All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 28, 2021 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:15:49
America First Ep. 902America First Ep. 902
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:10:13
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I think we'll just dive into the news.
Well, you see this!
Did you see this?
Tucker Carlson has a brand new show coming out.
It's called, um... What is it called?
Tucker Carlson Originals, I think?
And it's on the Fox News streaming site.
They've got a subscription-based streaming site.
That's where his daytime show is, Tucker Carlson Today.
So he's got a new show coming out called Tucker Carlson Originals, which...
I think it's a series.
I don't know all the details, but what it looks like to me is sort of like short-form documentary style content.
And they launch a trailer for the first episode of the show and it's about January 6th.
And it's about how all the January 6th protesters are being treated like terrorists and Darren Beatty's in it and Ali Alexander is in it.
And it looks awesome.
I mean, I'm gonna watch it.
It looks great.
And they're doing a great job, but I feel a little bit left out, gotta be honest.
Little bit sour grapes over here.
It looks awesome.
And hats off to, I think it's Scooter Downey who produced it.
And he's been around in these circles for a long time.
But it looks great from what we saw from the trailer.
I think it's a great idea.
I think Darren Beattie has been doing an incredible job covering this at Revolver News.
They've been at the forefront of this investigation.
And they've got the finest staff.
I know the people on the staff.
And they're incredible people.
And hats off to Tucker Carlson for staying on top of this thing.
This has been going on now since January 6th and, you know, I think he's one of the only mainstream people that's even still talking about it.
So, all around it's a great thing.
But I am a little bit upset.
I am a little bit bent out of shape that I wasn't in it.
What the heck?
I'm still on a no-fly list.
That's my life.
You know, and the Feds seized half a million dollars in assets from me.
What?
They don't consult with me?
I don't get an interview?
I'm a little upset.
You know, because when I got put on the no-fly list, that was in the news for a minute.
But then everybody goes on with their lives.
You know, I'm still on that list.
So people still text me to this day and they say, hey, can I fly out to do this?
Can you fly out to do that?
I get invited to weddings.
I get invited to do interviews, podcasts, whatever.
And I'm like, yeah, that would be great.
I'd love to go.
But I'm on the federal no-fly list because I'm on a terrorist watch list because I stood outside the Capitol at a protest sponsored by the sitting president of the United States.
So I can't go.
People go, oh yeah, that's right, I forgot.
That's still going on?
What are you getting off that?
Well, it'd be great if I knew.
That'd be really nice if I knew.
Anyway, so, yeah, I mean, I saw that trailer, I put it in my Telegram channel, and I said it looks good, and it is, and I have nothing but nice things to say about everybody involved.
Especially Darren.
Guy's blown up in the past few years, and he's been doing an amazing job.
But, and this isn't a dig at any of them, but it's like, what the heck?
I'm not in it.
Tucker Carlson won't even say my name on his show when he talks about some of the people on 1-6 that wound up on the no-fly list.
Whatever.
It is what it is, I guess.
That's okay.
We're doing our own thing over here, and that's, you know, and that's just great.
But, it's for all the usual reasons.
I mean, that just goes to show, I'm keeping it too real.
That's really what it is.
We all know why that is.
We all know why I'm the name that cannot... It's pretty amazing, because I'd like to think that I'm kind of a well-known entity in right-wing politics, even if I'm not known on like a national or global level.
At least within politics, I'm very well-known.
You know, in political circles.
If you ask anybody in politics, most people know who I am.
And yet, and I'm not even saying it like that, I'm saying I'm well known and yet I still have this effect where people can't say my name.
I'm pretty well known and pretty well liked.
Most of the mainstream people that you know know who I am, and a lot of them like me, but you still just can't even say my name.
It's kind of...
I mean, that's what I signed up for, but it's still kind of bizarre.
Because you'd think over time, it's like, yeah, alright, you know, he's not so bad.
Hey, how about this Nick Fuentes guy?
But it's like, no, it's still a code of silence.
But one day, you know, one day, people are gonna say Nick Fuentes.
One day, one day, they're gonna say it.
I hope.
Or if not, you know, then maybe just the people that do say my name.
Maybe they'll be in charge, I guess.
That's the other hope.
Anyway, so that's my other complaint.
That was my complaint yesterday.
That's my complaint today.
But we're gonna move on.
We're gonna dive into the show here.
It's a little hot in here.
I got the space heater in here as it was cold for a long time.
But I got the space heater in here and now it's way too hot.
Now I'm melting in here.
Feels like a furnace in this room.
I have a door open.
I have a breeze coming in.
And yet it's still hot.
I'm cooking.
Okay.
But let's get into our news here.
Our first story is about the CDC, which has now approved a fourth booster shot.
There's really much more to say.
This is the article.
It says, quote, the CDC has approved a fourth COVID-19 vaccine shot for adults with compromised immune systems, allowing for yet another dose amid concerns of waning immunity, as some pharma firms even hint at yearly boosters for all Americans.
Those who are, quote, moderately and severely immunocompromised may receive a total of four vaccine doses Including an initial two-shot inoculation, one additional dose, followed by yet another booster, said the U.S.
CDC in an updated guidance on Tuesday.
The immunocompromised were the first to receive authorization for vaccine boosters back in August, with U.S.
health agencies subsequently approving additional doses for people in other high-risk categories, such as those age 65 and older and adults more likely to be exposed to the virus.
And if you remember, we covered that decision in particular when they expanded the number of people that are eligible to receive the boosters.
And it says that it includes more categories like the elderly, you know, immunocompromised, in addition to them, the elderly, who they added, and adults more likely to be exposed to the virus.
We covered that story back in August and now it's virtually all adults are eligible for the booster shot.
They make it sound like it's this selective group of people or a selective number of groups of people but it's not.
It virtually applies to everybody because when they expanded the number of people eligible to get it they said well if you're in any kind of public setting at any point you're at an increased risk of contracting the virus so you're eligible for another dose.
Well guess what?
If all it takes to become eligible is you're in a public place at some point, that's everybody.
It says if there's an occupational risk, which means exposure to the public, then you can get another shot.
Well, that's everybody.
I mean, that's basically everybody.
Unless you work, like, on a submarine, or unless you work in a nuclear missile silo, or maybe you work from home, and you never leave the house.
I don't even know how that's possible.
So it's virtually everybody is eligible for the third, and they're now just beginning on the fourth.
That's an important point to make.
Because they make it sound like, well, one day everyone's going to get boosters.
Already, the booster shot is available for basically anybody that wants one.
Effectively, anyone that wants one can get one.
And so they're really, they make it sound like, well, we're almost there with the booster and then we're just starting with the fourth.
It's like, no, everyone's eligible for the third and they're beginning on the fourth, which means they're going to start opening it up for more people to get a fourth shot.
That's only a matter of time.
This was two months ago.
They opened up the third one.
Now there's a fourth.
It says, however, for the immunocompromised, the CDC classifies a third shot as an additional dose, which uses the same amount of vaccine as the previous two.
