Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 9, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:56:39

Google and the Jeffrey Epstein COVER UP | America First Ep. 421

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:32:38

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		Thank you.
		Thank you.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human rights.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		I'm sorry.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
unidentified		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified		Not even once.
		I've never heard of him.
		What is that?
		I've never heard of him.
		I've never heard of him.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I've never heard of Nick Butch.
unidentified		Who's that?
		...and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Not globalism will be our freedom.
		Not interested in the world.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Not even once.
unidentified		I've never heard of him.
		What is that?
		Americanism, not populism.
		Will be our freedom.
		I've never heard of him.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Like, what?
unidentified		Who's that?
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
		He's not interested.
		I'm sorry.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified		Not even once.
		I've never heard of Nick.
		What is that?
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		I've never heard of Nick.
		What's that?
		and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo. will be our credo.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
unidentified		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified		Not even once.
		Guy, I've never heard of a big question.
		Just that.
		Americanism, not globalism. not globalism.
		Will be our freedom. Will be our freedom.
		Will be our freedom.
		Will be our freedom.
		An older generation.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		Americanism, not globalism, not globalism, will be our credo.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified		Not even once.
		I've never heard of him.
		What is that?
		Americanism, not populism, will be our freedom.
		I've never heard of Big Fudge.
		Who's that?
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		Americanism, not globalism, will not globalism, will be our freedom. will be our freedom.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl, you know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
unidentified		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Not even once.
unidentified		I've never heard of Nick.
		What is that?
		Americanism, not populism, will be our freedom.
		I've never heard of Nick.
		What's that?
		and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Not even once.
unidentified		I've never heard of him.
		What is that?
		Americanism, not globalism.
		Will be our freedom.
		I've never heard of Nick Butch.
		Who's that?
		Who's that?
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America First!
		Good evening everybody.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you here tonight, this Tuesday evening.
		There's not really a lot to talk about in the news, I have to tell you.
		You know, I guess last week was all the big stuff.
		Fourth of July, Iranian tankers, things of this nature.
		And this week there's not a lot, not a whole lot going on.
		But we do have a great show regardless.
		We still are going to be talking about a lot, even though there's not much happening in the world.
		Tonight we'll be looking at a few big tech related stories.
		I'm basically going to paint a picture for you.
		I'm going to paint a picture for you, a narrative if you will, about Big Tech and the focus tonight will be on Google and Facebook.
		So I don't know if you've seen this, I don't know if you can confirm this, but there is a pretty substantial rumor, it's been going around and reported by some reputable sources, that Google has effectively scrubbed from the whole internet all images of Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein.
		This is a pretty big story.
		You know we were talking about this last night.
		Jeffrey Epstein has of course been arrested and indicted for sex trafficking of minors.
		Pretty big deal.
		We talked about last night how this individual has possibly hundreds of millions of dollars, billions of dollars, is a person of note with connections in politics, in entertainment, in Hollywood.
		And he's running basically a child sex trafficking ring.
		He's basically running a blackmail operation.
		It's a very important story.
		And we find out today that while all this is going on, Google has been secretly and quietly manipulating search results when people are looking up aspects or components of this story.
		For example, Sam Hyde was tweeting about this.
		Many other people were talking about this.
		If you look up Jeffrey Epstein on Google, It actually will not autocomplete and find his arrest.
		If you start to type in Jeffrey Epstein, it will show things like net worth, Jeffrey Epstein pictures, Jeffrey Epstein 2019, but not talk about his arrest.
		Beyond that, if you look up images of him with Bill Clinton, and we know that they were very good friends, In the last decade, in the last two decades or so, you won't find any of the many pictures that they had taken together, or any clues about their association together.
		So, we'll talk about that.
		We're also going to talk tonight about the story about Facebook's terms of service.
		So Facebook is at it again, they've changed their terms of service again, and this to me is pretty incredible.
		Normally the terms of service changes that we witness, that we see on Facebook, YouTube, Google, rather not Google, more like Twitter, it's something to the effect of they're ramping up their hate speech policies.
		I believe the last Terms of Service change we saw on Facebook saw them going after explicitly white nationalists and white separatists.
		This time their Terms of Service change is actually pretty interesting.
		They changed their policy on violent conduct.
		They changed their policy on violent rhetoric, rather.
		They've changed it such that now you can talk about mass shootings, you can talk about violence, you could use threats of violence or threats of killing against people.
		Only insofar as they're listed under Facebook's Dangerous Persons or Organizations provisions.
		So in other words, normally it's against the rules on Facebook to say, for example, like, I want to kill so-and-so.
		Like, for example, if I were to go on Facebook and say, you know what, I just want to go into this neighborh- I shouldn't.
		I should not even joke like this, but you could normally not say that you want to kill somebody.
		I was about to make a joke about that.
		Probably would be unwise, given YouTube's terms of service.
		Normally you can't say you want to kill people, right?
		You can, however, say you want to kill somebody on Facebook, so long as Facebook has banned that person under their dangerous persons provision.
		So if, for example, you say you want to kill Laura Loomer, that's allowed by Facebook.
		If you want to say you're going to kill Paul Joseph Watson, that's allowed on Facebook according to this new Terms of Service change.
		If you want to say I'm going to kill members of Identity Europa, that's covered under Facebook's new Terms of Service.
		You cannot say I want to kill Benjamin Netanyahu.
		You cannot say I want to kill Ben Shapiro.
		You cannot say I want to kill any person who is not covered under that provision.
		Very interesting change.
		So we'll discuss that new policy change and then lastly we will discuss this lawsuit against President Trump.
		Which has been ruled on by an appeals court, and it basically says that President Trump cannot constitutionally block people on Twitter.
		They say that's an affront to your constitutional rights as an American citizen.
		So we'll discuss that, and that should be our show.
		That'll do it for us this evening.
		A lot of big tech stories, although I gotta tell you, I'm like scanning, I'm like on BBC, Fox News, I'm on 4chan even, I'm on all the usual Sources, and there's just nothing going on, right?
		Of course, when we're away, that's when all the big stuff happens.
		That's when Jeffrey Epstein actually gets arrested, and it's the Fourth of July rally, and Antifa is doing acid attacks, and then we come back and it immediately stops, right?
		That's how it goes, but...
		We probably shouldn't talk too much about it because who knows something else will catch on fire, right?
		Usually that's how it goes.
		You complain nothing's happening and then somebody someplace catches on fire.
	So this is good enough.
	So this is good enough for now.
	We'll be talking about these big tech stories.
	But before we dive into that, just want to remind everybody, doing a little beard check.
	Maybe you want to press B in chat for the beard.
	And let me know, let me know in the live chat what you're thinking about the growth.
	We are going strong.
	I think the last time I took the razor to it was probably Tuesday or Monday.
	So we're going strong at about seven days about of growth.
	And I think it's going pretty strong.
	You know, I woke up today, I looked in the mirror, I said, it's really coming along.
	For a long time I said I wasn't going to do it because I didn't think I would get enough coverage, but as I see it developing over the past week, we've got about two weeks to go to judge and see how things are progressing.
	I think it's going to go very well.
	I'm very optimistic about the results so far.
	So press B in chat for Beard.
	The other thing we want to talk about before we dive into these big tech stories, we have to also be pressing F as well.
	So everybody press B, make sure we get a lot of B's in chat.
	B for beard.
	We also want to get some F's in chat going as well, once the B's have concluded, for a true American hero, true American patriot, rest in peace Ross Perot, who passed away this morning at the age of 89.
	Apparently he was battling leukemia for some time and he finally died at the age of 89.
	Of course we know Ross Perot was a self-made billionaire.
	He ran for president.
	He was one of the most successful third-party candidates for president in American history.
	Won 19% of the popular vote in 1992.
	I don't believe he won any electoral votes and ultimately that's what counts so that was unfortunate but We do want to be pressing some F's.
	Big remembrance for him.
	You know, Ross Perot, I think we look at him and it's a very important comparison I think to make in 2019 with Donald Trump.
	After his passing this morning, of course everybody is making the comparison.
	It's pretty striking the parallels you have in two cases of Ross Perot and Donald Trump.
	Billionaire, outsider, populist type presidential candidates who rise to prominence talking about things like foreign policy, trade.
	Ross Perot, a little bit about immigration.
	That was really more Donald Trump.
	And so people are drawing the parallels between these two people.
	And frankly, at this stage in the game, where we are in the Trump administration, I have to say that Ross Perot, we remember him as like the real deal.
	Donald Trump.
	You know, everything they say about Donald Trump I think is probably more true about Ross Perot in the sense that they are both billionaires, right?
	But we know that Donald Trump's father was quite wealthy, had a pretty nice head start, right?
	And that's not to say that Donald Trump didn't do fabulously well in real estate.
	That's not to say that he was not a good businessman or did not earn his wealth.
	We know that he had a little bit of a head start, right?
	Ross Perot, on the other hand, was born very poor during the Great Depression, and I could say, I think many could say, would be more aptly described as a self-made billionaire.
	In terms of who is an outsider, we know that Donald Trump has certainly been in the public eye for a long time.
	Sure, he had never held elected office before, but he had rubbed shoulders with politicians before, celebrities, had a television show, and things like this.
	Flirted with the idea for a long time.
	And Ross Perot I think was perhaps more truly an outsider.
	In terms of populist credentials, again I hate to say this, it does pain me to say it, but I think Ross Perot truly was the one who cared more about the issues.
	Not to say that our current president is not a fan of the American people, that's not to say that he doesn't care about the issues, but to me I think we compare these two people and in Ross Perot I see somebody who truly really didn't have to do the presidential bid, it really was more this Reluctant bid to save America from itself, from these horrible trends that are happening in trade, foreign policy, other areas.
	Whereas with Donald Trump, I don't think you could discount the fact that at least maybe 30% of his presidency is an ego project.
	And I hate to say that, I don't like to say that, but here we are in the middle of the first term and I think it's become somewhat apparent that that is A pretty important component of it.
	So I think we look at Ross Perot and we really remember a true American populist, patriot, somebody who ran for president, a quixotic bid which ultimately did fail, and perhaps paved the way for somebody like President Trump ultimately.
	So we're pressing some big F's in chat.
	Pressing F to pay respects.
	A great man.
	And really somebody who we may look into on a future premium show because, you know, I've been talking to some of my friends.
	QAnon hit me up today and said, you know, it's very critical.
	It would mean a lot if you talked about Ross Perot.
	You know, people don't really remember him so well.
	He gets beat up a lot by Republicans, neoliberals, because they say that he gave Bill Clinton a first term or canceled President Bush's Second term, President Bush Sr.' 's second term.
	But of course, we have to remember him as a great populist instead, in spite of his legacy being tarnished by globalists.
