All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 24, 2023 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:21:52
MUG CUCKED: Crowder DISAVOWS Anti-Semitism (Two Sides of the Same SHEKEL) | America First Ep. 1112MUG CUCKED: Crowder DISAVOWS Anti-Semitism (Two Sides of the Same SHEKEL) | America First Ep. 1112
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:11:01
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
You are watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Monday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight, lots to get into.
Big show.
A lot of drama.
A lot of drama going on in the conservative movement.
And our featured story tonight will be following up on our show on Thursday.
about the Steven Crowder drama and it's big drama, high drama on YouTube about money and principles and all that and if you caught the show on Thursday I took Steven Crowder's side and it's a big beef that he has with Ben Shapiro and the Daily Wire over
Whether or not they're faithfully fighting Big Tech as much as they can after they offered him a contract which would bring him aboard on their company but penalize him for being censored by Big Tech.
So we'll recap that drama and I also want to give my, I kind of have a new take, I'm a little bit over it.
On Friday, I took Steven Crowder's side.
Now, I'm not taking his side.
I'm taking my own side.
I think that it's a positive development overall.
I'm glad that they're fighting.
But I care a lot less about the outcome now.
And honestly, I'm just kind of irritated.
My initial take was right.
My initial take was right.
It was funny for a minute to say that Crowder was anti-semitic and he was doing this because Ben Shapiro was Jewish, but it's not that funny anymore.
Now it's just kind of pissing me off because today he went on Tim Pool and it was a huge show.
Like, I think 160,000 people were watching live.
It was massive.
And I didn't watch the whole thing, but I caught some of it.
And, first of all, he's wearing makeup.
And he's on the show wearing makeup, and he's reassuring everybody that he's not anti-Semitic.
He's like, well, I love Ben Shapiro, he's such a genius, and I love Andrew Clavin, and I love Matt Walsh, but this is just bad business, or whatever.
This is just not, they're just wrong about this.
And then he said something like, it's not because Ben Shapiro's Jewish, and anyone who suggests it is, is controlled opposition.
I'm not anti-semitic, and there's these anti-semites out there that are weird, and whatever.
And I'm just so sick of the gatekeeping.
Seriously, man.
And here's the thing.
It's especially... Well, here's what I'll say.
And I'll elaborate on this later on in the show.
If you don't agree with my views, or if you don't agree that, like, Jews control the world or whatever, fine.
If you don't believe that, or if you don't think that's important, or you'd prefer not to say it, honestly, fine.
And that's one category of things that are okay.
Maybe you don't believe that there's a Jewish conspiracy or that their Jewishness is essential to the conspiracy.
All the things that we talk about.
If you, for whatever reason, don't believe in it, prefer not to talk about it, prefer to talk about it less, that's all fine.
But then you have these people who are going to go out of their way to shut down anybody that does talk about it.
And it's not like they'll ignore those people because they prefer not to talk about it, or they'll disagree or argue with those people because they don't believe in it, but they will insist on going out of their way To ignore, deplatform, attack, whatever the situation calls for with its urgency.
Like when the Ye thing happened, clearly nobody could simply ignore it.
But that's what they prefer to do.
But when a situation like that arises where it's a very urgent and very salient moment and they can't ignore it, then they go out of their way to shut it down and attack, insult, emasculate, diminish, minimize.
And that's unacceptable.
Then there's a further, there's an even worse category still of people who insist that they're not gatekeepers, but do that.
People that pretend like they're fighting for the future, or the country, or integrity, or principles, and in addition to that, simultaneously go out of their way to attack people that say that.
So there's like three categories of people.
And I want people to understand precisely what I'm saying, and I'll get into it later in the show.
But you've got people who, of course I'm very controversial, I do this show, and I do tend to focus on the religious and the racial aspect of things.
I don't talk about ideology because I'm not really an ideological person.
I talk about religion, and I talk about race.
And when I say race, I use that as a stand-in for groups.
As a stand-in for the way that people are genetically.
Their races, their ethnicities, their gender, their nationality.
Talking about groups of people and how they're interacting.
And I understand that's very controversial and I understand that maybe people don't have that worldview.
They don't think that Okay, fine.
that these things are important or essential characteristics about people?
Because they're liberal, so they think that people are individuals, and so they think that a person's race or religion or gender isn't essential.
It's not an essential part of who they are.
It doesn't intrinsically matter to what they are.
Okay, fine.
There are categories of people that aren't on board with that, they don't agree with that, or like I said, prefer not to talk about it.
That's one.
Then you have people where... And the first one is totally fine.
Then you have people who are gatekeepers.
You have people that will, again, insist that that one particular worldview against all others has to be ignored whenever possible.
When it's not possible to ignore, it has to be ruthlessly attacked with no scruples.
It has to be insulted.
It has to be ridiculed.
It has to be...
Minimized, emasculated, again emasculated the people talking about it, have to raise questions about their sincerity, whether or not they're like traitors to America or traitors to their people or something.
And that's not okay, and that's classic.
And then there's the worst category, which I believe Crowder falls into, which is people who will insist, again, that they're in favor of everybody having a seat at the table and everyone expressing themselves, or they argue that you need to have integrity to always tell the truth or something like that.
While gatekeeping.
In other words, they insist they're not gatekeeping while gatekeeping.
And it's almost like that hypocrisy that makes it the worst category.
And the more that I think about it, the more that it makes me angry that Crowder is going to do this big self-righteous routine.
And a week ago I was willing to say, He's doing the right thing.
He means well here.
In principle, he's right.
But the more that I think about it, and specifically this appearance on Tim Pool, how he went out of his way, while he's pretending to be fighting big tech, he goes out of his way to call anybody that talks about Jewish power, controlled opposition.
He says, that's controlled opposition if you insinuate that, and I'm going to mock all the anti-Semites right now.
And again, people might say, well you gotta understand Nick, he just doesn't agree, he doesn't believe those things, maybe he doesn't want to talk about it, he wants to keep his YouTube, that's all fine and well.
But those things can't be true simultaneously.
You can at once be self-righteous and full of integrity and doing the right thing, but also be a liar, but also be a total hypocrite, And have a complete double standard and I'll elaborate on that but I want to talk about that Tim Pool appearance and why it totally changed my perspective because initially I supported Crowder and I said we're with the Mug Club and all that and I do still believe it's a good thing that he's criticizing Daily Wire but
After his appearance today, I feel like it's really just an incestuous war between really two people that are not very different.
And I don't even really know what the contention is here.
What is it that Crowder is fighting Daily Wire to say that he couldn't say on Big Tech?
That he wouldn't be able to over there.
I just don't understand.
His show is not different from Ben Shapiro's show.
He does his show on YouTube.
What could he not say?
