All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 11, 2022 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:00:28
THE END??? Red Wave ANNIHILATED By Retards And Hoes... TRUMP ALONE CAN FIX | America First Ep. 1096THE END??? Red Wave ANNIHILATED By Retards And Hoes... TRUMP ALONE CAN FIX | America First Ep. 1096
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
56:46
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
He's going to be only
America first.
America first. - Good evening,
everybody.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Thursday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight.
Lots to get into.
Big, important show.
A lot of subject matter about the 2022 midterms that we didn't get to last night.
Too much to talk about.
Of course the 2022 midterms took place on Tuesday with some shocking surprising results and we covered it live and last night I gave you my big overview on the election and what it all means and how we're supposed to interpret the results but we didn't get to maybe the biggest takeaway and perhaps the most important subject
Which is how the 2022 midterms will shape the 2024 presidential election primary on the Republican side.
And I'm specifically talking about this civil war that is now brewing behind the scenes and a little bit in public between the Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and the former President Donald Trump.
I intended to talk about it last night.
We ran out of time.
We'll be talking tonight about that.
That'll be our featured story.
I want to get into what effect the results of the midterms will have on this primary, which is actually set to begin on Tuesday.
This Tuesday, November 15th, which is crazy.
It's not crazy because it's historically unprecedented what has been going on, really since 2016, but I guess since 2020.
But a primary has never started this early, fully two years before the presidential election.
It's way earlier than the last presidential cycle, or the cycle before that, or the cycle before that.
So the Republican primary and the race for president will begin on Tuesday and we'll be covering that.
Trump is expected to announce at Mar-a-Lago and he may then face a primary challenge from Ron DeSantis at some point then in 2023.
And whoever wins that is going to shape the future of the party and it's going to be a referendum on whether the MAGA movement lives or dies.
Whether that's going to Leave an indelible mark on the Republican Party and then shape American politics institutionally for a century to come or if it will evaporate, become co-opted and destroyed.
Now you know how I feel about this already.
I am totally with Trump.
It is Trump 2024 on this show.
If you're not down with that, leave.
Stop watching.
Pull the plug.
unidentified
I hate you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
You're a traitor.
You're a dog.
You're an animal.
Okay?
You're trash.
And you're scum.
And you ought to be ashamed of yourself.
So it's Trump 2024 or nothing.
Trump 24 or bust.
Trump 24 until I die.
We're standing back and standing by.
And we'll get into why.
We also are going to talk about the exit polls.
We didn't get to that either.
I wanted to touch a little bit on that last night, and I'll talk briefly about it tonight.
It's very interesting.
We not only had results which were horrible for Republicans, but wait until you get a load of We're the different demographic groups broke down.
Surprise, surprise!
We didn't get 50% of Hispanics like everybody thought we would.
I was right about that.
Surprise, surprise!
We still didn't get 20% of those blacks.
unidentified
Damn it!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I really thought we were gonna do it this time.
We haven't won more than 12% of blacks in practically a hundred years.
But I keep thinking this is gonna be the year when they stop voting more than 90% for Democrats.
It didn't happen.
Yeah, go figure.
So we'll get into the exit polls as well.
It's just funny because on top of everything else, when we could get into Trump and DeSantis and all of that, but you still have these idiots on our side that are clinging to the idea after... and they think it's a new idea.
It's not.
They're still clinging to this idea that we're gonna become the party of the minorities.
It's never gonna happen!
Politics is racialized.
It is what it is.
I'm not pro or against.
That's just how it is.
The Republican Party is the white party, and the Democrat Party is the non-white party.
Again, I didn't make it that way.
unidentified
I didn't design it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Honestly, I'm really just ambivalent about it, but that's the way it is.
And all you have to do is look at the exit polls, or any poll for that matter.
The vast majority of non-whites vote for Democrats.
And if only non-whites were voting in elections, Democrats would win landslide elections every single year in nearly every state.
And if only whites were voting, then Republicans would be winning landslides in every election in nearly every single state all the time.
So like it or not that's the way it is and there are still people out there and they come up with a new argument for it or a new big idea for it every time.
At one point they said it was about freedom and Hispanics were natural conservatives and this kind of thing and lately Some have fallen in love with the idea that the Republican Party is going to become the working man's party, going to become the party of the union and industry, and that's how we're going to get them back on the basis of economics.
Yeah, well, it didn't pan out, so we'll get into that as well.
Should be a great show.
Before we get into the news, though, I want to remind you to follow me here on Cozy.
Smash the follow button right here to get a push notification when I go live.
Follow me on Gab Telegram, True Social, Parler.
Links are all down below.
So make sure to follow me.
What else?
I think that's it.
That's enough.
Frankly, that's enough.
I will be covering the Mar-a-Lago announcement on Tuesday.
I don't know what time it's at.
It should be prime time, so like 6 or 7 o'clock, although I don't know.
So, I'll be covering that Tuesday.
So if you're looking to tune in to the Trump announcement, so awesome.
Official, gonna be one of the biggest events in a long time.
Tune in here, cozy.tv slash Nick.
Besides that, not much else going on.
Okay.
Oh, also...
It was announced inadvertently by Destiny that I will be debating Destiny again on November 28th on the No Jumper podcast.
So I didn't know if that was official yet or not but he said it on his stream tonight.