	A very woke and patriotic American.
	So, God bless Ross Perot.
	Big F. Big and tough loss today.
	So that's Ross Perot.
	We're gonna move on.
	We're gonna talk about these current event stories.
	Text censorship, you know the drill.
unidentified		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I mean, the tech stuff, it's like, it's almost just depressing to talk about because we know what's going on.
		I mean, we so know what's happening here when we talk about Google and Facebook and all these companies and who runs them and what their game is and who they're involved with.
		It is a little bit blackmailing to discuss it because once we see the problem every day getting worse, And accelerating.
		You know, it's not only getting worse, but it's getting worse more quickly, and at the same time, just absolutely nothing is being done about it.
		Absolutely nothing is changing, and I don't think there's any hope that anything's gonna change anytime soon.
		So it's tough.
		But we're gonna talk about this stuff, uh, big tech.
		I guess we'll start with this Jeffrey Epstein story here, and of course the big story is that all these pictures of Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton have been completely scrubbed off of Google Images.
		So, one week ago, two weeks ago, before this very high-profile arrest, Before this big and controversial indictment has been unsealed, you were able to find all these photographs of Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein together.
		And why is this important?
		Why is this a big deal?
		Why are we talking about something seemingly so petty as Google search image results?
		Well, of course, because Bill Clinton is a very important person in the world.
		Bill Clinton, former president, his wife Hillary Clinton should have been the president if things went according to plan.
		Currently they are the heads of the Clinton Global Initiative.
		This is a pretty big deal, particularly when we've heard rumors and evidence swirling around the Clintons of sex trafficking, particularly child sex trafficking, that they would be photographed with alongside Jeffrey Epstein, who has just been indicted for trafficking of minors.
		That's kind of a critical detail.
		That's kind of a big deal that these two people would be together.
		Because during the election, and immediately after the election, they scrubbed and they banned everybody off the internet who was talking about a possible link between the Clintons, the Podestas, and sex trafficking.
		That was a conspiracy theory.
		That was something you couldn't talk about.
		And so now here we are two years later, and Jeffrey Epstein is back in the news And he's in the courts.
		You know, this is not Infowars trying him.
		This is the courts trying him for sex trafficking.
		Kind of a relevant fact that he was very much in bed with the Clintons.
		Perhaps literally, but definitely figuratively.
		So I do just want to talk briefly about their connection.
		This is on Fox News on the front page today, just to give you an idea of what we're talking about.
		How close they were together.
		This is from Fox.
		It says, quote, attorneys for convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein touted his close friendship with Bill Clinton and even claimed the billionaire helped start Clinton's controversial family foundation in a 2007 letter aimed at boosting his image during plea negotiations, foxnews.com has learned.
		The 23-page letter written by high-powered lawyers Alan Dershowitz, High-powered lawyers Alan Dershowitz and Gerald Lefkort was apparently part of an ultimately successful bid to negotiate a plea deal before Epstein could be tried for using underage girls in a sex ring based in Palm Beach, Florida in his private island estate on the 72-acre Virgin Islands home dubbed Orgy Island.
		Epstein spent 13 months in prison and home detention after agreeing to a plea deal in which he admitted to soliciting an underage girl for prostitution.
		This was many years ago.
		So this is a quote from the letter where Dershowitz and the other lawyer, they claim that Epstein was involved in the founding of the Clinton Initiative.
		So this is the letter.
		It says, quote, Mr. Epstein was part of the original group that conceived the Clinton Global Initiative, which is described as a project bringing together a community of global leaders to devise and implement innovative solutions to some of the world's most pressing challenges.
		read the July 2007 letter to the Pretty fascinating, right?
		office in the Southern District of Florida.
		The letter goes on, quote, focuses of this initiative include poverty, climate change, global health, and religious and ethnic conflicts.
		So here we see a pretty interesting connection, don't we?
		Pretty fascinating, right?
		We see all of these things starting to come together.
		I think everything in the world becomes pretty clear once we draw together all these disparate little stories.
		So, and once we have the Clinton saga, which, again, was talked about a lot more during the election, you had Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton, they start the Clinton Foundation, and everywhere these people go, there's sex trafficking.
		We see in Haiti, we see there are similar situations in Europe.
		We see that surrounding the Clinton Global Initiative you have all these allegations of particularly sex trafficking of minors, people going missing.
		You see people like John and Tony Podesta, who were their campaign managers and doing political consultation work for the Clintons.
		Rumors swirling around them, evidence swirling around them of, again, child sex trafficking.
		We have this Comet ping pong situation, Pizzagate.
		We have even Andrew Breitbart, who was talking about this in 2011.
		He tweeted how Tony Podesta and John Podesta being the subject of sex trafficking is not like...
		The number one story in the news today is crazy to me.
		Something to this effect.
		Dies of a heart attack at the age of 40-something shortly thereafter.
		So once you have all these very salacious rumors swirling around, the Clintons, people associated, their foundation, the Podestas, about child sex trafficking, then you have, and this is the critical missing link perhaps, hopefully, With Jeffrey Epstein, somebody who everybody knows the story with him, his wealth came out of nowhere, his Rolodex came out of nowhere, there's really no other way to explain it other than he was set up as a blackmail operation for U.S.
		government, entertainment, culture, etc.
		He's indicted yet again ten years later for sex trafficking, and then of course the link between them is then Google.
		Of course, to tie all this together, if that's not enough to understand what's really going on behind the scenes in government, in politics, in entertainment, that yeah, it's quite apparent that if Epstein's being taken down and he's in bed with these people, Dershowitz says, Dershowitz, the Jewish lawyer says,
		That Epstein was involved in the founding of the Clinton Initiative, the founding of the Clinton Foundation, and all that, and we see who Epstein is, and that's on the front page, it's undeniable, it's well documented, it's all over the place, but then Google takes it a step further and says, now we're going to scrub all images, all mentions of Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein being together, I think we're kind of starting to see What's going on in the country begin to take shape.
		Basically the way the country works, and we said it yesterday, cannot be said enough, the country runs basically on blackmail.
		This is how the country is run.
		And this is like no secret by the way.
		This has been talked about for decades.
	This has been disclosed in many government documents from the 50s or 60s.
	It's well documented that this is how the system functions.
	For whatever reason, people don't pay attention to it.
	They don't put too much stock in that in 2019.
	Maybe they think that that was like an old-fashioned thing, but this is how the country is run.
	It's run by whoever is handling Jeffrey Epstein.
	Maybe that's the Wexners, and the Wexners are in bed with Israel and the Mossad and all that.
	But whoever is, you know, handling Jeffrey Epstein, if that's the Wexners, whoever handles them, whatever, but some shadowy interest group, they get somebody like Jeffrey Epstein, they get him to connect with celebrities, politicians, and so on, use lust, use sex, all this other kind of black material.
	Intel and they traffic in that in order to control ever larger networks of influential people in the different sectors of influence in the country.
	And that's how the country is run.
	And I guess today the focus then is, well, how is that?
	How does these people really control the country?
	Well, they control mass communication.
	That's perhaps the most critical part of it.
	This is where big tech plays into it.
	And you know, people have always told me, or perhaps criticized me, or questioned me when I say this, When I say that big tech is the most important thing, but this is why big tech is the most important issue of our time.
	Because insofar as Google, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, Amazon, all these tech companies control your diet of information and of opinion, you cannot learn about these things.
	And if you can't learn about these things, you can't do anything about it.
	If you're not informed about these things, you don't know what's going on, and you operate as though it's not going on.
	So a lot of people say, oh well the number one issue is immigration.
	You know, I agree in like a certain sense.
	The number one issue is demographics.
	I agree that ultimately many of our problems are downhill from demographics.
	Believe me, we've talked about that a lot on the show.
	But at the end of the day, we have to recognize the very important role that communications plays in an advanced, technological, industrial society.
	When Google scrubs the images of Epstein and Clinton, this is what matters.
	When Google scrubs and, you know, memory holes things like the Las Vegas shooting and whatever happened there, Or other so-called conspiracy theories.
	This is where we get where we are today, when you're not allowed to question, when you're not allowed to talk about, you're not allowed to opine on these things.
	And so I think we see Google, they're taking all these images of Clinton and Epstein off of the internet.
	We can understand at once, it sort of vindicates the connection, right?
	I mean, they wouldn't be scrubbing these images if it wasn't true.
	For people that like to say, oh, well, it's because Google has a Democrat bias.
	Is that really why?
	It's probably because there is some sort of a connection.
	Google's probably in bed with them.
	And it also tells us the state of the modern world as it is.
	That it's all basically an illusion.
	It's all lies.
	It really is truly an information war.
	It really is about the control of the spread and proliferation of information and of opinion.
	So that's the Epstein scandal, but it goes a little bit of a step further.
	Like I said, we're gonna try and paint a picture for you tonight because these stories are a little bit related.
	That's the Epstein story with Google Images, but I think maybe perhaps a little bit more important is the Facebook terms of service.
	I think this takes it a little bit of a step further.
	If you've heard all that stuff about Epstein before, I think this really brings it home.
	This is a little bit more fresh.
	So I said at the top of the show, Facebook has changed their terms of service yet again this week.
	Normally when we see the terms of service change, it's in pretty predictable ways.
	Usually when Twitter changes their TOS, usually when Facebook changes their TOS, they're ratcheting up their restrictions on so-called hate speech or something like that.
	They're narrowing what you're allowed to say.
	But Facebook has truly been leading the way in new kinds of restrictions, right?
	Normally, I think we see with Twitter in particular, it's relatively mild.
	When they change their terms of service, for example, they recently changed it.
	I think Twitter actually changed theirs again this week.
	They said that their new change says that you can't use dehumanizing rhetoric.
	So that means, for example, that you can't say that a group of people or a person is less than human.
	And so we could see that a change of their terms of service like that is really just sort of like a piggybacking.
	It's like an extension of existing so-called hate speech regulations.
	And while it's not ideal, while we don't agree with that, it's predictable, it's entirely conventional.
	Facebook has really been leading the charge in very unconventional, very different regulations.
	I think the first time we really saw this was a couple of months ago when they said that they would go after and target specifically white nationalism and white separatism.
	We had never seen that before.
	And I think there was a tremendous disservice done when a lot of people treated that like it was just another effort by Big Tech to so-called censor conservatives, right?
	Or it was Big Tech overage or something like that.
	This was a totally different animal.
	Because understand, white nationalism, white separatism in themselves are not hateful or violent ideologies.
	I'm not.
	I don't claim to be a white nationalist.
	I've never claimed to be a white nationalist or a white separatist for a multitude of reasons, right?
	But those ideologies in themselves, not as if I'm running interference for them because I support them, but those ideologies in themselves are not hateful or violent.
