Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
America First News. | |
Good evening everybody you're watching America First My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes. | ||
We have a great show for you tonight. | ||
Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Friday. | ||
And I'm just now noticing that there might be a little bit of a challenge here with my wardrobe. | ||
I just noticed this. | ||
I sit down I turn on my camera, I get all ready to go. | ||
My casual Friday attire, of course, it's a casual Friday. | ||
I'm not wearing a necktie, I'm wearing a fun Hawaiian shirt. | ||
But I just sit down and realize that there might be a bit of an issue here with this greenish blue Hawaiian shirt. | ||
I think you can kind of see through it in some areas, right? | ||
Like here? | ||
Duh, hello green shirt department, green shirt moment. | ||
At first I thought it was just like wrinkled. | ||
I'm like, oh, what's going on? | ||
But then I realized nope. | ||
It's uh, it's the chroma key. | ||
unidentified
|
It's You can see damn it. | |
All right. | ||
Well, I might have to go. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, I think I might go change my shirt. | |
So I might have to put the music back on for a second. | ||
I didn't even... Of course! | ||
I know it's a green screen, but the green on this shirt isn't even that dark. | ||
It's like a light green compared to the green of the green screen, but nevertheless... I don't know. | ||
I mean, does that make it unwatchable? | ||
I mean, it is very noticeable. | ||
It is very visible that I'm completely blending in with my surroundings here. | ||
unidentified
|
Whoops! | |
Everybody's saying stay. | ||
It doesn't matter. | ||
It's okay. | ||
People are saying it's okay. | ||
We want to hear more lobby music. | ||
Don't change. | ||
Keep going. | ||
Keep the shirt. | ||
unidentified
|
It's cool. | |
Whatever. | ||
I guess we'll just go with it. | ||
It's all in your mind, right? | ||
Pain is in the mind. | ||
It's casual, they're saying. | ||
Yeah, that's true. | ||
It is very casual to blend in with the background. | ||
unidentified
|
All right. | |
Well, My apologies. | ||
I guess I won't wear this shirt on the show anymore. | ||
I think this is the first time I've worn this shirt on the show. | ||
I thought I wore it once before. | ||
That's why I thought it would be okay. | ||
I was putting it on and I'm like, well, it's a little green. | ||
Yeah, it's okay. | ||
I wear green shirts all the time. | ||
You know, I have another shirt that's like a green blue. | ||
It's like a plaid kind of a shirt, and that I never have a problem with. | ||
So maybe it's the new camera. | ||
Maybe I'm going to blame the new camera and say it's picking up sharper colors. | ||
Could that be it? | ||
I don't know. | ||
Anyway, you're watching America First. | ||
We have a great show for you tonight. | ||
Lots to talk about, lots to get into. | ||
Of course, as you can already tell, it's gonna be a low-key, casual, fun, stress-free stream. | ||
No stress. | ||
No stress tonight. | ||
I'm gonna try. | ||
I'm gonna try to be a little bit less stressed out. | ||
You should be as well. | ||
And of course tonight we're talking more about the coronavirus and all that. | ||
Tonight we're going to be talking about a number of different subjects. | ||
We'll be looking at this new antibody test that is being floated by Dr. Fauci and others as a possible immunity passport. | ||
You might remember that term. | ||
I think we talked about this last week. | ||
And this is an idea that has been floated in Europe. | ||
In Germany, Italy, some other countries in Europe, they're talking about getting some kind of certificate or something where the government will be able to identify who is immune from coronavirus and those people will be able to return to normal life before everybody else. | ||
So, and they haven't established what that might look like, but this was talked about last week in Europe, an immunity passport system where people that have gotten the virus already and survived, those people would get this passport and they'd be able to return to restaurants and public areas and not obviously have to worry about contracting the virus. | ||
And now in the United States, they're proposing that this antibody test might be a solution, that the antibody test might serve as that immunity passport. | ||
And so in other words, they will test your blood for coronavirus antibodies. | ||
Even if you haven't gotten the virus, even if you haven't been infected, your body might be developing the antibodies. | ||
And if that's the case, then you'll have this immunity passport or immunity certificate and be able to go back and do other things that non-immune people will not be able to do. | ||
So we'll talk a little bit about that. | ||
We'll talk about what's happening in New York. | ||
The death rate in New York continues to go up. | ||
And the death toll continues to stack. | ||
It's at more than 18,000 today. | ||
We'll get into the numbers. | ||
But what's happening in New York, what we're talking about tonight, is not just about the death count, but about what's happening in the hospitals. | ||
And this is something that we've been talking about for weeks on the show, which is the anticipated shortage of healthcare resources. | ||
And that is PPE, personal protective equipment, that is ventilators for people that are in ICUs, people with a severe coronavirus case, but also the hospital beds has been a big variable. | ||
And a lot of our response to the coronavirus has been based on the expectation using some of these statistical models that there would be a shortage of hospital beds Uh, in the event that there would be a major coronavirus outbreak in our big cities. | ||
And it turns out that this is not materializing. | ||
There is no hospital bed shortage in New York. | ||
There is no hospital bed shortage anywhere in the United States. | ||
In fact, across the United States a lot of hospitals are empty, and they're running out of money, and they're having to fire their staff. | ||
Because in the build-up to this coronavirus outbreak in the United States. | ||
They canceled elective procedures. | ||
They cleared out the hospitals in anticipation of having tens of thousands or thousands of people in intensive care, but that hasn't happened yet. | ||
And even in New York, which is the biggest outbreak in the United States, and this is peak week, this is supposed to be the most people hospitalized, the most people in ICUs, and most people dead. | ||
Even in the biggest city, with the biggest outbreak, there is no shortage of hospital beds. | ||
And so this begs a question about the efficacy of our strategy and about our models that we're using, our statistical models, to predict and forecast the spread of the virus and its consequences. | ||
And is that accurate? | ||
Are these models correct? | ||
So we'll dive into that a little bit and we'll also be talking about, and I guess this will be our featured story, will be about the reopening of the country, which again, similar statistical models are projecting that if we reopen the economy, there will be a major resurgence of the coronavirus and hundreds of there will be a major resurgence of the coronavirus and hundreds of millions of people sick and thousands dead and So we'll talk about that as well. | ||
We don't really have like a main story. | ||
We're just talking about a few different developments here with the coronavirus, but I don't know. | ||
I have to tell you, I might be trending towards the opposite side. | ||
You know, if you've been watching this show, that I've basically been saying we should do everything we can to stop the spread of the virus, and opening the economy sooner rather than later would be a terrible idea, and in no way is this comparable to the flu. | ||
I don't know. | ||
I don't know. | ||
The more that we trudge along here, the more a lot of what we're seeing about the coronavirus seems to be fishy. | ||
Seems to be a little bit suspect. | ||
And I'm not backing down all the way just yet. | ||
I'm not, you know, gonna go on a full retreat here. | ||
Yet, but I am saying that looking at these numbers here with the hospital beds, it really starts to beg the question, was all of this worth it? | ||
And the infection rates, I know I've been saying that the death rate is going down, and that's to be expected, obviously. | ||
Number one, because, I mean, we don't have enough data about the virus, frankly, because China didn't give us any information. | ||
And we hadn't seen a full outbreak cycle in Europe completed yet at the time of our lockdown. | ||
In other words, we didn't see the full course of what the outbreak looks like from beginning all the way until the end in a country outside of China before we had to go on lockdown. | ||
It was mid-March that the decision was made to lockdown. | ||
And it's only now starting to ramp down in Europe. | ||
It's only now starting to de-escalate. | ||
They are just past the peak in Italy and in some of these other countries. | ||
So, in fairness, the death rate is starting to go down because we're finding out that a lot of people are infected that are asymptomatic and never show any symptoms. | ||
We also are getting more data about the virus in our own country and from other countries. | ||
And of course, the social distancing has been a big variable in the death rate and the rate at which the virus is spreading. | ||
And all of that is true. | ||
And it is also true that more people are dying in a shorter amount of time than of a conventional illness. | ||
I'm not walking any of that back just yet, but I am starting to suspect that maybe there is something else going on here. | ||
The immunity passports, mass surveillance, and now we're finding out that it's not even as bad. | ||
With ventilators and hospital beds and other resources that they made it out to be. | ||
So, these are very, very strange and troubling times. | ||
We have to be very careful here with a crisis like this because, you know, just like 9-11 or just like 2008, we talked a lot about this early on, a crisis is a big opportunity for change. | ||
And it could have been a big opportunity for us to do the things that we wanted to do as nationalists. | ||
Shut down immigration, build a border wall, things like that. | ||
But it could also be a big opportunity for our enemies to do what they want, which might be, again, like I said, mass surveillance, monitoring of people, government takeover of certain things, which we should be cognizant of. | ||
We should be very cognizant of the agenda of billionaires like Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates. | ||
We should be very cognizant of the agenda of multinational corporations and big tech, Silicon Valley, Wall Street, because there are certainly maybe other machinations happening behind the scenes, which I never denied by the way, that we have to be weary of, especially as we reach the peak and move past it. | ||
As we, as the dust begins to settle and we figure out what the post-coronavirus society looks like, We're gonna have to be very careful that it doesn't turn into something that is a nightmare, right? | ||
So, we're going to take a look at everything going on with coronavirus, but I just want to open with that. | ||
A little bit of skepticism, a little bit of suspicion on my part, especially when I see these numbers with the hospital beds. | ||
The crisis that they've been telling us was going to hit, seems like it's never going to hit. | ||
Seems like it's not gonna hit in peak week, and that it might never hit as bad as they said it would. | ||
And so, I don't know. | ||
You look at Fauci. | ||
You look at Birx. | ||
These are Obama officials. | ||
These are Democrats. | ||
You look at Bill Gates, who is the second biggest funder of the World Health Organization. | ||
You look at the director of the World Health Organization, who has got some very suspicious background, very suspicious origin story. | ||
And it seems all very bizarre to me. | ||
Seems like there might be something else at play. | ||
But We're gonna dive in. | ||
We'll talk about all our coronavirus news and you'll be more informed and it should be good but before we do that of course it is Good Friday so happy Good Friday. | ||
I always feel weird saying happy Good Friday because kind of a bad thing that happened today. | ||
I mean of course it is a great triumph that happens over the course of the next three days but You know, to say, hey, happy Good Friday. | ||
You know, you think about what happened today and it's like, well, is that like, you know, that's not like an amazing, I mean, it is amazing, but it's like, was that a positive development that our guy got nailed to the cross? | ||
Like, hey, happy day, you know, day that God got nailed to the cross. | ||
It's like, eh, but it is Good Friday. | ||
So I hope you're enjoying your Good Friday. | ||
I hope you're abstaining from meat, making preparations for Easter. | ||
It's going to be a weird weekend. | ||
unidentified
|
Right? | |
Normally you go to Easter Mass and that's, you know, the best and the biggest day of the year on the liturgical calendar. | ||
And this weekend, we're not going to be going to Mass. | ||
Mass is still cancelled, obviously, everywhere, and can't have family get-togethers or anything like that, so it's kind of a weird time for the church. | ||
It's a weird time for the world, and a weird time, I guess, for the church in the world, right? | ||
But happy, I guess, you know, premature, happy Easter, happy Good Friday. | ||
Hope you're enjoying the holiday season. | ||
Hope everybody's staying healthy and safe and financially stable and everything. | ||
Another jobless report came out today. | ||
Another 6 million people out of work. | ||
16 million jobless claims in three weeks. | ||
So I hope everybody's staying okay in that area. | ||
But happy Good Friday! | ||
I didn't eat meat today, which is good. | ||
I had one, you know, I ate a turkey sandwich a few weeks ago and people got all bent out of shape. | ||
So I've been striving. | ||
I've been striving very hard. | ||
Not just for people to get mad at me. | ||
For God, too, obviously, right? | ||
But I've been trying very hard to keep to that. | ||
I didn't really eat much at all today. | ||
I was kind of sleeping most of the day. | ||
I got up early. | ||
I got a ton of work done. | ||
And then I just like passed out on the couch. | ||
I don't even know what happened. | ||
I just was out cold. | ||
So I didn't even have much to eat at all. | ||
It's kind of easy to abstain when you're not awake. | ||
unidentified
|
You know? | |
It's easy to abstain when you're occupied. | ||
Most of the day, but anyway, that's how it's been going for me, but we're gonna dive in. | ||
I don't really have a whole lot, not really a whole lot else going on. | ||
You know, we're here, we're inside, we're trapped, it's boring. | ||
I don't even know what else there is to say anymore with this coronavirus thing. | ||
I just want the world to start moving forward again, right? | ||
We're gonna dive in and we'll look at what's happening with the coronavirus here on Casual Friday. | ||
Of course, I will read off to you our latest numbers here. | ||
From our source here, I think BNO is not so good anymore. | ||
I checked BNO yesterday and they didn't have the most up-to-date numbers. | ||
So I'm using a new source today and yesterday. | ||
So our latest numbers here for the coronavirus, we are up to 500,000 cases in the United States. | ||
cases in the United States. | ||
500, 1,880 as of right now. | ||
We are up to 18,699 dead in the United States. | ||
And we have had more than 2,000 new deaths in the last 24 So death rate keeps going up, number of dead keeps going up. | ||
Well, you know, what else is new? | ||
But that's where we're at in terms of rate, in terms of the total. | ||
And I think it's kind of interesting, though, that we look across the world and, you know, really the only countries that seem to be affected so far are European countries. | ||
Isn't that kind of peculiar with few exceptions? | ||
And I don't know if that's because I haven't looked into it too closely outside of the major hot spots like the United States, China, and Europe. | ||
But what I'm noticing, and again it might be because of the testing, it might be for other reasons, but it seems like here we are a hundred days into this pandemic and the only countries that really have That have really had a major outbreak are the white countries, European countries and the United States and Canada. | ||
And it doesn't seem like it's hitting South America or Asia or Africa or the Middle East, anywhere else in the same way. | ||
And remember the first three countries that had an outbreak outside of China were South Korea, Iran and Italy. | ||
And South Korea and Iran are nowhere near where it is in Europe. | ||
And it's pretty bad in Iran. | ||
You know, they're in the top ten and they have been in the top ten. | ||
They've got 68,000 cases. | ||
And I guess they're maybe a little bit closer to a European, like, phenotype than some of these other countries. | ||
But South Korea has kept their numbers low. | ||
Japan has kept their numbers low. | ||
Right? | ||
Vietnam, Hong Kong, You know, no major country in Southeast Asia or really anywhere in Asia has reported a big, big number of cases, even in China, although the official numbers vary from what we suspect their real numbers are. | ||
They're not reporting anything major in cities outside of Wuhan. | ||
So it's kind of strange. | ||
It's kind of bizarre how that works. | ||
Why is it that only in Europe has it taken off? | ||
And the United States and Canada compared to everywhere else. | ||
And, you know, there could be other variables. | ||
Like I said, maybe other countries don't have widespread testing like we do. | ||
We didn't have big numbers until we had widespread testing. | ||
And maybe there's other reasons that are pertaining to travel or, you know, what kinds of precautions were taken and when against the pandemic. | ||
But it just seems a little bit bizarre, especially Asia, because you would assume that if the virus started in China, You would assume that the virus would spread rapidly all across Asia first, and then Europe, and then the United States, just because of proximity, just because of geography. | ||
The closer you are to a country, probably the more travel and commerce there is, the more opportunities there are for transmission, and the faster the virus might spread, as opposed to the virus going all the way to Europe and infecting Europe before it infects Singapore, before it infects Hong Kong, Japan, right, all these other countries. | ||
So I find that to be a little bit strange that Asia has not really had a major outbreak to speak of outside of Wuhan, but it's in every major city, in every country in Europe, even the small countries, even Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, right, Austria, and it's all the way in the United States. | ||
Before it's hit really bad in Southeast Asia. | ||
East Asia just seems very peculiar. | ||
But anyway, those are the numbers. | ||
Just some sneaking suspicions. | ||
I have a feeling something's not right here. | ||
Something is definitely strange. | ||
And I don't know if we'll ever get to the bottom of this. | ||
But we still don't know the origin of the virus. | ||
China is still lying to us about it. | ||
We've got all these peculiarities geographically and how it's spreading in other countries, and then we're going to talk about these hospital bed numbers, but I'm starting to suspect that something is off here. | ||
