All Episodes
Sept. 30, 2022 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:02:36
DIGITAL COUP IMMINENT??? Elon Musk To Create "TWITTER PROTOCOL" To LIBERATE Groypers | AF Ep. 1070
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
56:37
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
With respect, the respect that we deserve.
From this day forward, it's going to be only America First America.
America first.
Thank you.
nick fuentes
You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Thursday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight, lots to get into.
Our featured story is about Twitter.
Big development in Elon Musk's Twitter purchase.
We have now seen leaked text messages between Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk from March of this year, shortly before Elon Musk began buying up shares of Twitter.
And what we've learned is that there is a discussion between the founder of Twitter and Elon Musk not just about buying Twitter and changing it, but about creating an alternative to Twitter, which would be a protocol or a program.
And in other words, it would be the same function as Twitter, but without decentralization, without a company, without a board, without anybody controlling it.
And I'm not a tech guy so I don't really even know how this stuff works.
But it would just be there.
People would just access it.
And it would be out there decentralized like Bitcoin or something.
And people would be using that to post rather than the whole site being controlled by a company, being controlled by people, moderated by people.
And Elon Musk said he was open to exploring both options.
So we'll talk about that, what that might mean for all of us, and the ongoing lawsuit with Twitter.
We'll also be talking about Virgin Galactic, the airline, which has now announced that they're going to allow the girl flight attendants to wear the boy's uniform, and the boy flight attendants to wear the girl's uniform.
And they released a big promotional video and it was exactly the kind of thing you would expect.
It was the usual suspects, blacks, trannies, gay men, lesbians, and cross-dressing.
And the men wearing the skirts and the girls wearing the suits.
And so we'll talk about that.
It's a lot of what you see all the time.
But it's a little bit funny to me.
This is just going to be our flight experience.
This is your 2050 flight experience.
You're gonna be led onto the plane by a man in lipstick wearing a skirt and then black people are gonna beat the shit out of each other in the seat in front of you.
It's just like, it's a real recipe for success here.
And then a woman flight attendant or a woman pilot I almost can't even come up with that construction.
Woman pilot.
My mind just leaped to flight attendant.
A woman pilot with no experience will be flying the plane.
That's a little glimpse into our future.
So that's the news.
That's gonna be our show.
Before we get into that, follow me here on Cozy.
Smash the follow button to get a push notification whenever I go live.
Smash the follow button there.
Follow me on Gab Telegram.
True social links are down below.
Make sure to follow me.
unidentified
What else?
nick fuentes
That's about it.
We have a big stream coming on Saturday.
At least I hope.
1130 a.m.
Central Time.
We'll be live reacting to the Destiny stream with Jordan Peterson.
He'll be debating Jordan Peterson Saturday morning.
So I'd like to live react to it.
I don't know how long it'll be.
And again, I still don't even know if I can go.
I texted my mom today.
Hey, when's the wedding?
I have this wedding on Saturday.
And she goes, Well, call me and we'll figure out all the details.
I'm like, tell me the address.
Tell me where to be and when to be there.
What do you mean call me?
Call me so we can talk about our plan.
Plan?
Give me coordinates.
Give me a location.
Give me a physical and a temporal coordinate and I will be physically there.
Okay?
There ain't no plan.
Nobody needs a plan.
I love when that kind of stuff happens because if you just said the time and the date, I would know.
But it turns into a protracted negotiation.
Hey, just time and place.
All we really need.
Time and place.
I'll be there in time and in space.
No need to make a plan.
So I still don't even know what that's gonna look like.
But that's our tentative plan for this week.
Also, I'd like to do a stream tomorrow covering Putin's speech.
I don't know what time it is.
But Vladimir Putin is expected to give an address, it may be going on in like an hour, I don't know.
But Vladimir Putin is expected to give an address on Friday in Russia time to discuss the formal annexation and admission of the four territories into the Russian Federation.
And that, I got roasted for how I pronounced it, so I'm not going to pronounce it, it It's the two Ukrainian territories in the south, and then the two Donbass regions, the two Donbass republics.
And so all four will be formally accepted by treaty into the Russian Federation tomorrow, and Putin will be giving a speech about that.
And I don't know what is going to be said, or how eventful it will be, but I'd like to cover that if I can, depending on the time.
So that's my plans this week.
I'm back on Twitter, so I did a huge space today.
In case you missed that, I think they're out there somewhere.
I know someone records all of them.
But I did a big space this morning.
I finally got back on Twitter.
Thank God, because I was about to end it all without Twitter for another day.
So I got back online this morning, and I did a five-hour space.
Five hours!
Crazy.
And it was pretty fun, pretty wild.
I went over some different things, and then we took some collars, and we had... I don't think we had one American collar.
We had a couple of American collars.
But people are calling in from everywhere.
People calling in from Oman, and Romania, and Switzerland, and all over the place.
So that was interesting.
And that was my day.
So, feels good to be back on Twitter.
I feel like I just never have enough time.
