Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 9, 2023 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:12:14

W BIDEN??? Republicucks ANNIHILATED By Racist Catholic PRESIDENT | America First Ep. 1119W BIDEN??? Republicucks ANNIHILATED By Racist Catholic PRESIDENT | America First Ep. 1119

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:10:08

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We talked a little bit about it, but I always like to do a recap the following day.
		So, tonight we'll just be going over the Joe Biden State of the Union, as well as the Republican response to it.
		And I want to go into a little bit more detail about it.
		And also clarify, there are a lot of people saying, like I saw Destiny said something on Twitter about my Telegram post last night.
		Or was it this morning?
		I don't remember.
		I think it was last night where I said that the State of the Union wasn't that bad and some people took that to mean that I'm like a Democrat now and I saw Destiny interpreted that to mean that I was criticizing Trump.
		So I want to clarify a little bit because my comments caused such a row.
		So we'll talk all about that tonight and that'll be our only story.
		There's just not Really anything else happening?
		So that'll be our show.
		Yeah, not much else.
		Before we get into that, I want to remind you to follow me here on Cozy.
		Smash the follow button to get a push notification whenever I go live.
		Also, follow me on Gab Telegram, True Social.
		Link's down below.
unidentified		Trying to think what else.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I think that's it.
		It's another boring week.
		Not much going on.
		And not really even too much going on in politics.
		Just this speech yesterday.
		This China story, which is ongoing.
unidentified		I guess it's kind of finished as of yesterday, but...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But yeah, besides the State of the Union, I don't think there was even one other big thing going on today.
		I saw the death toll in Turkey has now hit like 8,000 people.
		That's crazy, but not really anything newsworthy about it as far as political analysis goes.
		I mean, it's news, but what is there to say about it?
		What's the angle?
		Pretty horrible, though.
		That's like two and a half 9-11s.
		Because of this earthquake.
		Pretty horrible.
		But that's it.
		I mean there's that and basically nothing else.
		So I guess we'll just dive right into it and pick up where we left off yesterday.
		Yesterday I covered the big speech.
		I didn't even know what was happening yesterday.
		I feel like it's early.
		For some reason I feel like the State of the Union is always later in February.
		Kind of snuck up on me.
		Somebody was talking about it over the weekend.
		I said, oh, when is that again?
		And they're like, Tuesday.
		I was like, what?
		But, um, it was the big speech last night and we watched it here.
		Had to kind of, took me a little while to get set up, but we were able to watch it.
		And so we watched that and then we watched the response by the Arkansas governor, Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
		And I have to say what's striking about what's happening now is that, and this is a very alarming thing, we have totally returned to normalcy.
		And this is my biggest fear for the longest time and it's being realized.
		This is why I'm so supportive of the Yay 24 candidacy, or potential, you know, people are talking about him running for office somewhere, somehow.
		Nothing has been declared yet, okay, nothing's been announced, but, you know, people have been talking about a Yay 24 thing.
		And it's also why I'm still supportive of Trump.
		It's because we really are coming back to a pre-Trump normalcy, and the regime has made a compromise with the populists, with two guys, with Joe Biden and Ron DeSantis, and we'll talk a little bit about that.
		Let me actually, give me a sec.
		I put my charger on my laptop here.
		And so last night, I think that was very much the takeaway.
		Maybe more than anything else is that Biden And the regime have totally routed the MAGA caucus, totally routed the MAGA base.
		And I hate to say that, I wish that was not the case, but it's just simply true.
		And I put some of those thoughts out on my telegram today, or last night after the speech.
		We as extremists, I'm an extreme right-wing guy, okay?
		I'm an extreme Catholic, I'm an extreme Reactionary, extreme, conservative, extreme.
		I am an extremist.
		And being an extremist means, I don't think that it means that I have crazy views, but I have views that are extreme relative to the mainstream, relative to what's considered normal.
		And what's considered normal is all very bad things.
		As we know, this liberal social agenda, liberalism itself, Where the culture is.
		So, it's really about how things are as they relate to the regime, how they relate to mainstream culture, how they relate to the institutions.
		And so, compared to all that, my views are very extreme.
		And therefore, my object as a political extremist is change.
		I want things to be radically different.
		I want the entrenched institutions and entrenched figures to be dislodged.
		And I want there to be a new regime, and I want the country to go in a different direction, and I want there to be a new mainstream and a new standard.
		And that's really what we've been talking about a lot over the last six or nine months.
		In a lot of ways, that's what the show has been about for the past six years.
		But especially since January 6th, it's about acknowledging that what we are above all else is change agents.
		Things are one way, and that has with it momentum, that has with it this weight.
		Society is going in one direction, and that direction is being perpetuated and maintained by the institutions.
		And so my goal, some people talk about what's your plan, what's your strategy, what's this, what's that?
		And I have plans, and I have tactics, and I have strategies, but in a very general sense what I've compared it to is like how a moon will orbit the earth, or a planet, or how an asteroid is on a certain trajectory.
		And I think about the trajectory we're on as being cataclysmic.
		And like I said, it's got momentum to it.
		If there's no intervention, if there's no opposing force, it will continue on its trajectory until there's a cataclysm, until it makes an impact, until it's destroyed.
		And so rather than saying we want something very specific or very particular to happen, although we all have ideas, although we all have imagination and visions about that, maybe more than anything at this stage the goal is to just alter the trajectory.
		If there's an asteroid headed towards Earth, people say that the defense strategy is to shoot a rocket at the asteroid and knock the asteroid off course, change its trajectory so it's not going to collide with Earth.
		That's kind of how I see what we're doing in broad terms.
		That's how I've compared myself to left-wing types or establishment right-wing types, is they favor the current trajectory.
		They don't want to change it.
		They want to modify it in a very insignificant way, but they don't actually want to alter the trajectory.
	They want to recalibrate it, they want to moderate it, ameliorate it, but they don't fundamentally want to change the trajectory.
	That's what I want to do.
	And that's why I have always supported things like Charlottesville, or like Trump, or like Stop the Steal, and by the way, I support all those things in themselves, you know, I support The cause of Charlottesville was opposing the renaming of the Lee Monument, and it was about opposing mass migration, and it was about uniting the right wing.
	So I support all those things.
	The Trump election, that was about protectionism, non-intervention.
	It was about nativism.
	I support all of that.
	Stop the steal.
	I do believe the election was stolen with mail-in ballots, so of course I actually do oppose those things.
	But it just so happens that supporting all these things, it's also about disruption.
	It's also about opposing and being contrary to the current trajectory, the current status quo.