And I know a lot of you guys have been saying this for a long time, and I think even I said this when the coronavirus first started back in January, that something is not right here. | ||
And we've been kind of going with the flow and monitoring it for your sake, for your own financial and health situation. | ||
And we've been watching the developments from the government and talking about it from a political perspective, but I have to tell you that increasingly, and it's only, I've only gotten, this feeling has only grown stronger over the past few months, that something is very much not right here. | ||
Something just really doesn't sit well with me when you look at what's happening with this immunity passport and Bill Gates and the origin of the virus and this Chinese laboratory. | ||
That conversation isn't happening anymore, by the way. | ||
That it's not spreading in Asia. | ||
I mean the list goes on and on of things that just seem out of place for a pandemic like this. | ||
But in any case, those are our latest numbers. | ||
We're gonna dive into the news and I think this will only bolster what I'm saying right now. | ||
So our first big development is actually about mass surveillance. | ||
One of the things they're talking about now with the virus is how they're going to improve their contact tracing. | ||
And remember we talked about this yesterday. | ||
Contact tracing is when somebody gets diagnosed with coronavirus or they get tested and confirmed with coronavirus. | ||
And then the government or the health care officials, they will look into who that person came into contact with Over the course of the incubation period, right, over the course of the amount of time that they would have been contagious, they would have been transmitting the virus, and they see who that person came into contact with, where they went, and that is a way that they're able to contain and control the spread of the virus. | ||
You know, for example, somebody comes into the hospital and tests positive with coronavirus, they might look at that person's family, and that person's workplace, and that person's school, or whatever. | ||
And they'll locate the people that might have been exposed to the virus and they'll monitor those people, maybe they'll get them tested, and if they can find everybody that that person might have infected and they can test them and see who has it and who doesn't, then that is a much more scientific and efficient way of containing the virus than saying, nobody can go outside, nobody can do anything, right? | ||
And that is what we talked about yesterday. | ||
They're going to have to improve that in order to bring everybody back into the economy, improve their contact tracing abilities, so that if there is an outbreak of the virus, they can contain it very quickly and not have to do a mass closure again or anything like that. | ||
And one of the ways that they're talking about improving their contact tracing is Apple and Google are going to build software into their smartphones. | ||
So Google has smartphones and Apple has smartphones. | ||
Google has the Play Store, right, for Android. | ||
And they're going to build software into their smartphones. | ||
And I don't know, maybe they're going to build an app as well that's going to track people. | ||
And how it's going to work is people are going to, I guess, voluntarily plug into this software if they tested positive for the coronavirus. | ||
And I guess if everybody gets the software then the Apple and Google, this machinery, will tell them if they came into contact with the person and Then they're able to quarantine and contain people that have been exposed to it. | ||
And this is from the New York Times. | ||
It talks a little bit about this. | ||
It says, quote, in one of the most far-ranging attempts to halt the spread of the coronavirus, Apple and Google said they were building software into smartphones that would tell people if they were recently in contact with someone who was infected with the virus. | ||
The technology giants said they were teaming up to release the tool within several months, building it into the operating systems of the billions of iPhones and Android devices around the world. | ||
That would enable the smartphones to constantly log other devices they come near, enabling what is known as contact tracing of the disease. | ||
People would opt-in To use the tool and voluntarily report if they became infected. | ||
The app would then alert phones that had recently come into proximity with that person's device. | ||
So, I don't know if this is an app. | ||
I guess they're building it into the operating system, which means that it's not a choice. | ||
You update your software for the phone. | ||
You know, if it's Apple, it's your iOS. | ||
If it's Android, that's their proprietary operating system. | ||
And so it's built into your phone, this technology, into every smartphone, Androids and iPhones, which I think is most of the phones in the world at this point, at least most of the smartphones. | ||
And that part is involuntary, obviously. | ||
And the software will be built in, you'll opt in, voluntarily put in your information, and it will log who you came into contact with and alert people based on that. | ||
And of course, if you're an idiot, you might say, oh, that's a great idea! | ||
That's a great way that we can do contact tracing and What a fine technology, I failed to see what the problem is. | ||
But of course, the involuntary part is that it's baked into the software, it's baked into the operating system. | ||
And more than that, you don't opt-in to the tracking, obviously. | ||
You might opt-in to receive alerts, maybe you opt-in to enter in your information if you got diagnosed with coronavirus, but clearly what you do not opt-in to is the tracking. | ||
That Google and Apple will be tracking everybody, and tracking everybody you come into contact with, and logging all this healthcare information. | ||
That metadata that is being collected is not optional. | ||
And obviously they do this already to some extent, and apps do this, and maybe the software does this. | ||
To the extent to which they're already doing this, I'm not exactly sure. | ||
But now, of course, I think it's much more overt, much more explicit, and now you've got this problem of logging all the devices in their proximity to one another. | ||
You know, maybe they can log everybody's devices and they have all that information, where each individual was at one point, and, you know, I guess they could put that together and see who was near whom. | ||
But now they've got this technology to say, oh, this person's phone was by this person's phone, and | ||
So on and it seems like it's opening it up more than it ever was before and then that's what it says in this report that it seems like there's more they're collecting more information than ever before and so while it does say in this report and it's it's so funny how they even try to keep up the facade that it's voluntary it's opt-in really how could you opt-in if you log in and it tells you who you were in touch with two weeks prior right in other words how could you | ||
Entering your information in the software and saying, oh, I just got diagnosed with coronavirus, and it tells you who you were in contact with in the past two weeks. | ||
You know, clearly that's not opt-in. | ||
Clearly that's not voluntary. | ||
They have to be collecting everything all the time in order to have that information on hand, in order to have any kind of cohesive picture for what they're trying to create, which is that contact tracing infrastructure. | ||
So to me, this is very, very suspicious, and that seems to be the direction that everything is going in with the virus. | ||
It's mass surveillance, it's government identification, right? | ||
Government control, it seems like committees taking more information than ever, corporations, private and public sector alliances collecting more data than ever. | ||
And it's things like this that make me really concerned because let's say this coronavirus turns out to be a nothing, right? | ||
Let's say, hypothetically, That after this coronavirus infects 150 million people, that the death rate turns out to be similar to the flu, right? | ||
Because that's the big concern, is if the death rate is 3%, then 150 million people getting the virus is catastrophic. | ||
If 0.3% die from the coronavirus, then you're talking about the flu. | ||
You're talking about something that is The same magnitude or in the ballpark of any ordinary disease that we deal with on an annual basis. | ||
So let's say that that's the case. | ||
Let's say that the coronavirus, when all is said and done, has a death rate that's similar to the flu or another conventional infectious disease that we have immunity for. | ||
Let's say that that's the case. | ||
After all is said and done, are we going to end up in a situation where Google and Apple and the government and the World Health Organization and the UN and the CDC have created a massive contact tracing Testing, immunity, passport, infrastructure that sees everything? | ||
And not only does it see everything, that was a given, and I said this the other week, that that already exists, and that's true. | ||
But more disturbingly, now all this information is being shared among all these different entities. | ||
That to me is maybe where the real source of concern comes from. | ||
Because we know that the NSA collects information, and we know that Google collects your information, and we know that Facebook collects information, and so on. | ||
But what we're seeing with the coronavirus, and this was the first thing that happened that Trump announced in the Rose Garden, was the public and private partnership. | ||
Right? | ||
Trump came out with Walmart and Google and Walgreens and the laboratories and the CDC. | ||
And he said, we have an unprecedented public-private partnership to tackle the coronavirus. | ||
So now, is it the case? | ||
And by the way, things have been trending this way all along, you know, for the past 10 years, 20 years, whatever. | ||
You've always had some degree of public-private partnership, but is it acceding now to a new level where there's virtually no distinction between these entities? | ||
And it goes from public to private, but then also to the supranational level, to the international level, where now is Bill Gates and the World Health Organization going to get all this information? | ||
Is the UN going to get this information? | ||
So to me, all of this is very disturbing, because if we're at a flu-like level with the coronavirus, and when all is said and done, this unholy leviathan world government apparatus is created, It seems to me like that was just the pretext for creating that infrastructure, doesn't it? | ||
It seems like some combination of media, health, international institutions teamed up to scare everybody into creating this, and that was the end game all along. | ||
And I was saying weeks ago that we could do that for nationalist ends. | ||
We should do that for You know, Bolshevik, not Bolshevik, I mean the Nazval nationalist type reasons, but maybe it was the case that the seeds were planted by all these other institutions instead. | ||
And that is also true when we look at what's happening with these immunity passports. | ||
And I'll read to you, this is the latest report from the New York Times on the immunity passport idea. | ||
Like I said, I believe we talked about this either early this week or last week. | ||
We talked about this idea that in Europe, in Italy, in Germany, in the UK, and in France, they're talking about this immunity passport. | ||
And they weren't specific about this early on. | ||
But they said that there would be some passport system where you will be tested. | ||
And if you had the coronavirus and you no longer have the coronavirus, if you're immune from it, then you're going to be able to reintegrate into society to a greater extent than everybody else or sooner than everybody else. | ||
In other words, maybe everybody will remain on lockdown until you get immune from the virus, and then basically the government decides, okay, you're immune, here's your stamp, and now you can go back into the world. | ||
And the question was, what does that look like? | ||
Is that a tattoo? | ||
Is that, you know, a microchip? | ||
Is that a piece of paper? | ||
Is that an ID card? | ||
What does that look like? | ||
How do you establish immunity? | ||
Right? | ||
And there were some questions about that. | ||
And today in the United States, Dr. Anthony Fauci floated the idea of an antibody test, which might be this immunity passport, might be the basis for an immunity passport. | ||
In other words, they will test you to see if you have the coronavirus antibodies. | ||
In other words, your immune system has developed the ability to respond to the coronavirus. | ||
That is a demonstration of immunity. | ||
You don't even have to get the virus potentially to have these antibodies. | ||
And if that's the case, then you're able to reintegrate sooner or to a greater extent than everybody else. | ||
And I'll read you, this is the report here from the New York Times. | ||
It's talking about I'm sorry, I have the wrong report in front of me. | ||
So the report actually, I actually just gave you all the information about the passport. | ||
That is the gist of it. | ||
And the immunity passport, or I'm sorry, the antibody test would be a finger prick. | ||
They say that the test is actually very simple. | ||
I was looking at a different report which we'll get into. | ||
This is about the beds. | ||
The antibody test is just a finger prick. | ||
It's not a needle. | ||
It's not, well, it's not like a, you know, conventional needle. | ||
It's a finger prick. | ||
They test your blood. | ||
They see if they have the antibodies. | ||
They're ordering them as we speak. | ||
They say that they'll be available in the next several days. | ||
Two weeks or maybe months. | ||
At least it might be months for widespread antibody testing. | ||
People that have already had the coronavirus will get them sooner than everybody else, but they're saying that that will be the basis for a possible immunity test in the United States. | ||
And of course, nothing is set in stone yet. | ||
This hasn't been greenlit. | ||
This is not something that people are talking about. | ||
The antibody tests are being developed and they are being produced now. | ||
I think they just produced one They just developed one. | ||
It's in production now and it's being distributed soon. | ||
But the idea of the immunity passport has not been... that's not set in stone yet. | ||
That's not concrete. | ||
So for now they have the antibody test and they'll see who's immune and who's not. | ||
But they floated the idea of that being the basis of some kind of certificate where then you'll get your antibody test. | ||
The government will give you the green light and they say okay now you can go out there. | ||
And you know to me this is very much along the same lines as what we saw with Well, we just talked about with the mass surveillance. | ||
And we talked about this last week, too, when it happened in Europe. | ||
This is where I have to draw the line. | ||
And you could say the virus is out there, and you could say that there are precautions that are necessary, like a mask, or a temperature check, or whatever. | ||
And I ridiculed libertarians for being so reactive about all this from the beginning. | ||
I don't think it's a tyrannical government takeover to say that You have to wear a mask on public transportation. | ||
I don't think it's a government takeover. | ||
I don't think it's tyranny for the government to say that you have to have a temperature check. | ||
If you check your temperature and you have a fever during a time of pandemic, when you have a virus that is spreading that we know very little about, that seems to me to be a reasonable restriction to put in place. | ||
Telling people they can't gather in crowds of more than 30 or 100 and varied state by state, to me, when you put that in place temporarily during a pandemic, that doesn't seem like a tyrannical takeover. | ||
That, to me, is something that is below my threshold of concern for government takeover, for global, you know, new world order type control. | ||
When you start to talk about mass surveillance with Apple and Google, when you start to talk about Public-private partnerships? | ||
Immunity passports? | ||
Antibody tests? | ||
unidentified
|
ID2020? | |
Tattoos? | ||
G2020 and tattoos, microchips, that kind of thing. | ||
That's where I draw the line. | ||
And I keep hearing more and more things that are increasingly areas for concern. | ||
Like I said, when it started, I wasn't suspicious of this. | ||
When it started out, telling people a shelter in place to me is not a major problem. | ||
Telling people to be concerned or to stock up on supplies, I think that's something you should be doing anyway. | ||
When the government starts to say that we're now going to administer a test, That is mandatory for everybody, and unless you pass the test, then you're not going to be able to reintegrate into society, and God knows what's in the test. | ||
If there is, you know, ink, if there is a chip or something like that, and it paves the way for government identification or government surveillance, that to me is an overstep. | ||
That to me is indicative of a larger agenda, and it all seems to be trending in that direction. | ||
And that is something to me that we should be pushing back hard against. | ||
So even if it costs lives to do that, I think it's actually worth it. | ||
Even if the coronavirus is very deadly, I'd actually rather take my chances with a global pandemic than take my chances with Bill Gates and the World Health Organization and Jeff Bezos and everything like that. | ||
I would take a global pandemic and a drastically lower standard of living, and I say that knowing full well what that entails and understanding full well the consequences of that, than having everybody being microchipped and being under the control of some kind of multinational corporation, than having everybody being microchipped and being under the control of some kind of multinational corporation, supranational government | ||
I don't think that is preferable to hundreds of thousands, frankly, dying from a pandemic. | ||
Pandemics happen and countries recover from pandemics. | ||
World government, you know, that to me is something that you don't come back from. | ||
So that's the antibody test, that is surveillance, but I'll tell you the reason for my concern. | ||
The reason for my concern all of a sudden is because of these evolving numbers. | ||
And not just the death rate, but these statistical models about the deaths. | ||
And this is the report that I was about to read a moment ago. | ||
I got my notes mixed up here. | ||
There's a report now in the New York Times, and this is information that's been Being reported across the country for the past week or so that none of these runs on hospital beds or other resources are actually materializing. | ||
You know, we were warned two weeks ago, and I think I talked about this last Monday, I said the next wave, the next challenge from this pandemic is the shortages of medical supplies and health care resources. | ||
At first it was the shortage of tests, and then it was the reaction from the government, the stimulus, the lockdown, and so on. | ||
