All Episodes
Previous Next
April 9, 2022 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:38:48
WORLD WAR III: White House ADMITS Russian "Chemical Weapons" Intel FRAUD | America First Ep. 975
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:34:10
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Good evening everybody!
You are watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Friday.
We have a lot to talk about, lots to get into tonight.
I wasn't here yesterday, but there's big news to cover.
On the Russia-Ukraine war.
And it's pretty amazing because the whole thing is playing out exactly like I have been predicting since before it started and now throughout the war.
The big story from yesterday is that we talked I think last week or the week before about these claims from NATO and from the US National Security Council that Russia was planning on using chemical weapons in Ukraine.
And I said that was complete nonsense, like everything else we're hearing about Ukraine.
Like the ghost of Kiev, like these alleged attacks on nuclear power plants, the war crimes, the attacks on maternity wards and pregnant people.
It was fake.
It was completely fake.
And I said the purpose of that was to create and spin sort of a plausible narrative to create an on-ramp for a U.S.
intervention.
And it would go something like this.
Russia and Ukraine are engaged in a stalemate.
Russia is no longer making advances because they encountered resistance that they didn't expect.
So therefore, they need to hasten the end of the conflict without losing, you know, because they need to save face.
Therefore, they will cross the red line, use chemical weapons, and in doing so, they will invite A reasonable intervention from the West.
What that is, nobody knows.
And a reporter asked Joe Biden last week, well, if you use chemical weapons, what would you do?
And Biden said, well, why would I tell you?
It's a surprise.
And I said last week, this is a very calculated strategy.
It's creating, rhetorically, a tripwire.
Okay, use chemical weapons.
If this, then we come in.
What does that look like?
We could do whatever we want, but we can activate the tripwire and escalate it basically on our timeline.
We can create, fabricate evidence of chemical weapons.
The Ukrainians could do it.
We do this false flag business all the time and nobody cares.
You know, they did the same thing in Syria.
They found out it was false and nobody even knows about that.
Nobody even knows that there was no evidence of chemical weapons usage.
It didn't matter because the timeline is 72 hours.
Chemical weapons used, Security Council convened, Airstrike.
Intervention.
And so I said that it's all about getting America in the war and so without getting too much into it at this point in the show the big story is they admit that was all a lie.
And a big report came out yesterday from the U.S.
intelligence apparatus that said, yeah, we have no confidence in our intelligence that says that Russia is planning to use chemical weapons.
We made that up to shape the information war that's going on between America and Russia right now.
Which is essentially what I said.
So that is our featured story.
It's a pretty big deal.
We'll get into that.
We'll also be talking tonight about a new report about blood clots.
And they're saying now that millions and millions of people are now having these severe blood clotting problems.
People that are infected with COVID.
People that are not infected with COVID.
This is the main side effect, lethal side effect of vaccines, but they're not attributing to that.
They're just saying this is long COVID or regular COVID.
Now COVID is giving people heart attacks allegedly, but there's big overlap with people that have been vaccinated.
So we'll talk about that too.
Should be a pretty good show.
It's going to be a low-key, casual Friday, relaxed show.
I'm in my Afcraft sweatshirt.
Afcraft Minecraft sweatshirt.
So I'm just big chillin Had kind of a long day, you know, I didn't sleep last night.
I wasn't feeling so well.
I'm still not feeling a hundred percent Just my sleep schedules been all over the place.
I don't know man.
I don't know if I'm sick I don't know.
Maybe it's just the weather changing but this haven't been feeling a hundred percent and so I stayed up all night last night and stayed up most of the day today and And I got a lot of work done.
I had a lot of coffee.
unidentified
So, I'm kind of burnt out honestly.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
So I don't really have the energy for a totally high-key show.
It's gonna be, it's gonna be a mellow, hey, thank God it's Friday.
We all made it.
We crossed the finish line.
We're here.
I didn't even get my Friday pizza because I slept for a couple hours before the show.
But that's okay.
It's going to be a good show anyway.
Before we get into the news, just remember to follow me on Gabin Telegram.
Links are down below.
Just click the buttons.
And also follow me right here on Cozy.
The button is below the Russian flag.
So make sure you're following me.
You get a push notification on your phone on Telegram whenever my show begins.
So just make sure you're following me.
I met 16,400.
But it's not enough.
I need to hit 17,000 very quickly.
So, let's just get to 17,000, okay?
Let's not... We don't need to talk about it, but if you're not following me, make sure you follow me as soon as humanly possible right now.
Smash the follow button.
Yeah, there's not much... Well, there's actually a few things going on in the news.
It's a shame because, you know, yesterday was kind of a slow news day, and today a couple of things happened.
There was a big development in the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping trial where all of the well, I think three out of the four suspects were acquitted there was a mistrial for one of the charges and on the other charges they were acquitted and I didn't read exactly the full report but the defense was claiming that and if you guys remember the details about this this was back during the election and
The media went crazy about a month before the election and said that these far-right terrorists plan to kidnap the governor of Michigan and like blow up the Capitol.
And as the months went on, we began to find out in 2021 that the whole thing was set up.
And half the people involved in the operation were confidential informants or directly working for the FBI.
The the mark the the actual victims of this of this entrapment scheme were like poor losers These people were so poor The feds come to them and say hey look we have all these explosives.
You want to buy explosives from me?
I'm an explosives expert.
You know we're gonna blow up this bridge or whatever and The victims of this entrapment scheme couldn't even come up with like a couple grand to buy explosives for their big anti-government plot They were like, okay, we'll get you 400 bucks, but we're gonna have to give you an IOU for now.
They never came up with the money.
I mean, so one of the guys didn't even have his own house.
He lived in somebody's basement, and then the other guy, like, didn't have a job, and they were all poor, and they had no Like operational capability at all.
So basically the Fed said, hey, do you want to get in my van and do a terrorist attack?
And the guys were like, okay.
And then they're gonna throw him in jail and say, hey, these guys are the masterminds.
So I think we'll cover that on Monday.
And I'm trying to think.
I think there was one other big story today.
Anyway.
So I'll have to save that for Monday.
The other big thing is Ketanji Brown-Jackson has become A Supreme Court Justice who is officially confirmed by the Senate today.
Three Republicans crossed party lines to vote for her.
And it was Mitt Romney, Lisa Murkowski, and Susan Collins.
So two women and a Mormon.
Big surprise.
And a friend of mine pointed out to me today that now the liberal justices on the court, there's six conservative, well we're being generous with that, but six relatively conservative justices on the court and three liberal justices.
And a friend of mine pointed out that the three liberal judges are all women now.
Stephen Breyer is stepping down in, I think it's July or August?
He's stepping down sometime in the summer, and then Ketanji will step in for him.
And then you'll have three non-white female judges.
You're gonna have Elena Kagan, who's Jewish, Sonia Sotomayor, who is Hispanic, and then you're gonna have Ketanji Brown-Jackson, who is black.
And those are the liberal judges.
And I said it when she was nominated.
I said it when conservatives went crazy over the fact that she couldn't define what a woman is or whatever.
But this is just what our country is now.
It's just going to be a matriarchy.
Anytime that any person has to pick somebody, it's a promotion, it's an appointment, it's hiring, it's anything.
Anytime a man has to pick somebody, it now has to be a woman, and 70% chance it has to be a non-white woman.
And so we're now just going to live in a country that's run by women.
I've said this before, but conservatives just aren't giving a good enough pushback.
I don't want to live in a country run by women.
I don't think that women should be on the Supreme Court.
I don't think that a woman should be president.
I think that the Supreme Court should be men only, and I think the presidency should be male only.
Honestly, I think the Senate should be male only.
I think the governors should be male only.
If I was being charitable, I would say just the presidency, just the Supreme Court.
But if I were being, you know, if I could really remake and redesign society, I would say there's a lot of positions, but we have to think as conservatives.
Conservatives make all these arguments about, well, you know, she's not exactly qualified, or she wrote this bad ruling.
Apparently, she loves child porn.
Because when she was, I think when she was a federal judge, she oversaw all these cases of child pornography and she gave these really lenient sentences.
And it was a pattern.
It's not like she did it once.
She did it like many times.
But in any case, conservatives say, oh she's not experienced enough.
Her response to this question shows why she's unfit to be a judge.
And I'm like, time out.
Conservatives last year, or two years ago at this point, appointed Amy Coney Barrett, who cried when George Floyd was shot, and who adopted kids from Haiti, and all this other stuff.
We appointed a woman, and now you've got all these women on the bench, all these women judges, and you got a woman vice president, and now conservatives say, well, now we need a female vice presidential nominee, And all conservatives seem to be able to say in response to this is to pick on this particular liberal woman or this particular nomination.