While the fourth jab, approved on Tuesday, is defined as a booster proper, the fourth dose is only half the volume of the others.
So it's kind of interesting how they changed the language there too.
Because at first they said two shots, right?
Two shots and then you're good.
Then you're immunized, you're fully vaccinated if you have two shots.
Then they said we're authorizing a third booster for everybody.
Now they're telling people the third booster is actually just part of the first dose.
You understand?
Two shots, one dose.
Am I the only one?
Like am I going crazy?
Because I feel like I am.
That's three shots, all part of the same initial dose, all the same amount of mRNA, all the same amount of vaccine, with a fourth shot, a booster.
Am I the only one?
Like, am I going crazy?
Because I feel like I am.
I mean, for a lot of reasons, but also because of this.
How do they get away with this?
They just change the way they call things every day.
Forever being vaccinated meant you couldn't get sick, right?
If you get the chicken pox vaccine, you don't get chicken pox.
Now vaccine means, well, you won't die.
You're going to get sick.
You're going to make other people sick.
You're going to have symptoms, but hey, look, you won't die.
unidentified
And people are like, yup, okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
You know, two years ago, vaccinated meant you can't get sick.
Now, vaccinated means you're gonna get sick, you're gonna be full of the virus, and you'll give it to everyone you know, and you'll be symptomatic, but you probably won't die.
You have a lower chance of dying.
Everyone goes, yep, that's what vaccinated means now.
Oh, you disagree?
Well, what?
You don't trust the science?
It's like this with everything.
And we talked about it the other day.
I don't know how much longer, I mean, I'll continue to keep doing it.
The show is live Monday through Friday, so that's how long I'll do it.
Until there's no more Mondays, Tuesdays... Until there's no more Mondays through Fridays, you know, I could be doing it as long as that.
But, it's like every day, it's another term gets redefined.
Every day, the thing they said yesterday is now altered.
And if you acknowledge that, if you notice that, you're the crazy one.
You're the ignorant one.
Right?
And we go through it like every week, but it's like this with everything.
It's like this with everything we know about the virus, everything we know about the epidemiological response, the vaccine.
Now this.
I mean, how insane is this?
Two shots.
Two shots.
That's what it was supposed to be.
That's what everybody was told.
Two shots, you're fully vaccinated.
Then they say, well, you know, a third booster might be a good idea.
Now in the blink of an eye in the in the middle of the night without anybody noticing the booster became part of the first now that's just another dose that's part of being vaccinated fully vaccinated or something and it's now so so it's really like we skipped ahead I don't even think this fourth one counts as a second booster now this is the first booster so now people get four shots
And according to the old system, that would have been a full dose plus two boosters.
Now, it's a full dose plus one booster.
So what the hell?
That's kind of hard to keep up.
But it's yet another reminder about how this is all going to work.
And I don't get it.
Like, so everybody understands that.
I know a lot of people are watching this, maybe rolling their eyes and saying, yeah, you said all that before.
We heard that last month.
You say this every night.
OK, yeah, that's great.
Well, then why are you considering getting the vaccine?
Riddle me that.
Everybody gets it because it's obvious and it's been happening so frequently with every aspect of the pandemic.
It's the same way.
And what I mean by that is the information yesterday contradicts the information today.
That's one part of it.
The other thing is they're lying about what they're going to do tomorrow, yesterday.
Everything is like that.
They did that with the lockdown when they said five weeks.
They did that with the mandate when they said we can't even mandate if we wanted to.
And then they did.
And so that's another part of it.
And so people understand the basic, and that's just two examples, People understand how this works.
People understand the manner in which all of this has been rolled out, which is basically through deception, through changing definitions, this concealed agenda that they let us know about on their schedule.
You know, they kind of let out information in a limited and half-truth kind of a way to string us along long enough to get full compliance.
I think everyone gets that, like I said, because there's many examples of it.
It applies to everything that they do, but yet people don't act like it.
That's what I'm getting at.
You may understand everything I'm saying on the show.
Maybe you watch a show every night or almost every night, and you've followed every development, and you know exactly what I'm talking about, but then people still say to me, well, I mean, should I get vaccinated?
Because, you know, I might get fired from my job.
It's just one vaccine.
And it's like, what part of this are you not getting?
They're not telling us everything that they want to do.
What is it that they want to do?
They want to vaccinate people every year.
They want the COVID vaccine to become part of the battery of vaccines that every infant gets, that every child gets when they go to school.
They want that to be mandatory for everybody to go to work and for people to go to college and for people to travel between states and between countries.
For people to get on buses and go to restaurants.
And you see this all over the world.
I'm not making this up.
That's already what they have in Australia, Canada, the UK, Israel, Italy.
That is already what they have in a lot of countries.
They already have it here in New York City, in San Francisco, in LA.
That is what they want.
the lockdown never ended They just selectively opened it up for people that are in full compliance.
But everything is still really locked down.
The government still has discretion over locking everything down to you.
But they are just giving people relief on the basis of their compliance.
And the compliance, as we've noticed, is always changing.
And so first it was fully vaccinated.
Watch how quickly booster shots will become a part of this.
And watch as more people get vaccinated because these deadlines are coming up for the mandate.
Watch how more aggressive they get.
Once they get these numbers up to 70-80% of the population, if that's in the cards, the lockdown is going to get a lot more aggressive.
The mandate, these kinds of actions will get more aggressive.
And once they achieve, I don't know what the percentage threshold would be, but once they get enough people, the booster shot's going to become a part of it.
And the thing about the booster shot, what they're already talking about now, in the same way they were talking about a mandate six months ago, in the same way they were talking about rationing health care six months ago, what they're saying now about the booster shot is that this is supposed to be an annual thing.
So it's not just like, again, fully vaccinated.
We've got a car alarm going off.
It's not just fully vaccinated plus a booster shot.
It's fully vaccinated plus a booster shot, plus a booster shot next year, and the year after that, and the year after that.
Forever.
I mean, that's just supposed to be everybody's life now.
And what do people not understand about that?
I just, I don't get it.
It's like people really think like this is all there is to it.
And I don't know how you could think that because, you know, if you think that it's just one and done or even just one booster shot, like that would be, you know, not a big deal.
But even if you think it's just, well it's just this, it's just this first dose, maybe with a booster shot, you're as gullible as the people who thought it was just going to be five weeks last March when they said five weeks to slow the spread.
You're just as gullible.
Or just as gullible as when they said there won't be a federal mandate.
That's not even legal for us to do.
You're gullible.
And, you know, clearly you don't have any kind of long-term time horizon.
Look into a crystal ball six months, twelve months into the future.
Do you see the scenario where everybody has to get a booster shot?
It's part of the same mandate that we're experiencing now?
And given everything that we know about the vaccine, which is that it's deadly, which is that it's causing very severe side effects, particularly in young people, is this a good idea for people to get injected with it all the time?
Because if you notice, the people that are suffering the adverse side effects, they do so after their second dose, meaning that it's really contingent on the amount, on the volume of material, right?
