy's a Jewish immigrant from Romania.
His dad's a hardcore Zionist.
He's a hardcore Zionist.
He was mentored by members of JINSA.
You know, a couple weeks ago we did a story about a major organ in the Jewish lobby, in the Israel lobby, that said that we need to give all of our best military tech to Israel?
That was written by JINSA.
Board member of JINSA mentored this guy.
All his academic role models were working in Jewish studies departments in universities.
He wrote a paper About how pro-Palestinian professors should be fired because Palestinian identity isn't real.
And that people are anti-Semitic for looking at Israel double standards.
It's like prototypical.
This is prototypical Zionist trash.
This is prototypical Jewish trash.
This is like Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, to the T, by the book, ethnic, Ancestry, background, the Zionist shilling crap, the whole deal, it's all there.
And you got these guys that come, there's this whole network that comes out and says, well that's tenuous.
He writes, it's a tenuous link.
It's based on flimsy evidence.
Well, you're just assigning him an abstract tribal identity, a demonized tribal identity.
The guy's a spy.
These guys are all spies.
These guys are Jewish spies for the State of Israel.
And you want to know why that's true?
It's because you have these guys that'll come into whichever scene it is, whether it's the conservative scene and you're Ben Shapiro and Prager, Or it's this scene, and it's Bronze Age pervert, and somebody else.
They come into the scene pushing 80% their issue, or our issues, the things we like to hear, and the 20% is something that is diametrically opposed to our foundational views.
The foundational view of this side is nationalism.
That's like the foundational idea is America first.
And America First, at its core, is about corruption.
It's about the fact that our government is corrupt.
It has been corrupted by foreign spies, foreign money, foreign businesses, foreign governments, foreign lobbyists.
Our country is failing because we have lost our... well, there's a lot of reasons we've lost our soul as a civilization.
But in a more logistical way, in a more practical way, we've lost our way because the government is being raped by foreigners.
Here you have a literal foreigner coming in and promulgating this lie that the number one, the number one perpetrator of this rape against our country, which is Israel, is somehow innocuous, or better yet, our closest ally.
You are a spy.
So I saw this thread and it's like, if you can't see it at this point, man, it's crazy.
But everybody sees it now.
I think everybody's lining up now.
The jig is up.
These guys know it.
Even Varg.
Varg is so, he's like, he is like what Bat pretends to be.
He's a true pagan.
He's a true terrorist.
Talk about Bronze Age mindset.
He's killing people.
And he doesn't even go out there and say that, so the jig is up and they're obviously panicking.
But it's amazing how we persisted with this, we pushed this, we pushed this, and now they're just going mask off and they're saying, you know what, Netanyahu's not that bad, Israel's our closest ally, it doesn't matter.
Now these guys sound like Dave Rubin.
We forced the Bronze Age warriors to now sound like Dave Rubin.
And they're going out there and saying, So what?
So what?
I'm Jewish.
So what?
Look at my character.
I'm your closest ally.
Look at everything I've done.
Oh...
A tenuous link.
A tenuous link.
Flimsy evidence.
I'm not even... Okay, I'm a little bit Jewish.
Alright, I'm totally Jewish.
And hey, I'm not even... Alright, I'm a little bit of a Zionist.
Okay, I work for the State of Israel.
But hey!
Why judge me on that?
Look at my character.
I mean, this is just like outrageous that this is going on.
But if this is what we see, imagine everything we don't see.
We see the Shapiro.
I saw that first, when I'm saying that was the first thing I saw in my career.
We see the Shapiro.
We see the Prager.
We see the Kushner.
We see the Rahm Emanuel.
Now we see the Kostin.
Now we see the Kostin El-Ammaryu, and Andrei, his father, and Dan El-Ammaryu, his brother.
We see the Alamaryu family which by the way here's a little fun piece of advice Alamaryu means brass smith in Romania so Bronze Age pervert?
Brass.
More like, dude, your ancestors worked with brass.
You're just like some shtetl gypsy shill.
That's what your ancestors were doing in Romania, dude.
Bronze Age Yale.
You're just some peasant from Romania.
You're some fucking gypsy.
That's the best part.
He comes over here and because he's anonymous he gets to pretend to be some bodybuilder of noble blood.
You're not from noble blood.
You're from a shtetl in Romania.
Your ancestors were peasants.
Your ancestors worked with brass.
You didn't even work with bronze.
You worked with brass.
Your ancestors were poor.
And he comes over here pushing his shitty book with his Yiddish accent.
It's crazy.
And anyway, so if that's what we see, that's just the tip of the iceberg.
And there's so much more that goes on behind the scenes that explains why you still have Charlie Kirk going out there in December saying that we need to stop it, the surging anti-Semitism.
That's why Tucker Carlson cancels the Ye documentary.
That's why, that's why these things happen.
And it's like I said earlier this week, can we put America first without confronting this?
Can we put America first?
Can we put God first?
Without confronting the fact that there is this ugly parasite hiding in plain sight that is dominating our country.
You see it right here.
You see it right here.
Be wary of sophistry based on this.
Is someone being rejected for their ideas?
Or based on tenuous links to some demonized, abstract, tribal-like- We've had enough of your i- We have had enough of your ideas.
We have had enough of your ideas.
We have had enough of your tweets.
We have had enough of your word salad.
Shut the fuck up.
America first.
Christ is king.
Go back to Israel.
We've heard enough.
That's what they- Isn't that what they always say?
The Prager, the Shapiro, the Kostein.
Listen to what we have to say.
You'll listen to what we have to say.
Shut up!
Shut up!
We have heard enough.
We have heard enough.
The Jon Stewart's, the Ben Shapiro's, the Bill Crystal's, the Prager's.
You're gonna listen to what we have to say.
But hear us out.
Listen to our ideas.
The Bill Maher's.
We've heard enough of your blasphemy.
Shut up.
It's America first.
Christ is King.
I don't need to hear anything else.
I don't need to hear anything else from a multi-racial populist.
I don't need to hear anything else from a neo-reactionary.
I don't need to hear anything else from some bodybuilding, whatever the... We don't need to hear anything more from people that reject Jesus and work for Israel.
Don't eat it.
So I see that kind of stuff and I'm like, wow, what a meltdown.
The panic is just insane.
Because for a year they denied it.
They're like, no, no, this isn't a spy network.
We're not an Israel spy network.
