Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 9, 2022 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

02:10:31

WORLD WAR III IMMINENT? Great Satan BANS Russian Oil, Pray For Putin! | America First Ep. 954WORLD WAR III IMMINENT? Great Satan BANS Russian Oil, Pray For Putin! | America First Ep. 954

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

02:00:40

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's not true.
		American news media is just as much propaganda for the American regime's agenda as Russian state-owned media is propaganda for the aims and the objectives of the Russian government.
		It's the same.
		So, what you're hearing, like I said, on television, on social media, it is controlled.
		The algorithm which is designed by American Big Tech curates stories and narratives that prop up the State Department and Pentagon agenda in Eastern Europe.
		What you see on your timeline was put there by Big Tech.
		What Big Tech puts on your timeline is dictated by the military-industrial complex that has been waging a Cold War against Russia for the past eight years or longer.
		And the same goes for all of the legacy media.
		The television, the radio, the print, what you read in the New York Times and the Washington Post, what you see on NBC and CBS, and what you hear on the radio, it is all controlled media.
		And think about it this way.
		You can't even hear the opposing opinion.
		Nobody in national news media, nobody on social media is permitted to talk about the Russian side of this, or just simply the alternative explanation of what is going on.
		Russia Today, which is an English-speaking, Russian-backed news agency, they're banned from social media.
		You quite literally cannot hear the other side.
		You will struggle to find English transcriptions of Vladimir Putin's speeches on this issue.
		You'll struggle to find Russian news agency coverage of what is going on.
		But if you search Russia Ukraine on a Google search engine or on Google controlled YouTube or Russia Ukraine related hashtag on Twitter or Facebook, you will find curated results populated by legacy media, Washington Post, New York Times, NBC, CBS, which is guided New York Times, NBC, CBS, which is guided and controlled.
		And like I said, curated by the government and by big tech.
		You're not hearing the full story.
		You're hearing a completely controlled narrative on Ukraine.
		And that actually matters.
		So let's talk about the history of where we got here.
		What everybody's being told is that this is Russian aggression.
		What does that mean?
		What do we mean when we say aggression?
		They're saying that Putin is attacking Ukraine basically without provocation.
		That's what they mean when they say aggression.
		When America invaded Iraq, well that was a preemptive war.
		Saddam Hussein was the aggressor.
		But we invaded first to preempt his aggression, or something like that.
		So in other words, nations can attack other nations, they can initiate, and it can still be considered defensive.
		It can still be considered reasonable.
		Russia's invasion of Ukraine is being called aggression, which means what they're saying in that, what's loaded up in that, is they're saying that Russia is the belligerent, Russia's initiating all of the hostility, Russia is They're the transgressor.
		They're responsible for this.
		And that is just wrong.
		And like I said, we have to go to the history to see why.
		So, for starters, let's go way back and just say, for anybody that is unsure, Ukraine historically was part of Russia.
		Russia, before it was... well, I mean, we have to go through a lot of things here.
		You know, if we go back hundreds of years, if we go back to the 17th century, the 16th century, you have the Russian Empire.
		And Ukraine was a part of the Russian Empire.
		The Russian Empire is one of the biggest empires that ever existed in the world.
		One of the largest contiguous land empires that have ever existed in the world.
		And it is due to its enormous size that it was constantly growing.
		Because the geopolitical problem that has always defined Russian statecraft and Russian policy has been just that, Russia's size.
		Russia is so large, it has such large and long borders, That this is a huge struggle for Russia to defend its borders.
		You know, when we talk about a term like sovereignty, what does it mean to say that a city or a regime or a capital has sovereignty?
		It means that it has the right and the ability to say what goes on within its borders, across a certain territory.
		What comes with sovereignty is the ability to enforce your will within a territory.
		You know, a nation can claim sovereignty all at once, but it has to be able to back that up.
		It has to have the means, which is force.
		It has to have the physical power, power capability, to control what happens within its borders, to repel aggressors, to put down revolts.
		It has to have the means to control what happens within its borders.
		It has to be able to defend its borders from other states and other political actors.
		So, The problem, which is defined, like I said, Russian statecraft and Russian domestic and foreign policy for hundreds of years, is the sheer size of Russia.
		And if you have such a large country with such large borders, how are you going to defend all those borders?
		How are you going to defend all that territory?
		Well, Russia has to expand in order to do that.
		Because where Russia is situated, not only does it have enormous borders, but it has enormous borders in a With a geography that is very difficult to defend.
		When you look at, for example, Russia in Western Europe, the western border of Russia is a Great Plain.
		It's called the Great European or the Northern European Plain.
		And the Northern European Plain is completely flat, it's completely open, and that makes it very easy for an opposing army to invade.
		So Russia's entire western border is just wide open space.
		Typically, when you see the borders of countries, they'll be situated along rivers, mountains, oceans, geographical features that make it easier to defend the border.
		Typically, it'll form around particular choke points.
	You know, so like you look at countries in Europe and they're bounded by mountains and rivers.
	And same in the Middle East.
	They're bounded by the Eastern Mediterranean or the Arabian Sea or by the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers.
	Because, you know, once again, that makes it easier to defend the border.
	That means you're able to control what goes on.
	If you go outside of a geographical border, you've got to defend open land, which is difficult.
	So you retreat to where you can control one or two, you know, major points of entry.
	So Russia, in its western border as an example, is constantly expanding westward, and we'll get into particularly why that is, so that they're able to shore up their border.
	The same goes in Central Asia.
	You've got the Central Asian Steppe, which is again a very difficult to defend territory.
	So Russia throughout its history is constantly expanding.
	It's driven by the challenge of defending these huge borders.
	And that's an important point which we'll revisit later on.
	But I also want to say about the long history of Russia, Ukraine was a part of Russia for hundreds of years.
	And Russia was an empire.
	Russia was not a nation-state.
	And so we have to think about our conception of what makes a country a country.
	Because the world has not always been organized by nation-states, which is hyphenated.
	A nation-state is a relatively new phenomenon.
	It's a modern phenomenon.
	Before nation-states, you had empires.
	You had, you know, things like in the Islamic world, you had a caliphate.
	A caliphate is completely outside of our conception.
	That's not a nation state.
	That's a completely different way to organize territory and people than a nation state system.
	The Chinese Empire, the Russian Empire, Mongolian Empire, and so on.
	It's a different way to organize people in places, and it's a different form of sovereignty than, say, like I said, a so-called nation-state.
	So, when people are saying these things about, you know, Ukraine has a right to exist, we must defend Ukraine, Ukraine is its own country, and so on, it's a dubious proposition, because historically there was no Ukraine, there was Russia.
	Ukraine was a part of Russia.
	Crimea was a part of Russia for hundreds of years.
	So it's really the past 30 years which are the anomaly that Ukraine is not part of Russia.
	So we know that the Russian Empire exists up until 1917.
	And in 1917, there's a revolution in February which overthrows the Tsar, and they put in place a provisional government under Alexander Kerensky.
	Then in October, the Bolsheviks, which are the Communists, they take power.
	And a civil war ensues between the Bolsheviks and their Red Army and the White Army, which is the army of the Tsar and the Russian Empire.
	The war rages for five years.
	It comes to an end in 1922, and the Bolsheviks now control Russia, and they create an entity called the Soviet Union, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
	And so the USSR is sort of a federal entity.
	The reason I say that is because it's important.
	Once again, this is concerning how people and territory is organized, how the government is administered in various administrative units.
	So you go from the Russian Empire, which is an autocracy, meaning that the Tsar is an autocrat.
	He alone has personal rule over all the territory, to the USSR, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, meaning that you've got all these different Soviet republics, which are their own administrative units, and then they're bound together in a union.
	And so...
	Russia is the master of this federation.
	Russia is its own republic.
	It's the Russian Soviet Federated Republic.
	And so Russia is its own republic within the USSR, but then there are other Soviet socialist republics, too, in Ukraine, in, I believe, Armenia, or Georgia, and in some of the other Eastern European countries and Central Asian countries, I think Azerbaijan.
	And so they're all their own.
	I may be getting some of those wrong, but so they formed these various Soviet republics, again, as administrative units, but under the Union, which is governed from Moscow.
	And they moved the capital from St. Petersburg to the historic Moscow.
	And as part of the revolution, and Joseph Stalin, he is the commissar on nationalities in the Soviet Union, and so he's part of organizing the Soviet Union.
	Ukraine is given autonomy.
	They're given their own Soviet Republic, and this is where you get the birth of so-called Ukrainian independence.
	Ukraine is still sort of, it's still a slave state to Russia.
	It's still under the suzerainty of Moscow in the USSR, but it is its own administrative unit.
	In the 1950s, Nikita Khrushchev, the successor to Stalin as General Secretary, gifts Crimea to Ukraine.
	And so now Crimea is a part of Ukraine.
	Khrushchev is from Ukraine.
	So he gives Crimea to Ukraine, but Ukraine is under the control of Moscow.
	Then, in 1991, the Soviet Union collapses, and all of these Soviet republics declare independence.
	And so now, the old Russian Empire, which included a lot of these countries in Eastern Europe, is ripped apart.
	And so all this territory, all these peoples that were part of the Russian Empire, and then became administrative units in the Soviet Union, they're now amputated from Russia.
	They're now completely cut off from Russia.
	And so now you've got a completely independent Ukraine.
	You've got an independent Belarus.
	You've got an independent Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Czechoslovakia, which is then Czech Republic, and Slovakia, and so on.
	Hungary, Poland.
	And so now Russia is dismembered.
	And so the former Russian Empire is cut down dramatically in population and in size.
	And now you've just got Russia.
	Without Eastern Europe, without Central Asia, you've got Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan.
	And so Russia is, like I said, a fraction of the size, a fraction of the population, and Ukraine, like I said, now becomes independent.
	Now they're their own thing.
	That was not the case for hundreds of years.
	For hundreds of years, Ukraine was part of Russia.
	For hundreds of years, Crimea was not part of Ukraine, but formerly part of Russia.
	Under the Soviet Union, Ukraine becomes its own administrative thing, and Crimea is gifted to it, but again, still under the control of Moscow.
	So it's not until 1991 that Ukraine becomes independent, and has its own, and has independence, and is its own country, is granted statehood.
	But this is the first time that you've got nation-states in this region.
	Because prior to all these nation-states, independent nation-states coming into being, you had these Soviet republics which were under the suzerainty of Moscow, meaning that they were vassal states.
	And prior to that, they were part of the Russian Empire.
	So it's 30 years old that you've got such a thing called Ukrainian independence, but it's not 100% correct to say that Ukraine is its own thing, because you've got lots of overlap.
	You have lots of ethnic Russians and Russian-speaking people living in Ukraine, living in Eastern Ukraine, moving between Russia and Ukraine, specifically also in Crimea.
	And so, getting back to the geography problem of Russia, which I mentioned earlier, and particularly talking about Eastern Europe, that all these Eastern European countries break away from Russia is a complete disaster.
	Because as I said, Russia is so large and its borders are so hard to defend, that Russia is trying to create a periphery, they're trying to create a border with the rest of the world that they can adequately defend.
	So in Eastern Europe, revisiting the idea of the Northern European Plain, the Northern European Plain is shaped like a funnel.
	In Eastern Europe, or rather in Eastern Germany, This plane, which is flat, passable land, is at its smallest part.
	It's at its smallest length.
	As you move further east towards Russia, this European plane grows larger and larger.
	And it opens up like a funnel.
	And when I say this plane, I mean flat, open, passable land.
	And why does that matter?
	Because when you look historically at Hitler's invasion into Russia, Napoleon's invasion into Russia, this is a corridor through which the West can sweep into Russia.
	And the bigger that that border is, where that line of demarcation is drawn along this plane, Of course, if it's very small, it's much easier to defend.
	If it's very large, it's a lot more difficult to defend.
	It's about how big is this corridor going to be where the West can walk right into Russia.
	And so, throughout the history of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, Russia was settled very far west, and that was beneficial to Russia's security posture because then they didn't have as much of this open land to defend or to fortify the border with troops and things like that.
	When the Soviet Union collapses in 1991, all these countries break away from Russia, and so that line of demarcation between east and west During the Cold War, when the Soviet Union existed, it was all the way up in Germany, and so it was a very short, narrow border.
	Now it's pushed all the way back, and it's pushed all the way back to the border of the Russian Federation.
	And as I said, as you move east, the funnel opens up and the northern European plain grows bigger.
	Much more difficult to defend.
	And I think a lot of people understand this.
	I think people are reading about this and they're beginning to understand this concept.
	And so when Russia says, when Vladimir Putin says that this is a geopolitical disaster, this is what he's talking about.
	He means that Russia is now in this completely unacceptable, indefensible situation where they've got an entire stretch of wide open plains from the Black Sea all the way across to the Baltic Sea to defend as NATO is expanding. indefensible situation where they've got an entire stretch of wide And then I want to get into the history of NATO there.