In other words, If people are having severe adverse effects after the second dose rather than the first, it shows us that if the first one didn't give them side effects, adding more mRNA did give them side effects.
It made it worse.
The more genetic material you have, the more this mRNA stuff, the worse off you are.
So, if you got one and you were okay, and you got two and you were okay, maybe you're not going to be okay if you get a third one, or a fourth one, or a fifth one.
And how many times do you want to roll the dice?
Some people are not okay after the first one.
Some people after the second one.
And, you know, maybe people are okay after getting both full doses.
But, you know, again, the question is, do people want to roll the dice and say, well, I'm so far so good, double or nothing.
Let's get it every year now.
Let's get it every year or twice a year for many years.
And we'll just take a chance on all this talk about scarred blood vessels and precarditis and myocarditis and heart inflammation and spike proteins crossing the blood-brain barrier and spike proteins winding up in the liver.
We'll just take our chances with that.
I mean, and again, the question will not be, well, would you like to get the booster?
It will be the same question people are facing now.
Get it or get fired.
Get it or be expelled.
Get it or get kicked out.
And you can't get on a plane, and you can't do this, and you can't do that.
Have to draw the line somewhere.
We have to draw the line here because you see they're already setting up for the fourth shot.
Like I don't know what what more can be said here.
They're already setting up for the fourth shot and what do you think they're going to be doing three months from now?
Three months ago it was a third shot.
Today it's a fourth shot.
What's it going to be in three months?
The fifth shot.
CDC is going to approve a fourth shot for everybody and then they're going to get a fifth shot.
What did Fauci say earlier this year?
He said after the CDC advisory panel struck down booster shots and then the director of the CDC unilaterally turned that over, Fauci said, well we're going to see more data in the winter that will prove we need booster shots.
He said that definitively.
That's a scientific statement apparently.
Well, the data will come back in the future informing us that we, in fact, do need a booster shot against what the CDC and FDA recommended.
Okay?
So, I mean, that's how they were talking months ago.
It's not long before we see the mandate expand.
So that's the latest on that.
That's the latest CDC announcement.
That's why you got to say no now.
I mean, why get one dose if they're just going to keep coming back?
And you want to be the guy that gets three doses and then says, I'm already dying.
I don't want a fourth one.
Just don't get the first one.
You know, just don't get the first one.
So that's that, but I want to move on.
I want to talk about China, our featured story.
Very awesome, awesome development, and it is a great day.
And we praise the mighty People's Republic of China.
Truly the number one country in the world.
And the big development there, I think this actually happened last week, but This was in the New York Times today.
I think this happened maybe not last week.
I think it was a few days ago.
But in case you missed it, China tested a hypersonic missile which is able to completely evade U.S.
anti-ballistic missile technology.
Very cool.
And so if you don't know what this does, you know, a conventional nuclear missile, intercontinental ballistic missile, will go up into outer space.
And then it comes back down and it hits another country, you know.
And the reason why this is really a flawed design is because I believe at two different points of entry, the target is able to detect with radar the missile launch.
And so I think they can detect it going out and they can detect it coming back in.
And the other thing is ABM Shield is relatively able to...
anti-ballistic missile shield is relatively able to counter ballistic missile.
The hypersonic missile is launched and doesn't leave the orbit.
It doesn't go into outer space.
And I'm not 100% sure I'm the tech here, but it doesn't go as high.
I saw a graphic about this on Twitter.
So this just goes up, and then it just goes really, really fast, and then down onto the other country very quickly.
And it's not able to be detected.
can't be intercepted.
And so this capability, I don't believe that China has the ability to put a nuclear warhead on it yet, but it paves the way for the People's Republic of China to miniaturize and strap a nuclear warhead onto one of these missiles and strike anywhere in the United States of America without being intercepted and without even being detected.
So we are saluting.
Can we get an 07 in chat for all of our top Chinese scientists?
07 in chat for the brilliant scientists in Beijing and all the Communist Party leaders for this glorious technological achievement.
We thought it couldn't be done, but you guys did it.
And this is a big deal.
Today, The US military came out and said that this was a Sputnik moment in the development of hypersonic weapons.
This has been something that's been going on for a few decades now.
But they said it was the Sputnik moment.
In case you don't know, Sputnik was the first satellite launched into orbit by the Soviet Union in the 1950s.
And that is what started the space race and the Sputnik moment was when America panicked because the Soviet Union was outpacing them in their race to the moon, to outer space, potentially to, you know, space weapons capabilities or something.
So they're saying similarly that China was able to perform this test should inspire panic that we're falling behind, we don't have these capabilities and we can't counter them.
So this is the article from the New York Times.
It says, quote, China's testing of hypersonic missile designed to evade American nuclear defenses was, quote, very close to a Sputnik moment for the United States, said General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on Wednesday in the first official confirmation of how Beijing's demonstration of its weapon capabilities had taken American officials by surprise.
The tests, which could revive fears of a Cold War-like arms race, come as Beijing is spending heavily to modernize its military and may be seeking to expand its nuclear arsenal.
Two separate tests, reported earlier by the Financial Times, took place this summer, conducted in a fashion the Chinese officials knew would be highly visible to American satellites.
But US officials remained mostly silent until General Milley spoke on Wednesday talking about the tests on a Bloomberg television interview show hosted by David Rubenstein, the billionaire investor and philanthropist.
He said, quote, I don't know if it's quite a Sputnik moment, but it's very close to that.
He said that it was a very significant technological event and it has all of our attention.
Hypersonic weapons have a long history going back to the 60s, but while General Milley did not elaborate, the surprise appears to have arisen from how China joined two different technologies.
The launch of a missile that completed a partial orbit of the Earth, and a hypersonic vehicle that could plow a suddenly shifting path, maneuvering in ways that would render all current U.S.
missile defenses obsolete.
At least one of the tests was not completely successful.
It reportedly missed an intended target by a wide margin.
But the advances suggest that China might one day be able to arm a hypersonic vehicle with a nuclear warhead, launch it into a low orbit, and release it from any place, including perhaps an evasive flight path over Antarctica.
Existing defenses of the continental U.S.
all point west and north over the Pacific, meaning they might fail in defeating an attack from the south.
Even if there were anti-missile bases pointed south, current anti-missile technology is designed to intercept intercontinental ballistic warheads on predictable parabolic paths in outer space, not hypersonic weapons that can zigzag through the atmosphere.
And there's something about imagining a Chinese nuclear-tipped missile zigzagging in low Earth orbit from Antarctica headed straight towards America that is very exciting.
And it also is very, very tragic.
You know, it's a sort of scary thing that makes me deeply disturbed and unsettled.
But there's something that makes me giddy.
There's something that makes me sort of gleeful imagining A hypersonic Chinese jet with a little China man flying inside of it maybe.
Real patriot family man.
Totally heterosexual, traditional, adhering to Confucian virtues, maybe he's got a wife and kids, and he's a member of the Communist Party, loyal, and he's a Marxist, you know, he's read all the literature, and he's flying in that hypersonic plane and he hits the button just like, you know, the Enola Gay dropped the bombs on Japan, and he hits the button and then this missile comes in and the Jews throw everything they have at it, you know, anti-ballistic missiles and
But nothing can stop, nothing can stop the People's Republic, nothing can stop the liberation of the workers.
