Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 6, 2022 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:25:28

EVIL EMPIRE: US ADMITS Ukraine Behind RUTHLESS TERROR STRIKE Against Innocent Civilian | AF Ep. 1073

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:14:29

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Wednesday.
		We have a lot to talk about tonight, lots to get into.
		Our big featured story is about Alexander Dugan's daughter, who, if you recall, was killed earlier this year in a brutal car bombing.
		Which we never found out the culprit for that, but of course everybody suspected it was operatives from the Ukrainian regime.
		And strangely enough, very bizarre turn of events, the U.S.
		security state has... ...of regime that ordered the killing of Alexander Dugin, which...
		Actually, he wound up somehow escaping and his daughter was killed instead.
		Like I said, in a car bombing in Russia.
		Very strange.
		And it almost suggests that maybe more acts of terrorism like this are on the way, and that perhaps the United States is trying to preemptively distance itself from Ukraine, which may be acting more radically.
		As the war continues.
		I can think of not really any other explanation.
		Very bizarre.
		We knew they killed Alexander Dugan's daughter.
		We knew they did this.
		And this is, by the way, in complete contravention against international law to target not just a civilian, but a civilian's family member in a war.
		And of course, Washington and Kiev are allies.
		So for Washington to leak that to the press, to the American press, basically throwing Ukraine under the bus and saying, yeah, these guys are terrorists.
		These guys committed this assassination of a civilian.
		It's very bizarre.
		So I know that was all over the press today, and that aspect of it sort of went under the radar, and we'll talk about that tonight.
		We'll also be talking about Saudi Arabia, And OPEC Plus, the oil cartel, which today announced their decision to actually cut oil production by 2 million barrels per day.
		Which, if you're not familiar with energy politics, we'll explain the basics of how that works, but essentially this is a political hit job against Joe Biden.
		If you've been paying attention, gas prices in the United States have been going down.
		And gas prices are almost entirely controlled by the global price of oil.
		And Biden has been going to great lengths to manipulate the price of oil in order to bring down the price of gas because he's got this very bad midterm election coming up in November.
		So he's been releasing, I think it's a million barrels per day from the United States Strategic Oil Reserve in order to buoy prices.
		And keep them low enough that gas prices are not so out of control right before the election.
		And Biden earlier this year made his trip out to Saudi Arabia and fist-bumped the Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
		In an effort to reset United States-Saudi relations and get them to maintain high levels of production for that domestic political benefit.
		And so today, Saudi Arabia with Russia, who's also an OPEC Plus member, get together and say actually they're cutting production, meaning that the price of oil will go up, and therefore the price of gas will go up, and this is happening just a month before the midterm elections.
		Huge It's basically just an open attack against the American president by our ally, by Saudi Arabia.
		So we'll talk about all that and what that means tonight.
		Should be a pretty good show.
		Kind of a slow news day.
		Not a whole lot going on.
		Hopefully nuclear war will start soon so that we can all just die and there won't be one big news story and then it'll be over.
		Okay?
		One big news story, the nuclear war has begun and then no more news.
		No more Super Chats, no more of that.
		And it looks like, I don't know, I mean... And you can read more into this than is there, but there are signs that this may happen.
		It's widely reported today that a nuclear missile, intercontinental ballistic missile with a range of 11,000 kilometers was being transported to Moscow today.
		I mean, people literally videotaping it on the highway.
		They're shipping a giant freaking missile on the highway to Moscow.
		And at the same time that the Ukrainian government has begun distributing potassium iodine to the residents in Ukraine, which is something that prevents your thyroid gland from absorbing radiation in the event of a nuclear blast, the United States made an order $290 million for the same thing for our population.
		So, certainly don't really like where that's going.
		Sort of worrisome.
		So there's not a whole lot of news going on, but there is this sort of steady march towards a nuclear war, which we're watching every day.
		So, what the heck?
		There's this tiny, the tiniest bug I've ever seen is right here.
		What in the world?
		What the frick?
unidentified		What the heck?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		What is that?
		I look over and I, you know, there's a little dust here around the pumpkin and I, and it starts to, it starts crawling around.
		Something was brought, you know what it is?
		I gotta tape this up where there's holes.
		I think they smell, they smell this pumpkin's guts.
		That's what they're coming for.
		So I gotta tape, I, I punctured it with the Hamburglar the other day and now, you know, now maybe it's open season here for Microorganisms here in the studio.
		That was weird.
		That's a bad sign.
		Anyway, so that'll be our show.
		Sort of a slow news day and I'm tired.
		I just woke up.
		I slept last night after the show.
		I'm trying to reset my sleep schedule.
		I went to bed right after my show.
		I woke up early today and by 10 a.m.
		I was like, I'm not making it through the day.
		It was like 10 a.m.
		I'm crashing.
		I'm burning.
		I'm in bed.
		I'm falling asleep.
		I say, I'll go and make some coffee.
		So I go to the coffee maker and I say, okay, great idea.
		I'll make a cup of coffee.
		I'll wake myself up.
		I open the coffee maker and I have a Keurig and I don't use the Keurig cups because there's so much plastic.
		If you use a Keurig machine, there's so much plastic that goes through the The individual cups you buy at the store.
		So I have one of those reusable ones that I just fill with coffee grounds.
		Anyway.
		So I had not cleaned that out.
		The last time I made a cup of coffee I didn't clean that out.
unidentified		So I opened it up and the whole thing was filled with mold.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The whole canister was filled with mold.
		The whole coffee machine was filled with mold.
		So I had to clean that out.
		And it's just like I had to brew like 10 cups of hot water to clean out The system.
		And at that point I said, this is just, I'm already tired.
		Now I'm tired and I'm cleaning a freaking coffee machine.
		So I just cracked open a monster and I got all charged up and I realized that I need to start doing drugs.
		I think that's what needs to happen because with the sleep schedule and the tiredness and all of that, I don't know if it's diet related.
		I don't know if that's McDonald's related illness, but I was all tired today, I'm all ready to go to bed, end my day, fall asleep, and then I cracked open a monster and it was like I hit the limitless pill.
		I'm reading articles, I'm writing notes, I'm making phone calls, I'm cracking necks, I'm in the text message, I'm driving around, I'm running errands.
		And then I hit the wall.
		Then I hit the wall later tonight.
		Crashed.
		Woke up.
		Showtime.
unidentified		So... So I don't know, man.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm just... I'm tired.
		I'm over it.
		I need to step up.
		I need to step it up.
		We need a higher dosage.
		I need to go to the doctor.
		I need something more.
		The monster's not cutting it.
		The caffeine's not cutting it.
		Got anything else?
		Adderall?
		Cocaine?
		Maybe I'll just start taking meth?
		What would you prescribe?
		What would you prescribe for this?
		But, you know, I need something here, man.
		Like I said, I wake up today I slept like 5 hours, I woke up at 6, it's 10am and I'm like, I can't do it.
		There's no way I'm getting through.
		12 more hours, I'm falling asleep.
