Jan. 18, 2023 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:38:38
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
It's going to be only America first! | |
| America first! | ||
| The American people will come first. | ||
| One. | ||
|
unidentified
|
From this day forward, it's going to be only America first. | |
| America. America. First. | ||
|
unidentified
|
America. America. America. America. America. America. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| Good evening, everybody. | ||
| You are watching America First. | ||
| My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes. | ||
| We have a great show for you tonight. | ||
| Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Tuesday. | ||
| We have a lot to talk about tonight. | ||
| Lots to get into. | ||
| Big show. | ||
| Big news. | ||
| What do you think about the hoodie, by the way? | ||
| I'm wearing my Donda Dove hoodie. | ||
| Check out the back. | ||
| Can you see the hair? | ||
| What do you think? | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're in the Don to Dove hoodie. | |
| I got the, you know, my hair was kind of not good today, so I put the hood up. | ||
| I kind of like how the hood looks. | ||
| What do you think? | ||
| I kind of like how it frames my face. | ||
| I think it makes me look more angular. | ||
| What do you think? | ||
| I'm really feeling myself in the hoodie. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| What do you think? | ||
| Let's get a one for hood, two for no hood. | ||
| Let me know what you think. | ||
| One for hood, two no hood. | ||
| Everybody's doing the Anakin sticker. | ||
| What do you think? | ||
| I like how it frames my face. | ||
| It makes me look angular. | ||
| Right? | ||
| I'm checking myself out. | ||
| I was checking myself out before I went live. | ||
| What do you think? | ||
| Hood off. | ||
| Hood off. | ||
| Yeah, the hair is just not going to happen tonight. | ||
| Hood stays on. | ||
| Hood on. | ||
| Isn't it amazing? | ||
| One simple adjustment Changes the whole look. | ||
| Right? | ||
| I need to figure out what I'm going to do with my hair. | ||
| Also, this hoodie has this, so it doesn't really... You kind of have to have the hood on, otherwise it doesn't look right, I feel like. | ||
| Anyway, I also like the sleeves are big so you do this like, uh, like number 3 in Kids Next Door. | ||
| Remember? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Somebody says, 3 if Nick should start lifting weights! | |
| Never. | ||
| Never gonna happen. | ||
| Never gonna happen. | ||
| When you're handsome, you don't need to lift weights. | ||
| You just look good. | ||
| That's such like an ugly cope. | ||
| Ugly people are like, go to the gym! | ||
| When you're handsome, you just, you just be handsome. | ||
| Don't need to lift weights. | ||
| Anyway, ugly cope. | ||
| Ugly cope! | ||
| Going to the gym doesn't make you handsome. | ||
| Fuck you. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| All right. | ||
| Big show tonight. | ||
| Our featured story is about World Economic Forum, which is going on today. | ||
| Well, it's going on this week. | ||
| And, you know, I want to talk about it because this is like a big thing now. | ||
| Everybody talks about Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum and Davos. | ||
| And I debated Alex Jones on this back in December, and I want to make the point again. | ||
| The World Economic Forum doesn't have any power. | ||
| Do people realize that? | ||
| Do people even know what it is? | ||
| It's a forum. | ||
| So, the forum itself has no power. | ||
| It has some power. | ||
| They invest money, and they organize it and everything. | ||
| But the point is who goes to the forum, that's what matters. | ||
| It's like Bilderberg or the Trilateral Commission or the Illuminati, whatever, when people talk about these things. | ||
| It matters a lot less where they meet and what they call it, as much as who, whom, is doing the meeting, with whom, and for what purpose. | ||
| That's what matters. | ||
| And so that's what I want to talk about tonight. | ||
| It's going on right now in Davos, Switzerland, which is a ski resort. | ||
| And I believe they started a day or two ago, and there are already some headlines. | ||
| Henry Kissinger said that Ukraine should join NATO, which is kind of a big deal, and there was a little tiff with Elon Musk on Twitter. | ||
| I guess he wasn't invited, and he said that their agenda is satanic. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's so good. | |
| So there's been some headlines, but I want to talk about it from the perspective of Klaus Schwab and the WEMF. | ||
| doesn't matter. | ||
| It's another one of these massive diversions from what's actually going on. | ||
| You want to know where the real power is? | ||
| Look at what happened to Ye at the end of 2022 and what is ongoing? | ||
| It's not people talking about The New World Order, you know, the non-specific, generic, neutral, no ethnicity, no religion, no race, New World Order that's following the Georgia Guidestones. | ||
| No, it's other stuff. | ||
| So we'll talk about that. | ||
| We'll also be talking tonight about a new bill that was proposed in Congress today by Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, which will criminalize hate speech. | ||
| And it's not going to happen anytime soon. | ||
| soon but we are going in that direction can get worse I know people maybe don't think that are they're not expecting that but it absolutely can get worse and most likely it will get worse and it's going to get worse online and it's also going to get worse | ||
| Legally, in terms of the law, the government. | ||
| So we'll talk about the bill and all that, and it should be a pretty good show. | ||
| Kind of a slow week, though. | ||
| I got, I'm, you know, I'm back. | ||
| I'm back doing my show. | ||
| Like, everybody, everybody said, oh, we missed the show. | ||
| We miss you. | ||
| And I miss doing the show, but there's just, it feels like nothing going on anymore. | ||
| The whole 2022 is boring, except for the awesome war. | ||
| And even that got boring really quickly. | ||
| Other than that, it's been a slow year. | ||
| It's been a slow... Ever since the pandemic, things just stopped happening. | ||
| It was a Trump election, and the 4chan prophecy was coming true. | ||
| You know, it happens when the weather cools. | ||
| Brexit happened, and the Cubs won the World Series, and Trump won, and everything was going on, and then it seems like after the pandemic everything kind of... well, with the exception of George Floyd, and I guess January 6th, that was a big deal in the war. | ||
| But just, there's not enough! | ||
| We want more, we want more things to go on. | ||
| Anyway, boring week, kind of a slow news day, but that's okay. | ||
| But we're back, so that's what matters. | ||
| Before we get into the news, I want to remind you to smash the follow button. | ||
| Here on cozy to get a push notification whenever I go live follow me here on cozy also follow me on gab telegram true social links are down below and Just so you know, I'll I'm back. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I'm back doing the show I'm here in LA. | ||
| I'm still doing some political work as you know But I'm doing the show remotely. | ||
| I have no idea when I'll be back in the studio. | ||
| I Probably not until at least February. | ||
| Maybe later than that. | ||
| I have no idea. | ||
| So we'll see. | ||
| But that's what we're doing right now. | ||
| This week I'll be doing the show. | ||
| I'll be back next week most likely. | ||
| It's good to be back. | ||
| I have to say though, I said the other day on Friday, I'm just not used to it. | ||
| I like to be at home. | ||
| I like to be in my studio. | ||
| I'm a little autistic about that. | ||
| I need to be at my desk. | ||
| It's good to be back doing the show. | ||
| Last night, I thought it was kind of a banger show. | ||
| I haven't done this show in a long time, so I came back kind of hard and I was talking about Hitler and Hunter Biden. | ||
| And the show went over really well. | ||
| Right Wing Watch clipped it and they said, Nick Fuentes said, Hitler is awesome. | ||
| And that went semi-viral. | ||
| So it feels like I'm back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now I know I'm back. | |
| It's good to know that people are still watching. | ||
| But, nope! | ||
| Nope! | ||
| I come back doing the show, everybody's still watching, everybody's still clipping it up, and Right-Wing Watch, our groyper at Right-Wing Watch is still clipping the show, saying, you know, and they took me out of context. | ||
| You know, when I said, I'm not saying Hitler's a pedophile, I'm saying Alex Jones said that Hitler's a pedophile, I said, and that doesn't make him less cool. | ||
| That's all I said. | ||
| Because I don't know what, I mean they clipped it and they totally took it out of context. | ||
| Let me just pull it up real quick. | ||
| Let me see if I can grab it. | ||
| How can I find it quickly? | ||
| I'm just going to name search myself. | ||
| Let's see if I can find it. | ||
| Okay, here we go. | ||
| They said, Nick Fuentes is not even bothering to hide his adoration of Hitler these days. | ||
| Quote, Hitler was a pedophile and kind of a pagan. | ||
| It's like, well, he was also really fucking cool. | ||
| This guy's awesome. | ||
| This guy is cool. | ||
| And they totally took that out of context, okay? | ||
| If you want to know the full context, watch the full show. | ||
| I'm so sick of these five-second soundbites. | ||
| I'm so sick of this out-of-context you know they take a little thing like that out of context where I'm saying Hitler is awesome and cool and I don't care that he's a pedophile and they totally take it out of context and misrepresent the meaning you want to know what I meant by it watch the full show I'm a deep guy okay I'm deep I have deep opinions and I have | ||
| sophisticated understanding of the world you're not gonna get the full context with this little they take the quote they take a 60-second clip oh big deal okay Hitler was cool you can even if you hate him even if you don't like him you could still say he's cool Even Alex Jones said, oh, you like the uniforms. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because the uniforms were cool? | ||
| Yeah, a lot of it was cool. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| The stadium was cool. | ||
| The flag was cool. | ||
| The movie was cool when they made that movie. | ||
| It was really, it was all cool. | ||
| Well, it wasn't all cool. | ||
| It wasn't all cool. | ||
| There were some parts that were not cool. | ||
| You know, certainly there were aspects of it that were not cool, but a lot of it was cool. | ||
| And you can admit that whether you love it or not. | ||
| Just saying. | ||
| Anyway, so yeah, so I come back, I do the show on Monday, and everybody's already, everybody's clipping the show, they're loving it, they think it's hilarious. | ||
