All Episodes
Nov. 22, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
03:16:35
Charlie Kirk Concedes to Groypers, Calls for "Good Faith Dialogue" | America First Ep. 504
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
02:36:53
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
Thank you.
Thank you.
You're not interested.
I'm sorry.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
No e-girls.
unidentified
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudd.
What is that?
Americanism, not globalism. not globalism.
We'll meet our freedom.
nick fuentes
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudd.
unidentified
Who's that?
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
The Boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
Americanism, not globalism, will not globalism, will be our credo. will be our credo.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
nick fuentes
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
No e-girls.
unidentified
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
I've never heard of Nick.
What is that?
Americanism, not populism.
Will be our freedom.
I've never heard of Nick.
What?
Who's that?
and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom. will be our freedom.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
I've never heard of Nick Pudge.
He's just that.
I've never heard of Nick Pudge.
I've never heard of Nick Pudge.
nick fuentes
I've never heard of Nick Pudge.
unidentified
Who's that?
Thank you.
The Homer Generation.
and its consequences have been a disaster for the human world.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human world.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom. will be our freedom.
I'm sorry.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
nick fuentes
Never!
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
He's just that.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
nick fuentes
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
Who's that?
unidentified
Thank you.
Thank you.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry.
unidentified
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
nick fuentes
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
unidentified
No e-girls.
nick fuentes
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
Who's that?
nick fuentes
I've never heard of Bigfoot.
unidentified
Who's that?
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
You're not interested.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
unidentified
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
nick fuentes
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Bunch.
It's just that.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
nick fuentes
I've never heard a big question.
unidentified
Who's that?
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the... Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the...
...and the boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the...
...and the boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the... ...and the boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the...
...and the boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the...
...and the boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the... ...and the boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the...
...and the boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the... ...and the boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the...
Not interested.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
nick fuentes
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
unidentified
No e-girls.
nick fuentes
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
Just that.
Americanism and populism will be our freedom.
The humor generation.
and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
Americanism, not globalism, not globalism, will be our credo. will be our credo.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
unidentified
You're an e-girl, you know the rule.
nick fuentes
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
No e-girls.
unidentified
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
I've never heard of him.
What is that?
I've never heard of him.
I've never heard of him.
nick fuentes
I've never heard of Nick Butch.
unidentified
Who is that?
and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo. will be our credo.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
He's just that.
I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
nick fuentes
I've never heard of Bigfoot's.
unidentified
Who's that?
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
Americanism, not globalism.
Will be our freedom.
\par You're not interested?
nick fuentes
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl, you know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
I've never heard of Nick.
What is that?
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
I've never heard of Nick once.
Who's that?
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom. will be our freedom.
I'm sorry.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
unidentified
No e-girls.
nick fuentes
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
He's just that.
Americanism, not globalism. not globalism.
We'll be our freedom.
An older generation.
and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
Americanism, not globalism, not globalism, will be our credo.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
No e-girls.
unidentified
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
God, I've never heard of big fudge.
Who's that?
God, I've never heard of I've never heard of big fudge.
God, I've never heard of I've never heard of big fudge.
nick fuentes
I've never heard of Nick Brunch.
unidentified
Who's that?
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
With respect, the respect that we deserve.
From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
America first.
Good evening everybody.
nick fuentes
We're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Friday to end our week here tonight.
We've got a casual Friday episode for you.
Very low-key, relaxed.
You can tell that I'm going to be low-key and relaxed because I'm not wearing a necktie tonight.
And honestly, it feels pretty good, right?
Feels pretty good.
I feel like this week things are finally beginning to wind down.
You know, last week we had the end to phase one of the Groyper War, but it was still pretty hectic.
You know, we had an event right up until last Thursday on, or rather at, the University of Houston.
We had our 500th episode special last Friday, and then of course we had a pretty vicious counter-attack by Benny Johnson and others on Monday.
So it feels like tonight, perhaps more than last week and maybe even the beginning of this week, we can finally feel things begin to wind down a little bit.
We're entering a holiday quartering period, Thanksgiving approaches, and so we truly are tonight relaxed.
And low-key it truly is a casual atmosphere tonight.
We have a great show, lots to talk about.
Tonight we're going to be looking at two articles in particular.
Pretty good show.
I am pretty excited that we're getting back to some substantive issues.
Last night, I wasn't thrilled at the show last night because...
You know, we just had to talk to, or talk about, a lot of these boring things.
You know, like I said, I don't want to dive back into it, but you know, these very partisan, surface level, soap opera type things, the Democratic debates, the impeachment hearings.
So, it's nice to have more of a return to form tonight.
We'll be looking at issues.
For example, our featured story will be about this article that Charlie Kirk published in American Greatness this morning.
Which, I don't know if you saw this on Twitter, was pretty rich and ironic.
American Greatness, if you guys know, they're actually pretty cool.
I understand that they published, I believe, They were the ones to publish Darren Beattie's speech from the HL Mencken Institute, if you remember that whole drama from last summer.
They were the ones to publish Michelle Malkin's critique of Charlie Kirk's immigration platform a couple of weeks ago.
So they're actually a pretty good platform, and they have a couple of articles up this morning about the Groyper Wars, seemingly in support of what we're trying to do.
But they also published an article this morning by Charlie Kirk, and I don't think I would talk about it.
I think I would probably let it go and not really discuss it.
Except for the fact that it was so brazenly and blatantly hypocritical.
It just simply can't be ignored.
I think it's something like the first or second paragraph.
It says something to the effect that we have to stop shying away from debates.
We as right-wing conservatives must engage in good faith discussions about what it means to be conservative.
And so, you know, I'm reading through this this morning and I'm thinking, yeah, we have to respond to this.
We have to read through this on the show tonight.
So that's what we're gonna do.
We're gonna look through this article and see what it's all about.
Analyze this from the perspective of the actual substance of the article.
You know, what it includes, what it doesn't include, what it discusses, but also obviously from a tactical perspective.
Because in this article there is some interesting substance.
I'll say at the outset, I don't think Charlie Kirk wrote this article.
I think he, like just about everybody else in Conservative Inc., probably hired a ghostwriter to slap this thing together in the last couple of days to save face, right?
So, in any event, I think there's some interesting substance in this article.
For example, he comes down a little bit on his radical immigration stance.
He addresses foreign policy, but nowhere does he mention Israel, or foreign aid, or dual allegiance.
He doesn't even mention some of the social conservative criticisms we have for him.
So there's some interesting things in terms of the substance, politically, of what is included, what is not included.
But then, of course, we also have to think about it in terms of what this article represents as a statement in itself that it was even written and published in the context of recent events with the Groyper Wars.
You know, I think it's best... The best way to summarize my position on this article is that this is a face-saving maneuver.
And I'll spoil it a little bit for you, my take on our featured story, but I'll elaborate further on that he puts this article together talking about how he's really in favor of free speech.
The article is called Clearing the Air on the Right.
And so that he put out an article where he feels the need to say that he's in favor of open dialogue and he's not a radical on immigration and he does support Donald Trump and he does support an America First immigration policy.
Or a foreign policy, rather.
To me, what that says is that we have created the perception that he is not any of those things, right?
I don't think he would put out an article where he says, I'm in favor of free speech, I'm not an immigration radical, and so on.
Why would he bother?
Why would he go to the trouble if we did not raise that question, if we did not create that doubt in the minds, not simply of students, or not simply of my audience, or people adjacent to me, but in the minds of his donors, and the minds of fellow travelers in the conservative establishment.
I don't know if we'll read through the whole thing because it's not super long, but it would probably be boring to read every single word.
It might be doable to do that if I sort of jump in.
Collar check?
If I jump in in the middle.
But we'll read through that.
Should be fun.
And then we'll also be looking tonight at an article by Bret Stephens, excuse me, in the New York Times.
This article has to do with a recent development regarding our Israel policy.
This went largely unreported, at least by me.
I didn't talk so much about it on the show, obviously, or on Twitter.
But this was announced earlier this week that this administration has officially changed Our stance towards Israeli settlements in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
And I'll fill you in on all the background in a moment when we get into this article.
But basically the American government's policy for 50 or 40 years, since the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, has been that Israeli settlements, civilian settlements, In Palestine, in the West Bank, in the Gaza Strip are illegal.
This is what is maintained by the international community.
This is what is maintained by the United Nations.
This is what is maintained actually by most countries in the world, that the civilian settlements are illegal.
And this was American foreign policy since the war ended in 1967.
Donald Trump reversed that this week and says that he recognizes the civilian settlements as legitimate and not illegal.
And this is part of the long-standing Trump policy of Gibbs for Israel, more concessions, more favors, more things for this country that seems to do nothing for us other than spy on us and take our money with both hands.
But we'll get into this article.
Bret Stephens had a very interesting take.
Excuse me.
And I think it deserves a little bit of scrutiny, deserves a little bit of coverage.
So that'll be our first story, and I think that should fill up our show.
I don't know what is going on with this collar.
Everybody's always giving me a hard time on Friday.
Fix your collar!
Fix your collar!
And then I go back and watch the replay and the collar's all messed up.
I don't know what's going on with that.
Anyway, hello Autism Check?
Can I get an Autism Check in chat?
So anyway, that's gonna be our show.
We'll do that New York Times article, we'll talk about Israel, and then we'll read through the Charlie Kirk article on American Greatness.
And like I said, Gonna be very casual energy tonight.
Before we dive in, do just want to give you a little bit of a little bit of an update on what our schedule is gonna look like on the show for the next week.
Obviously, next week is Thanksgiving.
It's the holidays.
So I just want to give you a heads up that I won't be on the show on Thursday.
Of course it's Thanksgiving, and I won't be on the show on Friday.
So our plans for next week are to do a show Monday, Wednesday, or rather Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, and then Thursday and Friday I will not be here, and then Monday of the following week I will not be here, and um...
There'll be a little bit of a surprise for you.
I won't be on the show, but I will be somewhere doing something, and I can't give away too many details, but I think a lot of people will be excited by it.
So, that's our schedule.
I won't be here next Thursday or Friday, or the following Monday.
We'll do three days next week, and then I'll be returning the following week on Tuesday.
So, just wanted to get that schedule out.
And one additional thing, I know people are asking me about if I'm doing any more debates, or interviews, or anything like that.
And so right now the tentative plan is that I will be appearing on the Dick Masterson show on Sunday.
I will be debating John Cardillo from Newsweek TV, I think is where he is, on Monday on DLive.
And I believe I will be on Lift the Veil on DLive on Tuesday.
You may see him around on DLive.
So that's my schedule there.
We're doing a lot of content, so I hope that makes up for not being here.
And I should have to say it makes up.
I'm entitled to take Thanksgiving and Black Friday off, but, you know, in case anybody thinks I'm slacking, anybody who wants to critique my work ethic, which is what you people love to do, I hope you guys all caught.
I was on a podcast with the American Spectator this afternoon.
We do have a lot of content coming up for you.
Like I said, Dick Masterson is Sunday.
John Cardillo debate is on Monday.
And then Lift the Veil interview is on Tuesday.
And I hope you guys all caught.
I was on a podcast with the American Spectator this afternoon.
I think it got published sometime this afternoon.
Very good interview.
Very fair.
If you guys have been following the American Spectator's coverage of Groyper Wars, it has been, in my opinion, exceedingly even-handed and fair, as I said.
The interviewer's name is Freddie Gray, and he is British, and I have to tell you, I got on the Skype call with him to do the interview, and he was a very nice guy.
I mean, he was a very good interviewer.
But I don't know what it is about English people, but I hear the accent and I can't help but find it funny.
Is that, is that racist?
Is that an offensive thing?
I, I get on the Skype call and I, I immediately had to suppress a laugh and try so hard not to begin imitating a British accent.
You know, he calls me up and you know, he's like, Hey Nick.
And, and you know, just begins carrying on as, as usual in a British accent.
And I have to, try so hard not to retort, hello, you know, cheers, mate.
And yeah, that's not a great British accent, but I had to try so hard not to just come back imitating the accent.
I don't know why I find it so funny.
That never used to be the case, but lately I talked to these people and I don't know if I just find it like unbelievable that that exists or what, but so that just a funny, funny little moment, funny American moment where you have a Chad Midwestern Chicago accent and it's not funny It's just epic and Chad.
No, but you guys should check out the interview.
I thought it was very good Because I was in it and I did a great job So that's on my timeline, but we're gonna dive in here to this article.
This collar is gonna be making me mad all night Gonna be another hole in that wall, in the glass wall of the studio by the end of the night if this collar doesn't... Is there a tool for this?
Look, I don't read GQ, I don't read Men's Magazine, okay?
I don't know what I'm doing here.
I put on the shirt, I put on the suit, and you expect that it's just gonna stay, but anyway.
So we're gonna dive into this New York Times article.
Like I said, this is Bret Stephens at the New York Times, which it's important to note that the author of this article used to write for the Jerusalem Post, and he's a Jewish Zionist.
I never knew this about Bret Stephens.
When I was in high school, I read his book, which is called America in Retreat.
At the time, he was an editorial writer for the Wall Street Journal.
And I saw the name Bret Stephens, and I saw Wall Street Journal, and I didn't really think anything of it, but then I figured out and discovered some years later that he's actually, I believe, was born in Israel, wrote for the Jerusalem Post in Israel, and he is a hardcore Jewish Zionist.
I think his name Stephens was...
Changed or something in Ellis Island.
It's like one of those kinds of stories.
Relevant detail, relevant fact, and I'll tell you why.
The article we're gonna read from the New York Times is called, The One Thing Trump Gets Right.
The sub-headline from, again, Jerusalem Post alumnus Brett Stevens, The One Thing That Donald Trump Gets Right.
In his mind, the subtitle is, Israel Settlements Are Not The Principal Obstacle To Peace With The Palestinians.
So of course, what he is alluding to in the headline and sub-headline is the only thing that Trump has gotten right.
It's not the judges.
It's not immigration.
It's not refugees.
It's not trade.
It's not Syria.
It's not the First Step Act or even the more liberal things.
The one thing Bret Stephens of the Jerusalem Post thinks that Trump gets right is that Israel's civilian settlements in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip are not the principal obstacle to peace with the Palestinians.
And so a little bit of background about this.
You know, I said I would explain this in greater detail.
So, of course, in the 20th century you had four major wars in the Middle East between Israel and a coalition of Arabs.
You had their war for independence in 1948, you had a war in 1956, a war in 1967, and the war in, was it 1971?
had a war in 1956, a war in 1967, and the war in, was it 1971, I want to say, 1971 or 1973.
I get the odd numbers confused, but in any case, there were four major wars between Israel and a coalition of Arabs.
The Zionists say that these were wars of extermination by the Arabs, and every time that these wars happened, it was the Arabs getting together, and for no reason at all, coming after Israel and trying to destroy them, trying to do another Holocaust.
You know, this is what they say every time.
And on the Arab side, they say Israel's provoking these wars, Israel's expanding, Israel's mistreating Palestinians.
For example, in the case of the Israeli war for independence, they were quite clearly genociding Palestinians.
They were going house by house, village by village, and physically removing these people from their homeland.
So, there's arguments on both sides.
I would say that probably two of the wars were provoked by Israel.
I would say two were probably more provoked by the Arabs, but I'm in no way an expert on the history here.
The war that we're talking about is the 1967 war.
After this war in 1967 between Israel and this coalition of Arabs, Israel occupied the Sinai Peninsula to their south, which you know is east of Egypt.
It separates Egypt and I guess the proper Middle East, right?
I'm not explaining the geography great, but so they occupied the Sinai to the south and they moved up into the north.
They occupied Lebanon and a little bit of Syria.
They occupied the West Bank and The Golan Heights.
They occupied all of Israel.
So after the 1967 war, they occupied all this land.
They withdrew from Syria.
I think they maintained control of Sinai for a little while.
But they had military control over the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.
And they never pulled out.
They retained sort of military control over these two places, and I think everybody acknowledges that that part is basically acceptable in the sense that after this war, Israel maintained a military presence there for the sake of their own defense.
So the argument goes.
I'm not saying that I'm in favor of a perpetual military occupation of Palestine, but, you know, a military occupation is one thing after a war like this.
The problem began when Israel began to put civilians into the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, building housing complexes and what they call civilian settlements, and having Israeli Jews move into these Palestinian lands, where it should be Palestinian, and they're building homes, they're establishing communities, these, you know, that's what they're called, they're settlements, and so in a sense, what this constitutes is colonization.
You know, it would be comparable to if America fought a war with Mexico, It might make sense that for a time we had some kind of military presence in Mexico to make sure that we could control our border and make sure that, you know, a revanchist Mexican offensive does not originate in Mexico and come after America in the aftermath of the war.
They don't, you know, reconsolidate and come back for us.
But it would be comparable to if we occupied Mexico and then we started sending Americans.
We started sending a bunch of WASPs from Boston and maybe Southerners from Alabama into Mexico and putting up buildings and saying this is part of America now.
And expanding America's borders into Mexico under the military occupation.
That's the rub for most countries of the world.
The United Nations international law is the civilian settlement process.