So I'm gonna announce it tonight.
November 28th.
It's a Tuesday and I will be in a discussion with Destiny live in studio in LA on the No Jumper podcast.
So that should be a lot of fun.
And apparently Sneako will be there too.
I think he's doing a panel the same week.
So maybe he'll drop in on our conversation.
Maybe I'll drop in.
I don't know.
But it's gonna be cool.
I'm gonna try and hang out with him.
So another big collaboration in the works.
And possibly another big one next week.
I'm not gonna be in town next week.
I'll be out of town from next Wednesday until next Tuesday, I believe.
And I might be doing a big collaboration, not sure yet, but I think it's almost a done deal.
unidentified
So, some cool stuff going on.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Alright, so with that being said, we're going to dive in.
We'll get into the exit polls, and I don't have too much to say about it, but I did just want to rub it in everybody's faces, because for what it's worth, this show and this movement have been completely consistent from the beginning.
About all these things, about the Jewish media.
I've been talking about the Jewish media since day one, okay?
And as far as white identity politics and White Lives Matter and opposing anti-white hatred, it's very popular now, but it was radioactive five years ago.
But I was there pushing that too at Charlottesville and on my show.
And so in a certain way, these things are sort of fundamental.
I don't talk about them on the show every night.
Occasionally I get back into the fundamentals, but we've been talking about a lot of these big narrative arcs over the year about Ukraine and about the midterms and about what would have been the other big subjects?
I'm drawing a blank lately.
Kyrie Irving, yay, whatever.
But the fundamental thing about the show is understanding that the country is racial.
It's a descriptive statement.
Before, you know, if you don't watch the show, if you're not really fully on board with me, look, I'm just describing how it is.
You don't have to like it.
In fact, you can dislike it.
But the country is racial.
The world is racial.
There are human beings, they are subdivided into races, and there is biological diversity within the human species.
And it's not just the skin color, it's all kinds of things.
We know that white people, and black people, and Asian people, and Hispanic people, and Indians, we all look different.
And we're not just different colors, we're different in all kinds of ways.
We have different kinds of hair, and different eyes, and noses, and lips, and cheeks, and different stature, and different all kinds of things.
Because We're in groups.
We're in biological categories.
And we're all human beings, but that diversity does exist.
It's real biological diversity.
And insofar as you have that, then it is going to show up.
These differences, this diversity is going to show up in all ways that you measure large groups of human beings.
It's going to show up, these diversities will present themselves in creative output, in intellectual output, economic output, anything that you measure you're going to see it.
And you're going to see it in politics too.
The reason I say it this way, the reason I'm saying it so clinically, and I'm sure a lot of people are like, yeah, duh, is because conservatives are in total denial about this.
Even mainstream conservatives, all the way in 2022, are in complete denial about this fact.
And they say that if you talk about race, if you talk about the essentialism of race, that race is an essential characteristic, meaning it's a part of a person's essence, They recoil at this.
They say that the only reason politics is racial or has identity politics is because of nefarious actors that are trying to divide us.
In other words, these racial divisions are arbitrary and unnecessary.
And they're not intrinsic to our nature.
They were designed.
They were cooked up.
It's particular to the current situation in America.
But if there weren't leftists trying to divide us apart, oh, they'd all just go away.
Well, that's not true.
As it turns out, race matters.
It matters who you are.
It matters what race you are.
It matters that America is a white country.
It matters.
It matters that America was founded, settled, created, built by white people.
90% white until very recently.
And now it's not.
And you can look at that in politics.
The non-white people don't vote the same as white people.
They don't believe the same things.
They don't have the same ideas.
They don't have the same culture.
Because they are different from us.
They just are.
And for the longest time, conservatives have been lying to themselves about the existential threat that is posed to our way of life by the increasing proportion of non-white people in America.
They've been lying to themselves about the gravity of that threat, or that that is a threat, by telling themselves that we can just convince these people, we can convince all of these non-white people, And their numbers grow greater every day, relatively, in absolute terms.
We can just convince them that our way of life is valuable.
And we can convince them to vote for representatives who want to preserve our way of life.
That, again, is a white way of life.
It was created, built, founded, perpetuated by whites for centuries.
And now that you have all these Africans and Asians and Hispanics living here, and they went from 10% to now 40% of the population, and soon 50 or 60%, well our job is to convince them that the status quo that whites created is worthwhile, and they should vote for politicians that want to protect it.
Conservatives.
Conserve it.
And they've told themselves, we don't have to worry about all these non-whites because it's actually going to be very easy to convince them.
And for a long time they said that we can convince them on the basis of ideology.
These Hispanic and black people are naturally conservative.
And the only reason that they don't vote for the conservative Republican Party is because they've been tricked by the media.
They've been tricked by Democrats.
And if we could just untrick them, if we could just educate them with Dinesh D'Souza movies, and tell them that in fact it is in their best interest to perpetuate our way of life, well then, they'll be voting for Republicans just like us.
And that wasn't true.
When conservatives were promulgating this natural conservative argument, year after year after year, conservatives lost with black voters, hispanic voters, asian voters, reliably, all the time.
And then Trump came along in 2016 and totally changed the logic and said, you know what?
We're the white party.
It is what it is.
90% of the people that voted for Trump in 2016 were white.