Nitpicking kind of things.
It's like the same thing with the trans argument.
They won't say transgenderism is wrong and we don't want to live in a society where that level of deviancy is normal and promoted.
They say, well, it just goes too far sometimes.
Well, the real battle is women's sports.
Whatever.
And I feel like the same thing is happening here.
Is anybody going to point out the fact that feminism has completely triumphed over the civilization?
It's treated like a foregone conclusion that feminism, first, second, third, fourth, all the waves, has washed over the country.
There is no resistance to it.
There's no argument.
And that's just the way it is.
And this is the consensus on both sides.
The future's female, men and women are equal, and apparently now we're just going to be governed by women.
It's just time.
And me, being the voice of the America First movement, I say no, that doesn't go far enough.
I do not believe that women should run the United States of America.
I think that men should run this country.
And I think that you don't have to go very far to get there if you believe that there are two genders.
Because, you know, a lot of conservatives will say, well, I believe there's two genders, male and female.
Okay.
Well, if there's two genders, that means that you understand that men and women are different and distinct and unique.
And then you would also understand that these differences are significant.
They're not trivial.
They're significant.
The differences between a man and a woman are not arbitrary, and they're not things that can be minimized or ignored.
They're very real differences, and the differences... they're actually impactful on the decisions, on the lives of men and women.
And so therefore, the society has to treat men and women differently, if they truly are different.
I mean, this is not, like, complicated stuff.
But it doesn't seem like a lot of conservatives are truly willing to oppose feminism.
And I think America First is maybe the only faction within the American right that is truly anti-feminist.
You have some of these guys that'll say, well, I don't like these crazy blue-haired SJWs.
Yeah, of course.
Those people are insane.
But they're perfectly okay with everything that came right up to that point.
So they'll draw the line at, okay, well, you know, that person's clearly a non-job.
Okay, well, what about one step before that person?
Well, that's totally fine, they say.
And two steps before that person?
That's totally fine, too.
Three steps before that?
Oh, well, if you question that, what are you?
Some kind of reactionary, misogynist, woman-hater?
No.
I'm a traditionalist.
I am not a feminist.
I believe in the patriarchy.
I think there's too many women on the court.
I don't think that... I don't like this trend that liberals and conservatives are holding hands, walking towards a female future.
I do not support that.
I don't support that in the private sector.
I don't support that in the public sector.
The idea that Jewish, Hispanic, and black women have the best interests of America in mind... I just... I'm sorry.
I just don't believe that's true.
And some people might say, oh, you're saying because they're Jewish, Hispanic, and Black?
No.
But we know the M.O.
there.
Okay, we know the MO of a hardcore liberal Jewish woman.
We've all seen that before.
We've all seen that story before.
Sarah Silverman, and go and watch TV, okay?
Hardcore liberal Jewish woman, we know what that's about.
These militant, militant, Hispanic activists, where they believe in La Raza and, you know, they'll talk perfect English and then they'll say La Raza, you know, with an accent, and they're militant, liberal, secular, okay?
Sonia Sotomayor.
And then Ketanji Brown-Jackson.
Just take a look at the confirmation hearing.
The smugness, the attitude that, frankly, that these, again, militant, younger black people have in America.
I saw one interaction between her and Ted Cruz where Ted Cruz asks her, do you think babies are racist?
Do you think white babies are racist?
Which is, you know, kind of like fair game given how liberals talk about whites.
And Katanji Brown-Jackson, she responds with this, you know, she's like at a loss for words.
She goes, And she does this, and they all do it, this like exasperated, condescending, smug, uppity thing, which is all too familiar, which we've all seen on TikTok, which we've all seen on social media.
She's another one of these, again, militant, black, race, liberal soldiers from the left.
And when I see the three of them together, What's more, when I see the three of them together with Amy Coney Barrett, who is one of these social justice Irish Catholics who's weeping over George Floyd and adopting Haitians, this is four out of five justices on the Supreme Court!
There is no chance in hell that these four women have got the best interests of America in mind Or the original interpretation of the Constitution or any of that.
They're not protecting dick, okay?
Not the Constitution, not the country, none of it.
And it's not just a race thing.
Race plays a part.
Gender is a big part of it.
But I don't know how you can, in any sense of the definition, call yourself a conservative and look at these four liberal women on the court and say, uh, yeah, this is, you know, say what you will, but man oh man, women have come so far.
Doesn't this say how equal our country is and how tolerant of women we are?
Yeah, it's a little too tolerant.
It's a little too equal.
That's too many women.
That's too many women on the court.
Okay, it looks like a pamphlet for insurance.
Okay, we got a black woman, we got a Hispanic woman, a Jewish woman, your token Karen, your token awful, affluent, white, female, liberal, social justice Catholic.
All that's missing is a woman who's deaf, dumb, and blind, or in a fucking wheelchair, right?
I mean, that's all that's missing on the Supreme Court.
For crying out loud.
So, you know, and I'm not just trying to be like xenophobic or racist or whatever here, but let's not pretend that this is good for our country.
This is not good for America.
This is not good for protecting our historical American nation.
It's no good.
And anybody can see that.
Ketanji Brown-Jackson, seriously?
It's a bad joke.
Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown-Jackson and Elena Kagan.
Really?
Our fate is in the hands of liberal Jewish, Hispanic, Black, and Catholic women.
I feel really confident.
unidentified
I feel really happy about that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
They should all look like Kavanaugh.
They should all look like Kavanaugh.
You know, Clarence Thomas is a great judge.
He's probably the best judge on the bench.
He's black.
But he's a guy, and he's conservative, and he knows what's up.
So, it is what it is.
But anyway, so that's the new composition of the court.
And again, there seems to be no resistance to this at all.
It seems like we're the only ones.
But you're not going to hear Fox, Breitbart.
There is no mainstream conservative that is brave enough to just say, this is not traditional, this is not conservative.
And what's more, just say the obvious.
I don't think most conservatives are okay with All these women at these high levels in government, but it's not even a question you can ask.
Not even up for debate.
Not even a contention.
Just is.
Just is.
We're just in a female-run country now.
No good.
Women have far too much power in America today.
They have far too much power over the men, and they have far too much power overall.
And Andrew Anglin made a good point on the stream he did with Beardson the other day, which is this.
When you consider the practical effects of affirmative action for women, he said it's basically a wealth transfer.
And you think about the relationship between men and women, and so much of the relationship between men and women is bound up in money.
You know, why does a woman need a man?
What are the qualities that a woman looks for in a man?
Well, one of the most important things is, is a man able to provide for her?
That's one of the things a man can do to mate with a woman is protect, provide.
And with the imposition of affirmative action, which is to say all this promotion of women in schools and employment beyond what they really are capable of, it's removing the man's role in the relationship.
So, You know, a lot of people point out how welfare has taken the baby daddy out of the home.
You know, welfare has replaced the father and the husband, and it allows a woman to be totally independent.
And that's true.
But that's just one side of the story.
The other side of the story is, what about these women that are getting jobs?
What about these women that are being placed in good schools and in jobs because they're women?
And then therefore are totally independent financially.
So now you have all these women that between welfare and between affirmative action, wealth is being transferred from productive men to, in real terms, unproductive women.
And it's, again, this is erasing the need for men in the marriage.
That's another Part of the problem, too.
You got these women walking around and, you know, they're making money because of Title IX.
You know, they're making money and they're doing a great job because of anti-discrimination, 14th Amendment type stuff.
And they don't need to get married and stay married and be dependent on a breadwinner because the government created, you know, affirmative action system is transferring money to them all the time.
So it's another, you know, they've just they've got too much power.
They've got too much power in the relationship.
They've got too much power in the government, in the private sector.
We got to take these people and put them back at home with their kids where they belong.
It's not to say they can't be in the workforce as like a teacher or a nurse or these historically the kinds of roles that women could have.
But they're just being pushed right through and they're becoming doctors and lawyers and president and all this kind of stuff.
No, I don't think so.
I don't know that we thought that one through.
Don't think we really thought that one all the way through.
I don't think anybody thinks that's a great idea.
Except for the women who are the beneficiaries of it.
So, anyway.
So that's the Supreme Court.
But I want to move on.
I want to get into the news.
I kind of look like shit tonight.
Kind of look like shit.
Feel like shit.
Why is my hair like this?
Why could I not just have straight hair?
I have to have this afro You know what, I'm going to play with it because it's Friday Saturday That's a little better, I guess.
A little better, but I'm still not happy.
I don't even know what I'm trying to do with it.
I just want to shave it all off.
Honestly, it's just so annoying.
I feel like I'm just keep going back to where I started with it.
I just want to wear a hat all the time.
Wear a fucking bag over my head.