	To say that white people should have their own nation, to say that white people should separate from a nation, there's nothing intrinsic about that position which is either violent or hateful, right?
	In the same way that being a black nationalist, or being a Zionist, being a Zionist, there's nothing intrinsically hateful or violent about it.
	Although a Zionist, it tends to, uh...
	Tends to associate with those kinds of things, right?
	But nevertheless, Facebook went after a specific political ideology.
	They said that, well, something about this ideology is wrong.
	We're going to make a editorial decision.
	and say that this this position this political position which again is it doesn't break the law it doesn't even break our terms of service but this has to be ostracized and marginalized and not tolerated for whatever reason and that was a totally different animal to say that we're going after this ideology specifically for no other reason than it's problematic and it could lead to violence so that was a very telling thing now they've got a recent update again unlike anything i think i've ever seen in any terms of service
	And this should be the death of Facebook.
	I really do believe this should be the cause of major litigation or congressional action or something.
	The press should be talking about it because this is unheard of and I'll read you this is from Breitbart.
	It says, quote, it's okay to threaten people with violence and death on Facebook so long as your target is a dangerous individual such as Paul Joseph Watson or Laura Loomer according to the social networks increasingly Orwellian set of rules.
	The tech giant's recently updated policy on violence and incitement states that death threats and incitement to violence are banned across the platform unless your threat is aimed at someone the social network has labeled an acceptable target.
	So I'm going to read you now...
	I'm going to read to you now.
	This is from Facebook's own website.
	This is from their own terms of service page.
	It says, quote, do not post threats that could lead to death and other forms of high severity violence of any target where the threat is defined as any of the following statements of intent to commit high severity violence calls for high severity violence unless the target is an organization or individual covered in the dangerous individuals and organizations policy Including content where no target is specified but a symbol represents the target and or includes a visual of an armament to represent violence.
	Statements advocating for high severity violence unless the target is an organization or individual covered in the dangerous individuals and organizations policy.
	And lastly, aspirational or conditional statements to commit high severity violence unless the target is an organization or individual covered in the dangerous individuals and organizations policy.
	Isn't that incredible?
	I mean it's almost, to me, I read that and it's almost unbelievable.
	I saw this on Twitter this afternoon, this evening, and I was reading through this screenshot of the new Terms of Service, and I almost couldn't believe it, that this was real.
	I thought it was doctored.
	I had to go in and Google it and find it on Breitbart, which is a reputable news site, to see that this is actually real.
	It literally says, do not post statements or calling for high-severity violence unless, what do you mean unless?
	Phelps says you cannot call for high severity, like in other words, high casualty violence.
	You can't call for a mass shooting, can't call for a bombing.
	It should be a period after that, right?
	You cannot call for mass casualty violence.
	But they say unless.
	What do you mean unless?
	Well, unless it's somebody who is named as a dangerous person or organization.
	So in other words, Facebook has deemed white nationalists and white separatists as dangerous individuals.
	Faith Goldie was taken off of Facebook under that rule change.
	So if you go on Facebook today and you say, I want to go and kill Faith Goldie, That's completely acceptable under their terms of service.
	The same thing with Paul Joseph Watson, Laura Loomer.
	Laura Loomer, who is not, I mean, she's a Jewish Zionist.
	I mean, let's not pretend like this is some kind of radical right-wing extremist or like a Nazi or a KKK.
	I mean, she's Jewish.
	She's a minority, right?
	That's what I mean by that.
	That's what I mean by that, right?
	So these are the kinds of people you could go after.
	You could say, I want to go bomb Nazis.
	I want to go kill the KKK.
	I want to go kill white nationalists.
	That's totally acceptable.
	But everybody else is essentially covered.
	And this kind of gives you an insight into what's happening in the country.
	This is some high level thinking.
	This is some high IQ posting.
	You're not going to hear this on Steven Crowder.
	You're not going to hear this on Ben Shapiro.
	You're not going to hear this on CRTV.
	Alright, I have met somebody in DC from there.
	You're alright, but you're not gonna hear this on these different places.
	Really, we have to break it down and understand what all this stuff really means.
	It really comes down to political violence.
	It comes down to, again, this war that is on for your mind.
	Basically, it all goes back to World War II, folks.
	Hate to do this, you know, might be getting myself into some hot water here.
	We'll see.
	But it all goes back to World War II.
	Why can you not be a white nationalist in 2019 today?
	Why can you not talk about white identity politics?
	Why can you not be authentically right-wing and reactionary?
	Why can you not identify as a fascist?
	Why can't you do these things in 2019?
	Of course, in theory, you could, right?
	But why is it not permissible?
	Why is it unacceptable?
	Why is it especially wrong to do that?
	And the reason why I'm saying this, you know, you might hear a question like, why is it not okay to be a fascist?
	And you would say, well, of course, because fascism is wrong.
	You know, fascism is authoritarian or something like this.
	But it's okay to be a communist in 2019.
	So understand where I'm coming from.
	It's okay to say you're a socialist.
	It's okay to say you're a communist.
	It's okay to wear a Che Guevara t-shirt.
	It's okay to wear a hammer and sickle.
	This sounds very basic.
	I promise you it won't be for very long.
	So when I say why is it not okay to be a fascist, I mean this in the sense that it's okay to be many other strains of extremist ideology.
	Perfectly acceptable and permissible.
	And by the way, it has nothing to do with death count either, right?
	We know that Mao Zedong killed 70 million people.
	I could wear a Mao Zedong t-shirt in public and not worry about getting killed.
	Can I wear a swastika t-shirt in public?
	No.
	You know, I was talking to Faith Goldie the other day.
	She was at a communist-themed bar in Toronto where they had pictures of Stalin and Lenin.
	Could you imagine a bar that was Hitler-themed with swastikas?
	Of course not.
	So why?
	Why can we not do white identity politics?
	Why can we not do these things?
	Because of course the connotation is Hitler!
	That's why it all goes back to this.
	When you say, well, we need a country for white people, or something to this effect, and I'm not, I would never say something like that, God forbid, right?
	That goes against my personal terms of service, but if you were to say we need to live in a white country, why does that sound bad to white people?
	Why does that sound wrong?
	Why can we not do that?
	Why does that sort of, in our mind, and in the mind of perhaps normies, maybe not people that watch this show, but why does that just sort of ring In a strange way.
	Why does it hit different to say something like that?
	To advocate for a white racial interest?
	Or to advocate reactionary politics?
	Something that's muscularly right-wing?
	Of course, because it all goes back to Hitler.
	This is what I figured out in college.
	It all goes back to the bad man.
	It all goes back to the Nazis.
	Well, you can't be actually that right-wing because that's Nazis.
	You can't actually be in favor of the white race because You know who else was in favor of the white race?
	We all know who that was.
	It was Hitler.
	And we all know that the Nazis are the bad guys.
	Basically, the way that our political and moral compass operates is it's all defined against Adolf Hitler.
	I know this sounds like a very particularist thing, but it's totally true.
	In terms of first principles, what is the one thing that you cannot be in America today?
	It's a racist or a Nazi.
	That's it.
	If you're a pedophile, you get written about in Slate and Salon as, well, I may be a pedophile, but I'm not going to touch anybody.
	I'm not going to harm anybody.
	Even pedophiles get this kind of apologism in left-wing media.
	Rapists, murderers.
	You see this all the time from the other side.
	You hear all the time about Black Lives Matter people who killed police officers, and that's not even talked about.
	In some cases you see apologism for it, right?
	So the one thing that you're not allowed to be, the one thing that is totally frowned against, totally condemned, is being a Nazi.
	And this is where even in like cultural and Hollywood depictions of Nazis, this is the one group that you can attack, right?
	Like the movie Inglourious Bastards.
	My favorite piece of Jewish propaganda, right?
	I mean, it's killing Nazis.
	That's fine.
	Set them on fire.
	Burn them.
	Kill them.
	You do horrible things because, well, of course, they're bad people.
	For me even to say this, people would say, for me to even suggest that that might be inappropriate or for me to suggest that that might be peculiar, why this would be the case, I'm sure left-wing people would say he's defending Nazis.
	For me to say that, well, it seems like the only group you can dehumanize are these people, and why is that, right?
	So, right-wing politics, white identity, can't talk about it because Nazis.
	Nazis are, in terms of first principles, the only thing that is wrong, the only thing you cannot be.
	That is the bedrock of evil, is Hitler.
	And this is where it all goes back to.
	This is where we have to really go back to World War II and really think long and hard, gee, why is it that the Nazis are the absolute worst?
	Because, you know, there were other fascists, right?
	Mussolini, Francisco Franco, There were other totalitarian dictators that weren't even right-wing.
	You know, Stalin, Mao Zedong, like I said, Ho Chi Minh, Pol Pot.
	There were other mass murderers in history, too, so it's not even just mass murder.
	You know, you've got, again, Stalin, Pol Pot.
	You even go back to history, like Genghis Khan or somebody like that.
	You get in trouble for it in a Genghis Khan t-shirt?
	They've got a statue of Genghis Khan in Mongolia.
	It's huge.
	We cut diplomatic relations with them?
	So what is it specifically?
	Gee, what is it specifically about this guy?
	What is it specifically about the Nazis that they are beyond the pale, evil, just completely outside of the Overton window?
	Well, they didn't just do mass murder.
	They weren't just totalitarian.
	They weren't just fascist.
	They weren't just right-wing.
	There was a very specific group that they went after.
	It was a very specific event that happened.
	And maybe you know what I'm driving at.
	It's something that's illegal to question in like 13 or 19 or 20 different countries in Europe.
	And maybe we really have to start asking ourselves, like, what's going on there?
	What's going on there?
	Why is it?
	I mean, do you really see how this all begins to unravel?
	How important this foundational event is in American Politics, even in 2019, it really all goes back to this one event.
	And maybe, I don't know if this is like the rantings of a madman, maybe this sounds a little bit crazy to you, but if you really take a step back and begin to unravel all these things, why can we not be in favor of, you know, immigration, or rather being against immigration in itself?
	You know, why is it we have to make economic arguments against immigration, and not demographic arguments against immigration?
	Well, because it really all goes back to these negative connotations.
	And why can we not be muscularly right-wing on social issues against transsexuals or homosexuals, against feminism, something like that?
	Because it all goes back to these negative connotations.
	It goes all the way back.
	And we really examine, again, these first principles, how we arrive at this preconditioning, right, or these presumptions about things.
	It really all goes back to this one connotation, very nasty and negative, and ultimately all goes back to one historical event, which is subject to, you know, historiological investigation, or in some places it isn't.
	And so I really think that this is ultimately what it's all about.
	We look at Facebook.