	And it's about supporting things that are disruptive and chaotic.
	and things that are going to elevate the consciousness and sort of wake people up from the routine, wake people up from convention and their normal expectations.
	We want to do things that are unpredictable and provocative and shocking so that it changes people's pattern of thinking.
	And they say, hmm, I'm going to consider the political paradigm in a different way.
	And it raises the consciousness and it allows attitudes to change and allows the situation to change.
	And the goal is that if we could shake things up enough, we can dislodge powerful institutions in the hopes that people like us can get into positions of power, or that new attitudes can shape the political landscape.
	And so that's broadly my mission.
	Now, it's with that being said that last night was so alarming for two reasons.
	On both sides, I should say.
	The Biden State of the Union and the Republican response.
	Uh, you see that the conversation has almost fully slid back to where it was 10 years ago on both sides.
	The Biden State of the Union, which is the Democrats and representing the leadership of the Democrat Party.
	And the response where Sarah Huckabee Sanders was selected by the Republican congressional leadership to give the statement on behalf of the opposition party, both formally as well in the sense that the Democrats are the party in power in the White House and in the Senate, but also because Republicans spiritually have been the opposition party for a long time, both of them expressed
	an ideology and a dialectic which is, like I said, a total slide back to the pre-Trump paradigm, back to the pre-Trump situation.
	And what I mean by that is, when Trump comes on the scene in 2016, and a lot of people have said, "Stop talking about 2016.
unidentified		Stop!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That was 10 years ago!
		But look, this is very important.
		It's important because it puts What is happening now in perspective and people need perspective because right now the right is leaderless and directionless.
		And I think that's also just true of politics broadly speaking.
		So it's important to talk about 2016 because it puts everything in perspective and it helps us elucidate what needs to happen in the future.
		What was so significant about that, which started this chapter, which is now closing, this window that opened then, which is now closing, is that it was a full challenge.
		And I've always said this, Trump mounted a challenge against the entire system.
		It wasn't against the Democrats.
		It wasn't against the so-called liberals or the leftists.
		It was a challenge against the entire system.
		Because how did it start?
		It started in the Republican primary, and it was a 17-candidate primary with 16 of the top Republicans plus Trump, and you had all of the, a lot of the young guys, a lot of the old guys, governors, senators, congressmen, even so-called outsiders, people like Ben Carson, who rose to prominence from The Prayer Breakfast, or Carly Fiorina from Hewlett-Packard, and even there were some others in there.
		And so the Trump campaign starts in 2015 with this fierce competition against the Republican Party, and not even just the so-called, the Illuminaries, not even just the top and the most prominent Republicans Elected officials in the party, but against really the entire conservative movement.
		He was antagonistic towards, again, not just the top 16 politicians in the GOP, but also against talk radio, and also against Fox News.
		A lot of people don't realize how fully Trump was challenging the entire system and both wings of it.
		If you remember, and I brought this up before, And a lot lately, because it's important to remember this as we set up for 24 and there's a prospect of this happening again and you've got this challenge from DeSantis.
		If you remember eight years ago, at the first Republican debate, the first Republican primary debate in August 2015, it was hosted by Fox News and it was a setup against Trump.
		And Roger Ailes, who ran Fox News at the time, he later died, but Roger Ailes handpicked Megyn Kelly.
		Roger Ailes and Megyn Kelly had a tight relationship.
		And when Megyn Kelly, at the first debate, put up that question about how Trump called women slobs, dogs, disgusting animals, that was a setup.
		And when Bret Baier in the beginning said, raise your hand if you will not pledge to support the eventual nominee, that was a setup.
		That was a Fox News debate.
		Those were Fox News hosts.
		That was a setup by Fox News.
		So it wasn't just that the Republican Party was against Trump, Reince Priebus and the 16 candidates, and they were all vicious.
		From Ted Cruz all the way through to Jeb Bush, they were all vicious and cheated, and they consolidated behind each other as they dropped out.
		They tried the coup at the convention.
		You know, remember when Ted Cruz at the convention said, vote your conscience instead of vote for Trump?
		So there was this opposition from the party, there was opposition from Fox News, even guys like Hugh Hewitt and others on talk radio, very opposed to Trump, National Review, put out an issue where they, I think the title was against Trump, that was the cover, and they had all the prominent pundits like Thomas Sowell and Bill Kristol and everybody was against him, Glenn Beck, Shapiro, I mean you name it.
		It was the entire, again, not just the GOP, but it was the entire right-wing political ecosystem.
		The establishment, the so-called conservative movement, they were all against him.
		And it goes without saying, so was every other institution.
		Hollywood, the mainstream media, the left, the Democrats, finance.
		If you look at the donors, if you look at the industries and where they put their money in that election, almost every, when you sort it by industry, almost every professional class and trade and industry The majority of them put their money behind Clinton.
		And it was only like the union workers and the firefighters and the cops that put the majority of them put their money behind Trump.
		So it was literally the entire apparatus, the entire system of which we know Is a uniparty.
		It's got a right wing and a left wing.
		And even as much as Republicans play up the fact that they are the opposition and canceled and censored and all that, they're very much in bed with the power structure that they pretend to oppose.
		Crowder talked about that with Daily Wire, and he's, you know, and to some extent he's even part of the power structure himself.
		And you can see that in Ken Griffin, the big Wall Street guy, leading all the Wall Street donors behind DeSantis.
		And you see this in Ben Shapiro's Daily Wire being the number one most lucrative publisher on Facebook.
		And you see this in Google sponsoring CPAC, the big conservative convention.
		You see this in George W. Bush going on The View or whatever, going on the talk shows to oppose Trump with James Clapper and James Comey from NSA, from the FBI.
		Point is, and this is all to say, if you've heard this all before, this is to say that the initial Trump campaign, which started this period that we are now in, over the last 10 years, he started a challenge against the system.
		And when I say the system, as I said before, the system is responsible for maintaining and perpetuating the status quo, which is horrible.
		Which the status quo contains in it all the things that Trump initially opposed.
		Mass migration, free trade, global government, the foreign wars.
		The State Department with their foreign mission all across the world, Defense Department with its military bases all around the world, the corruption that then seeps back, you know, the abyss that looks back at America, the corruption in Washington D.C.
		from foreign governments, foreign intel agencies in Silicon Valley, the espionage in the private sector, Trump launches a challenge against the entirety of the regime that is perpetuating this horrible status quo.
		And that is why they did everything, as you know, to put it down.
		That's why the media ran interference.
		It was 92% negative media coverage.
		That's why it was a special counsel.
