Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 11, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

02:04:04

Lauren Southern Producers BUSTED for Sabotage | America First Ep. 403

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:45:27

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		music
		music
		music music music music music music music music music music
		music music music music music music music music music music music music
		music music music music music music music music music
		Thank you.
		Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall.
		Wall. Wall. Wall.
		Thank you.
		wall.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		Thank you.
		Wall. Wall.
		Wall.
		Wall.
		Thank you.
		wall americanism not globalism will be our credo Amen.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America first. America first.
		America first.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening, everybody.
		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you this week, Monday, feeling a little bit better.
		Feeling a little bit better, still a little bit under the weather, of course.
		We missed our show on Friday.
		Due to... due to illness.
		Due to sickness.
		But I'm back!
		And we've got another great week of content ahead of us.
		We're already excited!
		We got a great show tonight.
		Lots to talk about.
		Big scandal is the story tonight.
		We'll be looking at a big piece that dropped in Dangerous.com by Miley Yiannopoulos, who, you know, we're not on great terms with, but he wrote a pretty long article about some things that are going on in the alt-light.
		Now normally we have problems with the alt-right, lately we've been having problems with the alt-right, but a big piece dropped today, like I said, in Dangerous.com, talking about Lauren Southern, or better known as her real name, Lauren Simonson's two producers.
		Her two homosexual producers, who are partners, and apparently, detailed in, it must have been a 200-page article, alright, I mean it's like a novel that was written, but detailed in this article are all sorts of claims that these two producers have basically been sabotaging the right-wing scene for about two years.
		And this comes in the form of financial fraud, aiding and abetting our enemies in the form of an NGO called Hope Not Hate, among many, many other shady dealings.
		And she'll be talking about the article.
		I'm going to give you the reader's digest, okay?
		Thank me later!
		If you've read the article so far, or attempted to read it, or if you've seen it, you'll thank me later.
		I woke up today, Afternoon, as I usually do.
		Well, because I'm sick, okay?
		I had to get a good night's sleep, and so I woke up today.
		I start reading this article in bed, and I'm just scrolling like, how long is this?
		I had to pick it up later, because I probably spent like a half hour reading this thing, and it wasn't even finished.
		So you'll thank me later.
		I'll give you the Reader's Digest.
		All right, I'll give you the summary about what goes on in the article.
		I'll give you my takes about it.
		There's a lot to discuss there, but I'll say at the outset, Can everybody tell me, can anybody tell me what I'm probably going to say tonight?
		For the people in the cheap seats, does anybody want to remind me?
		Can I get a little phrase in chat?
		What are we going to say?
		What do we always say?
		What do I have to say every day on the show?
		And nobody listens!
		One and a half year ago, years ago, what did we debate about within the right-wing community?
		There was a little war that went on over whom exactly?
		Over e-girls?
		What do we say about them?
		Hello?
		How many times do I have to say it?
		And here we are, we've arrived today, finally.
		It seems like it's literally every single one.
		Every single time it's the same problem.
		Right?
		So I'll be answering a few very important questions tonight.
		You know, some burning questions that have haunted civilization maybe since the beginning of time, right?
		I'm thinking of three questions in particular, all right?
		And we're gonna get to all of them and we will answer them, you know?
		It's more of the same, right?
		More of the same.
		What did we say last week?
		Immigrants...
		No, I'm kidding.
		We love immigrants.
		I'm just kidding.
		That's just a joke, by the way.
		Remember, YouTube's new terms of services.
		We salute you.
		We love those guys.
	But, you know, mass migration.
	Yikes!
	And ladies, yikes!
	Big Mac, it seems to be the only redeeming thing going around, right?
	And what else is new, right?
	Same shoes, different socks, is what it is on America First.
	We'll be looking at that article.
	I'll give you a summary.
	I'll give you my takes.
	And, you know, and I'll just say we have to be fair.
	We have to be fair.
	We're still awaiting a rebuttal from the party's name.
	So I will be fair and balanced.
	Fair and balanced on America First, as always.
	We are gonna, you know, we're gonna look at the article.
	I'll give you my takes.
	And we wait for the response from the parties involved.
	But it's pretty damning.
	Some pretty damning stuff in there.
	So we'll talk about that.
	We'll be talking about the tariff deal with Mexico.
	You know, they always find a way to disappoint.
	We talked about this last week and also the week before.
	I think it was not last Friday but the Friday before we talked about President Trump's threat of the tariffs.
	He tweeted out, or maybe it was a Thursday, He tweeted out that he was going to put a 5% tariff on all goods coming into America from Mexico on June 10th.
	Well, it's June 10th, and there's no tariffs.
	Now, they say that they reached a deal on Friday.
	The deadline for that threat was Friday.
	Even though Friday was not June 10th, he had to have signed an order authorizing the tariffs that would have went into effect, should have went into effect on Monday, but they say that they reached a deal with the Mexican government.
	There was this last minute thing that was put together where basically Mexico agreed, they conceded to a few important provisions, and now they alleged on Friday that they had made a deal and therefore we didn't need the tariffs anymore.
	So the president tweeted out on Friday that the threat of tariffs is suspended, no tariffs going on in Mexico.
	Well, we find out today, we find out today that that deal seems like a bunch of bulls.
	Seems like all the things that we talked about in the deal last week, it's either had already been agreed to, isn't exactly what they said it was, there's disagreement about what they promise now, and we'll get into all of that.
	But leave it to this administration to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
	I have to tell you, because on Thursday when we last spoke about this, I was excited.
	I said, you know what?
	Maybe I misjudged.
	Maybe my skepticism, my cynicism, maybe I was wrong about all that.
	Because you remember initially I said, after tariffs were threatened last month and countless times before that and never followed through on, I have no conviction.
	I am not encouraged or optimistic that this time will be any different.
	And so I said at the outset, what you'll probably see is just a complete back down on the tariffs.
	Now last week, so that was two weeks ago, last week I said, well, it seems like a deal has come together.
	It seems like Mexico has agreed to something resembling this third safe country rule.
	It seems like Mexico has agreed to expand the presence of National Guards there.
	There's something about buying agricultural products.
	It seems like Trump has been able to push them to a good deal with the threat of tariffs.
	We find out three days later not all it's cracked up to be.
	So we'll get into that and then we'll also be talking about this new document from the Vatican which is actually nice to see on gender and perfect timing as well.
	I think it shows that the Catholic faith is still the only faith It's the only one that's truly fighting globalism.
	It's the only one that we can seek refuge in.
	I know there's going to be some people that are going to say, Oh, but Pope Francis, Pope Francis, he kissed the feet of that Sudanese resistance leader and the migrants and this kind of thing.
	But we'll talk about this new document that was published in the middle of Pride Month.
	Beautiful.
	Talking about and affirming the traditional genders, the traditional gender roles, And so we'll get into that as well.
	And it should be a pretty packed show.
	But before we get into the news, I do have to tell you a little update.
	I just finished uploading and posting a brand new premium show.
	So for all my premium members, there's a brand new two-hour double feature show available on the website nicholasjfuentes.com
	Where we talk about the National Conservatism Conference, that's what the bulk of the show is about, is about this new conference that, I think we've gotten into this a little bit in the Super Chats last week, but this new conference that was announced by Yoram Hazony and David Braug is the other guy who's involved with this, and they're putting on the National Conservatism Conference where they've got all kinds of great speakers, it's taking place in July,
	In this episode I took a look, I peeled back the layers at who exactly is involved in this, where the money's coming from, who they're associated with, what the game is here, because there is a game being played.
	There's definitely something that they're not telling you about the conference.
	So I went into that in great detail and then I also went into The New York Times article that came out over the weekend about this Caleb Cain character.
	It actually ended up being pretty serendipitous because we had covered Caleb Cain's initial video where he said, I was in the alt-right and now I'm leaving and condemning the far-right and all this.
	We had covered that video on the previous premium show even though it was like a few months after the video had been published.
	And now this weekend we had the New York Times article about that guy released.
	So we went into that article, we looked at how many times it contradicted itself.
	It was just ridiculous, you know.
	Just as one example, so the article is about one of these former alt-right people.
	A lot of stories like that lately.
	Uh, named Caleb Cain.
	He got sucked into the far-right YouTube scene and, you know, the usual story that we hear about this.
	And there's one part in the article where they say how ContraPoints and people like Stephen Bonnell and what they're calling Bread Twitter or Bread YouTube or something, this like left-wing response to the alt-right and far-right YouTube presence is like, it's still fledgling.
	It's still growing slowly.
	And it was incredible because the comparison they made in the article is between ContraPoints and Stefan Molyneux.
	And they said, well, ContraPoints only has 600,000 subscribers, which pales in comparison to Stefan Molyneux.
	But if you break down the engagement, it's like ContraPoints blows him out of the water.
	So that was just like one out of about a thousand examples in that article of how the people in the New York Times are just openly lying about this algorithm stuff, former alt-right, all this stuff.
	But anyway, we cover that extensively on The Premium Show.
	Do check it out.
	Remember, nicholasjfuentes.com slash membership to sign up.
	And you got, you know, over 20 episodes.
	I think that was our 24th episode.
	And a few of them are over two hours.
	So you're getting a lot of content, so be sure to check that out.
	Gotta shill!
	We gotta shill because now we're under the gun by YouTube, right?
	Demonetization threat with the super chats.
	So we gotta prop up the premiums.
	I have to do it, you know?
	But you shouldn't blame me.
	Once we get into the Lauren Simons and stuff, you're not gonna blame me for shilling premium members.
	You'll say, well, you know, that's better than the alternative with all these other people, right?
	So that's the premium show.
	Also on my personal condition, I don't know if I sound any better tonight.
	I said on Thursday that I sounded sick and I watched the show and I didn't sound sick at all, but I sound sick to myself.
	I don't know if it's because I have like pressure in my ears or I don't know what's going on.
	I'm still a little bit under the weather.
	I do apologize.
	We canceled a little bit late on Friday, but like I said, I think You know, right when I started this show, my voice was just, like, gone on Friday, you know?
	Usually when I say I'm sick, it's like I'm throwing up, it's like I had a 10-item meal from Wendy's at 4am and I'm, like, you know, dying on the couch or something.
	But on Friday, I legitimately, like, couldn't talk without coughing and all this.
	So I just said I'll spare the audience.
	We'll just come back on Monday.
	So I hope you didn't miss me too much.
	We are back today, and we're going to lead with the Lauren Southern story, I think, because it's the most fascinating to me.
	I know you're dying to hear about it.
	Everybody wants to hear the latest E-Drama.
	I know that's that is always The tendency of this toxic community.
	It's all about the drama, right?
	It's all about the hearsay and the he said, she said.
	But, you know, that's what drives the content forward, you know?
	We ask for weeks and weeks.
	Can something happen?
	And I'm not about to turn away a great story, right?
	So I'll be looking at this.
	Like I said, it was an article that dropped on Dangerous.com, which is Milo Yiannopoulos' website.
	The article was written by him.
	The article is called, Say Farewell to the Klepto Queens of the British Far Right.
	Like I said, the article is very, very long.
	You could read it if you wanted to.
	I don't know why you would want to.
	I'm about to cover all the important details.
	Really, it is sufficient to read the first three to four paragraphs, which is what we're about to do.
	But I have to tell you, I opened up my Twitter today.
	I opened up my phone, and I'm checking all my notifications, and I start reading this thing, and I'm like, have I been reading this thing for my whole life?
	Am I 40 years old now?
	Is it like in 2001 A Space Odyssey, and now I turn, and I'm at the foot of the bed, and then I turn, and then I'm in the bed, and I'm a thousand years old?
	Because I feel like I've been reading this thing It's like 10,000 words, you know.
	Talk about, can we trim the fat, right?
	But so the article basically talks about, to set up the story for you, these two producers who were working for Lauren Southern.
	So if you know Lauren Southern, or you know her real name, Lauren Simonson, She's been a content creator, and she's been around the right-wing scene longer than me.
	I don't know the exact timetable, but she's been around for a few years.
	I believe she got her start on Rebel Media.
	She's Canadian.
