Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 11, 2020 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

02:26:37

President Trump Unveils New $4.8 Trillion Budget Proposal | America First Ep. 543

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:57:01

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		not globalism will be our freedom not
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		interested in I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified		Not even once.
		Guy, I've never heard of McFudge.
		I've never heard of a big one.
		Just that.
		I've never heard of a big one.
		I've never heard of a big one.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I've never heard of a big one.
unidentified		Who's that?
		We'll be right back.
		...and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism will be our freedom!
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Recognition that globalism will be our freedom.
		We'll be right back.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl, you know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
		No e-girls.
		Never!
		Hashtag never e-girls.
		Not even once.
unidentified		I've never heard of McQuadden.
		What is that?
		Americanism, not globalism.
		We'll be our freedom.
		I've never heard of McQuadden.
		Who's that?
		I've never heard of McQuadden.
		I've never heard of McQuadden.
		and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		Americanism, not globalism, not globalism, will be our credo.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
unidentified		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified		Not even once.
		I've never heard of Nick Bunch.
		It's just that.
		Americanism, not globalism.
		We'll be our freedom.
		I've never heard of Nick Bunch.
		Who's that?
		Thank you.
		Thank you.
		and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		Americanism, not globalism, will not globalism, will be our freedom. will be our freedom.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl, you know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
unidentified		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified		Not even once.
		I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
		What is that?
		Americanism, not globalism.
		We'll be our freedom.
		I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
		Who's that?
		and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		Americanism, not globalism, not globalism, will be our credo.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
unidentified		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Not even once.
unidentified		Guy, I've never heard of him.
		What is that?
		Americanism, not globalism. not globalism.
		Will be our freedom. Will be our freedom.
		Will be our freedom.
		Will be our freedom.
		An older generation.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
unidentified		No e-girls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Who's got the clip?
unidentified		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified		Not even once.
		I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
		Who's that?
		I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
		I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
unidentified		Who's that?
		Thank you.
		Thank you.
		...and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		not globalism, will be our credo.
		We'll be right back.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
unidentified		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified		Not even once.
		Guy, I've never heard of him.
		I've never heard of Bigfoot.
		What is that?
		Americanism, not globalism. not globalism.
		We'll be our freedom.
		I've never heard of Bigfoot.
		Who's that?
		and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo. will be our credo.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry for you, Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
unidentified		No e-girls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Never!
		Hashtag never e-girls.
		Not even once.
unidentified		Guy, I've never heard of Bigfoot.
		He's just that.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		I've never heard of Nick Clutch.
		Who's that?
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		If you're not interested, I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl, you know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America.
		America first. America first. America first. America first.
		America first.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You are watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Monday for another week of the show.
		And there's a lot to talk about tonight.
		Lots to talk about after this weekend.
		We've got a pretty exciting show.
		I have to say though...
		You know, there's been a lot going on this past week, but nothing really like huge, you know?
		There's a lot that's happening, but yet the featured story is about the budget, which is boring.
		So there's a lot to discuss, but it's like a lot of little things.
		It's a lot of baby stories.
		So we'll talk about a few things and then we'll talk about the budget and that's our featured story tonight is the White House's budget proposal for 2021 fiscal year 2021 which was released today and it's pretty standard stuff it's a 4.8 trillion dollar budget it includes 4.4 trillion dollars in budget cuts over the next 15 years
		And it's got the usual more money for the military, less money for education, for the EPA, two billion dollars for a border wall which is disappointing, and there are some other features and we'll go over everything that's in it and what it means about the administration.
		Something to keep in mind about the budget proposal by the president, it really doesn't mean much.
		I'm not going to say it doesn't mean anything, but the budget that we see that the president proposes after the State of the Union, this is only a proposal.
		And as such, it's really only meant to reflect the priorities of the administration as opposed to resembling any kind of a final deal.
		So we're gonna look at it and we'll reflect on what those priorities are, what that means for the White House, but it's not like this is probably what the budget's gonna look like.
		Because of course you've got the Democrats that control the House and they get to weigh in and they get to decide what's gonna be in the budget, it's not just the President.
		We'll get into that.
unidentified		You know, I'm not like... Does that sound interesting?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm not like thrilled to talk about that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I guess they're getting this coronavirus thing under control.
unidentified		Great!
unidentified		That's awesome!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		They're getting the coronavirus thing under control.
		I heard that the factories are starting to open again and Xi Jinping made a public appearance.
		I was hoping that he was like underground somewhere.
		I was hoping that he had fled the country.
		Because you hear about these stories where they say, where are the elites?
		We haven't seen the elites in so many months.
unidentified		They're preparing for something big!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So I was hoping, I don't know, maybe Xi Jinping is like underground, maybe he's in outer space, maybe he's in an ark in the ocean, and he's waiting out, he knows something that we don't.
unidentified		But no!
unidentified		He's still around and he's touring Beijing.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, I guess it's looking up over there.
		People are going back to work so the economic situation is going to be fine.
		That's terrific.
		So that means tonight we're talking about the budget and not, you know, global pandemic.
		So that's our featured story.
		We're going to be talking also about A story from South Dakota, which I don't know if you've seen this.
		It's sort of a smaller story, not like a huge deal, but in South Dakota they were considering a bill that would have criminalized using hormone treatments on juveniles.
		We've been talking a lot about this this past year or so, about in the case of James Younger for example.
		These young kids, you know, sometimes seven, eight years old, where the parents will put them on hormone replacement therapy trying to get them to become transsexual.
		And it's always so ridiculous because we all know children.
		We were all children ourselves.
		Everybody knows that if a little boy or little girl says, oh, I'm a girl or I'm a boy or whatever, this is part of the socialization process.
		It's not indicative of some kind of gender orientation, some deviancy.
		Obviously.
		And it's a good thing when you see these laws being proposed in more conservative states that target this practice because in a lot of cases you're just at the mercy of the parents.
		In the case of James Younger, which we talked about and he ended up being okay, we talked about that very famous publicized case, I think it was around summer or fall 2019, If it weren't for a huge outcry from conservative media, this was a case of an eight-year-old boy who was just at the mercy of his mother, who was going to put him on these drugs in spite of the fact that he was not trans, anything like that.
		And you know, even if he identified that way, I don't think chemically castrating is a great idea at that age, or any age for that matter.
		In any case, there was going to be this law in South Dakota criminalizing this stuff.
		And it actually failed in the Senate.
		It got killed in the Senate committee, the South Dakota Senate committee, by Republicans!
		Republicans killed this bill and, and this is what we'll talk about, the reason why the Republicans killed it.
		One of the Republican senators who shot down this bill said that it wasn't the place of the government to decide something like this.
		It was a family issue.
		That's right folks.
		If you are a mother or a father and you want to chemically castrate your prepubescent child, that's your business!
		This is what Republicans believe in 2020.
		This is what conservatives believe in 2020.
		This is the extent that they are taking this liberty, freedom-loving, Crazy libertarian ideology.
		Yeah.
		Thank God for Republicans keeping big government out of your house when you're trying to chemically castrate your eight-year-old son.
		So we'll get into that.
		We'll talk about what's happening in South Dakota and these disgraceful Republicans and everything that that's about.
		That should be a little bit, I think, more interesting than the budgetary process.
		So those will be our two main stories.
		Before we get into that, there's a couple of other things I just want to throw out there.
		Some housekeeping things and then some Interesting items.
		Some items of curiosity that I've seen online in the news.
		First of all, the first thing I want to address is AFPAC, the America First Political Action Conference.
		As you know, we are doing an event concurrently with CPAC.
		We're hosting our own conference Friday, February 28th in Washington DC.
		It's the same weekend as CPAC, which, if you don't know, CPAC is the big conservative political convention every year.
		I've been there twice now.
		And so it's gonna be Michelle Malkin, me, Scott Greer, Patrick Casey will be emceeing.
		It's gonna be a lot of high-profile guests, and I had announced this event I think just two weeks ago, but within one week we got close to a thousand applications.
		A crazy amount of emails, the volume, so many people interested in attending.
		And I regrettably had to announce this weekend that we had sent out all the confirmation emails.
		Unfortunately, we were only able to accommodate a fraction of the 1,000 people.
		I don't think anybody... We anticipated there'd be a lot of interest, but, you know, we're just not gonna be able to host 1,000 people anywhere near there, so...
		If you didn't get an email, you're not going to be able to go.
		If you did get an email, congratulations!
		You're going to attend.
		And I do just want to put this out there because I saw some sort of mixed reactions to this announcement that, you know, we had closed the application process and we were at, I mean, we're at like over max capacity.
		There's like a maximum occupancy for our venue and we're actually a little bit over than that.
		We're a little bit over that.
		So, I mean, we really can't even squeeze any more people.
		And I wanted to talk about that because, like I said, there were some people online who were very upset that they didn't get in.
		Some people are salty.
		Some people are like mad at me.
		Some people were just disappointed and I want to say obviously, you know, you're entitled to feel disappointed.
		We are sorry that we can't accommodate everybody.
		I just hope that if you are disappointed that you can't attend or you couldn't attend Kruiper Leadership Summit or both, I just hope that you will bear in mind and keep in mind that this is a obviously growing movement.
		You know, the Groyper War at the end of 2019 was really this huge, like, big bang, sort of, uh, I don't know what you would call that, like a pivotal boiling point moment for the America First movement, and we are Trying to build something, you know, so I hope that people are not upset that we can't accommodate a thousand people for the inaugural, I mean the first AFPAC.
		We are still trying to figure these things out and also, you know, not only is it that we're figuring these things out and trying to, you know, hold events and things like that, but also you have to keep in mind that we are grappling with challenges that nobody else has to grapple with.
		if you're a mainstream conservative organization obviously you can rent any venue anywhere and for the most part not have to worry about antifa and in some cases they do but more than that also don't have to worry about journalists Other nefarious actors trying to cause problems.
	So the reason we've had to keep these events small, like the Groyper Summit was relatively small, this conference is going to be relatively small.
	The reason, you know, not only are we this fledgling movement and we're growing and we're figuring things out and so on, but the reason it has to be small is because we're grappling with the challenges of trying to accommodate security, privacy, all those things.
	You know, for example, If we just open it up, General Admission, and we announce the address, well, number one, you could get people that are going to call the address and say, hey, there's a neo-Nazi gathering, and a hotel is going to shut us down, or a big venue is going to shut us down.
	You know, that's a problem.
	or number two we do it publicly in a bigger venue and you know even if they don't cancel us even if they don't call in threats or whatever which has happened before which happened with Miami we could get journalists that might show up or other people that might show up and say hey why are you here taking pictures of attendees whatever So those are some of the challenges that are uniquely ours as a nationalist, dissident, reactionary movement.
	And it's because of those challenges that we have to take extra precautions and have to be extra careful and ensure that none of that happens.
	And that's why we have to vet everybody that comes through and we have to constrict the amount of people that are attending.
	So I just hope everybody is understanding about that.
	And if you're not, well, you know, then get over it.
	Grow up, okay?
	We have to be adults about this.
	The good news is I've been talking with the other, like, you know, people, Patrick Casey and Vince and Steve and Jake and all the people involved in the planning of these events and all the people that were involved in Groyper Wars.
	And what I'd like to do, and this was my idea, I'd like to do this.
	I don't want to take credit, but it was my idea.
	What I'd like to do is a huge event in the summer because we have to rectify this.
	We have to make it up for the people that haven't been able to attend these events.
	I feel bad because of the Groyper Summit with this one.
	I feel like we're telling like 90% of the attendees you're not going to be able to come and that's not cool.
	You know, I don't like letting everybody down.
	I don't like disappointing people.
	People are willing to spend money and fly out, and they want to participate, and that's great.
	And so far, because of these constraints, which I hope you understand, we haven't been able to accommodate as many people as we'd like to, or as many people that are interested.
	So, and I don't know how viable or doable this is going to be.
	I don't want to make a huge promise, but what I'd like to do is over the summer, I'd like to really make a concerted effort to do a big event where everybody wants to come, can come, And I'm thinking maybe this time it'll be in like Texas or a real conservative stronghold.