		I hit a monster, and you know, that was good for a few hours, but by 4 or 5 o'clock, I hit the wall again.
		Do I hit another one?
		Do I drink 3 monsters a day?
		Do I start taking drugs?
		Do I start exercising and healthy diet?
		No.
		Nope.
		Yeah, no.
		Yeah, considered it.
		I don't think so.
		So that was my day.
		But it was a productive day.
		Got a lot of reading done.
		And I was posting all day on Telegram and everything.
		But I'm tired.
		And now it's a slow news day.
		It's hump day.
		It's like, man, can I just go on vacation?
		Can I just take my Christmas vacation already?
		I'm over it.
		Can Trump just announce and we get back on Twitter Anyway, all right, but that'll be our show.
		Enough out of me.
		Enough out of me complaining.
		That's the last thing you want to hear.
		I'm just telling you what's up.
		It's too hot in here.
		It's too hot in here.
		As always, my balls are already sweating.
		All right, so let's get into the show.
		Oh wait, one more thing.
		And before we... All right, this show's off to a great start.
		Before we get into the news, I want to remind you, smash the follow button here on Cozy.
		Smash the follow button right here.
		Follow me, get a push notification whenever I go live.
		Follow me on Gab Telegram, True Social.
		Links are down below.
		Be sure to follow me on all those.
		And huge stream this Sunday.
		Ethan Ralph, the ledge, the legend, he will be hosting a one-year cozy anniversary stream.
		It's called FriendFest.
		All day Sunday, so looking forward to that.
		Make sure you tune in.
		I'm gonna try and stop over and make a guest appearance.
		Unofficial FriendFest Cozy Festival.
		One year anniversary.
	Should be a lot of fun.
	I guess everybody's gonna stop by and make a little appearance.
	One year of cozy.
	Can you believe it?
	Pretty amazing.
	I didn't think we'd make it this far in one year.
	I remember when we announced the platform Around a year ago, the plan was we were going to have two streamers, me and Vince James.
	That was the plan.
	It was just going to be us two.
	We were going to try it out.
	We were going to test out our capacity.
	So when we announced, we said, okay, we got two streamers on the site.
unidentified		It's me and we're bringing on Vince.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And I said, we're going to wait until January to bring on anybody else because we got to test it and everything.
		And so we started with two and then we brought on three more and then three more after that and three and then it just grew and grew and grew and the UI improved and the UX improved and we got more features and now the site's like infinitely better.
		Whoa!
		Voice crack?
		Hello?
		Just woke up?
		Can't blame me.
		I just woke up.
		Sites infinitely better.
		We got like a billion people on here.
		We got a billion people.
		50 plus streamers.
		We got all the legends, all the greats on here.
		And it's only just been one year.
		We're not even technically, officially out of beta yet.
		I'd like to see a couple more essential things before I take us out of beta.
		There's a few things administratively.
		And and also in terms of features that I want to get done before we officially I mean we're not I don't even consider us officially launched yet really Because there's still a few essential things that we're not we haven't quite finished But it's pretty impressive one year One year down and we're competing with like every other all tech consider true social their peak traffic this year is 11 million visits
		Our peak traffic this year was seven and a half million.
		So Cozy has been around for a year.
		I think TruSocial has been around for a comparable amount of time.
		TruSocial has venture capital.
		The media group, the holding company that owns TruSocial, is worth a billion dollars.
		Okay, they've got a market capitalization of one billion dollars.
		They have investment, they've got venture capital, they've got Who's the congressman?
		Devin Nunes runs it.
		And Donald Trump is on it, along with every other major.
		And we're at 80% of their traffic.
		On our biggest month this year, we're at 80% of their biggest month.
		Pound for pound.
		And we've been around the same amount of time.
		They're on the App Store.
		We're not.
		They've got millions, tens of millions in venture capital.
		We have zero in venture capital.
		They've got the sitting president as well as every other major person begging to get on verified.
		We do not have them.
		We do not have the president.
		We don't have Tucker.
		We don't have, you know, half the people they have on there.
		Pretty impressive.
		And that's before we're really even officially launched.
		So Sunday we'll have a big celebration for that.
		I'll come on and say some things and we'll be joined by some of the other streamers.
		So it should be a lot of fun.
		That's Sunday, and I don't know the time on that, but I'll post it.
		I think I posted it on Telegram earlier today.
		Okay.
		With all that business out of the way, we're gonna dive into the news here, and our first story is about Saudi Arabia.
		You know, it's a shame because I feel like every show is just about international relations these days, but that's the only news that happens.
		There's like nothing going on domestically.
		I read the news every day.
		I read all the news every day, every site, and just like nothing really to speak of.
		So it's just that's been the focus for so long.
		So here we are again.
		We find ourselves covering another one of these stories and it's about this oil production cut by OPEC+.
		And if you don't know OPEC, It stands for, what is it, Oil Petroleum Exporting Countries.
		This is an international cartel of oil producing countries that's the biggest oil producers in the world, like Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Russia, Nigeria, the Gulf States, all the big oil producers in the world, I think minus Iran.
		Our part of this, it's an official recognized cartel called OPEC, if you don't know the history of this, and this was formed about 50 years ago.
		And the goal of the group is basically to control the price of energy in the global market.
		And they can produce really as much oil as we want.
		The supply is virtually limitless.
		The proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia, Russia, other Gulf states are absolutely massive.
		And the supply more than meets the demand every year for 50 years.
	People have talked for the last century about peak oil.
	The idea that one day we will reach the limit of our productive capacity.
	We'll reach a point after which we will no longer be able to increase oil production.
	And the problem, the implied problem there is that demand is always increasing.
	If the global population is growing, if the global economy is growing, if development is always increasing, then the humanity's demand for energy, humanity's demand for oil is always going up.
	And at some point, supply will not be able to keep up.
	If there's a finite amount of oil, then we'll not be able to keep up.
	And that will mean that the price of oil will just keep going up and up.
	And eventually, we'll have to ration and there'll be all these problems.
	But what we have now is, essentially, we do not have that problem.
	It's a cartel that controls the price by controlling the amount of production.
	And so Saudi Arabia is the real leader, and they will lead the other countries in this group.
	And together with their, the amount of oil that they produce, which is most of the world's oil, depending upon how much they choose to produce at their discretion, they can then manipulate how much money they can get for this.
	And the reason they do this is because all of these states, or most of them, rely on the export of energy commodities of oil, petroleum, and other products for their revenue.
	Saudi Arabia derives almost all of its revenue for its government from the sale of energy.
	And the same is true of Russia, and the same is true of these other countries.
	And so the less they produce, if they produce less oil, the price goes up.
	If the price goes up, they...
	They make more money.
	If they make more money, they can buy more stuff.
	So they get together and they control the price of oil by controlling production and they do that so that they can make as much money as they need to make to make ends meet for their treasury.
	In case you don't know.
	I like to go over the basics because, you know, I assume everybody knows this stuff and maybe a lot of you do but probably your average person doesn't fully get it.