Because of course this is naked expansion.
This is just naked colonization.
And I don't really have strong feelings on this.
You know I really fundamentally don't really care on an objective level about what happens between Israel and Palestine.
Of course, my concern is always, what is good for America?
What policy that Israel is pursuing is good for America, given that we have unconditional support of Israel?
What arrangement between the Palestinians and Israel is going to help us?
How does that play into our dynamics with our relationships with Arab leaders in the Middle East and with Israeli leaders?
My concern is not in itself international law or who's who's in the right, who's in the wrong, but it's moreover, you know, what is going to be the best arrangement that will help us maintain good relationships with both Israel and these Arab Muslim countries?
So that's the context of this, and as I said at the top of the show, the American position in Israel for 40-50 years has been, we believe that the settlements are illegal.
And I've debated a number of Zionists about this.
All the Zionists say, well that is the American policy, but we don't think it should be.
And so when Israel has flagrantly gone against us, For 50 years, we have told them, we have admonished them since 1967 to stop building settlements.
Even this president.
I think it was his first press conference after getting inaugurated was with Benjamin Netanyahu.
It was one of his first press conferences.
He explicitly told Netanyahu, hey, could you not build any more settlements?
Could you cool it with these civilian settlements?
Because as I said, for 50 years that has been our policy.
And why is that?
Because the more Israel expands, the more these civilian settlements encroach on Palestinian lands, the worse this makes our relationship with Arab countries.
Arab countries perceive us, and rightly so, as being unconditionally supportive of Israel.
And so when we give Israel our unconditional diplomatic, military, political, and economic support, and Israel is expanding these settlements, and that is to the detriment of the Palestinians, Who are appealing to Arab leaders for moral leadership and moral support in the international community.
It puts us in a tough spot with the Saudis, with the Jordanians, the Lebanese, the Syrians, Iranians, all the Arab governments in the Middle East who don't want to see the Palestinian lands ethnically cleansed or colonized or whatever.
So our policy actually makes a lot of sense.
We've been in favor of the two-state solution insofar as Palestine can have their own territory, And we have some guarantee for them so that we can have a diplomatic relationship with the Arab Muslims, but also obviously respecting Israel's sovereignty so that their lawyers and donors from AIPAC don't primary all the politicians in Congress.
I mean, that's essentially why we have this position.
And it's been the position since the 1967 war.
Donald Trump this week overturned that and said, now all of a sudden we support unconditionally the civilian settlements.
We don't think they're illegal.
This is terrible!
This is a horrible development!
Because in doing so, we have, in a de facto way, given credence to the idea of a one-state solution.
We have supported the idea that Israel should have uncontested rule over the entire Palestinian land, right?
everything that was in the original mandate of Palestine, which is going to hurt our relationships with all these Arab countries, anybody we hope to do diplomacy with, and even the Muslims themselves.
You know, it's worth noting that a lot of the terrorists, including Osama bin Laden, Ramzi Youssef, the World Trade Center bomber in 1993, a lot of these high-profile terrorists and terrorist groups, one of the biggest grievances they cite against the United States, why they terrorize our people, is our unconditional one of the biggest grievances they cite against the United States, why they and Israel's colonization of Palestine.
That is why, for example, Osama Bin Laden declared his fatwa against the United States in, I think it was 1998 or 1999.
One of his primary grievances and most prominent throughout the fatwa, his declaration of war against the United States, was our unconditional support for Israel and Israel's situation with Palestine.
So I'll read you.
This is an article from Bret Stephens, as I said, writer from the Jerusalem Post.
He is a Jewish Zionist.
He says this was actually the one thing that Donald Trump gets right.
I'm quoting here.
He says, quote, In this week's Middle Eastern news, the Iranian regime has reportedly killed more than 100 of its own people as it attempts to suppress another wave of nationwide demonstrations.
The Islamic State is taking advantage of Turkey's invasion of northern Syria to regroup.
Governments in Lebanon and Iraq remain paralyzed by popular discontent, and Israel has struck dozens of rockets near Damascus after intercepting Iranian rockets fired from Syria.
Into this thicket of trouble, Mike Pompeo announced on Monday that the State Department would reverse a 41-year-old legal opinion claiming that Israeli settlements in the West Bank were inconsistent with international law.
The decision has garnered outsized attention as if it's another gratuitous Trumpian obstacle on the road to peace.
It's not.
To paraphrase Ariana Grande, we have one less problem without it.
Which, by the way, don't you love the way these people talk?
Rob Smith.
Y'all like Cardi B, Jewish Zionist Bret Stephens.
To paraphrase Ariana Grande, we have one less problem without it.
I just sort of hate that.
I hate that they take this horrible, degenerate popular culture and they use it to justify, in the case of Rob Smith, anal sex and the normalization of homosexuality.
In the case of Bret Stephens, you know, basically unconditional support for the Zionist project in the Middle East.
In any case, he writes, I rarely have anything positive to say about Donald Trump's foreign policy and his overall approach to the Middle East is damaging and potentially disastrous for the United States and Israel alike.
His policy of negotiating our withdrawal from Afghanistan, his policy of withdrawing from Syria, he thinks that's a disaster.
He writes, and this is the key end to this paragraph, he says, So Bret Stephens says we can never leave the Middle East, we can never turn our back on the region.
In other words, we must maintain a permanent presence in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, all the countries that we're currently occupying.
He writes, "...and Israel will not be safe in an America-first world in which allies like the Kurds are cavalierly betrayed and enemies like Iran are haphazardly confronted." I'll read that to you again.
He says, "...Israel will not be safe in an America-first world." That is verbatim what Bret Stephens says.
And to me, the Israel-Palestine thing is not really a huge deal to me.
Obviously, I care about America.
We understand the ramifications of the Israel-Palestine conflict for our diplomacy with other countries in the Middle East and a number of other things, right?
I mean, it is a flashpoint in the world for conflict and there's a lot riding on the outcome of that situation.
But to me, this sentence says it all.
Because this paragraph is not simply about Israel and Palestine, it's about the whole Middle East.
Bret Stephens is painting a picture here of a foreign policy that Donald Trump has where we're trying to withdraw from Afghanistan, we're trying to withdraw from Syria.
We're trying to take our troops home.
We're trying to minimize our involvement overseas and focus more on rebuilding the homeland.
And Bret Stephens says this is a disaster.
He is framing that as us turning our back on the Middle East and expecting them to return the favor.
What exactly does that mean?
It almost even sounds like An ominous statement?
I mean what is that supposed to mean?
Is Bret Stephens implying that we'll be attacked?
He's saying if we turn our back we cannot expect the Middle East to reciprocate.
Does that mean that they won't leave us alone?
What exactly does that mean?
What business do we have there?
What interests do we have there?
What does he mean that they won't turn their back on us?
Does that mean there'll be more terrorism if we turn our back on the Middle East?
Is he subtly implying that If we are not currently, for example, occupying Syria for no reason at all, there would be terrorist attacks against the United States, if not for the 1,000 troops in northeastern Syria, simply preventing Assad from consolidating control over his government, consolidating control over Syria.
That there would be, what, terrorism in the United States?
It almost even sounds like a threat.
Every time these people talk about this issue, they always, they always hinge it on the fear-mongering, right?
They always hinge it on the fear and this hysteria and alarmism that there could be another 9-11.
Dan Crenshaw's fond of this same tactic.
He says, well, we fight them over there so we don't have to fight them over here.
Well, you know, we don't have to fight them over here if we just didn't bring them here, right?
But, in any case, So he says that America can't turn its back on the region, pulling out of the Middle East is turning our back on the region, and he says that Israel will not be safe in a world of America first.
So if we put our country first, and we say America first, And we put our interests first and that means putting our troops perhaps on the southern border instead of on the border of Syria and Turkey.
He says that Israel will not be safe because we've abandoned our Kurdish allies and Iran is going to expand.
And to me, this highlights the fundamental issue in our foreign policy, which is that you have the neoconservative establishment comprised largely of Jewish Zionists, and that's not everybody that is a neocon is a Jewish Zionist, but almost all the influential and that's not everybody that is a neocon is a Jewish Zionist, but almost all the influential ones You know, Shapiro, Brett Stevens, Bill Kristol, all these characters.
Sure, Dan Crenshaw is a goy, okay?
He's a white guy.
He, I believe, is nominally a Christian, perhaps.
I'm not sure about that.
So not every neocon is a Jewish Zionist, but we understand there is an overwhelming influence, and we know why that is.
The neocons are trying to push us to go to war in the Middle East to benefit who?
Who is the beneficiary of all this?
Israel.
The war in Iraq, the destabilization of Syria, the war in Yemen, the saber-rattling with Iran.
Israel is the ultimate beneficiary.
They are the one demanding and calling on us to do these things.
So the fundamental distinction within the conservative movement is the reality of the neoconservative establishment and to some extent the military-industrial complex and the deep state, but primarily the Israel lobby Apac, the neocons, the commentariat, influences in the DOD and the State Department.
So you've got this reality of this institution, which has existed on the right and prevailed for decades, and you've got the rhetoric of the Trump administration, which is America first.
And these cannot coexist.
Because America First says we have to pull out of the Middle East.
We have to put our own country first.
Our concern is America First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth.
That's our only concern, in fact, right?
And that means that we're not going to be fighting other countries' wars.
We're not even going to be concerned so much with other countries' safety.
If they want to protect themselves, they can buy guns from us.
Right?
They can, you know, have some kind of, I don't know, diplomatic relationship, but we won't fight other countries' wars.
And particularly in the White House, this conflict is very apparent between the rhetoric of Donald Trump throughout the campaign, and even in his administration, about pulling out of useless, costly, endless wars in the Middle East, letting the Muslims fight over sand, and we're going to put America first, and pull out of Syria, and so on.
And this influence from people like Jared Kushner, who's very much in bed with, you know, the Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and all these other Zionist influences like Sheldon Adelson, from the funding perspective, and the ZOA, and all this.
So within the right you have this fundamental clash, and this is one of the big debates that we've been having with Charlie Kirk, which I'll get into in a moment when we read his piece for American Greatness.
But this is what we've tried to expose.
People have said, oh, you're obsessed with Israel.
You're fixated on Israel.
Why is that your number one issue?
It's not.
But foreign policy is a big issue.
Foreign wars, you could say, have been the biggest sin against the American people.
The biggest waste.
The biggest insult.
In the sense that we've spent $6 trillion in 20 years fighting wars that are unwinnable and not in our own interest.
Well, our own people die, right?
Our infrastructure crumbles.
We can't fund anything that actually helps our own people.
So of course it's not to say that...
Israel is the fixation, but the foreign wars are, and who's sort of at the foundation of that?
Who is the basis from which we have launched all these wars?
Well, I think it's the Israel lobby.
That is why this fundamental difference must be confronted and discussed.
This issue has to be forced.
And I read this from Bret Stephens, and it's actually some pretty striking intellectual honesty.
He is saying, Quite straightforwardly, you cannot have it both ways.
You cannot have America have this unconditional support for Israel, protect Israel from all her enemies, and be America first.
Israel is not safe in a world of America first.
And Bret Stephens says, if Israel cannot be safe in a world of America first, then America should not be first.
That's essentially what he's saying, right?
And so, the real takeaway is that the America First policy, according to their definition of anti-Semitism, is implicitly, is very implicitly and necessarily, according to their hokey definition of anti-Semitism, it must apply.
Because people like Ben Shapiro and Bret Stephens have said in the past that if you're anti-Zionist, you're anti-Semitic.
This is what Ben Shapiro says.
Somebody asked Ben Shapiro at one of his college speeches, or maybe he was on a radio show long ago, he said, why have you said that being anti-Zionist is anti-Semitic?
And Ben Shapiro gave a very interesting answer.
He said that, of course, the Holocaust happened, so in order for the Jewish people to survive, they need a homeland of their own.
In order for the Jewish people to survive in the homeland of their own, they have to be able to protect themselves against Iran, against other countries, and so it's a very interesting sort of chain of logic.
So he says that if you are not for Israel defending itself, if you're not for America defending Israel, then he has this roundabout justification that then you are not in support of Jewish people existing, and therefore you're anti-semitic, right?
Means the argument goes that if America was not unconditionally supporting Israel, Israel could not protect herself.
If Israel cannot protect herself, then the homeland of the Jewish people doesn't exist.
If the homeland of the Jewish people is under threat or could not exist, well, we know that then Jews would be left to fend for themselves in the diasporic countries.
And if that's the case, well, then there's no permanent existence for them.
You know, they know they're constantly under siege by governments.
Anti-Semitism is this eternal threat.
So that is a chain of logic.
In other words, and this is his sort of QED here, is you don't support Israel, you don't support Jewish people existing.
You don't support Israel defending itself or America giving this blanket security guarantee, unconditional support, then you think that Israel should be wiped off and whatever.
And so that's what they're saying.
They are saying that to be America first, to put America first, this is what they're saying, is implicitly anti-Semitic.
And to me, that exposes the whole thing.
Because what has Ben Shapiro and all the establishment called us for the past four weeks?
What have they fixated on and honed in on?
It's this anti-Semite angle, right?
Holocaust denial, anti-Semite.
And a lot of people hear that and they say, oh, you know, of course, of course we don't support anti-Semitism.
You know, most people's first thought, their intuition, is anti-Semitism means, you know, you don't like Jewish people, right?
But that's not their definition.
Their definition is, if America doesn't give unconditional support to Israel, that is anti-Semitism.
So a lot of people hear that smear and they go, oh that's terrible, we would never support an anti-Semite.
But they're coming out in this New York Times article and they're essentially saying, you cannot have the coexistence of Israel and America first.
Israel cannot be safe in a world where America is put first.
In other words, putting America first is implicitly anti-Semitic, it is necessarily that.
Now in light of that, do you maybe have a change of heart about these accusations?
Maybe does that change your perception of Ben Shapiro and when he levies those kinds of words and accusations against us?
Because to me, something like this, you cannot run from that.
There's no getting around that.
There's no verbal trickery that will subvert that.
This is the issue we're trying to force.
This is what we've been trying to expose with this issue in particular.
You know, people are saying, oh, you're fixating on this issue.
You're fixating on an issue which is unpopular, or, you know, evangelicals like Israel, or, you know, why do they care about the USS Liberty?
Fundamentally, it's about this.
It's forcing this question.
It's forcing people like Bret Stephens to come right out and say this, and he did.
He said, Israel will not be safe in an America First world.
Well, if that's the case, I choose America First!
I don't know about you, but I think Israel is more than capable of defending herself.
Because of the foreign aid we've given them, they've developed one of the most sophisticated and advanced militaries in the world.
They're one of the biggest arms exporters in the world because we've subsidized the development of their own arms contractors and their own domestic Defense contractor industry.
They've got one of the most powerful militaries in the Middle East, if not in the entire world.
They've got one of the most sophisticated rocket defense systems, missile defense systems.
They've got the only nuclear arsenal in the Middle East.
Iran may or may not have a capability, but they've got the only warheads in Israel.
They're more than capable of defending themselves.
So I don't know about you, but if it comes to me, If the question is America first or unconditional support for Israel, I'm choosing America first.
And if Bret Stephens and Ben Shapiro and Dan Crenshaw and Charlie Kirk and yes, unfortunately, even if Donald Trump says the latter, well then they cannot claim to be America first.
They cannot claim to be patriots.
They cannot claim to be nationalists.
They cannot claim to be lovers of their country.
They can't say that they have allegiance to this country because they don't.
If it was any other country that this was the case, if the sentence read differently, if it said that Brazil will not be safe in an America First world, would anybody care?
Would anybody bat an eye?
The United Kingdom will not be safe in a world with America First.
Would anybody?
Oh, so what?
Russia will not be safe in an America First world.
People would say, good!
But it comes to this country, and because, you know, a hundred years ago something terrible happened, We have to have unconditional America-last foreign policy?
I don't think so.
But this is why they're calling us anti-Semitic.
You go through, and it's pretty interesting, we've been going through Ben Shapiro's old tweets from 2012, 2013, and he calls Ron Paul anti-Semitic.
He calls Patrick Buchanan anti-Semitic.
He calls Donald Trump anti-Semitic.
Or he says that Donald Trump flirts with anti-Semites.
What do they all have in common?
What do they all have in common?
Ben Shapiro for 15-20 years says that Patrick Buchanan is a virile anti-Semite.
A virulent, vitriolic anti-Semite.
Ron Paul is a virulent anti-Semite who would strangle Jews if he could.
That's what he says about Ron Paul.
He says Donald Trump flirts with anti-Semites.
Foreign policy is asinine.
What do they all have in common?
Ron Paul, Patrick Buchanan, Donald Trump, all want to put America first.
Is that a coincidence?
Do you think all these people, prominent, mainstream politicians, do you think they all have Jew hatred in their hearts?
Do you think they all, you know, wake up every day and think, how am I gonna come after the Jewish people?
Or do you think they...
have postulated or they have put forward an America first foreign policy.
They've rose to prominence.
They've gained notoriety, been put in a position in a lot of ways to influence foreign policy.
And Ben Shapiro wants to shut it down.