	Because another problem with D.C.
	is D.C.
	is like a hotbed of leftism, Antifa, but also Conservative Inc., Heritage, Creatures, all these characters.
	So I'd like to make it up at some point this year by doing a big event.
	And with that in mind, maybe you can forgive me.
	Maybe you can feel a little bit better if you got rejected.
	But, you know, I don't want that to be a damper on things.
	It's a good problem to have.
	You know, there's so much demand, there's so much interest at this point, and we are just scrambling to build up the resources and logistics and everything to make it happen in a very short amount of time, because this America First thing is moving very quickly.
	So, but we're managing it well.
	So, just wanted to let you guys know, a lot of people have been asking me, oh, did you send out the invites?
	Whatever.
	If you didn't get an email, you're not gonna go.
	We did send out all the confirmation emails at this point.
	So, there's that.
	The other housekeeping thing I wanted to talk about is for tomorrow's show.
	Tomorrow is the New Hampshire primary and the polls close at 7 o'clock central, which is when this show starts every night at exactly that time.
	It's so convenient the way that works out.
	I was looking up when did the polls close and it says they close between 7 and 8 p.m.
	Eastern time, which 8 p.m. Eastern time is 7 central.
	And coincidentally, that is exactly the time when this show begins every night.
	So tomorrow we're going to be starting the show at 7 o'clock and, you know, we'll probably do the usual introduction, maybe one story, and we'll be able to watch the results come in for the New Hampshire primary tomorrow.
	We'll do it live just like with the Iowa caucus last week, only this time I hope we actually You know last week I was so excited we were all prepared I had beverages and you know I had my New York Times dashboard set up on the monitor and then it was like five it was like 5,000 hours 127 hours and we never got the results.
	So hopefully tomorrow we get the results, but special show tomorrow if you're interested.
	It's kind of a big night, you know, because the Iowa thing was a fluke, so this will be like our first legitimate, real, hopefully, contest in the Democratic primary.
	Okay, so those are our major housekeeping things.
	One item of interest, curiosity, before we dive into the news, I saw this tweet today, and maybe you saw it, maybe you didn't, I put it on my timeline, but I saw this tweet today by Joe Scarborough, who is the host of Morning Joe, the show on MSNBC.
	You probably know him.
	I think he was, what, like a Republican congressman years ago?
	I don't really know his backstory.
	I'm not one of these, you know, hyper... I do a political show, but I'm not one of these, like, hyper political people.
	I think he was a congressman at one point, and he was a Republican, but he's on MSNBC.
	Well-known guy, obviously.
	If you're a political person, you know Joe Scarborough.
	But I saw this tweet from him today, and it was just...
	I just don't even know what to do anymore.
	Every time I see something like this, it's worse than the last time.
	Because I just don't know what to do!
	And I'll read you the tweet.
	Maybe you'll get where I'm coming from.
	He tweets out today, quote, Democrats have won the popular vote six out of the last seven elections.
	They won a record landslide in 2018.
	Demographics are a freight train carrying them into the future.
	The GOP's actions will accelerate their collapse.
	The future belongs to Democrats if they work hard and focus on 2020.
	Do you see it?
	Like...
	And it's incredible to me because I feel like the whole reason that I'm ostracized by Republicans and conservatives and Young Americans for Freedom and Turning Point USA and the Republican Party and everybody associated with me is treated the same way Is because we talk about demographics.
	We talk about how demographics are driving the future of our country and not in a good direction, I should add.
	That's the reason.
	That is like the lodestar, is that the word?
	That is like the foundation of our ideology or the foundation of our political orientation At least what differentiates us from the rest of the conservatives and why they hate us is because we are willing to say no, it's not entitlement mentality, it's not the deficit, it's not socialism, it's not taxes.
	It's demographics!
	It's that you've got all these people coming here, and people that don't know how to live here, people that don't speak the language, and even if they do speak the language, they're stabbing, and killing, and stealing, and shooting, and even if they're not even doing any of that, they've got bad manners, or they're chewing too loud in the cafeteria.
	They're just not us!
	And they're coming from terrible places.
	Maybe that is an indicator of what the country's gonna look like, right?
	That's the whole deal.
	And so in light of the fact that we're continually ostracized, we're made on the fringes and marginalized, made out to be like the worst people in the society.
	You're a white nationalist if you talk about this.
	You're a neo-nazi if you talk about this.
	I know you've heard this all before.
	But yet the left will acknowledge this, and even in many cases the right, will acknowledge this every day of the week like it's no big deal.
	Do you know what I'm saying?
	Joe Scarborough says, well, Democrats are crushing Republicans in the popular vote.
	Why?
	Because of demographics.
	Demographics are a freight train.
	What is the connotation of a freight train?
	Unstoppable.
	Powerful.
	Huge momentum.
unidentified		Heavy.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Steel.
		It's forceful.
		Nothing can stand in its way.
unidentified		Inevitable.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I mean, that's what a freight train is.
		And he's saying that demographics like a freight train are bearing down on Republicans, bearing down on white America.
		They are sending the Democrats into total political domination in the future.
unidentified		That is nothing that we don't say on this show, right?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And he puts that out and the New York Times puts that out and the Atlantic puts that out and everybody talks about this on their side and smugly and They're celebrating it and they acknowledge it because it's math and everybody knows it's happening.
		And we say, yeah, like, okay, sure.
		Democrats say demographics are gonna be the freight train that delivers them and, you know, whatever.
		That's gonna be their ace in the hole.
		Democrats will never lose because of demographics.
		Hey, maybe we should stop the demographic change that's driving Democrats to victory because, you know, we don't like what the Democrats stand for.
unidentified		Boo!
unidentified		White Nationalists!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		This neo-nazi is allowed to be on Twitter and he's verified?
unidentified		Get this guy out of here!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, Benny Johnson writes a 15 tweet thread trying to call me all sorts of names.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Michelle Malkin blacklisted from the movement.
unidentified		What?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I just... And you know, it's not anything new.
		We've been seeing this for the past like three years and you know it goes back to things like Charlottesville and People like Peter Brimelow or Jared Taylor, this is nothing new.
		This kind of stuff has been going on for like 30 years.
		White people and reactionaries and nativists, immigration restrictionists will stand up and point out the obvious and say, this is math, this is history, we know what's going to happen.
		Immigration, demographic change is inevitable, it is in motion, and we know what the consequences of it will be.
		And we are totally ashamed for that.
		It's evil to have that opinion, which isn't even a prescription.
		It's a description of what's happening.
		You're evil for observing what is happening.
		But the left says the same thing, and it's like, no big deal.
		So I saw that.
		It's just more of the same.
		You know, it's just incredible that, you know, you wake up And some days you're like, am I wrong?
		Maybe I'm wrong.
		I was thinking about it the other day.
		I was driving around and thinking to myself, like, on a weird level, I would like to be wrong.
		On some level, I wish that the country wasn't going to Turn into literal hell on earth because of demographic changes that are unstoppable.
		Because that's a pretty bleak future.
		And on a certain level, maybe it's the 80% white, maybe it's the Christian Universalist.
		Maybe it would be nice if everybody could get along, right?
		I mean, it would be nice if everybody could get along and America could welcome everybody in and they would just learn how to behave and everything.
		But that's not going to happen.
		But I know it's not going to happen.
		And, you know, some days you'd like to believe the left when they say, oh, you know, that's just a fever dream, or a conspiracy theory, or it's hateful, or whatever, and maybe we could just, you know, join into this delusion, but then you see tweets like this and you remember, oh no, I mean, obviously this is totally legitimate.
		Because I feel like it's gaslighting at this point, which is what we get from the media.
		It's just outright gaslighting.
		You will say one thing and they will tell you that's not happening.
		You're crazy for believing that while they say the exact same thing and they're smug about it.
		So anyway, so I saw that tweet.
		It's uh, you know, just interesting to remark upon, but we're gonna move on and get into the actual news here.
		Our first story is about the South Dakota bill.
		And I'll admit, I didn't read too much about all that was entailed here.
		I only saw this story today.
		Somebody linked it to me on Twitter, and I usually get annoyed.
		Whenever people tag me on Twitter, usually I'm just like, annoyed.
unidentified		I'm like, stop, why would you bother me?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Which is like, you know, why have a Twitter if people can't interact with you?
		But anyway, so somebody actually shared this story with me on Twitter, and I couldn't believe it.
		Well, I mean, I guess I could believe it, but it was outrageous.
		I'll read you.
		This is a report from a local source in South Dakota.
		Like I said, there was this bill that was going to criminalize certain aspects of these transgender hormone treatments for young people, but it was shut down by Republicans in a Senate subcommittee.
		And I'll read you the report.
		It says, quote, a Senate committee on Monday rejected a bill that would have prohibited medical professionals from providing hormone treatments and gender confirmation surgeries to transgender youths.
		The decision by the Senate Health and Human Services Committee followed emotional testimony from both advocates and opponents of the bill.
		About 20 opponents who rallied against the proposed legislation prior to the hearing helped pack the hearing room where the crowd filled the floor space and spilled out into the hallway.
		The vote was 5-2.
		Here's the best part.
		Here's the kicker.
		Senator Wayne Steinhauser, who is a Republican, made the motion to defeat the bill.
		So the bill that was supposed to prohibit doctors from performing what really amounts to chemical castrations or surgical castrations on children, a Republican voted to defeat that bill.
		He called it a gut-wrenching issue.
		Please.
		It's literally a gut-wrenching issue.
		That's what it is.
		That's what it entails.
		A child is brought into a is brought into a room and they literally wrench their guts and hormones around with scalpels and knives or pills.
		Anyway, wasn't that very clever?
		That was a pretty clever turn of phrase.
		Gut-wrenching.
		Sort of like what you're doing.
		But one that should be left with families and not the legislature.
		He says it's a gut-wrenching issue, but one that should be left with families and not the legislature.
		He says, quote, I believe the building block of society is the family.
unidentified		And this to me is the story.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We know what's been going on.
		We know the left, progressives, They, the globalists, have been driving these deviant practices, just horrible, ghastly procedures.
		It started with, well, you know, we could go way back, but it was the homosexuality, it was the gay marriage, and then it was transgender acceptance, and now, if the transgender acceptance wasn't enough, if the gay marriage wasn't enough, Now it's transgender surgeries on children.
		Like it wasn't enough that they got acceptance for these freaks that you see, like that Charlotte Clymer, Charlotte Clymer character and all these others.
		These like freakish, ghoulish looking men with makeup.
		You know, these pigs in lipstick.
		But no, now they have to be chopping up the genitals of children.
		We know that's been going on.
		And that's not to minimize it.
		That's not to like, you know, normalize that at all.
		But it is to say that that's sort of where we are as a society.
		And we've seen that.
		But the story in this case is that here you have a solution being presented in a conservative state.
		And this is, by the way, it's fascinating to me.
		There's so many levels to this.
		This is what we're told by conservatives all the time.
		Whenever we want to create the kind of society that is decent and orderly and healthy and safe and all those things, what are we told by the Republicans?
		Well, it's not the government's duty to do that because of a thing called the Constitution.
		You know, you can't create a moral society through government mandate because the government is just supposed to collect your money and give it to minorities.
		That's the only... Well, they don't say that, but that is in effect what it is.
		The government has limited roles.
		Read the Constitution.
		Where do you get the right from the Bill of Rights to do that?
		You know, and that's always what we hear.
		So they say it's a state's issue.
		You know, it's a state issue when it comes to all these things.
		Well, the best we could do is bring it down to the states.
		When we talk about abortion, when we talk about weed, when we talk about all these different things, can we ban it at the federal level?
		No, but you can delegate it to the states.
		Okay, well in this case, you know, for this Federalist argument that we hear from Republicans, the least we could do with our government is to govern our states the way we want.
		That's what all these people have a hard on for the framers tell us, is that we have a Republican, you know, the framers created this laboratory of democracy where you can have policies that are the way you like them in one state and another way in another state, and here you have South Dakota, which couldn't be more conservative, which couldn't be more white and Christian.
		And all the good stuff.
		And they have a bill that says, yeah, in South Dakota, we don't want transgender surgeries on our children.