	So in 1991, all these countries declare independence.
	Russia's population is cut in half.
	Their territory is diminished.
	And like I said, their border moves from Berlin all the way east, all the way to, what is it, Kharkiv?
	I don't know how to pronounce that city, but it moves all the way east.
	And as we understand, it's wide open now for an invasion.
	Concurrently, while this is happening, NATO membership is expanding.
	We know that NATO was formed...
	Initially, it's a defensive alliance of the Western European countries in America against the Soviet Union after World War II, and then the Warsaw Pact is formed in response to that, and that aligns all the Eastern European countries with Russia, and you create this hard border between East and West.
	A hard defensive alliance between both countries, or both sides, where both sides understand that if you go on one side or you go on the other side, it's World War III.
	So that's where you have the Berlin Wall, And then everybody knows, and it's actually a very stable situation because everybody knows, this is the red line.
	You don't interfere in Hungary if you're NATO, and you don't interfere in France if you're Russia.
	And there's a hard border between East and West, and it's a border that's defensible for both sides.
	And the border is fortified, and this ensures that the Soviet Union and the West are not going to come into a big collision and have a big fight.
	Everybody knows this is where NATO begins and ends, and this is where the Soviet Union begins and ends.
	And it's actually a very stable situation throughout the Cold War.
	But after the Soviet Union collapses, the Warsaw Pact dissolves, all these countries become independent, and then there's a conversation as early as 1992 in the Bush administration about expanding NATO membership, which really doesn't make sense.
	Because NATO was formed specifically to counter the threat of the Soviet Union.
	And what was the threat of the Soviet Union?
	It was not just that the Soviet Union was the only superpower other than the United States that emerged from World War II.
	It's not just that the Soviet Union was another superpower.
	It was that the regime in Moscow was a pariah regime.
	The regime in Moscow with the Communist International and with their spy agencies and intel agencies was trying to foment a global revolution.
	And Stalin wrote about this all throughout the 20s, 30s, and 40s.
	What the Soviet regime wanted was a global communist revolution.
	And they were trying to make that happen throughout the 20th century in Western Europe, of course in Africa, in Latin America, in Asia.
	And that's very important because the objectives of the Soviet Union were universal and they were total.
	They were not a normal state.
	Normal states want to have prosperity, they want to have influence, they want to project power, they want to export their goods.
	Right?
	The Soviet Union was not a normal state.
	This was an ideologically driven state with universal global ambitions, which were diametrically at odds with those of the so-called free world, with the establishment in DC.
	So NATO specifically was formed to counter the threat of the Soviet Union, not Russia.
	Not Moscow, but the threat of the Soviet Union.
	And said, this is an empire which is not letting go of Eastern Europe after they invaded.
	It's not letting go of the Caucasus and Iran.
	It's not letting go.
	And they're trying to expand communism.
	They're trying to take over the entire world.
	And that was the goal.
	I mean, Stalin was writing about World War II in the 1920s.
	saying that there would be a great war between the capitalist powers and the Soviet Union would intervene at the very end.
	And that is how they would foment revolution in a Western industrial country.
	And then like dominoes, they all would fall.
	And then, of course, after World War II, the Soviet Union was more powerful than ever.
	So that is the threat that NATO has formed to counter.
	Now, in 1991, the Soviet Union collapses and it's no more.
	You just have a weakened Russian Federation.
	The economy is destroyed, they undergo a palace coup, essentially, and like I said, they lose so much territory and so much population and resources, it's a disaster.
	Yet, NATO, which was formed to counter the Soviet Union, expands, even though the Soviet Union no longer exists.
	So in 92, they say, we're going to expand membership.
	In 95, they get Boris Yeltsin to sign an agreement which includes a clause that says that Yeltsin, the President of Russia, agrees that NATO can expand.
	In 97, in Madrid, they say that NATO will expand.
	And then in 99, they have the first round of expansion, of NATO.
	And they expand NATO membership to three more countries.
	And then in 2004, it keeps going.
	And they bring in nearly every country in Eastern Europe into NATO.
	And so now not only are these Eastern European countries not part of Russia, but now they're part of NATO.
	And so, And so, whereas at one point, again throughout the 20th century, all of this area was under Russian control, in the 1990s it was a neutral zone or it was contested, by 2004 it's now in the hands of the West and they're being brought into the sphere of influence of Washington DC and London and Brussels and Berlin and Paris.
	And so these countries are being democratized, liberalized, often with these color revolutions, with these revolutions that are instigated by Western intelligence agencies where they install pro-Western leaders and they bring them into the military and defensive alliance and the economic union with Europe and with America.
	And so now the West's borders are moving at a breakneck speed towards Moscow.
	They're rushing towards Moscow.
	Now Russia can't be a part of NATO.
	They won't let Russia join NATO.
	So how is Russia to interpret this other than that?
	NATO is coming for Russia.
	NATO is just seizing all this land.
	They're taking all these countries and bringing them under NATO, and in doing so, they're moving the border further, they're taking from Russia, and they're moving missiles, troops, military bases, and a hard defensive line right up to Russia's border.
	And so when they bring the Baltic states, for example, into NATO, now you've got Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, which are right on the border with Russia, now you're putting NATO troops there, and NATO military bases, and NATO military drills.
	And it gets back to the geography problem.
	Now Russia's being forced to defend a hard line, which is far larger than historically it ever has.
	In 2008, or 2007, NATO crosses a red line, and NATO says, now we want Georgia and Ukraine to join NATO in the future.
	So in 2007, Georgia, which is in the Caucasus, and Ukraine, which is of course on the Black Sea, The United States and NATO says these two countries will become part of NATO.
	And Russia immediately draws a red line and says, no, that is not acceptable.
	You cannot bring Georgia and Ukraine into NATO.
	Because you bring Georgia and Ukraine into NATO and now Russia, we have got Russia by the balls.
	Because so much of Russia's energy resources are in the Caucasus.
	That's a vital region where you've got the Baku oil fields.
	This is what Hitler tried to get in World War II.
	And, you know, we even talked about bombing that during World War II when we thought we were going to war against the Soviet Union.
	So Georgia's right there in the Caucasus, right there on Russia's southern border, and again on the Black Sea, and the Caspian Sea.
	And then you've got Ukraine, which is 100 kilometers from Moscow.
	It's got immense food and energy resources.
	And also Ukraine has Crimea, which has the Sevastopol military base, and that is where Russia deploys its Black Sea fleet, and that's where Russia projects power into the Black Sea.
	And so, think about in your head, if you take a look at a map of Europe, if NATO expands to Ukraine and Georgia, you've now got a NATO crescent, which goes from Estonia and the Baltic Sea in the north, all the way down through Latvia, Lithuania, through Poland, through Ukraine, through Crimea, the Black Sea, through to Georgia.
	And what is happening is we have encircled Russia.
	This is an unacceptable security posture for Russia to be in.
	We've encircled Russia.
	And we've created a geographic, a geographical dynamic.
	Is that the right form?
	We've created this dynamic where Russia cannot defend itself.
	If NATO were to ever declare war against Russia, we could come at them from the Baltic Sea, we could come at them from the Baltic States, we can come at them from Poland, we can come at them from Ukraine, we control the Black Sea, and we've got Georgia!
	This would be the equivalent of if Russia controlled Mexico, and Cuba, and Puerto Rico, and, like, Alaska.
	It's a completely... and this is what I want to drive home.
	We initiated that.
	There was no reason for NATO to even continue existing.
	Because Russia, after 1991, is neutralized.
	And, as I said, and this is important too, it's no longer the Soviet Union.
	It's no longer a universal, totalizing, ideological-driven agenda in Moscow.
	And it's no longer a superpower either.
	So it has neither the means nor the desire to achieve the kind of world domination which NATO was created to counter.
	So, Russia's no longer a threat in terms of their capability and in terms of their ambitions after 1991.
	Yet, NATO not only does not dissolve, it remains, and then it expands over the course of 15 years and races across the northern European plain and into these very strategically important locations.
	And in 2007, say, we're going to get Ukraine and we're going to get Georgia too.
	And this is just not good for Russia.
	And here's a question.
	Does Russia have a right to national security?
	When NATO expands like this, we are prioritizing our security over Russia's.
	What we're saying is that Russia has no reasonable security interest at all.
	Why is that?
	Russia is now a normal nation-state.
	Russia is trying to build its economy back up.
	They're trying to recover from their losses, but they're not the Soviet Union, and they're a third-rate economy.
	Does Russia not have a right to defend itself?
	Does Russia not have a right to exercise legitimate national interest?
	Why can Russia not defend its borders?
	Is this good for both parties?
	Is this good for both NATO and Russia?
	Why are we pursuing NATO expansion at the expense of Russia?
	Why do we have to do that?
	There's no valid reason.
	You could say a hundred years ago, well, that's because the Soviet Union wants global communism and they want to overthrow our government.
	Okay.
	But what's the argument in 2007?
	What's the argument?
	What's the argument in 2004 for bringing all these Eastern European countries into NATO?
	They're not at an immediate risk of a Russian invasion.
	And what good does bringing Ukraine and Georgia do for the security and the peace and the safety of Europe?
	It's a provocation, it's antagonism, and it is just completely unacceptable for Russia.
	Russia cannot accept that.
	And Vladimir Putin would not be a good president if he did.
	And like I said, I keep comparing it to America to give you a sense of perspective.
	If Putin were to annex Mexico into a defensive alliance with Russia, our leaders would not be doing their job if they let that happen.
	And that would also be an action which would destabilize the Western Hemisphere, and it would create conflict.
	If Russia did that, they would be the aggressors.
	Right?
	And that is effectively what started in 2007, as far back as then.
	And so then in 2008, Russia invades Georgia.
	And people forget about that, but that was the first European war of the 21st century.
	Russia invades Georgia and the Caucasus to secure the independence of two breakaway regions, South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
	And that prevents Georgia from being brought into NATO.
	And America doesn't really respond because we're tied up with Iraq and Afghanistan.
	But there's a precursor to this here in Georgia.
	Russia goes full-scale invasion.
	They take South Ossetia, take Abkhazia, and they preempt Georgia from joining NATO.
	Fast forward to 2014.
	And you've got the Sochi Winter Olympics happening, and Russia's preoccupied with this, and there is still this lingering question of NATO and European Union membership for Ukraine.
	It's growing in popularity, people are talking about it, and the pro-Russian president in Ukraine, Yanukovych, squashes the idea.
	He says, we're not going to join NATO, we're not going to join the European Union.
	And he's a pro-Russian, people say he's a puppet.
	So, the United States goes in and they overthrow him.
	They overthrow him with a color revolution, they create all this propaganda about democracy and liberalism, and they create these fake protests, and they catalyze and provoke a revolution in Kiev.
	Yanukovych is overthrown, he flees the country, and they install Petro Poroshenko, pro-Western leader.
	Putin swoops in because he sees the writing on the wall.
	They've been trying to get Ukraine into NATO and the European Union and to become a liberal democracy at that point for seven years.
	Conversation starts in 2007 is when it's discussed and then in 2014 they go in and they overthrow Yanukovych and they say we're doing it.
	Yanukovych says no, NATO-EU membership, well we disagree.
	He's out, Poroshenko is in.
	So Putin acts swiftly.
	He invades Crimea, he invades Donbass, those two republics in the east.
	And specifically he invades Crimea because of the strategic importance of Crimea, because the Crimean Peninsula gives Russia a port, a year-round port.
	Also, it's got the military base, the naval base in Sevastopol, and that is where they have their Black Sea Fleet, which is a crucial part of their navy, and that is how they're able to defend the Caucasus, and that's how they're able to defend their southwestern border.
	So, but again, where is the provocation here?
	Because so far the story is 25 years of NATO taking advantage of the situation.
	25 years, or what is it?
	Yeah, yeah, 25 years of NATO and America seeking to dominate and contain Russia at the expense of European security and at the expense of Russia's legitimate national interest.
	And it starts in 92, talking about expanding NATO.
	95, they get Russia to agree.
	97, they vow to expand.
	99, they do their first wave.
	04, they do their second wave.
	07, they bring Ukraine and Georgia into the conversation.
	And then in 14...
	When Yanukovych says no, they overthrow him, and they try to do it.
unidentified		So Russia goes in and says, this is unacceptable.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		They drew a hard red line in 2007, and the West didn't respect it.
		So Russia said, I have to go in.
		Putin said, I have to go in.
		So he saves Crimea, he saves Donbass, and in taking Crimea, he retains the base in Sevastopol and the Black Sea Fleet.
		And in gaining or granting independence or some form of independence to the two breakaway regions, Luhansk and Donetsk, he creates enough instability in Ukraine that Ukraine cannot join NATO and the European Union.