	Rebel Media is like a Canadian right-wing internet outlet, internet publication, and she was part of this initial crop of talent on The Rebel, which included, it was like her, it was Gavin McInnes, it was a few other people, Faith Goldie, friend of the show, you know, she was on there.
	She was part of that initial that initial class I guess you could call it on rebel of early talent that have since gone on to do better things and she moved from being more of a creator like Faith Goldie and like myself more of a conventional content creator in the past couple of years to doing these documentaries and since she took a break to do the documentaries from her normal vlogging and you know political type content or college campus speaking and
	She hired these two homosexual guys, also from The Rebel, named Kalen Robertson and his partner, whose name is George Lulin or something.
	It's in here.
	George Lulin John.
	I'm not familiar with the husband or the partner.
	Whatever you want to call it.
	But so she brings on these two producers.
	They're both gay.
	They're both British.
	They're from the rebel.
	It's rather, I think, they're Irish.
	But it's Caelan and it's George Llewellyn and they embark.
	They film her documentary for her.
	I guess they do work for the rebel.
	They do work for InfoWars and all these other people.
	And we look back now two years later at all these leaked emails, text messages, documents, invoices, testimony from people involved, interviews, phone calls, all kinds of copious evidence that has been gathered over a considerable amount of time.
	And we paint a picture of the last two years basically of a movement that has been infiltrated.
	These two people have embedded themselves in the movement as people that are, I guess, somewhat competent with a camera and with the microphone and with production.
	They have embedded themselves.
	They've made themselves important and made people depend on them in the conservative scene, particularly in Britain and Canada, but also in other places.
	And they have used that position basically to exploit the whole movement for money, to commit financial fraud basically, and also do a host of other nefarious things.
	And I'll read you the article here.
	It spells out, like I said, in the first few paragraphs, it spells out basically the whole story.
	It also lists some of these misdeeds.
	And I'll give my take on this.
	So the article reads, this is the sub-headline.
	It's pretty lengthy.
	So the article, Say Farewell to the Klepto Queens of the British Far Right.
	Sub-headline reads, two gay video producers stole tens of thousands of dollars from Tommy Robinson to fund shopping sprees, lavish dinners, and champagne-fueled parties in London's most expensive zip codes, say a string of witnesses.
	They endangered conservative celebrities by leaking security information to Antifa, That's your sub headline.
	with progressive journalists to cook up damaging stories about right-wing media figures.
	Former colleagues say their boss, Lauren Southern, knew about everything they were doing and encouraged them.
	That's your sub-headline, so pretty lengthy, but I'll read you, like I said, the first few paragraphs here of this expose.
	It says, quote, if you've ever donated to Tommy Robinson, the British free speech and anti-Islamist activist dubbed the backbone of Britain by Steve Bannon, there's a fair chance your money didn't end up paying for his tour bus or security guards, but was instead diverted to pay for champagne-fueled gay soirees.
	and some of London's most expensive zip codes.
	The culprits, a homosexual couple who produced both of Lauren Southern's documentary films and who last month released their own movie, You Can't Watch This, about free speech.
	More than a dozen former co-workers, friends, and acquaintances say Caitlin Robertson and George Lulon John bragged to them about these and other betrayals, thefts, frauds, and sabotages, including a secret years-long collaboration with a George Soros-funded far-left activist group that endangered the lives of Gavin McInnes, this reporter, so that's Milo, and Tommy Robinson himself, Leaked documents revealed here for the first time confirm many of the claims.
	And these are the claims.
	This is the last part I'll read from the article.
	It says, we found that the pair stole Bitcoin worth $20,000 from Tommy Robinson while the activist was in jail to fund their jet-set lifestyle, booked a luxury Airbnb and bought six bottles of expensive champagne on Tommy Robinson's wife's credit card, swapped camera equipment worth thousands of dollars for secondhand models they found on eBay, worked with Hope Not Hate, an Antifa-affiliated far-left organization for years,
	Defrauded Alex Jones with inflated expense claims, risked the life of Tommy Robinson by sharing his location with Hope Not Hate, risked the life of Gavin McGinnis by sharing his travel itinerary with the same group, circulated a fake email leak about Miley Yiannopoulos doxing his husband while being paid by Yiannopoulos' tour operator for PR work, defrauded Lauren Southern with inflated invoices while being paid by her to produce a documentary,
	Defrauded rental companies by failing to return equipment and returning inferior models and broken units.
	Made a fake rape claim against a far-left activist.
	Bragged about having TV shows canceled with bogus suicide threats.
	Doctored their clients videos to embarrass them.
	Gloated about their exploits while showering far-left activists with gifts, food, and drinks at London's most expensive hotels.
	So it's a hefty... that's quite the rap sheet.
	Southern who laughed and egged them on.
	And last but not least, disavowed Southern and Robinson when we challenged them about their crimes, claiming they'd been radicalized by the far right online.
	So it's a hefty, that's quite the rap sheet.
	A little bit embellished, I think, in some areas.
	But basically, I think the claims that we can, I think, narrow down and, you know, we can sort of distill this into something manageable.
	Basically, it's a broad record of financial fraud, which we'll get into some of the details there, endangering the lives of people with this relationship with this organization called Hope Not Hate.
	And then the last act, which seems to be when they were called on these two broad crimes, these two categories, they then reached out to journalists and claimed that they had been a part of the far-right and were radicalized.
	But now I've been de-radicalized and would like to tell their story!
	So it's just like the Caleb Cain article I talked about on the premium show and at the top of the show.
	So these are really the three categories here and basically it is no surprise for people that have been watching this show, this program for a long time, that these individuals would do these crimes.
	You know, the first category is the financial fraud, which is basically just a lot of petty stuff.
	Basically, you know, obviously people are donating to Lauren Southern and Tommy Robinson to get these documentaries produced.
	Lauren Simonson, that is.
	You know, getting all kinds of video content produced.
	And they're finding all kinds of manipulative ways to just leech money everywhere they can.
	You know, and this was actually documented when they were working for The Rebel with Ezra Levant, where they were sent over to London and they would send over these frantic requests for money.
	We need emergency funds!
	We need cash for an Uber!
	We need this and that!
	And so Ezra Levant would, you know, wire over the money, $200, $300, $1,000.
	You've got this issue with the invoicing, where they, working with Alex Jones or Lauren Southern, would inflate the costs incurred while they're producing things, and that's in the form of camera equipment.
	You know, they'll say that they're buying something off of Tommy Robbins' Amazon Wishlist, which might be an expensive camera.
	They get the camera, they sell the camera, buy a refurbished cheaper one, pocket the difference, you know, this kind of stuff.
	And what they're doing, people are finding, is pretty unfortunate because Not only are they just outright stealing the money from, you know, the conservatives and their donors and all the gullible idiots who are throwing their money at this kind of stuff, but they're spending it on degeneracy.
	They're spending it on alcohol.
	They're spending it on hotels, this lavish lifestyle, and one that includes far-left people who are their enemies, our enemies, the enemies of the people that fronted the money, you know.
	So that's one category, is the financial fraud, which seems to be a pattern there.
	And then the other claim, which to me is a little bit more worrisome than the financial fraud, you know, that kind of stuff, it's like you fire somebody or there's criminal charges or whatever, but it seems like it's money, you know, money is replaceable.
	But this other stuff seems to be far more nefarious, which is this claim that they are working with hope, not hate, which we're not familiar with that in America, but apparently that's sort of like the European or British equivalent of a right-wing watch type organization, or like the ADL or the SPLC.
	It's something along those lines, a far-left activist type body, you know, organ like that, which has very close ties to Antifa, according to this article and others.
	They're very litigious, so I don't want to make too many outright, you know, claims that they could sue me for.
	This is other people claiming this, you know.
	And so these two guys, Kalen and George, they have this relationship with hope, not hate, where they're friends with them, friendly, they're having dinners, they're having lunches, they're giving intelligence to them about itinerary information, travel information, security detail type information.
	And to me, that's far more nefarious, far more malicious, actually putting people in harm's way, jeopardizing them.
	And who knows how far that goes?
	Maybe this is only The tip of the iceberg.
	I've heard other rumors that there's blackmail going on, that Hope Not Hate had blackmail on them, and so they had blackmail on Tommy and on Lauren, and that's why they're in on it, and so on.
	And now then, I guess the ultimate crime is this last-ditch thing where they say in order to get out of this, you know, being nailed for these different claims, they're trying to reach out to journalists and say, well, we are de-radicalized now.
	We'd like to tell our story about the alt-right and hopefully rehabilitate themselves, find some other grift and some other movement.
	But, you know, I look at all this stuff, and I have to tell you, the details don't interest me, frankly.
	You know, I know a lot of people like the journalistic type stuff where they're shifting through documents and names and dates and all this stuff.
	I find it basically completely uninteresting, the minutia.
	This is why I'm reading the article and I want to blow my brains out because it's 10,000 words of, well, you know, he said this and she said that and, you know, they claimed it was $100 in there.
	I don't really care about all the details.
	I'm basically uninterested.
	But there are some very, very important lessons.
	Which are pertinent, which are relevant for our purposes.
	So that's why we're talking about this.
	I really don't love e-drama as much as I get accused of being an e-drama instigator or something like this.
	I really am not a big... I'm not in love with that kind of thing.
	I know my audience doesn't really care for that, but it is relevant for us for obvious reasons.
	The biggest and most obvious reason is, look, And we're operating off of the assumption that nobody's lying in this article, right?
	We're operating off the assumption that everything in this article is basically true, and I don't really have a reason to believe that it isn't.
	You know, I know a lot of the people involved.
	It seems legit to me.
	So, unless and until we see something to the contrary, we're gonna operate under the assumption that, yeah, I mean, this is all, and it's not really surprising either.
	Fits into a pattern of behavior with these individuals and groups.
	But to me, the most striking takeaway is, of course, what we know about various groups within the right-wing movement.
	You cannot expect that you're going to bring in Kalyn Robertson and George Lulin, you know, whatever.
	And George, the partner in this case, a little background about him, is a former transsexual, former transgender female that this person identified as, now is living as a gay man.
	You cannot bring in a couple of homosexuals who their whole life, if you dig into the background of both these people, are, you know, these people that are spending crazy money, and they're into the lavish lifestyle, a lot of it on credit.
	They're not living a conservative lifestyle.
	They're not actually conservatives, okay?
	So you can't bring in people that are not living conservatively and expecting them to come into the MAGA movement.
	They don't become conservatives overnight, right?
	And this is the case, I think, particularly with women and with homosexuals.
	I find that in conservative movements, but also in political movements in general, you bring these categories in, and this is just my observation, there seems to be a lot of conflict.
	We find that the bedrock of our worldview on America First is really that the world is comprised of groups.
	Not individuals, groups.
	We're not all atomic, you know, standard units of individual human being.
	You know, I mean, that's, I think, the conventional liberal position, an ostensibly liberal and conservative position in America or in Europe, which is we're all just, you know, these deracinated androgynous units, the individual.
	We don't believe that.
	Because of course, every person has a gender.
	Every person has a race.
	Every person has a tribe.
	Every person has a function in this society.
	The world is comprised of groups.
	These groups have characteristics.
	These characteristics have consequences and implications for how we conduct ourselves.
	And so when we look at these two groups, we find, wow, there's a remarkable pattern of behavior with women and homosexuals when they enter into these movements.
	What I find with the women is just ceaseless division.
	That's what I find.
	Irresponsibility, division, people that just frankly don't really care about politics.
	It's no surprise.
	Can you name a lot of female political philosophers in the last, oh, I don't know, Million years!
	You can probably think of a handful, and they're all feminists, and they all came about in the last 50 years, right?
	Nobody else.
	Women are not really suited to this kind of thing.
	That's just my opinion.
	I don't think they're inferior.
	I don't think they're dumb.
	YouTube terms of service, we got you.
	I'm totally within the line here.
	I love women.
	They're equal.
	I respect them.
	However, it seems that when they come into these movements, as I said during the Thought Wars, and as has been Demonstrated countless times since.
	They generate nothing but division, controversy, problems.
	It just doesn't seem to be a match.
	And I don't know how many more times I have to say that.
	I don't know how many more times we have to see, you know, people killing themselves during the cozy hour.
unidentified		You know, cutting their wrists during the cozy hour.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Or, you know, federal agents manipulating Peter Sweden into some sham marriage so they can spy on the movement.