		We don't want transgender hormone treatments on children because that is not, that is not decent.
		That is not moral.
		That is sick.
		That is satanic.
		This is what the devil wants.
		The devil, literally Satan himself, wants doctors to be going into children's private business with scalpels and knives and all that.
		And here you have a bill that says we will prohibit this horrible, I mean it's like insane that this is even going on in the 21st century, that will prohibit this terrible practice.
		And who stands athwart it?
		It's not the Democrats.
		It's not the Jewish ACLU, although they did, you know, challenge this rule.
		It's not the Democrats.
		It's not your, you know, whatever, SPLC, whoever it is.
		It's a Republican.
		A Republican brought forward the motion to defeat the bill.
		And what's even more amazing, which is not surprising that this happens because Republicans have been doing this forever.
		Now this is something to think about.
		Republicans have been in control for like decades.
		Think about it.
		Think about how many years Republicans have controlled the House of Representatives, the Senate, the Presidency.
		We controlled the Presidency since 2016.
		Eight years, obviously, 2000 to 2008.
		We had it with Reagan all the way through Bush.
		I mean, we've controlled the presidency, I think, a little bit more than half the time since 1980.
		And if you look at the House of Representatives, it's a blowout.
		And with the Senate, it's a little bit more mixed.
		And we haven't, like, we haven't had any progress, and we also haven't stopped the progress of the left.
		So it's not surprising that you see this, but the kicker to me is the argument that he makes.
		That, to me, is like the grand irony.
		That, to me, is just the icing on the cake, so to speak.
		He says that it's a gut-wrenching issue, which is an understatement.
		You see these children, like James Younger, Children.
	People that are the most helpless, the most vulnerable in the society.
	It's children, it's babies, and you've got women, or you've got, I guess just bad parents in general, that want to do these horrible things, just mutilating them.
	Think of the quality of life.
	I mean, a person is a child, and they're vulnerable and helpless, but they have to live the rest of their life.
	Think about what that does to a person when at seven, eight years old, somebody's messing around with that, or messing around with your hormones.
	You don't recover from that.
	If somebody, and in the case of like James Younger, these chemical castrations they call them, the hormone treatments, what they do is they prescribe medication that will thwart puberty.
	And you only get to go through puberty once.
	You only get that process happening one time.
	If you're on some kind of pill regimen or something like that, During puberty, or you're messing with your hormones in that critical stage of development, you don't get a do-over.
	You just become some weird, stunted freak, and you have to live with that for the rest of your life.
	And in a lot of cases, that could leave men in a position where they're infertile.
	It could mess with their testosterone.
	It can mess with all kinds.
	They don't reach their full development in terms of height, or size, or other features, maturation.
	And so think of what the kind of life that you're that you're sentencing a person to with these chemical treatments at that age.
	It's a horrible it's like it's it's just a terrible thing.
	Gut-wrenching is like the understatement of the year when you're talking about this or worse yet when they do these surgeries or procedures.
	I don't want to get into it but if you've ever looked up an animation of what is done during these gender transition surgeries
	And you know viewer discretion is advised if you want to look something up like that But I saw it and it's like it makes you want to vomit makes you want to throw up the kinds of Maneuvers that are done the kinds of things to create genitalia out of you know other genitalia It's sick, and you hear all the all kinds of stories of post-op transsexuals where they're killing themselves It's worse than before or whatever you know they start out mentally ill and then it's like they have all these health complications constant surgeries and
	Anyway, I don't want to get into vulgar and graphic detail on that.
	In any case, he says it's a gut-wrenching issue, but it's one that should be left with families and not the legislature.
	Family is the building block of the society, and it takes some balls on this guy to blame it on the family.
	You know, to put this on, oh well, at the end of the day, I'm just a family guy.
	I'm just a family man.
	Why do I not want children to be protected with the force of law?
	Well, because I'm a family man.
	Oh, you know, somebody like this... What are we supposed to do with somebody like this?
	Honestly, it's bad enough.
	In some ways, progressives are almost better, because progressives don't believe in God.
	They're completely amoral, if not outright immoral.
	They think that this stuff is progress.
	They think it's good.
	So, and that, you know, that's not to say that it's good to be that way, but at least it's sort of consistent.
	At least it's upfront about what it is.
	But you've got a Republican and he's just trying to pass this off as family values?
	No, I will not protect my children with the force of law because I just believe in the family.
	Oh, come on.
	Somebody like this... I don't know what you do with somebody like that, but...
	This, at the end of the day, is how Republicans think.
	When he says it's not a matter of the legislature, it's a matter of family, you know, this is in a lot of ways not really any different from the argument that the left makes about abortion.
	Think about it.
	And then apply that logic to everything that's happening, all the moral decay in the society.
	What does the left argue about abortion?
	Since Roe v. Wade and before Roe v. Wade, the mainstream argument, and up until very recently, the mainstream argument from the left was, we are not pro-abortion, we don't like abortion, and again, I'm speaking about like,
	mainstream you know obviously you have and increasingly it's becoming mainstream left-wing people that are saying no abortion is good and you should get as many you know so i'm not saying that doesn't exist or that's not you know becoming more prevalent and prominent but for a long time presidential candidates i'm talking like major figures They would never say outright they're in favor of abortion.
	They would say they're in favor of the right to choose.
	This is like what Pete Buttigieg says.
	This is what they say during the Democratic debates.
	Oh, it's a horrible decision for a mother to have to make.
	Buttigieg says, I caught this on Twitter the other day in one of these town halls.
	He said, but I don't trust the government to make that decision.
	It's a personal decision, and it's a hard, terrible, it's a horrible, could you imagine?
	It's a gut-wrenching, just like this guy.
	It's a gut-wrenching decision, but I trust a woman, I trust a family to do its best and not the government.
	And of course, what is our response to this?
	That's a human life.
	Abortion is murder.
	It's not up to the parents, it's not up to the family to abort their child.
	It's up to them to decide to conceive a child, and then it's not their choice anymore.
	You create life, you conceive life, and then that is a person, and then that is on its way to becoming a human person.
	And any kind of interference after that fact is murder, is taking a life.
	In the same way that you are not able to kill your baby six months after it's born, That's a terrible gut-wrenching decision, but this baby just wouldn't stop crying so I had to chop its head off.
	No, that would be infanticide.
	That would be murder.
	The state protects vulnerable people and all people from murder.
	Protects people's life and their liberty and all the rest, right?
	So no, it's not up to the family.
	And it's not a matter of liberty.
	It's not a matter of the Constitution.
	It's a matter of the most basic function of the law, which is to protect people from harm, from antagonisms, transgressions.
	And the same is true of this.
	This legislator says, well, it's a gut-wrenching decision, but I trust the family.
	To decide what?
	To permanently thwart and chemically castrate a prepubescent child?
	You would think in the same way that a baby in the womb or a fetus in the womb would have the right to see that pregnancy, to see that birth, go all the way through it and become a person.
	In the same way, wouldn't you then say that that baby or child has the right To go through puberty unimpeded?
	Do you understand what I'm saying?
	In the same way that a fetus, a pre-born baby has the right to become born and become a human being in the same way a person has a right to unimpeded biological development?
	I think that goes without saying.
	That should be a given.
	Who are the parents to stand in the way of that?
	That's a horrible thing.
	You wouldn't say that a parent has the right to chop off your kid's fingers and toes.
	You wouldn't say that a parent has the right to cut off their ear, stab them, put them on heroin.
	That doesn't make any sense.
	You're doing harm to the child.
	And a child, by the way, who can't protect themselves, totally at your mercy.
	And so of course it's the state's role to protect them, and that's the minimum.
	That is the minimum.
	That should be like the base expectation of every person, regardless of ideology, regardless of political orientation, alignment, anything like that.
	That should be like the basic, in the same way that you believe that, you know, the government should say you can't go out and murder people.
	It should be along those same lines.
	And then it should actually be taken a lot further.
	We should take the protection of children much further beyond that and look at all kinds of things.
	Look at what's on television, what's on the internet, we should look at what's in the water, what's in the food, we should look at medications.
	I mean, there's a whole host of things we could look at for the government to protect.
	But this is the new dividing line between these libertarian-minded conservatives and America First conservatives.
	Christians, decent people, people that kind of get it.
	Libertarians put this bullshit ideology ahead of the common good, or even in this case, the individual good.
	They would rather see children be chemically castrated than like their conception of liberty be violated.
	That's really how they think.
	And years ago, we used to laugh about this.
	I remember there was a Libertarian presidential debate in 2012.
	And the moderator asked the Libertarian candidates about driving.
	It was Larry Elder.
	He says, you know, should we have driver's licenses to drive a car?
	And all the Libertarians, hell no!
unidentified		No way!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Do I need a license to use a toaster?
		I mean, just like insane stuff.
		There was another question, I think from the audience, where somebody said, should it be legal for somebody to give heroin to a baby?
		And all the Libertarian candidates said, of course it should be legal.
		You shouldn't do it, but it should be legal.
		And we used to laugh at that.
		Years ago, we used to think that was funny because, obviously, it's ridiculous.
		And you didn't need an academic debate to show why that's ridiculous.
		You didn't need to invite David French and invite Sora Bomari and invite all these characters and have some faggy symposium and invoke Burke and philosophers and bring in data to explain why that's not something we should have in our society.
		It was just obvious.
		It was just ridiculous to say anything other than that.
		But this is what we have created.
		We do have, and this is the mainstream position, this contingent of Republicans that have put this idea of the market, or freedom, or liberty, the Constitution, ahead of what we know to be the best for society.
		You know America First doesn't just mean like about foreign policy.
		Often America First is invoked when we talk about like the interest of the United States government or the interest of the United States abroad as compared to the interests of corporations or Israel or Mexico or whatever.
		Right, or in the context of trade even.
		We talk about putting American workers first instead of immigrants, migrant workers, foreign workers through free trade, things like that.
		But it's more than that.
		America First is about putting the welfare of America, the country, the welfare of the people first.
		And so when we're thinking about putting the welfare of the people first, well, what does that look like?
		That means that we have to have a population that is strong and healthy and virtuous.
		Public virtue is really at the core of America First.
		Putting America First means the good of the society, the public welfare, and the only way to ensure the public welfare is public virtue.
		Men with good character in particular, but also everybody else, And obviously, things like this, and there's a whole host of other things which are probably less offensive to most people, but things like drugs, things like pornography, all these things that these libertarian conservatives say, you have a right to do, you have a right to try them, this is your idea, you know, or it's up to the states, but it's not up to the government.
		That's really the key distinction.
		From our axiom, we say things that are going to hurt the public good, things that are going to thwart the development of our people, should be prohibited.
		They should be stopped, or at the bare minimum there should be harsh regulations, extreme penalties, things like that.
		Obviously.
		In the case of this, if a doctor gets caught castrating a child, they should be put in jail.
		If parents consent to a doctor doing this to a child, they should be put in jail or heavily fined.
		This should go without saying.
		But libertarians say, well, this is not the purview of the state.
		This is not the purview of the government.
		We should not address these things with the force of law.
		It's just up to everybody to decide whether they will destroy lives, whether they will do things that are corrosive and ultimately detrimental to the society, or not.
		And what do you think is the consequence of that ideology?
		People are choosing the wrong things.
		People are choosing suicide.
		In some cases, literally.
		In some cases, it's things that are metaphorically suicide for them, and they're a particular case.
		But, overall, we're talking about people choosing, as a society, to commit suicide.
		Our society is committing suicide.
		And we should not give them that choice.
		I'm sorry, but you're not permitted to kill civilization.
		That should go without saying, just like a host of everything else that builds up to that, right?
		So I saw that story today in South Dakota and I saw that quote and it just stuck with me and I thought that this is really... and there it is.
		Therein lies where we are with the American right and with the whole country in general.
		But particularly with these fake conservatives.
		Conservative Inc.
		Libertarian conservatives.
		It's this idea of we have no moral conviction.
		We don't want to enforce our morals.
		It's just a big free-for-all.
		And, you know, injustice, evil, satanic influence can go by unimpeded.
		That's up to you.
		By all means, everybody just, you know, fend for yourselves.