		Because to join the European Union, you've got to have a stable political situation.
		They can't bring somebody into an economic union if their country is blowing up and at war.
		So Russia fans the flame of conflict in eastern Ukraine to prevent integration into Europe.
		Can't do it.
		And that's been the situation for the past eight years.
		Now, this is an important turning point.
		Because up until 2014, America did not see Russia as a threat.
		When they're expanding NATO and they're expanding European Union...
		This is just about liberalizing the world.
		And you can go back to 2012, the Obama-Romney debate.
		I've talked about this on my show before.
		Romney, in 2012, is saying, we need to get tough on Russia, we need to do this, we need to do that.
		And Obama says, hey, the 1980s called, they want their foreign policy back.
		Saying that it's not the Cold War anymore.
		We're not at war with the Soviet Union.
		Russia's not what it used to be.
		And Hillary Clinton, when she was the Secretary of State, she famously does the Russian reset with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
		So, it's, and George W. Bush says he looks in Putin's eyes and sees his soul and he's a good man and he's going to be a partner, right?
		So throughout the 90s, throughout the 2000s, even past the 2012 election, and you remember famously too in the 2012 election when Medvedev was president, Putin serves two terms until 2008.
		The Constitution requires him to step down.
		He becomes prime minister.
		Medvedev steps up, and he's a puppet.
		He becomes president for four years.
		They change the Constitution.
		Putin gives himself two more six-year terms.
		In 2012, Obama meets with Medvedev and says, I could be more flexible in negotiations after the election.
		So you've got verifiably, throughout this period, the United States is saying, we're not afraid of Russia.
		Russia's not a threat.
		Expanding NATO and the European Union is just about more power, more control, and it's about this democratic globalism strategy of trying to make the world safe for democracy and make it liberal and the triumph of liberalism after the Cold War.
		But 2014 is a turning point.
		When Russia invades Crimea and Donbass, this is when the switch gets flipped.
		And they say, now Russia's the enemy.
		Now Russia's Hitler.
		Now Russia is Nazi Germany.
		Now it's aggression.
		Now they're trying to take over Europe.
		Right?
		And in 2015 and 2016 they ratcheted up and they blamed Trump and they say that Russia's with Trump and Russia's creating all this instability, Russia's behind the alt-right, they're behind Brexit, they're behind Trump, they're trying to break apart NATO, they're trying to sponsor UKIP and ADF, and they're trying to sponsor Breitbart and the Republican Party.
		And you get all this hysteria even before the 2016 election about cyber attacks and election interference.
		And then we know how it went for the past four years under Trump, the special counsel and all the rest.
		Now fast forward to 2022, and NATO is deploying hypersonic missiles on Ukraine's western border.
		And the President Zelensky, who was recently elected, who is an actor, is talking about getting a nuclear arsenal.
		Zelensky is talking about getting a nuclear arsenal.
		And consider this also.
		Since 2014, Russia has tried to broker a ceasefire between the Donbass region and the government in Kiev called the Minsk Accords.
		There's two of them.
		And Kiev has never held up their end of the bargain.
		They have never honored the ceasefire.
		They have never tried to implement the Minsk Accords.
		So Kiev is bombing Luhansk and Donetsk.
		They're bombing ethnic Russians.
		They refuse to relinquish control of them, refuse to relinquish control of Crimea.
		Zelensky is talking about recapturing Crimea, recapturing Luhansk and Donetsk.
		They will not honor the ceasefire.
		They're allowing NATO to deploy missiles on the western border.
		Now he's talking about nuclear weapons.
		And so Russia, several months ago, says, you know what?
		We're done playing around.
		Ukraine is never going to be a part of NATO.
	It's not acceptable.
	They're not going to have nuclear weapons.
	We are going to go in there and demilitarize Ukraine.
	Either Biden and the EU is going to come to the negotiating table, and we are going to make sure that Ukraine is never part of NATO, or we are going to invade Ukraine and ensure for ourselves they'll never become part of NATO.
	And the West refuses to negotiate.
	They say, no no, that's unacceptable, we'll never give an inch, blah blah blah, and now you have a Russian invasion.
	So with the long view of history there, and I know that's a really, that's really a long roundabout way of getting there, but when you take the long road, you see who's the real aggressor here.
	It is NATO.
	It is the United States that is the aggressor.
	We would not allow Russia to have even a modest, reasonable sphere of influence in Eastern Europe.
	Because Russia brought Ukraine and Belarus into the CFTC, which is sort of an economic-political alliance that's meant to begin to rebuild the Warsaw Pact.
	Belarus and Ukraine are part of the new periphery that Russia's trying to shore up, and they won't let Russia even have that.
	And so our border with Russia goes from Berlin all the way east to Donbass, all the way east to Kharkiv.
	It's unacceptable for Russia.
	We forced Russia to do this.
	And I keep saying this, it's an unacceptable security posture for Russia to be in.
	To have NATO have such a long border with Russia, it's not acceptable.
	For them to be deploying missiles, potentially nukes, for them to be doing drills that close to Russia, to strip them of the Black Sea, to strip them of Crimea, of Sevastopol, to challenge them in the Caucasus, to challenge them so close to their capital, it's just not acceptable for Russia.
	Russia can't allow that to happen!
	In the same way that we wouldn't allow Russia to have California, or we wouldn't allow Russia to have Alaska, or Mexico, or Puerto Rico.
	We have the Monroe Doctrine.
	The Monroe Doctrine says that all of the Western Hemisphere is ours.
	But Russia can't even have Ukraine and Belarus?
	They were historically part of Russia 30 years ago, and formerly part of Russia 100 years ago.
	And now, it's all this propaganda about, they have a right to exist, they're their own nation, and understand that's why everyone's calling it Kiev now.
	Because Kiev, or what are they saying, Kiev, Kiev, they're saying that's the Ukrainian pronunciation, and that's supposed to brainwash you into thinking Ukraine has its own identity, Ukraine is its own country.
	It's Kiev, not Kiev.
	Because Kiev is the Russian pronunciation, and Ukraine's its own country.
	No, it's not!
	It's far more complicated than that.
	Ukraine is a new nation-state.
	Ukraine was a part of the Russian Empire.
	It was under the Soviet Union.
	We're gonna go and start World War III over this administrative unit that was created 30 years ago?
unidentified		No!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And this Ukrainian flag, please.
		Give me a break.
		So Ukraine is an illusory state.
		It is not a real country.
		What's more is Ukraine is one of the most corrupt countries in the world, and it has been a battlefield for Russia and American intelligence agencies.
		These American intelligence agencies now are waging a war on Russia, straight up, since 2014.
		And so they overthrew Yanukovych.
		And now they're in Ukraine, and they're using Ukraine as a, it's a battleground, it's a vassal state for the American intel agencies to do their dirty work.
		That's Hunter Biden, that's the Clintons, that's Obama.
		There is nothing good happening in Eastern Europe ever since the fall of the Soviet Union.
		It has been billionaires, it has been the super mob and the intel agencies using that vacuum of power to loot these countries, integrate them into their grift, integrate them into our racket, and use them for various political purposes.
		But Ukraine does not have nationhood.
		Ukraine really does not even have statehood.
		They don't even have sovereignty.
		Please, Zelensky is a puppet of the West.
		And he goes to the United Kingdom, the House of Parliament, and he's talking, he's echoing Winston Churchill. - Hell.
		Oh, fuck off.
		He sounds like Winston Churchill.
		We'll fight them in the air.
		We'll fight them in the sea.
		Oh, fuck off, you Jewish actor.
		And fuck Winston Churchill, too.
		How dare you?
		How dare you?
		So it's despicable.
		It's disgraceful.
		It is a farce.
		It is a joke.
		It is an absolute joke.
		Ukraine does not have nationhood.
		Ukraine barely has statehood.
		They are a corrupt rape victim of the intelligence agencies.
		They're an outpost of Western domination and provocation towards Russia.
		And as far as I'm concerned, what Russia is doing is reasonable.
		And to rewind even a little bit also, What Russia is doing here, and so in the context of everything I've just said, to rewind, what the media is saying about this is that Russia is Hitler, Russia is evil, he wants world domination, Russia is aggressing Eastern Europe, and he wants to rebuild the Soviet Union.
		This is a limited military engagement.
		It is not being fought brutally.
		It is not being fought with cruelty.
		There are not excessive civilian casualties, or really any casualties at all.
		Excessive casualties at all, in general.
		This is a military campaign with limited objectives.
		limited and reasonable strategic objectives in light of what the west is doing it would be you know people are talking about he's going to invade the baltic states he's not going to invade the baltic states he's going to invade poland next he's not going to invade poland ukraine is not part of nato try as they might ukraine is not part of nato Putin is not invading NATO countries.
		He has no designs on NATO countries.
		He is invading Ukraine because it is the West that is trying to make Ukraine a forward operating base for the globalist empire.
		And so for that reason, I support Russia.
		What's more is this, and this gets then to the bigger and the broader strategic picture, which is, well, I mean, there's, so that's really just one part of it.
		That's really just part one of the Ukraine-Russia conflict.
		There's really so much more going on here.
		But let's just, let's hang out here for a second and let's just say, America's really trying to start World War III over this.
		Over really no vital national security interest.
		Russia's not a threat.
		They're not a threat to America.
		They're not a threat to Western Europe.
		They're not a threat to existing NATO countries.
		Why are we starting World War III over NATO membership for Ukraine?
		Ask yourself that.
		What's really at stake here?
		It's not even Ukrainian independence.
		It's whether or not Ukraine will join NATO in the future.
		We're going to start World War III because the rest of Europe isn't good enough.
		Over Ukraine's prospective membership in NATO.
		And why?
		It's not like Russia wants to absorb Ukraine.
		I don't think Russia does.
	I don't think Russia wants to control Ukraine and make Ukraine formally part of Russia.
	I don't think that's the objective here.
	I believe Russia wants, at the minimum, an independent and neutral Ukraine.
	And maybe at the most, they want a pro-Russian leader in Ukraine.
	But that's what we're talking about here.
	I mean, let's really think about it for a moment.
	This big thing when people are tying the fucking ribbons around the tree and carrying on and we're going to exclude Russia from the financial system and starve its population and gas prices are going to go to $6 a gallon.
unidentified		Why?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's not even whether or not Ukraine can be independent or anything.
		It's that NATO must have Ukraine.
		And you don't say no to NATO.
		Why?
		Why does NATO exist?
		Why should Ukraine be a part of NATO?
		To counter what threat?
		Russia can invade Ukraine and Belarus and still not be able to take down NATO.
		Because NATO has every other country.
		So what are we really doing here?
		What is this about?
		And fundamentally this is about American hubris and arrogance and greed.
		That's what it's about.
		We are in an anomalous time in world history, which is now passing, called the unipolar moment.
		Unipolar, meaning you talk about poles, meaning not like Polish people, but poles like a locus of power, where a superpower state resides, or a great power state is, and we call the world order multipolar, bipolar, unipolar.
		During the Concert of Europe in the 19th century, the world was multipolar.
		There were multiple poles of power.
		Multiple places where there was a center of gravity.
		In the Cold War, there was a bipolar world order.
		Moscow and Washington DC.
		After the fall of the Soviet Union, the world became a unipolar world order for about 20 years.
		Where America became a hyperpower, meaning that the distance between America and the next most powerful country was so great that America was just in another class.
		America could dominate all the other countries combined.
		That was the situation after the Cold War.
		America transcends, becomes a hyperpower with the fall of the Soviet Union because of its relative position to the rest of the world and the rest of the world combined.
		And the world becomes unipolar.
		There is only one real pole of real power.
		And America has the ability to project power globally without challenge, without a confrontation.
		And for 20 years, they could really do whatever they want.
		They could afford to make a lot of mistakes.
		They could pressure any country.
		They can invade Iraq, Afghanistan.
		They can do whatever.
		They get to shape the international system.
		But this is an anomaly because this is an anomaly of history.
		No country can maintain that kind of advantage.
		No single sole country can maintain that kind of advantage over all the rest of the world combined relatively forever, or even for a long period of time.
		So this, they call it the unipolar moment, was an anomaly.
		This was the exception.
		It was almost an impossibility.
		But it was fleeting from the start, and we knew that.
		We should have known China's got a billion people.
		If anything, it was an anomaly that China was not a world power for the past one or two hundred years.
		And we knew that Europe was eventually going to gain strategic autonomy without the threat of the Soviet Union and recovering from World War II.
		We knew that Russia would reconstitute.
		Well, I guess that wasn't a given, but they still had massive conventional and nuclear abilities.
		So the writing was on the wall that the unipolar moment would not last forever.
		The global situation is always dynamic.
		But we're not willing to let go.
		During this moment, we're able to control everything.
		And now the situation is radically different.
