All Episodes
June 27, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:42:43
LIVE: Who Won the Second Democratic Debate? | America First Ep. 416
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:26:38
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
Sweetie!
Sweetie!
I'm sorry.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
unidentified
Who's got the clip?
nick fuentes
No e-girls.
unidentified
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
I've never heard of a big one.
Just that.
I've never heard of a big one.
I've never heard of a big one.
I've never heard a big question.
Who's that?
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
You're not interested.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
unidentified
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
nick fuentes
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
I've never heard of it.
I've never heard of him.
What is that?
Americanism, not populism.
We'll be heard.
I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
Who is that?
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster.
I'm sorry.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
unidentified
You're an e-girl.
nick fuentes
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
unidentified
Who's got the clip?
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
I've never heard of him.
What is that?
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
Who's that?
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
Americanism, not globalism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
I'm sorry.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
unidentified
You're an e-girl.
nick fuentes
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
He's just that.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
Who's that?
Thank you.
Thank you.
and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
I'm sorry.
nick fuentes
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
unidentified
You're an e-girl.
nick fuentes
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
He's just that.
Americanism, not globalism. not globalism. Americanism, not globalism.
Will be our credo. .
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
With respect, the respect that we deserve.
From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
America first.
- Good evening everybody, You're watching America First.
nick fuentes
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be with you here on Thursday night after the second Democratic primary presidential debate, presidential primary debate.
And it's been an interesting night.
It's been an interesting past couple of nights.
Of course, this is only part two.
Last night, you had debate number one, the first 10 candidates.
We streamed the debate on DLive, did analysis tonight.
We did the same thing with Part 2, and tonight in the debate we looked at Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Pete Buttigieg, Kamala Harris, Michael Bennett, Kyrsten Gillibrand, Marianne Williamson, Andrew Yang, Eric Swalwell, and John Hickenlooper.
And so that was our debate this evening.
I hope you guys caught our live coverage of that on DLive.
I gave some live commentary there over the course of the full and very long two-hour debate.
This was a long one, a real endurance competition.
Not very enjoyable, I have to tell you.
You know, last night we were excited, we were pumped.
It was the first time we had seen the candidates together on a stage.
Really before a national audience, and I don't know if that one was more exciting or maybe it was just because it was the first one, but tonight it was just so long.
It was so grating.
At like the one hour mark, I'm just like, can we just cut this early and just do YouTube and I can be in bed by like 11 o'clock because man, What a long evening.
It was pretty hard to watch, but you know, it's two debates.
We got it done, right?
We got the job done.
And I hope you guys enjoyed my live coverage.
We're gonna do some analysis.
It turned out that this structure of how we covered the debate really worked, because apparently...
I only found this out late last night.
Apparently a lot of people tried to do the live coverage of the debate on YouTube yesterday, and they all got like big suspensions.
I heard that a number of YouTubers got copyright strikes.
They can't stream for like 90 days.
So because I'm a genius, because the host of America First is an absolute 250 IQ genius, we covered it on DLive.
We got 6,000 watching yesterday, 8,000 watching tonight.
No copyright strikes.
Are you so lucky to have me as the host, right, to be running this show?
So it's been a good couple of nights for the show, but we're gonna dive into the analysis here.
I've got a whiteboard prepared for you.
I know it's hard to believe, but I did in the short time it took between the end of the debate and now I did cook up a little bit of a whiteboard.
We might be having some issues.
I might be having some technological issues with the whiteboard.
I pick it up, I start drawing on it, and I realize it's, like, bent.
I don't know what the deal is.
Hopefully it'll remain on the stand.
If not, I'll have to hold it, but I don't know what causes that.
I paid, like, 50 bucks for it, and it's, like, curved for some reason.
I didn't, like... I smashed the other one over my knee, and this is a new one, so I don't know what happened to this one, but in any case, we'll make do.
We've got a lot of numbers to look at tonight.
We've got a lot of data.
We'll be talking about... We're looking at the data.
Well, we'll be talking about a number of things.
We'll look at the issues, we'll look at winners and losers, we'll look at numbers, we'll look at predicted Google Trends and polling.
And so, it should be a pretty comprehensive look across the board at how people are doing and how we can expect them to do moving forward after the debate.
So, like I said at the top of the show, The people that were competing tonight, of course it is Biden, Sanders, Buttigieg, Harris, Bennett, Gillibrand, Williamson, Yang, Swalwell, and Hickenlooper.
They talked about a number of topics.
Pretty much the same, as far as I'm concerned, it was basically the same outline as the first debate in terms of the structure of which topics were talked about and in which order.
They talked first about the economy, although it was interesting, last night I thought the economic rhetoric was very strong.
Last night's debate they also started out with the economy, and I believe it was Elizabeth Warren who got the bulk of those questions.
And you had Elizabeth Warren, you had Bill de Blasio, you had a lot of people last night where I felt, from a Republican perspective, I felt like the Democrats really were bringing their A-game on the economics.
The rhetoric, the policy proposals were very compelling, from a populist perspective on econ last night.
You had Bill de Blasio with a very, I think, impassioned speech.
Surprisingly, a pretty good speech where he said, we're the party of the worker and we need to put the worker first again and Jay Inslee said we have to bring back the unions and Elizabeth Warren said we got to fight the corporations and Cory Booker said we have to smash monopolies.
And so I saw some very strong economic rhetoric last night.
Tonight I thought that was missing.
I thought there were a couple of good moments.
I thought Harris, right out of the gate, had a great statement on economics.
She really smashed the Trump corporate tax cut and that's going to be a big liability for him, I'm understanding, going into this election.
As we saw the debate last night, we saw the debate tonight.
The rhetoric coming from the left is right on the money on economics and particularly Devastating impact on the tax cuts because they're all right.
The corporate tax cuts that have brought about this so-called economic recovery, all of the wealth accrued from that tax cut did go to the corporations and largely to the 1%.
And even if the economics behind that isn't entirely accurate or true, there are a lot of people who would say, well, wages are rising and unemployment is going down.
That's all true.
But in spite of that, the perception, and we know what the perception is because we have polling on this.
The perception is that the tax cuts did not benefit the middle and the working class.
Even though, and we said this yesterday, even though the Treasury Department has said that 90 plus percent of taxpayers got a tax cut, a New York Times poll showed that more than 70 percent of taxpayers say that they did not benefit from the tax cuts.
So this particular line, and it was a very good statement by Kamala Harris, very well delivered, very articulate.
It was a crushing blow to say that the corporate tax rate is not delivering dividends for the working and middle class.
So that, to me, is a big red flag.
We're looking at both debates, the econ rhetoric in both ones, whether it's Warren or Harris or de Blasio or these other people.
That's going to be a big problem for Trump.
On the other hand, with this debate tonight, the focus was not so much on taxes, big corporations, To me, I thought the focus right out of the gate was on healthcare.
I don't know if anybody else picked up on this, but every question that was asked basically about taxes or more broadly the economy in general, Bernie Sanders, everybody else, That's where this debate broke a little bit from last night.
Sanders, Biden, Hickenlooper, I think, all these people, Bennett, even Buttigieg, they want to talk about health care and education as opposed to taxes.
and a pretty divisive issue at that in the Democratic Party.
So I thought that was pretty interesting.
That's where this debate broke a little bit from last night.
Sanders, Biden, Hickenlooper, I think, all these people, Bennett, even Buttigieg, they want to talk about health care and education as opposed to taxes.
So that was an interesting pivot, which, and, you know, some might say, well, the reason for that is because health care is most important to Democratic voters.
And it is.
If you look at any of the polling, health care is by far and away the number one issues for Democrats, and it's a pretty high issue for Independents and Republicans as well.
Only in very recent polling is immigration risen up and overtaken health care for Independents.
I think that was one of the most recent polls.
And even for Republicans, health care is right up there.
So I guess I understand why that is.
However, I think that to ignore the economic issue, that's a big misstep for a lot of these candidates.
Harris and Warren have used the economy in general, and particularly the corporate tax rates, to devastating effect against President Trump.
So on the economy, that was the first issue involved.
It seemed like they didn't really even talk about that so much.
It really, they wanted to get into healthcare.
The second topic, they finally did get into healthcare.
Officially, they moved on to that.
And again, we saw this cleavage.
You know, it's like we talked about yesterday.
No more is this more present and apparent than on the issue of health care.
The division in the party between pragmatists and establishment people on one side and progressives and idealists on the other side.
We saw this last night.
It was a flare-up between Bill de Blasio and Beto O'Rourke.
They said, who out of this field would completely eliminate private health care?
And I believe it was only Elizabeth Warren and Bill de Blasio who raised their hands.
Everybody else did not.
And they advocated either public option or moving towards single payer eventually or something like this.
But Bill de Blasio called Beto O'Rourke out and he said, why don't you support Medicare for All?
Why do you support private insurance?
You basically have no business.
in the Democratic Party as a progressive supporting private health care.
That was a very big and substantial moment.
I don't think it was quoted too much this morning after last night's debate, but it was very substantial as far as I was concerned in terms of as manifesting this division.
The same thing happened tonight.
It was a big debate about Medicare for All versus something like public option or getting to Medicare for All eventually.
I think they asked people to do a show of hands, and the only people that wanted to completely abolish private health insurance was Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris.
So already you're seeing these battle lines starting to be carved out.
Between last night and tonight, the only people that are in favor of completely abolishing private health care are de Blasio, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, and Sanders.
You could say that all the other frontrunners are pragmatists, Or establishment.
It wouldn't be totally fitting to say that somebody like Buttigieg is establishment, but certainly he falls in line with more establishment-type thinking on this matter.
More of a pragmatic approach as opposed to a progressive, idealistic approach.
So that's a big source of differentiation.
And I think that's going to be an important fault line or cleavage in the Democratic Party to come.
So it was basically the same debate.
Nevertheless, it was basically the same debate as we saw last night.
It was between, do we have Medicare for All?
And it was the same concerns about that.
How do you implement that?
How do you pass that?
