Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 22, 2022 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

03:21:21

America First Ep. 963America First Ep. 963

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

02:37:43

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		I feel like the mirror on the casino.
		I got the sun in the water, sweet home.
		I got the sun in the water, sweet home.
		I got the sun in the water, sweet home.
		I got the sun in the water, sweet home.
		I got the sun in the water, sweet home.
		Peace.
		I love you.
		I love you.
		- Out of my league, all the things I believe.
		You were just the right kind, yeah, you were more than just a dream.
		You were out of my league, got my heartbeat racing.
		If I die, don't wake me, cause you are more than just a dream.
		Out of my league, every day and every week and every year that we live in this country, do they care about our health?
		No!
		They prescribed poison to us from the pharmaceutical companies.
		They're poisoning us with the seed oils that we're eating, the high fructose corn syrup.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		They're poisoning the water with heavy metals, which is in the tap water.
unidentified		They're poisoning us with what's on television and out of Hollywood and pornography.
		They're poisoning us in every way that you can imagine, but we're supposed to believe now, suddenly, they care so much about our public health.
		That's why they're doing this?
		Does anybody believe that?
		No!
		They don't care about our health.
		They don't care about the public.
		They don't care about any of us.
		What they care about, ultimately, is profit.
		You're looking for the tyranny coming to America?
		It's here, right now.
		Now is the time to take a stand.
		We are faced with the question about whether or not we will get the vaccine and surrender and capitulate to the system, a devil-worshipping system that hates us and hate our country.
		the answer has to be always no.
		I will not complain.
		I stop playing games.
		And at any moment, I can check that yay button.
		I said trust no man, but you're on the side.
		I'll eat your day, cause I'm a dollar.
		I said treat you and girls in the corner.
		My mama said trust don't hold you, so I'm a man.
		I'm acting like to stop the track.
		I'm going to go first.
		Itch.
		See, Ricky said, what?
		I don't want to pull you.
		I don't want to pull you in a world.
		Okay.
		Not my words, not my rules. not my rules.
		I just enforce them, alright?
		They said, trust your man, but your brother said it.
		I'm gonna leave your day was in the car.
		They said, trust your girls like your mother.
		My mama said, trust no hope, use a water.
		They said, trust your man, but your brother said it.
		I'm gonna leave your day was in the car.
		Blacked out the sky.
		Everything.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Warming up.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Everybody dare to vote.
unidentified		All right.
		This is from your biggest Protestant fan, may you one day see the light!
		Well hey thanks, love you too, but sorry, I believe in religion that makes sense, so...
		Let's just call it what it is.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The system hates white people.
		That's just what it is.
		And everybody wants to call it everything other than that.
		They want to call it everything other than what it is.
		You may hear conservatives talk about cultural Marxism.
		Critical race theory.
		That's the new one.
		Gotta ban critical race theory.
		CRT.
		And critical race theory has Marxist origins.
		It's socialism, it's communism, it's anti-western.
		It's anti-western civilization, anti-western culture.
		Conservatives even will call it anything other than what it is, because it's not politically correct to say what it is.
		You can't utter it in polite society, but we all know what it is.
		It's racial.
		It's racial hatred.
		They hate white people.
		This little boy, Cash Gernon, was murdered, dragged out of his bed in the middle of the night in his home and murdered outside his house in the street by a black man because he was white.
unidentified		That black guy killed a white boy because he was white.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And this black guy hated white people.
		That's why he did it.
		It was an act of hatred.
		It wasn't random.
		It was an act of racial hatred perpetrated by a black male against a white boy.
		And why is everybody so afraid to call it that?
		Of course that's what it is.
		What has been engendered in the population for the past two years?
		What's been engendered in the population for the past 30 years?
unidentified		Other than anti-white hatred.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		What are people learning in the schools?
		When you go to grade school and you go to American history class, what do you learn about?
		In the new Howard Zinn curriculum, you learn about how white people genocided the indigenous Americans.
		White people enslaved black people and brought them over here.
		Once freed by whites, whites mistreated blacks by being racist towards them, terrorizing them with the Ku Klux Klan.
		Segregating them, making them drink in separate water fountains.
		We hear about how white supremacist Nazis try to take over the whole world with their fascist ideology in World War II with Adolf Hitler.
		And it was white.
		It was because they were Aryan.
		It's because they were white supremacists.
		Because they believed in racial purity of the Aryan race.
unidentified		That made them uniquely evil.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		They perpetrated the Holocaust against Jews.
		And that was, by far and away, the most obscene, worst genocide ever in the history of the world.
		And then, when all was said and done, white people were racist to the Muslims that blew up the World Trade Center.
		White people are racist to black criminals and the police.
		Basically, people are bred from cradle until grave thinking that white people are uniquely evil people.
		White people bear a special guilt for all the problems of this country, all the problems of every other group, and really, like, all the problems of humanity.
		And that's a guilt that is ancestral, it's not individual, everyone has it, and you can never overcome it.
		There's no clear way, discernibly, that you can ever overcome it and ever achieve equality with these non-white people.
		And it's as a consequence of this that these things are becoming more and more common.
		White people are being dehumanized.
unidentified		And when white people are dehumanized, black people are going to start killing white people because they see them as less than human.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And other people are going to start killing white people because they see them as less than human.
		How much do you want to bet that this, uh, whatever his name is, Darren Brown, whatever, was radicalized by the media into thinking that white people are racist and responsible for his suffering, not just as a black man, but as a gay man too.
		And that he committed this crime in retaliation for that perceived prejudice, perceived hatred against him.
		That's the consequence of all this anti-white hatred and dehumanization in the media, education system, and it's even enshrined in the law systematically through the government.
unidentified		And what do you think affirmative action is?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And a lot of white people don't want to talk about it now.
		They don't want to address it.
		They want to pretend that that's not the case because Honestly, I think a lot of white people think that it's beneath them.
		I think that white people think that it's our job to be better, to strive towards a post-racial society, that we ought not to notice race, and we should try not to notice race, that it's a good thing to aspire to, to not notice race.
		I think that white people are under the impression that to be cognizant of race, and to mention it and act like it matters, is beneath us.
		Like, it's backwards, it's regressive, it's primitive.
		And a big part of that, too, is because white people have, I think, internalized a lot of what the media says about us, which is that, well, we're on top of the world, so what do we really have to complain about?
unidentified		But here's the problem.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		This is not going to be a white country forever.
		And it's not going to be a white country for very much longer.
		In a lot of places, it already isn't.
		And in a lot of ways, it already isn't a white country anymore.
		And as the percentage and proportion of white people diminishes in America relative to non-white people, it's going to become more and more of a problem for white people that non-white people don't like us.
		It's just that simple.
		Just think about it in these simple terms.
unidentified		The media attacks white people.
unidentified		They say that white people cause the suffering of non-white people.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Increasingly, non-white people don't like white people.
		Nobody talks about that.
		But we know that non-white people largely regard white people with suspicion, distrust, in some cases, just don't like them, hate them.
unidentified		Nobody wants to say that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		People are very comfortable talking about racism against blacks or other non-whites, but nobody talks about the distrust, nobody talks about the resentment that non-white people have for white people in the country.
		And it's not everybody, but it is a lot of people, and everyone knows that.
		As the population becomes less and less white, and as the people in charge of the country and the people enforcing the laws of the people in the country become less and less white, that's going to matter a lot more.
unidentified		The American Pronunciation Guide Presents
		"How to Pronounce The World" is a production of the United States.
		The American Pronunciation Guide Presents "How to Pronounce The World"
		the American Pronunciation Guide Presents "How to Pronounce The World"
		the American Pronunciation Guide the American Pronunciation Guide Presents "How to Pronounce The World" the American Pronunciation Guide to "How to Pronounce The World" the American Pronunciation Guide to the World"
		the American Pronunciation Guide to "How to Pronounce The World"
		I'd like to propose a toast to our people.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'd like to propose a toast to the Voipers, to White Boy Summer, White Boy Century, to the reaction and the reclamation of the United States.
unidentified		Cheers everybody.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's gonna happen.
		They kick me off the plane, you know what that means?
		White boy summer road trip.
		They give us lemons, we make lemon.
		They throw me behind bars.
		And I start throwing baseball up against the wall.
unidentified		And now I'm playing catch.
unidentified		Because you know what?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The only time that they win is when they triumph over our spirit.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But they never can.
unidentified		They never take that away from us.
unidentified		Because I believe in God.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And I believe in America.
unidentified		Let's do it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We are still enjoying.
unidentified		White Boy Summer is still on.
unidentified		I don't care if I have to drive there.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't care if I have to get in Lake Michigan and go all the way around the Panama Canal.
unidentified		Nothing is going to stop white boys summer.
		Nothing is going to stop America first.
		America first, bitch.
		There's always a way.
		White people founded this country.
		This country wouldn't exist without white people.
		Wouldn't exist without white people.
		And white people are done being bullied.
		Done being bullied.
		We're the keepers of the American tradition.
		And I think our ancestors can smile on us right now for what we're doing.
		Cheers.
		Cheers. ... ...
		The mayor also just announced the city will start requiring proof of COVID vaccination for a range of indoor activities, including going to a restaurant or to the gym.
		New York is the first major U.S.
		city to introduce a mandate like this.
		It requires people to show proof of at least one vaccine dose and will be phased in starting later this month.
		You have to abide by the rules and you have to have a mask on.
		This is a mistake.
		It's not.
		Businesses have the right to refuse service even if you're not wearing a mask.
		That's their choice.
		Yeah.
		Take a seat.
		Take a seat.
		Okay.
		Take a seat.
		Where's your mask?
		Where's your mask?
		It's still a city order.
		Leave the property or you get a citation.
		Period.
		Don't argue with me.
		It's real simple.
		Put your hands right here.
		You don't need to take.
		Yes, you are.
		I will take you right now.
		You are in violation.
		And I gave you a lawful order.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm not going to Walgreens to get an mRNA, non-FDA approved, and even if it wasn't, experimental vaccine that goes inside your cells and manipulates your DNA to start producing spiked proteins, experimental vaccine that goes inside your cells and manipulates your DNA to start producing spiked proteins, which are killing babies Because I'm afraid of the flu, which kills like .00013%.
		I think it's even less than that.
		This is paving the way for a lockdown.
		And if you thought this was over, if you thought that we were getting out of this, you're not.
		We're not.
		It's not going back to normal.
		You're not going back to normal.
		This is the beginning.
		That was phase one.
		I believe that they probably had to let people out of the lockdown, give people a taste of what things used to be like.
		To 1.
		Let out pressure.
		It's a pressure release valve.
		And 2.
		It's a mental trick.
		People get a small taste of what they used to have, the hard lockdown comes back, and then people are more desperate to do what they're told in order to get full normalcy.
		But I think that's the agenda.
		And they're already talking about that in Iceland.
		They say in Iceland it's a 15-year lockdown plan.
		And they're talking about that with the vaccines.
		Regular, every six months, booster shots.
		Booster shots, vaccinations for COVID.
		So you're gonna get your two shots, and then get sick, and then you gotta get a third shot, and then, you know, you just get a shot every six months or something.
		mRNA poison.
		And that's with the 15-year lockdown plan, and that's with the masks, and the plexiglass, and the lockdown, and the vaccine passport.
		I think the endgame is the vaccine passport.
		When all of this is said and done, there will be no independent businesses left.
		There will be no public institution, public or private institution that is open to the public that will not be controlled by the state, that will not be controlled by bureaucrats.
		There's not going to be one place that you could go to outside where other people gather that will not be restricted based on vaccination status or some other arbitrary thing.
		And if they announced it tomorrow that that's what they were doing, people would resist it.
		And the only way to stop this, by the way, is to stop it where it is.
		You can't stop where it's going.
		You've got to stop it where it is.
		You've got to stop it in its track, right?
		I mean, do people not understand how that works?
		I think people have it in their minds.
		They're like, well, if it gets really bad, you know, I don't know if I'd go that far.
		Well, it's not really up to you.
		These things have momentum.
		And they're contingent.
		They're building one thing on top of the previous thing.
		So people have it in their heads, like, well, if it got that bad, you know, then I'd have a problem with it.
		Well, look how bad it is now.
		Look how bad it has gotten.
		Take a look back a year, five years.
		I mean, at everything, but specifically with the pandemic.
		Take a look back at one year ago, you know.
		People say, well, if it got so bad, you know, then I might say something, then I might do something.
		I might not like that.
		Okay, well, the only way we're going to stop it from getting over there is if we stop it over here.
		If we start saying no over here, we got to start thinking how we're going to stop it here.
unidentified		If people just stop doing it, There's a chance we could have earned that outcome.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We are continuing to wage our war against the mask mandate.
		I'm a big believer in just making everybody's life harder.
		You don't have to get fired over this stuff, but just make everybody's life difficult.
		Don't let the CDC guidelines be an imposition on you.
		Let it be an imposition on the people that have to enforce it.
		You know, let the people that work at these places of business remind you five times when you're in a store or wherever to put your mask back on and put it on over your nose and do this and that, right?
		Here's my challenge to you.
		Go into one of these stores when they reimpose the mask mandate and get in a confrontation with a worker and get in a shouting match and get kicked out.
		And you're going to feel adrenaline.
		You're going to go into Target.
		You're going to go into Walmart or wherever.
		And you're going to get in a big fight.
		And your mouth is going to twitch.
		And you're going to feel shaky.
		And you're going to get adrenaline.
		Some of you, yes, some of you maybe are used to this.
		And that's a good thing.
		It feels good.
		It reminds you you're alive.
		You're human.
		And the more that you do it, the more you'll be able to, you know, maintain your grip.
		But start getting used to that feeling.
		That's a good feeling.
		We want to start to feel that.
		Fuck these people.
		Ruin their day.
		Make these people that work at Target go home and cry because they have to enforce this bullshit.
		Make them lose their minds.
unidentified		Make them go to their therapist, and get on antidepressants, and cry.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Because you walked into Target and ruined their whole day.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Because gas is $4, and they don't know how they're going to pay their rent, and their relationship with their parents is bad, and they're getting used, and Tinder hookups, and then they gotta go to Target, and they gotta deal with some smug right-wing asshole not wearing their mask.
unidentified		And let those people go off the rails, and let the whole fucking system go off the rails.
unidentified		That's what we have to do.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		They, they see America merely as a vessel.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I mean, only, only a class of people so rootless If you view America in such a way as merely a vessel for abstractions, right?
unidentified		We're gonna smash your brain in with the Bible, idiot.
		We're going to smash your brain in with the Bible, idiot.
		And I'm addicted to the serotonin rush.
		Where's enough enough, baby?
		Where's enough enough, baby?
		Shit.
		Just eat a big mac, you stupid bitch.
		Say you took your can move a country in a peaceful place.
		The one who has to stop your life.
		It's not a last of life.
		You're like, you took your can move a country in a peaceful place.
		You're not a test, it's not a lie.
		Not a last of life.
		You're like, you're not allowed to make jokes anymore.
		We're not allowed to make jokes.
		It's not funny.
		Sipping wine.
		Having some pasta.
		Having some pizza.
		Oh.
		I'm weird.
		I'm normal.
		I'm, I'm, well, I'm not normal.
		I'm a virgin.
		I'm a virgin.
		All right, I'm an original.
		One.
		One.
		One person raised his voice.
		The teacher couldn't believe it.
		but the classroom couldn't believe it either.
		But in the end, he had logic on his side.
		And at the end of the day, he proved his point.
		And I predicted Sarah Taylor was like,
		I feel like the nigga I won't go sell, but he got the son of a casino.
		I feel like the nigga I won't go sell, but he got the son of a casino.
		I feel like the nigga I won't go sell.
		I feel like the nigga I won't go sell.
		From the prettiest dreams Millions of people trying to get on the scene And everyone's selling their souls Everyone's selling their Everyone's saying they want But they sleepwalking dead eyes closed L.A.
		Monster.
		I pray the Lord my soul to keep.
		Lord save these people.
		They are streets they let in.
		Safe in one day streets.
		Lord save us from L.A.
		They monster.
		I am my lightning.
		Blueprint vibe mic.
		Go get his rhyme light.
		Should've been signed twice.
		Most imitated.
		Grammy nominated.
		Hotel accommodated.
		Cheerleader prom dated.
		Barbershop player hated.
		Bang to the Roof K-Dan.
		Two words, got damn crazy, crazy.
		So I live by two words, fuck you, pay me!
		Screaming, teasing, saving.
		We know how the game be, I can't let them change me.
		Cause on Judgment Day, you gon' blame me.
		Look God, it's the same me.
		I basically know now, we get racially profiled.
		Cuffed up and hosed down, pimped up and hoed down.
	Plus I got a whole city to hold down.
	From the bottom to the top's the only place to go now.
	Let's go!
	He's gonna peel off for an hour and he's not of the truth.
	Let's go!
	You wanna know what's critical to all of this?
	We look at Christ on the cross.
	And you're going to kick us off Twitter?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You can't stop people that are religious zealots.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You cannot stop people that are motivated in the face of the fear of death.
unidentified		It gives false hope and eats them whole.