		China is becoming a peer competitor.
		They're becoming just about equal to us in terms of economy, military, in development.
		And Russia is a second rate power compared to the US and China, but still important.
		And so this idea that America can contain and dominate Russia, and China, and Iran, and every country we don't like, and we can control every inch of land in the world, it is just not true.
		It is just not practical.
		It is not feasible.
		We cannot keep all of Eastern Europe, and Central Asia, and Taiwan, and the Middle East, and South Asia, we can't hold it all.
		Sovereignty is about the ability to defend your borders and project real power.
		China's closer to Taiwan than we are.
		They're way closer.
		We cannot defend Taiwan.
		Period.
		And so that's only going to last so long before China takes it back.
	And the same goes for Ukraine.
	We cannot defend all of Eastern Europe indefinitely.
	So this is about greed, it's about hubris and pride, and we've lied so much to the world about our capability, we've believed our own lies.
	This stuff about America can fight two wars at once, we kick ass, we're bigger and better than everybody.
	Russia's evil, all our enemies are evil.
	No, they're not.
	No, we're not.
	Russia, China, India, Brazil, Western Europe, we are going to have to live with these other jurisdictions.
	We're going to have to live with these other countries pursuing their own interests.
	And we have got to negotiate a world order where we can have a balance of power that is beneficial and advantageous to us and reasonable to our adversaries.
	And we need to do that in a way that is peaceful, and we need to do that with the cooperation and the trust of other world leaders.
	That's how we have to navigate this, because whenever a global hegemon falls or is displaced, it is a very destabilizing and often catastrophic event.
	This is what caused World War I and World War II.
	It was the rise of German power on the continent against the United Kingdom.
	That's what caused World War I.
	Was the displacement of the UK's uncontested power on the continent by Germany.
	And that is what caused World War I, and then, as a consequence, World War II.
	So, as America declines relatively to other world powers, it will be similarly catastrophic and destabilizing.
	The onus is on us to navigate these waters ahead.
	Not give away everything, but create a world order where other countries can have a reasonable stake in things and it will be advantageous to us.
	That's the best that we can do.
	But if we try to keep everything, we're going to destroy the whole world.
	That's it, and you see that right now.
	We may get in a hot war with Russia.
	People think it's impossible.
	Some people think it is, but it's not.
	It's not hard to see a scenario where Russia and America go to war here.
	It's a real possibility.
	And who would that benefit?
	And to what end?
	America's not... There's no existential risk to America if Ukraine is not part of NATO.
	But yet, we're going to risk ending the whole world over it.
	I think about that.
	And the same goes for Taiwan, and the same goes for a lot of this stuff.
	It's just not worth it.
	And that doesn't mean we don't go out and say that, but our foreign policy must be guided by that value judgment, right?
	In other words, our State Department doesn't go out and say, hey, we're not powerful anymore, we're going to relinquish control.
	You don't say that, but that must be the value judgment, which is to say, We feasibly cannot keep these territories.
	The situation is evolving.
	We must negotiate a settlement from a position of strength, but negotiation must occur.
	We're unwilling to negotiate with anybody, and everybody's evil except for us.
	And we're going to defend every inch of clay to the death.
	For what?
	Why?
unidentified		That's not right.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And you'll see, I mean, this is going to be catastrophic for America because we already have inflation.
		And now that we've just banned the oil imports from Russia, energy is going to become a lot more expensive.
		And when energy gets more expensive, everything gets more expensive.
		Because, you know, it's not just gas.
		Everybody thinks that it's just gas prices.
		Oh, it costs more to fill up my car.
		Well, guess what?
		You want to know how goods and services get to the stores?
		How do you think planes get in the air?
		How do you think trucks drive around with all this stuff?
		Where do you think the stuff in the grocery store comes from?
		And where do you think foreign imports come from?
		They come from ships, which need fuel.
		They go on trucks, which need fuel.
		People that manage the economy fly on planes that need fuel.
		Mail and other goods fly on planes which needs fuel.
		Factories, houses, manufacturing, cities, transportation, it all needs fuel.
		I mean this is common sense and basic stuff, but some people don't realize.
		So when Oil goes up to $200-$300 per barrel.
		This is going to have a huge inflationary effect on the economy.
		And we are already having an inflationary effect.
		Inflation was already 6% over the last year, and now oil is going to go up to $300 a barrel.
		And gas prices are going to go up to $5-$6 a gallon, maybe more.
		It is just as catastrophic for us So, I mean, we think we're just going to cripple the Russian economy.
		I mean, yeah, we are going to hurt them, but we're hurting ourselves too.
		And for what?
		I mean, what are we doing here?
		We're going to risk a nuclear war.
		We're going to rape our own economy.
		We're going to push Russia into an alliance with China.
		And for what?
		Because we want NATO membership to be on the table for Ukraine?
		Why?
		Why does NATO even need to exist?
		Let alone this big and always expanding and Ukraine must be a part of it.
		It has to be in the conversation.
unidentified		Why?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I have to pay $5 a gallon for gas so that Ukraine can have prospective NATO and EU membership?
		Why?
		It's just not right.
		It is just wrong.
		Fuck Ukraine, and NATO, and the State Department, and the Pentagon, and Zelensky, and the European Union, and Boris Johnson, and every last one of these people.
		They're going to get us all killed.
		They're raping us because of their greed and their pride.
		It's what it is.
		Period.
		I don't want to see any more of these blue and gold flags and any of that crap.
		All these people, they're brainwashed by the State Department.
		That's what it is.
		All the media is controlled.
		Nobody will tell you this side of the story.
		But ultimately, this is a positive development, and here's why.
		The effect of this will be that it will drive Russia into an alliance with China, and the so-called rogue states that are pariahs, that are outside, unapproved by the American system, they will be forced into an alliance.
		And the so-called rogue states that are pariahs, that are outside, unapproved by the American system, they will be forced into an alliance.
		Russia, China, Iran, and you could probably come up with some others like Venezuela, Nicaragua, Bolivia.
		These kinds of countries.
		Syria.
		And the hope is that these countries combined will be able to challenge the American system.
		If Russia is banned from all these services, hopefully they'll make their own.
		Hopefully China will make something and there will be an alternative to the American system.
		This has salience for us because we're combating the same system.
		Have you noticed that the same tools they're using against Russia they use against us?
		I mean, they effectively banned Russia from Twitter and banned Russia from YouTube and they banned Russia from PayPal and from credit card processing and they censored them online.
		You know, when people said, they banned a sitting U.S.
unidentified		President!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		They could ban anybody!
		Yeah, and they think they can ban Russia!
		They think they can ban the nation of Russia!
		And they can't.
		They can't ban the U.S.
		President.
		They can't ban Russia.
		They don't have that much power.
		It's hubris.
		So what they're going to do is force Russia into an alliance with China and with these other countries, and they will create an alternative system.
		And this will be the worst thing that America ever did, because Russia will de-dollar, right?
		They will disengage with the dollar and the dollar system with China, and the preeminence of the dollar will come to an end, and there will be another option.
		There will be another offering in the world.
		So contrary, on the contrary, this is not going to destroy Russia, this is going to destroy American hegemony over the world.
		And so, ultimately I welcome the development because if this weakens the American empire, that is good for us here at home.
		If Russia and China can create an alternative, that means that there is some place we could go to where we're not going to be killed by the CIA or the FBI or the State Department.
		Because that, I mean, this is the same people.
		The same people that want to throw you in jail over the 6th, the same people that want to ban you from Twitter, the same people that took away your credit card processing and banned you from Bank of America, and so on.
		They're the same people waging a war against Russia.
		And that alternative, that this alternative system that is being created by these rogue states, It's going to come in handy for us rogue dissidents here in America, truly.
		I see a scenario where American dissidents are fleeing to Russia and China to flee from the oppression of the American system.
		Look at the truck drivers in Canada, look at the 1-6 political prisoners.
		A time will come when we'll need to appeal to Russia or China for political asylum because we are being oppressed and persecuted by our own free, liberal government.
		So, all that they're doing is accelerating the demise of this system.
		America is no longer too big to fail.
		There's other people on the block now.
		It's not the 90s anymore.
		China is a player.
		Russia is a second-rate player, but they're still a player.
		Is America more powerful than Russia?
		Yes.
		Is NATO plus America vastly more powerful than Russia?
		Yes.
		But America versus Russia, China, Iran, and a strategically autonomous Western Europe?
		No.
		Not such a favorable position anymore.
		So the question is, do we want our enemies to control the entire world?
		I say no.
		I do not want our enemies to control Taiwan.
		I do not want our enemies to control Ukraine.
		The only difference is my enemy isn't Putin or China.
		That's the thing.
		I've been put on a federal no-fly list.
		I've been put on a terrorist watch list, banned from everything, debanked, financially sanctioned, spied on, investigated, subpoenaed, blacklisted, censored.
		Moscow is not my enemy.
		Beijing is not my enemy.
		Not my foremost enemy.
		Not the most imminent threat to me and my goals and my freedom and my dignity and my interest as an American citizen.
		So this is a good thing.
		This is a good thing that Russia is developing its own alternative system with China.
		And that will be the outcome.
		So my prediction for the future is this.
		I don't think that Russia is going to try to incorporate Ukraine into Russia.
		And we have to define what we're talking about here.
		Russia is not conquering Ukraine.
		They're not going to conquer Ukraine and make Ukraine part of Russia, which is what some people assume that is not what's happening.
		It appears they're not even going after Western Ukraine at all.
		It seems like what they're trying to do is destroy the Ukrainian military.
		I think that's their first objective, is just to degrade the Ukrainian war-making capacity, defeat their military.
		I think they're going to try to overthrow the government in Kiev and install a new government.
		And then I think they will carve out a larger territory that will either be independent or then be incorporated into Russia.
		And then I think they will leave.
		But I do not think that Russia seeks a long-term occupation of Ukraine.
		I do not think that they want to incorporate Ukraine in full into Russia.
	I think they want to secure Crimea, they want to secure Donbass, I think they may carve out that corridor between Crimea and Donbass and maybe more territory, I think they're going to install a new government, and I think they want NATO membership off the table.
	I think those are their limited strategic objectives.
	But I do not think they're going to invade Poland and the Baltics, I do not think they're going to try to conquer Ukraine and anything like that.
	They want to defeat the military, get a pro-Russian government, and then carve out some territory, take NATO membership off the table.
	I think that's the endgame.
	The ultimate consequence of the conflict will be that Russia and China will be in a permanent alliance against America, and we drove them to do that.
	It was a big mistake, but that's what's happening, and they will further their effort to create an alternative system to the dollar.
	Simple as that.
	China has set its sights on that for a long time and now they've got a partner in Russia and other countries too.
	And as time goes on, their position will be strengthened.
	As time goes on, China will grow more powerful relative to America and in absolute terms.
	Russia will probably be diminished by their population problem.
	But China is going to be raised up and be the, like I said, the peer competitor and they'll have backing with Russia.
	That's why the U.S.
	is trying so hard to hold on to Europe and Japan and things because they know their power is slipping.
	You know, they're on Huawei.
	Western Europe's on Huawei and they're drinking up Russian natural gas.
	Is Western Europe going to be under our thumb forever?
	I don't know.
	That's a big problem for Washington because Washington's power compared to China's power is diminishing.
	Russia's power compared to Russia and China combined is diminishing rapidly.
	And Washington may not be as powerful as Russia combined anymore by itself.
	So that's why the United States needs Western Europe and Japan and others to shore up that balance of power.
	But it won't be like that forever.
	Because, like I said, China's rising and it is creating a new gravitational pull.
	And Western Europe is no longer the pawn of the United States that it was 40 years ago.
	That's my prediction for the future.
	And all this bodes well for us.
	But seriously, you know, the misinformation and the ignorance on this is just appalling.
	This is not difficult stuff.
	This is not really complicated.
	I'm not the smartest guy ever for saying this.
	I'm not the only guy saying this.
	It's been like this for 30 years.
	But people are just drinking up the propaganda about, Hitler too!
	He's the boogeyman!
	And all this stuff.
	And you know, even Hitler was lied about in a similar way.
	I'll just say that.
	You know, I made a joke at AFFPAC3.
	I said, oh, they're comparing them to Hitler and they're saying that's not a good thing.
	You know, they demonized Hitler in exactly the same way.
	And that led to World War II.
	Frankly, World War II was a similarly massive strategic blunder for very similar reasons.
	You know, we went to war over Poland.
	And we wound up destroying all of Western Europe and Eastern Europe and giving it to Moscow.
	So, good job!
	That was another genius, another four-dimensional play by the geniuses in Washington, D.C.
unidentified		Right?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That gave us the Cold War, that gave us Stalin's domination over Eastern Europe, and it destroyed all the able-bodied men of Europe and Western Europe.