		How many examples, how many instances of this do we need to see?
		You know, I thought it was anecdotal at first, but then it's like, no, it's just uniform across the board.
		They're all the same, right?
		And obviously Lauren Southern is indicted in this because allegedly she knew about it.
		And how could she not?
		I mean, they're her producers, right?
		And the timing of her retirement is quite convenient, right?
		If she had no idea that any of this was going to drop or any of this was going on.
		So that's in the first place.
		The other place is the homosexuals.
		I find that, you know, in this movement they tend to be very gossipy, tend to be, again, almost like women but, like, on crack cocaine.
		It's like a lot of the same tendencies of women, but if women hit, like, I don't know, Monster Zero Ultra into their veins and just went full, you know, it's like they press both the joysticks on Grand Theft Auto playing as Trevor and it's just game over for everybody, you know?
		I mean, these, they're like women but to the nth degree.
		So I find that The lesson, as always, after we look at this whole fiasco is, how many more times does it have to be said, folks?
		It's a political movement.
		Maybe we should have some standards.
		Maybe, just an idea, our political movement should reflect the principles and ideas that underlie the movement, that the movement hopes to achieve.
		What kind of political movement is built on people talking about trad values and the people filming the videos about trad values are butt-slamming each other behind the scenes, right?
		And the people that are in front of the camera are, you know, gallivanting across the world on the you-know-what kind of carousel.
		It's like, I don't know.
		Is it any wonder that that didn't work out?
		So that's Now that's my first observation.
		My other observation is, look, what you have to understand about this kind of cheap E-drama, I see a lot of people holding up my Leonopolis and saying, oh, Milo is based!
		Milo is our guy!
		What a great article!
		You know, I think we can at once acknowledge that there's obviously a problem with Southern, or rather, Simonson, Kalin, and these other people, while also realizing that Milo's a part of the same thing.
		What it is called is the grift right.
		You have people, like I think myself, I think like people watching this show, Before I got any Qatari money, right?
		Don't don't hold this show against me in five years when I get a big check from Qatar and I, you know, turn into some kind of e-celebrity monster.
		You know, don't hold it against me.
		But so far there seem to be people like me and people who watch this show who are serious who have real convictions about politics.
		You know, they jump into this because they're interested in political affairs.
		They see something wrong with the world.
		They want it to change.
		How do you do that?
		Well, you get informed, you get involved, there's activism, whatever.
		And so there are people that are genuinely moved about political activism, about political crusades.
		And then there are people that want to make money off of those people.
		It seems to be only these two groups.
		And so to me, when I see Milo reporting on this and I see Kaylin and Lauren, miss me with all the intrigue and the minutiae, the details.
		What I see is just the grift right.
		I just see a lot of people trying to make money, but you know, they don't really care about what's going on.
		So people will say, oh well, this article is so great about Milo.
		I think it's actually fascinating as a little bit of a case study that even in an article about fake conservatives, homosexuals, grifting the right-wing movement, the person that wrote the article is doing exactly that.
		What do you think this is?
		A sudden epiphany?
		And this is about doing the right thing.
		This is about exposing bad actors so that the nationalist movement can move forward.
		You know, there's this ending paragraph in the article talking about how, oh, the nationalist movement is so fragile and we can't have these people involved.
		And what were you doing for the past three years, the person who wrote the article?
		You know, the article is about homosexuals who are spending more money than they have and spending it on champagne and parties and no-showing appearances.
		It's like, I don't know, that sounds kind of familiar.
		I don't know.
		I feel like I read an article not too long ago.
		Sounds kind of familiar, you know?
		And so after we have to take a step back...
		I'd say, and really critically think, who are these people?
		Who are these people that we're watching, that we're giving our money to, that we ascribe our political, you know, dreams and hopes and pin them on these people?
		Who are they?
		Because I think a lot of the times you find that the character, that's where the deficit lies, you know?
		And I had a conversation with somebody not too long ago about this.
		We were talking actually about starting up a media network.
		Uh, because of the demonetization thing.
	And there's some early talks going on.
	You know, obviously unauthorized TV is one option.
	There's people talking about other sort of avenues for that.
	And I said, well, you know, I tried that.
	I tried the network thing with James Alsup, didn't work out.
	And this person said, well, you know, uh, James Alsup was a grifter or something, and this has happened to be an alt-right person.
	And I really thought, well, you know, that's kind of the big problem here.
	That's really the common denominator is the grift.
	Is the grift people that really have no interest in living a conservative life or making a conservative nation or anything like that, but they see a lot of, uh, a lot of Attention being paid to this stuff, and therefore a lot of money to be made on this stuff.
	And so, take your pick at any of these people, who during the election, glommed on, you know, they saw Trump was rising, they essentially saw a vacuum that needed to be filled, you know, of somebody with nothing to lose, basically sort of a fringe, off-the-wall character, I can jump into this, I can throw in, repeat the platitudes, somebody can write my speeches, write my articles, write my books, and the money pours in.
	And I think you can find a lot of examples of that.
	And suddenly three years later, either there's a tremendous fall from grace or they've totally moved on.
	I think Mike Cernovich is like the archetypal example of this.
	Somebody who literally wrote the book, MAGA Mindset, and then within how long did it take after the election for him to say, oh I don't even support Donald Trump anymore, I'm not even a conservative anymore, I'm not even right-wing anymore, I'm not even political anymore.
	Actually, I think Islam is better than Catholicism, actually.
	And you just find all these different layers, so it's like, you know, all the shekels that were pouring in for the Maga book, well, then we were on board.
	Then you were, you know, a real right-wing defender.
	Now not so much.
	And it seems like that's the case with everybody.
	It's all just about the money.
	And this leads me to the final point, most important point, when we look at this stuff, which is, it cannot be said enough, I've said this for a long time, Character, personal character, is the most important thing in politics, particularly in our situation.
	When we're looking at an insurgent nationalist movement, particularly a conservative insurgent nationalist movement, character is bar none, the number one, perhaps the only thing that matters.
	And I think you see on on both sides, the alt-right and the alt-right, two sides of the same coin of people like not getting this.
	You know, because I think you see with Richard Spencer, and with Milo, and with Kalen, it's like the same story.
	You know, in the case of Richard Spencer, it's somebody who thought that ideology was the most important thing.
	If we could only, as political people, construct an ideology that was the most true, the most nuanced, the most apropos, you know, about the way the world is going to work, or the way the world works now, well, we're gonna win the day.
	Never you mind how this turns into policy, never mind how this progresses our goals or advances the cause.
	We're just going to go out there, say the ideology, the magic words, and the white consciousness will be raised, the day will be saved, political goals achieved, right?
	How long did that take to fall apart?
	And did it fall apart because, like, they didn't have the right ideology or because they were making bad decisions?
	Bad personal decisions, bad business decisions, bad political decisions, optical decisions?
	You know, here you had an alcoholic making a lot of bad decisions.
	Somebody with bad moral character.
	In the case of Milo Yiannopoulos, I think it's the reverse side.
	Maybe ideology isn't the most important thing, but money is the most important thing.
	So Milo, who had, remember, after he was exposed, after the whole CPAC debacle, you remember this?
	It was two years ago.
	He was supposed to be the keynote speaker at CPAC.
	Reagan battalion leaked this old recording where he said something about how well in the gay community Pedophilia happens all the time, and that's like a wonderful thing.
	I'm summarizing here, but something to that effect.
	Tremendous fall from grace, like his career was ruined, fired from Breitbart, kicked out of CPAC, nobody wanted to touch him anymore.
	Associate with him, I should say.
	Right?
	And even after that, he got 15 million dollars from the Mercer family.
	15 million dollars!
	After he got kicked out of CPAC, after he got fired from Breitbart, did it matter that he got $15 million?
	Imagine if America First got $15 million.
	We could do with that kind of money, right?
	What a game changer that would be.
	$15 million, and that was after the bulk of the money had already been spent on his Dangerous faggot tour, and all the Breitbart stuff, the college tour, all these different projects going on.
	So I was like the tail end of it, to give you an idea, right?
	Did that matter?
	No!
	Because within maybe nine months of him getting that big fat check from the Mercer family, he lied and said that he was gonna have free speech week at Berkeley, and he invited all these people that he never contacted, and when Berkeley called his bluff, well, you know, he was left without any friends, any money, any backing, anything like that.
	Then a BuzzFeed article came out, the Mercer family didn't want to associate, now he's five million dollars in debt.
	So it just goes to show, have the right ideology, or maybe you think you have the right ideology, personal deficit, character deficit, and now you're irrelevant, now you're nobody.
	Miley Yiannopoulos.
	15 million dollars after that whole hit piece.
	Personal character failing.
	Personal character deficit.
	Doesn't matter.
	Now, you know, he's scraping together some kind of hit piece against Kalen Robertson and Lauren Southern so people will look at his website one last time, right?
	Okay?
	And then Kalen Robertson and these other people.
	Did it matter that they had funding?
	Did it matter that they were really good with production?
	They were very competent in producing a documentary.
	And I think, you know, I didn't watch it because I knew about this stuff, but a lot of people watch it, said it was a good documentary.
	Did it really even matter at the end of the day?
	I think this kind of overshadows it.
	Personal character failing.
	So...
	Look, and this can't be said enough.
	Maybe this is a little hippy-dippy for some people, too spiritual.
	You have to be a good person.
	You can't fake it.
	You can't hope that we'll be able to cheat the system, and maybe if we just try and break the system, get the shortcut, we can come around to the end.
	No, I mean, if you want a country that works, If you want a society and a civilization that works, and that is functional, and you like living in it, it's nice, and it's everything that we talk about, it's like it was a hundred years ago, you have to be a person that's worthy of living in that civilization.
	And that goes for our political operators, that goes for just everybody.
	You know, it really just comes down to a level of personal responsibility for what you're putting out into the world.
	You know, so for all the people that are out there, You know, and they're agitating for a return to traditionalism, and then they go in the back room and they're doing all kinds of sick, weird things.
	Well, I don't know.
	I mean, if those are the ones, they're the spokespeople and they can't live by it, how can you expect anybody else to, right?
	So, that remains the most important thing.
	You need to have people that are good operators, good point men, competent, all those other things.
	Have that kind of moral integrity.
	So a lot of lessons to be learned.
	That's all I'll say.
	It's been... and I don't want to be the one... I saw somebody tweeting this at me saying how I was moralizing.
	I was taking this stance that I'm morally better than people.
	I'm not saying anything like that.
	And I'm not saying that anybody's perfect.
	I'm not saying that I am the shining example of a perfect political operator.
	I think I'm, you know, I'm obviously not defrauding People in the way that they're doing or whatever.
	But I am saying that as we evolve, as we develop this movement, we have to really be careful about this kind of stuff.
	I mean, some say it's already too late, but there's a lot of lessons to be learned, a lot of careers that have fallen, a lot of money wasted from big donors and from small donors because you didn't have people, I don't think, who are worthy of carrying forward the movement.
	You didn't have people that were really serious, really principled, really living out the convictions, you know?
	Which I think we look at all this drama stuff and yeah it's it's sort of uninteresting petty dumb stuff and none of them are really operators anyway I think they're blacklisted by everybody so in a way it was important that it was published but to talk about it for too long the details to me is not very interesting what is interesting and relevant and pertinent is again the lessons understanding that this seems to be a recurring problem and there's a common denominator here that can be avoided so Hard to see it.
	It sucks to see.
	You don't like to see it because it's a lot of good people that throw their money at projects like this.
	And because he got like, you know, again, three bad apples that spoiled a bunch.
	That's very unfortunate.
	It's a very tragic situation, but you also got to keep your eyes open.
	There's going to be a lot more of this, you know, subversion, people co-opting the movement.
	Also, there's going to be a lot more stories about, you know, this de-radicalization thing, which I hinted at a little bit.
	So that's our story about Lauren Southern and Kalen and George Lulan and all these others, you know, really The next time you see some precocious female, precocious homosexual wants to jump into the movement, oh, hi!
unidentified		Hi, here's my boyfriend, and I want to be in the conservative movement.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I would just, you know, maybe think twice.
