All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 15, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:39:20
Fourth Democratic Debate Reaction and Analysis | America First Ep. 477
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:13:01
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
Not interested I'm sorry.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
No e-girls.
unidentified
Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
He's just that.
Americanism, not populism. not populism.
We'll be our freedom.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
unidentified
Who's that?
will be our credo. .
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
Americanism, not globalism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
Guy, I've never heard of a big one.
Just use that.
Americanism, not globalism. not globalism.
Will be our freedom. Will be our freedom.
Will be our freedom.
Will be our freedom.
An older generation.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
Americanism, not globalism, not globalism, will be our credo. will be our credo.
I'm sorry.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
unidentified
No e-girls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
Who's that?
Americanism, not globalism. not globalism.
Will be our freedom. Will be our freedom.
Will be our freedom.
Will be our freedom.
The Umar Generation.
and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom. will be our freedom.
I'm sorry.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
Guy, I've never heard of a big question.
It's just that.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Guy, I've never heard of a big question.
unidentified
Who's that?
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Never!
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
I've never heard of him think, what is that?
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
I've never heard of Bigfoot.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Who's that?
unidentified
I've never heard of Bigfoot.
The former generation.
and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo. will be our credo.
I'm sorry.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
What is that?
Americanism, not globalism. not globalism.
We'll meet our freedom.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
unidentified
Who's that?
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
It's not interesting.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
I've never heard of a big question.
Just that.
Americanism, not globalism.
Will be our freedom.
I've never heard of a big question.
Who's that?
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
I'm sorry.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
Guy, I've never heard of a big question.
What is that?
Americanism, not globalism. not globalism.
Will be our freedom. Will be our freedom.
Will be our freedom.
Will be our freedom.
Americanism, not globally.
Capitalism will be our credo.
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
With respect, the respect that we deserve.
From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
America first.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Good evening everybody.
We're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back with you here tonight.
Back with you again after a brief intermission.
We just concluded about 15 to 20 minutes ago our live coverage of the fourth Democratic presidential primary debate.
Which we covered on DLive.
So it's been a bit of a long night.
We are here with you at a later hour.
It is now nearly 11 o'clock central time.
11 o'clock?
That's pretty late for me.
Well, not necessarily.
Late to be doing this show, but not really so late for me.
And like I said, we just concluded the three hour Democratic debate, the fourth one of its kind.
So it's been a bit of a slog.
So for tonight's show, we'll be focusing almost entirely on the debate.
I'm thinking maybe it'll be a shorter show.
It's been such a long night and there's really not so much to say about the debate itself.
And I don't want to open up a whole other can of worms about other things going on in the news.
I don't really have time to prepare all that with the debate going on, so you know, perhaps it'll just be an abbreviated show tonight, but that's okay.
I very well may spend 45 minutes talking about the debate, so it could be a regular length show as well.
We're gonna kind of just play it by ear.
I have to say on this debate, three hours, it's the fourth Really, it's the sixth debate.
There's been four rounds, but six actual nights of debating, and all, you know, varying between two to three, and sometimes I think even exceeding three hours.
And it's like, enough already!
There's supposed to be something like ten debates by the end of the primaries or something?
How are we gonna do this ten times?
We watched the last debate, the third debate, Which was in September.
And I'm thinking to myself, you know, it's the same exact thing.
We did one debate in June.
It was one round, but it was two nights, two debates.
We did the second round in July.
It was two debates.
The third round was in September.
It was one night, one debate.
Tonight is one.
And every single debate, it's the same topics.
I mean, tonight they mixed it up a little bit.
It was actually sort of notable.
They didn't talk about climate change at all this time.
Which is surprising, and I'll get into that in a moment.
We'll get into that later.
But generally speaking, with minor exceptions, you know, they brought up the Ukrainian situation, impeachment.
They brought up what's happening in Turkey and that recent development.
But generally speaking, it's healthcare, it's gun control, it's taxes, it's criminal justice reform, it's education.
You know, tonight they brought up a couple of new things, but how many times can you have the same debate with the same people With the same talking points and the same discussions.
You know, it's like tonight they started out with the healthcare debate just like in every single other one.
Six debates.
They all start out about healthcare.
They all have the same discussion.
It's between public option and Medicare for All.
And of course, on the side of public option, you've got Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg, and you've got Beto O'Rourke, I believe, and Amy Klobuchar.
And on the side of Medicare for All, you've got Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.
And I think there might be one other who's not even really relevant anyway.
But it's like, that is a perfect example where it's the same thing.
And at a certain point, you just start to go a little kooky.
You know, you start to go a little crazy.
So, anyway, we're going to dive into it in a more systematic way.
I'm just venting at this point.
I'm just complaining.
If you were watching the coverage on DLive, towards the end of it, I'm just like fading out, man.
I'm like falling asleep.
I'm smashing, I'm punching this pumpkin over here.
I'm losing my mind because, you know, by the second hour mark, the third hour mark, you're like, all right already.
And it wouldn't be so bad if they weren't all so insufferable.
You know, at least with the 2016 Republican primary debates, at least you had Trump.
I think people are really starting to remember why we voted for Trump.
It's easy to forget when you're dealing with Trump every day.
It's easy to get sick of Trump because we've been dealing with him every day for the past two years, two and a half years since he got inaugurated.
But then you watch these things and Trump's not even on the stage, he's not even there, and then you remember, oh yeah, this is why we were so excited, we were so gassed up for this guy.
You know, then you watch a Trump rally, and what was he saying last week?
He said, the only reason Joe Biden was a good vice president is because he kissed Barack Obama's ass.
It's like, you know, things like that are reminds you, oh yeah, you know, that's why we lined up for him at 16.
That's why we all voted for him.
You know, and it's every time we do these debates we remember.
And at least in those 2016 debates we had him up there.
You know, with all the Democrats, even some of them we might agree with areas, like for example when Tulsi Gabbard talks about regime change or Andrew Yang talks about UBI or Elizabeth Warren talks about breaking up big tech.
We might agree at moments, but all the candidates on that stage are like controlled, inauthentic, phonies, politicians, whatever.
You know, it was so, I think, gripping about Trump, more than anything.
And frankly, like, this was so much more important than even the substance of what he was talking about, was simply the manner in which he spoke.
And everybody talked about that during the last election, but, I mean, that was really so important.
It wasn't even necessarily, I think he could have said really anything, close to anything on policy, but it was the manner in which he spoke, where, you know, you look at all these candidates tonight, and everybody's jumping into, you know, these like poll-tested, pre-planned, anecdotal speeches.
Well, you know, when I was the mayor of, you know, Cory Booker, Well, when I was the mayor of this city, I talked to, you know, Sarah.
And Sarah told me that she needed health care and blah blah blah.
And that's why it's so important to me for hard-working Americans.
And you know what I'm talking about?
Just this sort of like totally choreographed, sterilized, artificial, phony kind of stuff.
And I think that's the real way that Trump broke away from the rest.
As he's up there saying... I mean, some of the things he said, I think I talked about this with, um...
was it Dave, when I was on his podcast last week.
You know, some of the outlandish things he would say, like, the World Trade Center came down under your brother's reign, he said to Jeb Bush.
You know, the way he would talk about Syria.
You know, these people talk about, we have abandoned our allies and so on.
And Trump would say, you've got Assad and ISIS.
You can't fight two wars at once.
You got to knock out ISIS and knock them out strong.
And then you figure out what happens next.
I mean, he just talked like... It was just so... Some people saw it as obnoxious, I thought it was refreshing, you know, and then you see these debates and you remember, you know, how epic it was.
So, but it's not about 2016, it's about 2020, so we'll dive into it, so...
You know, like I said, this is the fourth Democratic debate.
As I said, we covered our first debates in June.
The first debate in June was two rounds, 10 candidates over two nights for a total of 20 candidates.