We're going to ignore that.
We'll just block everybody.
Then it's obvious.
We put all the evidence out, and then they go out and say, hey, come on, okay, maybe we are Jewish, but what are you going to just protect us for that?
Nuts.
Anyway, so that's that.
But I want to move on.
I want to get into the show here, and we'll talk about First, the big story.
I want to get into this multipolar world order first.
Because that's the big one.
We may not get to the TikTok story tonight, but I feel better about pushing that one back than this one.
So our first story, we're going to cover a few things.
And like I said, I was going to do this show for a long time.
It's about a lot of different events.
But it's been just such a hectic period that we haven't gotten a chance to do it.
But our big featured story tonight is about a series of events that are taking place in Asia, which are changing global political balance of power.
And specifically this has to do with the relationship between Russia and China.
A couple of weeks ago, Xi Jinping made an historic trip to Moscow And met with Vladimir Putin.
And this is, of course, in the wake of this Ukraine war, which is now entering its final phase.
And I said this last year that the Ukraine war would determine the future of the global balance of power.
That there was so much on the line in this conflict beyond just the Crimean Peninsula and the Donbass.
Of course, that was the tripwire.
And that was the precipitating cause.
That is where these two worlds collided in the world on the battlefield.
But it's not, of course, just about Ukraine.
It's about sovereignty.
It's about hegemony.
The United States deigned to say since 2008, and even earlier, that Ukraine and Georgia would become a part of NATO.
That the United States said we can put missiles at the throat of Russia in Georgia and Ukraine.
We can take the Black Sea.
We can take the Crimean Peninsula.
We could put missiles right next to Moscow.
And we can change the landscape in Eastern Europe.
And push Russia's borders back the furthest.
This is what's going on.
So that's what sets the stage as Xi Jinping making the trip to Moscow, and specifically saying that they will now forge an unbreakable bond.
Nothing can come between them.
You've now got the number one nuclear arsenal in the world, the second biggest conventional military in the world, manufacturer of the most sophisticated hypersonic missile in the world, now teaming up with the world's number one economy, world's number one population.
Two countries also that are autocratic, completely rejecting liberal democracy, completely rejecting that model.
It's the biggest challenge, it's the biggest confrontation against the United States in 30 years, in a generation since the Cold War.
It's a reshaping of the global landscape.
And so tonight, specifically, I want to talk about a few major developments pertaining to Saudi Arabia.
So in the last few weeks, Saudi Arabia has drifted further and further towards China.
And as I said at the top of the show, this is part of a much longer trend.
Which really starts with... Well, if you really want to go back, this has a lot to do with China becoming the number one economy.
Saudi Arabia is one of the world's largest producers of oil.
China is now the world's largest consumer of oil.
So it has a lot to do with trade and it has a lot to do with the economics.
But specifically, you can trace back the rift in American-Saudi relations to the killing of the journalist Jamal Khashoggi and how that caused all these problems and we were going to break apart with Saudi Arabia.
It was this hubris of saying that America can dictate to even a critical important ally who may actually be on the cusp.
How they operate with their internal affairs.
You can't kill journalists.
You can't kill this guy.
It really goes back to that but we talked about this a lot more on the show a year ago and I mentioned this at the beginning of the show when last year the war in Ukraine was causing oil prices to skyrocket and this is very bad for the Biden administration and fuel prices are going up and it's contributing to inflation in America and Joe Biden asked Saudi Arabia to Increased oil production to offset that effect and Saudi Arabia and OPEC refused.
And this was a total middle finger to America.
Which, Saudi Arabia and America, this is supposed to be one of the most important alliances in the world.
going back to 1945, going back to FDR's meeting with the king of Saudi Arabia and Standard Oil and everything.
This is supposed to be one of the most important alliances that undergirds American hegemony in the world with the petrodollar and with their control over the world supply of oil and natural gas.
And so going back a year ago, you've got the beginnings of a rift in the relationship.
Now it seems like that process is complete.
And it seems that almost in a matter of two weeks, Saudi Arabia is breaking away from America and now they're joining up with China and Russia, or at the minimum, becoming a free agent.
And there are a couple of things in particular, and here's an article from Russia Today.
It says, quote, Saudi Arabia's cabinet approved a decision to join a China-led security bloc, strengthening Riyadh's eastern ties and a further step away from American interests.
The state-owned Saudi Press Agency said that in a session of the Saudi Cabinet on Tuesday, King Salman approved a memorandum awarding Riyadh the status of Dialogue Partner in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which is a political, security, and trade alliance which includes China, Russia, India, Pakistan, and four other Central Asian nations as full members.
The organization further tallies four observer states, including Iran, and nine dialogue partners, which now counts Turkey, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia.
It is headquartered in Beijing and served by China's Jiang Ming as Secretary General.
Saudi Arabia's decision to join the SCO while falling short of full membership takes Riyadh's interest further east at a time when Beijing is testing out its way in the Middle East and a potential hit to U.S.
influence.
In early March, China brokered a deal for long-time Mideast rival Saudi Arabia and Iran to resume diplomatic relations and reopen embassies in each other's countries.
Deeper in Europe, Beijing, just as ambitiously, if so far less successfully, submitted a 12-point plan to achieve peace between Russia and Ukraine.
So this is China making a number of moves at a time when America's incredibly vulnerable for a lot of reasons, specifically the banking crisis that's going on, the high inflation, imminent defeat in Ukraine, So China is now intervening in the Middle East, and they brokered a deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
This is a huge deal.
Because, of course, Saudi Arabia and Iran have been in a cold war since 1979, when the Islamic Revolution happened in Iran.
And it's only been getting worse, especially in the last 10 years.
If you look at the situation in Yemen, where there's a proxy war going on, Syria was effectively a proxy war, there was a major rout over Qatar, Because of their support for Iran, the Middle East has been dominated for the last 10 years by a proxy war between these two countries and America playing up the religious differences and political differences between them.
And it seems like in a matter of one week, all of that is now over.
They reopened their embassies, normalizing ties in a way that they simply have never done in 40 years since the existence of the modern Iranian regime.
And this is all done now by China.
So you've got Saudi Arabia breaking away from the United States, moving into China's orbit in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and not only that, but at the same time that this is going on, China goes into the Middle East and it seems like overnight solves a blood feud which has defined the geopolitics of the Middle East for 40 years.