And Brett Stevens wants to shut it down.
The Jewish Zionists want to shut it down because they want their precious Israel to be safe.
Well, I don't care about Israel.
I don't care about their protection.
I'm I don't care about their safety.
I care about our people.
And I care about our tax dollars and our security.
And Israel can help themselves.
So anyway, we could go on all night about that, but I think you get the point.
To me, that sentence is so important.
At that point, it's not even about Israel and Palestine and settlements and wars that happened 40 years ago or things that happened 80 years ago.
To me, it is about this fundamental distinction that must be pressed.
We must force this issue.
Because everybody wants to pretend that you can have one foot on both sides.
We cannot name the Israel lobby but in favor of America first.
Doesn't work like that.
Does not work like that.
You can see in this administration what is happening.
You can't have one foot in America first and one foot in the Israel lobby.
Doesn't work like that.
And case in point, look at the withdrawal from Syria.
We can't even pull 1,000 troops out of Syria, a country we never belonged in to begin with, because of the influence of this lobby.
And that's not America First.
But that's Bret Stephens.
We're going to move into our featured story here, which is Charlie Kirk's article in American Greatness.
And, you know, of course it actually ties in.
It nicely ties in, because Charlie Kirk is an Israel First-er.
If he were offered the choice of America first versus unconditional support for Israel, he would clearly choose the latter because of who he gets paid by.
But he writes an op-ed about other things in American greatness.
The title of his piece is called Clearing the Air on the Right.
The subtitle reads, The most interesting debates happening today in American political discourse are not between the left and the right, but rather within the right.
You got that right, exactly.
We should not shy away from our differences, but embrace the dialogue in good faith.
Well, I agree!
I agree with all of that.
I agree that the most interesting debate is happening on the right.
I agree that we should not shy away from our differences.
I agree we should embrace dialogue.
And I also agree that the best ideas and the best leaders will win.
Case in point, we won.
We defeated Charlie Kirk because we have the better ideas and the better leaders.
Smarter, more handsome, normal size teeth, normal size face.
But obviously Charlie Kirk doesn't believe this, and this is why we're reading this article.
It's sort of just such a brazen and blatant hypocrisy.
If you haven't been following this saga, you know, we've been going to Charlie Kirk's Q&A events.
And in response to this attempt by us to not shy away from interesting conversations happening on the right, an attempt by us to engage in a good faith discussion, to allow the best ideas and the best leaders to rise up, Charlie Kirk has dismissed our questions.
He's called the people asking them racists, homophobes, anti-semites, trolls.
He said that our attempt to engage in discussion is sabotage, is a trolling sort of joke.
He's gone after me in particular, these so-called better leaders with the better ideas.
He's tried to smear me.
He's coordinated a massive smear campaign against me by all his turning point proxies and associated people.
I've been told, and this is from the horse's mouth, I've been told that he's sending out DMs frantically to every brand ambassador that he knows, telling them, you've got to denounce Nick Fuentes.
You've got to disavow Nick Fuentes.
You've got to disavow Groypers.
You know, really, Charlie?
unidentified
I'm not.
nick fuentes
I'm friends with all these people.
That's what's going on.
He's telling people, he's putting the message out.
You've got to disavow.
You've got to condemn.
You've got to call him an anti-Semite.
You've got to overwhelm him by discrediting him and destroying his reputation so people don't take his ideas seriously.
Is that a good faith discussion?
He has called on the ZOA to demand that I be deplatformed from Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, all that.
He's pretended that he doesn't know who I am.
He had me apprehended by a dozen police officers and prevented from even attending his debate with Kyle Kalinske at Politicon, and then he pretended not to know what that was about.
More recently, you should have seen what he did.
Questioners came up and he called them neo-Nazis and white supremacists, had them doxed in some cases, So this is Charlie Kirk who says that we should engage in a good faith discussion and not shy away and allow the best ideas to flourish.
Really?
He writes in the article, or you know, his ghost writer says, when I started Turning Point USA at the age of 18, I was often guilty of applying a purity test.
So there's the frame.
A purity test when discussing issues or evaluating politicians and activists.
For example, if someone wasn't promoting a purely free trade solution to America's problems, I wasn't listening.
Over the past three years on this issue and many others I have changed my mind.
And I haven't been alone.
Millions of like-minded Americans have also changed their minds on issues once considered indisputable conservative doctrine.
I love the frame of this article because right from the outset he's admitting defeat.
He can do this brazen tactic where he says, you know, we're trying to have a good faith discussion.
But the frame from this first paragraph is People can change their minds?
People can change their minds.
I used to be one way.
I used to believe in free trade, but now I believe in tariffs.
And that means people can change their minds.
So we can see how he's setting this up already.
We can see the tone.
He says, As someone who became known as an activist and built a national campus organization, all while being called too conservative and racist, all while getting written up by SPLC's Hatewatch blog, all while being on the receiving end of multiple hit pieces either directly stating or implying that I'm a bigot and my organization traffics in bigotry, it's an admittedly new experience that some are now applying conservative purity tests to me.
Well that's fascinating because we feel the same way about the SPLC stuff!
The irony is just so thick.
It's so thick and so not self-aware.
Wow, the SPLC was writing up hate pieces or hit pieces.
Hatewatch was attacking you as a bigot.
Wow, I can't imagine what kind of sick, evil person would do that.
Dishonest, unscrupulous person would use a tactic like that.
He says, these tests focus on my support for President Trump, my stance on immigration, and my beliefs about the use of America's military.
Of course he's referring to the Groyper War.
And you know that this is a good faith discussion when he won't even talk about what he's really talking about.
You know that he really believes in good faith discussion when he's about to write an entire article about something without even explicitly talking about it, right?
He's gonna say, oh, I'm being subject to a purity test about my stance on immigration and so on.
So, he's referring to the Gruyper War, but he won't call it that.
He's referring to our coordinated inquiries, but he won't name me.
He won't name the questioners.
He won't talk about the campus tour.
He'll just say in very vague terms, I'm being subject to a purity test.
Well, that's a very good faith way to frame it, right?
I'm going to take the high ground and a very general, very ambiguous, face-saving, you know, consultant-drafted statement.
I'm being subject to a purity test, and the purity test focuses on X, Y, and Z. Now, you've been raped by groipers, okay?
You got groiped at your campus, you know, tour events, and we've humiliated you not simply on your support for President Trump and on immigration, but your support for Israel and your support for homosexuality.
So he also leaves those two parts out.
I presume this is just more good faith, right?
The good faith is just really... Can you feel the good faith?
Can you feel the honesty from this one that he's just completely ignoring the other two prominent grievances?
He writes, this fucking shirt, I'm gonna blow my head off if this just doesn't stay.
Why does it just keep...
Can't.
I can't.
I can't do it.
It's not a very casual fit tonight.
He says, normally I prefer to allow my body of work to speak for itself, which I believe it does.
However, these questions are part of a larger ongoing debate taking place within the political right on many important questions, and when people I respect start contacting me and asking that I assure them of my conservative bona fides, it's best to address these questions head on.
So this isn't a tactical question that That he's saying this explicitly shows what's happening behind the scenes.
He's saying, you know, normally I would just let my work speak for itself, but all my friends are now calling me and saying, do you support Trump?
Do you support America versus immigration?
And now he's got to write this to defend himself.
So to me, I think that's a victory in itself.
He writes, on Trump, and this part is kind of useless, he just goes through and says, you know, yeah, I didn't support Trump, but now I do.
I didn't support Trump, but then he won the nomination, and then I did support him.
So I'm just going to skip that whole part.
It's like, you know, look, if you came around to support Trump after he won the nomination, sorry, but that was most people, okay?
With the- with few exceptions of these zealot, so-called true conservative types, who are, again, largely Zionist Jew neocons.
With the exception of a few radicals, almost everybody came around and supported him.
Once he won the nomination.
That was not the difficult part.
I'll also add that he was caught on video in July upset that Trump won the nomination.
So to say that he saved his own ass by rallying behind the Republican nominee is not really a statement of support, right?
You know, obviously if you support Rubio and Cruz and all these guys throughout the primary right up until he wins the nomination, that's not really a vote of confidence.
You know, to say that you only got behind him when he was the last choice, when he was the nominee, when he was going up against Hillary Clinton, and could have possibly been the president.
In other words, when you actually had something to lose from not supporting him, then you started supporting him?
Sorry, but that really is not something that restores my faith that you're a Trump supporter.
You know, he didn't support him until he won the nomination.
Until well after he won the nomination.
And even in the process of the nomination, he was caught on video saying he was upset that Trump won.
Right?
So I would hardly say that that is indicative of the fact that he didn't support Trump, but then he got convinced.
At what point did he get convinced?
He serendipitously got convinced the night that Trump won the nomination?
And then he discovered that if Trump was an ex-president, he should be on the ins with this guy?
Okay.
But he moves on.
He talks about immigration and assimilation.
He writes, He says, He says, I was picturing the He says, I was picturing the He says, I was picturing the He says, I was picturing the He says, I was picturing the Michael Jordan or the Elon Musk of immigrants, for example.
But apart from simply being talented, they should also love this country and share our values, a point I failed to articulate fully in the past.
By contrast, our current system is inundated by unskilled workers coming in by the millions and driving down wages for America's most vulnerable workers.
Our immigration status quo is unacceptable.
I've since become aware, specifically when it comes to F-1 visas, that the criticisms about systemic fraud and abuse are completely warranted.
The university cartel, as I refer to it, has grown reliant on the high tuition paid by foreign students to fund the salaries of their bloated administrative operations.
He talks about what President Trump does.
He says, here are some immigration policies I do support.
Building the wall.
Ending birthright citizenship.
Establishing English as the official language of the United States.
Ending chain migration and the visa lottery.
Lowering overall legal immigration levels and dramatically increasing enforcement of e-verify and visa overstays.
Now I'll say that he supported almost none of this four weeks ago.
He supported almost none of this four years ago, and to this day there was a tweet that came out literally today from Turning Point USA talking about how mass legal immigration makes America better.
So what happened Charlie Kirk?
Did you have a change of heart like you did on the night of the nomination?
Did he suddenly have an epiphany like he did on the night of the nomination?
Trump got nominated on the GOP ticket.
I suddenly support him.
I suddenly think he has the best ideas ever and I like him personally.
And in the same way, in the past four weeks, after he got grilled by Michelle Malkin, and Tucker Carlson attacked him on a show in a very indirect way, and we've humiliated him, and we've exposed him for being pro-mass legal immigration, donors for his organization are fleeing for the exits, his own chapters are dissolving, In the wake of all this, he has an epiphany!
And he says, you know what?
Wow, um, I just never fully articulated it.
That I also support immigrants that like our values, and I spoke too loosely.
No.
You didn't speak too loosely.
You didn't fully articulate these views.
You didn't have these views.
You didn't speak too loosely.
You spoke very authoritatively and concisely and decisively that you were in favor of mass legal immigration.
It was only when we showed up to ask our questions and we embarrassed and humiliated and exposed you Did your consultants or your managers or your crisis team come in and tell you this is not the position you should have?
You're going to lose money from your donors.
You're going to lose support from the conservative establishment.
I'll also add, by the way, that he comes forward and he says, our concerns are valid.
What prompted this epiphany?
It was us.
It was the Groypers.
It was this show.
It was the followers of this show going to his events and asking him about his support for mass legal immigration and the F-1 visa lottery or the F-1 visa program.
Prior to that, he was militantly defending the F-1 visa program, saying that mass legal immigration is a good thing and we should have no cap on legal immigration.
He said that people that criticize more than 1 million legal immigrants per year, people like that are wonky.
They're wonky.
Oh, I don't like that.
So that was his position.
We come in and we grill him for this.
Of course, we expose his true position.
He gets backlash.
Then he has his epiphany.
All the while he's in this process of fully articulating his real views and speaking less loosely about legal immigration, he's smearing everybody that prompted this as white supremacists, racists, white nationalists, neo-Nazis.
They're from Identify Yevrapa.
So which is it?
So, on the one hand, you're conceding to us, and you're acknowledging that our concerns were correct.
And we showed up to the Q&A in good faith, and we asked you policy questions that got you in trouble.
And they got you in trouble because they were right.
Because we were right on immigration.
So are we right on immigration?
Are our concerns valid and legitimate and we are America first immigration supporters?
Or are we neo-nazi trolls who are unserious and just came to sabotage and we're not trying to engage in good faith and we have nothing serious to say and we're not what the founding fathers are about?
Which is it?
Because he can't have it both ways.
Now, Charlie Kirk says that we're white nationalists and all this, and he gets Benny Johnson, the bisexual, plagiarist hitman, to release all these clips of my show to make me look bad and delegitimize the Groipers and try to make this all go away.
That's what they say.
That's what they say.
But what do they do?
They change their policy.
They release an op-ed where they have this big epiphany saying that we were right the whole time.
So clearly we are not the neo-Nazis they say we are.
Clearly we are not the white nationalist, unserious, saboteur trolls that they say we are.
If he concedes that we were right, if he changed his position, bent the knee publicly at his events and in this op-ed, saying that he was wrong and we were right, our criticisms were valid, he is tacitly saying that we are America First and our criticisms were legitimate from the beginning.
Now that shows you, number one, who we are, but it also shows you who they are.
It shows you how dishonest, deceitful, unscrupulous, underhanded they are.
Because they know that we're right, but they call us these names in spite of that, knowing that these names are not true.
So he says, yeah, well here are some policies I do support.
I support, I think he did support building the wall, he did support the Trump position basically, but lowering overall legal immigration levels, that is not what he supported a month ago.
Since Ronald Reagan's mass amnesty in the 1980s, no issue provokes a sense of betrayal among conservatives more than immigration.
one month ago.
It was only after we asked him.
But anyway, we'll move on.
He says, Since Ronald Reagan's mass amnesty in the 1980s, no issue provokes a sense of betrayal among conservatives more than immigration.
More recently, it's the failure to authorize the construction of the border wall.
Da-da-da.
While I vehemently reject the notion that the melanin content in someone's skin determines their views and voting patterns, it's plain that culture plays a significant role at the ballot box.
It means conservatives must do a better job winning over minority voters of all varieties, both native and foreign born.
New immigrant waves to America trend progressive upon arrival, partly because of their native cultures, but also because Democrats promise to give them more stuff.
We have to reach out to these communities, not alienate them with anti-immigrant rhetoric that signals they are not welcome as conservatives.
So in this he's also acknowledging argument about electoral winter and all that, even though he's arguing against it.
He says... That's not true though.
That's completely not factual.
Citation needed?
After two or three generations, voting patterns for these communities historically have normalized to reflect something closer to the rest of the electorate.
And I believe that if conservatives do our job, this can remain true.
That's not true, though.
That's completely not factual.
Citation needed two or three generations.
How about you look at Jason Richwine's work on this?
He studied over two and three generations.
How about you look at Sam Huntington's work on this?
After four generations.
After two, three, four generations, Hispanics don't even identify as American.
They don't even graduate high school at normal levels.
They don't have wealth accumulation at the same levels, employment at the same levels.
I'm pretty sure they don't even have literacy at the same levels.
And certainly, you look at certain Asian demographics, they trend more progressive after two or three generations as they assimilate.
So all of this is just factually wrong.
He says, oh, well, you know, they trend progressive when they arrive, but after two or three generations, they tend to normalize.
Yeah, citation needed?
Where has that been demonstrated?
How about with blacks?
How many generations have blacks been in this country?
How many generations since they got the right to vote after the Civil War or the Voting Rights Act in the 1960s?
How many generations is it going to take for them to not vote 98% for Democrats?
Is that a normal pattern?
Is that normalized?
Anyway, so I mean this is all just wrong.
He talks about his support for the RAISE Act, which is insufficient.
Then he talks about foreign wars, and he spends a good deal of time talking about how he's against foreign wars and all this, but that doesn't really even address the fundamental point.
You know, he goes on for a few paragraphs talking about how he opposes the war in Iraq, he opposes our intervention in Syria and Afghanistan, but that's not really the question.
The question is not about foreign wars in particular, or rather in general, it's the Israel lobby in particular.
We can say that we oppose the Iraq war, but what good does that make if we're taking money from the ZOA?
We can say that we're against the war in Afghanistan, but if we're taking money from Sheldon Adelson, what difference does it make, right?
Between us and the past two or three administrations?
He says, I believe the most interesting debates happening today in American political discourse are not between the left and the right, blah blah blah, but we must resist applying fake purity tests Really?
unidentified
Wow!
nick fuentes
Well, that's incredible.
Incredible.
Excommunication of conservatives who differ on significant but complex issues.
unidentified
Really?
nick fuentes
Wow.
Well, that's incredible.
He says, let's persuade and convince our ideological allies, and when we're wrong, admit it and move on.
This is how we conservatives will win together in 2020.
Incredible.
Incredible article, Charlie Kirk.
He says, we must resist threatening public excommunications of conservatives who differ on significant but complex issues.
You know, sort of like exactly what you did to Michelle Malkin and me.
Sort of like exactly what you did to Michelle Malkin and me all throughout the last two weeks.