		Maybe we think twice about it, right?
		Again, YouTube terms of service, which I love.
		Everybody's equal.
		I have no problem with anybody.
		I love everybody.
		I don't hate anybody, all that, but you just might want to think twice because there is, you know, there are some patterns here going on.
		So, That's the Alt-Light E-Drama.
		Pretty, pretty lame stuff.
		You know, again, it really comes down to, like, this invoicing.
		It's not really, like, thrilling details, you know, thrilling subterfuge or anything, but it does tell us about... Well, it doesn't really tell us anything.
		It tells you what I've been saying.
		It demonstrates what I've been saying for years, but nobody listens.
		And it's funny because Lauren Southern even talked to me, like, two years ago about the Tradthought thing.
		You remember this?
		Two years ago, for people that are new and just watching this show, maybe in the last year or so, it was like December 2017, January 2018.
		Huge battle across the whole right wing about women in the movement, and I was this bad guy.
		This is a big reason why America First Media split up.
		It was a large part of it.
		I was this big villain because I was bullying women out of the movement.
		And women are a net positive in the movement.
		That's what everybody kept telling me.
		Well, Nick, I know that it's not exactly consistent that you have women teaching that women should have traditional roles, but they're content creators.
		It's not consistent, and there's all these other problems, but a net...
		Nick, they're a net positive.
		They're bringing people into the movement.
		They're creating all this good content.
		I think all those people should, um, like, drive into a brick wall at this point.
		All these people.
		They're a net positive!
		They're a net positive!
		Really?
		And how would that have worked out if Gavin McInnes got killed?
		Because Kalen Robertson, who was brought in by Lauren Southern, leaked his itinerary information to Antifa.
		You know?
		It's like, really?
		Net positive?
		I don't know.
		I think that's a stretch.
		I think when all is said and done, when all is accounted for, big fat net negative in every case, right?
		With few notable exceptions.
		So anyway, I can't.
		We have to move on.
		I'm going to get in trouble.
		YouTube terms of service is going to misinterpret what I'm saying as some sort of misogynistic homophobic diatribe and that is the last thing I would want anybody to walk away with this with.
		That we are in any way opposed To the, you know, the fairer female race or homosexuals who are totally equal and amazing.
		You know, I would, the last thing I would want is YouTube to misinterpret it, or for anybody for that matter, to misinterpret it.
		Everyone is equal and we love everybody.
		Total equality now, right?
		That's gonna be our new slogan on the show.
		Just to remind everybody that everything that is said, you know, outside of some jokes, some edgy comedy, which the snowflakes might not like, we always are brought back to our convictions, which is Total equality for everybody, right?
		So that's our little commentary there on the alt-light e-drama.
		You know, alt-light, lots of problems, right?
		More money, more problems, I guess you could say.
		We're gonna move right along.
		I don't know if we'll have time to talk about this Vatican document because we're already close to 8 o'clock.
		And we do have to go over this Mexico stuff, so maybe we'll save it for tomorrow.
		But the other big news, more talking about things that actually matter, you know, outside of lessons, live lessons for the conservative movement.
		We have to talk about the real news happening in the world, which is the situation with Mexico.
		So like I said at the top of the show, to give you a little background, we remember on this show we covered it.
		Starting out two weeks ago.
		It was not last Thursday, but the Thursday before I believe that Trump tweeted out We're sick and tired of this you have these record numbers of illegal immigrants coming in in the month of May It was like the highest number of 20 years that came over in the month of May in 2019
		I said we got to get a handle on this so unless and until things change at the border of Mexico I'll put a 5% tariff on all goods coming into America from Mexico on June 10th and my initial reaction if you watch the show and you remember was yeah not gonna happen because last month in April at the time in it was the previous month in April He had said the same thing.
		He had said, we're going to put big tariffs on Mexico if it doesn't change at the border.
	And within one week, you know, it's exactly the same timetable.
	Within one week of that threat, it evolved from big tariffs on Mexico until immigration stops to, well, if the drug situation doesn't improve, we'll put a tariff on Mexican cars in a year.
	You know, so I said, well, another tariff threat, another dollar, right?
	Another day, another tariff threat, another shekel.
	And there are a dime a dozen.
	We see this all the time.
	It will amount to nothing.
	We got a little bit excited last week.
	Maybe got a little bit ahead of ourselves.
	But I said on Thursday, you know, it seems like a deal is coming together.
	The reports out of D.C.
	that there was this frantic effort underway by the Mexican delegation in D.C.
	I think their secretary of state was there, their minister of state, whatever, foreign minister.
	was in DC to work out a deal with Trump.
	And basically the framework of the deal looked like this at the time when we were talking about it on Thursday.
	It was that Mexico was going to promise to deploy 6,000 National Guard troops on their southern border to keep out migrants.
	We would implement, and this is perhaps the most important one, a third safe country agreement, which says that if, for example, somebody from Honduras, Guatemala, or Nicaragua, they're not Nicaragua, El Salvador.
	I keep saying Nicaragua.
	El Salvador, Guatemala, or Honduras, if they come through Mexico and apply for asylum in the United States, they'll be rejected because that'll be the third country they went to.
	Leaving their country of origin, traveling through a second safe country, and going to a third safe country, we would say, well, your asylum request isn't legitimate because you could have applied for asylum in Mexico.
	So that would have been really the big deal there.
	That's what we were most optimistic about on Thursday, is talks that that would happen.
	And then lastly that Mexico would increase their purchases of agricultural product from America, which would be big because we're in an ongoing trade war with China.
	And you see how this is all interrelated now, where we would put tariffs on Mexico, coerce them on one hand with immigration, but also to help them make up for the difference in what is going on with China while we do economic war with them.
	Now we see on Monday that a lot of this isn't really exactly what was promised.
	So Trump tweeted on Friday, he said, quote, the tariffs scheduled to be implemented by the U.S.
	on Monday against Mexico are hereby indefinitely suspended.
	Mexico in turn has agreed to take strong measures to stem the tide of migration through Mexico into our southern border.
	So that was the promise that was made last week.
	Tariffs aren't going into effect.
	We've made a deal.
	And that was, like I said, that was the framework of the deal.
	And also, I will say on Thursday, what we thought, and this is what everybody was saying in D.C., is that the tariffs would go into effect today, 5%.
	A deal would be made, signed, put into effect, and that would avert the tariff increase on July 1st.
	So the timetable we were working with on Thursday that was what a lot of the experts were saying and a lot of people, even the administration, was that what is most likely now, henceforth, on Thursday, is that Mexico will reach a deal with America in principle, basically, but not meet the first deadline.
	The tariffs will come down on Monday.
	While they work out all the deals, the tariffs would be into effect.
	They sign the deal.
	Deal goes into effect.
	And hopefully that all happens by the time the tariffs are scheduled to increase to 10% on July 1st.
	Well, they said scratch that.
	No tariffs at all.
	Tariffs never come down.
	We've got an agreement in principle.
	And then you're like, okay.
	So it's the same thing that we've seen for the last two years, which is a lot of bullshit, basically.
	You know, part of the language, but that's what it is.
	It's a lot of, oh, we reached an agreement.
	We reached an agreement in principle.
	Okay, well, if you don't get it in writing, and if it doesn't go into effect, it means nothing.
	The most important part of the deal is the closing of the deal.
	You know, art of the deal, you'd think you would know that.
	So how many times have we seen this?
	North Korea, agreement in principle to denuclearize.
	Have they denuclearized?
	Have they come close?
	We've reached an agreement in principle with China on trade at the G20 summit in December.
	Now, what happened to that deal?
	Oh yeah, it was torn up by the Chinese last month and now we're in a trade war again.
	And what about the deal that was made to pull all the troops out of Syria within 90 days on December 21st?
	Did the troops come home?
	No, they're still there, and actually they're expanding our presence there by how many thousands of troops it was announced two weeks ago.
	So it's like a lot of agreements in principle in just about every area, and it seems like actually not only does the agreement not get honored, but the opposite happens.
	It gets worse than it was before, and it's no different this time.
	So Trump said, quote, we have fully signed and documented another very important part of the immigration and security deal of Mexico, one that the US has been asking about getting for many years, will be revealed in the not too distant future and will need a vote by Mexico's legislative body.
	We do not anticipate a problem with the vote, but if for any reason the approval is not forthcoming, tariffs will be reinstated.
	Not even reinstated.
	The threat of tariffs will be reinstated.
	And it's funny.
	He says this.
	He says we have a signed and inked deal, and that's disputed.
	But he goes on to say, and you'll see it later, and it'll get passed in the Mexican Senate, but if there's problems, we're going to threaten tariffs again.
	So it's like, even if you had the most charitable interpretation of the events that happened this weekend, we don't even look at what Mexico is saying, and we're about to, we just look at what Donald Trump is saying.
	So what you're saying is, you threatened tariffs, Mexico came in and said, oh well we promised to do this, that, and the other, you have a signed deal.
	That's what he's saying.
	You avert the tariffs and now it still has to be passed in their legislative body and we don't even see it.
	Tariffs never went into effect.
	Does this look like a productive, does this look like a competent deal-making strategy?
	That we haven't even seen the so-called written agreement?
	It still has to even get passed by a legislative body, by a third party essentially, that didn't negotiate the deal?
	Oh, but if it doesn't get passed then we'll threaten tariffs again?
	So you didn't get a deal.
	Actually, if it still has to pass, it has yet to pass, and we don't see it, Then you didn't really come to a deal, did you?
	But you gave up all your leverage.
	Now, that's if we're being charitable.
	Now we look at what Mexico is saying.
	This is from the New York Times.
	It says the Mexican foreign minister said Monday that no secret immigration deal existed between his country and the United States, directly contradicting President Trump's claim on Twitter that a fully signed and documented agreement would soon be revealed.
	Marcelo Ebrard, Mexico's top diplomat, said at a news conference in Mexico City, But there was an understanding that both sides would evaluate the flow of migrants in the coming months if the number of migrants crossing the United States border is not significantly reduced.
	He said both sides have agreed to renew discussions about more aggressive changes to regional asylum rules that could have a bigger effect.
	So what Mexico is saying is we have no written agreement with the United States.
	There's no secret agreement.
	It's not documented.
	It's not inked or anything.
	We didn't agree to anything.
	We just agreed that basically, and it is set out sort of part of an early agreement, that in 90 days we'll evaluate the flow of migrants and we'll look at how things are going.
	And if they're still bad, then we'll look at some changes we could implement to asylum laws.
	So that's what Mexico is saying.
	This is from another source.
	It says, as part of Friday's deal, Mexico will take strong measures towards enforcement and deploy members of its National Guard to a southern border with Guatemala.
	Mexico also vowed to expand migrant protection protocols, also known as Remain in Mexico, to other ports of entry along the Mexican border.
	So basically, we don't really know what's going on.
	Trump is saying they have inked this deal, which is concrete.
	It's, you know, there's text on a paper.
	It just needs to be passed.
	The Mexican government is saying there's no such deal.
	We'll just agree at a later date to review the flow of migrants and maybe change things based on that.
	And then other sources, who are not Trump or the Mexican government, are saying that there was some kind of commitment made to deploy some number of National Guard troops and look at the Migrant Protection Protocols.
	Now even if we look at that, the Migrant Protection Protocols is not the third safe country agreement.
	The third safe country agreement says we can legally reject asylum claims if they're crossing through Mexico, which would be such a game changer.
	That means we don't even have to adjudicate their asylum claims.
	That means you have to apply for asylum in Mexico first before you apply to asylum in America.
	So that means that all these asylum seekers that are surrendering in ports of entry, we can turn them away.
	The problem is now we have to adjudicate them, bring them in, release them into the country because we don't have sufficient detention space at the border to keep them there while we process the claim.
	The Migrant Protection Protocol says we still have to adjudicate the claim, they just wait in Mexico.
	This has already been in place for months now.
	And yeah, you've returned about 10,000 people in the months since it has been implemented to Mexico while they wait, but the applications are still being processed.
	So there's still an incentive for them to come here.
	They're still surrendering at the ports of entry.
	It's just that they have to wait in Mexico.
	And that's, don't get me wrong, that's better.