		You want to let Satan through the front door, take over this country?
		hey, just as long as you stay out of my living room, what does it matter with these people?
		It's insanity.
		So that's South Dakota.
		This guy, Steinhauser, ultimately initiates.
		I mean, he wasn't the only vote, but he was the one who initiated the motion to shut down this bill.
		And as a result, I'm sure a lot of people have their lives ruined, and you've got to wonder, does there have to be some kind of cosmic balance sheet?
		You know what I'm saying?
	Here you have a guy who initiates a motion to stop a bill that would save people from having their lives destroyed.
	You know, they will be mutilated, they will be castrated, they will not go through puberty because this guy shut down a bill that would have prohibited doctors from doing that to these people.
	And you gotta wonder, like, in some capacity, should there be a cosmic sort of balance there?
	Where do the scales weigh there?
	This man initiated a motion that will ruin a multiplicity, multiple people's lives.
	And, you know, is there going to be an answer for that?
	Should there be a cost for that?
	Because you'll have a lot of innocent children who will bear the cost for his actions, and it seems like he will not bear the cost for his actions.
	I'm sure that's fine, you know, and this is why we are where we are, is people that are kind of like unaccountable.
	People that are doing really horrible things, and we can see it, by the way.
	It's not like it's a question of culpability or blame.
	We can assign blame very easily.
	But you have these people in power who are just doing these horrible things, and there's no price to pay for doing horrible things.
	And that's why we get horrible things.
	But that's what's happening in South Dakota.
	His name is Wayne Steinhauser.
	But we're gonna move on and talk about the budget.
	We've already flown through most of the time, and we're just arriving at our featured story.
	But it's a very important story, an important point to make.
	But we're gonna move on and talk about our featured story.
	We'll talk about this budget here.
unidentified		Not my favorite topic.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm kind of, you know, on some level, I'm good at this show because I'm good at talking and I'm smart.
		But on another level, I was never really made to be like a mainstream content creator, because on some level, to be a mainstream content creator, you have to be a salesman.
		You really got to sell it.
		You know what I mean?
		When you do your outro for the show, you got to say with enthusiasm, Smash the like button, smash the subscribe button.
		Don't forget to check out my link.
		You know, you got to sell it.
		There's nothing wrong with that.
		I mean, that's how you perpetuate it as a business and you expand your reach and so on.
		But I just don't have that in me.
		On some level to be successful, I imagine, you have to be somebody that's going to come on reliably every day and say everything is the biggest news in the world.
		It's the biggest, it's the most exciting, the most interesting.
		And I see this budget stuff and I'm like...
unidentified		I can't, I can't, I can't.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's not exciting, it's boring, but we're gonna talk about it.
		But hey, but we're here and I have to give you a show, so we're gonna talk about this budget... Yeah, good job Nick.
		We're gonna talk about this budget deal.
		Like I said, so the president every year... the budgetary process doesn't even work the way it's supposed to.
		The way it's supposed to work is that in the beginning of the year the President outlines a budget proposal and you'll have people from the Congress that will take this proposal and they will sort of build like a proposal that like kind of matches it.
		They'll have like an answer for it and then there's this process of debate.
		All the budgetary bills originate in the House of Representatives because the House has the power of the purse.
		The Senate will draft a bill.
		The Senate and the House will convene committees and they'll squash the differences between the bills.
		They'll pass matching bills and the president will sign it.
		And ideally, that is how the budgetary process works.
		But the way it's been working for the, and that's sort of a rough summary, but the way it's been working for the past so many years is you have this very ad hoc approach, which we've been covering this whole time, which is that the government will run out of funds, a government which is that the government will run out of funds, a government shutdown, and then we will race to pass a stopgap measure, which will fund the government until the next And that's what it's been for the past so many years.
		That's why we have these government shutdowns, because you don't have this orderly, nice process where all the different, you know, the chambers of Congress are convening and the president convenes and so on, but instead you've just got this sort of neurotic, insane, ad hoc process where You race at the last week to put something together and it's shutdowns and it's leverage and so on.
		So, in any case, what I mean to say is this is very much a formality.
		The president putting out his proposed budget, and it's been like this since he got inaugurated, it is very much a formality.
		So the President proposes the budget for next year, for fiscal year 2021, and that really is not what the budget is going to look like.
		The House will come up with their own version, and the Senate will negotiate, and the President really doesn't play a huge role in that process, and whatever comes out of Congress will look drastically different from what the President proposes.
		All this really is is a reflection of the priorities of the administration.
		You know, for example, when they set out so much money for a certain department, They are simply saying that this White House thinks this is a priority.
		You know, for example, there are some items which we'll read through in this budget.
		They give, I think, $3 billion more for NASA for lunar landers or something like that.
		And that probably, that figure, that exact figure may not materialize in the budget, but that they're giving a sizable increase in NASA's funding says that for this administration, space exploration is a priority.
		is an example of what this is really about.
		But I'll read you.
		This is a report from Fox News about the budget and everything that's in it.
		It's somewhat lengthy, but, you know, it's a big budget.
		It says, quote, The White House on Sunday unveiled a $4.8 trillion budget proposal that would slash spending dramatically on foreign aid and social safety nets, while including $2 billion for a southern border wall and substantially boosting funding to NASA, the Department of while including $2 billion for a southern border wall and substantially boosting funding to NASA, the Department of Fox News has confirmed the details of the budget, which the Wall Street Journal first reported.
		The package set to be formally announced on Monday, as is, stood little chance of passage in the House of Representatives, which the Democrats have controlled.
		Still, it serves as a signal of the President's priorities, as Republicans have aimed to retake the chamber in the 2020 elections.
		The plan aims to eliminate the federal deficit, or the differences between spending and revenue, that is slated to exceed $1 trillion this year by 2035.
		So in other words, a balanced budget by 2035.
		In all, the White House is seeking to cut $4.4 trillion in federal spending over the next 10 years, including reductions in spending on food stamps and federal disability benefits through more stringent work and eligibility requirements.
		Total cuts to non-defense discretionary programs, which do not include Medicare or Social Security, amount to $2 trillion in savings under the plan.
		The budget additionally calls for renewing the Trump administration's tax cuts for individuals and families.
		and corporations, I should add, which, you know, they leave out, but it's kind of the most important part.
		The budget calls for renewing the Trump administration's tax cuts that would otherwise expire in 2025.
		Modifications in Medicare prescription drug pricing would account for $130 billion in savings.
		Foreign aid would be reduced by 21% in keeping with the president's push to have other countries pay for what he calls their fair share, which I should add, I don't believe Israel is included in this.
		It seems like, and I'm not making this up, our foreign aid agreement with Israel, the current one, was passed in 2016.
		It's called the Memorandum of Understanding and the MOU was passed in 2016 and that's just a fancy way of saying we promise to pay Israel 3.8 billion dollars per year for 10 years.
		38 billion dollars over 10 years.
		And I'm not an expert on this legislative stuff, but it seems like literally every year since that was passed in 2016, there was a bill in the Senate confirming and rededicating us to that plan.
		And I should note, prior to the Memorandum of Understanding, There was another 10-year agreement which was $3.6 billion per year.
		So prior to 2016, it was a 10-year agreement, $3.6 billion a year, $36 billion in total.
		In 2016, they passed the Memorandum of Understanding and it's more money, $3.8 for 10 years.
		3.8 per year for 10 years.
		And I kid you not, I've seen it many times since I've been doing this show.
		There's a bill in the Senate, passes 100 to nothing.
		Senate confirms that we're sending them 3.8 per year.
		So I don't believe, well at least in this budget proposal, this is not anything concrete, but I don't even think in the proposal they're proposing to cut the foreign aid to Israel.
		It's more like the foreign aid to like NATO and you know.
		Afghanistan, maybe, Jordan, countries like, you know, those countries, but not the big one.
		Not our closest ally.
		We're cutting the foreign aid for the other allies, but never for our closest ally.
		Anyway, the Environmental Protection Agency would face a massive 26% reduction in funding.
		The Trump administration has rolled back Obama-era EPA regulations and oversight, saying they've hurt the economy for little benefit.
		The proposal would also cut the Department of Housing and Urban Development's budget by 15% while incorporating $2.8 billion for grants for helping to combat homelessness.
		And the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would see a 9% cut, although its $4.3 billion allocation for fighting infectious diseases would remain amid the coronavirus spread.
		And lastly, Homeland Security's budget would grow by 3%, the National Nuclear Security Administration's by 19%, and the VA by 13%.
		So all in all, it's kind of a mixed bag with this budget.
		I have to say, generally with the budget, it's important.
		For the reason that this is the stuff of politics.
		The reason that we elect a president on some level, you know, as far as our goals administratively for the government, should be to reallocate resources.
		Like, one of the best things that we can do politically is to change the shape of the government.
	You know, we talk a lot on this show about this idea of the nature of the American government.
	It is uniquely a question in our country.
	about this question of should we preserve limited government?
	Should we shrink the government?
	Should we care about government?
	And so on, or the size of government, I should say.
	And I'm a fan of saying on this show that we don't really care.
	We're in favor of big government.
	And I would even take it a step beyond that and say, I'm really apathetic about the size of government.
	I don't even know how you would measure the size of government.
	Is it the budget of the government?
	Is it the budget of the government relative to GDP?
	Is it personnel?
	Is it the number of departments?
	You know...
	How do you measure the government?
	And more than that, the government is so big, and it's never going to shrink any time soon, in any meaningful or significant way.
	I think we're kind of past that point.
	So now, if we understand that we have a big government, and that's the way it is, and by the way, all the people that talk about small government are dependent on the mega state.
	They're dependent on huge government, most conservatives included, and I'm not saying that like it's a bad thing, And maybe it is in some sense, but whatever.
	If we have a big government and it's not going anywhere, then the question is, how do we influence where the money's going?
	How do we influence the activities of this government?
	Well, we can do a couple of things.
	We can change the shape of the government, the priorities of the government, and we can change who the government is working for.
	This is what we have to think about as dissidents, And as people who are really like revolutionaries.
	Not revolutionaries in the sense of like fighting in the streets but revolutionaries like, you know, like the Bolsheviks or something.
	I guess they were fighting in the streets.
	At one point.
	But you know what I'm saying.
	We are infiltrating the system.
	We are subverting the system.
	And so, rather than thinking about these stupid, abstract, useless questions about what is the role of government, we should be thinking what are the practical, logistical, tangible ways that we can change the shape of government and make it work for the right people.
	That should really be the dialectic at this point.
	That is what matters.
	So, for example, When we look at this budget, cutting the EPA is huge.
	Whenever we get a Republican president into power, we have to, or whenever we get a Republican Congress, anything like that, we have to do things like this, and do things like this radically.
	Don't just cut it by 25%, just get rid of it.
	Just get rid of the EPA, get rid of the Department of Education, just get rid of these departments, because When you look at a lot of these departments, and it's most of them, but a lot of them, they are just funneling money, not just in any direction, but towards our enemies.
	You know, if you look at, for example, the EPA, this is stuff that's terrible.
	This is giving subsidies to all the wrong corporations.
	It's giving money to cronies.
	It's helping the big cities.
	It's just like a blanket check for the allies of the bureaucrats.
	This stuff should just be shut down.
	That spigot of free money has to be shut down.
	The same with the Department of Education.
	We look at all the grants that are going out to these colleges and they're underwriting loans and universities.
	Who do you think that's helping?
	In a lot of cases the money from the federal government is going to help our enemies in academia.
	You know the money from the federal government in a general sense is going towards things like the media or it's tax cuts for big corporations, whatever.
	And somebody who's more with it, with the details of this kind of stuff, who's with it really with the particulars of the administrative process, has to go through and identify who are our enemies that are getting money, and then just close off the money.
	That's like the biggest thing that we can do.
	Once we get political power, shut off the money for our political adversaries and let the money flow for people that are good for us or things that are good for us in general.
	You know?
	And that's why it's a little bit disappointing looking at this budget.
	It's like it's making deep cuts to the EPA and to HHS and that's great, but it's not giving a ton for like immigration, the border.