This is by far and away bigger, you could say, than the war in Ukraine.
This is a bigger signal than the war in Ukraine.
Last year we talked about how this has a lot to do with America's hegemony in the world, and this is a test for Russia, and Russia being able to survive means that, and I said last year, this is the beginning of the end of the unipolar world order.
Things like this look like the end of the beginning.
This looks like the beginning of the multipolar world.
This is not the beginning of the end of the unipolar world order.
This is the beginning of the beginning of a multipolar world order.
These are the consequences year out of what started in Ukraine last year, last February.
Because it's not any longer China threatening to become a world player.
China is now a world player.
China is now projecting strength in the Middle East.
And it's not just Saudi Arabia, it's others too.
It's other countries like Turkey, it's Iran.
You look around the world and here's a figure for you.
60-70% of the world's population are living in countries that did not put sanctions on Russia.
So this is the entirety of the world's population that is now no longer on the side of the United States.
If you can count in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia, it's like, at that point, who's left?
You've got America, you've got Western Europe, you have all the usual suspects.
You've got the European Union, you've got North America, you've got Australia, you've got Japan, South Korea, But we're now talking about almost all of the major players on the Eurasian landmass, again with the exception of the European vassal states like France, UK, Germany, are now not just leaning towards China, but they're on China's side.
They're on the same side as Russia and China.
And so in a future conflict, let's say a World War III broke out, You've got Russia and China on the same side.
You've got Iran with them.
You've got Venezuela on their side.
Cuba, Bolivia, Nicaragua.
You've got most of Africa on China's side.
You've now also got Saudi Arabia, potentially the entire Arabian Peninsula on their side.
Turkey's on their side.
Belarus is on their side.
Who's on our side?
NATO, Canada, Japan, South Korea.
End of list.
And maybe Brazil.
You've got, you know, these other countries in the Western Hemisphere, but nobody really prominent.
This is the gravity of what we're talking about here, and this is what we talked about throughout last year with the Russia-Ukraine war.
It's not just about Crimea.
This is about the eroding American system in the world order.
The other big aspect of this which people are talking about is the currency.
This is the part which is a lot more tenuous.
It is true that politically America is losing.
It is true that economically America is losing.
But in terms of currency, this is maybe the more tenuous case.
There have been developments in the past couple of weeks where some countries are agreeing to settle their trade balance in Chinese currency.
Meaning that traditionally, every country will, when they conduct trade, first...
They'll use dollars, they'll sell everything and do the trade in dollars and then they'll resettle in their home currencies.
Meaning that when countries are doing trade with one another, they're not doing it, it's not Saudi Arabia buying goods from China in the Saudi Rial and it's not China going and buying products in Brazil with the Chinese Yuan.
Countries are first exchanging their native currencies for dollars and then they're conducting trade.
And that's on top of the fact that all the commodities in the world are measured in dollars.
So the price of oil, the price of lumber, the price of all the commodities is measured in dollars.
And that's what it means when people say that the dollar is the reserve currency of the world.
This is the monetary standard of the world.
Meaning that this is what every country uses.
And also, every country maintains massive reserves of American dollars for this purpose.
And that became a big problem last year when the United States confiscated Russia's foreign currency reserves.
They've done that to other countries before, but never a country of this size.
Russia had $300 billion in foreign currency reserves.
They had $300 billion American dollars, which the United States seized and prevented them from transacting.
And they also prevented Russia from trading their rubles for dollars.
And so they effectively cut off Russia from the dollar-based system.
And we talked about this a lot last year and how that was going to cause a crisis of confidence in the world.
That if the United States could go in and Russia being the world's 10th or 11th largest economy, if they could seize a sum of that size, most countries don't have that much money in foreign currency reserves.
Of course, if Russia is number 10, there are 183 countries with smaller economies than Russia.
If America could do that to Russia, and they could do that to Russia for simply doing something that America didn't like, rather than engaging in terrorism or nuclear proliferation.
Then they could do it to anybody, and they would do it to anybody.
It's a big problem.
America being the arbiter or the owner of the world's reserve currency has to act like an umpire.
The reason that America's currency is a reserve currency, there's actually a lot of reasons, but among them is that the American currency does not discriminate against foreign buyers of the American dollar.
The American system is very transparent.
The corporate governance is very transparent and very fair.
And so when the United States politicizes and weaponizes their power that they wield over the dollar, they can get away with a lot of things like jacking up the interest rate.
But when they weaponize the dollar in such a heavy-handed way for a reason which is seemingly partisan... Russia invaded Ukraine.
Is that something that goes against international norms?
Well, some would say that.
Many others would disagree.
For it to be weaponized in a significant way for that reason, it shows that nobody's safe.
It shows that America is willing to wield this power in a way that is pretty arbitrary and very interested.
And so as a consequence last year a lot of countries began a conversation about settling their trade potentially in other currencies like India began this discussion and Brazil and Saudi Arabia and now we're beginning to actually see that.
The countries are now buying commodities in the Chinese Yuan and countries are committing to settle their trade in the Chinese currency.
And this is a story on that.
It says, quote, China and Brazil have secured a deal to conduct bilateral trade in their own respective currencies, eliminating the U.S.
dollar as an intermediary.
The agreement between the two BRICS countries, which have $150 billion in annual trade, would probably have been signed in Beijing this week.
Have Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's scheduled visit not been postponed due to an illness.
At around the same time, China also conducted its first ever trade of liquefied natural gas settled entirely in Yuan with France's Total Energies.
The decision by Brazil and China to pursue non-dollar trade is a huge geopolitical moment and a sign that countries are seeking to move away from using the U.S.
currency in direct response to Washington's abuse of the global reserve currency for its own political aims.
Although the greenback will of course remain a prominent force in global trade and economics, the Americans' ability to use it as a tool to bully and quash other countries is diminishing.
And so here's the rub.
I said earlier that we could say that China is indisputably becoming a political player and an economic player but in terms of currency it's still a long ways away from replacing the dollar.
Here's what I mean by this.
It is true that other countries are going to look for alternatives.
And we could simply say that this is hedging.
They are probably going to want to accumulate other foreign currencies, maybe even look into cryptocurrencies.
They're going to strike deals like this.
China is the number one trading partner for many of these countries, and if not number one, they conduct a lot of trade with China.
