May 21, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
02:08:45
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Wall. Wall. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wall. Wall. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| you I'm out. | ||
| Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's going to be only America first. | |
| America first. | ||
| The American people will come first once again. | ||
| With respect, the respect that we deserve. | ||
| From this day on, it's going to be only America. | ||
| Good evening everybody. | ||
| We're watching America First. | ||
| My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes. | ||
| We have a great show for you tonight. | ||
| Very excited to be back with you today here on Tuesday. | ||
| And it's a bit of a tough day, a bit of a dark day for us. | ||
| The feature of the show, of course, is about the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment. | ||
| So, I can't really tell you that it's a great day. | ||
| I can't really tell you that it's a fabulous day that we're experiencing today. | ||
| We're gonna be talking about that. | ||
| We've got a whiteboard prepared for you. | ||
| That's really our big news story. | ||
| Not so much else going on. | ||
| It seems like everything else is kind of simmering, kind of calming down a little bit. | ||
| Simmering? | ||
| Is that calming or is that escalating? | ||
| I guess, well... | ||
| Regardless, things are slowing down a little bit. | ||
| You know, last week I said we were getting excited because things were heating up with China, things were heating up with Iran, and now it just seems like nothing happens, you know? | ||
| And that's how I was feeling a little bit last week. | ||
| People are saying, War with Iran! | ||
| War with Iran! | ||
| We're going to war with Iran! | ||
| And in the back of my mind I'm thinking, nothing ever happens, you know. | ||
| Of course it's not going to happen. | ||
| But a little part of me is like, there would be such a big show! | ||
| It would be such a big show if we went to war with Iran. | ||
| And it would have been a lot of big shows down the road, right? | ||
| So maybe there's the military-industrial complex and then there's the America First industrial complex. | ||
| Maybe you have some high-level America First viewer in the State Department, in the Defense Department. | ||
| Maybe a high-level America First viewer on a submarine somewhere in the ocean presses the button, turns the key, whatever. | ||
| Says, you know what? | ||
| We have to do it for the content. | ||
| So, kind of a slow week. | ||
| So we'll be talking about women's suffrage. | ||
| Big 100th anniversary. | ||
| We'll be getting into that. | ||
| There's also some new information. | ||
| Out of the White House, actually very important related to personnel. | ||
| We've been looking at this position now for a couple of months now. | ||
| The immigration czar, you might have heard of this. | ||
| I think it was right around the government shutdown, people in the White House started to talk about the creation of a new position outside of the Department of Homeland Security, outside of some of these policy advisors. | ||
| And they would create a new immigration czar and they've had these czar positions in the White House for a while now. | ||
| I think this began under the Obama administration where they appoint kind of a temporary official to oversee one particular issue that is not being focused on maybe or is not getting the desired attention from the major departments because there's only so many departments and a lot of them do many different things. | ||
| So for example, I believe Barack Obama hired an Ebola czar or a Zika czar, something like that, during his administration to oversee, just as one example, one particular area, you know, strain of a disease, one particular crisis. | ||
| And so they talked about this during the government shutdown, the appointment of an immigration czar. | ||
| And of course, the DHS Secretary is out. | ||
| They have an acting DHS Secretary, Mick Alinan. | ||
| And what they've been discussing with these two positions is, of course, Chris Kobach. | ||
| Are we going to get Chris Kobach as either an Immigration Czar or as the DHS Secretary? | ||
| And so far, we haven't seen any movement on that. | ||
| We haven't seen anything in the way of Well, it was announced this week, first reported by the New York Times, that the President has found his immigration czar. | ||
| And it's somebody by the name of Ken Cuccinelli. | ||
| Not Kris Kovacs. | ||
| We'll be talking about that decision, and there's a lot of palace intrigue going on there about why it wasn't Kris Kovac, who might have played a role in torpedoing Kris Kovac's prospects in getting this position, or any other position for that matter. | ||
| We'll be talking about another personnel change which happened and some pretty interesting things happening in the White House, pretty interesting movements happening, but I can tell you not all of it good. | ||
| Not all of it good. | ||
| Like we were talking about yesterday with the E-Verify statement that was made in that interview with Fox News the other day, things seem to be going in the wrong direction. | ||
| It seems like just when we start to go in the right direction, just when we start to see, okay, maybe there's this renewed effort on this particular issue, or maybe it's on trade, or it's on foreign policy, every time he says we're pulling out of Syria, or we've got the USMCA ready, it always just, out of nowhere, just begins to go in the wrong direction. | ||
| It goes nowhere, right? | ||
| So, we'll get into all of that. | ||
| It should be a pretty fun Great show, even though it's a slow news day. | ||
| Slow news week, we have these sometimes, but we're going to try and keep it fun, energetic, regardless. | ||
| But that should do it for the show. | ||
| I was going to talk a little bit about the Australian elections, but honestly, I don't really feel it's that particularly exciting. | ||
| You know, I mean, we have a lot of Australian people who watch the show. | ||
| A lot of Kiwis and a lot of Aussies. | ||
| Kiwis, I guess, is New Zealand, right? | ||
| So, people in that general area, same accents. | ||
| We have a lot of those types in the audience, but, you know, for people that don't know, they have this big election in Australia. | ||
| The Conservative Party there pulled out a major upset victory. | ||
| and it turned everybody upside down. | ||
| The media was in shock. | ||
| People around the world were in shock. | ||
| I don't know if people around the world, but people in Australia were shocked that the Conservative Party won, but I don't think that's really so much relevant to American politics. | ||
| I guess it's fair to say if we see that happening in Australia, if we see this happening elsewhere in Europe, we see the European Union elections coming up, and the Brexit Party is polling very well, and Lega Nord, or just Lega as it's called now in Italy, is polling very well. | ||
| Suffice to say, I think that perhaps right-wing populism is not dead. | ||
| So, I don't want to expand too much on the Australian election subject, didn't really want to devote too much time to that, but I do think it's worth mentioning, I do think it's worth throwing out there just briefly to say, as we talked about a little bit last week when Viktor Orban came to visit Trump, that it seems to me like if the right-wing doesn't pull it off in America, | ||
| If we're not able to save the country politically with a conservative party, or a right-wing political revolution, or something akin to the insurgency we saw in 2016, if that doesn't work in America, I think we can all be very white-pilled that it's happening everywhere else, I guess. | ||
| I guess it's happening everywhere else. | ||
| So I don't know if you want to interpret that as a white pill or a black pill. | ||
| Black pill because it's highly disappointing here. | ||
| White pill that even if it doesn't happen here, it's happening elsewhere. | ||
| But we can look across the ocean on both sides and we can see that it seems like in Australia things are looking up. | ||
| I'm not sure exactly if their conservative party is exactly the kind of populist nationalist movement that we need, but regardless, it's better than the Liberal Party. | ||
| And we look across the other way in Europe, it seems like things are getting a lot better. | ||
| So, disappointing. | ||
| I guess maybe that's a little bit of a cope. | ||
| The virgin Trump in America versus the Chad, Orban, Salvini, Farage in Europe. | ||
| But that's something else that's going on. | ||
| Like I said, that should do it for our show. | ||
| We're going to jump into the immigration thing first. | ||
| Really, this has been the story of the administration. | ||
| This has been the most disappointing thing this year. | ||
| As I've been saying, I thought after the midterms we were going to get serious about immigration. | ||
| And I thought for a short time a couple of weeks ago we were going to get serious about immigration again, even though I've been totally blackpilled, totally off the Trump train. | ||
| You know, after the midterms we had executive orders in the works, allegedly, and we had a government shutdown that began, and it seemed like there was this focus, and then that evaporated. | ||
| And then that, of course, was totally derailed, totally failed. | ||
| We didn't get the federal government funding for the wall, and actually we lost on everything else. | ||
| And then after the government shut down, I said, okay, it's over. | ||
| It's game over. | ||
| Maybe we're gang gang. | ||
| Maybe we're gonna vote for Democrats. | ||
| Maybe we're gonna just go underground. | ||
| Maybe politics is finished. | ||
| But then we saw things were starting to pick up again. | ||
| Then we saw there was this renewed focus on immigration again, and we had this new proposal from Jared Kushner, which we talked about last week. | ||
| Turned out it was actually pretty good as far as modernizing the immigration system, shifting from chain migration to skills-based migration. | ||