	We look at Google.
	We look at all these different things.
	This unpersoning really goes all the way back to this.
	They say, you know, we're going to advocate violence against you.
	And in effect, we're going to rather tolerate violence against you.
	This is the only group of people that can be attacked and destroyed.
	And what is that all about?
	To me, it seems just like a big anti-white conspiracy.
	That's what I see.
	When Facebook says we're going to allow people to attack dangerous individuals, this is what I hear.
	And I've said before on Twitter that Nazi is the new N-word for white people.
	And I said that as a bait post.
	I said that basically in jest to make people, you know, get outraged and retweeted and get mad.
	But it's effectively true.
	I mean, think about that.
	Calling somebody a Nazi dehumanizes them.
	Calling somebody a Nazi basically says everything is on the table for that person.
	You know, killing Nazis is acceptable.
	Banning Nazis is acceptable.
	Violating their free speech and so on.
	And slowly but surely this definition or this connotation has crept up and absorbed everybody who wants to defend Anything that is explicitly or implicitly white, in fact, culturally or in any other sense.
	And so when I see Facebook saying all these dangerous individuals can be attacked, dangerous individuals, political violence, calls to, or rather incitements to violence, anything like that, is tolerated against them, that's what I see.
	I see a country where it's beginning to look like South Africa, effectively.
	That's really where South Africa plays into it.
	If you think it's ridiculous the idea that white people are going to be discriminated against, persecuted, killed, genocided in America, this is how it starts.
	This is how it begins.
	You know, and that's why South Africa is also, we don't want to get all into that, but that's why that's a pretty critical detail as well, because there's a country where it's happening, right?
	Or we could look to even, we could even look To their north, what happened in Zimbabwe, right?
	What happened to the white people there?
	If you don't think it could happen in America, this is how it starts.
	It starts with the normalization and the tolerance of anti-white rhetoric.
	We're there already.
	So long as you call them a Nazi...
	White supremacists, white nationalists, you've basically made it a negative thing to be white in the country.
	You've marginalized white people.
	This is how it begins.
	This is how it accelerates.
	Now they're implicitly tolerating violence against white people.
	If you go out and call for violence against, again, so long as they're white nationalists, so long as they're Nazis, you can call for violence against them.
	And pretty soon people are going to start doing violence against them.
	If they're not already doing that, by the way.
	And watch what happens when the country slowly sinks from 63% white to 50% white, one day to 40% white.
	That's in our future.
	That's going to be the next generation.
	It's already 50-50 with Generation Z. I think if you look at newborns that were born in 2012, that's when it finally came down.
	It was 50 non-white and 50 white.
	So what happens when the composition of the country is minority white by 10 or 15%?
	And this is tolerated when it's 60%.
	Think of this slide and where it's going to take us.
	And again, I say this as a campus conservative.
	I say this.
	We have to affirm we believe in total equality.
	We do not endorse Nazism or white nationalism or white separatism or anything like that.
	We are merely campus conservatives who want to see every race, every group protected under the law.
	That's what we want to see.
	It's going to happen.
	It's baked into the cake.
	We're a multiracial country now.
	There's really, I mean, that's kind of set at this point, more or less, within reason.
	This is how the demographics are going to unfold in the next couple of decades.
	Without radical change, this is how it's going to look like.
	If that's the case, We're gonna have to figure out how we can all live in harmony together.
	And it seems like there are people who actually don't want that.
	It seems like there's actually people who want a lot of harm done to the group, the people that founded the country.
	And I say this as a Mediterranean, you know, Irish, Italian, Mexican immigrant of, you know, four or five generations, right?
	So this is what's this is what is coming down the pike for America.
	You know, we look at all these different strands, it might seem like they're unconnected or not, you know, relevant to one another.
	But this is how you tie them all together.
	This is really what it all comes back to is this anti white agenda in the country and basically globally in the world.
	And you really got to do some deep thinking and investigating as to, you know, who might be responsible, what might be the interest there, what it all goes back to, why is it this one group, this one person, which is singled out and separated beyond all others as uniquely bad or only exclusively the bad one, you know, and what all these things have in common.
	I think there's a lot to think about there, which we can't exactly spell out explicitly on the show, but are nevertheless quite topical.
	So, That's Facebook.
	They say that so long as you're a dangerous person, you can have incitement to violence.
	Which, thank God, I'm not one of these dangerous people.
	They have not listed me as a dangerous person yet.
	I'm still allowed on Facebook.
	I'm still allowed on Instagram.
	And I should be, because I'm not dangerous to the system.
	I believe everything I'm supposed to.
	I have all the right opinions.
	9-11, Al-Qaeda, of course.
	9-11 was just these hijackers and it was Al-Qaeda.
	Nobody else.
	Nobody else.
	Muslim extremists.
	And, you know, the Holocaust happened, of course, we know that.
	And the mass shootings have all happened.
	I mean, I believe everything the government says.
	Why would they deem me not fit, right?
	Why would they deem me a dangerous person?
	I'm totally safe.
	I would never question these things.
	So we do have to say that, just so it's not ambiguous, right?
	Just have to say that to clarify.
	In case any of those dangerous individuals happen to be watching this show, I want to make sure that everybody knows that we are not dangerous, alright?
	We are totally within the system.
	Don't kill me!
	Don't shoot me!
	But that's Facebook.
	Our last story for tonight, before we get into our Super Chats, is this Trump Twitter lawsuit.
	We don't have that much time.
	Actually, you know what?
	Maybe we just might save this for tomorrow, because we're basically already... We're at the 45 minute mark, right?
	It's hard for you to tell, because what did we start at?
	7?
unidentified		7.20?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		7.25?
		So let me think.
		Yeah, this is about the 45 minute mark, so I think we'll just save that for tomorrow.
		We'll talk about the Trump case with Twitter.
		It's pretty nice to close on this thematically.
		It would be a little bit...
		Wouldn't really fit with the theme if we were to talk about that.
		So we'll just move on to Super Chats.
		We'll see what you guys are saying about all this.
		We'll take a look.
		Sorry to tease you like that, but I guess we'll have to save that for tomorrow, right?
		Hopefully this stream doesn't get me kicked off!
		I have a bad feeling about this one.
		We went a little bit hard on this show tonight.
		Maybe we'll have to private this one after some time.
		But I don't think I said anything that bad.
		I'm just asking questions, alright?
		I'm just investigating, alright?
		I'm just a Hispanic Afro-Latino campus conservative.
		I'm just wondering, you know.
		I'm just trying to make you think, alright?
		Not trying to dissent against the establishment.
		No, of course not.
		Of course not.
		But anyway, let's take a look at our superchats.
		We've got Seth Rich, who says, uh, my political journey.
		Dumb redneck conservatives.
		Capitalism is good.
		Multiculturalism is a lie.
		Nick, be my best friend.
		I'm not like those other superchatters.
		I'm not crazy.
		Okay, well that didn't make a lot of sense, so I don't know.
		Sounds kind of crazy to me.
		Lauren Rose says, Nick, have the based boys from Comptown on the show.
		I don't really watch Comptown, so I don't, I don't think I'm gonna do that.
		Plus, they're left-wing, so...
		I don't know if that would be a good fit.
		I don't know, definitely not e-girls.
		By default I'd have to go with goth girls, because e-girls is just a big no.
		Look, I've gotten a lot of heat for this lately.
		I don't know what it is, but all these e-girls, it's like an inquisition against me.
		It's a gamer inquisition happening.
		All these e-girls.
		So what exactly is an e-girl?
		Am I an e-girl?
		And it's a lot of e-girls that ask me.
		There's not just... I know there's one in particular who may or may not be watching this, who asked me this recently.
		It's not just this one, but many e-girls are always like, and many people in general, even guys, even these beta orbiters.
		What exactly is an e-girl?
		What, how do you define an e-girl?
		To me, An e-girl is any girl that's online and you know there are some good ones.
		Maybe.
		There's a handful of ones that are, I think, not... they're benign basically.
		But a girl going online and she wants money or she wants attention, she wants dopamine from guys, there's just something going on mentally where it sort of just rules them out basically.
		You can basically just write them off.
unidentified		And I'm saying there's some good ones, there's some good ones alright.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		There are some ones who I know and, you know, who have even been on this show before, right, that are okay, but generally a girl whose impulse is, I'm going to show off my boobs on Instagram, I'm going to show off my body on Instagram, like my picture.
		It's like there's something going on there which says probably not going to be a good match.
		So we're gonna have to go with goth girls on that one.
		We're gonna have to go with goth.
		You know, that's not a huge sacrifice either.
		Goth girls, you know, there's something to that, right?
		The old, the old Danny Phantom, uh, Danny Phantom pill, right?
		The, uh, what's the girl's name in that one?
		I forget, but, uh, there you go.
		Dog Fredify says, did you know that drinking small amounts of pee from sick people can give you immunity to the illness they have, like a vaccine?
		I don't think that's true.
		But I've never heard that before your local milkman says was just in Florida swimming with the manatees based creatures as their diet consists of Kale from the sea and Big Macs.
		Okay, the Big Macs not so much.
		Also, it's just the sea kale.
		Disavow.
		Disavow.
		But yeah, that's pretty based.
		Zoomer says, just my daily shekels and message of appreciation.
		Well, thank you, Zoomer.
		Much appreciated.
		Mr. Richards says, did you try the pizza in Comet Ping Pong while you were in D.C.?
		No, I didn't get a chance to go.
		You know, sort of interesting about that.
		Now, I don't believe in any of those conspiracy theories about Comet Ping Pong, because I would get kicked off YouTube if I did!
		But, uh, but you know, there is something interesting.
		Do you remember that guy that went into Comet Ping Pong with a gun to investigate what was going on there?
		It was a big news story.
		This guy went into Comet Ping Pong with a rifle and, uh, you know, and then that's when they started going after the Pizzagate people because they said, it's gotten out of hand, it's getting violent.
		You know what's interesting?
		If you look at the police report, that guy, he fired like only a couple of shots and the only thing he did was shoot the hard drive in their computer.
		Isn't that kind of interesting?
		Isn't that just kind of funny?
		I don't believe in any conspiracy theories.
		I think they're very dangerous.
		Those conspiracy theories are really problematic and dangerous.
		But, you know, the one guy that went in there to investigate, some radical poll guy, went in there and the only thing that he shot, he didn't even shoot anybody, he just shot the hard drive in their computer destroying all the evidence.
		Isn't that kind of funny?
		And that guy's listed on IMDB as an actor.
		I don't know, just kind of weird.
		Kind of weird when you think about it, right?
		Anyway, Carl says, Nick, I sent a DM to what I thought was a trad Catholic girl.
		Turns out she has an Indian boyfriend!