On YouTube, at Daily Wire, that he is able to say on YouTube on his own show.
There's not a lot of daylight between those two shows.
There's not a lot of... I don't understand what their big difference is.
And, you know, I know that there are some issues where, of course, Daily Wire supported the vaccine and they didn't go hard on election fraud and things like that.
But aside from those disagreements, they're both on Big Tech, and they're both going to shill against the biggest proponents of a lot of these issues.
So we'll get into that.
I also want to talk about this Charlie Kirk article which came out today, and this was in the College Dissident, which is that guy from University of Chicago who's doing a great job, Daniel Schmidt.
So I want to go over that.
And this came out this morning.
It was apparently a leaked audio from one of these, like, Jewish conferences or whatever that Charlie Kirk does.
He was at some, like, I don't know the name of it, but some, like, Jewish summit.
And it was kind of amazing because I remember last year everybody said that Charlie Kirk had changed.
He said he had some throwaway remark about white genocide, I want to say this was.
December 2021, I think, because I remember doing a Twitter space about it before I went on the Elijah Schafer Show on The Blaze.
So I think it was December 2021, like second week of December 21, he made some remark about, I don't know, white people.
White genocide, something in that category.
And he had said a few things like that in 2021, and I believe it was that year.
And everybody said, wow, Charlie Kirk is base now, Charlie Kirk is, he took all our talking points, and now he's like one of us, now it seems like we changed his mind, he's coming around.
Everybody was doing this victory lap, like he had this sincere change of heart.
And at the time, I said, you have to pay attention to what Turning Point is saying.
Because he can go on his podcast, and he can kind of blow with the wind a little bit.
And if the wind is blowing in that direction, he can go with it.
And he could go on his podcast and say whatever he'd like to say for that week.
And it'll be in the media, and he'll catch some blowback, and he'll also get some support.
I said, but the important thing is to look at the institution.
Because he has a show, and he also has Turning Point USA, which is an institution.
And Turning Point is an institution, creates literature, and it creates presentations, and it trains all of these student activists on the college campus, who are then going to go on and graduate, and then work in the conservative movement, whether that's on the Capitol Hill, or in elections, or that's in the conservative media, wherever.
And so it's more important to look at what the institution says, because the guy can say whatever he likes, and that can be the flavor of the week, whatever rhetoric is popular that month, that particular week, and it doesn't really have much weight or any staying power.
What matters is what institutionally, what are all these activists, these are the guys that are being churned out, what are they being taught?
Because they're not being taught what Charlie Kirk says on his podcast.
They're being taught something that's in a curriculum, something that's in the literature that has to be approved and goes through the nonprofit and all that.
And I said, if you look at what goes on in the nonprofit, it hasn't changed at all.
They're still saying the same things.
They're still cucking on social issues, whatever.
And anyway, that's a little blast from the past.
That was a couple years ago or a little over a year ago.
And today this big article comes out in College Dissident where he was, and again I don't know how public this was, I believe this is a leaked audio, he gives a speech to these, I guess it's a Jewish fundraiser, Jewish activism, something like that.
And it's all the same rhetoric about Judaism that we heard during the Greiper War, where he says that if you don't support Israel, you're not a real Christian.
If you don't support the Jewish people, you're not a real Christian.
The Jews are God's chosen people.
We need to do everything we can to support them.
Israel's just like America.
All this kind of stuff.
And this is not surprising, and it's not even new.
He almost said exactly the same thing I want to say back in 2018 or 2019, like maybe a year before the Groyper War.
And the Groyper War was three years ago at this point.
And so the point is, and this is what I've been stressing for as long as I've been doing this, how much progress are we really making?
People like to look around at the conservative movement and they see that a guy like Tucker Carlson will say something based on his show.
He'll have a once lately, not very often, but once in a blue moon, he'll have a really good monologue or something.
Or Trump will have a remark in his speech about immigration and people say, well, what a great victory.
It has been seven years, almost seven years, No.
unidentified
Longer.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
It's been almost 8 years.
Trump announced in July 2015.
June or July 2015.
It's been nearly 8 years since Trump announced.
And we look at the institutions, whether it's the GOP, with Kevin McCarthy becoming the speaker, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, who's the most right-wing member of Congress, or among the most, maybe top five.
When you look at that, when you look at Turning Point USA, when you look at this beef between Crowder and Shapiro, when you look at Tim Poole and what's on his show, it's been eight years.
Where can anybody show me the progress The Independence from Big Tech.
Can anybody show me a rightward shift?
Can anybody show me where?
And it's not to say that there hasn't been any progress, but it is to say that it's been almost a decade.
I mean, really close to a full decade since Trump announced.
That was supposed to be a revolution and supposed to break the consensus and the status quo in the Republican Party.
And don't even just look at the party, look even outside the party where there's a little bit more diversity of viewpoint and where there's Not as much pressure.
There's not as much decorum.
When you're in Congress or the Senate, it's one thing.
When you're outside the government, you can really get away with a lot more.
I'm hard pressed to find anywhere in the entire conservative landscape
Where things are getting more right-wing, or where the standard is becoming better, or more pure, or more righteous, or more Christian, or anything like that, the debates, and the rhetoric, and the narratives that are being spun up by the biggest creators, or by the Republican leadership, or even by the MAGA firebrands, it's like not different than it was 10 years ago.
In some cases, it's worse.
Ten years ago, Trump was calling for a ban on Muslims entering America.
And he also said that we would listen to Palestinians and Israelis about a two-party, or a two-state solution, rather, as an example.
Talking about black and Hispanic committing 99% of the murders in New York, building a wall, all this.
And if anything, you look at where we are today and it's like it's less right-wing, it's less extreme, it's less hardcore.
And it's not to say that there aren't pockets of it, like you see what happened with Ye and what's going on with me and stuff like that.
But across the board, I feel like people are lulling themselves into this sense of complacency where we really have to keep the pressure up.
And I've said this for a long time.
That's our job.
My job, if you are mistaken, is not to be mainstream.
My job is not even to be popular.
My job is not to be the most famous right-winger on YouTube or anything.
I've always said that my job is to pull everybody to the right.
My job is to be the immovable rock.
That's the job of our movement, of this show, of this media that we're creating, is to create an immovable rock that says this is what the right-wing standard is.
This is the correct opinion.
This is the truth.
It will always be here.
It's not moving.
It's not going to the left.
It's not compromising.
We're not trying to be clever.
We're not trying to adhere to the TOS.
We're not trying to appease a donor.
This is the right-wing standard.
This is the America First position.
This is the Christian choice.
This is what it is.
And it's not going anywhere.
And ultimately, we want that message to win, whether it's because it becomes so popular or because we influence people in the mainstream and they come our way.