Why did Benny Johnson put together a ten tweet thread of ten second clips from my show going back three years And try to portray me as a racist and an anti-Semite and a Holocaust denier and so on, and then say that mainstream conservatives should not coddle Nick Fuentes.
He should not be welcome.
What was that?
What was that?
If not but an attempt to publicly excommunicate conservatives that differ on significant but complex issues.
That's exactly what that was.
You won't even say my name in this article.
You won't even address the Groydbers or your own campus tour.
And so like I said at the outset, you have the substance of the article, which is all wrong.
The substance of the article politically is just trash.
It doesn't address the fundamental questions.
The fundamental questions are this.
Demographic realism, social conservatism, and dual allegiance.
He addressed half of one issue, which is demographic realism.
He addressed his support for bad immigration policies and then gave a very half-assed rationalization for what amounts to civic nationalism.
That was as much as he did to answer demographic realism.
He did not talk about his normalization of homosexuality and degeneracy, his rejection of Christ, and he also did not talk at all about the Israel lobby.
He talked a little bit about foreign policy, but that's really not good enough.
So the substance of the article is trash.
I'm sure he didn't write this.
This was probably drafted and edited and read over by, you know, a dozen different consultants and professionals and whatever.
So we know that this came out of some kind of a laboratory, right?
And that is why the substance is as safe and sterile and clean as appropriate as it's supposed to be.
you know they're supposed to be taking the high ground not addressing the actual fighting not addressing the actual constituent fighters in this conflict and that's a substance the tactics of it is an unambiguous victory for us that he had even published this piece tells you we're winning why would he have to write something like this obviously addressing us obviously addressing our concerns after the griper war it's because he's getting phone calls
it's because he's getting phone calls from donors and chapter presidents and leadership in turning point usa saying what the fuck You know, forgive the language, but that's what they're saying.
They're saying, really?
You support stapling green cards to diplomas?
Did you see Tucker Carlson was making fun of that on his show last week?
What the hell, man?
You're saying mass immigration is a good thing?
You're in favor of more than a million legal immigrants a year?
What's wrong with you?
People are pulling their contributions.
Like I said, chapter presidents are dissolving organizations.
So he puts out an article saying, clearing the air on the right.
And what this really is saying is, please stop leaving my organization.
That's what it's really saying.
It's saying, please stop leaving my organization.
Look, look, I'm America first.
Look, I learned.
I learned what I'm supposed to do.
Here, look, I don't support F-1 visas anymore.
And then look, look, I supported Donald Trump after he won the nomination.
And here, I don't support war in Iraq.
And I'm not against free speech.
I love free speech.
That's what this is.
It's a very desperate attempt to persuade people, to convince people who are running for the exits, that he has any legitimacy or credibility on any of these issues, or is a Trump supporter, which he doesn't.
I find this fundamentally uncompelling, and anybody who reads it will have the same thoughts that I will.
Anybody who reads this first paragraph Come on, really?
After these four weeks, everybody's seen what they've done to me, what they've done to Michelle Malkin.
He says we can't shy away from a good faith conversation.
Everybody saw what happened in the Don Jr.
UCLA event and why it happened.
He shut down the Q&A, the messing around with the lines, and so on.
So to me, this is sort of their battle of the bulge, so to speak.
This is their last ditch effort to try to convince people that they are not exactly what they say we are, which is frauds, Israel first, corporations first, owned and controlled by their donors, totally out of touch, and fundamentally at odds with free speech, hypocrites on their most fundamental issue, which is the dialogue itself.
So I read this, this, it's a total victory.
This is waving the white flag.
It's saying, yes, I support, you know, immigration restriction.
Yes, I'm against foreign wars.
We forced him to bend the knee and to explain to everybody what he's about, and nobody's buying it.
So we'll have more for Charlie Kirk at SAS.
I would like, I would like to write an article for American Greatness.
I think if Charlie Kirk gets to write an article for American Greatness, why can't I write an article?
Right?
I'm, I mean, there were a couple of articles in this publication sort of giving the other side, but how about one of the Groipers himself?
How about the Supreme Commander of the Groipers himself?
How is that fair?
You know, and that's the bottom line throughout this whole thing, is how it's totally asymmetrical.
These people get to pretend we don't exist, ignore us, and so on.
We've triumphed in spite of that.
But it's like, okay, if we're in favor of this free and open conversation, when do I get my turn to give my side of the story?
If you get to say your piece about this whole thing, and pretend it's not happening the way it is, and just brazenly lie, how come none of us get to give our side?
And they're gonna try and say, oh, well, we had one of our staff writers.
You know, write some kind of competent defense of what we're doing?
Well, that's not really good enough.
You know, that's not what they did for Charlie Kirk.
They didn't get one of their staff writers to offer a defense of Charlie Kirk.
They let Charlie Kirk write an op-ed.
So where's our op-ed?
When do the Groypers get a little bit of legitimacy?
When do we get to be taken seriously?
We're the ones that started this thing!
Clearly, you cannot have it both ways that we're so unserious and controversial that, you know, you can't publish anything we write and you can't talk about us and so on, but at the same time you're going to publish an op-ed that's entirely about us, it just doesn't mention us by name.
So, I would like to write something up about this this weekend, I think I will.
And I'll either publish it on my own or I'll find somebody else to publish it, but I'm going to write something up as a counter to this and sort of just go through and explain exactly what's happened and what our grievances are and what America First is.
And if they were fair, I think American Greatness would publish it.
I like them.
I think they've been doing great work, but I tried to like back-channel a little bit today and they were hesitant about the idea.
I think it's only fair that we get a rebuttal, right?
I mean, what happened to the free and open conversation, right?
They're more willing to publish hypocrites, people that lie, than me.
But anyway, that's the Charlie Kirk article.
It's, you know, maybe another great victory, another one of these epilogue victories, one of these little goodies that we get to go away with.
But we're gonna get into our Super Chats and we'll see what you guys are saying about all this.
He's running out of time here.
I wish I had a little bit of water.
That's not a request, by the way, from the producer, but just saying.
I have a water bottle right over there, and I'm looking at it, and it's very tempting.
It's like when SpongeBob is in Sandy Cheek's dome, and he's saying, I don't need it.
I don't need it.
I don't need it.
I'm looking right across the room with that water bottle sitting on the floor and I'm, you know, my mouth is dry.
I'm licking my lips.
I'm saying, I don't need it.
I need it!
You just fly across the desk.
Just pour it on my face.
Okay.
Anyway, we're gonna get into our superchats.
We've got Mr. Corgi who says Owen Cringeman be like, but but but I had an appearance in the House Bunny, so I was Hollywood elite.
Dude needs to hop off Nick's dick.
Yeah, facts.
Well, and I found out a very interesting fact about Owen Benjamin today.
You know, he's been calling me Jewish.
Which is funny because he is Jewish, you know?
Which is a very Jewish tactic, I might add.
You know, he has said on stream in the past that his father, I think, is like half Jewish, which would make him a quarter.
So, you know, he's said this in the past repeatedly and confirmed it that he has Jewish DNA.
And lately he's been lying and saying, oh, Nick Fletchers is actually Jewish.
You know, this is totally the Spurg and very true to form tactic by somebody like Owen Benjamin to say, oh, no, no, no, but you are too.
You are too, see?
And the reason that he said that is because he's citing a forum post from like 10 years ago I don't even know when it was published But he found some forum post from some obscure website that says that Fuentes could have been a Jewish surname right that is his evidence a forum post and a forum meaning anybody can post there it's not like this is in a book it's not like this is by an expert or a professor or anything like that a forum post from some obscure website that nobody's ever heard of says you know
Fuences might have been a surname which also means by the way Fuences is a local Spanish name but in any case so he had been using that as evidence that oh Nick Fuences is Jewish too you know I I'm Jewish, but so is he, so is he!
You and me, we're the same!
But I found out today that you know who sent that to him?
And maybe even the guy that wrote that forum post?
Was, uh, what's his name?
Andrew Meyer.
Who's a Jewish Zionist himself.
Who's a hardcore Israel firster, hardcore Jewish guy, his identity is Jewish, you know?
One of these Florida types.
So this guy, Andrew Meyer, has been trying to debate me on Israel for like months and I turn him down because I've done it before and he doesn't have enough clout.
And so this guy tweets the other day, Oh, I actually, I actually tipped off Owen Benjamin that Nick is Jewish because Nick is anti-Semitic or something like that.
So it's like, hmm, Jewish Zionist Andrew Meyer goes to Jewish Hollywood guy Owen Benjamin and says, Hey, I have this article about Nick Fuentes saying that he's got, uh, I have this fake forum post saying that Nick Fuentes is this.
This is what we're talking about.
So I generally refrain from talking about this, uh, you know, sad and pathetic loser, but...
I just thought that was an interesting development.
I just want to put that out there for the record.
It's just so typical.
Is it really surprising to anybody?
Because this rumor, I've seen this rumor passed around by bad actors, feds, wignats, lefties all the time, and it's like, to finally put it to bed, hmm, who's the one pushing that around?
Andrew Meyer.
So I think that kind of says it all.
But anyway, don't want to spend too much time.
That guy's, you know, like I said, the guy's a faggot.
What happened?
I saw a video this week where Owen Benjamin was like naked with another guy, slapping a guy's ass.
Did you see that?
The guy that does weird, I mean, what do they call it?
Bedroom wanks?
You know, he's jerking off with other guys, naked with other guys.
He talked about wrestling naked with other guys.
Yikes!
Yikes, department!
So, you know, needless to say, I think there's not really more to contribute to that conversation.
We'll let him, you know, figure out his issues wherever he is.
Tandrew says, this is an America First public service announcement for the holidays.
Acting like an unhinged lunatic with Asperger's will not red pill your family.
In most cases, it's better to say nothing than to say something foolish.
Chill, gamers.
Yeah, I second this.
You know, a lot of people, and I've been pushing back on this for years, a lot of people, they learn the relevant facts, they learn what's going on, and the first impulse is, I want to tell everyone I know.
I want to tell my friends, I want to tell my family, and I'm going to be persistent, I'm going to push this on them, and I'll tell you it's just not a good idea.
You are much better off having a nice holiday because, you know, in the grand scheme of things, family is one of the most important things, right?
Having a good relationship, having those moments, because you don't have family forever, you know?
And family are your blood.
Those are the only people, with few exceptions, that you can count on more than anybody else.
Blood is thicker than water.
That's kind of what the movement is about, is this idea of kin and family and your own and your community, right?
So, to alienate people over politics is just about the dumbest thing you can do.
So yeah, I would say this Thanksgiving, enjoy the company of your family.
Enjoy your time with them.
You know, enjoy a nice meal and talk about nice things.
Talk about what the kids are up to.
You know, school.
Talk about what the adults are up to.
You know, home improvement.
Talk about, you know, maybe have ideas.
Maybe talk about church.
You talk about what you're thankful for.
Be positive.
There's enough political stuff in the world.
There's enough negativity.
You know, why bring that into the holiday, right?
Why bring that into a time when people are supposed to come together and that you're supposed to be shielded from a lot of the nastiness and ugliness and fighting of the world and At least that's the way I look at it.
As somebody that's been in this struggle for years now, it's like every day I wake up and it's a fight.
It's a fight from the time I wake up until the time I go to bed.
On Twitter, on my show, it smears.
It's, you know, fighting back in the battle of ideas, whatever.
And the idea that you would bring that into a nice conversation with extended families is just wrong.
Family's what it's all about.
so uh let's see baseball worldwide's estimated shipping time on merch orders love the show can't wait to rep the gear it kind of varies depending on where you are and some orders take longer than others just be patient i have so many people that are emailing me where's my order where's my order and i check and it's like on the way Where's my order?
Where's my order, Nick?
I need you to email me.
They're sending me, like, multiple emails.
Where's my order?
Please tell... It's like... And then I go and check, and of course, it's on the way.
It's in the mail.
In one case, it was, like, being delivered that day.
It's like, if you just waited one more day, you wouldn't have had to pester me.
I have a thousand emails in my inbox, and I got, you know, people emailing me every day a dozen times.
I still didn't get my merch!
I still didn't get my merch!
Just be patient, alright?
Just be patient.
so so it'll come trust me you want to email me i'll look up okay baby i'll look up your tracking number and i will tell you that it's on the way if you need me to do that but um so it's it's on it's i guarantee you it's on the way just be patient I ordered my Kanye merch in October and it still hasn't come.
And I'm not emailing Kanye West every day and saying, Hey Kanye, where's my shirt?
Where's my shirt?
I didn't get a tracking number of my shirt.
It said eight to 12 weeks for shipping and I said, I'm okay with that.
When it comes, it comes.
And, uh, you know, if it doesn't come in a few months, well then I'll, then I'll make a report, you know, then I'll, then I'll try and get a refund or something, you know, but I'm going to be patient.
I also have a hat coming in the mail.
I have a pretty cool hat coming in the mail on Sunday.
You're gonna love it.
I think I'll wear it on stream on Monday or Tuesday.
Anyway, uh video game snake says charlie kirk is the leader of anti-raw if you believe demographics is destiny get ready to get punched Anti-racists rise up.
Yeah anti-raw coming to protest our events charlie kirk wearing the black mask But you could tell but you could tell that it's him because Uh, he's wearing a ski mask and you could see his little concave teeth inside the the hole for the mouth uh, foley says I'm still clinging to my past libertarian fetish of the 10th Amendment and states' rights.
Should I move on?
Or is this still a viable political tool and solution?
I would probably move on.
Nobody really respects the Constitution anymore.
And the Constitution in itself is not as valuable as it once was.
Now I'm much more concerned with outcomes as opposed to this process, you know, and what the Constitution says.
Nobody cares anymore.
You know, we're getting basically hate speech laws already, right?
Some kid was arrested in Naperville, which is not far from me this week.
Because he made a joke.
A racist joke.
A 14-year-old kid, uh, called a black student a slave.
And he's getting charged with a hate crime.
Okay?
So, how's that for the Constitution?
Well, but the Tenth Amendment says!
Democrats are giving you the finger.
You know, all these faggot Federalist types are like, well, but the Constitution says!
And Democrats are like, don't care, didn't ask, plus you're white.
You know, I mean, that's, that's what's happening.
And, and, you know, you're crying, and you're crying about it.
I don't know, probably not.
Okay, shut up!
I've never gotten the sports analogies wrong, alright?
They're always on point.
Have a good weekend, King and the Groypers.
I don't know.
Probably not.
John says, Nick, sports analogies be like, when they step up to the bat, if you don't throw a perfect spiral, they're going to hit a three-pointer.
Okay, shut up.
I've never gotten the sports analogies wrong, all right?
They're always on point.
I know.
I know why that's wrong, okay?
Yeah, it's deliberate.
I try to be funny mode about it.
But yeah, I don't watch sports.
Everybody knows that about me.
unidentified
I'm, uh, this has never been my thing, all right?
nick fuentes
But yeah, make fun of the cool genius with an epic show, for sure, because I'm not the most athletic.
Oatmeal Moments says, thoughts?
Okay.
Magnums says, please watch second to last Klavin question at UCF.
Okay.
Bert says flex on boomers by kneeling for holy communion at your local novice ordo parish and ladies wear veils.
Oh wow, based bro.
Mark says can you review your policy on which super chats you read and which ones you don't read anymore?
Thanks and keep doing what you're doing.
I'm reading all of them.
Lately it's just uh if they're like wignat type if they're bad optics I'm not gonna read them.
Trent says address me as your highness high as United 30,000 feet up and you're not invited.
What is that?
What is that one from that is from?
Which one is that from That is from That is from is that from so appalled I want to say let me let me double check on that is that from so appalled and Yes!
Ho ho!
Epic check!
I'm a genius!
I got it!
You could almost any Kanye song, even from Freshman Adjustment, you can name and I would get the lyrics.
Only the good songs though from Freshman Adjustment, not the bad ones.
Yeah, I got it.
So appalled.
And yeah, that reminds me.
Today is the ninth anniversary of the release of my beautiful, dark, twisted fantasy.
I was listening to that today.
I had to.
I'll be listening to that all night tonight.
Honestly, one of the best albums of all time, in my opinion.
I listen to that album and I sometimes forget how good it is.
There's only a couple of songs that I don't love.
Like, I hate the song, Hell of a Life.
and blame game is not like a real banger i like that song when i'm in a certain mood and it's funny the the chris rock sort of outro but hell of a life i never really liked but i was listening through it today and it's just like banger after banger monster all of the lights run away Gorgeous devil in a new dress.
I mean just power from start to finish.
It's just Kino from start to finish is just great tracks game changers stand the test of time So yeah, I hope people are listening to that album today.
I certainly was listening to it today He's the greatest.
He's the greatest of all time.
It's just simple in terms of rappers in terms of hip-hop uncontested best of all time And that was probably the high watermark, I would say.
Well, I don't know.
Life of Pablo is pretty good, too.
ASDF says, I waited on my house rep today.
He was talking to his supporters and mentioned how birth rates in Europe and the U.S.
are down and we need immigration because of it.
Then some boomer chimed in with the illegally meme.