		F in the chat for a fallen soldier.
		Yeah, big F for a fallen soldier there.
		Sorry to hear about that, big guy.
		But you shouldn't be DMing e-girls.
		I don't know what you think you're doing.
		A trad Catholic girl who's an e-girl?
		Yeah, good luck with that, right?
		I don't know.
		People talking to the e-girls.
		It's just like, what do you expect to happen?
		I was DMing an e-girl and something bad happened.
		She wasn't who she said she was!
		Shocker!
		That's so surprising!
		Oh my gosh, really?
		Yeah, so, uh, I don't know.
		I don't know if we could really sympathize with that, but definitely an F. Peter Foley says, Hi Nick, you looked great with Brittany Venti at the Met Gala.
		I saw the pictures in Vanity Fair.
		I loved how your outfit challenged gender norms.
		I don't know what you're talking about there.
		But whatever.
		B says, knicker please.
	Okay.
	Lauren Rose says the Trump train is actually named Lolita Express.
	No, disavowed.
	Trump wasn't involved with that.
	Trump has not talked to... I truly believe that he wasn't really that involved with Epstein.
	So, Trump is innocent in all this.
	Antti says, holla Nick, here's some pesos for you.
	Thanks, bro.
	No data says Eric Stryker blah blah blah.
	Please debate blah.
	Here's some money.
	TRS man sending free money will always be funny.
	Yeah, it is pretty funny.
	I don't know how TRS people can watch this show.
	It's sort of just like totally different, you know?
	It's sort of just, uh, you know, because all we do is kind of badmouth Wignets and bash Wignets.
	So I don't know how they can watch this show, but you know, whatever.
	I guess if they're going to give me super chats, I'm not going to complain.
	Matt McKinnon says, loving the ginger beard.
	Thanks.
	Yeah, there is a little bit of, it's a little red in some places.
	It's like black on the sides and it's a little bit red in like this area, I think.
	But it's looking good.
	I actually kind of like it.
	Makes me look a little bit more mature.
	But yeah, it is red in some places.
	Your local milkman says, prepare for super Italian hair growth.
	Yeah, well it's coming in.
	Ass Idiot says, at what point demographically is violence... Okay, I'm not just gonna read this.
	At what point is violence justified?
	Dude, why would you even ask this on YouTube?
	I don't understand what you think is gonna happen with that one.
	Mel double Romans Gibson says double Romans is double the intensity.
	I think it looks kind of retarded though if you do a double, but alright.
	Reagan Lodge says loving the beard, Nick.
	Very conquistador aesthetic.
	Well, thank you.
	Yeah, it's true.
	It is, you know, very ethnic look I guess you could say.
	Mr. Abatos says the Nicker Nation subreddit is down.
	Nick, is this the end of America?
	Please tell me we're going to be okay.
	Yeah, I saw it got quarantined.
	Uh, but it's not down, is it?
	Let me pull it up.
	Yeah, so it's just quarantined.
	But yeah, I guess we'll see what happens with that.
	Pretty cringe, but what are you gonna do?
	I'm not surprised.
	First name, last name, says objectively the best part of America First is when you go off on mom.
	What has she done this week, big guy?
	Chicken for dinner, ugly clothes, etc.
	I will not have Super Chatters provoking conflict with my mom.
	I will not have this infighting.
	I can complain about my mom.
	I will not have Super Chatters sowing dissent within the family.
	She's been fine.
	She's been fine so far this week.
	No problems to report, alright?
	Uh, I, well, you know what?
	There is, there is one thing, you know?
	This was last night.
	So, I take the, uh, I take Z-Quil, okay, as a sleep aid from time to time.
	I take NyQuil sometimes to help with my allergies.
	Also, it's a little bit more powerful than the Z-Quil.
	There's something, I don't know what you call it, that's in the NyQuil that helps you sleep a lot better than the Z-Quil, actually.
	I don't abuse it, but, you know, if I have really bad allergies, it helps a little bit better.
	With the congestion and the sleeping.
	But in any case, last night I'm having trouble sleeping.
	Of course, as always, I'm literally just too smart.
	Okay, that's what it comes down to.
	And so I go to the bathroom, I'm gonna have a little Z-Quil, and I know there's none of these little cups, none of the cups, you know, to drink it.
	And I'm thinking, what's going on?
	The Z-Quil, the Day-Quil, and the Night-Quil are all in my bathroom.
	At one time we had three of those little cups, measuring cups for the medicine, all in the vanity.
	Where are they?
	And then I go, and I go into my parents' bedroom.
	Of course, there it is.
	There it is.
	They're all in there.
	And they were moved, because they were at one point in my bathroom, and then they were not.
	So I... Somebody moved them.
	I know it wasn't dad.
	So I was very upset about that.
	I was, you know, fuming at like 1 or 2 a.m.
	I'm like, who's putting them?
	Why would you take them out?
	All the medicine is in here.
	I need the medicine.
	You know, I take the medicine.
	Why is it picked up and moved some, all of them, all, there were three of them.
	You couldn't have taken two or left one or something.
	They're all.
	So I was, you know, not happy about that.
	But anyway, not a huge, not a huge deal.
	I don't believe that.
	whatever you know not not a big deal but if there is anything if there's you know we could always improve right we can always improve i'm just trying to make you better uh i'm joking though daniel says if trump really is the last republican president is it feasible to pack the supreme court with conservatives before he goes no probably not um and i don't think he'll be the last republican president i don't i don't believe that i think it'll still be competitive for the next 10 years or so.
	But, you know...
	The problem is just that every time a Democrat becomes president, the pendulum's gonna swing, like, really far to the left, and, uh, they're gonna do a lot of damage.
	So, I don't know if he'll be the last one, but it'll be, uh, highly, highly competitive for the foreseeable future.
	And probably within 10 years, you know, it won't be competitive anymore.
	But I don't think anybody's talking about packing the Supreme Court.
	I don't think that'll happen.
	Republicans won't even do the nuclear option in the Senate, let alone they're going to pack the courts, really.
	They won't even use a simple majority to pass legislation through the Senate, let alone, you know, add another Supreme Court judge.
	So I don't think that'll happen.
	Samurai Spirit says, Do you think it's beef in the burgers in D.C. or something else?
	Yikes!
	Drink lots of water and eat fiber, big guy.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	I'm eating the mini-wheats.
	That's my fiber supplement for the day lately.
	Been drinking a lot of orange juice, a lot of vitamin C. Drinking a lot of water, yeah.
	But yeah, that's probably beef.
	I'm sure it's beef, you know.
	I hope you know who knows you Tardo says Nick Massad offers you $70,000 a year to abandon the Knickers take it or leave it definitely leaving it Yeah, that's that's not gonna cut it anymore So no if the Massad wants me to leave the Knickers alone, it's gonna have to be millions of dollars, you know I'm not going to sell out unless it's millions, billions of dollars.
	You know, it's got to be quite substantial.
	No, I'm kidding.
	I'll never sell out.
	I'll never sell out!
	Really though, I don't think I ever would because I don't really care about money.
	That's a thing.
	I've never cared about money.
	I want money to further political aims or other aims.
	I want money insofar as it's something to spite people who thought I wouldn't succeed.
	That's really it.
	Because I don't really spend money.
	The things I spend money on, I don't spend money on clothes.
	I don't spend money on stuff.
	I haven't bought a car, you know.
	Like the first thing a lot of people I think would do if they had a job like I have is like buy a car, you know, or something like that.
	But really all I spend money on is like fast food.
	I buy a book occasionally.
	I travel, but mostly mostly for what I do, you know.
	I don't sound like I'm traveling for pleasure.
	It's not like I'm like jet-setting to Rome or something like that.
	It's like I go to DC a couple times a year to network.
	So I really, I don't spend money at all, really, unless it's necessary.
	So that's why I couldn't really be bought in that way.
	I'm not really easy to bribe because I don't have very many vices.
	You know, if somebody offered me like, oh, we're gonna give you a lifetime supply of Big Macs or, you know, we're gonna give you Coca-Cola, we're gonna give you a lifetime supply of Diet Coke or regular Coke or something like that, you know, then I don't know.
	Then maybe I'd be bought.
	Who knows?
	But somebody said the Catboy compound is yours.
	All you have to do is support Israel.
	Well, then maybe you would be in trouble, right?
	But money doesn't really tempt me.
	Joe Schmo says, did you see Google Maps superimposed a fake tennis court over part of Epstein's Little St.
	James Island?
	Very sneaky.
	Also, have you seen his temple?
	I did not see the Google Maps thing.
	There you go.
	There's another.
	There's another big tech issue.
	And yeah, I've seen the temple pagan temple.
	Very interesting.
	What goes on there, right?
	Skeptical Pete says reparations for our nicker nation's hunter gang.
	Yeah, big time reparations.
	Devin says B for beard might even survive a Canadian winter.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, we'll see.
	Inner Heaven says keep the beard going then get the stache, bitch.
	Yeah, I'm gonna get the stache.
	That's what I said.
	I'll grow the beard, keep the stache, and then I think I'd like to trim the beard down and have like a scruff beard look and a full mustache.
	My friend QAnon had that going.
	It was a pretty good look.
	I was a fan of the look, so I think I might go for that.
	But who knows?
	I'll have to see what it looks like.
	You know, we'll see.
	Mike Stuchsberry's wife's boyfriend, Tyrone Ngubu, says, Hey Nick, did you see today that MPs voted to legalize gay marriage and abortion in Northern Ireland?
	Very blackpilled over here in Britbonland.
	No, I did not see that.
	I didn't know that it was still legal in Northern Ireland.
	I didn't really follow that too closely.
	I guess that is very unfortunate.
	I guess those are Keltoids as opposed to Angloids.
	A little bit surprising.
	Keltoids I thought are a little bit more based.
	Apparently not.
	Lachlan says you should get some top-down lighting to really emphasize your protruding jawline.
	Heavy brown, thick stubble, you have a great castizo mustache.
	I've been thinking about that.
	I've been thinking about getting some lights maybe overhead or some additional lights like off my desk or something.
	I've been, I've been sort of mulling my options here, thinking about it.
	We'll see what happens.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	Maybe we'll make some production enhancements.
	Now this show's doing much better.
	I feel like we're obligated to do that.
	You know, we were doing 4,000, 5,000 views a night.
	Maybe this was permissible now.
	We should probably kick it up a notch.
	I'm working with my website guy to do a new backdrop, so that'll change.
	But yeah, maybe we'll change up the lighting as well.
	Charlie Dirk says, did you hear about the 1.3 billion dollar cocaine bust on a ship owned by JP Morgan?
	No, I did not hear about that.
	But pretty interesting, right?
	Goes back to what I say about the war on drugs.