| I said to you and I said to myself, okay, there is room for course correction. | ||
| There's room to make things better. | ||
| But just time after time, we see it always thwarted. | ||
| And that's the announcement from today. | ||
| This is from CNN. | ||
| It says, President Donald Trump is expected to name Ken Cuccinelli, a former Attorney General of Virginia, to a top job at the Department of Homeland Security overseeing the administration's immigration policies. | ||
| Trump was considering Cuccinelli and former Kansas Secretary of State Chris Kobach for the newly created immigration position, but Kobach came under scrutiny this week when he reportedly demanded a list of requirements for the job, including access to a government plane, a future position in the president's cabinet, as well as unprecedented access to the president. | ||
| And so this is why this is a black pill. | ||
| I've heard from a couple of sources that Ken Cuccinelli is actually good on immigration. | ||
| I don't know if that's legit or not. | ||
| I don't know I haven't heard from some of the usual suspects on whether or not that's authentic. | ||
| Because we've heard a lot of people are good on immigration, right? | ||
| I mean we've heard that from a lot of different people and somehow it never seems to come to fruition. | ||
| It never seems to actualize. | ||
| So I'm not exactly certain about his prospects as will he be tough on immigration? | ||
| Will he be a good immigration czar? | ||
| They say he's good on border security. | ||
| This is continuing from CNN. | ||
| It says, although Cuccinelli shares the President's view on border security and immigration, he was a strong critic of Trump during the 2016 Republican primary. | ||
| Cuccinelli famously threw his credentials on the ground during the 2016 Republican National Convention in protest of Trump. | ||
| So I find it hard to believe. | ||
| They say at once he's a strong supporter. | ||
| He's great and strong on immigration. | ||
| He's in favor of border security. | ||
| But at the same time, and you might have seen this, there was a clip posted and it was circulating on Twitter from the 2016 National Convention. | ||
| Your member was very controversial at the time. | ||
| There was this question of the unbound delegates versus the bound delegates. | ||
| Is the party going to try to steal the nomination from Donald Trump and give it to Ted Cruz? | ||
| Will they throw it to Marco Rubio? | ||
| You know, what's going to happen? | ||
| And if you remember, there were a number of Republican Party apparatchik-type people who were not happy, who were in protest of this, and they wouldn't pledge their delegates to Donald Trump. | ||
| In some cases they were taking their placards, throwing them on the ground. | ||
| This was one of these people. | ||
| Ken Cuccinelli, who embarrassed everybody, embarrassed the whole party, he was so upset with the nomination, and actively campaigned against Donald Trump and spoke out against Donald Trump, throws his credentials to the ground in protest. | ||
| Donald Trump Jr., his son, goes on an interview and says, this guy's an idiot for doing that. | ||
| This is now our immigration czar? | ||
| I just think... | ||
| Every step of the way, every opportunity that we get to turn it around, every opportunity that we get to capitalize, we have this big crisis where now even the New York Times and the Washington Post and publications like this are saying, yes, there is a crisis at the border. | ||
| Yes, we need to secure the border. | ||
| You know, six months ago, they were saying, what crisis? | ||
| There is no crisis. | ||
| And it's gotten so bad. | ||
| It was bad six months ago. | ||
| It was bad two years ago. | ||
| It's gotten so bad now that now even the major publications are saying, yeah, Trump is right. | ||
| It's a crisis. | ||
| Now even Democrats are being polled as saying it's a crisis in huge majorities. | ||
| They're even saying that Trump's immigration plan should be voted in the affirmative by the Democrats. | ||
| They're saying Democrats should adopt and accept and vote for the president's immigration plan. | ||
| So yet again, a critical perfect opportunity to capitalize on what's happening at the border. | ||
| And instead of picking Chris Kobach, who we've talked about on the show, would be perfect for the job. | ||
| This guy served under George W. Bush. | ||
| He created like the first ever national system to root out foreign aliens. | ||
| He basically was one of the masterminds and architects of E-Verify in Arizona. | ||
| I mean this guy was like He is one of the modern, like, godfathers of strong immigration policy of the Department of Homeland Security. | ||
| This guy's a great lawyer. | ||
| He's very intelligent. | ||
| Not a great politician. | ||
| That's why he's not the governor of Kansas. | ||
| You know, he lost in 2018. | ||
| But nevertheless, he was the right pick, and we've gone through his credentials before, and we can't... I mean, he's got all the right backing from all the major organizations, all the right pundits, all the right politicians, and he was passed over. | ||
| In favor of Ken Cuccinelli, who didn't even, I'm sure, vote for Donald Trump, who didn't even want him to become the nominee. | ||
| Now he's working in the White House. | ||
| And this is one of the time-old, age-old problems that we see in the White House, which, again, is the personnel. | ||
| That's kind of the tricky thing, is for a long time, it's sort of hard to parse out. | ||
| Things have not been going our way. | ||
| Things have been failing, obviously. | ||
| We haven't seen progress. | ||
| We haven't even seen stasis on the core issues that were Uh, that were elevated during the 2016 election. | ||
| Things like foreign policy, things like trade, immigration. | ||
| Not only is it not progress, it's not even stasis. | ||
| It's not even staying the same. | ||
| It's all getting worse and getting drastically worse. | ||
| It's like accelerating. | ||
| It's the rate and it's also getting worse, right? | ||
| And it's hard to parse out, well, who's really responsible? | ||
| For a long time I think we were fit to say, well, And I would say it's strictly personnel. | ||
| I think in recent weeks and recent months, like we talked about last night with E-Verify, we can probably place a lot of the blame on the man himself, on the president. | ||
| But time and again I don't know how you keep making these decisions. | ||
| How many times have we seen this where we get somebody in the cabinet, or we get somebody who's a deputy to a cabinet member, or we get somebody who's in Congress working with the president, who you could go back in 2016, it takes a simple Google search, and they either worked for another campaign, or they spoke out against Trump, or they called Trump like Hitler, or the devil, or a white nationalist. | ||
| You go down the list of probably half the people in the White House didn't vote for the guy, campaigned for somebody else, or they spoke out against him. | ||
| You know, that's half the cabinet, that's probably half of everybody in the White House. | ||
| How does this keep happening? | ||
| You know, but then we get yet another one. | ||
| You would think two years in, we would have learned the lesson. | ||
| That's when I think you really have to put the blame on the man. | ||
| That's when I really start to question, do we vote for him again? | ||
| You know, I wavered a little bit last week. | ||
| We interviewed Jesse Lee Peterson on The Premium Show, and Jesse Lee Peterson, he's still on the Trump train, and we had a little bit of an exchange on this, and he urged me, he pressed me, he said, you know, you gotta vote for him because everybody's against him, and he's the only one who's fighting back, and he's the great white hope, and, you know, we have to trust that God is guiding him in all this. | ||
| I said, oh, all right, you know, maybe maybe we're being a little hard on him. | ||
| He does have a hard time out there. | ||
| But how do you keep making these mistakes two years? | ||
| And it's happened dozens of times and it's reported in the mainstream media. | ||
| It's not like this is Like a secret. | ||
| You know, it's not like I'm the only one who knows about it. | ||
| If I know about it, I'm some 20 year old guy in Chicago doing a YouTube show. | ||
| If I know about it, your advisors know about it, the people in your administration know about it, your friends know about it. | ||
| It's in the newspapers that you yourself read. | ||
| It's on television. | ||
| That's all you do is watch television. | ||
| So I think, time and again, when this happens, you have to say, I don't even think it's Cuccinelli's. | ||
| If he doesn't do a good job, it's not his fault. | ||
| If immigration is failing, it's really not the fault of DHS. | ||
| It's this man's fault! | ||
| Get it together, man! | ||
| For two years, I said, okay, well... | ||
| You know, he's he's getting his sea legs, like Steve Bannon said, you know, that's the excuse he gives for Trump when he goes around on his, you know, Trump apology tour. | ||
| Well, you know, he was figuring everything out. | ||
| How can you continue to say that? | ||
| So the Cucinelli thing is, you know, it's nothing we haven't seen before. | ||
| But to me, what is most shocking is a detail in this CNN excerpt that I read. | ||
| Why was Kris Kobach passed over? | ||
| Why? | ||
| Why was there this big backlash? | ||
| Why was Cuccinelli chosen over Kobach? | ||
| It had to do with this list that was leaked. | ||
| Like CNN said, Kobach only came under scrutiny this week when he reportedly demanded a list of requirements for the job. | ||
| And it was all kinds of embarrassing things, I guess. | ||
| I don't really know what standard for this kind of position, but it says that he requested the government plane, a future position in the cabinet. | ||
| I mean, some pretty heavy demands. | ||
| And the question is, well, who leaked this? | ||
| You know, every time that we look at this White House, which there's leaks everywhere, there's chaos everywhere. | ||
| And we talked about this last week with the leak that the president was preparing a 120,000-strong ground force to invade Iran organization. | ||