| They're totally understanding my meaning. | ||
| Anyway, I don't really have too much else to report. | ||
| Kind of a boring day over here. | ||
| It's kind of a boring day over here. | ||
| Oh, yeah. | ||
| That reminds me. | ||
| Thursday. | ||
| Big stream coming Thursday. | ||
| Really big things in store. | ||
| So true. | ||
| Thursday at about, I think it's going to be 10 a.m., My time Pacific Time I'll be doing a big collaboration out here in LA stay tuned for it. | ||
| I think you're really gonna love it Thursday morning I I don't know if I can say it yet because it's I I don't know if I can say it. | ||
| I believe it's confirmed, but I just don't want to throw it out there until I get the go-ahead. | ||
| Thursday, I mean, it's going to be a big stream. | ||
| Big things coming! | ||
| Big things coming! | ||
| This is my town, okay? | ||
|
unidentified
|
L.A. | |
| is my town. | ||
|
unidentified
|
L.A. | |
| is Hitler's town. | ||
| I'm... I'm Baby Hitler, and this is my town, bitch. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| L.A. | ||
| is my town. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is my world, alright? | |
| Alright? | ||
| I'm Baby Hitler, according to Alex Jones. | ||
| I don't... I don't call myself that. | ||
| I call myself... | ||
| Young Hitler, okay? | ||
| Well, I don't call myself either. | ||
| I call myself Nick. | ||
| Nick Fuentes. | ||
| But, you know, Alex Jones called me Baby Hitler during the break. | ||
| I said, hey man, I prefer Young Hitler. | ||
| If you're gonna call me that, call me Young Hitler. | ||
| Like, I'm not a baby. | ||
| But listen, alright? | ||
| This is LA. | ||
| This is my town. | ||
| Okay, go home. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is my town! | |
| I run this town, bitch! | ||
| This town is run by Lil Hitler, baby Hitler, young Hitler. | ||
| This is run by young Hitler, okay? | ||
| Go the fuck home. | ||
| Anyway. | ||
| No, I'm just kidding, of course. | ||
| But yeah, big collaboration coming Thursday 10 a.m. | ||
| It's gonna be good. | ||
| It was supposed to happen back in November, but I got busy with work. | ||
| But rescheduled it for Thursday. | ||
| So anyway, I think that's all I got for you. | ||
| Also, we have a new donation system on Cozy. | ||
| I just realized you actually can send a message with that. | ||
| So I'll be reading those, just so you know. | ||
| No, I'll be reading Super Chats and I'll be reading these as well. | ||
| um Because we got this new crypto and the site on Cozy is what we're planning to finally unveil at some point this year, probably first half of the year. | ||
| But we got this up to test the Bitcoin payments and that kind of thing. | ||
| And you can attach messages to the donations. | ||
| It's a bit, it's a crypto Bitcoin donation system. | ||
| And just, you know, I will be reading these. | ||
| I got a few yesterday, which I didn't read. | ||
| I'll read those tonight and any that are sent tonight. | ||
| And I'll also be reading the regular Super Chats. | ||
| But that's the play. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| So that's that. | ||
| We're going to dive in, I guess, because yesterday we didn't even get to all our news. | ||
| I got a little carried away. | ||
| You know, I was talking about being a real human being, and I was talking about, yay, and just sort of where we're at here as I picked the show back up. | ||
| So I didn't even get to the Joe Biden document story. | ||
| I may get to that later this week, maybe tomorrow. | ||
| But tonight I want to cover a couple of different things. | ||
| Our first story is about this hate speech bill. | ||
| And this is not, I mean, it's not groundbreaking by itself because one, it's very straightforward, very simple. | ||
| Two, we all knew this was coming. | ||
| And it is, it's not here yet, but it still is maybe inevitable. | ||
| And so today there was a bill proposed in Congress, in the House, by a Democrat, which is supposed to criminalize hate speech, and particularly its white supremacy. | ||
| So it's not hate speech against, as you know, white people, Christians, men, anything like that. | ||
| It's hate speech from white people. | ||
| And I'll read this story here from the New York Post and then we'll get into it. | ||
| It says, quote, U.S. | ||
| Representative Sheila Jackson Lee has introduced a bill aimed at fighting white supremacy by attaching criminal charges to certain forms of hate speech. | ||
| The Texas Democrat introduced the Leading Against White Supremacy Act of 2023, which aims to prevent and prosecute white supremacy-inspired hate crime and conspiracy to commit white supremacy-inspired hate crime. | ||
| The conspiracy addition means people who use hate speech online could face criminal charges under the legislation, even if they don't act on their threats. | ||
| Understand, before we move on, conspiracy is an extremely broad statute. | ||
| Not going to get into, not going to get too much into, you know, how I know that. | ||
| Related note, my lawyer was telling me about that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| He was telling me conspiracy is the prosecutors. | ||
| What did he say? | ||
| Low threshold to qualify for a conspiracy. | ||
| What constitutes? | ||
| Because the conspiracy is just an agreement. | ||
| You know, if me and my friends say we're going to go to get lunch, that's like a conspiracy to commit lunch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If I'm hanging out... | |
| We baked Alaska, and I say, hey, let's go get lunch. | ||
| That's a conspiracy to commit lunch. | ||
| And so really, it's just about this agreement, whether it's written, oral, whatever. | ||
| And what constitutes an agreement is so broad. | ||
| What can constitute an agreement is so broad. | ||
| And that's why prosecutors love it, because they don't even need an actual crime. | ||
| They just need this agreement. | ||
| And it's a very shoddy, very low standard. | ||
| And so what the bill says, and this is scary that this is being proposed. | ||
| It's not going to pass. | ||
| And even if it did, it would of course be challenged in the courts and most likely struck down. | ||
| But it's scary that this is legal language in the legislature. | ||
| They're saying that they're going to criminalize not just hate speech and white supremacy, but also a conspiracy for white supremacy. | ||
| So that means like a total ban on certain forms of speech is what that, that is effectively what that will produce, is advancing white supremacy, white supremacist that is effectively what that will produce, is advancing white supremacy, white supremacist ideology, antagonism based on replacement theory or hate speech that vilifies, or is otherwise directed against any non-white | ||
|
unidentified
|
So not only is it... | |
| So keep in mind, not only is it broad in terms of, it's like statutorily, as if that's a word, the statute is broad, but also it's extremely specific that it can only be perpetrated by white people against non-white people. | ||
| So anything that they consider so-called white supremacist ideology, or what they consider replacement theory, which is real, Or anything that vilifies a non-white group, they want to ban that. | ||
| They want that to be against the law. | ||
| And there's, we all know, a very good reason why they're saying that, which I'll get into in a moment. | ||
| It says the text of the bill specifically lists social media platforms as one area where hate speech could result in criminal consequences if that speech motivates another person to go out and commit a racist crime against others. | ||
| The bill states, quote, mass shootings and other hate crimes motivate. | ||
| Tainous and virulent crimes are inspired by conspiracy theories, blatant bigotry and mythical falsehoods such as replacement theory. | ||
| All instances must be prevented and severe criminal penalties must be applied to their perpetrators. | ||
| So that's the article. | ||
| That's New York Post. | ||
| That's the bill. | ||
| And, of course, the first thing is that all of this is just real. | ||
| They say that, as we know, and I'm not saying this for the first time, but we're getting to the point where things that are just simply true are not only being censored but also going to be criminalized. | ||
| They call it replacement theory. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it's really not a theory. | |
| What's the idea that white people are being replaced in their own countries by non-white people? | ||
| What defines a theory is that it's unfalsifiable, it's unprovable. | ||
| That's what makes it a theory. | ||
| You can't prove it or disprove it. | ||
| It's an unfalsifiable conjecture. | ||
| Well, this does not fall under that category. | ||
| Is that happening? | ||
| It's just a matter of math, and it's a matter of demography. | ||
| We take a census every 10 years. | ||
| And other data are collected all the time about the demography and the types of people that constitute the American population. | ||
| It's not unfalsifiable to say that there are going to be less white people and non-white people are being permitted to come in through legal and illegal immigration to replace them. | ||
| That's not a theory. | ||
| That's a hypothesis. | ||
| We can test that. | ||
| Not to go science-fag, but, you know, we can... The point is, it's not a theory. | ||
| It's not a conspiracy theory or regular theory. | ||
| It's a fact. | ||
| White people are being replaced in America, in Canada, in Australia, in Europe. | ||
| They're being replaced wherever they are. | ||
| White people are a global minority, and within this century, they'll be a minority within previously white-majority countries. | ||
| In all of them. | ||
| We know that. | ||
| That's a fact. | ||
| Well, with some exceptions, like Russia, I guess. | ||
| And by the way, as we know, they talk about this all the time. | ||
| There's an article off the top of my head, I remember, I want to say in 2018 or 2019 from Bloomberg, and they'll call it everything other than replacement, but meaning the same thing. | ||
| One of the words they use to describe it is refreshment. | ||
| There's an article in Bloomberg a few years ago. | ||
| They said we're refreshing the population with immigrants. | ||
| And it gets to this idea that the population is not growing on its own. | ||
| Americans, American citizens are not having enough children to maintain the same size or grow the population. | ||
| So they say that we need to let in lots of immigrants to make up the difference, to maintain a growing population. | ||
| And there's a lot of reasons why planners think that's beneficial. | ||
| For example, the entitlement system and they don't want to have a certain kind of population profile where there are too many elderly people that need to be supported by a small labor force. | ||
| It's largely economic reasons. | ||