And the prospect that America would freeze trade with China in the same way that they did with Russia over a crisis like, say, in Taiwan, That's the reason why a Brazil or France or Saudi Arabia would be looking to now denominate their trade in Yuan or settle their trade in Yuan.
In other words, they can't lose trade with China if America wakes up on the wrong side of the bed and says, we are going to seize China's foreign currency reserves because they invaded Taiwan.
Unlike with Russia, these other countries simply cannot afford to be cut off.
From China in the same way, so that's why they're now looking for alternatives.
That's why they're looking to conduct trade specifically with China in their native currency.
But the dollar system is not coming to an end anytime soon.
And there are a lot of reasons for this.
It's a very complex issue.
And a lot of that owes to the fact that all the countries in the world benefit from America and the dollar being the world's reserve currency.
Specifically countries like China.
Because China has a problem where they do not have enough demand for the goods that they produce.
It's a country that produces too much.
You could say they're a surplus country.
And so America, for example, maintains a $500 billion trade deficit with China.
Meaning that China exports $500 billion worth of goods more to America than they import.
America's the number one market for Chinese goods.
They need America to buy their stuff.
How do they buy their stuff?
America, in order to pay for that deficit, we get $500 billion worth of stuff.
We don't get it for free.
We're not giving them.
That's why it's a trade imbalance.
We're getting $500 billion worth of stuff more than we're giving.
How do we pay for it?
We pay for it in assets.
We pay for it in currency.
We pay for it in debt.
And so the American economy alone is willing to shoulder that burden.
We're willing to shoulder the burden of having a tremendous deficit, having tremendous debt, having unemployment.
We're willing to be the country that is a deficit country.
That is what allows China to be a surplus country.
And a lot of that has to do with the demand for American dollars.
America makes the dollars.
We pay China the dollars to get this stuff.
And it's that system that allows countries like China to exist.
Without that, they would have to restructure how their entire economy works if they were to suddenly become the reserve currency.
So it's actually a benefit for China.
It's actually not a good thing.
The other thing has to do with control of Chinese currency.
If China is to become the reserve currency of the world, that means that countries need to be able to transact the currency freely.
Meaning that Chinese Yuan needs to flow freely into and out of the country according to the demands of the market.
The United States dollar does this.
The money goes all around the world, it goes in and out, and there's really no major currency controls on that.
And like I said earlier, it's that kind of environment, it's that kind of business environment which allows America to be the reserve currency, among many other reasons.
Sort of a complex deal.
It has to do with confidence, it has to do with the power of the American economy, it has to do with them winning the war.
But it also has to do practically with the fact that it is the best option in the market.
As far as China is concerned, they fiercely control the value of their currency.
Domestically.
And so the idea that all these other countries would be accumulating massive amounts of Chinese currency and they could do that at will, or they could sell it at will, it completely goes against the monetary strategy of the Chinese central bank.
They actually have two central banks.
How they handle their currency, they have one policy domestically and they have one institution for international trade.
So, for a variety of complex reasons, it's just not going to happen that because France will buy liquefied natural gas and yuan, that that in any way threatens the dominance of the dollar.
There are a lot of things that are going to have to change for that to happen.
Because Brazil settles $150 billion worth of trade, in the grand scheme of things, this is not a tremendous amount of money.
That India may do some trade deals with China and Yuan again.
This does not in any way threaten the preeminence of the dollar.
Is the dollar system going to last forever?
Probably not.
As long as China is going to rise.
As long as other countries in Asia are going to rise.
Countries like China, India.
It's probable that over time it's going to be like the power dynamic more democratized and maybe there'll be a day when it'll be a little bit more diverse that there won't be one currency that is the standard for the entire world but it's not going to happen anytime soon and that has a lot to do with
The monetary policy in China and it also has a lot to do with the structure of countries like China and the fact that they simply cannot afford to have their currency being exported all around the world so long as they're a surplus country producing goods, exporting lots of goods.
So it's a very complicated subject.
It's really, we can't really focus on We can't really do the multipolar world as well as the currency situation in one show.
It's a very complex topic.
It's not really being given a full treatment on the show tonight, but it is important.
The point is that these are two very different things.
China becoming a political player in the world is a totally different situation than the Chinese Yuan being introduced into some of the bilateral trade between China's trading partners.
It's a completely different situation.
So US dollar not going away anytime soon, but it's also not something that is necessarily bad for China.
Those two things are not necessarily opposed to one another.
In other words, just because the American dollar isn't going anywhere does not discount the fact that China is becoming We are becoming a multipolar world.
That is apparent.
If Russia can invade Ukraine without the regime disintegrating and without being forced to reverse course, Then it is a multipolar world.
If China is able to go into Saudi Arabia and broker a peace between Iran and Saudi Arabia, it is a multipolar world.
If China is able to go into Ukraine and propose a 14-point peace plan or a 12-point peace plan, All of these are signals that the world is fundamentally different than it was before you could say 2022.
I would say a number like 2014.
And the prophecy that we talked about a year ago has been fulfilled.
This is the trend.
The hyper, power, unipolar moment of America is over.
By the same token, this will happen in a trade environment where the United States dollar is still the reserve currency of the world.
So that's the situation.
It's a little bit... and everybody keeps saying they're like, well, Well, another country adopted the yuan, and another country adopted the yuan.
The United States dollar is... it is inextricably linked to the global economy.
So, although the world is going to gradually move away from the dollar over time, it is not happening this year, it is not happening this decade, it is not happening anytime soon.
And that's because these things happen over time.
And institutionally, China isn't even seeking this.
Of course, China became rich off of the current arrangement.
China became rich off of the manipulation of their currency, which can only occur with the monetary arrangement that they have.
That can only occur in an environment where America is the reserve currency in the world.
So why would they change that now?
They got rich with America being the reserve currency.
They got rich with America paying them money in exchange for their goods.
They got rich becoming the...
Factory of the world and That is going to change that economically that will simply have to change their economy will be restructured and there may be a day when they'll be a Deficit country like we are but it's not going to happen anytime soon And so long as that is the economic reality in China that is going to be the reality of currency so They're a player.
And by the way, and all of this goes, this is all explaining what's going on, but the big picture is that this is a positive development for us.
And this is a controversial position because there's a lot of conservatives that will go out there, even like Donald Trump and Dissident types will go out there and say that this is a bad thing.
We don't want this to happen.
