Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 7, 2022 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:16:02

WHITE GENOCIDE: "NO WHITE MEN IN GOVERNMENT," British Media Gloats | America First Ep. 1055WHITE GENOCIDE: "NO WHITE MEN IN GOVERNMENT," British Media Gloats | America First Ep. 1055

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:06:39

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		America first!
		America first!
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The End The End
		The End
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening everybody.
		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Tuesday after Labor Day.
		We have a lot to talk about tonight.
		Lots to get into.
		Big featured story tonight is about this new government which has just been formed in the United Kingdom.
		And we covered this a long time ago, like, I don't know, two, three, four months ago.
		You remember Boris Johnson got kicked out because, not him, but somebody that worked in his government, like, groped somebody at a party.
		And I don't know.
		He didn't get fired fast enough or something, so that was Boris Johnson's fault, so they kicked him out.
		His whole government resigned and they forced him out.
		Well, now the Conservative Party in the United Kingdom has just chosen a new leader who is a woman.
		And our big story tonight, you know, I don't really actually care that much because this is Europe and also, you know, it's just not even really a big deal for us here in America what goes on in the United Kingdom.
		It really makes no difference whether it's who is that woman when Trump was president or Johnson or David Cameron, honestly to me it's all the same.
		So this new one, the old one, the one before that, you know, it's really six of one, half a dozen of the other.
		The reason why it's newsworthy for us is that this is being celebrated, this new government being formed is being celebrated in British media Because the four highest offices in the British government for the first time ever will all be held by people that are not white men.
		Every single one of the positions, not one of them I should say, will be held by a white man.
		So that's the Prime Minister, the Foreign Minister, the Business Minister, the Home Secretary, and the Chancellor.
		All five of those jobs, the Prime Minister plus the top four, none of them will be held by a white man.
		Instead you've got a woman, a couple of Africans, this other woman, and now not only is this going on, which is something to speak of in itself, but it's being celebrated.
		They're out there in the British media saying that this is such a spectacular step forward, it's so diverse, it's such a great thing.
		And of course, it's a little bit different in Europe than in America because in the United Kingdom, this is a country that is much older than the United States, obviously.
		The United States of America wasn't even settled by European colonists until the 17th century.
		Of course, the English monarchy goes back a thousand years, more than that, and has history even beyond that.
		With indigenous British people and then Europeans colonizing the British Isles in ancient times.
		Point being, there's far more history there.
		It's a far more ancient country.
		And so heritage, one could say, is a little bit more salient in a country like the United Kingdom, where you've got English, Welsh, Scottish, Irish, People that have been there for a thousand plus years.
		And now it's their representative government which is being replaced by people from Africa.
		Now in the United States it's a little bit different.
		Because although we have an historic European demographic, we also had African slaves when the Europeans arrived on the continent.
		And also there were indigenous people here before the Europeans arrived, and Asians came shortly after.
		Now, it's not to say that ethnicity doesn't matter in America at all, or heritage doesn't matter at all, but it is a fundamentally different equation.
		And so what does it say that in England you've got Kenyans running the government?
		Why is that a good thing?
		Why is that even happening, let alone celebrated?
		So we'll talk about, that'll be our featured story.
		We'll also be talking tonight about Netflix, who's getting some pushback from Saudi Arabia.
		And I have to say, I am Christian, but I have immense respect for Muslims because they seem to be the only people in the world, or one of the only religious peoples in the world, Muslims, That are successfully and forcefully pushing back against the West and their sick perversions which they push around the world.
		The transsexualism, feminism, homosexualism, all this kind of stuff.
		And so the story tonight is about how Saudi Arabia is pursuing legal action against Netflix because they're putting all this gay stuff in the Netflix shows.
		And that's against the laws of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia as well as all the Gulf states.
		So I think Bahrain, and the Emirates, and Kuwait, and Qatar, and Yemen, and Oman, I think they're all joined in with this as well, but all the Gulf states are in rebellion against Netflix, and they say, listen, we don't want any more gay kisses in the shows, we don't want any more gay stuff in Buzz Lightyear, or else.
		I guess Buzz Lightyear's Disney+.
		Nevertheless, they're saying, or else, we're gonna sue Netflix, and maybe kill some of them.
		Saudi Arabia is saying maybe we're gonna chop their heads off with curved swords.
		That's them saying it, not me.
		So we'll talk about that tonight.
		Should be a pretty good show.
		You love to see it.
		I so envy the Muslims because although they are heretics, They still do.
		As a religious people, they still are getting some of God's light in a way that atheists and Jews are definitely not getting.
		Muslims still revere Jesus and they're still a religious people.
		They're a conservative people, so they're still getting some.
		They're still getting some of the divine wisdom.
		Not as much.
		They're not getting it like Christians are, but they're getting some of it.
		And they're getting way more than these Jews are, and these atheists, and all these other rebels against God.
		And for that, we have to kind of look to them and say, we can do better.
		Why can't the Catholics do the same thing?
		Why can't America become a Catholic country, and we tell Netflix, hey listen, no more feminism in the shows.
		Put a veil on it, alright?
	Put a veil on it.
	We don't want to see any more euphoria.
	As soon as I finish the second season, we are banning euphoria from America, and that's the law.
	When are we gonna do that, huh?
	We could do better than these people.
	They still worship a giant cube.
	Okay?
	That's their religious artifact.
	They still go and walk around a giant cube.
	How primitive.
	But they're still doing it better than we are.
	So we have to get on their level a little bit.
	But that'll be our show.
	Before we get into all that, I want to remind you to follow me here on Cozy.
	Smash the follow button.
	What's going on with this jacket?
	I think this jacket is nearing the end of its life cycle.
	I keep noticing it.
	I don't know if that's the lighting or if that's... I think it's just being worn out from doing this all the time.
	From being on my show.
	Maybe it's time.
	Maybe it's time to get a new coat in here.
	I've been wearing the same two coats for like 10 years.
	Anyway, I just noticed that.
	But anyway, before we get into all that, follow me here on CodeZ, get a push notification whenever I go live.
	Follow me on Gab Telegram, True Social, links are down below.
	Make sure to follow me on all of those right now, if you haven't already.
	Follow me on Gab, follow me on True Social, follow me on Telegram.
	Not asking.
	Not asking.
	I'm telling you.
	This is a directive.
	You go and you follow me on Gab right now, if you haven't already, and Telegram and True Social.
	It's not a request.
	Used to be.
	It's not a request anymore.