| Other reasons too, but largely economic. | ||
| And so they'll call it everything other than a replacement, but in fact that's what it is. | ||
| They're going to replace the white people that would have been born if it was not for feminism and contraceptives and birth control and abortion and pornography and transgender and all that. | ||
| They're going to replace the white people, the American citizens that would have been born and the families that would have been created. | ||
| With non-white families from China, India, Mexico, the Northern Triangle countries. | ||
| What else do you call that? | ||
| You can call it a refreshment, a replacement. | ||
| On the most clinical, neutral language, they're talking about that as a function of the economy. | ||
| When you look at it from very partisan people like Michelle Goldberg at the New York Times, or if you look at certain writers at the LA Times, in the American Southwest, in Georgia, There's a very partisan language where they talk about it vindictively, like it's a good thing that white people are being replaced by non-white people for electoral purposes or for moral purposes. | ||
| It's some kind of revenge that non-white people replace them. | ||
| Non-white people get a higher social status or they'll accrue more political power. | ||
| White people get what's coming to them. | ||
| So there's all kinds of language, the point is, there's all kinds of language that they use to talk about it, but it's all the same thing, and it's happening, and it's real, and no one disagrees with that. | ||
| Fewer white people are being born, more non-white people are being born, globally, domestically, and in terms of the American population, non-white people are Almost all the people that are coming in through immigration with the stated goal of replacing the white people. | ||
| That's just what's going on. | ||
| And it's even worse now. | ||
| Here's something new. | ||
| I know, so we all understand that. | ||
| And I'll get on in a second. | ||
| But here's something new. | ||
| I saw this the other day on Telegram. | ||
| A lot of people don't realize that one of the most devastating effects of the COVID lockdown was its effect on the fertility rate. | ||
| Because if you look at the rate of population increase, you look at the fertility rate, before and after the COVID lockdown, the COVID lockdown decimated the American fertility rate. | ||
| The American fertility rate was below replacement. | ||
| Replacement is 2.1, meaning on average, I think it's 2.1 children per mother. | ||
| And I don't know what it was before the pandemic. | ||
| I think it settled somewhere around 1.7 or 1.8 or something like that. | ||
| After the COVID pandemic, it decimated population growth coming from American citizens. | ||
| Such that after the COVID lockdown, deaths outnumbered births. | ||
| So, the American population wasn't growing. | ||
| The American population, though, wasn't necessarily... I mean, we were still having kids. | ||
| But after COVID, it's like nobody's having kids. | ||
| And I don't have the figure right in front of me. | ||
| I don't know if I forwarded it to my telegram or not. | ||
| But that was one of the most nefarious consequences of the lockdown that people don't even talk about, is the fact that we had a bad birthrate before. | ||
| It decimated the birthrate even further. | ||
| And why do you think that is? | ||
| Men and women can't go out and meet each other when there's a lockdown. | ||
| Men and women already weren't meeting each other for all kinds of reasons. | ||
| Largely technological, but also feminism, and there's a lot of reasons. | ||
| That's not what the show's about. | ||
| But of course, what is the impact of forcing everybody to stay in their homes and canceling school and closing down bars and restaurants and baseball games and air travel and all that? | ||
| People are just not having kids anymore. | ||
| It's only worsening. | ||
| And anyway, so this is something that's going on. | ||
| We all know that. | ||
| It's happening globally. | ||
| It's happening here. | ||
| And that's just one aspect of it that they say is a dangerous conspiracy theory that is going to be criminalized. | ||
| And it's one like everything else. | ||
| It's like the truth about the vaccine, or it's like the truth about the election fraud, or it's like the truth about Ukraine, or the truth about George Floyd or BLM. | ||
| They're literally just making it illegal to tell the truth about anything that matters. | ||
| That's the bottom line. | ||
| But what's interesting specifically about this bill is that it's only... The angle, of course, of this bill is specifically about so-called hate speech, but it's only directed at white people. | ||
| And this is the kind of bill that you get in an apartheid state. | ||
| Make no mistake about it, it's framed in such a way, when it talks about white supremacy and it says that hate speech is illegal, it's easy for liberals to think that this is like punching up. | ||
| That, well, who would stand in defense of hate speech? | ||
| Who would stand in defense of supremacist ideology, right? | ||
| And even though it's framed in that way, it's framed as though it's against cruelty or oppression or whatever, By definition, this is a bill that only criminalizes a certain kind of speech from one group of people. | ||
| Only white people. | ||
| So, in other words, if a black person goes out and says something very nasty about white people, hateful, incites violence against white people, that wouldn't be illegal under the bill. | ||
| If I go out there and incite violence against some other group, highly illegal. | ||
| As a white person. | ||
| If a Jewish person goes out and it cites violence against me, or Ye, or the goyim, or whatever, I'm not criminalized. | ||
| This is the kind of thing that you get in an apartheid state. | ||
| This is the kind of thing that you get in a... They talk about systemic racism. | ||
| This is the kind of thing that you get in a racist country. | ||
| For lack of a better word. | ||
| I don't love that word. | ||
| But you want to talk about a state where antagonism against one group is baked into the cake, baked into the law. | ||
| That's what this is. | ||
| That's exactly what this is. | ||
| And if you want to talk about how the language of the bill says it's against hate crimes or something like that, well, guess what? | ||
| Murder, terrorism, assault, battery, that's all already illegal. | ||
| So what this criminalizes is something that's actually arbitrary. | ||
| If they're passing this bill because they don't like terrorism, well, guess what? | ||
| It's already against the law to be a terrorist or to commit an act of terrorism. | ||
| This is about certain ideas and certain people and certain things arbitrarily being subject to a specific criminal penalty. | ||
|
unidentified
|
state. | |
| And who's going to decide? | ||
| Is a Kamala Harris, Stacey Abrams, Attorney General, Prosecutor, DOJ, State's Attorney, Judge, are they going to be the arbitrators? | ||
| Presumably they're going to be the ones adjudicating what is and is not white supremacy or vilifying a group or antagonism based on replacement theory. | ||
| That's where this is headed. | ||
| As a state, we're under the pretext that whites are oppressing everybody. | ||
| Whites will be subject to this sort of arbitrary, punitive law at the hands of non-white people, the hands of a non-white majority and a non-white private and public bureaucracy. | ||
| It's part of a long line of things like that being implemented. | ||
| That's what's going on here. | ||
| That's what this bill is. | ||
| And again, like I said, this is not something that's going to be passed anytime soon, but this is where everything is headed, and this is a major red flag. | ||
| You can't look at this without looking at the context, which is that this came just two months after Ye got cancelled by the ADL and Ram and Ari and Zeke Emanuel and all the others. | ||
| This comes on the heels of the, I don't even remember his name, the basketball player. | ||
| It comes on the heels of all of the so-called rise in anti-semitism and rise in hate speech. | ||
| It comes on the heels of Elon Musk taking over Twitter and allowing people back onto the platform. | ||
| And that Amazon documentary blowing up. | ||
| And this is sending a very clear message, which is this. | ||
| You can't win. | ||
| That's the message. | ||
| No doubt this legislation was written by the ADL. | ||
| Or written by somebody that is adjacent to the ADL. | ||
| And no doubt that this was written and proposed In this way, at this time, for that reason, which is that there's this battle going on over what our country's going to be, and what's going to happen to this country, and whether this is going to be a country that is a place for Jews to loot, and Jews are going to battery the population with immigration to make it easier to loot, which is what goes on. | ||
| Among others, it's not just Jews, but they are the main ones. | ||
| Or if this is going to be a country that is going to be a nation, With a real identity and a government that serves the interests of the people and represents the people and is working for the people. | ||
| And there is some semblance of sameness or similarity between the classes and between the elites and the people they rule? | ||
| That's the question. | ||
| And so there's this real tug-of-war, which is just, this is down the line, downstream from the Trump election, and downstream from even what was going on with the Libertarians, and downstream from Pat Buchanan, and, you know, it's downstream from a lot of things. | ||
| Downstream from Ye, And it's all about the struggle of are we going to be a Christian, strong, independent, sovereign nation, or is this going to be a country that's run by gangsters? | ||
| A country that's thoroughly infiltrated by spies and foreign intelligence, and a country that is bought and paid for by the capitalists, the wealthy firm owners, the money lenders, the money minters, the Jews, among others. | ||
| That's a question. | ||
| And so, a bill like this is a shout across the bow that says, look, Elon Musk can buy Twitter. | ||
| Ye can go and name them on Alex Jones. | ||
| We will just push to make hate speech illegal. | ||
| And they'll do it if you let them. | ||
| They will run the government for the next two generations. | ||
| They'll replace everyone on the Supreme Court. | ||
| Mark my words, that's their plan. | ||
| They want to ban hate speech. | ||
| They want it to be like Europe. | ||
| They want it to be like Canada. | ||
| They want people like me, for it to be against the law for me to speak. | ||
| Because, of course, we can make cozy, and we have a shot at getting back on Twitter, and I could go on YouTube and do an interview, and I could go and link up with a famous person and be able to spread my message that way or something. | ||