Can I just wear a bag over my head everywhere I go?
Forever?
I miss the masks.
Because I could just go around in sunglasses and a mask and a hat and just totally blend in.
Anyway, whatever.
It's fine.
unidentified
So.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
We're gonna move on.
We're gonna get into our news here and we're gonna talk about the vaccine death.
And I'm starving, man.
I'm really hungry.
Should have had a pizza before I went live, but woke up really late.
Whatever, I'll just have to get something after the show.
Anyway, All I had today was an orange.
I had breakfast really early and then I had an orange and that was it.
And a lot of coffee.
Okay, so our big story here it's about, you know, vaccines killing everybody.
We're just gonna fly right through this story because this one's not really anything new, but here's the report.
It says, catching COVID is associated with a five-fold increase in the risk of deep vein thrombosis And a 33-fold increase in risk of a potentially fatal blood clot on the lung in the 30 days after becoming infected, according to new data.
The findings, published in the British Medical Journal on Thursday, could help explain a doubling in the incidence of death from blood clots in England since the start of the pandemic, compared with the same periods in 2018 and 2019.
So, this is official British data.
They say that twice as many people now, twice as many people are dying from blood clots as were dying before the pandemic.
It says they also helped to put the very small increased risk of blood clots associated with COVID vaccination into context.
The Dr. Frederick Ho, a lecturer in public health at the University of Glasgow, Who is not involved in the research said the degree of complications associated with COVID is much stronger and lasts for much longer than what we might be getting after vaccination.
He said even those people with mild symptoms who did not need to be hospitalized might have a small increase in the risk of blood clots.
Although previous research had suggested that catching COVID was associated with an increased risk of blood clots, it was unclear for how long this risk remained and whether mild infections also increased people's risk.
To address the uncertainties, Anne-Marie Forse Connolly at Umeå University in Sweden and her colleagues measured the risk of DVT, pulmonary embolism, Which is a blood clot on the lung and various types of bleeding such as gastrointestinal bleeding or burst blood vessel in the brain and more than 1 million people with confirmed COVID infections and more than 4 million uninfected individuals.
By the way, I mean they can say, well we definitely took care to control for vaccination, but they didn't.
That's not in the research, that's not in the report, they did not look at vaccination at all.
So all that we have is a two-fold increase in the risk of death from blood clotting from before the pandemic compared to after the pandemic.
And again, this is what we've been saying for years now.
I don't really think there's any interesting angle on this other than that everything that would be happening if we were right about the vaccine and they were wrong.
Because some people say, how could you possibly be right?
And the whole medical establishment is lying or ignorant.
Are you telling me that we're going to see people?
This is exactly what you would see if that were the case.
Because I know for some it's hard to believe because all the media and all the governments and the big drug companies, they all say vaccines perfectly safe and effective.
There's some risk but it's negligible.
It's not anything to be concerned about.
And some would say, well how could they all be wrong?
How could they all either be deceiving you or not know?
And people on the internet, the conspiracy theorists are right.
Well, what are the kinds of things that you would need to see to prove that they were all wrong?
What would be the kind of evidence that you would need to see that a vaccine, which is very deadly, was mandated on the entire population for an entire year?
Well, this is exactly, along with everything else, the kind of thing that you would see.
You would see soccer players dropping dead during their games.
You would see high school and college athletes dropping dead for no reason at all.
You would see young celebrities, even who are not athletes, dying early or having complications with stroke or Heart disease?
All of which we've seen.
You would also see an increase in heart attacks and blood clotting, which has all been documented.
And not documented in some secret online conspiracy forum, but documented by the governments themselves.
We looked at a report Before the end of last year, once again from the United Kingdom, which said that they had millions of more young people with undiagnosed heart disease, and they said that was due to pandemic fatigue, meaning they were just so stressed out with the shutdowns and the pandemic in itself that it was giving them heart attacks.
They didn't even attribute it to COVID in itself.
They said, well, all the COVID-related policies are just stressing people out and giving them heart attacks at the age of 25 and killing them.
Again, that's data.
They come up with these excuses for it.
They say it's pandemic fatigue, but that's the data you would see if a deadly vaccine was mandated on the public.
And then you get these, again, the anecdotal stories of a soccer player.
And some say, oh well these soccer players, you know what they're saying about the soccer players?
They say that when a referee blows their whistle, I'm not making this up, you can look it up, they say that when a referee blows his whistle so much and so loudly in a soccer game, this stresses the soccer players out, again, so much that they're having heart attacks and dropping dead on the field.
So you see all these soccer players, which is an endurance heavy activity.
This is one of those, what is it, aerobic, anaerobic activities.
These guys are running up and down a field constantly for an hour and a half, two hours.
So in other words, it's putting a lot of stress on their cardiovascular system.
If you had a deadly vaccine coursing through your veins that would cause blood clotting, that'd be a big problem for you.
And again, that's what we're seeing.
These people that are subject to the most cardiovascular stress.
People are dying from blood clotting, from heart disease, and then they come up again with a convoluted explanation.
They don't deny the data because they can't.
It's in the news.
People watch TV and they see a guy drop dead on the field and then they perform an autopsy and you know they find out what's going on so they explain it away.
It's pandemic fatigue.
It's the whistle disease.
There was a kid who was in a Disney show Who was hospitalized for a heart attack.
The kid from the High School Musical show on Disney Plus.
And this is a perfectly healthy, he's a dancer, he's like 19 or 20 or something, hospitalized for a heart attack.
They come out with the story and they say, well this is totally abnormal, but his ex-girlfriend wrote a song dissing him and talking about their breakup.
His ex-girlfriend, who's also a celebrity, who was on the same show, she wrote a breakup song or two about him, and it was so stressful, it caused him to have a heart attack.
The guy's in his teen- he's a teenager, he has a heart attack because of a breakup song?!
You know, if Justin Bieber could hack it, I think you could hack it without a heart attack.
So in other words, everything that would be obvious, every logical thing that you would see, if the vaccine were deadly and they were covering it up, you're seeing it.
They're diagnosing millions of people, or they're saying there's millions of people with undiagnosed heart disease, but they're blaming it on stress.
You have, again, the most cardiovascular, demanding sports.
Those athletes are dropping dead playing their game.
It's like a regular thing now.
High school, college athletes, they blame it on the whistles.
Young celebrities, strokes, heart attacks, they blame it on breakup songs and the pressure of the business.
And now they just say, well that's just, 25-year-olds having heart attacks is just normal now.
And then you get data like this, which says that Twice as many people as before now have blood clotting and it's got nothing to do with the vaccine.
It's just this disease.
And really COVID and the vaccine are working perfectly in tandem because anything that the vaccine causes they could just blame on COVID.
And if all these bad things are happening because of COVID then the government can do whatever it wants.
So the disease washes over the population.
It's mild.
And nobody knows anything about it, so they invoke all these powers and jurisdictions that nobody ever thought was legal.
Then they introduce a vaccine, and the vaccine makes everybody sick.
They blame it on the disease, and then they can, again, continue to do whatever intervention is necessary.
Oh, now we've got these blood clots, stroke, heart attack problems.
Well, it's just more COVID.
More COVID, which means more vaccines.
More vaccines means immunocompromised population and it means a sick population.
People that are immunocompromised and that are sick require more intervention.
So this is now a very bad feedback loop where there's really no way that you get out of this.
If there's no data that's being done to isolate the vaccine and COVID, if there's no honesty on that, Then the vaccine is something that's self-justifying and all the actions of the government.
Oh, well, if things got worse, well, it just shows we didn't go far enough.
If people get more sick, if there's more infection, if there's more death, it's not our intervention.
It's the disease adapting, which means more intervention.
So this is very bad and you got to pray for anybody that got this vaccine because, I mean, it's literally killing people.
I know it's hard to believe a year ago, because people go, when it's their job on the line, when it's their school on the line, they're going to be ostracized from their family.
They go, come on Nick, is this real?
Or is this just the show?
Is this just things that we say?
We don't want to get carried away with our conspiracies online.
This is my real life we're talking about.
Yeah, it is real life.
It's your real body.
It's the real vaccine.
unidentified
It's the real world.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
It's real.
We said it for a whole year.
Don't get the vaccine.
The vaccine will kill you.
It's not worth it.
Drop out of school.
Quit your job.
If it means getting the vaccine, don't get it.
And I know a lot of people said, ah, fuck you.
I'm gonna take my chances.
Some people were just in a position where they had to.
But now those people pay the price, sadly.
Now those people will pay the price.
You only have one heart, and one body, and one brain, and all of that is now compromised.
If you compromise due to the mandate.
So again, this is not anything new.
It's not anything we didn't see or predict.
But again, every night on the show we're building a case.