	And so anyway, OPEC plus, which is OPEC I think plus some additional states that are not official members, they announced that they were going to cut daily oil production by 2 million barrels per day in an effort to increase prices.
	And they say they're doing this in order to preempt a global recession.
	And representatives from Saudi Arabia said basically, well, we're not going to wait around for a recession to hit.
	We know a massive economic contraction will happen worldwide next year.
	So we're going to preemptively offset that by helping our bottom line, cutting production, raising prices.
	Now that's what they say, but realistically this comes With the backdrop of the war in Ukraine and when we talk about OPEC Plus and we talk about petrostates and the states that are dependent on the export of energy commodities for their state revenue,
	The salience here with the Ukraine war is that Russia is one of the petrostates, Russia is dependent on the sale of oil, and in particular they're dependent on the sale of energy to fund the ongoing war in Ukraine.
	And one of the ways, as we've discussed recently in the context of Germany and the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, one of the ways in which the United States is trying to wage war against Russia is by begging Saudi Arabia To increase production, drive down oil prices, and thereby drive down the amount of money that Russia is able to raise from the sale of oil.
	So, Saudi Arabia is coming out and saying, well, we're raising prices because we have to preempt this global recession.
	Really, what's going on is two things.
	You've got this war in Ukraine.
	You've also got the upcoming election, which are very much influenced right now by the price of oil.
	So this is the story from the New York Times.
	It says, quote, quote, President Biden and European leaders have urged more oil production to ease gas prices and punish Moscow for its aggression in Ukraine.
	Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, has been accused of using energy as a weapon against countries opposing its invasion of Ukraine, and the optics of the decision could not be missed.
	The White House was not happy.
	The Director of the National Economic Council, Brian Deese, and Jake Sullivan, the National Security Advisor, said in a statement, quote, The President is disappointed by the short-sighted decision by OPEC Plus to cut production quotas while the global economy is dealing with the continued negative impact of Putin's invasion of Ukraine.
	The cut of 2 million barrels per day represents about 2% of global oil production.
	By reducing output, OPEC Plus was also seeking to make a statement to energy markets about the group's cohesion during the Ukraine war and its willingness to act quickly to defend prices.
	At a news conference after the meeting, the Saudi energy minister, Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, said OPEC Plus was acting amid signs of a downturn in the world economy that might cause demand for oil to weaken and prices to fall.
	He said we would rather be preemptive than be sorry.
	The move appeared to have the desired results.
	The price of Brent Crude, the international benchmark, which had slumped during the summer, rose more than 1.5% after the meeting, extending the gains recorded in recent days and bringing prices back to levels last seen in mid-September.
	The average price of gasoline in the United States recently began to rise again, tracking with the price of oil.
	In response to the announcement, the Biden administration said that the President would order the Energy Department to release 10 million additional barrels of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in November.
	Earlier this week, the administration said that it didn't have any plans to extend a six-month effort to release 1 million barrels per day, which was scheduled to finish at the end of this month.
	So that's what's going on.
	OPEC Plus says they're going to cut production in order to raise prices.
	And they say that that's because of the economy.
	When a global recession happens, energy demand will go down, and if demand goes down, then prices go down.
	Prices go down, then revenue goes down for the oil-producing and exporting countries.
	So they're saying, we want to get in while we can, we want to jack up prices while demand is high, while we can still get it, in order to offset the forecasted losses that will come when this recession hits next year or the year after.
	Well what's really happening though is that there's an enormous political significance with what's going on in Ukraine.
	And we've talked about that with Germany.
	And that has more to do specifically with natural gas.
	And I want to clarify again for people that may not understand, there's three products here.
	You've got natural gas, you've got gasoline, and you've got oil.
	Natural gas is what is pumped through pipelines in Belarus and Ukraine, and prior to the terrorist attacks in September, pumped through the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines in the Baltic Sea.
	And natural gas was pumped into Germany, and that was a part of their energy mix.
	Russian natural gas, part of the natural gas that Germany imports, which fuels their homes when they heat their homes in the winter, which fuels their manufacturing and industry sector, the production of chemicals, and their production of automobiles and things like that.
	You've got oil, which is different than natural gas, and then oil is refined to create gasoline And gasoline is what we put in our cars when we drive.
	It's a petroleum by-product.
	And the price of gasoline is tied to the price of oil.
	Because gasoline comes from oil.
	Just so people understand.
	Because we call it gas here.
	We call it gas in America.
	And so you might misunderstand.
	Natural gas is different than gasoline.
	Natural gas, which is going through the pipelines, which rushes the largest Producer of natural gas in the world that's different than gasoline Which is what we pump into our cars at the pump just in case I'm not gonna okay.
	Everyone knew that let's just say everyone knew that I'm not gonna you know It's okay.
	If you didn't get that before but I believe it's my understanding Maybe I'm not a scientist or anything, but that's my understanding of it and so anyway So we've talked in recent weeks about natural gas going into Germany.
	But this has to do with the production of oil and the global oil market.
	But it's really all one and the same in a certain sense because Russia is an energy exporter.
	They're the world's leading exporter of natural gas.
	They're one of the top three or top two exporters of oil in the world.
	And the countries need both.
	Countries need natural gas and they need oil for their energy needs.
	And Russia is a significant producer of both, and Russia controls the production of both, or controls a lot of the market share for the production of both of those things in the world economy.
	And so, the reason that this is relevant for Russia's war in Ukraine is not so much the same as the natural gas and the politics of the pipelines in Central Europe and Eastern Europe.
	It has more to do with how Russia is funding its war machine.
	The higher that the gas prices go, the more money they make and they're able to continue the war.
	The United States is not just blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines to sever the economic interdependence between Germany and Russia.
	They're also striving to drive oil prices down by driving oil production up in order to starve Russia of the cash it needs.
	If the European countries get together and they impose a ceiling, a price ceiling on how much they're willing to pay for Russian natural gas, and if the price of oil goes down, then the Russian state is really cash strapped.
	There's only so many markets for its natural gas.
	And the natural gas cuts both ways in a certain sense.
	It's difficult for countries like Germany that import Russian natural gas to replace it and find substitutes before the winter and get a supply of energy that they need.
	By the same token, it is as difficult for Russia to find new partners to export their natural gas to, because in the same way that Germany can't build infrastructure to replace energy that they import, Russia cannot easily build new infrastructure to export energy to new markets or new countries.
	So they can only export so much of the natural gas or oil that they were giving to Europe or other Western countries to countries like China or Iran.
	There's only so much.
	And so that's one of the ways that the United States was waging an indirect war against Russia.
	Not just through the training of the Ukrainian military and the supply of Long-range artillery, short-range artillery, light arms, cash, logistics, officers, mercenaries, intelligence, coordinates, things like that.
	And it's not just the sanctions against their currency and against their exports, but they're also waging a campaign against energy prices in the global market to hurt Russia's ability to sell their commodities and get cash to continue paying for this war.
	That's one of the means that they're doing this.
	Now, Russia is a part of OPEC+.