But being that rock, being that guy out here, as I said last week, it's this constant tension of, Are people that believe what we believe, are they going to be conquered by the system and attracted to say less, compromise on the issues, become convinced that our convictions are too much to ask for, too extreme, or too fringe, or it's a purity spiral, or something like that?
Are they going to get drawn back into this hamster wheel, vote in the next election, hold the line, this is good enough?
You have to watch your expectations things like that or are we going to be appealing to people in the Mainstream and have them thinking I feel like a hypocrite.
I feel like a coward.
I'm not really right-wing.
I need to be over there I need to say the truth.
I need to talk about what's going on and there's this constant back and forth and you can see it it's a it's a Sort of like a cultural, moral battle that the battlefield is, are these people?
I think about a guy like Elijah Schaeffer, who at one point was very skeptical and had his own thing, and then he was ablaze.
And over time, just he realized, because he was in it, He's like, these guys are right.
What happened to them isn't fair, and they're telling the truth, and I'm sick of it, and I'm sick of self-censoring.
And now he's doing an independent show, and he's truly independent.
And he's not gatekeeping, it's not these snide little snipes calling so-called anti-Semitic people controlled opposition or whatever.
As a matter of fact, it's the opposite.
He's making little quips that indicate that he knows more than he lets on.
He's not gonna throw people like me under the bus.
That kind of thing.
You know, that's an example of, we're trying to get people in the mainstream on board with our message.
So many people on our side are so quick to say, we gotta jump ship on our message and go join the mainstream.
Because, you know, that's where the YouTube AdSense money is, and that's where whatever is.
Anyway.
I don't know how we... that's a total detour, but... So we're gonna talk about this Charlie Kirk thing.
That's just part of this, like, ongoing debate, really, since the Groyper War.
So we'll get into all that.
That's our news.
I kind of just went in there, but I do just want to say before we fully get into it, and I'll read through this article that we have from College Dissident.
Before we get into that, I want to remind you to smash the follow button here on Cozy.
Follow me here to get a push notification whenever I go live.
Smash the follow button.
Also, follow me on Gab Telegram, True Social.
Links are down below.
Apologies, I was late tonight.
I did tell you I was gonna be late though.
It was a whole ordeal.
Had to drop off his rental car, and there was traffic, and then I got in this big debate with Kai Klips about incels again, and that took like three—you know, the rental car thing was over really actually very early in the evening, but then I got on this call, and I got all upset, and we were debating, and I was on the call for like three hours, and I forgot I was doing a show.
Then I was like, oh, I got to go.
And then I would mess with my hair.
I was in the shower.
Anyway, so I was a little bit late.
You know, I had this rental car because I need a car to like go to work and stuff.
And, you know, my political work and everything.
We're hard at work making the most Christian-based, America-first political movement possible over here.
And we're making a lot of phone calls, making a lot of progress.
We're doing a lot over here.
So I have this rental car you know I need a rental car out here and I didn't I didn't know how long I was gonna use this particular one so I booked it for like a week or whatever and I wound up needing it for much longer and I just never like renewed it and I thought you could do that I thought you could just keep a rental car I rented this I had like a minivan for like a week and I just kept it And I wasn't sure what the rules are with that.
I've had a rental car and you return it like a few days late and they don't really care.
You just drop it off.
They charge you for the extra days.
So I'm thinking this isn't... I'm sure this is fine.
So I had it for like 10 days like late or something and they're texting me.
They're texting me every day like You need to bring the car back.
It's overdue.
You need to upgrade your contract.
Call this number.
And I called the number, and it gives me this menu.
It didn't have any of the options I apparently was looking for.
So I just hung up.
I tried calling again.
I went to the operator.
Nobody picked up.
I said, okay, whatever.
I guess they don't want it that bad.
I guess they don't want it back that bad.
unidentified
I'm calling, you know, they're texting me, bring back our car, bring back our car.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
And I'm calling them and they don't pick up.
I'm like, well, you must not want the car back that much because here I am.
I'm calling.
I'm calling the number.
Nobody's picking up.
You must not want the car.
I'll hang on to it.
So today I wake up and I get this text and they're like, your car is more than six days late.
We have no choice but to report the vehicle stolen to the police.
And I was like, oh shit!
I was like, what?
So, at first I kind of freaked out, and don't judge me yet.
I get this text.
I wasn't planning on driving to the airport in rush hour traffic to return this stupid car, but I get this text in the middle of the day, and it says, you have not returned the car.
It is over six days late.
We will have to initiate a stolen vehicle report to the police.
And I'm like, come on, man, don't be like that.
So I call.
I wait for the operator.
I say, hey, I got this text.
It says you're going to report the vehicle stolen.
What's going on with that?
And the guy goes, oh, well, it's not six days past due, right?
Like, that's a mistake, right?
I said, no, it's like 10 days late.
He's like, oh, yeah, you got to bring it back.
I'm like, Really?
Like, back to the airport?
I said, can't I just... can't I just, like, pay you over the phone?
He's like, no, no, you gotta bring it back.
I'm like, isn't there a location closer by me?
I'm, like, not really near the airport.
He's like, no, no, you gotta... I'm like, alright, alright.
He's like, we close at 8.
I'm like, okay.
So I, you know, I brush my teeth, I get dressed, and I'm starving, I haven't eaten yet, get in the stupid minivan, hit the road, I hit traffic, I'm in traffic for hours, I'm falling asleep at the wheel, I'm like veering into other lanes, people are honking at me, I open the window, I'm flipping people off, I try to cut somebody off, he won't let me, I flip him off, you know, I'm like half asleep, I get to the place,
And I pull in, and you know what I realized?
The more I was thinking about it, I'm like, I should have held on to it for another week.
Because they're not, they didn't initiate, they're not going to report the vehicle stolen.
That was a scare, that's a scare tactic.
That is something that they do, I'm sure, for idiots like me.
You know, or like minorities, or like stupid kids, or women, where they say, it's like, you know how they do this?
I hate this.
At night, there'll be these, police will set up these machines that That flash like a red and blue light it looks like a police siren and it's not a real cop car but it looks like it when you're like driving down the highway or in the city and it's supposed to trick you into thinking there's a cop there so you slow down and then you drive past and it's just like a little machine and you're like you stupid fucking pig you know like that's not a cop car you tricked me you make me think there's a cop car to get me to slow down
Anyway, so I'm driving there and I'm getting angrier and angrier.
I'm like, you know what?
I shouldn't return this car at all.
I should go and get dinner and drive it all the way back and come back when I feel like it.
Because I was gonna... I had it on my to-do list.
I'm like, I gotta bring this car back eventually.
But then they do this scare tactic thing.
They're like, we're gonna initiate... You're not initiating anything.