How do we do that in a big country?
And people who were on the other side, well, how do you belong in a progressive party?
If you're not in favor of universal health care.
And both of these complaints, or rather, both of these criticisms were addressed in the same way.
The progressives said, well, you know, we don't know how to implement Medicare for All, but we're going to do it because it is imperative.
You know, it's basically the same.
The Medicare for All people really don't have a good answer.
You know, and there's a pretty interesting moment where they asked Bernie Sanders, point blank, like, How are you going to do Medicare for All?
Like, even the countries where you do have universal health care, they still have private insurance as well on the side.
So, how do you completely eliminate that?
You're like the first country to ever do that, and Bernie Sanders' answer was, Millions of people are gonna stand up to the insurance companies and say, we're not gonna let this happen.
That's not like a real answer.
But I guess if you yell loudly enough, you know, you do the right rhetoric, this revolutionary zeal, I guess people don't care, right?
So that's the progressive side.
The pragmatist establishment side is, it's the same as we saw last night.
Well, we're not against Medicare.
We're not against Medicare for all.
We just think that we need to get there in steps or we need to keep what works and discharge what doesn't work.
Buddha Judge, which I thought was a pretty good turn of phrase, he said, we need Medicare for all who want it.
And if you want to have the public option, if you want to sign on to government health insurance, then that means it works for you.
And if you don't, you have private insurance.
Gillibrand says that, or Gillibrand, it doesn't matter how you pronounce it because she's a dumb dummy.
Dummy who doesn't belong in the race, you know, Polly Pocket over here.
But she said that, well, my plan is going to get us from private and public to single-payer.
Eventually, it's like this fusionist approach, and Hickenlooper said we can't have democratic socialism, we have to have private insurance, and it's always a rerun of what we saw last night.
But these battlegrounds are being, these lines in the sand are being drawn, essentially, on this issue.
This will be a big one moving forward, and it's also symptomatic of larger things.
Progressives versus pragmatists.
We've been saying this since the 2018 primaries.
Two years ago, I think, right?
What's 2019?
One year ago!
We saw in the 2018 primaries like last spring, last summer, we said the same thing about the Democratic Party.
It was a division between establishment and progressive.
So that was healthcare.
It's the same thing we saw last night.
They moved on to immigration.
Also the same thing we saw last night.
Pretty interesting.
They asked everybody to do a show of hands on who would decriminalize illegal immigration.
This was phase two of the debate.
And just like last night, just about everybody raised their hands.
I think maybe a couple of people did not raise their hand yesterday, but everybody on the stage raised their hand tonight in saying That they would support getting rid of provisions that would make it such that illegal immigration is a civil and not a criminal offense.
In other words, basically meaning it's not illegal at all to come into the country illegally.
Making it such that in effect we don't have a border at all with Mexico.
So that the people that are coming here will be given like a fine or something and a pathway to citizenship and welfare and they'll have the right to vote and all this other stuff.
They'll get free healthcare too, which I thought was incredible.
You know, they did a couple of show of hands, and it just goes to show how far to the left the parties moved.
The first show of hands was how many people would give free, government-funded healthcare to illegals.
Everybody raises their hands.
How many people would be in favor of decriminalizing illegal immigration?
Everybody raises their hands.
I believe there was one other hand raised, and it was very similar.
But basically, you know, there was no disagreements on the issue of immigration.
There was one little moment there in the middle...
Which was a foreshadowing for things to come.
There was one slight dust up.
I don't want to say it was like an exchange, but Kamala Harris did very gently go after Joe Biden.
And this was a big foreshadowing as we saw the rest of the debate play out.
She said, well, you know, the one thing I disagreed with the Obama administration on was immigration.
She looked right at Joe Biden and she said, you know, because in California they were deporting illegal immigrants who had not committed a serious criminal offense.
And I disagreed with that.
Now that was a very important moment, starting to seed again her attack on the number one guy and also seeding this distinction and differentiation.
Those are the operative words these past two nights between her and Joe Biden.
She said, well, you know, I like Joe Biden, I like the Obama administration, but I'm just a little bit more progressive on immigration.
That was a very critical detail.
So they said that.
Everything else is basically the same.
You know, it was all, well, we looked at the picture of the two illegal immigrants dead.
And this is very personal for me, and we're all weeping, and this is not reflective of our values.
It was all the same, right?
So that was immigration.
They talked about China.
This was basically unimportant.
Michael Bennett brought up the Holocaust, which was great.
Buttigieg said something about China.
I didn't really, this one really didn't matter to me in my eyes.
They talked about criminal justice.
This was the most critical moment of the debate.
This is like the whole debate was about this one moment.
And you have to understand when we look at the debates, this is so important because there's going to be a lot of debates going ahead.
I think there's like 10 planned in the Democratic primary.
The debates are the most critical thing going into actually the primaries and caucuses, actual voting in the states.
And what you have to understand about the debates is debates are not defined by, like most of it is basically irrelevant, doesn't matter.
Insofar as in general, you have a passable performance, like that's all that matters.
What is critical about the debates is these cinematic, dramatic moments.
That's what makes the debate.
So if you remember, Donald Trump was so good at this.
While everybody else was going by with these sort of perfunctory performances, they gave good policy answers on like healthcare or the Middle East.
Jeb Bush gave some, you know, okay answers.
I don't know if I agree with everything, but they gave answers about their record and how their parents were mailmen, or they gave an answer about how, well, when I was governor, I did this, or when I'm president, my plan, I have it, and the study says this.
But what mattered was that Donald Trump created these moments which got everybody's attention.
Either it was A particularly, you know, controversial attack or a wild statement, a big exchange with three different people or something like that, calling Rand Paul ugly, you're having a tough time tonight, little Marco, you know, this kind of stuff.
That's why he was able to capture so much media attention.
That's what gained him so much currency in the race.
And that's ultimately what matters.
That's what makes or breaks campaigns.
You remember Marco Rubio?
Very good performances in the first so many debates, but the third one, the second or the third one killed him when he kept repeating himself on, Obama knows exactly what he's doing.
It was a moment like that, it was over for him.
All of this is to say, The whole debate doesn't matter.
That two hours basically was irrelevant compared to this one moment on the issue of criminal justice.
And this was totally planned, totally calculated.
She practices before Kamala Harris launched probably the most devastating attack I've ever seen in a presidential debate.
I've seen, you know, so many of them since like 2008.
I'm probably not the best source.
I've been watching that many of them, only alive 20 years, but pretty brutal, pretty devastating.
She said, you know, look...
Joe Biden defended segregationists and where the Democratic Party were progressive and I, and this was the best part, she connected it back to herself.
She said Joe Biden supported the same busing policies, segregationist busing policies that I was a victim of, that I was segregated in Berkeley, California, something to this effect.
And this statement was just absolutely brutal.
It was over for Joe Biden.
She lynched him.
And to me, that was a totally calculated ploy.
She practiced that.
She knew that issue was coming.
And she like fought for that one because Rachel Maddow, if you remember this moment, they were sort of going across the field.
What do you think about criminal justice reform?
And Pete Buttigieg, you had this big controversial thing and South Bend and blah, blah, blah.
Kamala Harris, she rested the microphone away.
She said, well, I'm black so I get to talk about race.
I mean, that's literally what she said.
She said, well, I think I get to talk about race and they're like, um, no, you have to wait your turn.
But she didn't listen.
She's like, no, I'm, uh, I'm black and this is my issue.
I'm, I'm black.
So I get to talk about race.
And that was the opportunity.
She used to just gut this guy so it was totally planned and it was a brilliant strategy.
It came off with devastating effect because in that attack she highlighted every difference that mattered.
I mean that's the art of campaigning is to take what your opponents is their weakness and take what your strength is and exacerbate those two things what they cannot do and what only you can do that's what makes your breaks campaign they taught us this at the leadership institute okay this is koch brother funded research and tactics and what she did when she attacked him on this issue was she highlighted and made playing these differences that she is black She is a woman.
She is more progressive.
She is young.
And Joe Biden is old.
He's white.
He's a man.
He's part of the establishment.
Possibly racist.
And in that attack, which was very gentle, it was very gentle, but it was very devastating.
There was an emotional appeal in there.
It's indisputable.
It attacked one of his weakest points, and he was not ready for that.
His answer?
I got a little bit of an applause from the audience, but he was not ready for that.
He was totally flustered.
He did not recover from that for the rest of the debate, and that's going to stick with him.
That'll stick with him in the next debate.
That's what people are going to be talking about all day tomorrow, in the morning shows, in the evening shows, in the next so many election cycles.
That's a defining moment of this debate.
Possibly of the entire primary.
It's very early to say that, but this is one of those standout moments where you say, this is going to set the tone for the rest of the race.
So to me, that was huge.
That moment, and Kamala Harris had been performing well up until that point, and she performed well after that, but that point was, she wins a debate, hands down.
That was the most memorable point of tonight and last night.
She's number one, so far, in the debates.
Not in the polling, but in the debates.
And Joe Biden, that makes him the biggest loser.
He came in, he had the most to gain perhaps, maybe the most to lose as well because he's the frontrunner, and he lost big.
He went in there, that should have been his opportunity to solidify his lead, to defend against a lot of these attacks which have been leveled against him on the groping charges, on the racial stuff, on his past, maybe on Obama's record more or less.
He didn't do any of that.
There was nothing really compelling about what he said.
He was doing okay in the beginning, but that attack devastated him.
He never recovered.
So, He's probably the biggest loser because of that.
Everything else, you know, all this other stuff about diversity and, you know, Biden trying to come back talking about the bank bailouts, didn't really matter.
That was really it for that issue.
On abortion, they're all in favor of abortion.
You know, what else is new?
On climate change, a lot of perfunctory answers on, you know, it's the same effect we talked about last night on climate change.
There's really no disagreement.
It's really just sort of this boring, Unimportant policy stuff, which again, it's more about the rhetoric.
It's more about sounding like you have a plan or something than actually the policies being true or mattering or being practical, right?