	And Russia, like Saudi Arabia, like the other energy exporting countries, they have collectively a vested interest in seeing oil prices being as high as they can be or as high as the market can bear without getting into other areas like people looking into alternatives or fracking becoming viable like what happened about 10 years ago.
	So they want, so without getting too deep into it, they want oil prices and energy prices to be as high as they can be, to be as high as the market can bear, as high as consumers will pay for them without exploring long-term investment and long-term alternatives which will take away market share from them and their ability to control the price.
	So Russia gets together with Saudi Arabia and they say, hey, yeah, okay, screw Washington.
	We want to make oil prices higher.
	We're about to enter a global recession.
	Why is Saudi Arabia going to work with the United States and make less money?
	What's Washington offering?
	It's in Saudi Arabia's interest.
	It's in OPEC's interest to raise the price.
	It's in Russia's interest to raise the price.
	It's in the OPEC plus nations' interest to raise the price because they want to make more money because the recession is real and coming.
	And it's in Russia's interest to raise the price not just for that reason but also because they've got a very costly war which is going on far longer than I think Moscow or maybe anybody anticipated.
	So Washington and Biden made this bid over the summer to try and win Saudi Arabia over but really not offering anything substantial.
	And so OPEC plus with Saudi Arabia and Russia as the two primary movers come out today and say, yeah, of course.
	What are you kidding me?
	Of course, we're going to raise the price.
	So that's one part of the significance of it.
	The other significance of this is how it affects Biden domestically.
	And it seems like this is just like an all out attack, not just on America, but on this White House, on this administration, because I don't think it's lost on anybody the timing.
	We don't just have this dilemma in Eastern Europe where Ukraine has to make this big push before the winter and a lot of things become complicated in the winter.
	The battlefield literally changes because of the weather and the snow and of course then Central and Eastern European countries are really stepping in it with the high and inflated energy costs.
	So it's not just that, but at the same time you've also got this midterm election coming up for Joe Biden.
	And a huge part, the most important issue for American voters, which I'm sure the Saudis are aware of, is inflation and gas prices.
	And those two things are really one and the same because inflation is driven, and particularly this year, by surging energy costs, by higher gasoline prices, and also just plain higher energy prices.
	Because understand, the price of energy has a ripple effect.
	It's not just that you're paying more to fill up your car with gas.
	It also costs more for truckers to fill up their trucks with gas and airplanes to fill up their planes with fuel.
	And if it costs more money for truckers and for airplanes and for other transportation, well then it costs companies more money to deliver their goods.
	It costs more for logistics.
	And if it costs more money to heat your home, it costs more money to heat factories and manufacturing.
	And it costs more money to produce things and manufacture them.
	If it costs more money to do that, well then those costs are eventually passed down to the consumer.
	So rising energy prices, it's one aspect of inflation in itself.
	Because the consumer, an individual consumer, will have to pay more for a tangible good.
	Heating their home, filling up their car with gas, Things like that.
	But you're also going to see those rising energy costs passed on in other ways.
	Everything you buy is going to get more expensive.
	If you travel, plane tickets more expensive, hotels more expensive, household goods, anything that comes across the ocean, anything that's delivered in a truck, more expensive.
	Anything made in a factory that uses energy, more expensive.
	So these things add up, and we've seen that in Europe and in the United States.
	It's not just that energy prices are skyrocketing, which is a form of inflation on its own, but it's also driving core inflation, which is everything minus food and energy, which are highly volatile.
	So not only is Riyadh, not only is Saudi Arabia striking at the United States strategic objectives in this war in Ukraine by helping Russia get this huge windfall, they're filling up their coffers with cash, selling oil at a higher price, but in addition to that they're also, it's also a shot across the bow at the Biden administration particularly, not just Washington and the deep state and the State Department and all that,
	It's sort of like a partisan shot against the Biden administration against this president because this is really going to hurt him in the midterms.
	And they know that.
	Saudis know that.
	The Russians know that.
	They know that.
	And it's interesting because in the same way that we're playing Russia's domestic politics, we're trying to cripple them with sanctions.
	We're trying to deprive them of certain goods.
	Our companies, our American companies like McDonald's and Nike and Netflix are boycotting Russia.
	Because we're trying to facilitate a regime change.
	We're trying to facilitate a negative public opinion of the war, of Moscow, of Putin, by the oligarchs, by the people.
	In the same way, it's almost like that's being thrown back on us now.
	Not just by Moscow, but also now by, it seems, Riyadh and Abu Dhabi and the other Gulf states.
	They're taking the serious shot against the Biden administration by causing inflation to get much worse before the election.
	And the Biden administration, they've been countering the high energy prices by basically emptying the strategic petroleum reserve that the United States maintains.
	It's almost empty.
	And they weren't going to extend.
	They were going to have a million barrels per day through the end of September.
	Or is it the end of October?
	And now they say that they're going to release 10 million more barrels in November.
	Well, why do you think they're releasing 10 million barrels of oil in November?
	Why do you think they're doing that?
	Because if they're releasing 10 million barrels of oil, do the math on that.
	If they're releasing 1 million barrels per day for however many months, And then that is suspended at the end of October and now they're not releasing 1 million per day but just 10 million in November.
	That's not enough to release 1 million per day.
	That's enough to release as much as necessary in the first week before the election.
	Literally before the election!
	November 1st happens, and they release however much of this as they want in the week before the election.
	The election happens, and then they're out.
	Then they're done.
	So it's almost like the day after the election happens, gas prices will go up.
	The release of oil will stop, and it has to because we're running out, and the reality of the high price of energy in the global market will set in.
	And if that doesn't tell you, like, what's wrong with democracy, and that's sort of a detour here because we're talking about the strategic imperatives, but if that's not a pretty damning indictment of democracy, I don't know what is.
	Rather than fix a systemic issue, which is the fact that our energy supply does not meet our energy demand, we're not independent in terms of our energy production, rather than address anything like that by opening up more American lands to drilling, Or pursuing fracking and giving up on this green initiative stuff, opening up clean coal and all of that.
	Rather than tapping all of our available energy reserves, What we're instead going to do is begin releasing our oil reserve which we've built up over 20 years and completely empty it so that we could just keep prices kind of low long enough to squeak by in the next election and then we're worse off.
	We are literally worse off because prices will be higher the global price of oil will be higher than it was before
	And now we're stuck with these high global energy prices, but with no reserve, with no backup, literally nothing left in the tank, but at least we'll have a marginally better performance for the ruling party in the legislative election, right?
	I mean, if that doesn't tell you what's wrong with the system, and that's what they're doing.
	So, it's a pretty sad day actually.
	That's what they're doing, that's what's going on, and I guess the takeaway from all this is it's so ironic that they, for years, said that Donald Trump was responsible for this weakening posture of America abroad, and the world doesn't respect us, and we're losing our allies, and all this.
	And look at this just abject, we're just getting slapped in the face here.
	Saudi Arabia, who we gave a 700, what was it?
	A 700 million dollar, 700 billion dollar arms deal in 2017.