You just want to scare me.
So I think, uh-oh, like the cops are gonna get me.
I'm gonna get the manager.
You're not getting them.
You're not calling the cops.
I'm calling your bluff You know so I got I was a little bit upset with myself I'm like you idiot you jumped in the car you raced over here like a like a goof and Like they're gonna call the cops.
They're not gonna call.
Maybe if I had held on to it for another week or something.
They just do that to scare you.
They just do that so you, like I did, like you panic.
Jump in the car.
I hope the cops don't get me.
I'm gonna hold on to it for another week.
So I was getting mad and it's like, at that point it's a principle of the matter.
It's not like I didn't want to return it.
It's like, are you gonna bitch me out?
Like did I just get...
It'd be one thing if I was returning it anyway and they happen to send this to me and it's like, well, I was gonna bring the car back anyway.
But now it's like, you know, I wanted to bring the car back, but now you're gonna trick me?
Now you're gonna, like, trick me?
You're gonna try and scare me?
You can't scare me.
So, you know, I brought it in anyway.
It's like I drove all the way out.
By the time... I was getting angrier and angrier, but by the time I got there, I was like, you know what, I'll just... I don't want to drive all the way back out here.
So I just dumped it off.
unidentified
But, uh... It was just stupid.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
That was just... I don't like that.
I don't like... I don't like that people feel the need to do that.
I mean, I guess I should have brought it back on time.
But also, you know, I'm a really busy guy.
What do people need that for?
So they could go to the beach?
I'm out here kind of, like, running a pretty serious operation, so... You know, I needed it for an extra week.
Anyway... So, it was this whole ordeal.
I had to drive all the way there, drive all the way back.
Then I got in this whole debate.
But now I'm here.
Now I'm back doing the show.
I also didn't do a show Friday.
I had to see Puss in Boots 2.
Excellent movie, by the way.
Highly recommend.
I don't usually watch animated movies, but I was seeing all the clips on TikTok and it looked really good.
So I went and saw that.
That's why I couldn't do the show.
I know you understand.
It was totally worth it.
Don't regret it.
And so I saw that.
Didn't do the show.
And now it's Monday.
So that's just to catch you up to speed.
Just to bring you up to speed a little bit.
Saw I baked Alaska over the weekend.
Anyway.
So that was my weekend.
Hope you guys had a good weekend.
But I'm back now, and we're doing it.
We're doing the show.
I'll probably be back tomorrow at my usual time.
I may not be doing a show Wednesday.
But I will let you know.
But I'll be here the rest of the week, just maybe not Wednesday.
I gotta do something at night.
So... I'll let you know on Telegram about Wednesday if I'm doing a show or not.
But every other night I'm gonna try and do it at 9 o'clock Central, 10 o'clock Eastern.
But today just was totally effed up because of this rental car bluff.
unidentified
This rental car hoax.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
They're trying to scare me.
Yeah, you know, we're gonna call the cops.
Oh, really?
unidentified
You're not gonna do anything.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I brought it back, like an idiot.
Then I rented another... Then I just walked across the street, rented another car.
I'm like, I'm not gonna give you more business and try to scam me.
Not really, just try to scare me, but... Anyway.
How's my hair?
I, you know, I never like to... I'm always, like, late because I start the stream and then my... I don't like how my hair looks.
I just gotta find something to do with it.
I just don't even know what to do with it anymore.
I don't know how to style it.
I don't even know what I'm going for.
I just want to get rid of it, honestly.
It's just too much of a hassle.
You know?
I don't even know what I'm expecting it to do anymore.
I just want it to look TikTok cute.
You know?
Should I just wear a hat?
Hide my ugly hair?
like this.
Because I'm just not happy with it.
unidentified
I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I just wish I looked good all the time.
I wish that was my superpower.
Like, I was just photogenic and I could just go on the camera and look awesome.
But I feel like every time I go on camera I look like shit.
That's what I like to do on Twitter Space.
Don't look at me.
Anyway.
Alright.
But let's, uh... Let's get into the show.
Let's dive in here.
How do I look now?
Now, does this look okay?
Sean McCrossin says, "Literally look perfect." Thanks.
Thanks guys.
Cute ass nigga says Anne Frankenstein.
Thanks.
You look great.
unidentified
Thanks.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
This nigga cute.
unidentified
Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
You know I needed that.
I needed that.
I needed a little boost.
unidentified
What about like this?
How's that?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
All right.
unidentified
Let's see.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
So our first story, I want to talk about Charlie Kirk and this article from College Dissident.
Now, in fairness, okay, Daniel Schmidt, he puts on, and I like the guy, okay?
He's doing a great job.
But he's on Twitter and he's like, bombshell!
This is gonna ruin Charlie Kirk's career!
I hope everyone enjoys the choices they made, you know, blah blah blah!
And I'm like, oh boy, what's this bombshell gonna be?
And then the article comes out and it's like, what, Charlie Kirk's a Jewish shill?
We knew that.
We already knew that.
Everyone knows that.
Everyone already knows.
He's always been a Jewish shill.
It's not anything he didn't say last year, the year before that, the year before that, and the year before that.
Like, we already knew that!
Bombshell!
Charlie Kirk serves the Jews.
No way!
unidentified
What?
Shocked.
I'm absolutely shocked.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I can't believe this new information.
Indian Groyper says that's a based way to hype it up.
Hey, I can't, I don't hate.
I'm not hating on it.
unidentified
He's like, Bob Shaw, whoa, you're never gonna believe this.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Everybody's like, really?
Uh, so yeah, no, I respect it, but I was just, I was kind of like, oh, well, yeah, we knew that.
But anyway, so this is the article.
I'll read it to you guys and I'll comment on it.
It says, um, this is from December.
It says in one audio excerpt, Charlie Kirk, an evangelical Protestant, tells the audience, quote, And I will stand by that statement.
If you are a Christian that doesn't love Israel, then you take your Bible way, way, way too much for granted.
What does he even mean by that?
What does that mean you take your Bible for granted?
Does that mean you don't believe that the Bible is inspired Word of God?
What does that even mean?
I will stand by that statement.
If you are a Christian that doesn't love Israel, then you take your Bible too much for granted.
Like, I don't even know what that means.
I think...
I think what he means is that you don't really believe in the Bible, which is insane.
That is an insane thing to say.
The Bible is the Old Testament and the New Testament, just so everybody's clear.
And the reason I say that is because the New Testament means that the real Israel is the people that believe in Jesus Christ.
There is the biblical Israel, which is the descendants of Abraham.
And then there is, and that's the Old Covenant, the original covenant, of which there were several that God made with Noah, and with Abraham, and with Moses, and with others.
But that is the original, that is the Old Testament, or the Old Covenant.