	But that's not the third safe country agreement.
	The National Guard troops being deployed at the southern border, I guess that's a little bit better.
	But that's already, they've had National Guard troops on the border for a year in Mexico.
	So they're saying we'll throw some more troops there.
	I don't think that really makes a difference in terms of how many people have come over because it's been in effect for a long time.
	So the best case scenario that we have is that they've inked a deal and it's in writing.
	It just needs to be passed in the Mexican Senate and it says we're going to expand the migrant protection protocols, send a few more troops to the border, and nothing about buying agricultural product.
	That's the best case scenario.
	Still has to be seen by the public, still has to be passed.
	That's sort of a failure.
	Sorry, that's really not good enough.
	Worst case scenario, and you know, why should we expect anything else over the past three years, right?
	The worst case scenario is that there's no inked agreement, there is no agreement in principle or in writing, and that what, you know, we're really talking about is what was talked about in the New York Times, which is that Mexico and America will review the migrant flows in you know 45 or 90 days and evaluate based on that what changes they can implement in the future.
	So your best case scenario is basically this terrible weak deal that does nothing and has yet to even be passed or seen by the public.
	Worst case scenario there's no deal.
	So it's exactly what we said from the outset.
	You know, I guess, fool me once, shame on you.
	Fool me twice, shame on me.
	We got all excited on Thursday.
	Oh, it's gonna be third safe country agreement.
	6,000 trips on the border.
	They're gonna buy our agricultural product.
	It's a home run.
	We did it!
	No tariffs?
	No deal?
	What's going on?
	What's going on, man?
	I mean, just an absolute failure.
	And, you know, all these people out there, all these mogapeans, Donald Trump is a genius!
	Donald Trump just used tariffs to break Mexico.
	And this is going to send a signal to China.
	If anything, this sends a signal to China that we're not serious, right?
	If we threaten tariffs to Mexico before they even go into effect, we basically totally concede on this conceptual agreement that they're not even willing to say in a press conference exists.
	I don't know how you have any leverage in any deal after that, you know, but we keep going.
	So it's a shame.
	And I guess there's a lot of parties you can blame for this.
	Maybe you say that, well, Mitch McConnell was going to thwart the tariffs.
	Mitch McConnell was going to overwrite the tariffs, so he had to back down.
	I'm getting tired of that kind of stuff, because let Mitch McConnell do that.
	You know, if the argument goes that, well, Trump couldn't get a good deal because the tariffs couldn't have gone into effect, because if Trump tried to sign the declaration of a state of emergency to get the tariffs, that Mitch McConnell would overturn that, that Mitch McConnell and The Republicans in the House would vote to overturn the tariffs on Mexico?
	Let them do that.
	It's just like with the federal spending bill.
	Remember after the government shutdown ended and they did it with a deal that was passed by Mitch McConnell in the Senate that said that we're going to get rid of, or rather we're going to implement immunity for sponsors of minors and we're going to expand catch and release and all this stuff, and everybody said, oh well, Trump had to sign that.
	He had no other choice.
	Mitch McConnell would override him.
	Let Mitch McConnell do that!
	Let Mitch McConnell shut down the tariffs and then let the Republican Party revolt!
	Let Republican voters revolt against the party and say, why would you do that?
	We're winning this trade war against Mexico.
	Immigration is a big problem.
	Why won't you let Trump govern?
	Let them do that!
	So I don't understand what's going on in the White House.
	I guess it's what we said from the outset, which is Trump is simply not serious.
	He didn't do the government shutdown.
	To fix immigration.
	He did it to convince his voters that he was serious about immigration.
	So that when election time comes around in 2020, he can say, well, I didn't fix anything at the border, but I tried.
	But I shut down the government and they wouldn't let me.
	And they wouldn't let me build the wall.
	Mitch McConnell wouldn't let me.
	You know, even though if he were really serious, he would just dare Mitch McConnell to veto, or rather to override his veto of the funding bill.
	And same with this tariff threat to Mexico.
	I don't think he threatened to put tariffs on Mexico to fix the situation at the border.
	It's another one of these.
	I pulled out all the stops in 2020.
	I pulled out all the stops to fix immigration, but they just wouldn't let me.
	Mitch McConnell is going to shut down my tariffs.
	I just had to give in to a deal.
	But I tried.
	But I tried to fix immigration.
	We just need a majority again in the House and the Senate.
	We just need for you to vote for me one more time, you know?
	Because if he were serious, he would say, let's just put tariffs on Mexico for the fun of it.
	Let's just put tariffs on Mexico and then raise the tariffs and then raise them again and just continue to say no.
	And not for any other reason than let's just make them come up with an offer That we're satisfied with and let them scramble and be frantic and let them panic and come to Washington D.C.
	pleading for a deal.
	Let's just let that happen for like three months and we'll see what happens.
	We'll see if they come up with a better deal.
	In the meantime, we collect money.
	It helps U.S.
	manufacturers and businesses.
	And if Mitch McConnell says we're going to override your tariffs because our business interests Don't like that you're passing tariffs?
	Let them do that, and let them explain to the American people come 2020 why the Republican Party went against the President, who has a 90% approval rating, and why they went against tariffs, why they went against a measure to stop illegal immigration, and on and on.
	But, I mean, that's just not happening.
	For whatever reason, it's not happening, and there's no excuse anymore, you know?
	Two years ago, I would have said, well, the Congress, well, this and that.
	Could have done it.
	You could have done it.
	You could have put the tariffs down.
	You said you were going to.
	You said it wasn't a bluff.
	It was a bluff, right?
	I mean, that's pretty clear now.
	So, very disappointing.
	You know, just when we thought we had a white pill, it becomes a black pill.
	But that, you know, whatever.
	What are you gonna do, right?
	Whatever, okay?
	I mean, not like anybody's surprised.
	So that's, that's the art of the deal for you.
	That's a tariff.
	We're gonna move on to our super chats and we'll see what you guys are saying about all this stuff.
	That's funny.
	I see a massive... I see a massive dip in viewership.
	We were talking about the... I guess people wanted to hear about the E-Drama because it's like 2,200 viewers with the E-Drama.
	1,900 we talk about Mexico.
	Should I just do an E-Drama show then?
	For the longest time I was skeptical about it.
	Usually when I talk about E-Drama people complain.
	They're like, we don't want to hear about Twitter beef.
	We want to hear about the news.
	But now, I don't know, I look at the Ralph Retort.
	I look at some of these other shows.
	I look at Keemstar.
	I'm like, maybe E-Dramas.
	Maybe I'll do the E-Drama show.
	It's more fun for me.
	I like the drama.
	I think it's fun.
	But anyway, we're gonna take a look at our Super Chats.
	We'll see what you guys are saying.
	We'll see what you guys are up to.
	Hellgraph says, thoughts on Shrinking Market Theory.
	I don't know anything about Shrinking Market Theory.
	So I don't know.
	I don't have any thoughts about it.
	Let me look it up.
	shrinking market theory I don't see anything I don't see anything.
	It's a shrinking market theory right out of the gate here, so I don't know what you're talking about.
	Bill says, do you have any criticism of the war on drugs?
	Yeah, it's uh, you know, they're not serious about it.
	It's just like with immigration.
	If they were serious about the war on drugs, we could win the war on drugs, but they're not serious.
	You know, everybody says the war on drugs is a failure.
	We've spent all this money and, you know, people have been incarcerated or killed because of the war on drugs and drug use has only increased.
	Why do you think that is?
	We're not serious about fighting the war on drugs.
	If we actually got serious about fighting the war on drugs, that would mean that states could not legalize marijuana.
	Like, you understand, you're not really at war with drugs if you have many states within the country legalizing drugs, right?
	You're not serious about the war on drugs if you don't have a secure border.
	That's kind of a big deal, you know?
	And there are many instances That are similar to that.
	So I would say that I'm in favor of the war on drugs, but just, you know, the government isn't.
	And I think it's because the government profits on it in more ways than one.
	So the war on drugs will continue as like a for-profit business for like the CIA and the government and all these other groups, you know.
	Now that doesn't mean that, you know, opposing drugs is bad.
	That doesn't mean that drug prohibition could never work.
	It just means that in its present form, in my, in my observation, The people that say they're against drugs are not actually serious about enforcement.
	So I think the solution is to kick up enforcement about a thousand, you know, a thousand times.
	A lot of people say, well, the war on drugs, nobody's serious about it, so let's just give it up.
	Well, no, I don't think that's the way out of it.
	You just got to get serious about it.
	Many Thanks says, who's more cringe, Miley Cyrus or Chris Evans?
	I would probably say Chris Evans because he's a man.
	To be a man and to be a shitlib is like the cringiest thing there is.
	To be a woman and a shitlib, it's like, well, it's understandable.
	It's understandable, darling, why you might feel this way, but for a man, there's no excuse.
	Casey Alexander says, Hey Nick, you said last week that you'd be open having an e-girl read superchats as you just sat back and nodded.
	Well, Cassie Dillon just got let go from Daily Wire.
	Hello, Redemption Department.
	See, the problem is, you know, maybe we would do that.
	That might be a funny joke.
	But the problem is she doesn't actually know how to speak English very well at all.
	Because if you've ever seen her on a show or on any broadcast, she has a lot of trouble enunciating all of her syllables.
	It's terrible.
	I remember when we were on RSVN together and she did a show called Raised Right.
	With Will Nardi.
	Raised right.
	And I remember I would watch her show.
	I would have to watch her show because I would have to blow smoke up her ass afterwards so she would get me a show on RSPN.
	And I remember at one point she was giving me all these critiques.
	She's like, well, if you're going to do a show, you've got to do this, that, and the other.
	You're not ready.
	You've got to go to this youth leadership summit so they can teach you how to be on camera.
	I'm like, you stupid, dumb idiot.
	You stupid dumb retard idiot.
	You don't even know how to talk properly.
	Like if you watch, I can't really even, I can't do an imitation of it.
	It's hard for me even to articulate what it is, but she does not enunciate all the syllables.
	She was never, never had a grasp on that, which is so fundamental to anybody who's on radio or on broadcasting or anything.
	And she was coming to me telling me, well, I have all these critiques and you need to do this and that.
	I'm like, you suck.
	Your show's bad.
	My show gets more views than yours and all the comments in your comment section are negative.
	So no, I would not have her read because she can't read.
	Yeah, I don't know.
	I don't want to be involved with her.
	She's such a horrible, horrible person, witch.
	uh d cas says boomer props you are the future love your show well thank you man much appreciated you will be spared i promise i promise just present present this ticket at the you know when the zoomers take over and you know we'll we'll carve out a nice place for you that boy says but without illegal immigration blueberries will be more expensive and who would build the houses uh my cringe and blue pill brother says this yeah Well, it's pretty funny.
	I remember there was a news report.
	Me and my mom were watching the news or she was watching in another room.
	I was doing something else and it was like, oh, well, their report is that if the tariffs go into effect, avocados could become more expensive.
	And even my mom was like, what?
	This is crazy.
	You know, so what?
	You have to pay more for an avocado, right?
	And that's always the argument.
	It's always the alarmism about rising prices or, you know, who will, but who will do this job?
	But who will, you know, work in the fields?
	Who will do the jobs the Americans won't do?
	And both of these arguments are ridiculous.
	And Ben Shapiro and other free market, free trade zealots peddle these incessantly.
	The argument about prices is wrong because, well, we look at the past year of trade war with China.
	Has anybody been severely impacted?
	The only prices that have increased for me are gas taxes, and that's because Illinois is bankrupt.
	That has nothing to do with China, you know.
	I think all the numbers show that, if anything, the costs from the trade war have been eaten by manufacturers and by China itself.
	China having to subsidize its own businesses over there to stay competitive.
	So all these alarmists that were going on and on about tariffs on China saying, well, it's you're going to pay a lot more for consumer goods.
	It never happened.
	It never happened.
	What we said for years about tariffs was proven right, that the cost would be eaten by the manufacturers, by the other countries.
	All true.
	They have 3.4% GDP growth.
	I'm pretty sure was the number downgraded from 3.5 and 3.6% unemployment.
	So it's like, you know, you've got the fastest growing economy in like 15 years with tariffs on one of our biggest trading partners.