Yeah, well, that's not really surprising.
That's what the conversation is these days.
That's exactly what the conversation is.
Senecas has been bumping that Denzel Curry intro song you debuted on DLive.
Who made it?
I'd love to throw a few bucks their way.
That song owns.
God bless, bud.
Well, thanks.
I'm really glad you like it.
The guy that makes all the original music for this show is a good friend of mine.
From BU, back from when I was in college.
I don't want to dox him or anything, but he's a very, very solid guy.
Really talented in a lot of ways.
But the links for the music are in the description.
I don't have the link for that song up, but I think it might be on his channel on SoundCloud, so the SoundCloud links to the intro and the lobby music for this show are down below, so you can check him out there.
I don't know if you can message on SoundCloud, but that's who he is.
He's got a lot of other good music as well.
Very solid guy.
I don't know what that means.
You mean if we make Dave Rubin a heterosexual or do you mean if we beat him in a debate?
Catholic monarchy?
I don't know what that means.
You mean if we make Dave Rubin a heterosexual, or do you mean if we beat him in a debate?
I'm not really sure what you mean.
One, two, three.
This is a big fan here, Nick.
I want to ask how do we encourage change in society where people have no virtue and specific casual sex and nihilistic individuals Wow, really great question.
How do we make change in society when things are bad?
Well, I'm doing it I'm doing it join your party have a family live your values become a part of the community.
That's how you do it You gotta be the change you want to see in the world.
I know that's a gay thing to say, it's a gay quote, but it's true.
A lot of people want to talk, but people don't want to live the lifestyle.
You know, they want to talk, they want to talk, but they don't want to have a family, they don't want to get married, they don't want to settle down, they don't want to, you know, be true believers, but that's what you have to do.
And you have to, if you believe in community, you have to get involved in the community.
A lot of people say, I'm just going to go fuck off and live in the woods and that's going to be it for me.
It's like, well, that's not really, uh, I mean, certainly some people that's their ideology.
Their ideology is primitivism, but you know, if you're one of these people that believes in community and, um, you know, belonging and family and solidarity and things like that, well, you got to get involved in the community and, um, you know, have a big family and, uh, Teach your kids the proper way, you know?
And, um, you know, support people like me, support people like me, right?
And, uh, join your, if not that, you know, join your local party.
Join the Republican Party, whatever.
Do what you can.
Uh, Jake says, yeah, of course I believe in Christianity.
Oh, public morality is nosediving?
It's tearing the fabric of society?
What, you want to legislate morality?
What is this, a theocracy?
T. Charlie Kirk, yeah, exactly right.
Well, it's just, it's total context denial, and totally out of touch, When people say things like, oh you want a theocracy or you want to legislate morality, people are just going to do what they want in the privacy of their own homes.
It is denying and ignoring the obvious reality which is that it's not the 1970s anymore, right?
Or it's not it's not the 1950s anymore.
In the sense that, you know, maybe in another time you might say, oh well people are just simply doing what they want in their homes, but that's not what's happening.
The institution of marriage is in crisis.
It's being destroyed.
Families virtually don't exist anymore in a lot of ways, right?
Things are being torn apart at the seams.
Gender, male-female relationships, the marital bond, children being raised by their mothers and taught by their fathers, all this.
It's being destroyed at the fundamental level.
And anytime we push back on that, we hear from Charlie Kirk that we're theocrats, we're the Westboro Baptist Church kids.
Talk about tone-deaf.
Talk about context denial.
What's happening all around us?
So yeah, that's exactly right.
And that's what a lot of people say that kind of thing to me.
They say, oh, don't you think you're being insensitive?
It's like, no, I don't.
I think we are the only people that are the resistance.
We're the only people making the case against mass immigration.
We're the only people making the case against degeneracy.
We're the only people making the case against the societal ruin.
And people come to us and they say, oh, but couldn't you moderate a little bit?
Well, couldn't you be more sensitive?
If you want moderation, if you want sensitivity, that's everyone else.
That's literally everything else.
If you want somebody to be an absolute pushover about these issues, that's every other institution in the country.
And they come to the one source of authentic resistance, real, strong, muscular, With moral conviction the resistance to this decline and they say oh but don't you think you're being a little insensitive don't you think that's sometimes it is hyperbolic sometimes it is extreme so be it we're trying to be provocative we're trying to provoke thought we're trying to get people thinking about the other side You know, because the consensus is that this is okay.
The consensus is that homosexuality should be normalized, and casual sex is fine, and divorce is fine, and single-parent households are fine, and mass immigration and replacement is just okay.
That's the consensus by everybody, and nobody is offered an alternative.
If they do, you see what happens to them, and they apologize, they bend the knee, or they, you know, go into irrelevance.
So then people come to us, the only ones making the case for the other side, and they say, well, don't you think you're going a little far?
Don't you think that's a little insensitive?
I don't think so.
Don't you think it's insensitive when these people say they're going to replace us?
I mean, that's literally what they say.
We'll replace you, there'll be a funeral for whites in America, whites will become a minority, and that's a good thing.
Where's the sensitivity from the people with all the institutional backing?
Anyway, so that's exactly on point.
ASDF says, uh, retards be like, uh, was getting smeared by journalists part of your plan?
Of course, retards!
Well, congratulations!
You got yourself smeared!
What's the next step of your master plan?
Crashing Conservative Inc?
That doesn't really work so much.
But that's true.
Was getting smeared by journalists part of your plan?
Of course!
Well, congratulations!
You got yourself smeared!
So what's the next step of your master plan?
Crashing this movement with no survivors!
I mean, that's all we're doing.
That's exactly what we're doing.
We're crashing the movement.
We're crashing it, and that's the thing.
That's the thing.
I don't care if we win at this point.
Well, I shouldn't say that.
I care if we win, but I think Jake Lloyd said this.
I don't know what victory looks like.
I don't even know if it's even possible anymore.
I think we might be too far gone.
But even if we can't win or if we don't win, we're gonna crash the plane, okay?
Now that doesn't mean, okay, disavow, that doesn't mean crashing literal planes into things.
Not like that.
But like Bain says, we're gonna crash this vessel, which is the conservative movement.
We are going to torpedo conservative bank.
We're gonna torpedo the establishment.
We're gonna cause a lot of pain, a lot of destruction, ideologically, rhetorically, you know, infrastructurally speaking.
Infrastructure in terms of organizations, not buildings.
I just can't.
These military analogies can very easily become problematic for us.
But yeah, that is the objective.
People say, you're dividing the movement, you're ruining the movement.
Yes, we will either replace the movement or we will destroy the movement.
But that's it.
We won't be ignored anymore.
We won't be shut out anymore.
You've got two options.
Conservative Inc.
is going to just fear us forever.
We will never go away.
And, you know, we will deconstruct what you have.
Or we're going to win.
And that's how we're going to play.
It's like what Trump, you know, when everyone was saying when Trump ran for the primary, you're destroying the party.
You won't even endorse the eventual nominee if it's not you.
And he's like, yeah, I mean, I'd like to be the nominee, but if not, I'm not going to take away my options.
That's like us.
You know, we'd like to be the conservative.
We would like to become...
The conservatives in the country.
But if not, then we're never gonna stop this.
We're not gonna get rid of any of our options.
Conservatarians, as I've worked with too many special needs kids to not know that Charlie Kirk has Asperger's.
Friends X has it and has virtually all the same mannerisms.
Yeah, I noticed exactly the same thing.
It's all these tics.
The tics with his mouth, the tics with his eyes.
He does his blinking thing.
He does that.
And he does this mouth thing.
Pay very close attention.
He does this.
I'm probably going to start doing it now that I've got it in my head.
But he does the blinking.
He does this with his mouth when he's talking.
He does that.
And the teeth.
The teeth is something I've seen in a lot of people.
Like I said, I've seen it in Owen Benjamin.
I've seen it in Charlie Kirk.
I've seen it on Ashton Witte.
They all have the same sort of teeth situation.
These little teeth, big tooth to gum ratio, sort of concave inverted, or rather they're pointed inwardly.
And I don't know if that's part of it, but certainly it seems like that goes with the territory.
It seems like that's a pattern.
So yeah, definitely has all the textbook mannerisms, as you say.
Characteristics of someone of the Aspergers.
And I don't say that in a negative way, but it's just true.
YamatoGoddess says, remember Andrew Jackson and back when Democrats actually were the real racists?
Ah, those were the good old days.
Yeah, well what they say is racist now is actually based in Red Pill, so...
Mr. Lennon says, how much do the YouTube jannies get paid?
unidentified
I don't know what that means.
nick fuentes
Let's see.
Andy says, you won crazy nikka.
Here's a free super chat.
Thanks.
I had to read that like that.
Throb Schneider says, congrats on 69,000 subs this weekend.
Nice.
Can we get some ends in chat for nice and only for nice and absolutely nothing else?
Congrats, King.
Oh, thanks.
Yeah, let's get some ends in chat for nice.
No, because like I said, I'm deeply in denial about it.
Remember, remember, if it ever comes down to this, if it ever comes down to YouTube banning me, I will always have the case that they're discriminating against a protected class.
So no, I still identify as male because I'm deeply undercover about this identity.
I think I'll only begin to manifest it once, or if, I should say if, I ever get banned from YouTube.
Then I'll say, as a deeply closeted trans man, they discriminated against me, a protected class, and banned my show.
And then I'll have a lawsuit on my hands.
C says hi Nick your favorite female griper here.
Okay.
Well, I'm putting words in my mouth, but okay Yeah roast me.
My question is how are females supposed to be based in Redfield if they're not online?
They're not supposed to be based in Redfield.
That's just it They're not supposed to be I don't want a you know wife who is based in Redfield I don't want a wife who is cooking son and rad pie and saying goy.
I don't ever want to hear my wife say the word goyim Okay, that's just it We don't want hyper-political, based-in-red-pill movement GFs.
We want normal, apolitical wives.
They are sort of instinctually feminine and shrad.
That's just it.
Women cannot be based-in-red-pill.
They simply cannot be.
Women can be women, or they can be these disgusting pig feminists.
But there's nothing in the middle.
There is no You know, BNR.
Women don't take these ideological pills because they can never be woken up.
They can never be woken up because fundamentally on a certain level, they're not even really conscious of, you know, cognizant of what's happening on the political realm.
In many ways, I think.
So I would say you know woman woman becoming red-pilled has that ever happened ever in history certainly there are some women I would say like Michelle Malkin is like spiritually based and red-pilled I'd say Ann Coulter's based in red pill but in terms of like egirls and all that You know, we're not looking for women to be going online and reading Culture Critique.
We just want them to raise our kids and cook a little schnitzel and beans, which is what my mom did for me this week.
Had some great... It's been a long time, but we had that very healthy option.
We wanted to cook baked mustard chili.
We want, you know, the rigatoni D, okay?
That's what we want.
And um You know, we don't we don't really want the reading lists.
We don't really want to sit down and have a discussion We don't we don't want wifey to be harping about I'm not gonna say that unoptical was about to say something very epic, but not optical at all We don't want them talking about Things that are happening in the country.
I know that's a dud but I was about to say something very epic, but very getting me bandworthy so, um We say, yeah, roast me.
I will roast you.
How are females supposed to be based in Redville if they're not online?
We don't want them online.
We don't want them to be based in Redville.
We want them to be apolitical and just feminine, okay?
And that's enough.
Yeah, well, we need to be online.
No, you don't!
What, are they gonna be on Twitter and making this trash content?
I have never seen a femoid making good content, with a few exceptions.
Most e-girls just peddle trash, okay?
Their content is just garbage.
And I'm I could spend a lot of time on my on my views on this but I'll just leave it at this no e-girls Okay, let's see video game snake says Vox day comparing the gripers to Jordan Peterson and acting like he took down Jordan Peterson as a joke Don't know what crawled up his rump such a loser I don't know what you're referring to.
I didn't see him say anything like that.
I I don't watch his content.
People are always saying, Vox Day said this, Vox Day said that.
I don't really know what you're talking about.
But yeah, certainly anybody that works with Owen Benjamin.
Well, probably not on our side, so whatever.
Matt Walsh says, Christian equals believing a carpenter nailed through a cross, repented for the sins of humans, ate magic fruit because a talking snake told him to.
Okay.
So we've got some kind of cringe atheist in chat.
Yes, yes.
I love when they try to make it like talking snake.
These are people that believe in the multiverse, okay?
The same people that are saying, Le Talking Snake, Le Sky Dad, these are the people that believe that the universe came from nothing, and they don't know how he got here, and they think that there's a multiverse, and there are universes where it's exactly the same, but it's, you know, a little bit different.
You know, these people believe in things that are straight-up retarded, okay?
Straight-up ridiculous.
They believe in black holes spitting out planets and all this crazy stuff.
They believe that we came from monkeys.
Give me a break.
The Bible makes more sense than any of this, you know, lab coat shit.
Please.
These people can't explain anything.
Science!
Science!
I believe in science.
Really?
Science can't explain anything.
Do you know how many times I've like gone to Google and said like, you know, what is this?
What is that?
It's like scientists have no idea.
Scientists don't know why we sleep.
They don't know why we yawn.
They don't know why we laugh.
They don't know what lightning is.
They don't know how the origin of life got started.
They don't know where the universe came from.
They don't know how big it is.
I mean, they don't know anything!
unidentified
And they're like, oh, late talking snake!
nick fuentes
They believe that, you know, Christ was crucified, died, buried, rose again.
Yes, bitch.
And if you don't believe that, you're gonna burn in hell forever.
Science!
Science says I'm calculating that I'm burning at a temperature of approximately 100 Kelvin.
That's- that's gonna be you.
So you better repent, big guy.
Better repent.
Because if you're wrong, you're gonna be on fire, uh, forever.
VideoGameSnakes says Vox Gay wants to debate you on the 6 million now.
Pseudo-intellectual with nothing of value to say in his monotonous, spurred voice.
Which side is he on?
Which side is he on?
Is he on the side of 6 million happened, or is he on the side of 6 million didn't happen?
But yeah, I just don't think he has enough clout to debate that.
I also think it's sort of a diversion from what we're trying to get at, which is mass immigration, Israel.
Seems like a big waste of time.
But in any case... I don't know.
I would know.
I'd have to think about that.
I would say that Vox and all these guys really just trying to hijack my clout.
Debate me!
Debate me!
Trying to hijack my clout.
People that are irrelevant.
But yeah, I think that's probably a diversion.
Probably just a big distraction.
But let's see, we've got Colin who says, hey Nick, my first super chat, thanks for the work you do for Zoomers.
Like, why would we debate something that happened 80 years ago?
Of course, of course the masturbation machines and the, uh, what was it?
Lampshades and soap and all of that happened, alright?
Look, somebody called me up from the Washington Post.
And they said, do you deny the Holocaust?
And I said, no.
I said, I would never deny the Holocaust.
I would never deny the Holocaust.
I have never denied the Holocaust.
He said, do you believe the official story from the museums that, you know, there's a systematic killing of six million people and blah, blah, blah?
I said, yes.
I said, yes, of course.
I said, I believe all of it.
You know, Elie Wiesel, he graduated from my school, Boston University, and even though he lied about the whole thing, even though in his book he was caught in multiple bald-faced lies about what was happening, I don't care.
I still believe it, okay?
The stories about the masturbation machines, you know, jerking them off to death, which was written about, the lampshades, the bars of soap, the roller coasters, the roller coasters I believe it all.
Why would they have any reason to lie?
Why would they have any reason to lie or even exaggerate, right?
I said I've never denied it.
And beyond that, why would they have any need to exaggerate it or, you know, come out with this ridiculous stuff?
Whatever you want, whatever you want.
And reason being is I like to be alive.
I want to be alive.
I don't want to get assassinated like, you know, like other people.
No, it's not to say that I don't believe the facts.
I do.
I believe the facts.
But, you know, also I don't want to get killed like people that have denied it.
So that's why I make it very clear.
I have not denied, you know, of course because I believe every part of it, but also because I don't want to get assassinated or get my house exploded like has happened to other people that have You know, I want to be clear, I made a joke, but people that have said similar things unironically have had their warehouses burned to the ground, you know, people show up to their doors threatening them, they've been assassinated, and, and for good reason!
And for good reason!
They were denying something that obviously happened, and that's, that's, it's worth getting killed over that, you know?
You know, people tell me they deny the moon landing, and I'm like, you know, oh, you deny things that actually happened?
Well, that should be criminalized like it is in Europe with other things.
So yeah, I think I've made my position on this crystal clear.
Crystal clear if anybody's actually interested in the truth.
Colin says hey Nick my first super chat.
Thanks for the work you do for zoomers and the US I can see many similarities with AF and Okay, I'm just not reading this I see many similarities with you and a you know fascists.
Oh, thanks Princess says, call me a based Jew.
unidentified
No.
nick fuentes
Jared Kushner says, I went on New York Times today and I see a message that the New York Times is reviewing our cookie policy.
Wow, things are moving fast.
Yeah, Overton window is shifting there.
They're looking very closely at their official cookie position.
Let's see a sick nothing with a big super chat.
Thanks so much Andrew Stone.