They talked about guns.
Swalwell launched an interesting attack against Bernie Sanders.
Bernie is known as probably one of the weakest on guns.
We know he's from Vermont.
It's not popular to be in favor of gun control in Vermont.
So Swalwell attacked him.
That really wasn't a huge deal.
I think Bernie played it off relatively well.
And that was really it.
Then they had some questions towards the end.
To me, the rest of it didn't really matter.
It was the build-up, it was economy, healthcare, immigration, and it was criminal justice, which to me were the biggest issues.
Everything else was exactly what we saw yesterday.
It was more of the same.
No disagreement, no real differentiation, no real big moments, no real big applause lines.
So those were the topics covered.
We're gonna get into some quantitative data here now, and we'll look at how people stacked during the debate in terms of speaking time, in terms of Google Trends, and on Predicted.
So first we'll look at speaking time.
It looks like Bernie Sanders talked the most times.
I tally that he talked 11 times throughout the debate, so he came in at number one.
Number two was Joe Biden.
He talked 10 times.
Coming in at third, you had Kamala Harris, who talked 9 times.
So pretty clean.
Bernie, Biden, Harris.
Then you had Buttigieg with eight.
You had Gillibrand with seven.
Michael Bennett with six.
You had Marianne, or I'm sorry, Eric Swallow with five.
Hickenlooper and Williamson with four.
And last and definitely least, Andrew Yang with two.
He spoke two times during the whole debate, except for, and that's not counting the closing statement, and also when they all were asked what the biggest threat to America is.
So Yang talked twice throughout the whole debate, and it was pretty clear from who was the most present that the top tier people were the ones that were most involved in the debate.
You know, yesterday we saw some people moving up a little bit, moving the needle.
I think Klobuchar definitely moved up slightly.
I think Cory Booker did a big, did a good job, made a big splash for himself.
Possibly Bill de Blasio went up a little bit as a result of yesterday's debate.
So there was some mobility last night.
Tonight, all the bottom tier people Didn't really impress.
I think they really weren't present.
You know, Williamson is crazy.
Swalwell is a joke.
Kickenlooper is just too boring.
Bennett is a goof.
Andrew Yang just wasn't there.
It really was a contest between these four people.
So we're starting to see what the field is going to look like moving forward.
Who's really going to be competitive?
And we'll show that with our whiteboard momentarily.
So that's in terms of speaking time.
In terms of predicted, or rather, we're going to look at Google Trends first.
There are some pretty interesting trends throughout the debate.
It looks like, and we're going to look at it over the past hour here.
So I don't have it for the debate, but I do have it for the last 60 minutes here.
It looks like the biggest splash was made by Andrew Yang actually and Pete Buttigieg.
If you look purely in terms of who had the biggest recognition at the end of it, Buttigieg by far and away had the biggest search interest, the biggest, what would you call this, what do you call this figure?
They were trending.
Buttigieg was trending more than anybody else at much higher numbers.
Yang was the second highest, but very low compared to that.
Kamala came in third.
So in terms of Google Trends, you could probably say that Buttigieg got the biggest boost in terms of name recognition.
People saying, well, this guy is reasonably articulate.
He's smart enough.
I like this guy.
Whatever.
He sounds reasonable.
And so I think that shows that he sort of propelled himself into the top tier, which is pretty incredible because he's not a national figure at all.
You know, he's the mayor of South Bend.
He's competing against Senators.
Senators from California, you know, the biggest state in the country.
Senator from New Jersey.
Senator from Massachusetts.
Major states.
He's the mayor of a small, midwestern city.
So for him to propel himself now, get that name recognition, that was very critical for him.
So that was tactically a very good performance for him.
Yang had a lot of interest on Google.
I don't know what that's all about.
To me, his performance was just nothing short of an absolute disaster, unmitigated.
His answers were not compelling.
They were too fast.
They were monotone.
He didn't speak English.
He spoke twice.
He was not aggressive at all.
I thought he did a very bad job explaining the UBI.
So to me, maybe that's purely driven by the who the F is this factor.
You know, who's this Asian guy and something about $1,000, I guess.
Let's Google him real quick.
That's the only thing I can think of that explains that.
But I don't think anybody watching that was really pleased with that performance.
And the Kamala Harris, of course, because of that, I think that big moment between her and Biden.
So that's what the Google Trends show.
We will also look at the predicted numbers, which we do sometimes.
These are basically unreliable in the long term, but in the short term I think they show where the mood is at, where the sentiment is at.
Predicted is of course a betting market, so it works in the same way that stocks do.
You basically buy shares Of a certain prediction about a given market, about a given political outcome.
So for example, we can look at this market where you can buy contracts as to who you think will win the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.
And you can bet, based on percentages basically, what the likelihood is that a given candidate is to win the Democratic nomination.
So this is a good number to show where people think the odds are adjusted after the debate.
So if we look at these numbers right after the debate, Joe Biden is down 3%.
And he's in first place at 21% chance of winning the nomination.
Kamala Harris has launched into second place with 19%.
She jumped 7% in the last 24 hours.
Elizabeth Warren has gone down 2% actually.
She's in third at 19%.
Bernie Sanders is in fourth at 16% with no change.
So it looks like that performance didn't help him, didn't hurt him in the eyes of the bettors, in the eyes of the predictors.
Pete Buttigieg is in What is this?
5th place with 15%.
He's up 3.
Andrew Yang is down 4% and he's down to 10% in that 6th place.
So that's where the bettors are thinking in terms of the long-term trends.
Who's gonna win the nomination?
There's also a couple of markets for where people think the different candidates will be at in the polling after this debate.
And so you have a number of markets here.
They don't cover all the candidates, but they do cover the top ones.
After this debate, 80% of people in this market believe that Joe Biden will poll lower than he was before the debate.
So 80% of people essentially are saying that Joe Biden's gonna go down in the polls after the debate.
73% say that Elizabeth Warren will go up in the polls after the debate.
74% of people say that Bernie Sanders is going to go down in the polls after the debate.
Pete Buttigieg, 67% say that he'll go up.
91% say that Kamala Harris will go up in the polls after the debate.
76% say that Cory Booker will go up and 76% say that Beto O'Rourke will go down.
So we do have actually a whiteboard to show you where things are at in the polling to give you a little bit more of a visual representation.
I know you guys like the whiteboards here and we'll see if it balances.
It's a little bit bendy.
I don't know if I could show you.
I don't know if you'll be able to see, but it's like it's a little bit curved, right?
It's not totally flat.
I don't know if that's like a temperature thing.
I don't know if that's like the material like contracting or what that's all about, but we'll see if it stays up here.
And we've got the ranking in terms of the RCP, the Real Clear Politics polling average.
And this is an average of all the polls that have been conducted in the month of June.
And I'm showing you this.
I don't think we actually need to adjust based on the lighting.
This looks fine to me.
So we look at where people are as of tonight.
Joe Biden is in number one with 32%, Bernie Sanders in second with 17%, Elizabeth Warren in third with 13%, Kamala Harris in fourth with 7%, Pete Buttigieg in fifth with 7% also, Beto in sixth with three, and Cory Booker in seventh with 2%.
Based on the predicted numbers, based on my observations, we can say that Joe Biden's probably going down.
Bernie Sanders is probably going down or staying about the same.
If he goes down, it's because Elizabeth Warren or Kamala will have consolidated some of his voters, but I would imagine he's going down.
Elizabeth Warren is going way up, according to the polls, according to my observations.
Kamala Harris going way up, Buttigieg going up, Beto going down, and Cory Booker going up.
And I think this seven is the field.
This is who is going to be competitive.
Possibly, you know, will there be a dark horse like Bill de Blasio?
I think he could be the one that rises up out of the rest of the field, but basically everybody else I don't see is very competitive at this point.
And it's sort of interesting, all the people that have gone down, what do they have in common?
Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, and Beto O'Rourke.
And what do all the people that have gone up have in common?
Elizabeth Warren, The people that are losing are the straight, white men.
Biden, Sanders, O'Rourke.
And the people that are ascendant are the diversity coalition.
Black, women, gay.
You know, Cory Booker, Buttigieg, Harris, Warren.
And I think this shows that in general, the progressive coalition is ascendant.
You know, to a certain extent, Bernie Sanders, he is a progressive.
He's out there.
He's a so-called democratic socialist.
but in many ways, without that wokeness on racial or gender issues, the very fact that he's not a woman or black or, you know, some other kind of person of color, by the very fact of that, that kind of lumps him in with this other category of people.
It really is a tribal thing at this point.
It really is identity politics.
Because you could say that Beto is progressive in his policies.
You could say that Bernie is progressive in his policies.
But they're going down because of who they are, I think, largely.
Now, they had poor performances.
That does have a lot to do with how they did individually, but I don't think you can discount the fact that this is reflecting a more tribal, a more radical, a more progressive Democratic Party.
This is a big factor.
In 2016, it wasn't, because everybody knew Clinton was going to be the nominee, and she was a woman, and the competitors were all, it was white guys, right?
It was Sanders, Martin O'Malley, Lincoln Chafee, and that was the field.
But now that you really have an open and competitive primary and you do have some diversity in there, you're seeing what an impact that's having.
You're seeing that the country is going to look like Chicago.
It's going to look like New York City.
You're going to get a lot more people that look like Lori Lightfoot and people that look like, you know, some of these other crazy radical mayors that you see in like South Bend or like you see in Jacksonville or other places.
People like Stacey Abrams, this is the future of the country.
If you think Kamala is bad now, you think Cory Booker is bad now, give it 10 years.
This is a Democratic Party in 2020, and look who's on the rise, and look who's going down, right?
But these match my general observations.
I think, and we'll look at winners and losers now, my general conclusions and observations.
I would say that, of course, the big winner of the night is Kamala Harris.
She was by far and away the biggest winner of both nights, you know, and we all know that it was because of that one moment.
She's surging in predicted Google Trends everywhere you look.
She had that big moment.
I think she's definitely number one from tonight.
I think Buttigieg was a winner tonight.