Every night on the show we're gathering data and we're putting together a case.
And so when we look at these broad narratives about Russia, when we look at the COVID vaccine, when we look at these other things.
Somebody's telling me my show went down for a few minutes.
unidentified
That's okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I think it'll be in the recording.
Anyway, so the point is to say every night on the show we're building a case.
So I know sometimes the show gets a little repetitive, but it's about You know, people have a very short attention span and the government relies heavily on that.
And the government relies on people not connecting the dots and not sort of accumulating these admissions that they make.
And so when you look at the vaccine from March 2020 until now, I've covered it every night.
I've covered it every night since.
And it becomes this snowball and an avalanche of just irrefutable proof.
Maybe you could take one or two of these things.
Okay, maybe that High School Musical Disney guy, maybe he did have a heart attack from the breakup song.
When you take that, coupled with the whistle syndrome, coupled with pandemic fatigue, coupled with, again, all the other data points, you begin to create a picture that is pretty unignorable, you know?
And the same thing goes for Russia.
We paint In broad strokes, big narratives, but every night we've gotta say, okay, here's where we are so far and here's the latest.
So I know it's not anything new, but every night we're building the case about, I mean, this is solid.
This stuff has credibility.
This is not just, you know, psycho, you know, people say, hmm, I wonder where they're getting their narrative from.
People think I'm getting, like, paid to tell you not to take a vaccine.
What money is in not taking a vaccine?
If anything, it's literally the opposite.
You have these live streamers and they're very small or very big.
They're getting paid to tell people to take the vaccine.
Where exactly is the money in saying, hey, don't get vaccinated?
I just don't understand where that would even come from.
No, the evidence is out there.
I mean, if you're on the side of the so-called science, you're on the side of you think that whistles cause heart attacks.
You think that blowing a whistle in someone's ears all of a sudden sends them to the ground with a heart attack.
Sends them to hell with a deadly heart attack.
Really?
unidentified
So...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Anyway, that's a vaccine.
Don't take it!
I don't care what they say.
They may be gearing up for another wave.
Don't take the vaccine.
You see what it's causing.
You want to die by a whistle or a breakup song?
Or you're just too stressed out?
You know, then have at it.
Get double, triple, get boosted up.
But otherwise, don't do it.
Okay, but we're going to move on.
We're going to talk about our featured story here.
This is the big one.
This is another one about Russia.
So a couple weeks ago you remember I said that I was very concerned about the direction of American rhetoric about the Ukraine war.
Specifically these claims by the regime that Putin is a war criminal and that they suspect that Putin will use chemical weapons.
And we started to see last week and the week before there was this trickle of information.
You know last week Joe Biden went to Europe And there was a NATO summit, a European Union summit, and a G7 summit.
And before he goes there, and while he's there, all they're talking about is war crimes in Ukraine and the possibility that Putin will use chemical weapons.
And I told you back then, I said, listen, if the National Security Council And the Pentagon, and the State Department, and the White House, and the NATO Secretary General.
If all those people are saying the same thing, which is very controversial, which is very provocative, if they are all saying that Putin may use chemical weapons, I said a decision was made at the policy level that they were going to broadcast that intelligence.
I said that's not information.
That's not a spokesperson informing the public.
I said that's a coordinated PR strategy.
A decision was made inside the regime that this is what they're going with.
And whatever their strategy is, it is vital to their strategy that the public believes that Putin is preparing to use chemical weapons in Ukraine.
And I said, this is such a scary thing because chemical weapons are weapons of mass destruction.
And people see chemical weapons, like war crimes, genocide, invasion of a sovereign nation, as some of the legitimate pretexts for NATO or any intervention by another state.
Because they call this the rules-based international system, and they say that sovereignty is absolute, nations can't interfere in the affairs domestically of other nations, unless they do some of these things.
Chemical and biological weapons is one of them.
Nuclear proliferation is one of them.
Genocide, war crimes, torture.
There's a very small, and whenever you hear these kinds of things, keep in mind, those are the pretext, that's the casus belli.
That's the excuse that a NATO, a Western, or any regime will use to intervene in another country while still being in compliance with the so-called rules-based system.
They say, we're gonna bomb Gaddafi and do regime change in Libya, but that's okay.
That doesn't violate the rules because, well, Gaddafi broke the rules first.
He broke the rules by not having a true democracy and doing these other things, and so We can kick him out, because, well, you know, he's breaking the rules about what a sovereign can do.
And the same thing in Iraq.
The United States invaded Iraq unilaterally in 2003, and everybody said, what?
You can't do that!
Even France was against it, even NATO was against it.
And the whole world was shocked at the invasion of Iraq.
Nobody liked Saddam Hussein, but they said, you just can't go around knocking down regimes and invading countries for no reason.
And the United States said, well, he's breaking the rules.
He's genociding the Kurds.
He's torturing people.
He's trying to procure a nuclear arsenal.
And he's stockpiling chemical and biological weapons.
So they said, the international rules-based system must be protected by America intervening.
We have a right to protect the people of Iraq.
So when they say these things like war crimes and chemical weapons, these are real technical terms.
This is not just random stuff.
They're not just saying, hey, Putin's a bad guy, in other words.
When they say war criminal, chemical weapons, you're talking about, this is another tier, okay?
That's a classification.
That's a term.
And so when that's being parroted across all those institutions, NSC, Pentagon, White House, NATO, State Department, when they're all saying that a decision was made behind the scenes, we're going to brand Putin a war criminal, we're going to insinuate he'll use chemical weapons,
And what that does is it gives us the sort of moral and legal pretext to escalate our intervention in Ukraine beyond what we're already doing, which is sanctions, which is material support for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
And God only knows what that means.
Does that mean that we're sending them planes?
Does that mean we're establishing a no-fly zone?
Does that mean we're going to war with Russia?
Who knows exactly what that means?
And I said it's disinformation.
I said probably.
Putin has no intention of using chemical weapons.
I said because it would make no sense that he would.
Putin knows, just as well as any other rogue state, he knows that the use of chemical weapons would invite an escalation from Western powers, which he does not want.
He knows he's under intense scrutiny.
He knows the world is watching.
He knows that he's got to conduct this war with the utmost restraint, because they'll lie about it anyway.
And he knows that the West is just chomping at the bit.
They are salivating for an excuse to go to war with Russia.
And so why would Putin, if that is the paradigm, and if he's in a very delicate, precarious situation, why would he use chemical weapons and invite more scrutiny, invite more pressure?
The Russian military can win the war without chemical weapons.
They could win them by bombing the population centers to the ground.
They could win by using heavy artillery.
They could win by using the full might of their air power.
If they wanted to hasten the end of the war, They could do that in a variety of ways before resorting to chemical weapons.
They would not invite all that scrutiny.
What's more, they don't really even need to hasten the end of the conflict because they're going to win regardless.
So, from the point of view of Russian decision makers, it just makes no sense.
And I said that from the beginning.
Putin's not going to use chemical weapons.
He's too smart.
Additionally, this is the playbook of the West.
We saw this in Syria.
We saw this in Iraq.
There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Doesn't change the fact that we've been at war there for 19 years.
We said that Assad used chemical weapons in 2013, in 2017, in 2018.
No evidence was ever produced that that happened.
Doesn't change the fact that we're still deploying a mercenary force in eastern Syria.
And the same is true now here with Russia.
There's no evidence that Putin wants to use chemical weapons.
It would not even make any sense.
Just like it didn't make sense for Assad to deploy them at the end of the Syrian Civil War.
Just like it didn't make sense for Saddam Hussein to procure WMDs.
Doesn't make sense and it's probably a lie.
And the big story today is that the Western media admitted it.
Yesterday the Western media came out and they said that it's true.
There is no or low confidence in the American intelligence that Russia was planning to use chemical weapons.
They made it up.
They made it up.
They're admitting they made it up.
And this is from NBC.
This is not from InfoWars.
It's not that InfoWars is not credible, but it's not like this is even from a friendly source.
This is from NBC.
It says, quote, It was an attention-grabbing assertion that made headlines around the world.
U.S.
officials said they had indications suggesting Russia might be preparing to use chemical agents in Ukraine.
President Joe Biden later said it publicly.
But three U.S.
officials told NBC News this week that there is no evidence Russia has brought any chemical weapons near Ukraine.
They said the U.S.
released the information to deter Russia from using the banned munitions.
So, I mean, did I not say this verbatim last week?
They did not tell you that Russia would use chemical weapons because that was real information.
They told you that to shape public opinion.
When they tell you things, it's not saying, we learned this, we're going to tell you what we know.
They're telling you a variety of things and the goal is not to inform you.
The goal is to change your perspective because what the people think is actually crucial to their strategy.