	So all that's nonsense.
	And then about the, you know, who will do the jobs the Americans won't do?
	Well, it's a story about wages, of course.
	You know, the argument goes that, well, we need illegal immigrants to do cheap labor.
	We need illegal immigrants to do landscaping, or housekeeping, or we need illegal immigrants.
	That's what the left says, ironically.
	You would think that's a racist thing to say, but the left is who says that.
	Who will do all these low-skilled jobs?
	Well, the reason that happens is because corporations pay politicians to bring them in so that they have lower expenses for labor.
	That's all that is.
	The reason Americans won't do those jobs is not because Americans don't want to work hard, it's because Americans don't work for slave wages, because Americans typically don't like taking welfare, they don't have some kind of supplemental income regime, or they don't defraud the system.
	There's a lot of reasons for this, you know?
	So the result would be that If you didn't have illegal immigrants, wages would just rise.
	That's what's been happening for the past few years.
	You know, wages have simply just been rising.
	And if you got all the illegal immigrants out of the country, suddenly wages would go through the roof.
	And suddenly it would be actually very lucrative for somebody to go work a low-skill job.
	Maybe they'd be able to feed themselves and live off of a wage.
	Imagine that, doing a job like that.
	But unfortunately for the greedy capitalist pig, they would have to shell out money for health care, for benefits, OSHA regulations, all kinds of other things that they don't do when it's illegals, you know, or when it's cheap labor from Mexico or from some other place.
	So it actually, you know, that argument works against itself.
	People would say, well, but you know, we'd have the shortage of labor.
	Good!
	A shortage of labor means wages rise.
	So, you know, people at once complain about wages are falling and, you know, the middle class isn't getting ahead, but they're in favor of ever-increasing immigration.
	What do you think immigration is?
	Labor.
	What do you think happens when you get more of something?
	People value it less.
	They pay less for it.
	You bring in more immigrants, you bring in more labor, people pay less for a surplus of labor.
	That's what happens.
	That's why you get lower wages.
	It's, you know, basic economics.
	Yo Nick, immigration in the UK is crazy.
	Parts of my city have been taken over.
	I even heard about one street being called the Isle where the Sikhs are.
	Mr. K Mass says I was making fun of you being a mutt last week, but later that day my mom unironically told me she's a quarter black and that I'm an octoroon.
	I guess the joke was on me all along.
	Mutt pride worldwide.
	Well, really, I think it really adds a little bit of credence to the expression whiter than you, Muhammad, right?
	I mean, for all the people that say, he's not white, he's a mutt, he's this and that.
	You know, they're always less white than me themselves.
	I don't even identify as white.
	I'm proud of my heritage.
	I was talking to my mom the other night about my glorious Italian lineage.
	I'm proud of my non-white heritage.
	Italian, Irish, Mexican.
	So, and then on all sides, a lot of great people in my ancestry.
	Who do they have on the Anglo side?
	Winston Churchill, this warmonger, war criminal.
	And they have, who else?
	I mean, the people that invented liberalism and capitalism.
	Wow, good job everybody, right?
	So I'm a proud person of color, I will say.
	Aaron says, hey man, brand new knicker and you're the only political channel I watch anymore.
	Love your stuff and can't wait to keep watching.
	Well, thank you, man.
	I appreciate it.
	Good to hear.
	Good to hear that people are not watching the others.
	They're only watching America First.
	I'm the only one that you can trust.
	You can only really trust me.
	You have to basically defoo from all other content creators.
	I'm the one, you know, that you need to watch, right?
	Maybe, maybe Cain was right when he talked about it.
	Caleb Cain was right when he said it was a cult.
	Nah, I'm joking.
	But thanks, man.
	Glad you enjoy the content.
	It's the best content on YouTube, what can I say?
unidentified		It is.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It just simply is.
		Soap says, peanut butter chocolate, great when separate.
		Disagree.
		Disagree.
		What are you talking about?
		What are you talking about?
		Reese's is one of the greatest candies, so I don't know.
		If anything, that's an argument in favor of integration, actually.
		You should find a different argument for that one.
		No, that's gay.
		That's gay and LARPy.
		Forcing citizens to call each other comrade-based?
		No, that's gay.
		That's gay and LARP-y.
		Imagine calling your neighbor your comrade.
		Why does everybody cringe?
		Maxie says, press turtle in the chat to give our movement max health and armor.
		Yeah, you gotta enter in the cheat code turtle to go turtle mode, max health, max armor.
		Lawyer up if you want to get Jared Holt off our case.
		You gotta type in the cheat code lawyer up if you want to get Jared Holt, Right Wing Watch, Christopher Mathias, Luke O'Brien to stop writing hit pieces about you.
		I think that's how it works.
		Yeah, I remember that.
		When he called them out.
		You know, Mark Collette, I think he has a lot of good content.
		Unfortunately, it's just the optics are not really great.
		I talked to him on a stream one time on this week on the alt-right.
		weeks past.
		Yeah, I remember that when he called them out.
		You know, Mark Collette, I think he has a lot of good content.
		Unfortunately, it's just the optics are not really great.
		I talked to him on a stream one time on This Week on the Alt-Right.
		This was years ago.
		And I was like, this guy's really smart.
		He hits all the right notes, but then you kind of look into what's going on there, and it's like, we got a Wignat-ish affiliations.
		So, So I think, like TRS, we're content to say, you know, there's some good stuff coming out of there, but...
		Maybe best if we just go our own way, you know, chart our own course.
		Which is fine, you know, that's fine.
		But it's just a little, some dicey things going on there.
		But he's a very smart guy, and he was right on the money with Lauren Southern and Hope Not Hate, definitely.
		Nolan Watts' Canadian government was apparently involved in a genocide.
		3,000 equals genocide?
		Okay, retard.
		Trudeau's on apology tour.
		The government had nothing to do with it.
		Sad.
		Well, I don't know anything about that.
		I heard about that vaguely.
		I think Faith Goldie told me something about that.
		But I don't really keep up with the Canadian politics, so I don't really know anything about that.
		I'll just say, you know, this proves that as gay as America is, Canada will always be gayer, you know?
		So for everybody that says, you know, Trump is a Cheeto man or whatever, it's like, well, you have Justin Trudeau, so...
		But yeah, sorry to hear that my friend Canada once great country now, not so much right?
		God's plans is to feel when or one New York Times article from being alien deniers.
		Yeah Disclosure imminent who knows right?
		Pro-truth Anti-media says many accounts even history teachers who had certain historical footage gone over Crowder spat and he gets re-monetized Speak English!
		It's time to relook.
		And what Crowder really is, they wiped me along with others at the flip of a switch.
		So I'm going to try and decipher what this means.
		This is just sort of broken English here.
		So accounts of history teachers who had certain historical footage I don't know.
		I can't really interpret what you're saying.
		I'm trying my best.
		I don't think Crowder is in on it.
		he got re-monetized?
	I don't know if that's true.
	I think that's what you're trying to say and who Crowder really is.
	Are you suggesting perhaps that Crowder was in on it, that this was part of some kind of elaborate scheme?
	I don't know.
	I can't really interpret what you're saying.
	I'm trying my best.
	I don't think Crowder is in on it.
	I don't think it's that elaborate, frankly.
	I don't know that he's been re-monetized.
	I haven't heard that, but I haven't really looked into it since it happened last week, so I don't know.
	I guess I'll have to check that out at a later date.
	But for future reference, if you want a little bit more of a clear response, you've got to have a little bit of clarity in the super chat.
	We've got to be using all the precise and every word that we intend to use to convey meaning.
	And this is really truly what language is, using precise words to convey meaning.
	We really have to, I think, focus on some of these skills there.
	But thanks.
	I'm going to be Inner Heaven says, here's my last $2.
	Now I am broke.
	Thanks a lot.
	Well, thanks Inner Heaven gang.
	Much appreciated.
	My buddy Inner Heaven.
	Yeah, well... Better your $2 goes to me than Lawrence Simonson, right?
	I'll just say that much.
	At least when you give me $2, you know that it's either going to a Big Mac or it's going in the bank.
	That's the only two destinations, right?
	Or it's going towards a Nerf gun, but that rarely happens.
	Ponzi says thanks for pilling me so far.
	What is the Walter pill?
	Walter pill is incoming.
	I think I think the world is not yet ready for the Walter pill.
	So definitely incoming pill there.
	House bears to start taking vitamins.
	Nick you eat too much junk!
	You don't know what I eat?
	You don't know what I eat?
	I haven't eaten fast food in over a week.
	The last time I ate fast food was last Saturday.
	I had a sandwich from Popeyes.
	And the time that I had fast food before that, I don't even remember.
	So, all these people always, you eat too much junk food, you eat too much whatever.
	You don't know what I eat?
	How do you know what I eat?
	Because I post when I eat fast food once every two weeks or once a week.
	You know what I've been eating lately?
	I've been eating salads.
	Today I had tostadas that my mom made, okay?
	I had mini-wheats the other day.
	Well, the other day I had a hot dog, admittedly, but that's whatever.
	That's fine.
	You can have a hot dog every now and then.
	You can have a couple hot dogs.
	You can have like, you know, two or three hot dogs and a lot of fries.
	Whatever, okay?
	All right salad a couple of times this week I had you know, just straight-up just good healthy food All right, and I haven't had fast food in a long time.
	So I Don't need I don't trust the vitamins.
	I get my vitamins from the food that I eat Cressif says hey Nick.
	My wife is a lesbian.
	What do I do?
	Might be a blessing in disguise, who knows, right?
	No, I'm kidding!
	I'm kidding!
	It's not Catholic!
	It's not moral, but it's not, but it's not moral, right?
	But it's not moral.
	But we can't have that.
	But we can't, but we cannot think like this.
	No, no, but we can't have it.
	My life is a lesbian.
	What a, what a complaint, right?
	What a, what an unfortunate thing.
	No, I'm joking.
	I think that's a joke.
	So whatever sir Volker Steen says Crowder.
	I'm fighting for free speech David Irving spends 4,000 days in solitary confinement for wrong think brah did David Irving Spend time in solitary confinement.
	I didn't know that Let me look that up.
	Is that true?
	What the this keyboard I got to get a new keyboard I I'm gonna invoice one of my super chatters $10,000 for a new keyboard.
	David Irving, solitary confinement.
	I don't think that that happened.
	I've never heard of this.
	I got this Logitech keyboard and it's like, whatever, for whatever reason, the receiver, if the keyboard's in the wrong position, it doesn't receive it.
	Solitary confinement in Vienna, November 2005 to December 2006.
	Oh, I didn't know that.
	I did not know that.
	Wow.
	Just makes me respect him more.
	But yeah, very true, very true.
	Talk about free speech warriors.
	MD Extremes says, do you mean to say that sodomites are backbiters despiteful?
	Do you mean spiteful?
	Boasters, covenant breakers, implacable and unmerciful?
	Imagine my shock.
	Yeah, isn't that interesting?
	Isn't that sort of fascinating how that works?
	It's almost like it's not an arbitrary preference, it's almost like it's a manifestation of profound immorality.
	It's so weird.
	Who could have called this?
	Pinky Culture says, in an organic state, women would avoid politics.
	Exactly!
	Why should they want to be involved?
	They should want to be home with the kids.
	If I were a woman, why would you want to be involved in politics?
	You know, and this kid's, you know, mommy's home!
	And they run up to you and hug you and you get to take care of the kitties.
	What's better than that?
	They want to be involved in politics?
	They want to make... They want to be a content creator on YouTube?
	Really?
	It's not all it's cracked up to be, believe me.
	If you're a woman, you get to marry somebody, they take care of all the bills.
	All the money.
	They're handling it.
	And what do you have to worry about?
	You cook dinner.
	You learn how to cook.
	Cooking's fun.
	Cooking's fine.
	I don't know how to cook anything.
	Whatever.
	I don't need to.
	Right?
	That's, you know, for other people, alright?
	But cooking, I'm told, is very fun.
	It's a fun hobby.
	People take it up on the side if, you know, when they retire or whatever.
	Get to cook, be with the kids.
	It's a little tough sometimes, but what's more rewarding than that?
	Spending time with your children, your family.