So, there are non-white people voting for Trump, but there's not very many of them.
And there are white people that voted for Biden, but 92% of black people voted for Biden.
And 70% of Hispanics voted for Biden.
And 70% of Asians voted for Biden.
And the vast majority of non-white people voted for Biden.
And these are the voting blocs.
Is most of the whites and some of the non-whites for the Republicans and about half and a changing number of white people for the Democrats and nearly all of the minorities.
That's the way it is.
And that explains how modern politics is.
On BLM, on immigration, on the anti-white hatred and the destruction of the monuments and the holidays and Columbus and all of that.
Makes perfect sense.
And so Trump comes in in 2016 and says, you know what?
I'll just try to get more white voters.
Whites are 60% of the country.
They're the majority in the swing states that we lose consistently.
I'll just appeal to the white voters rather than trying to pander to the black and Hispanic voters.
And that's how I'm going to create a coalition.
I'll win more whites than Mitt Romney.
I'll win more whites than John McCain.
Instead of trying to win more non-whites than any Republican has ever won in this century.
And then he won the election.
And I thought, foolishly, that that would be enough to put to bed, finally, the idea that pandering to minorities or non-white voters is going to be a long-term Viable electoral strategy for conservatives.
But it wasn't.
Because ever since then, you've had this natural conservative pandering to minority thing, this race denialism creep back into the Republican Party, creep back into conservative politics in a different form.
And you get guys like Steve Bannon, who is a true boomer.
He is a true boomer who is loaded up with white guilt and just as ignorant as they come.
I don't think he's a dumb guy.
But it's generational.
He is a thick-as-pig-shit white boomer who really does feel guilty about racism and slavery.
And so he really wants black people to think that he's not racist.
And he really wants to be their best friend and he wants them to be at the rally and all this.
And so guys like Steve Bannon and others have been pushing this idea now for years.
That if we change the Republican Party into a poor person's party, into a working class party, so-called working classes doesn't even exist, okay?
Everybody works, except for the rich.
What it really is, is you've got welfare people, you've got welfare minorities and welfare whites who do not work.
You've got a sort of slave class of retail workers and immigrants and, you know, this perpetual underclass.
Then you've got a true middle class, then you've got the rich.
And anyway, and the rich can be subdivided, but there's the working, what does that even mean?
But anyway, so Bannon says, we're gonna win over these blacks and Hispanics on the basis of their economic plight.
We're gonna make the Republican Party a party of poor people and a party of the worker as opposed to the capitalist.
The worker as opposed to the white plantation owner, whatever.
So he says, we're going to create something called multi-racial, working class populism.
We're going to take the Trump message, take away all this white revanchism, take away all this make America great again, confederate flag stuff, and we're going to inject it with Bernie Sanders, free healthcare, free stuff.
He says, and we're going to win over all of the Hispanics and all the blacks, and the Republican Party will rule for a thousand years.
Literally, the way that he talks.
And Republicans have been telling themselves in the 2018 election, in the 2020 election, in the 2022 election, that the Republican Party is getting more diverse and we're winning more Latinos and more blacks and eventually the wall is going to break and it's going to be viable that Republicans will be, they'll be competing for these minority voters.
And it just never happens.
And here we are again in 2022.
F you, Bannon.
F you, Steve Bannon, you fat bitch.
You lost.
You were wrong.
These are the exit polls, according to ABC, about how voters broke down along racial lines.
unidentified
Can I load it up?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Oh, come on.
That's not loading for me right now.
Seriously?
All right, let me Google.
Seriously, the page is literally broke.
Let me pull it up.
Cut this out.
Cut this part out.
Here we go.
I found a different one.
So check this out.
Here is how the partisan vote broke down along racial lines.
60% went for Republicans, 40% for Democrats, so a majority of white people voted for Republicans.
Black voters, 86% went for Democrats, 13% for Republicans.
Republicans, here we are, decades into this strategy of Platinum Plan, First Step Act, you know, you name it.
13.
We barely get double digits.
Barely double digits!
They vote 86%!
That means one in- you could get 10 black people in a room and 9 of them vote for Democrats.
Still!
86% voted for Democrats.
They literally thought they were going to get 20%.
I saw a clip from Ben Shapiro last week and he was talking about the polls and he said, some of the polls are showing that Republicans have 17% support among blacks.
Do you know what that means?
Do you know what a big deal that is?
Republicans have never gotten more than between 8 and 12% since Franklin Roosevelt.
This happens every time.
I've only been doing this for six years and it's happened every time.
They tell themselves before the election, we're finally gonna break the wall.
We're gonna get 20%.
It never happens.
They seriously thought they were gonna get 20% of the black vote.
And these are the people who get paid the big bucks.
This is Steve Bannon, who lords over all this foreign money from Israel and China.
And Ben Shapiro, same exact story.
And these are the most listened to.
You got Bannon, who's like the Trump wing, and Shapiro is like the Jewish wing.
They're both Jewish, but Shapiro's like the Zionist, neocon wing, and they're both got millions of listeners, and identically, they're both on their pile of Jewish money saying, we're gonna get 20% of the black vote, and we don't even come close.
We haven't even come close once.
13%!
Next time for sure.
Hispanics!
This is the other one.
They say, of course, the Hispanics are the largest... are the, uh...