	You know, if I were the president and I just had to make a budget proposal And, you know, it's not gonna look anything like what's gonna come out of the Congress.
	I would say let's just give huge money to ICE.
	Let's just give insane money for border, insane money for the police, whatever, you know, towards our general political allies.
	I would reorient the entire, if we can have a big government, okay, or if we have to have a big government, fine, but let's reorient the apparatus to serve the interests of our infrastructure, of our institutions.
	Instead of looking at it like we should just sort of like mitigate progressivism, mitigate the damage of, you know, what Obama and Carter and, you know, Bill Clinton did.
	Instead, we should reorient it and say, let's take all this government and use it to build our political apparatus.
	That's what the Democrats do and we never do that.
	Excuse me.
	So, you know, I see this, I see this tax bill or this budget proposal, tax bill, budget, it's all the same, whatever.
	I see this budget proposal and it is sort of a good opportunity to remind people that this kind of administrative stuff is critical.
	It's crucial because the money has been flowing from the state to build up the Democrats, to build up their apparatus, to build up all these, I mean, it doesn't come from nowhere.
	And I mean, In a lot of cases, it does come from the government to build up these nefarious institutions, and when we wield political power, we have to do a 180 with that.
	We have to do a complete 180, instead of just, you know, this sort of gentle, soft, mitigating approach, which is what I think the past so many Republican administrations have done, going back, you know, really since, like, Reagan.
	Eh, it's the budget, but it's whatever.
	It's not what the budget's gonna look like.
	This is just priorities.
	You know, like I said, this budget proposal is just the priorities of the administration.
	But looking through this, it's like, this administration doesn't know what the hell it's doing.
	This administration...
	This continues to be a huge disappointment.
	Not in that, like, it's the worst administration in the world.
	Because, I mean, it's not like it's not done anything good.
	It's just a missed opportunity.
	That's what I, that's the line I'm going with when it comes to this administration.
	It's not necessarily that the Trump administration is terrible or it's horrible.
	And it's doing good things.
	But it's a missed opportunity.
	We could be doing so much more with what we have.
	We're doing so little.
	The potential that was at our disposal was, at one point, has been squandered.
	It could have been transformative, like a real realignment, a real change.
	And I said this at the State of the Union.
	You know, a lot of people said, oh, it was a great speech.
	And I mean, yeah, it was like it was an okay speech, but but it could have been so much more, but it could have been so transformative.
	And that's where people get on my case.
	They say, oh, well, you say nice things about Trump or you say bad things about Trump.
	I just, I, and I think a lot of people, understood that getting him in office represented probably the biggest opportunity to turn things around in our country to date.
	Excuse me.
unidentified		I've got like a, like a scratch, you know, when you get like a tickle in your throat.
unidentified		Excuse me.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Oh, my water bottle's all the way over there.
		That's the worst in the world.
		It's almost worse than if I didn't even have a water bottle at all.
		It's just looking at me.
		All the way.
		It's just, just out of reach.
		It's like three feet away, but I can't, but I can't retrieve it.
		I can't grab it.
		I'll just have to soldier on here.
unidentified		Excuse me.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		What was I even saying?
		What the hell was I even saying?
		I was saying that it was... I don't know.
unidentified		Jeez, this show is going downhill.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It was a missed opportunity, okay?
		I lost my train of thought.
		I was coughing too much.
		Masaad got me for that comment.
		That little detour about the Memorandum of Understanding, they made me pay the price for that one.
		They slipped in, I don't know, some kind of, I don't know, speck of dust drone flew down my esophagus.
		Okay, well that's the budget.
		I don't really have too much more to say about it.
		You get the picture.
		When it comes to this budget stuff, and here's something bigger than that, kind of going back to my point about the day-to-day affairs of the state, the logistical aspect, this is what we have to be doing.
		I can't stress this enough, because I was in the belly of the beast.
		You know, I went to the, excuse me for the sniffle, I was at the Leadership Institute, I was at Young Americans for Liberty, I've been to all these different, like, campus organizations, these like political youth organizations, whatever.
		And what they are fixated on, for the most part, is like the issues.
		For the most part, what these things are designed to do, in some capacity, is to build up like email lists and databases and things like that.
		And, you know, that's maybe a topic for another show.
		But in a lot of cases what they do is they just have these like debates and conversations.
		I see conservatives across the country are fixated on having like philosophical debates.
		Like, useless, rather, conversations about the issues.
		Which, you know, it's not like entirely useless to talk about politics.
		It's not entirely useless to have debates and a dialectic and so on.
		But we're at the stage where we have enough of that.
		We have enough people reading conservative books.
		We have enough people that are, like, doing intellectually stimulating stuff.
		You know, I look at the breadth of these conservative institutions, things like ISI, the Intercollegiate Studies, I think that's what it is, Institute, and LI, and Yale, and Heritage, and you know, you could go down the list.
		And so many people that are principally concerned with getting kids to read like the Founding Fathers or understand the Constitution.
		But how many organizations are showing young conservatives or young right-wing people how to actually get in power and wield power?
		Because that's what the Democrats are doing.
		You know, whenever I see this, like, budgetary stuff, this administrative stuff, it always reminds me of how, like, such a huge deficit we have on our side of people that understand how to move the levers of power.
		Because on the Democratic side, there is no shortage of resources to train People that are interested in young people in community organizing and getting involved in campaigns and getting involved in data and technology and getting involved in administration and so on.
		They've got an army of bureaucrats in training, basically.
		Just waiting for a democrat to become president.
		Just waiting for a democrat to become a congressman or a senator.
		And these bureaucrats are just waiting to get in there and just F stuff up.
		Get in there and write regulations and write rules and mess with procedure and so on and steal money.
		All this stuff.
		And we don't have a clue when it comes to that.
		So, you know, maybe that's a project for the America First movement.
		Eventually.
		I don't want to tip my hand, but maybe that's in the works.
		Maybe that's, you know, something that's being talked about behind the scenes, but that to me just always stands out when I look at this like administrative, when you look at like the budget, it's like where are our guys?
		Where are our guys who are in these offices?
		Putting together documents like this that understand how this political game works, that are committed to building a serious apparatus.
		And that's detail, boring, like underground in the Congressional Office of stuff, but it is essential for us to turn things around.
		So, that's the budget.
		That's sort of my big takeaway.
		Aside from, you know, it's a proposal, it doesn't have much real-world impact aside from kind of like symbolically showing where the President's at.
		And aside from, you know, I'm happy about foreign aid and EPA and all that being cut, and I'm not so happy with the fact that there's only two billion dollars for a wall, I can say my overriding message is we need to understand this stuff better.
		But that's the budget.
		We're gonna move on and take a look at our Super Chats.
		We'll see what you guys are saying about all this.
		I'm gonna start on DLive with our lemons and then I will make my way over to Entropy and we'll see what everybody's saying there.
		So let's see, uh, I'll be on DLive here, it says, uh, LG, or LGBT Democrap, Democrap, says Mary F. Kill, Faith Goldie, Cassie, uh, Cassandra Fairbanks, Ashley Rae Goldenberg.
unidentified		Hmm.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's a tough one.
		It's a tough one because I'm friends with Faith Goldie, so I don't know, it's a little offensive, it's a little rude to talk about her in that way, and, uh, Cassandra, I, Don't believe I've ever met.
		Maybe I saw her at CPAC.
		I'm not entirely sure actually.
		Ashley I'm mutuals with on Twitter, but I've never met her.
		I don't believe so that's that's a little too I don't know.
		It's a little too personal for me, but you know if I had if I had to I'd probably say I'd probably marry Faith.
		I'd probably... I'd probably just be the order you listed it in.
		I'd probably marry F and kill in that order.
		It ain't no offense to anybody involved.
		It's just sort of my, you know, my initial take.
		LGBT says, would you rather be gay or a woman?
		Hmm.
		You know, this doesn't really put me in a great position.
		Look, I'll just say this.
		I think I would rather be almost anything than be a woman.
		I'll just put it that way.
		I think I would rather be like anything than be a woman, you know, faced with two bad options.
		And I would say that, you know, if you're gay at the bare minimum, you're still a man.
		And also, if you're gay, you could just not be.
		You know what I mean?
		You could just refrain.
		So with a woman you're kind of just you're set you just got to be a woman and uh you know could you imagine honestly I feel bad for these women they've really got it tough out there.
		I don't mean to be too down on women as like a category uh you know not like that's anything new for the show but think about the fact that they've got like 30 years And then what do you do?
		As a woman, it's like you got 30 years to get your act together and then you start aging and then you get, you know, big and you start looking older and your eggs dry up.
		And it's like, for me, I'll compare it to this analogy.
		When I was a kid, whenever I played video games, the ones that I hated the most were the timed challenges.
		I always hated that.
		I always hated the timed missions.
		You know, when you play a video game and you have all kinds of different missions, but you always have like a speed run, a timed trial where it's like two minutes on the clock.
		And that's the way, and I could never handle that urgency, that sense of like, that pressure, the time limit.
		And I feel like if I were a woman right now, a 21 year old woman, and I'm facing down like, I've got nine years to find a husband, have kids, or else I'm like, I'm one of these wine roasties, these wine drinking, you know, hads, life has passed them by.
		I don't, I don't know if I, I don't know if I could deal with that.
		You know?
		And, you know, childbirth and all that.
		And I'm not doing this gay, like, women have it so hard.
		I'm doing, like, no, man.
		It just sucks.
		Like, unenviable situation.
		And they are, in almost every sense, secondary.
unidentified		You know?
		In almost every capacity.
		So, uh...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So yeah, I think I would take almost anything over being a woman.
		Not like I would, you know, be in love with being gay or anything, but being a woman to me just seems like a death sentence.
		But that, but hey, but that's why, but that is why we respect them so much.
		That is why, that is why we are so good to them.
		That is why they, you know, get to leave the burning building first and all that.
		It's because they are the real heroes.
		They are the real troopers out there.
		America First Juice says Nick is owned by Big Vagina.
		Simply not true.
		Simply not true.
		Artichoke says a normal society would riot about New Way Forward.
		I don't think so.
		The New Way Forward is what that immigration bill proposed by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez I don't think so because, you know, that's just a bill that's being proposed by a fringe politician.
		So, I don't know, what kind of a dumb comment?
		Like, yeah, it's a terrible bill, but in an insane country people would riot over this!
		Over what?
		A congress, a legislator, a congresswoman proposes a bill?
		Like, maybe if the bill got passed into law, but you're talking about a bill that was proposed and will never get passed, so...
		People get weird about... People should be riding in the streets!
		Believe me, there's plenty of stuff that people should be riding in the streets over.
		Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez proposing a stupid bill is not one of them, you know?
		Oh, pitchforks!
		Pitchforks!
unidentified		She proposed a bad bill!
unidentified		I'm out there!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And hey, you first, right?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, all these people talking about, you know, normal pitchforks are all these people that if they got asked at work if they have right-wing views, they would say, No?
unidentified		No?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		what are you talking about?
		You know, so all these people get real hot about it online.
		They get real hot under the collar.
		Everybody gets real tough online.
unidentified		And it's normal to try to throw up your pitchforks.
unidentified		And then what?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		They go to their job the next day and God forbid if their co-worker came up and said, do you hold right-wing political views?
unidentified		They'd be like, what?
		No.
		No.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		What are you talking about?
unidentified		I don't really follow politics that much.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's my favorite.
		It's laid out in everything on the internet.
		I'm so sick of seeing it.
		People on the internet, you know, I don't need to tell you.
		But, uh, I used to be just with bodybuilders, but now it's with everybody.
		It used to just be with these, like, uh, you know, musclehead, uh, gym cell types, where they'd be like, oh, I'm, I'm so tough, I'm a big, strong, whatever.
		And it's like, oh, okay, see you at work tomorrow, you know?
		Oh, and I've done this bit plenty of times.
		I'm not gonna do the whole bit over again, but I imagine like Mr. Incredible in his insurance office, you know, hulking giant guy, but situated in a cubicle and having to answer to customers and some diminutive, tiny, bureaucratic-type boss coming up and yelling at them in the face and, you know, the powerless just have to take it, you know?
unidentified		My boss is a real asshole.
unidentified		I'm gonna go, as soon as I get off work, I'm gonna go throw weights around.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So.