And the hypersonic missile is zigzagging, dodging everything that's being thrown at it, and then it just makes an impact and the whole world says, the great Satan has been defeated.
You know, there's something exciting about that.
unidentified
I hope it doesn't come to that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
It goes without saying.
It goes without saying that I really hope it doesn't come to that.
I desperately hope that that does not happen because I live here and so do many people that I love and care for.
But, you know, the idea that one day some country is going to be able to knock America down a peg or two, even if it's just by having that capability, you know, I like that.
I like that aspect of it.
The idea that China could just bitch-slap America, uppercut America at any point that it wants, and that's literally what it would be is an uppercut.
It would be a kick to the groin from Antarctica.
Kind of ironic, isn't it?
China from Antarctica kicking the balls right up there.
The old come from behind comeback of the People's Republic hitting us where we least expected it.
You know, we had all our ABMs pointed west and north and we're like, what's that?
unidentified
It's coming from Antarctica!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
It's like one of those Nerf darts with the little thing in it.
It's a whistling hypersonic missile straight from Beijing, bitch.
Remember Taiwan?
It's called payback.
So anyway, that's the big... that's a big development.
That's a big technological achievement.
And I, you know, I'm joking a little bit, but this is also a really big deal.
And more things like this are going to happen.
China is going to outpace American technological development.
May not happen soon and it's not gonna happen all at once and you know nobody knows exactly when it's gonna happen but at the rate that we are going which is towards transgenders and these black people and women painting their nails in the military and all that affirmative action and BLM and diversity quotas and women running things We're going down.
If we're not stagnating, we're going down.
And China is just rapidly moving forward.
They've got a billion and a half people.
They've got a huge pool to pull from.
They're rewarding people of merit.
They're making their men masculine.
They're being ruthless in their pursuit of global domination, is really what it is, and power, regional and global power projection.
So in other words, again, we don't know necessarily when it's going to happen, and it'll happen with different industries at different times, but the pace that we're on is we're going down and they're going up.
And this is something that we as American dissidents should welcome.
Because, and I'm actually going to debate Stig's Hexenhammer on this soon, on the Ralph Retort, it's on November 4th.
But something to keep in mind is that when a lot of people look at America versus China and they see this dynamic, which I've just described, they panic.
And they say, we need to be better than China.
We've got to dominate China.
We have got to out-compete with them.
We've got to get the best and brightest immigrants or the best and brightest Americans.
And we've got to show them that freedom still rings and democracy's the right way.
We've got to show these commies what for and all this.
And I get it.
I do get it.
And on some sense, I agree.
But it's important that people decouple themselves.
It's important that you and I and we decouple ourselves from the American state and from the American regime.
When people say, we need to go and protect Taiwan, it's like, who's we?
Me?
I have to go protect Taiwan?
Why do I have to go protect Taiwan?
I say, oh no, we mean the military.
The military?
The military hates me!
General Milley, the same guy that says this is a Sputnik moment, he said that he's studying white rage.
And I'm sure he and the people in DHS and the people in the CIA and the FBI and the NSA, they all consider me and the people who watch my show probably like enemies of the state or terrorists or something like that.
We need to protect Taiwan?
We need to match China?
I don't know what we you're talking about.
I think about we as the American people or we as American dissidents, American patriots, but I don't consider Milley and the U.S.
military and the U.S.
State Department and the federal government as part of that we.
That has got to be decoupled.
And I think a lot of people have a practical understanding of this, or maybe I should say it's the opposite, a theoretical understanding of this.
We need to have a real practical and full understanding of what this means.
It means that when China develops capabilities that are better than ours, do you see?
Whose capabilities are they besting?
Ours as the American people, or the American military's?
They're besting the American military.
I'm not competing with China's hypersonic nuclear-tipped missiles, but the Pentagon is, and the Department of Defense is.
Now why do I have any stake in that?
The State Department, or rather the Defense Department, would just as soon, maybe sooner, nuke me with their outdated ICBMs than China would with their brand new hypersonic missiles.
Don't you understand that?
And people would consider China a salient threat to the American people because they say, well, China's an antagonist against America.
But I would counter by saying that the American government is an even bigger antagonist against the American people, and specifically against American dissidents, than China.
If I were to bet on who would kill me sooner, the Communist Chinese government or the People's Liberation Army versus the FBI and the CIA and the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security, my money would be on the latter.
So when China outpaces the military in no meaningful way, does this really affect me?
In no meaningful way, does this have anything to do with me?
Does it threaten me?
And to the extent that China is humiliating America or showing America up and besting America on the world stage, that has got nothing to do with me.
That doesn't reflect on me.
That doesn't affect me.
That is not a reflection of me and what I do.
That is a reflection of That is something relevant for the people that are in charge of this country, the American regime.
That is relevant for the universities that create the professionals that work in these fields.
That's a reflection on the federal government and all its agencies and departments who are supposed to be competing with them.
That's a reflection on the government, specifically the Congress, and how they procure and allocate resources, specifically tax dollars.
That's a reflection of the efficacy of the government and all the different organs that are a part of it.
Not just the state itself, but also the, like I said, education system, entertainment complex, the think tanks, the NGOs, the banks, you know, all of it, the whole structure.
That's an indictment of them, not me.
And to the extent that our goals as American dissidents is to bring down and replace the American regime, it is a good thing.
When an entity outside of America, like China or Russia or anything for that matter, becomes more powerful than our government or embarrasses our government or delegitimizes our government, that's a good thing.
And we have to think about it in terms of what our goals are.
The goal of the American regime is global hegemony for various reasons.
There's a profit motive, there's a power motive, you know, there's a lot in there.
But the people in the State Department, the DOD, the Pentagon, the White House, the administration, they want world domination.
That's been the story for the past 30 years, and even before that, really since World War II.
They want world domination.
They say they want the ability to fight two wars at once.
They want a military presence in every country.
They don't want one country on the face of the earth to have a nuclear arsenal that they don't permit.
They don't want one country in the world to rival the American reserve currency.
One country in the world to dictate its own affairs within its borders.
Take a look at Venezuela, or Cuba, or Iran, or even North Korea for that matter.
North Korea is threatening towards us, but nevertheless.
They want world domination.
It's not enough that we protect America.
That's not what they want.
It's not enough that we pursue America's interests.
That's not enough.
They want every knee, they want every country in the world to bow.
They want the ability to project American power on every corner of the globe.
And you can see that with the way these neocons like John McCain used to talk, or John Bolton.
They want a war with Russia.
They want a war with China.
They want a war with Libya, and Iraq, and Iran, and Venezuela, and Sudan.
Every country you can name that doesn't bend the knee to America.
And it's always pressure, it's always sanctions, it's always everything that they can get away with they will to make these countries submit if for no other reason other than they refuse to do so.
That's what they want.