It was basically a passable performance.
You know, I don't think that he blew anybody out of the water completely.
He avoided a lot of these dust-ups.
I think Eric Swalwell criticized him one time.
That really fell flat.
So I think Buttigieg did himself a favor by being articulate, you know, being this whiz kid that he purports to be, and he'll get that name recognition.
I think people will watch him in the audience and say, you know, who is this guy?
I like him!
And so I think he'll go up in the polls as a result.
I think that Bernie Sanders, like I said, he's probably about in the middle.
I don't think he won.
I don't think he lost.
It was basically a weak performance.
A lot of what he was saying felt sort of redundant and repetitive.
It was a lot of the same stuff we heard in 16.
It's this 1% stuff, and it was really out of touch in many ways.
You know, he was being asked about wokeness, about diversity, about these kinds of things, and he really didn't have an answer aside from the stale Occupy Wall Street-tier rhetoric that he had in the last election.
So, I think that Kamala's number one, Buttigieg, he had a pretty marginal tactical victory there.
Bernie Sanders probably somewhere in the middle.
The biggest losers in my mind are Joe Biden and basically everybody else.
Maybe Andrew Yang is the other biggest loser.
Joe Biden went into this having the most to lose.
He's by far and away number one in the polls, as we can see.
You know, more than double the runner-up there and by far and away leading everybody else in the race by triple or bigger numbers.
And he did lose.
He lost bigly.
He got attacked by Eric Swalwell for his age.
He got attacked by Kamala Harris for his past, for his record.
He got attacked from a couple of other people.
And so I think that he was by far and away the biggest loser.
And really what we learned from the past two debates is the rest of the field is kind of irrelevant as far as I'm concerned.
You know, we can see that people like Eric Swalwell will throw a grenade into things.
You know, they can change up how things work, change the dynamic.
They can be a little bit of a wild card, but basically this is your field.
This is what will be competing, and really after the last two nights, I would say that it's no longer Biden's race to lose.
Honestly, I think that we were thinking that last week, and I told everybody.
People would ask me in the super chats, or we talk about polling.
My opinion has always been we cannot make a judgment until the first debate, until we see who's going to choke, Who's gonna run away with it?
Who's gonna bring a knife to the debate and really start slashing some people up, right?
Who's gonna really eat people's lunches and, you know, go all out and all that?
So I said, maybe a couple of weeks ago, that it's Biden's race to lose at this point in time, before we've seen anything.
But it doesn't mean anything, because there's a lot of race.
We haven't seen them together.
And so after this debate, I think we can see clearly That Joe Biden is fighting for his life.
I think Bernie Sanders, it's not guaranteed for him either.
I think he's got to fight too.
Basically the race is wide open now and it's between these seven people.
I think if anybody's most likely after tonight I would say the Kamala Harris.
In my eyes, it's probably moved up into the first or second place in terms of who's most likely.
I think what matters more than anything on the debate stage is, again, who's willing to cut people, who's got that edge to them that they're going to be able to bully other people and do what it takes.
Take risks like she did.
So I think that Kamala Harris, in my eyes, really moved up in terms of her likelihood.
I think Buttigieg is moving up very rapidly.
He's playing it smart.
He's very tactical, well-spoken.
Doesn't seem to get flustered.
Joe Biden is there simply by the grace of his past.
He's resting on his laurels.
You know that he was in the Obama administration.
He's got the name recognition.
He's been around.
Bernie Sanders is up there.
But I think this top five is who's competitive.
I think Beto O'Rourke It's gonna be bumped out.
Cory Booker, if he's bold and risky, he takes risks.
I think he has the potentiality to move into the top.
I don't think he's very likely to win, but if he plays it smart, he might be able to break into the top five or six there.
But I think that's the state of the race so far.
I think it really is wide open between these people.
I think Elizabeth Warren has maybe the most chance to eat up Bernie Sanders' base.
I think she's much more Likeable.
I think she's much more, got a much better charm to her.
I find that if it's between Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren as sort of the kooky old white democratic socialist like populist revolutionary, I think Elizabeth Warren definitely had a better performance last night than Sanders.
If it's between who's gonna be a sort of progressive establishmentarian, I think Harris and Buttigieg definitely beat out Joe Biden.
And ultimately, I don't know it's probably too early to tell but I think ultimately it'll come down to these top five here.
I don't think I don't think these two will really be so much of a So much of a part of it.
I guess it'll really come down to the early primaries like Iowa, New Hampshire.
That's really what's going to decide.
But until that point, I think it's just going to be sort of this, uh, what would you call that?
What do you call that?
It's going to be the horse race between these top five people.
And there'll be some movement between now and the caucuses and primaries on February 3rd.
But I think that's going to be your top five.
That'll be your core five.
And you'll have some hangers on in the bottom, maybe you know one of the bottom tier people have a good week but I think that's pretty much set in stone and in my eyes it's wide open so we'll see what happens but that's basically my analysis those are my general observations of winners and losers that's some quantitative data for you but but that's what's going on those are your two debates so we're gonna move on we're gonna take a look at our super chats we'll see what you guys are saying about all this we'll see if you agree with me I know last night I was very down on Tulsi Gabbard.
I was very down on Mommy.
And I ended up being proven wrong.
Although I will say, you know, she did well in the Google Trends.
So did Andrew Yang.
And his performance was trash.
And she did well in a drudge poll.
But it's a drudge poll.
It's drudge.
Who do you think votes in the drudge poll?
Do you think Democrats vote in a drudge poll?
Who reads what's Matt Drudge?
He's like a gay libertarian.
And I mean, I think he's actually homosexual, right?
So, I mean, he's literally like a right-wing guy.
Drudge is a right-wing site.
So, correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're doing an unscientific online poll from Drudge, that Tulsi Gabbard blew away the competition.
Did she do well in all the debate polls and surging in Google Trends or Was she one of the candidates with the least amount of name recognition?
And she has a striking appearance, so people are googling her.
And it's a right-wing poll, and she's the most... I think she's the most appealing candidate for right-wing people out of the field.
So, I would say that last night, I was down on her performance.
People said, oh, no, you're wrong, because she's doing well on these numbers.
Now that we see these numbers tonight, and I saw what those numbers looked like, I said, I don't know if that's all the way what it is.
Maybe she'll be a dark horse.
She's still in the race, obviously.
There's more debates to come.
But, you know, we'll see if you disagree with me about Yang, is what I was getting at.
We'll see if it's something similar.
People say, oh no, but Google Trends and polls, and I think he did great.
I thought he did terrible.
What a big fat disappointment.
That was the saddest thing I saw all night.
He talked twice!
He talked less than Eric Swalwell.
He was less aggressive than Eric Swalwell.
And when he did talk, he was like a nerdy Chinese student in the back of the class, you know, reciting all the numbers in the number pie.
You know, it was terrible.
So bad.
Couldn't have been worse, in my opinion.
That was his time to shine.
To, you know, make an appeal to a national audience.
That's why we donated.
That's why we went all in.
So he choked.
Big time choke artist.
That's what matters in politics.
Your character.
Do you have balls?
That's what matters more than anything else.
Policy, your background, your stature, your look, optics, really everything about you matters less than if you have nuts.
And I know that's like a vulgar Or maybe a crude thing to say, but it's 100% true.
You make it in politics if you have edge, if you have guts.
And if you don't, you're dead.
And that's what Andrew Yang proved.
Funny, different, generational, UBI, you know, you did the math, all that stuff, it doesn't matter because you choked.
And that's what Donald Trump proved.
He didn't have the best policies.
He didn't have the best anything.
But he was just the biggest, most obnoxious, the meanest.
He did what it takes.
He was the smartest about it.
And you know, the strategy, that comes a long way too.
But really, that's what makes or break.
I mean, other things are important.
Other things you can't do without.
But that's what makes or break.
If you don't have that, you shouldn't be in politics.
You know, you should be an entrepreneur or a bureaucrat or something.
Big disappointment by Yang.
Uh, you know, and I hate to see that because we wanted to see him go far.
We want to see him talk about technological unemployment and universal basic income and human first capitalism, that kind of thing, but it just wasn't there.
But so anyway, we'll look at the super chats.
We'll see what you guys think about all this.
We've got Hundungus who says, Nick, nice live stream, big guy.
You did a good job, but my time is up.
Well, I'm sorry to hear that, but thanks.
James Russell says, time to jump on the Tulsi train, lads.
Yeah, after Yang.
After Yang's performance, I gotta say.
I don't want her to be president, but I'll stand.
I'll stand, you know, mommy, while she lasts, right?
Really Good Comics says, get schwifty for Bernie.
Aw, yeah!
We got a Redditor in the chat.
Well, thanks, Really Good Comics.
Much appreciated.
Thanks for the lino!
I saw you dumping a lot of lino in there, so thank you for that.
Highly true.
Yeah, that was pretty funny.
Talking about chemicals and fighting hate with love or fear with love.
true ron sun says my favorite part of the debate was when eve ever crazy cult leader marianne williamson opened her mouth yeah that was pretty funny talking about chemicals and fighting hate with love or fear with love she was very kooky and added a little bit of levity to the debate so i like that billy mays says i missed the debate and i'm seeing r.i.p. you Yang in chat.
Did he perform badly?
He performed worse than badly.
It was tragic what happened to him.
Joshua Bond says, I want mommy.
Missed the milk tonight.
Thank you for your service, my Nick and fellow Nickers.
Well, thanks man.
Glad you like the stream.
I missed mommy too.
I wish we had her on the stage.
Axton says, Yang gang had a more destructive meltdown than Chernobyl.
Yeah, very, very substantial meltdown.
I could get behind this.
says Tulsi versus Kamala, naked mud fight.
I could get behind this.
I could get behind this.
Certainly, maybe if we have women running for president, that's how we decide it.
You know what?
I get it.
It's the 21st century.
Maybe a woman's going to be president, but let's decide it the only way that makes sense.
Naked mud wrestling, right?