		Sin, billionaires who are still broke.
		Jesus, save all my people from this monster.
		For it takes their souls.
		It gives us hope and eats them whole.
		Sin, billionaires who are still broke.
		Jesus, save all my people from this monster.
		For it takes their souls.
		It gives us hope and eats them whole.
		Sin, billionaires who are still broke.
		Jesus, save all my people from this monster.
		For it takes their souls.
		It gives us hope and eats them whole.
		Sin, billionaires who are still broke.
		Jesus, save all my people from this monster.
		For it takes their souls.
		Sin, billionaires who are still broke.
		.
		Verification commencing.
		Verified.
		You are a real human being.
		The mayor also just announced the city will start requiring proof of COVID vaccination for a range of indoor activities, including going to a restaurant or to the gym.
		New York is the first major U.S.
		city to introduce a mandate like this.
		It requires people to show proof of at least one vaccine dose and will be phased in starting later this month.
		It's not.
		Businesses have the right to refuse service, even if you're not one of them.
		That's their choice.
		Yeah.
		Take a seat.
		Take a seat.
		Mary and I, we're out.
		Okay.
		Take a seat.
		Where's your mask?
		Where's your mask?
		It's still a city order.
		Leave the property or you get a citation.
		Period.
		Don't argue with me.
		It's real simple.
		Put your hands right here.
		No.
		You don't need to take.
		Yes, you are.
		I will take you right now.
		You are in violation, and I gave you a lawful order.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm not going to Walgreens to get an mRNA, non-FDA approved, and even if it wasn't, experimental vaccine that goes inside your cells and manipulates your DNA to start producing spiked proteins, experimental vaccine that goes inside your cells and manipulates your DNA to start producing spiked proteins, which are killing babies Because I'm afraid of the flu, which kills like .00013%.
		I think it's even less than that.
		This is paving the way for a lockdown.
		And if you thought this was over, if you thought that we were getting out of this, you're not.
		We're not.
		It's not going back to normal.
		You're not going back to normal.
		This is the beginning.
		That was phase one.
unidentified		I believe that they probably had to let people out of the lockdown.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Give people a taste of what things used to be like.
unidentified		Two.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		One.
		Let out pressure.
		It's a pressure release valve.
unidentified		And two, it's a mental trick.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		People get a small taste of what they used to have, the hard lockdown comes back, and then people are more desperate to do what they're told in order to get full normalcy.
		But I think that's the agenda.
		And they're already talking about that in Iceland.
		They say in Iceland it's a 15-year, 15-year lockdown plan.
		And they're talking about that with the vaccines.
		Regular, every six months, booster shots.
		Booster shots, vaccinations for COVID.
		So you're gonna get your two shots, and then get sick, and then you gotta get a third shot, and then you know you just get a shot every six months or something.
		mRNA poison.
		And that's with the 15-year lockdown plan, and that's with the masks, and the plexiglass, and the lockdown, and the vaccine passport.
		I think the endgame is the vaccine passport.
		When all of this is said and done, there will be no independent businesses left.
		There will be no public institution, public or private institution that is open to the public that will not be controlled by the state, that will not be controlled by bureaucrats.
		There's not going to be one place that you could go to outside Where other people gather that will not be restricted based on vaccination status or some other arbitrary thing.
		And if they announced it tomorrow that that's what they were doing, people would resist it.
		And the only way to stop this, by the way, is to stop it where it is.
		You can't stop where it's going.
		You got to stop it where it is.
		You got to stop it in its track.
unidentified		Right?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I mean, do people not understand how that works?
		I think people have it in their minds.
		They're like, well, if it gets really bad, you know, I don't know if I go that far.
		Well, it's not really up to you.
		These things have momentum and they're contingent.
		They're building one thing on top of the previous thing.
		So people have it in their heads, like, well, if it got that bad, you know, then I'd have a problem with it.
		Well, look how bad it is now.
		Look how bad it has gotten.
		Take a look back a year, five years.
		I mean, at everything, but specifically with the pandemic.
		Take a look back at one year ago, you know.
		People say, well, if it got so bad, you know, then I might say something, then I might do something.
		I might not like that.
		Okay, well, the only way we're gonna stop it from getting over there is if we stop it over here.
		If we start saying no over here.
		We gotta start thinking how we're gonna stop it here.
unidentified		If people just stop doing it...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		There's a chance we could have heard that outcome.
		We are continuing to wage our war against the mask mandate.
		I'm a big believer in just making everybody's life harder.
		You don't have to get fired over this stuff, but just make everybody's life difficult.
		Don't let the CDC guidelines be an imposition on you.
		Let it be an imposition on the people that have to enforce it.
		You know, let the people that work at these places of business remind you five times when you're in a store or wherever to put your mask back on and put it on over your nose and do this and that, right?
		Here's my challenge to you.
		Go into one of these stores when they reimpose the mask mandate and get in a confrontation with a worker and get in a shouting match and get kicked out.
		And you're going to feel adrenaline.
		You're going to go into Target.
		You're going to go into Walmart or wherever.
		And you're going to get in a big fight.
		And your mouth is going to twitch.
		And you're going to feel shaky.
		And you're going to get adrenaline.
		Some of you, yes, some of you maybe are used to this.
		And that's a good thing.
		It feels good.
		It reminds you you're alive.
		You're human.
		And the more that you do it, the more you'll be able to, you know, maintain your grip.
		But start getting used to that feeling.
		That's a good feeling.
		We want to start to feel that.
		Fuck these people.
		Ruin their day.
		Make these people that work at Target go home and cry because they have to enforce this bullshit.
		Make them lose their minds.
		Make them go to their therapist and get on antidepressants and cry because you walked into Target and ruined their whole day because gas is $4 and they don't know how they're going to pay their rent and their relationship with their parents is bad and they're getting used and Tinder hookups and then they got to go to Target and they got to deal with some smug right-wing asshole not wearing their mask.
		And let those people go off the rails.
		And let the whole fucking system go off the rails.
		That's what we have to do.
unidentified		That's what we have to do.
		That's what we have to do.
		That's what we have to do.
		That's what we have to do.
		That's what we have to do.
		That's what we have to do.
		That's what we have to do.
		Everything in my life.
		Talking with my dad.
		Said it ain't Christ life.
		It's not.
		This is a Christian nation.
		This is America.
		This is a miracle.
		I fear and love God.
		When you remove the fear and love of God, you create the fear and love of everything else.
		You talking to somebody right now that only fears God and Jesus has won the victory, bro.
		Africanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		Transcription by CastingWords
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening everybody!
		You are watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Monday.
		We have a lot to talk about tonight.
		Lots to get into.
		We're going to be doing a big debate recap.
		As you know, last Friday I debated Steve Bonnell, otherwise known as Destiny, on the Russia-Ukraine war.
		It was an easy victory.
		Which I predicted last Monday.
		But I hope you all enjoyed.
		It was a very successful stream.
		We had 20,000 live viewers across all platforms on Friday.
		Which makes it, I think, one of the biggest streaming events we've ever done on Cozy.
		We had I believe 10,000 watching on Cozy between my channel and Ethan Ralph's channel.
		I think there was about 8,000 watching on Destiny's YouTube channel and then 1,500 to 2,000 on the Ethan Ralph Odyssey channel.
		So between everything about 20,000 live viewers at its peak.
		I think now hundreds of thousands of people have watched it with all the replays that have been posted on my channel, Ethan's channel, and Destiny's channel.
		So, huge viewership and I think a decisive victory for the Russians.
		The response was almost universal.
		Everybody said, I won the debate and it was very fun.
		So we'll do a little debate recap.
		We'll also be talking tonight about the Russia-Ukraine war itself and give you some updates on what's going on there.
		The war is ongoing.
		And right now all eyes are on, and I don't know if I'm pronouncing this right, it's Mariople.
		Again, I don't know if I'm pronouncing that right, but it's uh...
		Coastal city on the coast of the Sea of Azov and so everybody's paying attention to this siege Which is going on on that city.
		The Russians are trying to take it over and connect their forces Which originated in Crimea and its forces from Donbass after which they'll move north Towards the capital or west towards Odessa, which is the other major city on the Black Sea coast Specifically, we'll be talking tonight about the negotiations.
		The Russians and the Ukrainians have relaunched negotiations.
		They're being mediated by Turkey.
		And so Russian President Vladimir Putin has given Ukraine a series of demands.
		Specifically, they are Russia wants Ukraine to recognize Russia's annexation of Crimea.
		They want Ukraine to allow Donbass to break away from Ukraine as well as potentially other territory.
		And they also want Ukraine to change their constitution to declare neutrality and that they will never join NATO.
		And then lastly, they want Ukraine to denazify and demilitarize.
		So we'll talk about those demands.
		We'll also talk about what Zelensky is saying.
		Zelensky says that he is not going to capitulate to any of those demands.
		And Zelensky says that if Russia does not surrender, there will be a third world war, there will be a no-fly zone, and he still says that he wants to join NATO.
		So we'll get into all of that.
		Should be a pretty exciting show.
		I love it.
		I love the war.
		I can't stop thinking about it.
		I posted this on Telegram last night.
		I just can't stop thinking about it, even over the weekend.
		And it was a beautiful weekend in Chicago.
		Great weather.
		It was like 60s yesterday, 70s today, and I've just been driving around just enjoying the weather, doing some work, but doing some work on the road.
		But I just can't stop thinking about it.
		Everywhere I look, I just see the blue and gold for Ukraine and it's just infuriating.
		And I just wish there was some way I could show support.
		I just wish there was something I could do.
		I'm driving around, I'm looking for stores that sell Russian flags, Russians.
		I need to show my support for Russia.
		We're working on some merch.
		I'm gonna try and get the merch store back online and I'd like to sell a hat Or a shirt.
		Something, before the war is over, to just express our solidarity with Moscow.
		Because everywhere I go, I see ribbons tied around the trees, I see Ukrainian flags in people's windows.
		I saw something totally ridiculous today.
		I was driving around my town, and I saw in the street corner, there's this house and it's all decorated, and they've got these little signs in their lawn and it says, Stop the war!
		Stop Putin!
		And all this stuff, and I just flipped it off as I drove by.
	Powerless.
	I don't know what else to do.
	I want to put a big Russian flag on my car, but I don't want my car to get vandalized, you know?
	I would put, like, a Russian bumper sticker on my car or something, but I don't want someone to vandalize my car.
	You know, I'd put... I would tie, like, a white, blue, and red ribbon around my tree outside my house, but I don't want my... I don't want my house to get vandalized either.
	It's so hard.
	It's so difficult these days.
	We have to show solidarity somehow.
	I gotta do something.
	I can't stop thinking about it.
	It's just great to finally see somebody stand up to the American empire.
	You just love to see it.
	Well, you want to know what's gratifying?
	It's particularly gratifying because there's nothing they could do about it.
	That's what's awesome about it.
	It has the same energy as Donald Trump.
	Because Putin is going in there, he's reaching into Ukraine in a very real and physical way, figuratively, but also literally.
	You know, Putin is reaching into Ukraine and taking what he wants, and there's nothing that the West can do to stop him.
	They can sanction him and they're doing all this.
unidentified		We'll just take the billionaire's yachts.
unidentified		Okay, we'll crash your currency.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And they can't stop him.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		They can do nothing.
unidentified		We'll give $13 billion to Ukraine.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It doesn't matter.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		He's going to kill them all.
unidentified		He's going to kill them all.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The Ukrainian fighters, the foreign legions, it doesn't matter who you send, the Russian army will kill them all.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Not all the people, but all the fighters.
unidentified		Russia will destroy them.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And I saw over the weekend they used a hypersonic missile to take out an arms depot, which is awesome.
		And there's something about that because, you know, there's a sense of powerlessness that the opponents of the American regime have had to endure for decades, you know, almost a century.
		And you're beginning to see a real global resistance.
		It's magnificent.
		It's very gratifying to witness.
		You know, it's the same feeling when I saw UX going on Twitch and raiding those livestreams and they couldn't do anything about it.
		And they're like, there's this off-platform activity.
		Protect yourselves from the UX love raids!
		And it's the same feeling I got watching Trump win all the primaries and then win the general.
		And it's the same feeling I get watching Putin reach out and take Ukraine and bombing buildings and hypersonic missiles and just absolutely crushing the opposition and there's nothing anyone can do.
		You know, Nancy Pelosi, she introduces Zelensky and Zelensky's talking before Congress and they're all applauding, you know, but you can do nothing.
		You know, all your strength And you know, but they can't do anything about it.
		So you love to see it.
		You really love to see it.
		I love to see it.
		I salute the new Tsar Vladimir Putin, you know, the pride of Moscow.
		But anyway, so we'll get into all that.
		We'll do a little debate recap.
		Then we'll get into the negotiations.
		And this is the fun part.
		Oh, it's all so fun.
		You know, the build-up was fun.
		The initial invasion, I was just hooting and hollering when I heard this.
		You know, I was driving to Florida for half-pack, and then I hear this on YouTube.
unidentified		I'm watching a live stream, and we're like, woohoo!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, this is yippee!
		This is great!
		And it's just been a real pleasure, been a real joy to watch the ongoing conflict and to hear the increasingly degraded Ukrainian forces.
		I especially like these videos of the Foreign Legion because you have these American volunteers, all these...
		You know, all these liberal Americans.
		They're volunteering to go fight in Ukraine and you read their posts on Reddit, they're posting videos on Twitter, and they're saying, We're running out of supplies!
		I thought we'd be taking over towns!
		We're just getting hit with missiles!
		There was one guy who said he literally escaped Ukraine.
		He pretended he was Red Cross to get across the border.
unidentified		He goes, They're crazy!
unidentified		They told us they'd shoot us in the back if we don't go to the front lines, but we're just getting cut down on the front lines!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And the Russians say, you know, it doesn't matter where you're from, we'll kill you.
		So the conflict has been a real, you know, it's been a real joy, you know, because these myths about the Ukrainian resistance just getting dashed, you know, on the rocks of reality.
		They're saying, oh, you know, the ghost of Kiev and all this.
		And then they come back from Ukraine and they say, it's over.
		Ukraine is flattened.
		It's all lost.
		And now the negotiations begin.
		Now they put the screws in them.
		The siege of Maripol.
		And they're on their way to Kiev.
		And then they will relent.
		And the victory will be decisive.
		It will be indisputable.
		And it'll be a real... And Darren Beattie writes a lot about this.
		And I don't know what the...you know, the coverage of this on Revolver has been a little confusing, but Darren Beatty wrote about this, he's been writing about this for years, talking about the psychological impact.
		There's going to be a real psychological impact on the world when Putin dictates the terms of surrender, and Ukraine accepts them, and he just wins the war.
		takes Ukraine.
		And there's going to be a real psychological impact on the world when Putin dictates the terms of surrender and Ukraine accepts them and he just wins the war.
		It's not ambiguous.
		It's not murky.
		It's not a great area.
		He just wins.
		Putin goes in there and he does what he wants and he just wins.
		And And there was nothing we could do about it.
		All the hashtags, all the posts, all the bullshit.
		He won.
unidentified		We lost.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		There was nothing we could do about it.
		And then we're gonna suffer pain because of the backfire from all our sanctions and everything.
		We, you know, the oil reserves are running out.
		The prices are going up.
		Food prices are gonna go up.
		Russia has all the fertilizer.
		They have all the fertilizer and they have all the food and there's not going to be enough.
unidentified		Prices are going to go up.
unidentified		They're going to win the war.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The economic pain will be ours.
		And, you know, all these Americans, just like in 2016, they're going to have that same feeling of powerlessness.
		They're going to say, you know, we lost.
		And it's just gonna be delicious for that really to sink in.
		It's really gonna sink in for them and we're lucky enough to witness this.
		We're lucky enough to have a front row seat and watch it all unfold.
		And you know, There is a lot more where that came from for the American Empire.
		There are a lot of white pills like this to go around in this century.
		So anyway, we'll get into all of that.
		Before we do, just want to remind you, follow me on Gab, follow me on Telegram.
		Links are down below.
		You know, I'm posting lots of great content every day on both Gavin and Telegram, so follow me there.
		Follow me on Truth Social.
		I'm on Truth Social at NickJFuentes.
		And follow me here!
		Follow me here on Cozy.
		Click the follow button down here.
		Click the follow button and you'll get a push notification whenever I go live.
		Whenever my show begins, you'll get a push notification on Telegram if you follow me here on Cozy.
		So make a Telegram, follow me on Cozy, and you'll get notified when the show begins.
		It's been a tough deal trying to adjust to this new time zone deal.
		You know, I've been struggling with that, but I think the show's gonna sort of regulate.
		I think we're gonna... the show start time will begin to stabilize very soon.
		It's just that ever since the Senate abolished time as we know it it's it's been a little tricky getting used to all of that but you know we're finding other ways you know we're finding a rhythm here so anyway I don't think there's any other announcements Let me think.
		No, I think that's it.
		We have some new channels here on Cozy.
		Milo Yiannopoulos now has a channel here on Cozy.
		Cozy.tv slash Milo, so follow him.