		Okay.
		But let's see, we've got America First Juice says, hope you feel better, King.
		Thanks.
		Yeah, I've been feeling pretty lousy.
		Been feeling pretty lousy this weekend.
		I've been having vertigo, really bad vertigo, since like Friday afternoon.
		Friday afternoon I was at lunch and I was talking to somebody and it just came on all at once, just like out of nowhere.
		And I just, just like severe vertigo.
		And I don't know where it came from.
		It's like mid-sentence and I was like, whoa.
		And since then, since I had lunch on Friday, it's just on and off all throughout the weekend.
		And today got it really bad.
		So I don't know what that's about.
		I don't know if it's just random.
		I did get it a few years ago for no apparent reason.
		I don't know if it's just random.
		I don't know if it's a vitamin or mineral deficiency.
		I don't know if it's dehydration or it's allergy medication or allergies or something with cyanide.
		I mean it could be like a lot of things.
		I have no idea.
		I'm, you know, my health situation, as always, is complicated, but thanks.
		Irish Catholic says, is E. Michael Jones cancelled for his take on Joker?
		No.
		Among the Ruins says, right now, arthouse groyper is alternating between push-ups and throwing darts at a photo of you.
		Fuentes!
		Yeah, I love to see that.
		Yeah, last night, John Miller put out some tweet about the Oscars.
		He put out some tweet about a Korean filmmaker who delivered his acceptance speech in Korean.
		And it sounded to me like vaguely xenophobic, so I liked the tweet.
		I didn't watch the Oscars, I was not watching them, but John Miller, who's the host of Show on Blaze TV.
		He put out a tweet and it sounded like vaguely xenophobic.
		It was like vaguely taking issue with the fact that a foreigner was speaking a foreign language at the Oscars.
		And I was like, yeah, whatever.
		So I gave it a like.
		And this guy, Arthas Groyper, replies to the tweet and says, this is a terrible take and fuck you Nick Fuentes for liking it!
		And he just goes off.
		And I'm like, I just can't, I just can't do it anymore, man.
		Ever since the Groyper Wars, I got to a new level of, like, fame.
		Not like I'm a celebrity or anything, but I did get to, like, another level of fame, where everybody hates you.
		You know?
		And that's always, isn't that always how it goes?
		It's like, you have a small cult following, and that's fine.
		You know, what, people don't know about you, and the people that do know about you, like, generally like you.
		Except for your, like, enemies, you know what I mean?
		And then you get to a certain level, and then everyone hates you, you know?
		Then you're like too mainstream, and fuck him, and what, you know what I, you know what I mean?
		I feel like that's just what happens.
		It happens to like every East celebrity, it happens to regular celebrities, that's just where I'm at right now.
		Because ever since the Groyper Wars, it's just non-stop shitting on Nick for every little thing.
		Every thing, every take.
		He eats wrong.
		He's eating with the fork and knife wrong.
		He liked this tweet.
		F you.
		He hung out with the wrong guy one time.
		He said that it would be funny if we went to war with Iran.
		That means he's Jewish.
		Oh, his dad works for a certain company.
		He's owned by China.
		He's doing a conference.
		He's trying to get everybody doxxed.
		He's a fed.
		Oh yeah, your mustache is terrible.
	You wear jeans?
	Fuck you.
	I saw that America First Highlights posted a video today, it was like Nick Floynce's leg reveal, and I said, yeah, I wear jeans on the show, and somebody's like, jeans with the blazer?
	Terrible look.
unidentified		It's like, terrible look!
unidentified		You don't even see my fucking pants!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But that's how it goes like every it's always the needling the nitpicking the So we're just at I'm just at that stage now in my career in my life where it's just you can't you can't do this And I'm just gonna keep doing what I do.
		I'm just gonna keep vibing.
		That's always how I've been I just vibe haters are gonna hate people are gonna say what they're gonna say, but it's like Probably not loud.
		Making it really hard to save the white race.
		This is what I have to put up with.
		Atlas is about to shrug.
		Hey, guess what?
		If I'm Atlas holding up the world, if I'm Adolphus...
		I mean Atlas if I'm Atlas holding up the white race.
		What if I shrug?
		Atlas over here holding up the white race and all I get is shit from You know people that don't not even have their names out there.
		No skin in the game.
		I Mean, maybe I just shrug maybe I just shrug you know what?
		So no, I'm kidding kidding, of course Big Globes says, get a chance to listen to Kirk and Ben lick their wounds.
		Oh, no, I didn't get a chance to.
		I'll put that in Google so I remember.
		Did they say my name or did they talk about gripers?
		I don't know to what extent they talked about me.
		Zimundas is relating to the accordion vibe.
		You the type to look for beat samples.
		Uh, yeah, I mean, occasionally if it's a really good sample.
		Yeah, but that song, Accordion by Madvillain, it's a great song, and I've been listening to it all weekend.
		It's really sort of captured my, uh, my energy.
		Being, uh, having vertigo, you know, just like a lot of, look, I'm like this, uh, eccentric, neurotic, hermit sort of character, and that song really fits that, how I was feeling this weekend.
		Accordion by mad villain and you know you ask about the sample It's interesting that you ask that because the sample for that song is amazing, too I've been listening to that as well the sample being of course Experienced by Daedalus.
		It's very good.
		So I've been blasting that Plowcoon says I better not see anyone cooning for egirls in chat Yeah, same He says, the n-word in Attack of the Clones.
		I don't know what that means.
		Fool for Christ says, shout out to fellow Orthodox bro, Big Bill.
		Okay.
		Black Trick Casey says, hey big guy, hope you're feeling better.
		Thanks.
		I'm feeling okay.
		Yeah, glad to hear it.
		I didn't really read too much about that.
		big guy, always gets me through waging.
		Yeah, glad to hear it.
		Thoughts on Peterson going to Russia for treatment?
		I didn't really read too much about that.
		I guess his situation is just like much worse than he let on, Jordan Peterson, which I don't know.
unidentified		I don't know.
unidentified		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I mean it's sort of like a Dante's Inferno like fitting punishment with Jordan Peterson.
		You know what I'm saying?
		This guy is a Gnostic.
		He is a fake Christian psychologist Who tells young men, your path to salvation is psychology.
		Your path to salvation is this, you know, totally obfuscated, overly complicated, like bullshit psychoanalytic nonsense.
		Listen to me.
		Young men that are lost.
		Psychotherapy.
		Self-writing.
		Buy my Shape of Music carpet, you know?
		And then this psychologist who's got all the answers, where does he end up?
		In treatment for all these terrible psychoactive drugs.
		Now, I'm not saying that to gloat.
		I don't think it's a good thing.
		I feel bad for the guy.
		I hope he gets okay and everything.
		He's going through a rough time.
		His wife's dying of cancer, I guess.
		You know, he had this terrible reaction to his medication.
		But, you know, look, it is somewhat fitting.
		It is kind of a cautionary tale.
		All the people look up to this guy who told them that the answer is... I mean, I imagine going to Jordan Peterson's house would be like that movie, Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
		You know, all these completely over-educated, egghead academics.
		His book, Maps of Meaning, is just like hot trash.
		The answer is simple.
		Jesus Christ.
		Two words.
		Say his name.
		But he will not do that.
		And that's why I don't like him.
		You know, Jordan Peterson wants to have his own take whatever, but he sells his self-help brand under the guise of like Christianity, but it's a Gnostic brand of Christianity.
		In other words, it says the path to salvation is through something other than Christ.
		It's through self-analysis.
		Well, Christ wasn't really a guy.
		He was an archetype.
		You know, all this, you know, trying to get around the idea...
		And that's no good.
		The only path to salvation.
		What does Jesus Christ say?
		The only way to get to my Father is through me.
		There's no other way.
		And it's not, it is not an archetype.
		It is not a self-authoring suite.
		It is not the collective unconscious.
		Jesus Christ is a Son of God.
		He was born to the Virgin Mary, crucified, died, buried.
		It happened.
		He saved everybody, and I'm very weary of anybody that tries to get around that.
		I'm very weary of anybody that, you know, and especially people that say they're Christian, but when they're asked about God or Christ, it's always, well, basically or technically, it should be very straightforward and simple.
		And that way it's kind of fitting.
		Don't do these drugs.
		The drugs are no good.
		I don't trust any of that stuff.
		I don't take antihistamines anymore because I don't trust the drugs.
		People have no idea what they're putting in their system.
		You know, people trust these doctors.
		You know, and this is the refrain that we hear from psychologists and psychiatrists, They say that emotional problems and depression and personality disorders are the result of chemical imbalances and drugs correct chemical imbalances.
		I don't think doctors know what the hell they're talking about.
		I don't think they can measure these chemicals.
		I don't think they know what the correct balance is.
		I don't think that they can correct them through medication.
		I don't think they know what they're doing.
		I think it's like the equivalent of bloodletting.
		As far as science goes when they talk about correcting chemical imbalances.
	Some of these drugs that are commonly prescribed lead people to commit suicide or they destroy their life so bad because of mood changes and mood swings and temper outbursts that they end up killing themselves because of all that.
	Because the drugs destroy their lives in other ways.
	People have no idea what they're consuming and it's like That, to me, is fundamental.
	Anybody that prescribes to people medication is totally reckless.
	And, like, this fucking basket case is a perfect example of it.
	You know, Jordan Peterson, what a brilliant guy.
	Yeah, he's such a genius.
	He's got it figured out so much that he's, like, he's eating nothing but beef, and he's, like, dying from these drugs.
	And I don't mean to laugh.
	I mean, it's terrible what's happening, but...
	It's folly, but it's foolish, and you see it in the results.
	So I hope it gets better, but those are my thoughts on that.
	It's like, hey, yeah, good luck.
	This is your guy.
	And not to say, I mean, look, not everybody's perfect.
	Everybody, you know, has their downsides and everything.
	So it's not to say, oh, well, this guy's having a hard time.
	That means everything he believes is garbage.
	But it is to say this psychologizing and the drugs I mean, it only gets you so far, and maybe this is where it gets you, right?
	Anyway, that's my take on Peterson.
	Let's see, Castizo Gamer says, do you read UNZ?
	P.S.
	listen to Rap Snitch something.
	Okay, I'll listen to that.
	I do read UNZ.
	He's very good, and he's got a great series.
	I encourage everybody to read the UNZ review.
	He's got this great series called American Pravda, and he goes through a lot of these sort of false historical narratives, the lies that have been told, It's really good stuff.
	A lot of it is very thorough.
	You know, there's one particular article that a friend of mine turned me on to, which we just call it the 19,000 word article.
	Just because it's 19,000 words and it's part of that series.
	There's a lot of good ones.
	I encourage you to check them out.
	But yeah, I read them.
	Save the West says you look like you need to nap, big guy.
	I mean, I got good sleep last night.
	I've been sleeping.
	I don't know what it is.
	I just don't feel great.
	I've been on a good sleep schedule for like a while now.
	For at least a week, I want to say.
	And I don't know if it's the vertigo.
	I don't know what it is, but I don't feel right.
	I don't feel 100% lately.
	I'm tortured.
	Tortured.
	Haunted.
	Kept awake at night, I've stared into the black pill for too long.
	You know what Nietzsche says about staring into the black pill?
	The black pill stares into you!
	You fight long enough, you fight these neurotic, transnational people and, you know, maybe become one.
unidentified		Kidding, I'm not becoming one, but you know what I'm saying.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So yeah, it's tough.
		It's not easy.
		It's not easy being a content creator.
		Big Boots says, my dad called five-year-old me a fag for wanting an Easy Bake.
		Yeah, he was right to do it.
		You are a fag for wanting that.
		I was the same way.
		When I was a kid, I remember, like, I have, like, vague, vague memories of, like, when my sister got, like, a baby doll.
		I wanted to play with it.
		I don't think my dad ever said anything about it, but I wish he had at that point.
		You know, I wish he, I mean, obviously, you know, I got into Star Wars later on, but I wish that, I mean, that's, like, in other words, that's not a bad thing when people do that.