The second debates in July, same deal, 20 candidates, two debates, two nights.
In September and October were essentially part of the same series.
They had the same qualifications.
For the summer debates there was either a polling qualification or a fundraising qualification.
You had to meet I think it was at least 1% in three qualifying polls, or you had to raise something like 65,000 individual donations.
With the fall debate, September and October, it was, you had to have, I think it was 130,000 individual donors, and you had to meet a polling threshold.
It was an "and" as opposed to an "or", and the polling threshold was at least 2% in four approved polls by the DNC.
So where was I going with this?
Yeah, so these debates were a little bit more tough.
September you only had 10 candidates over one night.
Tonight we actually had more candidates than the September debate.
Tonight we had 12 candidates in one night, and this was actually a record setter.
This is the largest debate stage ever.
In American history, if you recall in the 2016 Republican primary, they had a debate where they had 11 candidates.
I think they squeezed in, it might have been Rand Paul or Carly Fiorina or somebody like that after the undercard debate.
I think Carly Fiorina succeeded and they didn't want to kick one of them off.
So last year the biggest was 11, this year we have 12, and of course the two additional candidates were Tom Steyer, the billionaire who started the impeach Trump super PAC, And it was Tulsi Gabbard, who did not qualify in time for September, but did eventually meet the polling threshold by the October debate.
So it was a much bigger debate.
It was 12 people.
It's incredible that the field grows like this, you know?
It should be narrowing, but it's like we see 10-person debates in June and July and September, and now they're growing.
Now it's a 12-person debate.
It was three hours.
It was hosted by CNN and the New York Times in Ohio.
And that's critical obviously because this is a battleground state and perhaps the tone of the debate was different for that reason because of the location they are trying to appeal, presumably in this debate, to Midwestern voters, Ohio types, which is vastly different from coastal types.
You know, this is probably the deficit the Democrats are trying to make up, which is white, working-class, union-type voters, the so-called Blue Dog Democrats that the perception is that Trump won those over in 2016.
So that's really the context of the debate.
All the competitors include Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, Andrew Yang, Beto O'Rourke, Cory Booker, Pete Buttigieg, Julian Castro, Amy Klobuchar, Tulsi Gabbard, and Tom Steyer.
That's everybody that was in the debate.
Some of the key differences, you know, and I mentioned this at the top of the show, like the first three debates were virtually the same, or the first three rounds were like carbon copies of one another.
And you had some outstanding moments and big applause lines and some squabbles, I guess you could call it.
But generally speaking, you know, my takeaway from the last debate, if you watch my coverage, I was very disappointed.
After the third debate in September I said essentially nobody really won, nobody really lost, nothing has changed after this debate, and actually it didn't even really matter because all the same topics were discussed, it was all the same people, and Nothing was really fresh.
Well in this debate there was a totally new dynamic and I will say that's why I was a bit more interested and invest in this debate is because it was a sort of a fresh dynamic.
I said in the DLive coverage that there were three major things that have changed that differentiate this one from all the previous debates and really maybe is a watershed moment in the whole primary.
Which is number one, you've got the Ukraine scandal, which embroils not only Donald Trump, but also Joe Biden, because now that Donald Trump is being implicated in the scandal of perhaps putting pressure on the Ukrainian government to investigate Biden, of course, Trump has dragged Biden into this and exposed and brought to light some conspicuous dealings, business dealings, that Hunter Biden had with various foreign governments while Joe Biden was the vice president.
You know, did Vice President Joe Biden have a hand in that?
So this has happened since the last debate.
That's number one.
Number two, of course, Bernie Sanders had a heart attack, which is kind of a big deal.
One of the big questions in the last three debates is about vitality, about age, about, you know, generational change somewhat.
So Bernie having a heart attack at 80 years old, or I think he's a little bit over 80 years old, Is something that's significant.
So that's number two.
And number three, of course, is that Elizabeth Warren is now essentially a frontrunner.
Whereas maybe five, six, seven months ago, she was a tertiary or secondary tier candidate, now it is clear that she is vying for the top spot.
If you look at the polling, and we're going to do that, if you look at the polling in Iowa, if you look at the polling in New Hampshire, the first two primaries and caucuses in this race, She's leading in most of the polls there, the most recent ones.
In the national polling, she's starting to pull ahead in some polls ahead of Joe Biden, in several she's matching, and in a few she's within striking distance.
So each of these things is actually sort of interesting.
It lines up very neatly that each concerns these top three candidates.
Joe Biden can be seen as, I think, basically still number one.
Elizabeth Warren, number two in striking distance.
And Bernie Sanders, who used to be, I think, the runner-up, used to be the one who was maybe vying for the top spot.
He's now been pushed into third.
Each of them has their own story, their own little character arc and foil, which has changed perhaps their fortunes in this debate.
I have to say, none of these things were really explored in a very interesting way.
The only thing that was really maybe interesting was Elizabeth Warren, I'll say.
And the reason I say this is because the Ukraine thing with Joe Biden was basically inconsequential.
And I could have called that basically because, you know, what you have to realize at this point is that, you know, these corruption scandals, they really don't mean anything.
In the sense that if the moderators ask Joe Biden in this Democratic debate about Hunter Biden's involvement with the Ukrainian or Chinese government or, you know, these contracts with foreign governments, nobody in the Democratic audience is going to sympathize with Trump's argument that Joe Biden should be arrested for this, right?
Virtually no Democrats are going to watch this debate, watch Joe Biden questioned about his involvement with Ukraine and Hunter Biden, and say, I'm not going to vote for him because I don't like what's going on.
In the same way that if there were a Republican primary debate and Trump was being asked about the Ukraine scandal, no Republican would say, this president needs to be investigated or something.
You know, we're at a point now where everything is so partisan and so polarized that, I mean, it really doesn't matter.
These scandals only serve to mobilize the base of the respective parties.
You know, Trump talking about Joe Biden mobilizes the Republican base.
That's really the only effect it has.
Democrats talking about mobilizing... rather, Democrats talking about Trump and his Ukrainian improprieties mobilizes the Democratic base.
And ostensibly they're competing for moderates, trying to convince them, but, you know, for the purpose of a Democratic primary, And that's the context of this conversation.
Bringing up Joe Biden's dealings with Ukraine, I mean, he hand-waved it away.
It was a very weak deflection.
He said, you know, Hunter Biden gave a statement.
His statement speaks for himself.
And anyway, I'm going to talk about something else now.
And it was a totally weak deflection.
Totally obvious that that's what it was.
And the moderator let it go and nobody cared, you know, so that I mean that really didn't meaningfully change the dynamic With regards to Sanders heart attack, you know, he got asked one question about that and he gave a ridiculous answer You know, how do you respond?
This is my microphone.
How do you respond to you know people who might be concerned about the heart attack?
And Sanders says, uh, go to my website.
unidentified
We're doing a rally in Queens.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
And that shows why I'm really healthy.
And by the way, I love my wife and kids.
And everybody claps because we're sympathetic.
He's an old man.
He had a heart attack.
So, you know, I was led to believe that, you know, maybe these things might have changed the dynamic.
They didn't.
The one thing that was really different, and I think this was the most noticeable and what everybody was talking about, is now that Elizabeth Warren As perceived as the frontrunner, or because she has this momentum, this potential, this trajectory to become the frontrunner.
She's ascendant in the race.
All the attacks came on her.
That was the biggest way in which the dynamic has changed.
Whereas the last debate and the previous debate, everybody was attacking Joe Biden.
And I forget if it was the third exactly or the second, but you know, I remember Beto O'Rourke Castro, you know, all these guys, Buttigieg, everybody piling on Joe Biden.
Kamala Harris, of course, was first in the first debate back in June.
She was the one who sort of opened it all up, opened that offensive up on Joe Biden when he was the unambiguous frontrunner.