		He's going to begin live streaming soon.
		We've also got Cancel Proof, which is a new show with Paul Eskindon and Jason Rink.
		A couple of friends of mine, they produced those mini documentaries.
		So if you saw the mini documentary episode about my frozen bank account or the no-fly list, they produce those.
		They're great guys.
		They're Christian, they're conservative, they're awesome.
		I did a podcast with them actually I think last month or it might have been in January that's actually up on Rumble.
		But they've got a great show, really well produced, really cool studio, cool lobby, everything.
		So give them a follow.
		But I love it.
		I mean, this platform is just growing every day.
		I don't know if you noticed, but it's like every week we're adding new streamers.
		It's unbelievable, the rate at which this thing is growing, and it's just awesome to see.
		It's awesome to see, particularly, because I watch Cozy every day, and I'll be watching Cozy at like 3 a.m., and we'll have a thousand people across the site watching streams any time of the day.
		At least a thousand people.
		So I'll tune in at 3, 4, 5 a.m.
		sometimes, you know, on a Monday or on a Sunday and there'll be a thousand people watching content, you know.
		There'll be multiple people live and there'll be a thousand, two thousand people watching even at the weakest hours, you know.
		And it's just awesome to see that, to see the growth potential.
		We hit, I think, five or six million page views in the past 30 days.
		The engagement was crazy after the debate.
		I think we had like a hundred thousand page views in 24 hours after the debate on Friday.
		So the site's blowing up.
		We're adding new streamers all the time.
		We're getting great retention.
		We're bringing over all kinds of audiences.
		It's just, it's the biggest white pill of the year, I think, is the... People are saying 6 million.
		I didn't mean to say... That's just, that's what it is, okay?
		I didn't mean it like a dog whistle.
		It's just, that's what it is, okay?
		We're between 5 and 6 million page views over the past 30 days, which is incredible because I think America First.Live was getting like 4 million per month.
		And we went from zero on CozyTV in October to we're approaching six million, which is just unbelievable.
		Which is, like I said, that's 50% more than what I had on AmericaFirst.live at its peak.
		So, this thing is just exploding in the best way.
		Really awesome to see.
		But, like I said, I don't think there's any other announcements besides that, so we'll just jump right into it.
	I want to do a little recap of the debate on Friday.
	I'm sure a lot of you guys watched it.
	But if you didn't, the replay is on this channel.
	So if you go to the replays, it's my most recent stream.
	You can watch the debate with Destiny.
	You can also watch it, I think it's on YouTube.
	It's on Destiny's channel on YouTube as well.
	So it's really, it's all over the place.
	But I debated him on Friday about the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
	And I told you the previous Monday, I told you last week that it was going to be a slaughter.
	And I said it was going to be a slaughter because this is my expertise, okay?
	You know, I cover a lot of things on this show.
	Some things I'm not really familiar with.
	And then, of course, some things I really am very well read on.
	And I would say that international relations is probably my strongest... that's my strongest topic, okay?
	That's my wheelhouse.
	I feel like I intuitively understand that better than any other subject.
	I have more background knowledge on that than any other subject.
	And particularly this conflict.
	And I said last week, you know, I remember when I was in high school when the crisis began.
	You know, I was on Speech Team, I was on Model UN, I was a sophomore in high school when this whole crisis started in 2014 when the Maidan Revolution happened and Russia annexed Crimea and started backing the separatists in Donbass.
	So I've been following this for fully 8 years, you know, and I've been following it ever since.
	This particular conflict.
	And I know it on both sides.
	Because, you know, 8 years ago I was on the side of the neocons.
	You know, and I was just telling a friend of mine the other day, I was a hardcore neocon.
	When I was in high school, I read Bret Stephens, who at the time was at the Wall Street Journal.
	He wrote a book called America in Retreat, and he talked, actually, about exactly this scenario in that book.
	Brett Stevens, he's now a columnist for the New York Times.
	He started out at the Jerusalem Post.
	Spoiler alert, he's a Jewish Zionist.
	So he starts out at Jerusalem Post.
	He was at Wall Street Journal when I was in high school.
	He wrote this book called America in Retreat.
	And it was basically about how the Obama doctrine of abdicating American global hegemony would lead to this global crisis.
	And it would see Iran invading its neighbors at the same time that China is invading Taiwan at the same time that Russia invades Ukraine from Belarus and from Crimea.
	And I remember reading that and thinking, oh my gosh, we need American leadership in the world.
	And I watched or listened to the Max Boot podcast.
	Max Boot, he's another Jewish Zionist neocon.
	I remember I read Garry Kasparov's book.
	Garry Kasparov was a chess grandmaster from Russia.
	And now he's a polemicist and he's a political pundit and he writes books.
	And he wrote a book eight years ago called Winter is Coming.
	And it was about how Putin's a dictator and he's gonna turn Russia into this totalitarian state.
	And I actually saw him speak live at the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.
	I saw him speak.
	I got him to sign the book.
	I read it.
	So, you know, you guys probably aren't interested in this.
	So I was all in on this issue.
	But on the other side, I was on the neocon side.
	And I will go to Speech Team, and I will go to Model UN, and I would make the case.
	Everything that Destiny said, I would make those arguments.
	And I would say, you know, Obama needs to do more to support Ukraine.
	He's sending them non-lethal aid, hamburgers and blankets.
	They need guns, they need fighter jets, you know, they need all this.
	And I said, you know, we need to create a tripwire in Ukraine because if Putin invades, that's gonna signal to the rest of the world and the rogue states that, you know, America doesn't defend democracy and all this crap.
	I was eight years ago, you know?
	But so I know this issue inside and out.
	I know that side.
	I know my side.
	I know every angle.
	And so I said last week it was going to be a slaughter because I just know my stuff here and destiny just doesn't.
	You know, I was watching his streams.
	I'm not gonna do the whole... I mean, I basically said all of this last week, but I'll just reiterate.
	You know, I watched his streams leading up to the debate, and he just does not have any command over the history.
	You know, I'm friendly with him.
	We had a friendly debate.
	We had a friendly discussion, actually, last night.
	But he just doesn't have the breadth of knowledge here.
	You know, he doesn't know the players, he doesn't know the theory, he doesn't know the history here.
	He just doesn't get it.
	Like, he doesn't know the Cuban Missile Crisis, okay?
	He doesn't know the Monroe Doctrine, he doesn't know... he just doesn't know.
	And you don't know what you don't know.
	So we do the debate on Friday, and it went exactly as I expected.
	It's funny, he does his opening statement, and he doesn't even really make an argument.
	And if you go back and watch the debate he does this and you know I may at some point I think I may actually tomorrow or at some point this week I may go back and watch a debate and do a commentary stream on the debate itself and go over everything because I really I want to go over it precisely and in a very surgical way.
	Because when you're in a debate you kind of miss certain things and you have to be strategic and stuff.
	But he does this opening statement and he really doesn't even put forward an argument.
	The topic is, it's about Russia's incursion into Ukraine.
	Is it justified?
	What's the story here?
	Why is it happening?
	Whose fault is it?
	In his opening statement, he doesn't even really make a positive claim.
	He doesn't even make a positive proposition.
	He just says, you know, Nick might tell you this.
	He might say this.
	And he almost, he tries to preempt a lot of the pro-Russian arguments.
	Like that Russia is trying to denazify Ukraine.
	Or that Russia is this bulwark of Western values.
	Or, you know, a lot of, he tries to preempt like every argument.
	And it takes a sort of superficial survey of every pro-Russian argument that maybe he's seen on the internet.
	And it was funny because I'm listening to the opening statement.
	And I'm thinking like, it's not covering anything that I prepared.
	I mean, nothing in his opening statement even addresses my core argument, which is about NATO enlargement, about theater support missiles, about all this kind of stuff.
	And so he does this whole opening statement, and then at the very end he says, you know, the issue is that Russia has invaded Ukraine and violated their sovereignty, And, you know, Ukraine wants to join NATO.
	So, you know, 95% of his opening statement is trying to preempt arguments that I wasn't even going to make.
	And then the final 5 or 10%, the core of his argument, there's two parts to it, it's something like this.
	Russia violated Ukraine's sovereignty and nothing can justify that.
	That's one part of it, and then the other part is, if you're going to argue that NATO expansion is a threat to Russia, well, the reason that that's not the case is because Ukraine chose NATO expansion, and if Ukraine was in Russia's sphere of influence, well, that's not consensual.
	So, to put those two together, it would be something like this.
	It would be like, well, you know, you have to consider the plight of the Ukrainians.
	They want NATO membership, and you can't put Russia's security interest ahead of Ukraine's security interest, and Ukraine's security interest is they want NATO membership.
	So I guess it's actually a three-parter.
	And then it says on top of that, you know, therefore nothing justifies the Russian invasion.
	So there's kind of like three... I guess there's really three pieces.
	It's something like this.
	Even though you may argue that NATO expansion could threaten Russia, you can't prioritize Russia's security over Ukraine's security.
	Ukraine chose NATO over Russia.
	And lastly, nothing justifies the Russian invasion.
	And so that's really the thesis, but he doesn't really back this up.
	He also says, and this is also kind of ancillary, he says the real thing that Russia desires is revanchism.
	And what revanchism means is a desire to restore a country's lost lands or territory or people or something like that.
	So...
	You know, and this is sort of the background of that three-part argument is, well, Russia's not really concerned about security.
	The things that Russia says it's concerned about are not its real concerns.
	What's really going on here is that Putin is a dictator, and he is power-hungry, and he's hungry for territory, and he's trying to rebuild a dead empire.
	So that's sort of the... that's really the background of the whole argument.
	But it's not supported.
	Throughout the entire debate, none of this is really supported, and so that's a destiny argument.
	My argument on Friday is something like this.
	We have a crisis.
	This is not desirable for anybody.
	The crisis that is ongoing is not desirable for the United States, it's not desirable for Ukraine, and it's not desirable for Russia.
	How did we get here?
	You know, we can argue about what ought to be, or what should be, or what is right and what is wrong, but what is real is that people are dying, and buildings are being destroyed, and there's war going on, and we are on the brink of a great power nuclear conflict, which has never happened before.
	We've been on the brink before, but it's never actually happened, but it seems like we're closer now maybe than ever.
	So, whose fault is it?
	How did we get here?
	And what is our responsibility?
	What is the responsibility of the United States?
	And I make the case that there is a pattern of behavior over 30 years, since the end of the Cold War, where the United States has expanded its power and expanded its dominion at the expense of the security interests of other nations, in particular Russia.
	That the United States is not a benign hegemon.
	It is a global hegemon with lots of power, more power than any other country in the world by far, and maybe more power than every country in the world put together.
	And if we want to have a stable world order, we have to have balance.
	And in order to have balance, we have to allow other great powers and other countries to exert a reasonable sphere of influence and pursue a reasonable security policy.
	I said, and part of that would be, we have to stop expanding NATO.
	Putin's demands are not unreasonable.
	We should have acceded to them.
	We didn't, now there's a crisis, but there's still time to neutralize the situation.
	And that was really my counter-argument, which I supported, I think, at length with historical examples and numbers and, you know, it's funny, I go into the Destiny community, I go onto their subreddit, I go onto Destiny's upload on YouTube, and everybody in the comments section is saying, you know, oh, Nick was looping, Nick was saying the same things over and over.
	And it's true.
	But all the Destiny sub-community, they all remembered what I said.
	I mean, that's really the point.
	I'm not...this isn't debate team.
	This isn't a technical debate where everybody hears every argument and everybody is doing a technical analysis of every argument and every warrant and every claim.
	I kept repeating, look, NATO spends $1.2 trillion, Russia spends $65 billion.
	Now the Destiny sub-community, they kept hitting me for this.
	They're saying, oh he kept looping that.
	He kept saying that over and over.
	He kept saying, you know, NATO spends all this and Russia only spends this.
	He kept saying that NATO is a counter-Russian alliance.
	And I wanted to impress those two points because When you consider those two facts in particular, it really changes your whole understanding of the conflict.
	Because how could you contend that Russia is this aggressive empire, you know, they're the belligerent, they're the problem, when they are so small and so powerless compared to the entire NATO alliance?
	I mean, how could any serious person portray Russia as this?
	Because look at the media coverage.
	To your average simpleton, your average normie who knows nothing, they think this is the new Soviet Union.
	They think that Putin is Joseph Stalin.
	They think that he's the arch-villain, he's the big bad guy, he's the big evil supervillain that's invading its neighbors and trying to end the world because they're greedy and so on.
	And impressing those two facts destroys that narrative.
	The big bad guy, you know, the big evil warlord, yeah, his military is a fraction of a fraction of the size of the NATO alliances.
	Why does that matter?
	The NATO alliance was built to counter Russia!
	So how can you argue that it's Russian aggression?
	When the counter-Russian alliance is more than 10 times bigger and expanding to 13 countries in a span of 20 years.
	Who's the aggressor here?
	Who's the belligerent?
	Who's the threat?
	Who's the revanchist?
	It's not Russia.
	Anyway, so I impressed those two facts in particular, but I also talked a lot about missiles.
	And this is something that I hadn't really talked about on the show last week, but this is another important thing.
	Missile systems are a huge part, you know, maybe the central part of military doctrine in the nuclear age.
	Specifically in the ICBM age, because it's really, I guess you could separate it, you have the introduction of the A-bomb in World War II, and then you have the H-bomb in the 1950s, and then you have the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles, which means you've got these missiles that are extremely long-range, With a miniaturized warhead, and they could be launched from the sea, the air, or from land, and they could hit a country on another continent and inflict devastating damage.
	So now the military doctrine and the balance of power is not so much about tanks, obviously, and guns and planes and bullets and conventional means.
	It's about missiles.
	And the point that I made, and this is really crucial to understanding how America is provoking Russia, how they're undermining Russia's security, look at the big picture.
	Look at the pattern of behavior over 20 years.
	And I made the case that In 2001, the United States pulls out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.
	So in 1973, I believe, Richard Nixon and Leonid Brezhnev, they formed the ABM Treaty and they put a moratorium on the development of anti-ballistic missile systems.
	What is an anti-ballistic missile system?
	The United States and the Soviet Union at the time, you know, they had amassed these giant stockpiles of nuclear warheads and ICBMs and they were engaged in an arms race.
	And people, you know, there's really, there's actually a lot to unpack here.
	It's a really complicated subject and I actually regret this a little bit.
	I maybe should have laid this out more in the debate or maybe before the debate.
	It was almost tough to have a real conversation because you could tell that the audience and Destiny don't actually understand the theory behind nuclear doctrine and balance of power in the nuclear age.
	Because there's a lot to it that isn't very intuitive and maybe isn't obvious at first glance.
	You know, because people would say something like, well why would the United States have a thousand nuclear warheads?
	That's more than enough to destroy the entire world.
	So why would you need like three or four times as many missiles as would be required to end the world?
	And that's because, you know, the missiles aren't always accurate, and maybe some of them fail, and of course, you know, the idea is that if the Soviet Union triggered a first strike against the United States, where would the Soviet Union launch their missiles at?
	Well, the Soviet Union would launch their missiles at our missiles, so that we couldn't use our missiles to retaliate.
	So, the United States, in order to hedge, you know, and this is a concept in international relations that is sort of central, it's called the security dilemma, insofar as the Soviet Union has nuclear weapons, they have the capability to strike America first.
	They have the capability to hit America with nuclear bombs.
	How do you hedge against that?
	You know, if that is the case, if that security posture exists, we're vulnerable.
	How do you protect against that?
	Well, the United States has to develop enough nuclear missiles that if the Soviet Union hits our nuclear missiles, we'll have enough that we can hit them back and retaliate.
	And so, nuclear retaliation is kind of at the heart of defending against nuclear weapons.
	Insofar as two countries have nuclear weapons, each country knows that the other can launch nuclear weapons at the other.
	You know, if the Soviet Union has nuclear weapons, they can drop nuclear bombs on our population and destroy our country.
	That's an unacceptable security posture, so we have to have nukes.
	Well, if we both have nukes, then we both know that we can hit each other with nukes.
	And if we both have nukes, where would we drop those nukes?
	We drop them on the other country's nukes, so that they couldn't hit us.
	So both countries are developing lots of nukes so that if the other side hits the other, well then they'll always have more.
	Then you get the nuclear triad where they have various means of launching them.
	They've got nuclear submarines, nuclear warheads that could be dropped from planes, nuclear-tipped missiles.
	So that in the event that, let's say, the Soviet Union destroys all our airfields and all our missile silos, we can still launch them from our submarines, which are always moving and the locations are unknowable, right?
	And vice versa.
	So that's a very important concept in understanding how do you have a stable world order?
	How do you have peace in the nuclear age?
	How is it that many countries can have large nuclear arsenals without war breaking out?
	Because understand, the very existence of nuclear weapons creates instability.
	That any country has a nuclear bomb, that any country has a nuclear capability, threatens all the other countries.
	And creates an unacceptable security risk.
	So, it's actually a very tenuous and a very delicate thing that we even have peace, that we even have confidence between the nuclear powers.