That is in their interest.
They profit from it because they're on the board of the companies that the government buys the planes from to enforce the hegemony.
They're on the boards of the companies that sell the energy to these countries and so on.
We're talking about global commerce.
Our interests as American dissidents, as a practical matter, is to delegitimize the American regime.
We see the American regime and we identify it as evil.
The people in it are evil.
They clearly are not putting the American people first.
They're not putting the American nation first.
They are not Christian.
They do not believe in the nation that is America.
They're not of it.
They're not from it.
They don't believe in it.
They don't serve it.
They see themselves as global citizens.
They see themselves as part of this power structure again that's pursuing world domination.
So pursuant to our goal, Which is to dethrone evil people occupying and running our country, we need to have a regime change.
So, it's probably not a good idea for these evil people that hate us, and it's our goal to dethrone those people, it's probably not a good idea for those people to have world domination, right?
If we're American dissidents, and separately we identify the regime, and say those are evil people, they're occupying our country, they're making our country worse, We need new people running the show.
It stands to reason that it's not good for them to control the whole world.
Our ends are at odds.
They want to retain power.
They want more.
We want them out of power.
So they hate us!
If we succeed, they fail.
It's a zero-sum game.
If they succeed, we fail.
If they have global domination, if they have unlimited power, then we can never unseat them.
This is what puts us at odds.
That is why there's no we here.
We, the government.
We, the military.
I'm not with the military.
I'm not with the government.
Obviously, right?
For reasons I've just laid out.
So, pursuant to our goal of dethroning evil people, they can't have world domination.
And what's more, if there's ever going to be a regime change in America, two things have to happen.
In order to undermine the authority of the people running the country, they have to be delegitimized and they have to be incapable of exercising authority through the use of force.
Those are the two things that underlie their authority.
Their perceived legitimacy to exercise authority and their ability to coerce people.
Those are the things that underlie their authority.
To the extent that China is on the rise, primarily they are undermining the legitimacy of the American regime's authority to rule.
What do I mean by this?
When China inevitably rises up in this century and may surpass America in these kinds of fields, What this is going to do is cause a big crisis of conscience in a lot of people's minds.
They'll say, I thought America was number one.
Aren't we the greatest country ever?
Isn't that part of our identity?
If we're not number one, who are we?
If a country that isn't a free democracy is number one, is free, open democracy capitalism?
Is that the way to go?
This is going to destroy the ego and self-conception of many Americans.
And who are they going to point the finger at when all this happens?
When people see China rising against America and becoming relatively and absolutely more powerful, They're going to look at our government and military and say, hey, what's going on?
This government's better than you.
We used to be better and now we're worse.
What happened?
Primarily, it's a delegitimizing effect that that's happening.
It could have another effect.
It could affect the other part, which is their ability to coerce people.
But primarily, as China rises, this is going to cause a big cognitive dissonance in America where people are going to start to question what we're doing.
And our identity.
Who are we now?
Because all we believe, what we were told to believe for decades and for generations is that America is the greatest country, we never lose, we're the best, we're number one.
What's more is the only way to be like we are is to be free and democratic, right?
That was a dogma supposedly that prevailed after World War II and then to a greater extent after the Cold War.
Is it the only way you're going to achieve a western standard of living and project powers if you're a free democratic capitalist?
What happens when a totally authoritarian, arguably totalitarian country like China rises up some kind of traditional communist autocracy?
What happens when a country like that, not just any country, but a country like that rises up and takes America's place?
Or not even that, but becomes a great power that rivals America.
What happens when a country like that, out of the ashes of the Soviet Union, rises up and now rivals America in AI and quantum computing and hypersonic missiles and all these emergent new technologies?
What is that going to say about America?
A lot of people are going to start to question and say, well, what are we doing here?
Maybe freedom's not all it's cracked up to be.
Maybe democracy isn't the best system.
Maybe we're not the best.
Why?
What happened?
Why are we not the greatest anymore?
It'll become inarguable that America has lost prestige and status.
It'll be inarguable that in absolute and relative terms, America is in decline.
Now, a lot of people suspect that.
Some people are in denial about it.
But what happens when that's made plain and it's a practical reality that we have to live with, that America can't just do whatever it wants?
Well, that is going to go a long way towards delegitimizing the ruling class.
That's good for us.
So that's a roundabout way of saying, you know, look, I know it might sound counterintuitive.
People say America first, but you're cheering on China.
Why am I cheering on China?
Because the American regime is a greater enemy.
That's why.
The American regime is who we are principally concerned with deposing.
China has virtually always existed, and they always will.
China has been around Way before we were, and they will be around way after us.
They don't even know when Chinese civilization began.
It's been around for thousands and thousands and thousands of years.
And so, you know, the idea that America is going to contain China, or dominate China, or get rid of China, that's just not in the cards.
Now we can mitigate the influence of China, and their corrupting influence, and obviously we want to have autonomy, we want to be independent from China, but the idea that we're going to kick the Chai Kong's ass and they're going to go crumbling or something, it's not going to happen.
The American regime, however, is in a much more tenuous position, and they present a much more immediate threat to us in particular and our particular way of life, and our history, and our religion, and us as, frankly, as white people too.
So I don't see China as an impediment to our success.
Necessarily, it's a zero-sum game with the American regime.
They're the impediment to our success.
Insofar as they're still in charge, we're losing, we're failing, we're being ruled by a hostile occupier.
So in the same way that other countries look to sponsor states like the U.S. and the Soviet Union and their anti-colonial struggles in the past 60 years, We're kind of in a similar situation, not the same, but there's some similarities in the way that we have to approach the problem.
So... Hypersonic missiles, it's a good start, and this is going to keep happening.
These Sputnik moments, they're going to keep happening with increasing frequency.
unidentified
And, uh...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
They're going to be, it's going to be more significant as time goes on.
unidentified
This is just the beginning.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Like he said, this is very close to a Sputnik moment.
There's going to be a real one soon.
Within this decade you're going to see a few of these and it is going to cause people to stop and think and there's going to be some introspection and that is going to change the political dynamic in America and it's exactly these kinds of openings, these changing attitudes and changing
Circumstances which are gonna be a big opening for us big opportunity for us in the future to change the conversation and change the dynamic Because right now it's not working for us, but that's that we're gonna move on and we're gonna look at our super chats and see what you guys are saying about all this About the honorable and the powerful.
The great and powerful Chinese people.
I salute them.
I do.
07s in chat to the Communist Chinese.
Very awesome.
We love to see that.
But let's take a look at our Super Chats and we'll see what you guys are saying.
Let me bust open a little San Pellegrino.
We'll take a look.
Why am I all the way I'm like all the way off here today.
It should be like here.
unidentified
Okay.
Let's take a look and let's see what we got.
Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Scroll through a little bit.
unidentified
Oh, man.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Another day, another nickel.
Another Wednesday.
Another hump day on the show.
I got a lot of stuff to... I had a long day today, I had a long day yesterday, I got a long day tomorrow, and the next week is gonna be long.
unidentified
And it just keeps going, you know?