Oh, we've got a so this guy is a bear He says Nick lives with his mom and this is presumably a supporter of Owen Benjamin Well, you support a homosexual Jewish failed Hollywood comedian.
So I mean, yeah, I I guess, uh, I guess me saving money and not buying into the rent game at 21 years old.
You know, that's so weird that a Jewish guy would shame me for not paying rent money.
That's so weird.
That's so weird that Owen Benjamin would say, oh, you know, building generational wealth and living in a multi-generational home in a trad fashion.
That's cringe.
You should move out and pay a landlord.
You should pay all your money to a landlord.
He he he.
Okay.
Yeah, but this guy probably jerks off with guys like Oren Benjamin Do you naked wrestle by any chance with guys like your leader does the bear Jew?
Bert Paulson says my name Jeff.
Hello white culture says Christians literally by the way Thanks for the money white culture says Christians literally believe a talking snake tricked humans deep magic root and a carpenter saves us from the magic gained from the magic fruit Yeah facts Priority.1 says, if money was no object, would you rather... and you're gonna go to hell, by the way.
Priority.1 says, if money was no object, would you rather run your own paleo-conservative pack or would you grow America first in scale to be like Rush Limbaugh?
Why not both?
I'd probably do both.
James says, I used your picture to show the barber how I wanted my haircut today.
peak Groyper vibes or peak gay?
No, I have a good haircut, so I don't blame you.
It's a good haircut.
I kind of like that.
I kind of like where this is going.
This is a good start.
This cult of personality reminds me of Kim Jong-un.
Give me the Nick Fuentes.
Everybody must have the same haircut as me.
Everybody must eat the same diet as me.
Honestly, I'm kind of thinking it should go in that direction.
I don't want to say that totally unironically, but you know, the idea that we would all get on the same fitness regimen and the same diet and have the same style.
I don't know.
It's not an idea that I don't like.
Okay.
So, so no, I like that.
I know people going, give me the Nick Fuentes haircut.
It's like, it'll turn into Fight Club, you know?
His name, what will they say?
His name was Ricky Vaughn!
He will show up at CPAC.
Well, I don't want to say we're not gonna go Project Mayhem on CPAC.
I'm not gonna say that.
I disavow that.
But, you know, some kind of weird cult of personality?
I don't know.
I'm not opposed to it.
Let's see.
Troy says, I know we need to focus on America and rebuilding, but who is the biggest foreign threat to American... To American what?
By governments?
Are non-state actors bigger threats?
It's obviously China.
China's the biggest threat for what it's worth.
lanky says pee pee poo poo ducks says uh but he says prove god exists science is based it's all in the bible dude read thomas aquinas for two dollars i'm not going to prove god for you you got to read thomas aquinas but uh you know like i've been saying look it's not it is no longer i don't think if you are militantly rejecting god that's your prerogative but you will end up in hell that's your choice atheists be like guess i was wrong
guess i was wrong it's in your best interest but if you're not interested in finding salvation or communing with your holy father - Sure.
There's only so much that we can do on this show.
I'm telling you, go to church, read the required materials, and people are saying, but my test tube says, but my test tube says that, you know, blah blah blah.
Well, uh, you're going to hell forever, so... Marcus says, do you see... Okay, great.
Uh, NoRace says, Vox Day is calling you to debate right now.
Hmm, I don't know, it's kind of irrelevant.
He's too bald for me to debate.
FailedAntiRoot says, Owen, after talking to Andrew Meyer, I've concluded it's all interpretive nonsense.
Also, Owen, takes Andrew for his word on surnames.
Hmm, it's almost like he's a dishonest jag-on.
Guy Safari says hi Nick.
We know you love burgers, but where do you get your chicken?
Cheesies, what is a chicken cheesy?
I don't know what that means You mean chicken tendies I Get my chicken tenders.
I get them from Chick-fil-a or Popeyes is where I go for chicken Nick says my friends have become annoyed with me constantly using America first lingo I now refer to them only by their real names cuck one cuck two femoid one femoid two and You know, that kind of meme talk is a little cringe.
If it's incidental, if you're saying like, oh, based or something, that's different from than saying, oh, you're COG1 and you're FEMOID1.
Hello, Spurg department.
Yeah, I would, I would, you know, maybe, I would maybe retreat on that one a little bit.
If you throw out a little based here and there, a little, you know, meme check, vibe check, that kind of thing, that's okay, but...
My friends are cup one and cup two.
Hey cup two.
It's like hello pole meetup check.
Hello pole meetup energy You know, what did that guy with the elbow pads in the helmet or you know the big guy?
Hello pole meetup check I'm just just trying to bust your chops a little bit Yeah, I saw some stuff about that on Twitter, but I didn't see the actual speech.
Yeah, I saw some stuff about that on Twitter, but I didn't see the actual speech.
Dean says, Yes.
Just a Canadian says, "Suicide of a Superpower." Hopefully there's still time to reverse the effects of the issues you talk about.
Keep it up, big guy.
Oh, thanks.
Yeah, I agree.
Natsu says, will Nick Fuentes watch the new mini Mercury film?
Thank you for everything you do.
You have brought me back to the church and to God.
God bless.
Well, thanks.
You know, this is tough because I know the folk salad guys like her and she's a young girl and I don't want to single out and attack her.
And I'll leave it at that.
I'll leave it at that.
I will be a merciful, benevolent leader that you know me to be.
You know, a very, a fair, a fair leader of the America vs. Movement.
So I'll just leave it at that.
I think you know what I might say, but you know, I'll say, these are young kids, and she's a supporter of the show, she's a fan of the show, and that's great, and they're having fun, they're making content, they're meeting up IRL.
I can't countersign all that, so.
Yeah, maybe I'll check it out for sure.
Those folk salad guys, you know, it's the youngsters.
I'm not that I'm a very old guy, and I know I've said this before, but...
I see the next generation and that's what it's all about.
It really is.
You know, because you get a little confused sometimes about what you're about when you get into these just endless fights and it seems like it's, you know, to no avail, to no end, but then you see the next generation.
You see the babies, you see the young kids, you see the teenagers that are getting into this and they're earnestly saying, Nick, what can we do?
You know, how are we going to turn the country around?
And you're like, this is why we're doing it.
This is why we're doing it.
So they inspire me.
The younger generation inspires me.
Dean says, bro, you shouldn't have upset Teddy Spaghetti.
He has a 150 IQ and will throw hot pasta at you.
I still don't know the Teddy Spaghetti meme.
I guess that's referring to Vox Day.
But yeah, the guys, the guys are very self-important.
You know, self-aggrandizing individual.
No humility, no humility at all.
I don't push politics on my family.
How do you persuade family and friends who believe the MSM to join the traditional right?
What issues would you push first?
Greetings from a nationalist in Switzerland.
I don't push politics on my family.
If we occasionally talk politics, I'll tell them what I think.
And that's where it sort of starts and ends.
But I would say that you got to meet them half-way.
You gotta meet them where they are.
Issues that resonate with them, you gotta talk about.
And, you know, you don't push issues on them.
You ask them questions.
You get them thinking.
You provoke thought.
But pushing on them is not the approach.
Nobody's ever been convinced because you push them really hard.
I'm right.
You're wrong.
I'm right.
That never works.
You never win an argument.
But if you subtly start asking the right questions, you know, get them thinking.
Make them think the idea is theirs.
That's how you persuade people.
But I don't know why everybody wants to do this.
I want to push my politics on my family.
What's wrong with you?
What is wrong with you?
Don't you just want to hang out with your family?
You know, when I got to college, I realized, you know, your parents aren't going to be around forever.
And I don't want that to sound bad or morbid, but it's true.
Your parents aren't going to be around forever.
And, you know, part of why I live with my parents and why I like it is because they're not gonna be around forever.
And I'm gonna go move off somewhere and not see them as much and, you know, there's something sad about that, right?
Not that you should be dependent on your parents forever, and I'm not really dependent on my parents, but not like you should, uh... You know what I'm saying?
It's not like you can't forge your own path and start your own life.
You should.
But I think that there's this mentality that people have.
It's very weird, like anti-family energy.
Very weird anti-family sentiment, which I don't get, you know.
That's one of the strengths of the people that are coming here is they're very much multi-generational in terms of their family outlook.
You'll have a household where you've got a abuela, abuelo, you know, you've got the parents, the kids, in some cases the grandkids.
And that's not to say that everybody should live like that or can live like that, but there's something to be said about that kind of household where there is that kind of unity.
I'm Italian, that was big in my family is the family all being together, so...
It's a very, like, WASP-y, boomer thing to, uh... And I know this is sort of... I'm taking it on a detour here, but, you know, this kind of, you know, we have to push things on our family.
Why?
Why not just enjoy time with your family, bond with them, you know, talk with them, take... get advice from them, hear their stories, that kind of thing, as opposed to, I... they need to be nationalists!
They must join the trad right!
This politicization of everything is gross.
It's, like, totally Marxist.
Mark Walters says the Donald okay Cowboys is autism checked.
Yeah Let's see, Alan or Athens says, you debating Charlie would be Armageddon for turning point.
Yeah.
Griffin says, jokes on you, I actually have autism.
Also have an awesome Thanksgiving and monarchy will save America.
Praise God and the king.
Okay LARPer, but hey, thanks for the holiday wishes.
Likewise, hope you have a good Thanksgiving as well.
Athena says, love you brother, big things are coming.
You'll see.
I agree.
I'm believing in this as well.
Video Game Snakes says, I wonder who could be behind the Vox gay drama?
I feel like you need a 147 IQ to figure it out.
The sociopath stuff is just tiresome and creepy.
Well, I mean, this duo is just so absurd and ridiculous, you know, Vox and Owen.
Is any, is any, uh, like, relevant person, like, really checking the dark stream every day?
What is the latest take from Vox Day?
Is anybody really checking, uh, what is it, the Gay Bear podcast every day?
What does Owen Benjamin have to say?
And they'll listen to an hour of, like, hollow earth theory and the firmaments and all this.
Are any young people like, hi, I'm Zoomer Bear.
I'm a young person.
I'm a gay bear.
I'm watching the dark stream.
unidentified
I...
nick fuentes
Whenever I watch a dark stream, I have a little trouble because I keep falling asleep during it.
I have to drink a monster before I watch it, but it's really good.
Trust me, guys.
It's really good content.
If you can stay awake through the whole thing, it's, oh, it's Keno stuff, man.
But that's just the trick, is not falling asleep in the first 10 minutes.
You have to watch it on three times speed to hear it at, like, a normal human pace, but, um, but trust me, if you can get through it, it's really insightful.
So yeah, I don't really why do people harp on this?
I don't understand why people harp on this in the super chats people like you I think this is like the third super chat you've given talking about Vox and Owen Yeah, that's one, two... Who is starting the drama?
Yeah, I think it's a lot less... You know, I mean Owen Benjamin obviously is stirring a lot of the drama, but it is Super Chatters.
It is the fans who are going back and forth and saying, Vox!
Vox!
Nick said this!
unidentified
Nick!
Nick!
nick fuentes
Vox said this!
unidentified
What?
nick fuentes
What do you have to say?
Vox said this!
I fucking hate that.
I hate people that do this.
Please don't do this anymore.
I am not interested in this E-drama.
If they want to counter-signal me, if they want to be unproductive, I'm, you know, making the right fresh and interesting again.
If they want to oppose that, that's their prerogative.
I think that's stupid and irresponsible and selfish of them.
But all these people that come in the live chat and say, Nick, Nick, Nick, what's, you know, comment on the latest drama.
Dude, shut up.
Shut up.
I don't know if it's very optical.
I don't want to get deplatformed.
Kathy Zhu says, hey Nick, planning on making a speech at Amren 2020.
Jared Taylor and you are my favorite speakers.
I don't really have any plan to do that.
I don't know if it's very optical.
I don't want to get deplatformed.
Love Jared Taylor.
Love Amren.
But I worry that if I'm at the speakers list that we're going to get me out.
They're gonna kick me off the platform, so I'll have to play it by ear with that.
Ned Kelly says, Me, look in my pee-pee-poo-poo super chat wallet.
Say, Nick, it seems I'm temporarily light.
How's my credit in this America First join, anyway?
Yeah, that's funny.
I think I have a collar stay in here right now.
Yeah, I have a collar stay.
Okay, really edgy.
Ty Borz's collar stays should help.
They're about $10 for a bunch.
Oh, oh, the things.
I pulled those out.
I think I have a collar stay in here right now.
Yeah, I have a collar stay.
Why is it not?
But it's not working.
But it's not working.
He says, metal can ruin your shirt if you forget to take them out before sending the shirt to the producer to be laundered.
Okay.
Tool says, beautiful and intelligent man.
10 out of 10 would go gay.
Okay disavow agree that I'm beautiful and intelligent but disavow on the gay HelloGraph says, Nick, my sinuses have been plugged for a week.
Yeah, relating to that.
My sinuses have been plugged for years because my parents got a dog that I'm allergic to.
Thank you for that.
Huge Chrome says, new viewer, does your collar always look that bad?
Oh, are you always a gay faggot?
owned uh heralds it seems odd that a middle eastern nation put their hands out like peasants when they have the leviathan natural gas mine with 500 million centimeters cubed of gas i guess that new temple is made of gold bricks cheers big guy Well, you know why that is.
Are they going to turn down money when they can have it?
They have their hands out like peasants.
They have them out like tax collectors.
Hand out like peasant is implying that they're asking.
They're telling.
It's like a very transactional thing.
This is just how it works.
Oh, we take the money that belongs to us.
So I would say, why would they turn down more money when they can get it?
Yeah, so true.
Nikos is somewhere at Turning Point headquarters.
There's a Nick Fuentes board with a spreadsheet noting Thursday and Friday off and post-it notes, Catboy roasted mushrooms.
Yeah, so true.
They've got a cork board with my picture, Patrick Casey, Steve Franson, Jake Lloyd, Scott, Vince.
There's a thread of yarn connecting them all, Columbia Bugle, you know, all these guys.
They're all connected.
What is their endgame?
Roasted Mushrooms, Melted Swiss Cheese, Femoid, Peepee Poopoo.
What does it all mean?
Zylon says, shout out RZoomer, right?
Okay.
Henry Yates with a big super chat.
Thank you so much.
Johan says PewDiePie vs. Andrew Anglin.
Who is more based?
Well, we disavow Andrew Anglin.
Somebody said today that, oh, Nick Fuentes praises Andrew Clavin, and that's just a disguise way to say Andrew Anglin.
Oh, except for the fact that we've always disavowed Andrew Anglin.
So, yeah.
Oh, and you're actually Hitler.
You're actually Adolf Hitler.
The journalist that said that is actually, you know, Karl Marx.
The journalist that said that is actually, you know, So I don't know some kind of mass murderer So yo, you just you're saying you're disguising.
I've always disavowed the stormer I've always disavowed that neo-nazi publication Andrew Klavan on the other hand based in Redfield totally based love that guy and I think he likes us.
I think he likes us, too PewDiePie is based as well.
I would say he's more based than not that neo neo-nazi frankly for what it's worth on the storm or though people really just don't understand it not defending it and I would never defend never defend but People really just don't get that.
It's all ironic, you know, but that that's more more irony that people don't understand I know I'm probably gonna get roasted for saying that.
People say, Nick Fuentes defends, you know, whatever.
Not a defense, but it's just saying, you know, it is... I don't think they really understand what they're trying to do there.
Not to say that I'm about that, but just to say...
You know, look, if we're being honest, they don't really, they don't really understand the tone there.
Anyway, Herschel says, uh, John Mark is not anti-Christian.
He has specifically said so in interviews.
He is against Christian Zionism and the cucked form of Christianity that supports open borders.
Oh, well, thanks for the clarification.
Uh, let's see, this Russian guy says, free super chat, based, okay.
Michael says, GTA stream tonight?
Uh, no.
Oba says, hey Nick, thanks for all of what you're doing.
My question is will we get an updated book list?
Nope.
No race says Israel is why your Energy is expensive as hell.
I don't well, I don't know about that Will says debate Vox on the Holocaust.
I don't see why we debating something.
Why would we be debating something?
That's a hundred years old Pineapple says what's your favorite book or section in the Bible?
Well, my favorite section is the gospel.
Obviously, it's the four books of the gospel and Favorite book I think I've said and I my favorites probably the book of Matthew I would say Okay, I don't really know anything about that.
Okay, I'm not gonna read that.
It's not running from a debate.
Okay, I don't really know anything about that.
Schneider says, gradually I began.
Okay, I'm not going to read that.
Mr. Lennon says, you're going to debate Vox?
Please don't run, King.
It's not running from a debate.
It's just a question of what we're trying to do.
Charlie Kirk has tried to make this about the Holocaust.
Benny Johnson has tried to make this about, you know, when they call me a Holocaust denier, they're trying to change the conversation.
I understand that that is the tactic.
We are doing this inquisition about America First foreign policy, demographic change, and opposing degeneracy, all of which are pressing and relevant today.
When they say, oh, Nick Fuentes is a Holocaust denier, they're trying to change the frame and say, don't pay attention to mass immigration.