| And insofar as that is made possible by lapses in control over the technology, control over the internet, they want to go in with the heavy hand of government and just ban it outright. | ||
| That's what this is about. | ||
| And so it's not going to pass today, but this is how they're thinking. | ||
| This is Jonathan Greenblatt. | ||
| This is how these guys are thinking. | ||
| They saw what happened a couple months ago. | ||
| They're panicking. | ||
| The consciousness is rising. | ||
| People know about replacement migration. | ||
| People know that's happening. | ||
| And it's a real thing in demography. | ||
| It's called, I think it's called the fourth demographic transition. | ||
| And there are major demographic transitions over the last 6,000 years. | ||
| And this last demonstration, and it's about drowning the developed and it's about drowning the developed world, | ||
| the developed civilized world in these people, in these people who are not going to be able to perpetuate it. - Okay. | ||
| So anyway, so as we know, that's what's going on. | ||
| And this is the censorship is a huge part of the strategy. | ||
| And I did a show about this, I want to say, two or three years ago, where I laid out how it's all connected. | ||
| The censorship is such an integral part of it because guess what? | ||
| White people are not going to be the majority, and it's going to be very noticeable. | ||
| And it's not just going to be noticeable in a benign way, in the way that it is going to be, like, literally observable, that you're going to go to a mall and count the white people and there will be a lot less of them. | ||
| There are not going to be as many as there were before. | ||
| You're going to feel in the minority. | ||
| You're going to see it. | ||
| But it's not just that. | ||
| People are going to know they're a minority because of how they're being governed and what the quality of life is like. | ||
| When you go to non-white areas, they're different than the white areas. | ||
| It's dirtier. | ||
| It's more violent. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's worse. | |
| Now, that's not to say that non-white people read into this and they say, so what are you saying? | ||
| I'm saying what I'm saying! | ||
| You go into these neighborhoods and they're different. | ||
| They're not the same. | ||
| And, qualitatively, they're worse. | ||
| And that's because the people that are coming here from these other countries, they just don't have the same standards that we do. | ||
| They don't have the same capacity to live in this kind of a country. | ||
| They just don't. | ||
| Look at where they come from. | ||
| They come from Africa. | ||
| They come from Mexico. | ||
| Look at Africa and Mexico. | ||
| How are they doing? | ||
| It's no wonder they come here and then their neighborhoods look like their old neighborhoods. | ||
| Anyway. | ||
| So the whole country is going to start to look like that. | ||
| It's not a pretty picture. | ||
| And if you want to see that, just go to any major city, start in a white neighborhood, and start driving to a non-white neighborhood. | ||
| And you'll see a gradient. | ||
| And the gradient is in terms of like litter. | ||
| And what's more, the governance is going to reflect Thank you. | ||
| This is well the governance and I don't mean the government. | ||
| I mean the governance which happens in the private and a public context is going to reflect this and that means that you're just going to start getting screwed as a white person. | ||
| Your white kids are going to get screwed by the school. | ||
| You're going to get screwed by the justice system. | ||
| You're going to get screwed by your employer. | ||
| You're going to get screwed by the government. | ||
| Like in San Francisco, they're proposing $5 million reparations to every long-term black resident. | ||
| In Evanston, Illinois, which is north of Chicago, they're talking about the same thing. | ||
| Not $5 million, but reparations for black residents. | ||
| In Chicago, the mayor, Lori Lightfoot, said she's not going to take questions from white reporters. | ||
| And it starts like that. | ||
| It starts with these little jabs. | ||
| It starts with this preferential treatment. | ||
| It starts with the mentorship program. | ||
| And it starts with the favorable. | ||
| And it starts with the entitlements and the programs. | ||
| In the last stimulus bill, one of the last major spending bills, which included a COVID stimulus, they earmarked, like, I think $60 million just for non-white people. | ||
| Just as, like, a gift. | ||
| Just as a... Here you go. | ||
| I forget exactly which one it was. | ||
| It's in my notes here somewhere. | ||
| But in the last major spending bill, they earmarked, among all the other appropriations, just, like, $100 million or something And of course it's under the guise of COVID or it's always under some pretext, but it's for the disadvantaged, whatever groups, blacks, Hispanics, whatever. | ||
| And so this is a country we're going to live in. | ||
| Here's the point. | ||
| The censorship is so critical to this because the white people are going to notice that and they're not going to like it. | ||
| And they're going to start to talk. | ||
| At dinner, at work, at the water cooler, below, you know, they're gonna, what's the expression, below their breath, they're gonna say in a very quiet voice, and they're gonna talk about it privately, and they already are, and pretty soon they're just gonna start to talk about it openly, and a guy like Donald Trump is gonna come around and start saying it openly, and people are gonna start to support that guy. | ||
| And people are going to start to watch media, like shows like this. | ||
| And they're going to start to watch people that are talking about that and talking about how, hey, we don't like that. | ||
| We don't like that this is happening. | ||
| And as the country gets worse, people are going to talk about it more. | ||
| They're going to notice it more. | ||
| They're going to talk about it more. | ||
| And it's going to start to build up some political cachet, being against it, being against the plunging of this country into the third world. | ||
| It's going to get more, if you think it has clout now, it's going to have a lot more clout as time goes on. | ||
| 5, 10, 20, 25 years. | ||
| Politicians, media, it's all going to become very popular stuff. | ||
| It's all going to be very talked about. | ||
| If there is hardcore censorship legislation, people are not going to be able to talk about it. | ||
| And if they're not able to talk about it or report on it, they're not going to be able to organize around it and do anything about it. | ||
| And so this is about, it's like burning your house down, but tying you up first. | ||
| They want to break in your house. | ||
| They want to tie you up first. | ||
| And you're like, why are you tying me up? | ||
| Just take my stuff and go. | ||
| It's like, we're not, we're not just taking your stuff. | ||
| We're going to burn your fucking house down. | ||
| And we don't want you to be able to do anything to stop it. | ||
| That's what this is about. | ||
| You know, they're already looting the country. | ||
| They already have everything that they can have. | ||
| But things are going to get even worse. | ||
| It's going to get more violent, more chaotic. | ||
| It's going to be harder to be white. | ||
| It's going to be harder to be a Christian. | ||
| And they are They're putting the shackles on now so that once it's too late, once the boiling water is too hot, we're not going to be able to turn down the temperature. | ||
| We're not going to be able to organize to resist it or fight it. | ||
| That's why the censorship is such a critical part of the agenda. | ||
| And that's why it's not even about free speech. | ||
| It's about the right to dissent. | ||
| Big difference. | ||
| I'm not out here fighting for your right to be a Satanist. | ||
| I don't think you should have a right to be a Satanist. | ||
| Because that's always what, that's always the retort. | ||
| Is, well, would you be okay with X, Y, and Z? | ||
| Would you, you know, if you're in favor of free speech, what about Drag Queen Story Hour, After School Satan Club, or whatever? | ||
| It's like, I don't give a shit about any of that. | ||
| I hope they ban all that. | ||
| I hope they ban all that and throw everybody that's doing that in jail. | ||
| It's not about the right to say anything. | ||
| It's about the right to say specific things. | ||
| It's about the right to say dissenting things against the people with power, against the government. | ||
| So it's not about say anything, say as much as is permitted. | ||
| It's about saying very specific things, which is like, we should stop immigration, which is like, white people should organize around their identity. | ||
| What the country's like and the quality of life. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So So... I'm gonna go to the government. | |
| They'll get the police to shut you down. | ||
| That's what's going on. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So that's that. | ||
| That's our first story. | ||
| How's the hood holding up? | ||
| What do you think? | ||
| It feels kind of silly. | ||
| I don't know if I... I don't love the feeling of it, doing the show in the hoodie. | ||
| But you saw the hair before. | ||
| You saw the hair pre-hoodie. | ||
| Pre-hood. | ||
| Also, hey, and by the way, there's one other thing I want to say about this. | ||
| The other thing is this. | ||
| The reason they don't want you to be able to vilify a group is because groups are doing this, okay? | ||
| Black crime, Hispanic immigration, Jewish power, these are all things we have to talk about. | ||
| And you can't talk about them if you can't talk about groups in, like, a negative way. | ||
| You talk about white people, you want to vilify a group? | ||
| Talk about white supremacy. | ||
| But you can't vilify the Jews, you can't vilify the black people, you can't vilify... And not that we're trying to vilify, but there are things happening in the country, and the things are being done by people, and there's patterns here. | ||
| Some of these people, you'll notice, have things in common. | ||
| Who's stealing all the catalytic converters in Chicago? | ||
| That's a thing that's going on. | ||
| That's a thing that's being done by people. | ||
| And what do all the people doing it have in common? | ||
| Well, they're all black men. | ||
| It just is what it is. | ||
| And I don't say that in like a mean way, but that's who's doing it! | ||
| And when it comes to Jews, same thing there. | ||
| And we're about to get into this. | ||
| When you look at who hates Jesus and makes all the pornography and all the war and everything, the lewd media, And all the gay stuff and feminism and immigration and liberalism and communism and usury, greed and vulgarity. | ||
| It's all, they all have something in common. | ||
| They're all Jewish. | ||
| And people like to say, no, no, no, there's some of, no, they're all secular. | ||