	And that confidence and that peace, it's built on this understanding, it's built on this psychological concept, this theory, Of Mutually Assured Destruction.
	And Mutually Assured Destruction, what that means is that every nuclear power has to be confident that the world would end if nuclear weapons are used.
	That if we launch them against another nuclear power, they would retaliate and it would be a losing prospect for any country to initiate the use of nuclear weapons.
	That's how you have peace.
	Because otherwise, countries could not accept.
	And that's another thing in international relations, is the idea, you know, Destiny kept repeating, he kept saying, well, NATO's a defensive alliance, they've never invaded Russia, and they never probably will.
	And that is maybe true.
	You know, you may believe that NATO, it is unlikely that they will invade Russia, but that's all that you could really say.
	And that's kind of another concept is that, you know, and I said this on the show today and I said this on Friday, the existence of an offensive capability in itself presents a theoretical threat.
	That the United States possesses the nuclear weapons, that NATO possesses a $1.3 trillion per year military, the capability that they have, that kind of firepower, presents a threat.
unidentified		Why?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Because all it would take is a discretionary choice by the leadership in DC for them to win a war against Russia.
		And so understand, if you're Russia, if you're any country for that matter, the existence of an offensive capability in another country without an equal or, you know, without defensive parity, that presents a risk to the security of your country.
		The only thing that's stopping NATO from invading Russia, if we say that NATO will probably not invade them, is this very sort of flimsy, like, You know, this very flimsy assumption.
		And I said this in the debate, it's not sufficient.
		It's not adequate to say NATO probably won't invade Russia today.
		Because, of course, NATO could invade Russia tomorrow, or the next day, or ten years from now.
		And that's the thing, is they always can.
		It's the capability to do that that creates a security risk.
		So, what countries have to do is create a balance.
		So if NATO has certain offensive capability, Russia needs some way to match that.
		So how do they match it?
		Well, weaker countries can develop a nuclear arsenal.
		Right?
		If we're talking about conventional capabilities, non-nuclear capabilities, countries can develop cheaper defensive capabilities that can match the more expensive offensive capabilities of the other country.
		And this is where we get into missiles.
		So, as an example, in 1973, and we'll get into the ABM thing, and I guess we'll sort of circle back to this concept.
		So in 1973, back to the ABM thing, Richard Nixon and Leonid Brezhnev, the General Secretary of the Soviet Union, they signed a treaty on anti-ballistic missile systems.
		And what's happening in the 60s and 70s is that the Soviet Union and America are building up their stockpiles of warheads and of missiles, In an arms race, and that's why I explained the concept of mutually assured destruction and the sort of nuclear thinking, there's an arms race.
		They're building up because both sides are distrustful of one another and they need to know, again, that they can retaliate.
		Well, in the 60s and 70s, both countries start to look into anti-ballistic missiles, which are missiles that shoot down missiles.
		And they're looking into the capability to create basically an umbrella Of protection.
		Where, you know, hypothetically the Soviet Union launches an ICBM at the United States, and then an anti-ballistic missile system will shoot down those ballistic missiles.
		And then the United States can launch missiles at the Soviet Union and retaliate.
		Or, theoretically, you know, if the United States builds an ABM shield around itself, it can launch strikes at Russia without Russia being able to retaliate.
		And understand, the ABM shield, it's counterintuitive.
		Most people would think, oh, you know, there's technology where we could shoot nuclear missiles out of the sky.
		Wouldn't we want to pursue something like that?
		Wouldn't we want to protect ourselves from nuclear weapons?
		The answer, counterintuitively, is no.
		We do not want to protect ourselves from nuclear weapons.
		And that has a lot to do with the balance and the concept of mutually assured destruction.
		Because if the United States is protected from ICBMs, if it's protected from a first strike or a retaliatory strike, then there is no deterrent from the United States initiating the use of nuclear weapons.
		It actually makes the world less safe.
		Because if the United States develops an ABM shield, and if the Soviet Union develops an ABM shield, and if China develops an ABM shield, well then there's really, you know, now nuclear weapons are sort of back on the table.
		Because then if we say hypothetically, hmm, you know, let's say in a theoretical scenario, the United States says, you know, well, hostilities between us and the Soviet Union have reached a boiling point, we think that we could destroy their ABM shield, we could destroy their anti-ballistic missile system, and then the Soviet Union will be vulnerable to a nuclear attack.
		We can nuke the Soviet Union, we can nuke their ABM sites, we can nuke their nuclear weapons, we can nuke their population centers and their industry, and even if they have nuclear submarines that could launch nukes at us, our ABM shield will knock all of that out of the sky.
		Now nuclear weapons are back on the table as As a sort of, you know, functional tool of war.
		It's not something any longer that we could say confidently would result in our own destruction, like we could if we didn't have an ABM shield.
		So, the military doctrine of the United States ever since that treaty passed was not to protect ourselves.
		Was to say we will not develop a capability to shoot down nuclear weapons.
		What underlies U.S.
		security is the retaliatory capability.
		We're not going to shoot nukes out of the sky, but if you nuke us, we will destroy your country.
		And if every country has that policy, then nobody will be using nuclear weapons.
		That's the bedrock.
		Since 1973, that is the bedrock of world peace.
		That is why great powers do not go to war.
		That is why great powers do not use nuclear weapons against each other.
		It is because of retaliation.
		It is because of mutually assured destruction.
		It is built on the 1973 ABM Treaty that says countries will not develop an anti-ballistic missile system.
		So, in 1991, the Soviet Union dissolves, and it is weakened dramatically.
		Its conventional military capability is destroyed, its economy is destroyed, the territory shrinks, the population shrinks, it's a disaster.
		In 2001, Russia is still a very weak country, and all the Soviet satellites are amputated from Russia.
		In 2001, the United States pulls out of the ABM Treaty and the United States begins to research and develop an anti-ballistic missile system.
		And I said this is part of a pattern of behavior here.
		This is a very provocative thing to do.
		This is an incredibly destabilizing thing to do.
		And who initiated it?
		The United States.
		And Destiny countered and he said, well, you know, the United States pulled out of that treaty because China was not a signatory on the treaty, and China is developing an ABM, and China's nuclear power.
		He said also North Korea has a nuclear arsenal, and Iran is developing a nuclear arsenal, and at the time we thought Iraq was developing a nuclear arsenal.
		So the argument goes from the foreign policy establishment in Washington that, you know, Russia shouldn't be too concerned about this because, well, we're only building an ABM system to counter Iranian missiles.
		And we're only pulling out of the treaty because it's insufficient, because China hasn't signed on to it, so therefore China could develop an ABM shield.
	So, we're investing into an ABM shield to counter Iran and maybe China.
	The problem with that logic though, and this is what I said in the debate, is that the ABM system that's being deployed to Europe does not discriminate against Iranian or Russian missiles.
	It shoots down missiles.
	So you're building an ABM system in Alaska, you're building an ABM system in Eastern Europe, you've got an ABM system in the Arctic Ocean, And you're building an ABM circle around Russia.
	And you could say, well, it's for Iran.
	It doesn't matter what you say it's for.
	The systems aren't programmed to only shoot down Iranian missiles.
	They can't recognize missiles.
	They just shoot down missiles.
	So once again, the capability would theoretically then exist for them to shoot down Russian missiles.
	And again, Now, the nuclear doctrine has fundamentally changed, and it's no longer based on retaliation and mutually assured destruction.
	Now it's based on this umbrella of protection concept.
	And again, they could say it's for one thing, they could say it's for another thing, it doesn't matter.
	And it does destabilize The ABM Treaty peace and the confidence that other nuclear powers have that other nuclear powers will not initiate a first strike.
	I mean that's really the foundations of the thinking on nuclear strategy is the ability to initiate a first strike and survive.
	Theoretically, if the United States is successful and develops an ABM shield, and they deploy it around Russia, they could say it's for Iran, they would have the capability to strike Russia, and Russia would not be able to retaliate, theoretically.
	And that's unacceptable.
	Because of course, now Russia, they go from, you know, before 2001, they know that if America hits them, Russia could hit them back, And it's game over for everybody.
	So America, we can have confidence based on what we know about people.
	America would not destroy itself, so they will probably not destroy Russia.
	And Russia could then have confidence that there will be no first strike.
	Not just trust, not just an assumption.
	You know, America probably won't.
	Not likelihood, not probability, not trust, not words.
	They can have confidence.
	They can be assured.
	That America won't strike Russia because America will then be destroyed.
	If, after the ABM Treaty is toast, America would not be destroyed if they initiated a first strike, there's no longer that assurance, there's no longer confidence, and now Russia is thinking about, we're going to be destroyed.
	So what does Russia do?
	America pulls out of the ABM Treaty.
	This destabilizes and upsets the entire nuclear order.
	And so the next day, Putin goes out and says, we will be forced to develop hypersonic capabilities.
	So Russia then begins to develop a hypersonic missile system.
	What's the significance of hypersonic?
	You know, maybe you've read about this or heard about this.
	The idea behind a hypersonic missile, hypersonic meaning faster than the speed of sound, is that these missiles are unstoppable.
	So if America's going to develop a system that shoots down missiles, Russia says, okay, we'll develop a missile that is so fast, you can't stop it.
	And what has been initiated, thus, is an arms race.
	Now America is racing to develop an ABM shield, and now Russia is racing to develop these offensive capabilities that can pierce the ABM shield.
	So now Russia is investing in hypersonic missiles, hypersonic gliders, and these other more sophisticated kinds of missiles, and I'll add, that are far cheaper.
	It just so happens that the ABM shield doesn't work.
	There is no anti-ballistic missile system that works in any reliable way.
	These ABM shields, they shoot down about half of the missiles that are launched.
	And when they conduct tests on the systems, and when they conduct the tests, the ABM system knows where the missiles are going to be, when they're fired, where they're fired from, the missiles are launched in the daytime, so they can see them, and even then they only shoot down half of them.
	There was only one test conducted at night and the ABM didn't shoot down any of the missiles.
	So the ABM shield is extremely expensive and it doesn't work.
	Nevertheless, that we're even investing into it, Russia doesn't know what our capability is, that we're investing into it is enough to destabilize the current order.
	On the other hand, the hypersonic missiles are very cheap and they work.
	They're precise, They work, and they're cheap.
	And Russia and China are further along on those technologies than even the United States is.
	And so this is just an example of, you know, trying to understand the things that the United States is doing that are provoking Russia.
	And again, and this gets to the heart of the conversation, you know, throughout the debate I'm saying, look, the United States is doing these things which are very provocative.
	To pull out of the ABM Treaty is extremely provocative, it's destabilizing, it upsets the order, it disrupts Russia's security, It is causing them to invest in more sophisticated missiles, it's causing an arms race, and this is just sort of hand-waved away.
	And, you know, the NATO side and the pro-America side and the neocons, they sort of hand-wave that away and they say, well, the ABM doesn't work.
	Well, the ABM doesn't even work.
unidentified		True.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, we only pulled out of the ABM to shoot down Iranian missiles, so it's not a big deal.
		That's what they say.
		Or they'll hand wave it away and they'll say, well, the United States would never launch a nuclear strike on Russia, so it's no big deal.
		But the problem with that thinking is, just like with Ukraine, it does not consider the security interests of Russia.
		Yeah, it's easy to say that when you're in America.
		You know, you feel a lot better about these things when you're in the country that has those capabilities, you know?
		It's easy as an American to say, yeah, you know, America probably won't nuke you today.
		Oh, well, the ABM shield doesn't even really work.
		Oh, well, we're not going to shoot down your missiles.
		It's like, okay, but again, what is that doing for Russia?
		You can say all of that.
		But that does nothing to reassure Russia.
		Russia can have no confidence in this.
		Oh, America won't first strike you?
		Well, that promise and that assumption and that likelihood gets you nothing.
		It means nothing.
		Is that good enough if you're Russia?
		If you're a Russian citizen, and you look up at the sky, and you know that an American nuclear missile can fall out of the sky and land on you and kill everybody in a 10-mile radius, is it good enough for you to just say, like, well, you know, that probably won't happen?
		Well, they said that they, you know, wouldn't shoot down our missiles.
		Well, I don't think it really works.
		That's not good enough.
		When we're talking about a country of 150 million people, when we're talking about a country with a $3 trillion GDP, we're talking about a great power, and we're talking about a state apparatus.
		They need assurances.
		They need confidence.
		And these kinds of assumptions about the West's goodwill, and assumptions about the West's real capabilities, It's just not sufficient for a country to be confident in their security posture.
		You would be far more confident as Russia to say, well, America won't strike us because our hypersonic missiles pierced their ABM shield.
		You know, think about it.
		If you're the Russian President, and your job is to keep your people safe, would you prefer to say, well, the United States' ABM shield doesn't work, and they probably won't strike us, and it's for Iranian missiles anyway, or would you prefer to say, it doesn't matter if the Americans have an ABM shield, we have a missile that will pierce anything, we have an unstoppable missile, and no matter what happens, if the US initiates a first strike, they will be destroyed.
		Which would you prefer?
		And honestly...
		One of those, the latter, is an obligation.
		You, if you're the President of Russia, you have an obligation to do the second thing.
		That's the only, frankly, that's the only responsible thing to do.
		That's the only responsible security policy.
		If you're not doing anything and everything to ensure that you have parity, defensive parity, or offensive parity with the other side's capabilities, if you're not doing that, you're not doing your job as President.
		So in a sense, Putin has to do that.
		If the U.S.
		pulls out of the ABM Treaty, Putin has to develop hypersonic missiles.
		Nothing personal.
		We don't... Russia doesn't hate the West.
		He doesn't want to kill everybody.
		He's not evil.
		But he has to develop a capability that can restore the nuclear balance.
		And he can equally say, well, I'm not going to use them against America.
		And that means just as much as America saying we won't use our missiles against Russia.
		We won't shoot down Russian missiles with our ABM shield.
		It means just as much.
		But that was only part of the argument.
		That gives you an idea about the psychology here.
		It's got nothing to do with antipathy or hatred or greed.
		It's about security.
		It's about confidence.
		It's about balance.
		And it's about perspective as well.
		And you start to see some of the problems in the NATO position.
		They have no sense for the Russian perspective.
		Again, I agree in the sense that will NATO invade Russia?
		Probably not.
		Will the West succeed in building their ABM shield?
		I mean, not anytime soon, and it's not done now.
		But again, what assurance does that give to Russia?
		We have been adversaries with Russia since 1945.
		And there has been distrust, and there has been subterfuge and deception for 70 years.
		And so what good does that do for Russia?
	For us to say, hey, we promise we're not going to destroy you, even though we can.
	It's not good enough.
	They need to have more.
	They need to have a better assurance.
	And that gives you an idea of the mentality.
	But the other thing is to demonstrate this pattern of behavior that America does these kinds of things where, is it better for us to build an ABM shield?
	In a selfish way and in a short-sighted way, you know, yes, potentially.
	In the long term, it's going to backfire.
	But yeah, we're building this ABM shield, but we're doing it without regard to anybody else's interest.
	There's this blind side that we have.
	And it's part of this pattern of behavior.
	But then let's fast forward to the other argument, which is about NATO enlargement.
	You know, the crux of the issue, obviously, about this whole Ukrainian war is that Russia is being provoked into invading Ukraine.
	And how are they being provoked?
	With NATO expansion.
	Over the past 20 years, NATO has expanded into 13 different countries since the enlargement process was initiated in 1997.
	There were three major waves of NATO expansion in 1999, 2004, and 2009.
	And with the NATO expansion into all these Eastern European countries, they're expanding into formerly neutral countries, into formerly Warsaw Pact countries, into countries that are formerly part of Russia.
	And since 2008, Russia has said it's a red line for Ukraine and Georgia to be made members of NATO.
	Nevertheless, NATO keeps pushing for them to be a part of NATO.
	And in 2014, there's a coup in Ukraine.
	They overthrow the government.
	It's backed by the West, and people can dispute that, but there's evidence that suggests that the Western intelligence agencies were involved.
	And the Ukrainian government is overthrown and a new government is installed that wants Ukraine to join NATO.
	So Russia moves in and they invade Crimea to secure their naval base on the Black Sea and they back the separatists in Donbass because it's a stipulation that in order to join NATO you can't have any kind of civil disorder.
	So by fueling the civil war in Donbass this is preventing Ukraine from advancing towards NATO membership.
	And in a sense, in 2014, NATO pushes across the red line.
	You know, Putin lays down the red line in 2008 and says Ukraine is not joining NATO.
	And in 2014, that red line is crossed.
	And they say, well, we don't care.
	We're going to overthrow the government and put Ukraine and NATO anyway.
	And Putin pushes them right back and says, no you're not because I'm going to invade Crimea and I'm going to fuel a civil war and that will preclude Ukraine from joining NATO.
	You thought you were going to get away with this?
	You thought you were going to push past my red line and make Ukraine part of NATO?
	I don't think so.
	Not so fast.
	And understand, The provocation came from the West.
	Putin said in 2008, Ukraine is not going to join NATO.
	And for six years, the West pushes.
	They fund the Ukrainian opposition.