And now that Elizabeth Warren is ascendant, now that she's rising up, right out of the gate, within the first half hour, Buttigieg launched a pretty savage attack on her for health care.
And maybe this was the most meaningful exchange of the night.
You know, P. Buttigieg, who has been relatively muted, subdued, sort of very conservative performances in the last debates, you know, not really knocking it out of the park, but not failing, just giving these sort of competent, steady, like I said, very conservative performances.
I think perhaps he is noticing that this is not really helping him in the polls.
He's struggled to break out beyond this second-shelf status with the rest of the other candidates.
In a lot of polls, Yang is pulling ahead of Buttigieg.
In some polls, O'Rourke is pulling ahead of Buttigieg.
You know?
So I think I recall, in like May or June, he was surging.
The media was infatuated with him.
Everybody thought he was going to be the nominee.
He was this incredible story.
And it turned out that, you know, just like Yang or just like other candidates, it was this flavor of the month effect.
And he sort of stagnated since then.
So maybe he thought, if I'm going to go out on the attack against this frontrunner, this might help me.
And the reason why this might have been a smart move on his part is because Elizabeth Warren, as the frontrunner, is a much better foil for him than Joe Biden.
There's not a lot of latitude, I don't think, for a Buttigieg to attack Biden on, perhaps other than his age.
You know, maybe the argument is that Joe Biden is old and Buttigieg is young.
Biden's been around and Buttigieg is sort of a fresh face.
He's not from Washington.
He's from, uh, South bend.
But beyond that, I mean, they're both relatively moderate.
They're both trying to, and I think perceived as maybe having the best shot at winning back the working class or white people or whatever, Biden being white and relatively normal and having been around the block, having won a lot of these States with Barack Obama in 2008 and Buddha judge being from the industrial Midwest, having won a lot of these States with Barack Obama in 2008 and Buddha Whereas Elizabeth Warren is a progressive.
She's coastal.
She's an academic.
She's a lawyer.
You know, it's a much better foil for him to lash out at her for being unreasonable and impractical on Medicare for All than it would be to go after Joe Biden, you know, because he's old or something.
So it was a pretty smart move on his part.
You know, there were a lot of exchanges like this.
Like I said, Buttigieg attacked Warren.
A lot of people attacked Warren.
Yang attacked Warren a little bit.
Biden attacked Warren a little bit.
There were a lot of different jabs at her from different angles, you know, about the wealth tax, about Medicare for All, basically just about the whole premise.
You know, there was also a very good moment And this might have been, this was probably the best moment in the whole debate.
There was a time towards the end when it was Biden, Sanders, and Buttigieg, and they all kind of, I'm sorry it wasn't Sanders, it was Biden, Warren, and Buttigieg.
And they all kind of gave their take.
You know, I think Biden said, I'm the experienced guy and I can get things done and so on.
And Warren said, well, I dream big and we have to be daring and we have to be Democrats.
You know, we have to be progressives.
We have to be bold.
And Buttigieg said, well, you know, I don't, I don't have to be Biden.
I don't have to be Warren.
We can sort of have this middle path where we can be satisfied with creating a new majority and, doing universal public education, universal health care, Medicare for all wanted, whatever, without being extreme, without, I guess, moderating too much, whatever.
So I thought that was a pretty nice lineup.
But I got to be honest, you know, we've done these sort of analyses where I go issue by issue and go point by point.
I think at this point that's basically useless.
We kind of know all the issues.
We know basically where everybody stands on them.
We know all the positions.
We've done this like six times now, you know?
So I think everybody kind of knows where people are on the issues.
So I'm not going to break it down point by point.
I'm just going to basically judge it in terms of who are the winners and losers of this debate.
I'll say that in this debate almost everybody had a pretty strong performance out of the frontrunners.
You know, I'm just gonna say what I've been saying for months, which is that really the only people that matter at this point are Biden, Sanders, Warren, and perhaps possibly Buttigieg, maybe O'Rourke.
And I think even those last two would be a stretch.
To me, I really see this as a race.
I continue to see it as a race between Biden, Warren, and Sanders.
In my eyes, these are the only people who have any kind of potential to make it all the way.
I don't think anybody else has potential.
You know, maybe somebody will come away with a surprise victory in some state on Super Tuesday.
You know, maybe one of them will pull ahead and have a good week in the polls.
But at this point, I think the race is sort of beginning to calcify and solidify, and we've got our top tier contenders.
You know, so, uh, does it really matter how well Tom Steyer did?
Like, not really.
You know, does it really matter if, you know, Amy Klobuchar did well?
For what it's worth, I think Amy Klobuchar did do kind of well tonight.
She was fighting for her life.
She picked a fight with Warren a few times.
And I thought it was pretty effective.
She gave some impassioned speeches, some good applause lines.
But at the end of the day, she's polling at what?
Like 2%, 3%?
Could she win any other state other than potentially Minnesota?
I don't really think so.
You know, you look at Iowa, and we're about to look at some of these polling numbers, and it's split, you know, 22, 25, 15, Biden, Sanders, and Warren.
You know, that's like half the field.
So unless Klobuchar is going to suddenly, you know, usurp all these votes from the rest of the field, it's just not going to happen.
And that's one example of, you know, the whole rest of the field outside of these top three candidates.
So I would say that generally, I mean, everybody had a pretty strong showing for the most part.
I thought the only exceptions to that were actually Tulsi and Tom Steyer, maybe Castro.
But generally, everybody else had a pretty strong performance.
And maybe Harris as well.
I think Biden did pretty well.
He didn't talk too much, but he also didn't have to defend himself as much as he did in previous debates.
You know, in the last few debates he was constantly Fending off attacks from other candidates who are trying to you know sort of get on the news cycle or whatever So he was left alone and left alone.
I think he did better than when he was attacked That said, he made a lot of gaffes.
He continues to come off as confused, discombobulated, sort of clumsy, klutzy, awkward, and that's not really a good look.
You know, it's somewhat competitive, and that sort of thing plays into all his weaknesses, which is his age and, you know, these questions about his electability.
So, he had a probably a competent performance.
He had good statements, but it was brought down by those issues.
Warren had a pretty strong performance.
I think she was much weaker fending off these attacks about Medicare for all, but she was sort of strong on the wealth tax.
I think throughout she basically held her own.
I don't think all of her rebuttals were extremely effective on health care, but they got the job done.
She spoke the most out of anybody.
As usual with the past three debate performances, you know, like I said, they were strong, pretty above average performances.
I think the rhetoric that she's putting out there appeals to people based on the polls and just based on the general appetite for sort of progressive economic policy mixed in with moderate wokeness.
So I think she had a strong showing.
Sanders, I think, did well.
He sounded a lot more coherent.
In the last debate, he had that horrible cough.
I don't know if you remember, but he sounded terrible.
He looked kind of rough.
Then he had a heart attack.
This was basically what he needed, which is to say that he had to show up and appear healthy and alive and with it mentally.
And I think he did that.
You know, I think he seemed with it and was kind of charming.
There were some funny moments, and there were some good applause lines, of course, going after the 1%.
You know, that's his bread and butter, so I think he did well.
Kamala Harris, I don't think she came off very effective.
She didn't really speak really at all, the whole debate.
She was kind of absent, and the times that she did, it didn't really work, I don't think.
Yang was very good.
But I mean at this point it really doesn't matter with him.
I think he's kind of done Um, O'Rourke, same thing.
Booker is annoying and a fag.
That's really, as much as I can say about him, I just think he's a big faggot.
And, uh, I don't, I don't think he's, he might actually be gay.
I don't mean that in a way that he's a homosexual.
I mean in a way that just everything about him, the way that he talks, his mannerisms, his facial expressions, I mean everything about him, it's, it's just effeminate, feminine, weak, appeasing, and I just don't like him.