	Sweetheart, one of the biggest arms deals in history.
	And we've supplied them with their war in Yemen, and we look the other way when they kill Khashoggi and all this kind of stuff.
	And you've got Biden going over there to beg them, doing a fist bump.
	Seriously?
	And this is how they repay it.
	This is their answer.
	Is to undermine America internationally and domestically.
	And siding with Russia.
	And I'm here for it.
	Saudi Arabia is slapping the American regime in the face, and I'm here for it.
	I'm living for that.
	I am living for Saudi Arabia reorienting its posture away from Washington and towards Moscow.
	I'm living for Burkina Faso doing that and Central African Republic and Mali which are all flipping in the past two years.
	I'm living for Sub-Saharan Africa flipping and Eastern Europe.
	I am living for Berlin.
	Hopefully waking up after they get totally de-industrialized and going with Moscow.
	The entire world is reorienting to a multi-polar world order and I am living for that.
	I'm here for it.
	Vladimir Putin, what's his name, Mohammed bin Salman, he is eating and leaving no crumbs.
	I'm here for it.
	I love to see it.
	And it's so rich because they said that, and I was here covering it on this show for five years, that Trump is not respected, Trump is pushing our allies away, Trump is doing all this terrible stuff, and we can't catch a break.
	We've got to commit terrorist acts against our allies in Germany.
	We're begging Saudi Arabia to increase production.
	They won't.
	They refuse.
	They cut production a month before the election.
	And good for them.
	Good for them.
	And that shows the loyalty that all these other regimes really have to America.
	This big narrative that has been spun up by the neocons and the deep state About how we've got these obligations to Japan and the Kurds and every other actor in the world.
	Look at how that loyalty is being repaid.
	And it shows you the real dynamic here.
	Who was really in charge of this relationship from the beginning?
	Were we ever really in charge of Saudi Arabia?
	Were we ever really in charge of any of these countries?
	I don't know how much we, I mean we never had any say in it, but even the deep state, how much say they really ever had in it.
	If Biden can't go over there and get them to not cut production right before the big midterm election while they got this war going on, we look like idiots.
	And we sort of are.
	The government is full of idiots.
	If you're Saudi Arabia, if you're any of the allies, how seriously can you take Joe Biden?
	So good for them.
	But that's the situation with Saudi Arabia.
	It's not going to make a massive difference.
	I would say the impact is more pronounced domestically.
	I don't think you can frame this any other way other than as a hostile action against Biden himself, against this administration.
	It's what it is.
	So, and I like to see that.
	This is why I've been in favor for a long time of Russia and China being strengthened at our expense because this is the kind of thing that becomes possible.
	Now it's not just us working against the Biden administration and working against the American deep state, but now it's like we got the cavalry coming and we got we got Saudi Arabia coming in.
	Saudi Arabia can inflict a lot more damage on the regime than we can.
	And so in a sense, it's like a shared struggle.
	It's a good thing that Saudi Arabia and India and Germany will have other options that they can pivot to.
	That's a good thing.
	Because if that weakens Washington D.C., guess what?
	Same enemy.
	Same enemy.
	And it's not necessarily to say the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
	It doesn't mean that, you know, I love the Saudi state.
	I don't.
	The Saudi state is by no means a good actor in the world, by any stretch.
	It's not.
	It's not to say that they're our friends.
	It is to say, if they're weakening Washington, that's a good thing.
	It doesn't mean that we have any kind of sympathy for them necessarily, it doesn't mean that there's any kind of relationship there, but it does mean there's a cause and effect here.
	If Russia and China are strengthened, if they're forming the foundation of a new pole in the world where other states and other entities can turn towards, and insofar as that takes market share away from Washington, that disempowers Washington, Well, that's the same Washington that we're fighting against.
	That's the same Washington that we're fighting against when we talk about the globalist world order, the globalist American empire, the American regime.
	It's the same entity.
	And I don't know how people don't see that.
	They will at once talk about the capital rioters languishing in solitary confinement.
	They'll talk about the weaponization of the DOJ.
	They'll talk about the surveillance state turning inwards and being used against patriots.
	They'll talk about the corruption and the lobbyists that manipulate our politics here, but then they'll go in turn and support the exact same people that are doing all those things at NATO, at the UN, in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in Ukraine.
	And they cannot see the contradiction.
	It is quite literally the exact same people.
	When I say the same people, I mean literally the same human beings.
	The same libtards, the same libcock, Biden, deep state, globalist spooks that are throwing patriots in jail, throwing people you know in jail for going to the Capitol.
	They're the same people waging this war Against the Deep State, or rather against Russia, against Iran, against North Korea, against China.
	So I will never understand the boomer that goes and watches Bannon's war room and Bannon is going to talk about how, oh, our brothers are locked up in the Capitol, but we need to empower the FBI to take on the Chai cops.
	It's like, what?
	It's the same FBI.
	It's the same people.
	Do you do realize that The more that our Cold War and arms race...
	And antagonism against China, the more that that creates bigger budgets and more personnel and more everything for the intelligence community and the State Department and the Pentagon, you're giving all of that to the same, the exact same people that are arresting you, that are spying on you.
	They're the same.
	And boomers, it's just like, there's just like this firewall they can't understand We need to do a new church committee, and we need to impeach Mary Garland, and we need to abolish the FBI, but we need to give the FBI everything they need to fight these Chi Com spies.
unidentified		What?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		No, no.
unidentified		China needs to get way more powerful, okay?
unidentified		Russia needs to get way more powerful.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And people say, you're a shill.
		Curious, you're shilling for China?
		I wish I was a paid shill!
		I'm an unpaid shill!
		I'm out here shilling for Beijing and Moscow and I'm not even getting paid!
		I wish I was a- if I was a paid shill, I would tell you.
		I'm an unpaid shill.
		I am a pissed off and resentful unpaid shill.
		Where's my cut?
unidentified		Huh?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Russia's selling all their arms to Africa.
		They're selling all their energy to China.
		Where's my cut?
		I'm holding down the fort here in America.
		I'm going on Russia Today.
		I'm calling it a special military operation.
		I'm waving the Russian flag.
		Where's my cut?
		Now, I see what China's doing.
		China's building government buildings in Africa and they're building highways and infrastructure and... Okay, where's my cut?
		You know, the whole system's against you and it's just me.
		Me and Darren Beattie.
		Where's our cut, huh?
		Bannon gets $30 million for Getter.
		Where's the subsidy for Cozy from the People's Republic of China, huh?
		I wish we were getting a little taste, but we're not.
		I would tell you if I was, because 100% I support China and Russia growing, because if Russia and China grow, then our enemies shrink.
		If Russia and China take, then we recede.
		The United States government recedes.
		It's quite simple.
		And when I say it's literally the same people, I'll give you a perfect example.
		What you have going on in Africa right now is that, particularly in West Africa, there's been a few notable coups, a few notable civil wars going on in this past week in Burkina Faso, in West Africa, in the past couple of years in Mali, and in Central African Republic.