Most rapidly growing minority group in the United States as a result of legal and illegal immigration.
Not a problem, Republicans say, because one day Hispanics are going to become white.
They're going to start calling themselves white.
This is what they say.
There's a book out called White Shift by some Jew.
And it says that Hispanics will eventually become white.
unidentified
Really?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Because they look brown to me.
I'm Hispanic.
I'm Mexican.
And you know what?
My grandfather was brown.
unidentified
Okay?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
He was brown.
He looked like an Indian.
They called him Injun Joe.
And it was only because I have three white grandparents that I am white presenting.
unidentified
Okay?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I have white skin.
I have green eyes.
I have brown hair.
I don't have the phenotype from my mom.
Okay?
But the idea that Hispanics, marrying Hispanics, in the Southwestern United States, in Texas, in LA, in Southern California, you got brown people who are 3 feet tall with black hair marrying other brown people who are 3 feet tall with black hair, Guess what their kids are?
Brown, three feet tall, with black hair, and almond-shaped eyes, and they don't look white, and they're not white, and they don't act white, and the average IQ of the people coming across the border is 85, and so none of that is changing, but they tell us, don't worry, these guys are becoming white, okay?
Over time, they're going to start calling themselves white, and acting white, and they're gonna be white, And they're all going to vote for Republicans because they drive trucks, and they work on farms, and they're patriotic, and they're Christian.
Well, Hispanics in this election voted 60% for Democrats, 39% for Republicans.
It's exactly the same as it was in the last cycle, the same as the cycle before that, and a little bit better than the cycle before that.
40% appears to be the ceiling.
I've watched a lot of elections and a lot of special elections.
I don't think I've ever seen the Hispanic vote, with the exception of I think one election, where they've gone more than 40% for Republicans.
So 60% that's still That's still not great.
But it gets better on that one too.
Asians, 60% Democrat, 40% Republican.
So not one non-white group voted a majority for Republicans.
Whites were the only group.
So in other words, if there were no white voters, Republicans would not have won anywhere.
Now, you'd have to break it down.
Of course, I'm exaggerating a little bit.
You'd have to break it down state by state and district by district.
But think about that.
If there were no white voters, Republicans would have absolutely lost this election.
And think of what that means.
Inflation was 10%.
Crime is higher than it's ever been this century.
There's a labor shortage.
There's a supply shortage.
We're at war with Russia, and this is the incumbent party that would have got, at the minimum, blacks 86, Hispanics 60, Asians 60, it wasn't even close, 20%!
Democrats would have won this election by 20% if there were no white people in America.
Now, tell me why all these other non-white countries are so dysfunctional.
They love it!
That's what they vote for there.
That's a society they create.
Okay?
Are you starting to see the problem?
It's been 20 years, man.
It's been 30 years.
30 years of this dynamic.
And it's worse than ever before and they still vote for Democrats no matter how much outreach and pandering and bending over backwards.
Is that not crazy?
Democrats would have won this election if you tallied up all the votes by 20%.
Or more!
If it was only non-white voters.
That, let that sink in.
Think about that.
There's a lesson in there.
Okay?
Now it gets even better because when you break it down by age, it's even worse.
Okay?
Black voters aged 18 to 29, 89% for Democrats.
to 29, 89% for Democrats.
unidentified
89%.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
89%.
So that's the future.
Blacks overall, Young blacks, 18 to 29, were 89 to 9.
9% of young blacks voted for Republicans.
If you look at Hispanics, 18 to 29, 68% voted for Democrats, 30% for Republicans.
And there's no numbers on Asians.
Whites, 18 to 29, still not good, but better.
politics 18 to 29 68 voted for democrats 30 for republicans and there's no numbers on asians whites 18 to 29 still not good but better 40 for republicans 58 for democrats and So it is true the younger generation is more liberal, but the young blacks and Hispanics are even more liberal than whites.
Still, it's the older blacks and Hispanics that are anchoring these high percentages.
It's these boomers who grew up in a country where there was Jim Crow, who grew up in this country where they're probably not immigrants, or the children of immigrants necessarily.
So think about that.
And what's the point of all this?
If the Republican Party is going to be viable in the future, we are going to have to win over Hispanics, we are going to have to win over blacks, but the point is this.
We're not, elections are not going to be won and lost for Republicans based on the Hispanic and black vote, which is basically locked in.
It's only going to be won with the dynamic white vote.
That's it.
So this idea that we're going to transform our party to try to win over Hispanics, it doesn't work.
So let's just stop doing that.
We should not stop being tough on crime to win over black voters, because the black vote is inelastic.
It never changes, no matter what.
Think about it this way.
Here's a startling, troubling statistic for you.
Even blacks who self-identify as politically conservative, the majority of them vote for Democrats.
Pro-life, socially conservative, fiscally conservative, self-identified politically conservative blacks, the majority of them vote for Democrats.
Okay?
So, the conservative Republican Party can't even win over conservative black voters.
And it would necessarily be the case because it's 9 and 10.
So not 9 and 10 blacks are liberal, but 9 and 10 blacks vote for Democrats.
Why do they do that?
God only knows.
Why do they play the knockout game?
Why do they punch white people in the street for no reason?
Why do they rob 5-7-11's in 30 minutes?