There are a lot of people that say that we should engage in a war with China or we should engage China in other ways over Taiwan or economically or with trade.
The problem with this argument, though, Is that insofar as America is empowered to take on China, or Russia for that matter, we are empowering not America as our country, we're empowering American decision makers in government.
And so, when we talk about China's rise, and you'll have conservatives that bemoan the loss, the concession of territory and market share to China, You have to ask yourself, who is really losing here?
Because it's not us.
It's the American firm owners.
If China is expanding its market share in the world, who's losing?
It's going to be the same American interests.
The same American interests that are fighting that and resisting that tooth and nail, they're the same ones that are engaging in diversity, equity, and inclusion.
They're the same ones that are embracing stakeholder capitalism and environmental social governance.
They're the same ones engaging in censorship.
They're the same ones footing the bill.
For the great reset.
They're the ones trying to put the small farmers out of business.
They're the ones trying to put all the other small everything else out of business.
It's all it's all really the same and you could see that a microcosm of that is with TikTok and we're not going to get to the bills tonight.
We could talk a little bit about TikTok as this is one of the many battlefields between America and China.
If you want to visualize it, if you want to make it concrete, the TikTok example is very instructive.
And I've given this take before, but this is like how everything works.
TikTok being banned by America, the argument for this goes something like, if TikTok is allowed to operate in America, they're stealing our data.
They're stealing our data, and the Chinese government can access that, and they could do great harm to America based on this.
So we have to ban TikTok.
By the same token, I think another reason they want to ban TikTok is that TikTok is the most successful, fastest growing social media platform of the 2020s.
It is rapidly growing.
It is now in the top five.
It is on track to be the number one social media platform in the world.
It's also young.
It's killing Facebook.
It's killing Instagram.
And it's killing them with their business.
The business of Facebook is advertisements.
95% of Facebook's revenue comes from advertisements.
Amazon, Google are also in the advertisement business.
TikTok is the hottest market for advertisements, believe it or not.
So when we say they're at war with each other in business, they are literally at war in the exact same market.
You think that TikTok is in the social media business, they're in the advertiser business.
They are a direct competitor to Facebook.
TikTok gets their money for advertisements, Facebook gets their money through advertisements, and the most coveted demographic, which is the young people, TikTok is far more competitive than any property at Meta or frankly any other Silicon Valley property because of course Meta has both Facebook and Instagram.
TikTok is killing both.
It is also killing YouTube which came out with a competitor product called YouTube Shorts.
So here you have a scenario where America, and specifically these American big tech social media businesses, are just getting killed by TikTok.
They're getting killed by a Chinese company.
And they're not getting killed because China's cheating.
China just came up with a better product.
Now what is the significance for us?
Objectively what is taking place is that TikTok is eating America's lunch.
It's a Chinese-owned company operating in America and competing for American market share against American companies.
So you could say, and this is the Republican mindset, this is bad for America, it's bad for Americans' privacy, it's bad for these American businesses, and should TikTok be banned, who will be the beneficiary?
Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and they will be the beneficiary to the tunes of billions of dollars.
We're not talking about chump change.
TikTok is their number one surging competitor.
It is the, they call it the Instagram killer.
So they are, it is these American firms which are by far and away the number one beneficiaries of the anti-China policy.
So in other words, China losing is good for American firms.
But look at it on the ground level.
Are we benefiting from TikTok being banned?
I'm talking about you and me.
I'm talking about the American Dissident Right.
Because take a look at where the most viral, most successful right-wing content has come from on social media in the last two years.
It's all come from TikTok.
It's, of course, heavily censored on YouTube.
It is, of course, heavily censored on Facebook.
Heavily censored on Instagram.
Meta and Google are the two biggest social media companies.
Twitter doesn't even come close.
Google and YouTube have 2 billion users.
Facebook Meta has 2.5 billion users.
Instagram has over a billion users.
Twitter has I think 300 million just to give you a sense of perspective.
TikTok is coming up on a billion.
So we look at it for the dissident right and the Chinese-owned platform Is empowering creators like Andrew Tate, Tristan Tate, Sneeko, even you could say Nelk, Donald Trump, Alex Jones, you could say to some extent me, you could even say guys like Daniel Schmidt who is able to accrue over 30,000 followers on TikTok in a couple weeks.
So TikTok being banned benefits Meta and Google.
It hurts Andrew Tate, Alex Jones, Nick Fuentes, Ye, all the dissidents that are blowing up on the platform.
And it's not to say that TikTok doesn't censor, but it does say that TikTok plays by a slightly different set of rules.
Certainly they are subject to similar pressures, but not the same pressures, because they're not American companies.
They're not in Silicon Valley.
They don't have that Silicon Valley bullshit.
They may have to abide by certain ADL pressures, but they don't really believe them and they're not institutionally entrenched in the same way.
So insofar as TikTok has more market share, it's better for us, objectively.
It is worse for American firms.
Who are the American firms?
They are the opposition.
They are the enemy.
Facebook and Instagram and YouTube, if they get the market share of TikTok, they are going to censor more than TikTok.
So, who is that market share?
Who do we entrust that?
Is it in better hands in Beijing or in Silicon Valley?
Objectively, the answer is Beijing.
For dissidents, for the rich, for the Jews, for the people that control our country, it's better that it's in Silicon Valley's control.
But since when is that?
Since when are we Silicon Valley?
We're not.
We're the Americans.
And you could look at a variety of things like that.
Edward Snowden.
When Edward Snowden blew the whistle on the NSA and revealed that the NSA was illegally spying on Americans and harvesting their metadata and unmasking Americans in the metadata, and that they were spying on people's phones through their microphone, through their camera, through their smart TVs, where was the only place that Edward Snowden was safe from extradition or assassination?
Compare the fate of Edward Snowden with Julian Assange.
Julian Assange was held up in an embassy in Europe for a decade and had treatable illnesses that he suffered from and was starved and was isolated and was kept in basically a prison and ultimately was extradited and is currently being tortured in America.
For a fact, we know that he's being tortured.
Edward Snowden is living out his life in Russia.
And he's on Twitter.
And he's tweeting about his life.
So, Russia and China being independent and sovereign has created a jurisdiction where an American dissident who has as Dangerous and as threatening and high-profile as Edward Snowden has a place to live, has a place to survive.
Why?