		I mean, obviously, you know, I got into Star Wars later on, but I wish that, I mean, that's like, in other words, that's not a bad thing when people do that.
		These days, it's like, so much is passed on as child abuse, you know, and there's obviously the extremes with the left where they say, if you gender your children, that's abuse.
		These days, it's like, so much is passed on as child abuse, you know, and there's obviously the extremes with the left where they say, if you gender your children, that's abuse.
		But, I mean, even a lot of conservatives are kind of pussies about this, you know what I mean?
		But, I mean, even a lot of conservatives are kind of pussies about this, you know what I mean?
		Like, it was a good thing that my parents were extremely traditional in that sense, to kind of, you know what I mean?
		Were good at guiding me in certain directions and away from other things, because I feel like that doesn't really happen these days, and that's why so many people end up just like effeminate, you know what I mean?
		Just end up, particularly with men, but in some cases with women, without like a guiding hand to kind of, and not like over the top, but to kind of push you in the right direction.
		This is why you get a lot of these guys now who wear makeup, or they're simps, or they're simps, hello, or they're coons, or whatever, so, so your dad was based, your dad was right.
		Warrior says, what's one value you'd want your kids to have? - I love.
		One valley I'd want my kids to have...
		I don't know.
		One, among lots of values, probably faith is the most important one.
		I think that's, you know, I think that's the most important thing.
		But after that, maybe discipline is a big one.
		Prudence, judgment.
		I think my biggest strength is probably just judgment.
		Because, you know, where I have a deficit in some characteristics, I make up for it in others because I think I have basically good judgment.
		You know, I'm, you know, risk-averse when it's necessary and you know I think I don't want to get too much into myself but you know what I mean I think prudence prudence good judgment goes a really long way as far as values go and can not a substitute for everything but I think it can make up for If we're not on top of everything.
		But yeah, so I'd probably go with that.
		Jude says, is a GF who cheats worse than a guy who cheats?
		Absolutely.
		Absolutely it's worse.
		And you know, I don't know what the... I don't know what the judgment is in like the Catechism and the Bible.
		I assume that what the Christian religion says is that it's equally bad for a guy to cheat than it is for a girl to cheat.
		And, you know, if that's the case then okay.
		On a moral level it's the same.
		But I think we all know that maybe on another level it is definitely not the same.
		Maybe it's a sin for a guy to cheat in the same way that it's a sin for a girl to cheat.
		But we all know that it's a much bigger betrayal for a woman to cheat on her man than for a man to cheat on his woman.
		We all know that.
		And I'm not condoning that.
		You know, I'm not... I think it's... I think casual sex is gross.
		I think multiple partners is gross.
		And, you know, betraying your wife or your husband is gross.
		All that said, we all know that one is absolutely worse than the other.
		And we know this because with women, women are not completely like sexual people in the same way that men are.
		Or at least they don't have the same sexual drive or sexual impulse.
		You know, I think we all know the tendency of men, which is, you know, that men are...
		Men maybe have a more carnal orientation, you know, for better or for worse.
		And women do not.
		For women, it's a bit more of an emotional thing.
		And so when a woman cheats on her man, it's like... Well, not only is it that she's emotionally invested in another man and they're not sexual, so it's like something else, but more than that, women are like... I don't want to say... Well, I can't say that.
		I shouldn't say that.
		But marriage, properly understood, is that, like, the wife, the wife is, uh, you know.
		I don't want to throw around the P word, but it's like, hello, why does the wife take the husband's last name?
		You know, why was it that the husband would have to offer up a dowry for the wife?
unidentified		It's because, like, on some level, the wife, the woman, belongs to the man.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm not gonna say, look, I mean, You know, you could say whatever you want about it, you could dress it up any way you want, but we all know that it's like, who's the boss and who's in charge and, you know, how that arrangement works.
		So when a woman goes against her man like that, it's just like a total subversion of that, of that arrangement.
		It totally subverts the power structure, the sort of chain of command of the relationship, if that makes sense.
unidentified		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm trying to, I'm trying to articulate it in a way that isn't bad optics.
		If you come right out and say that a certain way, it's going to ruffle a lot of feathers and you never live that down.
		You know, that's going to be one of the Benny Johnson clips.
		Nick Fuentes said on one of his shows that, you know, women are, women are X, Y, and Z of men.
		But, so we're going to have to try and find a way to work around that.
		But you know what, you know what I'm saying.
		I mean, we all get it.
		It's just not, it's not the same.
		This is why in polygamous relationships in the Bible or in history, I don't believe it was ever a woman who had multiple husbands.
		It was a man who had multiple wives.
		And, you know.
		So, to me it's just very intuitive, but also there's some reasons.
		Let's see.
		It's a very important question though.
		Okendoors says, AF pack is full, but will there be an AF rally?
		Perhaps.
		Elsoy says, are Midwesterners the most based Americans?
		I think so, yeah.
unidentified		Well, Southerners are probably right up there.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I think, like, rural people in general are more based.
		Because, I mean, like, Chicago is the Midwest and it's not based at all.
		So I think rural, like, rural people in the mountains, rural people in the Midwest, rural in the South are probably the most based.
		I don't know if it's, like, a regional thing so much as it is, like, level development.
		Minnesota Groypers is America's first summer camp.
		Could you imagine?
		Bulbin says, if I started in the USA, would Corona be eradicated?
		Oh, if it started in the USA, would Corona be eradicated?
		I don't know.
		How would I know?
		How would I know that?
		Millennial Welder says, thanks for all you do.
		You're welcome.
		Blue says, no big stories.
		It's so lame.
		It would be such a shame if something really bad happened.
		I know!
		It's, yeah, that would be terrible.
		Ron says, make America goy again.
		Yeah, based.
		Toothy says, control the media, control the mind.
		Oh, yeah, that's really good.
		That's a great idea.
		Yeah.
		Nick the Brick says, sent my CA ballot in for Bloomberg.
		Wish him luck.
		Is that California?
		Yeah, hope he does great.
		Hot Dog says it's a pee-pee wrenching issue.
		Yeah.
		Jaded says, Steinhauser, you can't make this stuff up.
		Yeah, makes you think.
		Armenian Groyper says, been MIA because my mom was in the hospital.
		Better now.
		Big shout out to Mutual Groypers that prayed for her.
		God is good.
		Jesus is king.
		Praying for all Groypers.
		Hey, well, good to hear it.
		All true.
		Glad to hear your mom's doing okay.
		Sorry to hear she was in the hospital, though.
		Welcome back.
		Minnesota Groy versus jail time for those that enable perversion of kids.
		Big agree.
		Time doubts.
		Can Libertarians handle being red-pilled?
		In some ways they are red-pilled but, you know, they obviously don't get it all the way.
		Mike says, me at AFPAC.
		Nick, it's great to see you.
		Why'd you roast my super chat for 45 minutes?
		Now you won't even look in my direction.
		Yeah, I think somebody made this joke last week, so congratulations.
		Timedout says, I like... he says, don't... what is it?
		Like, don't red pill mom.
		What about libertarian friend?
		With these red pill arguments.
		My advice is the same.
		Just use discretion.
		Okay, don't ruin a relationship trying to red pill.
		Generally, don't try to... I mean, try to red pill people, I guess, but...
		Friends and family seems like it's like off-limits.
		The purpose of friends and family is not totally to be on the same page politically, especially with family.
		So, okay, well, I can't rebuild my mom.
	What about my friend?
	Well, you know, if you're talking about politics and, you know, you happen to give him your point of view, that's fine.
	But, you know, the problem is when people get pushy.
	That's what people don't like.
	Polish American says, how's your neck doing big guy?
	Need some ointment?
	My neck's still messed up, but again, I don't think topical thing is gonna help that.
	Probably just, I don't know, I probably just have to wait until I expire as a human being.
	You know, I feel like with a lot of my medical problems, I've just sort of resigned myself to like, ow, my neck hurts.
	Well, I only have 70 more years at most.
	That's kind of how I look at it with everything.
	It's like, oh, ow, ow, my neck hurts and I need to get my wisdom teeth out.
	Well, the good news is I can probably really let myself go in like 50 years.
	Well, I can't live forever, so I guess...
	You know, and it'll be resolved one way or another.
	I don't want, you know, when I look at these medical treatments, invasive procedures and medications, I'm like, I'd rather die than fight all that.
	I think about, you know, having blood drawn.
	I just can't, I just can't do that.
	Can't do it.
	You know, with anything.
	I brush my teeth too hard, and they say your gum line is receding.
	And they say if your gum line recedes too much, you have to have surgery to reattach the gum line.
	I'm like, what's the alternative?
	Can I just, like, die?
	Can I just, like...
unidentified		How long do I have?
unidentified		Can I just get new teeth?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		If it involves a needle, if it involves anesthesia, if it involves medication, I'd rather just wait and see how bad it gets, you know?
		So I know that's irrational, but that's who I am.
		I'm a greaseball.
		I've got that greaseball gene that says no doctor.
		Okindors says Afghanistan or budget in title equals no viewers yet.
		Understandable.
		Nothing's going on.
		Polish American says in my house, my mom has the power of the purse.
		That's funny.
		In my house, does my mom have that?
		Well, not really.
		Well, she, she, I will say she controls a lot of the spending.
		She controls a lot of the spending.
		Let's just put it that way.
		No, I'm just kidding.
		That's a joke.
		Williams is hate, cringe, super chats.
		All I have to say is God bless you.
		Hey, well, thanks.
		Shyster says, how's it going big guy?
		That's going okay.
		I'm not feeling 100%.
		But I'm working my way through.
		I'm fighting through it.
		300 Spartan says Nick on Trump.
		I'm not mad, just disappointed.
		Yeah, basically right.
		Boo Radley says coronavirus check.
		Yeah, I've contracted the coronavirus.
		Kathy Zhu, she gave it to me.
		She gave it to me.
		Lifted Trucks says I know you're from the city, but some coyote hunting or come coyote hunting, bud.
		Yeah, I'll do that for sure.
		Artichokes, as the bill is supported by many non-white representatives.
		Whites become minority and this bill won't pass?
		Okay, I just want to like... I want to take two cinder blocks and attach them to strings.
		To the ceiling.
		And I want two people on either end to take the cinder blocks and pull them out and let them go.
		Let me just do that.
		When I'm doing the super chats, that is what I envision.
		I imagine sitting on a stool and having two cinder blocks go this way and then like that.
		I imagine a grand piano falling on top of me or an anvil.
		Okay.
		I imagine somebody getting a anti-material rifle, an anti-aircraft gun, and just pointing it in my general direction.
		Bill supported by... Yeah, we all know demographics, but that's not gonna happen anytime soon.
		She presented the bill.
		It's not gonna go anywhere.
		Maybe if a Democrat administration gets in 2024, but, you know, let's not hold our breaths until that happens.
		Sheesh.
		Password says women can go to heaven, gays cannot.
		Yeah, but what are we talking about here?
		You didn't say a... well, I guess it's intrinsic and homosexual that you're, like, acting, but the idea is that if you're... if you're gay, you could just not do that.
		That's sort of like the get-out-of-jail-free card, you know?
		So if the question is you have to be gay or be a woman, I guess... if the question is you have to be a gay that's actually involved in gay sex, and not just somebody that, you know, is attracted to people as, like, a gay attraction paradigm, If you actually have to participate, then I would say, I'll take the woman.
		I'll take the woman card, because you're right.
		Because you're right, couldn't get into heaven, but I saw, I thought sort of like a sly technicality would be, well, you know, you could just not play ball.
		You could just, you could, no pun intended, you could just not play ball and then it's like, you know, You just, uh, are regular.
		But, uh, yeah, well, if, if the, if the choice is, if the choice is you have to be a woman or be an active member of the gay community, I would regrettably choose woman.
		I would regrettably.
		But, you know, in some sense, it's like, well, whatever.
		I don't know.
		I just don't want to be a woman.
		I just don't want to be a woman.
		I want to be a man.
	I can't imagine.
	Could you imagine?
unidentified		And I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's probably not like the end of the world being a woman.
		I'm sure there's pros and cons.
		And I'm sure if I had a female brain, I would want to be a female, you know?