And now the next challenge, as we near the peak of death and of confirmed cases and hospitalizations, will be the lack and the shortage of PPE, personal protective equipment. | ||
It'll be the lack of respirators, ventilators, hospital beds, ICUs, medical personnel, technicians, things of that nature. | ||
But that's not materializing. | ||
All across the country, you have empty hospitals, you have hospitals that are laying off workers, you have hospitals that are running out of money because they don't have elective procedures being done, because people are not going into their hospitals. | ||
They cleared out All their facilities in preparation of major coronavirus overrun, and that never happened. | ||
And so now, in some cases, they're closing hospitals. | ||
And I'll dive into this report here from the New York Times, talking about even the situation in New York City, where it's the worst off. | ||
It says, quote, New York's daily death toll continues to be staggering, approaching 800 for a third straight day, and some hospitals are still teetering on the brink of chaos. | ||
But, after closing schools, shuttering most businesses, and ordering people to stay home, the state has managed to avoid the apocalyptic vision some forecasters were predicting weeks ago. | ||
As the number of intensive care beds being used in the state fell for the first time during the outbreak, According to figures released on Friday, the data showed that 18,569 people in New York were hospitalized with the virus, which is far below the dire projections that as many as 140,000 hospital beds could be needed as the outbreak peaked. | ||
So we're nearing the peak of the outbreak. | ||
In New York, New Jersey, right on the eastern seaboard there, we're nearing the peak. | ||
They said that there would be a need for 140,000 beds. | ||
Hospitalizations are going down. | ||
ICU beds, at least being used by coronavirus patients, are going down, not up. | ||
And the number is 18,569 in terms of hospitalizations. | ||
They were predicting 140,000. | ||
It's less than 20,000. | ||
And we may have already... Are you kidding me? | ||
We may have already passed the peak. | ||
Okay, so we just can't catch a break on this show, right? | ||
My left light just went out. | ||
Let me go turn it back on. | ||
Seriously? | ||
unidentified
|
Some good Friday, huh? | |
I swear, there's gonna be a hole in the wall by the end of this show. | ||
unidentified
|
Alright, I hope that... I hope that stays. | |
Because if that goes out again, there's going to be another hole in the wall. | ||
Can't catch a break. | ||
What a show, right? | ||
We got the green screen shirt, we got the light going on, my notes are all over the place, man. | ||
I tell you, some days you just can't win. | ||
This is no news. | ||
10th consecutive week, no news. | ||
I'm nearing the breaking point here. | ||
I'm nearing the coronavirus breaking point. | ||
Some people are nearing the breaking point because like, you know, all the relatives are dead and they can't feed their kids. | ||
They got laid off. | ||
unidentified
|
And I'm just like, no news. | |
My lights are going out. | ||
My green screen's all fucked up. | ||
Sheesh. | ||
Somebody says, why I oughta? | ||
unidentified
|
Why I oughta? | |
Yeah, for real. | ||
Anyway, I'm losing it over here. | ||
Where was I? | ||
What was I even saying? | ||
Lost my train of thought there. | ||
I'm about to fly off the handle here. | ||
But then I remembered it's Casual Friday, and we have a low-key energy, right? | ||
Then I remembered it's supposed to be a relaxed show. | ||
Show's so boring anyway. | ||
This show sucks with all this, you know, dumbass news about the coronavirus. | ||
It's bad enough, bad enough we don't have any content for the show, and now the production's failing. | ||
Anyway, what was I saying about the... | ||
Beds or whatever. | ||
So it's 140,000 predicted. | ||
We're at less than 20,000 beds being used. | ||
predicted, where less than 20,000 beds being used, this is in New York City alone, right? | ||
This is in New York City where you have the most people, obviously it's the highest population density in the country, biggest population, biggest, you know, most populated city in the country. | ||
This is the worst of the worst, right? | ||
It's the peak in the biggest, most densely populated city with the worst outbreak. | ||
And they're at a small fraction of what was projected for hospitalizations. | ||
Not death, not infected, but hospitalizations. | ||
They projected $140,000. | ||
Obviously that's seven times more than what we actually have, which is $18,000. | ||
It says Governor Cuomo of New York has relied on several models in making his decisions, and while each is slightly different, they all convinced him that the wisest course of action was to plan for the worst while hoping for the best. | ||
When asked on Friday if he feared losing credibility for trusting some models that have proven to be less than accurate, Mr. Cuomo said no. | ||
He said, I think my credibility would be affected if I didn't ask experts for their opinion. | ||
The governor also said that the discrepancy between the predictions and the actual statistics had been caused by the behavior of New Yorkers themselves. | ||
Dr. Deborah Birx, the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, seemed to agree and congratulated Mr. Cuomo and his counterparts on Friday for having slowed the tide of infections in their states. | ||
Dr. Birx said, quote, that has dramatically changed because of the impact of what the citizens of New York and New Jersey and across Connecticut and now Rhode Island are doing to really change the course of this pandemic. | ||
The total number of confirmed cases in New York State rose by nearly 11,000 from Thursday to Friday, the largest single day increase yet, and now stands at 170,812. | ||
The 777 new deaths in New York pushed the state's death toll to 7,844 and the total for the tri-state region of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut over 10,000. | ||
So, to me, this is really suspect. | ||
Because it's not like the numbers are a little bit inaccurate, right? | ||
And they put it so nicely here in this article. | ||
The models have proven to be less than accurate. | ||
Less than accurate. | ||
You're projecting 140,000 hospitalizations And they're at 18,000. | ||
That's a little bit more than less than accurate. | ||
They were projecting millions of dead people. | ||
Now they're projecting 60,000. | ||
That's a little bit less. | ||
That's a little bit more than less than accurate. | ||
That's less than accurate. | ||
It's wildly wrong. | ||
It's incorrect. | ||
It's so wrong that it's basically useless at that point. | ||
And I was willing to say that, well maybe you get less death because obviously you shut down the country. | ||
And that makes sense to me. | ||
That makes enough sense to me. | ||
When you're talking about hospitalizations, To me, I don't understand how the projection could be seven times less than what they expected. | ||
I don't understand how that could be possible. | ||
How could the forecast be that wildly wrong? | ||
And if that's the case, to what extent is that a result of the change in behavior? | ||
Was that a 140,000 bed projection, assuming that nobody at all would social distance? | ||
To what extent was... did the New Yorkers radically Beat the odds, right? | ||
Did they expect that nobody would participate and then everybody participated? | ||
I don't understand how you get an order of magnitude of 7 like that, or multiple rather, of 7 in terms of these projections. | ||
And to me, if that's not materializing in New York, it's not going to materialize anywhere else. | ||
That won't materialize in Detroit, or New Orleans, or LA, or in the South, or any other state, or any other city. | ||
And that's supposed to be the worst of the worst. | ||
So it's not going to happen anywhere else. | ||
And so at the end of all of this, are we going to be looking at a situation where hardly anybody died? | ||
Hardly anybody was hospitalized relative to what we were being told? | ||
And then in that case, how do we justify all the action that's been taken up until now? | ||
16 million people are unemployed. | ||
The stock market has collapsed. | ||
GDP is going to shrink for the next like three quarters. | ||
They're saying we might not even fully recover by the end of next year, by the end of 2021. | ||
They're saying that this will have catalyzed the worst recession since the Great Depression. | ||
It might constitute a depression in itself. | ||
Will all of that have been worth it if the death rate for the coronavirus ends up being 0.3%? | ||
If it ends up in less than 60,000 people die? | ||
That you don't even have a shortage of medical supplies? | ||
And obviously that would be a good thing in some sense. | ||
It would be a good thing if we didn't have a horrible, catastrophic pandemic on our hands. | ||
It'd be a good thing if people didn't die. | ||
That would be a good thing. | ||
And like I said, it might be a good thing if slightly less people died than were projected, if we were able to save lots of lives because we took drastic action. | ||
But what if drastic action was never warranted at all? | ||
What if the numbers are shrinking without the social distancing being factored in? | ||
unidentified
|
Right? | |
In other words, what if that's where the numbers were going to settle regardless of whether or not we stayed inside? | ||
What if the death rate was going to be 0.3% all along? | ||
And not just because. | ||
Everybody started to take this seriously and all the rest. | ||
To me that is going to be a disaster and what do you even do in that circumstance? | ||
I think it would almost actually be worth it to simply lie and say well we averted crisis. | ||
At that point it would be in the government's best interest to simply lie and tell people that it was going to be so bad but Trump saved us because how would you ever come back from something like that where the government tells you Stay inside, 16 million unemployed. | ||
If we endured all of this and just wait for the economic fallout to hit, it hasn't even started. | ||
For us to endure all of this, this insane fever dream that we've been living for the past month and a half, or rather for the past month I guess at this point, and it was all for nothing. | ||
You know, think about all the plans that were disrupted. | ||
School plans, wedding plans, social outings, trips. | ||
Businesses shut down. | ||
If all of that happened, it was all for nothing. | ||
You know, I guess that might be a good thing in some sense. | ||
I mean, why would we? | ||
The only reason I'm saying that is for Trump's sake, for winning re-election. | ||
Maybe it would be a good thing overall if that happened to the government, that people stopped trusting the government and there was some kind of mass reaction to this. | ||
But these are very, very confusing times. | ||
And again, this is just a hypothetical. | ||
I still believe that we should be cautious and I still believe that probably you know a lot of people are going to die still and if we reopen the country I think there's going to be a big resurgence in cases and we might have to get to this on Monday because we're running out of time here but that's a whole that's a big report in itself talking about these various models projecting what could happen if we reopen too soon you're gonna have you know lots more people dead lots more infected | ||
And you know, we're just talking about models a moment ago. | ||
Should we trust these statistical models? | ||
So I do basically still believe that there is a threat posed by the coronavirus and it still is something we'll live with. | ||
And everything I've said is still true about building up immunity and a vaccine and all of this. | ||
But the question is, what is the death rate going to be? | ||
That's the big question. | ||
Because you look at the numbers and not only are drastically less people dying, drastically more people that are asymptomatic showing up in the data. | ||
Less hospitalizations than were ever thought. | ||
But more than that, if you look at who is dying from the coronavirus, almost everybody that's dying from the virus is somebody with a pre-existing condition. | ||
The people that are dying without pre-existing conditions is like a negligible number. | ||
It's virtually nobody. | ||
Nobody is dying that's not either elderly or has a pre-existing condition. | ||
And so what are we really doing if we shut down the whole country and we shut down really the whole world over a disease which is basically a mild virus but if you have a pre-existing condition there might be extreme complications. | ||
So at this point I think we are moving from you know if there are two camps on this coronavirus debate from people that are saying it's all bullshit it's not real the whole thing's a government hoax to people saying it's this is terrible and this is a deadly pandemic and you're gonna die from coronavirus I think we have firmly moved into the middle I was probably Moderately on the side of saying this is a bad pandemic and what the government said is probably warranted. | ||
I'm probably moving much more closer and maybe firmly in the middle as saying that as we start to see the peak and as we move towards reconstruction or reintegration, I am very suspicious about the direction these things are going. | ||
I'm very suspicious about the new numbers that are being reported. | ||
In Europe, in the United States, in Asia, nothing here really seems to add up. | ||
And it never did from the beginning by the way. | ||
And we talked about this all the way back in January, how nothing was adding up. | ||
They were telling us that the virus came from a wet market, and that is not true. | ||
Every day we find more information that shows how untrue that is, right? | ||
And they were doing tests back in February on every animal at that wet market, and they couldn't find a single one that was a match for the coronavirus. | ||
And they come to find out that it's a specific variety of bat, they don't sell that bat at the wet market. | ||
That bat doesn't even exist within a huge radius of that wet market. | ||
There's this Institute of Virology right next door to the wet market. | ||
The patient zero and the first people that got the virus weren't exposed to the wet market, right? | ||
So that was how this all started. | ||
We didn't even know the origin of this virus. | ||
Then we find out that if you look at the structure of the virus, it has a signature that looks a lot like AIDS and SARS, almost like a designer virus. | ||
It's this nasty, it's got this nasty composition that looks almost like it was put together, like a bioweapon. | ||
And that would be consistent with the explanation that it came from some high security clearance level virus institute, as opposed to a wet market, right? | ||
And then you have the lies from China and the lies from the World Health Organization. | ||
You've got the World Health Organization telling us not to shut down travel. | ||
And you've got the WHO that didn't declare it a pandemic. | ||
And then you've got this director of the WHO who's got a weird background, right? | ||
And so the list just goes on and on. | ||
Every day it seems like it's more lies, it's more falsehoods. | ||
The statistics are wrong. | ||
The institutions are lying. | ||
I don't know what to believe at this point. | ||
And at first I thought, well, pandemics happen and certainly we're in the midst of one. | ||
But the severity of it, that is the question mark. | ||
What is the death rate? | ||
How severe is it? | ||
What threat does this pose to the average person? | ||
And then compare that to the threat of shutting down the economy. | ||
It's probably much worse to shut down the economy and deal with all the repercussions from that, which is, for example, that multinational corporations will take over society. | ||
It's small businesses that are going to get destroyed by this, right? | ||
It's small everything that's going to be destroyed by this. | ||
And the government and the big corporations, the multinationals, will pick up the pieces. | ||
That's what it is, right? | ||
So to me, seeing the economy destroyed and this usurpation by multinational corporations, the UN, the WHO, billionaires, that to me seems like a much graver threat than something that may be on the scale of a flu or even a little bit greater than the flu. | ||
So that's that's going to be the question moving forward and we'll have more information next week and as the weeks go by but I'm not liking it. | ||
I'm not liking it one bit. | ||
I don't like the solutions. | ||
I don't like these people. | ||
I don't like Fauci. | ||
I don't like Burks. | ||
I don't like Bill Gates. | ||
I don't like, who is it, Tedros is the director of the WHO. | ||
I don't like China. | ||
I don't like any of it and I don't like these new numbers. | ||
Hospitalizations, deaths, I don't like that it looks like only people with complications are dying. | ||
None of it seems to be adding up. | ||
None of it seems to actually be true. | ||
And it could very well be that we were all just suckers in a big game, the big push all of a sudden for global control. | ||
And I was suspicious of that at first. | ||
Of course, I was suspicious of all this information for months, you know, and I was one of the first to sound the alarm on immunity passport and I said that maybe the chip would be a little far-fetched but immunity passport is certainly there and the chip seems increasingly likely and even going all the way back to the origin of the virus none of it none of it makes a lot of sense but we'll see That's where I'm at right now. | ||
I'm questioning. | ||
I'm skeptical. | ||
I'm suspicious. | ||
I'm not all the way there yet, but I think there are some major questions that need to be asked. | ||
Now that it seems that the worst has been prevented, maybe it was never going to happen, but at the very least we could say that the worst has been averted, the worst has been avoided. | ||
I think now is the time for the hard questions and to say, what kind of world are we going to live in and what just transpired? | ||
After we get over this hump, I think we'll have the luxury of asking these questions, but we're gonna move on. | ||
We'll take a look at our Super Chats, and we'll see what you guys are saying. | ||
A lot of questions tonight, not a lot of answers. | ||
And that's sometimes how it goes, right? | ||
On this Friday, we've got big questions, but I guess we'll find out more as the days and the weeks go on. | ||
In particular, in the next few weeks, because they'll have to make a decision about when to open up the country. | ||
And you know what? | ||
When they open up the country, that's when we'll know. | ||
Because right now, the CDC guidelines are going to last until May 1st. | ||
And so the question is, are those guidelines going to expire on May 1st, or will they be extended to May 30th? | ||
Will they be extended beyond that? | ||
And whenever they get extended to, whenever those guidelines expire and people reintegrate, then we'll see. | ||
Because when they reintegrate, if there's a big spike and a ton of people start dying, well, then we'll see that this was a legitimate pandemic. | ||
If that doesn't happen, if Trump boldly reopens the country and everybody gets back to work and maybe you see a big spike in infections, but hospitalizations don't go crazy and death doesn't go crazy, well, then we'll say, was it really worth it to begin with? | ||