| No, no, they're all liberal. | ||
| It's like, no, they literally all have the same names and they all like came from Eastern Europe, you know, or Israel. | ||
| They're all Jewish. | ||
| Well, they're not really Jewish. | ||
| Yeah, they are. | ||
| They most certainly are. | ||
| They all have Jewish grandparents. | ||
| Would you like it better if I said that? | ||
| They're not Jewish! | ||
| Okay, they all have Jewish grandparents. | ||
| Is that better? | ||
| They all have Jewish grandparents. | ||
| Is that a better way to say it? | ||
| Because there's a lot of debate about who's really Jewish and who's not Jewish. | ||
| Okay, fine. | ||
| Their grandparents are all Jewish. | ||
| I don't have any Jewish grandparents, but they all do. | ||
| So they're more Jewish than me. | ||
| Anyway, that's why they don't want you to vilify any groups, because they don't want you to talk about the groups. | ||
| I don't want to vilify anybody, but look. | ||
| We live in a world where there are groups. | ||
| Human beings have identities. | ||
| As it turns out. | ||
| Crazy, I know. | ||
| Human beings have difference. | ||
| And human beings have identities. | ||
| And these identities matter to individuals. | ||
| And being black means something to black people. | ||
| And it is real insofar as it is meaningful to them. | ||
| Also, there are black people. | ||
| There are black people and there are white people. | ||
| There are people whose skin is brown and people whose skin is not brown. | ||
| And it goes deeper than that, as we know. | ||
| The African-descended people have other differences, and they're real. | ||
| And so it's not just that blackness matters to black people and among black people and is something that means something to non-black people, and it matters As a societal concept. | ||
| But also, these people actually exist. | ||
| There actually are such a thing as white and black people. | ||
| And they are different. | ||
| And the differences are real, too. | ||
| And so, insofar as we live in a world like that, we have to talk about it. | ||
| They're not gonna act the same. | ||
| They're not gonna have the same problems. | ||
| They're not gonna have the same aspirations. | ||
| They're not going to have the same faculties and talents and all that. | ||
| Prejudice, antipathy, hatred, cruelty, discrimination. | ||
| It just has to do with understanding. | ||
| How do we achieve an understanding of the world and why the things are the way they are? | ||
| You have to talk about it. | ||
| You start doing things like this, you can't talk about it. | ||
| Anyway, so that's that. | ||
| But I want to move on. | ||
| I want to get into the world economics. | ||
| I want to get on into the World Economic Forum and talk about the ongoing WEF Summit. | ||
| Let me just take a sip of water first. | ||
| I'm getting a little thirsty. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's getting a little hot in this hood. | |
| Okay. | ||
| Okay, okay. | ||
| So our feature story, how are we doing on time, by the way? | ||
| We're good on time. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| Okay. | ||
| So our feature story is about the World Economic Forum, and you know, it's not even so much about the World Economic Forum. | ||
| It's more what people think about it. | ||
| I'll just read this article. | ||
| This is something that's going on right now. | ||
| This is from the Associated Press. | ||
| It says, quote, when some of the world's wealthiest and most influential figures gathered at the World Economic Forum's annual meeting last year, sessions on climate change drew high-level discussions on topics such as carbon financing and sustainable flood food systems. | ||
| But an entirely different narrative played out on the internet, where social media users claimed leaders wanted to force the population to eat insects instead of meat in the name of saving the environment. | ||
| Which they do, by the way. | ||
| The annual event in the Swiss ski resort town of Davos, which opens Monday, has increasingly become a target of bizarre claims from a growing chorus of commentators who believe the forum involves a group of elites manipulating global events for their own benefit. | ||
| Experts say this was once a conspiracy theory found in the Internet's underbelly, but has now hit the mainstream. | ||
| A researcher with the ADL, who studies anti-government extremism, said, quote, this isn't a conspiracy that is playing out on the extreme fringes. | ||
| We're seeing it on mainstream social media platforms being shared by regular Americans. | ||
| We were seeing it spread by mainstream media figures right on their primetime news, on their nightly networks. | ||
| Which he's probably talking about, like Tucker Carlson. | ||
| The meeting draws heads of state, business executives, cultural trendsetters, and representatives from international organizations to the luxe mountain town. | ||
| Though it's always unclear how much concrete action will emerge, the meeting is slated to take on pressing global issues, from climate change and economic uncertainty to geopolitical instability and public health. | ||
| Hundreds of public sessions are planned, but the four-day conference is also known for secretive sessions, which are planned. | ||
| Backroom meetings and deal-making by business leaders. | ||
| This gap between what's shown to the public and what happens behind closed doors helps make the meeting a flashpoint for misinformation. | ||
| Kathleen Jameson, who is the director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at University of Pennsylvania, who studies misinformation, says, quote, When we have very high levels of ambiguity, it's easy to fill in the narrative. | ||
| Theories about influential global leaders are not new, she said, but scrutiny of the forum and its chairman, Klaus Schwab, intensified in 2020 in the early days of the COVID pandemic. | ||
| That year, the theme of the meeting was the Great Reset. | ||
| So, number one, it's always so funny to me, whenever they talk about this stuff, it's a good reminder that left-wing people are in bed with the government. | ||
| And I don't know if anyone realizes that, like, but you really need to, it's 2023, it's time for you to really internalize this. | ||
| They all work for the government. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| All left-wing people work for the government. | ||
| They all, everyone works for the government. | ||
| Big tech works for the government. | ||
| Journalists work for the government. | ||
| Almost all left-wing people, activists, work for the government. | ||
| They all work for the government. | ||
| And it's, I don't know that they really, I don't know that they have fully internalized that, or maybe we haven't. | ||
| But to me, it's always such a trip when you've got these researchers. | ||
| Do you know where these researchers work? | ||
| They work at think tanks that are funded by the State Department. | ||
| Here's a little trick. | ||
| Whenever you see one of these anti-hate researchers or experts look up the obscure think tank they're a part of, and eight times out of ten, it is directly subsidized by the government, literally. | ||
| When you look at whatever, if it says like strategic something or global something or democracy something or whatever, and they're all like obscure, and you probably never heard of them, and it's some acronym, And they're all projects of some other bigger think tank, which is funded by the State Department, or the military, or the CIA, or some billionaire, or a Jew. | ||
| Always, every single time. | ||
| And that's actually a huge part of American diplomacy and national security policy. | ||
| Is they have this constellation of what they call NGOs, non-governmental organizations, and their non-profits and their foundations and their think tanks and their initiatives and whatever. | ||
| And you can go and look it up. | ||
| They publish their backers and there's usually a Wikipedia page for it or something. | ||
| And there's this huge ecosystem, and they're like nesting dolls. | ||
| There'll be like one inside another inside another. | ||
| And the money comes from the State Department. | ||
| The money comes from the U.S. | ||
| military. | ||
| The money comes from the CIA. | ||
| The money, it all flows from either the state apparatus or some very nefarious other interest. | ||
| And the same goes for these big tech companies. | ||
| Look at who's running the big tech companies. | ||
| They're so in bed with the national security apparatus. | ||
| The people that work in big tech then go on and work in these national security roles and the people in the national security roles then go and fill up these positions at Google and Facebook. | ||
| They're all in bed with each other. | ||
| And so it's such a trip when you read something. | ||
| This is from the Associated Press where you get an ADL. | ||
| Anti-government extremism expert weighing in and it's like this is the government running cover for the government This is the government press the government researcher the government whatever Going out there to tell you that the government isn't doing anything wrong. | ||
| And by government, I don't just mean, like, the state itself, although they are all funded by the state, but it's a very, like, disgusting conflict of interest, disgusting, incestuous thing. | ||
| They don't even realize that. | ||
| Like, Cassie Dillon, Jared Holt, perfect example. | ||
| And this is sort of a detour. | ||
| They're the perfect example, because Jared Holt, if you don't know, he's like one of my old nemesises. | ||
| He's one of my old nemeses. | ||
| He was a low-level, like, Antifa grunt from Arkansas. | ||
| He was from Bentonville, Arkansas, and his parents are divorced, and he was a little gay freak. | ||
| And then, you know, he became a liberal. | ||
| He got, like, who knows? | ||
| He got molested or something. | ||
| He became some sort of faggot liberal at Arkansas College, whatever low IQ state school he went to. | ||
| He goes to D.C. | ||
| to become this Antifa grunt, get away from his parents. | ||
| He then goes to work at Right Wing Watch. | ||
| And at Right Wing Watch, he was constantly clipping my videos and writing about me. | ||
| And the guy went from, like, Like, basically maladjusted, hates his parents, gay boy, state school, like, burnout loser, to like, disaffected liberal grunt in a metro area. | ||
| And then he went at Right-Wing Watch. | ||
| It's like a liberal, he goes to work at Right-Wing Watch. | ||
| And what is Right-Wing Watch? | ||
| Well, the job of Right-Wing Watch is to write about people like me. | ||
| Right-Wing Watch is funded by People for the American Way, which is funded by the Open Society Foundation. | ||
| Open Society Foundation is George Soros' group. | ||
| And Open Society Foundation is funded by the U.S. | ||
| State Department. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| So this guy, think about it. | ||