Uh, Buddha Judge had an okay performance.
It's questionable whether some of these scuffles he got into will help him.
Certainly, uh, attacking Warren I think will earn him some credit.
With more moderate people who don't want these extreme options like the wealth tax.
He had a good moment with Beto O'Rourke.
I think he really beat him down on gun policy.
Castro doesn't matter.
Klobuchar had a good performance but doesn't matter.
Gabbard sucked!
The performance by Tulsi Gabbard tonight vindicated everything I've been saying about her.
You know, this has been sort of a contentious thing.
Every time I say this I get people in my comments who disagree with me.
And, you know, like after the first debate, for example, I said that Tulsi Gabbard had a very weak performance, and everybody said, well, no, actually she was the most googled candidate after the debate, and she won the online drudge poll.
The online, uh, what do they call it when it's immediately after a shock poll or something?
She won the online drudge poll after the debate, so that means you're wrong.
You know, so she won an online poll from a completely right-wing libertarian news source.
It's the Democratic primary.
I don't know if you know that, right?
And people googled her.
Maybe it's because she's hot or they didn't know who she was, right?
But it's been my take from the beginning that she's just... she doesn't have that X factor.
She's not charismatic.
She's not articulate.
She's really not smart tactically.
I've been saying it since the beginning.
These like dark horse candidates, they have to really capitalize on their main issues.
They have to frame the whole conversation with their strengths.
You know, Yang has always been the foil to me.
Yang's pitch, what makes him different, is UBI.
He's an outsider.
He's reframing the whole conversation around human-centered capitalism, technological unemployment, and UBI.
So what his task is, is to take every question and not give boring, forgettable Sort of cookie cutter answers like every other Democrat.
He has to reframe them, shift the paradigm, turn it upside down and make it about, you know, why UBI is going to solve everything.
And that's why it was genius.
It was sort of funny, but it was genius.
When he was being asked in the second debate about climate change, he didn't offer up yet another plan about a Green New Deal or some kind of investment in a green energy like everybody else, like Jay Inslee, who is no longer in the race.
He said, you know what we need to do?
Climate change is already, it's already too late.
We need to move to higher ground.
Well, how do you move to higher ground?
How could you afford such a thing?
We're gonna pay everyone $1,000 a month.
It might have sounded silly, but that's exactly what you're supposed to do, is take these issues, not give boring, forgettable, cookie-cutter answers, and reframe them according to your strength, according to your distinguishing factor.
Tulsi Gabbard never does this.
She gives the milquetoast answers, and even worse than that, she gives answers that like, don't even appeal to Democrats.
She gives answers that are like, they don't go all the way, where she's really, you know, sort of speaking truth to power.
She doesn't like, go all the way and really tell it like it is.
But she also doesn't toe the Democratic line.
She kind of walks right in the middle, where she says something that's a little bit out of step with the other Democrats, but not enough to make me happy, not enough to make us happy, but she doesn't appease the Democrats enough to make them happy.
You know, so for example, like on abortion, she says, I think abortion should be safe, legal, and rare.
You know, this is something that appeals to nobody.
Republicans don't like this, and Democrats don't like this.
Right?
Democrats at this stage in the game are basically in favor of abortions.
You know, reproductive justice, reproductive rights.
So something like this is far too moderate for the stage.
You've lost the Democrats.
But also being favor of, or being pro-choice rather, alienates any conservative that you might hope to appeal to.
It's a very tiny sliver that you're winning over.
So, you know, not only is she not reframing it according to regime change, her experience as a soldier, and this kind of thing, foreign policy, which is her bread and butter, but she's also not even giving forgettable answers that, you know, might carry her in some capacity with the rest of the field. might carry her in some capacity with the rest of She's giving answers that are alienating probably everybody.
And on top of that, you know, she's just, she lacks charisma.
She is not articulate.
She got into it with Pete Buttigieg, and I legitimately thought she was on drugs or something.
This should have been her time to shine.
They ask her about Turkey and Syria and the Kurds.
It's all about regime change.
It's the biggest news story for the past two weeks.
This is her time to say, what the hell, Democrats?
I thought we were against endless wars and regime change.
You know, this has been a perfect opportunity for her to really grandstand and show why she's the only one who's leading on this issue and why it's important.
And she lost me.
She was not compelling.
She was monotonous.
She kept repeating the same word, the same phrases over and over again.
And even better than that, when Pete Buttigieg aggressively challenged her on it, he said, Seriously disagree with you.
I was a soldier and we're ashamed that we're abandoning the Kurds and whatever.
I mean, and I totally disagree with the guy, obviously, right?
But he gave this impassioned, like totally neocon, gay, you know, waving the bloody shirt.
Rebuttal.
And what was her response?
Did she say, well I was a soldier too, and how many people have to die to bring about regime change?
Did she name Israel?
Did she name Saudi Arabia?
Or did she sort of fecklessly, you know, say like, so what you're saying is you support regime change?
So what you're saying is you support regime change?
Just like over and over?
It was a disaster.
She totally lost that point, and she had no business losing that point, and then she even got spanked by Biden like five minutes later.
You know, then after all that was said and done, she totally lost that one.
Then Biden came round about after like 10 minutes and nagged the shit out of her again, and she didn't even get a rebuttal.
She didn't even say, oh I was mentioned, I'd like to respond.
She just let it go.
So, I'm vindicated again.
She's bad.
She's not going to win.
She's not a good candidate.
She's pretty, and I agree with her on Assad, and I think she's based.
I've heard things from behind the scenes, what she said to people I know, and she's based, and it would be great if she was a nominee, and she'd maybe be a good foil to Donald Trump, but she's an incompetent femloid, and, you know, that's really all there is to it.
So, that was Tulsi Gabbard.
Tom Steyer's just a goofus.
So that's really my read of the general debate.
You know, how I think this will influence everything... Honestly, at this stage in the game, it's like I've been saying.
The whole field is is losing.
The field, I don't see anybody in the field, which is everybody except for the top three, I don't see any of these people who have really been running away with it or showing any signs of breaking out.
You know, that is really the question, is you've got your front runners, you've got the people that you could see having a reasonable chance of winning the nomination or a good chance, and then you've got everybody else.
And so what these debates are for really is sort of jockeying within the competitors, the actual competitors, and then the other question is who is breaking out.
That's really what these debates are for.
You know, so a lot of people, they come up with these very like academic analyses, or very, I don't even know what you would call it, but it's a form of analysis that helps nobody.
You know, like I'm watching FiveThirtyEight, and Nate Silver, and all these guys, and people that are live tweeting, and they're giving a play-by-play.
and they're fact-checking and you know they're evaluating tactically what each statement is going to do and well that's a nice applause line and whatever and it's like this kind of analysis at the end of the day like towards what end who is this helping what how is this information useful how are these takes useful the way and I've been saying this throughout the whole process the way we have to look at the debates is in the part of the larger you know obviously the context of the election we're talking about is a process where
You know, this is the opening phase where it is fundraising, it is rallying, and it is debating, right?
Town halls, things like this.
This is basically phase number one.
Phase number two is the actual voting.
It's the primaries and the caucuses.
It happens in chronological order.
Unlike the general election, it doesn't happen all on one day.
You know, each state has a different date for their election.
And every state is different, and the dynamics change as the race goes on.
People drop out, you know, people rise and fall, whatever.
Some people win a primary, and they become more viable.
They attract more money, they attract more attention, you know, and the race is very dynamic at this point of the game.
Then you've got the conventions, and then you've got the general.
You know, so I'm looking at these debates in light of the process.
Not in light of the debate as, you know, some sort of abstract thing in itself, but how does it serve the rest?
So all these little nitpicky things about, well, is this person right?
Did they get one over?
Did they have good applause lines?