So there's a lot of moving parts, a lot of variables, but we'll see what happens. | ||
I'm going to take a little sip here. | ||
unidentified
|
And now we'll take a look at our super chats. | |
Now that I've completed the sip, now we'll take a look at our super chats. | ||
Very confusing times. | ||
The fog of war. | ||
The dark side clouds our judgment, right? | ||
It feels like in Revenge of the Sith... | ||
I've been watching that movie, like, over and over. | ||
And throughout the movie, they keep saying, like, these are confusing times. | ||
You have to be very careful. | ||
The dark side clouds everything. | ||
Same energy. | ||
Very much similar energy. | ||
Same energy as that. | ||
Because I don't really know what's going on. | ||
Alright, let's see. | ||
Soviet Henry says Animal Crossing got banned in China. | ||
Be careful. | ||
Careful of what? | ||
Well, Owen Benjamin is literally gay, so probably him. | ||
You know? | ||
And I, you know, that's just the way it is. | ||
I mean, Owen Benjamin, you know, hey, hey, listen, Owen. | ||
Well, I don't know. | ||
I mean, there is... I was gonna say, hey, not that there's anything wrong with that. | ||
There is, but he should just straight up admit it. | ||
I mean, he has admitted it in the past, and I called him out on it, and then he was like, oh, no, you're making things up. | ||
It's like he admitted to it. | ||
He admitted to room wanks, was it called, and all kinds of other bizarre things. | ||
So I don't want to launch too much into that for community guidelines reasons. | ||
I don't want to be toxic to another streamer, but if you're taking the literal definition of who is more gay, well, I believe Stefan Molyneux is not gay at all, like in that way. | ||
But Owen Benjamin has admittedly been up to no good in that area. | ||
But, you know, I don't know. | ||
It's tough to say because at least Owen Benjamin, I mean, you know, I don't want to really say anything too positive about him because he's been very nasty towards me. | ||
And nasty is really an understatement. | ||
I mean, he's just said things that are so not right about me and my family. | ||
But if you're going to compare and contrast the two in an objective way, Stefan Molyneux, well, they're both Jewish, and they both do this thing where they like pretend to be based, but they're really not. | ||
You know, Stefan Molyneux is Jewish. | ||
Owen Benjamin is Jewish. | ||
They're both admitted ethnically Jewish. | ||
And They'll both do this thing where they pretend like they're based, they pretend like they're going to talk about Jewish power, or they pretend like they're going to talk about, you know, the religious Jewish angle, but then they back away from it, you know? | ||
They come right up to the line, just enough where they delude people into thinking they're honest, just enough where they get you thinking that they're one way on the subject, and then they're going to back off. | ||
Like, Stefan Molyneux is the archetypal, he is The master at this. | ||
And he'll put out a tweet, and people will reply, Based? | ||
What do you mean by this? | ||
This is so cool! | ||
And then, when push comes to shove, he'll say, Oh, you know, my grandmother was a victim of the Holocaust, and anybody who questions the Holocaust should be put in jail, and blah blah blah, and anyone who's anti-semitic is evil, and anti-semitism is evil, and I think Jewish people are amazing, and There's nothing wrong there, and there's no problem at all, right? | ||
He does this all the time. | ||
They all do that. | ||
It's such a grift. | ||
It's the biggest grift ever. | ||
They sell themselves as, I'm this honest broker, I'll talk about anything, even that, and I'm looking into that, I'm asking questions about that. | ||
But then they never answer them. | ||
And whenever they're pressed on it, then they shy away, they back off. | ||
Just like what happened with me and Stefan, you know? | ||
Stefan is such a free speech warrior that he had to disavow and unfollow me and unperson me because I made a joke about a genocide. | ||
Well, it wasn't just any genocide, right? | ||
So, Stefan does that and Owen Benjamin does too. | ||
Owen Benjamin, for a long time, everybody said, oh, he's based, he names them, you know, he says grabbler and this kind of thing. | ||
But then, when I say, okay, Owen, like, you know, you're telling me that I won't name them, you're telling me that I'm not based, Or I'm not honest, or I'm, you know, optics-cucking or whatever. | ||
But then he will go and say, well, Nick is saying that I'm ethically Jewish, and that's actually really racist, and that's actually really wrong. | ||
He thinks that because I'm ethically Jewish, that I'm, you know, that that means something. | ||
That doesn't mean anything! | ||
That doesn't mean anything! | ||
Who cares? | ||
That means nothing! | ||
What difference does it make? | ||
Of course we're talking about behavior! | ||
We're talking about culture! | ||
We're talking about ideology! | ||
I was like, hmm, there it is, right? | ||
So both of them have that habit where they pretend that they're cool on the issues just enough so that people like us and my audience will buy into their, you know, they'll buy their book, they'll buy their pay-per-view, you know, sign up for their crummy website, and then when push comes to shove it's, I'm actually a humanist and I'm against racism and I'm, you know, I'm just a soldier of the ADL. | ||
So they both do that. | ||
that but um i will say that um yeah so i think they're both really um when it comes to that i think they're both basically dishonest i don't think there's anything redeeming going on there and that's just it when you do this i don't believe you have to be any particular way but you just have to be honest you don't have to be uh you know a catholic america first nationalist you You know, everybody's entitled to their own beliefs, but just be honest. | ||
Just be honest about what you are and what you are not. | ||
And I've always been honest about what I am. | ||
Even when the left-wing media comes after me or when the right comes after me, I'm always honest about what I am. | ||
Have I ever wavered in terms of my ideology or what I stood for? | ||
This show has been called America First since it started. | ||
This show has been America First for three long years. | ||
For over three years. | ||
This has been a Christian, American Nationalist, America First, conservative show for more than three years. | ||
The positions on trade, the positions on media, on war, on all of it. | ||
There have been virtually no changes since the show started. | ||
Where there's new information, you might gain a more nuanced understanding, certainly the rhetoric has been refined, even the ideology has been refined over the years, but the core has remained the same, and I've never pretended to be anything else. | ||
You know, and when the media calls me a white nationalist and I say that's not true, I'm not pandering to the media, and I'm not pandering to the alt-right, right? | ||
I pander to my people. | ||
I don't pander to anybody. | ||
I tell the truth, and that is what attracts my people. | ||
I've always been this America-first, nationalist, Catholic, and what you see is what you get. | ||
And I expect that much from everybody. | ||
I don't care if you don't believe in the moon landing or whatever. | ||
I don't care if you're an cap philosopher like stefan but what they do is they pretend to be something that they aren't you know stefan says i'm a free speech absolutist and i you know i believe in the open exchange and i don't believe in political correctness and i believe in rigorous philosophical dialogue and but you lie | ||
Clearly you don't believe in that, because if people are to the right of Mike Cernovich, if that jeopardizes your ability to hang out with Raheem Kassam and all those characters, you are nothing to do with us. | ||
If that creates a problem for you and your ability to get money from certain people, Or get clout from certain groups, then you want nothing to do with them. | ||
So you're a liar. | ||
So that is not actually what you're about. | ||
You might say that you're about this open dialogue and open exchange and rigorous philosophy, but what you really care about is clout and money. | ||
You care about fitting in with that group, right? | ||
And your reputation. | ||
And that would be fine if that's just, you know, look, I make no bones about the fact that I am a strategic actor and I want to win at any cost. | ||
I'm not actually about rigorous philosophical debate, and I'll talk to anyone and anybody about any idea. | ||
That's not the purpose of this show. | ||
The purpose of this show is to move the ball forward for America first, at any cost. | ||
And so if I do something strategically, that's what optics was all about. | ||
That's what, you know, that whole revolution was all about. | ||
And it's paid dividends and you understand that but I've never said like I've never done the Charlie Kirk thing stupidly where I say I'll debate anyone anytime anywhere because it's not true because I want to do things that will benefit me and I want to do things that will benefit my movement and the cause and our ideology our vision for the country Right? | ||
I don't position myself as a philosopher. | ||
I am a political actor. | ||
I want to achieve political ends. | ||
I'm not really interested in sophistry. | ||
I'm not really interested in philosophical masturbation sessions. | ||
But Stefan says he is, but he's not. | ||
He cares about money and all that. | ||
And then he also does that thing with the Jewish thing. | ||
Ah, oh, well, please, you know, he does that thing on Twitter where he'll pull up an anti-white tweet and he'll say, please don't be Jewish, please don't be Jewish. | ||
Oh, but they are. | ||
And it's like, yeah, we all see that happening. | ||
We all see that there are Jewish people on Twitter that will say, I hate white people. | ||
As a white person, you know, dear fellow white people, But then when he actually gets pressed on what's going on with that, what's going on with, you know, that Jewish, whatever you want to call it, mindset or whatever, he backs off. | ||
And when push comes to shove in the grope roars, and as much as he gave it lip service when it was going to get him clout or my audience was going to look at his stuff, you know, he was going to peddle it in as far as that went. | ||
But then when the Holocaust thing came out, then he wanted no part of it. | ||
You're unfollowed. | ||
You're disavowed. | ||
You're disavowed! | ||
Some free speech guy, right? | ||
And Owen Benjamin is very similar. | ||
You know, I'm gonna do the grabber thing and I'm gonna do the edgy comedy thing. | ||
I'm gonna take it further than everybody else to show you that I'm a comedian and I don't care. | ||
But then when people start to make fun of you because you're, you know, half a past and you have this certain ancestry, then all of a sudden it's, well, you know, there's nothing wrong actually with that. | ||
It's just different. | ||
I'm Jewish, but it's different. | ||
No, I'm not Jewish. | ||
Yes, I am. | ||
But if I am, it doesn't matter. | ||
And I'm not anyway, but if I am... | ||
And it's true, I am 25%. | ||
No, I'm 12%. | ||
No, I'm 8%. | ||
But it doesn't matter anyway. | ||
But I'm making fun of Grabbler, see? | ||
Well, but the real Grabbler thing is not being Jewish, it's something else. | ||
It's being, you know, a certain way. | ||
And so... | ||
Who has the patience? | ||
Who has the mental energy for all these gymnastics that these people do? | ||
Just say what you mean. | ||
Just be straight up. | ||
Anyway, I've made my point, but that kind of stuff just makes me so mad. | ||
Because I pay a heavy price for actually just being what I am. | ||
You know I get attacked by everybody for that reason. | ||
If I were just a shill, I'd be the best shill ever. | ||
Because I'm really smart. | ||
And so I could be a really good shill, and I could tell you what you want to hear, and I could fit the mold of a certain caricature. | ||
I could be the, you know, Johnny America, clean cut, whatever. | ||
You know what I'm saying? | ||
I could put aside some of the more quirky aspects of my personality. | ||
I could even say I was a Protestant. | ||
That'd be a much better fit. | ||
For being an America First nationalist. | ||
I could say I'm a Protestant, and I'm wearing a cowboy hat, and I love my guns, and I love my pickup truck, but that's not me. | ||
But that's not me. | ||
I could adapt myself in both ways. | ||
I could adapt myself to be a certain character and to shill. | ||
and fit a certain mold for a certain audience, and maybe that would go well, or I could change myself, and I could try and achieve mainstream appeal, but I'm just who I am, and I face a lot of criticism from all sides. | ||
I face criticism for being real on the issues from the left, and I face criticism from the right for being real on who I am, If I fall short of, you know, being Christ himself or something like that, then you're a fake Catholic, you're a fake nationalist, you know, you're a juvenile, you're, you know, Mexican, you're X, Y, and Z, you're, oh well, you know, you don't drink, you don't smoke, and that means you're not a man, you know what I'm saying? | ||
So, just be yourself. | ||
Just be yourself. | ||
I don't know if he should be in the WWE Hall of Fame. | ||
Groyper says, my Yeshua comment was a joke. | ||
Of course, it's Jesus. | ||
It was a really funny joke. | ||
Decided to stop being a freeloader. | ||
Enjoy my diamond. | ||
Well, thanks for the diamonds. | ||
John Ball says, do you think Chris Benoit should be in the WWE Hall of Fame? | ||
I don't know if he should be in the WWE Hall of Fame. | ||
No, I don't think that'd be a good idea. | ||
Dallas Groyper says, did you see that fat, disgusting reporter? | ||
Ask the Surgeon General about racism today. | ||
Insufferable. | ||
I did not see that. | ||
I don't watch these news conferences anymore. | ||
They're just boring. | ||
I just read the I read the The summary on the news afterwards because I I just can't take it anymore, but thanks for the ninja genie Polish American says his blood be on us and our children if you say so yeah, we all read it and And that's what I don't understand. | ||
Everybody's always telling me, you know, even like at CPAC this year, after AFPAC, we went to Trump Hotel, and you remember that Asian girl came up to me on stream, and she said, well, how can you be Catholic if, you know, you don't believe in supporting Israel? | ||
And I don't know, it's like, do these people read a different Bible than us? | ||
Do they just read a completely different Bible? | ||
I don't get it. | ||
How can you read the Gospel? | ||
How can anybody read the Gospel and not understand what happened there? | ||
And they say, no, no, no, it was the Romans, no, no, no, you know, we're supposed to worship Israel, the nation state founded by the Jews in 1948 and the Jews that are, you know, the modern Jews. | ||
Are we reading the same book? | ||
I don't understand because, you know, when I read the gospel for the first time, Pretty explicit, pretty straightforward what happened there, right? | ||
I mean, it's not rocket science. | ||
It's not like it really leaves much to the imagination or for interpretation. | ||
You know, it's Jesus and it's Barabbas. | ||
That's the name, right? | ||
Am I saying that right? | ||
What do they say? | ||
Who are we gonna kill? | ||
And they say, Jesus, not this criminal. | ||
Let the criminal go. | ||
We gotta get Jesus. | ||
How should we kill him? | ||
Crucify him! | ||
unidentified
|
They yell out, crucify him! | |
And Pontius Pilate, I'm washing my hands of this! | ||
Let his blood be on your hands and all your descendants! | ||
And they say, fine with us! | ||
And I'm paraphrasing here, but... | ||
How is that ambiguous? | ||
What am I getting wrong here? | ||
What am I missing? | ||
What am I getting wrong? | ||
I must be the idiot. | ||
I must be the Philistine who's not reading that properly. | ||
I don't really understand where the disagreement comes in, right? | ||
And the whole gospel is like this. | ||
It's not just that part. | ||
The whole gospel's like this. | ||
With the Pharisees, and they try to trick him, and they try to... And they're plotting against him, right? | ||
I mean, it's like... I don't know, man. | ||
I know that they say, like, well, technically the Romans were the ones to nail him to the cross, but, like... Seriously? | ||
I mean, we all know what preceded that. | ||
Do we not? | ||
I mean, certainly the Romans might have been the ones who actually nailed him and put him up, but... But who were the ones that had him, uh... Who were the ones that had him arrested? | ||
Who were the ones that had him crucified, right? | ||
That demanded it? | ||
That they were the jury? | ||
The mob? | ||
I mean, so... Anyway. | ||
Dallas Gruyper says Surgeon General is literally black and she asks about black racism. | ||
Yeah, I did hear about that Because he what did he say he was telling people he was speaking to the blacks and minorities and he said You know if you're not going to do it for yourself do it for Big Mama and he was doing all these all these like | ||
Colloquial black expressions kind of funny Modern monarchist says the passion of the Christ has a sequel coming soon Yeah, I've heard about that over the years, but I don't know is that actually coming Protestant groper says can't believe I used to sub to daily wire now. | ||
It's yours All I need is Jordan Peterson and masterclass America first. | ||
Yeah, that's right Jordan Peterson in the masterclass Then you're gonna be a perfect well-adjusted person you'll be a genius yourself But yeah, that's pretty crazy. | ||
It's good to hear when people come over from Daily Wire or, you know, Turning Point or whatever. | ||
Well, thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
Yeah, he would be up there. | ||
person normies think is brilliant it's neil degrasse tyson for me well thanks for the ninja guinea um yeah he would be out there i don't know there are a lot of people out there you know and that's just it normies are stupid so they they just have no or npcs i mean you know what i'm saying average people are not smart so why would you put a lot of stock in who they think is smart you know what I'm saying? | ||
Like you've got your public smart person and You're a pop, smart person, but that means very little, because what the public believes, I think, means very little. | ||
The public believes in ridiculous things. | ||
Most people believe in ridiculous things and, you know, not very... They don't really think very much, so... You know, if they think Neil deGrasse Tyson... If he has a reputation as being a genius, that means very little to me. | ||
So I know exactly the kind of thing you're talking about. | ||
I don't know. | ||
I think, yeah, he would certainly be up there because he's just one of the worst. | ||
So pompous. | ||
Barack Obama's up there too. | ||
Everyone thinks Barack Obama's a genius. | ||
At least liberals do. | ||
Maybe something more general would be fitting. | ||
People like, uh, what's that guy, Malcolm Gladwell? | ||
Don't care for him. | ||
I don't care for, who's that guy with the glasses, uh, that very liberal, what's his name, Noam Chomsky? | ||
I guess he's written some good books, but, I mean, he's very liberal too. | ||
A lot of these public intellectuals. | ||
Like that. | ||
In that vein, these like liberal, like New York Times best-selling author types. | ||
I can't stand. | ||