Right when I start to get acclimated, right when I start to get situated, I build up my following, I find all my friends, I follow everybody, I get in the groove, the tempo, the beat, I get in the zone, I get dialed in to post, and then it gets taken away.
And then, That's like I have to restart all over again.
Well, it's not like I do have to restart and do it all over again.
It totally disrupts my mojo.
I'm in my zone.
I'm in the, I'm dialed in, and then they yank it away from me, and then I gotta find it all over again, then I gotta, I gotta spin it back up, I gotta follow everybody, I gotta, cause you kinda gotta find your voice on Twitter.
It's not, it's not like talking, or thinking, or posting on Telegram for that matter, or doing a show.
It's really it's own medium.
And you need to work into it.
There are a lot of things that I tweet.
There are so many things I do not tweet.
Because I get back on Twitter, and I'll just be on there for 12 hours before I even really think of something.
I really get a concept for something to tweet.
And it's not always great, but I start getting some things out there.
And then I'm refining and I'm thinking.
It's getting me in a certain state of mind.
I'm warming up.
And then usually by the evening I'm all spun up.
I'm in it.
Engine is hot!
The engine is hot!
And we're sailing ahead.
We are flying ahead.
And the tweets keep coming.
The concepts, the ideas.
And then I get banned.
And it's like, whoa, whoa!
Abrupt stop.
Abrupt halt.
And all the momentum is lost.
I had momentum for years on that platform, and then it got shut down, and I keep trying to get it spun up and it gets shut down.
So I'm in the zone now.
I'm in the zone.
Like I said, I did a super long space, and I was gonna tweet some stuff before I went to bed, but like I said, so many tweets unpublished.
Concepts.
That I thought about and didn't really go there.
And then I went to bed and I woke up and again I spun it back up and I'm in there.
And I know this account will be gone in four hours.
It seems to be that they run some kind of a spam check or something like that at 4 a.m.
every day.
unidentified
That seems to be the pattern.
nick fuentes
So maybe I'll sign out of my account after the show and let it pass over.
Like the Jews in Egypt, you know, let it pass over.
I'll sign out and the Spirit will pass over my account.
It'll pass over my device without catching me, without suspending me, without knowing that I'm a Jew in exile.
Or a Jew in Egypt.
That I'm a supporter of Moses.
I don't think that'll work, so we'll see.
But anyway, so that's been my day.
I got back on Twitter, I got some McDonald's, did some reading, did the usual stuff, and as always, it's another slow news day.
But some things are going on.
So we'll dive right into the news.
Like I said though, that's the schedule.
Tomorrow I'd like to do a reaction stream to cover the Putin speech.
Saturday I'd like to do the debate.
Both tentative because I don't know what's going on, okay?
I'm just getting schlepped around all over the place.
Going to this wedding and I love when you're like, I love when you're not, you don't just have plans but it's like you're told you have plans by somebody else so you don't really know what the plan is.
I want to know the details.
I want to be in control.
Let me see, did she text me the details?
I don't even think she did.
Oh no, she did.
Okay, it's at 2.30.
Okay, so we're good.
It's at 2.30.
Maybe I'll just show up late.
I'll show up late.
Yeah, let's do that.
Yeah, maybe I'll just go late if it's a two- Maybe I'll just, uh... Yeah, I don't know.
I'll figure it out anyway.
So, it looks like Ron for 1130.
Looks like Ron for 1130, me reacting to Destiny vs. Jordan Peterson.
And I'll say this.
It's a little bit funny.
Jordan Peterson will talk to Steve Bunnell.
And yeah, I'm gonna do this for a second before everybody rolls their eyes.
Yeah, I'm gonna do this.
I'm gonna go there.
Frankly, and I know we all have come to expect it, I know it's not a surprise, this is just how it goes.
I'm not mad about it, but it is just... this needs to be said.
Jordan Peterson, who works at Daily Wire with Ben Shapiro, will debate Steven Bunnell And he'll show up on a stage with that guy.
But not me!
But never me!
What the heck is that, huh?
Not me, not Faith Goldie for that matter, and that's ancient history if you go back seven years, six or seven years.
But he's gonna go on a stage with Stephen Bunnell, who's in an open relationship and a godless atheist, and has all these other issues.
And that's fine.
I'll share a stage with him.
unidentified
But not me!
nick fuentes
Well what the heck?
I'm a Catholic, American nationalist, reactionary.
I probably agree with him on most things.
But why?
Why am I shunned?
Why am I a leper to these people?
Oh yeah.
Cause I name the Jew.
Straight up.
And I know it's cringe to say it like that, but it's that simple.
But doesn't that tell you the whole story?
Here I am, Catholic, reactionary, member of the culture war, pushing tradition, pushing Trump, right-wing politics, all this, capitalism, whatever, and I probably have 90% of my opinions I share with Jordan Peterson, or a lot of them, I don't know about 90%,
He will not share a stage with me, would not be seen in a room with me, would not talk to me.
But he'll talk to Stephen Bunnell, who he agrees with on nothing!
Who's an atheist, a feminist, pro-trans, pro-Biden, pro-Ukraine, all the rest.