	You know, people say war on drugs is failing.
	We just have to legalize.
	It's like we haven't been fighting the war on drugs, you know?
	We haven't been trying to win.
	So how could he say it's a failure if we're not even trying?
	Uh, Scotticus says, Tucker Carlson used the phrase purity spiral recently.
	Our guy much?
	I don't think so.
	I think that's a pretty common parlance.
	Uh, but, you know, who knows?
	Maybe.
	Uh, B Neal says, RSBN rejects Unite!
	America first!
	Well, I wouldn't say I'm an RSBN reject.
	Just a RSBN alum.
	More like an RS... I'm kind of like far away.
	Why was I all the way out here?
	More like an RSBN alumnus.
	I wouldn't say I'm a reject.
	We parted ways.
	It was basically mutual after Charlottesville.
	But sure, whatever.
	Geest says, have you read Culture of Critique?
	Some Polish guy keeps recommending it to me.
	Yeah, I've read it.
	But yeah, look, to me, I mean, Culture of Critique, here's the thing about it.
	It's an interesting book, but for that to be the end-all be-all about the subject matter, I think is dubious.
	You know, people treat it like that's like the book on this topic.
	I think the thesis is a lot more controversial than, you know, people just sort of read it and take it at face value.
	This is why I say most people shouldn't read books.
	Most people are not smart enough to read books.
	I don't say that as some like, like elitist or anything, but it's like, Most people do not have the ability to interrogate what they're reading, to entertain a thought while challenging it and not believing it at the same time.
	Do you know what I mean?
	Most people read a book and they're like, oh, I just believe everything I'm reading, you know?
	That's not to say that I don't agree with the premise, but the idea of a group evolutionary strategy as a sociological concept is pretty controversial.
	Like, it's not something that is totally beyond doubt, right?
	I think it's a lot more than people give a credit for.
	I think a lot of people in this area of the right take this as like, this is the gospel about this question.
	There's a lot of other literature that discusses this.
	There's a lot of other things going on.
	Also, you know, somewhat monocausal when it talks about certain influences in the country.
	So I would say that it's an interesting read and there's a lot that's true in there, but I don't know if it's the end-all be-all.
	That's all.
	CIA defectors to survive the Clinton attack.
	Still here, big guy.
	Well, that's good.
	Jordan Scott Mills says, no Streamlabs?
	They're a big guy.
	Why a guy to give 30%?
	I don't know where you've been, man.
	We haven't had Streamlabs for five months, so... No Streamlabs, big guy?
unidentified		Duh!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We haven't had it for five months.
		So, I don't know where you've been.
		Why do I have to give 30%?
		Because we got banned from Streamlabs.
		So, Sam Day, right?
		Like, why do I have to give 30%?
		Are you retarded?
		Because we got banned.
		Sam Day says, ultimate black pill is that there is no electoral winter coming.
		The Republican Party will court a more paused coalition, leaving no one to represent us.
		Paused, I think you mean.
		Not paused.
		Paused.
		Are you dumb?
		What's with all the dummies in Super Chat today?
		Paused.
		Coalition is paused.
		P-O-Z-Z-E-D.
		Some boomer here, of course.
		Paused.
		I think I sounded out.
		I'm going to sound it out.
		It's paused, bro.
		Positive for AIDS.
		Paused up.
		And no, that's not true.
		Republicans will not succeed in winning a so-called more paused coalition.
		The electoral winter is coming.
		Republicans will not win a new electorate.
		So you think they're going to win blacks, really?
		Think they're going to win Hispanics?
		Doubt.
		So I disagree with that.
		Forgivable says, what do you think about right-wing people like Ryan Saavedra who report on everything dumb AOC does?
		Helpful or harmful?
		Pretty harmful because it's all just a big diversion.
		AOC doesn't matter.
		We could probably count on this show.
		How many times have I talked about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez?
		Probably like five times, you know, in the last year or something.
		But that's all these people talk about, fixating on her.
		And here's why it's problematic.
		It's a diversion because it creates a false dialectic between...
		You know, so-called millennial socialists and Turning Point USA, free market.
		That's not the dialectic.
		The dialectic is the people, the grassroots, the populists versus the elites.
		You know, the dialectic is not socialists versus free market retards.
		It's, you know, are you in favor of this pedophile, sex trafficking, elite economy that's built on usury and high interest?
		Or are you in favor of the American people?
		You know, it's really, that's the proper dialectic.
		So it's a total diversion, total distraction.
		Those people... and Ryan Saavedra, I believe, works for DailyWire, right?
		He's like a big-time Zionist.
		Pretty sure he's Jewish or something.
		Yeah, if I'm thinking about the right person.
unidentified		Let me pull him up.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, DailyWire.
		Look at that face, that goblin face.
		Yeah, that guy's on our side.
		Look at this goblin.
		What a creep.
		Yeah, that guy's definitely with us.
		I could tell by that goblin physiognomy.
		He looks like that card in Yu-Gi-Oh.
		What's that card in Yu-Gi-Oh?
		Like a goblin looking card?
unidentified		Let me pull it up on Google Images.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know what I'm talking about, don't you?
		It's like a little green head.
		What am I, what am I thinking of?
		It's like a trap card.
		I'm not gonna move on until I find this card.
		Can somebody tell me what it is?
		I, it's like a green head.
		It's like small.
		Looks like a little, uh, it doesn't have goblin in the name, I don't think.
		It's some kind of a trap card.
		Yu-Gi-Oh, a trap card.
		It's like three something, maybe?
		It's, uh... Maybe somebody can post it in chat?
		Oh, this one's in Japanese, so I can't find it.
		We may have to move on.
		I'm not gonna spend ten minutes looking for a Yu-Gi-Oh card.
		But that's what he looks like.
		I have it in my head.
		I have the image in my head, but I can't think of what his, uh... what the card's called.
		It's like a reversal card.
		Let me think.
		Yu-Gi-Oh trap card Not only I'm gonna be able to find it it was very it was like a famous card Maybe I'll look up Yu-Gi-Oh famous card.
		Maybe maybe will that work?
		Maybe maybe somebody in chats figured it out.
		I'll check live chat in a moment famous cards It's not like a monster, I don't believe.
		It's like a trap card.
		It's like a little green goblin face and that's what he looks like.
		I don't think I'm going to be able to find it just based on describing it in Google Images.
		I'll have to wait for somebody to post it on Twitter or something.
		You know, at me on Twitter if you know what I'm talking about.
		We're going to have to move on.
		Anyway, that guy's a goblin.
		Poor physiognomy.
		Probably an ectomorph.
		Very, very bad, shady person and the dialectic is totally wrong.
		Now, he posts some good content sometimes, but generally it's, like I said, it's all just a big diversion.
		Okay, let me check live chat.
		Maybe you guys have figured it out.
		Is it Pot of Greed?
		Is that it?
		Let me look it up.
		Yu-Gi-Oh Pot of Greed.
		Yep, that's the one!
		That's the one.
		You got it.
		He's the Pot of Greed.
unidentified		That's so good.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So perfect.
unidentified		Yep.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, he's the Pot of Greed Yu-Gi-Oh card.
		Let me see.
		Can I get these up on the screen at the same time?
		Let me try and see if I could do this really quickly.
		Pull them up for you both at the same time so people can, you know, we spent so much time doing this, I would be remiss if I didn't pull them up on screen for you.
		Let me see if I can add these into the frame side by side here.
		Let's see, we'll do a media source.
		And let's see.
		Downloads.
		Can I do two at once or no?
		Why is it just showing videos?
		Is it pictures maybe?
		Documents.
		I used to, I knew how to work regular OBS a lot better than this.
		Let's see.
		Is it media source?
unidentified		No, that's, that's, that's not that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'll just do image slideshow.
		That's not it.
		All right, you know what?
		Or maybe can I do this?
		Ah, here we go.
		Maybe I'll try it this way.
		I promise it's all worth it.
		I promise you it's all worth it, alright?
		This may seem like very slow content, but it's all gonna be worth it in the end.
		Here- here we go!
		Here we go!
		Here we go, okay?
		Now how do I- how do I switch from one to the other?
		Loop, um, randomize playback.
		Okay, I don't know.
		I'm just gonna throw it up.
		Okay, so here's Ryan.
		Okay, there it is.
		So there's the Pot of Greed.
		There's the Pot of Greed card, and then it should change, I think, in a moment.
		And there's Ryan Saavedra, whatever his name, however you pronounce it.
		There's Ryan, okay?
		And there's the Pot of Greed Yu-Gi-Oh card.
		It's a spitting image!
		Whoops.
		Dropped my lamp there.
		It's the same!
		They're the same!
		It's the same!
		It's the same.
		We'll see it one more time.
		There's Ryan, and then we'll see one more time Pot of Greed, okay?
		And then I'll remove the image source.
		There it is.
		There you have it.
		Perfect.
		Perfect comparison.
		Perfect zoomer reference there.
		All right, we're gonna move on.
		We're gonna move on to some other super chats.
		This show's gonna be like 10 hours long if we spend that much time on every chat.
		People in chat are dying.
		But it's so true, right?
		It's perfect!
		Yep, pot of greed.
		And kind of, you know, and actually it's uh... That's not a trap card, it's a spell card, but um...
		Yeah, it kind of makes sense.
		In a way, he is a pot of greed.
		I think him and Daily Wire, pot of greed, it's actually quite fitting, right?
		But anyway, we're gonna move on from that little detour.
		Elizabeth Warren's Family Station Wagon says, have you read Hatred's Kingdom by Dor Gold?
		No?
		I don't know if that's supposed to be another phonetic thing, but no, I've never read that.
		Provo says Connie's early work was a little too Motown for my taste.
		When Graduation came out in 07, I think he really came into his own commercially and autistically.
		Yeah, I I don't know did Did excuse me did College Dropout had a little burp there?
		Did College Dropout have a Motown sound?
		I don't I don't think it sounded very Motown to me.
		I mean it's a rap album.
		I know he sampled a lot of Motown songs in there, a lot of like Marvin Gaye and things like that.
		But I don't know if he could say that that was Motown.
		And what about late registration?
		Late registration wasn't Motown.
		And, you know, a freshman adjustment for what it's worth is mixtapes weren't Motown.
	Not most of them, I don't think.
	You know, he had John Legend samples or other samples.
	So you're wrong about this.
	College Dropout was probably one of his greatest, if not his greatest, album.
	And I'm not going to disagree.
	I love Graduation.
	It's one of my favorites.
	But if you can't appreciate old school Kanye, I don't know.
	I think that's very plebeian of you.
	AJF says, R.I.P.
	Ross Perot and Justin Raimondo.
	Two Basin and Red Pill gripers.
	Also, you look like a hobo.