I mean, Noam Chomsky is a brilliant linguist, but then he wades into any other subject and it's like, you know, you're not really anything special here. | ||
So it's people like that. | ||
Noam Chomsky and Malcolm Gladwell. | ||
I really hate the New York Times bestseller types and the TED Talk people. | ||
I would say that like as a category, I hate anybody that does a TED Talk. | ||
I hate anybody that ends up on the New York Times bestsellers list. | ||
I hate the New York Times bestsellers list so much and the kinds of books that end up on there. | ||
Maybe you know what I'm talking about, maybe you don't, but that midwits and yuppies and college-educated type people, they go to Borders, or I guess Borders doesn't exist anymore, but they go to Barnes & Noble, or they go to Amazon, top sellers, or they go to Target even, and or they go to Amazon, top sellers, or they go to Target even, and | ||
And it's like some pop science book, or some pop psychology book, or some pop sociology book, Ezra Klein's latest book, and it's some, you know what I'm saying, it's like a genre in itself, of these really like baby level books. | ||
I'm kind of off tonight. | ||
in a way that people think they're smart, they think that they're learning something, but they're written like for babies. | ||
They're written like a documentary. | ||
In other words, it's like chewed up and spit out. | ||
It's like spoon-fed baby information. | ||
I don't know if I'm doing a good job of explaining it. | ||
I'm kind of off tonight. | ||
I'm not really feeling it tonight, but that variety of books, I just, I can't stand. | ||
I, And I had my fair share of that in high school. | ||
I read a lot of books in high school, and I would read a lot of good books and a lot of bad books, and the bad books I read invariably were the best sellers. | ||
It was the number one, it was the Mark Levin book, it was the, you know, whatever. | ||
Even Ann Coulter's book was shit. | ||
It's right there on my shelf. | ||
In Trump We Trust? | ||
Here, let me get that book and I'll show you what I mean. | ||
I'm getting up. | ||
I already got up once. | ||
I might as well get up again. | ||
unidentified
|
I'll find it for you. | |
Okay. | ||
So I guess Ann Coulter, I mean, she's had good books before. | ||
I haven't read any of her other books, but her latest book, I think this is her latest book, this came out in 2016, it's In Trump We Trust, and I got it because I like Ann Coulter, you know, she's great and everything, and it's a New York Times bestseller, and it's about the Trump election, and she predicted it. | ||
Okay, now the book retails, what does it say on here? | ||
Okay, the book's $23. | ||
It's, uh... 214 pages. | ||
And that's including notes and everything. | ||
Without the appendix. | ||
Without the appendix. | ||
Without the notes. | ||
Without all the extras. | ||
unidentified
|
It is... | |
182 pages. | ||
So they sell you a book that's 214 pages. | ||
It's really 182 pages, if you don't count the appendix. | ||
And the appendix is just quotes of people that didn't think Trump would win the election. | ||
So that's really necessary, right? | ||
This is the appendix, which is 40 pages. | ||
It's 40 pages of geniuses, which in other words is quotes from people who didn't think Trump would win. | ||
Really necessary. | ||
That's really good filler. | ||
And then it's pages of notes. | ||
And the notes are like Twitter posts and everything, which I don't know how necessary that is. | ||
And the rest of the book is filled up with stuff like this! | ||
Sidebar... Sidebar immigration glossary. | ||
And it's just like a funny... It's like, oh, this is a funny joke. | ||
And the whole book is full of stuff like that. | ||
You know, here's a book. | ||
It's just a book with a list of citations of when Muslims celebrated 9-11. | ||
Oh, Trump said Muslims celebrated 9-11. | ||
The media said they didn't. | ||
Well, here's a whole page of citations of when they did. | ||
And, like, just throughout the book, there's these cheap tactics like this. | ||
You know, here's another one. | ||
Two pages of, like, CNN headlines. | ||
You can see the big spaces and everything. | ||
The whole book is full of stuff like that. | ||
It's full of filler! | ||
It's 180 pages, 215 with everything, 180 pages of actual content, and the content itself has all this filler. | ||
sub headlines, big capital letters, these stupid little sidebars and graphical things. | ||
This appears all throughout these little breaks. | ||
And it's like, there's no content in here. | ||
And it's books like, not totally like this, this is just like a political, this is the political iteration of it, or the political genre of this. | ||
But there are tons... this is... every New York Times bestseller is like this. | ||
It's like... and it's not all as egregious as this. | ||
This is like a political book that got rushed out during the election. | ||
And, you know, this is the political variety of it. | ||
But I don't even know if I have any other books on my shelf like this. | ||
But it's that New York Times bestseller type where it's just like you wipe your ass with it. | ||
Self-help shit or it's like whatever. | ||
Stuff like that is stupid. | ||
It's interwoven with like funny anecdotes and you know the book is told from the perspective of the author who's like writing about how he researched the book and it's like Well, I knew I had to talk to this expert. | ||
So, I woke up on a bright, sunny morning in New York, and I looked out the window, and it was a nice day, and I thought about this. | ||
And then I got on a plane, and I headed to Toronto, and I talked to this expert, and this expert said this, and the expert said blah blah, and this is like chapters and chapters of filler bullshit like that. | ||
You know? | ||
And I can't stand that. | ||
I'm trying to see if I have any books like this. | ||
Oh yeah, here's another one. | ||
I'll go pull out another one. | ||
While I keep getting up, while I'm getting up, I might as well. | ||
unidentified
|
Here. | |
This one's under my stacks. | ||
unidentified
|
So I'm going to have to... | |
Damn it. | ||
unidentified
|
Alright. | |
I'll fix this later. | ||
I just have like stacks and stacks of books. | ||
I have like five stacks of books in my office like this high. | ||
This was at the bottom of it so I just knocked them all down on accident. | ||
Here's another one. | ||
The Bitcoin Standard. | ||
Here's another one. | ||
Written just in time by the way. | ||
For Bitcoin taking off. | ||
Bitcoin goes up 10 million percent and this retarded economist says, I'm going to make money off of this. | ||
I want to make a book about Bitcoin. | ||
$30. | ||
And when was it printed? | ||
I want to know because I'm going to laugh. | ||
Yeah, printed in 2018. | ||
So, you know, some faggot says, Oh! | ||
Bitcoin is blowing up and everybody thinks it's free money! | ||
Time to write my Bitcoin book! | ||
Time to write my Bitcoin book so that anytime somebody looks up, Bitcoin book! | ||
Learn more about Bitcoin. | ||
What is Bitcoin? | ||
Oh, this comes up in the SEO, and I sell a $30 book, and you know some stupid yuppie, you know, living in the suburbs or in the city, living in downtown Chicago, is gonna, oh, what's this Bitcoin all about? | ||
You know, some stupid-ass boomer. | ||
What's this Bitcoin all about? | ||
Bitcoin. | ||
Google, you know, more about Bitcoin. | ||
And this comes up on Amazon. | ||
Oh, I'm gonna learn all about it. | ||
And it's like, Okay, he doesn't start talking about Bitcoin until chapter 8. | ||
Until chapter 8! | ||
The book is 285 pages, and they don't start talking about Bitcoin until page 167! | ||
And the rest of the book is about the history of monetary theory. | ||
Well, here's what money is. | ||
Here's the history of monetary metal. | ||
Here's the history of fiat money and blah blah blah. | ||
And you know, I suppose that's like... But it's not really a book about Bitcoin. | ||
This is not a book about Bitcoin. | ||
This is not about the decentralized alternative to central banking. | ||
This is a book of garbage. | ||
This is a book of garbage filler that if you even read Like a cursory amount about monetary theory, you're gonna know all this stuff. | ||
You don't need to read about how, oh, they traded with shells at one point. | ||
Here's a, you know, here's a one-chapter story, a one-chapter diversion about a tribe that used shells as money. | ||
And see, this is how shells can be used as money. | ||
Like, that's crap. | ||
That's crap. | ||
I don't need to waste my time reading this whole book. | ||
This is... I will wipe my ass with this. | ||
I can use this as toilet paper. | ||
I don't need toilet paper from Target because I could just rip pages out of this book and wipe shit out of my ass with it because it is worthless. | ||
Because it's not worth the pages it's written on. | ||
Okay? | ||
And I'm... That's just what it is. | ||
Now, I could read this shit or I could read What's a good book on my shelf? | ||
I could read whatever. | ||
Anything else. | ||
I could read Sam Huntington where it's like 400 pages of dense information. | ||
I could read an old book that might be 100 pages but it's densely packed. | ||
There's nothing in there about You know, I got on a plane and I flew here. | ||
It's like one of those YouTube videos turned into a book. | ||
It's like a documentary turned into a book. | ||
And you know, in every documentary, they're like, with the crew, and they're like, oh, this is crazy. | ||
Wow, that's really interesting. | ||
You know what I mean? | ||
Like, just give it to me straight. | ||
Give me the information. | ||
I have a high IQ. | ||
I don't need to hear the rest. | ||
so anyway so i hate anyway that's like the second or third super chat but i hate that shit so much i hate that you should not read any book that's on the new york times best-selling list don't read any of it you'd be better off just find the author and read their column for free online And it's distilled, and it takes a minute, you know? | ||
Read that, read old books. | ||
And I know that's a meme, but it's true. | ||
Read old books, read books by academics, read books that are not bestsellers, read books that cost $50, you know, not $30. | ||
You read a book that costs $25-$30 in Barnes & Noble, that's crap. | ||
Read a book that's like $100 because it's only being printed by, like, university libraries. | ||
Anyway, so I just can't tell you how much I I just despise that And what I despise most about it is people think they're like smart. | ||
I'm learned I'm gonna go, you know, you see this all the time on like airplanes people go in like the airport Bookstore and they're like I'm gonna learn, you know, you get some yuppie bitch who goes in I'm gonna get smart I'm gonna learn. | ||
Oh, that's interesting Look, look at this book on the display case. | ||
$30 book about mnemonic devices? | ||
No. | ||
That's interesting. | ||
I'm gonna thumb through this while I'm drinking my little wine cooler. | ||
Like, you're an idiot. | ||
This was written for dummies like you. | ||
It was written, they fill up the trough for little piggies like you, oinking it up to come in and stick your big fat snout Go roll around in the dirt. | ||
Go roll around in the dirt, you dumb animal. | ||
I hate that shit! | ||
I hate it so much! | ||
I don't know why I hate it, I just do. | ||
Because it's just such a... It's such a lie. | ||
It is. | ||
That's why I think reading is basically a meme. | ||
I really am a big believer. | ||
You want to read books, read old books. | ||
unidentified
|
And, um... You know. | |
Or don't read at all. | ||
Frankly, most people don't really need to read that much, honestly. | ||
If you're going to be a streamer, if you're going to be a public person, then read. | ||
If you're curious and you want to build your brain, then read. | ||
But, you know, people that think, I'm going to become smarter, I'm going to learn so much. | ||
Not going to happen. | ||
Anyway, let's see. | ||
Where was I? | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini Dallas Griper. | ||
Yeah, this kind of stuff. | ||
And Ann Coulter, you know, she's written some good books in the past. | ||
I haven't read anything else by her, but I'm told her older books were better. | ||
Try harder. | ||
You owe me my money back, Ann. | ||
I need my $23 back for this. | ||
And don't read this book. | ||
unidentified
|
This is trash. | |
Read something good. | ||
unidentified
|
What else do I got on the floor there? | |
Let me see if I can, uh... I don't know. | ||
I don't really want to spend any more time on this, but... Read anything else. | ||
unidentified
|
Whatever. | |
Whatever! | ||
unidentified
|
That's my New York Times rant. | |
I hate it. | ||
You know, because I knew a lot of people in high school, like teachers, that were like this. | ||
Teachers reading these books. | ||
I can imagine some guy who's like got a college degree, 35, professional, and he's got a little library in his living room, and his whole living room is these glossy hardcover books from Barnes & Noble. | ||
Malcolm Gladwell! | ||
Noam Chomsky! | ||
What's that guy's name? | ||
Nicholas Taleb, right? | ||
Is that the guy's name? | ||
He wrote the foreword to this book. | ||
Yeah, Nicholas Taleb and... Oh, I'm a big brain! | ||
I'm a genius! | ||
I'm reading TED Talk experts! | ||
I'm in Mensa! | ||
I'm in Mensa! | ||
I'm in Mensa and I read the New York Times bestsellers! | ||
I'm a genius! | ||
I'm a certified genius trademark! | ||
Yeah, okay. | ||
You're gonna get the barcode tattooed on your forehead, you dumbass, you know? | ||
You're gonna get a barcode tattooed on your forehead. | ||
Anyway, um, Protestant, GROIPERS is all I need. | ||
I just read that. | ||
Modern Monarchist says, I forgot, how did the Owen Benjamin feud start? | ||
Somebody super chatted and said, hey, you should do a stream with Owen Benjamin sometime. | ||
And I said, what did I say? | ||
I said, like, I already did a stream with him. | ||
No, no, somebody said, somebody super chatted and said, you and Owen agree on everything. | ||
And I replied and said, well, I don't know if we agree on everything. | ||
I said, but, you know, we agree on a lot and whatever. | ||
And he went off on me for that. | ||
Then the next day he started, like, going off on me and I said, like, oh, well, that was weird. | ||
Maybe he took it the wrong way. | ||
I'm not going to respond, but I think maybe he misunderstood what I meant. | ||
And then the next day he was like, just went full on, on the attack. | ||
So that's how it started. | ||
Big Chungus says, Nick, Big Mama is very racist, don't you think? | ||
I think so. | ||
Jonas says, great content is always king. | ||
You ever played the DLC for New Vegas? | ||
Which was your favorite? | ||
I played the, I played one of them. | ||
It was the one where you fight in Alaska. | ||
Operation Anchorage, I think it was, but I didn't play any others. | ||
That one was okay. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
Q Boyd says, who wins sexual economy other than e-girls? | ||
Chad's. | ||
Chad's and e-girls. | ||
Well, Chad's and Stacey's. | ||
Stacey's and Chad's. | ||
That's who wins in the polyamorous sexual marketplace. | ||
Simps. | ||
Simps win too, frankly. | ||
It's e-girls, it's simps. | ||
Because the two kinds of men that appeal to women in this time are your, like, top 1% of men who are tall and muscular and rich and, you know, handsome and all that. | ||
That's your top 1%. | ||
And that's who's just gonna have their pick of the litter, right? | ||
I mean, they're just going to have free reign, and girls are just going to give it out. | ||
And, you know, and even just like your general alpha types, you know, your frat house, your jock, your chad type, those are the ones that are just going to have their free reign. | ||
And it's going to be also the simps, frankly, who are going to, and I mean, are they really winning is the question, but ultimately they will then inherit all these roasties who When they're done riding the carousel, they will settle down with a nice, compliant, weak man who has a weak hairline and a weak jawline and, you know, bug eyes. | ||
So in a sense, in a sense, they're winning, I guess. | ||
They're kind of playing the game. | ||
They're playing the ecosystem. | ||
They're like a, you know, a parasite or something. | ||
There's sort of like a vulture after the lion gets the kill then the vulture swoops in and picks off the remains So these are really the if there are winners, I guess it would be Chad it would be the simp beta orbiter type and And of course all women all women just I mean they have free reign they get to choose and ultimately in this polyamorous system Or polyamory. | ||
I don't mean polyamory. | ||
Hypergamy, excuse me. | ||
Hypergamy is what I mean. | ||
In a hypergamous society, women are actually the ones in control. | ||
It's really a matriarchal society. | ||
Or a gynocratic, right? | ||
Not mothers, it's women. | ||
So it's a gynocratic system where because social status and social hierarchy is determined by sex, Women are the ones that get to decide who has sexual value, who has sexual appeal. | ||
And women get, unless you're raping them, women give consent for sex, right? | ||
Women are the ones that give, they're the gatekeepers of sex, and therefore, they're the gatekeepers of sexual status and social status. | ||
So a lot of men are out there saying like, you need to man up, and you need to get laid, and that's how you're going to, you know. | ||
But that's wrong. | ||
It's ultimately the women who get to decide who has status, who has value, if you determine value based on that sexual marketplace, that sexual marketplace value. | ||
So a lot of people think they're like, oh, this is a good thing, and that's how it's always been. | ||
Wrong. | ||
Wrong. | ||
Social status should be determined by things like wealth, nobility, character, and sexual value should follow that. | ||
And women should be attracted. | ||
A lot of the things are going to stay the same. | ||
Physical strength, monetary success, you know, general integrity in terms of looks, like, you know, general beauty. | ||
A lot of these things will stay the same, but your sexual value will proceed from your social value among other men. | ||
That is what a rightly ordered system looks like. | ||
Right now, it's just all the way around. | ||
And so you'll have guys who are like total degenerates that will attract women. | ||
You know, guys with lots of tattoos, or guys that are roided up, guys that are totally on steroids, guys that are on drugs, guys that are deadbeats. | ||
You know all male feminists, right? | ||
you're gonna have a lot of instances of people that are kind of hacking the system because They're appealing to women's crazed brains and their social status among men proceeds from their sexual status among women and So it's it's inverted. | ||
It's totally reverse how it should be. | ||
It should be that your sexual status proceeds from your social status, and your social status is determined by those kinds of things. | ||
Can you provide? | ||
Can you protect? | ||
Are you respected among men? | ||
Do you have status among men? | ||
Those kinds of things, right? | ||
And like I said, some of that will stay the same, but now we just have these crazy, crazy ideas where, you know, you look at some of the people that are out there, and it's like, you know, you're gross. | ||
It's only in these times when women are hopped up on birth control and have all the power and all the control do you get some of these men that have high status that are total creeps, right, or total weirdos. | ||