And what's the one reason?
What's the one reason?
Forget everything else.
Because I talk about Jewish power.
That's it.
And specifically Israel.
We all know that's what it is.
Why am I controversial?
I'm not that much more controversial than anybody else.
I just talk about one or two things that they will not.
And they will not talk about those things because they either are those things or they're complicit in them.
That's what it is.
So yeah, we're gonna do that.
We're gonna go there for a minute.
I know it.
For a lot of people, It's a given.
To me it's just even redundant even to talk about, but it is pretty wild.
It is pretty ridiculous.
Because what could you say are the issues that we disagree on?
If he's against trans and LGBT and that's his big culture war issue, and if he's against feminism and he's pro-masculinism and pro-free speech and all this kind of stuff, what's the one thing?
Well, he works for a company run by hardcore Jewish Zionists who don't live in Israel.
That's what it is.
But I'll talk to Destiny where they're in complete contradiction.
And I used to point this out during the Groyper War.
When we were sending the Groypers to Turning Point USA events, they wanted to talk to Communists.
They wanted to talk to Atheists.
They wanted to talk to Devil Worshippers.
They would ostracize us, ban us, go hard against us.
They went harder against us than they went against the communists.
And that's what their ideology was based around.
Capitalism and communism.
But they'd rather talk to the people who they were going on tour saying were responsible for a hundred million dead because of their economic system.
And those people are more human than the people saying, dancing Israelis, USS Liberty, those kinds of things.
And doesn't that tell you something?
If they're not willing to share a stage with people saying those things, well, why not?
Well certainly, because those things are just so far out there and so crazy, that's why they hold so much power, because they're so ridiculous and have no basis in reality.
But anyway, I'm not mad about it.
I'm just saying, food for thought, we're right.
But Saturday we will be watching it.
It'll be interesting.
If nothing else, it'll be fun to watch.
It'll be a good watch.
Okay.
So we're gonna dive into the show here.
Our first story is about this Virgin Airlines policy.
They changed the policy now where the flight attendants can wear whatever uniform they want.
I guess they have a red skirt suit for the women and a purple suit for the men.
And so Virgin Airlines did this big British Virgin Atlantic, is specifically what it is.
They changed the dress code so that the boys can wear the girls uniform, they can wear the red skirt suit, and the girls can wear the boys uniform, which is the purple suit.
And it wasn't just enough that they announced the change, they put out this ridiculous ad where they have got, I guess it's some kind of TV star woman who's some kind of LGBT icon who's running the campaign, she's the face of it.
And then with her you've got all these black and brown people, and you've got a non-binary person, and you've got a butch lesbian, and you've got the gay light-skinned black guy in the skirt, and all of that going on.
And this is a story that says, quote, In a bid to become the most inclusive airline in the skies, British Virgin Atlantic scrapped rules on Wednesday requiring its staff to wear gender-specific uniforms.
This means male personnel may now wear red skirt suits to work.
The company, which is owned by billionaire Richard Branson, announced that it would update its gender identity policies to champion individuality, enabling its employees to wear clothing that expresses how they identify.
According to the airline's press release, personnel are now free to choose any company-approved uniform, no matter their gender, gender identity, or gender expression.
The uniforms have been created for Virgin by British designer Dame Vivian Westwood.
Vivian.
The updated policies also provide an option for both Virgin Atlantic staff and passengers to wear pronoun badges To make sure they are addressed with consideration for their gender identity.
The airline's ticketing system will also allow people with a gender-neutral marker in the passport to use U or X. U-X, huh?
U or X gender codes on their booking, as well as the general neutral title M-X.
It's like Mr. or Miss, but M-X.
How would you even pronounce that?
Mix?
Mixer?
This feature, however, is available only in a handful of countries, including the US, India, and Pakistan.
In addition, Virgin Galactic has updated its trans inclusion policies, entitling members of this community to time off for medical treatment related to gender transition and allowing them to choose changing and shower facilities.
Is it really groundbreaking news?
Is it really surprising?
Whenever these things happen, I'm almost surprised that it's not already a thing.
Oh, the gay flight attendants can now wear skirts.
It's like, weren't they already?
They might as well be.
You go on these airplanes and that's the only people that are flight attendants.
Is women and gay men.
And, like, obviously flamboyantly gay men.
So you see these kinds of things and it's like oh I really I mean it seems like it's only a matter of time before everything becomes totally gay like this.
But the reason I want to cover it in particular is to paint a picture of the future for you.
It's pretty amazing because I want to look at the juxtaposition of they put out this highly produced ad, super trendy, you know, pop music and they've got all these black and brown trannies and flamboyant gay guys and butch lesbians and everything in between and they're gonna put out this advertisement and they got the light-skinned gay black guy strutting down in the warehouse with the skirt on
And I'm thinking, okay, so contrast that with what's really going on on the airplanes.
Which is, every day now, there's a new video from an airplane where black people are going at it with each other.
Just like everywhere else.
But now, I guess it's spread to the airplane.