		That's why the Republican congressional leadership opposed Trump's agenda in Congress.
		That's why Reince Priebus Filled up the White House with terrible people, you know, that is why it was such a slog in the four years of the Trump term.
		The benefit though, here's the thing, even though Trump was less than ideal in the way that he governed and less successful, the reason why Trump was so essential is because that he remained a disruptive force.
		He was out there saying things, even if he wasn't doing things, he was saying things that were challenging the status quo.
		He was still calling himself a nationalist, he was still talking about putting the National Guard on the border, he would still go before the United Nations and call out the globalists, still trying to break apart the NATO alliance, and even until the very last day trying to end the wars, bring home the troops from South Korea and Germany, And all the way through to Stop the Steal, challenging the legitimacy of the elections is a good thing.
		Going out and protesting in the state capitals, another good thing.
		January 6th, a good thing for all of the aforementioned reasons.
		Since January 6th, we have began something that I have warned about for as long as I've been doing this show, which is this slide backwards From before this challenge ever happened.
		And it's about, it's about going from January 6, 2021, when the president, the sitting president of America, refused to accept the results of the election.
		Openly challenged the results, threatened to hold up or thwart or sabotage the transfer of power through the election, and called his supporters, which they heeded, to march on the Capitol.
		Now, he didn't call on anybody to do violence or break windows or fight cops.
	But it is something that two years ago the sitting president said, I'm calling my supporters to come to Washington, to come and sit on the Capitol, the capital city that is.
	I'm calling my supporters to march to the Capitol and make our voices heard and say we don't accept the results of the election.
	And what it turned into A riot.
	I'm not going to say it was an insurrection.
	It wasn't.
	But it turned into a literal riot.
	Why did it turn into a riot?
	Because millions of Trump, tens of millions of Trump supporters are furious.
	They're pissed off that the country's totally rigged.
	It's totally set against us.
	We can do nothing about it.
	We elected Trump!
	You know, that's what Obama said.
	Oh, go out and win an election.
	Well, and I've said this before, that's exactly what we did.
	We won the election.
	They rigged everything and sabotaged Trump's first term, and then with this doubling of the early voting, they overthrew Trump with this fake rigged, everybody's automatically registered as an absentee, oh, we have the biggest turnout ever, there's 150 billion votes.
	150 million, but you know, it was ridiculous turnout for what it was.
	And so people say, you know what?
	Fuck this.
	I'm not speaking for them.
	I didn't break in.
	But people were saying, you know what?
	This is bullshit.
	Stop the count.
	You know, I'm sure a lot of people said, like, we're going in.
	Fuck these people.
	This country is totally corrupt.
	We have totally been screwed.
	There's no recourse.
	It just seems like we get censored, we win an election, it gets sabotaged, then they change how they do the voting.
	We try to go through the legal way to do it, which is the Supreme Court and state representatives.
	The Supreme Court doesn't even hear the case.
	Amy Coney Barrett abstains from voting on the decision.
	State representatives, all Republican, don't even give a shit.
	They don't even do an audit of the ballots.
	So I'm sure a lot of people said, you know what, we're going in.
	Now, this idea is exciting because it shows that with Trump as the leader and with the massive base of support that would really do anything he said, there was a real spear, there was a dagger at the neck of the regime.
	And I say that metaphorically, of course, but they knew that.
	I knew that, like, we knew that.
	Not everybody on our side knew that, because a lot of people are like, you know, we're just like, hey man, we just want to make our voice heard.
	It's like, no, it's a lot deeper than that.
	When the Democrats said it was worse than 9-11, like, that was true.
	They said that, and I agreed with it for different reasons than them, but we were both on the same page that we recognized the significance of it, the gravity that that happened.
	Both the left at CNN, who are talking about our institutions, and me on the extreme right, who is there, we both recognize the gravity and the significance of what it represented, that picture of tear gas on the Capitol that he came in five years ago, or four years ago, and he was leaving with that kind of a scene.
	Both the left and some on the right recognize this is a big deal.
	This is a true showdown about the future of the country.
	And the fate of this challenge and this threat to the regime's control over America is a very serious thing, and it's a very big deal.
	And so that's where we were two years ago.
	And like I said, that was the disruptive potential of the Trump Candidacy, the Trump election, the Trump presidency.
	Now the question is, how do you go from that, which is 500,000 patriots surrounding the Capitol, breaking in, waving flags, we don't accept the election, Mike Pence is a traitor.
	How do you go from that, to two years later, we're talking about what?
	Inflation?
	Unemployment?
	Gas stoves?
	How do you go from that two years ago to here we are now, and Trump is saying, uh, we gotta go and vote in the midterms, and we gotta vote for Hershel Walker, and hey, it's another conversation about Medicare and entitlements.
	It's not even about right and left, although it is.
	But what it's about more than that is, again, the idea of the status quo, the asteroid, and our small rocket ship, our missile, which is supposed to hit the asteroid and knock it from its course.
	What has happened over the last two years is that the asteroid is coming back onto its old trajectory.
	We are sliding back to the same dialectic between left and right, like this challenge never even happened.
	It's like it's been erased.
	And what we're setting up for, what we saw last night, And what we've been seeing, what we saw in the midterms, what we saw last night, this is a taste of what the next two years will look like, and what, and more importantly, what the midterm after that will look like, and every other election after that.
	Which is, what did we see last night?
	Joe Biden gave a State of the Union speech, and we'll get into that.
	You know, we'll get into what was said, and what was good and bad, and everything.
	But he gives a State of the Union, and the State of the Union, what I said on Twitter, or on Telegram, is true.
	It wasn't that bad.
	Now, I didn't like it, okay?
	I don't like Biden.
	He is a Democrat.
	He's a liberal Democrat.
	So he supports a lot of things that are A total deal-breaker for me.
	He supports abortion.
	That's a deal-breaker.
	The border is open.
	Whatever he said last night about he wants to secure the border, yeah, well, the border is open.
	Okay.
	That's a deal-breaker.
	And it goes on and on.
	And there are other things too.
	He supports a genital mutilation of children with the trans stuff.
	Deal-breaker.
	There's a lot of stuff that he supports which is a no-go.
	But from the perspective of the dialectic, which is a dialectic is when you have two opposing positions, and that frames the issue.
	To say that you have two of these opposite positions, or two rhetorical positions, that obviously frames the debate on that issue.
	The dialectic is between one thing and the other thing.
	That's kind of like what a presidential election is.
	That's the dialectic.
	And that's sort of like how these two things are clashing, how these two things are being argued against each other.