Don't pay attention to white replacement.
Don't pay attention to, you know, Zionist control of foreign policy.
Don't pay attention to, you know, total degeneracy and the purple or pink mafia.
Pay attention to the fact that he said this.
Um, so I would say that that's playing exactly into their hands, which is what they've been doing from the beginning.
By attacking me, by doing this kind of thing, they've been playing into Turning Point's hands the entire time.
So, maybe I'll do that in the future, but definitely not now.
Aleph says, good show.
Teddy Spaghetti needs a verbal lashing.
Okay.
Concho says, cheers to Republicans becoming unelectable in the next 10 years.
I'm afraid there might still be some culture left in your diversity though.
Also, Stefan did you dirty.
Yeah, he definitely did do me dirty.
I don't think I'll ever talk to him again.
Bill Swatson says, Israel last.
I think it's just every other country last.
America first, second, third.
I mean, that's the only concern.
Cycle says 4 in the morning and I'm zoning they say I'm possessed.
It's an omen.
I keep 300 like the Romans He says like the Trojans.
It's oh he says I keep 300 like the Trojan 300 knickers throw some Romans Yeah, definitely do not throw some Romans.
I thought you just got it wrong, but you're doing wordplay there Yeah, black skinhead, of course.
I don't know.
I don't agree with that.
Not really.
Not really.
of a Mossad asset.
I don't agree with that.
I feel bad saying this because they likely used his father's leverage and he's trapped, worth investigating.
Not really.
Not really.
Why do people want to engage in e-drama?
We're exposing Charlie Kirk and people want to get involved in gay e-drama.
When Benjamin said this, Vox Day said this, nobody cares.
Let Owen Benjamin do his thing.
Let Vox Dei do his thing.
I think they're gay and cringe, whatever.
But let them, if Owen wants to do his stream and say the earth is flat, okay, fine.
And I'm gonna do my thing.
But let's get something straight.
The attacks are coming in one direction.
Who started this thing?
Was it me or was it Owen, right?
And who started this thing this month?
Was it me or was it Owen?
Did I break talking about Groyper Wars to attack him?
Or has he been obsessed with me for the past month or so?
Infatuated.
So, I've been focused.
I'm keeping my eye on the prize.
I'm focused on Charlie Kirk, Turning Point, Conservative Inc.
Which is...
My mouth is very dry.
I'm focused on Charlie Kirk, which is the number one thing, right?
Conservatism, we can all agree, is pernicious.
They're pushing mass immigration.
They are the bigger threat than the left, you know, these fake conservatives.
And everybody's choosing that this is the time when they're going to attack me and say, oh, you're Nick Fuenteses, whatever, he's this, he's that.
Okay, well, we're the only ones leading anything that's actually making any progress.
Well, people are doing their gay live streams and whatever, so.
Yeah, uh, no.
That's not the time for this.
Maybe when all the dust settles, like after the election, we can engage in stupid, silly, useless, pointless drama.
But, you know, for now, we've got bigger fish to fry.
Chris says, I hope Israel thrives, just not at the expense of one American life or one American dollar.
Says Michael Schur, 20-plus-year CIA veteran and former head of the Osama bin Laden units.
Okay, yeah, I agree with that.
Pepe says, why is Christian Zionism even a thing?
Have they not read the Bible?
If anything, Christian Zionism should be about taking over Zion for the church.
Yep, I hear ya.
Kid Trunks says, you're the best and most lucid, or rather, your best and most lucid Israel speech.
Good job, bro.
Thanks.
Uh, bourbon says free chat.
Godspeed.
Thanks.
Andrew says, what do you think about Tom Cotton immigration?
What do you think about Tom Cotton immigration?
I think he's okay on immigration, but kind of cucked on everything else.
Uh, Keddie says, uh, CK is just waiting and hoping to revert back.
Yeah.
It's not a, that is not an authentic, um, you know, epiphany that he has had on immigration.
Julian says, are you going to debate Vox?
Uh, not on the Holocaust.
I'll debate him on, I don't know, maybe something else.
Puss Fowler says, Amazing how culture and ethnicity tracks so closely.
Zayad says, Dispensationalism ruined foreign policy.
Please address.
Don't know what that means.
Didn't go to college.
Julian says, Italians aren't supposed to drink milk after 10 a.m.
It's no wonder you always have a tummy ache.
I don't drink milk.
Vintage says hi Nick.
I've discovered you from heel stream, but got it.
What is heel stream?
But got interested after discovering you're no egirls clip a year after then started watching your live streams this year.
You're awesome, man Thanks, bro Puss feller says the Kirk cries out as he strikes you.
Yeah, exactly Just scroll down too far I got to go back up.
Where are we?
unidentified
Oh Okay, here we go.
nick fuentes
Bookie, another E-Drama Super Chat, gonna pass that one.
Royal Winds says, Anti-Semitism is used as both a sword and a shield.
A sword to strike down enemies and a shield to deflect all criticism.
Yep, that's exactly correct.
That is exactly how it is.
Saint Martin says, Episode 504, work of art.
unidentified
Thanks.
nick fuentes
Let's see.
Content Gay says, Nick, what do you think causes first generation and second generation non-white Americans to become red-pilled?
Is it higher intelligence or something else entirely?
I would say that first generation, it's not like they're red-pilled.
They're just like traditional.
They're just like inherently traditional in the sense that You know, people that live in these foreign countries live in very traditional cultures.
Like in China?
Forget about it.
In terms of race mixing, in terms of demographic change, in terms of degeneracy, all that stuff.
With the exception of them not being religious, they have a pretty traditional culture.
Maybe not as much in these cosmopolitan areas, metropolitan areas, but certainly a lot of the people that are coming over here in some cases.
I'm not saying they're natural conservatives or natural Republicans, but I think you do see a lot of intuitively traditional thought from maybe more the people that are coming from the rural areas of the farmlands or whatever.
They do have different dispositions.
So you kind of get what i'm uh getting at there so I wouldn't say that they're necessarily like red pill like they go online and they're reading, you know culture of critique or something like that, but They do come from more traditional countries where a lot of this shit just doesn't fly.
It's a very western phenomenon A lot of this degeneracy being so open and explicit and endorsed and so on by the government and the media.
So I would say that it's it's like that first generation tradition and probably is residual a little bit in the second generation.
I don't think I think second generation is probably decidedly not Red Pill though.
Burger fans, is Charlie stupid enough to believe melanin content are the only important differences?
Or does he say this to keep his followers off certain topics?
I don't think he really believes in anything.
I think he just says what he has to.
So, yeah, the position is, excuse me, the argument goes that race is skin deep.
And they know that's not true, but that is what helps them keep mass immigration flowing.
Lone slob says dummies out here quoting Cardi B while we be quoting holy scripture speaks volumes exactly well and we're quoting scripture we're quoting Patrick Buchanan we're quoting like serious thinkers and yeah they're saying as Ariana Grande said I mean that's how vapid they are let's see flat worst says Nick okay more e-drama Bob Sakamoto says quick Nick what's a word that rhymes with scoop stoop
Simon Scholas says, please tell me you didn't get a Cookie Monster hat.
I can either confirm nor deny what kind of hat I got.
Michelangelo says, great interview on Americano.
But one thing, one little thing, if I get crippled on one thing.
Catholicism teaches virtue ethics, not deontology.
Well, and I didn't say that they teach deontology.
I said we have a deontological ethics.
We're concerned with process.
Alasdair Macintyre's After Virtue.
I have his Marxism and Christianity, but anyway, it's a technical detail, faggot.
unidentified
Great interview, great job, you're smashing it, but one little thing, one little thing.
nick fuentes
Shut up!
How about shut up?
Laura says, I'm new to your channel, but your willingness to address taboo issues is very refreshing.
You're smart, comical, and got a lot of grit.
Thanks for the content.
Aw, well thanks, I appreciate that.
And this one wasn't even backhanded, it wasn't even thanks, but one little thing.
You practice virtue ethics and not, you know, deontology.
Okay, well you get what I was saying, didn't ya?
Irredeemable says I'm back to support Nick in America against Holocaust, orthodoxy, and multicultural invasion.
You must defend against conservatism, lefties, the enemy within and without.
Okay.
Tyler says do you go Black Friday shopping?
No, because, you know, it used to be that you could get a good deal.
But now it's, uh, we all know that you don't get good deals anymore.
We get the worst trade deals in the history of trade deals.
We don't win anymore on Black Friday.
But it's true.
You used to be able to go in and it was the door busters.
You'd go in, you'd have to line up at, you know, 1 a.m.
or whatever, and it would be dramatic price cuts.
Now it's just like a planned sale now.
It's just like a regular sale the stores open at like seven o'clock They go on throughout friday throughout saturday So it's just a it's like everything else.
It's just fake and gay and bogus, you know It's not you don't get a great deal.
This is just when they do like their christmas sale now And that's just when you're supposed to do your christmas shopping and they give you a modest sale and everybody goes in because it's black friday But what's the best deal?
Now, I remember one time I went and I bought my PlayStation 4 in 2015 on Black Friday.
And I think instead of paying $350 for it, I paid $300 for it.
Okay?
I mean, these are the kinds of deals you're getting.
So, you could get that with a coupon.
You could get that, you know, so... No, I don't do the Black Friday shopping.
I don't really... I don't go regular shopping.
I don't really buy anything.
The only thing that I buy is occasionally I eat out.
I go to the diner or I go to McDonald's.
And I buy sometimes games or props for the show, but in terms of things for myself, it's like food and nothing else.
Everything else is travel for the show, props for the show, games to stream, you know, equipment for the show, and then it's gas for my car and food and that's like it.
So I don't, I don't do any regular shopping, let alone Black Friday shopping.
I'm a very, I'm a very meager, or what is that?
Meager no frugal meager.
I'm a very frugal person when it comes to the the money situation.
I'm not not a big spender ASDS is generally to red pill you have to drop suggestive things and make people think they came to their conclusions themselves.
Yep Hofferman says hey Nick love the show.
I hear you refer to Wignatt a lot and I'm not too sure what exactly fits that title How can myself and others avoid being one?
Just don't be cringe KD says, are Super Chats the best way to support you financially?
Love what you're doing and want to help out any way I can.
Super Chats, they take a pretty big cut with YouTube.
So I typically tell people if they plan on making a bigger donation or something like that, definitely don't do it through Super Chat.
Email me and we can.
I don't like to post a lot of information publicly because I get deplatformed from PayPal and Stripe and things like that.
So if it's like five bucks here and there, yeah, super chat is fine.
But, you know, when it comes to the bigger ones, it's like if you don't want to be giving a ton of money to YouTube, you should probably just hit me up on email and we could arrange something else.
Joker says what's your go-to Taco Bell order?
I have been eating Taco Bell a lot lately.
It's kind of sucks Honestly, I used to be able to eat that for a long time But every time I get it, it's just like wet
Gross and I guess it's always been that way but lately I go there and I'm just like so I got the like grande nacho box the other day and I was watching that documentary the new Pearl Harbor about 9-eleven and I was sitting I watched about 40 minutes of it I'm eating these nachos and it was like uneatable unedible because all the chips were so soggy they couldn't even support the toppings so I had to get my own bag of chips and put the other chips under my chips and
And it's like, this is a joke.
Are you kidding me?
This sucks.
How could you feed this to me?
I got a double chalupa.
Just gross, dude.
I just... I just don't... I'm sorry.
I used to be able to eat that all the time and now I just... I don't have the appetite for it anymore.
Maybe it's because I'm getting older.
But, um...
I used to get the Crunchwrap Supreme.
I would get the Double Chalupa, or I'd get the Chalupa Supreme.
I would get the Gordita Crunch, which was one of my favorites for a long time.
Just the Dorito Loco Taco Supreme, I would get that.
Supreme means they're sour cream and lettuce.
So those would usually be my go-tos.
Five Layer Burrito.
Whatever, like, the special boxes of the time.
It's all the same shit.
They just package it in different ways.
The tacos, the burritos, the wraps, the... It's all the same ingredients.
Meat, you know, whatever.
It's just repackaged in different ways.
Let's see.
ASDF says the Bible says it's better to be cold versus lukewarm.
Exactly.
GTZ says should dissident right leaders create a new party?
unidentified
No.
nick fuentes
Last name says, love the show.
What do you think about Watchmen?
I've never seen it.
Dabrick says, new here.
You're definitely not the Nazi people say you are.
I know!
Tell me about it.
Wheeler says, Nick, I've been bringing, I've been binging COD and I'm too red-pilled for it.
Lots of hidden meanings in that piece.
You're the GOAT.
COD?
You mean like the game?
What do you mean you're too red-pilled for it?
It's a multiplayer shooting game.
What do you mean you're too red-pilled?
You're too red-pilled to Play, search, and destroy?
Really?
What is political about this?
But thanks.
Delta says, Fuentes is a Euro-Spanish name, which means spring, derives from Latin fons, which is also a root for the English word fountain.
Yeah, exactly.
It's what I've been saying.
It is a Spanish name.
It is a local Spanish name.
Andy says, Millennial from Seattle.
And by the way, my 23andMe indicated as much.
Andy Barr says, Millennial from Seattle, a giant social experiment was made on my cohort and many fell for degeneracy that was marketed to us as freedom.
Go Generation Z!
Yeah, you're right about that.
You know, I have a little bit of sympathy.
Toy trains are kind of cool, frankly.
I don't know if I'm just, you know, maybe I'm a man-child for saying that, but I've always thought they were kind of cool.
Not like Thomas the Tank Engine, but like a model train set.
Those are kind of kino, though, don't you think?
I would never have one.
I could never be an adult and have one, I don't think.
I always thought they were cool as a kid, but I find them to be kind of neat.
I think they're kind of fascinating.
Spades guy says lisping.
Welcome to McSpencer's.
Can I interest you in the absolutely brunch Ian Cabo?
It's a What does it say burger served with a mimosa?
Yeah Jim Grinson says, I think, the more we understand the opposition's framing, the easier to win people to the other side or at least move them to a more neutral position.
The nature of multi-party grifters is beginning to be asserted.
Okay, it's kind of confusing wording here.
I don't really... what does that mean?
Multi-party grifters?
Don't really know what you mean by that, but I agree about framing.
alternate says hey nick uh do you know about these spitting faces in chicago it would be hilarious if charlie's face was on there with his inward teeth spitting water Yeah, that would be funny.
Yeah, I know about how you don't live in the suburbs and not know about, uh, you know, Skygate or what was it?
Cloudgate?
The Bean and the, uh, the fountains, of course.
What is that?
That's in Millennium Park, right?
Right by the Art Institute off of Michigan Avenue.
Now, of course I know the spitting faces.
Would be pretty funny if Charlie Kirk was on there.
Torn bootstraps says hey Nick.
They used to call me an incel, but now I have a GF We are all going to make it Kings thoughts.
Yeah, I hate when people say this Whenever somebody gets a GF.
Hey Kings, we're all gonna make it.
Yeah.
Okay.
Thanks a lot Batman Thanks a lot friend.
Hey friend.
I just got a GF.
We're all going to make it.
Okay friend.
Hey Oh, please, please don't come around with this.
Deep Asteros says, hey Nick, are you a fan of Martin Cabello III?
I don't know who that is.
Oh, oh, no.
Yeah, I do know who that is.
Yeah, he's pretty funny.
I've been seeing his content floating around on Twitter.
I don't really know what he's about, but I've seen a lot of his videos and they're very funny.
Jared says pecan or pumpkin pie or something else.
I generally like apple pie.
I like Oreo pie because I'm a child.
I love Oreo pie and Baker's Square.
The old Baker's Square at Keno Midwest.
They only have it in the Midwest.
I wonder where else they have it.
I think it's like a regional thing, but I like the Oreo pie.
I like a, uh, I like an apple pie with ice cream.
I like a banana cream pie.
That's one of my favorites is banana cream.
And, um, what else?
Blueberry pie is pretty good with ice cream, but yeah, I generally don't go in for pumpkin or pecan pie.
Never been a fan of either really.
Wheeler Visuals says, I just burnt the F out of my leg.
Don't smoke weed.
Yeah, agree.
Coltis Gordon says I was watching UFC last week and the referee's name was Kevin McDonald.
I started laughing out loud and my friends asked me what was so funny.
I said you wouldn't get it.
Yeah, Joker moment.
Truth Seeker says read the book of Enoch for monster red pills on Genesis.
Okay.
John says, women are apolitical.
They sat at home, or were apolitical.
They sat at home and the media radicalized a vast majority of them.
Yeah, and we need to make them apolitical.
What are we trying to say?
That they should be political?
Because if you are, then that's cringe and wrong.
Brittany says, mother of three, stay-at-home mom, based in Redpill, politics is my hobby.
Not an e-girl, okay?
I don't want, look, politics being a hobby to me is just a major turnoff.
Fine, I'm speaking for myself, but uh, you know.
You, okay, have politics as your hobby, but to me, I cannot tell you nothing pisses me off more than, you know, femoids.
For the most, with few exceptions, coming up to me and, I'm based in Redfield, I'm, I'm fashy, I'm whatever.