So every day there's a new video of, and it's always like Chicago to Houston or Miami to New York or something.
And it's always Spirit or Southwest.
And we get these videos now every day of black people just beating each other up on an airplane.
And they get in a slap fight, and they're spilling over into the aisle, and they're spilling into the other seats.
And then, now, you get this counter-trend.
You get the melody and the counter-melody.
You get the trend and the counter-trend of drunk white people calling them the N-word.
And so now we've got this sort of competing melody here.
Of black people being obnoxious and fighting each other on the airplane.
Ghetto black people with their pants around their ankles fighting each other and then you get occasionally a white person that's fed up that calls them an n-word and puts a whole flight on blast.
So put those two things together.
The perfect picture of the future is this.
The year is 2030.
And you've got black people brawling it out on the airplane around you.
You're just trying to visit your, like, sick parents, or visit your kid in college, or you're flying on a family vacation with your kids, and you got black people, hey fuck you nigga, fuck you bitch nigga, slapping each other and punching each other.
And now, and now we've got the added benefit that a flamboyant gay man with nails in a skirt and high heels Is gonna sprint down the aisle and say, oh no, no, stop fighting.
Like, I think I would rather be on the flights on 9-11 than be in these new flights.
I think I would rather be on an airplane with Al-Qaeda than be on like an average flight within the next 10 years.
unidentified
Honestly, am I the only one?
nick fuentes
I would feel more comfortable if a group of Muslim terrorists got up and said, like, we're taking control of the plane and we're hijacking it.
I would rather be on a plane with them than be on a plane with these black people fighting each other and these faggot flight attendants wearing skirts and wearing high heels with the nails.
Now that's not an endorsement.
I'm not endorsing terrorism when I say that.
I'm not saying I want that to happen, but I am saying that it would be preferable.
That I would feel more comfortable if the plane were hurtling towards a field in Pennsylvania or a CIA black site than be on a plane in the modern day.
Seriously.
That's gonna be... And I want everybody to consider, like, the way that these things are now overlapping with each other, the way that these layers are being stacked, our entire country is like this.
Our entire country is that dynamic, being destroyed with this pincer mechanism of feral blacks on the one hand, feral minorities, Stealing catalytic converters and shooting people and all that kind of thing.
And then on the other end, it's fat women, stupid bitches, faggots in skirts, and this is like the pincer maneuver that is raping our daily life, raping our daily existence.
You live in a major city, you walk outside your house, and you better keep your head on a swivel, you better never relax, because this neighborhood is controlled by the blacks.
Get to work, and you're gonna get a transgender boss in your face, yelling at you to get a memo or whatever, and you're gonna see HR because they heard you say something, you misgendered someone's pronoun.
This is the face of anarcho-tyranny.
Anarcho-tyranny would probably be cool if it existed in a white communist country.
If it existed in like the 1970s, if it was like Escape from New York.
You know that movie Escape from New York where you're in...I guess there were blacks there too.
But if it was like that movie where New York is turned into a prison and the whole place is anarchy everywhere and people cutting each other up with knives and there's a ghetto pimp driving through, I would prefer that kind of anarcho-tyranny, Soylent Green, Escape from New York kind of anarcho-tyranny, because what we have now is somehow incomprehensibly worse.
The anarchy is worse.
The tyranny is worse.
They're both far worse.
So They changed the policy.
The already gay men are going to get gayer as the flight attendants on the flights.
But I really wanted to call attention to how that is going to interact.
I want to talk about the chemical interaction that's going to take place on these flights in the future, which is you're going to get a little bit of everything.
Just when you thought flying on a plane couldn't get more... and it was already bad.
It was bad to begin with.
With leg room and check bags and TSA and they grab your dick and balls and all that kind of stuff.
You thought it was bad with that.
And masks.
Now add on to it black people fighting and yelling and being fat and everything.
And now add on to it the referee for the fight.
Who is going to be James Charles.
James Charles will be refereeing this N-word brawl on your flight today.
And that's going to be our country.
So like I said, I think I prefer... This is where people go, what?
You prefer the Taliban?
Like, yeah.
Like, no, not even, not joking this much, not even joking this much, I would prefer Taliban rule in America to this.
You want to know why?
Because at least if black people were fighting at the airport, they would get their hands cut off.
And there would be no guys wearing high heels at flight attendants.
Maybe they'd be women in burqas, but wouldn't that be preferable?
Think about it.
What would you prefer?
Because I know I sound crazy when I say that.
I know people say I sound like an insane person, but who's more insane?
Like, what is really insane here?
Is it insane that we would be under Taliban rule in America?
And the women would have burkas, and thieves would get their arms chopped off, and blasphemers would get their tongues cut out.
Or is it more ridiculous that you're gonna board an airplane with a mask on, get groped, you have to bring a shampoo and a three-ounce bottle, and then you get on the flight and black people are gonna be Say to me, bitch!
unidentified
Say to me, bitch!
nick fuentes
Fuck you, bitch!
And then, and then if that wasn't bad enough, a fucking gay man in high heels is gonna zoom over in a miniskirt To break it up.