	That, of course, sets the tone of where a conversation about a particular thing is going to go.
	From the perspective of this conversation that's happening in the country, the political consciousness of the American people, and the dialectic between the right and the left, what Biden said last night is something that is not radical at all.
	It wasn't radical left, even though he actually governs as a radical left-wing president.
	He really is maybe the furthest left-wing president in history, even though he doesn't seem like that, even though his rhetoric isn't that way, even though His visage isn't that way, he's like a white, old, Catholic guy.
	It actually is as radical, at least as Obama, perhaps more.
	But he's disarming, you know, his charisma, his look.
	His attitude is disarming and it looks more normal.
	The substance, I'm talking strictly about the speech, was a speech that actually doesn't really offend conservatives that much.
	He didn't go up and give an AOC speech.
	He went up there and gave like a Michael Bloomberg speech.
	Maybe a little bit more left-wing.
	Example, when he talked about the cops, he went out there and actually said a lot of pro-cop stuff.
	He went out there and said, That what happened to this latest black guy can never happen again.
	But you know what?
	The cops are expected to do too much.
	And we support the cops, basically.
unidentified		That's not a very... Compare it to George Floyd.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Burn it all down.
		Riots are okay.
		Abolish the police.
		That's a slide.
		That's a slide back to the middle.
		And even when he talked about things like health care, did he say he wanted Medicare for all?
		No.
		He talked about the price of drugs and the price of insulin.
		Those are two things that Trump did.
		Trump cut the price of insulin.
		Trump cut the price of drugs.
		Biden undid both of those and so the prices are out of control now.
		Now he wants to bring them back down.
		Okay, again, talking about those things?
		Not that radical.
		When he's talking about immigration, did he say we want to bring in 100 million immigrants in the next century?
		We want to get to 400 million, like other left-wing people have said?
		Did he say no human being is illegal?
		No!
		He said we need border security.
		We need the resources to secure the border, he said, and we need a pathway to citizenship for the dreamers.
		Which are not even all of the DACA.
		I think Dreamers is within DACA.
		And temporary protected status.
		The TPS, agricultural, tech workers.
		That's not that radical!
		That's literally what the Gang of Eight supports.
		That is what the Gang of Eight supported 10 years ago.
		That's actually what the Trump Compromise was, if you recall, in 2018.
		This is something that was floated, I want to say this was the beginning of 2018.
		In September 2017, yeah, in September-October 2017, when the first migrant caravan came around, or the second one, Trump floated the idea of a pathway to citizenship for DACA.
		He did!
		And a lot of Trump people jump ship.
		I remember because I debated them.
		Trump floated the idea of a pathway to citizenship for DACA, and then in the beginning of 2018, when the first government shutdown happened, they were talking about a deal where they would give up DACA in exchange for 23 billion for the border wall plus, because they just released the blueprint for it, plus border security.
		And they wanted the RAISE Act, which was like a 50% cut in legal immigration and a few other things.
		So this is, the DACA, the DREAMers, and the TPS, that's always the first Concession that Republicans are going to give in comprehensive immigration reform always.
		It's legalize DACA, legalize the DREAMers, legalize TPS.
		That was the Reagan program 40 years ago.
		Legalize 3 million, get the fence.
		Although it never happens that way.
		And again, this is okay.
		I understand Biden does not support border security.
		I know that.
		It's not just about the DREAMers.
		We know that.
		Here are the facts.
		Nobody's getting deported anymore.
		That just isn't happening.
		There is no border.
		Nobody's even being turned away because Remain in Mexico is overturned.
		And catch and release is now in full effect.
		People get apprehended, they get released into the country, and we now have 250,000 plus people being apprehended at the border every month.
		Probably half that number are never apprehended coming in month over month.
		All of that notwithstanding, what Biden said, strictly in terms of the rhetoric, was not extreme.
		You can say it has no bearing in reality, it's counterfactual, but strictly I'm talking about the messaging.
		It was a very moderate message on police, on healthcare, on immigration, on all these things.
		So that's the new, the left has really went from Bernie Sanders, AOC, this sort of crazy stuff, at least in rhetoric, at least in terms of what is being said, Biden brought it back to the middle.
		And then what we heard in the response from Sarah Huckabee Sanders, again, did she go out there and talk about election fraud?
		Nope.
		Did she go out there and say globalism even once?
		Nope!
		Did she talk about Ukraine and how we are like, you know, this ridiculous thing that's going on with NATO where we're pouring all this money in and Europe is being destroyed with this energy crisis?
		Nope!
	Did we make any mention of bringing home the troops, ending the foreign wars, protecting our infant industries or our strategic industries?
	Not at all!
	It was like the Trump program made no mark at all.
	She went out there and the first thing she said, one of the first things, was about fucking big government and freedom.
	She talked about big government and freedom, and she talked about education and school choice, and she talked about the Little Rock Nine and racism, and she talked about the troops in Iraq fighting ISIS, which is not even, which we made and isn't even a thing anymore.
	And so you look at these two speeches and this could, with some exceptions, maybe Biden talking about trans youth, this, these two speeches could have happened 10 years ago before Trump even ran and nobody would have even noticed.
	Maybe people would have thought Biden's speech was better, actually.
	If this speech happened 10 years ago, I'm talking about in 2013, if Biden gave the State of the Union then, people would have thought it was actually maybe a little bit more right-wing, a little bit more populist than, like, what Obama would say, specifically buying all the building materials in America, stuff like that.
	But almost anything that Biden said is not much different than what Obama would have said.
	And everything that Sarah Huckabee Sanders said is not anything that Marco Rubio wouldn't have said in his response.
	Or whoever else, I forget anybody else that gave the response during the Obama administration.
	And so you look at both of these speeches and what's alarming is We are really between the midterms and this, and now what's being set up for 24, which is Biden versus DeSantis.
	We're being set up for, and this is what they wanted, it's almost like a V-shaped recovery from Trump.
	In the same way that they talked about we were going to lock down everything for COVID and the economy crashed and then we would reopen and the economy would come right back and it would be like it never happened, a V-shaped recovery, they want to do the same thing with Trump.
	Where Trump took everybody off script for five or six years, took everybody off script, rose the consciousness, created this threat to the system, and they want to, as quickly as possible, cut the head off the snake, quell the dissent, shut down all those opposing narratives, arrest all of his, and censor all of his lieutenants and all of his surrogates and all of his strongest supporters.
	And what they want is to resume the trajectory from where we were in 2014 or 2015.
	Take the Republicans back, take the Democrats back, and it's like that never happened.