| This guy was in high school, and you could read his old Facebook posts, and he's literally just like a bi-curious weirdo in high school who hates his parents, and he hates his small town in the South, and whatever. | ||
| He's literally just like a fucking weirdo. | ||
| Goes to this loser college and he's basically just, he's at 22 years old, he's just like almost anybody else in America. | ||
| He's just like some queer-mo mediocrity. | ||
| Goes to a big city and is like liberal. | ||
| Joins up with Antifa. | ||
| Antifa, street fighting, you know, edgy, I'm an edgy, being liberal Facebook guy. | ||
| And then is funneled into this government intelligence system, this contracted-to-the-private-sector ecosystem of government-funded nonprofits. | ||
| He's at Right Wing Watch, which is downstream from the U.S. | ||
| State Department, writing about the government's enemies like me. | ||
| Because that's what I am. | ||
| I go against the government narrative. | ||
| I go against, you know, the deep state. | ||
| I go against the permanent state, which dictates our security policy and our economic policy and our migration policy and our food policy. | ||
| I go against, and those are all the interests of the powerful people. | ||
| I go against those things. | ||
| I'm against the seed oils and the high fructose corn syrup, and I'm against the corruption and the espionage and the spying and the foreign wars and the lobbying and all that and the mass immigration for cheap labor, blah, blah, blah. | ||
| And like, so he goes from like queer liberal, queer, mediocre, liberal kid from small town, you know, Walmartville, USA. | ||
| And I say Walmartville, he's from Bentonville, not because he's just from flyover country. | ||
| And he gets funneled into like the USA. | ||
| security system. | ||
| And then he levels up and goes to work for the Atlantic Council. | ||
| That was his next job. | ||
| He was a fellow at the Atlantic Council, their digital forensics lab. | ||
| And the Atlantic Council is one of the most prestigious think tanks in the world, actually. | ||
| It's one of the most important, influential, prestigious think tanks. | ||
| And look at who funds the Atlantic Council! | ||
| It's all of the most powerful entities in the world, public and private. | ||
| It's State Department, it's U.S. | ||
| military, it's NATO, it's the Foreign Ministry of the United Kingdom, it's the Foreign Ministry of Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates, and it's Japan, and it's JPMorgan, and it's Pfizer, and it's Bank of America, and it's Microsoft, Okay, like so why are they fun? | ||
| Why are all they funding this queer? | ||
| Right and I say queer not like, you know, just what he's just like a queer. | ||
| He's just like a questioning He's I mean, he's like married to a woman now But he's like got a flower tattoo and he probably like had sex with guys and stuff So they they're all funding this queer writing articles about me doing a live stream show saying like Hitler is cool and stuff and now he works at some other thing and Now, that's like one section. | ||
| The other section is Cassie Dillon. | ||
| She's another nemesis. | ||
| Cassie Dillon, she was a girl who I met in college. | ||
| She was working at Campus Reform, which is a project of Leadership Institute, which is one of the big conservative think tanks. | ||
| And she was also a fellow at Daily Wire, which is Ben Shapiro's outfit. | ||
| And, you know, she was kind of like grooming me to be like a conservative pundit or whatever, and I just kept talking about Jews too much. | ||
| So she told me, I don't ever want to talk to you again. | ||
| I hate you. | ||
| We are not on the same page. | ||
| And she starts sending all my material to Media Matters, which is a left-wing hit piece outfit, to try and get me fired and canceled. | ||
| Well, Cassie Dillon, she didn't quite cut it at Daily Wire because she has thin lips and is ugly and not talented. | ||
| She goes to Pepperdine, spends a little time there, spends some time in Israel, and then she winds up at this new think tank which is called, like, Jewish Defense Institute or something. | ||
| I don't even know. | ||
| It's like some new thing. | ||
| It's like Institute of Jewish Defense. | ||
| Some stupid, obscure acronym thing. | ||
| And that's funded by, like, the Israelis. | ||
| That's funded by the Jews in some form, obviously. | ||
| And she's doing the same job that Jared Holt is. | ||
| Now, here's what's amazing. | ||
| Cassie Dillon was, like, your normie conservative. | ||
| She's on the Prager Force. | ||
| She's at Campus Reform. | ||
| She's at Leadership Institute and Young Americans for Liberty and College Republicans and all this. | ||
| She's at Daily Wire with Ben Shapiro. | ||
| Jared Holt is an antifa, grunt, queer liberal. | ||
| Like, on its face, they're two totally different people from two totally different worlds with fierce disagreements. | ||
| Here's this queer Antifa grunt who hates his parents from his small town in Arkansas. | ||
| Divorced parents. | ||
| And here's Cassie Dillon, this lipless, hooker-looking girl, and I think like her mom died or something, or her parents are divorced, I don't know, some other broken home in Western Mass, Western Massachusetts. | ||
| And, but she's like this rootinist, tootinist, Zog, Ziocon, whatever. | ||
| Now, they should be on opposite sides, but they both wind up, but they both were groomed to do the research and the homework for Israel and for the U.S. | ||
| government in these think tanks, funneled into the think tank world, attacking the same people! | ||
| Her on behalf of the right-wing Jews in Israel and the Israel-connected DHS, State Department, FBI, DOJ, and Jared Hole attacking it. | ||
| From State Department funded think tanks, Atlantic Council, things like that. | ||
| Anyway, that's how the system works. | ||
| That's just how it goes. | ||
| What was I saying? | ||
| I lost my train of thought. | ||
| How do we even get on that? | ||
| But anyway... | ||
| Yeah, what was I even saying? | ||
| Oh yeah, so that's just like a total, that's just not related to the news at all, but I'm reading this Associated Press article and it's like ADL anti-extremism expert says the government's totally fine. | ||
| People don't even realize the extent to which everything that's written and everything that's talked about and everything that's put before you was literally done so by the fucking government. | ||
| Done so by spooks, done so by these like intel spy type people. | ||
| And even people, they're not like, they're not secret agents, they're not like James Bond, they're mediocrities. | ||
| They're mediocrities from bad schools that got funneled into doing this kind of work. | ||
| And everybody believes that's what politics is. | ||
| That it's a Cassie Dillon versus Jared Holt, but it's not. | ||
| Politics is people like me against the system. | ||
| It's the people that are not on the payroll of some billionaire downstream from the State Department or Bank of America fighting against people like me. | ||
| Or what did I say? | ||
| People that are doing that versus people that are not doing that. | ||
| So, anyway. | ||
| But that's just what they're saying about it. | ||
| What I wanted to get into, I kind of just went on a total tangent there. | ||
| But that is how the system works. | ||
| And people, anyway. | ||
| The point is, people don't even realize how entrenched they really are. | ||
| Follow the money. | ||
| Where do people get paid? | ||
| Who signs their paychecks? | ||
| Where does it all come from? | ||
| Because you'll find some troubling things. | ||
| Anyway. | ||
| But back to the news. | ||
| World Economic Forum. | ||
| I wanted to talk about this tonight because this is like a very persistent thing that I've heard over the past couple of years. | ||
| World Economic Forum. | ||
| Klaus Schwab. | ||
| You'll own nothing and be happy. | ||
| And, you know, directionally that's all, like, valid. | ||
| That's all legitimate. | ||
| But I think that lately it's becoming a diversion. | ||
| Because there's kind of like two... Well, let me say it this way. | ||
| The government and the power in the world does some really shady stuff, as we know. | ||
| Powerful people do conspire. | ||
| The rich people, the people in the government, the people that run things, they're all the same people. | ||
| They all went to the same schools, they all go to the same country clubs, they all live in the same zip codes, they're all friends, they all conspire together, and they have an agenda. | ||
| Of course they have secret meetings, and of course they collaborate with each other, and of course they have initiatives and they have things that they'd like to see in the world that are not public. | ||
| All of this goes without saying. | ||
| All this should be self-evident. | ||
| Now, they know that. | ||
| They know that we know that. | ||
| They know that when they're making these shady backroom deals, and when they have, when they, they put one over on the podcast, and so how do they prevent people from finding out about it and organizing against it and overthrowing them? | ||
| Well, they can censor it, they can counter it, they can argue against it. | ||
| There's a really interesting paper that was written in 2008 by a guy named, I believe, Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule. | ||
| Adrian Vermeule, who you might know, he's like a Catholic integralist. | ||
| I think he was at the New York Times. | ||
| But it's this guy, I believe the name is Sunstein, and Adrian Vermeule, they wrote a paper in 2008, and it was a research paper about how to counter so-called conspiracy theories. | ||
| And there's a few menu items, there's a few categories of how the government can respond. | ||
| And they are what you would imagine. | ||
| If somebody is saying that the Jews did 9-11, well, they could just kill all the people saying that or ban them from putting it in the press or publishing it online. | ||
| That's one option. | ||
| They can counter it by going on TV and making the case, doing things like the 9-11 Commission. | ||
| And they produce evidence, and they show it to the public, and they argue against the conspiracy. | ||
| Here's why it was these hijackers from Saudi Arabia. | ||
| Another option, though, that is maybe counterintuitive that people wouldn't think of is, what if you disrupt and disorganize the people that are promulgating the conspiracy theory by introducing red herrings and introducing things that are diversionary? | ||
| Instead of censoring the critics, instead of arguing the critics or the conspiracy theorists, What if you put people in their camp, put people in their group, that posed as one of them, and have them put out some theory, put out ideas that lead the group down a wrong path, or make the group look bad, or make the group look crazy, as a way to disrupt them? | ||
| And what if the government were to promote those people? | ||