Like if that's... That's too much for me.
It's too much.
I can't take it anymore.
I can't accept this anymore.
I can't take this country.
Bring on the Taliban.
Bring it forth.
Bring on Taliban rule.
Bring on the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Bring on Russia and the Chinese Communists.
Nuke it all!
Burn it all to the ground!
Leave nothing!
Leave nothing left.
There is nothing worth saving here.
Am I overreacting?
I don't think so.
There is only so much that a man can take.
There is only so much that a patriot and an American can take.
unidentified
With what we got going on.
nick fuentes
Taliban!
unidentified
Bring it forth!
That's what we want.
nick fuentes
The people are crying out for it.
Do you hear it?
The people clamoring.
Clamoring for Taliban rule in America.
Begging for liberation.
So that's Virgin.
I'll not be flying there.
And honestly, it's not going to make a difference because they're going to do that to all of them.
They're going to do that to all of them.
And you're going to see it.
You think this is something that's happening online?
You're going to see it.
That's the one thing I can't stand, is for the past 10 years, we have heard people online tell us, go outside, touch grass.
This isn't happening in real life.
Twitter is not real life.
Yeah, it is.
What else would it be?
Where would it be?
If not, what do you think it exists?
In a dream?
You think we dreamt about Twitter?
It's real!
What do you think?
Where do you think it comes from?
It's real people in real life.
That's where the content comes from.
Twitter's not real life.
What is it then?
Underwater?
Of course it's real life.
And we've heard people for years say, you're overreacting, that's happening over there, that's the minority, that's a small number of vocal extremists on the internet.
No it isn't.
No it isn't.
20% of Zoomers in schools identify as LGBT.
In real freaking life, where we live, even if you leave your house and go outside and touch the grass, they're still out there.
And all the flight attendants were already gay.
So now they're just getting a change of clothes.
All those gay flight attendants that you see on every flight, now they're just getting a change of clothes.
You're gonna see them.
You're going to see the blacks fighting.
Wait until you see it.
Wait until it happens to you.
You'll be on the flight where the blacks are fighting.
You'll be on the flight where it's a guy in high heels who comes to break it up.
It will come to pass.
You'll see it.
And it is impossible for any one of us to live a dignified life so long as one person has to be subject to that.
I am that engineer that called those people the N-word on the flight.
I'm him.
I am that guy with the Burger King crown that called that woman an N-word bitch.
We're him.
We are that guy.
So long as there is one guy subject to this kind of Negro nonsense and all this other stuff, Then no man is free from it!
We're him!
And this is what's going on all across the country, across the board.
There was another story this week where a gay guy was fired from his job as a weatherman, I think, in New York.
He was a weatherman in New York on a local affiliate station.
And he got fired because he was on some kind of like webcam site like Jack Murphy doing all kinds of weird gay sex acts and I guess the news station found out about it and they fired him.
That's not the story.
The story in the news was about how celebrities And people across the internet rallied behind the guy to say they shouldn't have fired you, it's horrible that work can separate out your social life.
So, think of it.
These are the ways in which the country's changing.
It's not like... I could deal with socialism.
I could live with that.
If America was socialist, I could live with that.
Breadlines.
Well, we have to wait in life, so you have to be patient sometimes.
Patience is a virtue.
I could live with that.
What I cannot live with is, hey, you could see me on the evening news covering the weather and then on XXX.com blowing some other, like, seriously?
And then you jump on a flight and It's the story that I talked about before.
I would prefer Sharia law.
Here's a short list of things that I would prefer to what we have now.
Sharia law implemented by Al-Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban, or Iran.
Socialism.
Communism, fascism, Germany ruling our country, Japan buying everything, Chinese communism, the Chinese buying everything, some kind of lunar colony ruling America from space.
I would prefer almost just about anything.
To the kind of daily humiliation and indignity that we have to suffer in this country now.
Lizzo playing the flute at the concert.
That almost wasn't even the most offensive thing.
You know Lizzo, in case you missed this, she was at some concert in D.C.
in the National History Museum or National Archive.
They brought her a crystal flute That belonged to James Madison, the president.
And she played it on stage while twerking.
She got this obese black woman with her ass hanging out twerking, playing a former president's crystal flute, which was a gift from the French.
And that, you know, that's sort of just par for the course.
It's like, we've already seen that in various ways.
It's not really a shock.
What I almost hated more is she goes, after she plays the flute, she goes, Yo!
I just played James Madison's flute!
unidentified
Oh my gosh, yo!
nick fuentes
She goes, history is freaking cool, man!
History is freaking cool, man!
So we should all just commit suicide because it seems like There has just been the triumph of the inverse.
Everything that is wrong is now ascendant.
Stupidity, ignorance, vulgarity, all of the vices, every kind of vice, every kind of sin is just now Considered good.
So you get, it's not even so much fat naked black woman twerking with the... Okay, we saw that during BLM.
We saw that during 2020 and every shade and every kind of expression.
But when she goes, history's freaking cool, man.