Because Russia is powerful enough that they can resist political pressure to extradite and they can also protect him from any attempt by American military to drag Edward Snowden out of there against the will of the Russian government.
So in other words, if Iran and Saudi Arabia and Turkey and Belarus and India become like this, you are now expanding the jurisdiction where maybe American dissidents might be safe.
American dissidents are not safe in Europe.
They will be extradited.
American dissidents in Singapore or Japan are not safe.
They will be extradited.
American dissidents anywhere in Latin America We'll either be extradited or they will be picked up.
They will be picked up by the American military.
So, once again, when it becomes concrete, we see that the more that America's adversaries rise, the more that they are creating a world that is safe for American dissidents.
In the same way that maybe Alexei Navalny isn't safe in Russia, he's safe in America.
In the same way that a North Korean defector isn't safe in North Korea, they're safe in America.
So if you seek the ruin of the current regime, you necessarily have to cheer for when the power projection capacity of the American regime recedes against China, Russia, whoever.
Now granted, ideally America would be the superpower of the world, led by the right people.
If Ye were in charge of America, if he were the dictator, We would want America to crush all of this.
We would want America to put all of this down.
I don't buy into these arguments about other countries should be free and all that.
America should get as much as it can.
Now don't get me wrong, we should seek harmony and we should try to engage in genuine diplomacy and the policy should be mutual prosperity.
But we should seek our advantage wherever it's appropriate and wherever it's doable.
As long as we have a government that genuinely represents the interests of the people, to some extent.
It's never going to be perfect, there will always be corruption, and leaders can make mistakes.
But what we have right now is a government that is not only not representing the people, but at war with its own people.
And so that's why, in the American Revolution, it was beneficial for us to have the support of the French.
And that's why during the Civil War, maybe the South would have won if they had the support of the British, which they almost did at one point.
And you see how these things play out.
The Nazis sent Vladimir Lenin back to Russia during World War I, and ultimately the ruin that was visited upon Russia in World War I gave birth to the Soviet regime in the same way that the ruin that was brought to Germany in World War I gave rise to Hitler.
That is a necessary precondition to regime change, and I'm not saying we want Hitler, we want Stalin, or we want a British-controlled Jewish Confederacy.
I am saying that it is a fact of politics that when we're going up against the regime, we need a powerful Agent from outside an extrinsic powerful force from outside to make that happen because by Necessity there is no power strong enough within the country that can challenge the regime The regime is the most powerful.
That's what makes it the regime.
So there's nothing within the country that can challenge it Now there are things that can confront it.
There are things that can become a nuisance there are things that can Rally against it but by necessity if there was anything powerful enough to displace it.
Well, it would happen But it's by the virtue of the fact that the regime is the regime that it's unchallenged and and it's not even close so that's why it requires China becoming more powerful than America for the American regime to be able to be displaced.
I mean that is just a logical I mean, it just logically follows that that is the case.
I fail to see how else would you displace the powerful regime with something less powerful than itself.
Couldn't happen.
So that is why necessarily it is a good thing for American dissidents that China is able to broker these deals and that Saudi Arabia and Iran turn away.
And frankly, I see the future there.
When I look at Saudi Arabia, Iran, Russia, and China, They don't have the quality of life we have.
But when we look at the trajectory, we can see clearly that America's quality of life is going down and theirs is going up.
America is becoming a country that doesn't produce anything of value, and these are all countries that are producing everything of value.
They're creating an ecosystem where they've got all the raw materials they need, they've got advanced manufacturing, they've got basic manufacturing, they've got tourism, they've got technology, they've got quantum, hypersonic, they've got AI, they've got everything.
And so if you were to place a bet based on the trajectory, you'd put your money on China.
That doesn't mean that America's going away.
America has enough inertia that will carry it through this century.
But just because America isn't going to lose doesn't mean it's going to win.
And that's how I would put it.
But that's not necessarily a bad thing.
I've said this before on the show.
China going in and humiliating America.
The only loser in that situation is the Pentagon, the DoD, the State Department, the American firms, Silicon Valley, and all these institutions are working against us.
Why would we cheer on?
Why would we want them to win and become more powerful?
Doesn't make any sense.
So that's the situation with Saudi Arabia and it looks like The future has China dominating a coalition that controls the Eurasian landmass.
And think about what we're talking about here.
China possesses so much of the world's critical minerals and other raw materials.
The things that they don't possess, the majority of, of which there are many minerals that the majority of the world's production of them comes from China.
Just China happens to have them in their territory.
What they don't have themselves, they go into Africa and they use all this money that they have from trade and they build parliament buildings and they build presidential palaces and they build ports and highways.
And so the things that they're not getting from their own country, they're getting from Africa.
And they're buying the political and diplomatic support of Africa.
And so you've got between Africa, Russia, India, China, Saudi Arabia, and Iran, you've got most of the world's fossil fuels, you've got most of the world's critical minerals and other raw materials, you've got the vast majority of the world's population, you've got the countries that will be the majority of the world's population a century from now,
Countries like Nigeria, Congo, Ghana, Tanzania, these countries are going to be the population leaders in this century.
China and India are the population leaders now, and they will be, but they've got to hold on the population of the present and the population of the future.
The critical minerals and materials of the present and of the future.
They've got the manufacturing of the past and the present.
They make the shoes and the toys and the cheap garbage from Amazon.
They've also are building a semiconductor ecosystem.
And they're also building quantum computers and hypersonic missiles.
Allied with Russia, they also have the world's number one nuclear arsenal.
Allied with Turkey, they have the world's largest army in Europe.
Allied with Saudi Arabia, they've got the world's largest reserves of oil.
They've got most of OPEC with that.
So when you think about what we're talking about here, we're talking about a far-reaching coalition of independent states that is going to account for all the stuff, all the gas, all the oil, all the rocks, all the people.
They're gonna run the world.
And the question is, what are we gonna have to offer?
What do we make?
What do we harvest?
That doesn't mean that America's down and out, but it does mean that America needs to rethink its strategy here.
Because what we think we have, which is bullying people with the banking system, and bullying people with the American market, it's not as powerful as we thought it was.
We shut down Russia, and Russia's doing fine.
Could we shut down China without destroying ourself?
The answer is no.
Could we protect Taiwan?
Maybe today, not in three years.
The answer is no.
Could we win a war with China?
Probably not.