| What if the government were to promote and elevate those people? | ||
| And so this is something that, this is not me saying, this is a paper that was written, I believe, at Harvard in 2008. | ||
| And this is an Obama guy. | ||
| Sunstein was an Obama guy. | ||
| There's an article about this in UNS Review. | ||
| If you go to UNS Review American Pravda, he wrote an article, like, why I don't care about Alex Jones or something, and he talks about this. | ||
| This was a guy that went on to work in the Obama administration, writing that this is one way that they can disrupt the conspiracy community, is by putting in these types of people. | ||
| And so, we have to be very on guard about this kind of thing, that when it comes to the so-called red pill, or truth tellers, or people trying to unravel the world, there are people that whether intentionally or unintentionally, | ||
| Are putting out a flavor of these ideas that is not, it's either not true, well, none of it's true, but it's either not true because it's meant to divert, it's meant to dilute, or it's meant to sabotage. | ||
| It's meant to either take people off the right course, it's meant to dilute the message, or it's meant to just make the whole message look silly or stupid or bad or something. | ||
| And so the Klaus Schwab stuff to me falls under that umbrella, because there's clearly something going on in America, which is that there's this replacement migration, white people are being genocided worldwide. | ||
| The men and women are being ripped apart by feminism. | ||
| Christianity is being taken out of the society. | ||
| It's becoming a godless secular society. | ||
| Technology, the medium is the message. | ||
| Technology is invading all of our lives and controlling us. | ||
| And people that control the technology control us. | ||
| These are things that are happening. | ||
| And all the while that you've got people like me talking about things like race realism or Jewish power or talking about feminism and like, you know, the real nature of men and women and Catholicism and things like that, at the same time you've got a steady chorus throughout | ||
| For decades, saying that it's about the Illuminati, and it's about the Trilateral Commission, and it's about Bilderberg, and it's about the Georgia Guidestones, or aliens, or lizard people, or clockwork elves, or everything other than what it is. | ||
| And the World Economic Forum is the latest iteration of this. | ||
| Klaus Schwab is not running the world. | ||
| The World Economic Forum is not running the world. | ||
| People pointing the finger at the World Economic Forum and talking about certain things are not looking at other things. | ||
| And so what's interesting to me is the contrast between the talk about a guy like Klaus Schwab and a guy like Jonathan Greenblatt. | ||
| Jonathan Greenblatt runs the ADL, Anti-Defamation League. | ||
| What is the Anti-Defamation League? | ||
| It was founded 100 years ago because some Jew raped some girl, and he did rape her. | ||
| And I believe he was lynched. | ||
| And this ADL was founded because the Jews protested the lynching of this pedophile rapist. | ||
| And they said that was a defamation because... | ||
| Because the people were anti-Semitic. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| It was a defamation against the Jewish people. | ||
| And there were a lot of incidents like this. | ||
| And honestly, the history of Europe is littered with incidents like this, where Christian children go missing and the well gets poisoned and, you know, what are you doing over there, Rabbi? | ||
| What are you doing at the water well? | ||
| Now everyone has the plague and is dying. | ||
| Hey, what are you doing, Rabbi? | ||
| You're right around the scene of the crime where that Christian child was sacrificed or went missing right around Passover. | ||
| You know, there are a lot of things like this happening over the last 2,000 years. | ||
| But especially in the early 20th century, there's a lot of incidents like this. | ||
| And so the ADL comes together. | ||
| And ADL is, by the way, a project of, uh, what is it called? | ||
| B'nai B'rith? | ||
| I don't know how to pronounce it. | ||
| But it's part of this, like, international Jewish effort. | ||
| Initially, ADL was a project of that, if I'm not mistaken. | ||
| And ADL was founded to basically protect Jews. | ||
| ADL was founded as, like, a Jewish protection thing. | ||
| It's like a Jewish mafia. | ||
| It's like an organized Jewish mafia, is what it is. | ||
| ADL. | ||
| And nobody even thinks, like, well, what... ADL is just now synonymous with, like, anti-hate, anti-racism. | ||
| But what it's really about is protecting Jewish people. | ||
| And not even, like, doing the right thing, but just protecting Jews and their interests and their... and them as a group. | ||
| And there are a lot of such institutions like this. | ||
| The World Zionist Congress, Zionist Organization of America, World Jewish Congress. | ||
| You can go down the list, there's tons of them, various Jewish federations and so on. | ||
| And anyway, Jonathan Greenblatt's the head of ADL. | ||
| ADL's a totally powerful organization, and they were literally in court It came to light that they're a foreign intelligence operation. | ||
| Like, they work with Mossad, they work with Israel. | ||
| It's a foreign intelligence operation on U.S. | ||
|
unidentified
|
soil. | |
| This is all out there. | ||
| You can look it up. | ||
| It's all legit. | ||
| They literally got called out in a U.S. | ||
| court as being a foreign intelligence operation and agents of a foreign government. | ||
| And they operate like a mafia. | ||
| And they used to work with violent groups like the JDL, Jewish Defense League. | ||
| And it was just a few months ago when ADL was going around because a couple of black People. | ||
| A black basketball player and then, yay, the black entertainer, artist, were going around saying things about Jewish people and their influence in society. | ||
| And ADL was going around saying that they were going to get a multi-billion dollar deal canceled and they were gonna get the basketball player kicked out of the games and they're gonna pick up the phone and shut down Apple Music and Spotify and Adidas and Gap and they're gonna shut down William Morris Entertainment and they're gonna shut down | ||
| Balenciaga, and they're gonna shut down all these things, shut down the Twitter, and shut down the Instagram, and apparently, if you criticize Jews, if you say that Jewish people have bad business practices, and they're nepotistic, and they don't care about anybody other than themselves, and they look out for each other, and they have too much influence, and they're not Christian, apparently if you say that, ADL, among others, | ||
| Like Ari Emanuel have the kind of clout and power to totally destroy your life, even if you're a billionaire, even if you're a celebrity, even if you're just a basketball player. | ||
| Is there the same kind of talk about Jonathan Greenblatt, who runs that group, as there is about Klaus Schwab? | ||
| And what are the consequences of criticizing somebody like Jonathan Greenblatt? | ||
| And what are the consequences of criticizing his outfit and their MO? | ||
| Versus the consequences of criticizing Klaus Schwab's outfit and their MO? | ||
| And I'm very interested in that contrast because if you go on Twitter and talk about the World Economic Forum, you're fine. | ||
| And if you go out there and talk about Klaus Schwab, you're normal. | ||
| Maybe people think you're a little weird or a redditor or something, but you're fine. | ||
| You're not going to get fired from your job because you say, I will not eat the bugs like Klaus Schwab wants me to. | ||
| But if you say that you don't like Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL, different story. | ||
| And that should be a very easy to understand demonstration of who really wields the power and what's really going on. | ||
| And the truth is that the World Economic Forum is just a forum. | ||
| And the people that show up at the forum are either like Jonathan Greenblatt or they're under the thumb of people like Jonathan Greenblatt. | ||
| And that's what matters. | ||
| World Economic Forum is a forum for government and business leaders who are all either Jewish or subject to Jewish interest. | ||
| Jewish bullying, Jewish mafia tactics. | ||
| And so people want to fixate on the forum, and they want to fixate on the resort that it happens at, and the guy that hosts it, but they don't want to talk about who's there, and what their early life says, and what their agenda is, and what the commonalities are between them. | ||
| And that's what really matters, isn't it? | ||
| So, you know, I've been hearing this Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum, depopulation, transhumanist, Georgia Guidestone. | ||
| Yeah, none of that actually sounds all that crazy. | ||
| People have been saying that on TV forever, and everyone knows about all that. | ||
| Okay, everyone knows about all that. | ||
| Well, not everybody, but a lot of people do. | ||
| You can say all that and still be on YouTube. | ||
| You could say, you know, like Tim Pool could go on the Tim Pool Show and say, I don't like Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum. | ||
| And he doesn't get banned on YouTube. | ||
| If you go on there and say something about, like what Ye said, different story. | ||
| So I look at that as just a great big diversion. | ||
| And it's not to say that the World Economic Forum doesn't articulate some aspects of the global agenda and things like that. | ||
| It would have to. | ||
| It's a forum for the global leaders, but what matters is who the leaders are. | ||
| And this is something that Bannon kind of started. | ||
| I don't know if you'll recall, but the World Economic Forum happens in Davos. | ||
| Where have you heard Davos before? | ||
| Because the first time I heard it, I heard Steve Bannon say it. | ||
| Back in 2016 or 2017, he used to say the Davos crowd in a stupid Irish-American accent, like he's so folksy. | ||
| It's like he worked at Goldman Sachs. | ||
| He acts like he's just one of the guys. | ||
| It's like you weren't your naval intelligence spook and you worked at Goldman Sachs. | ||
| And he has this outfit and he has this affect like he's just some city guy. | ||
| Like he's some rough-around-the-edges city guy. | ||
| It's like you're a naval intelligence spook and you work for Goldman Sachs. | ||
| And you're a conduit for the Mercer family. | ||
| Anyway, so he would always say, you know, the Davos crowd, and that never meant anything to me. | ||
| When he did, he did that debate, that monk debate in Canada, and he would always say the Davos crowd, the Davos crowd, the globalists, the Davos crowd. | ||
| That's the first time that I had heard that, and I was young, so, you know, maybe that's something that other people had known about, but that's when I heard about it. | ||