I mean, ultimately, this is irrelevant.
What matters is, how is this going to affect the race?
And at this point, you know, like I've been saying, just because, like, Klobuchar had a good night in this debate, she's polling at 2%.
Like, it doesn't matter.
She's not, like, anybody's second choice significantly.
So why are we talking about her?
It's about these top three Jockeying for first, second, and third place in those opening contests, and then it's the field vying for some kind of breakout moment.
And then, you know, it's a particularly difficult thing to break out.
They've got to have a big breakout moment, and they've got to keep building upon that.
It's got to snowball.
You know, there have been breakout moments.
Kamala Harris had a breakout moment in June.
When she attacked Joe Biden.
She surged in the polls.
She didn't capitalize on it.
She got all this media attention for about a month.
She was surging in the polls.
People were expecting maybe a follow-up in the second debate.
And there was no follow-through.
She did not deliver.
She did not capitalize.
She did not build upon the breakout moment.
And so she was sort of subsumed back into the field where she is uncompetitive.
And I look at the debate tonight.
Did anybody break out of the field?
Is anybody going to start polling at double digits from the field?
No, I don't think so.
Is anybody going to suddenly become a competitor in Iowa and New Hampshire?
You know why?
Because Klobuchar gave Warren a reality check?
Um, no.
I mean, they just don't have the clout, they don't have the charisma, they don't have that force of will or personality, you know, whatever these intangible factors are in electoral politics, they don't have it.
You know so I'll say my takeaway from this is I think that you know Joe Biden continues continues to have these weaknesses.
Like I said, the gaffes, these sort of moments of confusion, he just sort of seems discombobulated, just seems like a little bit off.
I think Elizabeth Warren continues to be strong, solid, tending to be a high-quality candidate.
I think it actually, her being attacked by everybody, increases her prestige.
I think in a way, that sort of is a validation of the fact that she's the frontrunner.
It sort of like confirms itself in the sense that she is ascendant, she is rising, and by virtue of everybody else recognizing this and attacking her, it really sort of, you know, what would be the word?
What would be the word?
I'm trying to think of the right word, but it's not coming to me.
It essentially just confirms that she is rising.
It compounds the effect.
It shows that if people thought she was the frontrunner, well, now they know that she is, right?
Or she's at least considered in the running to be the frontrunner, right?
That she's within striking distance.
So I think that enhances her prestige.
I think she will continue her rise.
I think she will continue to I don't think he did good enough to really recapture the energy that he had earlier in the race or even in 2016.
It'll tighten up.
Sanders, I don't think he did good enough to really recapture the energy that he had earlier in the race or even in 2016.
He's stagnating and even falling a little bit.
He's not really doing anything to recapture that energy.
He's not really doing anything to recapture that energy.
I think, like I said with Kamala Harris breaking out in June, you have this effect of disintegration.
I think, like I said with Kamala Harris breaking out in June, you have this effect of disintegration.
You have this effect of slowly but surely there is this decay of support, of energy.
And unless you're constantly keeping that up and feeding that and building upon it, you're slipping.
And that's what you're seeing with Sanders.
He's strong, he's competent, but he's really not fresh enough.
He's really not injecting enough energy to even stay where he is, let alone rise and eventually surpass these guys.
He doesn't really have the vision that's required.
He doesn't seem proactive enough.
So I'm going to say that what is the effect of this?
There will be some movement with the rest of the field, among the field.
unidentified
the world.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
That will be marginal and ultimately meaningless and then within the competitors, the top three, I think Elizabeth Warren will continue to rise, Joe Biden will stay about the same, and Sanders will stagnate as well, perhaps go down a little bit.
That said, AOC, it was just announced, she endorsed Bernie Sanders, so that could see him rising a little bit.
That's kind of a huge blow to Elizabeth Warren, but Just looking at the debate, I'm gonna say that's my basic takeaway.
There was one other notable observation just before we, you know, I give you some more general thoughts and we move on to super chats.
There is one notable thing about this debate is they didn't talk about climate change at all.
Which I found to be kind of interesting.
Because climate change is like one of the most important issues for Democrats in this election.
If you look at the issues that voters care about in any of the polling, climate change is like among the top five for Democratic voters, if not the top three or number one.
They didn't talk about climate change virtually at all.
It got kind of mixed in with some of the other topics like about jobs and the federal work guarantee and things like that.
But they didn't really ask them any explicit direct questions about climate change, which is good because we didn't need more of that.
But they did talk a lot about foreign policy.
They spent a half hour on foreign policy when Democrats don't care about that at all.
So I thought that was sort of notable.
I'm also going to show you some statistics here.
I'll show you some numbers.
So in terms of words spoken, in terms of speaking time, I'll just go from top to bottom here for this debate.
Elizabeth Warren spoke the most, followed by Joe Biden, Beto O'Rourke, Amy Klobuchar, Cory Booker, Pete Buttigieg, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Andrew Yang, Julian Castro, Tulsi Gabbard, and Tom Steyer.
So the people that spoke the least was Yang, Castro, Gabbard, and Steyer.
You know, and that just goes to show, I mean these people are relevant, they will not win, and the people that spoke the most were Warren and Biden, number one and number two.
Sanders was actually towards the bottom, which again just kind of goes to show that he's really not so much in the race.
To me, it's really a race between Warren and Biden, and then you've got really everybody else.
Sanders is kind of hanging on, but like I said, he's stagnating.
In terms of polling, I'll just read off some of the most recent national polls.
The most recent poll is from Harris.
It has Biden at 35%, the frontrunner Warren in second place with 17, Sanders at 14.
A Quinnipiac poll from October 11th to the 13th has Warren as the frontrunner at 30, Biden in second place at 27, Sanders at 11.
Nobody else has double digits, not even close.
Uh, and then there's a morning consult poll, which has Biden at 32, Warren at 21, Sanders at 19, and then again, nobody else comes close to double digits.
Most of the polls are like this.
It has Biden as number one, you know, in a couple it has Warren as number one, but generally it's Biden number one, Sanders and Warren in a tight race for number two, and it's everybody else who is nowhere close.
That's at the national level at the state by state level the first primary contest of the season will be Iowa on February 3rd 2020 in all these polls Warren is pulling ahead of the three Most recent polls from Iowa, two of them have Warren in the lead, number one.
One of them has Warren tied with Biden.
All of them show a pretty tight race between Biden, Warren, and Sanders, but it's noteworthy that in a lot of these polls, Warren is number one.
And there is a lot of talk.
There are rumors that Biden is preparing to lose Iowa.
So if Elizabeth Warren wins the Iowa caucus, and like I said, this is the first contest, that'd be a pretty huge moment for her.
I think that would signal and show she's a new frontrunner, she is viable, and that will attract a lot of money and attention.
That'll be big for her.
That could be the momentum she needs to carry her through, you know, the first four contests in February.
Then you've got New Hampshire.
You know, these are a little bit tighter.
In the three most recent polls in New Hampshire, just like in Iowa, you've got two polls where Warren is number one, and one poll where Warren is tied with Biden.
So it's actually exactly the same as Iowa.
In all the polls, it's pretty tight among these three guys, except everybody else doesn't even come close.
And the numbers are a little bit different in Nevada and South Carolina, but that's really sort of a different part of the primary.
So generally speaking, and like I've been saying since the third debate, the shape of this race is kind of coming into view here.
It's Biden, Warren, and Sanders.
Increasingly, really, it's Warren versus Biden, and Warren is rising against Biden.
That's really kind of what you need to know is at this point in time, the arrows, where are they pointing?
I would say that in terms of who can win, it's going to be those three.
And what is the trajectory?
I see Biden as going down, Sanders going down, and Warren going up.
And that's where we stand right now.
That is, I think, where the energy is.
That's where the momentum is, the movement.
And that is certainly the result of this debate, I would say.