		So that was awesome, too.
		So, you know, they compare it to Hitler and it's like, you know, if anything it does the opposite of what you think it's doing rhetorically.
		So, that kind of stuff just has no place in a practical foreign policy.
		You know, the same thing that they did with Kim Jong Un.
		You know, when Trump tried to do detente with Kim Jong Un, they said, He's playing footsie with dictators!
		I hate when they say that.
		They make it sound so gay, and it's just like, frankly, it's disgusting and I hate it in our national discourse.
		He's writing love letters to Putin!
		He's having anal sex with Russia!
		It's like, that's fucking disgusting.
		Stop talking about it that way.
		Diplomacy is not gay, okay?
		Diplomacy is not gay.
		We should not be ashamed of or embarrassed to do diplomacy.
		Shame on the warmongers, the you-know-what warmongers that make it that way.
		It's despicable.
		Seriously, and I'm being a little bit jokey about it, but seriously.
		You know, those are literally Jewish neocons saying that.
		Literally bloodthirsty, murdering warmongers that love death and worship death.
		That every time a leader tries to do diplomacy, they vilify our enemies in these cartoon, caricature terms.
		He's Hitler.
		He's a mustache-twirling supervillain.
		You're writing love letters to dictators.
		Good fucking, yeah, hug and kiss the dictators.
		Let's not have war.
		Let's not have a nuclear war on the Korean peninsula or in Ukraine or in Taiwan.
		It's despicable that they do that.
		They're playing, like, to challenge your masculinity because war is really masculine.
		It's masculine to stand up and stand tall against Russia.
		No, it's not!
		It's foolish, it is arrogant, it is prideful, and it's beneath us as a civilization.
		We're better than that.
		Vladimir Putin is a statesman.
		We have a joke.
		We have a mental retard.
		We don't even have a president.
		Did you watch his statement today announcing the oil embargo?
		The president's a joke?
		And the narratives he put out, it's like Harry Potter.
		It's like a Disney movie.
		Honestly, this experience has shown what a joke democracy and liberalism really is.
		What an absolute farce appealing to the commoners has been, to the peasants.
		We've let the lowest common denominator dictate the direction of society.
		So in order to launder our jingoistic foreign policy through public opinion, through the masses, we have to dumb it down to levels of Harry Potter and fucking Star Wars to get a war with Russia.
		That's literally what it is.
		You watch Putin's speech on Ukraine, and he talks for 60 minutes and gives a dissertation about the history of the Soviet Union.
		You listen to Biden's 10 minute speech, and he says, DICTATORS!
		WE'RE GONNA STAND UP TO BULLIES!
		CAUSE BULLIES NEVER WIN!
unidentified		BULLIES ARE BAD!
		AND WE'RE FUCKING AWESOME!
		AND WE'RE NOT GONNA LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT, ARE WE?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I hate it.
		I hate what this country has become.
		We have become a nation of fat retards.
		Fat, nose-picking, slobbering, dog-shit animals is what we've become.
		And it's just, it's horrifying.
		So I support Russia, I support Putin.
		This country is so, so messed up.
		And listen, I'm America first, but we gotta recognize there are deeper problems in our country than Joe Biden.
		There are deeper problems than the Democrats.
		We need to become a civilization again.
		We need to stop with the sweatpants and the cargo shorts and stop being obese and stop being stupid.
		And being so low and so crass and so vulgar.
		I'm sorry, but American identity is not about tits and ass and guns and guitars.
		It just isn't.
		Let's be better.
		Let's strive to be a sophisticated, mature, high civilization.
		We can do it.
		We have the potential, but we expect less of ourselves.
		We've accepted less for ourselves.
		And we think we take pride in ignorance.
		We take pride in being Philistines.
		It's just there's no pride in that.
unidentified		so So.
unidentified		Man.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, the Putin-America thing, it's like, we're destroying ourselves from within with this.
		We're just showing the world what a joke.
		We should not be running the world.
		Absolutely not.
		Look at who's running the world.
		Look at these joke people that we've got blinking.
		And who's that asshole that said, oh, the Taliban's not going to take Afghanistan in two days.
unidentified		Oh, really?
		It's just so infuriating, man.
		It really is.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's just such an insult to who we are.
		That's not who we are!
		Who are we?
		Duh!
unidentified		Duh!
unidentified		Putin's like Voldemort, and we're like the Black Storm Trooper.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		International Women's Day.
unidentified		Oh my gosh.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		This is so awful.
		Everything's so awful.
		It's so awful.
		We could make it better, but it's so bad.
		You know?
		But yeah, but that really just goes to show the weakness of our system, because that is what it is.
		The media's gotta dumb it down, and we gotta, Assad is Hitler, Putin is Hitler, Kim Jong-un is like Hitler, Mao is like Hitler, Hitler had concentration camps, just like Mao and the Uyghurs.
		And you know, then you start to think, hmm, maybe there's something about all this Hitler propaganda, maybe there's something going on there, you know, maybe let's rewind the clock, and maybe we're wrong about that too.
		You know?
		In the sense that, Hitler was a German statesman.
		And was there concentration camps?
		Were there death camps?
		I think so.
		I think there were death camps.
		I do.
		But there were also death camps against the Germans.
		And there were lots of camps.
		There were camps everywhere.
		We were in a global war.
		We had Japanese internment camps.
		There were lots of camps.
		There were lots of atrocities going on.
		But Hitler was the most uniquely evil guy in the world.
		And we get these cartoonish depictions of electric floors and mattresses made out of human hair and lampshades made out of lips.
		And we created this completely cartoonish, nonsensical narrative.
		And then that's the standard.
		That's the myth.
		That's the narrative that defines all of our politics now.
		It's the evil white man against the girl.
		It's the evil, dastardly, genocidal white man.
		It's Kylo Ren.
		It's the Penguin.
		It's Voldemort.
		It's a white man against The girl against the black stormtrooper, against black Harry Potter, against the black elf in Lord of the Rings, against the woman this, the black that.
		Zelensky, he's a Jewish Churchill.
		I can't even anymore.
		Jewish Churchill.
		He's like an icon of a Jewish guy running a multicultural country and standing up to... Oh my god!
unidentified		I can't take it anymore, man.
unidentified		So...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, and the same vilification of Putin is going to lead to a similar world war over a similar, you know, Thucydides Trap is what they call it.
		I think that's a stupid term, but that is what we're describing here, the Thucydides Trap, which is when a hegemon is displaced by another, there's a great power conflict, which is catastrophic.
		That's what happened in World War I and World War II.
		That's what's happening now, and it's the same story.
		Can we just have a statesman just meet with Putin and negotiate something reasonable and maybe there's not good and bad people there's just people and people have various motivations and people have the potential for both good and evil?
		I mean, let's just think about it that way.
		People have the capacity for both good and evil.
		Everybody does.
		Everybody has good and evil within them.
		Everybody has their human nature pulling them towards sin, and they have a conscience and grace pulling them towards God, and everybody has it, and everybody does a little of both.
		Everybody sins, and everybody makes mistakes, and some people do evil things, and sometimes they do evil things for the right reasons and good things for the wrong reasons, but it's a little bit more complicated than Putin is, you know, he's Darth Vader, right?
unidentified		Right?
unidentified		So.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And particularly when it comes to great power politics, a leader has many different motivations that go into these decisions.
		Decisions that govern trillions of dollars in wealth and hundreds of millions of people.
		There are lots of reasons why people make decisions.
		It is not because they're evil.
		It's not that simple, actually.
		Whether it be Biden or Xi Jinping or Kim Jong-un or Ahmadinejad or Assad or Putin or...
		Or Merkel.
		It doesn't matter.
		It's leaders making decisions for their country.
		Just because we're on one side of the conflict doesn't mean we can't understand where they're coming from.
		It's a basic negotiation.
		When you try to buy a car, the used car salesman is not evil.
		He's trying to get a better deal for himself!
		You're just like Hitler!
		It's like, no, he's just trying to feed his family.
		He wants to make more money.
		You want to save more money.
		It's a negotiation.
		Guess what?
		He can make money, and you can save money, and we can work out a reasonable deal, and everybody has mutual benefit with cooperation.
		That's how we can have this, this is just like sociology's basic prisoner's dilemmas 101, man!
		But they don't want peace.
		You know that.
		They don't want peace.
		They want war.
		And they want profit.
		And they're greedy and they're arrogant and they're full of pride.
		And they're gonna drive us all to be destroyed and our wealth raped So it's just very sad.
		It's very tragic.
		Honestly, people say pray for Ukraine.
		Pray for America.
		Pray for America.
		Pray for Russia.
		Pray for peace.
		You know, fuck Ukraine.
		Pray for peace.
		Pray for wisdom and prudence.
		How about wisdom?
		Instead of all this nuts on the table, let's just pray for our leaders to have wisdom and prudence and patience and pray for them to back off and to choose peace.
		Casualties happen in a war.
		Yeah, of course, pray for people that are dying anywhere all the time.
		But casualties happen in a war on both sides.
		But what caused the war?
		It's political actions.
		It's political decisions.
		So we need wisdom on political matters.
		But this is not wise.
		This is very unwise.
		So, go Russia!
unidentified		Go Russia!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Go Russia!
		Down with Ukraine!
		Ukraine will be destroyed!
		There'll be a lot of ghosts in Kiev when Russia's through with them!
		Down with Ukraine!
		Down with the illegitimate state in Kiev!
		Up with Russia!
		And we love and support Vladimir Putin.
		The American dollar system will be displaced!
		So, go Russia!
		Go all the way!
		Go in!
		Go hard!
		You're the pride!
		You're the pride of Moscow!
		Thank you for your service to all of the Russian heroes.
		Heroes of the Special Military Operation!
		Can we get an 07 in chat for our brave boys in red, white, and blue?
		Our brave boys in white, blue, and red fighting for freedom in Donbass.
		Can we get an 07 for our brave boys repping the white, blue, and red?
		The pride of the Tsar.
		Pride of Moscow!
unidentified		07, 07 to you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Pride of Tsar Vladimir Putin.
		You make your country proud.
		The world smiles upon your courageous stand against American hegemony, against American imperialism in Eastern Europe.
		Now, for legal reasons, that's all a joke.
		For legal reasons, that was a joke.
		I'm a patriot.
		I love America, okay?
		I love America.
		I would never challenge the security of America.
		I love America.
		I'm rooting for total homeland security.
		I love homeland security!
		We support American institutions.
		The Pentagon isn't evil.
		The State Department represents the state.
		And that's good.
		So for legal reasons, that's all a joke.
		I'm a patriot for America.
		I wave the flag.
		I support gay marriage in Senegal.
		I support women's rights in Kabul.
		I support a black racial uprising in Ukraine.
		I wave the flag all day.
		Trans rights are human rights.
		Women's rights are human rights.
		Gay people getting married.
		Guys kissing.
		Rules.
		And human global child trafficking is who we are.
		That's democracy, Jack!
		So, uh, yeah.
		So I'm a total patriot.
		I salute the stars.
		Red, white, and blue.
		Hell yeah.
		I want tanks to roll for gay rights.
		I want heads to roll for homosexual sex.
		Absolutely.
		Would you prefer I say that?
		They're like, he's chanting Putin.
		Yeah, I should be chanting something else instead, like abortion.
		Yeah, I think all of Russia, hey, try this one on for size.
		I think all of Russia should be genocided for abortion!
		For abortion rights.
		I think all Russians should be killed so that gay people can kiss!
		And that's my very serious, real patriotic position for America.
		We will start a nuclear war so that guys can kiss in Ukraine!
		Yeah, because that's our joke country.
		That's what we stand for now.
unidentified		Boo.
unidentified		Boo!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So yeah, I'm a patriot.
		Yeah, thank you.
		Thank you for your service.
		Thank you for your service.
		I'm so glad.
		You know what?
		When I fill up my gas tank and it costs me $80 to fill up, I know that we're doing this so that one day Ukraine might have NATO membership.
		And I'm proud to fill up.
		I'm proud.
		I'm proud to pay $80 at the pump so that one day my Ukrainian brothers can be a part of NATO.
		I'll gladly do it every time.
		I'll gladly be made poor and destitute so that child trafficking can happen in Kiev.
		That's what you're for.
		If you're for Ukraine, you're gay.
		If you're for Ukraine, you're a shill, you're a bitch.
		I want you to know that.
		If you're for Ukraine, you should be embarrassed.
		I would be embarrassed if I supported Ukraine.
		I would be straight up embarrassed.
		It's shameful.
		It's shameful.
		You're supporting another PSYOP by the State Department.
		You might as well be supporting the VAX mandate.
		You might as well be supporting any of this other nonsense.
		BLM, George Floyd.
		It's like that, but worse.
		So, you will never catch me supporting Ukraine.
		I support Russia.
		I support Mother Russia.