Why do they walk around with their pants around their ankles?
I don't know.
I don't know.
I'm not black.
So it's not my experience.
It's unexplainable.
But this is what they do.
Okay?
This is how they are.
It is what it is.
That black vote is locked in, man.
It is totally inelastic.
It doesn't matter.
I mean, it doesn't matter what they believe or who they like.
I mean, it just doesn't matter.
So why would we create these opportunity zones and a platinum plan and Just send the military in.
Do what must be done.
Send the military into these black neighborhoods.
Make the streets safe.
They'll complain about it.
It doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter.
They're never going to vote for us.
Help them.
They can't help themselves.
Same thing with Hispanics.
You know, you're going to get 30-40%.
The only thing that Hispanics seem to like is racism against blacks.
So it seems.
2020, you had the best turnout among Hispanics for Republicans out of any other election in response to BLM because Hispanics in Little Village and Pilsen were aiming guns at the black rioters in the city of Chicago.
This is what happened.
There was a major Hispanic backlash to the black crime.
So should we be appealing to Hispanics?
I don't think necessarily that is the case.
The only time when Republicans won a truly national election was in 16 and 20 with Trump.
And Trump did it by bringing out white voters in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan.
It's not to say only talk to them.
It's not to say that we don't want other voters.
But it is to say, if you're a smart person, if you're a strategic person, and you're trying to win an election, and trying to maximize your upside, you focus on where there's the most to gain.
And the majority, and the people that are sympathetic to the Republican Party, are still the white people.
So, it was true then, it's still true now.
Multiracial working class populism is not going to work.
And here's the last thing I'll say about it.
There was an article in the New York Times earlier this year.
And it talked about Hispanic opinion polling.
And it showed that Hispanics actually agree with Republicans on quite a bit.
They agree with Republicans on illegal immigration.
Surprisingly.
They agree with Republicans on crime.
They agree with Republicans on the economy.
Those were arguably the three biggest issues in this election.
Crime, immigration, and the economy.
All of which Hispanics agree with, Republicans on.
The economy is busted.
Illegal immigration is worse than ever.
Crime is worse than any point in this decade or in this century, I should say.
unidentified
Crime is worse than ever.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
If we were to expect Hispanics to vote for Republicans based on their broad agreement with us on the most important issues in this cycle, then they should have voted a majority at least 60% for Republicans, but they didn't.
Why not?
It's because on issues of culture and identity, they still side with the Democrats.
They're for gun control, they're for abortion, they're for And overall, they're in favor of the broad Democrat vision for America, which is diversity, inclusion, anti-white, anti-colonial, anti-settler.
That's what they're in agreement with.
To put it simply, they think that Republicans are racist.
They think that Republicans are too racist and too white And they also think probably that that is something that is wrong with America.
And so their idea of planning their flag as a people in America is with Democrats as their representatives.
It's what they do.
The Democrat Party is their ethnic interest lobby.
They're in the Democratic Party Congress as the Latino faction.
They don't see themselves as part of a whole holistic American identity the way that Republicans do.
That's and that's the only way that you can explain it.
How else could you explain it?
If you look at black and hispanic voters as voters like white people who are going to vote based on their ideas and based on their policies and affiliation, then you would expect in an election where the incumbent party has given us High inflation, bad crime, worse than ever illegal immigration.
You'd expect that Hispanics, who the polling shows, the majority agree.
60-70% agree with Republicans on all those issues.
You'd expect them to go for Republicans, but they didn't.
The only conclusion that you can draw, and don't tell me it's about candidate quality, don't tell me it's about the particularities of the race.
These are patterns that have gone on for 30 years.
30 year trend lines.
It's not about the particularities of this race or this year or this cycle or this candidate.
The only conclusion that you can draw is that blacks and Hispanics care more about their ethnic interest and their identity as a people within America than they do about their ideologies.
They're not ideological.
They're tribal.
They don't vote based on the ideas of their fellow Americans or the policies of the representatives.
They vote based on their ethnicity.
They are Hispanic.
They are Black.
They vote for the Hispanic and Black Party.
In the same way that Trump made the Republican Party to some extent the White Party.
If it wasn't explicitly that before.
Again, I'm just saying how it is.
I'm not saying the way I'd like it to be.
I wish that Hispanics and blacks were assimilated enough that they would be 50-50 or 60-40 or whatever, but they're just simply not.
And nobody likes to look at the exit polls because it's kind of a big red pill that 13% of the population votes in 90% one way every time for like a hundred years.
So...
Anyway, so that's that.
But I want to move on.
I want to get into our big story tonight, which is about DeSantis.
And so those are just the exit polls.
That's just big picture stuff.
We already knew that, but in case you needed a reminder, there is no white shift.
Anglo-American values are not being transmitted to these immigrant groups.
It just isn't happening.
And the idea that we're going to pander to them and the The road to the White House runs through Little Mexico.
That just isn't true.
So I want to move on and get into this civil war between Trump and DeSantis.
This is the other major and maybe the biggest takeaway of the midterms.
Before the midterms even happened, there was this warning shot fired, where Trump said at a rally two days before the midterms, When he was in Florida endorsing candidates, he said, Ron DeSanctimonious.
And that, and I honestly think it's kind of lame.
Ron DeSanctimonious.