Alright, let's see.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
We've got Oscar says, hey Nick, sorry about my poo poo super chats recently like the one that other day about Ben Shapiro and cupcake frosting.
Please forgive me.
I love you lots and you make my day.
Well, thanks a lot.
I appreciate that.
Based Coop says, do you know Art Jones?
He has the America First Committee in Illinois.
He's so based, the Republican Party disavowed him.
Would love to see him join Cozy TV, his CNN interview is on YouTube.
Are you kidding me?
That guy is a total retard.
He is like a literal neo-Nazi, you know?
Like, dresses up in a Nazi costume and, you know, goes to these retard rallies with all the other wignats.
He's so based!
I think he's just a joker.
He's just a clown.
Not even in a good way.
unidentified
Just a buffoon.
So, yeah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
No, not a fan.
He's not gonna be... I don't know why you would say that.
I don't know if you're just ignorant about what he's about or maybe you don't know what I'm about, but no, we're not really a fan of that guy.
I was a moron.
Chosenlies says, from time to time I rewatch your debate with Trainwrecks and Hassan, Sargon, etc.
It's a great replay.
Hassan is so intellectually inferior to you that the debate was almost embarrassing to watch.
He was so intellectually inferior... He's really not a bright guy.
I wish we could do more of those.
You see why they don't debate?
It's so, it sucks so hard.
Cause it's like, could you imagine if we could just be on Twitch?
That's something so simple and that everyone else has access to, but it's just another thing that we just can't have, you know?
It's one of those situations where, I mean, It's one of those situations where, I mean, if people like Hassan and Destiny had to debate people like me regularly on a fair platform without censorship, it would be a different country.
I mean, it really would be a different country.
If Patriots just had access to YouTube and Twitch and PayPal, It would be a different ballgame.
So yeah, it's a good replay.
The one time I got on Twitch, the one time I got to debate a big person, you see what happens, they get totally embarrassed.
And my profile exploded.
But you only get to do a couple of those before the system catches on, and then they go, you know what, we're never talking to him again, and he can't have a channel, and he can't have a platform, and he can't have a PayPal, and so on.
So yeah, it sucks.
Kyle Computers has heard of Revolver News.
I was watching and he had their founder on.
Pretty great coverage of Fed's involvement on 1.6.
Tucker is also doing some special on Fed involvement.
I hope it's not acceptance programming watered down.
General thoughts?
Revolver News.
Yeah, really dude?
No, I never heard of that.
Thanks.
LiRefugeesIsLibsOfTikTok posted a video today of a black guy punching a white woman in the face in a crowded subway.
Matt Walsh posted a quote tweet reply stating, and a bunch of coward men stand around doing nothing.
Tough guy Matt Walsh would fight some random black guy in the middle of a packed subway car to defend some awful.
Wouldn't be me.
unidentified
Yeah, I agree.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Now, now he's gonna get all up on his high horse about the black crime, right?
When Ahmaud Arbery was burglarizing those houses, Matt Walsh said, "Well, I go and look at construction sites too sometimes.
It's what guys do." Do you remember that?
Remember when Ahmaud Arbery was walking through that construction site in his timberlands, in his basketball shorts, in a neighborhood 40 minutes away from him?
And all the Daily Wire people including Matt Walsh said, there's nothing conspicuous going on there.
He's just checking out the construction site.
It's something us guys do.
Remember that?
That was two years ago.
No, it was less than two years ago.
About a year and a half ago.
But now he's going to lecture everybody on it.
Oh, you're a coward if you don't defend some white woman on the subway getting beat up by a... Oh, really?
Really?
I think it's a daylight and a dollar short, Matt Walsh.
But hey, thanks for the super chat.
I appreciate it.
Yeah, pretty funny.
Love to see the 180.
I mean, people really have come such a long way.
Poop Retard says, here's a real Halloween fight for you.
Madison Cawthorn's atrophied legs.
Yeah, that's very good.
Kyle computers his white pill.
The Lord redeems the life of his servants.
None of them who take refuge in him will be condemned.
Psalm 34 22.
Wow, that is a big white pill.
Super Lionheart says don't sweat the Tucker documentary.
He'll be begging you for a streaming slot on Cozy TV very soon.
unidentified
Yeah, we'll see about that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Let's see.
MSE Zoomer says, even if it's a better movie, Star Wars is Gnostic and Lord of the Rings is Catholic.
Yeah, that's probably true.
But it doesn't mean it's a better movie.
That's a thing.
And you could say Lord of the Rings is more based.
I would probably agree.
Did you know J.R.R.
Tolkien was Catholic?
Yeah, I think everyone knows that.
But Star Wars is a more entertaining movie, and that's what a movie's job is to do.
It's to entertain, you know?
So I don't watch a movie for Catholic apologism.
I would read for that, you know?
I would go to church and I would read books and, you know, do things like that.
But when I watch a, you know, fantasy movie, I want escapism.
I want entertainment.
I want to watch Star Wars.
I do not want to watch Lord of the Rings.
unidentified
So, I think that's a very weak, excuse me, it's a very weak cope.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
It's like, well, that movie's more based.
Okay, well, it's not fun to watch.
So, Kyle Computers says, White pill, little that a righteous man hath is better than the riches of many wicked, for the arms of the wicked shall be broken.
Psalm 37.
Love you, man.
Hey, love you too.
Top Guns is an ignion.
A couple of my buddies are starting a podcast called Two and a Half White Guys.
Would we be able to stream on CozyTV?
Nope.
Because it sounds gay.
Because that sounds... Two and a Half White Guys?
Come on, man.
What the hell's wrong with you?
You're starting a podcast?
Yeah, no, sorry.
You gotta have an audience to come on CozyTV.
We're not opening it to just anybody that wants to start a show.
I think me and my friends are pretty entertaining.
I think me and my buds are pretty heckin' entertaining.
I think everyone would love to hear our conversations.
Yeah, maybe think again.
I don't know.
I mean, I'm not trying to dissuade you, but you know, you go on one of the other platforms.
If you get an audience if it goes somewhere then yeah you could come on the platform but we have nine streamers on here right now and we'll have 12 next week and we're not we're not bringing on everybody that just wants to start a show we're looking for people that have an audience this is for streamers predominantly who have already been deplatformed that's the only people we've brought on so far and we plan to bring on in the future for now so
You know, it's not... In the future, we might be able to do that, but this is the beta test period as well.
So, in the first couple of months in particular, we're really looking just for the people that need a refuge.
But, I mean, I wish you luck.
I think the name is gay, but... Hey, good luck.
Two and a half white guys.
Welcome to Two and a Half White Guys.
I'm your host, Fashy White Goy.
Our topic for today is... I don't know.
Uh, Groyp worth of vengeance is your mom was right to tone police you.
You say imprudent, unoptical.
Okay.
Thanks for that.
Lil Stain Nibba says, uh, if there's one person I can think of that deserves the privilege of streaming on cozy, it's Nate smokes.
Nate fights like hell for the American people.