So it's another boring debate.
I don't even know when the next one is going to be.
unidentified
Let me Google that real quick.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Let's see, Democratic Debate Schedule.
I think we have like 10 more of these, basically.
Let's take a look from Newsweek.
The next Democratic Debate will take place on November 20th.
So, we've got another one coming up next month.
How many more of these are there?
Let me see if I can find a whole schedule.
Here's from Wikipedia.
so let's see we've got we've got one on november 20th we've got one in december which they do not have a date selected yet and then we've got uh seven eight nine ten and eleven twelve so we've got one in november we've got one in december and then six more after that for a total of twelve So we are a third of the way done with these debates.
A third of the way done.
And that's an accomplishment, I guess you could say, but obviously a lot more to go.
But I think that basically things will probably be decided.
I don't know if there'll be 12 debates.
I think Probably they'll have it figured out maybe by, you know, 8 or 9, maybe 10.
Maybe by the 10th debate they'll have it figured out.
We'll maybe have a frontrunner, maybe even a nominee, a de facto nominee at that point.
But that's your fourth debate.
You know, like I said, they suck, they're boring, but, you know, that's, uh, that's the news.
That's our coverage.
But we're gonna take a look at our superchats.
We'll see what you guys are saying about all this.
I know it's late.
I know it's been a long night.
So I'm going to try and speed through these.
We've got Jax, who says, I can't stand female candidates.
Yeah, I agree.
They shouldn't be running for president.
Why are they running?
They're not going to win.
They can't do the job if they do win.
James says, what angered me most was that Buttigieg's take was so dumb that this chat could have done a better job than Tulsi's response.
She didn't even go all out at anyone else during the subject.
Very disappointing.
Exactly!
Exactly right.
You know, people in my live chat could have defended against Buttigieg better than her.
It was a disaster.
Anybody could.
Tucker, Trump, anybody who's even remotely familiar with this stuff.
I mean, she totally botched it.
I'm completely vindicated on that.
Yeah, I saw that.
It's not really horny posting.
She just asked, will I ever be based?
And I'm going to respond to that after the show, but, you know, to answer it just now, I mean, look, Kathy, you can be based.
I will consider you based, but You know, we just have to make a little bit more progress.
She's getting there.
She's made big improvements.
I don't know if you've seen this, but, uh, you know, she did the 1350 on Twitter.
Very epic.
And she's friends with me.
We're mutuals on Twitter.
So, I mean, these are big steps.
At the end of the day, look, being based means you know what's really happening in the world.
It means you're not a phony.
It means you're not full of shit.
And I'm not saying that Kathy Jew is any of these things, but, uh, you know, being based means that It's not like we're trying to, like, manipulate people.
It's not like we're trying to propagandize people or anything.
It's not like a malicious thing.
We're trying to get people to wake up about what's happening and, like, tell the truth.
So, and I think Cathy, she was very smart.
I think she's very smart.
She's got that high Chinese IQ, so I think she can figure out what's happening.
It's just a matter of getting her there, getting her on the right side of history.
In the meantime, I respectfully disagree with her on a lot of these issues, but I think she can be based.
She can get there, and she could be an asset for the cause in some ways.
So, you know, that's what we're trying to do.
We're trying to red pill the masses.
I think it's working.
Right?
But let's see.
Derpy says, my vote will be a write-in for Yang's autistic son.
Yeah, I don't know.
I would vote for Baron over Yang's autistic son.
Glenn says, let me be crystal clear.
I had a cavity filling six hours ago and my mouth is still numb.
Half my mouth can't taste food.
Under your health care plan, Mr. Flint says, how do we prevent this crisis?
Thanks for the epic coverage.
That's kind of funny.
Well, yeah, I mean, that's how all these people are talking, right?
I don't know.
If I were in charge, no health care, no public services, I would just make things collapse, essentially.
Shystris is all these Moloch worshipers talking about being friends with John McCain.
Uh, hello, eternal sodomy and fire for the rest of time department.
Yeah, I mean, that's basically what we're talking about, right?
Well, and it just goes to show what's going on in D.C.
that, I mean, they're all the same people.
They're all the same evil Moloch-worshiping creatures, right?
They're all friends with John McCain and John McCain is this warmongering neocon anti-Trump scumbag?
Like, what does that tell you?
Nose out says Pete Buttigieg went through a lot of shit together with his friends in the military.
Yeah, that's correct.
Important selection of words there, too.
Yeah, that's a little Joe Bidenism.
Yeah, pretty funny.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah, that's a little Joe Biden-ism.
Yeah, pretty funny.
Lord Maryland says, watching the debate reminded me how much I missed 2016.
Yeah, exactly.
FF says, even these cow folk know the real score on U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.
Watching the debate, wars for regime change is like watching a ridiculous puppet show full of lies and nonsense.
Yeah, that's true.
And, you know, again, it's totally controlled.
I think everybody realizes that.
Second R says, is Andrew Yang crisp and slacks pilled?
I think so.
His slacks were looking pretty crisp.
Pete says, just learned that Native tribes are legally considered domestic-dependent nations.
Reminds me of another nation within America.
Yeah, that's pretty funny and true.
Well, I can think of a lot of people like that.
Chad Poopter Griffin says, presdia chat to disavow Joe the Boomer for being a pedophile.
Joe the Boomer is not a pedophile.
I will not tolerate slander.
Gay says Nick, whatever you do, don't read the next super chat.
Folk Salad Intel says that it's actually a vibe check in disguise.
Stay safe, big guy.
I don't know this one looks okay to me but hey thanks.
Underscore says turn 21 and want to get my concealed carry license but I really don't want to pay $100 and give my fingerprints to the FBI.
Think it's worth it?
I don't know, bro.
I mean, all these people that are so, like, paranoid about dumb stuff like this.
I won't give my fingerprints to the FBI.
Uh, you know, it's like, do you think the FBI couldn't get them if they wanted them?
All these people, don't do 23 and me, you're giving your saliva to... It's like, if they really wanted to use what they have against you, like, there's nothing you could do to stop that.
They've got satellites, They've got surveillance cameras everywhere.
They've got metadata.
They've got your cell phone.
They've got your computer.
I mean, the resources that are at their disposal.
They've got the NSA.
And, you know, people will freak out over these minor things.
I won't buy a ticket to Joker.
I will not give my saliva to 23andMe.
I will not give my fingerprints to the FBI.
It's like they put up all these arbitrary obstacles in their way to, like, getting along in the modern world as if, like, completely ignoring the elephant in the room, you know?
Like, okay, if that makes you feel better...
You won't give the FBI your fingerprints.
The FBI could come to your house and, like, take you away and put you in a black site, you know, some FBI, CIA black site, and you'll never be heard from again.
You think, like, if they really wanted to come for you, you not getting a concealed carry permit would stop them, you know?
Oh, I won't give Google my saliva.
You know, Google knows everything about you.
They know you better than you know you.
And you think, like, well, if I just don't do this one thing, like, I'll be better off?
Like, nice cope.
So, uh, make your own decision, man.
Uh, Daniel says Kamala Harris talks exactly like Miriam Pataki.
I don't know who that is.
Uh, Rektum says Yang really held his own against the opposition tonight.
He didn't just defeat him, he downright wrecked him.
That's true, he did have very good performance.
He defeated Warren, he defeated some others.
He has the data.
Can't beat the data.
Yamato says and then one day for no reason at all people voted Nick into power could happen.
Who knows one day?
Rectum says can we get some crab emojis and chat for Bernie?
Well, he's not dead yet So I don't want to jinx it if we jinx it.
He'll never die Bueller says broseph is a gay man looking to branch juridians.
I don't know who broseph is Are you talking about my friend broseph?
Yamato says McCarthy is rolling in his grave.
Yeah Nose out says anus 12 nationalism.