N.T. says, I need to check my Bible to see if the Antichrist is supposed to be short.
Yeah, Buddha judge to me definitely strikes me as a contender for Antichrist.
That guy, he's got everything wrong going for him.
KNG versus my uncle was turned into a bar of soap.
Vote for me.
That was Michael Bennett.
What a dope man.
He had some good rhetoric, but I mean just what was going on?
What's wrong with that guy's face and the way he talks?
It sounds like a bumbling doofus, so that was a big mess.
Tyrone says, I don't like Mommy Kamala's ideas, but somehow I respect her way more than the others on stage.
It's refreshing to see someone actually go out for blood.
It's blood for the blood gods.
I'm with ya.
She went out, it was bold, it was calculated, but it paid off big.
She was right on the money.
That was the best thing she could have done.
And yeah, I hear ya.
She sucks.
I mean, her ideas are terrible.
She's a bad person.
But, you know, you do respect, in a gladiatorial setting, you respect somebody who's a showman, who's gonna go in for the kill.
And who's going to do what it takes.
And we like that.
We like that showmanship, the sportsmanship.
It's the display of ability.
And that's what we live for on the show.
I'm a debater myself.
I live for that.
So, absolutely.
Very good.
You do respect her for that, but you know, not much else.
Tyrone says, or I just read that one.
Ann Marie says, Marianne Williamson 2020.
Yeah, I don't know if I'm on board with that, but certainly interesting.
You know, funny.
Enemy AC-130 says, imagine voting for a party where every candidate is guaranteed to go to hell.
Yeah, basically, right?
They're all in favor of abortion.
They're all in favor of sodomy.
They're all in favor of what other atrocious things?
Feminism and all the rest.
So there you go.
Jack says invite yourself.
Invite Yousef from Urbana Champagne back on please.
No, I did that already.
He said he doesn't want to come on.
So I think we've been over that about a thousand times.
Josh Sarris says Chinaman is cancelled like those Mexican tariffs.
Sad bro.
He wasn't ready other than Biden defending being against busing was definitely effing based Can we give it up?
Can we give up the torch for stealing?
Swallows well, okay.
So English is again.
It's gonna be the language you have to speak on the show here.
But yeah, no, I think Swalwell attacking Biden on the age thing was very smart.
I thought that was a very good play.
And you're right.
Yeah.
Yang was not prepared at all.
That was the big mistake he made.
I don't know if he just got nervous.
He got flustered.
But you can't do that, man.
You can't do that.
You got to have that high T, that high energy.
You just have to have that killer instinct, that killer mentality.
He doesn't got it.
He doesn't have it.
He doesn't got it.
He doesn't have it!
And so he is a non-player in the debate.
That won't get better, I know.
But yeah, Swalwell did pretty well there when he challenged Biden.
That was a pretty good moment.
And you know that they're all going after Biden now.
They smell blood in the water.
He's the weak link.
And there's a lot to gain from attacking him.
Yeah, that was pretty based.
Okay, I'm not gonna read that.
Yeah, thanks for giving us the laundry list of your favorite moments.
Lawrence says, Nick, I have to pee-pee.
Okay, I'm not going to read that.
Hong Kong says, hey, big guys, your favorite U.S. Army soldier again.
Top laughs of the stream.
Women are mad.
It's not their turn.
Soy farmers are epic.
Joe versus a sassy black lady in my family are Holocaust survivors.
Yeah, thanks for giving us the laundry list of your favorite moments.
Thank you so much for that.
Hun Dungus says, when is Mommy Tulsi coming back?
Black Mommy is mean.
Yeah, Black Mommy don't take no mess.
Black Mommy don't take no mess from nobody.
Definitely not from a white boy.
Definitely not from a white man.
So yeah, Mommy, new Mommy is very mean.
I like Jilf.
Jilf is our new Mommy now.
Mommy Tulsi, Milf Mommy Tulsi is cancelled.
Jilf Williamson is Mommy now, is my new Mommy now, right?
But yeah, Kamala's is very vicious, very brutal tonight, and I like that about her.
Uh, Hondungas, I just read that one.
Antis is breaking news.
Marianne Williamson challenges President Trump to a duel in the shadow realm.
Yeah.
She said, I think you know what this is about, President Trump.
And in my mind, in her closing statement, and in my mind, I imagine that what she sees through her eyes is like this very cartoonish, like, Princess and the Frog like voodoo spiritual warfare.
I think she sees Trump as like an ancient reincarnated evil and a top hat.
I think you'd like there are these eternal enemies.
There's this old spiritual war that goes back millennia.
I think you know what I'm talking about, President Trump.
And when she says that in the back of his mind, you know, this ancient evil that animates him is saying, oh, she's on to me.
The forces of light, the ancient forces of light coming up against me.
So when she was saying that, I got this very like weird vibe in my head.
She's going to go and battle him on the astral plane.
She's going to go out there.
She'll, you know, meditate and ascend to a higher realm and duke it out in the shadow realm, you know, somewhere else.
And she'll say, oh, I fought you a thousand years before.
And in a way, I think it's very funny.
I don't know if she's on drugs or something.
She seems like a 1960s hippie, basically, like Jane Fonda.
I got that kind of vibe from her, you know.
So whatever's up with her, I like it.
I like the energy from her.
It's very based.
Oswald says, my parents saw your show.
Dad agrees with you, but can't listen to your voice.
It sounds too much like Ben Shapiro.
Mom just thinks you're crazy.
Well, I don't try to appeal to boomers.
So that's unfortunate.
Your parents didn't like the show.
But then again, I'm not really trying to appeal to, you know, old people or people's parents.
I'm trying to appeal to you, the young people.
So that's okay.
They can stick to Mark Levin and, you know, Rush Limbaugh, whatever that's all about.
Glenn C says, call me blue pill, but I can't see how an average American could vote for anything like these platforms.
They're just crazy!
Well, you gotta understand, they're trying to appeal to the base.
They're trying to appeal to the progressive base.
So, these issues are not popular.
Decriminalizing illegal immigration is not popular.
Abortion is not popular.
Medicare for all is popular.
Climate is popular.
But a lot of these things are like poison pills.
But they're competing not for independents.
They're competing for progressives at this stage of the game.
They're competing for who's gonna have the base go out and support them in the primaries and all that.
So you gotta understand that's where it is right now.
But I think they'll maybe move more towards the middle.
And if they don't, they're gonna lose.
You can't win Ohio on these platforms.
You can't win Iowa, North Carolina on these platforms.
So, don't interrupt the enemy when they're making a mistake.
This is good for us.
You know, the people like Tim Ryan and Egghead and John Hickenlooper who are saying we need to bring the party back to the middle, they're the ones they should be listening to.
But, you know, they're listening to Kamala and all these crazy people.
And there's an incentive for that, but I think long term it's going to cost them.
Carl Marks says, Yang Gang cancelled.
Bigly, yeah.
Hardcore cancelled.
I'm burning my Yang Gang hat.
It's game over.
Chonk says, hey big guy, good job with putting up with the debate.
Thank you for your service.
Well, thanks man.
Glad you enjoyed.
Captain Nicky says, hey Nick, I wrote you, but you still ain't calling.
I left my cell and the home phone at the bottom.
Give me a call.
I'm your biggest fan.
I'm not gonna call you on the phone, but if you emailed me, I'll try to email you back.
As soon as possible, right?
I'll get right on that.
That's my number one priority.
Libertarian Culture says, thanks for the in-depth analysis and the great facial reactions during the debates.
Long live the Knicker movement!
Well, thanks!
Crank says, Nick, I'm a close friend of Yang and I want you to know that he doesn't actually believe in what he says about reparations, immigration, gender pay gap, etc.
Secretly, all he believes in is money.
Well, I definitely believe you, LARPer.
But even if that's the case, who cares, man?
Country's going to hell.
What difference does it make at this point, right?
God's plan says, what does American foreign policy look like if a Democrat president actually got out of the Middle East?
They're not going to get out of the Middle East.
I don't know if you paid attention, but all the Democrats in the last two debates basically pivoted away from talking about the foreign wars at all.
And if they talked about it directly, they wanted more involvement.
They were talking about nuclear proliferation, they were talking about getting tough on Iran and things like this.
So I didn't hear any rhetoric about ending wars last night or tonight.
So, I don't think they're pulling out.
Maxie says, Heil Hickenlooper.
Yeah, I'd disavow.
Alan says, Gillibrand, Kamala, Mommy Tulsi.
F1, marry one, kill one, go!
Hmm, that's a tough one.
Let's see, Gillibrand, Kamala, Tulsi.
Let's see.
Well, I would have to kill Kamala Harris.
You know why?
and I would have to probably marry Tulsi and you know what, Gillibrand.
Very, very easy because, you know, the thing is, as much as Gillibrand is obnoxious, there's something about her which is compatible, let's just say.
So I would probably have to, but I couldn't tolerate her, so I'd have to bang her, have to, you know, hit it and quit it, and then Tulsi, you know, if she was mommy GF, she was my my old lady then I think that's a perfect arrangement So, very easy, very easy question.
Not hard at all to rank.
Simon Scholas says, Tulsi is Mommy, but Marianne is Granny.
A hardcore Jill faction with Marianne Williamson.
video game snake says yang is for dumb normies my reddit had a jeb level performance may or mr reddit had a jeb level for performance made biden look good by comparison mommy tulsi will win and give us a big kiss Yeah, I agree.
Kisses for everybody from Mommy.
And, uh, yeah, he was embarrassing.
The Unpossible says, Yang speaks twice and wins 2020.
Yeah, doubt.
Hundungus says, Williamson Ouija board 2020.
Yeah, Williamson and, uh, you know, Rasputin 2020.
Williamson and John Lennon.
Arcade Outpost says, most of the Democratic debate tonight, questions were, how will you best speed up demographic replacement?
I don't, I didn't hear that.
Maybe if you're a retarded wig nut you heard that, but I don't, I don't really, uh, get where you're coming from on that one.
Uh, let's see.