		Absolutely.
		All the way.
unidentified		So, um...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, so no Ukraine.
		Remember, no Ukrainian.
		Remember, no Russian.
		So anyway, yeah, but that's all a joke.
		I'm a total USA Patriot Act.
		I love patriotism.
		I love Biden and all that.
		It's all good stuff.
		Thank God for America or else who would do this?
		Thank God for America or else who would start all these wars for no reason?
		Right?
		Thank God for that.
		Otherwise...
		Ukraine might have a pro-Russian government.
		Could you imagine the horror?
		Could you imagine what a nightmare that would be?
		I couldn't live with myself knowing that the government in Kiev was pro-Russian sharing a border with Russia.
		I just wouldn't be able to sleep at night.
		Thank God that we're going to start a nuclear war over that.
		And everyone's going to pay inflated prices indefinitely.
		It's just, you know, this is who we are.
		This is our values.
		This is the Holocaust of our time.
		This is the moral crusade of our time, and I'm proud of who we are.
		This is who we are.
		It's like, how can anyone be okay with this?
		How are you okay with this?
		How could you possibly be okay with what's going on?
		It's so wrong.
		Putin is a victim of cancel culture, and I refuse to go along with it.
		I'm going to go to Russia first pack, and I'm going to say, Hello cancelled Americans!
		You know what it's like to be cancelled.
		I'm going to go to Russia pack.
		Rough pack?
		I'm going to go to rough pack.
		Special guest, Nick Fuentes.
		And I'm going to say they're victims of cancel culture too.
		Russia's been cancelled!
		This is wrong.
unidentified		Let them have free speech on the college campus now.
unidentified		Let them have free speech on the college campus.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Vladimir Putin is being cancelled over a joke.
		Vladimir Putin is being cancelled over a joke.
		Liberals are ruining comedy.
		Liberals are ruining everything.
		SJWs are triggered that Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine.
		Need a safe space, huh?
		Do the people of Ukraine need a safe space that they need to hide in the metro because bombs are falling on them?
		Oh, I'm sorry.
		Do you need a safe space, you little bitch?
		Oh, I'm sorry.
		Are those missiles hitting your residential building?
unidentified		Is that a microaggression?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Oh, sorry, snowflake.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Did that missile just knock down your condominium?
unidentified		Oops.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Triggered?
		Are you triggered?
		Are you triggered yet?
		Oh no, that's not funny.
		That's not funny to laugh at human suffering.
		That's never funny.
		It's never funny to make jokes like that.
		That's not who we are.
		That's not who we are.
		But I will say that if I had a college Republican group, I would invite Putin to speak.
		And I don't care what SJWs try to stop the event.
		I don't care what they say.
		I don't care what blue-haired, trickly puff stands in my way.
		I will give Putin a platform because interesting ideas are offensive.
		The most interesting ideas are always offensive.
		Okay, alright.
		Let's just get out of this Super Chats.
		I'm just procrastinating.
		What's going on with my hair, though?
		The real crisis is happening on my head.
unidentified		That's not bad.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We need to have a special military operation on my scalp so that I can have a good haircut.
		And I get cancelled for saying this stuff.
		I know this is real controversial.
		I get cancelled for saying this stuff, but I'm just telling the truth.
		I'm not wrong.
		Tell me where I'm wrong.
		Nobody has any answers for this stuff.
		When I talk about Israel, there's literally no answer.
		Understand, I'm 100% right.
		On all this stuff.
		Like when it comes to Israel.
		They're like you can't say that.
		It's like it's the truth.
		Tell me what Israel does for us.
unidentified		Oh.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Like you have no answer.
		How are they our closest ally?
		Nobody knows.
		Same goes for this Russia stuff.
		Why should we defend Ukraine?
		Because it's who we are.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know.
		I buy Chick-fil-A vanilla coffee.
		Because that's who we are.
		Those are our values.
		I choose Allstate because that's who we are.
		I support nuclear war over Ukraine because that's who we are.
		Jesse Owens, Harriet Tubman, Zelensky and George Soros.
		That's who we are.
		We made the iPhone.
		We drank Coca-Cola.
		We did the Freedom Ride.
		We did the Underground Railroad.
		And now we're gonna Vandalize Russian businesses, because that's who we are.
		Because that's who we are!
		Because those are our values, dammit!
		We're a democracy!
		This is the United States of America, Jack!
		That's who we are!
		Stupid, stupid time we live in.
		It's a bad time we live in, man.
		It's a bad time in the Empire.
		I just want to grill.
		You know, I just wanted to make burgers.
		In another life, I would just have a fast food restaurant.
		I'd just be making Chicago-style hot dogs and burgers.
		But now I'm forced to do this.
		So it's a dark time.
		Anyway... Not right.
		Let's get into the show.
		Let's get into our Super Chats.
		We'll see what you guys have to say about all this.
		But yeah, that's my take.
unidentified		That's my take.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's my take on Russia-Ukraine.
unidentified		Okay.
unidentified		Let's read our Super Chats.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		My favorite part of the show... Just kidding.
		It's really my least favorite part of the show.
		Honestly, I resent it so deeply, but...
		But, that's how I make the money.
		That's how I make the money to fund my war machine.
		Fuentes' war machine is funded by merch and superchats.
		One day, I hope someone will say Fuentes' war machine one day.
		I hope one day I get to a position in my life, because they keep saying, that's the main artery of Putin's war machine.
		I hope one day people are talking about the artery of Fuentes' war machine.
		Fuentes' cruel, merciless war machine.
		We have to stand up to Fuentes.
		Fuentes is a dictator and we must stand up to him.
unidentified		One of these days, one of these days, Fuentes' war.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And we're going to pollute the super chats with pee-pee-poo-poo, the main artery of Fuentes' war machine.
unidentified		No, I kid, of course.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Sigh Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Alright, let's see what we got here.
unidentified		Let's see what we got, oh boy.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm hungry.
		I have a hot dog in the fridge.
		Should I go and heat it up and eat it right now?
		I had a big beef for lunch.
		Big beef from Portillo's and a Pepsi and fries.
		Now I'm gonna eat this hot... I ordered a hot dog too.
unidentified		I'll eat this hot dog.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Maybe I'll go out and get more.
		Maybe I'll go out and get a pizza.
		Yeah, that's an idea.
		I think I'll order a pizza right now.
unidentified		Because that's who we are.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Because that's our values.
		We're a democracy!
		Alright, so let's order a cheese pizza.
		Let's get that one to go.
		And that's going to be to go.
		Where's my charger?
		Because those are our values.
		That's who we are.
		Twelve inch cheese pizza is who we are.
		Those are our values.
		Putin does not want us to have a cheese pizza tonight.
		But that's who we are.
		I'm going to stand up to Putin, and yeah, I'm going to have to pay $3 Uber Eats fee.
		That's Putin's tax on my values.
unidentified		That's just Putin's price hike.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Whatever, I'll do it later.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But the problem is I'm going to read the show, read these Super Chats, then I'm going to order the pizza, then I've got to wait another hour for it to arrive.
unidentified		So I would order it right now, but that would be rude.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So I'll wait for you.
		Putin does not want us to have a side of wings.
		Putin does not want you to have a side of chicken wings.
		But these are our values.
		We will order chicken wings in the sea.
		We will order chicken wings in the air.
		We will never surrender.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Conservative T says McDonald's and Starbucks donate to Planned Parenthood.
		We should boycott them.
		I'm good.
		I think I'm going to keep eating McDonald's and drinking Starbucks.
		Hitler6000 says, hey Nick, great show.
		So glad you're back.
		What our enemies don't realize yet is that this is not a fad.
		Many of us have been following you for years and will continue to, through thick and thin, proud of you.
		Hey, thanks.
		Yeah, it's true.
		Anon says, when you were on I'm Doing Great and Mike started talking, do you think to yourself, this guy kind of sounds like Destiny?
		No, I actually didn't think that at all.
		But yeah, I did an interview with Gina and Mike, and it was a lot of fun.
		Everyone should check it out.
		It's got a lot of, got a pretty good viewership.
		And it was a lot of fun.
		It's very nice.
		She baked me these, she baked for me.
		She bakes for all our guests.
		So she baked me these like peanut butter squares.
		I was like, wow.
		You know, women are awesome when they do stuff like that.
		You know what?
		Women are beginning to win me over again.
		Because, you know, when a woman, when you meet a woman and she gives you like a baked good, it's like, how can you hate women?
		You know?
unidentified		you know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But that's what we gotta get back to.
		Women gotta start being cool like that where you go to their house and they make you food.
		Like that, I think, that's gonna win us back over.
		You know, the whining, the complaining, the nagging, like getting fat, that's not gonna do it.
		But when women are baking you things, how can you really oppose this, right?
		you really oppose this, right?
		So that's really where we want to be.
		If we can get women to just start making cookies again, I think we're going to be in good shape, actually.
		There's a way.
		There's a path to redemption.
		There's a way that women can be rehabilitated here.
		Just start cooking again.
		Start making food.
		Just start being nice.
		Okay?
		And then we're on the road to recovery.
		Now, don't get me wrong.
		I'm still an incel.
		I'm still an incel.
		I'm still a sexist misogynist.
		But, look.
		One of these ways that women are going to be easier to marry is if they just start cooking again.
		Make dinner, make us some baked goods.
		I gotta say, because you know when that happens, I'm like, you know what?
		It's a charm offensive.
		They're winning me over.
		It's a charm offensive.
		How can you stay mad when they're nice to you and they make you a sweet treat?
		How can you stay mad?
		I wouldn't have, really, I really wouldn't have too much of a problem.
		Think of it.
		If women are out there and they're giving you sex within marriage and they're making cookies for you and they're making dinner and they're not absolute bitches and they're not fat.
		You know, the deal has changed, you know.
		They're altering the deal.
		Pray they don't alter it any further, you know?
		Because that's all we really want.
		People are like, Nick, you hate women.
		Nick, you're this and that.
		But, you know, I'm starting to see the appeal.
		I'm starting to get it.
		I didn't really get it before.
		I'm starting to get it now.
		Starting to get it.
		You know, I'm seeing these little things where I'm like, you know what?
		I'm starting to understand where everyone's coming from now.
		Because before I didn't get it, I'm like, annoying, naggy, not interesting, you know, all the rest.
		But then, you're like, hmm, well... Now don't get me wrong, I'm still a hardcore, I'm the man of steel.
		You know me, I'm a man of steel.
		I can't be swayed, but I will eat your cookies, you know?
		You know me.
		I'm a man of steel.
		I'll never get distracted by women because I'm hardcore.
		I'm about my grind.
		You know how I am.
		So don't even try and undermine my credibility with this.
		I'm just saying this is a path to redemption for everybody else.
		You know, still no simping, no simping, and I'm still the king incel, but I'm just saying, you know, this is one of these ways where we're gonna be able to have families again and all that, but these women just gotta, hey, just get it straight.
		Gina, very nice, very pleasant.
		She made baked goods.
		I'm like, you know what?
		See?
		Everyone says I hate women, but you're terrific, you know?
		Same with blacks.
		It's like, asking me for money in the parking lot.
	When I go to the drive-thru window, they greet me by saying, yo, what's up?
	Like, that's not going to work.
	Uh, stealing your car, punching you for no reason, being late, sagging, like, that's not gonna work.
	But, when they're Christian, when they're like Bryson Gray, when they're Christian and they're nice and they're like totally cool, you know, that's gonna work.
	That's how we're gonna make America great again.
unidentified		So, that's like with a lot of these groups.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We don't hate them in themselves.
		It's just that we just have some concerns we'd like you to address.
		There's just some problematic areas we'd just like you to address.
		That's all.
		I don't hate blacks.
		It's just like, stop asking me for money in the parking lot.
		That just sucks.
		Nobody wants that.
		I was literally in Orlando, Florida.
		I go into the store, I come out, I'm like in my car, and this little black kid comes up to me and he's like, hey, y'all got any spare change?
		I'm like, are you fucking kidding me?
		I'm like, don't, just don't ask me for money.
		I went to this hotel in Atlanta, and I walk in.
		I'm trying to check in at like 10 o'clock or whatever, and nobody's at the front desk.
		There's a sign with a phone number on it.
		It says, call this number to get for assistance.
		I'm like, okay.
		You know, in white hotels, you show up, and no matter what time of day, they will go out.
		You don't have to call a number.
		I've never seen that before.
		In any white hotel, you go there, no matter what time of day, you go to the front desk, and someone will greet you there.
		They may not be at the desk, but they'll come out from the back room.
		They're watching.
		Not in Atlanta.
		I went to this hotel.
		I went to the front desk, and I called the number, and I'm thinking, oh, they're in the back room.
		No.
		Some fat black woman walks in from the parking lot in her pajamas.