So they're just bombarding you with things.
They're bombarding your mind with words and information to alter your mind.
That's the definition of propaganda.
It's not information.
They're not saying, here's a full report.
This is a factual account of everything going on to inform you of the goings-ons.
They're just bombarding you with rhetoric.
They're bombarding you with things, some things that are true, some things that are not true, things that are half true, in order to create a public perception and to create a favorable environment, a favorable PR environment for the rollout of their policy.
So, They're not trying to tell you what the real situation is with chemical weapons, but they do need you to think a certain thing, again, so that when they roll out their policy, it's going to have a particular reaction and be received in a certain way.
And they're admitting that.
They're saying, yeah, we made it up.
There's no evidence that Putin was doing that, but we just told you that so you would think that.
Because if you think that, and if the world thought that, then that would change how Putin acted.
So you see, public opinion, whatever their policy is, whatever their strategy is, It is dependent on public opinion.
So public opinion then becomes part of the war.
Just like bombing and shooting and all of that, maneuvering, just like those things are part of the war, just like those things affect the outcome of the war and then have to be planned and there have to be logistics, there has to be a strategy, public opinion is too.
The outcome of the war is partially contingent on what the public thinks.
So the U.S.
government must control how the public thinks.
That means they're not just going to tell you something and say, hey, it's off to the races.
Draw your own conclusions.
They've got to carefully manage what the people think by telling them a mixture of truth and lies.
Telling them a mixture of things that are partially true Things that are complete fabrications.
They've got to control what people think because it will affect the outcome of the policy.
I've said this for years.
You cannot take regime media at face value because it goes from the National Security Council, State Department, White House, NATO, it goes from there to AP and Reuters, it goes from there to New York Times and Washington Post, from there to CNN, MSNBC, NBC, from there to BuzzFeed, and from there to Snapchat News on your phone.
And so, You know, somebody pulls a stupid 22-year-old Zoomer, pulls up their phone and watches some faggot millennial say, breaking news!
Here's your 15-second scoop on Ukraine.
And yeah, it came a long way, but it came directly from the State Department.
And so this faggot millennial, he might not be in on it, but he is laundering the regime's program for them through public opinion.
The decision makers make a decision, they give it to the spokespeople, and then the spokespeople run it through a long chain of the media ecosystem, and then it arrives at you, and you think you're getting information.
You're getting regime propaganda.
You're getting your information from the government.
Do you think the government tells you the truth about any of this?
I mean, why do governments lie?
It's because the job of the government is to pursue a particular policy agenda.
Well, the reception publicly of that agenda, particularly in a democracy, affects the outcome of the policy.
And when you live in a democracy, the so-called civilian leaders are also dependent on the public opinion.
So the careful control and maintenance of what the public thinks is extremely important.
You could say it's vital, it's detrimental to the regime imposing its agenda.
And so that's why great effort and great resources must be expended to creating a manufactured, perceived world, okay?
Sort of like a lore, a baseline, a universe for the information consumer to live in, a baseline And then great care must be taken to manage that world and to filter unfolding world events in a way that the public will perceive it favorably.
So that's why it's so essential for them to have a monopoly on information.
They have to have a monopoly on how information is distributed, how it's created, How it's shared and transmitted between people.
That's why they seize control of television, radio, print, and social media.
They've got a monopoly on 90 or 95% of creation, distribution, and transmission of information.
And that means that everything that we learn about the world, how we orient, because that's when people evaluate new events, they have to orient themselves within the world.
Okay, Russia invaded Ukraine.
Well, why?
Well, we need that backstory.
Well, who are the players?
Putin and Zelensky.
Well, who are they?
Well, we need a biography.
What kind of a guy is Putin?
What kind of a guy is Zelensky?
Who are we?
Who are they?
What's our relative position in the world?
What's the motivation?
So, it's like a movie.
You know, a story has to be created, a narrative has to be created about the whole world and all the world events sort of linking together.
And so people are indoctrinated in school and with media in this world, this created story world, and that is the world in which people are orienting themselves.
So why did Putin invade Russia?
Well, because Putin is Darth Vader.
Putin is evil.
We're in a battle.
It's about our democracy versus the autocracies of the East.
It's about dictators and bullies versus freedom and human rights and the good guys.
And who are we?
Well, we're America, Jack!
We're America!
And so orienting ourselves in that way, we can interpret this is about a bully against a victim.
This is about autocratic dictatorship against the inexorable expansion of liberal democracy, which is righteous and just.
Total information control is required for that opinion.
You can't have Russian media.
You can't have Putin going in there.
You can't have somebody going in there and saying, actually, what about Libya?
What about Iraq?
What about these other things?
And then the same goes here for the chemical weapons.
Nobody can question it.
That's a conspiracy theory.
You deny the official government narrative about the use of chemical weapons in Ukraine where hoaxes happen all the time.
Well, you're a conspiracy theorist.
That's not good information.
That's an alternate fact.
You live in a different world.
You live in the world of disinformation.
That's what's really going on here.
And they're admitting that.
So, they just said, hey, when we said that Putin is using chemical weapons, that was a deliberate lie to shape public opinion, which is essential for our strategy against Russia, which now includes information warfare elements.
And the funny thing is a lot of liberals eat this shit up.
And so a guy like Destiny would go into a debate with me and say, Well, Putin's using chemical weapons.
And I would say, That's bullshit.
And he would say, Source?
Source?
He would say, Source?
The experts say... I doubt that the NATO Secretary General and the National Security Advisor and the Pentagon would all be lying to you.
Except that they fucking are!
Except that they are, and they admitted it.
So, that's pretty damning, isn't it?
Because all these liberals that guzzle, they fucking guzzle, Western propaganda, they just slurp it up as though we're the only government in history that doesn't lie to its people.
I mean, they're gonna sit there and say, huh, really?
You think that everyone's lying to you?
unidentified
Really?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Oh, according to a report from AP, New York Times, State Department.
Oh, but you know better?
You think it's a lie?
Where's your source on that?
I just Googled it.
I just went to I'mRight.com and Snopes fact-checked you and, you know, the Illuminati just said you're a conspiracy theorist.
Yeah, okay, and then they come out a week later and say, yeah, we lied.
We lied because we knew if we lied it would change Putin's actions.
Because we have a conflict of interest!
We're engaged in a war with Putin!
And the public's perception of the war is a variable.
That is a variable in the outcome and the chances of our success.
So we have to control that variable.
It's a conflict of interest.
You know, but a guy like Destiny, one week ago, or two weeks ago, he would say... He would say, according to the NATO Secretary General, Jake Sullivan, the State Department, they all say the Moon's using chemical weapons.
Independent monitors in Ukraine said...
Right?
And I would say, that's bullshit.
That's the classic NATO playbook.
And they would say, really?
Because you don't have a source.
But according to the Council on Foreign Relations in the Atlantic Council, you know, this is what Putin does.
And then a week later, imagine that.
They come out and say, yeah, we lied.
It was all a lie.
unidentified
So... I mean, it's enough to make you lose your mind.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
That's the thing, I mean that's the one, that's the red pill, okay?
The red pill does not mean you have a particular opinion actually.
When you say red pill that doesn't mean I'm a two-way conservative and I think that, you know, whatever.
The red pill means that you understand that we live in a created story world, a narrative story world that the media designed and they enforce through their monopoly on information.
That's what the red pill means.
It's from the Matrix.
You know in the Matrix, he takes the red pill and he says, wow, I thought I lived in the real world, but I don't.
I live in a fake world.
Everything I thought was real is fake.
That's what the red pill means.
That's the original meaning of the red pill.
It wasn't like, oh, you're a 2a conservative and you know, let's go Brandon.
It doesn't mean, you know, all that stuff.
Jesse Smollett's an idiot.
It means that you understand the whole, the whole, you know, your perception was created.
Your baseline, the lore of the world that you've been taught from school and media was created in the past 30 years.
To launder the agenda of the oligarchs.
There are people that run our country, bureaucrats, think tank types, lobbyists, bankers, billionaires, and they are the ones that make the decisions.
And what you see is democracy is just this war playing out, this information war playing out.
And it's about whose story is going to win.
We're telling stories through words, and words are paid for with money, and money is controlled by the capitalist class.
And so really it's just this great game of the capitalists.
Fighting a war of legitimacy and information over the people and it is a war on for your mind, but that's what's going on.
You don't have choice.
You don't have agency.
It's just about what billionaire think-tank media story you're gonna choose to believe today.
Are you gonna believe the Claremont Fox News?
Are you gonna live in that world?
Are you gonna live in the Counts on Foreign Relations, MSNBC, you know, whatever story.
Jeff Bezos story.
But you don't have real choice.