So, anyway. | ||
American Groper says, do you foresee a resource war occurring in East Asia? | ||
Uh, no. | ||
Holy Servants says, how do you think the town whore is holding up with these social distancing measures right now? | ||
Ha ha ha, thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
Remember that joke you made earlier? | ||
I'm gonna riff on that. | ||
Dude, funny, funny, good joke, man. | ||
We're going to tag team the audience with comedy. | ||
But, no, there is no such thing as a town whore. | ||
Every woman these days virtually is a whore, and they're not holding up well. | ||
You know, that's the thing. | ||
It's actually, and that's why I've been loving the quarantine. | ||
You know, a lot of people have been saying, oh, you know, government tyranny. | ||
Maybe the reason I haven't been so averse to the government shutdown of the society is because I am kind of enjoying The fact that everybody is suffering. | ||
Not economically, not in terms of families, but in a specific way. | ||
The way in which women and homosexuals are suffering. | ||
Because women, and gay people too, they require a constant supply of sex with strangers. | ||
And the coronavirus is destroying them. | ||
You know, there's memes about this going around of women that are like melting down because they can't go out and have sex with strange men. | ||
And to me, that is very funny, that is very satisfying to see gay people too. | ||
But the thing about gay people is they're doing it anyway, because they're already bugged. | ||
They've already got a bug. | ||
In some instances, I'm sure they're probably chasing the coronavirus itself, right? | ||
They're already bug-chased with AIDS. | ||
And I'm sure a lot of them are doing it with coronavirus. | ||
So, you know, in that way, they're just kind of the sickest of them all. | ||
They're still going out there, but unfazed, undeterred, but women, but your women are out there and they are dying inside because they're saying, I'm not having sex with strangers. | ||
And they're melting down from it. | ||
So they're not holding up. | ||
I'm sure it is. | ||
says, Groiper alert, this is not a test. | ||
Corbittreport.com, Corona World Order, unironic, must watch. | ||
I'm sure it is. | ||
Thanks for the Ninja Gini. | ||
Modern Monarchist says, 2024, President Dennis Prager and Vice President Ben Shapiro. | ||
Yep. | ||
NJ Conservative says, Holy Week Gini missed last night. | ||
Well, thanks, buddy NJ conservatives is happy. | ||
Good Friday was on path back when I started but embraced my Catholicism because of you Well good to hear it Thanks. | ||
Glad you are back on the right track Well, it sounds like you've embraced it. | ||
So that's good to hear. | ||
Happy Good Friday to you as well. | ||
Happy Easter. | ||
Thanks for all the Ninja Genies this week. | ||
I appreciate it. | ||
Ethel says, Hey Nick, what are your thoughts on SpaceX and this multi-planetary idea? | ||
I think it's pretty weird. | ||
Thanks for the genie. | ||
Um, multi-planetary idea to me seems impractical. | ||
I think it's worth pursuing, but I don't know that it is going to be efficacious. | ||
Is that a word? | ||
I don't think that it will be practical, you know, and they're saying that, well, the technology will improve and we're going to colonize Mars and terraform Mars and I don't know. | ||
It just seems to me to be so impractical because the planets are so far away from us. | ||
And they're so inhospitable to human life, particularly Mars. | ||
That's one they're looking at. | ||
It just doesn't seem to me to be practical that there will ever be a sustainable presence of human beings on Mars for any purpose, economic or long-term habitation. | ||
It seems like it's worth pursuing. | ||
There will definitely be benefits of being interplanetary. | ||
You know, if something happens on Earth, then we'd still have another planet. | ||
So, I think that it's worth pursuing for that reason. | ||
The benefits would be priceless. | ||
I mean, there would be, obviously, if you're talking about the survival of the human race, I think that that is something that would necessarily have to be looked into. | ||
But that being said, I think like a lot of projects, we will find another way. | ||
We will find maybe different options because thought of like interplanetary colonization. | ||
And maybe that's because it's like the 21st century and we're not ready yet for that. | ||
But that just seems like so outside the bounds of what is possible, at least now, that I don't see that ever happening. | ||
We can barely figure it out here, let alone over there. | ||
You know, to build a supply chain to another planet seems to me like impossible. | ||
To build a sustainable colony on another planet seems like impossible. | ||
And as of right now, it almost seems like the costs are way higher than, you know, they would almost defeat the purpose of it anyway. | ||
Because put people on Mars and they're going to evolve differently. | ||
They're going to have all kinds of problems. | ||
And will they be able to sustain themselves? | ||
There's no water there. | ||
There might be ice, right? | ||
But there's no water. | ||
There's no oxygen or there's not enough, right? | ||
The atmosphere, we can't breathe it. | ||
So it just doesn't seem practical. | ||
So, Uh, let's see. | ||
Justin KG says, great stream with Jaden yesterday. | ||
Did you do celebration stream for passing PewDiePie yet? | ||
No, that's right. | ||
I don't think I did. | ||
Did I? | ||
I don't know if I ever did. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
When did I pass PewDiePie? | ||
Was that this week or last week? | ||
I don't even remember. | ||
I think it was last week. | ||
I don't even remember. | ||
I think it was last week, right? | ||
I said I would celebrate. | ||
But, um... | ||
I just never did. | ||
I don't know, maybe I should celebrate. | ||
I guess I must have just forgot last week. | ||
Yeah, maybe we'll do a big celebration stream. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
Thanks for reminding me. | ||
I'll put that in my notes, maybe. | ||
Yeah, it was a good stream with Jaden. | ||
Me and him just keep fighting, though. | ||
We bicker. | ||
We're like, you know, we're like siblings or something. | ||
I don't know what it is. | ||
It's a sign, though. | ||
You know, whenever I stream with Jaden, it's so funny because we end up playing Call of Duty, And we legitimately get mad. | ||
I don't know if he gets mad. | ||
He says he's playing it up. | ||
But I legitimately get mad. | ||
I legitimately get mad at him. | ||
I get frustrated with him. | ||
Because we'll be playing squads in Call of Duty. | ||
And I don't want to rehash the argument here in a one-sided fashion, but he'll go out and do his things. | ||
It's well known, my issues with his gameplay. | ||
And we'll legitimately get into it. | ||
And we'll be sitting there, and I'll be totally mad. | ||
I'm totally pissed off. | ||
And it gets kind of quiet and awkward on the stream. | ||
But, you know, to me, what that says is that there is a closeness. | ||
It's actually a good thing. | ||
When you fight with somebody, that shows that there is resilience to the relationship. | ||
You know, joke with somebody. | ||
If you can cross the line with somebody and come back from it, then that shows that you have a good rapport, right? | ||
If you are always fighting with somebody, or if you're afraid to fight with somebody, if you're afraid to cross the line, if you're sort of like, uh, if it's awkward, you know what I'm saying? | ||
Then, um, then that shows that you're not actually that good of friends, so. | ||
So it's actually a good thing. | ||
A lot of people say, oh, you and Jaden fight so much, but it's actually a good thing. | ||
It shows that there's actually a good friendship there, right? | ||
But we do bicker a lot. | ||
It is a source of contention. | ||
It is a major source of frustration. | ||
I don't know about him. | ||
He always tells me he's just playing it up. | ||
I don't think that's true. | ||
He always says, I'm just playing it up. | ||
I don't think you are. | ||
I think you're pissed off. | ||
I'm pissed off, and I maybe know you're pissed off because I'm pissed off. | ||
But, uh, anyway. | ||
Anyway. | ||
We're, we're Zack and Cody, right? | ||
Uh, Drew Bruce is big news in Australia. | ||
Pell acquitted by high court. | ||
Yeah, I heard about that. | ||
I'm not like a constitutional scholar. | ||
I don't really think too much about the Constitution. | ||
Modern Monarchist says, do you find problems with the Constitution and why? | ||
Problems with the Constitution. | ||
You know, I'm not like a constitutional scholar. | ||
I don't really think too much about the Constitution. | ||
I would say that the problem with the Constitution, It's not so much that there are problems with the Constitution so much as our country has basically outgrown the Constitution in the sense that the country that the founders were writing a Constitution for and the world that they were writing it in were so different than where we are now. | ||
The world is different than the Constitution. | ||
The country is different. | ||
This is a country of 350 million people spanning coast to coast. | ||
We're the number one country in the world. | ||
Uh, colonialism has ended. | ||
We have full integration with the world. | ||
Technology is advanced. | ||
It's a completely different circumstance than when they were writing it. | ||
And you could say, well, it's timeless, timeless principles. | ||
And in some sense, that's true. | ||
But in a lot of ways, it's also very flawed because they did not obviously anticipate mass immigration. | ||
They did not anticipate, you know, a time when Europe was not in control of the world. | ||
Think about that. | ||
The Constitution was ratified in 1789. | ||
And so, for fully a quarter of a millennium, Europe ruled the world, right? | ||
And for most of recorded history up until that point, Europe was the leader of the world, save for a few other major civilizations like China and Persia, right, or the Arabs or, you know, a few others. | ||
Europe was the dominant civilization in the world, except for a few others. | ||
And even when China had a bigger population or might have had a technological advantage, Europe seemed to always be, you know, the leader of the world. | ||
And, of course, America was founded at a time when Europe ruled the world, during the Pax Britannica, when the British Empire in particular, but other empires ruled the world, the colonialism. | ||
And it wasn't until the middle of the last century that that really ended. | ||
It wasn't until the middle of the last century that you had the real rise of the third world, of these former colonial holdings or, you know, you see China and you see independence in Africa and Independence has been established in South America for a long time, but you get the point. | ||
So, globally was a very different picture. | ||
For obvious reasons, domestically was very different. | ||
And so the Constitution might have been good for a time, you know, for the late 18th century America, but it definitely does not take into consideration a lot of problems today with technology, with populations, and with the private sector, even with banking, you know. | ||
So there are a lot of unforeseen problems inherent in it. | ||
Which, um, and I can't give you a ton of specifics because I'm not like a constitutional scholar, but there are a lot of problems in there. | ||
But, um, so I would say that that's the general issue. | ||
It's really more about the context. | ||
But, um, anyway. | ||
Question for Nick says, like, for example, the First Amendment. | ||
If I could give an example off the top of my head, because I would feel remiss if I didn't give you at least one example. | ||
The First Amendment. | ||
First Amendment applies to government only, but not the private sector. | ||
So, Twitter can ban you, but that doesn't violate the First Amendment. | ||
How does the Constitution protect free speech? | ||
And people will say, well, the government is the biggest threat and protects free speech from the government, but in practice, what's the difference? | ||
The Twitter and all these other private entities constitute monopolies. | ||
They constitute, in essence, the public sector or the public square. | ||
Even though they're private, they constitute the public square. | ||
And could the founders conceive of the public square being owned by a private entity? | ||
I don't think so. | ||
Because the public square used to be the public commons. | ||
You know, that would be the state building or a public park, right? | ||
Or a street corner or something like that. | ||
And maybe it might be in private hands, but even then it would be subject to the First Amendment, you know, outside. | ||
But that doesn't exist in the same way that it did all that time ago. | ||
So that would be one area. | ||
And also with federalism. | ||
Does federalism really work when you're talking about a nation as complicated and complex as it is now? | ||
You know, even things like interstate commerce. | ||
I mean, there's a lot of problems even inherent in this idea of federalism. | ||
Immigration is another area. | ||
Is that a state issue? | ||
Is that a federal government issue? | ||
And who gets control of immigration? | ||
The Congress or the executive? | ||
There's a lot of debate about this today. | ||
Obviously, there's nothing in the Constitution about demographics, which is a problem, or citizenship. | ||
You know, it should be in the Constitution some, you know, something about citizenship, no birthright citizenship, something like that. | ||
The 13th Amendment is very flawed in that way. | ||
I guess the 13th Amendment was later on, but still a part of the Constitution. | ||
So, 19th Amendment is another one. | ||
Question for Nick's is, my Chinese wife has C19. | ||
Her name is Sheet. | ||
Okay, yeah, that's really funny. | ||
NJ Conservative says, Judas sold out Christ for silver. | ||
Now America being sold out by similar forces. | ||
America first. | ||
Wow, very novel take. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
Very true. | ||
Big Globe says, listening to CNN at work sucks. | ||
Wish I could listen to America first. | ||
Yeah, me too. | ||
NJ Conservative says, hope your family has a blessed Easter. | ||
Yes, you too. | ||
Happy Easter. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
T. James says, do another McDonald's and Baskin-Robbins periscope. | ||
unidentified
|
No. | |
Sheeny says, long time no see big guy. | ||
I got my job back and a promotion too. | ||
Maybe this pandemic ain't half bad. | ||
Well, congratulations on the promotion. | ||
Good to hear from you again. | ||
Yeah, it's been a while. | ||
Congrats on the promotion, on the job. | ||
Glad to hear you're doing better. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
It's true, maybe it isn't half bad after all. | ||
Maybe he'll get a $1,200 check too, right? | ||
Probably an alcoholic. | ||
Okay, thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
Is that so? | ||
to be an alcoholic or a chain smoker uh probably an alcoholic boopers says booper sends a ninjagini with no message okay thanks for the ninjagini question for nick says the njf impression is all about the hands says patrick patrick casey is that so is it all about the hands i would like to see somebody i've never seen anybody do an impression of me deliberately | ||
People might, you know, unconsciously imitate my inflection or my hand motions, but I don't think I've ever seen anybody do a really good Nick Fuentes impression. | ||
I don't think I've ever seen anybody even try. | ||
And if they do try, do it really well. | ||
I know Patrick did one, but it wasn't... I don't know if he was really trying that hard. | ||
He was trying to just be funny. | ||
But I'd like to see that. | ||
I gotta get more famous so that somebody will do it, so that they'll be a Nick Fuentes impersonator. | ||
Well, that's not true. | ||
There was one person who used to be on the Daily Brat who did an okay impression, and I didn't like it. | ||
I didn't like it. | ||
I don't like how my voice sounds. | ||
You know how that goes. | ||
You don't like to hear yourself back to yourself. | ||
So I didn't like his impression, even though it was accurate. | ||
AquariumGroper says, shout out to my good friend Tomascovich. | ||
He's watching America First for the first time tonight. | ||
Well, thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
Yeah, shout out to him. | ||
Hope he's liking what he sees. | ||
I don't know. | ||
I wasn't really feeling it tonight. | ||
I don't really feel like tonight was a knockout stellar show. | ||
Maybe come back next week. | ||
I'm tired. | ||
It's Friday. | ||
I've had enough, you know. | ||
I've had enough of this coronavirus news for the week, so I'll come back next week when I'm in a little bit more, when I'm a bit more fresh. | ||
Modern Monarchist says, Sanders and Biden have fans only account. | ||
Fans only. | ||
Do you know what's called only fans? | ||
This fucking guy, man. | ||
Modern Monarchist. | ||
Every chat he sends in, it's like I'm just shaking my head. | ||
Pick one. | ||
Biden or Sanders having an only fans. | ||
Dude, really funny. | ||
Kyle says go full sticks mode. | ||
No shirt. | ||
Yeah, I'm not gonna do that Among the ruins says are you into blady? | ||
Have you heard his new album? | ||
No Pikachu says how come your green eyes don't turn transparent. | ||
That's a great question Bring the fire says it is truly a good Friday with America first and God so true Save the West says cool skyscraper shirt. | ||
Where can I get one? | ||
Yeah? | ||
Dax says my GF just got sent home for two weeks. | ||
She's a nurse Many such cases. | ||
SP with the Ninjettes says, have a happy Easter. | ||
Thank you so much. | ||
You too. | ||
Have a good Easter. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjette. | ||
SP, one of our George Soros of the movement, so to speak. | ||
Thanks a lot. | ||
Harley says, can we get a thank God the virus wasn't as bad? | ||
Sure. | ||
But I don't know if it's like, thank God it's not as bad so much as it is they lied to us, right? | ||
Nate Smokes says, have a great day! | ||
Thanks, you too, buddy. | ||
Simon Scola says, what it do? | ||
Flight crew, FTC, flight team stand up. | ||
I don't know what that means, but thanks for the diamond. | ||
Dak says, Rams is right. | ||
This is fishy. | ||
Hospitals empty in Washington. | ||
It is fishy. | ||
Patrick Casey says, hey King, my girlfriend, who's super hot by the way, says, Okay, thanks for the diamond. | ||
Yeah classic classic Patrick move always flexing on us in cells with his with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez girlfriend Triangle Patrick Casey always coming in and flexing on us in cells. | ||
Yeah, we get it Patrick We get it This is real life triangle Patrick gets the girl, right? | ||
But we do get a lot of that. | ||
Hey King my girlfriend. | ||
Yeah, so very real very real black swan says we should minecraft with the boys sometime no spurge this time promise yeah i remember your minecraft server and i quit i think after 10 minutes thanks for the ninja genie yeah we'll see i don't really like minecraft i gotta be honest it's just not fun to me Alan Akbar says, again, why do you hate white rappers? | ||
Because they suck. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
Pennsylvania Groyper says, what were your Easter family traditions growing up? | ||
Well, we went to Mass and then, well, usually, well, what was the order? | ||