		And these are all former French colonies.
		If you don't know, France has maintained a sphere of influence over their former colonies.
		And in all these countries, you've got rebels burning the French flag and saying these neo-colonialists are racist, they're arrogant, we don't want them here, we want them out, we want their peacekeepers out, we want their diplomats out, we want them out.
		And they're waving the Russian flag.
		And what has taken the place of, in these three countries, French peacekeepers and French military is now Russian private military contractors.
		So you've got hundreds of Russian mercenaries now keeping the peace for these new government regimes, and you'll never guess who's on top of this, who's running the report, what's the narrative from the think tanks?
		It's what you would expect.
		Russian propaganda in West Africa.
		It's not the result of Africans seeking new partners and looking towards other patron states.
		They say that Russia is running a sophisticated disinformation campaign on WeChat and Telegram and other social media messaging apps in West Africa to turn the Africans against France and in favor of Russia.
		You know who's writing those reports?
		Which is, which by the way, parallel completely what's happening in America.
		It's the same narrative.
		When in 2016 you have the rise of the so-called alt-right and Breitbart and those things.
		Hillary Clinton said that Putin was the great godfather of the alt-right in August.
		August 2016.
		And of course when Trump won, who did they blame it on?
		Russia.
		Russian collusion.
		Sergey Kislyak and Jeff Sessions.
		And in parallel, when they overthrow the government in Burkina Faso is Russian disinformation.
		You know who's writing the report on this?
		You know who's drafting the report on that?
		It's the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensics Lab.
		You know who worked at the Digital Forensics Lab at the Atlantic Council?
		Jared L. Holt from Right Wing Watch who stalks this show.
		So think of it.
		Okay, think about this.
		Jared Holt is Antifa.
		He is a literal Antifa operative, used to live in Washington D.C.
		He worked for Right Wing Watch.
		Right Wing Watch was funded by People for the American Way, which was funded by the Open Society Foundation, which is George Soros.
		He graduated from that writing about this show and writing about the alt-right and Charlottesville to working at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensics Lab.
		Where he created reports about January 6th and our streaming on DLive and those kinds of things.
		And the same institution is now writing about how the Russian state is backing disinformation on social media in West Africa to overthrow neo-colonial French Empire and talking about the increasing influence of Beijing and Moscow in Africa.
		So when I say it's the same people, I mean it's the same exact people.
		And people ask me, they're like, you're shillin' for China, you're shillin' for Russia, it's a pincer, it's...
		You think that I'm really gonna get hunted down by people at the Atlanta Council Digital Forensics Lab, but then go and shill for them when they talk about Russia and China in Sub-Saharan Africa?
		Or Russia and China in Ukraine, or Syria, or Taiwan?
		Make that one make sense for me.
		We gotta get more funding for the Atlanta Council when they do their reports about China and Taiwan, because when they do that, it's legitimate and patriotic.
		But now when they do it to me, like, hello?
	So that is why it is in the best interest, and it's so obvious if you have a brain, it's clearly within the best interest of dissidents in America to support the creation of new poles of influence in the world against Washington, against the Washington deep state, against the Washington regime.
	It's a good thing.
	And so insofar as Russia and China are laying the groundwork for that and laying the foundation for that and they're attracting interested clients like Saudi Arabia or Iran or Qatar or Djibouti Djibouti or Somalia or Turkey or you know, whatever, Libya, it's a good thing.
	It's not a good thing for the American state, but then again, what's bad for the American state is good for us.
	What's bad for the American regime is good for the American dissident.
	Such is the logic that we follow here.
	So for that reason I support it.
	I support the pivot to Moscow on the part of what appears to be on the part of the Gulf states.
	So that's that.
	Alright.
	I want to move on.
	I want to get into the car bombing in Ukraine.
	I'll say this.
	Here's my problem with the international relations story.
	Side note.
	The reason I don't like the international relations story is because there's no way to make them fun, you know?
	I think that's why people don't like the international stories.
	Because when you talk about domestic politics, you can make it fun, you can make it funny, you can spin it.
	There's not really, like, a fun angle to talk about, like, global energy politics.
	What's the punchline?
	Where's the joke?
	You know?
	Sort of hard to make light of that.
	Because it's all very technical.
	You know, we're talking about systems and dynamics and And these sort of complicated, intertangling relationships.
	I think that's why I don't like it as much.
	Because even though I love the subject matter, I think you guys don't like it as much.
	And for that reason, I don't like it as much.
	Because when we talk about, like, flight attendants wearing, boy, flight attendants wearing high heels, we can make fun of that.
	We can make a joke about that.
	When you talk about the Saudi energy minister said they're cutting production, or they're, yeah, they're cutting production by 2% and that raised oil prices 1.5%.
	It's like, how do you make a punchline out of that?
	You just can't.
unidentified		So, I think that's why we don't like it as much.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But anyway, with that, you know, we make do.
		It's informative.
		It's informative, we make do.
		I hope you like it.
		See, to me, I love... that's my true passion is international relations, you know?
		I was at Model UN.
		That's what I studied in college.
		And that is, to me, what is most interesting because it's a level of analysis at the highest level.
		I think you can't understand domestic politics without understanding international politics.
		You can't understand the pressures and the dynamics of a state without understanding how it relates to other states in the world and other multinational institutions.
		So, to me, that's like the study of civilizations.
		It's a study of the world.
		It's like the study of everything.
		It's a study of economy, military, production, population, governance, administration, jurisdiction, law.
		Like, it's an intersection of everything political.
		So that's why I love it.
		It's like the highest level.
		It doesn't get higher than that.
		I guess philosophy and religion.
		But in terms of the pragmatic, there's nothing higher there.
		So I love it.
unidentified		I love it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I like I like to read about it.
		I like to explain it But it doesn't make for the same kind of show it's not as entertaining I know it's not as funny So it is what it is.
		All right.
		Why is this piece of hair sticking out?
		Alright, well let's move on.
		We're gonna get into our featured story here about the Ukraine car bombing.
		I don't want to spend too much time on this because it's already like 1.15.
		When did I start this stupid show?
unidentified		Let me see.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, I don't really know.
		Because it took me 10 minutes to get my hair together, so I really have no way of knowing, but anyway.
		So um yeah so I don't want to spend too much time because it's been a long show already but our featured story is about this Ukraine car bombing and I don't know that we ever covered it on this show but if you missed it uh earlier this year the daughter of a major political theorist in Russia was killed in a terror attack The name's Alexander Dugin.
		He's a... I don't know if he's ethnically Russian, but he's a Russian philosopher and political theorist.
		He's closely associated with the Kremlin.
		He's got ties to Turkey.
		Very controversial figure, and he's written some pretty influential books that are taught in the Russian military and which have influenced Putin's strategy and his thinking.
		And so he's seen as a very prominent intellectual in Russia.
		Let's just put it that way.
		Earlier this year, his daughter was killed in an apparent attempted assassination attempt against him.
		He was apparently driving someplace.
		He got out of the car.
		His daughter was still in the car.