Jawaz says, got a free super chat, but don't eat it because $1,000 a month.
Well, thanks man, um, for the free super chat.
Fritz says, everyone else in the debate, um, uh, something, I can't, I don't know what you're trying to say there.
Joe Biden says, nani?
I don't know, I guess that's anime talk.
I don't know anime talk.
Evan Schaal says, was Yang threatened by the deep state or are Asians just too polite?
He's just a p-word.
He's just weak!
He just, uh, didn't have the balls.
That's all it is.
Fritz says, keep it up, big guy.
Thanks.
Unpossible says, these candidates have baby bird brains.
I mean, if any of them wins, sure, the first two to three years will be dope.
Just free money for days.
But USA is dead after.
USA's been dead for a minute, though.
So, uh, no, I don't think... we're not getting any money.
What are you talking about?
You think white people are getting any money?
Forget that.
Yeah, you're right about that.
You're definitely right about that.
Compared to someone like Obama, who at least was articulate.
Debate was a mess.
Democratic Party mess.
Yang canceled.
Yeah, you're right about that.
You're definitely right about that.
You know, the last competitive primary, at least Obama, you know, was compelling, was a good speaker.
In 2008, I think he fell off a little bit as years went on.
But he was very competent.
And, you know, I think even normies, middle of the road people could say that his message was compelling.
But you're right.
Now it's just a total freak show.
Dan D says, don't know how people that have been Dems their whole lives can get behind these candidates pandering to insane college shit libs hard.
I think it's a mistake.
Yeah, ultimately, I think you're right.
French carnivores is the poor black people victims of guns pee pee poo poo.
Yeah.
Well, we know what's going on there.
Top snacks is Marianne Williamson big cringe.
No, not cringe.
She's based.
Cuban says thanks for slapping RNC Maxwell on that the debate in that debate also F agenda 21 on agenda 21 person So, what are you a Marianne Williamson supporter?
FF says g'day mates.
You're watching Australia first.
My name is Nicholas J Fuentes We have a true blue great for you tonight bloody excited to be here tonight.
We're gonna talk about them bloody Lebo's I don't know what that is, but okay great Matty Freddy says even an extra dose of adrenochrome couldn't save Biden from Queen Kamala's righteous smackdown.
Yeah, all the adrenochrome and baby blood and other transfused fluids, they could not save him from that righteous racial retribution.
It was like Django Unchained.
Rhian says, Nick, I took your advice and bought $30 of liquid ass to drive away the five hobos in the park storm drain.
I'll make that storm drain into a sewer drain.
I'm glad that worked for you.
Elston says, can't believe Yang pooped the bed.
The dude literally imploded.
Now I advocate mom universal basic milk and cookies.
I think that's where we're going to have to go next.
That's our only refuge, right?
Honestly, though, after these two debates, Trump looks great, frankly.
After these two debates, I wasn't thrilled with Trump before, but you know, compared to these guys, I'm with him now.
Alberto Insalvini says, I can't watch any more of these.
It's a freak show.
Well, we don't have to worry about that for a little while, so we're good.
Medieval Dad says, R. The Donald is now quarantined on Reddit.
It's over for Blumpf.
Reddit is gay.
R. The Donald is lame and dumb.
Marshall says, yikes, boring and cringe debate.
Less soy pill, more egg pill.
Hell yeah, that's what was missing tonight, was the egg.
Where is the indispensable man?
Where is that egg?
Get me that egghead!
I think we all missed him tonight.
Yeah, she's gonna make me slam on the accelerator in one way.
Yeah, she's going to make me slam on the accelerator in one way.
V says press N for Nicker.
Okay, you can do that.
Nova says, do you think Yang will give in and give UBI to illegals?
No borders in UBI would have.
Nicker's sailing across the Atlantic to get in.
Some already have.
What a stupid, dumb question.
You should feel ashamed for even asking that.
What kind of idiot do you have to be after watching that debate to ask about Yang?
But when he becomes president and passes UBI, will he give it to illegals?
What are you, stupid?
Geez, I thought, you know, I heard the dumbest thing all night from, uh, from Marianne Williamson, but you just won the prize.
Logan S says, hey Nick.
Hey.
End White Guilt says, sorry about the vulgarity, but Jill O'Brien looks and talks like she's not used to... Okay, I'm not gonna read that.
That's very vulgar.
Get off the stage, dopey.
Yeah, I agree with that.
Facta says I'm all in favor of the most incendiary and POS, or paused.
It's not POS, it's paused.
Paused, Dem winning the primary, Biden getting pegged in public, but Kamala is okay with me.
Yeah, me too.
Call her mommy, says breed, suckle, or deport to Tel Aviv with Mommy Tulsi, Brittany Venti, and Ashley St.
unidentified
Clair.
nick fuentes
Uh, well, I would be deporting.
Hmm, this is interesting.
I'd be deporting Ashley St.
Clair, of course.
I think we would, uh, marry Mommy Tulsi and we would, uh, and we would, you know what, with Brittany Vencey.
I think that's how we'd have to do it.
Uh, but definitely deporting Ashley St.
Clair.
What a vapid whore.
Yeah, no thanks.
Want nothing to do with her.
She's getting shipped back to Israel.
And, uh, we'll do Mommy Tulsi for wife and Brittany Vencey for the hit and quit.
unidentified
No offense.
nick fuentes
Look, I have to rank it.
I'm answering the question honestly, all right?
It's nothing personal, all right, Brittany?
We like Brittany Venti on the show.
I get along with everybody, okay?
But, uh, you know, I think that's how we'd have to rank them up.
How can you compete with a mommy GF?
You can't.
She's a MILF.
What are you gonna do?
You can't win.
Froyo says, how after 2016 have they not learned to not say wild shit on TV or to say wild shit on TV?
My record shows that a country that works for everyone is so important.
Please clap.
Yeah, that's so true, right?
I guess it makes sense in the first debate to play it safe and maybe they'll go off the rails later.
You gotta understand it's only June, so there's a lot of race left.
Master of the Falcon says, hey Nick, what do you think about the oncoming 1000 years of darkness?
A dumb question, not answering it.
Not funny, didn't laugh.
David Sperner says, Yang is gay now.
They literally laughed at the bag.
Looks like we have no chance in nationalized neat life.
Great show, King.
Please start reading PayPal.
I don't want to want Google getting any of your money.
It's not really a practical way of doing it.
But yeah, it was pretty sad that he got laughed at.
I love when people go in.
You should change the way you do your show.
You should just ask questions like you're supposed to.
Josh Sears says, how about everybody just get in line?
How about I worry about the Super Chats and you worry about questions?
All right.
How's that?
How's that on for size?
Josh Sarah says, Yang equals whiteboard.
Totally crumpled and barely holding together.
Also made in China.
Yeah, very, very accurate analogy.
Totally true.
Totally destroyed, crumpled, off-balance, not prepared, and made in China.
Yeah, very true.
Wright Bowers says, at one point Buddha judge mentioned that he grew up next to a soy field.
Coincidence?
I think I'm noticing a pattern there, right?
A sodomite defending soy fields?
Imagine my shock, right?
Zoom says pineal gland cleansed.
Astral projecting with grandmommy.
Marianne tonight.
Souls interlinked.
Yes, big things are happening, definitely.
In the astral plane, in the cosmic realm, magical things are happening.
I think Marianne is really set to take the nation over by storm.
Pineal gland.
That's very funny.
That's a very funny.
These are the super chats that I enjoy and appreciate the ones that make me laugh that are funny Very, very well done, Zoom.
Congratulations.
Friendly Jew says you're made in China.
Whiteboard, is it really white?
Also do not point at whiteboard with a black stick, you degenerate.
What a stupid super chat.
Another one who should feel ashamed.
Fancy Pants has advised to raise my sons to be based.
I don't know.
I'm not a dad.
How should I know?
Take them to the south side of Chicago.
That's the easiest thing I could tell you.
You know, how do I make somebody based?
Dude, I don't know, man.
Just figure it out.
It's not hard.
But yeah, I would advise a field trip to Humboldt Park, Garfield Park.
Not on a weekend, not after dusk, but maybe just take them around.
Let them see what happens, you know?
Let them get uncomfortable.
Drive and go to a stoplight in one of those towns, in one of those neighborhoods, and just let them get uncomfortable.
Let them look around and feel fear.
And then I think, you know, very quickly they understand the relevant facts, right?
But Video Game Snakes has given me vindication for calling Biden weeks ago.
I don't remember that one.
Maybe you can post a clip.
Benjamin says watch Based Girls.
I don't know.
Und Panzer?
I don't know what that is.
Shemp says no chance that Julian Castro goes up because of Mexican-Latino vote and Beto Biden falling down top ten.
Remember, identity politics matter.
Again, the language of the show is English.
I want to make that very clear.
Yeah, no, Julian Castro will go up, but he's polling so low that I don't think it'll be really... I don't think it'll be substantial.
I don't think it'll be significant.
He'll go up, but I don't think he's in the top tier.
I just don't think he's really that competitive.
I might be proven wrong, but I think like Cory Booker, he'll be towards the bottom of the field regardless going forward.
But he'll go up.
I said that yesterday.
And yeah, I said Beto and Biden falling.
I said that.
I said Beto and Biden falling down.
You're not paying attention.
Machiavellian says... and whoops, I scrolled too far down there.
Machiavelli reborn says Kamala Warren ticket 2020.
I don't know if that would happen.
Maybe, but it's a little premature.
We don't know who's going to be at the top of the ticket, let alone.
Why do people always want to rush these things, you know?
Can't you just be comfortable with the fact that we're in the race?
There's a lot of time left.
A lot of things have yet to happen.
Warren, here's 2020.
I don't know, dude.
We literally just finished the second debate, which is the first debate, two hours ago or an hour ago.
All right, pump the brakes.
We'll see what happens.
Luder McChicken says bottom text.
Yeah.
Video Game Snakes says Beto over Tulsi.
She'll do better in the second debate.
Again, don't know.
Beto's definitely out.