I think we woke up and we would do Easter baskets. | ||
The Easter bunny would come and we'd do our Easter baskets. | ||
and then we go to church. | ||
I don't know if we did the baskets before or after, I think it was before, right when we woke up. | ||
Easter basket, and then we went to church, and then we came home, and then typically we played with our Easter stuff. | ||
Usually it was a lot of springtime type stuff, like I remember one year I got like a wiffle ball, we were playing with that, you know, or a frisbee, you know, some kind of outdoor thing. | ||
We would do an Easter egg hunt usually at my grandma's house or at my house, or we participate in one in the community. | ||
I think we would do that. | ||
And, you know, an Easter egg hunt goes, right? | ||
So you would do something like that. | ||
I don't really remember very well. | ||
The Easter memories are not as, for whatever reason, I can't remember them as well as Christmas or some of the other holidays. | ||
It was generally a low-key celebration. | ||
It would just be mass, and then it would be the Easter basket, and that would be it. | ||
You know, I think you remember the holiday because you get a big break in school, and it's a big buildup. | ||
There's the music, and the food, and the movies, and it's, you know, a big cultural moment for a long time. | ||
Plus, it's New Year's Eve, and it's, right? | ||
But Easter, it's just like, we go to the mall, sit on the Easter Bunny's lap, you know, some of that. | ||
We'd paint eggs. | ||
I remember we would do that. | ||
We would paint eggs. | ||
That was always a good time. | ||
Those little egg holders, right? | ||
And you'd paint them and put them out to dry, and then you'd peel them. | ||
I never ate the hard-boiled eggs, but we'd paint them. | ||
So we did that. | ||
We did the Easter egg hunts. | ||
I'm trying to think what else. | ||
I think that was really it. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
So there you go. | ||
Alan says, In Sweden, 70% of Corona deaths are Somali and Syrian. | ||
Oh, interesting. | ||
Jen Zesus says, how's Big Mama Fuentes doing? | ||
She's doing okay. | ||
Embro says, Apple wouldn't allow the CIA to get data from a terrorist phone a while back. | ||
Remember that? | ||
I do remember that. | ||
Thanks for the Nijigini. | ||
But they're just going to track all of our data? | ||
Okay. | ||
Yeah, I remember they did that. | ||
They wouldn't open up The locked phone or whatever for the FBI. | ||
Yeah, curious how that works. | ||
Boo Radley says, check out Ed Snowden's book, Permanent Record. | ||
Yeah, sounds awesome. | ||
It's about the current state of mass surveillance. | ||
Base Zoomer says, the contact tracing tech uses Bluetooth low-energy. | ||
Locationing is done via two plus phones in proximity. | ||
Thank you, LabCode. | ||
Thanks for the Nijigini. | ||
OpticsRespector says, would you do the antibody test? | ||
Probably not. | ||
Simp into pimpin says I got turned full griper by a girl. | ||
What do I do? | ||
I don't know what that means Patrick Casey says die economy die stupid economy Patrick's being real funny tonight Patrick's drinking the funny juice. | ||
I Very true. | ||
Yeah, I love all the people out there posting that screenshot today from CNBC where it's like, best stock market since 1938, 16 million unemployed, and they're like, wow, we're living in a society. | ||
Wow, capitalism must really be broken if the stock market could have the best days since 1938, but 16 million unemployed, and it's like, are you a baby? | ||
Are you like an idiot? | ||
Do you not know how the economy works? | ||
Take a look at the stock market. | ||
Okay, go ahead, pull up your app on your phone, your stock market app, or look it up on Google. | ||
And take a look at the stock market over a three-month period and then come back to me. | ||
People are showing the screenshot from CNBC, I think from Mad Money, Jim Cramer's show. | ||
Or maybe it was a different show that Jim Cramer was on. | ||
But in the background, it's like, Wall Street has best day since 1938. | ||
It's a big green arrow and stock market's up. | ||
But the, what is it? | ||
What do they call that? | ||
The Chevron, or what do they call that? | ||
It starts with a C. | ||
At the bottom of the screen says, 16 million unemployed in three weeks. | ||
And people are saying, like, oh, that shows how broken capitalism is. | ||
See? | ||
Because Wall Street is doing great and celebrating, but people are unemployed. | ||
Now take a look at the stock market over the last three months. | ||
When they say best days since 1938, do you know what that means? | ||
It means that the stock market went up by a bigger point number or a bigger percentage than any other day since 1938. | ||
But this happens every time you have a depression or a recession. | ||
The stock market fluctuates. | ||
And when the stock market goes down by 35% and then it goes up by a high percentage, that doesn't mean that Wall Street had a really, really good day. | ||
That doesn't mean that, oh, the billionaires and Wall Street are doing amazing. | ||
I mean, they're always doing amazing, but you know what I'm saying. | ||
If you know how to read that information, you understand what that means. | ||
The stock market might rally from a 35% discount based on good information and based on stimulus from the Federal Reserve, based on expectations they're trying to price into the economy, what the damage is going to be, while 16 million people are unemployed. | ||
That is the point of speculation and of investing and all of this, is you're looking towards the long term. | ||
When the economy rallies after a big dip, it rallies based on the expectation that the economy will improve later. | ||
The stock market crashed weeks ago, anticipating the unemployment numbers now. | ||
And maybe it didn't anticipate as high as it would be or perfectly, but the stock market crashed back in the beginning of March. | ||
Or the middle of March. | ||
You know, whenever they shut down the country or when it started to get really bad, the stock market crashed and ultimately it bottomed out at 35% below the previous high. | ||
35%. | ||
It wiped out four years of gains based on the expectation that you would see mass unemployment and a big contraction in the GDP. | ||
Now that you're getting good headlines and they're talking about opening up, and there's Federal Reserve stimulus and fiscal stimulus, based on these headlines, the market rallies. | ||
But it rallies from the low. | ||
It rallies from the five-year low, a big percentage increase from the low. | ||
And so when they say, oh, you know, best day since 1938, they're talking about the biggest single-day increase from a low, which happens during a depression. | ||
In the years during the Great Depression, you had many highs and many lows, record highs and record lows, because the economy fluctuates based on new information from government and speculation based on government action and how things are going to work out. | ||
But they're pricing in, and it's a process, they are pricing in the damage and the effect of the coronavirus. | ||
And you'll see more lows. | ||
You'll see new bottoms in the stock market. | ||
You'll see days where it crashes again, and you'll see more rallies. | ||
But it's literally retarded babies who don't understand how the economy works. | ||
It's people that, I don't know if they're kids, or they're college kids, or... | ||
People that just don't, they don't invest or whatever, but they're like, oh, look, this, this screenshot says it all. | ||
Stock market's up, but unemployment is high. | ||
Corporations are, you know, some corporations are doing better than others, but the economy is not doing well. | ||
Okay? | ||
The economy is not doing well for everybody. | ||
This is affecting everybody. | ||
And obviously billionaires are going to be fine, and your major, major multinational corporations are not going out of business anytime soon, but You know, it's just a misinterpretation of this information. | ||
We could take a look at the macroeconomic picture and say, is Walmart and Amazon, are they going to be big winners from this? | ||
Certainly. | ||
But are they winning simply because of mass unemployment? | ||
You know, are they really saying, oh, unemployment is a good thing. | ||
I love unemployment. | ||
No, not necessarily. | ||
Now, might this present an opportunity? | ||
Might they be better off in the future? | ||
You know, that is a conversation that we could have, but They take that screenshot and they're like, wow, Wall Street having a good day when unemployment is high? | ||
It's like, well you're just misinterpreting that information, clearly. | ||
They're rallying on the expectation that unemployment will eventually get low again. | ||
That's why that's happening. | ||
on the Federal Reserve stimulus, that businesses will stay afloat, that people will stay afloat, and they're rallying on the expectation that people will get back to work. | ||
Not that people are out of work, right? | ||
So, anyways, Patrick commenting on that. | ||
You die, economy. | ||
The economy should do bad. | ||
I want everyone to do bad. | ||
It's also, I will say, it's also funny that all the same people that were cheering on the economic collapse are the same ones that are going to pretend to care about the unemployed, right? | ||
All right. | ||
All the people who two weeks ago were saying, oh the economy crashed and that's a good thing, you know, take that GDP, take that boomers. | ||
Oh, people are unemployed? | ||
Good, maybe the collapse will happen. | ||
All the people that were saying, oh, good, you know, the economy's getting worse, they're all now going to pretend to care and say, see? | ||
Look at how out of touch Wall Street is. | ||
See? | ||
Oh, the economy's going up. | ||
When unemployment is high? | ||
And so clearly these people just have no consistent view of the economy. | ||
There is no coherent, thorough understanding happening. | ||
It's just a lot of memes. | ||
That's what it is. | ||
It's a meme understanding of the economy. | ||
Meme opinion. | ||
Mark Tose says, one prick equals one ship. | ||
Yeah, I don't know if that's how they're gonna do the chip, but I'm not taking any chances. | ||
Uh, Dak says, in two weeks it'll be a bloodbath. | ||
Yeah, okay, lab coat. | ||
Yeah, right. | ||
Portland Groyper says, remember the good old days when we talked about Israel? | ||
Seems so long ago. | ||
Happy Easter, Nick. | ||
Yeah, I remember. | ||
Thanks for the Nijigini. | ||
Happy Easter. | ||
Fuggs, it's a total 180 since last night. | ||
What changed your mind? | ||
It's not a 180. | ||
It's not a 180 at all. | ||
I told you. | ||
We're talking about hypotheticals, number one. | ||
We're talking about trajectories. | ||
And it's not a 180. | ||
I've always been suspicious of this. | ||
And don't believe me, go back and watch my show in January when I said, they're lying about the virus. | ||
They're lying about where it came from. | ||
China's lying. | ||
The World Health Organization is lying. | ||
And I've been consistent throughout. | ||
I said, you don't have enough data. | ||
And so when you don't have enough data, based on what you see, that's how you have to act. | ||
You cannot go back in time, you know? | ||
In other words, you don't have the benefit of retrospect in the middle of March. | ||
In the middle of March, we looked at the projections, and we looked at Italy, and we looked at the death rate, and it was unacceptable, the losses that we might have faced, right? | ||
And I've never been, you know... | ||
I've never been, I've never shied away from making statements like that based on available information. | ||
The available information back then showed a much, much higher death rate and the statistical projections were much worse. | ||
And they had a higher death rate because they didn't account for a lot of asymptomatic people and so on. | ||
And so based on that information, I think the lockdown was justified and so on. | ||
But what I'm saying tonight is if these projected numbers turn out way lower and way lower once you're factoring in the social distancing and if the death rate is way lower and if the solution that they're proposing increasingly is surveillance and shipping and identification then retroactively that changes how we look at the coronavirus. | ||
So it's not it's not really even a 180. | ||
It's like I'm looking at where things are headed And I'm saying, I'm shifting a little bit in my assessment of the situation. | ||
Because what I said yesterday is, it's not comparable to the flu. | ||
And I still believe that, by the way. | ||
Because the death rate is still high, and the death rate will still be high if you're looking at a 6 week period, right? | ||
It's still, what is it, a 6 to 8 week period that you're talking about 60,000 deaths. | ||
Which compared to, you know, flu season is about the same, but the flu does 60,000 in a year compared to in eight weeks. | ||
And moreover, that's with social distancing and so on, right? | ||
And they're talking about also the numbers might shoot back up if we reopen. | ||
So we're not out of the woods yet. | ||
And I never said that, oh, I completely changed my mind. | ||
Now it's fake. | ||
And I said, if there's two camps, I'm moving more towards the other one. | ||
And we also have the benefit of doing that now that we've reached the peak or are approaching the peak. | ||
We have the benefit of reassessing now that we have reached or are reaching and will soon be past the peak. | ||
We can say, oh, well, obviously the data is different now. | ||
So it's not a total 180. | ||
It's an evolving understanding. | ||
And we're talking about hypothetically what happens if it turns out this way. | ||
What happens if we all go back to work and the death rate remains low? | ||
What happens if we go back to work and the death rate is 0.3%? | ||
Well, then we could be skeptical about the whole thing. | ||
You know, and things like that. | ||
So, it's not a 180, and it's not that anything's changing my mind, it's just that the more that we look at the information as it comes in, what changed your mind? | ||
Well, our understanding of the situation evolves as we get more information. | ||
And we didn't have this information two weeks ago. | ||
They didn't talk about an immunity passport two weeks ago. | ||
That wasn't being talked about at the governmental level in the United States two weeks ago. | ||
They weren't talking about mass surveillance for contact tracing two weeks ago. | ||
Hospitalization was not drastically under what was projected two weeks ago, right? | ||
The death rate was not as low as it was two weeks ago. | ||
Two weeks ago, they said a quarter of a million was the upper bound and 100,000 was the lower bound. | ||
Two weeks ago. | ||
This week, they said 60,000. | ||
unidentified
|
So... | |
You know that's that much is a given that your situation your understanding evolves as a situation does but I don't think it's a 180. | ||
I still basically believe the lockdown was and is necessary it'll still you know what I'm saying is true it'll still be with us for two years or you know longer than that until we develop an immunity as a society naturally or with a vaccine you're going to be dealing with bouts of coronavirus outbreaks and it'll keep coming back that is still true. | ||
Will it be more deadly or drastically more deadly than the flu or another virus? | ||
Well, now that's in doubt. | ||
Now that remains to be seen. | ||
And we'll have to see what the curves look like in Italy and in Europe and in New York. | ||
But it's looking like the death rate is trending down. | ||
Now, the death rate in the United States is still about 3%, right? | ||
The death rate in the United States, the official death rate is actually closer to 4%. | ||
So if the death rate ends up being 4%, then we're in trouble, and we are still in trouble, and that's what it is now. | ||
But if the death rate comes down, as the testing goes up, if the death rate does not match the rate at which new confirmed cases arise, including asymptomatic carriers and everything, and the death rate stays the same, then, you know, it'll still be a big and the death rate stays the same, then, you know, it'll But if you have the confirmed case number increasing and it decouples from the death rate, and the death rate goes down, or number of deaths, the death rate goes down as a percentage, | ||
Then it's not going to be as bad, obviously. | ||
Then we're talking about something like another flu or another more conventional virus. | ||
Maybe something marginally more deadly than the flu. | ||
Something like SARS or something like, you know, previous viruses that have come out of China. | ||
So all I'm saying is that that seems like it could be a possibility now. | ||
And what are we going to do then? | ||
So, no. | ||
It's not a 180. | ||
Commando Chicken says, Nick, you wear skinny jeans? | ||
I'm not wearing skinny jeans. | ||
Peace King says, Globalist showing their hands? | ||
Possibly. | ||
They're always showing their hand. | ||
Allen says, bring in guests? | ||
Do Collins? | ||
unidentified
|
No. | |
Baze Doomer says, I will fear no evil. | ||
Psalm 23-4. | ||
Thank you, big guy. | ||
unidentified
|
Wow, very true. | |
Mario's a Zionist EMP wave broke the light Q predicted this. | ||
Okay Femboy says Nick this show is so boring chat change on camera. | ||
Yeah Portland groper says blessed that I still have a job. | ||
Here's to America first. | ||
Thanks Over groper says we was suckers. | ||
Well, we'll see peace King says respect the pivot. | ||
It's not a pivot. | ||
It's not a pivot. | ||
I And I love when people do this. | ||
New information comes out. | ||
You're pivoting. | ||
You're 180ing. | ||
Not a pivot. | ||
Not a 180. | ||
How is it a pivot? | ||
A pivot is, you know, you change your position. | ||
My position hasn't changed. | ||
The information has changed and is changing. | ||
And as the information changes, you have to change your understanding of the situation. | ||
And, um, you know, to offer up skepticism at this point, I don't think is, is, uh, inconsistent with the information that's coming in. | ||
People that were crying out conspiracy three weeks ago were still wrong. | ||
You were still wrong, I believe, four, three weeks ago to be saying this is overblown, whatever, because all the information four weeks ago pointed towards major pandemic. | ||
And the people that were saying that it was not a big deal and x, y, and z, they were saying that based on no evidence. | ||
They were saying that based on A knee jerk impulse to question anything that comes out. | ||
And to me, I believe that a pandemic from China, or in general, is likely. | ||
And I said this back in January. | ||
This might be the one, it might not be the one. | ||
I said this in January. | ||
I said, but if it is the one, Or if it isn't the one, then we have to prepare. | ||
And when it is the one, then we'll be prepared and we'll know what to expect, right? | ||
In other words, we're going to get a pandemic eventually. | ||
Based on globalization, based on lax hygiene and sanitation standards in other countries, you're going to get a pandemic. | ||
And you're going to get one that's bad. | ||
Even if it's a virus, if it's bacteria with antibiotics, you're going to get a bug that is going to bring the world to its knees. | ||
Better prepare now. | ||
Whether it is the one or it isn't the one. | ||
And I said that in January and February. | ||
But, um, people that were saying in the middle of March, oh, it's nothing, it's the flu, you know, like that boomer. | ||