You believe a narrative, you believe a story, you guzzle information from a controlled source, and then you vote for a particular agenda.
And that's really what it is.
So, I mean, these liberals, that's the part that they just don't seem to understand.
Like, I'm talking with Destiny a couple weeks ago, and I'm like, don't you understand how corrupt our system is?
And he goes, I think our system works pretty well.
Works pretty well.
I think we pretty much have a democracy.
It's like... People are just naive.
They're just naive toadies for the regime.
I mean, that would be like in North Korea.
You're saying, you know, I don't think our system is perfect, but I think it works pretty well.
We are under attack by the capitalists every day and our glorious leaders defending us and You know, I don't know.
I mean, that's probably not far from the truth.
Maybe use a better example, I guess.
But, um, you know, but... People can understand how that stuff works in a totally, like, in the Soviet Union.
Or in, uh, China or North Korea.
You know, people go, how could the people in China not question the Tiananmen Square Massacre?
It's no different for us than, like, January 6th or 9-11.
But they have no idea that they are just loyal, patriotic toadies of the regime.
And they're like, well, I just think that, you know, we're not perfect, but we're striving for better angels and a more perfect union and all this crap.
And it's like, you're a shill for murderers.
You're a shill for murderers and bankers and exploiters and parasites and, you know, you're not liberal.
You're a pawn.
So... Anyway, so I always get on such a such a tangent when I talk about the information war, but that, I mean, they told us it's a lie.
I'll finish reading the article.
I didn't even finish.
It says, it's one of a string of examples of the Biden administration breaking with recent precedent by deploying classified or rather declassified intelligence as part of an information war against Russia.
The administration has done so even when the intelligence wasn't rock-solid, officials said, to keep Russian President Vladimir Putin off balance.
Coordinated by the White House National Security Council, the unprecedented intelligence releases have been so frequent and voluminous, officials said, that intelligence agencies had to devote more staff members to work on the declassification process, scrubbing information so it wouldn't betray sources and methods.
Just this week, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan stood at the White House podium and read out loud what officials said was more declassified intelligence, asserting that Russia's pullout from areas around Kiev wasn't a retreat, but a redeployment that signals a significant assault on eastern and southern Ukraine.
The idea is to preempt Multiple U.S.
officials acknowledge that the U.S.
"...complicate its military campaign, undermine Moscow's propaganda, and prevent Russia from defining how the war is perceived in the world." Multiple U.S. officials acknowledge that the U.S. has used disinformation, rather information, as a weapon even when confidence and the accuracy of the information wasn't high.
So that means that they're willing to lie in the information war.
Sometimes it is used low-confidence intelligence for deterrent effect, as with chemical agents, and other times, as an official put it, the U.S.
is just trying to get inside Putin's head.
Sort of lying to the public to manipulate the outcome of the war.
And by the way, this is not the first time they've done this.
Do you remember three or four years ago when they said that Russians were putting bounties on the head of American soldiers in Afghanistan?
And then they came out two years later and said that was a lie?
I mean, so they do this all the time.
And go back and look for that story.
That was a huge story, and that dogged Trump for a year.
They said, how could you shake hands with Putin when he's putting bounties on the heads of U.S.
soldiers in Afghanistan?
He's paying for Mujahideen and jihadists to kill Americans.
And they said that for months.
And then they came out literally in the first year of the Biden admin and said, oh, we lied.
There was no evidence that that was true.
There was no evidence.
But it was the number one headline for months.
And they always brought that up to hit Trump.
They said, oh, you know, shouldn't we go to war with Russia over this?
So how do you believe anything they say?
WMDs, Maidan, bounties on the heads of soldiers, chemical weapons.
It's all bullshit.
They're willing and able to lie.
They'll say anything to get what they want.
And they want a war with Russia.
They're willing to lie about chemical weapons.
I'm sure if they're willing to lie, That Putin is bringing chemical weapons to Ukraine.
They're willing to lie that he used them, and they're willing to lie about that as a pretext to go to war with Russia.
These are the most dangerous people in the world.
And it's not like they're lying.
This is not a white lie.
These are lies that are poisoning the well of diplomacy between the United States and Russia, which is a really big problem.
They do not want America and Russia to have peace.
They want war.
So think about that.
When they say Russians are paying to kill Americans, when they say Russians are going to use chemical weapons in Ukraine, they're poisoning the well of American-Russian relations.
They're provoking Russia.
They're bringing us closer to war with the second nuclear superpower in the world.
These are not white lies.
These are not, what do you call them?
What's the other word for like a white lie? - I, So it's not negligible.
These are very problematic lies and they're very consistent and they're very repeated and they're provocative and you just got to ask yourself what's the goal here?
Who is doing this?
Why are they lying to bring us to war with Russia?
What's the outcome?
They want America to pay $5 a gallon for gas?
They want us to pay more for energy and food?
They want to tank the global economy?
They want Americans to go fight and die for Ukraine's sovereignty?
You know, why are we doing this?
Who benefits is always the question.
Who benefits?
Fib.
Yeah, it's not a fib.
It's a very big and grand and significant deception here.
But More of the same.
So anyway, that's that.
So I was right.
You should have listened to me.
I was right.
But we're going to move on.
We're going to take a look at our Super Chats and we'll see what you guys have to say about all this.
Let me crack open my water here.
Thank Alaska.
He's turned me onto this Mountain Valley water.
You can't see because it's green, but really good stuff.
He sent me a case of this.
unidentified
Whoa.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
So, uh, yeah, so I've been trying this all week.
Pretty good.
Highly recommend.
I think this is my favorite sparkling water You know because I'm a big I'm a big sparkling water guy and It comes in a glass bottle a cool Great taste.
Great carbonation.
Yeah, all around it's just a big winner.
I prefer it over all the others.
It's got a great flavor.
Probably the best flavor out of all the waters.
As far as the carbonation, I'm not very picky.
So I like Perrier, I like San Pellegrino, but it's the surreal good taste on this one.
It's called Mountain Valley Sparkling Water.
Highly recommend.
So big, big shout out to Baked Alaska for supplying the water.
I appreciate it.
Okay.
But let's take a look at our Super Chats.
Let's see what we got.
unidentified
Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Reagan says, give me Groiberty or give me death.
Yeah, so true.
Pubert Brogan says, did you do a senior prank in high school or did you ever do anything to mess with your teachers?
You said in the past you always argued with your teachers.
I don't, and I never said that.
You definitely imagine that.
No, I never pranked my teachers and no, I never argue with my teachers.
In fact, I've said the opposite.
I think arguing with your teacher is cringe.
I would talk with my teachers.
I mean we would get in conversations, but I was never one of these like debate me.
Oh, hey, Mr. Libro.
You know, I never did that.
I always thought that was cringe.
I would debate students.
You said in the past you always are, you know, you imagine that about me.
You know certain things about me and so You're projecting that onto me.
But no, I never argued with my teachers.
People are saying, you said that?
Okay, show me the proof.
Where's the proof?
Give me the clip.
Give me the clip then.
Boo says, if only... because I don't think you could find it.
If only you were born in 1890 with everything we know now we could have prevented all this.
Yeah.
For the Ghosts says, I saw Michael Phelps in person today.
Did you know he literally cooks his own chicken tenders?
He also mentioned to watch The Wire since he grew up near Baltimore.
My favorite quote of his today was, I want to be my best authentic self.
Okay, cool ideas guys.
This is pretty simple.
Extend an olive branch and give your detractors a cozy channel.
Let them build a following with the occasional gentle reminder you run the platform.
In six months you'll have most of the dissent and right.
In a year you'll attract mainstream conservatives.
Now you can dictate the terms of the conversation.
Control the medium.
Control the message.
Yeah, I am.
I am controlling the medium.
Why would I let dumb idiots on the platform?
You know, it's always these dummies who are sympathetic to my detractors and they say, you know, somehow an alliance of my detractors is like really essential.
Here's the thing.
My detractors are not productive people.
So everybody's always fantasizing about, what if you just put her there?
I don't, I do not need to because I have what everybody wants.
We have the successful movement with all the momentum and we're the biggest with the most organic support.
We've got the platform.
We've got the foundation.
We've got the conference.
And you have people that for really no good reason at all are just constantly ankle biting, lying, slandering, generally out of resentment, out of sheer resentment because they can't do anything on their own.
And people think that if we just You know, forgave all of that and brought them into the fold that that would somehow help us in a material way.
You know, this is why you're not running this.
I mean, this is why you're not in my position.
Everybody thinks that if we just, hey, all you losers who resent me because you're not successful in your own way, all you people that hate me, again, out of pure spite, jealousy, and resentment, if I just, if I just bring you on board,
I'm very practical I'm very pragmatic and you know helping people that helping people that hate you lie about you sworn enemy want to destroy you and also people largely that do that because they're not successful on their own trust me when I say there's no value there so
What do you think the point of controlling the medium is if you can't exclude your enemies?