	So follow me on all that.
	What else?
	Hey, check out, if you haven't already, MyMoviesPlus.com, $6 for the America First documentary.
	You've probably already all seen it by now.
	If you haven't, hey, just get on top of it, okay?
	MyMoviesPlus.com, $6, America First documentary.
	Share it with your friends!
	Tell your friends, tell your family that there is a man who has been put on the no-fly list for free thinking.
	And people are gonna say, what?
	That's outrageous!
	Tell me the full story.
	Say, hey, mymoviesplus.com.
	Six dollars.
	Because this is something that is the most important thing going on, okay?
	This thing that happened to me is now everybody's problem.
	This thing that happened to me, the no-fly list, the money freeze, this is everybody's problem.
	This is important for you and everyone you know in your life.
	So everyone needs to go and take a look at it.
	Check that out.
	I think that's all of our announcements.
	I hope you had a good Labor Day.
	I'm sorry I didn't do a show yesterday, but I didn't feel like it because yesterday was a holiday.
	So, I hope you all had a great Labor Day weekend.
	I really had an uneventful Labor Day.
	I woke up late.
	I went out.
	I got a cheeseburger.
	I got a hot dog.
	I got ice cream.
	I got sick.
	I didn't throw up, but I got sick twice.
	I went out on Labor Day and I got a double cheeseburger with fries, a hot dog with fries, and then, and I was so full.
	And then I went out and got ice cream and then I couldn't even finish the ice cream.
	Then I, for some reason, I just had to go to the bathroom.
	So I had to like race home, flew through the door.
	You know when you get, you know when that happens?
	I don't know if it was the dairy.
	You know, I don't know if it was the milk content in the ice cream.
	I don't know.
	But I flew through the door.
	You know those when you're like, can't even get your pants off in time?
	I know, TMI, I know.
	But yeah, that happened.
	And then I was sort of lethargic.
	I almost threw up the day before, but I kind of saved it.
	I was up all night.
	I had this huge breakfast.
	I had eggs, toast, hash browns, ham, bacon, coffee.
	And I was so close to throwing up, but I held it down, man.
	I held it down like a trooper.
	Fell asleep on the floor, no problems.
	Besides that, not too much going on, you know, just...
	Last week was my first full week back, and it took a toll, man.
	By Friday night, I was just... I was kind of over it.
	I'm not gonna lie.
	Friday night, end of the show, end of the Super Chats, I was kind of over doing this whole thing.
	So I took a weekend, you know, I binged the old classics.
	Not really, you know, I only eat very infrequently anyway, and when I do, I get very hungry and I go and eat a hamburger and a hot dog and ice cream.
	But I'm back now.
	But I'm back now, so I hope you all had a nice Labor Day weekend.
	I did.
	It was a nice weekend.
	Very overcast.
	My favorite weather.
	So that's that.
	But anyway, that's all I got for you in terms of what's new with me.
	Not much is new with me, honestly.
	Getting ready for the midterms.
	That's about it.
	We're gonna dive into the news, I guess.
	We're gonna dive into the news.
	We'll see what's going on here in Saudi Arabia.
	Love to see it!
	And I'll just read this one out to you.
	It says... Excuse me.
	My mouth is all dry.
	I just brushed my teeth so my mouth is all dry.
	It says, Gulf States... Excuse me.
	Gulf states have demanded that Netflix remove all content deemed to violate Islamic and societal values and principles, according to Saudi media.
	Recent material, including that made for children, contravened regulations, said Saudi and Golf Cooperation Council media watchdogs in a statement.
unidentified		Did not.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		and the gay football player kissed and everybody was like, whoa, not okay.
		Even in, like, 2010!
		It jogged my memory in the live show.
unidentified		Who was this?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Do you remember?
unidentified		I ain't got the lo-fi channel up.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It was...do you remember what I'm talking about?
		Nobody watches sports here.
		Michael Sam!
		That's right.
		Michael Sam.
		Yeah, and everybody, and even back then people were like, oh, nope, not cool.
		You know, we're gonna stop beating you up and killing you.
		But don't go kissing around on TV.
		That was like 10 years ago.
		Now it's in the children's shows.
		Now it's on Jurassic World Camp Cretaceous.
		Lesbians.
		Lesbians.
		And that's a little bit less harmful, but still harmful.
		It says, footage from the controversial French film Cuties, Mr. Girl's favorite, pedophile Jew Mr. Girl, also featured in the report by Al-Akbaria TV along with the caption accusing Netflix of being, quote, cinematic cover for immoral messages that threaten the healthy upbringing of children.
		Which I quite like that statement because it's true.
		I think there's an argument that can be made about putting immoral things in art for adult consumption.
		If you want to put that on cable, if you want to put that in an X-rated film or something.
		There's an argument I think can be made about that.
		But the problem is that we live in a family society.
		And you've got programming that's designed for children and families with that kind of thing in there.
		This is inculcating the children and the youth of a country with a very particular, well an immoral, an amoral or an immoral set of values.
		And that's just not right.
		Now adults are discerning.
		And adults should be able to discern.
		And in that case, if people want to put something behind a paywall or something like that, that's one thing.
		But I like the message here.
		It says that it's interfering.
		It's cinematic cover, meaning they're under the guise of creating art, under the guise of creating cinema.
		They are advancing, and it's a sort of moral imperialism.
		They're colonizing the family room.
		They're colonizing the living room with an immoral message, which is that homosexuality is okay.
		And that's exactly what it is.
		And as it says, it threatens healthy upbringing of children.
		That's absolutely what it does.
		It says, another video on Al-Akbaria's website alleged that the streaming service was, quote, promoting homosexuality by focusing excessively on homosexuals.
		True.
		The channel also interviewed several public figures who made similar accusations and called on the authorities to take immediate action.
		The joint statement from the Saudi General Commission for Audiovisual Media and the GCC Committee of Electronic Media Officials said, quote, Netflix was contacted to remove the content, including content directed at children, and to ensure adherence to the laws.
		And you know what that means?
		Chopping off heads.
		You know what that means?
		Throwing them off buildings, chopping their heads off.
		And you know what?
		Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
		They warned.
		And you know what that means?
		Chopping off heads.
		You know what that means?
		Throwing them off buildings, chopping their heads off.
		And you know what?
		Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
		That's what I always say.
		You don't want to get your head chopped off.
		You didn't want to get thrown off a building or hung from a crane?
		Shouldn't have put homosexualism in the children's media.