Like, I had to Google Sanctimonious.
I mean, I know what it means, but it's one of those ones where it's like, what does that mean again?
That's not the same as Little Marco.
Hey, you're little, bitch.
I'm bigger than you.
I could beat your ass.
Hey, little Marco.
Hey, lie-in-tent.
You're a liar.
You put your hand on the Bible and then you lie.
unidentified
Why?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Because you hate God?
You lie.
You're a child of the lie.
Everything you say is a lie.
And we all hate you and you're ugly.
And your wife is ugly.
That was in 2016.
You know, when Trump was doing insults in 2016, it was stuff like that.
Little Marco, Lying Ted, what was the other one?
And this one is Ron DeSanctimonious.
I had to go to a... I don't know what... I'm not sure I know what that means.
Sanctimonious, it's like serious, it's like formal, right?
I mean, I... Hey, you, you're so sanctimonious, you know?
Why are you so sanctimonious all the time?
Can't you just relax?
Doesn't work.
And anyway, so he said that.
It was like, okay, it's kind of lame.
Whatever.
It was a drive-by passing shot.
And right after he said that, all these influencers on Twitter went nuts.
Crowder, Shapiro, Matt Walsh, James Woods, Cernovich, Scott Adams, Jack... I think Jack Pasovic.
I'm not sure.
But all the big influencer, all the big conservative Twitter accounts flipped out.
And they said, what?
Two days before the election?
Reagan's 11th commandment?
Thou shalt not attack a fellow Republican?
This just shows that Trump is unfit.
unidentified
Blah, blah, blah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
And it was like, whoa.
What the heck?
He just called them a name.
They act like he shot the guy.
He did a rally.
He said, oh, Ron DeSanctimonious.
Okay, it's sort of like a snarky thing.
So what?
And they all, they flew out.
And all with the same, the exact same line.
Man, say what you will about Trump.
Maybe you like him, but he shouldn't have said this two days before the midterms.
He shouldn't have said that.
Why attack a Republican?
The midterms are coming up.
You can't...
All at the same time, all with the same line, coordinated.
It wasn't even that big of a deal, but they all made it a big deal.
And that was the headline.
Trump attacks Republican, Republicans outrage, blah blah blah.
So it was already sort of forming before the election even happened, and then even more so after the election.
The New York Post, which is a conservative publication, the day after the midterms on Wednesday, yesterday morning, on the front page, It said DeSantis is the new leader of the party and there's a big picture of DeSantis.
And that was all the coverage on Fox and all the coverage on conservative Twitter before the night was even over.
They were blaming Trump for the losses and crediting the victories to DeSantis.
And talking about what a miracle it was.
He won Florida by 20%.
He flipped Miami.
And it just goes to show that he's the new face.
He's the new leader.
He's the one that's going to take it on in 24.
And here's the thing.
They were setting this up for a long time.
I did a show about it a few months ago.
Ron DeSantis has built up a war chest of $200 million.
Trump's is $100 million.
So Ron DeSantis is the governor of Florida, elected in 2018 by a margin of half of a percent.
Donald Trump is the former president of the United States who won more votes than any president in history.
And Ron DeSantis somehow has twice as much money as Trump.
$200 million to Trump's $100 million.
Trump's $100 million in the Save America PAC came mostly from small donors.
The $200 million in DeSantis' PAC came almost all from large donations from big Wall Street donors and billionaires.
Do you think that big Wall Street billionaires and donors are flipping from Trump to DeSantis and giving him $10-$15 million checks for DeSantis to run against Charlie Crist?
Charlie Crist never had a chance.
He was not going to win this.
DeSantis won by 20% and the polls showed that.
Do you think billionaires and Wall Street insiders were giving DeSantis $10-$15-$20 million checks throughout the last year for his super PAC?
Do you think that DeSantis was raising money all across the country and doing events in New Hampshire and Iowa because he was worried about his chances of beating Charlie Crist for the governor's seat?
In the governor debate, A couple months ago, Charlie Crist asked DeSantis on the stage point-blank, are you going to serve your full term as governor?
The full four years.
Because the presidential election's in two years.
So if you ran for that and won that, you couldn't serve your full term.
And DeSantis didn't even have an answer.
And quietly behind the scenes, all the Trump architecture has been pivoting towards DeSantis.
It's been a long time coming and now, now that the midterms are out of the way, basically 24 started and now it is coming out of the open.
But it is going on behind the scenes to a much greater extent than people are even aware of.
It is a palace coup against Trump.
They're overthrowing him to put in place DeSantis.
And this is the article about this.
This is from Bloomberg.
That's his quote.
Fresh off of his re-election victory, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis now faces a potential showdown with Donald Trump for the Republican nomination in 2024.
Trump has already made DeSantis his leading foil on the campaign trail, boasting in rallies of polls that show the former president leading DeSantis roughly 2-1 among Republicans.
Those who know DeSantis say they believe he'll seize the moment and won't be deterred from taking on Trump.
DeSantis has sidestepped the question of a 24 presidential campaign, most notably in a debate last month with his now vanquished rival for governor, Charlie Crist, whom he defeated with 60% of the vote on Tuesday.
Trump, who is expected to announce his own candidacy on November 15th, has increased his swipes at DeSantis, dubbing him Ron DeSanctimonious and threatening to divulge damaging information if he runs.