And what makes us Christian, and what makes the Bible the Bible, is the existence of a new covenant.
A parallel covenant that God makes with humankind through Jesus Christ, where there is a new everything.
There is a new temple, there is a new sacrifice, there is a new Israel, there is a new everything.
And it doesn't mean, as he said, that he came to get rid of the old covenant and the old law, but he came to fulfill it.
And that is, there's a meaningful, it changed in a meaningful way as a result of that.
That's sort of what the New Testament is about.
is about the creation of a new religion, which is not Judaism, which is not the Talmudic But a true Christian religion for Jews and Gentiles, for everybody, and it's a new Israel.
So, point being, when he says that if you don't support this Jewish, rabbinical Jewish state in Palestine, which really has nothing to do with us.
I mean, the land has nothing to do with us.
And when I say the land, I mean, we don't have a religion like the Muslims, where the land has some Salience for our salvation.
We don't have to go to Palestine to be saved.
Nothing about that land is bound up in our salvation.
Other than that, it of course has theological and historical significance because that is where Jesus Christ lived and that's where the events of the Bible took place.
But unlike these apocalyptic Jews or Muslims or other religions, our salvation isn't dependent on a geographical place.
Uh, because our religion is about the next life and the higher world, not what's going on over in some desert in Palestine.
That even has anything to do with Christians.
And what's more, forget even for a moment about that plot of land, but that this Jewish state, which is really Jewish in name only, I mean of course it is Jewish, but specifically it is run by rabbinical Talmudic Jews.
Not like what we're talking about in the Old Testament, but what we're talking about in the Mishnah and the Talmud.
Something that's completely different and has nothing to do with Jesus Christ.
So why exactly would that negate our sincere faith that the Bible is inspired by God if we don't support this Jewish, this Zionist occupation government in Palestine?
You know, it's just a ridiculous statement.
And it's a ridiculous statement for any Christian to make.
The article goes on it says in another excerpt Kirk emphasizes the need for American churches to support the modern state of Israel.
He said, quote, I think that, you know, American Christians, of which I speak to churches all the time, need to continue to support Israel and the Jewish people.
Additionally, Kirk expressed remarks that contradict fundamental Christian doctrine and Jewish teaching.
Kirk called Jews the chosen people who are, quote, chosen to bring the word of God to as many people as possible.
He said, quote, You're chosen to obey God, to honor God, but you happen to be the messenger, the community, the nation, the people that God saw fit to bring his divine and transcendent commands, he told his Jewish audience.
The article says, While many Christians believed that the Jewish people had a covenant with God, the resurrection of Jesus Christ, according to all denominations of Christianity, became the universal covenant offered to Jews and non-Jews.
So, the idea that Jews are bringing the Word of God, it's not true.
How could they?
If rabbinical Jews don't believe in Jesus Christ, how could they bring the Word of God to anybody?
They're not doing that.
That's sort of the whole point.
The Word of God is the Gospel.
The Word of God is the Bible.
The Word of God are the words that God actually spoke when he became man.
How could a Jew bring the Word of God to anybody when they don't even believe in God?
They don't even believe in Jesus Christ.
It doesn't make any sense.
That's not a Christian belief.
And so he goes on, he says, the nation of Israel acts exactly how we act.
Even though in 2019 he asserted how America is a placeholder for timeless ideas, but Israel would be an exception to that.
So, nothing in this article is new, actually, like I said, but I know that a couple years ago, there was a span of time, I want to say in 2021 and 2022, when Charlie Kirk started to say some things about white people and how white people are being discriminated against and how mass immigration is having an effect on the demographics of America.
And and these like sort of just really throw away remarks It's one thing to make a passing remark on your podcast like one time It's another thing to actually assert.
Hey, this is what's going on and that that's a whole worldview to say that there are Races and that the demographics matter That's a whole worldview to make a passing remark on your show that there will be more non-white people than white people Yeah, that's just an observation.
Everybody can see that.
Everybody knows that on some level.
And even the left talks about it.
So there was a time when people thought that the center or the mainstream, guys like Charlie Kirk and Matt Walsh and Michael Knowles and others, were moving towards us or they were replacing us or they were eliminating the need for us because they were saying the things we were.
And I have always been very skeptical of that because As I said, the things that we say are becoming popular and unignorable when it comes to Jewish power or black crime or mass immigration or white genocide.
Whatever you want to say, everything that we have said for years is coming to pass and is no longer ignorable.
And the people know that and the The people that talk to them know that as well.
The podcasters, the pundits, personalities, they know that too.
It is very easy to tell people what they want to hear.
That is what politics is.
It's a balancing act, and this is how it typically, it's not how it should work, but this is how it works.
Particularly with Republicans.
Republicans have always done this.
They have always told the voters what they want to hear, selectively.
Never more, never more than is necessary, but they'll tell their constituents the bare minimum of what people need to hear to keep believing and keep voting and keep giving money.
The bare minimum.
And that's one part of the Balancing Act.
And the other part of the Balancing Act is not actually believing what the people believe, and then working against their interest every day once you're elected.
And the perfect example is, like, Donald Trump.
Who, I love Donald Trump, but he was world-class at this.
Do you remember in 2018, some of you guys are too young.
Which is, some might find that to be a ridiculous thing to say, but a lot of the people to watch my show are in high school.
So some of you are too young to remember.
But in 2018, I remember a month before the midterm elections, Trump put the National Guard on the southern border.
And he went to a rally and said, I'm a nationalist.
I think I'm going to start saying that it's not a bad thing.
I'm a nationalist.
And I remember being like, Trump's back!
It's the old Trump.
It's just like it used to be.
He's saying he's a nationalist, and he's militarizing the border.
This is the best thing ever.
And you know what happened?
We got murdered in the midterms.
Like, we got slaughtered.
We lost the House.
We barely hung onto the Senate.
And we lost, like, critical races, too.
We lost, like, in Montana, which we should have won.
And then within a month, National Guard went home from the border, government shutdown ended, no money for a border wall, never heard nationalist ever again.
And it's like, that's just what they do.
And Trump is not, and I don't like using Trump as an example because he is, he's probably better than all of them.
He's better than almost anybody in Republican politics, even though he's done it.
But he's just, that's just a perfect example.
And Republicans have always done this.
They did this to the Tea Party.
They did this with the Buchanan Brigades.
They did this with Trump.
Are people just really stupid or forgetful?
They always do this.
They always tell you what you want to hear, just as much of what you want to hear as you need to keep buying in, to keep believing in the process.
So that they can rug pull you again and again.
And this is exactly what Charlie Kirk does.
Two years ago, once again, it's so easy to make one of these passing remarks about white people, and you get all the people that just needed to hear that from him go, Maybe he really is one of us.