That to me is the more pernicious thing almost because that is just the base celebration of ignorance which goes on all the time that nobody talks about.
This post-literacy, illiteracy of the country.
That's the level of engagement that people have with ideas and with things that matter.
That's fucking cool as shit, man!
And not to be vulgar, but that's how people talk these days.
You get these history shows and it's like drunk history.
Drunk history!
And the show is something like, alright, so basically George Washington said fuck you, let's create a fucking free country and do shit that we wanna do.
Again, that's how they talk.
And that's like our level of engagement with things that matter, with subjects that matter.
That's the level of development.
And that's what's celebrated is That's so frickin' cool.
So basically, they frickin' said, meh meh meh, this is how people are.
And that, like, that's the, that's the mindset.
That's the, that's the mode.
Which is so prevalent.
I think anybody would say, okay, shh, this is disgusting, this disgusting pig is ridiculous.
I think anyone would say that.
But it's this celebration of base ignorance and the complete lack of standards, the filth that you see everywhere.
She sticks her tongue out.
That's the other thing that they all do now, is they all stick their tongues out.
unidentified
Right?
nick fuentes
You see all the girls and everybody, that's a thing that they do now, is they stick their tongues out.
It's like, we just live in this country where there's just no, there's no dignity, there's no propriety, there's no respect, no self-respect, and honestly I think a lot of it just has to go.
Like a lot of these people, we gotta try and save people, we gotta try and save as many people as we can and turn them back, but it's a fine line between evangelizing and throwing our pearls before swine.
Fine line.
Between evangelizing people that can be saved and throwing our pearls before swine, at some point you've got to recognize these people are gone.
They're gone.
And they're not coming back.
And there's a lot of them.
And our country and its institutions have given themselves to that.
Those are the people running the institutions.
People that are just, they're just gone.
They're just forsaken.
And you see it everywhere now.
It used to be the case that we had this normal society and you did have this peanut gallery, but the peanut gallery is getting louder and louder and louder and now they're in control and now they dictate everything and now they have supplanted what was normal.
So whether it's an airplane or the news or it's the national history or even just the base attitude of the young people, It's everywhere now.
So, pretty messed up.
And that's why you need to have a fundamental shift.
It's not enough to say, hey, we need to change our tax policy or something.
It's like, no, man, we need a totally new vision.
We need to drop liberalism.
We need to drop liberalism and be done with it.
We need liberalism to be thrown out of the ash heap of history with communism and fascism and all that.
We need to put liberalism in the same garbage bin.
Because that is the root of all of this.
Why care about anything if you're a liberal?
Why would we deign to have a right to impose standards on a society if we accepted this natural rights talk?
Couldn't.
Couldn't do it.
What's the Lockean argument to impose standards, which anyone could say are arbitrary on a society, or to have an elite?
Couldn't do it.
So it's gotta go.
It's gotta go.
The rights for all these people.
Because I'm watching this advertisement for the... and this is the last thing I'll say.
I'm watching the announcement trailer for the uniforms and they're like... and it seems like they're cognizant that this is so shocking and horrible.
And the gay people in the commercial are saying, well this isn't hurting anybody.
And honestly, it's true.
Could you come up with the Lockean argument?
Could you come up with the liberal argument to impose a dress code on these people?
I don't know that you could.
And that is where the irrational must rise.
That's where the rational must give rise to the irrational.
Because I said so.
Because it is just.
Because we know.
Because we know.
We don't need to come up with a rational argument to defeat The people that want to see fat black women twerking naked playing our former president's flute.
We don't need to come up with a rational argument for why men shouldn't be wearing skirts on the airplane.
We don't come up with a rational argument for why it's wrong for black people to burn down our city and fight at Disney World.
We need authority to be exercised.
Not to make an argument, not to persuade, But to be expressed against the enemies of what we know is good.
That's what has to happen.
And if that comes in the form of whatever kind of regime, it doesn't matter as long as we see some reassertion of it.
So that's the Virgin Airlines policy.
Totally freaking awesome.
Totally awesome!
But alright, we're gonna move on.
We're gonna talk about Twitter.
unidentified
Yeah, you like that about 9-11 airlines?
nick fuentes
It's true though.
When you compare the two, would you rather be on a plane with 9-11 hijackers or on a Virgin Atlantic flight?
I think I'll take my chances with the Muslims now.
Because you know what, if we were on a flight with Muslims, at least the Muslims would kill the gay flight attendants first.
We could be rest assured that if we were on a plane with Muslim extremists, I'm confident that before hijacking the plane, they would deal with the guy flight attendants in high heels first, or the black people punching each other.
If the air marshal couldn't control them, if the flight attendant couldn't control them, you know who would step up.
You know who would step up and get the job done.
And that is a goat herder with a rag on his head.
And you know that.
And you know that.
They're going to do the job that we won't do.
They're going to do the job that none of us will do.
And that's just... And when I say the job we won't do, I mean reprimanding these people that are doing improper things.
That's what I mean.
I don't mean like... I don't mean the rest of it.
I mean they're gonna do the job that we won't do.