So it's a major sea change in the global balance of power.
We're getting to the point where all of China's allies together will be able to defeat the United States alone and maybe with all the United States allies.
So...
It's a new world.
It's never happened like this before.
It's ending 500 years of Western European dominance.
China has not been in this position of relative power in 500 years.
No country from the Orient, no country from the East has.
And so you thought we had globalization 30 years ago.
We're truly entering a period of globalization where now Africa will be a global player.
India, China, these are now global players.
The Muslim world, the Persian Gulf are going to be global players.
Just due to, it's just the math.
It's the people, it's the money, it's the stuff.
It's the combined capital wealth of their countries.
So anyway, so that's that.
It's all their factors of production combined.
But that's that.
I want to move on.
We'll talk about these bills next week.
We're already two hours, fifteen minutes in.
So I'm going to move on.
We're going to take a look at the Super Chats and see what you have to talk about.
Or what you have to say about all this.
Like I said, it's a little tedious.
It's a little boring.
Sort of painting a picture for you of how the world is changing and giving you a little bit of the background.
How the Ukraine war set all this up.
unidentified
But it's a very big topic.
nick fuentes
But we're gonna move on.
We'll see what we got here.
Give me a sec to get set up and I'll read your superchats.
We'll see.
unidentified
But it's good because the Jews control America. - Yeah.
nick fuentes
So America falling means the Jews won't control the world anymore.
They have for a long time.
They went from Spain to Amsterdam, from Amsterdam to Paris, from Paris to London, from London to New York.
And now their reign seems to be at an end.
unidentified
But we'll see.
nick fuentes
Let's take a look.
streamlabs matthew tts
Dean came and sent $50.
I know you have to appease boomers and coomers with the be fruitful and multiply thing, but I think the Catholic Church appreciates the resurgence of celibacy.
Your confidence and contentment in the celibate life is inspiring.
Wittingly or not, I pray that you inspire more men to be priests and religious.
Love speech.
nick fuentes
Well, I want to get married and have kids at one point.
It's not so much that I'm saying be celibate, although the Bible says being celibate is better.
here.
But I am saying that I am not gonna buy into this delusion about women and family.
It isn't what it used to be.
When people talk about these things, don't get me wrong, I get it.
I get where people are coming from.
But you gotta realize that in many ways you're looking down the barrel of a loaded gun when you talk about marriage or children.
And that's because of the way the society is set up and people say, well, just don't, well, just avoid it.
You can't.
You can't.
You can't control your kids.
You can't control your wife.
Now some would say you have to let go, and I agree with that to some extent.
You can't control your life.
Things will happen.
You have to take them a day at a time.
And if a family is what you want, if a family is what you feel you're called to, then you'll figure it out.
But, maybe more than anything, it's not even so much that.
It's just that the be-all end-all to my life is not The pursuit of relationships.
Because that's what it comes down to.
Everybody gets on my case.
They're like, it's about family.
He's being smart.
Or he's, you know.
He's being smart by waiting until marriage.
That's smart.
Or, hey, well he's focused on his business or blah blah blah blah.
And it's like, at the end of the day, my life is just not dominated by a focus on relationships.
And that's really what it comes down to.
These guys, they don't give a... It's not about being fruitful and multiplying.
John Doyle is not married.
He doesn't have kids.
Most of these guys don't.
I remember that was a big contention a year ago.
Everybody who's getting on my case, they're saying this incel thing's terrible, blah blah blah.
Every single one of them are fornicating.
They're all fornicators.
John Doyle's a fornicator.
And who knows?
One day the evidence of that might come out and there's some certainly embarrassing stuff there.
But he's a fornicator.
Everybody knows that.
All his friends know that.
Everybody knows that.
And so it's the same people that are telling me that it's about this religious calling and having a wife and kids and blah blah blah.
They're not married.
They're not multiplying.
They're just being fruitful.
They're just ejaculating everywhere.
And so, what does that tell you?
If all these people that are on my case about this incel thing is just weird, the real trap thing is to get married and blah blah.
If it was really about that, they would have kids.
But they don't.
Most of the people criticizing me about the incel thing are fornicators who are not married.
And so that tells you that for them, they are not against the incel thing, or my thing, because they're really sticking to the Bible here, and they're just, oh hey, God's orders, we're just, we're just being, you're not being fruitful and multiplying, you're just fornicating.
And so it's about this guilt complex of, here I am telling people that you should not Be pursuing these things.
You should focus on yourself.
And if a woman comes into your life, then so be it.
But that should be something that comes as a result of being a man.
They hear me saying these things and their fixation on fornication, their fixation on having sex, it creates this guilt feeling.
And then, so I'm the bad guy.
These guys out there, they're living a life Which they know is wrong, which they know is honestly petty, and I wouldn't even really care all that much to tell you the truth.
I'm not... Understand, I'm not going out there and chastising them.
I'm not going out there and saying, I hate this... I mean, have you ever heard me do a show where I say this fornicator and that fornicator?
I'm not that guy.
I don't care.
I mean, some of these people are promiscuous.
It's no secret.
It's no secret that guys like Ethan Ralph and Beardson and Baked Alaska are a little promiscuous.
I don't ever go on the show and browbeat them about their life choices.
People make their choices.
They have to live with them.
But the people that lash out at me for having my life, which is not fixated on those things, they're all fornicators that feel this guilt.
They see me talking about my life and my priorities and my focus, and I'm sure they feel very embarrassed and guilty about the fact that their life has been consumed with fornication.
And that rather than, you know, I look at Doyle and the reason I keep throwing him out there as an example is because here's a guy who doesn't work.
He doesn't work.
He doesn't make videos.
Do you know how hard I work?
I have a platform.
I do a conference.
I do a show every night.
In addition to all sorts of other activities.
This guy makes three videos in a year.
But he's flying to Austin, Texas to fornicate.
He's flying to other states to fornicate.
And so I'm sure he doesn't do protests, he doesn't do rallies, he doesn't do conferences, he doesn't make videos, he doesn't stream, he don't do anything.
Other than collect his blaze bucks and fornicate.
And so when you see the real deal like me go out there and say, I'm married to what I do.
I am simply not interested.
I don't even feel the pull.
I don't even feel that low appetite.
I'm sure that's very embarrassing.
I'm sure he feels a deep shame response.
So then I become... So instead of...