Maybe he really is.
unidentified
Wow.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
He had a sincere change of heart.
No, we never heard that ever.
When's the last time Charlie Kirk said anything like that?
Few and far between.
You know, it is consistent and constant, the steady drumbeat of working for the Jewish interest, working, being a liberal, being a total liberal, supporting the status quo, being in bed with the worst people ever, doing all kinds of corrupt stuff with silent partners and scammers and that kind of thing.
It's what they do.
Is anybody surprised by this?
Well, nobody should be.
I'm not.
And here's the thing.
This is scandalous.
This is just not correct, and I'm not nitpicking here.
To go in front of people that don't believe in Jesus Christ and say, you're the chosen people to spread the Word of God, and if you don't support this satanic country in the Middle East, you don't believe in the Bible, that's not purity spiraling to say, you can't say that.
You can't say that.
Now, because there is this question where people say, well, how much is too much when it comes to building a coalition, building a Big Ten movement?
You know, there's room for discretion and tact and being strategic and there's a time and a place to say everything.
There is no time and no place to say these things because these things are deeply offensive to anybody that is a serious Christian.
And what do I mean by serious Christian?
I don't mean LARPing.
I don't mean you're, like, making a big show of your prayer life, or it really matters to you that it's super-duper trad or whatever.
I mean, if you really care about the crucifixion, if what it means to be a serious Christian is to take seriously, That it's just about Christ and the cross?
That's what it's about?
We're not Gnostics.
We don't believe in archetypes.
We don't believe in feel-good.
It's about Christ on the cross.
A real God.
And He really became man.
And He really went up on the cross.
And that is the sacrifice that is represented every Sunday.
It's the most important thing that happens in the world.
If you take that seriously, you can't say things like this.
You can't say things like this anywhere because it's not true, and it's a lie, and it's basically heretical.
So you can't say it for political expediency.
You can't say it to gain brownie points.
You know, there are things that you can say for those reasons.
If you want to go out there and say, you know, maybe I want to compromise on Health care.
I want to compromise on tax policy.
Okay, fair enough.
If you don't want to say that race and IQ is a real thing, I could understand why you would think that's not a tactful thing to say.
You can't go out and say you don't believe in the Bible if you don't support the rabbinical Talmudic Jewish Zionist state in Palestine, and the Jews, the current Jews are the chosen people, and Christians need to support the Jews.
And again, precisely saying you don't believe in the Bible if you don't support Israel, and this stuff about Jews are these messants, like, it just isn't true.
But these are the things that'll, this is the only thing that'll never go back on, and here's what I want people to think about.
We're, we're Christian, okay?
We're Christian, we're American, we're white, you know, or some of you are black or Hispanic or Asian or whatever, And when Charlie Kirk disses us by saying these things or other things, a lot of people are willing to say, well, this is what we have to work with.
But you know that never in a million years would Charlie Kirk ever make it ambiguous that he supports the Jews.
And so it's this battered wife, Stockholm Syndrome that we have.
The Jews would never!
I mean, you know how they are.
You know how sensitive and touchy they are about these things.
Charlie Kirk has to go before this audience and say, Hitler is bottom of the barrel!
Worst thing that a person could ever do!
Blah, blah, blah!
Like, now we know that that's, like, performative.
We know that that's like a very performative empathy or sympathy.
Does anybody really get charged up about like Hitler?
Yeah, yeah, we all get it.
Hitler was bad, whatever.
But he's got to go there and make it clear without a shadow of a doubt that like he is in their pocket.
Like I'm your guy and I'm always going to support you.
And I hate anyone that's against you.
And everyone needs to support you.
And if you don't support you, you're not a real Christian.
And he's just going to tell them everything.
He is going to reassure them.
He is going to leave no room for doubt.
He is with them.
But nobody does that for us.
Nobody does that for the base.
Does anybody do that for white people?
Does anybody do that for Catholics?
Does anybody do that for Christians?
We settle for breadcrumbs.
Breadcrumbs fall off of the table at Fox News, or at Blaze, or at Daily Wire.
And you, not you guys, but there are a lot of Catholics, or America Firsters, or white guys, or white separatists, white nationalist types, who are gonna scurry under the table and eat up the crumbs gratefully.
Meanwhile, the Jews are at the table having a feast.
You know, and all kinds of other groups, too, are at the table, and Charlie Kirk is serving up a feast.
And that's just like an analogy.
Charlie Kirk's not the only one.
They all do that.
And it's just outrageous.
And I'm made to feel like the bad guy for demanding more.
I'm made to feel like, hey, it's totally unreasonable for you to expect Better from the leadership.
It's totally, when I go out there and say, we don't want McCarthy, and people go, or I say, we don't want Loeffler and Perdue.
We don't want McConnell.
We don't want Ronald McDaniel.
Like, we don't, I don't like Tucker Carlson's show when he's shilling for war with China.
Like, I don't like that.
I don't like when he goes out there and says, we support gay marriage.
We don't.
And then people antagonize me and they say, Well, you're purity spiraling.
That's not reasonable.
That's not going to happen.
That's not practical.
Why can't it happen?
Why can't that be practical?
Why can't we demand that?
Because they're not going to leave any room for doubt that they stand with the state of Israel or whatever.
They stand with the Jewish people or they're totally race blind in favor of a colorblind meritocracy.
We're selling ourselves short and we're we're not asking for enough and when you see this stuff from Charlie Kirk, it's like It's the same as it always has been nothing has ever changed and people Think they're and this has been a little debate in our circles, you know it's no secret that there were some people that have betrayed me or were unhappy or whatever and you know what they all have in common is none of them none of them like
Leave America first or backstab me and then keep doing what they're doing.
They all throw me under the bus and then stop saying stuff about Jews or stop saying other stuff.
And I'll give you a per- the reason I bring this up today is I saw this tweet from Jake Lloyd.
Where, I forget what the original tweet was, but it was, I think it was like Dave Rubin, Michael Malice, Blair White, someone else, we're all in a picture.
And Jake Lloyd, who used to be with us, he used to be a friend of mine, he used to be in America First, he quote tweeted that, I think today or yesterday, and said, oh these are all radical leftists.
Right.
And somebody said, what's Michael Malice's deal?
What's he about?
And Jake Lloyd says, oh, he's an atheist libertarian.
Michael Malice is a Jew.
Michael Malice is an atheist Jewish libertarian.
And if you've been around the block, you know that, of course, like, it just goes with the territory.
Atheist libertarians are very frequently Jewish, like the most ideological, the most hardcore.
That's a very, because Jews are very extreme ideologically and often very secular.
There's a lot of Jewish communists.
There's a lot of atheist Jewish libertarians.