	And it's back to our regularly scheduled programming.
	That is what is alarming here.
	And that's what I said last night.
	During, uh, I think I said it after Biden and before Sanders, and then Sarah Huckabee Sanders comes on and says, and says the stuff about freedom and big government.
	And it's like, hello?
	It's like Trump never happened.
	And the reason why this is a problem is because, like I said, Trump opened up a window in 2016.
	It was so disruptive.
	It was so chaotic.
	He opened up a window where something actually could have changed.
	We could have really altered forever the way that America is and where it's going.
	When you see Sarah Huckabee Sanders get up and DeSantis is creeping up in the polls and all this is going on, it's like that the longer, the further that we get away from the Trump election, And the more moderate the GOP becomes, the more that opportunity in that window is shutting.
	And once Trump—if Trump doesn't win this thing in 24, you know, or if somebody else more radical than him doesn't win the primary at the minimum, let alone the general, who's going to run in 28?
	It's going to be someone worse than DeSantis.
	I hate to break it to you.
	It's going to be somebody worse.
	You think DeSantis is controlled op?
	DeSantis is the compromise between the regime and the Trump supporters.
	DeSantis is in the middle.
	What happens when Trump is no longer in the equation and it's DeSantis and the regime?
	They're going to put up somebody in the middle between and they're going to keep having it and keep it's going to keep becoming fractionated until We're right back where we already are.
	If we're not already, we're right back where we started.
	If Trump or Ye or someone equivalent doesn't win the primary and therefore get the mandate from the Republican constituency to represent them in the race, if someone doesn't even win the primary like that, let alone the general, what are they going to put up in 28?
	They're gonna put up Jeb Bush.
	They're gonna put up Rubio.
	They're gonna put up Hutchinson, Asa Hutchinson, who is a former governor of Arkansas, or Larry Hogan, or somebody like, uh, who is the governor of Massachusetts, Baker.
	They're gonna put somebody up like that.
	And then it's over.
	You think the GOP is bad now?
	Wait until whatever happens here, if it's not Trump or Ye, wait until it's DeSantis.
	Wait until it's...
	A Democrat wins again.
	And then what you're going to get in 28 is Nikki Haley.
	That's exactly what you're going to get.
	You're going to get Trumpism without Trump.
	So, and I said this on Telegram today, both Biden and DeSantis represent a compromise.
	Between the regime and the MAGA constituency.
	It's like they did hear the MAGA crowd and the MAGA crowd said, well, and really it's not even just MAGA.
	It's like.
	It's all these blue collar white guys and the white liberals, you know, I guess it's like college educated white people and white women.
	That's really the constituency which is up for grabs here.
	The whites with no college education are firmly Trump, and obviously all the non-white people are very much Democrat.
	So it's really a question of these white people who are not solidly populist, nationalist, whatever you want to say.
	It's about these people in Pennsylvania, these people in Georgia.
	It's like about non-white turnout, partially, and it's also about college-educated whites and white women.
	And so the compromise is like, okay, we see that Trump was going out and he was hitting everybody on the economic issue and he was hitting everybody on maybe the foreign wars and things like that.
	And so they trot out somebody like Biden, who is an old white guy.
	He's not woke.
	He's not some frizzy-haired black girl.
	He's not some psycho talking about defunding the police.
	He's not some psycho guy with the pronouns and all that, although he really, I mean, he really is, but he doesn't look like it.
	And he gave a candidate, and by the way, 2020 was rigged, I'm not saying it wasn't, but they gave a guy who it was plausible that he could have won.
	He was plausible, or people are going to accept him.
	What Trump has going for him is that he's exciting, and he's going to rile everybody up, and he is going to incense the public, and they're going to go out for change.
	The strength for Biden is that people like that he's chill, he's not offensive, he's not seen, he's not heard, he's the opposite of.
	of inciting.
	He's the opposite of inspiring.
	He is not going to rile anybody up.
	He is not going to charge.
	He's going to turn everybody off.
	He's going to turn everything down because what he's playing for is the status quo.
	And so in 2020, it was stolen.
	But in 2020, this was a plausible compromise candidate that people were, again, not offended by, not provoked by, not incensed by.
	Clearly, Because it was he was delivered and really without much of a fight you know there was a stop to steal stuff but you know there weren't a lot of people that turned out for that relative to how many people voted for Trump.
	75 million people voted for Trump.
	Were there 75 million people in the streets?
	No.
	So Biden was acceptable enough where people said, hey, this isn't going to be so bad.
	Again, he plausibly was elected, even though he rigged it and cheated.
	It was plausible.
	And there was widespread acceptance of him as the president.
	And there it is.
	And now, DeSantis versus Biden is gonna be the same thing.
	DeSantis is just enough, just enough Trump that people are gonna say, hey, he's okay.
	You know, he's got the credentials.
	He's culture war, even though he sucks on culture war.
	He's not a culture warrior at all.
	He's not America first at all, like Trump.
	He's not an outsider at all.
	He's a GOP hack who was in Congress.
	He's a fucking Jewish-Israeli shill.
	When he was in Congress, and now that he's the governor, he is not successful in the culture war.
	You know, this war against Disney was a failure.
	He was just as bad as any other governor on COVID and vaccines.
	Like, it goes on and on.
	But he's just enough like Trump that they're gonna take it, and we're gonna get another zogged up conservative shill, just like Rubio, or just like Cruz, or anyone else.
	And so they both represent this new dialectic of, hey, it is once again safely a debate about big government.
	It is once again safely a debate about Republicans and Democrats.
	Biden and DeSantis.
	Biden and Marjorie Greene.
	The Democrats and the Republicans.
	Big government and little government.
	As opposed to Trump, who represented something a new dialectic, which was the people against the system.
	The people versus the elite.
	And what were the issues then?
	The issues were the wars, trade, corruption, you know, drain the swamp.
	That's an anti-corruption message, which is actually tracks.
	What did Xi Jinping do?
	Anti-corruption.
	What did Putin do?
	Anti-corruption.
	So, You know, that tracks with, like, the anti-Atlanticist, anti-NATO, anti-liberal, anti-Zog thing, which is what Trump was a part of, and those were the issues that came with that dialectic.
	The people and Trump, you know, the Americans with their leader, with their, it was sort of like horizontal, but with a leader against the system.
	Whereas now, and this is why I said I like Biden.
	I didn't say I like Biden because I'm a Democrat.
	Okay.
	I don't, I would never vote for a pro-abortion person ever, ever.
	I would never vote for somebody who's in favor of abortion.