He will always stand up to the RINOs and never back down from the radical left.
Nate Smokes is a true American patriot but has stuck in livestreamer hell after the DLive purge.
Hashtag I stand with Nate.
Yeah, we can bring him on for sure.
He's always been a loyal viewer of the show.
And a good guy.
Cole says we need common sense pumpkin control.
Where is Nick the Knife?
unidentified
Oh my gosh.
Oh man, that's the end.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
You know, we're coming to the end here.
Kyle Computer says why get the gene mutation global as Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and Lucifer shot?
If you are American first or self-called grouper, self-called grouper because a job?
Do you not see how open the job market it is right now guys?
If you can't resist now when it's easy, when?
Was this written by a by an immigrant?
unidentified
Why get the gene mutation shot if you're a so-called self-called medic in first because job?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
You're an immigrant?
unidentified
You're a foreigner?
You speak English?
Why get the gene mutation shot?
He's so self-called Medicine First.
Because of the job?
Because of the football game?
Because of the hot dogs?
The pizza?
Oh my gosh.
Is this guy like an immigrant?
I mean, where are you from?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
What the fuck is this search?
unidentified
What the hell is this?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
That's literally... I'm not even making that up.
That's what it says.
Yes.
unidentified
Oh man.
Can you proofread these?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Or maybe you're just struggling with the language.
unidentified
I mean, I guess I could understand that.
But if you're American, if you can speak English... Man, you're having a hard time.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
If you can't resist now when it's easy, when?
unidentified
That's a pretty, it's a powerful, it's a profound question.
Yeah, you're very right.
Oh yeah, we enjoy that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Groovy Times says, can you please explain how we have an allegiance to Israel?
unidentified
Oh my gosh.
Man.
I'm crying.
I'm crying on these niggas.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I cry!
Can you please explain how we have an allegiance to Israel and the vaccine is bad if Israel is 85% three-shot vaccinated?
If the vaccine kills, why would Israel take it?
Maybe they never actually did.
unidentified
I don't know, man.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
That's a good question.
I don't understand.
What does the allegiance to Israel part have?
We don't have allegiance to Israel.
So I don't know what that is all about.
And if the vaccine is bad, if they're vaccinated, I don't know, man.
Maybe they're all just gonna die too.
I think a lot of what they do, you know, a lot of people just presume they're like, well, they could have just vaccinated themselves.
It's like, well, maybe they did.
Maybe they just did.
You know, I don't know that everything is necessarily a global design.
You know, certainly aspects of it are designed, but I don't know if they can design everything and every unintended consequence, and I think that's a fallacy.
Hicks says, Nick tells vaxxed pigs that they're owned by the New World Order.
Boomers squeal and cry.
So typical.
Why did they, did they not like that?
I posted on Gab right before I went live.
And I said, if you got vaxxed, you're owned by the New World Order.
Why did they say something about that?
unidentified
Let me check Okay, for some reason, Gab's not loading for me.
There we go.
okay there is no vaccine so no one is vaccinated Injection?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Yes.
Clot shot?
Death jab?
Yes.
Vaccine?
unidentified
No.
Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Thanks for the clarification.
What else?
What else do we got in here?
Tim Trina Patriot says, if the New World Order's mission is population reduction, they don't want to own you, they want you dead!
unidentified
Oh yeah, my mistake.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I don't criticize those who get it and those who do not.
I don't play progressive games and neither should we.
Oh, is that what it is?
More so if you get vaccinated, you're a complete fucking moron.
unidentified
Thank you, Boomer.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
You are an idiot.
It's none of your effing business if people get vaccinated, dumbass.
unidentified
Oh, thanks.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
The pureblood thing is so cringe, by the way.
Everybody's saying pureblood.
It's so stupid.
He says, already owned by the Corporation of the United States.
unidentified
Oh, is this guy like, uh... What do they call those?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
There's, uh... Emancipated Citizen, or what the hell do they call it?
The, uh...
What do they call those people that don't believe they can be arrested?
I forget there's a name.
There's a name for them.
What the hell are they called?
Somebody help me out.
Because they believe that.
They say that, like, in the Constitution, the United States of America is not the country.
It's a corporation.
Like, the government's secretly a corporation.
That's, like, a technical thing in the Constitution that no one knows about.
What do they call them?
Sovereign citizens.
Yeah, he's a sovereign citizen.
The corporation!
That's not... they're not even just saying that like comparing America to a corporation.
It's not a metaphor.
They really believe that America is formally a corporation and that like just no one knows about that.
It's a technicality.
So, I must be a sovereign citizen.
unidentified
Yeah, so the boomers aren't happy.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I gotta tell you, Gab is a great platform, but a lot of the people on there are just straight-up retarded.
It makes it kind of difficult.
Somebody says, asterisk, JWO, Jew World Order.
unidentified
Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Conspiracy bullshit.
Get a job instead of fear-mongering for money.
Thanks, Carla Song, with the cat profile picture.
unidentified
Okay, anyway.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
So yeah, I thought that would go over pretty well on Gab.
unidentified
I guess they all just hate me now.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Edge says, I thought Jews were supposed to be smart.
Now they're going to lose to China?
What happened?
I guess too much butt sex doesn't pay.
Yeah, that's great.
Pentecost says, so you say, Sadie.
Here we go.
So you say.
I think I'm just going to kill myself as soon as possible because this is just brutal.
So you say Seydes are basically Protestants but in your debate with Styx you say Protestants are in the church and you cite Vatican II.
There's also a clip of you saying that the Pope is a heretic.
At what point is a manifest heretic considered a non-Catholic?
Would you consider Biden a Catholic or Pelosi?
How can a notorious heretic claim to be a Catholic or claim papal office?
Well, when I say they're Sedes, it's really not difficult to grasp.
I said they're basically Protestants.
Sedes are basically Protestants because they, as laymen, are saying, I don't recognize the Pope.
I don't recognize this Pope's authority.
I think this isn't a valid Pope.
And how, really, on a meaningful level, is that different from Martin Luther saying, well, that's not my church, or even the Eastern Orthodox, even the Schismatic, saying, well, that's, you know, the Pope doesn't have primacy, he's just a first among equals, or something.
It's really kind of like the same thing to me, you know?
The appeal, I think that's the whole point of the Catholic Church, is that it has authority, it's protected from error, You know, the Pope is infallible.
I think that's kind of the whole point.
You know, the Church was founded.
It's personal.
It's a temporal institution.
This idea that it's like, well, I think that they stopped being the real Pope in the 19th century.
I think they stopped being the real Pope in the 20th century.
It's like, okay, so are we Protestants now?
I'm a Sadie of the Contest that thinks that the Pope wasn't legitimate after this year.
Well, I am a Sadie of the Contest that thinks it wasn't legit after this year.
You know, the point is the same.
They're fracturing the faith.
They're fracturing the truth.
It's one holy Catholic apostolic church.
The gates of hell don't prevail.
It's built on St.
Peter.
The idea that there would be anti-popes or a vacancy, it just blatantly and plainly contradicts all of that.