Cringe?
Cringe check?
Okay, whatever, you know, and...
Hey, you're married.
That's great.
You're a mother.
That's awesome.
That's great.
That's all we want.
If politics is your hobby, knock yourself out.
That's fantastic.
But I'm just saying for me, when people say, oh, you say women should be based in Redfield and an e-girl.
Well, I will say it's one thing being a mother and having kids, and it's another thing being, you know, like some single roasty.
But I will say just generally, I don't think women should be political.
That's my position.
I don't know how people can come on the show knowing what the show is and be like, I think women should be political.
Okay, well you're watching the wrong show, you know.
Go and watch, you know, the gay simping for women show where they say you can do whatever you want.
That's not this show.
This show says women should not be political, you know.
When have women... name a single prominent political theorist or philosopher who was a woman.
And I'm not talking about pundits.
I'm talking about political theorists, political philosophers, one.
The only ones that exist are, like, feminists.
And all they had to say was, like, you know, things are bad for women.
You know, there wasn't even, like, a significant message.
Then you've got some very good female activists, like Phyllis Schlafly, or Michelle Malkin, or Anna Coulter, Faith Goldie, people like that.
But I'm talking in terms of rules.
I'm talking in terms of what is generally true, what is, you know, I'm not talking about exceptions.
I'm talking about the rule.
I think women are generally not political.
That is just my opinion.
That is my traditional opinion.
That's exactly right.
I want to go off, man.
be like hello mcgolliam here's your overcooked dinner aren't i a good wife t.e tips cheap sundress that's exactly right i i oh man i want to go off man i could unload so hardcore yeah here's your overcooked dinner mcgolliam Am I Goyam?
Uh, okay.
Gross.
Barf.
Uh, ASDF says, Atheist be like Lay Sky Daddy.
LMAO at fundies.
But also, we're likely living in a simulation created by a more intelligent being.
Yeah, these people are idiots, dude.
Lab coats should be put in jail.
RJ says, what's your iFunny?
I'm not iOn.
I am not on iFunny.
He says, also just finished a Big Mac.
10 out of 10.
Here's one for you.
Thanks.
VeganGroper says Bill Gade is a renegade physicist that calls the establishment a religion.
Check him on public space.
Probably not gonna watch the public space anytime soon.
Sven says move to Wisconsin.
Illinois is cucked.
I'm considering moving to Wisconsin actually.
It's kind of nice up there.
Madison thereabouts.
But no, don't say Illinois.
I mean, Illinois, yeah, it's kind of rough here.
But it's my home.
Don't say that about my home.
This is where I was born.
This is my home!
What does Kanye say?
He says... What is the line from the Chick-fil-A song?
I forget the lyric.
I can't think of it at the moment, but I'm standing up for my home, okay?
Content Gay says, the Nazis... okay.
William says, I don't deny the Holocaust.
You won't find anyone who's more... I'm not gonna say that.
Dumbass says, bro, I'm sick of all these Batmans talking about having GFs.
Wow, dude, you're so cool.
Have fun being broke, never having free time.
Well, I'm not countersignaling having GFs, okay?
We want to get married, we want to have kids, and GF is an intermediary stage.
So I'm not countersignaling having a GF, but I am countersignaling this abundance signaling, which is like, you know, everybody's so blackpilled, and then they get a GF, and then it's like, hi, oh, hey guys!
It's just me and my GF.
Hey fellas!
Hey friends!
It's just me and my GF.
We think that you guys are gonna make it.
We think that you'll make it one day too.
Do you know what?
So the tone is just so patronizing and it's abundant signaling.
So yeah, that is what I... I'm not opposed to, you know, having a GF.
That is required, right?
To have kids and all that.
And certainly there are downsides, you know.
The money, the time commitment.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not really looking forward to, you know, shelling out all this money for gifts.
I don't even know what to get!
It's so daunting to me, the idea that you have to give your girlfriend or your wife a present, like, several times a year.
Her birthday, Christmas.
uh your anniversary valentine's day that's a lot of stuff and it's not like even so much the money which is bad enough in itself but it's like what do you even get somebody what am i gonna get what am i gonna get her books what am i get i don't even know where to begin clothes a purse a bag and it's four times a year for the rest of your life four times a year for the rest of your life 400 gifts That's insane!
Every year?
What are you supposed to do?
Oh, I got you more clothes.
I guess that's what they like.
But it's like things like that that is very daunting the constant expectation for date ideas You know, I see my one of my friends is very much like a romantic guy and he's telling me Oh, I took my girlfriend to the opera and I'd send her, you know All these gifts and whatever and and I'm like, oh, I so don't even think like that You know to me my idea of the weekend is I'm gonna stream.
I'll go see Joker alone I'll go get a cheeseburger at 3 a.m.
In a bad neighborhood and drive home listen to music and now it's like what I gotta be like all these faggots who post on Twitter and they're like or the girl will post on Twitter she's like my boyfriend texted me or she'll be like I came home today and there were two dresses on my bed and there was a note that said pick a dress I'm picking you up at six Stuff like that makes me want to go Wignat mode.
It makes me want to go Joker mode.
I see shit like that and it makes me want to get in my car and I don't even want to tell you what I want to do with it.
I don't want to tell you that I'm going to turn it into a missile, okay?
That I'm going to turn it into a 2,000 pound missile going 100 miles an hour down the highway when I see that kind of shit.
Do you know what I'm talking about?
These posts where girls will post a picture and it's like, oh, my boyfriend is just the best.
And it's like rose petals leading up to the bedroom.
And on the bed, it's like, I've picked out two outfits.
Make yourself look nice.
I'll pick you up at six.
I've got a plan.
unidentified
That kind of shit makes me so mad.
nick fuentes
You know, if I get a wife, you know what it's gonna be?
It's gonna be... I'm gonna be sitting on the recliner, watching the 9-11 documentary, and she's gonna be whipping up baked mustachioli.
And for anniversary, I'll take her out to Maggiano's, okay?
I'll take her out to see Joker, we'll watch it at the home theater, and then we'll go to Maggiano's, and that's the anniversary, okay?
That'll be the routine.
But this kind of like... but that's how it is these days.
I feel like women...
Maybe I'm just projecting here.
Maybe that's just the perception.
I don't know.
But the things I see on social media, it just like so turns me off from that whole thing.
How women talk, what they're about with these kinds of things.
That you have to be like this quirky faggot.
You have to like this quirky like romantic homo and be like...
Get dressed.
I'm picking you up at 7.
You know, and obviously, you know what I mean?
I can't really capture exactly the vibe, but you've seen these kinds of posts before.
They've got like the outfit laid out and you know this and this and all and whatever you see these posts where it's like He worked there was one in particular It's like he worked 12 hours and then he drove three hours to pick me up and then he took me to the nicest Restaurant in the city overlooking the town and and then he gave me a gift and this is great.
It's like if it were me It's like I'm gonna roll out of bed at noon.
I'm gonna fuck around on my phone for a few hours and You know, I'm gonna have my bowl of oatmeal, I'm gonna have lunch, whatever, do my show, and then, and then, you know, I'm gonna be like, oh hey, like what's up, you know?
Let's go, you want to get McDonald's or something?
I'm going with or without you.
You want to go eat McDonald's in the parking lot, you know?
We can listen, we can listen to Graduation again, we can listen to Life of Pablo if you want.
You can pick the Kanye album.
Anyway, so yeah, the Batmans, Batman is cancelled.
We will not have any Batmans.
No Batmans in Shad.
We have Joker, we have Bane, no Batmans.
Anyway, so I see that kind of stuff.
Maybe that's just not my temperament, maybe I just don't have that in me, I don't know.
But, so that's my take on that.
Let's see, uh, Kulox is dressed casual like a knicker bloke right before he speak his collar spoke.
Wow, that's very good.
Um, New Front says, okay, not gonna read that.
Vibe Check says, seeing how many people think Charlie is such a great guy in his comment section on his tweets is kind of blackpilling.
Don't let it blackpill you.
We're gonna win.
Living Stranger says, do you have a favorite 1980s movie?
By the way, thanks for fighting the good fight.
God bless.
Thanks.
Favorite 1980s movie... Let me think.
Favorite 1980s movie... I really like Do the Right Thing, which came out in 1989.
I really like... Let me think.
unidentified
What else?
nick fuentes
Trying to think eight.
I don't really think in terms of decades.
I think more in terms of like, you know movies, obviously Let me think.
What are what are the others like cozy?
I'm trying to get in that the 80s mentality I Don't really like any of these corny 80 movies like the action I never got into like Terminator or Robocop or What what is the other ones?
even the like lethal weapon and that kind of thing I Never got into that.
Let me think.
What is my favorite?
I don't know.
Off the top of my head, I don't really think about it in terms of decades.
I could tell you what year a movie's in, but I can't, like, index it by decade.
I have to think about that for a little while.
Let's see.
Name says, how about another joke?
Joker meme, Fuente.
I think we've had enough of your Joker memes.
What do you get when you cross a Joker meme with Super Chats?
You get the $10 you effing deserve.
Sens $10.
Well, thanks for that.
That was kind of fresh, I guess.
Armand says thoughts on Thomas Sowell's A Conflict of Visions.
I never read that.
PG says cult of personality.
Go full carnivore!
Get primal!
No.
Dabrix is using hair products.
Based or gay?
It's definitely based.
I don't use any hair products, but it is based.
My hair just stays up naturally because I have thick, med hair.
AltLitz says, I tried to attend Shapiro's event in Massachusetts, but was turned away.
Next year, I'm going to try dressing in drag and wearing a MAGA hat.
So if you see hideous, roided, black, spin Israel questions on your Twitter feed, you will know it worked.
So that's pretty based.
Yeah, I can't wait for next year, I guess.
Yeah, Democrats are trouble.
He says, seen five Democrats today and I'm just about fed up.
Democrats are trouble.
Collins says, what I meant about this was you're being your country first to the death and Christian and a leader for kids who are basically in high school and college.
Okay.
Michael says something in Latin.
Very impressive.
Very impressive in Latin.
In Hot Water says, ask Charlie if he'd support revoking Scientology's tax-exempt status.
It is a lose-lose question for him.
His funder, John Mappin, is a madman.
uh yeah that's that is a really good question we'll have to get him maybe uh in the springtime with that one grins since as each group fights for their own interests naturally and often unconsciously most people base their actions and statements on their worldview beliefs which is a result of experience and genetics yeah that's basically true Dumbasses.
Atheists literally believe the universe exploded into reality, then amoebas just appeared, then they turned into fish, then they turned into monkeys, then they turned into humans.
That's literally what they believe.
So, yeah, but I know, uh, you know, the cross is so outlandish.
Yeah, life came out of nowhere.
Amoebas just appeared, then they're fish, then they're monkeys, and now I'm- I'm got a brain.
Okay, retard.
Willy says, started reading about Aquinas today.
He chased a whore off with a hot fire iron.
That is hot stuff.
Yeah, he was based.
Well, I mean if people bring it up with you obviously defend yourself, but I try to just You know, what is the word defuse the situation?
John says, you're right.
Cheers, family, but don't talk about politics.
P.S. Can't wait to get roasted by my black family this Thanksgiving for liking Trump.
Well, I mean, if people bring it up with you, obviously defend yourself.
But I try to just, you know, what is the word?
Defuse the situation.
Marty says, Nick, do you ever read the Z blog?
No, I don't know what that is.
Spurgalicious says, did you see any of JF's critiques of the Groypers?
No.
Roosters has found you recently.
Greetings from McLean County.
If you ever have to drive through Decatur, Krekel's Custard makes the best thin burger.
Keep it up.
I will.
Noted.
Noted.
Thank you for the recommendation.
Finally something that's useful for me.
All these people, check out this documentary, check out this article.
Finally something I can use.
Yeah, noted.
uh willie says fans of andrew clavin should check out um somebody on d live okay boreum says what does a man do when the people around him acknowledge why genocide occurring but don't seem to care what does that mean i don't know what is a man to do when people don't care that i'm talking uh i don't know dude just start a family Dax says how did Steven Molyneux do you dirty?
I like that guy.
Oh, he disavowed me and he unfollowed me.
And so the guy's a coward Studley's and the guy's a fucking shill dude.
He talks about oh, I love the truth and I love philosophy and then he cucks whenever it gets tough Let's see So yeah, very very disappointed in him Where did I leave off here?
Studley's a daily reminder that all modern science is rooted in Kabbalah and alchemy.
Jesus Christ is king.
Every knee shall bow.
Facts!
Yeah, big agree on that.
Video Game Snakes is did you hear?
Water Buffalo.
Cenk Uygur of Young Turks is running in California for Congress as a Democrat.
In Katie Hill's district, first congressman to get into a verbal argument with Alex Jones.
Wow, yeah, cool.
Yeah, I knew that was happening.
Yeah, first congressman to get, yeah, uh-huh.
Merlin says Google supports America First.
Yeah.
you gain says charlie invites dialogue just to make fun of you also charlie you don't know the first thing about me pal yeah asdf says saying every iberian is a sephardic is gay well that's exactly what they're saying they're saying like well because some jews took on spanish surnames everyone has a spanish surname you know as possibly Yeah, it's a total, total Jewish trick.
Richard says, Catholicism fake.
Okay, banned.
Have fun being in hell forever.
RX says, here's a free Super Chat King.
Have you played Red Dead Redemption 2?
Yes.
ASDS says, imagine having to explain anti-cath Super Chats to St.
Peter.
Yeah, can't imagine.
You're at the gates.
You're gonna be saying, St.
Peter, St.
Peter, let me in.
He's gonna start reading off the Super Chats.
Hey, remember when you said this?
Yeah, bye.
Floor drops from under you.
You know, you drop into hell forever.
Oh, yeah, that sucks.
Benjamin Belcher says, Nick, I want to let you know that Vox challenged you to a debate tonight.
Oh, thanks.
I didn't know that.
Joshua says, free chat.
Don't read.
Okay.
Harris says, stand up for my home.
Even if I take this walk alone.
Yeah, there it is.
ASDF says, get her cleaning supplies.
Yeah.
Hey, so for your anniversary, I got you a new duster.
I got you some Windex.
I got you this.
This will make it easier for you to clean and cook.
I got you some steaks.
Hoping you could throw those on a grill tonight.
Yeah, good idea.
Mr. says, from one Afro-based bean griper to another, take my money and continue the crusade to reconquista our great nation from the globalists.
Santiago E Sierra.
Well, gracias, much appreciated.
Ed Lundgren says, I got a Chick-fil-A gift card and I instantly thought of you talking about a number one with lemonade.
This show is definitely impacting my daily life.
Yeah, I hear that.
I'm the same way.
The things that you see in here, they really do change the way you think, so I'm going to keep in mind.
Anonymous tippers has never knew what a simp was until he brought it up.
I've been going full chad mode on my girlfriend It's like bees on honey.
Sorry.
I'm busy.
Oh Base dude base nib would be like, oh I learned what a simp was and now me and my girlfriend Oh based bro.
Thanks Batman.
Are you thinking says you need to red pill yourself on the shining?
I know about the shining Dummy.
Dans is pretty sure you missed my super chat big guy.
Well that sucks.
ASDF says Sal and his family and Do The Right Thing are very based.
Yes, yes.
I relate very strongly to them.
In some ways, in certain ways.
Yeah, very I'm that's gonna be me that's gonna be me, you know What once all this show is banned and everybody chases me out of the movement.
I'll have some small Italian restaurant in You know some obviously all the neighborhoods will be diversified awesome small Italian neighborhood and people start giving me grief about who's on the wall we need some black folks on that wall and I'll be like Turn off your music!
Get out of my restaurant!
You know?
That'll be, uh... That'll be me.
That's my fate.
My restaurant will be burned down, chased out of my neighborhood.
unidentified
That is a very good movie.
nick fuentes
It is Spike Lee.
Spike Lee's kind of retarded.
And all of his movies since then have been shit.
Like, I saw Chirac, and that was terrible.
Then there was one other one that I saw, which was no good.
But, um... Yeah, that movie was very epic.
Angel, and great soundtrack.
Public Enemy, um, and what, what else?
What other song?
I forget the other song I like from there, but great, great film all the way around.
Angel of Wrath says, cringe reddit to your atheists be like, we're all soulless automatons.
Hello, brain heathen department.
Go visit grandpa at the zoo, genius.
The epic son of god versus the cringe son of monkey.
Yeah, facts.
Our, our father is god, your father is gorilla.
Michael says the new Pearl Harbor is a great documentary.
I agree.
Okay, well that's our last Super Chat.
That's gonna do it for us tonight on the show.
Wow, another great night of awesome Super Chats.
I love it.
Remember to subscribe to the channel, give me a big thumbs up, leave a comment down below, click the notification bell to be notified every time I go live.
Remember we are on the air Monday through Friday 7 p.m.
Central, 8 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time.
I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
As always, thanks for watching.
Thanks to our Super Chatters.
Wow!
Great job, everyone.
Really great job.
Thanks to everybody that watches the show.
We love you and I will see you on Monday.
Until then, have a great weekend and have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
Export Selection