	So, it's not like I'm pro-Biden, but the reason I say that is because, look, I'm not gonna get tricked like an asshole into joining up with Steve Jewish Schill, you know, white cuck, boomer Bannon, and hillbilly Marjorie, and hillbilly whatever, George Bush, and not even, he's a fake hillbilly, hillbilly Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Into this red team blue team thing.
	I'm not gonna get, I'm not going to get riled up about Biden with Marjorie Greene.
	I'm not gonna get riled up about Biden with Tucker, shills for war with China Carlson.
	And by the way, Tucker, don't make me your op, okay?
	You know, I don't know who is gonna hear that.
	I don't know who needs to hear that.
	But I've heard things.
	Tucker, don't make me your op, Chinese shill, okay?
	Big mistake.
	I've, you know, I've heard some not good things about Tucker.
	Tucker's up to some not good things.
	And we know all about that, so...
	You know, he didn't want to say my name when I was put on the no-fly list, and he was pretending to support the J6ers, even though he did nothing during Stop the Steal, by the way.
	Did nothing during Stop the Steal, based in red-pilled Kabbalah bracelet, right?
	But, um... Did nothing during Stop the Steal, couldn't bring himself to say my name when I got put on the no-fly list, and all the rest.
	And now, now what's the program?
	Shilling for war with China?
	What's the program now?
	Shilling for gay marriage?
	Who even is this guy?
	He was a libertarian for 20 years, or something like that, with the bowtie and all, and a total neocon, in favor of the Iraq war, and then he gets this primetime slot when Trump gets elected, and suddenly becomes the voice of populism.
	Suddenly becomes a voice of economic nationalism.
	Never said anything racial or like about Jews, but, you know, suddenly he's a voice for multi-racial working-class populism and war with China.
	Sounds a lot like the Bannon agenda, and Bannon is tied up with the ZOA.
	Sounds a lot like the Likud party.
	Sounds a lot like the, uh, what is it?
	What's the Yoram Hazoni Conference?
	National Populism Conference?
	What the hell even is it?
	I don't even know what it's called.
	It's called National Conservatism?
	Sounds a lot like that.
	So I don't know what that's all about.
	Um, but anyway, so, and this is what is going on.
	There was legitimate dissent eight years ago, and now there just isn't.
	Now you have the GOP shills, and then you have GOP shills pretending to be dissidents.
	You have GOP, straight up, Kevin McCarthy, Mitch McConnell, neocon, shills.
	And then you have people like Koston Alomaru and all these others like on Twitter and guys like Tucker and Crowder and whoever.
	Who are total shills, but like wearing a mask like they're one of us.
	And it's like, you know what it means to be one of us?
	It means actually to be red-pilled, okay?
	It means actually to know what's really going on, which is that Jews run the media, okay?
	And that white people are being replaced in our own countries.
	Never forget that.
	That's what's going on.
	What's going on is that America is being destroyed with immigration.
	White fertility rates around the world are plummeting.
	Christianity is falling because the West is falling in the world.
	And Jewish people took over all the elite institutions 70 years ago.
	That's what's going on here.
	I don't want to hear anything about, you know, it's China and it's groomers and it's this and that.
	It's like, hey man, let's focus on the big picture here.
	People that hate Jesus run everything.
	That's like the problem here.
	So anyway, so that's my big takeaway from the State of the Union last night.
	Like I said, and to get specifically into the speech, the speech wasn't that bad.
	Everybody jumped down my throat for saying that.
	I said, look, the speech was like 60% good.
	It was like 60% similar to Trump.
	And everybody said, oh, you're like Richard Spencer now?
	Uh, no.
	It's just true.
	Trump said it.
	Jesse Watters said it.
	I'm not the only guy to say this.
	Biden plagiarized like half of Trump's agenda.
	Am I supposed to get riled up because he's a Democrat?
	He's a Democrat!
	What did he say?
	He said we're gonna do an infrastructure bill and all the building materials will be sourced from America.
	Am I supposed to hate that?
	He wants an infrastructure bill, we like that.
	He wants to source all the building materials in America, we like that too.
	The CHIPS Act, the capping the price of insulin and prescriptions, we like that.
	Even to some extent going after the wealthy, are we not in favor of that?
	Are we suddenly not in favor of going after giant corporations?
	I'm not one of these eat the rich guys, but I don't think the Trump election was ever about this Cato Institute stuff where we're going to pretend the tax code is perfectly fine and the rich are, we're not going to touch the rich or something like that.
	That's just crazy to me.
	There wasn't a whole lot in the speech to be offended about.
	I don't like gun control, I don't like abortion, I don't like the trans stuff, I don't like even some of the cop stuff or whatever, but there wasn't a whole lot that was extremely off-putting in that speech.
	And that's the point, is that the regime has gotten very hip.
	They have gotten very hip to what is going on, and we would be... we would be...
	Naive, and we would be in denial to say that that's not what's going on here.
	That Biden and everything else, the war in Ukraine and so on, represents the regime consolidating and restoring their power.
	That's what's going on here.
	So, you know, I watched a speech last night and Frankly, I thought the Biden speech was more compelling than what Sarah Huckabee Sanders said.
	Now, does that mean that I support Biden?
	Of course not.
	But it does mean that we're in danger of losing any real opposition to the regime.
	We know that what Biden said was all lies.
	We know that Biden's not following through on any of those things.
	Okay, we know that.
	But what's scary is that the opposition won't even say any of that.
	They won't even say those things.
	Sarah Huckabee Sanders gets up there and talks about the Little Rock Nine and big government, and Biden's talking about junk fees and resort fees and insulin and cancer and whatever else, the border.
	You know, Biden went up there and gave a speech about America, and Sarah Huckabee Sanders goes up and gives a speech about the damn Democrats and big government.
	It's like, okay, so we're orphaned.
	There's no opposition party.
	The regime chugs along.
	Everybody, you know, rejoins.
	Everybody re-enlists as Republicans and Democrats, and I guess that's just it.
	You're either going to get some black woman progressive, or you're going to get some white woman, like, libertarian, liberal, whatever.
	These are our choices.
	And nowhere in the mix is a fascist, Christian, nationalist, you know, give me something here!
	Work with me here!
	Give me something!
	So...
	We're in a lot of danger right now, and frankly, where is the opposition?
	You know, because a lot of people, I know I'm not the only one who notices this, there are a lot of people that are coming at me lately, like just me as a guy.
	They won't even like come at my arguments, like I'm saying a lot of stuff that is actually very important here about the fate of having a legitimate opposition, and I just get attacked For all kinds of bullshit, by people who are basically selling out.