		That's them's the rules.
		Them's the rules, Jack.
		That says there is no immediate response to the accusation from Netflix.
		Although Sunni Muslim-ruled Saudi Arabia has no laws regarding sexual orientation or gender identity, sex relations outside marriage, including homosexual sex, are strictly prohibited.
		Under the country's interpretation of Islamic law, consensual same-sex sexual conduct is punishable by death or flogging, depending on the perceived seriousness of the case.
		So, you know, Netflix is up to their usual tricks.
		You know, they're promulgating filth all around the world, promulgating adultery, feminism, and in the latest... this is... that's wrong by itself, but the latest Is the homosexuality, the transgenderism, and so on.
		And finally, there's some pushback from a religious, conservative civilization, from Islamic civilization, saying, hey, you know, we know that you're full of it.
	This is not art.
	This is not cinema.
	This is a progressive, secular, liberal, immoral social agenda, which is put in children's programming, and it's meant to indoctrinate the youth.
	That's what it's there for.
	And that's a very important thing.
unidentified		Thank you.
unidentified		Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I know this sounds very simple, but some people don't understand the gravity of this.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Some people say, oh, so what?
unidentified		It's a gay, it's a lesbian in Jurassic Park.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, ...combination of deterrence and punitive punishments and rehabilitation and those kinds of things But really what governs the conduct of man is their moral paradigm.
		The reason that most people don't kill and steal is not because it's illegal, it's because it's morally wrong.
		And the reason for a long time that people went to church and people waited until marriage to have sex was not because of laws that were on the books, although there were laws on the books even in the West, it was because their, again, their conduct was governed by their morality.
		So, when you've got this stuff in children's media, in Star Wars, Jurassic Park, etc.
		Disney Channel...
		It's bad enough if it's in the general media.
		It's particularly pernicious when it's being pushed on children.
		Again, under the guise of creating art, what they're really doing is pushing this immoral social agenda, and they're telling kids that, hey, it's okay to have a same-sex relationship.
		What they're saying then, in a sense, what's implied there, Is that marriage is not about procreation.
		Sex is not about procreation.
		What they're saying is that what really matters is passions.
		What really matters is passions and affinity and affection and sex as recreation.
		That's all implied.
		That's where, you know, for a long time a lot of liberals used to say, you know, what's the deal about so-called normalization of homosexuality or gay marriage?
		Here's the problem.
		It fundamentally reorients sexual morality as well as our entire conception of sex and relationships.
		And a lot of this stuff you guys already understand, but it serves as a reminder of how monumental these social changes have been in the last 50 or 60 years.
		It used to be the case that people are, at least if they were, it was very frowned upon.
		There was a culture of shame.
		People are not supposed to be having sex outside marriage.
		They were supposed to, and like the Saudi law says, it doesn't say you can't have a particular attraction or a particular gender identity.
		It says you can't be an adulterer.
		And in other words, the only legitimate sexual, the only legitimate sex that is happening is within marriage between a man and a woman for the purpose of procreation.
		When you have all these messages inside the programming and start to change the laws and the norms and so on, it fundamentally changes human affairs.
		It fundamentally changes our societal orientation On Human Affairs, governed between men and women and between all individuals, it completely changes a society from a family society of men, women, and children, husbands, wives, and children, and parents, and grandparents, and extended families, to a society of individuals who are just kind of out there and having their fun and enjoying the passions of relationships.
		It's a completely different society.
		And again, a lot of this stuff is basic.
		A lot of this stuff is Conservatism 101.
		But it's depressing that the only countries in the world that seem to be willing to stand up for traditional sexual morality, or any kind of morality for that matter, sexual or otherwise, are Muslims.
		Because you look at Saudi Arabia and it's not even like a real country, okay?
		These are like primitive desert traders.
		If you look at the history of the Gulf and really like the whole Middle East, like Saudi Arabia is not a country.
		You've got a tiny strip of land around Medina and Mecca.
		And like, that's it.
		And historically, these were like Bedouin tribesmen that were just conducting trade between Africa, Asia, and Europe.
		It's not...it doesn't even have a semblance of real nationality like Egypt does, or Turkey, or Iran.
		It's not a real country.
		It's a fake country propped up by the U.S.
		government and oil.
		Like, it's what it is.
		Okay?
		And yet in spite of that, they're the only ones, it's like them and Iran and some others, I guess Russia, we in the West turn our noses up and say, oh, these countries are so impoverished and primitive and undeveloped, and some will say backwards, but they're these countries are so impoverished and primitive and undeveloped, and some will say backwards, but they're the only ones standing up for timeless truths, as well as they're the only
		Because really ask yourself, when it comes to media, is there any morality?
		Like, think about that.
		I know a lot of people look at people like me, a lot of liberals will look at people like me or others and say, you know, oh, these Christians, these conservatives, they're so uptight about what's in the media.
		You know, and decades ago it was about metal music, or it was about violent video games, or it was about the Simpsons, or whatever, and now in these days it's about, you know, Lord of Dim Rings, and it's about the Buzz Lightyear, and the Black Stormtrooper, and all this.
		But think about it.
		In terms of the mainstream, in terms of your average person or the sort of liberal consensus in America, is there any kind of morality in Western media?
		Is there anything that is put on television these days where the people producing the content or moderating the content or platforming it say, is this moral?
		Is that a question that's being asked at all?
		Because media is propaganda.
		All media is propaganda.
		It's all created, it's all propagated.
		It's created, and it's created with a certain kind of flavor, a certain kind of worldview.
		It's stories, and stories have values and characters and...
		Virtues and lessons and these kinds of things.
		Is there anything in the media today where anybody could say there's any kind of moral judgment being exercised about what is produced and what is consumed?
		Because it seems like culture is just a complete free-for-all in a sewer.
		You know, I saw the other week at the VMAs MTV Video Music Awards.
		Lizzo gets up there and, you know, she's not even wearing any clothes.
		She's an obese black woman in, like, a bra on stage.
		And she gets up there and she goes, you know, motherfuckers told me that I fucking can't fucking make it.
		Just like... And everyone in the audience is like...
		And this is like and I see this on TikTok and everybody's eating this up and it wasn't always like this.
	You know, I remember when I was growing up and Miley Cyrus did her thing and with Rob Robin Thicke or Rob Thicke or whatever and I remember Growing up you had sort of you had the Britney Spears.
	Remember that song, If You Seek Amy?
	I remember I didn't understand that until I was like 14 by the way.