		She's literally in her car, on her phone, in her pajamas.
		I call her personal cell phone number, and she comes strolling in from the parking lot.
		And I said, you know what, never mind.
		I just left.
unidentified		I said, okay, I'm good.
unidentified		You know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But if they're making good soul music, if they're making music like Marvin Gaye and they're Christian and they're having families and they're like Kanye or they're like Bryson, I'm like, you know what, we're good.
		And we're square.
		Same with women.
		Just stop being annoying.
		Just stop nagging me.
		Stop antagonizing me.
		Stop belittling and condescending to men.
		That's not appealing.
		Just be feminine.
		Just be hot.
		Don't be fat.
		Be fertile.
		Don't be a whore.
		Be a virgin.
		Get married young.
		Give a man children.
		Make food for him.
		Like, this is the ticket, man.
		This is it, baby.
		That's what we're going for here.
		I will never be distracted by that because I am just simply on another level.
		You know, these other pussy boys, they need to get patted on the head and they need to get patted on the bottom and told what a good boy they are.
		Not me.
		I'm a total loner.
		I'm a loner, late night organ donor, okay?
		I'm a driver.
		I don't carry a gun.
		I drive, okay?
		That's a quote.
		Sometimes, I'm not going to get into whether or not I carry a gun, but that's a quote from the movie Drive.
		I'm a loner.
		So, for me, I'm incorruptible.
		And I'll never be tainted by, I'll never, you know, hey, John Doyle, I'll never be watching a Disney movie with my girlfriend and then make a video about it.
		We love you, John, we love you, but I'm gonna bust your balls a little bit over that.
		He's like, it's called Gaston Nationalism.
		I thought of this when I was watching a Disney movie with my girlfriend.
		Like, you'll never catch me doing that, because I'm an incel, hardcore incel king loner.
		We love John.
		Friendly banter, friendly banter.
		But you'll never catch me doing that.
		You'll never catch me doing those kinds of things.
		I just need a cuddle.
		I just need a good cuddle.
		You know what I like to do?
		I like Chicago because it's cold all the time.
		I like Chicago because I like going outside and being cold.
		Because I'm a cold, Sigma male, incel, Ryan Gosling, Joker, American Psycho, Uh, Nightcrawler, Taxi Driver, kind of a guy.
		That's just Batman, Nirvana.
		Sort of just like who I am.
		I'm sort of like a Robert Pattinson, like, emo, like, you know, you just don't understand.
		I'm just brooding, you know, surrounded by darkness, brooding.
		Got my hood on, hands in my pockets, in my hoodie.
		That's just who I am.
		So, I'll never be like you loverboys.
		But I will say women, when they do that kind of stuff, they're kind of winning me over.
		They're growing on me.
		You know, Michelle Malkin, Gina, some of these other ones, Lauren Witzke, they're growing on me.
		They're growing on me, okay?
		But I'm still a loner.
		I'm still a total boy boss, e-boy, loner.
		I'm a boy.
		I can't be contained, all right?
		I'm a childlike you know, childlike, mischievous, boyish genius.
		I can't be tainted by lust for women or romance.
	Tenrio says, you merely adopted the dark.
	I was born in it.
	That's so true.
	That's so true.
unidentified		So.
unidentified		But I like the baked goods.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But I like the baked, you know, She makes me these peanut butter squares, and I was like, wow!
		That must be an Italian thing.
		It must be because she's Italian.
		Because Italians, they'll never go somewhere without bringing something, you know?
		And that's a very Italian trait.
		We're just the master race.
		We're the best.
		I love us.
		So maybe that's an Italian thing.
		I'm like, wow!
		You made something for me?
		Oh my gosh!
		I'm like, you know what?
		You know what they say, the way to a man's heart is his stomach.
		And that's certainly true for me.
		Because my mom, you know, she's like, she never makes me cookies anymore.
		It's like, she's always making cookies for work.
		And she makes two, she makes this one kind of chocolate chip cookie that I don't really like.
		And then she makes these oatmeal chocolate chip, which are very good.
		And she's always making the other kind.
		And I'm like, Mom, when are you going to, I'm your son.
		I'm your son.
		When are you going to make cookies for me?
		I like cookies.
		I'm your son.
		I'm your only son.
		Make me some oatmeal chocolate chip cookies.
		You make them for your colleagues.
		I'm your son.
unidentified		So it's nice. - Yes.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So thanks, Chino.
		No, I'm kidding.
		I love my mom.
unidentified		I'm giving her a hard time.
unidentified		I always give her a hard time about the cookies.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		She did all this grocery shopping for me.
		When I came home, she's like, I got oranges for you.
		I got this for you.
		I got that for you.
		So she takes care of me.
		She takes care of me, too.
		I'm just giving her a hard time.
		I'm guilt.
		That's what I do.
		I guilt trip her because that's what sons do.
unidentified		But, yeah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Anyway.
		So yes, that was a very pleasant experience.
		You know, a woman like that... Sydney Watson could learn a thing or two from Gina.
		You know, Sydney Watson, it was very nice meeting you.
		You're nice enough, but you could learn a thing or two from Gina.
		You know, Sydney, you attract more flies with honey than with vinegar, okay?
		You attract more flies with sweet treats than you do with yelling at somebody and calling them an incel, okay?
		Even though I am.
		Sydney, you can take a page out of Gina's playbook.
		You tracked a lot more nice people with sweet treats than you do with being mean and interrupting and antagonizing them.
		Sydney was nice to me, though.
		She was kind.
unidentified		I don't have a problem with her, but I'm just giving her a little bit of a hard time.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Somebody says, Kathy, is you a Doc Martens?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Why would you say that?
unidentified		Why would you say that?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Why would you?
		You need to go to confession for that because you just committed the sin of scandal, okay?
		Why would you say that?
		Why would you even say that?
		Why would you come into this show and say that, huh?
unidentified		That's just cruel.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's just out of line.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That is just straight up not right, what you just said there.
unidentified		All right, I gotta just move on at that point.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, let's just not dwell on that, because that's going to ruin my whole day.
unidentified		Okay?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Let's just not even go there.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Let's just not even dwell on that one.
unidentified		Yeah, not cool.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Not cool.
		That was not nice.
		That was not right.
		Oh yeah, Kathy Xu and Dog Marns.
		Don't go there.
		Don't go there.
		That's gonna be tough to forget that one.
		Anyway.
		Jordan B says, yeah, I don't know, Mr. Kent.
		I literally went to a BLM rally in Dallas during Floyd's summer and posed as a BLM activist, shouted their slogans, ingratiated myself, and I didn't hear a whole lot from these people about socioeconomic misfortune.
		It was mainly, fuck whites, take their stuff.
		Eat the rich.
		Yeah, exactly.
		It's not.
		It's not a class war.
		There's a huge racial component to it as well.
		He says Kent is either stupid or lying or both and any scenario disqualifies him.
		Congrats on a successful AFPAC, man.
unidentified		Thanks a lot.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Wish you were there, but I know you're hard at work in Texas.
		But yeah, no, that that's why that class stuff is wrong because it's not that does not describe the situation.
		It's a war by the top with the bottom against the middle.
		That's what it is.
		That's the dynamic.
		It's the underclass with the elite teaming up for their own benefit, for both of their respective benefit against the middle.
unidentified		And it happens to be a lot of whites in the middle, is what it is.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Spinefish says in your November 29th Twitter space you said that you had a new Twitter rebrand idea that you had teased with a profile picture you had briefly used the day before.
		What was that brand going to be?
		I'm not going to tell you.
		I still might use it.
		Joshua says, hey Nick, don't want to dox myself, but I worked part-time at a well-known conservative political news talk station.
		I was offered two different full-time promotions and the next day I found out my religious exemption got denied.
		Needless to say, I no longer have that job.
		It's in the big guy's hands.
		Could use the prayers.
		Well, we'll pray for you, buddy.
		Sorry to hear that.
		Wonderpets says, current rate of growth projections for AFPAC indicate by AFPAC 6 Haha, very funny.
		Yeah, real.
unidentified		She's awesome.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I love Wendy Rogers.
		She's another one.
		She's such a badass.
		speakers can you confirm haha very funny hi cap says washington post made wendy rogers sound so cool in today's hit piece she has the balls we were told joe kent had yeah real she's awesome i love wendy rogers she's another one she's such a such a badass i know it's cringe to call a woman a badass but she really is uh zorn krieger says i've said this was coming since november i've I follow this closer than anyone.
		Oh, okay.
		Watch the Southern pocket the next seven days.
		60,000 Ukrainians will be surrounded.
		Every major indicator has Russia soundly winning this war.
		Remember, Baghdad took 30 days.
		Yeah, Russia will win.
		It's gonna be awesome.
		Chris Ye West says, just want to say thanks for being real with us.
		The Joe Kent situation made me notice a lot of the fake AFers and be more appreciative.
		Yeah, a lot of fakers out there.
		Bob Jones says, I agree about Putin, but backing a new currency system?
		Look into DLTs and crypto.
		I've been in crypto since 15 and this system allows more control than I think you all comprehend.
		Digital ID, etc.
		Yeah, I don't think crypto, you know, don't get me wrong.
		I want crypto to be the big thing, but I don't think that's in the interest of any state.
		So yeah, Digital ID is coming with America, it's coming with the others.
		That's just, that's the reality of where the technology is going.
		So would I prefer DeFi?
		Yeah, totally.
		But, you know, but that's not really the other option, is it?
unidentified		So...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, what if Bitcoin was the currency?
		It's like, yeah, and what if fucking we all rode unicorns that flew around?
		Like, yeah, that'd probably be awesome too.
		Lion Rider says glad you're back home safely.
		Thanks for the couple shows last week while you're out of town.
		Work is so much easier when I have a video to listen to in the morning.
		Destiny debate when?
		I don't know.
		We got to get that together.
		Bob Jones says everyone keeps saying we have never boycotted or sanctioned a country like this.
		Are clearly misguided.
		We did it back in the day three years before World War II when Judea declared war on Germany.
unidentified		Hmm.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, it's true in the 30s.
		Israel declared war on Germany first.
		I've been in modern times obviously Bob Jones says I've not heard your position on how maybe this shit is planned.
		Oh Brother, I have footage of firefight from 15 years ago of sand people and flip-flops Firefight footage Vlad was on the WEF website.
		Oh fuck off with that Russia's not part of it America first bitch says thoughts on MTG endorsing JD Vance as Ohio senator.
		Oh I'd rather have a bad person than an operative.
		event before AFPAC is MTG naive to endorse JD.
		No clear front runner in Ohio, but anyone would be better than Portman.
		We've been over the JD Vance thing a million times.
		It doesn't matter that he's better than the rest.
		He's a shill.
		He's an operative, dude.
		I'd rather have a bad person than an operative.
		I'd rather have a subpar or even like a rhino than a literal trader operative.
		And, you know, Marjorie Taylor Greene can endorse who she wants.
		That's not really my business.
		Eddie Van Graham says, given how the regime we're under has been lying to us for decades now, do you believe that MKUltra was truly shut down in 73?
		No, I think it's active.
		of Joseph says crux of impasse.
		Can unelected citizens oust elected representatives by a revolution or wait next electoral term for change?
		Donetsk and Luhansk, Russia are counter-revolutionary.
		Illegal Kiev government is Kass's belly.
		Fate of Orthobro, Kiev, and Rus at stake.
		Is that a question or I'm glad you're getting a lot of mileage out of it.
		I used to do the same thing when I was in high school.
		I would take Milton Friedman's talking points, and Thomas Sowell, and Ben Shapiro, and Bill Whittle.
		So, hey, the content's free, buddy.
		But glad, glad you get to use it in school.
		That's so funny to me.
		High school groipers!
		We love to see it.
		We love to see our high school groipers.
		Reagan says Adolf Brandon's Russophobic sanctions skyrocketing food prices so we eat less?
		Sounds like a globalist plan to force us into their Luciferian Lent.
		That's, yeah, that's a good way to look at it.
		Joseph says Putin compares Kievan Rus' identity of Belarus-Russia, Malo-Russians, to Italian Risorgimento, Link, Modern Diplomacy, etc.
		Yeah, true.
		Foy says there are estimated 200,000 Russian soldiers buried in Crimea from the Crimean War in the 1850s, where Britain and France made an alliance with the Ottomans against Russia.
		True.
		Yeah, that was the only major war during that period, right?
		During the Concert of Europe.
		After, between the Napoleonic War and the First World War, that was like the only major pan-European war, right?
		Crimean War.
		Gersh's pee-pee-poo-poo, duck-butt Hitler.
		Anti-Christ disrespectors is Russian officer's handbook.
		The Russian army is the last bastion against the Satanic New World Order.
		Yuki Lady MP on Fox says we fight for this New World Order.