They're gonna cancel the Netflix shows and they're gonna cancel the boys in skirts and all this.
So God bless them.
Inshallah.
Inshallah!
Can we get an Inshallah in chat for the Taliban?
Can we get some Inshallah in chat for our Muslim allies such as those in the Taliban or the Arabian Peninsula or Iran?
Let's get an Inshallah.
I guess Iran.
Do Iranians say Inshallah?
Is that Farsi?
I think that's Arabic, right?
So inshallah for our Muslim allies.
I know it's they don't they don't have a lot going on there but you know they don't have this going on.
All right let's move on let's talk about Twitter before I get myself back on the no-fly list.
So our feature stories about Twitter And the big development is that we've now seen these new text messages that Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey exchanged before Elon Musk began purchasing Twitter stock earlier this year.
And they talk about not just buying the platform but a few other ideas which included at one point putting Elon Musk on the board of Twitter or creating a new Twitter protocol not controlled by any company.
And this is the story.
It says, quote, Elon Musk exchanged text messages with Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey a few weeks before he made his $44 billion offer to buy Twitter.
Dorsey texted Musk in late March saying he left Twitter because a new platform is needed and it can't be a company, according to a court filing related to Twitter and Musk's legal battle that was uploaded to Document Cloud by New York Times reporter Kate Conger.
When Musk asked what it should look like, Dorsey said Twitter must be an open source protocol funded by a foundation of sorts that doesn't own the protocol, only advances it.
Dorsey went on to say over text message that Twitter can't have an advertising model and that he intended to do this work and fix our mistakes once he left the company's board in May.
In response, Musk said he would like to help if I am able to.
In another March text message, Dorsey revealed that he had previously attempted to get Musk on Twitter's board back when we had the activists come in, but he said the board rejected the idea according to the text message log.
He said, I think the main reason is the board is super risk-averse and saw adding you as more risk, which I thought was completely stupid and backwards, but I only had one vote and 3% of the company and no dual class shares.
Hard setup.
Musk expressed a desire to discuss more, adding, quote, I think it's worth both trying to move Twitter in a better direction and doing something new that's decentralized.
So this is interesting, and it tells us a little bit about Elon Musk's motivation for buying Twitter.
A lot of people said that he was doing it for profit, but this seems to suggest that that's not the case.
If he's out there talking with Jack Dorsey, whose original vision was for Twitter to be the free speech wing of the free speech party, and he's talking about it in these terms and has his trust, then I think it's fair to say that Elon Musk Contrary to what a lot of the haters said, that he was buying Twitter to promote his batteries or his stock or protect his account, he really was trying to buy Twitter to advance free speech, which is a positive sign that a powerful guy like that is pushing in our direction.
I will say, though, the more salient feature here, though, is how it seems that maybe they're a little bit naive.
Maybe I'm wrong about this, but because of course Dorsey and Musk, they must know more than I do.
But it would almost seem a little bit naive to even suggest that such a thing like a Twitter protocol could exist.
Because as we've seen, the problem with censorship is not happening at the platform level.
It's not happening at the level of Twitter or Facebook or YouTube separately and individually.
It's not the company politics or the company policies happening at any particular company or all of them.
Because what we know about the platforms is that they all collude.
And that would seem to suggest that each individual platform is not really in control of its own destiny.
And what do I mean by that?
Well, the recent example was Andrew Tate, who was banned from every platform all at once.
And so, what that proves is that you don't have this diversity between the companies, which would indicate an autonomy of the companies.
If all of these companies were truly autonomous, meaning they had their own decision makers and they had their own pressures and constraints and incentive structures, then you would expect that naturally they would have different policy or different implementation.
If YouTube were truly autonomous, their policy would maybe be similar but not quite the same as TikTok.
And TikToks would not be quite the same as Twitters and so on.
And you would expect that at the minimum there might be one platform, one holdout, that doesn't ban.
But they all ban at the same time.
And so did Stripe, a payment platform.
And what that indicates, if they don't have diversity like that, that would seem to suggest that they don't have autonomy.
It's like the media.
If the media were truly free and independent, they wouldn't all promote the same stories and all agree to not talk about the same stories.
They're not autonomous.
They're not independent.
They're colluding, which would suggest that there's a meta-culture in the industry.
And the same is true at the social media companies.
It would seem to suggest that there's either a meta culture or they're all being subject to a higher pressure or a higher influence that is not unique to their company and they don't have real latitude to make discretionary decisions but rather that someone else is making the decision for the industry, like perhaps the ADL, or the people that are drafting the policies, or perhaps the Congress, or maybe something else.
And that would lead to the other problem, which is that these platforms don't just exist on the Internet.
They exist in a very specific place.
They exist on your phone.
That's where the users are, is on mobile.
And how do the platforms get on the phone?
Well, we all know you don't access them through browser, you access them through the proprietary app on the proprietary app store, which is the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store.
And so, even if Twitter were able to become a free speech platform, well, it would run into all the same problems as all the other existing free speech platforms.
What's the difference between True Social and Twitter?