DeSantis didn't mention Trump in his victory speech on Tuesday but sounded very much like he's still campaigning for office.
He said, quote, leaders don't lead, they follow.
As our country flounders due to failed leadership in Washington, Florida is on the right track.
I look forward to the road ahead.
DeSantis already has financial backing from one key Republican constituency, a wide swath of Wall Street donors and wealthy individuals.
Some of whom have made clear they are not eager for a Trump return in 24.
Many see DeSantis as a candidate who is just as conservative, anti-tax, and anti-regulation as Trump, but with none of the baggage.
These donors helped fuel DeSantis' record fundraising this cycle.
The $164 million that DeSantis raised since January 21 is not only more than any governor in U.S.
history, but exceeds Trump's donations through the third quarter by $3 million.
About 60% of DeSantis' haul comes from donors who gave $50,000 or more, including at least 10 billionaires benefiting from Florida laws that allow unlimited donations.
Trump, in contrast, relies largely on a network of small-dollar donors, a sign that his grassroots support is greater than that of DeSantis.
DeSantis' wooing of wealthy donors, crucial to his success in a presidential contest, began early in his first term.
Okay, so it's very clear what's going on here.
And it's all spelled out in this article.
DeSantis has raised more money than any governor in history, more than any politician, even more than Trump.
$164 million, and the vast majority of it came from people that gave more than $50,000.
Largely billionaires, Wall Street donors, Contrast it with Trump, who all of his donations come from small-dollar donors like us, like you and me.
People that are going to give $100, $50, $20 with the mass marketing through the emails or through envelopes.
Is that not so telling and indicative right out of the gate?
And why do the Wall Street donors favor DeSantis?
Why do Wall Street donors favor anybody?
They say, well, and this is from billionaires like Ken Griffin of Citadel.
Who is one of the notable billionaires that flipped from Trump to DeSantis.
He said, like they all do, that Trump has too much baggage.
And he's too divisive.
And they want a guy like DeSantis who's going to give them the rockstar economy that Trump did without all the problems.
So what do these Wall Street people want?
They want more money.
When Trump fights for trade protectionism, immigration restriction, when he fights to end foreign wars, when he fights the culture war on Twitter, and he fights the media, they see that as too much chaos.
That's bad for the bottom line.
That's volatility.
They don't want that.
That's bad for business.
What they want is a pro-business Republican.
They want a fiscal conservative like Ron DeSantis who is plain Jane, boring, not a fighter.
They want a bitch who is going to lay down and cut their taxes and cut regulations and help them make more money.
It is that simple.
And that is what they're saying.
Ken Griffin, who I just said, the billionaire owner of Citadel, major financial firm on Wall Street, he gave DeSantis $10 million.
And he said in an interview with Politico this week, why he flipped from Trump to DeSantis, he said, well, Trump was too divisive.
He said that he didn't like that Trump targeted people based on their race and national origin so much.
He said, but he liked Trump's rockstar economy.
And he said that DeSantis is going to be a little bit more stable, even though he didn't like that DeSantis sent those illegal immigrants to Martha's Vineyard, and he didn't like that DeSantis passed the Don't Say Gay Bill, and he didn't like that DeSantis went to war with Disney and the cruise ship industry.
So, let's see.
DeSantis' constituency, who gave him $165 million, doesn't want to close the border.
Doesn't want to shut down immigration.
They don't want to fight LGBT indoctrination in the schools.
They don't want to fight the vaccine.
They don't want to fight woke capital.
So why are they giving DeSantis money then?
If they're supporting him in spite of those things, and things like that are the reason they ditched Trump.
It's for exactly the reason I just said.
They're not interested in any of those fights.
They're either liberal themselves or their only real politics is profit.
So they don't care about the woke curriculum.
They don't care even the things that DeSantis shills promote for the idiots that are going to vote for him.
In other words, when all these guys go out there and say, we need to drop Trump, you need to vote for DeSantis, they'll use things like that as the argument to support him.
They'll say, look at what he did with those illegals at Martha's Vineyard, look at what he did with Disney, look at the Don't Say Gay Bill.
That's their proof of why we should vote for him.
That's weird, because the people writing the $10 million checks are writing those checks in spite of those things.
So, question.
If we're being told to vote for DeSantis for the things that the people writing the million-dollar checks don't like, what are we going to get in the DeSantis administration?
Do you think that DeSantis is going to listen to the people that voted for him?
Or the people that wrote 60% of the money up, 60, 70, 80% of the money in checks, the $10 million checks?
Who's he going to listen to?
Who's the real constituency there?
And what's more?
If you're a billionaire and you look at these banks and you look at BlackRock and these other financial firms, they like certainty.
They quite literally put their money where their mouth is.
They're not like pundits who just talk and they get paid to talk.
They get paid by how they make their money go to work.
So when they write a ten million dollar check, that's a pretty strong vote of confidence that they're not gonna get what they don't like.
Unlike us, idiots, that vote with our votes, foolishly, for the policies we're gonna get, these billionaires, they like a sure bet, they vote with their money.
They give their money.
And if you're one of these big financial guys, and you're writing a $10 million check to DeSantis rather than Trump, and you like low taxes but you don't like culture war issues, who do you think knows better?