Okay, that's a stupid super chat Studio I cans a drunk Kathy Jew on telegram right now asking if the knicker will ever think she is based Look out Nick drunk text incoming.
I don't think she's ever drunk texted me, but I Don't know.
It's kind of amusing to see on telegram kind of amusing.
I What do the e-girls think about when they're up late at night, drunk?
They think about me.
They think about Nick Fuentes, you know?
What do the e-girls think about me?
They think about me all the time!
I don't think about e-girls.
I'm not up at night thinking about e-girls.
I'm up at night thinking about... Well, I'm not going to tell you what I'm thinking about.
I'm thinking about politics, okay?
Do you want to know?
I'm thinking about politics, alright?
I'm thinking about pasta.
Alright, does that sound good?
But, uh, I'm not thinking about e-girls, I can tell you that much.
So, but it's so true, you know, Brittany Venti trying to, trying to get my goat the other day, tweeting about my eyebrows.
She's DMing me, antagonizing me.
And, uh, you know, Kathy Xu, the drunk texting.
What can I say?
What can I say?
E-girls like me.
They're infatuated with me.
What can I say?
Is it because I'm handsome and cool?
And I'm indifferent to their affection?
Could that be it?
I don't know.
Let's see Finn says anus 12 for presidents.
Yeah, that's something I could get behind Prince of Conquest is really late night work tonight big guy get some good sleep after the show epic show as always.
Well, thanks, buddy Finn says anus 12 for president goth GS for everybody That's something that interests me Prince of Conquest says Harris and Bernie are going to give Big Pharma an offer.
They can't refuse Yeah, that's kind of funny Forrester says Bernie and Biden were the most energetic on that stage and they're almost dead.
unidentified
Mmm, I don't know if I agree with that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Treads, excuse me, says thoughts on Blackpill's video on the Joker?
Well, I did a whole review of that on DLive.
Amira says, mmm, homemade pickled cabbage.
I heart med food.
Is pickled cabbage med?
I think that's like... I don't think meds eat pickled cabbage.
I think that's like, isn't that an Irish thing?
I thought I was Irish, or like Eastern European, or like German or something.
unidentified
We don't do pickled cabbage.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
But cabbage is good for your test, so I'm down with cabbage.
Chip says, what are you wearing to Politicon?
I never confirmed I'm going to Politicon.
Gamma says, Mr. Fuentes, have you heard that Revenge of the Sis' squad car was stolen by Jeffrey Epstein while Mersh and Royce were out solving crimes at the casino?
This is a serious matter.
We're all in danger.
Teddy Spaghetti involved.
I don't know what any of that means.
I know Revenge of the Sis is very butthurt that I don't respond to their emails or something.
But I don't know who any of these other people are.
Sounds kind of ridiculous.
Wag the Dog says, wee woo, I'm a fire truck.
All right.
Protein says, the debate tonight had very lowbrow discussions.
Yeah, big agree.
Four Shades says, do you think mustache man went to hell?
Who's mustache man?
This Greek guy says, if I see another live chat about eyebrows, I'm going Joker mode on this whole operation.
Yeah, I'm with you on that.
Dan D says, the eyebrows will grow back.
Remember the philtrum question mustache fix that Maybe we're a big hat pulled down low for a week.
We got your back King Yeah, I mean look with the regard to the eyebrows which everybody's talking about so much First of all, first of all, not a big deal.
Everybody's in the live chat.
Oh, eyebrows, eyebrows, whatever.
And it's like, I get it, it's a joke.
People are trying to bust my balls, whatever.
But it's like, they look slightly lighter than before because they were trimmed, you know?
Like, not a big deal.
Number one.
Number two, people are acting like it's this, like, weird thing that I did.
Oh, who does that?
Who gets their... Like, it was some... Like, I went deliberately to get them trimmed.
I went, I got my hair cut.
Uh, the guy, you know, he cut my hair, obviously.
He trimmed my sideburns.
And he said, hey, do you want your eyebrows trimmed?
Now, he usually trims my eyebrows anyway.
And what he does is he he just uses scissors and he just combs them up and cuts off a little bit of the excess.
That's typically how he does it.
This time he's like, oh, I'll use the clippers.
He was sort of laughing.
He's like, maybe they're so thick.
So he just took the clippers like Juju, you know, Kathy Juju, you know, he did the clippers back and forth, you know, just got the eyebrow a little bit and just cut the length.
In real life, they honestly look the same.
You know, I posted a picture on Telegram and they look virtually the same.
I don't know, maybe it looks... maybe because of the lighting, maybe it's because of the gain on the camera.
It looks a little different.
But everybody's making such a big deal out of it.
Sheesh!
So, uh, but, you know, whatever.
It is what it is.
Uh, you know, people... Oh, he waxes his eyebrows?
Who does that?
That's not like... I didn't wax my eyebrows.
I didn't go to, like, get them done.
You know, the online stuff is so annoying.
People just are so ridiculous about, you know...
You know, people, the way people talk about me, the way people just make shit up about me, conspiracy theories.
I was on poll the other day, made the mistake of like searching myself on the poll archive and like just the crazy things people say.
It's like, oh my God.
And this is why you can't do it for the people.
This is why I don't do the show for the people.
I do the show because it's because it's good content.
You know, it's hard to explain, but I do it for the sake of itself.
You know, I don't start up the show because, like, I want to impress everybody or make everybody happy or whatever.
I do the show because I, you know, care about telling the truth and making things that are funny.
I care about the con- like, that this content exists.
And and so if I were a guy and I was you know some retard and I was like I do it for the fans at this point I'd be like, you know what?
Fuck the fans.
I'd be like, you know what these people I Give them my all they make fun of me and they you know people make things up about me.
Whatever I I put my life on the line and wig gnats are saying like he's secretly Jewish He's actually co-opting the movement, you know, all this stuff.
I'd be like, I'm done, you know, but I'm doing it for the art, all right?
I'm doing it because it has to be done.
So anyway, these are my thoughts.
This is what I've been thinking about lately.
Nose Out says, Bernie doesn't have the heart for presidency.
Well, that's a pretty funny pun there.
And by the way, not to say that I don't love my viewers.
That's not to say that I don't love a lot of you guys, and we're friends, and we are in this together, ostensibly.
But, you know, that alone is not sufficient to, you know, drive somebody to make the sacrifices that I do.
That's all I mean to say.
Michigan Wave says the Neocons, Never Trumpers, and Deep State types prefer Biden, Buttigieg, and Harris.
Will they attempt to co-opt Warren with money or have the big media start a smear campaign on her?
You know, I don't really think there's any truth to that.
I mean, maybe they prefer some of these guys, but you know what?
I think they can just as easily co-opt Warren as anybody else, frankly.
Do you really believe that Warren is like, they're afraid of her?
I don't think they are.
You know?
In the same way that they really, I mean, weren't even that afraid of Trump.
I mean, they were afraid of him in the primary, but in a big way, all the usual Republican donors kind of co-opted him.
And, you know, we'll see if he's able to shake that off or come out on top or whatever, but, you know, do you think that, like Elizabeth Warren, in other words, will be less co-optable than Trump?
Of course not.
So, maybe they prefer these other guys, but I think they'll have no trouble assimilating her into the status quo.
Dilligent says wore my blue slacks for the Democrat debate.
Naturally.
Big Mike says Tulsi's statement about friendship and our nation kind of warmed my heart.
The knowledge that friendship is magic is the truest white pill we have, second of course to the grace and glory of Jesus Christ.
That's true.
Friendship is very important and you know she did give a good warm statement about that.
Honestly, You know, people say this is a joke.
They say the real ethnostate, and I don't believe in that, but they say the real ethnostate is the friends we made along the way.
Honestly, hate to sound sappy, but it is true.