		I guess people didn't know that.
		And somebody blew up the car.
		The car was exploded with a remote explosive.
		Killing the daughter.
		Horrible tragedy.
		And a clear, if that was supported by a state actor, clear violation of the rules of war, international law.
		Not supposed to do that.
		You're not supposed to target even military personnel like generals and civilian leadership, let alone a straight-up civilian, let alone the daughter of an intellectual.
		That's so beyond the pale in terms of what is permissible in a war.
		So that happened earlier this year, and we never got a definitive conclusion, but everybody suspected, and all signs point to it was the Kiev regime that was attempting to assassinate Dugin wound up killing the daughter.
		It didn't get a lot of media coverage in the West and it was sort of swept under the rug and people forget about it But it's part of this escalating war well today the big announcement is that the New York Times got a tip from the Intel community in America and They're able to confirm that it was in fact Ukraine That put out the hit on Dugan.
		And so this is the article from Russia Today.
		It says quote U.S.
		spies believe that the Moscow car bombing that killed journalist Daria Dugina in August was authorized by parts of the Ukrainian government, according to the New York Times today.
		The anonymous intelligence officials also claimed Washington had not been involved in any way, would have opposed the operation if they had known about it, and admonished Kiev afterwards, none of which could be independently verified.
		Dougina was killed on August 20th.
		When the car she drove exploded on the outskirts of Moscow, Russian authorities blamed Kiev and named two Ukrainian nationals as suspects but never accused the U.S.
		of having any role in the assassination.
		According to the story in the New York Times, it says, quote, the United States took no part in the attack either by providing intelligence or other assistance.
		They also said they were not aware of the operation ahead of time that would have opposed the killing had they been consulted.
		The closely held assessment of Ukrainian complicity was shared with the U.S.
		government last week.
		The spies were reportedly concerned that such a covert campaign could widen the conflict And are frustrated with Ukraine's lack of transparency about its military and covert plans, especially on Russian soil.
		While Russia has not retaliated in a specific way for the assassination, the U.S.
		is concerned that such attacks, while high in symbolic value, have little direct impact on the battlefield and could provoke Moscow to carry out its own strikes against senior Ukrainian officials, some of whom have less protection than President Volodymyr Zelensky said the Times.
		So this is sort of interesting.
		You can see that what's going on here is that Washington is losing control.
		And this isn't the first time that we've seen this.
		The most recent example is just a few days ago.
		If you remember on Friday, Russia formally signed the treaty bringing or initiating the process of accession of the four Ukrainian territories into Russia.
		And almost immediately after, Zelensky held his own signing ceremony and signed an expedited application for NATO membership.
		Which apparently we find out that day that none of the NATO members knew was coming.
		Wasn't planned.
		They didn't know about it.
		They didn't approve of it.
		And Zelensky put NATO in this unfortunate position where Jen Stoltenberg, the NATO Secretary General, is supposed to give a speech a few hours afterward.
		He said, I'm making this unprecedented announcement and so on.
		And in the build-up to this, Zelensky goes out there without telling anybody and says, hey, we're applying to NATO.
		So Stoltenberg goes out and says, Yeah, uh, no.
		That's not happening.
		That's not happening anytime soon.
		Ukraine's not joining NATO.
		Like, that's just... you would need... It couldn't even happen if they wanted to.
		You need a consensus.
		Hardly any states in NATO even support that.
		It's not happening anytime soon.
		So Friday was like a total disaster.
		So who does Zelensky think he is?
		He goes out there in the streets of Kiev and signs this thing saying, we're going to join NATO.
		And NATO says, whoa, whoa, whoa, no you're not.
		Like, what are you crazy?
	We want to bleed Russia.
	We want to bleed their economy.
	We want to bleed their military.
	And we're going to do that with your people.
	But we're not going to enter World War III like this by bringing you into NATO.
	What are you crazy?
	So we see that, and then not five, four days later, you see this huge report in the New York Times sourced by spies in the United States, and you know that's legit.
	You know these unnamed sources, that's legit.
	The New York Times and the intel community are like this.
	They have people that worked in the intel community, they're kids, right, for the New York Times.
	So that's all legit.
	The USIC, intelligence community, leaked this to the Times to put out there in the press, regime media, And they're saying, essentially, we've lost control here.
	They're saying Kiev killed this person, killed this civilian, and they're putting this out now, months after the fact, because probably they suspect that there's going to be more of this.
	That the Ukrainian regime is totally outside their control if they're trying to get into NATO and they're killing civilians.
	Maybe there's more of this on the horizon.
	And so, and this is why I say the U.S.
	press is regime media.
	The U.S.
	regime, the U.S.
	security apparatus, is putting this message out there.
	They're disseminating this as an unofficial public position through the Times to say, hey everybody, just so everybody knows, we are not with them.
	We're not with Kiev.
	If they start killing people, we got nothing to do with it.
	If they start killing and assassinating more people, and they provoke a massive Russian response, if they provoke a reciprocal response from Moscow, hey, we had nothing to do with it.
	We didn't support that.
	If we knew about it, we wouldn't have permitted it.
	And why else?
	And so that's how this works.
	That's the inner workings of this, which tells you a little something about the relationship of the media and the security state.
	The security state is using the media to disseminate, again, its unofficial status, which is like, okay, so how can you say the media is independent if they're just going to take what the US spies say and publish it pursuant to the US strategic objective?
unidentified		That's besides the point for a second.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Now why would the United States try to disseminate this in an unofficial capacity?
		Why would they throw Kiev under the bus?
		It's because they've lost control.
		If they had Kiev under their control, they would have slapped them on the wrist and said, hey, we're not playing that game.
		Don't assassinate Russian officials.
		And Kiev would say, oh, OK.
		All right.
		We won't do it anymore.
		But if the United States security state Has to go to the New York Times and put this out there unofficially and say, whoa, whoa, remember that thing that happened two months ago?
		Yeah, nothing to do with it.
		We're gonna put some distance between us and that.
		It says that they're out of control.
		It means that clearly, probably more of this is going to come and the United States has maybe tried to intervene and has not been successful.
		And taken together with the story we just covered about Saudi Arabia, Look at how much this has just gone outside the control of Washington in every way.
		We're having to attack our allies by blowing up Nord Stream 1 and 2.
		I mean, that's literally a flagrant, blatant terror attack on our allies.
		That's what that is.
		The only countries that even had the capability to destroy Nord Stream 1 and 2 were the United States and Russia.
		And if Russia did it, NATO would have activated Article 5 and they would have blew Russia to smithereens.
		It would have been just the pretext they needed.
		They say that Russia did it as a false flag to create division in the NATO alliance.
		Doesn't make any sense.
		Russia couldn't have done it undetected, and if they did, it would have provided the perfect pretext for the United States to escalate and get Russia to bow out.
		Easily.
		So there is no doubt that we did that in the Baltic Sea.
		So we're committing terror attacks against our allies because we can't restrain them.
		We did that because we could not prevent Berlin from having some form of rapprochement with Moscow.