I don't think he's competitive anymore.
Tulsi is not competitive at this point.
And it remains to be seen if this surge that she had will materialize in the polling.
I don't really believe it, but we'll see.
Josh Saris says, Nick, I believe a few weeks ago I predicted Joe Biden would die this campaign cycle.
Fairly certain we saw that happen tonight.
Vindicated?
Well, I believe you meant he would die like physically, you know, biologically.
Cease to live.
And I still think that might happen because he's getting up there.
But definitely the campaign is in trouble here.
I don't know.
I don't know if it's over for him completely yet.
Again it's very early we have to stress it's very early we're not it's February 3rd is the first contest and then you have a whole primary season and then you have a convention and then you have a nominee that's over a year away so he's still got money still got name recognition there's a lot of time a lot of time for him to recover from this So I don't think he's out yet, but certainly this is a big blow that's been dealt to him.
It changes the whole dynamic of the race, but he's not out yet.
Gooey says, how you doing Epic Gamer?
I'm tired dude.
I'm tired.
I'm hungry.
I'm irritable.
I'm pissed off.
This debate was painful to watch.
And, uh, I'd like to just get over and have my scrambled eggs at the diner.
I'm ready to, I'm ready to check out, all right?
But, uh, but I'm doing okay.
Brandon Hanson says, Yang doesn't have samurai blood running through his veins.
He has soy sauce.
What a shame.
P.S.
Don't bad talk mommy, Tulsi, or else I'll bomb Iran.
Yeah, it's true.
Yang does not have the samurai spirit.
Very critical ethnic difference, and it makes all the difference, ultimately.
I'm not criticizing mommy.
I'm just saying that I don't think that that those polling numbers are what people said they were You know people are saying oh, she's blowing away all the polls She blew away an unscientific online drudge poll really and she was number one in Google Trends big whip So's Andrew Yang, and he sucked it up big So I doubt it I don't think.
I don't think it works.
It's clear that that message does not appeal beyond the internet and young people.
They laughed at him, so I think that kind of says it all.
But if he really did a good UBI presentation, he could do a lot better, but it just the delivery was so bad.
Gooey says, my Nikka hurry fix the headphone hair.
Yeah, I know I got headphone hair.
What can I do?
I only have so much time to prepare between the debate and now.
Good Sender says, Phil 413 and God bless the Nikker Nation.
Well, thanks.
Video Game Snakes says, Warlord Williamson is going to ban autism vaccines.
I know she's gonna do it.
She will bring the country back to the light.
She'll bring the country back to Thoth and the What are they called?
The Anunnaki?
Marianne Williamson will reunite us with the fallen ones, with the fallen Anunnaki race.
She will raise Thule.
She will raise Atlantis from the sea.
She will raise the consciousness to a higher dimension.
I can see this happening in my third eye.
She is aligning the chakras.
You remember dragon energy?
I think she's actualizing it finally, so.
Very esoteric wisdom being on display tonight.
Most people couldn't get it, but people that are in the know, people that are in tune to these things, we understand what happened.
A cosmic shift in energy, very substantial.
A disturbance in the universe.
ASDF says the 2016 Republican rule where candidates got to respond if their name was mentioned was probably also part of making the debates more interesting.
Yeah, and they should have done that tonight, but they basically operated that way, but The incentive wasn't there because it wasn't explicitly said.
You know, if that incentive was there, that if you get mentioned, then you get a chance to respond.
The incentive is to name people and to attack people.
So that didn't happen.
And as a result, it was boring and lame.
LR says, will the superdelegates save Biden's sleepy corpse?
They could, but it's again, very premature.
We don't even know where the, where the unbound delegates are at or the bound delegates.
unidentified
Why?
nick fuentes
Why are people like this?
Will the superdelegates save him?
Will Yang give amnesty?
Or will he give UBI to illegals?
Will Warren and Harris 2020?
It's June.
At this time in the last election, they didn't even have the first debate.
Not even all the candidates had announced yet.
And that was a very early primary.
That was a very premature primary.
So peop- It's like, chill!
Relax!
We have a lot of race left!
There's plenty of time to speculate on these things, but it's too early.
Premature nibbas be like, sheesh.
Knock-a-jar-it-holds-a-Spanish-is-cancelled-cringiest-language agreed.
James Russell says Tulsi did a good job yesterday but Yang effed up hard even though Google searches and Drudge can be argued she compared to Yang did a good job.
Well, that's not saying literally anything at all because Yang had a horrible the worst performance between both debates.
Worst than Swalwell.
Worst than Tim Ryan.
Worst than Hickenlooper.
Worst than Inslee.
You're saying Tulsi had better than Yang?
She had better because Yang had the worst performance by far in both nights.
So, well, but compared to Yang, she did a good job.
That's saying nothing.
According to the net, and even pissed off the blue checkmark journalists.
Well, that's not hard at all.
So, you know, this James Russell's guy, consistently with bad takes, but you know, thanks.
Well, she did better than the worst guy out of all of them.
Oh, that's huge.
That's, that's, well, I guess she'll take it all the way to the top.
In a 20-person contest, she did better than the worst person.
I guess she's ascending.
She's rising quickly.
I like mommy.
I'm with you.
I love mommy.
All right.
I want her to make cookies and keep us safe from the neocons and all that.
But you know, a drudge poll, Google Trends, this does not a race make.
The predicted numbers, she's not even competitive there.
And everywhere else, I didn't see, you know, even just watching the performance, I wasn't blown away.
So I don't see it.
I just don't see it.
Dr. YT says here, okay.
America First says, I just hope Arian Egghead makes it to the next debate.
LOL, but in all honesty, great job tonight.
Love to see the audience grow.
Zoomers rising up.
Well, thanks man.
Yeah, it's been a pretty good and productive past couple of nights, right?
I'm the real winner of the debates.
Because America First is doing well.
So that works.
It works for me.
Casey Alexander says, it'll be Biden with Harris's VP.
Okay, can we just... I know people don't like these jokes.
People don't like the joke, but can we just, like... Can we just... Really?
Why?
Why do we have to do this?
Oh, you can see the drawer.
I was confused what this was.
Seriously, how many times do we have to say it?
It'll be Biden with Harris's VP locking up the average Joe in black vote.
Boom!
Goodbye, blump, and hello to the coming anarchy.
Yeah, okay.
A little premature.
Are ye aware, says Harris, America doesn't want a food fight?
Proceeds to teleport behind Biden.
Yeah, that was pretty funny.
She says, let's stop fighting, and then she just slit his throat.
Very epic.
George says, don't give up on gang.
He will shine during the next debate.
Mark my words.
Well, he very well may recover.
But we have one debate so far.
This is what we have to go off of.
So, and it was horrible.
Uh, Cranks says, Nick, I have a confession.
I don't know Yang.
Okay.
Shem says, congrats on 8,000 D live viewers tonight.
Great show.
Well, thanks man.
Fancy Pants says, uh, I can't read that.
Zoom says, Blumpf cancelled.
America First cancelled.
Yang cancelled.
Welcome to Astral America.
Welcome to the Astral Realm First.
I'm your host, Anunnaki.
I am your host, the Ascended One, the Ancient One.
I'm your host, the Lost One.
And we have a great broadcast for you tonight.
This evening, we are talking about crystals.
This evening, we are talking about the Earth's mantle and the crystals that lie within.
Tonight, we are talking about alchemy.
Josias' granny brings the cookies, mommy brings the milk.
Hell yeah, baby!
Mommy, grandmommy, 2020.
Tulsi, now that's a ticket I can get behind.
You want me to give my prediction?
I think it's Gabbard-Williamson, 2020.
And it's grandmommy and mommy stepping up to the plate, and they're gonna take care of us.
Anon says, if you really want to clear out hobos, zip tie a Febreze handle down and toss it like a flashbang in the sewer.
The sick sick, chic six, sheep's sick.
Another tongue twister, very nice.
Videogamesnakes says, Nick and mommy sitting in the tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G.
We are not!
We are not!
We are not.
I just like her like a friend, okay?
Josue?
It's Josue.
Says, Yang will do better next time.
Okay, yeah, we'll see.
Let's see, what else?
Nick Fuentes says, can't wait till my president gets butt blasted.
Yeah, that's gonna be great.
Can't wait until Chasten and Pete are in the Oval Office having gay anal sex in the White House.
Isn't that gonna be great?
Isn't that gonna be great for the country?
You know what that means, right?
I mean, they say, first gay president.
I'm okay with that.
That's progressive.
You know what that means, right?
Having gay anal sex in the White House.
And you know Barack Obama was probably doing that.
He's gay, but like now they're not even lying about it.
Now it's like they're advertising it.
Yeah, we're gonna sodomize each other in the White House.
I'm gonna sodomize my husband Chasten in the Oval Office.
What kind of country do we live in, you know?
Not to be crude, but that's what it is.
That's what it is.
What do you think they're talking about when they talk about love who you love and choose who you marry?
What do you think that means?
That's all code for that.
Hate to be the one to say it, but it's what it is.
It's not these cutesy, oh hi Chastin, hi Pete, look at our dogs.
It's not that.
It's something way grosser and more depraved.
But yeah, that's gonna be great.
I can't wait to have the first man, Chastin, the first gentleman, Chastin Buttigieg, in the White House.
That's gonna be epic.
That's gonna be great for our country.
Brett says, the defective human product known as John Bolton and the fat idiot known as Mike Pompeo must go.
Agree.
Adam says, who do you see as a possible team from the Democrat crew as president and VP?
Kamala and Booker were in sync with the Smollett incident.
Dude, I have no idea.
Was anybody talking about Mike Pence?
Was Mike Pence even running in 2016?
Why?
Why?
Why do we have to do it this way?
Why do people need this?
We will see how it plays out.
We will see what the teams look like, and they'll be based on pragmatism and like nothing else.
So I could see any combination working.
It could be Biden and Harris.
It could be Harris and Buttigieg.
I don't know, man.
We don't know.
We don't know who the nominee is gonna be.