	The National Endowment for Democracy is behind this.
	They're pushing propaganda since at least 2010.
	And they do not accept Russia's position for six years.
	And after six years in 2014, they step over the red line.
	They overthrow the government.
	They don't win an election.
	The Ukrainian people didn't vote in a referendum.
	They didn't elect a leader.
	It was a Western-backed, violent coup.
	And they install a leader who's going to give them what they want.
	They decisively and And understand too, Ukraine is part of Russia.
	It has been a part of Russia for 300 years and it is in Russia's neighborhood.
	This is on the border with Russia.
	Russia has a military base in Crimea.
	It's on the Black Sea.
	It is of vital strategic importance to Russia.
	So they cross this red line and this is something that really is not even important to the NATO security posture or, you know, that's not even to say the American security posture, but it is for Russia.
	So they cross this red line in a way that is so belligerent and in a way that is so offensive and really for no good reason.
	It's not like they invaded Ukraine because this mattered so much.
	They pushed into Ukraine just because they thought they could do anything.
	We saw that Putin drew a red line and we said, you know what, we don't care.
unidentified		Eh, we don't care.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And for no good reason.
		We pushed in because we never take no for an answer and we never respect other countries.
		We just want it all.
		And again, no good reason.
		Just because every country has to be part of NATO.
		We have to have every country.
		And you don't want us there?
		Well, that just makes us want to be there even more.
		And Putin says, yeah, not so fast.
		I'm willing to go further than you.
		You want to overthrow the government?
		Okay, I'll invade Crimea and I'll fuel the separatists.
		So, now you can't join NATO.
		What are you going to do now?
		What does the West do?
		Does the West say, oh, you know what?
		We pushed too far.
		Does NATO say, alright, you know what?
		Let's back off.
		You know what?
		We made a mistake.
		It's not going to happen.
		And they should have done that because, by the way, it can't happen.
		Insofar as that civil war is ongoing, and insofar as Crimea is disputed, Ukraine cannot join NATO.
		It's just not in the cards.
		And Russia's not moving out of Crimea anytime soon, and Russia's not going to stop the civil war anytime soon because Russia drew a red line.
		They said it's unacceptable.
		It's black and white, no ifs, ands, or buts.
		Ukraine cannot join NATO.
		So, Ukraine cannot join NATO under the current situation, and the current situation is not going to change.
		Russia's not going to give up Crimea.
		It's just not going to happen.
		And Russia's not going to stop fueling the civil war in Donbass.
		And so does NATO say, you know what?
		Not worth it.
		Let's pack it up.
		We tried.
		Clearly, you know, it's not going to happen.
		No!
		They keep pushing!
		And so they start giving money now to the Poroshenko government.
		You know, they install the Western-backed leader, Poroshenko, and they bring in these Galician neo-Nazis who now head up the security forces, the military, and they occupy important positions in the government.
		And they keep pushing.
		And so now the United States is fueling the civil war on the other side.
		So now you have a proxy war between Kiev and Donbass with Kiev backed by the West and Donbass backed by Russia.
		And what the West does is they embolden the Ukrainian leadership.
		And so the Ukrainian leadership says, you know what?
		I've got NATO behind me.
		I've got America behind me.
		I can do it.
		I can challenge Russia.
		I can stand up to Russia.
		So Russia is, they're not as powerful as NATO, but they're vastly more powerful than Ukraine.
		But Ukraine thinks that the West will do anything to defend them.
		So now Ukraine says, you know what, I'm not scared of you, Russia.
		I'll use drones against Donbass, and I'll talk about, and this is the precipitating factor, Zelensky, who was recently elected in Ukraine, another Western-backed leader, he signs an agreement with the United States bolstering their diplomatic relationship.
		Zelensky threatens to rearm Ukraine with nuclear weapons.
		The United States and the British are sailing destroyers and flying planes right up against the disputed territory in Crimea and Donbass.
		So, you know, Russia intervenes and says, you know, not so fast, you're not crossing my red line, and the United States and NATO walk right up to the red line and say, oh yeah?
		Well, we'll see who can draw red lines in the world.
		Only we can say what goes.
		You don't have any say.
		And so finally, Russia invades Ukraine and says, you know what, no more fucking around.
		Ukraine's not going to get a nuclear weapon.
	They're not going to join NATO.
	They're not going to militarize on our border.
	You're not going to be, you know, launching Turkish drone strikes on the Russian border.
	It's just not going to happen.
	You're not going to challenge our territory in the Black Sea.
	And so Russia invades.
	And then when Russia invades, oh, bloody murder.
	You know, NATO and America cry out and it's all in the media and they say, oh my, this is the worst thing that's ever happened.
	He's a war criminal.
	He's a murderer.
	He invaded them for no good reason.
	It's just like the Soviets.
	It's just like Hungary in 56.
	It's just like Prague in 68.
	This is what the Russians always do.
	He just wants to rebuild his empire.
	He's just greedy.
	He's just a dictator.
	So once again, just like with the ABM shield, it's about this Western perspective, which is that the West can do no wrong.
	We just wanted to expand NATO.
	We weren't going to use NATO to attack you.
	We just wanted to take NATO.
	We wanted to take Ukraine into NATO.
	And understand that with the NATO membership comes a lot of consequences.
	If Ukraine joins NATO, you know, why is this a red line for Putin?
	Why is this a legitimate security problem for Putin?
	If Ukraine joins NATO, NATO puts a military base in the Black Sea, a naval base.
	If Ukraine joins NATO, NATO can deploy an ABM shield in Ukraine.
	If Ukraine joins NATO, NATO can deploy short-range and intermediate-range nuclear missiles in Ukraine.
	They can deploy hypersonic missiles in Ukraine that can reach Moscow in five minutes that are unstoppable.
	So in short, you know, once again going back to this idea of balance and security, if Ukraine joins NATO, NATO has a dagger at the throat of Moscow with ABM, with short-range missiles, theater support missiles, and with the naval base in Sevastopol.
	No question.
	No question.
	This puts Russia in a completely indefensible situation because if you look at a map of Eastern Europe, the Baltic states are a part of NATO.
	Poland is a part of NATO.
	If Ukraine is a part of NATO, you've got Belarus sticking out.
	That's an indefensible protrusion.
	And you've got the Kaliningrad Expost.
	In a hypothetical war, you would, and also then you have Turkey in the south as well, in a hypothetical war, you have got an indefensible border from St.
	Petersburg in the north all the way down through to the Caucasus for Russia.
	You've got a NATO attack, which, I mean, they would quickly take over Belarus, and so you've got the entire northern European plain.
	All the way from St.
	Petersburg down to the Caucasus to defend.
	You've got a NATO assault coming from the Black Sea.
	You've got missiles, theater support missiles coming from Ukraine.
	Belarus is wiped away.
	I mean, you've got troops basically right there on the border of St.
	Petersburg, Moscow, of Volgograd.
	I mean, it's over before it even begins.
	And so Russia's put in a completely indefensible posture in both conventional and nuclear means, if all of this is completed.
	With Ukraine under the control of NATO, they could not win a conventional war, they could not win a nuclear war.
	They put up an ABM shield to shoot down the nuclear missiles, and they can launch missiles just as easily, and a full-on naval assault, and a land assault, and an aerial assault, and it's over.
	And the only argument that comes from the other side is like, oh well, but NATO wouldn't do that.
	Well, NATO wouldn't do that.
	Really?
	And the reason that people compare it to Mexico, like what if Russia had an alliance with Mexico, is because the thought of Mexico having Russian nuclear missiles, and having a Russian naval base in the Gulf of Mexico, and having the entire southern border have to be defended against a potential peer competitor, it would just be unthinkable.
	And then imagine if Russia was 13 times more powerful than the United States.
	Right, or 20 times more powerful than the United States.
	That would be the equivalent.
	What if Russia were 20 times more powerful, and Mexico was in a defensive alliance with Russia, and Russia had their ICBMs, or I should say short and intermediate range missiles, and an anti-ballistic missile shield, and they had a naval base in Mexico.
	It would be unthinkable.
	And the Russians could say, oh well we're not going to invade you, but again, Who would be confident in that kind of a promise?
	Nobody would be.
	And that's to illustrate the Russian perspective on this.
	Why was it necessary for them?
	Why was this such a security risk?
	Because between what the United States has done with the missile treaties, this new arms race, what we've done in the Middle East, the expansion of NATO, We are putting Russia in a position where it cannot defend itself, and we have demonstrated no good faith, we have demonstrated no restraint either.
	You know, when we didn't like Gaddafi, we just took him out.
	When we didn't like Assad, we just tried to take him out.
	And it didn't matter who we had to back.
	We backed Al-Qaeda and ISIS.
	We didn't like Saddam Hussein, we took him out.
	So, you've got this pattern of behavior where we don't care about other countries' security, we do whatever we want, we don't follow international law, we depose countries we don't like, we contain countries that we don't like but we can't do anything about yet, and then we're putting Russia in a position where if we wanted to take them out they couldn't stop us.
	That's why Russia invaded Ukraine.
	And on the, you know, on the three major points, you know, destiny says, well, He says that Ukraine's sovereignty is inviolable.
	He also said that sovereignty was conditional.
	When NATO invaded Libya, or I should say when NATO conducted airstrikes and deposed Gaddafi in Libya, So, why was the invasion of Ukraine wrong?
	anarchy for 10 years, Destiny said, "Oh, well, that was justified even though it was a violation of a country's sovereignty because of certain conditions." I said, "Oh, well, so sovereignty is conditional then." He said, "Yeah." I said, "Well, who determines the conditions?" NATO.
	Okay.
	So, why was the invasion of Ukraine wrong?
	Because you can never violate a country's sovereignty unless NATO says it's okay.
	Really?
	So what happens if NATO wants to violate Russia's sovereignty?
	I guess that's okay.
	So that argument doesn't work.
	He says, well, Ukraine WANTS NATO membership, but does not want to be in Russia's sphere of influence.
	Well, I would quibble with that because they had to have a revolution in Kiev for Ukraine to WANT to join NATO.
	Ukraine didn't want to join NATO.
	That's why they had to oust the president.
	That's why they had to overthrow the government and install a new one.
	And then anyway, that fails in the latter argument because the final argument is no country's security can be enhanced at the expense of another's.
	Well, we can surely demonstrate that Ukraine joining NATO, while it may enhance Ukraine's security, clearly comes at a detriment to Russia's security, so it actually doesn't matter what Ukraine wants.
	It cannot enhance its own security at the expense of Russia, which is what joining NATO does.
	So the argument fails on every front.
	And it also fails on the front of if you're going to defend NATO and the United States.
	Well, NATO and the United States have done things that are far less defensible than what Russia is doing in Ukraine now.
	And we could get into a lot of counterexamples.
	We could get into the Saudis' war in Yemen.
	We could get into Israel's war in Palestine and Syria.
	We could get into the Monroe Doctrine and everything that that has entailed for 200 years.
	You know, I mean, there are so many counterexamples with how the United States and NATO has acted in recent years that there just wasn't time to cover that in the debate.
	You know, like, for example, the situation in Yemen.
	So, At about the same time that the Ukraine crisis started, the government in Yemen was overthrown by Shiite rebels backed by Iran.
	Yemen is a country on the Arabian Peninsula, south of Saudi Arabia, west of Oman.
	And this was a vassal state of Saudi Arabia.
	The monarchy in Yemen was overthrown by Iranian rebels.
	Iran and Saudi Arabia are in this sort of cold war in the Middle East.
	They're engaged in multiple proxy wars across the region.
	So Iran backs rebels in Yemen.
	Yemen, the rebels overthrow the Saudi-backed government in Yemen.
	in.
	And what does Saudi Arabia do?
	They launch a brutal invasion of Yemen.
	It's the worst humanitarian disaster in the world.
	And the United States fully supports it.
	We refuel their planes.
	We have American mercenaries there.
	We have American operators there.
	It's not even legal that they are there.
	But what we say is that we're fighting Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula there, even though they don't operate there anymore.
	But so we back what is essentially the same thing.
	You know, Russia invaded Ukraine because Western backed rebels overthrew the government and wanted to extend the Western Empire there.
	So Russia invaded.
	Well the same thing happened in the Arabian Peninsula.
	Yemen was a vassal state of Saudi Arabia.
	The Iranian rebels overthrew the government, so Saudi Arabia invaded and conducted a brutal war.
	And we backed that war.
	And there's no, you know, stand with Yemen against the United States.
	It just doesn't happen.
	You know, Visa and Mastercard don't pull out of Yemen.
	There's no, you know, anything like that.
	Or out of Saudi Arabia, I should say.
	I mean, it's effectively the same situation.
	And then the same thing with Israel.
	What's the argument for why Israel is occupying the West Bank and the Gaza Strip?
	Or the Golan Heights?
	You know, in 1967 there's this Arab-Israeli war.
	And the Israelis not only beat back the Arabs, but they then occupy a greater extent of Palestinian lands than ever before, and they move into the Sinai Peninsula, and they move into the Golan Heights in Syria.
	They eventually relinquish Sinai, but they keep the Golan Heights to this day, and they retain control over those areas in Palestine, and they say, well, we have to control Palestine because if we don't, Palestine will be used to attack Israel.
	And the United States unconditionally supports this since 1967.
unidentified		It's the same thing.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Israel is occupying Jerusalem, West Bank and Gaza Strip and Golan for the same reason that Russia is currently in Ukraine.
		For the same reason.
		And it's not to pass judgment on Israel.
		I'm not trying to, you know, that's not, I'm not making a value statement about Israel's occupation of those territories.
		But it is to say, you know, if in principle you're opposed to these kinds of military operations, well then where's the outrage over Israel?
		Where's the outrage over Saudi Arabia?
		Where's the outrage over Syria?
		I mean that's what we're doing in Syria.
		We tried to back the so-called moderate opposition to Assad and overthrow the government.
		And, you know, Assad is defeating our forces there.
		And so, you know, then we started conducting airstrikes.
		And there was a debate about invading.
		We still have about, you know, what is it?
		Two, 5,000 contractors and other American mercenaries.
		This is what great powers do.
		This is how great powers behave.
		It's not a war crime.
		It's not unprecedented.
		It's not 19th century.
		This is what great powers do.
		They always have, they always will.
		That is how they behave.
		They will pursue their security at any cost and then they will find a pretext to justify it.
		You know?
		And that's all that that is.
		Oh, well, we deposed Gaddafi for reasons.
		You'll always find a reason.
		You know, but it's just this quibbling about, oh, well, your reason's not good enough.
		We took out Gaddafi because, you know, his election wasn't fair enough.
		But Russia invaded Ukraine because they were going to join NATO?
		Well, that's not one of the exceptions that we approve of.
		They're all exceptions and all exceptions are pretext.
		They're all pretense.
		They're all just excuses to go to war to protect vital interest.
		Every time.
		Always.
		That's what it's for.
		So, and like, it's so naive to say otherwise.
		No, no, but our reasons are the good reasons.
		No, there are no good reasons.
		Why are we backing Saudi Arabia's war on Yemen?
		That's, that one's not about democracy.
		You think Saudi Arabia invaded Yemen to establish a fucking democracy?
		They invaded Yemen because it was gonna be a Shia satellite state for Iran.
		That's why.
		And now they're conducting a brutal war that they can't even win!
		And so it's a stalemate because the Saudi military is completely ineffective, and we're fueling this never-ending conflict, and that one's got nothing to do with democracy or, you know, self-determination or anything like that.
		What's the Saudi basis for violating the sovereignty of Yemen?
		There is no basis.
		And they didn't need one because it's not on CNN.
		And it's not on CNN because that's part of the Council on Foreign Relations agenda.
		So how naive do you have to be?
		I mean, are you just stupid?
		I mean, think about it.
		They're seriously going to say, well, I'm really mad about Russia invading Ukraine because they violated the sovereignty of Ukraine and Ukraine has a right to determine if it wants to join NATO.
		That's why I'm mad.
		That's why this is wrong.
		And, you know, TV is covering it.
		And social media is amplifying it because this is the right position.
		Because, you know, there are good people that support democracy.
		Not because it's what the State Department and the intelligence agencies and the National Endowment for Democracy and the NGOs want.
		You know, this isn't agenda-driven.
		This didn't originate in the foreign policy establishment in D.C.
		No, this is just the right thing.
	This is what people want.
	This is all legitimate.
	Okay, so if sovereignty is inviolable, and if self-determination is sacrosanct, then where's the outrage over the Saudi war in Yemen that the United States is funding and providing material support for?
	Because it's the same thing.
	Except there is no pretense about... I mean there's no... Nobody is arguing that Yemen hasn't involved... No one's even talking about it.
	And no one's talking about the war in Yemen because the Council on Foreign Relations supports that war.
	The State Department supports that war.
	The CIA and the Pentagon support that war.
	And you will not see it on CNN because CNN obeys those institutions.
	And you won't see it on social media because big tech obeys those institutions.
	And as a consequence, nobody's talking about it.
	And nobody's talking about it because they weren't fucking told to talk about it because people are ignorant and stupid and they will just go with whatever is on TV.