	Who's... I don't know who this Justin character is, but...
	No, I don't look like a hobo.
	I'm wearing a suit and, uh, and you know what?
	It's a good look.
	Yeah, R.I.P.
	F in chat for Popsin, but he died a long time ago, right?
	Okay, I'm not gonna read that.
	Aunt Bessie says, in The Sopranos, a rabbi cries out in pain as he tries to get out of his financial ends with Tony while ending up with more money than before anyway.
	Deplorable anti-semitism and harmful stereotypes.
	I agree.
	Very anti-semitic depiction.
	Very shameful.
	I agree.
	Drew with a big super chat.
	Wow, thank you so much.
	God bless.
	Very substantial super chat here.
	He says, occasional big bag super chat versus the virgin $2 daily dopamine.
	While you were gone, I listened to Ben Shapiro for my US politics.
	Lots of Zion pills.
	And Cringe, plus every 10 minutes, wanted me to buy his online gold with my retirement fund.
	Yeah, yeah, that's pretty funny, but hey, thanks for the big shekels, man.
	Glad to be back!
	You know, you're gonna have to settle, I guess, for something else.
	I'll be gone all next week, so you'll have to go back to Zion, Ben.
	That's alright, I guess, in small doses, right?
unidentified		But...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Really can't compete with the Chad 2 hours uninterrupted screed.
		You know, the Virgin advertisements and 10 minute product placements versus the Chad 2 hour screed.
		The Chad 2 hour rant, just a guy in front of a green screen, no graphics, no videos, no ombudsman, no guests, no...
		No, uh, Bulwer 3rd.
		No title cards.
		Just me, the green screen, the desk, the mug.
		That's all you need.
		It's very pure.
		That's all you need.
		I hold up the whole show all by myself.
		It's just the talent.
		Just raw.
		Raw and uncut.
		Raw and uncut every night.
		Giving it to you every night.
		But thanks, man.
		Appreciate it.
		Glass Half Empty says, a friendly suggestion for days that you have nothing to talk about.
		Have something that you worked on earlier to do a show on, like a deep dive subject.
		Wow, that's a great little suggestion.
		Thank you so much.
		Thank you so much.
		Thanks for making me better.
		I don't like doing the deep dives.
		Logozok says, Hey Nick, fellow Zoomer here.
		Sadly, it's not going well for me since I found out yesterday my dad passed away.
		Please pray for me if you can.
		Well, sorry to hear that, big guy.
		Big F in chat.
		Wow, death surrounds us, truly.
		But I'll be praying for you, Logozok.
		Sorry to hear about that.
		Yeah, that's not, that's not a great thing to hear, right?
		Very sad.
		So, uh, hope everything's alright.
		Well, I mean, obviously, everything's not alright, but, you know.
		Hope, uh, you know, everything works out in the end.
		Uh, Rudolph says, FYI, Pro donated to LGBT AIDS Resource Center charity 35 years ago, so he was based on economics, but seemed to be pro-gay.
		You know, I, I don't know why people have to do this kind of stuff.
		If he's based and pragmatic and, uh, I'm not surprised.
		who really cares about the rest, right?
		Zoomer, you know, he like ran for president to save America, self-made billionaire, great populist.
		Oh, but he gave to the wrong charity.
		Like, how retarded do you have to be?
		Zoomer Crusader says, hey, Nick, long time PP, first time poo-poo.
		What are your thoughts on Nicker Nation getting quarantined today?
		I'm not surprised.
		Everybody knew this was going to happen.
		So, you know, this is why I didn't want to get on Reddit in the first place.
		I knew we would ultimately get, you know, issues like this.
		Uh, but whatever.
		Chris says, there are six grams of protein in an egg, but I can't eat enough to get big like him.
		Nice round muscles, they're smooth too, like the waves of Lake Superior on a calm day.
		When I was a kid, I ate a big egg.
		Okay, I don't know what any of this means.
		Okay, I think there's more protein in an egg than six grams, but whatever.
		Derek Bowser says, Andrew Breitbart and Jonathan Bowden both died in March of 2012 of heart attacks in their 40s.
		Bowden's speeches have recently been scrubbed across YouTube.
		Really makes you wonder, big guy.
		Yeah, really makes you think.
		Andrew Breitbart was a large lad, but I don't know if you die in your 40s from a heart attack.
		Especially when you're talking about what he was talking about.
		Seems like something was up there.
		The Unpossible says the real world is the same as the online world.
	I agree.
	Ghani says Sticks said in a recent video that it would make no sense for the US to bring in more legal immigrants.
	Good to see the libertarians are finally coming around.
	Yeah, I guess, but I mean for the wrong reasons, right?
	I mean, a libertarian says no more immigration because, like, there's already unemployment.
	Like, I don't know if that's really compelling, but nevertheless, uh, you know, if they've got the right position, I won't complain.
	The Unpossible, the Virgin Thanos snap versus the Chad Third Impact.
	Who wins?
	Probably the Third Impact, because, what is it, everybody becomes one or something?
	I don't remember.
	It was all...
	I haven't seen that in a couple of years.
	But, yeah, I would probably say...
	What kind of question even is this?
	Who cares?
	Base Nickers is from Arlington and was away for the fourth.
	Our city in DC are completely paused.
	RIP Ross Pro, the true based populace, but we have to back Trump in 2020.
	Okay.
	Like, I don't know, man.
	The super chats, it's like obnoxiously stupid tonight.
	Skeptical Face of Pete says, Based Jew Leo Strauss coined the famed reductio ad Hitlerum.
	Ah, very good.
	Yeah, Leo Strauss is definitely based.
	Uh, Wide Fur says, AFB hitting different since Nick got back from DC.
	You think?
	I don't think it's different.
	Uh, Kane Jeepers says, Hey Nick, we live in a society.
	Okay, Bill says, didn't you love the end of Inglourious Basterds where they had a one-minute long, gratuitous scene of Turing Hitler's face in a Swiss cheese with a gun?
	Yeah, it was cool to see that because it was Hitler getting shot.
	Yeah, that was awesome.
	Quentin Tarantino's really based.
	I love when he shows white people getting murdered by Jews or white people getting murdered by black people.
	I really like seeing white people get murdered.
	I really like the scene in Hateful Eight.
	You ever see the movie Hateful Eight?
	Yeah, I like that scene in Hateful Eight when the old racist had his son suck a black guy's penis before he got killed by that black guy.
	That was really an epic and based moment in cinema history.
	Yeah, that's definitely nothing going on there.
	Nothing inspicuous going on there.
	That's definitely not Jewish propaganda, right?
	Against a white man.
	Whatever, right?
	I'm sure that's just par for the course.
	Normal action flick.
	Cool anti-racist moment in cinema when that happened, right?
	Makes me wanna make you want to pop off a little bit makes you want to go off a little bit But what are you gonna do?
	No data says animal vivisection is the but you know Tarantino's based on other questions.
	I'll leave it at that No data says animal vivisection is the live dissection of an animal for research Nazis were the first to outlaw this but that's not what they mean.
unidentified		Is it?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		What I don't know what this means Let's see.
		Let me scroll up here I scroll down too far.
		So let me try and get back to where I was.
unidentified		Here we go.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Nick's Therapist says it was impertinent of you to revoke Dresden's chat privileges.
		Haven't you ever heard of tough love?
		He says he'll try to be more considerate of your self-image, but try not to be so sensitive.
		Okay, banned.
		See, it doesn't even bother me, but it's just people want to be obnoxious.
		you just get banned.
		Mr. Leon says, where are the moderate Zionists opposing the Judeo-grooming gangs roaming our streets, raping kids in the face?
		Good question.
		Yeah, they have a lot more, they have a lot bigger problems with me calling out Ziocons than they have with, you know, Neocons.
		They have with, you know, these kinds of people.
		That's the thing.
		It all goes back to my analogy about blue check marks on Twitter.
		You know, I don't have any problem with people that are calling out blue checks, even though I'm a blue check, because I know there's a problem there.
		And the same goes for Ziocons, right?
		Republic of Kekistan says, is Jacob Zuma a based Zoomer president?
		Honesty, please.
		I don't know who that is.
		Who is that?
		Jacob Zuma.
		Oh, South Africa?
		Yeah, I don't know enough about him.
		Let's see.
		Kane Jeeper says, Ireland first with Nikolas O. Fuentes.
		That sounds Irish to me, right?
		Don Trell says, check Twitter tomorrow to see Brittany Venti go goth.
		Really?
		Big if true.
		I will be watching Twitter very carefully tomorrow if that is true.
		Fosimo says you were laughing at boomers calling Antifa fascists and Nazis for the chess move to avoid Facebook censorship.
		Oh, yeah, that's maybe that's true But it's still retarded Justin says how do you cope knowing that you know, man?
		God bless big guy knowing what you know, man.
		I I don't know.
		What do you mean, how do I cope?
		It's just hard.
		I don't know if there is any coping.
		How do I cope doing this silly show where I laugh and we have a good time, I don't know, drinking coke, staying up until 5 a.m., driving around the neighborhood.
		I don't know if I'm coping.
		I'm trying to find ways to cope, but it's very difficult.
		Knowing, knowing what I know, right?
		It's like, it's like when Thanos said to Tony Stark, you're not the only one that's cursed with knowledge.
		You know, that's how it is.
		But I don't, I don't know if I am.
		I'm unsuccessfully coping, trying to find ways to cope, but it's not easy, right?
		Bezos says, did you see the sandwich pop-up stall comprised entirely of people with AIDS to fight stigma recently?
		I wonder if they qualify as dangerous.
		I didn't see that, but yeah, it is kind of interesting.
		Any kind of rally that wants to defeat the stigma of AIDS really wouldn't want to be caught anywhere near there, right?
		It's like, don't touch me!
		Maybe I'll go, but don't touch me, right?
		Well, I wouldn't go, but it's like, you know, you know what I mean by that.
		Probably probably not a great idea to get all the all the people of AIDS together kind of like just a big bioweapon You don't be really funny.
		I don't be funny But uh, you know, if we got all the people of AIDS together, I really could be a serious bioweapon I mean they're one route.
		What would Sam Hyde say a lethal injection in their balls?
		Basically, that would be kind of Bob, you know funny concept to think of it that way Awesomer says, when's the next debate big guy?
		Want to see you go nico mode again.
		If I hear this question one more time, I'm gonna punch a hole in the wall.
		I'll punch another hole in the wall.
		Ronson says, if robbers ever broke into my house and searched for money, I'm not gonna read that.
		Fatnibba says, Ross Proe wanted to move to Uganda in his later years, but he did admit that within the United States there are too many certain kinds of people.
		Okay.
		Kurt Roman says, just want to support tonight's epic show.