	No, I would rather, I would rather, you know, be a content creator on YouTube.
	I would rather make videos of myself and have to ceaselessly, ceaselessly come up with new political content so that, you know, people could dox me and threaten to harass me or kill me or, you know, get beta orbiters or whatever and I gotta pay bills and yeah, gee, tough choice.
	It's a really hard choice to make, man.
	Why is Stargate SG-1 such a good TV show?
	I don't know what that is.
	I think I'm going to retire now for family, of course.
	Nothing more, nothing less.
	Well, good.
	Good on you, man.
	Good to hear.
	If you can do it, you know, you should.
	Yeah, if they're subversive, gotta go.
	excise subversive gays thoughts and heathens from the right yeah if they're subversive gotta go can't have subversion in the right wing williams's thoughts on aim worth joining I think AIM is good.
	If you're gonna join any organization, you should join them.
	But I gotta be honest with you, I think, I think organizations in general, I think you really got to consider the risk factor.
	I would say be very, very cautious, err on the side of safety when it comes to that.
	Because, you know, we've seen a lot of incidents lately where, you know, A little bit of exposure to groups like that, it can come back to bite you.
	And it's not... AIM is one of the better groups, you know, they have very good OPSEC and all that, and I think Patrick Casey is a very competent leader.
	He's very good at what he does.
	I trust his vision for that group.
	But I would just say that a lot of people, what we preach on the show is you go up, you become a normal, functioning member of society.
	It can be, you know...
	It can be a risk.
	You take a risk when you join on there.
	If it's like you lose your livelihood if that gets exposed and you know your family's gonna go hungry, I would say you think twice, but it depends on your personal situation.
	But AIM is a great group.
	Nick says, thank Destiny for introducing me to the Knickers.
	Yeah, thanks Destiny.
	All these people, yeah, it's always funny.
	They talk about platforming the America first, but they're concerned about it because they know the people will watch the show because it's good content and it's true, right?
	Theos is money for our favorite eboy hedgehog enthusiast.
	Thanks.
	I'm not a hedgehog enthusiast.
	I think that's you're talking about Lawrence Simonson, but I am your favorite eboy.
	I'm becoming an eboy!
	You know I'm rocking, lately I've been rocking the Hawaiian shirt.
	I've been cuffing my jeans.
	I've been wearing those vans that everybody's wearing.
	I'm gonna get some colorful socks.
	I'm there.
	I'm an e-boy.
	I'm still young.
	I'm still young and hip.
	I'm still like a teenager.
	I'm not gonna die.
	I'm gonna live forever.
	I'm not getting old.
	Okay, so I don't want anybody to say I'm aging.
	I am still a very young man.
	You could still say I'm borderline like a teenager, alright?
	I've got some years of youth left in me, okay?
	I believe it.
	You're only as old as you feel.
	That's what I always say, right?
	So anyway, Master Race says, I'm a true conservative.
	I buy my AR-15s with cash.
	Ah, yeah, beast, dude.
	Epic.
	Like, epic gun purchase.
	Woolad says, Oh Allah, destroy and shatter the grifterites.
	So true.
	No grifters!
	Can't have grifters.
	No grifter.
	Remember, no grifters.
	Yeah, but that's all of them, you know.
	That's all of them, frankly.
	Factus is Milo being the head of the Straight Pride Parade is like having an AIPAC employee at the head of an America First movement, lol.
	Well, you basically have that with Yoram Hazony, right?
	I mean, that's essentially David Bragg.
	Yeah, pretty funny.
	That's all it is, really.
	Talking points and cleavage that mainly attracts low IQ people who want to listen to bumper sticker talking points coming from a girl.
	That's all it is, really.
	Look, I mean, I hate to say that because, you know, I think some of them have good ideas.
	Like I like Faith Goldie.
	I think she has good content.
	I was watching her stream the other day, or today actually, and it was a good stream.
	I like her content.
	I like Lauren Rose's content.
	But by and large, look, why do men watch girls produce political content?
	I'm talking about the audience.
	Does the audience show up because that's just really, I really just love political takes?
	Or is it because it's like, you know, pretty girl, you know, and doesn't really matter what she's talking about.
	That's to me what I see.
	It's like that Ashley Clare girl.
	Here you have another case of a literal cam whore who put on a MAGA hat and now everybody's drooling over her.
unidentified		Oh, she's a based MAGA babe.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		She's a MAGA babe.
		She's the queen of MAGA Twitter.
		Camorra and a MAGA hat.
		It's like, you know, does anybody have any illusions about what's going on there, right?
		So, uh, so I agree.
		Uh, Jay Hial says, these superchats might have to become indulgences with all the sins these bad takes make you commit.
		What?
		With all the sins these bad takes.
		Oh, you, boy, because they make me say, uh, Nazi slogans and things like that.
		Yeah, maybe.
		Video game snakes is lol Simon Malloy died of butt cancer.
		Did he who's Simon Malloy?
		I don't know who that is All these people.
		I don't know.
		I don't know what you're talking about.
		Oh From he's a progressive giant So some progressive died of... Oh, that's... Yeah, press F in chat.
		That's a very tough loss, I guess, right?
		Little Jesus says, Clout Rap is that Twitter rap song I sampled you talking about white rappers for the intro.
		Did you enjoy?
		Castizo power!
		Oh yeah, I did see clout rap, actually.
		Yeah, pretty good.
		Pretty good song.
		I was a little bit offended at my verse, though.
		You mentioned me one time, and what did you call me, a spic or something?
		You called me, referenced my Mexican heritage.
		It's like, I feel like there's a little bit more to me than that, right?
		And one line, there were some people in there that didn't deserve, you know, a line, and I got the same amount as them in the song.
		I feel like I deserved a little bit more, you know, proportionate to my clout.
		Right?
		What would be the word?
		Commensurate to my clout.
		But I got one line, and it was not even a very good line.
		So, interesting premise, and not a bad rap.
		You know, not a bad vibe, okay?
		But, you know, just a little bit insulting.
		You're trying to get me to promote the song, and it wasn't very flattering.
		That's all I'm gonna say.
		Caesar King says no man has the right to be an amateur in the matter of physical training.
		It is a shame for a man to grow old without seeing the strength of his body.
		Oh, I think Socrates said that or some other gay Greek or something.
		Yeah, whatever, dude.
		Whatever, Jim Sell.
		Nobody wants to hear your cope.
		Nobody wants to hear it.
		I will become a gym cell when I need to, when I'm older.
		But for now, I've got this young man's body.
		I've got the teenager metabolism.
		I feel fine.
		I don't need that at this juncture, right?
		Once I start putting on the pounds, well then it'll make sense because then I'll start building muscle.
		But for now, it's like It's I don't I don't need it.
		I'm good.
		Okay, I'm fine.
		No, thank you.
		No, thank you Not for me video game snake.
		I I'm kidding.
		I'll be getting in the gym very soon I have to because I'm developing a little bit of a belly not a not a huge belly I'm not getting fat but just a little bit of a you know, a little bit of a little A little belly fat, okay?
		I don't know what that's all about.
		They say it's trans fats, they say it's the processed foods.
		Guilty as charged.
		You know, I was looking in the mirror the other day, I was like, oh boy, I got a little bit of a, got a little bit of a belly.
		I don't know, I don't even necessarily mind that.
		You know, I think having a belly is kind of a Chad thing.
	The virgin, fragile six-pack versus the Chad belly, you know?
	Imagine me, boisterous, smashing into you on the street, my big belly, bumping into you and you bounce off of it into traffic, you know, versus some, you know, six-pack, you're eating salads, you know, doing your little crunches.
	The chad belly, it's just a cauldron of pasta and hot dogs.
	I think, you know, there's clearly a superior way to live there.
	Anyway, Video Game Snake says, uh, wait, what?
	Kaelin leaked Gavin's stuff to Antifa?
	I met him once and he gave me raging homo vibes.
	Why did he go after Gavin?
	Does he hate you?
	He is a homo- he's a homosexual.
	He gave me raging homo- well, that's because he's gay.
	Uh, why did he go after Gavin?
	Does he hate you?
	I don't- why is this person asking these questions like some frantic panicked mode?
	I don't think he knows me.
	We're mutuals on Twitter, actually.
	I don't think he went after Gavin.
	I think he got blackmailed, but I don't know the whole story about that.
	I just know that that's what the article said.
	He gave over his itinerary to Hope Not Hate.
	Froyo says, wish Kanye had the rhetorical IQ to push back against Letterman.
	His interest in Trump was always about cultural intuition and there's normies who still haven't wrapped their heads around that.
	Yeah, I agree 100%.
	Kanye intuitively gets it, but he doesn't really, I don't think he can articulate it very well.
	And David Letterman was such a jagoff in that interview.
	I hate David Letterman.
	That whole interview, he's just totally off-putting the way that he is.
	I've never liked him.
	But it was unfortunate that Kanye couldn't more decisively push back.
	He did a good job, all things considered.
	But that Letterman is such a jerk.
	Jose Antonio says, to all women in politics, STFU.
	Now go clean the house, wash clothes, make meals, Disavow, I disavow this message.
	Disavow.
	This sounds very misogynistic.
	I don't know what you're thinking, big guy.
	You know, this goes against my personal terms of service.
	I don't know what you're thinking putting a chat like that for the show after the rule change.
	I don't know what your game is there, but we're not about that on the show.
	We're about total equality for everybody.
	So I'm gonna, I'm gonna have to stop you right there, all right?
	Treader says, Sean's right.
	Grift world.
unidentified		Wee woo.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm a fire truck.
		Okay.
		Cad says, don't get demonetized, big guy.
		Yeah, thanks.
		I'll try not to.
		Glenn says, is it cringe that I got red-pilled last summer from Million Dollar Extreme?
		Started with AllSup, then found that subreddit.
		Now I'm also a knicker.
		Uh, no.
		I got red-pilled by Sam Hyde, basically.
		In large measure, so... No, I don't think that's cringe.
		Reddit says, Trump's broken promises right-wing grifters and mass tech censorship last week feels like we're going in circles.
		Yep.
		Yep, that's life, big guy.
		That's life.
		That's the way things go, right?
		The more things change, the more they stay the same.
		That's the words to live by.
		IJ says, hey Nick, nice tie.
		Thanks.
		Temple says...
		Whoops, scrolled down too far there.
		Temple says, do you think Posobiec and Chamberlain are grooming the sex laptop to be the next Lauren Southern?
		They're really promoting the hell out of this broad.
		I don't know what their game is with her.
		It could be.
		I don't see that much talent with her.
		She seems to me just like a vapid e-whore, you know?
		I think that's basically what she is.
		So yeah, I mean, maybe they're positioning her, you know, to take up some larger position, but I don't really know.
		I'm not really privy to all that.
		Not a bad idea.
		It could be the case.
		That's very true.
		Very true.
		I am a cool guy, and I am a part of the cool crowd.
		I guess the tables have turned, haven't they?
		I guess the tables have turned, you know?
unidentified		Very true.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I am a cool guy, and I am a part of the cool crowd.
		I guess the tables have turned, haven't they?
		I guess the tables have turned, you know?
		Now, I'm the cool internet guy leading the cool internet movement with all these old people and grifters in the movement.
		I'm the Chad leader of the Nickerite, the Zoomerite, you know?
		So I guess you could say that.
		Yeah, I guess I am a pretty cool guy.
		Connor says, People with no connections or influence are often defamed or have their personal lives picked apart because they share the same opinions you share.
		Where do we draw the line when it comes to character flaws?
		Where do we draw the line?
		I think maybe, like, criminality is, like, a good position?
		You talk about tearing people's lives apart!
		Is that what happened in this case?
		I don't think that's what happened, you know?
		So I would say that it's... you have to be reasonable about it.
		I'm not saying you have to be a saint, although, you know, that would... you should be as moral as possible.
		But I am saying that people that are stealing money from the movement and they're homosexuals, like, that's kind of a big one, you know?
		Or, uh, you know, generally things like that.
		You gotta be moral.
		You know, you can't be an alcoholic.
		I think that's probably not great.
		You can't be... I think it's... I think... I don't think you really need to define it very well.
		I think people can very well understand the difference between sort of just being a human being and somebody who's obviously problematic.