	But, you know, like, Destiny is making this case of like, oh, you know, people are, you know, people are just mad.
	This is outrage-driven.
	You know, the reason that everybody is upset with Russia, like, Visa and McDonald's left Russia because of popular outrage.
	You know, the people spontaneously noticed what was happening in Ukraine and it was such an outrage, they demanded something be done about it, they held McDonald's accountable, and McDonald's answered to the people.
	As did NBC.
	NBC covered it because the people were hungry for coverage of the war in Ukraine.
	It's like bullshit!
	No.
	No.
	The institutions do not respond to what the people want.
	The people want what the institutions tell them to want.
	The institutions set the agenda, and the media launders the agenda through public opinion, and public opinion feeds it back to the institutions.
	And that is why people cry bloody murder over Russia's invasion in Ukraine, but the American government funds a Saudi's war in Yemen.
	And it's got nothing to do with democracy, it's got nothing to do with self-determination, or the fucking UN, or the UN's laws on war, or any of that.
	And that's realism.
	And that's realism.
	That's understanding how the world works.
	Trust me when I say this.
	You are not making the foreign policy decisions of the United States government.
	Do you think you are?
	You know, and fundamentally that's the conceit of the other side, is they really believe that, you know, some fucking tranny in a ballerina skirt who's drinking soy and playing Valorant, they think that person is making decisions for McDonald's boycotting Russia.
	I mean, that's literally what they think.
	They think that the Pentagon and the State Department and all of that is at the beck and call of some fucking guy with boobs, with pink hair, who is balding, who is complaining about war crimes on Twitter because he saw it on Reddit.
	And like, I can assure you, that is not the direction of how these things are decided.
	It is decisively in the other way.
	No.
	As a matter of fact, the policies are set in Washington.
	The policies are determined in Washington.
	And the policies are determined by think tanks, permanent bureaucrats, and lobbyists.
	It's called the Iron Triangle.
	You've got the interest groups, which are the lobbyists, We have the think tanks.
	And what is a think tank?
	The think tanks draw from Harvard and Yale and MIT.
	The think tanks draw from all the elite academic institutions.
	They pick them out.
	Those are the most prestigious jobs.
	Georgetown and George Mason and Harvard and Yale and all of that.
	The think tanks suck up all the Ivy League, and who are the Ivy League people?
	How do you get into an Ivy League college?
	Legacy.
	How do you get into Ivy League college?
	Well, the Ivy League schools are like 30% Jewish, and they're almost all legacy admissions.
	Or it's, you know, foreign students, right?
	So these are the people that are filling the think tanks.
	And the think tanks are all the best and brightest and they're writing the policy.
	They're doing the research.
	I mean they're creating the picture of the world and of the policy.
	So it's the interest groups which are representing all the richest.
	It's the think tanks which are all the elite academics, Jews, legacy people.
	Legacy people meaning like other people that went to Harvard and Yale.
	So that's like the current elite just reproducing itself.
	And then you've got the bureaucracies.
	Then you've got the agencies and the departments and the executive branch, the bureaucrats that have been there forever, the proper deep state, the Pentagon, officer corps, intelligence agencies.
	They are the ones setting the policy.
	So you get this conglomeration of like, you know, the Atlantic Council, and the Brookings Institute, and like the Council on Foreign Relations, in concert with Raytheon, and Lockheed Martin, and the Pentagon, and the IC, and the State Department, and they are setting a policy about Ukraine.
	And the policy that they set is, well, Ukraine should be a part of NATO.
	And that is good for a number of reasons.
	That is good for American energy.
	That is good for vested American corporate interests.
	It's good for the State Department.
	It's good for the Pentagon.
	The Pentagon wants it because they want to put their missiles there.
	The State Department wants it because they want their embassy there.
	It's democracy, liberal democracy to flourish there.
	And, you know, maybe investors want it because if Ukraine is a part of NATO and there's a thriving liberal democracy, then that means that, you know, Western energy companies can invest in all the shale oil in Ukraine and all the natural gas deposits in the Black Sea and profit from it.
	And they don't have to ship expensive liquefied natural gas to Western Europe to stave them off of Russian natural gas, which is cheaper and comes from a pipeline through Ukraine.
	So they three, this Iron Triangle, comes up with the policy, and then they send over the CIA to kill the people in Maidan, and they send over billions to back the opposition, and they control, they have a monopoly on media, they control the media, they overthrow the government, and then Putin pushes their shit in and says, not so fast, we just invaded Crimea, fuck you.
	And they go, oh, you want to say F you?
	well, you know, we got an answer for you.
	Putin invades.
	And then they rally their troops, you know, the Iron Triangle.
	They rally their troops in the media, and the media sets the tone.
	The narrative comes from the think tanks, right?
	The think tanks write the papers, and they do the research.
	You know, the foreign policy experts, they get interviewed on the shows.
	They write the policy papers, and the experts and the journalists pick it up in the Times and in the Washington Post.
	And then that is fed into the lowest common denominator sources like BuzzFeed and Vox and all the others.
	And then this is what people are guzzling 24-7 because there is no other media.
	So, you know, where are people getting their news about the world?
	CNN and NBC, they're watching the shows, and the shows go to the experts, and the experts all came from Harvard, and so on.
	Okay?
	And they're going to social media.
	And the social media timeline and trending topics and hashtags are curated by big tech.
	And so they're getting a curated timeline, again, of legacy news sources and others.
	And it's all the experts feeding them the narrative.
	And so then everybody is saying, wow, have you heard about this Ukraine thing?
	This is horrible.
	And they're talking amongst themselves.
	And then they're tweeting about it.
	And they're regurgitating it back to the establishment.
	And there's this illusion that it initiated with them.
	Like, well people saw what was happening on TV and they got so mad about it they demanded that action be taken and then the government responded.
	And this is how the Iron Triangle launders its agenda through public opinion.
	That's what launders means.
	Because the Iron Triangle couldn't announce to the people like, hey, we're going to war with Russia.
	Because there's this illusion of a civilian elected government.
	But they can work through the media.
	They can work through the algorithmic curation on social media.
	And brainwash people into believing their position.
	And then the people will, like a feedback, regurgitate that back in elections and on social media.
	And in protests and other astroturf displays of public support.
	And then the elected government will respond to the people and carry out the policy that the Iron Triangle wanted.
	That is how these things work.
	And Russia knows that's how things work.
	China knows that's how it works.
	That's why we've had the same policy for 30 years.
	You know, when I told this to Destiny, I'm like, you know, this is what's going on.
	And he's like, I'm like, look at Obama.
	Obama said he would end the wars and he would close Guantanamo and end the spying and it all went on anyway.
	And Destiny was like, well, maybe Obama got in and thought, wow, I didn't realize how bad things were.
	It's like, You know, they just, they're so naive.
	They think that it's like, they think that these institutions are way more ignorant than they are.
	No, Obama got in there and then he was told like, hey, this is how this stuff works, you know.
	And there was, like in every administration, you know, there's a personnel coup, and just like when the Trump admin So anyway, but and and this is um You know, I mean I'm sort of getting off track but that that's what these liberals believe.
	I mean they think like I don't even know Fundamentally, it's like process oriented You know, I guess they don't really understand the process.
	Like, they really believe, like, oh, my ideas about Ukraine are my own, and they're about ideas.
	Like, it's not about ideas.
	Ukraine is not receiving public support because it's spontaneous, like, consciousness from the people.
	No, people were told to think a certain way by TV, and, you know, the war in Ukraine is not about democracy, you know, like I said.
	If it was, Why would we back Saudi Arabia?
	It's got nothing to do with democracy and if People were spontaneously being aware about these things.
	Hey, they would have stopped the Yemen thing nine years ago, you know, so It's just ridiculous and this you know these this iron triangle is literally gonna get us all killed because Like they just are never stopped.
	There's no oversight.
	There's no accountability.
	They have unlimited resources and You know, these are the sociopaths.
	These are the murderers that are going to get all of us killed ultimately so And you know that's why the Harvey Weinstein and the Jeffrey Epstein thing were so important because Jeffrey Epstein was your bridge between Hollywood and the intelligence agencies.
	Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad agent and he had dealings with Hollywood celebrities and financiers and the British government and other world governments.
	And Harvey Weinstein, too.
	Harvey Weinstein was protected by an outfit which was all former Mossad agents.
	And that demonstrates that, you know, all this pedophile, like, you know, conspiracy stuff that happens in Hollywood and the media, it's inextricably linked with the Iron Triangle.
	It's linked up with intelligence.
	So when we talk about conspiracies, it's like there is a vast network of control happening here.
	It's not like you have these thriving democratic institutions that are all independent and performing separate functions.
	They're all organs of democracy.
	No, they're all, I mean, these are all mechanisms of control of about a thousand people, you know, one to three thousand people in the world that are making all the decisions.
	And they're enforcing their decisions with blackmail, extortion, you know, and other, you know, kinds of punitive things.
	But anyway, so that's... now I'm just totally off track.
	But that was a debate and like I said, I thought it went very well because, I mean, at a certain point he just... in order to justify his position, he was just making these crazy claims like he was saying Yeah, NATO determines when sovereignty can be violated.
	Like, if you say that, you lose the debate.
	I'm sorry, but nothing else matters.
	If you start out by saying, you know, under no circumstances can Russia violate Ukraine's sovereignty, and then later on you say, oh, well, NATO invaded Libya, that was okay because sovereignty is actually conditional.
	Who determines when it can be violated?
	Well, we do, of course.
	Yeah, like you lost.
	And then also he said something like, you know, I said, well, Russia should influence Ukraine because there's nothing wrong with great powers influencing weaker neighbors.
	And he said, well, we don't do that.
	And I said, yeah, we do.
	We do that everywhere.
	And he was like, no, we don't.
	And so if you're asserting that, like, the American government doesn't exert influence in the Western Hemisphere, like in Mexico— I don't even know what to tell you.
	Like, at that point, you just need to read a book or something.
	And then there was one other ridiculous thing.
	Oh, and then he said something like, you know, NATO will never invade Russia.
	When you say things like that, it just shows you don't understand foreign relations at all.
	Well, NATO probably won't invade Russia.
	Okay.
	And, you know, I'm pointing a gun at you.
	I probably won't kill you right now.
	And, you know, I'm sure you feel really good about that, right?
	I have an AR-15 and it's a loaded gun in your mouth.
	I promise I won't kill you.
	I have no reason to.
	You know, that would be like if I put a loaded gun in your mouth and I said, hey, listen, I mean, if I shoot you, I mean, I will go to jail.
	I have no reason to kill you.
	I won't.
	I most likely will not do it.
	And it's true.
	I probably won't do it.
	But like, does that make you feel good?
	Do you feel good about that?
	Do you feel good having a loaded gun in your mouth?
	I have a loaded gun in your mouth, the barrel of a loaded gun in your fucking mouth.
	And I'm like, hey, like, but I promise I most likely would make no sense.
	I'm doing this out of self-defense.
	Why would I pull the trigger?
	I have never done this before.
	I've never done this to anyone before.
	And I've never shot you before.
	Don't you feel good about this?
	Don't you feel fine?
	You know, why would this be a problem for you?
	You know, of course you would say, like, hey, get this loaded gun out of my mouth.
unidentified		It's just obvious.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I know that's a sort of oversimplification, but, like, the point stands.
		If somebody has the capability to utterly destroy you, it really honestly doesn't matter what their intentions are, what they say they're gonna do, it's unacceptable.
		You know?
unidentified		So...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So that's the point.
		And you could make all kinds of convoluted like, well, but that's not quite the same thing.
		The point is, you know, taking Ukraine is a strategic detriment to Russia.
		And you could call it defensive, but for Russia to not have Ukraine is strategically a detriment.
		And it doesn't matter who has it.
		It's just unacceptable for them to be so vulnerable.
		Vulnerability is not acceptable like that.
		I mean, that level of being vulnerable, as the president of Russia, you're not responsible if you allow that.
		And it'd be one thing if he'd nuked Ukraine or he invaded Poland, but we're talking about a special military operation with very limited objectives, which we'll get into tomorrow, because I've already been live for an hour and 40 minutes.
		So, you know what?
		I'll save the news for tomorrow.
		We'll pick this up where I left off tomorrow, because tonight's show I was going to get into Putin's demands, which are extremely reasonable.
		Well, we just don't have time to do that tonight.
		So, I'll have to change the title here.
		And we'll just cover what I was going to cover tonight, tomorrow.
unidentified		Oh, okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, so we're going to move on to the super chats.
		So with that, we will move on to the Super Chats.
		And we'll see what you guys have to say about all of that.
		I am hot, okay?
		I am sweating.
		My shirt is wet.
		My ass is wet.
		I am sweating in here.
		I don't know why.
		If it's just because I'm getting all worked up?
		I think it's just because I'm getting worked up talking about this.
		I mean, I think I have, like, Look, I'm wet.
		I'm soaking wet.
		Should I take my jacket off?
		That would look unprofessional.
unidentified		I'll keep the jacket on, but I'm like... Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, man, it's hot in here.
		I'm gonna open the door.
		I'm gonna open the door.
		I'm gonna leave my chair.
unidentified		do this, but I'm dying out here, man.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm just dying.
unidentified		You know what?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Should I just change?
		I mean, it's just not, you know, I'm gonna, should I change my pants?
		I don't know, should I?
unidentified		This is not enjoyable for me right now.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm literally sweating.
		All right, I'm gonna change into some shorts.
		Well, no, then you're gonna see them.
		All right, I guess I'll just sit back down.
unidentified		Guess I'll just sit back down.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		but i'm dying over here man i'll just try and wrap up quickly because i mean i'm really i'm really dying over here oh So I had to open the door.
		It's getting hot in here.
		You know, I just, I get into this, you know, I'm losing my voice, you know, because I'm talking so much.
		I get into this foreign policy stuff, man.
		I just, I just get really worked up about it, okay?
		I'm getting pissed off like I'm saying.
		I'm getting into it.
		I'm gesticulating.
		I'm getting angry.
		I'm raising my voice.
unidentified		Okay.
unidentified		Let me just calm down.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Then we'll get into the super chats.
unidentified		Let's...
		Let's go.
		Yeah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So that's my take on... that's my recap of the debate.
		But like I said, I'll probably go back and watch the whole debate on stream and give live commentary during it.
		Maybe I probably not tomorrow.
		I got to do stuff tomorrow, but maybe Wednesday.
unidentified		Yeah, that was exhausting.
unidentified		I hate the live chat.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Every message in live chat is just garbage.
		The stuff that you say, I just question what kind of people are writing these messages.
		Like, why would people write these things?
unidentified		Like, someone says, Arizona chat.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		He says, Nick needs to get cozy.
		Like, why say that?
		Like, what's even the point of writing that?
		Arizona Chad, good guy.
		But I read a chat like that and I'm like, why?
		Some people just like say things just to say things, you know?
		They're just like saying, it's like the equivalent of just like garbage, you know?
		Like, Nick needs to get cozy.
		It's like, okay, yeah, and?
		Someone says, Nick loves me.
		Like see, is that funny?
		Like why, what's the point?
unidentified		why would you even write that you know so uh yeah good guy We like Arizona Chad.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good guys at Chad.
		I didn't deliberately pick him out of the bunch here, but I just took a random one.
		It just happened to be him.
		Good guy, but... He's got a good TikTok.
unidentified		They're like, what the fuck?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Woos us as I love you.
		See, that's funny.
		That's, that's funny.
		See, at least that... At least that's funny.
		Some of these other ones, it's just like people just like, boom, boom, boom.
		It's like, you know...
		You know, it's like a big crowd of people just going blah blah blah blah like that's my live chat every other live chat There's like some semblance of like a conversation and my live chat people are just like blah blah blah blah blah Everybody's just saying just car like just complete crap and just garbage Nick twerk, please see like why I mean why even say that?
		It's not even funny.
unidentified		All right.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		cough - This is why I just ignore the live chat every night.
		I just ignore it, because it's just cancer.
		It's just complete AIDS, and I just hate the live chat.
unidentified		I hate it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I hate live chat, okay?
		And I hate it!
		But, you know, I just ignore it every night, and every time I look at it, it just, like, fills me with rage.
unidentified		So...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Going back to ignore, I'm ignoring you now.
		I'm ignoring the live chat now.
		That's for you.
		That's for someone else.
		It's definitely not for my, it's not for me.
		So I'll just go into the Super Chats and not, not much better, but you know, whatever.
		So let's see what you guys are saying here in the Super Chats.
		We've got Unknown Soldier says, does no one find it suspicious that pretty girl politically provoked came out of nowhere?
		To be around highly persecuted dissidents?
		Is she a fag?
		She's out here trying to seduce Beardson, perhaps.
		Well, she's... Why would you call her pretty?
		I mean, what's that all about?
		What are you, simping over her or something?
		I mean, I think she's older than me, so... Does no one find it suspicious that that sexy girl that I'm... Why even throw her a bone like that?
		You know, you people just can't help yourselves.
		You just can't help yourselves, can you?
		I don't think she's fat.
		I think she's just another e-girl, you know?