| Or a leak that said the president was actually very skeptical of war in Iran. | ||
| Or, you know, years ago when Steve Bannon was still around and you'd hear all these leaks about personnel changes and drama in the Oval Office, swearing, fighting, phone calls, this kind of thing. | ||
| Where did the leak come from? | ||
| According to people connected to the White House, this is according to Ryan Gerduski, Stephen Miller leaked the list. | ||
| So that's to me what's most shocking. | ||
| Donald Trump hiring somebody who campaigned against him. | ||
| Donald Trump hiring somebody who isn't good on policy, who is not true to the MAGA spirit, the America First Revolution. | ||
| That's not new. | ||
| The shock to me is that according to a lot of sources the person who leaked this list of demands that got Kobach passed over came directly from Stephen Miller which if you know anything about the White House Stephen Miller is he's one of the top policy advisors and he is seen as the last remaining immigration hawk in the White House, I guess, except for Trump, if Trump can still be considered such a person. | ||
| So, you know, we had Steve Bannon in there. | ||
| We had a few other good people in the White House who were serious about immigration. | ||
| Slowly but surely, all of them have been eliminated. | ||
| Slowly but surely, all the nationalists, all the heavy hitters, all the hardcore people, even lower level people like Darren Beatty, And I don't say that in a negative way. | ||
| I mean, he was a speechwriter. | ||
| But somehow, all these people in the White House who were Trump campaign people, who were America First people, who have been around the block, who are endorsed by people like Ann Coulter or others, somehow they've all been cleaned out of the White House, yet Miller remains. | ||
| And I never really thought too much about that. | ||
| You know, we always saw Miller as the saving grace of the administration. | ||
| Well, maybe they get Mick Mulvaney as the Chief of Staff, and Mick Mulvaney's totally Koch brother owned, and, you know, maybe we get Mickalinen in his DHS, and he's maybe worse than Nielsen. | ||
| But hey, at least we got Stephen Miller looking out for us. | ||
| He was looking out for us last year, when you had the government shutdown, and he torpedoed all these deals that would have given amnesty for DACA. | ||
| And we talked last week, why was Kushner's immigration proposal seen as good? | ||
| Well, because Stephen Miller gave it a stamp of approval. | ||
| But according to Ryan Gerduski, who's very connected to these sources, he's one of our favorites on the show, he says that actually Stephen Miller has to do with a lot of these different incidents. | ||
| I've actually also heard that in the case of Darren Beatty, another perfect example. | ||
| You know Darren Beatty? | ||
| He was one of the only tenured university, or I'm sorry, non-tenured university faculty to endorse Donald Trump in the 2016 election. | ||
| He has written great articles in American Greatness, a few other publications. | ||
| He spoke at the HL Mencken Conference. | ||
| I mean, a very solid dude and very strong America First type guy. | ||
| Totally, 100% our guy, America First type person. | ||
| When he was fired as a speechwriter, I've heard from some back channels, from QAnon himself, that when Darren Beatty was fired, Stephen Miller did not stick up for him. | ||
| And it seems like that is a pattern. | ||
| I've heard this from multiple people. | ||
| That when these pro-immigration people get fired, or they get forced out, or they don't get hired, it seems like Stephen Miller perhaps is behind this. | ||
| I guess the word on the street is that Miller wants to take all the credit. | ||
| He wants the strong immigration agenda in the White House, but he wants people to see that it was done by Stephen Miller. | ||
| And again, This is what we've heard. | ||
| We've heard this from good sources. | ||
| So I don't want to, when I say that this is what we've heard from back channels and things like that, I don't want to undermine the claims being made. | ||
| These are good sources saying this, but I am saying this is the word on the block. | ||
| This is what we hear, but they are pretty legitimate sources. | ||
| So to me, that's pretty shocking. | ||
| That's pretty surprising. | ||
| Because like I said, for the longest time, we always said, well as long as Miller's in there, if Miller goes, we're done. | ||
| If Miller is out of the White House, then it's over. | ||
| But I think you're starting to see that this is how, this is politics. | ||
| This is the mean game of politics. | ||
| And egos enter into play, and personalities enter into play. | ||
| And that should tell you something about the struggle that we face ahead of us. | ||
| When a lot of people are very much obsessed about policy, And people are obsessed about legislation, and people are obsessed about ideology, and meta-politics, and philosophy. | ||
| All of that really takes a backseat to personnel. | ||
| All of that takes a backseat to logistics, to politics, character, loyalty, things of this nature. | ||
| You know, if you think about politics as a car, All that, you know, intellectual, heavy, high-minded type stuff is in the trunk of the car. | ||
| What's in the driver's seat is things like character. | ||
| It's who the politicians are. | ||
| And I've said that a lot about the Democratic contest in 2020. | ||
| People always say, well, who do you think is going to be the nominee? | ||
| Is it going to be a progressive? | ||
| Is it going to be a socialist? | ||
| All of that matters a lot less As opposed to, who are the people that are competent? | ||
| Who are the people that actually have the character traits? | ||
| Who has it in them that they're going to be able to close the deal, get the nomination, whatever? | ||
| And that's an analogy, but I think it fits with Stephen Miller as well. | ||
| Clearly, it doesn't really matter that he's very strong in immigration, if that's the kind of attitude that he has. | ||
| If that's the kind of personality, whatever, character traits that he brings to the table, if he's willing to backstab everybody who can actually accomplish this agenda, what good is he in the White House? | ||
| Would you prefer Steve Bannon, who may be a prima donna and leaks a little bit, but he's a team player, he gets a job done? | ||
| Well, maybe he suffers from a little bit of the same thing as Miller. | ||
| Or do you have Stephen Miller, who's this psycho, I guess this is what the word on the street is, and he's somebody who's going to force everybody out, leak things to keep Chris Kobach out? | ||
| Because if Kris Kobach got on as immigrations are, I think a lot of people would say, you've got a much better chance of turning the border security situation around. | ||
| But he didn't let that happen. | ||
| So, very disappointing if that's true. | ||
| Very disappointing to hear about Miller. | ||
| And the obvious disappointment is the end result, which is that now we've got, you know, the next best, the second best pick, as opposed to the best pick for Zarf. | ||
| So we hope, you know, we hope this guy Cuccinelli does a good job. | ||
| We hope that what they say about him is true. | ||
| We hope that he's good on border security, but I don't think he's a substitute for Kovach. | ||
| And if Kovach doesn't get in at DHS, I think we know we can blame two people, Donald Trump and Stephen Miller, for why the border isn't secured. | ||
| You got the White House. | ||
| You got the presidency. | ||
| It's all locked and loaded, ready to go. | ||
| You've even got fine people waiting in the wings to take over and guide policy and get things done, but you're not making it happen! | ||
| There's no excuse anymore! | ||
| There's nothing that you can blame it on anymore. | ||
| You know, when people say, oh, Nick turned on Trump when it wasn't popular. | ||
| No, I stuck with Trump even when it was unpopular for probably a lot longer than I should have. | ||
| But it was only at this point when you can say so clearly, so transparently, you had the opportunity. | ||
| It was right there for you. | ||
| Chris Kobach, you could have hired him, you could have hired all these other fine people, you could have fired these people, but you didn't make it happen. | ||
| That's on you now. | ||
| That's on the people in the White House as opposed to all these external forces, right? | ||
| Now the other development, which to me is even a little bit more surprising, kind of a shocking turn of events today, is that Johnny DeStefano was fired today. | ||
| This is according to Another source here it says quote in January Trump had a meeting with or I'm sorry I know this is from Gerduski. | ||
| I'm reading the wrong one. | ||
| It says DeStefano has a wide range of roles inside the West Wing including overseeing the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs and the Office of Presidential Personnel and was one of the last remaining aides from the beginning of the Trump administration. | ||
| And he resigned today. | ||
| So remember the key office that he holds, the key responsibilities for people that don't know. | ||
| If you've watched the show for a long time, that name might sound familiar. | ||
| If you're from Washington D.C., there are some people in government who watch the show who have given me that name. | ||
| It's not a household name, but Johnny DiStefano was the head of the office of personnel for the White House. | ||
| We talk about personnel, we talk about these kinds of problems, like Cuccinelli, like Republican National Convention or Republican National Committee type people being hired instead of Trump campaign people being hired. | ||
| This is the guy. | ||
| And I've talked to a lot of people, and without fail, they will all tell me, who's the number one person that you need to agitate to get fired? | ||
| Who's the number one person who needs to be named in the White House besides, you know, some other people? | ||
| It's Johnny DeStefano. | ||
| Johnny DeStefano was put in charge of the Office of Personnel, and he's the reason why the entire White House is staffed with people who worked for Marco Rubio in 16, or worked for Ted Cruz in 16. | ||