There's 1,300 cases! | ||
That's not a lot of people! | ||
Well, that is still wrong. | ||
It is still wrong to say, back then, oh, not a lot of people have it, only 1,300 cases. | ||
That was obviously wrong, because now we're up to half a million cases. | ||
And so you cannot look at the present number and say, oh, we're okay, because, you know, you have so many that are undetected and testing isn't there. | ||
And until and unless you do the testing regimen, you don't know how many people have the virus. | ||
And if you don't know how many people have the virus, you don't know what the death rate is. | ||
And if you don't know what the death rate is, you have no idea what you're dealing with. | ||
So, you know. | ||
And I know that's going to happen, and I've been saying that's going to happen, but So it's not, it's not a, respect the pivot, it's a 180. | ||
Not a pivot, not a 180. | ||
You know, if it comes out in a few weeks that the death rate is drastically lower, does that mean that we were wrong to look at the information back in March? | ||
The information that we had and make a decision based on that? | ||
Why did we in March not look into the crystal ball and see that the death rate was much lower? | ||
You know what I'm saying? | ||
So, any and all takes have to be based on the information at the time. | ||
Time doubts is a stream watching endgame would be fun lol. | ||
That sounds retarded. | ||
Thanks for the ninja genie Fanny says I worked at a hospital and wanted to tell you it's not busy weeks ago, but scared you were going to roast me Okay, thanks for the ninja genie, but also weeks ago. | ||
You didn't have as many people because the outbreak wasn't as bad yet This is supposed to be the peak. | ||
So if you say the hospital wasn't busy weeks ago. | ||
Well, that's because we haven't peaked yet You know So, it wouldn't have made sense. | ||
If you said two weeks ago, the expectation is that it would have peaked this week. | ||
So, if the expectation was, whether or not it peaks this week, if the hospital was empty four weeks ago, do you understand? | ||
There was no expectation that the hospital would have been overrun four weeks ago because the epidemic wasn't that bad yet. | ||
Nitrodub says, first time I recall you taking a drink on the show. | ||
Okay. | ||
Starships says, video of Chinese people sneezing on food in US supermarkets, wiping tissues on public spaces is suspect. | ||
I agree. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
Brad the Zoomer says, groiping, conning, TikTok is a pastime. | ||
Ed, Zoomer, Brad. | ||
Okay. | ||
Opticsrespector says, false factions? | ||
Never heard of that before. | ||
What is a false faction? | ||
I don't understand why people want to watch this show if they, you know, they hate my god, they hate the people that watch the show, right? | ||
Weston Burns says, I love America first. | ||
I love you, and I am who I am. | ||
Please don't reject me. | ||
No, I will. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini, but just take your cringe somewhere else. | ||
Look, you're not Christian. | ||
You're not a nationalist. | ||
I don't understand why people want to watch this show if they, you know, they hate my God. | ||
They hate the people that watch the show, right? | ||
I don't understand. | ||
This guy's in our chat every day doing Fed shit, spreading, you know, Wignat ideology, taking a dump on Jesus. | ||
Oh, but I love your show. | ||
Why? | ||
You know, thanks, but no thanks. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini, but I don't understand. | ||
We don't want to have people around here that are going to be, uh... | ||
trying to get my show banned. | ||
And that's, at the end of the day, the problem. | ||
I don't have a problem with people that disagree, but this guy comes into the chat and he's posting things that are going to get this channel banned. | ||
That's why I have a particular reaction about people that are posting Fed stuff and people that are posting extreme, ideological stuff, right? | ||
Alt-right stuff. | ||
It's not because, you know, it's not anything about disagreeing. | ||
It's because that is the kind of stuff that's going to get my show banned from this platform. | ||
You know, people are like, oh, you know, Nick is an optics cuck. | ||
Nick doesn't want this because he's a cuck, whatever. | ||
In an ideal world, we could have anybody post whatever they want in the chat, in the super chat, but that's not the world we live in. | ||
We've been driven off YouTube and the only complaints that I've gotten from DLive is they say my live chat. | ||
That's the only thing they say. | ||
They say, well, you haven't been reported about anything, but your live chat keeps getting reported. | ||
Ciao. - Bye. | ||
If you want to clean that up, then you can hang around, but people that are not considerate of that, I can't give you a second and a third chance because I'm not going to get that benefit from DLive. | ||
Yead says Press R to reject Dresden Burns. | ||
Jizza says, Charlie Kirk is anti-immigration. | ||
So true. | ||
You're welcome. | ||
Glad to hear it. | ||
No, I think that's just because unemployment is high now. | ||
Optics Respecter says, So true. | ||
Joe Blow says, Yeah, very true. | ||
Among the Ruins says, I've never heard this take before. | ||
When is the next video coming? | ||
That's hilarious. | ||
I've never heard this take before. | ||
Baseless Accusation says, "Nick, I bought your master class, but it's only one video of you mocking me. | ||
When is the next video coming?" Dude, funny. | ||
Thank you for the Ninjagini. | ||
That's hilarious. | ||
Just a White Male says, "People who think Jews are still the chosen people are reading a different Bible. | ||
It's the Schofield Bible." That's not true, but thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
I've heard that conspiracy a lot. | ||
I mean, there are a lot of people that are reading the Schofield Bible, and there is a bad translation, but that doesn't explain all of it, okay? | ||
The Schofield Bible is not the end-all be-all explanation of Zionist evangelicals in America. | ||
It just isn't. | ||
But thanks for the Nijigini. | ||
The Schofield Bible? | ||
Oh, really? | ||
What's that? | ||
Like, that's not... Some of these people, they find, like, one thing, and it's like, you know, The Kalergi paper! | ||
The Schofield Bible! | ||
Oh, this explains it all! | ||
Cultural Marxism! | ||
The Frankfurt School! | ||
You know, they find these monocausal, like, little, you know, obscure causes, and it's like, that's not... Sorry, but not it. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
I mean, it plays a part, and it's part of a bigger pattern, but that is not, that is not really, uh... And in a lot of cases, you have evangelicals that are not reading the Schofield Bible, but they're still extreme Zionists or, uh, you know, philo-semitic. | ||
Vlad Groyper says, Nick the Biker, Harley, Cafe Racer, or Rocket? | ||
I'm not a biker. | ||
Joshua Larson says, I have three of Noam Chomsky's books on language, and you're absolutely right, he's brilliant in One Avenue. | ||
Yeah, exactly. | ||
Linguistics, and that's his area of expertise, so those are probably very academic books, but, you know, writing pop political theory, that is not, that is not really worthwhile to me. | ||
Thanks for the Nijigini. | ||
Spanish Griper says Old Covenant was cancelled in the New Testament. | ||
The New Covenant is between God and the Gentiles. | ||
Well, that's not actually what it says. | ||
It just says it's between God and Christians. | ||
That's true to, you know, the Old Testament and the New Testament, the Old Covenant and the New Covenant. | ||
But it's not that it's non-Jews, in other words, like non-Hebrews or non-like, right? | ||
The tribes. | ||
But it is to say that if you're a Christian, you're the new Israel. | ||
That is the covenant that is made by Jesus Christ's coming and death and resurrection. | ||
unidentified
|
So... | |
So true, thanks for the Nijigini, but it's about Christians. | ||
It's Christ and the Christians. | ||
And that's what that girl, she came up to me and she's like, how can you be against Israel when, you know, the Old Testament says, we bless those who bless Israel. | ||
Well, Israel in the Old Testament means the tribe. | ||
And then Jesus comes and he makes a new covenant with the believers in Christ and says, well, if you believe in me, you know, I fulfilled the prophecies. | ||
I am the savior. | ||
If you believe in me, then that's the new covenant. | ||
That's the new Israel. | ||
It's the believers. | ||
so true Allen says how to be a paleo conservative by Nick Fuentes okay Grifters says says Smash, Merry, Kill, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malk, and Tulsi Gabbard. | ||
I'm not going to do that. | ||
Boopers says Internet articles are as bad as books, just drivel. | ||
Yeah, but at least they're free. | ||
Giants says what about Tucker's book, Ship of Fools? | ||
Is that a bestseller? | ||
Yeah, and, you know, I'll just say some are better than others, but I, you know, I still just generally believe that you should read old books. | ||
It might be worthwhile to read these books just to see what these people are saying, and, um, you know reading it as like an artifact of our time uh And it's, you know, Tucker Carlson's book is a contribution to the conversation, the political landscape. | ||
But reading it in itself, I think, you know, you could read better books. | ||
But Tucker Carlson's book is probably better than most. | ||
I read his book and it was insightful. | ||
And there's some new information in there. | ||
Better than most, but again, I do prefer to read other stuff. | ||
That's my preference. | ||
Chicken Strip says, do you have any stream elements? | ||
No, because I couldn't do payouts with stream elements. | ||
Zavibas says, just listen to your gut. | ||
Yeah. | ||
James says, glad to see you doing well here. | ||
DLive is the future. | ||
Uh, yeah. | ||
Thanks for the Nijigini. | ||
Ghani and Groik versus Nicholas means people's victory and Fuentes equals source. | ||
Yes. | ||
uh... big money wages is have a good friday and weekend everyone cheers thanks you too buddy thanks for all the ninjagini's happy easter buddy i appreciate it uh... redeemer says did you see that gamer in twenty years thing based odysseus says new york buries their dead in pottersfield judas died in one interesting dumb asses so women are gatekeepers well i got skeleton keys ah very good | ||
Logos says is Greek mythology based or cringe Nick. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
I'm just not even gonna address that Garku Oh says shallot you watching America first with Nick Fuentes. | ||
I Don't know shallot. | ||
Are you out there fart sniffer says Switzerland's neutrality. | ||
What's their endgame? | ||
probably survival Johnny says, worst part of quarantine is no more turning point Q&A's. | ||
That is certainly the worst part. | ||
JD Raffle says, press H to hate all women. | ||
Ha ha ha, JK. | ||
Press H to hate all women whores. | ||
Okay. | ||
Timedout says, I think you passed PewDiePie on like March 30th or 31st. | ||
Okay, thank you for that. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
ack says enjoy the content hey thanks for the ninja glad you enjoy big max is loving the cyberpunk mimetic polycarbon shirt nick glad you enjoy ack dash says take my lemons okay thank you for the ninja genies practical tms is arguing with friends as bonding as med others don't Is that true? | ||
I think everybody argues but Jaden isn't met. | ||
That's the thing. | ||
So maybe maybe It's one way for me and something else for him because he's in a cringe He is a cringe Scots-Irish German, so Maybe in his mind. | ||
This is like very deeply personal and he takes deep personal offense at these fights and as a Mediterranean I'm like, ah, you know, we're breaking each other's balls We're having a good time. | ||
Maybe for Jaden. | ||
He's stewing about this, right? | ||
He's reaching a boiling point with me. | ||
unidentified
|
So, I don't know. | |
Practical, but more than that, I think it's just generally true about relationships. | ||
Not even so much for bonding, not even just arguing, but sincerely getting in fights and having a problem with somebody. | ||
That is how you build a resilient friendship. | ||
Not arguing, fighting. | ||
Practical TM says, Ann Coulter books need to get retards on board. | ||
Okay, that's missing the point. | ||
Black Phillips is happy Passover. | ||
Amazing origin story behind it. | ||
Haha, funny and based. | ||
Tutus has finally started reading Sam Francis. | ||
Pretty good. | ||
Glad to hear it. | ||
Modern Monarchist says, forgive me, I am a pole. | ||
I get drunk on this show. | ||
Okay. | ||
Tastes Like Chicken says, the Russell Report show coming up on DLive. | ||
Great. | ||
Modern Monarchist says, I cannot wait till you tour and I can grope with ya. | ||
Yeah, I can't wait for that either. | ||
I'm looking forward to that. | ||
I'm looking forward to people coming up to me and saying, Hi! | ||
Hi! | ||
I can't wait to just meet strangers and shake hands and listen to what you have to say. | ||
You know, you listen to what I have to say and I absolutely reciprocate that, you know? | ||
And you are right to expect that from me. | ||
You listen or I have to say you watch my show and when I meet you, I want to hear your takes. | ||
I want to hear your take on politics. | ||
I want to talk to you about politics. | ||
That's all I'm capable of. | ||
Let's see. | ||
Black Swans is different. | ||
Minecraft server with all our friends. | ||
Oh, sounds amazing. | ||
Um, is hiding gonna be messing around on that one too? | ||
2-2 says, Whiteys have a lot of good qualities. | ||
Wrapping isn't one. | ||
Big agree. | ||
47IQ says, Today is suspended upon the tree. | ||
He who suspended the land upon the waters. | ||
Wow, so true. | ||
Thank you for the Ninjagini. | ||
Fomosis says, Why do Nutsacks have wrinkles? | ||
That's a good question. | ||
Black Swans is also, WTF are the Super Chets usually this bad lately? | ||
Uh, yeah, pretty rough. | ||
Holy Servant says, Dresden gonna go cry in Pat's chat later now, lol. | ||
Yeah, probably. | ||
TakeCover says, do mods have a list of banned words, cringe memes? | ||
They do not. | ||
PewDiePie says, I'm still waiting on your celebration stream, Fuentes. | ||
Ha ha ha, funny. | ||
Funny username. | ||
Timedouts says, Nick, do you think it's important to get a physical exam every year, even if you don't play sports? | ||
Well, why are you asking me? | ||
I don't know. | ||
Thanks for the Ninjagini. | ||
I'm not a doctor. | ||
Holy Servant says, do you know how... I don't get a physical every year. | ||
I don't need that. | ||
Holy Servant says, do you know how Zionists infiltrated USA Evangelic? | ||
What does that mean? | ||
Dax says, the live chat is 50% of the show. | ||
DLive mods are gay. | ||
Okay. | ||
Embro says, lots of gift subs tonight. | ||
Thanks, guys. | ||
Yeah, thanks a lot. | ||
Done for now. | ||
Says, wanna die. | ||
Thanks, timed out. | ||
Okay. | ||
Big Chungus says, this in a blunt. | ||
Cultist Gordon with the Ninjet says, just got my degree in Lemonomics. | ||
I have made so much money. | ||
I bought a jet just for you. | ||
Well, thank you so much for the Ninjet. | ||
Glad to hear you've got your degree in Lemonomics. | ||
That's really great. | ||
Holy Servant says, will website be done before 2021? | ||
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
Okay, all right, yeah, I'm just not really happy with our super chats tonight these suck I'm not happy. | ||
It's 1015 the show is dragged on long before long after it should have With all these garbage, what would even are some of these chats this one in particular? | ||
Do you know how Zionists infiltrated USA evangelic? | ||
What does that mean? | ||
And yes, I do. | ||
You want me to explain it or what? | ||
How Zionists infiltrated the evangelical community, evangelicals, US government. | ||
And yes, I do. | ||
Do you want me to explain? | ||
Or is that a knowledge check? | ||
Hey, knowledge check? | ||
Is Greek mythology based or cringe? | ||
Who asks something like this? | ||
What is the intention? | ||
I'm wondering who is out there and says to themselves, here's a thoughtful message for Nick. | ||
Here's a thoughtful super chat. | ||
Here's a thoughtful question that I'd like answered. | ||
Is Greek mythology based or cringe? | ||
I want to know if Greek mythology is based or cringe. | ||
Cringe. | ||
Is Greece cringe? | ||
Am I cringe, Nick? | ||
Am I based or cringe? | ||
unidentified
|
you're cringe some of these it's just like I don't know man I don't know. | |
Uh, anyway, so yeah, pretty, pretty rough night. | ||
Some of them are good, some of them are bad. | ||
It's a mixed bag, but there's just too many. | ||
The problem on DE Live, it's the, the threshold is lower. | ||
When the Groyper Wars happened, we had to increase the threshold. | ||
We wanted to, because we have all these new people coming in, and naturally a lot of people that, you know, shouldn't. | ||
Maybe we don't need to read their superchats. | ||
And so we were gonna raise the threshold from $2 to like $5, but then we had to go to DLive, and the threshold is lowered from $2 to $1. | ||
Now anyone with $1, $1, is gonna come in and, you know, do a smiley face emoticon, or just say hi, or say pee-pee poo-poo, or whatever. | ||
They're gonna say, uh, what's Switzerland's endgame? | ||
unidentified
|
Right? | |
Yeah, anyway, so so yeah, whatever whatever it's Friday. | ||
Thank God. | ||
It's Friday. | ||
I'm done I washed my hands of this. | ||
I washed my hands of the super chat. | ||
It's good Friday Holy Servant says yes explanation was the implication. | ||
Okay Big Chungus says great myth check like fraternities. | ||
Yeah They call me J.D. | ||
says, just send money. | ||
J.D. | ||
J.D. | ||
my id, my unconscious, J.D., my brother saying what's on my mind. | ||
All right. | ||
Well, that's our last Super Chat. | ||
That's going to do it for us on the show tonight. | ||
Sheesh. | ||
Long week. | ||
It's a long week. | ||
There's no news. | ||
I'm bored. | ||
I'm ready to I don't know. | ||
I'm ready to go off. | ||
So my beard is itching. | ||
My hair is too long. | ||
I'm reaching a boiling point here folks. | ||
I'm not very cozy right now. | ||
But that's going to do it for us on the show tonight. | ||
Remember to follow the channel. | ||
Subscribe to the channel. | ||
Follow the email list. | ||
Sign up for the email list. | ||
NicholasJFuentes.com. | ||
Remember we are on the air Monday through Friday. | ||
7 p.m. | ||
Central, 8 p.m. | ||
Eastern Standard Time. | ||
I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes. | ||
This is America First, as always. | ||
Thanks for watching. | ||
Thanks to our Super Chatters, in particular. | ||
Big, big, big thanks to our Top 3. | ||
Thanks to AKC, Dash, Timed Out, and Cultist Gordon. | ||
Is it Cultist Gordon? | ||
Big thanks to our top three. | ||
Can we get a salute for our top three? | ||
Thanks to those. | ||
Thanks to everybody that superchats. | ||
Thanks to everybody that watches the show. | ||
We love you and I will see you on Monday. | ||
Until then, have a great weekend, have a happy Easter, and have a great rest of your evening. | ||
unidentified
|
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo! | |
It's going to be only America first. | ||
America first. | ||
The American people will come first once again. | ||
America first! |