		So Germany's out of control.
		We have to go to the New York Times and put Kiev on blast and throw them under the bus.
		This country we've given 80 billion dollars.
		Because they've become some kind of out-of-control, belligerent terror state that is no longer under our influence anymore.
		They're killing civilians.
		They're trying to join NATO, trying to start World War III, talking about nuclear bombs.
		Saudi Arabia, who we do billion-dollar arms deals with, just gave us the middle finger, and not just our country, gave the President the middle finger by hiking gas prices before the midterm elections.
		North Korea, They're set to do another nuclear test, their first one in five years, which is apparently the build-up to that is all these missile tests where they're flying ICBMs over Japan.
		Over Japan!
		Not west of Japan in the Sea of Japan, over Japan into the Pacific.
		Everywhere you look, do you see a robust, solid, US-led world response, or do you see everywhere you look the world is out of control?
		India will not sanction Russia.
		We're trying to play Pakistan off of India because India was supposed to be our ace in the hole to check Beijing, and now we can't get India on board with our sanctions against Russia.
		Everywhere you look, in every region, in West Africa, in Southeast Asia, in East Asia, in Eastern Europe, in Central Europe, everywhere you look, it is slipping out of our control.
		That's a good thing for us, but it's a very dangerous prospect because that is happening and yet simultaneously the regime in Washington is unwilling to let it happen.
		That's what this whole Ukraine war is about, that's what these trips to Taiwan are all about with Pelosi and all these other high-ranking officials.
		It's us holding on for dear life to unipolarity, to global hegemony, but yet everywhere you look, just slipping through our fingers.
		And when the question is now concerning nuclear war, and we're at war with Russia in everything but name, and they're talking about defending themselves with nukes, that's a very dangerous predicament.
		That's a very dangerous situation, which is happening with the background of America trying desperately to hang on to its international control to no avail in the middle of this Tit-for-tat escalation, which gets closer to nuclear exchange every day.
		It's a bad setup.
		So, the situation with Ukraine, not good.
		And at one point, our cooler head's gonna prevail and say, you know what?
		Not worth it.
		Let it go.
		Ukraine belongs to Russia.
		Let it go.
		Nord Stream 2 and 1 are blown up.
		Germany is de-industrialized.
		They're offshoring their manufacturing to the United States.
		Russia's been weakened by this.
		Europe has been brought closer into orbit with Washington against China.
		Okay, let's call the quits.
		What more do you want?
		This guy's a nutjob.
		He's gonna get us all killed.
		Clearly the sanctions against Russia are backfiring in multiple ways.
		Countries like India are trying to do their deals now, not in dollars.
	At what point do you cut your losses and say, we don't rule the world anymore?
	Do we have to go to a nuclear war to prevent Russia from annexing its borderland, its historic territory?
	Seriously?
	Over Crimea?
	That's what this is about!
	That's how this... It's not how it started at the beginning.
	You don't have to go all the way back.
	But really, the precipitating cause of this crisis was the annexation of Crimea.
	After the Maidan in 2014, are we really going to go to nuclear war?
	Because Khrushchev gave Ukraine Crimea in 1956, and when the Soviet Union collapsed and this administrative part of Russia became independent because of a fluke of history, and then they inherited Crimea, and then we overthrew the government, so this pro-Western EU has the Crimea now.
	And then Russia takes it.
	We're gonna go to nuclear war over something as ridiculous as this?
	Seriously?
	That's greed!
	That is just straight-up greed and wrath and hubris.
	It's all of it rolled up into one.
	That's what this is about.
	Because we couldn't let Russia have Crimea.
	We couldn't let Russia have a favorable government in Kiev.
	Seriously?
	Because why?
	No takesies-backsies?
	Okay.
	Khrushchev gave Ukraine Crimea and, well, when your country freaking collapsed in 1991, one part of your country declared independence.
	Okay.
	That's how it is forever now.
	Set in stone.
	We're locked in.
	We can never change the borders again.
	Your country collapsed.
	Oh well.
	Now we're going to dismember all of it.
	And if you want any of it back, you're a warlord Hitler fascist and we're gonna go to nuclear war over this?
	It's insane.
	It's insane.
	And we can have a strong American foreign policy without having an American foreign policy that's just suicidal, which is what we have right now.
	All across the board.
	And Trump led the way on this.
	You can have detente with North Korea.
	And people say, he's playing footsie with dictators.
	Would you prefer nuclear bombs exploding in North Korea or not?
	It's that simple.
	He's playing footsie.
	Kim Jong-un is a heinous dictator, be that as it may.
	Do you want a nuclear war or not?
	Because I would much prefer Trump stepping into North Korea over the DMZ and meeting with Kim Jong-un in Singapore over missiles flying over Japan and another nuclear bomb test in a few months.
	I don't know about you.
	And same thing with all these other situations.
	Not good.
	But that's that.
	We'll watch all these situations.
	It's fascinating.
	I'd like to get into all these other areas because it's... people don't realize how this is... how we're really setting up for a truly global conflict.
	This Russia-China versus NATO thing, it is happening everywhere.
	It's happening in Africa.
	It's happening in Central Asia, in Eastern Europe.
	It's happening in the Middle East.
	It's happening in Southeast Asia.
	It's happening everywhere.
	People don't even really understand.
	People think this war is in Ukraine.
	The war is in Armenia.
	The war is in Kyrgyzstan.
	The war is in Burkina Faso.
	The war is in India.
	This war is going on in Libya.
	It's going on everywhere.
	People just don't see it.
	So, playing a very dangerous game here.
	And as you can see, by developments like this, we're not even fully in control, which is scary.
	So that's the situation with Ukraine.
	I hope they just level these people.
	I hope Putin just kills Zelensky and just gets it over with.
	But, I mean, we'll see what happens.
	We're gonna move on.
	We're gonna take a look at our Super Chats and we'll see what all of you have to say about this.
	This crazy world we live in.
	Let's take a look.
	Let me pull this up.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Get my water bottle here.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Alright.
unidentified		Okay.
		phone rings No, we're not alike.
		How could you say we're alike if there's two meals?
		There's a chicken nugget meal and a burger meal and we chose differently.
		at the Hamburglar.
		Do you think it's a sign?
		We are so alike.
		I had the chicken nuggets though.
		We are like Nardo and Sasuke. - No, we're not alike.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		How could you say we're alike if there's two meals?
		There's a chicken nugget meal and a burger meal and we chose differently.
		How could you say we're alike?
		It's the same meal.
		You get a surprise toy, but it's the same.
		In terms of choice, you made a totally different choice than me.
		How are we the same at all?
		You're a chicken nugget guy.
		I'm a Big Mac guy.
		Totally different.
		The happy meal, you get your fries, your drink, your toy, which are the same, and then the entree is the only thing that's different, and there's only two.
		And I chose one and you chose the other.
		That means we're opposites.
		That means we're completely different.
		So, how could you even get Hamburglar?
		You didn't even get a hamburger.
		So, no.

▲