		You know, I'm friendly with her and everything.
		I'm nice to her.
		But listen, every woman in this space is just trying to, like, you know... It's about the economy of male attention.
		Everybody knows that, so... I see it very cynically, but... You know, she's nice enough.
		There's a utility in what she does, I guess.
unidentified		But, um, you know, whatever.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It is what it is.
		I'll just say he's always on that show.
		I don't know what to tell you, but some of these people, they're always on this girl's show.
		You know, I dropped in there, I dropped in there the other night because Destiny was on there, I dropped in there because there was a debate, but I'm never, I'm never like, hey Britney, can I come on Politically Provoked?
		You know, but these guys always are on there.
		They're always on there, you know?
		That Mio kid in particular, that Mio guy, I mean, what the hell?
		He's a sidekick to a girl.
		Britney does politically provoked and Mio... Okay, it's much cooler in here.
		I open the door.
		Okay, I'm cooling off.
		Okay, cool down achieved.
		We're at a reactor meltdown happening, but we've cooled down.
		I'm good now.
		But Mio, he's like a sidekick to a girl.
		She's the main character and he's like her little plucky pet.
		Like her little sidekick.
		It's just like so emasculating.
		I just can't.
		I can't even anymore.
		I see it everywhere.
		And you know what I realized?
		I just need to be alone.
		That's what I realized over time.
		You know my entire life my entire life.
		I sort of looked at You know sort of like Friendship and groups, and I was always sort of socially on the outside looking in you know I've always had friends.
		I've always had groups of friends, but I I've always been an alien.
		I'm not I'm not like other people.
		I'm just sort of a spiritual outsider and I always You know, had this curiosity and maybe a longing to belong.
		And you know what I've realized over time is, you know what?
		I'm just resigning myself to just being alone or I'm alone.
		I accept that now.
		You know, it's like that song, Better Off Alone.
		You know, I'm better off alone.
		Because, you know, I see all these simps and all this, you know, all these behaviors that I really just can't stand.
		And I'm like, I just can't be around it.
		I can't be around that.
		When I look at these niggas, I'm like, oh my gosh.
		I can't suffer it.
		I've given up.
		I've given up my search for compatibility.
		I've given up, you know.
		So there's only, you know, so I'm just going to channel all of that.
		That's what I've decided.
		I'm going to take all of that and just channel it into my work.
		I'll take all of my, you know, whatever is not happening socially, I'm just going to take all of it and redirect it into my sort of eccentric passions and my projects.
		And all of that, because that's really all that I'm deriving any kind of satisfaction and fulfillment from.
		The rest is just frustrating, to be quite honest.
		The rest is just infuriating.
		Because, you know, I go around people and I feel obligated to be around people, and then I'm around people and I don't really enjoy it.
		So I'm just sort of going back to square one.
		I'm just sort of simplifying and just building a new understanding, you know?
		I'm going all in on incel, okay?
		I'm embracing incel.
		That's just how it's supposed to be, I guess.
unidentified		So I guess that's the move.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Because I see the Mio thing and it's like, I must be the only guy who's like, you know, what the hell's wrong with you?
		The guy's a sidekick to a woman!
		To a woman!
		He goes dutifully every night, he goes in, and I like the guy, he's a nice guy, but he dutifully goes in there every night to be like, hi Brittany, I'm here, I'm here, I'm back, hi Brittany, you're so cool.
		And be her little like minion and like Nobody sees anything wrong with this like but this is and to a lesser extent This is like what every guy does now, and I'm like It's like is there something wrong with me am I the weird one apparently apparently yes So I'm I am just I'm out.
		I'm out.
		You know what I quit I I resign from public life.
		I resign from social.
		I resign from society.
		I am outside of... You live in a society?
		I don't.
		I am outside of society.
		You know.
		I'm succeeding from society.
		I am a society of one, okay?
		I'm gonna move into a building.
		I am gonna move to like some high-rise in Florida.
		I'm gonna live at the top.
		I'm never gonna leave.
		I'm never gonna do anything other than work.
		No one will see me.
		I'll hire like one person to be my ambassador to the world and that's gonna be... I think I've decided that's my new direction in my life because It's the rest of it is just too it's almost just too infuriating to bear sometimes This little nigga he goes on this show.
		He jumps on these zoom calls and goes hi Brittany And she goes hi Mio.
		Oh my gosh.
		You're so cute or whatever and it's like What's going on I mean this is just so twisted I And then you know what the worst part is?
		And here's the worst part.
		You know, I see some of you in the live chat and people are saying, that sounds great.
unidentified		Me too.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, blah, blah, blah.
		And you know, and that's really the worst part is, you know, people come around and they're like, wow, Nick, I'm just like you.
		And it's like.
		No you're not.
		That's really and that's the worst part.
		I was just on the Dalton stream and Dalton was like you know yeah I'm like the man of the house and yeah I agree with you Nick and and it's like you know full well you know full well he's you know he says that and he gets back with his wife and it's like you know honey I'm home you know And that's how they all are.
unidentified		They all try to come around me and be like, I'm an incel like you, Nick.
unidentified		And then they go back, you know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And then the wife, the old ball and chain is like, you know, cut that incel crap.
unidentified		And they're like, yes, dear.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's, and that is honestly the worst part.
		So, so don't even front with me.
		Don't even front with me like that.
		It is what it is.
		You don't want to be like me.
		You don't, you don't want to, you know.
		Do not envy, do not envy this incel.
		Beardson, Beardson says me and Nick are the only incels left.
		I'll cut out your tongue if you keep saying that.
		Okay?
		But no, you don't want any part of this.
		You know, you're a part of society.
		Enjoy, okay?
		Enjoy.
		But that's what I've decided.
		I've seen enough.
		I'm packing my bags.
		And I am seceding from society.
		It's what I've decided.
		I've really, I've seen enough.
		I've been down this road enough times and I'm like, you know what?
unidentified		I think I'm good.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I think I'm good.
		I think I'm okay, actually.
		I think I'm all good.
		Blackpilled.
		Blackpilled by politically provoked.
		Destiny's very based on this.
		Destiny says he hates women.
		I'm like, you know what, Destiny?
		He gets it.
		He hates women, and he's a little more extreme than me on this, but, because I don't hate women.
		I just, you know, can't really relate to them at all.
		But, uh, he was on a stream the other day and he said he hates women.
		I was like, you know what?
		Maybe this guy's not so bad after all, but... Someone says, Nick Tau.
		Yeah, I'm a Nick Tau.
		It's true.
		I'm a Nick going his own way.
		Nick Gal.
		Nick going his own way.
		That's so true.
		Going my own way.
		I kid.
		Well, I'm not, I'm not really kidding.
		That's the thing, I'm not really kidding.
		No, no, I mean, I'm just trying to fit in.
		Because I want to fit in.
		That's, you know, when I say I'm like, you know, when I say I'm like taxi driver and American psycho and joker, you know, it's really, it's all real.
		It's all real.
		I and I'm we're really relating and we're relating okay we're finding we're finding commonality in the in these archetypes okay modern American archetypes because I wanted to fit in you know that's so me it's so me You know, and I'll try to fit in and all that, but I think, I think I've realized, you know, I'm, in a society, I'm the Joker, right?
		In a world of Bruce Wayans, I'm a Joker, okay?
		In a world of Batmans and Bruce Wayans and, uh, and Black Catwoman, I'm a Riddler, I'm a Joker, okay?
		I am, uh, Travis Bickle.
		It's just, um, that's sort of just the way that it is.
		So, you would never, you would never understand that.
		You would never understand what that's like.
		I'm a Plankton.
		In the world of Spongebob's, I'm a Plankton.
		I'm a Sheldon Plankton.
		With my computer, with my computer wife!
		With my super computer wife.
		And my holographic meatloaf and my chum bucket.
		I'm the chum bucket, you know?
		Chumburger.
		I'm the chum dog at the chum bucket.
		With my computer wife, my holographic meatloaf.
unidentified		And, uh... You know, it's how it is.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And that's how it is, so...
		Anyway, that's a great question.
		What was the question again?
		I don't even remember.
unidentified		That was our first Super Chat.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I think it was about 20 minutes on that Super Chat.
		Justin says, during your travels have you ever met Scott Presler?
		I see him on the timeline doing a lot of activism for Republicans.
		Is he one of those decent fags?
		Yeah, I've met him.
		I've told the story a hundred times.
		I don't know.
		I'm kind of mixed.
		I mean, on the one hand, he's like, you know, I just think what he's doing is ineffective.
		And I'm not a fan.
		I'm not a fan of him personally.
		And he's like flamboyantly gay.
		And he's like a party guy.
		He's like a Republican Party guy.
		And I don't like the phrase, like, decent fags.
		I think that's kind of like an oxymoron.
		Because here's my feelings on it.
		I'm honestly not the most virulently homophobic person in a certain sense.
		Like, you know, take Peter Thiel as an example.
		He is gay.
		But you would never know it.
		He doesn't talk about it and You know, he got outed by Gawker years ago I'm not good.
		I would never be like, oh, you know what like fuck him or whatever I'm not just saying that cuz he's rich either.
		I'm not just saying that because he's rich.
		He doesn't give me money I you know, but hey, we would always welcome.
		We're always welcome as long as no strings attached but um What's really, what's really bothersome are just, like, these people that are, like, freaks.
		Like, when I see Scott Presler, and he's in these ridiculous cowboy boots, and he's got the long girl hair, and he's, like, you know, and he's, like, sassy, you know, it's like, get that, just get that away from me.
		Just get it away from me.
		You know, that, to me, that, that is what I feel, like, a deep revulsion for and all that, but, um, You know, so in that sense, there's no, but there's really, it's not decency.
		That whole situation is not decent.
		So I would, I would really say it's something more like, I would not say decent, I would say benign.
		Now, if you're sort of like benign, I really, I don't care.
		You know, is it, it's still wrong, is wrong, but from like a social, political point of view, it is benign in a sense.
		But yeah, we all know we're talking about like these faggots like that's just so you know It's just awful and I don't you know, it's a bane on society.
		I don't know why I mean it is all together But that stuff in particular is like I'm just wondering who is seeing that and being like yeah like more of that please fill up my cup with more of that like You know what I'm saying?
		So, to answer your question, he is a flamboyant sort of fag, but I guess as benign as possible, I mean, in a certain way.
		He's not out there, like, pushing.
		The thing is, though, with a lot of these gay Republicans, because you could say, like, Dave Rubin.
		Like, Dave Rubin, it's sort of a tricky thing with these people.
		Like, Dave Rubin, He's another one where he's not really flamboyant, but he is one of these gay people where he is militantly pro-gay.
		And if you're not down with that, he's got a problem with you.
		Same with, you know, like Jeff Giza is kind of this way.
		And I used to talk to Jeff Giza years ago.
		And he's a nice enough guy and everything, but he's also like fiercely pro-gay adoption.
		And if you're not in favor of gay adoption, because he's a gay dad and he adopted, I think.
		I'd forget if it was a surrogacy or adoption, but, and if you're against that, oh, he like hates you.
		You know, he's like totally hates you.
		And so that's a thing.
		He's another one where he's not like, I mean, he's a little flamboyant, but not totally in your face.
		But if you're not down with it, like he hates you.
		So, I look at gay people like Alt Hype, Ryan Falk.
		I don't mind it.
		I don't really mind it, you know?
		Because Ryan Falk, he's not flamboyant.
		He doesn't push gay, even though he is a fag.
		Whatever, you know?
		So, but Scott Presler's flamboyant, and he's probably like one of these more, you know, one of the... It would be a big problem if you were against the gay agenda for him, so.
		So that's my take on that.
		But I don't like Scott Presler.
		He was a dick to me.
		He was a jerk to me.
		And I was trying to be... You know, I'm just a friendly guy to everybody, but he was a total jagoff, so it's like, whatever.
		But, um... Yeah, so Scott Presler, he's, you know... And do they all have to be, like... Why does it have to be a literal, like, Rob Smith, Scott Presler leading the charge?
		I just... I just don't get it, man.
	But anyway, King Fatass says, I don't know if Patrick Hawley is based or cringe, he's on the verge of becoming a wig gnat or just overdosed on red pills.
	But what I do know is that this movement needs a Zoomer leader and he's a millennial.
	Well... Yeah, see, I really like Patrick Hawley.
	He's a great guy.
	I love National File.
	But some of the stuff he does, I'm just like, come on, man.
	Like, what are you doing?
	Like, he did this big article about the National Socialist Club.
	Like, a puff piece for the National Socialist Club.
	And I'm like, you know, why?
	Just, like, why?
	And I feel the same way about Keith Woods and some of these other people.
	You have to realize, at a certain point, that that WGNAT stuff is just a complete dead end.
	And not only is it a dead end, it's counterproductive.
	It's just, like, poisonous.
	And, you know, I just, I'm... If you don't get it at this point, then you just really shouldn't be in this, is my opinion.
	I'm done explaining it.
	You know, you can say, well, but why, Nick?
unidentified		Why is it?
unidentified		Why would you say that's poisonous?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's like, listen, if you don't get it, you just don't get it, okay?
		If you don't understand, if you don't grasp that intuitively, you just don't have the sense.
		And I'm not saying that about Hawley because I like him a lot.
		He's a great guy and he's totally right on the money.
		He's courageous and he's a great writer and he's my friend.
		I saw that article and I'm just like, come on, man, like, what are we doing here?
		Because, you know, these groups, there's this, and let's just say it outright, there's this active effort on the part of the alt-right to reconstitute itself, and you see all these new groups popping up, like Patriot Front is one of them, and there's a few notable others.
		And it's all these former alt-right groups sort of re-reforming into these new... It's the same shit though.
		Same tactics.
		Same message.
		Same people.
		Literally the same dummies.
		But they just, oh we have a new thing now.
		New name and new telegram channel and whatever.
		And listen.
		They tried that.
		It didn't work.
		The people are dysfunctional.
		The message is not resonating.
		The strategies don't work.
		So, like, and if something doesn't work, I hate it.
		If something doesn't work, I don't want to be a part of it.
		I don't want to be associated with it.
		I don't want to be a part of, like, a loser club.
		And, you know, so when I see Keith Woods pushing this stuff on Telegram, I'm like, just, what are you doing, man?
		Like, you're a smart enough guy.
		Why are you pushing all this garbage?
		Where it's like borderline, probably confidential informants.
		It's people that just don't know what they're doing.
		They don't know how to win.
		And then when I see Hawley doing that, I'm like, come on, man.
		National Socialist Club?
		What, are you kidding me?
		You know, they tried that five, six years ago, and it's, we know that's a dead end.
		We know that that stuff is just, it's just awful.
		It's just, it's cringe, that's not, it's not based, it's not, and it doesn't even work.
		You know, are we, I'm not a national socialist, okay?
		And it's not because... I'm not saying that for the media.
		They'll call me whatever anyway.
		It's just that's not what I believe in.
		And none of these groups are Christian.
		None of these groups are conservative.
		I mean, that's one of the biggest things, is they're all pagan.
		And none of them are Christian.
		If they supported what we support, they would just join us.
		But they don't.
		You know, they want to do their own thing.
		And they want to do their own thing because their thing is distinct from our thing.
		And one of the big distinctions is that they're not Christian.
		If they were Christian and patriots, they would just say, oh wow, I was wrong, I'm just going to join America first.
		But they keep creating these LARP organizations where they're pushing Hitler, and they're pushing paganism, and they're pushing Satanism.
		They're casting spells.
		They're part of Order of the Nine Angles.
		They're confidential informants.
		There's nothing, nothing good can come from that.
		And you know what?
		I don't mind that they exist because good.
		It's going to attract other losers and other pagans and other weirdos and that'll keep them away from us.
		It's like a sort of like a mousetrap.
		But that only works if there's no crossover.
		So I, You know, I just don't want to be seen as, you know, people on their side are always talking about, you know, when is Nick going to join up with Mike Enoch?
		Never.
		It is never going to be fruitful for me to work with a loser.
		It's never going to be fruitful for me to work with a confidential informant.
	I will never do that.
	And there's no benefit to be gained there.
unidentified		So...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So it's very frustrating to see that happen, but I like Patrick.
		I think he's a good guy, but I see that stuff and I'm just like, come on, man.
		Come on, man.
		We love you, Patrick.
		But, you know, I see that stuff and I'm like, dude, what are we thinking?
		Benjamin.
		I'm not saying that to be patronizing.
		just disagree with it strongly.
		Benjamin says disappointed.
		Molyneux says who said today he is okay with Dave Rubin's family plan.
		I'm asking myself, is he being genuine or is he avoiding criticism of the powers that be?
		Love your work, Nick.
		Up and up for AF.
		I think, well, Molyneux's not Christian, so there's your answer.
		That kind of like peaceful whatever philosophy only gets you so far without God.
		You know, that libertarian prosperity bullshit.
		I mean, that really just gets you so far.
		Pretty Fly White Guy says, Day One of Slowly Buying Influence.
		Okay, Anados says, Am I the only one that thought that Scribble Groyper drawing you posted on Telegram was extremely moving?