Do you think that when Michael Cernovich tells you idiots that DeSantis is a stronger conservative than Trump, do you think that he's right?
That DeSantis is fighting a culture war stronger than Trump and that's why we are the suckers that should vote for him?
Or do you think that Ken Griffin knows better, when he gives $10 million to DeSantis, that DeSantis is going to do a lot less culture war shenanigans than Trump is at the end of the day?
Who do you think knows better?
Mike Cernovich, the guy that gets paid to talk?
The guy that gets paid?
By who?
Nobody knows.
The guy that gets paid to talk and tell all of us what to think and how to vote?
Or Ken Griffin, who lords over billions in assets and gives $10 million checks to politicians?
Who do you think knows?
It's quite obvious.
And why do they say, what's the argument for DeSantis from these shills?
Based on the midterms, because that's why we're here.
They say DeSantis won Florida by 20%!
Yeah, well, 900,000 Republicans moved to Florida between 2018 and 2022.
So DeSantis increased his vote total by 600,000 votes over the last four years, but 900,000 registered Republicans moved to Florida.
They say that he won by 20%!
Marco Rubio won by 20%.
DeSantis won a statewide race in Florida by 20%.
That's substantial for a purple state.
Well, so did Marco Rubio.
And Marco Rubio's an idiot.
Marco Rubio is a neocon.
Rubio's an unexceptional, unremarkable senator who faced a totally lame Democrat opponent that could never win.
So, if DeSantis is the guy because he won Florida by 20%, is Marco Rubio the guy?
I don't think anybody would argue that.
I think that would be a bad joke if anybody would argue that in 2022, but yet there they are, saying that the 20% is enough.
If winning Florida is enough, Donald Trump won Florida by a million more votes than Ron DeSantis did in 2020.
We don't have any trouble winning Florida.
Trump won Florida two times, and DeSantis couldn't have won it the first time without Trump, so that doesn't make any sense.
They say, well, DeSantis flipped.
Miami Dade!
Well, Miami doesn't really look like the parts of America that you need to win, does it?
Who lives in Miami?
Jews?
Cubans?
Haitians?
There are a lot of Jews, Cubans, and Haitians in Pennsylvania?
Or Michigan?
Or Wisconsin?
That's not even really the demographic that you need to win.
And I'll grant, it is remarkable that he flipped Miami.
That is pretty significant, but it's also not representative of any other constituency in America.
They say that Trump's candidates all lost.
You know, look at Mehmet Oz and Hershel Walker who's struggling and Blake Masters who may have just lost tonight.
Well, Trump endorsed hundreds of people.
Out of the hundreds of people that he endorsed, 219 won and only 16 lost.
So, 92% of the candidates that Trump backed won.
And 8% lost.
So, that's not even really...
And in any case, whose responsibility is it for the midterm elections?
The ex-president or the sitting congressional leadership of the Republican Party?
Like Kevin McCarthy and Mitch McConnell and the chair of the party, Ronna McDaniel.
And then arguments on the basis of their profile.
They say that Trump was ineffective.
Well, why?
He was paid by the Israel lobby.
He had a bad staff.
All the things that you could say about Trump, you could say are worse about DeSantis.
DeSantis, the first thing he did as governor was go and sign a bill in the state of Israel.
His campaign manager, Christina Pusha, is a literal Soros shill.
She worked in Georgia.
For some color revolution Eastern European guy who was an elected official in Georgia, then went to Ukraine.
In other words, she's like a prong of the CIA.
She worked for NGOs in post-color revolution former Soviet Union satellite states like Georgia and Ukraine.
She's a campaign manager.
Yeah, real winner.
Out with Jared Kushner and in with Christina Pusha.
Wow, what a big difference that made.
So, All of these arguments that you see in favor of DeSantis are flimsy.
They're not real arguments.
These are arguments that were created by consultants to convince people that Trump is still not the number one threat to the establishment.
How do we know that Trump is still the guy?
Well, let's see.
Are the DOJ and the FBI investigating Ron DeSantis?
Why do you think they're investigating Donald Trump?
Do you think because Donald Trump is corrupt?
Is that why they impeached him twice?
Is that why they appointed the Mueller special counsel?
Or did they do all of those things to stop him from making revolutionary changes?
Why are they not doing that to Ron DeSantis?
It's because they are confident that he will never make revolutionary changes.
How about social media?
Donald Trump is banned from every major social media.
Once again, they are afraid of his potential or proclivity to incite a revolution.
Literally!
And they're afraid of his ability to mobilize his legions of grassroots supporters to get out the vote for him.
In terms of the media, the media to this day relentlessly attacks Trump.
Relentlessly.
He has not been the president for two years and they still ran on him.
Ran on January 6th, ran on him being a threat to democracy, his supporters being a threat to democracy.
Meanwhile, major publications like Time Magazine and the Washington Post and the Atlantic and the New York Times prop up Ron DeSantis and support him.
Do you think that the mainstream media supports DeSantis because he's going to be a great representative for us?
And do you think that they trash talk Trump because he really is a corrupt, terrible, racist?
Or does the media attack Trump because they recognize he is the biggest threat to the media's control over the political process, and they refrain from attacking DeSantis because they understand that he's the only one that can deprive Trump of the ability to do that?
▲
Export Selection