You know, the more people I meet in this movement, the wedding I was at this weekend, the people I met in Miami, some friends I'll be meeting with in a couple weeks, or next week rather, it is really true.
Some of the best people I've ever met, I've met doing this.
They're some of the best people I'm convinced in the world.
You know, world-class intellects, world-class talents, and just funny and good and kind people.
So, it's a little sappy, it's a little goofy, but it is true, and definitely for our movement.
So, you know, because all my old friends, all my old friends who ditched me after Charlottesville were burnouts, and now all my friends are like geniuses, talented people, you know, people with integrity, deep faith.
So, So it is true.
Friendship is magic.
Isn't that like a My Little Pony thing though?
So I don't know if you're trying to meme me there.
Red Pilled says, did you see Ann Coulter name them on Eric I'm a Punished Goy Metaxas show?
Also Rick Wiles might be our guy.
God bless.
I did see that.
Very epic.
I retweeted that clip actually.
Cosmic Craft says, what happened to your eyebrows?
I trimmed them.
Stephen says, I noticed that Tom Steyer said the Dems need to be the moral authority.
They think they are God and the church in one.
Well, you know, I don't think that's exactly what they meant.
But, you know, nevertheless, that is true.
Beezer says, uh, you looked like Eric Hayden there for a while.
I don't know what that means.
Excuse me, cough there for a second.
Cough department?
Christopher says, thoughts on Booker looking two ways at once?
It's funny.
It's, it's very disturbing actually.
Uh, Mark Smith says, oh no, no, no.
This must be some kind of, uh, is this a Tulsi Gabbard thing or an Owen Benjamin?
When people talk about mommy's milkers, I can't tell if they're talking about Tulsi or there's some cringe like bear from Owen Benjamin.
Ever since, because all the Owen Benjamin people are like, oh mommy's milkers.
I guess that's a joke that Owen Benjamin does about me.
And it's like totally cringe, but I can never place it when we do these debates.
Uh, Ian says, Tulsi surfs.
Yang is lame.
Punch the pumpkin.
Uh, okay, that's pretty cringe, bro.
Davey says, I agree with Hillary Clinton on abortion.
Tulsi Gabbard.
LMAO.
Yeah, I know, right?
Who could support this?
That's really based.
Uh, Levi says, Tulsi Gabbard, USA's first female autistic president.
Yeah, gonna take a pass on that.
My dumb ass is Tulsi.
So you want regime change?
You support regime change?
You actually want regime change?
Buddha judge.
Yes.
Mommies belong baking, not debating.
Exactly right.
Exactly right.
It was so cringe, man.
It made me embarrassed to be alive.
I'm embarrassed to have ever supported non-interventionism.
Derpy says, and I scrolled down a little too far, Derpy says, Yang be like, I have the data, and Tulsi popped 12 Xannies before the debate.
Also, my son has hella autism.
Yeah, pretty funny.
Josh Sayre says, Nick trying to think of the word to describe War and Ascending.
Expidentially.
Got you, bro.
Thanks for slugging through this dog shit.
Well, thanks, bro.
Yeah, that's the one I was thinking of.
Expidentially, of course.
Especially expidentially, yeah.
Yeah, well thanks, buddy.
It's not easy, and I didn't even really do that good of a job, because I was, you know, people are like, hey, good job.
What do you mean?
It's not like I was really composed for the whole thing.
Good job what?
Getting tired halfway through and totally checking out?
You know, halfway falling asleep, raging, punching shit, you know?
Yeah, I did a really great job tonight, I know.
I'm a really seasoned and experienced broadcaster, very professional.
Steven says disregard my last chat.
Styler criticizing Trump.
Okay.
InnerCityDemocrats says I'm inviting you to STFU Femoy to get me milk.
Yeah, facts.
I'm inviting you to get me milk and cookies, please.
Oatmeal chocolate chip, please.
Oatmeal chocolate chip cookies, please.
Mommy, that'd be helpful.
Let's see.
Prophet says Portland Andy is the content king.
Okay, don't know what that means.
Darrington says, debate on immigration at school tomorrow.
I pray I can hide my power level enough to not get expelled.
P.S. My partner is, as long as they are illegal, LOL.
unidentified
As long as they are illegal.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Yeah, I'm the same way but in a different way.
unidentified
Kidding!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Kidding!
That's a joke.
Joking department?
Yeah, really do avoid revealing your full power levels.
I guarantee it doesn't work out in a good way.
Most of the time people think they're gonna reveal their power levels and like they're gonna red pill the world.
I'm gonna reveal my power levels and you know everyone's gonna be convinced That I'm right.
And it's like, you know, what really happens is like just everybody stops liking you and stops talking to you and your life could be destroyed instantly.
Big Hoss says, Betfair odds update war and 50% Biden 17, Sanders 7.
See, so I was right.
Anderson says, Do Americans know that if they lose the cultural war the whole world is over?
Latin American guy here.
Not true.
Not true.
The future could lie in other countries.
I look at China pressuring America and I see a future there.
You know, could you conceive of a world where other countries have enough clout that they could pressure the United States?
And perhaps pressure the United States into a more reactionary direction?
Like imagine if hypothetically, and this is maybe a silly hypothetical, but imagine if Russia had some kind of a block With Eastern Europe and, you know, maybe Iran and, like, nationalist-type countries.
What if they became strong relative to the United States, or stronger relative to us, and were able to exert some kind of a pressure on our system?
Like China has been doing this week with the NBA and Blizzard and whatever.
It's worth considering.
Luke Cotterell says, watch out for Antis 12.
He had assassinated the First Eleven and Jeffrey Epstein.
Sounds like a dangerous man.
Yeah, that was pretty based.
I dunno, kinda seems like NPC behavior to freak out over something so trivial, you know?
that was pretty based uh finn says take the anus 12 pill okay dumbass says nick's eyebrow looks slightly different and people go nuts i don't know kind of seems like npc behavior to freak out over something so trivial you know yeah it is basically uh i agree with that it also could have been like i also thought it could have been like devon staff people trying to troll me because a lot of the super chats last night about the eyebrows
are people that i never recognized or people that i don't recognize people i've never seen before so part of me thinks there are a lot of like i don't know maybe butthurt people i don't know I don't know.
Maybe they came from Devon stack.
I Maybe they came from somewhere else.
Not like Devonstack did a stream about me, but who knows?
Lil Jesus says, Open Google, I browse.
Good night, King.
Well, thank you for that, Lil Jesus.
Dimitri says, Expidentially.
Burp.
Expidentially.
Yeah, like Rick and Morty, right?
Okay, well that's our last Super Chats.
That's gonna do it for us tonight.
Bit of a shorter episode, but you know what?
That's good.
The runtime of the show is an hour.
We're clocking it into like an hour and ten.
And we stream for like, we've been streaming since seven o'clock, so it's been nearly five hours.
I think that's enough.
So that's gonna do it for us on the show tonight.
Remember to subscribe to our channel.
Give me a big thumbs up.
Leave a comment down below.
Click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
Also, do subscribe on DLive and Telegram.
Those are sort of like... if all else fails, I think I'll be able to remain on there.
So, you know, we've been doing these debate streams on DLive.
If you want to see the other DLive streams I do, gaming streams, review, commentary, whatever, it's dlive.tv slash NickJFuentes.
And Telegram is like the last vestige.
That's where I put all my announcements.
I post there really more than anywhere else lately.
All my hot takes.
It's t.me slash NickJFuentes1.
So be sure to check those two out.
Download Telegram if you haven't already.
It's very good.
Simple to use.
Remember, we are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
Central, 8 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time.
I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
This is America First.
As always, thanks for watching.
Thanks to our Super Chatters.
Thanks to everybody that watches the show.
We love you, and I will see you tomorrow at our normal time.
Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
Yeah.
▲
Export Selection