And look at the libertarian movement.
It's literally full of them.
It's like, it's just one of those things.
They're all over.
Michael Malice, very famously, after Ye and I went on Tim Pool a month ago, or a month and a half ago, we went on that show I think on a Tuesday.
The following day, Michael Malice went on the show with the Star of David armband as like a show of Defiance against the yay phenomenon.
Michael Malice, the Jewish, I think he's gay too, Jewish gay libertarian atheist, comes on the show the next day with a Star of David armband to diss so-called anti-Semites.
And so now, so that's, like, this is, like, I'm not purity spiraling here.
So Jake Lloyd, who used to be a friend of mine and was at AFPAC and everything, AFPAC One, He goes and runs for the hills after January 6th to try and get a job in Normie Politics.
He works for the Don Huffine's campaign for governor in Texas.
And he got that job.
Someone gave him that job thinking he was with me.
Did that as a favor to me.
He wasn't a friend of mine at that point.
Jake Lloyd wasn't.
So he goes running for the hills after January 6th.
He wants to get a job in Normie Politics.
He wants stability so he can find his girl and get married and all this.
And then later on, you know, a year later, he makes all these complaints like, well, I, you know, I stopped being friends with Nick because it was a cult of personality.
I stopped being friends with Nick because, uh, you know, it was too centered on his personality and then he's too Catholic because he's Protestant and all this kind of stuff.
But then I see his timeline today and he says, Michael Malice is a radical leftist.
What's his deal?
Oh, he's an atheist libertarian.
And somebody replies to Jake Lloyd's tweet and says, well, isn't he something else?
And Jake replies with a sweating smiley emoji like, heh heh heh.
Uh, I don't know.
That's like why you can't say he's Jewish.
So let me get this straight.
You know, lately there's all these critics of me.
Guys like John Doyle and Jake Lloyd and Matt Kipton.
And by the way, these are all like, just dirtbag traitors.
And they all have these critiques of me like, oh, you know, Nick's like, we don't like his personality, or we don't like the way something went down, or this, this, that, and the other.
Every single one of them, down to a person, will not talk about Jews, will not talk about race in a particular way, or all these kinds of issues.
And like today, that's like such a perfect example.
And so, Once again, it gets back to, there are people that are going to be immovable and just say, like, this is what's going on.
This is the truth.
And then there are people, for various reasons, who are going to make compromises.
on the truth, which we all, again, it's not like I'm making this demand, like saying, no true Scotsman, you're not a real right winger.
It's like you have Christians going out there and they're not talking about like the number one thing that's going on, which is the Jews, which are kind of like an antagonist in the New Testament and have been an antagonist throughout Christian history.
They have been ascendant in the last three centuries and taken over everything.
And they're like a big part.
They're authoring a lot of these issues, like the porn industry, Hollywood, whatever you want to say, usury, the news media.
It's all like you can call it whatever you want at the end of the day, but that's what it is.
unidentified
Yes.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Ye proved that.
It was a demonstration.
He proved that.
And then you could just do the research and you could look at that guy from Tech Tips or that guy that Keith Woods had on the other day, all the guests on Joe Rogan, this Lex Fridman deal, Daily Wire.
It's like, it's such a prominent and important thing that if you're a Christian, you need to be aware of and talking about.
And at the minimum, not attacking people that are talking about it.
And then you get this whole conservative movement that seems to be built around silencing that.
And to the extent that people are pulled away from this, like they're, they're, it's not like it's because that's some kind of like, like this is so effective, like Charlie Kirk is going to make life in America better for us and like save America by running cover for the state of Israel.
But because that's where the system is.
That's where the money is.
That's where the careers are.
And, you know, never forget that this is stuff that matters.
This is not like a purity spiral to say that nobody should be a part of a movement.
That is at the minimum.
I mean, again, you don't need to be in a movement necessarily.
It's built it.
You don't need to go to work and tell everybody about this, but I don't know how anybody could go back the other way and support something where they're heretical.
I don't know how many could go back the other way and say, I'm willing to compromise, like, my faith.
I'm willing to go out there and compromise and support people that are going out there and saying that you don't believe in the Bible if you don't support the State of Israel.
That is just messed up.
And we expect that from the older generations who don't know any better.
We expect that from people in politics who have so much to lose and convince themselves it's necessary.
I do not expect that from young people who do not have a future because of this dynamic.
And there are really no other options.
Like, we don't have a good future ahead of us.
And young people are convincing themselves that we just need to be heretical, join up with the establishment, do what's been done for the last however many generations in order to not lose what exactly?
I just don't get it.
You know, I see this and I do not see the same team.
We gotta work with Turning Point to defeat the other adversary.
It's like, well, they're working with Israel.
Who's this other adversary?
Who's this other adversary we're fighting?
We need to focus our firepower on the left.
It's like, dude, Tucker Carlson is advocating for gay marriage and war with China.
Charlie Kirk says you don't believe in the Bible if you don't support Israel.
What do you mean direct our fire against the left?
These people are all liberal.
These people are all heretical.
And I'm not trying to purity spiral, but it's like, can we just ask for something very basic?
Which is, can we just have like a true Christian movement?
Or is everything supposed to be just infiltrated by Jews and atheists?
Because that's what it seems like.
It seems like every institution from Hollywood to the Ivy League's universities to the investment firms and the hedge funds, the government, it's like does it all have, does there have to be a Kushner in everything?
Can't there be one thing that's Christians?
Is that too much to ask?
Apparently.
So anyway.
That's a Charlie Kirk article, but not a big surprise there.
I mean, we knew that.
We've known that for a long time.
Anyway, so that, and I'll tell you one of these days, I'll tell you an even more wild story about some of the personal stuff.
And I said this on Telegram the other day, and maybe this is gonna sound crazy and unhinged, but there's definitely, like, something going on.
Because lately, there's been, like, an organized antagonism against me, and against America First, and against Ye, and everything we have going on.
And it's all coming from people that are connected to Israel.
And it's also coming from people that won't talk about Jewish power.
Which is, like, extremely suspicious to me.
You know?
Like the whole APU thing and John Doyle.
Very bizarre.
You know, because all these guys were literally at my conference and eating off my plate and they're all like anti-Semitic.
They all are.
But then, out of the blue, all of a sudden, they all decide we're not going to talk about Jews and We're gonna join up with like Turning Point and DeSantis and Tikvah Fund and all this and we're gonna decide that Nick Fuentes is no good even though I was like you know they're all eating out of the palm of my hand and it's it's not even like there's like some popular thing it's like just a handful of guys who really want a career in politics just decided because it's not like there was some popular
Like, there's some civil war going on.
Like, there's never been any, like, large-scale resistance to what I've been saying.