	But you know you had all this kind of stuff where even 10-15 years ago people were saying it's so bad now imagine what it'll be like later.
	People used to say when I was growing up not too long ago They would say, how could it get much worse?
	It's a slippery slope.
	What is it going to look like in 10 years?
	And like, okay, now look at it.
	It is, somehow it got worse.
	If you didn't think it could get worse back then, it's because you didn't have the imagination necessary yet to imagine morbidly obese black women getting up and just dropping F-bombs and F-this and F-that and everybody's just loving it and there's not, nobody even cares.
	There's not even a mom's demand action.
	There's not even a Christian family something And the question is, what kind of society do we want to create?
	Do we want to have a society that is completely vulgar, completely gratuitous?
	Completely immoral or amoral?
	That's the issue of our time.
	It's not even a right or a left issue.
	It's not about right-wing or left-wing.
	It's not partisan.
	The question is, I guess to some extent right and left is part of it, but the question is, is morality important?
	Are we a moral people?
	Do we want to have a moral society?
	Do we have morality?
	And if that's the case, Then should we not have some moral prejudice when it comes to the media that's being created and propagated in America and all over the world, and particularly for the kids?
	Because that's what seems to be lost in everybody.
	And I look at something like this, and I look at a country like Saudi Arabia where they cut people's heads off, and I say, yeah, they're more civilized than we are, actually.
	Saudi Arabia, which is cutting people's heads off, and all the rest, It is a brutal country.
	They're more civilized than we are.
	I agree with them.
	I agree with them on this.
	They are more sensible than people in America that would say, yeah, let's just have a total free-for-all.
	Let's have fat, naked people, and let's have gay people, and trans people, and let's just have violence, and gratuity, and so on, and just no regard.
	That's a big question about what kind of country we want to live in.
	And increasingly, although countries in the Middle East are poor, and illiterate, and violent, and have all these problems, they have morality.
	They at least, and it's the wrong one because they're not Christian, but they have a moral code based on a belief in God, and they're pious about it, and they stick to it, and they're serious about it.
	And people will say, oh well, you know, there is immorality anyway.
	Well, there's immorality in every society.
	But the question is not, do you have sinners?
	We're all sinners.
	The question is, do you identify that there is such a thing as a right and a wrong?
	And there is such a thing as sin and temptation.
	And we have a responsibility to resist that.
	And we have a responsibility to rear our children in a particular kind of way.
	The real trick, the real evil thing is the extent to which morality's just been obfuscated.
	And people say, uh, oh, Saudi Arabia?
	Well, they're all a bunch of hypocrites.
	I hear that all the time.
	Uh, well, all the religious people are always the most hypocritical.
	Uh, the pastors are rich, and the Muslims drink alcohol anyway, and everybody's just a hypocrite.
	And it's like, okay, well, you know, there's a big difference between saying, there is a right, there is a wrong, we fall short of it, but we try, And saying there is no right and wrong, so why bother?
	There's all the difference in the world.
	That's the difference between a hundred years ago and today.
	That's the difference between a moral society that is having families and children and decency and literacy and development and productivity and so on, and a country like we have today.
	Where everybody's in bed, and everybody's sick, and everybody's depraved, and nobody's having families, and the relationships are completely poisoned, and the bodies are poisoned, the minds are poisoned, nobody cares about anything.
	That's all the difference in the world.
	It's not even like people were convinced to be evil, they were told, well, there's no evil anyway.
	All the people trying to be good are just hypocrites, so there is no good in evil.
	That's what we have.
	So Saudi Arabia doing the right thing.
	The takeaway is we can do it too.
	Here's the takeaway.
	We can get in control of the US government.
	And we can use the government to change the culture.
	That's the lesson.
	Everybody telling us you can't do it, you can't put that genie back in the bottle, you can't reverse what's been done.
	Yes, you can.
	Get in control of the government, change the laws.
	Punish the people making this stuff.
	It's not hard.
	There was a big decision this week, excuse me, Pornhub just got banned by Instagram.
	And that's after they got banned by Visa and Mastercard.
	And this deplatforming was the result of a concerted campaign by a non-profit, which is something about how Pornhub is profiting off of human trafficking.
	And it says that the regulations stipulate that if a company is profiting from trafficking, then that's a violation of the law.
	And well, you know, pornography and human trafficking are like this, so it's being deplied from across the internet.
	And that's a result of laws on the book which are being taken advantage of to an extent, in a good way I'm saying, by activists to get this filth off the internet and make it less accessible.
	Imagine if we could just rewrite the laws.
	Imagine if instead of saying it's about human trafficking, imagine if we said porn is illegal.
	Not human trafficking is illegal.
	Therefore, if you profit from it, and then so to mitigate risk, you need to kick them off it.
	Just ban it!
	Just get people in power, write the law, ban this, ban this, this is, you know, or, or, you know, what restricted in a particular kind of way, whatever.
	But the point is, you can use the laws to shape the culture.
	And by shaping the culture, you can shape the next generation.
	By shaping the next generation, you can fundamentally change society.
	That's a lesson.
	And that's why conservatives should not be afraid to get rid of this separation of church and state.
	It's a BS premise.
	There is no such thing as separation of church and state in the Constitution.
	It doesn't exist in any way.
	People misinterpret it all day long.
	Anytime a religious person uses their religious morals in a position of power, people say, separation of church and state.
	It's got nothing to do with that.
	You have the Establishment Clause, which says that the government can't create a state religion or can't create their own church or something, which is not what we're talking about.
	And you've got this idea of separation of church and state, which comes from a letter, I think by Thomas Jefferson, and it's just about how The government will seek to infiltrate the church like they had done in the Church of England from where the founding stock came from.
	It's got nothing to do with religious laws.
	There were religious laws in America until 30 years ago.
	On the state level, at the federal level, you had religious laws against adultery, against sodomy, against pornography, all kinds of things, against miscegenation.
	You had religious laws all up and down for most of this country's history.
	So conservatives have gotten this libertarian streak where they say, you know, we can't use the government.
	We just got to be at the mercy of all these immoral Jewish people running Hollywood and the porn industry.
	And we just got to let them have access to our children.
	We just got to let that stuff into our homes.
	Through TikTok and the cell phones and TV and, you know, we just have to be better parents.
	No, actually, just get the government to get that out.
	Get the government to go after these multi-multi-billion dollar industries and punish them so that we can get a decent society.
	That's what we got to do.
	If Saudi Arabia could do it, we could do it.