It's not that Twitter has more users.
It's not that Twitter has 300 million users and that makes it fundamentally different.
The difference is that True Social is not censoring and Twitter is.
But if Twitter stopped censoring, they would very quickly go the way of True Social and Parler.
And Getter and all the others, which is to say they would run into some serious problems from shareholders, from advertisers which supply the revenue, from investors, from pay processors, from the app stores.
So, in other words, the problem of censorship on the platforms is not a platform problem.
People are simple.
So they see Twitter ban people and they say, oh, Twitter should just simply stop banning people.
But what if Twitter did stop banning people?
Well, we have evidence that they would run into the same problems as all the other platforms that have the bright idea to not censor.
Maybe they're banned from the App Store.
Maybe their stock price falls.
Maybe their shareholders revolt and the board reverses the decision.
Maybe the advertisers pull out and the company, which was never profitable, cannot even become profitable in the future and they run into all kinds of problems.
Maybe there's a revolt within the company of the people that work there.
Can Twitter be a free speech platform?
I don't think that it can.
Can Facebook be a free speech platform?
I don't think that it can.
I don't think that these things are as simple as we think they are, as if the company just made the right decision.
How we go about that is going to be far more complicated than people understand.
You've got to change the culture.
And Jack Dorsey has the right idea.
He says, well, the problem is that it's a company.
The problem is there's a board, there's shareholders, there's advertisers.
He begins to talk about some of the pressures, but there's even more beyond that.
He says, if we make it a protocol, well, there's just one problem with the protocol.
We've seen in the past that that has not stopped censorship from happening, too.
So I don't know that there is a good answer outside of the government getting involved as a consequence of all of this.
If these companies were regulated like utilities, I think that's the only way that you solve all those problems at once.
AT&T can't stop providing telecom services to racists.
They can't do it.
The water company and the gas company and the electric company can't stop providing water, gas, and electricity to people that are racist.
And so you have woke people working at those companies and they're subject to pressures, but the government says there's no discrimination.
So that's just the state of things there.
And so it would seem to me then that that's the only way that you can solve all those problems.
What are the odds that you're going to solve Twitter and also solve the Apple App Store and also solve the payment processors and the advertisers?
You're not going to convince all these people that free speech is profitable or something that they like or should fight for.
You're not going to convince all of them to do that.
And you're not going to get lucky that you get a base person to take over Twitter, Apple, and the advertisers, and the board, and everything all at once.
What are the odds that it's all going to shake out with the right people, the right ideas, and the culture shifts, and so on?
There just are not the pressures and incentives to push society in that direction.
There is nothing to be gained by the people who are the interested parties by allowing people talk about Jews on the internet.
There's just no one powerful that benefits from that.
And there's no one powerful that would not stand a lot to lose by defending those kinds of people.
Fundamentally, censorship works because the censored people are weak.
They're societally weak.
You censor people with fringe political views.
Fringe political views will give a person low status and probably low income and low wealth and low everything.
People that have fringe political views, even if they're rich, although they're often not, are ostracized.
And so that's why they're able to get away with it, because at the end of the day, nobody's gonna care that much about so-called Nazis being kicked off the internet.
And who's gonna go and risk their reputation for those people to be on there for the purpose of principle?
Very unlikely.
So...
The forces of society are arrayed against this kind of awakening that people... People delude themselves into thinking, like when I talked to Styx Hexenhammer, he's like, we just need to win the argument, man!
We just need to convince people, man!
We just need to go out and build a better platform, man!
Do people seriously believe that we're gonna raise the consciousness and wake everybody up and one day we're gonna convince everybody to have free speech?
Because if you think that, that's just not plausible.
It sounds nice, but there's no roadmap to get there.
There's no roadmap.
I don't believe where that's possible.
The only way to do it is to get in the government and change the rules.
And yeah, they do that at the court.
Or in the legislature?
Or in the White House?
That's it.
Those are your options.
The bureaucracy, the legislature, Supreme Court.
Those are the three avenues through government that you're going to be able to set the right forces, set the right pressures to allow a free speech culture to flourish.
Only within the parameters government sets can that happen.
But right now, it can't happen.
Please hear about these things.
Buy Twitter, run into a lot of problems.
Create a Twitter protocol, run into a lot of problems.
It cannot be solved at the platform level.
There's so much else going on.
And can you solve it at every level that it's happening at?
Can you solve it at the App Store, and the bank, and the processor, and the advertiser, and the shareholder, and the broader culture, and the social climate?
Can you do all that in a reasonable amount of time?
Don't think so.
So, if we want to get serious about censorship now, we've got to win elections and then get the government to change the rules.
Otherwise, you're just... you're playing games.
Niggas just playing.
So, that's my take on that.
And we're gonna move on and take a look at our Super Chats.
We'll see what you guys have to say.
unidentified
Another slow news day, but that's okay.
nick fuentes
We made the best of it.
We had a fun show.
I had a lot of content earlier today with my Twitter space.
So let me get my water here.
let me get my headset and we'll see what you got I'll All right.
Export Selection