		And we see the people that are problematic, you know.
		It's not, in the case of these people, it's not like their lives were ripped apart, it's they imploded, they self-sabotaged because of their moral failings, right?
		So I'm not saying it's like, we have to go after and rip apart people that aren't moral, that aren't, you know, living up to.
		People do that, I don't like people who do that.
		I'm talking about people like Milo is a good example, who flamed out because of drug and alcohol addiction.
		Nobody ripped him apart.
		They ripped him apart, and then he got $15 million, and then he destroyed himself because of his lifestyle.
		And Kalen Robertson and this other guy.
		Nobody knew about this, for the most part, until yesterday or until, what's his name, who was mentioned earlier, Margot.
		Mark Collette talked about it, right?
		That was around CPAC, so February of this year.
		Nobody had even heard of that.
		They destroyed themselves because of their lifestyle.
		And so, there's a lot of instances like this.
		So, I guess that's an important clarification.
		I'm not saying go after and destroy people who don't live up to, you know, the moral standards set by somebody.
		And we should rip people down and tear down fellow right-wing people.
		I'm not saying that.
		I'm saying that, you know, time and again, when people fail, when movements fail, organizations, it tends to be because of the character deficit.
		At least in this circumstance with alt-right, alt-light, e-celebrity types of the past couple of years, we see a lot of momentum, a lot of opportunities squandered.
		And it wasn't for lack of ideological knowledge or lack of funds.
		It was because they couldn't get their act together, you know.
		So I think that's an important distinction to make.
		Nicholas says, here they come, screaming across the sky.
		It's lots and lots of jets, planes, the greatest collection of aviation DVDs we've ever offered.
		And through the special TV offer, you can get two DVDs for the price of one.
		I remember that one, too.
		Lots and lots of jets and planes.
		They also did another, what was the other one?
		They did another one just like that.
		But, yeah, the old infomercials.
		The new Zoomers will never understand.
		They will never know what it was like.
		To watch these dated infomercials in between, you know, Nickelodeon shows or whatever.
		The Sunroof Retractable Awning, you remember that one?
		That one was on up until very recently, the same advertisement, for like 10 years.
		So what do we have?
		Lendy pen, lots and lots of play-ins, Zoo Books, Sunroof, you know, so there's a lot of good ones.
		David Sperner says, Nick, who would win?
		One well-adjusted national Azuma talk show host or one hour of two dollar peepee poopoo and Drake and Josh superchats?
		Me, clearly, because I'm because I'm making money off of it, right?
	Deplorable Mike says, all pro-drug stoners need to be expelled from the right wing, Duterte style.
unidentified		When?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I agree.
		Yeah, no pro-drug people.
		It's not a pro-drug movement.
		Yeah, that's true.
		That's true.
		But that doesn't, I think, take away from the failures on the other issues.
		Yeah, make sure you don't do that.
		Faith Goldie says, thank you so much for the show, Nick.
		Best analysis yet.
		Moral characters, everything in the movement.
		For leaders, laity, and pee-pee-poopoo alike.
		Ah, well thank you, Faith Goldie.
		Much appreciated.
		And we love Faith Goldie.
		You know, look, if there were any e-girls that we could say are alright, I would say it's Faith, it's Lauren Rose, it's Soph.
		So there's some, you know, it's like, as with anything, there's some exceptions, you know?
		I don't think it's a totally blanket rule.
		We like Faith Goldie.
		So I appreciate that.
		Thanks for the super chat.
		Thank you for the kind words.
		Thanks for thanks for living it out, right?
		I will say with Faith Goldie.
		She got married, you know, she's gonna have a family and that's that's what it is, right?
		That's what it's all about.
		So, uh, so I do appreciate that.
		They're Faith Catholic and, and a goy, you know, which is critical, right?
		So thanks, Faith.
		Much appreciated.
		Mommy Faith, always coming in.
		Elegant says, the cheap labor, more expensive fruit debate kills me, not to mention the energy argument.
		The United States, okay, yeah, I just simply can't read that last part.
		But, uh, but yeah, that, that debate is just so, it's all so tiresome to write about.
		Who will work in the fields or the, you know, inflated prices?
		How many times have we heard that?
		It's just total farce.
		Turkey Tom says, hey Nick, please unblock me on Twitter.
		I can't live without you.
		I am a fellow base Mediterranean.
		Help!
		I think I blocked you for a reason.
		I distinctly remember seeing your ad recently and being not pleased with what you were posting.
		So I don't think I'm gonna unblock you Turkey Tom, but maybe I'll look into it.
		You know, I'll type it in just for the fun of it, but I don't believe I'm gonna be unblocking you anytime soon.
		Turkey time.
		Cringe Normies says, take my money, I'm listening while playing Fortnite.
		Based?
		Well, thanks bro.
		Reddit says, tool up.
		Yeah, we're gonna tool up.
		Oh, we're tooling up every day, believe me.
		We do have to tool up in preparation for our missions, as we say.
		Dark Side of Reality says, all the early alt-right movements collapsed because they didn't have the church at their core.
		Big part of it, definitely.
		Excuse me.
		I think that's a big part of it, sure.
		Red Coat Slayer says, Hey Nick, what's the most red-pilled Fortnite dance?
		Um, I don't know.
		That's a good question.
		Maybe the floss.
		The floss is the zoomer dance.
		You know, I mean, that is the signifier, the identifier of the zoomer lately.
		But, you know, the swipe it.
		Otherwise known as the Millie Rock is a good one.
	Let me think.
	The infinite dab or just the plain dab is a fine dance.
	Orange justice is a classic.
	So I would say all of those are acceptable.
	The default dance, of course.
	So I would say default orange justice, the milli rock, the dab, and the floss, I would say, are all very critical contributions.
	But not to be outdone, the NeNe.
	The NeNe I don't think ever made it into Fortnite, but you know, it has slept on.
	Lance says Nick joins Kara, Boga against the Eternal... Who-toid?
	I don't know what that is.
	What does that even mean?
	People speaking different languages.
	Daniel says your thoughts on tattoos.
	Very against tattoos.
	Tattoos are gay.
	I guess, look, people have said this before, if you're in the military, I guess, in a gang, something like that, it makes more sense.
	I personally think tattoos are stupid.
	I would never get a tattoo.
	I think lesser of people that have tattoos, frankly, if you want to know the truth.
	So I, yeah, I'm against it.
	Why would you want to get a tattoo?
	I don't understand it.
	You're the product of thousands of years of your ancestors surviving and fighting, so you could be here.
	If you believe in evolution or design or anything like that, you're going to scribble on yourself?
	What could possibly be so valuable?
	Meaningful that you would write it on your body like that, you know people getting a Chinese character skull or barbed wire Whoa, dude, you're cool.
	So I guess it makes sense if you're in a gang if you're in the military I think that's the only maybe borderline acceptable applications, but I'm just against it.
	I don't think that's only it's cool I think it's gross.
	I think it looks dumb King Harless says stop eating salads need more Big Macs.
	You can go from being a big boy to a big man You just can't win.
	You eat Big Macs.
	Stop eating junk food.
	You eat salads.
	You eat Big Macs.
	I'm just gonna be me.
	I'm just gonna be me, I guess you could say.
	David Sperger says, Nick, did you know that you can get 12 issues of Zoobucks with the elephant issue and tiger poster for only $19.95 and each issue comes with stickers.
	Must be 18 or older to order.
	Aw, thanks.
	This joke is so funny.
	Four times.
	We could do it four times.
	It's still funny.
	How many times can we do it?
	It'll still be funny.
	Four times in running and it is just as funny as the first time.
	Thank you so much.
	Lincoln Young says, saw you on Red Elephants.
	Got into your clip videos.
	Loved it.
	Now I'm here.
	You think you will have another stream with Red Elephants, Blackfield, and Owen?
	Uh, yeah, maybe.
	I mean, he sets those up.
	Um, so maybe we'll do that in the future.
	I'd be down for it.
	But thanks, man.
	Appreciate it.
	Glad you, uh, liked my stream with Vince.
	He's a good friend of mine.
	Owen has been very kind to me.
	We like him.
	And Blackfield, I don't know very well, but he was very cool on the stream.
	So I appreciate it.
	Okay.
	Yeah, I don't remember the exact line, but, uh, you know, I don't, I don't know.
	I wasn't really in love with it.
	Just saying.
	I think about writing my own rap songs myself, and every time I stop short because I say, well, wait a minute.
	Just because I like good rap music doesn't mean I can produce real rap music, so...
	So I don't know.
	I think about it a lot.
	It's a pipe dream of mine to do a creative venture like that.
	You know, I look at Beardson Beardley, who has hundreds of rap songs and has made some very good ones that he's released on Twitter.
	The ones that he's posted are very good.
	Paul Towne is a very good musical artist.
	Great voice.
	Very slept on.
	You know, so I've always thought, should I branch out?
	Should I expand my horizons?
	I don't know if I have it in me.
	I don't know if I have the aptitude.
	Which is tragic, because I would love to do one of the creative arts like that, but I just don't think I have the capacity.
	I think my aptitude is very one-track, so who knows?
	But maybe I'll give it a shot one day.
	Me and Party Goy collaborating, or somebody else.
	We'll see.
	Okay, so I see we have an anti-Catholic in the chat.
unidentified		That's okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		True, I do.
		Glenn John says, trusted characters you say, but you push socialist pedo church.
		Okay, so I see we have an anti-Catholic in the chat.
		That's okay.
		Well, you're going to go to hell, so I don't know.
		I mean, why should we trust somebody like you if you're going to hell?
		Billy says, Nick, I decided to give a name to my America First mug.
		And by the way, the churches in Socialist are pedo, okay?
		You have pedophiles in every institution in the world.
		Name me an institution where you don't have people that are sinning or doing sexual abuses.
		They have them in Protestant churches.
		They have them in Orthodox churches.
		They have them in synagogues, Muslims.
		They have them in public schools.
		They have them in businesses.
		You know so people always with the church sex scandal as if the Catholic Church is the one of the largest organizations in the world and people point out a handful of scandals that exist in every other institution at higher rates and say well the church is particularly a problem.
		So you can go after yourself Billy says Nick.
		I decided to give a name to my America first mug I chose the name Nick as a tribute to you.
		Thanks, Nick Thanks.
		Thanks for sharing.
		I appreciate that right.
		It says lots and lots of trains.
		Yeah, that's what I was thinking of That's a more memorable one KC says, hmm, Ash St.
		Clair is also Jewish?
		What's going on?
		Yeah, isn't that funny?
		Will Chamberlain, Ashley St.
		Clair, AJ Cortez.
		That's so funny and convenient and weird, right?
		It's fine.
		It's fine.
		It's because they're, you know, really go-getters, I guess.
		Jahiel Fish says, the E-drama proves Western women are bunk no more!
unidentified		True.
unidentified		Banned.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Can't have them.
		Okay, that's our last Super Chat.
		That's going to do it for us on the show.
		It's nine o'clock.
		It's been a two-hour show.
		Remember to check us out.
		NicholasJFuentes.com membership.
		It's only five dollars per month to become a premium subscriber to the show.
		It helps support the show monetarily.
		Demonetizations are happening.
		Censorship is happening.
		We have to have your monetary support.
		It's the best way to do that.
		But you also get one exclusive show every week as a premium member.
		We just posted one today, a two-hour special.
		And the last one we did was a two-hour feature.
		And, you know, there's no reason for that.
		You know, it's just a two-hour show because I'm just charitable with the content, right?
		Two-hour show posted today about, like I said, that New York Times piece.
		We also exposed the National Conservatism Conference.
		So be sure to check that out.
		The link is down below.
		NicholasJFluentes.com slash membership.
		Remember to subscribe to the channel.
		Give me a big thumbs up.
		Leave a comment down below.
		Click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
		Remember, we are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
		Central, 8 p.m.
		Eastern Standard Time.
		I'm Nicholas J. Flintzis.
		As always, this is America First.
		Thank you guys for watching.
		Thanks to our Super Chatters.
		Thanks to our premium members.
		We could not do the show without you folks.
		Thanks to everybody who watches.
		We love you and we'll see you tomorrow.
		Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.

▲