| He was one of the chief architects of this failing Trump White House. | ||
| And we said this last week. | ||
| If you get bad personnel, if you get George Bush personnel in the White House, it becomes the George Bush White House! | ||
| So this is the guy! | ||
| And Donald Trump tweeted today that, you know, we're sad to see him go, he did great work, blah blah blah, but apparently behind the scenes, this is according to Ryan Gerduski, he tweets out, quote, in January Trump had a meeting with conservative leaders and his staff when he asked them why he had so many personnel issues, so maybe he's hip to this, Connie Hare, who is Gohmert's Chief of Staff, called out to Stefano as the culprit. | ||
| Trump turned to Johnny, who was in the meeting, and this is my favorite, and said, quote, that doesn't surprise me. | ||
| I hear that from a lot of people. | ||
| So to me, this is the killer. | ||
| Trump knew about this. | ||
| Trump knows about the personnel issues. | ||
| He knows enough about it to inquire. | ||
| That's according to somebody familiar with a closed door meeting in the White House. | ||
| That Trump is going around and asking, why am I having all these issues? | ||
| Why are people leaking? | ||
| Why do I find out that people in my White House are not executing my orders? | ||
| You know, like we saw with Mattis a couple of weeks ago. | ||
| Why are they leaking things? | ||
| Like we saw with Raj Shah, I think was his name, who was in the communications department. | ||
| Why are they stabbing me in the back on policy as we've seen time and again with some other people? | ||
| Why is this happening? | ||
| We knew about it. | ||
| He's been hit to it. | ||
| And they say Johnny DeStefano. | ||
| He says, well I know that too. | ||
| I hear that from everybody. | ||
| He's getting fired today. | ||
| So I don't know. | ||
| It's like a white pill, black pill sort of thing. | ||
| Are we black pilled that, like, we're two years in and it seems like even though we're aware of these things or have been aware of these things, only now we're hearing about it from the man himself? | ||
| Only now do we start to see a little bit of a change? | ||
| You know, in the sense that DeStefano gets fired? | ||
| Is it a white pill that if some of these people are being cleaned out, maybe it's long overdue, but it's finally happening and there's course correction? | ||
| It's hard to tell. | ||
| You're just like dizzy at this point. | ||
| Are we going to fix immigration or are we not going to implement E-Verify? | ||
| Are we going to change personnel in the White House or are we going to turn over people like Chris Colbeck? | ||
| It's like, just can we pick a lane here? | ||
| Can we choose up? | ||
| Because I don't know. | ||
| I don't know if we're going to be Keep America Great 2020. | ||
| We're on board. | ||
| This is our last ride. | ||
| We're going to do it. | ||
| Or if I should be, you know, shilling for Yang Gang or for Tulsi Gabbard. | ||
| I don't know what to do anymore because it seems like every day it's like We're cooking. | ||
| I hate America. | ||
| I'm totally with the Koch brothers and Big Ag. | ||
| And then the next day it's like Johnny DeStefano's out. | ||
| Nielsen's out. | ||
| Everybody's out. | ||
| And we've got this new immigration bill. | ||
| We're changing the consensus. | ||
| So it's all up in the air. | ||
| I can only say so much. | ||
| I can only analyze so much. | ||
| I can only agitate as much as I can from my throne here in the America First Kingdom, you know, to my to my club of knickers, to my court of knickers. | ||
| I can only do so much, but it's very confusing. | ||
| It's very chaotic times, and I guess the subtle white pill on that is if it's chaotic, If it's uncertain, if it's unstable, then that means there's a chance, there's a chance, a possibility that things could turn around. | ||
| That's all I'm gonna say. | ||
| It's clearly turmoil. | ||
| There's clearly conflict in the White House. | ||
| Perhaps there's internal conflict within the man. | ||
| Something is definitely happening here. | ||
| And I guess the one, you know, if we're going to remain optimistic, if we're going to remain a little bit hopeful, the one thing we can say about that is if there is some kind of a brawl, if there's some kind of a battle happening, then we know at the very least that we're not down and out quite yet. | ||
| It's not over until it's over. | ||
| So that's not to say that it's highly likely that things are going to turn around, but it is to say that there's a chance it's not over yet. | ||
| If DeStefano gets fired because Trump is hip to the fact that he sucks, Maybe that means he's hip to it, and maybe that means that he's looking to do something about it. | ||
| And he has been making personnel changes, and hey, the appointment of an immigration czar, even if it's not Kobach, is a good thing. | ||
| So, I think there's two ways to look at it. | ||
| There's glass half empty, glass half full, right? | ||
| But that's some of the shakeups happening in the personnel office. | ||
| Hopefully that leads to good things, but it just makes you want to tear your hair out that it's like really, I think the damage has been done. | ||
| You know, you hire, rather you fire Johnny DiStefano in May, late May 2019. | ||
| It's like you should have done that yesterday. | ||
| You should have done that six months ago, you know? | ||
| We wanted personnel changes before the beginning of the new year, before 2019, and now here we are. | ||
| And only now are we getting around to it, and you still haven't replaced Defense, DHS, some of these other big ones. | ||
| Mick Mulvaney's still the Chief of Staff. | ||
| What are you doing, big guy? | ||
| You gotta get, you gotta get Mick Mulvaney out. | ||
| He's just gotta put, like, Ann Coulter in charge of personnel, or, I don't know, one of my friends. | ||
| You gotta put somebody in charge of personnel who knows what they're doing, because it's just a mess right now. | ||
| It's a disaster. | ||
| So that's personnel, but we gotta get to our feature story of the day. | ||
| Like I said, we have a whiteboard. | ||
| As I said, and you may have seen this online, All the representatives are celebrating. | ||
| Everybody's talking about this. | ||
| Today is the big day, everybody! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whoo! | |
| Happy 100 years! | ||
| Happy one century! | ||
| Can you believe it? | ||
| It's already been a century. | ||
| Has it really been that long? | ||
| One full century of women's suffrage. | ||
| Today is the day, a hundred years ago, May 21st, 1919, When the 19th Amendment was passed. | ||
| Incredible! | ||
| Incredible! | ||
| Good job! | ||
| Congratulations! | ||
| The 19th Amendment passes and I'll read the text of the bill to commemorate this momentous occasion. | ||
| It reads, quote, the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex. | ||
| Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. | ||
| So, in short, All the amendment says is, women have the right to vote. | ||
| And it's so funny, because I'm doing a little research for the show, and I have to rely almost entirely on things that I have found in the past, you know, happened upon, stumbled upon, red pills that I have found, because you try and do a little research, you google something like, women's suffrage cons, you know, women's rights mistake, 19th amendment, biggest mistake, 19th amendment, you know, whatever, and nothing comes up. | ||
| Article after article after article about, okay, it's the 19th amendment, it's the 100th anniversary, here's the effects, whatever. | ||
| Nobody can tell me one con. | ||
| Nobody can tell me one area there. | ||
| And this is the standard position. | ||
| And I say that because this is the standard position for everybody to have. | ||
| We're going to wade into some uncomfortable waters. | ||
| Now, I'll say at the outset, because I like being online, you know, and I'm an equal opportunity person. | ||
| Women, men, black, white, up, down, purple, yellow, whatever, whatever you want to be, okay? | ||
| You're equal, okay? | ||
| And everybody should be equal. | ||
| I believe everybody should have the right to vote. | ||
| Do I think the 19th Amendment was a mistake? | ||
| Perhaps. | ||
| But I think everybody should have the right to vote. | ||
| Regardless, we are here. | ||
| We have to live with it. | ||
| We're going to offer some critiques. | ||
| We're going to offer some criticisms of the 19th Amendment, but I don't want anybody to get the wrong idea. | ||
| I don't want anybody to get the wrong idea that I don't respect women or women's rights, because I do. | ||
| And that's just part of my personal terms of service. | ||
| That's part of my personal ethical terms of service, I guess you could say, that I'm not spreading hatred, I don't hate women, I don't hate any class based on gender or race or anything like that. | ||
| That is according to my personal terms of service, my ethical terms of service. | ||
| I'm going to say at the outset, these are just some little critiques. | ||
| Just a little food for thought as we celebrate the 100th anniversary of women's right to vote. | ||
| And I found some very interesting numbers here. | ||
| I found some very interesting... | ||
| details, some interesting factoids, trivia facts about women's rights. | ||
| It's been 100 years since they got the right to vote, and I want to look at two studies, one curious consequence of women getting the right to vote. | ||
| Everybody's, you know, again, the standard position is, of course, this is a good thing. | ||
| It's necessary. | ||
| It is moral. | ||
| You cannot morally be opposed to everybody voting. | ||
| You know, the moral, perhaps the most important moral thing in our country, civic duty, civic obligation is the voting. | ||
| That is what is sacred. | ||
| You know, it's a democracy, and the best thing you can do is go to the ballot box, cast your vote, and everybody should be able to participate, no matter what race you are, no matter what gender, class, anything. | ||