	You know, like John Doyle?
	It's like, you know what, John Doyle?
	You can call me whatever you want, but I'm not a fucking sellout.
	You know, he's going out there and insinuating, he's like, oh, Nick's a fed, he's running a honeypot, and he's gay, and all this, and it's like...
	I didn't see you on January 6th.
	I was there on January 6th.
	I didn't see you during Group War when we were going out there and talking about dancing Israelis and we kind of created like a based Generation Z reaction.
	I didn't see you there.
	Okay?
	I don't know about you, but I'm banned on YouTube.
	I'm banned from PayPal.
	I'm banned from everything.
	The ADL put me on a list of five fucking people on Earth that could not get their Twitter account back.
	I was condemned by the GOP for being anti-Semitic.
	Like, it's just this cascading, it goes on and on.
	I got subpoenaed by Congress.
	I got re-banned on Twitter.
	I got reinstated, and I think I'm the only one so far who got re-banned.
	And so you can say whatever you want about me, but I don't take money from Jews, and I don't go on Twitter and YouTube to share my opinions.
	I have to share it on a website that I built.
	Because I'm the only one, it seems, that is actually voicing legitimate dissent.
	So people, a lot of people have come at me and criticized me with all kinds of theories and speculation.
	About, oh, I'm a Fed, or, oh, I'm a Wignatt, or, like, oh, he's hypocritical.
	You know, that's just a bunch of bullshit.
	Hypocrisy.
	Blow it out your ass.
	I'm a pragmatist.
	I want to win.
	And not that I am a hypocrite anyway, but that's just, like, the most bottom of the barrel.
	You know, or, oh, his sexuality, or his treatment of, you know, he's just, like, not a nice guy.
	Like, the way he treats his peers is, like, really mean.
	I've been being attacked a lot lately.
	I'm going to be attacked a lot more.
	Again, I heard something today.
	People are setting up to attack me.
	And it's not lost on me the predicament that we're in.
	The fact that Trump is becoming moderate, the GOP is sliding backwards, dissent is being eradicated, the alt-right is dead, my whole movement has been censored and deplatformed, Trump is hosting parties at Zog and the gay headquarters, And then you got all these people coming and saying, oh, I'm the problem because, oh, well, well, you know, I think he's a fed, or I think this, or I think that.
	It's like, you work for Jews!
	You're on Fox News!
	You're on Fox News!
	Fox News doesn't return the President's phone calls.
	Fox News tried to eradicate Trump in the beginning.
	You're on YouTube, where you can't talk about the vaccine, or Russia, or BLM.
	It's like, are you kidding me?
	So...
	I'm getting sick of it.
	And you know what's gonna happen is... Look.
	If Trump isn't gonna get it together, if nobody's gonna get together, then I'm just gonna have to go in more than I already am.
	And I don't mean, like, violence.
	I mean, look, if we can't get one congressman who is not a fucking pussy that's afraid of the media, that is like, oh, oh, we have to disavow because the media is gonna, you know, maybe if I just apologize, you know, then I'll go in.
	I'll go in and I'll run.
	I'm not old enough to run, but I will be in time.
	And I'll go in, and I'll just do it.
	You know?
	Maybe we gotta go straight to the beer hall.
	No, now I'm not insinuating I'm like Hitler or anything, and I'm not insinuating we're gonna, like, do a thing, but...
	I am saying we can't count on anybody.
	All these people, we don't know who the fuck they are.
	We don't know where they come from.
	They're all getting paid by somebody.
	You know, it's like Ye said, who's the real owner if your boss is getting a salary?
	It's a good question.
	They're all either Jewish or involved with that or they're, you know, have some institutional backing and We're dangerously close to losing any of the momentum that we had from 16.
	Any of this opportunity that opened up in 16 to legitimately change anything.
	And instead people are settling for scraps because they're afraid.
	That's what it comes down to.
	Because they're weak and they're afraid.
	Settling for scraps because they're either too weak to go out with their real face and name and say something real, you know, because they don't want to lose their job, or they're, and so they're afraid, or they're weak and they're willing to accept Trump, you know, with a throwaway line in his speech about immigration or something.
	Like, it's been almost 10 years, man.
	It wasn't enough in 2016, and it's been 10 years.
	Think about that.
	It wasn't enough.
	What he was saying in 2015, when he started running, when he started running in 2015, it wasn't far enough.
	We all know that.
	We knew it then, but we expected it would get better.
	It's gotten worse.
	10, almost 10 years later.
	And people keep saying, You gotta wait.
	Right?
	Incremental reform.
	You gotta wait.
	Be patient.
	Play the long game.
	Be smart.
	Play it out over time.
	And I'm not saying don't be smart.
	I'm not saying don't be strategic.
	But this system has got to be confronted.
	And people are doing it.
	And there's progress being made.
	You know, Joe Rogan going on his show and defending Ilhan Omar?
	Every Ilhan Omar saying it's all about the Benjamins.
	Every Kyrie Irving taking down the apology on Instagram.
	Every Ye going on InfoWars.
	Every Joe Rogan defending Ilhan Omar and Crystal Ball laughing it up and saying, yeah, there's an Israel lobby.
	Okay, we're moving it further down the field.
	People are waking up.
	Every time I go on Adam22 and say, hey, I'm a race realist, and they're like, you know, it's not that bad.
	We're moving the ball down the field.
	But in every instance, it requires somebody to just say it and pay a price.
	You know, and I love paying a price.
	I love going out there and paying a price.
	Because that means, like, you did something.
	So I'm, you know, I'm collecting these things, the RNC condemning me, getting banned on everything.
	I'm collecting it because it's like, I'm that guy, okay?
	I'm the guy.
	But, so many people these days, they're like, well, we'll just confront the system later.
	Well, it's 2023, okay?
	We ran out of time 10 years ago.
	Realistically, we ran out of time in 2005, okay?
	And it's 2023.
	And it's been 8 years since Trump announced.
	And people don't want to do anything significant for, like, at least another 10.
	Who even knows the timetable?
	I want to wait until, what, 2050 before people are going to say what I'm saying now when the country is 39% white?
	Good luck!
	So, you know, people have just got to think about What's going on?
	And what we can expect from what we're being given here, what we have to work with, which is Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Kevin McCarthy in a slut, Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	Oh my gosh!
	How about Marjorie?
	What a clown!
	I mean, and here's the thing.
	I understand drawing attention to yourself.
	I understand making a name for yourself because it's about the platform.
	You are the platform.
	So if you draw attention to yourself, it gives you a platform to share your message.
	Like, I get all that.