	If China can do it, if Russia can do it, we can do it also.
	And we've done it in the past, and we gotta go back to doing it.
	So that's Netflix.
	Love to see it.
	Love to see it!
	It's funny because there was a time like six years ago when like liberals on the left and right libertarians on the right would get together and say yeah we hate Islam because it's so backwards and regressive and I remember when I was in high school and I used to say like
	Islam's terrible and you as a liberal should agree because in the Muslim world women can't drive and they throw gay people off buildings and so we agree with the left.
	The left should hate Islam too.
	Now I find myself doing the opposite.
	I'm like, no, Islam is awesome, okay?
	They may not believe that Christ is the son of God but they have religion and they're traditional and they're conservative And I'm not a liberal.
	I'm against liberalism.
	I don't know if we should be throwing people out of buildings.
	I'm against that for sure.
	But the kinds of laws they have over there, we should definitely explore a lot of that over here.
	But it's so funny because the conversation was so fundamentally different.
	Just six, seven years ago when the meme was that liberals like Bill Maher, you know, all these Zio Jew liberals who have no morality, you know, we're on board with them as agnostic libertarians, right?
	Or very, very weak, religiously weak libertarians saying, yeah, we're standing up for women and all this other stuff.
	Yeah, hell no.
	Nope.
	Now we're not against Islam.
	Islam's not the problem.
	Liberalism is the problem, okay?
	Well, another religion actually does a lot of heavy lifting with the evil in the country.
	It's called Judaism.
	Talmudic, rabbinical Judaism.
	They're really doing a lot of the heavy lifting of evil in the world currently.
	It's just what it is.
	I mean, hey, if people say that's anti-Semitic, well, it also happens to be true.
	You know, so if you don't like that reputation, hey, you know, consider worshiping God.
	I don't know.
	It's just an idea.
	But anyway, so we're not against Islam.
	We are against immigration.
	We're not against Islam on the grounds that they're anti-liberal.
	We're against liberalism.
	So anyway, that's that.
	But I want to move on.
	I want to get into our featured story about this new British government.
	And like I said, I mean, you know, I'm not extremely interested in British politics.
	Like, I have not been following it at all.
	I don't even remember who is the woman... I can picture her face in my head.
	Who is the female Prime Minister that came before Boris Johnson?
	Was it... Don't tell me.
	I don't even remember her name.
	She was.
	I could see her face.
	I could see her doing that stupid dance.
	What's her name?
	It was David Cameron.
	He stepped down.
	Then it was her.
unidentified		What was it?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't even remember her name.
		How bad is that?
		Theresa May.
		That's it.
		Theresa May.
		And then Boris Johnson.
		Okay, so I don't follow this at all.
		But we covered it a few months ago.
		The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Boris Johnson, was forced out.
		His whole government mutinied.
		He wasn't going to step down.
		But there was this big sex scandal in his government, which in my opinion was totally overblown.
		Some cabinet minister groped.
		It was like a gay groping, though.
		But it was a groping.
		I mean, let's be real.
		Apparently this guy groped some guy at a bar and he got punished and everything.
		I think they made him step down or whatever, but...
		I don't know, Boris Johnson didn't disavow him hard enough or something like that.
		And so then everybody said, okay, well now Boris Johnson's gotta go.
		And at the time, I said, you know, that's just a little bit crazy.
		Okay?
		That's just a little bit crazy.
		Because in my opinion, if Boris Johnson groped a woman, I wouldn't care.
		Okay?
		If Boris Johnson groped a woman drunk at a pub, If it was him who did it, I would think that's not even like a big deal.
		I think a lot of the Me Too stuff is so overblown.
		Now, don't get me wrong.
		If you got a guy going around raping people, that's one thing.
		You know, if he's going around with the gun and saying, listen, have sex with me or I'll kill you, you know, that's one thing.
		And if there's people who are going around doing something like that, that's obviously totally wrong.
		But how do we go from, you know, rape is wrong, to now it's like, oh a guy grabbed a woman's boobs in a party.
		Hang him!
		String him up!
		String him up and quarter him!
		Draw him and quarter him!
		Oh come on now.
		Now look, and I don't really even have any skin in the game because as you know, I'm asexual and an incel.
		So that's just not even, it's not even an issue, okay?
		I'm not doing that.
		I'm not going around doing anything like that.
		Never have, never will.
		Asexual incel, by the way.
		I'll get married, and I'll have sex to have kids, and that's about the extent of it, okay?
		So I don't even really have a dog in the fight, just like how I'm in favor of drunk driving.
		I don't drink, but I am in favor of drunk driving.
		I think that probably people drunk drive successfully all the time.
		And, you know, it should be regulated to some extent, but it's a little bit overbearing, you know?
		Anyway, that's beyond the... we could get into that another time.
		That's beyond the scope of the show.
		And it's the same thing here.
		Boris Johnson was forced to resign, not even because he groped a woman, but because some cabinet member groped somebody.
		And even though that guy got disciplined, he didn't get disciplined enough.
		So the head of government of one of the G8 countries had to step down.
		Listen, I don't care what anybody says, that's not a serious country.
		If the leader of a G7 country, G8, G7, one of the biggest economies, one of the biggest militaries, a P5 nation, meaning a nation with a nuclear arsenal and aircraft carriers, if the head of government, and effectively the head of state, is forced to resign because a minister groped somebody, that's not a serious country.
		It just isn't.
		Uh, even, and again, even if he was the guy groping, I wouldn't care.
		But he got kicked out because another guy groped and he didn't have a strong enough reaction.
		That's just crap, in my opinion.
		I think there's a little bit of a gray area between an all-out rape and inappropriate touching, which is honestly just part of human affairs, in my opinion.
		I don't think anybody's going to go down the street and wave a flag saying groping is alright, but it's like, listen, It's like getting in a bar fight.
		Someone punches or shoves somebody at a bar.
		Well, that's tantrum out to murder!
	It's like, no it isn't.
	People shove each other.
	People shove and get shoved and people get drunk and they throw punches and it's really, it's not a big deal, okay?
	And in the same way that people get in a pub and they get drunk and shove each other, yeah, people get drunk and they grab a...
	That was my take on this when it happened a few months ago.
	And I stand by that.
	the end of the world that's not rape.
	And certainly the head of government should not be losing his job because someone else did it and didn't get disciplined enough or something.
	Anyway, that was my take on this when it happened a few months ago.
	And I stand by that.
	I'm the only one brave enough to say that.