This is like, these are foundational beliefs of Catholics.
As far as Protestants being in the church, I don't think I said that.
I said they're Christian insofar as they have been baptized, believe in Jesus Christ, and I think there's one other thing I forget.
It's been a long time since I did that debate, but insofar as they believe that Jesus is the Son of God, and they have faith in God, and they are baptized, I don't think I said they're in the church.
unidentified
Christian.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
And, you know, some Catholics will say that there's a broad definition of what it means to be Catholic.
You don't even necessarily have to be confirmed Catholic, but they say when there's no salvation outside the church, they say, well, technically, if you're baptized, you're in the church.
And so there's some technical arguments there.
But I don't think I said they're in the church.
I think I said they are Christian by definition.
And some would say for the purpose of salvation, they're in the church.
No one would call them Catholic, though.
You're saying, what you're effectively arguing is that I called Protestants Catholic, which I didn't.
I said they are Christian, and by some definitions, when it concerns salvation, people would say they are in the church.
But I didn't say Protestants are Catholic.
Protestants are not Catholic if they're Protestant.
And you're trying to do this, well, if No, not everyone is Catholic, obviously.
are Catholics and aren't saying he's Catholic.
No, not everyone is Catholic, obviously.
So, I mean, what a stupid thing to say.
And I didn't say the Pope is a heretic.
There was this article, I think I know what you're talking about, that went around a long time ago, and this is what happens.
The press lies about the Pope all the time, and I said something to the effect of, well, if this is true, this would be heresy, and it turned out not to be true.
So, you don't have the quote, I don't have it in front of me, but that's what I recall.
unidentified
So...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
So anyway, Fox 63rd Oblog Roy versus they say we nigga like the feds in the interrogation room We can get through this just let us know who shot duck Nigga, we don't have to go back to the hood.
We ain't gonna get ran up.
I'm getting you dick sucked on live But I tell you who will me so fuck you.
I don't know shit Okay.
Thanks.
I don't really understand that but thanks for that true Jack Blixby says they are upset about China challenging their power because if we were run by China, we wouldn't have tranny generals or trannies raping our daughters in school bathrooms.
Christ is King!
So true.
I don't know if it's that necessarily, it's just that the more that China becomes powerful, the less powerful they become.
I don't think they're afraid of like, China's secretly based.
I don't think that's it.
They just don't like, it doesn't matter what China is.
They just don't like a rival power stepping on their turf.
I mean, I'm sure they don't like that China's traditional in some respects, but I think that's largely a myth when people say, they don't like China because China's based.
China does a lot of BLM, they promote a lot of BLM propaganda in America, so I don't know if I'd go that far.
Spencer says, have you heard of Cliff High?
Nope.
Kenneth says, social credit plus 100,000.
I'm gonna be a rich man if I ever have to live in exile.
Max is great show Nick.
Love you King.
Have a great night, buddy.
God bless.
Thanks a lot you two Principal groin versus pit vipers got gripe so hard yesterday.
Yoba made pit vipers Yoba forever.
So true Yeah, they did get griped JD Dallas is January 6 was 1905 next time.
It will be 1917.
We will get them next time.
time it will be 1917 we will get them next time well disavow but i know what you're talking about i I see the similarities and they are there.
unidentified
They are there.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
But don't forget, a big part of 17 was the World War I and some other things going on too.
So, some similarities, I agree.
Uh, Diversity Members is not sure how familiar you are with Patriotic Alternative with Mark Khaled, but he could be a great person to have on your platform.
Maybe.
Love you, bud.
Uh, maybe.
Yeah, maybe.
I'll think about it.
Kai Clips says, I'd be like, hey, any ideas what I should call my show?
MFs be like, I've got one.
The Kai Conservative Moment Revolution Show Cast Minute.
Also, Kat, your immigrant accent sounds like JF.
Yeah, I don't know.
I was trying to do like a French sort of... broadly continental European broken English.
Yeah.
Kai, when are you gonna start your show, man?
When are you gonna start your show?
We're looking forward to bringing you on the platform.
You should just call it the E-Girl Show.
You should just call it the Girl Show.
Or the MRNA Show.
The Nanobot Show, hosted by The Nanobots, coursing through your veins.
I'm Kai Clips, and this is The Nanobots Talking.
Nah, that's an old joke, but thanks buddy, I appreciate it.
Yeah, I don't know.
What did you say it was gonna be?
It's the Hall of Notes song.
What is it?
Out of Touch?
Eh, it's pretty good.
It's pretty good.
Out of touch with Kai?
It's not bad.
Blind Lickers says, Hey King, I know it's not Halloween yet, but can we get an ugly AF Christmas sweater and a little Groyper ornament?
Don't be mad at me.
Thoughts?
unidentified
Yeah, maybe.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
It's not even Halloween yet, but maybe.
Yeah, maybe we'll do that for Christmas.
Real poopy retard man says yo yo Gen X peaceful observers as you can't appreciate Lord of the Rings unless you read the books which are actually the peak of Anglo mythological literature oh okay so I have to watch nine hours of movies and then read 2,000 pages of books before I get it got it yeah
Before I can enjoy the movies, you just have to read a Bible's worth of fantasy novels, and then you just get to watch 12 hours of movies, and then you'll really appreciate it.
It's like, I think if I didn't grow up with it, I probably just won't like it because the movies aren't that good.
I think it's something like that.
Phillips says, have you read The International Jew by Henry Ford?
unidentified
No.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Ace Brilhart says, sorry about all the retard chats and I love you Nick.
Have a good night.
Thanks, you too.
Bronzo says, as Australia is a corporation listed on the American Stock Exchange, my birth certificate legally makes me a naval vessel under Admiralty laws.
Wake the fuck up Libtards.
There's no law saying a boat isn't allowed to drink and drive.
You're a boat.
Oh, it's a sovereign citizen thing.
That's pretty funny.
That's pretty funny.
Drinking and driving joke.
Very good.
Diversity member says, Not sure if you intended to neglect this point, Nick, but the notion that enough whites will leave the military expecting minorities and trannies to fight China is poorly mistaken.
They'll make sure to get whites in the front lines, even if it means a draft.
Uh, yeah, I don't know what the relevance for that is.
I don't think I even talked about that tonight.
Uh, Fuck63rd, Oblogroiper says, We will have to educate you on what's going on in the streets.
Since Keem is retiring, you can get into Drama Alert Chicago Edition.
That's a great idea.
That one, Groyper.
So, thanks for everything you do.
God bless.
Thanks, you too.
Okay, all right.
Geez, thank God.
That was brutal.
That's our last Super Chat.
That's gonna do it for me tonight.
Thanks for watching.
Remember to follow me on Gabin Telegram.
Links are down below.
I'm on the air Monday through Friday, 8 o'clock Central, 9 o'clock Eastern Standard Time, only on cozy.tv.
As always, thanks for watching.
Thanks to our Super Chatter subscribers.
Everybody that watches the show, we love you.
I'll see you tomorrow.
Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
▲
Export Selection