		Keep up the great work.
		Thanks.
		Benjamin says, have you heard of Orania in South Africa?
	I'm hoping that something similar can be built here in the United States.
	Yeah, no, I don't know what that is.
	Mr. Yakub says, why would an e-boy shut off all possibility of falling in love with an e-girl and starting an e-family?
	You could handle politics and hurt everything else.
	Yeah, that's the thing.
	I was talking to somebody this week about the difference.
	Somebody was like, this e-girl.
	She's like, well, you're an e-boy.
	And I was like, yeah, but here's the difference.
	An e-boy is a positive thing.
	An e-boy is like an aesthetic.
	An e-boy is somebody who wears the Vans.
	They cuff the sleeves, right?
	They wear a beanie and, in some cases, paint their nails black.
	They wear a chain.
	It's a look.
	They skateboard, they smoke pot or jewel or something like that.
	I don't know if... I don't meet all the criteria, but an e-boy is like an aesthetic.
	It's a style.
	To say somebody's an e-boy It's like a look.
	It's like being seen or goth or something like that to be an e-boy.
	To be an e-girl is totally different.
	An e-boy is basically a positive thing.
	It's sort of like a counterculture, sort of internet creation.
	But an e-girl is an entirely negative connotation.
	An e-girl is sort of like a vapid, sort of...
	It's not all of them.
unidentified		Not all of them.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		There's some good ones.
unidentified		All right.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm gonna take some heat for this But you know, it's entirely basically a negative connotation girls that are online.
		They want attention.
		They want money They want people to ogle at them.
		They want people to DM them so they could turn them away, you know, and so So yeah, that's why I reject this.
		You know, e-girl, e-boy, not really comparable definitions.
		They sound similar, but they're entirely different.
		Rugal, an e-girl, you know, we just don't want any part of, but an e-boy needs a wife.
		Needs a wife who is in the realm of reality, in my opinion.
		Rugal says ginger beard proves Irish masculine genes superior.
		Perhaps, yeah, if they are asserting themselves in such a strong way there might be something to that.
		Whitehotep says pee.
		Okay, thanks.
		Jaws TV says free money time.
		Thanks.
		Your god now says here's some shekels from SoCal.
		I'm getting my affairs in order before being cast into the sea.
		Keep up the good work, big guy.
		The beard looks good.
		Well, thanks, man.
		Much appreciated.
		And, you know, your sacrifice will be worth it, right?
		Mr. Fahrenheit's test.
		okay really good comics says yo really great super chat tonight i'm really enjoying myself truth seeking missiles is how can a clam cram in a clean cream can these are not even difficult anymore these are easy baby mode uh This very long super chat.
		Are ye aware says all the people answered his blood be on us and on our children Matthew 27 25 really makes you think how long till the Bible cannot be read on YouTube.
		Wow that's a really great question really based in red pulp question.
		Spooky ghost says if you were to target one public utility okay not gonna answer that.
		Jaws TV says the test for first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas and retain the ability to function.
		Big agree on that one.
		Big agree.
		Well said.
		Old Liver Rivers says, Zog turning dogs against us.
		It's paused.
		Okay.
		I'm Nice says, My girlfriend is obsessed with environmentalism.
		Subtle flex there.
		My girlfriend.
		Yeah.
		Check yourself.
		All right, big guy.
		My girlfriend.
		Going around flexing on us like that.
		Anyway.
		My girlfriend is obsessed with environmentalism and removing plastic from rivers and stuff.
		If she was actually red-pilled, I'd hate her.
		Get a cutie conservationist girl.
		Uh, yeah, disavow.
		Who cares?
		You know, girls who want to care about plastic, who cares about all that?
		Maybe some tree-hugging person?
		Disavow.
		Matty Freddy says, and again with this, you know, GF posting, get you a girl who cares about the environment.
		Get you a show about GFs, alright?
		Matty Freddy says, if you need a game to pass time, get Mordhau on Steam.
		James also made a video about the devs getting into a spat with the media for not cracking tone on racist in-game chat, and it's actually a lot of fun.
		I will check that out.
		I'll add it to the list.
		Ryan says, Pot of Greed, a you-know-who's favorite card.
		Ah, thanks.
		Abe says, based God flooding DC in California earthquake.
		Yeah, God is really helping a brother out lately.
		Takeover says, have you read and seen the entire Western canon?
		Add it to your list.
		No, I have not read the entire Western canon.
		Excuse me, but yeah, I'll add it to the list for sure.
	Mr. Richards says, JF has been on the Lolita Express.
	I don't think that's true.
	No problem.
	So speaking of trap cards, take a look at one of the greatest allies advocating for degenerate procedures.
	He goes by GazT something.
	Allman's going right now.
	Okay.
	That's hilarious.
	Why does he sound so logical?
	What kind of question is that?
	Why does he sound so logical?
	I don't know.
	Vladimir Putin sounds so damn logical and reasonable in regards to liberalism in his last interview with the G20.
	Why does he sound so logical?
	What kind of question is that?
	Why does he sound so logical?
	I don't know.
	He's just so supremely logical.
	Die.
	I don't know, dude, because he's intelligent.
	Not Mel Gibson says, 2.5K views on YouTube, but 8K on DLive?
	Total site viewers on average on DLive is 2 to 3K.
	You had more than triple on your stream.
	Shave your face and be ortho.
	So, No, I'm not gonna be Ortho.
	Angelo John Gage says, the most precious possession you have in this world is your people and for this people and for the sake of this people you'll struggle and fight and never slacken.
	Okay, I recognize this quote.
	I'm gonna disavow.
	I'm pretty sure I recognize this quote, but I'm gonna disavow just in case.
	Seems a little too high-powered for the show, but never tire, never lose courage, and never lose faith.
	I don't know if I would say that.
	I would say it's probably more like faith rather than, you know, race, but okay.
	AmTheWebz says, but thanks anyway.
	Good to hear from Angelo John Gage.
	AmTheWebz says, hey Nick, for that man face scarf, I recommend Dollar Shave Club premium razor shipped right to the door.
	Amazon drone will drop it off to you.
	Looking good, big guy.
	Thanks.
	KF says, hey Nicker, I want to make...okay, not gonna read that.
	Bezos says, did you pay attention to the Roger Scruton affair?
	No.
	Soane Stare says, Yeezus, classic or dud?
	I'm one of the few who say classic for Send It Up Alone.
	Filipino Chad from New York with Italian fiance.
	Yeah, disavow corrupting the gene pool there.
	But nevertheless, Yeezus is definitely a classic.
	Red Pill take there.
	In my opinion, Yeezus is one of his better albums.
	Every song on that album is good.
	Every song on there is a banger, in my opinion.
	So I would be one to say that Yeezus is in the top half of his albums, you know, if you were to rank them.
	So I am definitely a Yeezus, well, I don't know, maybe not the top half.
	But it would be like towards the middle maybe.
	He's definitely, definitely one of his better albums.
	A lot of great songs in there.
	I'm with classic.
	Definitely not a dud.
	Epididymis says, was Kevin Nash really raped in the summer of 1992?
	Kevin Nash.
	Who is that again?
unidentified		Rings a bell.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Let me see.
		Okay, I don't know what you're referring to.
		But anyway with Yeezus, there's a lot of other I think there's better songs on there than send it up I mean hold my liquor I think is better bound to probably the one of the better ones on site So I don't send it up wasn't even one of my favorites.
		But anyway, MD extremes is what's the deal with black people?
		They're okay.
		Can't read that ID cases Jimmy Neutron episode on Carl was pregnant psyop.
		I don't know DTX says, Nick, what does the E in e-girl stand for?
		You know, like online.
		E, like, you know, e-mail, e-commerce.
		What does the E stand for in e-mail?
		Electronic.
		Electronic girl, I guess you could say.
		Electronic.
		In other words, she's online.
		Billy says, Nick, are you going to AmRen two months ago?
		Yeah.
		NotMelGibson says, uh, whoops, there it is.
		Wait, where'd it go?
		I just lost it.
		Not Mel Gibson says, no e-girls and no tree girls.
		Boy, oh yeah, well said.
		Briggs says, Nick, sorry for the 31-year-old boomer question here, but what is the meme of the kid in his underwear in his room?
unidentified		What?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't know what you're talking about.
		West Saxon says, hello, the feel-when-no-gf department.
		Yeah, hello department.
		Apt says, why do we let women participate in elections, the military and the police force, but not sports?
		Do we take sports more seriously?
		I think we let them participate in sports.
		They're just segregated right and Maurice's nice beard.
		I have the same one.
		Okay Pete says I have flooded my room with books now.
		I am a nerd with no concern for daily life No foundations and weird posture.
		I have become a goofball, but we're a man of more than one book very true very red pill take on the book question and Okay, that's all our Super Chats.
		Wow!
		Great job tonight, everybody.
		Really great job.
		You're really making me earn it.
		Really making me earn it tonight.
		Earning it on the show.
		Thank you so much.
		You know, suddenly taking money from Ziocons doesn't seem all that bad, right?
		Now we got two more.
		Anon says hi and Cultist Gordon says the post above is above.
		Great, really just terrific.
		Great job everyone.
		But those are going to be our last Super Chats.
		Wow, thank you so much.
		Remember to check out nicholasjfwences.com slash membership to become a premium member.
		Only five bucks a month you get one additional show every week.
		Link is down below.
		We got one last question.
		This is the last one I'm going to take.
		Lil Jesus says, how does Ye rank on your Kanye list?
		Might be my fave.
		Really?
		It would probably be second to last for me.
		And that's excluding Watch the Throne and Cold Winter or Cold Summer.
		What is the one?
		I forget the name of it at the moment.
		But in other words, excluding the compilation albums, or rather collaboration albums, I would probably rank Yay, probably second to last.
		I wouldn't put it over, yeah I wouldn't put it, I'd probably rank it, yeah, just over Life of Pablo.
		But I don't know.
		I haven't put too much thought into it.
		Definitely not my favorite.
		Compared to all... There's seven songs on it.
		There's seven songs compared to, you know, late registration compared to graduation.
		No way.
		No way.
		Okay, but that's our last one.
		Remember to subscribe to the channel.
		Give us a big thumbs up.
		Leave a comment down below.
		Click the notification bell to be notified every time I go live.
		Remember, we are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
		Central, 8 p.m.
		Eastern Standard Time.
		I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		This is America First.
		As always, thank you so much for watching.
		Wow, thank you.
		Thank you so much to our Super Chatters.
		Wow, I appreciate the Super Chats, but really the quality is what, you know, makes the show great.
		Thanks to our Premium Members.
		Thanks to everybody that watches our show.
		We love you folks, and we will see you tomorrow.
		Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.

▲