	No one else will come out and say that even though it's true.
	Even though everybody is sick to death of this consent nonsense.
	Here's a little sexual morality for you.
	Get married.
	That's the only sexual morality that matters.
	Get married.
	Get married, then you can have sex.
	Outside of it, it's immoral.
	But this... and anyway, this show's not even about this, but I'm just getting on a total sidetrack here.
	This consent stuff is just crap.
	The consent morality is a paltry replacement for biblical marriage.
	It used to be the case that if people wanted to have sex, they had to get married.
	And a marriage is between a man and a woman.
	And there was a whole process and ceremony and formalities and education.
	And the parents and the family were involved.
	Okay, that's great.
	Now, people are just having sex all over.
	So now it turns into, well, it's like, instead of listening to the Bible, we're listening to John Locke.
	And our sexual morality comes from contract law.
	It comes from Chicago School Economist.
	You know, it comes from Gary Becker or something.
	It's like, okay, kissing, sign on the dotted line.
	Initial here, initial here for boob touching, initial here for smooches, initial here for ass grabbing.
	Seriously?
	It doesn't work like that.
	We're human beings.
	We're not robots.
	Okay?
	We're human beings.
	Sign on the dotted line if it's okay if I... You know, and again, this is coming from the asexual incel.
	Okay?
	Anyway, but that's a whole other issue.
	So this society of, you know, we took a picture and he grabbed my ass!
	Oh, what do you want, a cookie?
	Anyway, that's not even what this is about.
	So Boris Johnson gets forced out.
	This was months ago.
	Now the Conservative Party, who's still in power, they're picking a new Prime Minister because it's the Conservative Party that's in power in the Parliament.
	And now Boris Johnson is no longer the leader of the party, so the party now picks a new leader.
	And they pick this woman named Truss.
	Her name is Liz Truss.
	And she is appointing the first cabinet in which the top four positions are not held by white men for the first time ever.
	None of the top four positions in government held by men.
	And the media is not only reporting this, but celebrating it.
	That's a good thing.
	In England, okay?
	In England, the top four people and the Prime Minister, none of them are white men.
	They're all non-white or women.
	Again, serious country.
	Here's the article.
	It says, quote, Liz Truss is preparing to appoint the first cabinet in history in which none of the great offices of state will be held by a white man.
	Although Truss will not learn if she is to be Britain's new Prime Minister until today, which was I think yesterday or something.
	Her commanding poll leads mean she and her aides have spent weeks discussing the makeup of her cabinet.
	Quasi-Quartang, the business secretary, is certain to be chancellor.
	Quasi-Quartang.
unidentified		Chancellor of England.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Naturally.
		The Eaton-educated son of Ghanaian immigrants, Kwarteng, only received his first cabinet job in January last year, but has been a close ally of TRUST since they entered the House of Commons together in 2010.
		Truss is likely to appoint James Cleverley as foreign secretary.
		Before his appointment in the decaying hours of Boris Johnson's government as education secretary, the third in three days, Cleverley had been a junior minister at the foreign office, acting effectively as Truss' deputy.
		Cleverley's mother came from Sierra Leone.
		Ghana, Sierra Leone.
		The role of home secretary is thought to have been earmarked for Suela Braverman, the attorney general and former leadership contender, Braverman's mother was born in Mauritius and her father came to Britain from Kenya.
		So Sierra Leone, Ghana, Mauritius, and Kenya.
		Quartain, Cleverley, and Braverman are among only 11 black or Asian members of parliament to have attended the cabinet.
		It was not until 2014 that Sajid Javid, Sajid Javid, of course, became the first buku-duku, you know, boo-boo-doo-boo, Prime Minister Bumba Bamba Ganga of Bangladesh, the new King of England.
		That's the world.
		That's the world that we've inherited.
		Sajid Javid became the first, it's just like a fucking joke, became the first non-white conservative MP to join the cabinet.
		Yet Quartang would be the fourth to be Chancellor in a row after Javid, Rishi Sunak, and Nareem Zahawi, while Braverman would be the third to be Home Secretary in a row following Javid and Preeti Patel.
		Sundar Katwala, the director of British Future, a think tank which specializes in immigration, said, quote, The most striking thing is how ordinary and how extraordinary it is at the same time.
		This is an extraordinary pace of change even in two or three years.
		Never mind a decade.
		Yeah, it is.
		You could say that again.
		Extraordinary pace of change even in two years.
		Yeah, it is.
		Question.
		Why is this going on?
		Why is this a good thing?
		It's England.
		It's England and Wales and Scotland and Northern Ireland.
		But you've got a government made up of people from West Africa?
		Why?
		Why?
		Can anybody tell me why that's a good thing?
		It just doesn't even make any sense to me.
		And I know this is the usual diversity rant, but particularly in England, shouldn't the King and Queen of England be English?
		And shouldn't the Prime Minister of England be English?
		And shouldn't the cabinet members be English and not from Ghana?
		Why are Ghana... I mean, okay.
		You know, not every country is going to be homogeneous.
		Not every country is going to have 100% the thing that they are.
		You know, England is not going to be 100% English.
		And Wales is not going to be 100% Welsh.
		It's going to be close.
unidentified		You know, maybe it should be close.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Maybe I have Ghanaian people in London.
		Fine.
		Maybe you have people from Sierra Leone in London.
		Okay, fine.
		But in my opinion, the government of England should be English.
		It should be made up of people from England.
		Culturally and ethnically, ancestrally English.
		Why is that a controversial statement?
		Just like the president of Ghana should be Ghanaian and the president of Sierra Leone should be Tierra Leonean, whatever the demonym is for that country, whatever.
		Is that not appropriate?
		And I said earlier in the show, it's even different than in the United States, because at least in America, Obama, well, Obama was not the real president because he wasn't born here, but if you had a black president who was a slave, you know, that their ancestors were slaves, you know, that maybe makes sense.
		Because the United States of America was founded in the 18th century.
		Arguably, the American settlements began in the early 17th century.
		And when those were starting, black people came over here.
		And when we got here, indigenous people were here.
		So, there were Mexicans in Texas and there were Mexicans in Florida.
		Okay, and when I say that I mean there were people that were part Indian and part Spanish.
		So it's... I still think that it's important that America retains a European culture and so on, but at least there's a case to be made in America to some extent.
		To a greater extent than you could say about Europe, at the minimum.
		We don't have to say in terms of degrees how much.
		But there's more of a case to be made.
		Can you have a black president?
		I think so, actually.