	But this is a person who is pursuing attention for the sake of attention.
	She jumped on the yay thing so fast.
	When it was hot, and then when Ye went on InfoWars, she jumped off so fast.
	Just the same.
	And when the China balloon thing happened, she's jumping around with the balloon.
	It's like, is there, is there just no limit to what this person will do?
	She's in, she's in Congress screaming like a banshee.
	In the, like, just screaming and yelling like an asshole.
	And about what?
	China?
	Really?
	So what do you know?
	You really know a lot about China?
	Marjorie Taylor Greene's understanding of China comes from, like, her local Chinese restaurant, okay?
	She's seen about as much of China as she's seen the inside of a Panda Express.
unidentified		For crying- But now she- No, we gotta go after China!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		China this, China that!
		I mean, this is just like an ignorant, like a straight-up ignorant, boorish person.
		Who, what's the goal?
		Get the seat on the committee, be a star, something like that?
		Apologize at Holocaust museums?
		And she's like the most so-called right-wing member of the MAGA caucus, and, you know, she's Trump's BFF and all that.
		And some have said that she's like the future.
		Like, okay, if that's the future, like, we don't have a chance.
		We don't have a shot.
		And I think John Miller put out something today that was really insightful.
		He said that people call Marjorie the right-wing AOC, but really she's nothing like that.
		Because AOC actually challenged Pelosi.
		AOC actually challenged the conference leadership.
		AOC actually pushes the envelope, and she never punches left.
		AOC never attacks Antifa, she defends them.
		AOC never attacked BLM, she defends them.
		Whereas Marjorie...
		Never goes against leadership.
		Marjorie tap dances for McCarthy.
		Marjorie's gonna go and attack the so-called real anti-Semites, the real whatever, extremists.
		So, the point is to say, and I know that I've got a personal beef with her now, but the point is to say that across the board, I'm giving you a lot of ideas, is to show you that across the board, from McCarthy to Trump to DeSantis, even to Marjorie on the right-wing flank, to the Sarah Huckabee Sanders thing,
		To guys like Doyle, who represents, you know, and it's so funny, everybody that just has a axe to grind with me, they just run to, like, the other young guy in the space who's just, like, completely inferior and everybody knows it, but they're like, oh, we hate Nick, who else is there?
		Oh, uh, John, we like Doyle!
		And they all pretend to like this fucking faggot nerd that says heck off, commie, and wears dresses.
		And is OBVIOUSLY, OBJECTIVELY, INFERIOR in every way.
		Just like, not as talented, not as smart.
		Cold takes, bitch made.
		And they're gonna say, oh, we like this guy because, you know, because fuck Nick, he was mean to me once or something.
		And it's like, hey, this is what you got.
		It's all people that are just like...
		They're in it for all the wrong reasons!
		They're not true revolutionaries, okay?
		We need people, and I just fail to see them.
		Even like Alex Jones, you know, Ye and I go on Alex Jones, and Alex Jones is gonna be like, I was a victim of a publicity stunt, and I hate Hitler.
		Really, dude?
		Infowars run Infowars?
		So it's like, you can't even count on Alex Jones to be a revolutionary.
		Yeah, 1776 will commence again.
		Oh, but don't say anything about Hitler or, you know, I hate you.
		Okay.
		So where's a revolution gonna come from?
		There are three places it's going to come from.
		Trump, yay, me.
		End of list.
		That's it.
		Who else do you see?
		Who else do you see out there that's really doing something?
		Because it's not going to come from DeSantis.
		It's not going to come from Marjorie.
		It's not going to come from Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
		It's not going to come from The Blaze.
		It's not going to come from The Blaze or Daily Wire or Matt Walsh.
		It's Trump is going to dig down deep and bring it out of himself, as maybe we're seeing him start to do.
		Or it's going to come from Ye, or it's going to come from me.
		But I don't see anybody else.
		I don't see anybody else on the scene.
		It's not coming from Alex Jones.
		It's not coming from Tucker, who wants war with China.
		And it just sucks because you, I mean, you literally look around America, which is a country of 330 million people, and it's a shame that there really aren't any other names.
		Like in a country of 330 million people, there aren't any other names of prominent opposition, prominent organized opposition.
		So, and there are other people that are talking about it, but who else is doing anything?
		You know, people will throw out, you know, their favorite alt-right, you know, or adjacent, Groyper adjacent, e-celeb.
		But the reason I throw my name in there is like, I'm obviously an extremely competent and intelligent individual.
		I built the Cozy Platform, we put Afpac together, you know, so I'm somebody who clearly has ambitions beyond just being a Ryan Grodusky.
	Crazy China Balloon, LOL, just like that episode of Drag Race, signed Ryan.
	Ryan Grodusky.
	You know, it's like, I'm not content to just, you know, war tomorrow, fight like hell on my podcast.
	You know, I actually have my eyes towards something bigger, and I feel like there's just almost nobody else that's out there on the same page.
	And it's not lost on me that I'm being attacked at this very crucial time.
	I am that guy.
	And there's this crucial moment of a vacuum of leadership, and the chance that this opposition is going to collapse and fall, and the Trump revolution will not be institutionalized, and I'm the one lone guy standing up and saying it, and I'm the one being attacked from all angles, being, oh, he's this, he's that.
	Well, you know what?
	You're all being paid, so... Anyway.
	So that's my real rebuttal here on this, on the, you know, State of the Union.
	Everybody's on my case.
	Oh, he's pro- even, even Destiny.
	He's like, see, this shows Trump is out of touch.
	It's like, nigga, it ain't about Trump.
	It's about the GOP.
	And to the extent that Trump has been assimilated into the GOP, it is somewhat about him.
	So... Anyway, that's that.
	But... I want to move on.
	I want to take a look at our Super Chats.
	We'll see what you guys have to say about all this.
	That's my... take.
	So we'll see.
unidentified		But, uh...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I heard something very shocking today.
		You wouldn't believe.
		But yeah, Tucker trying to make me his op?
		Don't do it, pal!
		Big mistake.
unidentified		Alright, let's see.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We'll take a look at our Super Chats.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We'll see what we got.
unidentified		All right, let's see.
		All right.
		Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Caden says skyscrapers equals Jewish money changing land production equals legitimate American economy.
		Oh, this is more Southerner cope.
		Anons says, I work in mud.
		That's legitimate economy.
		I'm working in mud.
unidentified		Yeah, okay, pal.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Anons is regarding COVID vaccines.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		What is your opinion on non-mRNA COVID vaccines which are based on the same tech as old flu vaccines?

▲