Here's a five-dimensional chess move.
Bring on people that lie about you non-stop, have not one good thing to say about you, you know, they have nothing in common other than they hate you for, you know, completely petty, ridiculous reasons.
Yeah, if you just win those guys over, I think it's all, I think it's over.
unidentified
Okay, really?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
But everybody says that.
unidentified
It's just, you know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I think it's people that are sympathetic with one or two of them and they try and come up with, hey Nick, well I still like this guy.
What if you just were nice to him?
You know, look, it's very simple.
I'm willing to work with anybody who wants to work with me for the most part.
If some of these people would give up their arms and say, you know what?
I was wrong.
I I lied.
I didn't understand you.
But I'm willing to put our differences aside and work together for America first.
Then I would say with magnanimity and benevolence, I would say, yeah, welcome aboard.
But that's just it.
These people differentiate themselves because they're just unwilling.
They're unwilling to bend the knee.
They will not show any of the respect that I am owed.
You know, they, they want to come in and then they want to call the shots and they want to attack who they want and attack what this is about.
It's like, listen, you can have your own opinion.
That's great.
But you know, people become a groiper yesterday and then they come in and they say, okay, well, I don't like this one and I don't like the way you're doing things.
And you know, Oh, you have a problem with my criticism?
This is a cult!
I can't stand this!
And it's like, okay.
So, you don't want to be a part of this.
This is a team.
So, I've been very forgiving for a lot of people.
Dalton.
You know a couple years ago Dalton was saying oh I'm a paleo con not to be confused with the gripers who are not paleo con and they're this and that and you know what Dalton did?
Humility.
He said you know what he goes I was wrong I misunderstood you I want to work with you I think what you have going is great and I didn't trust him at first but I said you know what I'll take I'll take the call.
I'll build the connection.
And we got to talking and I found out he's a great guy.
And now I think he's one of the best rising stars on the platform.
I absolutely love the guy.
I think he's talented, I think he works hard, and this is a guy who years ago was shit-talking me.
And I remember refusing to talk to him.
I remember Trey, who I used to like, Trey was always telling me, oh, you gotta get on a call with Dalton, this guy's great, and I said, oh, that guy that's always talking trash?
I said, yeah, I don't need to waste my time with that.
And Dalton, who did not have a platform, really, came to me and said, hey, look, you know, I misunderstood.
I was, and I'm not saying this to like embarrass him.
I'm just saying like, and it worked out for both of us.
I'm glad.
I'm glad it worked out that way because I think he's one of the best guys on our team.
And I think it would be horrible if he were wasting his potential, you know, seething and resent and resenting about me like some of these guys are.
But that's the thing.
he's practical and he was willing to say, "Okay, Yeah, I was wrong I said Nick was a bad guy.
I was wrong and we brought him aboard and yeah, and it was huge and You know, I'm buying Dalton coin.
I'm long Dalton coin 100% And I consider him a great friend and and like I said one of the great assets of cozy TV one of the great assets on the platform, but There's a big difference between a guy like that and some of these others where you know They it's all the wrong approach.
They come in and they're attacking everyone on this thing.
They attack what we do They criticize and then when we say hey listen, you know, honestly, we don't really I think your criticism is invalid and we don't really want that and And then they go, oh, okay, well, I'll just, you know.
And then it goes into, oh, well, you know, you always were no good.
You always, and then every, we can do no right.
Everything we do is wrong.
Oh, they believe every conspiracy, the least charitable.
So, you know, the door's always open.
If one or two of these people ever said, hey, listen, you know what?
And I'm willing to, especially, just because you said that, just to demonstrate my good faith, I'm willing to say, right now, and this goes for any of them, goes for any of them, the door is always open.
If they just say, you know what, and you don't have to, I mean yeah, pride hurts.
But if you say, you know what?
I was wrong.
I'm sorry.
I want to work together.
I see the error of my ways.
Conflict is not in our interest.
We'd be more productive working together.
I don't care who it is.
I'm saying this now, tonight.
It's valid now.
If people thought it wasn't on the table, it's on the table now.
And I'm saying for any of them.
If they just say, you know what?
I was fighting.
I was resisting.
But America first, inevitable.
I won't fight anymore.
I'm sorry.
Nick's the leader.
If any one of them just says that, be willing to set them up on cozy.
Give them a platform.
Extend an open arm.
And I'm not going to trust right away, but I'll say we could work together.
That's really my platform.
It always has been.
But there are some people that I know will never do that.
That I know, again, they're so poisoned with hatred and envy and resentment that they just can't do that.
And, you know, people like that we just don't need.
We don't need people like that.
That's not productive.
It's a team, okay?
We need cohesion, we need structure, and people that are gonna come in and just Ankle biting and this petty shit.
It's just you know, I that's not that is certainly not what's keeping us from growing if anything That's we're one of the few movements that's willing to sideline bad people, but You know, I'm saying that and you know, if you think that's the thing well anyone can take me up on that offer at any point, but I Seriously doubt that will ever happen.
So I don't think we're in any danger of that Cool ideas guy.
That's a thing.
It's it's one way.
It's a one-way street with that.
I Cool ideas, guys, as most of the dissident...or I just read that.
Reagan says, Nick, you mentioned a few weeks back there might be some pro-Russia merch coming.
Is that still in the works?
Yes.
Rohanians...I just don't want to announce anything anymore because then every night, when's the merch?
When's the merch?
As soon as we stop being banned from the finance system by Jews, okay?
Rohanian says don't read on air.
Okay.
Donald Trump says the cinematic pre-show clips are extremely well done.
Watching them is always super motivational.
Anyways, these niggas must be putting something in the Chicago air because I've been constantly exhausted and taking naps throughout the day too.
Huh, maybe it's the weather.
Spinefish says on June 21st 2018 you said there would come a time when you would have to make a transition to a serious commentator and stop joking about Catboys and Gamer Girl P. When did that time pass?
Well, you know, listen...
A lot of that stuff is just, you know, just cringe that if anything I said screw that and I said you know what we're just gonna be who we are.
There's some things you can't joke about now because you know people just are ruthless and scrutinize everything I say so I'm you know I'm a little bit more guarded than before but by and large I don't censor too much.
Spinefish says do you like Macklemore?
No.
White Power Rangers says, okay I'm not going to read that.
Eddie Van Gram says, don't know if you were already aware of this or not, but Katanji presided over the Pizzagate shooting case.
This combined with her child porn leniency makes her a truly evil person.
True.
John says it's sex, not gender.
Gender was a term John Money, the child rapist and pedo, coined for sex transition surgeries back in the 60s.
Tolerance breeds acceptance.
Using their language is the beginning.
Okay.
Linda Hoffman says only men should leave this country, only men should vote, and women like me get the honor of raising boys into men who are strong enough to do so and know the smell of cookies baking in the oven.
Let's go!
Cookies are back on the menu.
Let's go.
It's true.
Well, thank you.
We love you, Linda.
God bless you.
We love you and your family.
And there's something so... People perceive it as such a hateful and nasty thing, but it's really it's a loving thing.
Women love to take care of their men.
They love to take care of their husbands.
They love their boys.
They love their sons.
You know, I know of my mom.
My mom loves to take care of me.
Classic Italian mom.
She loves to, she's always, can I fix you a snack?
Can I make you something?
Whatever.
And we have a great relationship and women love that.
The relationship between men and women, for all the things that I say about women, There's a complementarity there.
We're not equal and it's not a put down.
It's that we are perfectly, we're like puzzle pieces.
We fit together perfectly.
And our roles fit together perfectly.
And so men and women should not be in a competition.
over who's gonna be the boss and who's gonna be the president.
God told us who the president's gonna be.
God told us who the boss is gonna be.
Let women do their role, which is what they want.
Let men do their role, which is what they want.
Men like engineering.
Men like work.
Men like fighting.
Men like competition.
Women like nurturing.
They like caretaking.
They like gossiping.
They like socializing.
So let women Mediate the disputes.
Let them hang out with the other women.
Let them cook the food and do the ritual type things.
Let them nurture the children and their husbands.
Let the men be the engineers and the architects and the designers, the protectors, the providers.
That is the divine order that God created.
And so, you know, people always make it out like, oh, you know, you're a bully, you're abusive or something.
No!
No, is there anything better than a mom and her children?
I mean, this is, we're talking about the Virgin Mary and Jesus.
We're talking about the most blessed arrangement that there is.
Which is the mother and her children.
Right?
Everybody always with the, oh, you know, you're being mean to women there.