Like, I've been doing the same thing for years, and people kind of know that at this point.
And, um...
And there were these guys like Carson Wolfe and Matt Kipta and Vince Dow and John Doyle and and others and they all kind of like and Patrick Casey and they all have these very weird connections like Patrick Casey talking to the January 6th committee and having the Charlottesville lawsuit mysteriously dropped around him and he was at the Capitol but never got charged
And you have Matt Kipta who was there with me at the Capitol also but and was in the visitor logs at the White House but never got investigated and he threw me under the bus he knew I was under FBI investigation before I did and now Patrick Casey's best buddies with
The Peter Thiel crowd, and with the Chronicle magazine getting promoted by these types, and APU is at, what do you call it, this National Conservatism Conference run by Yoram Hazony, who's a dual citizen, and he's in bed with DeSantis and the Tikvah Fund and all the, you know, so it's like, now maybe that's a little schizophrenic, but it's very bizarre that all these people, all these, like, youngsters,
They're either like, have these weird connections with Feds, or they're these guys who are really trying to get traction and want to occur in politics, who threw me under the bus to work with these other types.
It seems like there's this very organized thing coming together that's like, well, we're America first without Nick Fuentes.
We're America first without, even like Scott.
Like, and I like Scott.
Scott Greer I'm talking about.
I like Scott.
He's a friend of mine.
We're on good terms and everything.
But even him the other day, he puts out a tweet and he said, I don't know why everybody insists on calling it ZOG.
Zionist Occupied Government.
I don't know why everybody spurgs out when you call it the Globalist American Empire instead of Zionist Occupied Government.
Because to call it Zionist Occupied Government is ghettoizing.
And not even true.
unidentified
And it's like, What?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
It's not true that our government's occupied by Zionists?
That's not true- you don't think that's true?
It's obviously true!
Of course it's- DHS, State Department, FBI, DOJ are all occupied.
To say it's not true and like say it's ghettoizing?
You think it's get- what do you mean ghettoizing?
So are we supposed to support war with China and, like, gay marriage?
Is that not ghettoizing?
Like, we can't call it Zog?
To talk about these issues is!
It's not ghettoizing, it's polarizing, sure.
I mean, to say a Muslim ban, you don't think that was ghettoizing or something?
Like... So I saw that tweet the other day, and Darren Beattie retweeted it, and I like Darren.
So I like both of them, but I was just kind of like, hmm, that's a little weird.
Little bit weird.
Little bit bizarre.
And that's not an attack.
Because like I said, I like Scott.
I've been friends with him for years.
I've been friends with him.
He was one of the first guys I met in DC in September 2017.
So I've been friends with this guy for like more than five years.
And You know, and I'm not trying to diss him when I say that, but obviously I disagree.
I don't like the GAE thing.
I don't like when people call it Globalist American Empire.
Because I think that it's just like calling it, you might as well say World Economic Forum.
How is it really that different?
Globalist American Empire, World Economic Forum, like, I did a whole show about it last week, how people blame Klaus Schwab when it's, we have to talk about who's really doing it.
And how is that any different to say, no, no, don't call it Zionist, call it just like Globalist American Empire.
Don't call it Zionist Occupied Government.
Call it something else.
Don't call it that.
Call it Globalist Empire.
Really?
So I disagree.
I mean, I like them, but I disagree with that.
I think we should call it, I think we should call out the Zionists.
I think we should call out the Jews.
I think we should call all of that out, obviously.
And I don't know why he would go out of his way to tell people not to... I mean, maybe he disagrees, but I don't know why he'd go out of his way to say, no, don't call it that.
And he's also friends with Patrick, and Patrick was really tight with Kipta.
And they all live in DC, by the way.
You know, Patrick lives in Arlington, Kipta lives in Navy Yard, or did at one point.
Scott, I don't want to dox him, but he's in that area.
It's like, okay, so you got all these guys who live in Northern Virginia, And they're all part of like the Dissident Movement or whatever for years and... Just all these weird... none of them... You know, they're all like maybe WN, but they're not like talking about Jews.
It's like... That's not suspicious.
And then they're all up with like Hazoni and... DeSantis and this kind of stuff.
Like... I don't know, man.
All I can tell you is this.
All I can tell you is this.
I'm independent, and I'm America first, and I'm...
Just, you know, for better or for worse, whatever people might want to say about me, I'm just Nick Fuentes.
You know, some people hate me for that, and some people say, I hate Nick Fuentes.
He needs to be more, like, turning point, or he needs to be more whatever, you know.
Some people hate me for that, the lack of professionalism, the impulsiveness or something.
They, you know, they hate me for some of my Nick Fuentes attributes.
Some people love me for my Nick Fuentes attributes.
They're like, that's Nick Fuentes.
He's authentic and charismatic and this and that.
So whether you hate me for that or love me for that, here I am on my laptop in LA doing work for Ye, who went on InfoWars with the mask on saying he loved Hitler.
For better or for worse, what you see is what you get.
It is what it is.
And clearly, it's two people that cannot help themselves, cannot prevent themselves,
From saying what's on their mind, which is a far cry from people who are kind of like concealing things and work and we don't know how they get paid and they're like in DC and all this weird stuff and they have these schemes and these plans and they're clever and they're Straussians or you know whatever and so whenever whenever the claws come out there's like this concerted campaign to take me out And it's coming from these people that will not talk about Jewish power.
It's like, it's more than conspicuous.
So anyway.
And the Charlie Kurt thing is proof of that.
You know.
Anyway, so that's that.
But I want to move on.
I want to get into this Crowder thing.
And it's a little bit more of the same here.
You know, on Thursday I talked about this big beef between Crowder and Shapiro.
And initially I took the side of Crowder And I said that I was so happy he was doing this and that, you know, even though he's talked trash about me, I support what he's saying and I support what he's doing.
But I kind of changed my mind completely today because I saw him on Tim Pool.
He was on Tim Pool this evening and he kept going out of his way I'll set up the background in a minute.
But throughout the interview, he keeps going out of his way to say, I'm not a controlled opposition anti-Semite.
I love Ben Shapiro, but I just don't like his business model.
And just to set up the background, Steven Crowder was at Blaze.
His contract didn't get renewed for some reason.
And he was a free agent for a while, and Daily Wire gave him an offer.
And the offer, which people are debating about the details, but this is Crowder's contention.
The offer said something like, if you get censored on Big Tech, we will cut your pay.
And Steven Crowder says, well, this model makes Daily Wire dependent on big tech.
And he said that that is really unfair and hypocritical.
How could you fight big tech, but your business is dependent on big tech?
Like, to put it succinctly, that's really the message.
Daily Wire is going to penalize its creators on behalf of Big Tech, effectively.
▲
Export Selection