| It's just seen, you know, the standard position. | ||
| Yeah, women have the right to vote. | ||
| Deal with it. | ||
| What are you, some kind of regressive bigot? | ||
| What are you, some kind of 19th century kind of person? | ||
| You're This is just how it's supposed to go. | ||
| But there are some curious consequences. | ||
| We're gonna look at probably the first consequence, which I think is undisputable. | ||
| I mean, this is just completely factual. | ||
| It's math. | ||
| Since women have the right to vote, and almost immediately since women have the right to vote, you can see a direct correlation between women voting, and the rise in women's participation in voting, and the rise of both taxes and spending. | ||
| It's a direct relationship. | ||
| This is totally undisputed. | ||
| I'll read you two studies here. | ||
| The first is a Harvard paper by John Lott. | ||
| So if you don't know John Lott, he is a brilliant statistician. | ||
| You might know him He writes papers on mostly about guns, mostly about statistics about gun crime and things like that. | ||
| He's written a number of books on the subject, but this is a Harvard paper from John Lott. | ||
| And he writes, so this is not, this is not like, you know, MGTOW.com. | ||
| This is not, you know, wayofthebarbarian.net. | ||
| You know, it's like women should be whatever. | ||
| This is a Harvard paper from a serious statistician, well regarded, well respected. | ||
| Suffrage coincided with immediate increases in state government expenditures and revenue and most liberal voting patterns for federal representatives, and these effects continued growing over time as more women took advantage of the franchise. | ||
| On the basis of these estimates, granting women the right to vote caused expenditures to rise immediately by 14%, by 21% after 25 years, and by 28% after 45 years. | ||
| So fully 45 years after women get the right to vote, and understand, they didn't even have matching turnout with men 45 years later. | ||
| You know, it passes in 1919. | ||
| 45 years later is what? | ||
|
unidentified
|
1964? | |
| 1965? | ||
| They did not match men's turnout in voting and then ultimately exceed men's turnout in voting until the 1980s. | ||
| So we're talking about just a little bit of women voting into the mix. | ||
| We introduce a little bit of women's suffrage into the mix. | ||
| It's all men. | ||
| Okay, now we've got the sweetie squad rolling in. | ||
| Now we've got, you know, we got the females entering in and they're gonna vote. | ||
| So you track this over time and you see a direct correlation over so many years as women turn out in higher numbers and become a higher proportion of the electorate from 14 ultimately to 21 to 28 percent after 45 years. | ||
| 28 percent rise in state expenditures and that's before you even get, that's almost a third before you even get to women matching men's turnout in voting. | ||
| That's one study. | ||
| Study number two is from the University of Cambridge. | ||
| It says, using historical data from six Western European countries from the period 1869 to 1960, we provide evidence that social spending out of GDP increased 0.6 to 1.2 percent in the short run. | ||
| And this isn't surprising. | ||
| I'm pretty sure this is exactly what people said when women were going to get the right to vote. | ||
| Women and men vote differently. | ||
| eight times larger effect on social spending as a result of women gaining the right to vote. | ||
| And this isn't surprising. | ||
| I'm pretty sure this is exactly what people said when women were going to get the right to vote. | ||
| Women and men vote differently. | ||
| That's really the red pill about this. | ||
| That's what people have to understand. | ||
| And we're going to get to that in greater detail with this whiteboard. | ||
| But just something to understand as we read out these numbers, as we read out these reasons, why do you think the state spends more money after women get the right to vote? | ||
| Well, clearly women are voting for different policies. | ||
| That's a very subtle detail. | ||
| That's a very subtle little part of this. | ||
| People might jump to, well, you know, women, why do women vote for these things? | ||
| Why would women vote for higher programs? | ||
| Or what other causes could there be there? | ||
| But the very subtle thing to acknowledge within that is that you see a change in spending, you see a change in policy, because women vote differently than men. | ||
| That's really what's critical here. | ||
| What we understand in this, you know, democratic sort of mentality, universal mentality, is that we are atomic individuals. | ||
| We are these units of person. | ||
| You know, we are the individual voter, the individual consumer, the individual producer. | ||
| And if there are no differences between us, if we are all interchangeable, then therefore we should have the same rights and responsibilities, the same privileges, the same obligations, the same expectations, If we take this liberal tabula rasa, blank slate approach that everybody is one atomic unit, you know, individual human person, then that means they're interchangeable. | ||
| You know, why should women and men have different voting rights if they're interchangeable? | ||
| Women are gonna vote and they'll vote, you know, we expect the same as men. | ||
| Why should You know, people that are rich and people that are poor have different rights or different treatment by the government. | ||
| Well, because they're interchangeable. | ||
| They're the same. | ||
| You know, it's just kind of a thing. | ||
| You know, it's just arbitrary that one person is a man, one person a woman, one person is black, one person is white, one person is rich, one person is poor, somebody is young, somebody is old. | ||
| That's why now they're agitating for 16-year-olds to vote. | ||
| They say, well, 16-year-olds are a part of our democracy too, and they should vote. | ||
| Well, people vote differently. | ||
| They vote differently because they are different. | ||
| Women vote differently from men because they are different. | ||
| They think different. | ||
| They have different temperaments. | ||
| And we can see this. | ||
| Women have a totally different system of ethics than men. | ||
| They have a care-based ethical system, whereas men have a justice-based ethical system. | ||
| Why do you see a rise particularly in social spending? | ||
| Because women Care for the poor. | ||
| Women care for the needy. | ||
| Women care for the disabled, or whatever. | ||
| And what is the solution? | ||
| It's a government program. | ||
| Whereas a man, who can think about a situation from an impersonal, abstract view, and go outside of himself, and say, hmm, if I were God, if I were in a third person position, if I take a justice based, ethical view of this situation, not being partial as me, myself, But as somebody looking at it from outside, from ahead, how is this going to work? | ||
| Well, you see that there are poor people and there are rich people, and we can pay poor people. | ||
| You know, we could have something like welfare as one example of social spending, but necessarily to do that we would have to take from people who are working. | ||
| Perhaps that's not the best approach. | ||
| Perhaps we should look at the efficacy of these programs. | ||
| Are they working? | ||
| Does it create perverse incentives? | ||
| There is a justice-based ethical system. | ||
| We're looking at it from the abstract. | ||
| We're looking at cause and effect in very impersonal terms. | ||
| Men uniquely have this ethical system. | ||
| Women have a care-based ethical system. | ||
| It's postulated that they have a different view of ethics because they are mothers. | ||
| Because biologically, whether they are mothers or whether they just have the eggs, they're not mothers yet, they are biologically intended to bond with a baby inside of their womb. | ||
| They're expected to have a relationship where they have a child dependent on them. | ||
| And not just inside the womb when they have to selflessly change their life basically to accommodate another life. | ||
| But then even once the baby is out of the womb, they have to have this special bond. | ||
| You have You know, it's almost like this. | ||
| It's basically a parasitic relationship and strictly biological terms. | ||
| I don't mean that in a negative way. | ||
| I don't mean that in a pejorative way, but it's, you know, the baby is taking and the woman is providing. | ||
| So it is this relationship where the baby is dependent. | ||
| The mother is relied upon for care. | ||
| And so it is seen that this, this sort of abstract thinking, is then applied to their ethical system they have a care based ethical system that they cannot view the world impersonally they cannot view the world in a third-person way you know and I'm sure there are women who can I'm not saying we're not talking about you know some individual or a high IQ person or somebody was trained to do this kind of We're talking about, generally speaking, we're talking about sort of evolutionary psychology here. | ||
| Women's ethical systems, typically, their temperament is to think in terms of care. | ||
| Their ethics is to think in terms of, oh, you know, poor so-and-so. | ||
| We have to take care of people. | ||
| We have to be sensitive to people because of that relationship that they have. | ||
| We could say that the man is an individual. | ||
| We can say that all this liberal tabula rasa type thinking can apply To a single, solitary, adult, mature man. | ||
| It cannot apply really to anybody else. | ||
| It cannot reasonably apply to a mother. | ||
| It cannot apply to a child. | ||
| It cannot apply to, you know, maybe the indigent or low IQ people. | ||
| It really just does not apply so much to those others. | ||
| So that's why you see these differences. | ||
| That's why you see big differences in the way women vote, and particularly with The spending. | ||
| And we're gonna bring up the whiteboard here. | ||
| There's some more direct consequences as well, something a little bit more contemporary, a little bit more concrete. | ||