| And to me, talking about those kinds of things, it's just a diversion. | ||
| They're talking about an elite, which is, like, generic and neutral, and has an agenda, which is generic and neutral. | ||
| And the fact of the matter is, the elite is not generic and neutral, and their agenda is not generic and neutral. | ||
| The elite are a kind of people, and they're doing specific things to a certain group of people. | ||
| The elites are Jewish, and they're doing something to white countries. | ||
| Like, and, you know, to say that they're doing it deliberately, and like there's, just because they hate white people, now maybe that's more of a reach, maybe that's something that would be more circumstantial. | ||
| But purely in terms of what we can attribute, what we can look at, just at the facts, the elite universities, the hedge funds, the political donors, they're all overwhelmingly Jewish. | ||
| The elite universities are all run by Jewish people. | ||
| I'm talking about Ivy Leagues. | ||
| 7 out of 8, or is it 6? | ||
| 5 out of 6? | ||
| But they're all run by, all the presidents are Jewish. | ||
| And all of their departments and all their advanced graduate schools, look at the people running them. | ||
| And they go on to produce the professionals. | ||
| They go on to produce the class of people that are going to be the rulers, or the class of professionals that work for the rulers. | ||
| And then you take a look at the hedge fund managers. | ||
| And it's like 14 out of 25 of the top hedge fund managers are Jewish. | ||
| And it's like, you look at the biggest donors on the Democrat or Republican side, and you took the top 10 Democrats, top 10 Republicans, and the majority out of the top 20 are Jewish. | ||
| And it's like, it goes on and on and on like that. | ||
| You look at the guy that runs OnlyFans, Jewish. | ||
| The guy that runs MindGeek, which owns the bigger porn sites, also Jewish. | ||
| And you look at the big music labels, the big record labels, and you look at the big Hollywood studios run by Jewish people. | ||
| So you look around the board and it's like, okay, so it's not just like a neutral, genderless, raceless elite. | ||
| Which is what they like to think they would like for us to think of them as suits. | ||
| They're just suits. | ||
| They're just faceless suits and masks. | ||
| It's like, well, they're not just suits and masks. | ||
| There are people with parents from places, specific places. | ||
| Look around. | ||
| You don't have to look very far. | ||
| Who's been running the Federal Reserve since the 80s, with the exception of Jerome Powell? | ||
| Janet Yellen, Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan, hello? | ||
| I mean, look at the people who run the banks. | ||
| You don't have to look very far to start seeing these patterns. | ||
| Red media, hello? | ||
| And so the point is, it's not just any kind of elite doing any kind of thing. | ||
| And what countries are they doing it to? | ||
| Africa has a fine fertility rate. | ||
| If you're talking about depopulation, well, it's not working in Africa. | ||
| It's not working in the Middle East. | ||
| It's certainly not working in Syria or Afghanistan. | ||
| It's not working in Nigeria. | ||
| There's going to be 7 billion Africans by the end of the century. | ||
| There's 8 billion human beings now. | ||
| So people want to talk about these things that are being done to the population. | ||
| It's like things are being done to Christianity. | ||
| Things are being done to white people, to white countries, by this group. | ||
| And it's not to say that that's the only thing that's going on in the world, because there are other power centers in the world. | ||
| The Chinese are powerful, and the Russians, I believe, are independent, and you've got these Gulf states which are in bed with Israel to some extent, but they exert their own influence. | ||
| And so, it's not the only force, but we have to be honest about what's going on, and this idea that it's this faceless, neutral class of suits, and they're doing it to everybody. | ||
| It's like, well, I mean, there are some things they are, but some people are benefiting at the detriment or at the expense of other people. | ||
| And the people that are moving to America, it's like they won the lottery at the expense of the native-born population. | ||
| And the people that are the beneficiaries of the Platinum Plans, and the reparations, and the environmental social governance, and the diversity, equity, and inclusion, they're benefiting at the expense of the white people. | ||
| So nobody ever wants to talk about, like, because, and I remember, I debated Alex Jones about this, and you know, it's, I'm glad we had that debate, because it's always such a trip watching his show. | ||
| I go on his show and he's like, well I understand that you're mad that they attack white people. | ||
| It's like, dude, that's the basis of it! | ||
| That's the basis of it! | ||
| You're gonna sit here and pretend that DEI, ESG, critical race theory, mass migration, we're supposed to pretend that that's hurting non-white people equally? | ||
| Or at all? | ||
| It's not! | ||
| It's benefiting them at the expense of white people, and that's a feature, not a bug. | ||
| And so, you know, when he sort of says that like it's this add-on, well, I get you don't like how they talk about white people. | ||
| It's like, dude, that's the basis of the whole agenda. | ||
| It's like when Chris Rufo and that other guy talk about critical race theory and they say, well, the real victims are the Asians and the black kids. | ||
| Because the black kids are taught they can't be victorious. | ||
| They're taught to be victims. | ||
| And the Asians are taught something. | ||
| It's like, no, clearly, clearly the white people are the big losers in that program. | ||
| And the same is true of mass immigration. | ||
| And the same is true of the other stuff. | ||
| So. | ||
| And as far as the Jewish thing, when people say, well, they're not really Jewish, or it's these secular Jews, but the real thing they have in common is they're liberals, it's like, that's not true! | ||
| That's also not true! | ||
| ADL, SPLC, you know, all these types of groups, you know, look what's going on there, and look at the things you're not allowed to say! | ||
| It's not to say that they don't oppose anybody else, but who do they really go the hardest against? | ||
| And why? | ||
| It's because they're a mafia. | ||
| And they're very powerful. | ||
| And they're not the only game in town, but they're the only ones you can't talk about, because that's how powerful they are. | ||
| But we want to talk about Davos, the name of the resort town. | ||
| It's like, it ain't Davos, dude. | ||
| It's Jewish. | ||
| Okay, the Davos crowd. | ||
| Yeah, well, the Davos crowd are all taking Saturday off, okay? | ||
| What you left out about the Davos crowd, aside from the fact The fact that they meet at a resort town called Davos is they're all taking Saturday off and they're all wearing two hats. | ||
| Especially after what happened to Ye. | ||
| That proved it. | ||
| If anybody doubted, that proved it. | ||
| This guy was a billionaire. | ||
| He is one of the most beloved, influential, brilliant, talked about, famous people in the world. | ||
| In this ...century in American history and look at what they were able to do. | ||
| They were able to scuttle two 10-year, billion-dollar deals. | ||
| Two! | ||
| And freeze all his money and sue his pants off and Get talent agencies to back out, stadiums won't host his show, Spotify won't publish his music. | ||
| This is a guy that was everybody on TV, every celebrity. | ||
| He, I mean, he could really get away with anything and they would have him on the show and tell him how smart he was and how great he was and how much they love his music and blah blah blah, whatever. | ||
| They wear his shoes, they wear his hoodie. | ||
| And it's like he said, DEF CON 3, a flip, A flip switch. | ||
| A switch flipped! | ||
| I always do that. | ||
| A switch flipped, and it was game over, man. | ||
| Not game over, but you know. | ||
| And, and... They flipped the switch, and it was, it was never, it's never gonna be the same. | ||
| And that was the guy with, that was the richest black guy in America. | ||
| And not just any rich guy, but like, the fan favorite of, like, Earth. | ||
| Not because he talked about Democrats or Planned Parenthood or Trump or wearing the MAGA hat, but because he said Jews. | ||
| And you don't talk about that. | ||
| Yeah, you don't know what's up. | ||
| Anyway, so that's that, but I want to move on. | ||
| I want to take a look at our Super Chats. | ||
| We'll see what you guys are saying about all this. | ||
| Let me just get my water over here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's see. | |
| Take a look at our super chats. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's see. | |
| Okay. | ||
| let me just refresh this okay Let's see. | ||
| Benjamin Bingham says, Nick, you meet the girl of your dreams, but she's vaccinated. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Damn. | |
| Kind of already happened. | ||
| With, uh, I believe Kathy Zhu is vaccinated. | ||
| Is it a deal breaker? | ||
| By the way, I love you so much. | ||
| Thanks for giving my views a voice. | ||
| Hey, well, thank you, man. | ||
| Love you too, buddy. | ||
| Girl of my dreams! | ||
| Girl of my dreams, but vaccinated. | ||
| That's a tough one. | ||
| Yeah, that's a tough one. | ||
| Uh, you know, honestly... Here's the problem. | ||
| You know, as far as if she's like, let's say hypothetically, she's my wife, it's not the worst thing in the world because then there's like a little countdown timer. | ||
| And I'm thinking like Henry VIII, you know? | ||
| Because it's like if she's vaccinated, that means it's like, it's like, okay, this marriage has got a whole lot shorter. | ||
| And if you know anything about me, you know, you know, it's like, okay, Well, her mortality just went down 50 years? | ||
| Damn, that sucks. | ||
| You know, presumably she's 17, 18 years old. | ||
| You're telling me her life expectancy goes considerably down the older she gets to almost nothing by the time she's 30? | ||
| Man, that sucks. | ||
| You know, so in some cases, it's almost like her being vaccinated is part of her being the dream girl. | ||
| In some sense, you know, perhaps her being vaccinated makes her the dream girl. | ||
| You know? | ||
| Because it's like, she's not getting old. | ||
| She's just gonna die suddenly. | ||
| You know? | ||
| No, I shouldn't say that. | ||
| That's terrible. | ||
| I shouldn't say that. | ||
| But you know, we're going to be having a big fight. | ||
| We're going to be having it out. | ||
| We're driving home from the function. | ||
| The kids are crying in the back. | ||
| I'm screaming. | ||
| I'm like, and you know what? | ||
| This is so typical. | ||
| This is, I can't believe you would say that to me. |
Export Selection