		I think you can have a black president of America because blacks have been part of America since the founding.
		It makes sense to me.
		It makes more sense.
		Can a Mexican be the president?
		I think so.
		Mexicans have been around in this continent for a long time.
		Now, do I think we should have a million Mexican presidents?
unidentified		No.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Do I think we should have a Mexican nation?
		Not necessarily, okay?
		It makes more sense.
		But you've got a country.
		In Europe, you've got France, which comes from the Franks.
		It comes from the French.
		They're an ethnic group and they've got thousands and thousands of years of history.
		Thousands and thousands of years of blood and history and culture on that land.
		Over a long period of time.
		And the only person fit to govern the French is an ethnically Frankish king, in my opinion.
		And the same is true of Germany.
		Germany's got a lot of history.
		Thousands and thousands of years and its fight for unification and nationality and a unique culture and so on.
		Only fit to be ruled by a German king.
		And so on and so forth.
		And there should be a Tsar in Russia who is a Muscovite or just an ethnic Russian.
		They could be from St.
		Petersburg or they could be from somewhere else in Russia.
		You know, that's appropriate to me.
		But where do you get a king of, or not even a king, where do you get a whole government of people in England made up of people from West Africa?
		It just doesn't even make any sense to me.
		Why is that a good thing?
		And people say, well, it's diverse and diversity is good because it gives them a new perspective.
		Why would a Ghanaian perspective be valuable in England?
		Why does that make sense?
		If I came to Ghana and said, well, you need to listen to my American experience, you know what they would say?
		They would say, that's white supremacist.
		If I went to Africa and said, I need to be president because my white experience makes me have a better perspective than you black people.
		They would say, you're a neo-imperialist, you're a colonist, you're a white supremacist, you're an alien, you're an outsider, you're a gentrifier.
		You know, they would come up with all these names.
		That's a negative.
		But you've got Africans pouring into England and causing all these problems, by the way.
		But also then they get elected into the highest positions of government.
		And people say, well, it's great because of their diverse perspective.
		I think that in the United Kingdom they should have an all-English government.
		Maybe have some Members of Parliament in some of these minority neighborhoods or something, but I think that moving forward, a decision, just like we talked about a moment ago, we have to decide about whether we want to live in a moral or an immoral society or an amoral society, we've got to make a decision about whether we want to live in a national or an anti-national society.
		Do nationalities matter to us?
		Does heritage matter to us?
		Do peoples matter to us?
		Or do these things not matter at all and we're a globalist world and have a globalist country?
		That's the question that needs to be answered here.
		Do we want to have a country that just has no culture and everywhere we go is just we're all aliens?
		Because that is what the elites and that's what the people on the coasts are pushing.
		That's what... And by the way, you look at the demographics of these cities.
		Take a look at New York, take a look at L.A., D.C.
		What do these three cities have in common?
		Outsized influence of a particular group.
		You know, some people say it's 2%, but they're represented way too much.
		Well, in New York, it's like 13%.
		Or 17% I think.
		In LA, similar percentage.
		DC, similar percentage.
		You know, what's going on with that?
		But America, they're trying to turn America into this country for everybody.
		As you know, America, Canada, the United Kingdom, Western Europe, Australia, these are countries that are going to be for everybody.
		These countries are designated.
		The European countries are going to be designated.
		These are going to be the countries for everybody, where there's no language and no religion and no ethnicity.
		Now that's not true of every other country, because of course Nigeria is still Nigeria.
		And Brazil is still Brazil, and China is still China, and Iran is still Iran, and Japan is still Japan.
		But all these European countries, our homes, are going to be home to everybody.
		And we're going to go into the city and see people that we don't recognize, speaking languages that we don't speak, professing a religion which is foreign to us, mannerisms and values and customs alien and maybe offensive to us, and lording over us and ruling us.
		Ruling us At the provincial level, at the national level, running our bureaucracies, running our companies, making decisions about our lives.
		Our countries were just seemingly designated as the countries where this was going to occur.
	And so the United Kingdom, unlike America, there's no semblance of a propositional nation or anything.
	They've got a monarchy.
	They're not a republic.
	Their sovereignty doesn't come from the people.
	You call it a constitutional monarchy, you could say it's monarchic.
	Institution has been weakened.
	But it's not even, you can't even make the argument that it's a creedal nation based on all men created equal like this nonsense, this perversion that they say about America that doesn't even apply to the United Kingdom.
	But this is just happening to all the white countries.
	You just have to be integrated.
	You just have to be swallowed up by non-white people, replaced in government, replaced in the Fortune 500 company boards, replaced in college, and replaced, period, in your own country.
	It's just wrong.
	It's just not right.
	Can't you leave us alone?
	Can't the English just be the English?
	Can't the French just be the French?
	And you can be the Ghanians and you can be from Sierra Leone and Mauritius and everything else?
	At this point, I just don't even understand.
	I mean, you're either actively anti-white or you're pro-white.
	There's nothing in between, I don't think, anymore.
	You either think that white people have the same rights as natives, as anybody else, and the rights of their own country, and their own jurisdiction, and their own home, and their own community, or you think that white people don't have a home, white people don't deserve a home, and the white countries are for other people to come in and occupy.
	It's a decidedly anti-white mentality.
	You know, as an example, I saw last week Somebody sent me an article about South Africa, and there's a small town in South Africa that's been around for 20 or 30 years, but they only allow white people to live there.
	And of course, 30 years ago when Nelson Mandela became the president, they got rid of segregation and they started integrating all the black and white people.
	Well, so they start up this white community, whites only community, and it's a private area.
	There was an investor who bought up all this private land and started a private community.
	And they've only approved white people to live there, and they're all flying the old apartheid flags, and they've got statues of apartheid leaders, and all the South Africans are campaigning to get this place shut down.
	And I'm thinking, what exactly is the problem here?
	You have all these white people, they want to go form their own community, and you've got all these other people saying, no, you can't do that.
	You've got to be integrated.
	Why?
	People might say that's racist.
	Okay, fair enough.
	It's racist.
	Why can't those racist people go and be racist in their own community?
	You don't have to live there.
	Why do you have to force the racist people to live among everybody else?
	It's like you realize that there's a totalizing universal agenda here.
	When people say, you know, we're just gonna go to the woods and do our own thing, that's not an option.
	For whatever reason, you can read into it what you want.
	I think people can come to their own conclusions.
	White people are being forcibly...
	Exterminated.
	Forcibly replaced.