| Of course, when we look at rising state expenditures, that raises the question of who are they voting for? | ||
| Which party? | ||
| You know, not just in terms of policy, but what candidates are they voting for? | ||
| And let me change my settings here so you can see the writing on the whiteboard a little bit better there. | ||
| I know it's a little bright sometimes. | ||
| We'll bring that down. | ||
| We're looking at the way women voted in 2016 and 2018. | ||
| This to me was the biggest red pill and maybe the most informative. | ||
| Maybe you have women who are conservative. | ||
| I know there are a handful of conservative women who watch this show. | ||
| You know, all ten of them. | ||
| The whole dozen women that watch this show. | ||
| They are out there. | ||
| And there are women out there who are conservative. | ||
| And there are women out there who can make sense of these things. | ||
| And they can take a more justice-based, ethical approach. | ||
| You know, we're not saying that that's everybody. | ||
| We're not saying that every single woman down to an individual person Thinks this way, or falls victim to these kinds of things. | ||
| We are saying, in general, it is a woman's temperament to think in this way. | ||
| And that shouldn't be a controversial thing to say. | ||
| I feel like a lot of leftists ridicule that position, that women have different brains, or they think differently. | ||
| But it's obvious. | ||
| If you have different outcomes in voting, that is reflective of different thinking, of course. | ||
| You wouldn't have a direct correlation between a rise in spending or, you know, these kinds of voting patterns based on female enfranchisement if they didn't think differently, of course! | ||
| You know, so leftists might come around and say, oh, you think women have different brains? | ||
| What are you, some kind of knuckle-dragging? | ||
| You know, what are you, some kind of backwards bigot, sexist misogynist, whatever? | ||
| No! | ||
| No, if women thought the same as men, if it were interchangeable, it were the same, replaceable, then they would vote the same. | ||
| There would be no rise in expenditures. | ||
| These numbers wouldn't be so different, but they are. | ||
| And so we're going to look at 2016 and 2018. | ||
| This is if only women voted in the election. | ||
| This is if only men voted in the election. | ||
| If only women voted in the 2016 presidential election, you know, so let's say women get the franchise. | ||
| In other words, you control for gender and you keep all men out. | ||
| Hillary Clinton wins. | ||
| 458 to 80. | ||
| Hillary Clinton wins. | ||
| This is like a super landslide. | ||
| This is like one of the biggest landslides in the history of American politics. | ||
| Hillary Clinton wins. | ||
| The same Hillary Clinton who, do I have to remind you, was physically impaired, who was physically not fit to become president. | ||
| Outside of that, she was a criminal. | ||
| I'll tie to that the policies. | ||
| I mean so you add every reason in the book a rational person to say we should not vote for this person. | ||
| She is not physically fit. | ||
| She legally could be in jeopardy. | ||
| Her policies are a disaster. | ||
| She's just obviously a psychotic bad person. | ||
| She would have won one of the biggest landslides in American history. | ||
| Everybody agrees she was a bad candidate. | ||
| Perhaps one of the worst candidates. | ||
| One of the most corrupt candidates. | ||
| One of the most controversial candidates. | ||
| She could not beat Donald Trump! | ||
| 458 electoral votes if only women are voting, compared to 80 for Trump. | ||
| That's women, okay? | ||
| If only men voted, it's 188 to 350. | ||
| So we know that Trump actually won by 306 electoral votes. | ||
| 306 to, I think, 232. | ||
| Okay, so women are voting obviously in the complete opposite direction. | ||
| Hillary Clinton not only wins, but she wins by a ultra historical landslide. | ||
| If men are voting, Trump wins by a much bigger landslide, 44 more electoral votes. | ||
| Does that not tell you something? | ||
| Does that not tell you something that women are thinking differently? | ||
| And perhaps we can say that in thinking differently we can evaluate which kind of thinking is better for the maintenance of the affairs of the state? | ||
| Kind of obvious, right? | ||
| In 2018. | ||
| And it's not just 2016, by the way. | ||
| It's not just because Hillary Clinton is a woman. | ||
| We look at 2018. | ||
| If only women voted, Democrats would have 275 seats in the House of Representatives, compared to only 164 Republicans. | ||
| So they won something like 228. | ||
| So again, you're talking about 60, 50 more seats for Democrats. | ||
| If only women voted in 18 versus if only men voted, Republicans would actually have a majority! | ||
| 249 to 186 seats. | ||
| And all of this is to say, you take a look at this picture. | ||
| Look at it! | ||
| If you like women's suffrage, if you think I'm misogynistic, if you think I'm sexist or something, look at this! | ||
| Look at it! | ||
| Take a long hard look. | ||
| Do you want people like Hillary Clinton being elected? | ||
| Do you want Democrats being elected? | ||
| Can we fairly say that Democrats and Hillary Clinton are objectively bad for the country? | ||
| What they represent, objectively, is not good for a nation. | ||
| Can we all agree upon that? | ||
| I'm sure if you watch the show you agree that what Donald Trump and what Republicans run at is objectively good for the country. | ||
| It's not a matter of opinion. | ||
| It's not a matter of perspective. | ||
| A country must have borders. | ||
| A country must have a strong economy. | ||
| A country must have a strong balance of payments system. | ||
| A country should not be overseas fighting other countries' wars. | ||
| That's what Trump and the Republicans represent in 2016 and 2018. | ||
| Can we agree these are objectively the right answers? | ||
| And yet women get them wrong! | ||
| Yes, and yet the way we evaluate how women are thinking about these subjects reflected in their vote is incorrect. | ||
| I'm sorry, sweetie. | ||
| It's wrong. | ||
| It's a big red X. You voted for Hillary Clinton 458 to 80. | ||
| That's the wrong choice. | ||
| And so if we could say that women are voting differently than men, and men voting differently than women, we can say that there is, you know, choice A, which is, you know, men are gonna vote within their temperament, which is for Trump, or they're gonna vote for, you know, Mitt Romney, or they're gonna vote for John McCain over Barack Obama. | ||
| And women are gonna vote for... | ||
| They're gonna vote for Hillary Clinton. | ||
| They're gonna vote for Barack Obama. | ||
| They're gonna vote for Al Gore. | ||
| They're gonna vote for these other people. | ||
| Can we say, if we have this unequal relationship, if we have, you know, this disproportionate pattern here, that one is objectively better than the other? | ||
| That if we can differentiate these things and and say that it's symptomatic of different temperament, different thinking, different ethical systems or political thinking, that one is obviously better, objectively better than the other. | ||
| And if we wish to optimize the country, which is based upon the vote, the states, the country, the government is run by representatives who are voted in by the people, that if we want to have an optimal country, a country that is running on full cylinders, that we need to have the people better at making the decisions, making that we need to have the people better at making the decisions, No, no, no, no. | ||
| Nope, because that would be sexist. | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| We can clearly say that Donald Trump would have been better for the country in 2016. | ||
| We can clearly say that Republicans are better for the country in 2018. | ||
| And even though women make the wrong choice, even though we can say that women vote differently because they think differently and their thinking is not suitable to political subjects, no, it doesn't matter. | ||
| No, it doesn't matter. | ||
| It just simply doesn't matter. | ||
| 20-some-trillion-dollar debt and the spending increases, Democrat-Democrat demographic electoral winter setting in in the next couple of years, Republicans never winning another election again, it's of no concern. | ||
| Because what is far more important than maintaining a balanced budget, than having an efficient government, than having some kind of demographic stability, what is far more important than all of those things is that everybody is treated and feels equal. | ||
| And that's my position. | ||
| That's really my position. | ||
| I take a look at this chart. | ||
| I take a look at state expenditures. | ||
| I look at our current situation. | ||
| And even there's a correlation between the status of women and the fertility rate. | ||
| 3.3% before women's suffrage, 1.7% after. | ||
| You know, I look at all these different things in spite of all the negative consequences or potential negative consequences. | ||
| It's really all relative to even say negative. | ||
| In spite of the consequences of women voting, This simply does not matter to me, because no consequence is worth having a society that is not equal. | ||
| No consequence is too great. | ||
| No disaster, no catastrophe, too horrible, too dangerous for the American people, too adverse to the national interest, is too great. | ||
| To overwhelm or to convince us that women should not be treated fairly and equally before the law. | ||
| That they should not be joyfully participating in the democratic process. | ||
| So I look at all this and it doesn't mean anything to me. | ||
| If you were to be... | ||
| Whoops. | ||
| If you were to be against women's voting in the current year, in 2019, I would say you're a bigot. | ||
| I would say you're some kind of misogynist. | ||
| What, do you hate women? | ||
| You think women are dumb? | ||
| What, you think women are only good for cooking and cleaning? | ||
| You think women are only good for pumping out babies? | ||
| What a ridiculous, silly person you are. | ||
| What an anachronism. | ||
| Can't you see that everything's going just fine? | ||