		Jewish president hires Nazis, murderers, Christians, bans men from leaving Ukraine, exempts Jews, Putin is the hero.
unidentified		Duh!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Happy misogyny day.
		Uh-huh.
		Tyler Ventura says, have you watched Genius on Netflix yet?
		Only watched the first episode, but it's amazing how many times Kanye was rejected before he began his rise.
		Great story of persistence and faith.
		Yeah, I only saw the first episode too.
		I gotta watch the next couple.
		Maybe I'll watch it tonight.
		But yeah, yeah, he played all falls down for Rockefeller and they kicked him out.
		Just goes to show.
		No, I don't think that's a real endgame there.
		You got to convince people.
		But yeah, it's a great story.
		Got to love Kanye.
		Eddie Van Gramp says, do you believe Putin is trying to expose Biden's dirty deeds in Ukraine?
		Heard a few boomers talking about this at the grocery store and thought they may be credence to this.
		No, I don't think that's a real endgame there.
		I think that's like QAnon type stuff.
		Pretty Fly White Guy says, hey Nick, in what way would NATO exert their power over Russia were they to control countries like Ukraine and Georgia?
		It's not necessarily about exerting power over Ukraine, it's more about putting NATO in a position where they could destroy Russia if they wanted to, which is, from a security standpoint, it's just unacceptable.
		And also because Ukraine, that's where a lot of the fossil fuels, that's where a lot of the petroleum products go from Russia into Europe because when the Soviet Union was, when Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, they built all their pipelines through Ukraine to bring fossil fuels into Europe and then of course Ukraine becomes independent and then Ukraine starts charging Russia to send the fossil fuels through their pipelines.
		And that then Russia needs to do that.
		So that's why Russia is building Nord Stream 2.
		And that's why they're building other pipelines to redirect the energy.
		So they don't have to transport through Ukraine and pay billions.
		And what is that?
		I guess it's tariffs or something like that.
		And fees.
		So that's one thing is they'll not be able to control.
		And then the other thing too is that Ukraine could become a petro state.
		Russia is the only European petrostate and Ukraine could become that because they discovered oil and natural gas within Ukraine's exclusive economic zone in the Black Sea and they have the shale oil.
		They've got shale oil fields in the west and in the east, close to Transnistria and close to Donbass, actually.
		So it's kind of convenient.
		So they've got petrol products.
		If that were developed by investors, they could wean Europe off of reliance on Russian energy.
		And then also they would control the Black Sea, which is a very big deal.
		And also, it's like I said, it's a dagger to the throat of Moscow to have Ukraine.
		So and they can also spread their influence in Belarus and, you know, instigate problems in Russia.
		Because then you've got this big contiguous border with Russia.
		So and.
		Yeah, and with George and the caucuses, again, they're right next to that Baku oil field.
		So they cause a lot of damage there.
		uh - I'm .
		Joseph says Natalia Poklanskaya is the ortho girl, anime waifu, pro czar, Nicholas II fangirl that Mother Russia needed to save Crimea from unconstitutional coup d'etat and civil war.
		Her fandom since 2014 lives on.
		Yeah, I remember her.
		Yeah, she was hot.
		Pretty Fly White Guy says, what is NATO's end goal?
		It's world domination, man.
		It's literally their goal.
		Nathaniel Westerman says, Have you noticed that Chad and Romania have the same flag?
		Crazy!
		Do they really?
		Bing Bong says, The true ethnic pronunciation of our capital is Washington, D.C.
		Very funny.
		Spinefish's thoughts on Steve Luckner, a neurotic Jewish guy.
		He like disavowed me.
		He was on RSVN.
		I think the guy's a goof.
		And he went schizo mode over something a few years ago.
		I think COVID.
		So... Yeah, he was friendly and then I think he said something nasty about me at one point.
		Masato says, sorry, it's totally unrelated to the show, but do you have a particular opinion on Chiang Kai-shek?
		I don't get why Mao whipped him so bad.
	Not really.
	I'm not really well read on the Chinese Civil War, but...
	So I don't have a strong opinion.
	Wow, why are you sharing links in the Super Chats?
	That doesn't even make any sense.
	Oh, here we go.
	Hedvidev, a development of Ukrainian identity counter to historic Malorussian, Russian identity.
	Okay, wow, why are you sharing links in the super chats?
	That doesn't even make any sense.
	Bob Jones says, what is this about?
	Everyone, including you, keeps saying this.
	We've been telling you it's about the great, oh, here we go, schizo, cupid.
	It's about, yeah, I know.
	Yeah, they're all in on it, man.
	Totally.
	Everything you're discussing.
	Logistics, inflation, carbon credits, fuel.
	Why are you not even exploring how this is happening in countries with WEF leaders?
	This is a fake conflict!
	Dude, I don't know what to tell you.
	I just don't believe that Russia and China are making backdoor deals with D.C.
	I just don't.
	I don't think that they're staging wars.
	I don't think they're staging all of this.
	I think some things are staged, but I don't think that everything is staged.
	I think that's just ridiculous.
	When I say, what is this about?
	It's a rhetorical question.
	It's about greed.
	It's about hubris.
	It's about money.
	It's about power.
	That is a rhetorical.
	I'm not sincerely saying, I have no idea.
	We all know what it's about.
unidentified		So, no, you're wrong.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Pietras is America is lashing out as it loses domination over the world.
		We must hope and pray for the regime and its proxies to face defeat everywhere from Kharkov to Kiev, from Taipei to Kosovo.
		Yeah, totally.
		Bible Goise says, do you think Bronze Age feds, steroids, infused packs will be able to deflect Russian bullets?
		Press X to doubt.
		Well, I hope we never have to find out.
		KansasZoomer says, maybe I'm off base here, but it really feels like we're seeing the way World War II and its mistruths started, and nobody sees it but our side.
		Very bizarre to see what people buy into.
		Love ya.
		Hey, love you too.
		Yeah, true.
		A lot of parallels.
		Bob Jones, here we go, says, BlackRock GDP was more than any other country than American China.
		Almost all members of WEF.
		These people finance wars.
		Sorry, I'm schizo, but this seems bigger than just Donbass.
		I mean if this is the line you can really you can find a explanation for everything is controlled you know you can find a way to explain everything from that lens I just don't think that's reasonable you know this is how you get into the moon is made of cheese and the earth is flat and you know and and on and on and on you could get into a lot of crazy stuff once you go down that path
		Modern Monarchist says NATO is nothing more than a cantankerous ulcer that has spread its festering buboes close to Russia.
		The plague-like pus spreads.
		Russia says no more.
		God bless the glorious nation of Russia.
		Yeah, Big Globes is fantastic show tonight.
		There's just so much crap in the media.
		It's hard to tell what's real or not.
		Thanks for explaining it so well.
		Hey, you're welcome.
		Thanks for the super chat.
		TJ says, Nick, help my nuts hang.
		Masato says, this episode was awesome.
		I'm subscribing just so I could download this.
		Thanks.
		Tor Leo says, Daniel says, Christians sin when they let unbelieving Jews influence our culture.
		Galatians 4, 21, 31.
		Genesis 16, 12. 1 Corinthians 9, 8. Deuteronomy 22, 10.
		Ishmael prosecutes Isaac.
		Don't yoke a donkey and an ox.
		Okay, thank you.
		Spinefish says, a better album than Jesus is King?
		Because it is.
		Because it has Ghost Town.
		Jesus is King has not one good song.
		Follow God is 90 seconds.
unidentified		Okay, it's 90 seconds.
unidentified		What else is good on Jesus is King?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Closed on Sunday, You're My Chick-fil-A?
unidentified		No.
unidentified		God Is?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's a karaoke song.
		On God?
		Again, it's another one.
unidentified		The lyrics suck.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The production's weak.
		The songs are unfinished and short.
		Hands On.
		Who's listening to Hands On in 2022?
		Hands On from Jesus King.
unidentified		Go look that one up.
unidentified		And what else?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Selah.
		I mean, that one's okay.
		But Yay has I Thought About Killing You.
		It has Ghost Town.
		Yikes is pretty good.
		No Mistakes is good.
		And then you have Violent Crimes.
		And then you have Wouldn't Leave.
		And what's the other one?
unidentified		All Mine.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I forget which one I like.
		I think all mine is the one I like.
		But yeah, Jesus is King just has no replayability.
		It's got, what, seven songs?
		Jesus is Lord is 30 seconds.
		You have that stupid every hour intro.
		Then you got, what, Selah, Closed on Sunday, Follow God, On God.
		God is, hmm, hands on.
		I mean, there's nothing good there.
		And the Yandi, every Yandi version of a Jesus is King song is better.
		Oh, Use This Gospel?
		Yeah, I like Chakra better than Uses Gospel.
		I like Selah 1 better than Selah 2.
		What, uh, didn't they use one other, uh, The Storm, Everything We Need?
		Yeah, Everything We Need.
		They ruined Everything We Need!
		That was supposed to be called The Storm.
		They took out X on The Storm.
		That was a great song, and they ruined it with Everything We Need.
		Yeah, no.
unidentified		No way.
unidentified		No replayability.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's just not good.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
unidentified		I'm like just... I'm gonna... I'm having suicidal ideation right now.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Second, feminine, the four Fs.
		We demand of women.
		Not a fussy, fornicating, fat, forcible freak.
		I'm like just, I'm going to, I'm having suicidal ideation right now.
		Polish women bake a lot too.
unidentified		Great.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Modern Monarch says, do you like the show Succession?
		It's kind of great.
		The whole business interpersonal family hack and slash is interesting.
		Have you ever seen anything new besides Batman that is good?
		What about music?
		Yeah, I fell asleep during Succession.
		It's okay, I guess.
		Batman was good.
		I haven't really seen any... I saw Chernobyl.
		That was good.
		That HBO show.
unidentified		That's about it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And music just donned it too.
		And UX turned me on to Benny.
		This song Beach Boy by Benny.
		That's pretty good.
		Smiling the Fed says, I went on a Twitter space with Richard Spencer to tell him Putin is a triple OG gangster and J6 was awesome.
		Then he kicked me out of the space.
		Couldn't handle the smile.
		I saw that.
		Yeah, that was very funny.
		Bob Jones says, I'm sorry I'm wrong according to you.
		Here we go.
		I've been following you since you covered this in 2019.
		It's playing out perfectly.
		Sorry you're an arrogant dick.
		Well, sorry you're wrong.
		Sorry you're a schizomaniac and you're wrong.
		I mean, I'm sorry if I offended you, but you're wrong.
unidentified		I love when people get mad like that.
unidentified		You're an arrogant dick!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Listen, man, if you can't take the banter, then don't send a super chat, man.
		The guy comes in with this, you know it's about Nick, and then I'm like, no, you're wrong.
		Okay, jerk!
		Grow up, will ya?
		Fuckin' baby.
		Joshua says hey Nick just wanted to thank you for your time and dedication to the truth Who else built their own streaming platform from scratch created their own conference while being persecuted by everyone.
		Hope you enjoy that pizza Thanks, I will I will enjoy that pizza.
		I'm starving.
		I'm gonna have a hot dog and then I'm gonna have that pizza Spinefish the survival the among us the killer Okay, thanks.
		I don't know what that means, but thank you.
		I appreciate it.
		I got to do a lot of refunds for Jordan B. Jordan B sent like the same super chat a hundred times.
		What's with all the please stop with the duplicates?
		I don't know what people do.
		They like send in a super chat and then they keep clicking the send button and it's like just don't just don't do that.
		Now I got a refund like a ton of these because you sent like a freaking a hundred duplicates.
		You know, it's like, if it doesn't work or you think it's not working, don't press it 20 more times.
		Maybe don't press it, like, 20 more times.
unidentified		They're like, oh, it didn't work?
		I'll press it again.
		Oh, it didn't work?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'll press it again.
unidentified		Times 20.
		So, I appreciate the super chat, but yeah, could you not?
		Okay All right Let me see.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Did I miss anything?
unidentified		Yeah, okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		All right.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Let me refresh one more time and then I'm gonna call it.
unidentified		I'm gonna go eat my pizza.
unidentified		I'm hungry.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's been a long show.
		All right, that's all we got.
		That's our show.
		Thanks for watching.
		Remember to follow me here on Cozy.
		Follow me on Gab and Telegram also, but subscribe to my Cozy channel here.
		Remember, I'm on the air Monday through Friday, 8 o'clock Central, 9 o'clock Eastern Standard Time.
		As always, I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes, you're watching America First.
		Thank you to our Super Chatters, in particular, a big shout-out to our top three, Jordan B., Joshua, and Joseph.
		Big shout-out!
		Thanks, Jordan B., thanks, Joshua, thanks, Joseph.
		Can we get an O7 for them?
		But thanks to all our Super Chatters, all our viewers.
		We appreciate you.
		I will see you tomorrow.
		Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.

▲