Instead of the right thing, which is to change your life, he's gonna take it out on me.
And say, well, you're just, this incel thing is weird, fornicating's normal.
The incel thing that Nick Fuentes is saying, that's, he's just so weird and eccentric, uh, uh, that, that's weird.
Fornicating, like I'm doing, being obsessed with that is normal.
You see?
That's the psychology there.
Because I've always encouraged people to get married.
I've always said the most fulfilling life for most people is to get married.
I've always said that people should do that.
I've always said that I'm just not that way.
I've always said that I'm just a guy who... that's not... that's just not something that I'm really interested in, to tell you the truth.
I don't wake up and think about...
Sex, sex, sex, and romance and relationships.
I wake up and think about stuff.
I wake up and think about politics.
I wake up and think about money.
I wake up and think about business.
I wake up and think about every, almost every other thing.
And that's just the way I am.
I've never pretended to be normal.
I've never pretended to be like everybody else.
You know, and if I were, then I would make a big charade out of it.
I would go and get a girlfriend and say, see guys, look, here's my girlfriend.
See, I'm just like everybody, or whatever.
But I'm not telling people not to get married, or to be like me, or live a life like me, or be celibate, or whatever.
I've simply said that that's not my focus and some people just can't handle that.
They're like, no, you have to.
And then when you find out that they're all fornicators, then you realize what's going on.
You have to be as bad as me.
That's the psychology.
You have these guys that are fornicators.
And they say, you know, because they're hypocrites, they're living a totally degenerate life of hypocrisy.
They go and say, oh well, Nick's the bad guy.
Yeah, yeah, Nick's the bad guy.
Who can expect me to be celibate?
What am I, some weirdo?
What am I, gay?
I'm rich.
I'm an internet celebrity.
I should be bagging dimes.
He's the weird one for not doing that.
So, people always overthink it with me.
Everybody's always trying to explain their way out of it for me or rationalize my behavior.
Shut the fuck up.
I don't need you to defend, like, my... And I appreciate it.
I appreciate why people do it.
But I don't need people to make excuses for me.
Okay?
I do what I want.
I say what I want.
And this idea of like you need to give me some some out some cope of like here's why Here's why he's not it's like because I'm I want to be a great man and so the idea of Flying around and fornicating with every e-girl who gives me attention.
It's just not consistent with that at all That's what makes me different So I don't like when people say, well, fornicating is a sin.
It's like, I'm not not fornicating because it's a sin.
I mean, that's part of it.
But I'm not fornicating because I want greatness.
I want to fornicate with greatness.
I don't want to fornicate with an e-girl with tattoos.
I want to fornicate with greatness.
I want to have sex with myself, okay?
I want to have sex with the idea of greatness and the idea of myself as a great man.
That's where my sex drive is going into.
My sex drive is going into that, as opposed to pumping it out into some 5 out of 10.
I gotta pump out my virile essence into the first e-girl that drops a line in my DMs.
Seriously?
And people go, well, he's just not doing that because... Well, he's just playing by the rules.
It's like, I'm not doing that because... Come on, now.
Do you think so low of me?
Do you think that I have that in me?
I just want it, but I'm just holding myself back?
What I want is greatness.
Not... Not to hang out with girls.
Because that's what it comes down to.
I mean, they say it's... And here's the other thing.
Here's the other thing I'm going to say about this.
This is a free nigga going off.
Can a free nigga go off for a moment?
Here's the other thing.
I'm going to be brutally honest with you.
I'm going to be brutally honest with you.
If there was a way that, like, I could have sex or something, and it was just the sex, Like, I mean, I would struggle against the temptation, but that is something that I would probably like.
Not that I would do it, but that is something that I'd probably like.
Okay?
Here's the thing, though.
A lot of these guys, it's not about that for them.
It's about everything else.
The sex is not even what it's about.
What it's about for them is cuddling.
And watching Disney movies together.
And it's about the drama.
It's about the drama.
It's about getting a long-ass text on iMessage.
And getting in a fight.
And going to a party and she's there.
And oh my gosh, I can't believe you'd show up here.
It's about every- And that's the truth.
That's the dirty little secret.
Is that it's not even- That's the sickest part.
That's the part that I don't understand.
It's not even about the sex.
It's not like they're going and they're pumping a load and not to be gross about it, but you know, let's be real.
It's not like that's even what it's about.
It's about this maternal validation.
And I've called it therapeutic girlfriendism.
I know that's like a cringe, you know, meme name for it.
But they seek out the therapy.
They seek out the therapy that women provide.
So they can say all they want, it's like about, you know, it's about virility and it's about sex.
It's about nothing of the sort.
And you hear it all the time.
They betray themselves all the time when they say things like, JFK deserved to get shot because he cheated on his wife, who's so beautiful.
Or when they say things like, I'm gonna put a village to the sword for my girl.
Or whatever.
Or when Kai Klipsch said something like, and I hate to shit on him when he's not in the country, but he said something like, women nag us because they care about us and I like that and blah blah blah.
It's like, so you don't, it's not even about getting your rocks off for you, it is about literally marrying your mom.
You want to marry your mom.
You cannot really become a man
Because you you flew the coop and now you want to marry your mom and bring your mom back into your house and you want your mom to make your schedule and lay out your lay out your underwear for you and you want your mom to uh your wife mom you want your mom wife your your sister wife wife mom to come in and fucking boss you around and tell you what to do and for you to cry into her shoulders
And so the difference is, here I am saying you have to cut the umbilical cord and be a man.
I am not saying do not have a girlfriend.
I am not saying do not have sex with women.
Although, you shouldn't fornicate.
But I'm not even saying those things.
I'm saying be a man.
I'm saying be a man.
You don't need a girlfriend.
You don't need, like, girlfriend is not the end-all be-all.
You need to have a life.
You need to be a man first.
You need to cut the umbilical cord, get out of your mom's womb, and be a guy first.
Then a girlfriend will literally come out of nowhere.
And then you can get married and have your babies, okay?
Because I know a lot of guys that are like this.
I know so many guys.
You would think Groypers are all incels.
Do you know how many wedding invitations I've had to turn down?
There are so many gripers who are married and have kids and have family, but you know what they're not doing?
They're not doing it so that their girlfriend can run their fingers through their hair and tell them what a good job they did, and they're not doing it so that they can watch Disney movies and just get away from it all.
Export Selection