| Can't you see that women's suffrage is just so obviously and naturally not only right, but unequivocally the moral thing to do? | ||
| That's my belief. | ||
| That's my belief. | ||
| So happy 100 years of women voting. | ||
| You know, I look back at 1919 and I look at 2019, And you know what I see? | ||
| Progress. | ||
| I see improvement. | ||
| I see a country that was the number one economy, military power in the world! | ||
| The envy of planet Earth! | ||
| Everybody wanted to go there! | ||
| Clean, orderly, moral, traditional. | ||
| Families are strong, we're reproducing, you know, and all that. | ||
| And I look at 2019. | ||
| Shit literally in the streets, garbage everywhere, new outbreaks of typhus, tuberculosis, polio, measles. | ||
| I see just waves of dirty, smelly people traveling from across hundreds of miles of desert, coming across the border to set up shop, you know, somewhere in the country. | ||
| I see the crime, the gangs, and everything that goes on. | ||
| I say 100 years of women's suffrage. | ||
| Now that's what I call progress. | ||
| But there is still so much work to be done. | ||
| There is still so much work to be done. | ||
| We can enfranchise people that are younger. | ||
| We can enfranchise the disabled. | ||
| We can enfranchise felons. | ||
| We can enfranchise everybody so that we can continue to see the fruits of universal suffrage, the democratic process. | ||
| It's a beautiful thing we've had in the country. | ||
| You know, I look back at 100 years, all those backwards, terrible people, you know, living back then. | ||
| I think, wow, what a disaster that was. | ||
| Good thing we changed all that, and we are where we are, right? | ||
| So congratulations, everybody. | ||
| Congratulations! | ||
| We did it! | ||
| We did it! | ||
| America is number one, the moral leader of the world. | ||
| Congratulations, women. | ||
| We salute you. | ||
| Go out there, keep voting, keep doing your thing, keep going to work. | ||
| Hey, ladies, keep kicking ass, baby! | ||
| Future's female! | ||
| Because we have a lot more progress ahead with with women getting the right to vote. | ||
| So that's a hundred years and um, you know, please no ban. | ||
| Please no ban. | ||
| Please don't put in a limited state. | ||
| I'm not being sarcastic. | ||
| Women voting, I love it. | ||
| So that's that. | ||
| We're going to take a look at our super chats and we'll see what you guys are saying about all this. | ||
| Do you agree? | ||
| Do you disagree? | ||
| You know, women, speak up! | ||
| Raise your hand! | ||
| You know, you want to get that Girl Scout patch for raising your hand in class? | ||
| Speak up, girl! | ||
| You know, tell me what you think. | ||
| Stand up to me. | ||
| You know, tell me, tell me why I'm wrong. | ||
| You know, I want to hear that. | ||
| But let's take a look. | ||
| We'll read our Super Chats and we'll see, we'll hear from the unwashed masses. | ||
| NC Ritz's first episode, Daenerys burns the Cull. | ||
| Series finale, Jon Snow collects the toll. | ||
| Is Game of Thrones based in Redpill? | ||
| Well, I don't even know what, burning the Cull? | ||
| What does that mean? | ||
| What, did she work in a factory? | ||
| Where there was, um... Did she work at a factory? | ||
| There's some kind of coal-based, uh, you know, energy source? | ||
| I'm not sure. | ||
| Is that some kind of other expression? | ||
| Never heard it before. | ||
| Um, but, uh, yeah, could be. | ||
| Could be. | ||
| I-I never watched Game of Thrones. | ||
| I never watched... I don't think I watched one episode of it, but I heard that liberals, libtards are mad about it. | ||
| So, yeah, maybe it's based in Redfield after all. | ||
| You know, maybe Game of Thrones actually is, uh... Maybe they're woke, right, on the FQ? | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| Commented before about being a LARPer Okay, very descriptive username says I don't know if you're hurting for content or not But if you ever like to talk to a now red-pilled ex-ante for the work for a refugee resettlement agency drop me a line And he gives me his email I will do that. | ||
| I would love to speak with you one-on-one, personally. | ||
| That is my favorite thing. | ||
| Cody says, do you think murder should be legal? | ||
| Still no. | ||
| I think I answered this one yesterday, actually. | ||
| I think somebody inquired about the legality of murder yesterday, actually, and that's been asked in the past. | ||
| Still no. | ||
| My position is still that murder should be illegal. | ||
| But thanks for the question. | ||
| Cassie Queen of Spades Dillon says, Will it ever reach a point where the milk supply becomes so shrunken and contaminated with cocoa powder that saving any pure milk will be pointless? | ||
| No, I don't think that'll ever be pointless. | ||
| Saving pure milk... | ||
| I think will never be pointless because you know You know, it's I could see the appeal of chocolate milk I guess I could see the appeal of you know Putting a little bit of chocolate syrup in your milk. | ||
| I get it. | ||
| Look I get it, but at the same time There is a certain value. | ||
| I think there's definitely something that is important and wholesome about a good, clean old glass of pure milk. | ||
| So I don't think we should allow that pure glass of milk to leave the earth forever. | ||
| Because there's only so much of it to go around. | ||
| There's only so much. | ||
| And do we really want to be the generation that dumps out the last glass of pure milk? | ||
| The last generation that had You know, the pure milk. | ||
| I don't think that's something we want to do. | ||
| I don't think that's something that we want to do. | ||
| Who thinks that's a good idea? | ||
| That we should completely, you know, get rid of all the milk. | ||
| I'm in favor of, you know, we can have chocolate milk and we can also have regular milk and that's fine, you know, but I think they should both be preserved. | ||
| We, look, in some ways I just think that we have to sort of protect a future for pure milk, you know? | ||
| That's just how I, that's how I think of it. | ||
| We must, we must, you know, somehow enshrine pure milk and a future for pure milk to be created. | ||
| That's, that's how, kind of how I think about it in those terms. | ||
| Lauren Rose says, you should have Walter from Drake and Josh on the show. | ||
| Thanks, yeah, I'll give him a call after the show. | ||
| I'll look for his contact information online. | ||
| NC Ritz says, remember when Drake, PP, and Josh poo-poo? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Lauren Rose says, no gaming stream marathon this morning? | ||
| Coward! | ||
| Well, yeah, because I slept last night, so... | ||
| I only do them in the morning. | ||
| I'm only awake in the morning when I haven't slept. | ||
| You know? | ||
| And last night I should have slept because I was up all day. | ||
| I was exhausted, but I still couldn't sleep. | ||
| I went to bed at like 10 o'clock, and I could not fall asleep until 4 a.m. | ||
| So, that was my situation. | ||
| Woke up a little bit late, but you know, I guess it's better than not sleeping, which is what I've been doing. | ||
| So, it's just the curse of the high IQ. | ||
| Tortured. | ||
| Laying awake at night. | ||
| But that's you know, but that's that's how the good content is generated I wouldn't be so funny and edgy if I wasn't a tortured, you know in some ways Twisted soul so so you should actually be grateful Glenn sees as I disavow women. | ||
| I disavow that comment. | ||
| I disavow that comment, sir Talk about racist. | ||
| Nave says, hey big guy, love the show. | ||
| Thanks for fighting the good fight. | ||
| A true martyr. | ||
| So true. | ||
| I really am a martyr. | ||
| But thanks. | ||
| You know me. | ||
| I'm always out there fighting. | ||
| Fighting the good fight against the Democrats. | ||
| Zoom says, have you read any Jacques Ellul? | ||
| No. | ||
| Eric says, Nick, you're a shot of Febreze in this cultural sewage treatment plant we call the USA. | ||
| That's an adequate description. | ||
| A pleasant smell to mask the stench of the rotting corpse that is the country. | ||
| I could say that's probably accurate. | ||
| But hey, maybe one day, maybe one day we're actually going to turn it into something. | ||
| You know, for now we're doing the show. | ||
| First YouTube, then the world. | ||
| You know, from humble beginnings. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Maybe one day. | ||
| Mike Pence started out as a radio host. | ||
| So important to remember. | ||
| Doom Marine says, Nick, Chad, I am 30-something with a wife and kid and more on the way. | ||
| We go to church and just bought a house. | ||
| What comes next? | ||
| Lay out the plan. | ||
| Well, good to hear. | ||
| Congratulations. | ||
| 30-something. | ||
| Can't relate. | ||
| Can't imagine. | ||
| You know, I imagine myself being 30-something and I just, I just can't, I can't deal. | ||
| You know, I just get paralyzed. | ||
| But 30-something. | ||
| Wife and kids. | ||
| More on the way. | ||
| Got the house. | ||
| Excellent. | ||
| Going to church. | ||
| Perfect. | ||
| What comes next? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I don't know what you need to do. | ||
| You got it made, dude. | ||
| You know, just gotta take care of the marriage, take care of the kids. | ||
| You did it. | ||
| You achieved the end game. | ||
| So now you just gotta make sure that the kids are healthy and well adjusted, educated. | ||
| I would say that the... | ||
| The goal for an adult, if you have a family, is financial security, financial independence, and it's making sure your kids are okay. | ||
| I think one of the things where the ethnics are actually red-pilled on this is they really do take care of their kids. | ||
| And that's, I think, why they're set up better than a lot of these Anglo, white-bred Americans. | ||
| The ethnics take care of their own. | ||
| Mexicans do this as well. | ||
| You know, Mexicans, I think, are able to get by because they really are. | ||