	Forcibly their base of power, their countries, are being destroyed.
	What if white people want to be influential in a white country?
	What if white people want a home?
	What if white Americans, or white English, or French, or Germans, or whatever, native white light-skinned white European people, What if they want to create a country and they want that country to be their home and they want people in their home to be kin, similar, family, bound by ancestry?
	What if they wanted a particular kind of culture that is familiar, a language that is common and familiar, a religion which is common and familiar and their own?
	And what if they wanted leaders that represented them?
	Represented what they look like, how they act, Their values, their language, their culture, and their laws to follow suit to reflect their interests.
	All the countries in the world that are like this are being filled up with other people saying, um, excuse me, no, you can't have that.
	No, you've got to have all these other people.
	Nope, you've got to have a country full of other people, and you've got to have your businesses full of other people, you've got to have your government full of other people, and other people got to write your laws, and you just got to get used to it.
	You just have to tolerate it.
	No, now you've got to do the education.
	It's not enough to tolerate.
	Now you've got to wipe your white tears away and you've got to learn how we live and navigate around us.
	Make room because we're here now.
	You don't like it?
	Get used to it.
	It's our country now.
	It never was your country.
	And again, it's not just happening in the United States where there's more of a claim by historic black descendants of slaves or Mexicans or something.
	It's happening in every single white settlement anywhere in the world.
	In the United Kingdom, in America, in Canada, in France, in Italy, even in a small White enclave in a majority black nation on a majority black continent in South Africa.
	They gotta go in there and say, Nope!
	There's one person you forgot to ask and that's a black majority.
	Nope, you can't have your own place.
unidentified		You gotta be over here.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Your values have to be integration.
		Your values have to be globalism.
		Your values have to not just be not racist, but anti-racist or anti-white.
		You've got to repudiate your identity.
		You've got to repudiate your right, your homeland, in the service of the international, the general, the universal, the not-white, the alien, It's not right.
		There's nothing that is good about this.
		There's nothing that's moral about this.
		I would argue the opposite.
		It's immoral.
		It is immoral that foreigners come to these countries.
		If I moved to the United Kingdom, I wouldn't dare run for office and tell the people in England how to live.
		I'm not English.
		I'm not ethnically English.
		I'm Irish.
		I'm not ethically English.
		I wasn't born in England.
		I don't know anything about England.
		I wouldn't deign to go to that country and become elected.
		I don't even have kids!
		And the kids are gonna go and become elected.
		Because we're foreign.
		And, you know, it's great that Western countries allow foreigners to enjoy dignity and respect and equality to some extent.
		But in order to have the foreign, you've got to have the familiar.
		And for it to be familiar, it's got to be common.
		And this is true of every country, and everybody accepts this.
		Not everybody in China is Han Chinese, but most of them are.
		And the people that are not Han Chinese, well, some of them actually get thrown in, like, concentration camps.
		That's maybe State Department propaganda.
		Maybe it's a good thing.
		Who knows?
		But point being is some of these other people are able to be there and they're treated worse than they are in the West, but they know that.
		We're in China.
		We're not home.
		We're an ethnic minority.
		We're in the minority.
		We're foreign.
		They know that.
		And they understand that.
		And the great thing about the West is that the minorities and the foreigners have rights and dignity and are treated like human beings and so on.
		But don't get it twisted.
		We've got the familiar and we've got the domestic and we've got our home.
		And we've got visitors and guests and foreigners and we have some kinds of minorities and things like that.
		And I think that's an appropriate state of affairs, but what you've got going on now is something like imperialism, where people are coming in and saying there's no respect for the place that they're visiting, or where they're a foreigner in, or a minority in, or something like that.
		They want to come in, and it's not enough to have their own home, or their own community, or their own neighborhood.
		They want to take over.
		They want to take over and repudiate the existence of the original native place and say, there is no England.
		England is for everybody.
		It's like, no, actually it isn't.
		And neither is France, and neither is Germany, and neither is any of these countries.
		You wouldn't go to Saudi Arabia and do that.
		You wouldn't go to Mecca and say, this is a Christian place.
		This is for us.
		I mean, maybe you do that with an army.
		I wouldn't be opposed to that, eventually.
		But it would be a hostile action.
		We'd be going in there and saying, hey, we are going to... And, you know, the Muslims would have every right to say, no, we're going to repel the invasion.
		But it's what it is.
		It's an invasion.
		But nobody would do that now and say, hey, diversity is our strength.
		They wouldn't do that with a liberal premise.
		But everybody's okay with it happening here.
		And, you know, again, I think everybody kind of understands that, but it's sick.
		And the thing is, people say, oh, so you're a white supremacist?
		I mean, look, it's only happening in the white countries.
	That's the only places where this is happening, really.
	You've got other border skirmishes, and you've got other migrations of people, but for the most part, we're the greatest migrations in the world happening.
	From the Middle East and Africa to Europe, and from Latin America and Asia to America.
	Those are the biggest That's the greatest demographic shift happening in the world right now.
	They call it the fourth demographic shift.
	The Global South moving to the Global North.
	And it's just going to impoverish all of us.
	Sierra Leone President, Ghanaian Prime Minister, whatever, Home Minister, whatever the structure is over there.
	And they're celebrating it, saying, isn't it so great that all these West Africans are running England?
	The whole world has gone insane.
	So anyway, that's that.
	Disappointing.
	But, uh... But that's just how it is.
	Why does it say I've only been... My, uh... Did I, did I... Oh, my, uh... Am I still live?
	My, um... Streaming software's, like, paused at 40 minutes.
	I keep looking over, I'm like, 40 minutes.
	I said, I feel like I've been live for longer than that.
	I've been live for an hour and 20 minutes and it only says 40 on here.
	Okay, so that's just a glitch on my end.
	Alright, I just got confused for a sec.
	I was gonna say, I finished that story, I was like, oh jeez, did I really only talk for like 30 minutes?
	Okay.
	So that's it, that's all I got.
	Yeah, I panicked for a sec.
	I'm like, wait a second, I did, was that a 30 minute monologue?
	I said, I feel like I've been talking for way longer than that.
	Okay.
	Alright, so let's move on.
	We're going to move on.
	We're going to take a look at our Super Chats.
	We'll see what you guys have to say.
	Eh, it's kind of boilerplate stuff, but there's nothing going on in the news.
	So, we're going to revisit some oldies and some goodies.
	Which is Saudi Arabia being based and white genocide being real.
	Two true things.

▲