You hate women.
I don't hate women.
I hate that men think that women are just like inferior men.
They're not.
They're women.
And and yeah, that's that's what I don't think women want to vote.
Women don't want to be voting.
Women don't want to be concerned with this stuff.
And let the man vote for the household.
We're not all individuals.
We're families.
So let the male vote for the household.
The household is a polity in itself.
The household is its own government with the male at the top and the woman has delegated things and the children are sort of like the subjects.
Let the man be the delegation of his household.
It doesn't mean that the woman has no power.
The woman has some say in it, but the man casts the vote.
And that means that politics is not dividing the domain of the family, where you're gonna have a man and a woman going out and voting for different parties?
Let the man cast a vote on behalf of the house, and the house is not divided.
There's not a political fault line running through a marriage and between the children.
Let the man vote.
And let the family be a coherent unit, and the family is all in it together.
But instead we've got this, no, everyone's going to be sliced up.
Men versus women, and the parents versus the children, and the sisters versus the brothers, and the blacks versus the whites, and so on.
They don't want a male to cast the vote for the family.
They don't want the families to be in a community.
They don't want the wife serving the husband.
They want the wife serving the state.
They want the children serving the state.
They want the man serving the state.
That's what they want.
They want everybody's ultimate allegiance to be to the New World Order.
And they want to create fault lines and earthquakes between families.
That's what they want to do.
And it's not cool.
So I'm with ya.
I'm with ya, Linda!
We love you.
She's amazing.
It's the best thing in the world.
I get mail from these big families.
People always send me, and I'm not encouraging this because I don't want people to, like, dox themselves or whatever, but when people do it's nice.
People send me, like, a Christmas card or a postcard and they'll say, hey, here's my family.
And everybody says, oh, Groypers are just like incels.
Which, not that there's anything wrong with incels, but...
You know, people be surprised.
They get postcards all the time and it's like, here's me and my 10 beautiful kids, here's me and my 5 kids, 7 kids.
And we have all these big, Catholic, conservative families.
They watch the show.
It's a family affair.
And it gives me a lot of faith in what we're doing here.
You know, if people like that are buying in, if, you know, because that means that the message and the messenger are together.
You know, those are the people we're trying to win.
And so if that, if the message is resonating with them, that means, you know, we're doing the right thing.
That means the substance and the style is right.
So, love to hear it.
Pretty Fly White Guy says, Hey Nick, Super Chat Day 14.
Have a good weekend.
Thanks.
Cameron says, We're a generation of men raised by women.
I'm wondering if another woman is really the answer we need.
Tyler Durden.
I hate that movie, but yeah, that quote is true.
A lot of people think it is.
unidentified
A lot of people think, I just need a girlfriend.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I just need a wife.
unidentified
That's like, no, bro, that's not the answer.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I mean, yeah, you should get married and all that.
That's great.
But you should really work on yourself.
And if a wife is into the equation, if a girlfriend's in the equation, then that's, you know, then that will happen naturally.
But guys should really work on themselves.
unidentified
And yeah, I see it all the time.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
That's what a lot of guys think.
It's my wife's mission.
I just need to get head pats.
unidentified
I need a girl to pat me on the bottom and tell me what a good job I did.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
It's sick.
Anon says, Justice Katanji, we still need your argument for dissent and ending statements begin in an hour.
I'm gonna stop you right there.
I'm on my lunch break.
What are you expecting me to do?
Very funny.
Hicks says, anytime I'm near a edge my brain goes, what if you threw yourself off and killed yourself?
LMFAO.
Don't you hate heights?
Slash have intrusive thoughts?
I think you told the story once about how you hung out with some friends on a skyscraper and you hated it.
Oh yeah, at Trump Tower.
I don't have intrusive thoughts like that.
But I am afraid of heights.
Bingus says the distributist says the right will win the culture war via superior aesthetics and tasteful art.
How can young creatives channel divine beauty?
And what are the best avenues for dissemination?
I think if you're asking that question, you're in the wrong profession.
Artists have inspiration.
Nobody needs to like, okay, I'm gonna design the right-wing alternative.
If you're doing that, like, you should just, you know, get a job in construction or something.
It's too self-conscious.
Real artists possess inspiration and genius and I hate when niggas be like, I'm gonna be the right wing whatever and then they just come up with this amateur canned garbage.
So...
I really believe an artist is inspired.
If you're an artist, you'll know it.
If you have a vision, you'll see it.
You're not gonna go and like, I'm gonna work on becoming an artist.
Nah nigga, you don't work on it.
I mean you have to work at it, but you're gonna need inspiration.
So, you'll know.
Hoppy says, so tired of everyone being stupid.
Yeah, tell me about it.
Andrew says, Nick, you are tall and handsome.
You're a savvy investor, right?
Surely you noticed SportsKruiper coin mooning this week.
We are loading up on this coin, correct?
You are funny and smart.
Great show.
Thanks.
Sky Guy says, you talking about acting black at the airport was the funniest thing ever, man.
Also, how do you think this Russia-Ukraine thing would have played out if Trump was in office?
I have no idea.
Matthew says, hey Nick, do you think that Russia's invasion has delayed or affected the Great Reset in any way?
Yeah, I think it's delayed it.
Eddie Van Gram says, which generation is the worst overall and why?
I don't know, dude.
Millennials?
Matthew says, I'm on a 31-day cozy streak.
I literally use this platform more than YouTube now.
Thanks for making this platform.
You're welcome.
Stewie says, Zoomers are gayer than other generations because Gen X molested all of them.
Yeah, there's some truth to that.
Tootoo says, two years ago I made fun of you for being an old man at 21 and you responded by saying, can't wait till you turn 21 so you can see what it feels like.
Today I turn 21 and I can say, ha ha, you're still old.
Have an age of day since I turned 16.
Happy early 24th.
24th.
Thank you.
Hoppy says, everything is so Please just become Catholic and help end this bullshit.
Love you, Nick.
Yeah, so true.
Good point.
Optic Zoomer says, it seems conservatives rarely cite religion to support their policies and resort more to science, economics, traditionalism instead.
Do you have political views that are purely, mostly justified by faith?
Uh, no.
Hoppy says, I hate them.
Mannequin Skywalker.
unidentified
Yeah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
D. Sharps' Cozy Friday, yeah.
Tutus, as you said, in middle school you argued with one of your teachers about whether or not Mitt Romney would beat Obama in the presidential election.
I remember everything, you can't hide from me.
No, that was my freshman year in high school and that was in debate club.
Virginiansis07, Nick, you're probably already clarified this, but just out of curiosity, did Gosar actually disavow you or is that actually an April Fool's joke?
I addressed this on Monday, I think.
Fartbox is you're making me optimistic that Jake Lloyd will stream on cozy.
Well, no, that's never gonna happen.
He betrayed us Antidotes, well, maybe it'll happen.
I don't know.
Well, he would have to you'd have to give me a pretty big explanation But yeah, I guess the doors open The doors always open his betrayal wasn't so bad, but it was a little bit of a betrayal But you know, I'd be willing I'd be willing to hear an apology, but I don't think that's gonna happen But you know, you never know Anna Dose says, I want to thank you for consistently mentioning Daily Stormer.
I checked it out, and now I pretty much read it every day.
Andrew Anglin is a genius writer and hilarious, too.
Yeah.
Spinefish says, did you listen to Yeezus when it first came out?
Yeah, and I didn't really like it, but I couldn't stop listening to it.
I didn't like it.
Like, I listened to Black Skinhead, and I was like, what is this?
It sounds so weird.
And I listened to I Am a God, which I hated at first.
But I couldn't stop.
I kept listening to the iTunes preview over and over.
I've always been a Kanye fan.
Bryce says, on behalf of the chosen people of Israel, I avow Nick Fuentes.
To all Jews who would nick their enemy, your days are numbered.
You'll not replace us.
Okay, thanks for that.
Oshkosh says, Hey Nick, long time viewer, first time Super Chatter.
Your content, comedy, and character has inspired me and many others to pursue political victory in our communities.
I have prayed since I was a kid that God would raise up a generation of leaders.
God is doing that through AF.
God bless you.
Hey, thank you so much man.
God bless you too.
I appreciate it.
Okay, that's our last Super Chat.
That's gonna do it for me tonight.
Hey, thanks everybody.
Remember to follow me on Gabin Telegram.
Links are down below.
Follow me on Cozy.
I'm on the air Monday through Friday, 8 o'clock Central, 9 o'clock Eastern.
As always, I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
Thanks for watching.
Thanks to our Super Chatters.
Everybody that watches the show, we love you.
I'll see you on Monday.
Until then, have a great weekend.
Have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
America First!
▲
Export Selection