		But as a male, with all that I see, with all my clarity, all the vision that I possess, The potential.
		You know, man truly is, like, the master of the universe, you know?
unidentified		On some level.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And not to get, like, cringe-like reddit on you, but you know what I'm saying, like, when you think about Mankind and all that is at man's fingertips.
		Philosophy, mathematics, engineering.
		Not like I really participate in a lot of that on a daily basis, but the option is there.
		You know, music, genius, war, duty, sacrifice, all this.
		And to like give it up, you know, to shrink.
		The benefit of being a woman to start is you never know.
		I bet if you took my brain and put it in a woman's head, she would explode.
		She would just melt down.
		She would just completely, spontaneously combust, so.
unidentified		I just don't, just don't wanna, don't wanna be that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Don't wanna be that.
		But, I guess, I guess, you know, if you're gonna get rid of my technicality, then I would go woman.
		Bad Faith Poster says, hey, I know you're the, hey, I know you, you're the pee-pee-poo-poo guy, yeah.
		If I ever hear that on the street, I don't know what I'm gonna do, man.
		That's gonna make me sad.
unidentified		Hey, I know you.
unidentified		You're the pee-pee-poo-poo guy.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that's me.
		Yeet says, Vertigo is the worst U2 song.
		Oh, very funny.
		Yeah, it's also a bad symptom.
		Jude says, did you see the video of AOC's BF simping on White Race?
		No, I didn't see that.
		Although, it doesn't sound like you know what simping means.
		But I didn't see the video, so I don't know.
		Artichokes, does one-fifth of Democrats support the bill?
		Yeah, okay, just shut up, just shut up, just shut up.
		One-fifth of Democrats, yeah.
		So it's harmless, yeah.
		One-fifth of Democrats does not pass the House and the Senate and get signed by the President.
		What, are you retarded?
		There would be pitchforks in the streets because a fraction of one political party supports a crazy bill?
		Like, what are you saying?
		What are you trying to argue with me here?
		There should be pitchforks because both parties have been complicit in just what's been going on for 60 years.
		And you're saying, no, what's really bad is that some fringe politician proposed a crazy extension of what's going on?
		Like, do you not see why that's retarded?
		And he's gonna fight me, and he's gonna fight me on it throughout the show.
		Fight me on it throughout the show with more, in each super chat, dumber than the last.
		Well, whites are gonna be a minority!
		Yeah, no shit, retard.
		Geez, I just can't.
		I don't know what's going on today.
		It's been people drinking retard juice.
unidentified		Uh, excuse me.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You've been drinking retard juice and now you're acting retarded.
		Based Gentleman says dehydration worsens vertigo.
		Heard ginger helps.
		Good to know.
		Password says shrugging is just lazy atlas LARPing.
		Okay.
		Scrumpy says you may have a lack of Iron King.
		God bless.
		Okay.
		Middling says top three presidents excluding Trump.
		Top three presidents excluding Trump.
unidentified		Kind of a... I kind of hate these questions.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't know.
		Andrew Jackson.
		I'd say Andrew Jackson would be up there just because I like him.
		He would be up there.
		George Washington and I would say Who else?
		Are we going by favorite or, like, best?
		Because I, you know, there's some presidents I, like, like them even if they weren't the best.
		Like JFK, I like a lot.
		Was he, I mean, he was kind of ineffectual as a politician and got a lot of bad things done, too.
		But I like him.
		I like his style, I like his look.
		You know, I like the idea that he's, like, this rich, young, handsome president, cool, you know, stood up to you-know-who.
		Secret societies and the CIA, right?
		So there's something about that aesthetic 1960s cantaloupe aesthetic which which died out Chad but he would obviously don't agree with everything he did so so that's that's kind of the question so I would say Andrew Jackson would be up there and then maybe George Washington and then I don't I don't know maybe I Who else is good?
		Polk.
		James Polk.
		Okay?
		You happy with your boring history question?
		Gene says, I kind of hope Peterson... Okay, I'm not reading that.
		We're not going to wish death on anybody.
		Dr. Gruyper says, psych is the most politicized field of medicine.
		Yeah.
		Gene says, Peterson needs Big Bear's Russian turpentine cure.
		I don't know what that means.
		BadFaithPoster says, I stopped taking my ADHD medication.
		I feel good.
		Yeah, that's me.
		I stopped taking my allergy medication.
		I feel good.
		Yeah, that's pretty funny.
		VladGroepers is dating a chick online.
		She's 29, no driver's license.
		Okay, I don't know what that means.
		WD says, no better medicine than Jesus.
		King Life.
		Yeah, well he's not really helping the vertigo.
		You know, and that's kind of the thing, it's like, I don't know, you just like... You just have to, like, take medicine, you know?
		Groy versus somebody, get this man a burger.
		Feel better soon?
		Thanks, yeah, maybe I'll get a burger later.
		Maybe I'll get a burger if I'm feeling up to it.
		Debt collector says, please, Nick, go outside for your health.
		Yeah, okay.
		Florida man says, Imam Nick.
		Static says, the Chad Mill cheater versus the monogamous virgin.
		It's not Chad.
		It's not Chad to cheat.
		It's not Chad.
		There's nothing Chad about casual sex.
		Casual sex is disgusting.
		But I'm just saying, we all know it's not as bad if you're promiscuous or a cheater as a man than if you are as a woman.
		Now they're both wrong, but we all know.
		Greatest story says Molyneux gathering Intel from e-girl kingpin you see no, I don't know what that means When us is Nick pray three Hail Marys every morning and night.
		Okay.
		Thank you Base gentlemen says your take on prudence reminded me to suggest for cardinal virtues Christian philosophy book.
		Ah, yes.
		Thank you BasedGroiper says, you probably haven't thought of this, but the moment should just get a trillion dollars.
		The movement, I think you mean.
		Yeah, good idea.
		DebtCollector says, don't give up big guy.
		Yeah, I never said I was giving up.
		I'm just saying, hey, take it easy.
		GroibmasterFlex says, hey Nick, just switched to DLive.
		Love the show so far.
	Keep up the good work.
	Support from Boston.
	Well, thanks buddy.
	Bulbin says, those white people kissing black boots.
	Yeah, yeah, did you see that black Israelite video?
	I put that on my timeline to raise the white racial consciousness.
	I'm hoping that if people see that, because it's hard not to, not to feel something bubbling up inside of you, and we all know what that is.
	So I was hoping by putting that on the timeline it might activate, it might open the, might open the third eye.
	I had a very visceral reaction.
	That's what it is.
	That's what being an adult is.
	It's finding out that there's so many things to worry about.
	It's your neck.
	It's your back.
	It's your skin.
	It's your teeth.
	It's your microbiome and your stomach.
	You know, it's like never-ending cascade of maintenance and problems and routines and habits and purchases and rituals.
	I just want to like tear my face apart.
	I don't want to be caught.
	In all these cycles, I feel like a clock!
	I feel like a clock with all these gears turning and just the constant pattern, the constant tempo of all these different things you have to do at different intervals.
	It's enough!
	I am not like that.
	I am like the melody, okay?
	If my life is a song, you've got the brutal, percussive intervals of all these patterns, all these rituals, habits that you have to engage in, sleep, eating, socializing, the holidays, the calendar, you know, all the different things, and I am like the melody that sort of swims, that transcends all these different things, or complements them, I don't know.
	But I don't, but I don't like it.
	I don't like it.
	I don't like it.
	Don't like it.
	I'm too much of a free spirit, I guess you could say.
	I feel like the underground.
	I feel like the man of the underground.
	I am being ground up by the machine.
	I'm being ground up by the gears, by the tempo, the unrelenting tempo.
	Okay.
	Black Phillips' correct answer, be a woman, become a nun.
unidentified		I just don't, I just, no!
		Being non, you're still a woman!
		No, no, no, no!
		You're not!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Or what does Joker say?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Go back to ripping off mobsters?
unidentified		No, no, no!
unidentified		I'm not going to do that!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		George says, should I call my mom the n-word for her birthday?
		No.
		No, be nice to your mom.
		LT says, something, what?
		Okay, I don't know what this means.
		Artichoke says, hey Nick, I saved a cup of retard juice for you.
		No, that's okay.
		That's okay.
		I'm good actually.
		Jude says, AOC forced her BF to say whites are racist on video.
		Okay, that's gross.
		Artichoke says, I'm gonna give up pitchforks and milk.
		Thank you.
		That's good to hear.
		Yeet says, hey Nick, rank all 45 presidents based on their haircut.
		Yeah, these are the kinds of questions people are throwing in.
unidentified		Hey Nick, um... Favorite battle in the 30 Years War?
		Hey Nick, um...
		This is awesome!
		This is how some of you people are!
		Hey Nick, favorite engagement in the 100 Years War?
		Favorite Prince during the Concert of Europe?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's like, I just want a vibe, okay?
		I just want a game.
		I want a game.
		I want to talk about big issues.
		Who's your favorite Secretary of State?
		Charlie Kirk says, Would you rather be a woman or get a lobotomy?
		What's the difference?
		That's too obvious.
		That was too obvious.
		Low-hanging fruit.
		Too easy.
		Obviously, I'd rather be a woman, I guess.
		I mean, getting a lobotomy is probably only a little bit more of a Taking away my mental capacity, you know what I mean?
		You know, becoming a woman would take away maybe like 80% of my mental capacity.
		Getting a lobotomy, you're getting it like 82, 85.
		Just kidding, just kidding.
		I'm only joking there.
		I would probably go for being a woman, I guess.
		You could be a smart woman, you know?
		Void Zero says, Vertigo can happen after you change sleep schedule.
		Is that true?
		That's possible then, I guess.
		George says, hmm, you watch Spongebob.
		Good taste.
		Yeah, thanks.
		Artichoke says, thanks for white pilling me with facts and logic.
		You're welcome.
		Q says, maybe missed answer.
		Will AF Pack be streamed?
		Yes.
		America First Pack will be streamed.
		Okay, I'll move on to entropy.
		Jay Renz, has ever noticed how lefties will use any excuse to bring up the Islamic Golden Age?
		Basically the Muslim equivalent of we was.
		Still, it's only the second worst Abrahamic religion.
		Okay, yeah, they do bring that up a lot.
		Sammy says, why is everyone sleeping on Soph?
		She's one of the best dissonant right-wing voices at the moment making amazing socially conservative arguments, but just doesn't value government that much.
		Hello simp department.
		I haven't seen her content anymore.
		Didn't her YouTube channel get banned?
		So I don't really know where to find her.
		I think she's she's on free speech TV, right?
		But I don't I don't have a subscription there.
		So I don't I So I can't really access it.
		But yeah, I mean, she, I liked her content when she was on YouTube.
		RJ says, does anyone else find it weird that some people still unironically wear baseball caps backwards?
		Why is that?
		Why would that be weird?
		Radtrads says, is going to school for political science worthwhile?
		Is shifting the culture on academia still possible?
		Yeah, it's worthwhile.
		Just got to know what you want to do with it.
		Josh the Remover says for this is the will of God that by doing good you may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men as free Yet not using Liberty as a cloak for vice, but as bond servants of God.
		Yes, that is so true RJ says Nick's really simping for his own fans.
		No, please don't be mad at me.
		We wanted you to come it wasn't personal It was out of our control who cares what we think lmao.
		Yeah, I don't care what you think I'm just telling you the situation and I am I am it is a I don't want people to be disappointed.
		I'm telling you the way it is.
		And if you don't like the way it is, then I don't care.
		But I'm not simping.
		These people don't understand what simping means.
		I hear this all the time.
		People say, oh, you simp for... People say that my fans simp for me or something else.
	Simping is only something that happens with women.
	It is only something that happens towards women.
	Uniquely.
	Simp Exterminator says, uh, people on Twitter who are bitching about Joaquin winning because his speech was gay are retarded.
	Like, I'm sorry that you're a little baby who isn't capable of separating artist from art.
	People just don't get it.
	Yeah, that's what it boils down to.
	People just don't get it.
	I'm content with just saying that at this point.
	People just don't get it.
	Look, it comes down to the Pareto Principle.

▲