		Such great artwork.
		It's unsaid who the faceless family man is.
		My Groyper intuition tells me that it's actually a future destiny.
		Looking up so proudly at his old best friend.
		Prophetic?
		Yeah, maybe.
		Zoomer Guy says, Hi friend.
		Been a while.
		Yeah, I love the portrait by the way.
unidentified		It's awesome.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hi friend, been a while since I superchatted.
		Right now, laying back on the couch, smoking a Navalny and Zelensky pack.
		Yale students always try to provoke Putin, but he is destined to revive the Russian Empire.
		So true.
		Wow, I feel like Nick Fuentes right now.
		Spencer says, hey Nick, what's your cozy streak at?
		I think it's at 12.
		Ian says, to what extent do you think Call of Duty unironically had an effect on convincing people that Russia is bad?
		I say pretty significantly, actually.
		I think it's negligible, honestly.
		Ian says, you are watching the Nicholas J. Fuentes Power Hour.
		Tune in on weekdays at 6 p.m.
		Pacific Time to watch Nick Fuentes get thrown by Mossad.
		Do you remember that, Nick?
		That was classic.
		Glad you're safe.
unidentified		Yeah, I remember.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thomas says, hey Nick, love the show.
		You should make a Z hat.
		Yeah, thanks for the idea.
		Smiley the Fed.
		Suggested a hundred YouTube subs doing some IRL with Wooza and Zykotic.
		I had my Russian flag cape and Putin shirt on to find those pogs for Putin.
		We even ran into Hulk Hogan at a karaoke bar.
		HH.
		Wow, nice.
		Majorian says NATO claims to be a defensive alliance, but both Serbia and Libya... But it attacked both Serbia and Libya.
		Neither country attacked a NATO member.
unidentified		21.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		America's hostile towards.
unidentified		It looks offensive.
unidentified		Yeah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hey Nick, it's been a few weeks, but great meeting and hanging out with you during AFPAC weekend.
		It was my first IRL event and all the gripers and eslabs were such real niggas.
		Hype for the next!
		Hey, well, sorry for attacking you earlier, but great meeting you as well.
		Very Chad, very based.
		Love to see the chads.
		You know, it's good to see the other people, but it's also really good to see the chads, because it's like, you know what, if there's buy-in from the chads, you know, we're in good shape.
		So, yeah, great meeting you, man.
		Great to hang out at the Meme Mansion, and glad you had a good time at AFPAC, your first IRL event.
		Just, you know, the TikTok content just has to improve a little bit.
		The Batman meme, that was a good start.
		but you know we just we want to get some better tik-tok content you know I'm I'm following you so I see what's up but yeah I believe in you I think there's some good stuff the Batman thing you sent me that was cack that was good stuff but thanks a lot man I appreciate it good to hear from you sorry I attacked you earlier but you know just wasn't on purpose burgish says hey hey
		Donald Trump says had a meeting to get an internet provider for my boss and this representative with Cogent Communications bragged to me about how they cut off internet to their clients in Russia.
		Very messed up.
unidentified		That is messed up.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Woozus says I wish Ukraine had a Brutus type figure that would stab President Zelensky.
		If only, right?
		Dan says, epic debate and stream tonight man.
		Your skills with rhetoric are just so nice to hear.
		They are a breath of fresh air when all we hear is faggotry daily.
		So true.
		Major says the chuckwagon is goaded.
		Okay, Bingus says watch Destiny Debate Tranny Sports with a bunch of shitlibs and trannies earlier.
		He really does despise the community on the left and it shows.
		You'll flip him, Sheev Fuentes.
		Very true, yep.
		You know, hey, the proverbial, you know, I'm gonna be being attacked by, I said this before, Vosh will be about to finish me off in a duel.
		And Destiny will say, I need him!
		And, you know, he's gonna say he's got control of the Groifers and the Congress.
unidentified		He's too dangerous to be left alive!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And then Destiny's gonna cut off Vashj's hand and kill him.
		And then he's gonna pledge himself to my teachings.
		And then I'm gonna send Destiny to kill all the wingmats.
		I'm gonna send Destiny to, uh, Wherever the Wignats are holed up at, I'm gonna send you to... Where are they, Indiana?
		I'm gonna send you... Wipe them out!
unidentified		Once again, Grover's will rule!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And he's going to go and his eyes are going to turn yellow and he's going to turn and look at the, you know.
unidentified		That's going to be a slaughtered.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Destiny's gonna go and debate Patriot Front.
unidentified		And he's gonna go and debate all the others.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Or maybe all the cozy streamers!
		Maybe he's gonna go and debate Dalton and Vince and Steve and... There can only be two!
		And, you know, me and Destiny build the Death Star.
		Nah, I kid, of course.
		Oh yeah, wouldn't that be a trip?
		Gonna send him to the Jedi Temple and then he's gonna kill all the, uh, gonna slaughter the left-wing community.
		Vosh and Hassan and that Trani he was debating with.
		Catch him off balance.
		Execute Order 66.
unidentified		Oh yeah, oh yeah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We're gonna build the superweapon.
		Oh yeah.
		Yeah, you bet.
		You bet.
unidentified		Destiny, there's too many Groibers.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		What are we going to do?
unidentified		And he turns his lightsaber on.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And then his best friend, Hassan, is gonna be like, to his girlfriend, I saw him killing younglings.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm so sorry.
unidentified		He's the father, isn't he?
		I'm so sorry.
		And then he's gonna go to Mustafar.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Then they're gonna fight.
		Destiny and Hasan or Vash.
		Then they're gonna fight.
unidentified		I sense Destiny is in danger.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, then I'm gonna pick up whatever's left of him.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, he's gonna be crawling around.
unidentified		You know, he's gonna be crawling.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And then I'm gonna pick him up and bring him back to Coruscant and, you know.
unidentified		She was alive!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I felt it!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm going to patch him up, and then he's going to become this sort of cyber-enhanced person.
unidentified		So I think that's how it's going to play out.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's gonna be pretty ugly.
		Where's Melina?
		Is that her name?
		Is she safe?
unidentified		Is she alright?
		It seems in your anger, you killed her.
		She was alive!
		I felt it!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Oh yeah, yep, so... Very tragic, but I'm gonna harness his power to, you know, take over the country.
		It's gonna happen, you know, use his pain to make him stronger.
		So that and that's really the plan.
		I guess it all ends with me sort of creating a destructive final order and like knocking all the galaxies.
		Thank you.
		Knock some girl into a cavern with the force push That was awesome.
		It's Star Wars 9 when He was like and this will be the last of this.
		What is the I don't even I've seen that movie like one time But he was like this will be the last word in the Skywalker Bloodline or whatever any fucking force pushes both of them into a cave or does he knock out Ben Solo knocks him into the cave and Yeah, and then she's just laying down bloody and bashed and he's just nuking the whole galaxy fleet.
		Pretty epic.
		It was kind of awesome.
		The way that she killed him was gay, though, and she's like, and I'm all the Jedi.
unidentified		It's not really satisfying.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Anyway, so that's where this is going, I guess.
unidentified		Where was I?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Traxton says, what do you think about Yeji from ITZY?
		I don't know what that is.
		Kyle says, mutually assured destruction probably applies in the cybersecurity realm as well.
		We'll shut down your energy networks if you shut down ours, maybe to a lesser extent because it's harder to showcase or flex those types of capabilities.
		Come to Louisiana or Georgia.
		Lots of girls would like to simp for a man.
		Get the fuck out of here.
		get out of get out of town man oh my do you know what there's so much wrong with this super chat no no there is nothing comparable with cybersecurity that's just not even close and Go to Louisiana or Georgia, man.
		We'll get the f... Will you get out of here?
		No, I'm not coming to Georgia or Louisiana.
		And I'm not going there for girls.
		I'm... Hi, you know, could you imagine me with my fucking suitcase packed?
		I'm here for the girls.
unidentified		Someone told me there were girls here.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Could you imagine?
		Could you imagine something so low?
		Could you imagine something so pathetic?
unidentified		Ugh.
		Here I am!
		Where's the girls to sip over me?
		Hey, you know what I'm here for!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, I'm a little bit more complicated than that, okay?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm a little... There's... It takes a little bit more than... than... You know, it's just people.
unidentified		It's fucking... It's people.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm gonna come to Georgia.
		First of all, like I'm ever gonna move to Georgia.
		But I'm gonna go there for the southern girls.
unidentified		For the babes.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Jeez, get out of town with that.
		It's like you people don't even know me.
		It's like you don't even know who I am.
		Oh my gosh.
		Yeah, I just, I don't know, man.
		The way, the way that you people think of me, it's like you don't even know me, you know.
		I'm just so misunderstood.
		It's like you don't even know me, you know.
		I do this show every night, thousands of hours of content.
		It's like you guys don't even, you talk to me like you don't even know who I am, you know.
		I'm so misunderstood.
		Like there's this me that you think of in your head and you think like I'm gonna wear a fucking cowboy hat.
		Or, you think I'm gonna go to the Alamo, or you think I'm gonna move to Louisiana for the girls or something, and then there's like, you know, then there's Nick Fuentes, the eccentric genius, misunderstood, you know, screaming into the void every night.
		Sort of what sucks about being famous, you know, struggle for your own identity, for me, you know, who I am.
unidentified		But anyway.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		South is overrated?
unidentified		It is what it is.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But anyway.
		But hey, thanks for the big super chat.
		Thanks for the $100 superchat, by the way.
		Thanks for the $100 superchat, but I will not move to Georgia for the girls that will simp over me, whatever the hell that means.
		Like God intended!
		What does that even mean, dude?
		Anyway, Michael says, but hey, I appreciate the big super chat.
		07's Kyle, thanks a lot, but no.
		Thanks a lot, but no.
		No, I will not move to Louisiana for the girls that will simp over me.
		That sounds annoying, frankly.
		You know what that sounds like?
		That sounds annoying.
		But I appreciate your consideration Michael says thank you Nick for delivering logic and knowledge every nightly program America versus the future What is your take on the deviant left begging for money to place?
		Gay bombs in Florida.
		I never heard of this Anchor says thank you great show today.
		Thanks Keck dogs his thoughts on Jesse Ventura and not a fan.
		I Mac Mance's nice job teaching Destiny about IR.
		That debate was literally the best dialogue on the Ukraine versus Russia on the internet, which is insane, I know, right?
		Yeah, no one else is really debating this.
		So, big contribution.
		Kyle says, to the audience.
		So now I'm reading your super chat to my audience.
		He says, look up Gianfranco Martinez.
		He runs a program for quitting porn and simping.
		Think of porn as like a heroin addiction and takes your manhood away.
unidentified		Makes you gay, too.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't know who that is, but yeah, you should quit porn.
		But, you know, these people can never quit simping.
		I mean, I, you know, I've never met a former simp.
		It's no such thing, you know.
		Yeah, but you should quit porn.
		Absolutely.
unidentified		But, um, wow.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Porn?
		Porn is an addiction, huh?
		That's a really groundbreaking take.
		Kyle says, By the way, you articulated the Iron Triangle needs to be an AF short clip in and of itself.
		That was a perfect explanation from the universities to institutions.
		Fauci was roommates with Gates at Cornell.
unidentified		Yeah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Very real.
		CatDog says, Patrick Hawley's piece wasn't about any National Socialist Club, it was about THE National Socialist Club.
		Yeah, okay, thanks.
		Kill Animals says, I asked before if one was offered money from Russia, Soros, would one take it?
		And you said no without elaborating.
		So why is it okay to take money from Peter Thiel?
		What is the principle at work?
		I don't think I ever said I wouldn't take money from Russia.
		I think he asked about Soros, which is different.
		So I mean now you're just misrepresenting what I said.
		Kyle says Tucker Carlson did an hour interview with Kid Rock tonight.
		The show is so much better.
		Holy gosh.
		Thank you.
		Kyle says possibly a stupid question.
		Do you follow Patrick Byrne closely?
		I don't know who that is.
		He's working with Lindell and General Flynn from the election integrity side.
		Surprised it doesn't come up on the show.
		Mike Lindell and General Flynn.
		It's just that's not serious.
		That's why.
		Troll says, great job in the debate, Nick.
		You whooped destiny.
		I'm loving the exposure you're getting on all these mainstream platforms.
		Hey, thanks a lot, man.
		I appreciate it.
		Yeah, glad you liked it.
		It's 20,000 live viewers on all platforms, which is amazing considering I'm banned from all of them.
		Just goes to show.
		Kyle says, I think you did an interview with Nathan from Lift the Veil a while back.
		You remember him?
		I wonder if he'd be interested in Cozy?
		So very impressive stuff.
		Thanks a lot, man.
		Kyle says, I think you did an interview with Nathan from Lift the Veil a while back.
		You remember him?
		I wonder if he'd be interested in cozy.
		He used to do some pretty intense interviews with SRA victims.
		Yeah, maybe.
		I remember him from DLive, but he was a simp for his wife.
		But other than that, yeah, I'd be fine with him coming on here.
		Max says, great debate on Friday, Nick.
		You're one of the smartest guys I know and I couldn't be prouder to be a Groyper and a follower of the great Nick Fuentes.
		Good night, buddy.
		God bless.
		Love you, King.
		Hey thanks man, love you too.
		Lane says great show tonight Nick your Valorant gameplay with Veda and UX was moving the Sage wall placements the W key with the judge world class 80 career Fortnite wins also our fearless leader yeah you know everyone's doubting me on Valorant but I kind of popped off with the judge today so you know just uh you know I do what I have to do
		You know, I come in with the bucky, I come in with the judge, I make it happen, okay?
		I'm not, I'm not a great player, but I may do, okay?
		But thanks, thanks for acknowledging that.
		Smoothie King says, love the IR streams, it really cuts through the pretense.
		You can't be a liberal without believing your own propaganda and democracy building world takeover.
		Traxton says, this is Yeji.
		Okay, I'm not gonna pull that up.
		Donald Trump says pee-pee poo-poo.
		I call being the last Super Chatter from now on.
		Okay.
		All right.
		That's the last Super Chat.
		I'm so tired.
		I've been fixing my sleep schedule and I'm just so fatigued.
		You know, because when you fix your sleep schedule, you just get tired all the time.
	You just have no energy.
	I've done it so many times, it's like the worst.
	So I went to bed last night at like 11.
	I woke up at 7, okay?
unidentified		So I woke up...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I had, I had pizza for breakfast, I watched the Putin interviews, I did some work, and then I fell asleep at like, I don't know, maybe, you know, nine, nine or ten.
		Then I wake up at noon, you know, and I'm just like so tired, and then I, you know, I force myself to get out of bed, I shower, I drive around, and I do stuff all day.
		I come back to the show.
		I do this two-hour monologue.
		Now I'm doing these super chats.
		I'm just... I'm beat.
		I'm already fatigued because of the sleep schedule business and then I'm just up all day.
		I don't know how you guys are awake all day.
		I can't do it.
		I just have no energy.
		You know, I had to hit a cup of coffee just to stay awake through the show.
		But you know, when I'm fixing my sleep schedule, I'm always more tired than usual.
		But I don't know, man.
		I don't know how to keep a regular schedule.
		It's just not... It doesn't work for me.
		Kyle says, Patrick Byrne is legit.
		Nightman, love you.
		Praying for you.
		American Hero.
		Hey, thanks a lot, King.
unidentified		Love you, too.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		07's in chat for Kyle.
unidentified		Okay, so that's our last Super Chat.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Man.
		And I'm sweating, you know.
		And that was so, like...
		I was so strenuous.
		I'm sweating over here like that was an exhausting show and I'm not getting enough oxygen.
		I'm being choked to death here.
unidentified		Oh, that feels better too.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So, that's gonna do it for me.
		I'm gonna probably check out the UX stream if he finally gets around to doing it.
		He's always saying he's gonna stream and then he never does.
unidentified		But, so yes, that's it for me.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thanks for watching.
		Remember to follow me on Gabba Telegram.
		Follow me here on Cozy.
		Remember, I'm on the air Monday through Friday, 8 o'clock Central, 9 o'clock Eastern Standard Time.
		As always, thanks for watching.
		Thanks to our big super chatters, in particular our top three tonight, Kyle, BlackSwan, and Van.
		Big shout out!
		Can we get an 07 for our top three tonight?
		Thank you guys so much, Kyle, BlackSwan, and Van.
		Van and Kyle, very consistent.
		BlackSwan, one of our favorites.
		He talks too much, but you gotta love the guy.
		He pollutes these group chats.
		He goes in and he's just, he just posts so much in the group chats, but I love that guy.
		He's a great guy and he's very good.
		He's very good at what he does.
		Very big help.
		You guys have no idea.
		One of the real backbones of the movement.
		Silent in the shadows.
		And the guy's an operator and very good.
		And he's real brash, real East Coast brash.
		I like that.
		So we love him.
		We love him.
		So thanks a lot, you guys.
		Kyle, Black Swan, Van, we appreciate it.
		Thanks to all our super chatters.
		Thanks to everybody that watches the show.
		I love you guys.
		I'll see you tomorrow.
		Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.

▲