We don't know who number one and two are.
We know who the top six are, and that's it.
And we'll see what happens.
There's a lot that needs to happen.
Primaries, caucuses, debates, fundraising, events, media.
I mean, there's a lot that has to happen.
The convention!
So, I have no idea who the vice president will be.
I have no idea what the ticket will look like.
The race is wide open at this point.
Let's see Tyler says when mommy Tulsi will never take 20 minutes making your late-night Baskin-Robbins milky with a meek very sorry my friend Yeah, that's funny a little reference to one of our late-night streams.
I know she'll be quick with it She knows her way around the blender Primal says, did you see Owen's clip, Politically Correct College?
I believe it was inspired by your amazing debate.
No, I didn't see that.
Fancy Pants says, love all the knickers.
Yeah.
Temple Drake says, marry Tiffany Trump, knock Kushner off his throne, and run this country.
It's all so simple.
I don't know if it's even worth it.
Tiffany Trump, have you seen her?
No, thanks.
I know why they went after Ivanka, right?
She's the good-looking one.
Yolts says, R.I.P.
unidentified
the bag.
nick fuentes
How sad.
Yeah, pretty disappointing.
Let's see.
VideoGameSnakes says, do you do like your brother Etika?
Yeah, okay.
HonkLivesMatter says, day one of being president, they sit you down and tell you you'll be JFK'd if you do anything to actually make a difference, like build a wall.
That's why nothing changes.
Yeah, you know what the president is told on day one.
HonkLivesMatter.
Yeah, you know what happens.
Treader says, great viewership.
Permanent D live switch?
No.
I don't trust their TOS, but you know, maybe.
I don't know.
We'll see.
Probably not.
Technology Badges, I can't decide if Kamala Harris looks more like Jar Jar Binks or the Grasshopper from Bugs Life.
Neither?
Honestly, I don't see it.
Technology Bad says, Marianne Williamson, yeah, I'm thinking mommy mode.
Okay, I'm getting sick of the joke at this point.
Anon says, Nick, that was literally the hardest tongue twister according to the Guinness Book of World Records.
Jesus Christ, verbal master, undefeated, pee-pee-poo-poo.
What can I say?
I'm the best.
I'm good at doing this, okay?
Video Game Snakes says, Williamson will begin third impact.
She's an angel!
Now that's a funny, okay, now that's a good super chat.
Very true.
Now that's who we have to look out for.
We have to look out for Williamson completing the Human Instrumentality Project and making all souls one.
It's all over if she ever gets to the core of NERV, if she ever gets to NERV headquarters, right?
Brandon says, Hey Nick, what kind of cookies do you think Tulsi will make in the White House kitchen when she's president?
I'd hope for peanut butter.
Well, I like oatmeal, raisin, oatmeal, chocolate chip.
I got a hair in my mouth.
I like the oatmeal cookies.
I like plain chocolate chip.
Let me think, what else?
I like the ones, do you know the ones where they have a chocolate chip in the middle?
It's a sugar cookie and a chocolate chip in the middle.
I don't know, there's a lot of fine cookies out there.
I know she'll make the right selection.
Maybe something exotic because she's from Hawaii.
I know she'll make the right choice.
I trust mommy.
Mustafa says Daddy Nick lectures the kids on patience.
I feel like a dick to do it, but it's like, give me a break!
I've given you so much!
Well, who do you think the president's gonna be?
Who do you think?
It's like, we're very early on here, you know?
I'll crank faster.
Says, I think I speak for all your viewers when I say they were really sorry for jumping the gun and speculating too much.
I think you're right.
I think you do speak for everybody.
Apology accepted.
Apology accepted.
I forgive you.
No, I'm being a little too hardcore, but I'm just you maybe you can forgive me why my my patience is so short tonight after this debate and I've been on here for like three hours and I'm like hungry and After all that bullshit these people put me through on the debate, I'm like, I just, I have no patience anymore.
Having to sit through, yeah, we'd make illegal immigration legal, and yeah, we support abortion, and all this nonsense.
So I'm running a little low.
Please do forgive me if I'm coming off as a little bit hardcore.
Josh Sears says we need a complete and total shutdown on spirits coming from the astral realm Until we can figure out what the hell is going on completely agreed Marianne Williamson is calling for a complete and total shutdown of The ghost zone until we can figure out what the hell is going on Isn't that what they called it in Danny Phantom the ghost zone?
Wasn't that what they called it?
unidentified
Let me check Ghost Zone.
nick fuentes
That's what it's called, right?
Yeah.
Marianne Williamson is calling for a complete and total shutdown of the Ghost Zone until we can figure out what the hell is going on.
Yeah, she's, uh, that's a pretty funny joke.
The Marianne Williams stuff will never get less funny to me.
I think that's too hilarious.
Videogamesnakes says, Mommy Tulsi more like Daddy Buttigieg.
Yikes, bro.
Highly cringe.
Disavow.
We don't even know... We don't even know what's going on there, frankly.
I would imagine the one running for president would have to be...
On top, but we don't even know.
We don't even know.
Maybe they're, maybe they switch.
I don't know.
But I would say that that's, but I disavow either way.
Gross.
Mommies and grandmommies.
None of that weird, creepy stuff.
Evan Green says, and either way, they're not cowboys, right?
So even if, even if we were going to go there, it's like we're not going there with, you know, that, right?
Evan Green, if we were going to go there, we'd go there with cowboys, right?
Evan Green says that's, it's all, it's all jokes, by the way.
It's all ironic.
I don't know.
That's a good question.
I don't talk to many boomers.
I'd probably say mowing the lawn.
My dad gets really mad at me when I don't mow the lawn the right way.
Or at least he used to.
He would always say, you gotta go out and do a good job.
When you mow the lawn, that's a reflection on who you are.
The way that you mow the lawn is a reflection on your work ethic.
That's your stamp on the lawn.
And if you don't do a good job, that reflects poorly on you.
So I would go out and I'd half ass or whatever.
I wouldn't do the weed whacker and he'd give me a...
You give me hell about that.
Go out there and finish and be proud of the work that you do.
Okay, dad.
Yeah, that's great.
Why even bother?
Grass grows, it gets cut.
Can't I just do it like tomorrow, you know?
So I think that pisses him off.
My dad does this to me all the time.
He's always on his phone.
I'm the one who doesn't do it.
I'll be out to breakfast with my dad, and he's on his phone.
And the thing about my dad, which is even more amazing, is he doesn't even talk to you when he's on your phone.
He just completely ignores you, which is incredible.
Right?
I mean, generally he's engaged, but he'll get on the phone at various times, and when he's on the phone, it's so obnoxious because he just gets in the zone.
And I'm probably like that too, but with him it's like, you literally just, it's like, hey, so blah blah blah, you know, you're talking to him, and just silence.
Until he, and then, oh, I'm sorry, what did you say?
So that to me, it's with him, it's the reverse, that annoys me with him.
I find that I, and even if I am on the phone, it's, I'm more responsive, I guess you could say.
So I would say the lawn mowing, that's really a pet peeve for the baby boomer.
My father's barely a boomer, he's right on the cusp.
Fancypants says you look tired.
Yeah, I am tired.
I've been my sleep schedule has been a mess Temujin says I may be switching my vote from yang leader to Miami to mommy gang leader to mommy.
Yeah, me too Let's see.
Random says, Nick, this is your mom.
It's past your bedtime.
That's so funny.
Brandon Hanson says, booty judge is definitely a power bottom.
All right, I don't want to think about it.
Disavow.
Yolts says, the astrally projected wall just got 10 feet higher.
Yes, the astral defenses just got 10 microns deeper.
Some nonsensical unit.
They just got 10 midichlorians denser.
The astral shield protecting our dimension just got 10 micro units, just got 10 astral units higher, just got more ascended, right?
Josh Sayre says, if Nick stays on the stream any longer, his soul will vacate his body into the ghost zone.
I'm going away.
I'm going ghost.
Sam wants a Tesla, says Obelisk and Temple of Zeus in DC.
Are you really surprised they want to kill babies?
Still not sure if I live in a computer simulation or hell.
Probably the latter.
CrankFaster says, how can you continue to be a free market shill after learning that Steve Hillenburg wanted to end Spongebob after the first movie but Nickelodeon's greed made them ruin it?
I'm not a free market shill.
I'm in favor of big government.
Generic guy says, are you gonna have a 420 premium special when it becomes legal in Illinois in 2019?
Probably not.
We're not in favor of weed.
So, oh great, more super chats.
Josh Sears is going ghost mode.
Yeah, we got to go ghost mode in a minute.
I'm gonna go ghost mode after the show, if you know what I mean.
I'm gonna be going ghost.
I'm gonna become Casper the ghost.
No, I'm kidding.
Those are all jokes.
Just total comical.
I mean, I will go ghost and come back, of course, and, you know, be alive still.
That's what I mean.
No, but that's gonna do it for us.
We have to cut it off.
That's our last super chat that we've received.
So that's gonna do it for us on the show tonight.
Remember to check us out.
NicholasJFuentes.com slash membership to become a premium member.
Only five bucks a month if you like what you see.
That's the best way to support our show monetarily.
We're 100% viewer funded and you do get the extra content, so be sure to sign on there.
Link is down below.
NicholasJFuentes.com slash membership.
Remember to subscribe to the channel.
Give us a big thumbs up.
Leave a comment down below.
Click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
Remember, we are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
Central, 8 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time.
I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes, as always.
Thank you guys for watching, thanks for the superchats, thanks to our premium members, thanks to everybody that has watched our coverage of the first 2019 Democratic presidential primary debates.
It's been fun, but tomorrow we will be back to our usual format, 7 o'clock, Central Time sharp, not a moment sooner, just like always, we'll be back to our normal routine of being at 7 o'clock, Sharp tomorrow normal schedule, but like I said, thanks for everybody that's watched us on D live watch us on YouTube We appreciate it.
It's been fun.
It's been big and exciting.
But we'll see you tomorrow.
Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
America First!
Export Selection