| You know, they have this very family-based mentality, whereas I think you see a lot of white people, and it's like, you know, white kids, they graduate from high school, nope, you're pushed out, you're pushed, and you got to be on your own, and they're not able to develop the same kind of resiliency, I don't think. | ||
| That's my perception, at least, as some of these other racial groups in America. | ||
| So I would say that that kind of financial independence, taking care of the kids, probably next. | ||
| But what comes next? | ||
| You got it made, dude. | ||
| You just got to make sure everything is smooth sailing. | ||
| It's not easy. | ||
| Not easy being a family man, being a family guy, right? | ||
| So I don't know what you mean, what comes next. | ||
| Just got to make sure the kids are set up, you know, that they don't get paused, they don't get brainwashed, you're able to provide for them, able to gain some kind of financial independency for your retirement, you know. | ||
| I haven't really thought that far ahead. | ||
| I'm trying to get to that stage, so I can't really relate to these challenges down the road. | ||
| Uh, but I would imagine I would start accumulating weapons, accumulating land, saving up money. | ||
| These would be my concerns. | ||
| These aren't my concerns now. | ||
| But if you've got the children, I'm just such a klutz today, I'm knocking everything over. | ||
| But if you've got all that figured out, I would say that's what's next. | ||
| But hey, congrats. | ||
| Who am I to tell you you already got it made? | ||
| Jose Antonio says there is no competition to Nick's high IQ reactionary hot takes. | ||
| Entertaining educational fresh and raw truth with you, my white homie. | ||
| Hey, thank you, my man. | ||
| So true. | ||
| Who can't compete? | ||
| Truly. | ||
| With me, the humble campus conservative. | ||
| I don't think there are any other hot takes. | ||
| I don't really know how to roller skate. | ||
| I can't, I have trouble, I have difficulty walking and running as opposed to, as opposed to, you know, you want to throw wheels into the mix. | ||
| I don't know why you want to throw wheels into the mix. | ||
| You know, ice skating, rollerblading, people say, you know, You mastered walking and running, why don't we try it in wheels or blades or something? | ||
| I'm perfectly content just hanging around. | ||
| But yeah, Jess Southern, would I go on a date with Jess Southern? | ||
| I don't know, is she... I don't know. | ||
| I know the elder Southern, or actually I believe she's older. | ||
| So the younger Southern has a certain... | ||
| Proclivities. | ||
| I'll just say that much. | ||
| I don't know if Jess Southern shares that. | ||
| I'm not, you know, and I love Lauren Southern. | ||
| I think she's, you know, she's beautiful and talented. | ||
| Lauren Southern is a beautiful, beautiful and talented girl, you know, so I'm not trying to say anything negative, but Jess Southern, total babe. | ||
| Would I go roller skating with her? | ||
| Maybe. | ||
| I'd be slipping and sliding and falling all over the place, but yeah, sure. | ||
| Sure, I'd go roller skating with her. | ||
| Maybe I'd be in the arcade gaming it up while she roller skates, you know. | ||
| No, I don't know. | ||
| But Jess Southern, total babe. | ||
| I don't know if that offends anybody. | ||
| Does that offend you, Libtard? | ||
| Does that offend you, Snowflake? | ||
| I'd go roller skating with Jess Southern. | ||
| Cassie, Queen of Spades Dylan says, 725 p.m. | ||
| Your Moorish ancestry is showing. | ||
| It has steadily gone from Anglo work ethic to Mediterranean work ethic. | ||
| We are reaching dangerous levels. | ||
| We are gradually... I guess it's in the opposite direction. | ||
| We start, and it's also latitude as well. | ||
| Latitude as well as time. | ||
| We start out seven o'clock, Anglo work ethic. | ||
| Now we're heading down 705, 710, 715, firmly in Mediterranean work ethic. | ||
| We're at a much lower latitude. | ||
| Now we're getting dangerously low. | ||
| We're heading down past the Sahara Desert. | ||
| We are entering into a Moorish, perhaps a Sub-Saharan work ethic, one might say. | ||
| Dropping in latitude as well as work ethic. | ||
| Jokes! | ||
| It's jokes, everybody! | ||
| I'm kidding! | ||
| I'm kidding! | ||
| 1.5% African! | ||
| I'm kidding! | ||
| It is a joke, everybody. | ||
| That is a joke. | ||
| I am 1.5% African. | ||
| I am something like 2% North African, West Asian. | ||
| I'm only kidding, of course. | ||
| No, I, I, yeah, we're gonna have to fix that. | ||
| Maybe tomorrow. | ||
| Tomorrow we're back on schedule. | ||
| Seven o'clock sharp. | ||
| Soft commitment to this, uh, but a good observation nonetheless. | ||
| It's jokes, everybody. | ||
| Why so serious? | ||
| I know some, some little libtard, some, uh, junior whopper hand libtard cuck is gonna go on Destiny's Subreddit and say, look at this clip. | ||
| Nick said that, you know, black people have bad work ethic. | ||
| It was a joke! | ||
| I was kidding! | ||
| I was just joking. | ||
| Alright, everybody? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sheesh. | |
| Everybody's so politically correct these days. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You can't even, you can't even say these things. | |
| Temple Drake says, congrats on 32,000 subscribers, big guy. | ||
| You deserve a million. | ||
| Also, you look great with your new haircut. | ||
| Wow, thank you! | ||
| Thanks, I'm glad you like it. | ||
| I'm glad I'm glad people like it because you know, I don't always it's not always a winner You know, I I got a few bad haircuts You know in like 2018. | ||
| I think I got a bear a bad haircut in the beginning of 2019 So I've been trying to get it right I've been trying to get it just right so I appreciate that and and thanks I do deserve a million I deserve more than a million actually and Black Swan says hi, how would Alabama go about challenging Roe v. Wade? | ||
| Well, that's just it. | ||
| The work is done on the part of Alabama. | ||
| What happens now is that... | ||
| There has to be a contest by a circuit judge or, you know, a federal judge. | ||
| It has to work its way up through the court system, basically, where somebody will challenge it. | ||
| They'll say, well, I want to get an abortion, or, you know, some rights group or something will sue and say this is unconstitutional, this goes against Roe v. Wade, because Roe v. Wade interpreted the Constitution saying abortion's a constitutional right. | ||
| That'll work its way up the court system through the federal courts, ultimately, If the Supreme Court decides to take it, they take it, they'll hear it, and they would have the chance to overturn Roe v. Wade. | ||
| Alabama state government has already done their part, so now it's just a matter of will the Supreme Court take the case if it makes its way all the way up. | ||
| And then what will they decide? | ||
| 918 says, these Anglos just don't appreciate the perfect timeliness of 7 p.m. | ||
| MST, Med Standard Time. | ||
| A lot of nags, a lot of nags in the chat. | ||
| I deserve it. | ||
| I deserve it. | ||
| Yeah, fair enough. | ||
| Fair enough! | ||
| You know, I think if Leonardo da Vinci was doing America First, I think he would be later than me. | ||
| And so what does that tell you? | ||
| Basically, we're living in a society. | ||
| I think... | ||
| I think if Raphael and Dante Alighieri were doing America First, I think they actually would be late, too. | ||
| You know, they'd be too busy being philosophers and painting the Mona Lisa. | ||
| Oh, sorry, I'm late. | ||
| I was painting the Mona Lisa. | ||
| And that's kind of, in a way, what I do every night on the show, so... I would just think about that before you criticize. | ||
| Dylan Brown says, Nick, have you seen Professor Edward Dutton? | ||
| No, but that name sounds familiar. | ||
| Why does it sound familiar? | ||
| Edward Dutton, English anthropologist. | ||
| I may have seen him because it sounds so familiar. | ||
| What was his book? | ||
| What book did he write? | ||
| Yeah, it sounds really familiar, but not off the top of my head. | ||
| Let's see, Gabriel says, how do I access premium shows? | ||
| I signed up for them. | ||
| WTFrig, I feel like a boomer looking for the E. Michael Jones conversation. | ||
| That's on Friday. | ||
| And the premium shows, you just go to the website. | ||
| It's in the top right corner. | ||
| It says premium content. | ||
| You log in and it's all on the page. | ||
| I don't know why people are like, how can I find it? | ||
| How can I find it? | ||
| Where's the button? | ||
| You know, hey, Sonny, where's the button for premium? | ||
| Literally, it's on the top right corner. | ||
| You can't miss it. | ||
| It says premium content. | ||
| So, but if you have any trouble, just email me. | ||
| I'll get back to you. | ||
| Dylan Brown says, worst comes to worst. | ||
| Which would suck. | ||
| We all go to Australia, maybe if you're 56%. | ||
| British move to Britain. | ||
| Britain is a Muslim country now. | ||
| I don't think we're gonna escape to there. | ||
| If anything, I'm going to Italy. | ||
| That's my contingency plan. | ||
| Italy is gonna be white Israel. | ||
| At least for us ethnics. | ||
| Anglos are not allowed. | ||
| Sorry. | ||
| Sorry Nordcux. | ||
| You know, you want to talk about Odin and Thor and blond hair, blue eyes. | ||
| Well, you can go back to Sweden then. | ||
| You know, you can go and when America goes upside down, you can return home to Sweden, you know. | ||
| Or you can return home to Germany or return home to England or whatever. | ||
| And us Chad Mediterraneans will be chilling, hanging out on the beach in Italy. | ||
| We'll be watching as dear leader, as Il Duce Salvini is personally driving the ship, bringing all the Africans back to Africa, bringing all the Arabs back to North Africa. | ||
| And we'll be on the beach. | ||
| We'll be on the beach. | ||
| We'll be on the beach. | ||
| And maybe there'll be some bitches involved, too, on the beach. | ||
| Hello, department? | ||
| We'll be on the beach, sippin' wine, havin' some pasta, havin' some pizza. | ||
| Oh! | ||
| Havin' some gabagool on the beach. | ||
| We'll be watchin' Il Duce, drivin' him off into the sunset, away from the homeland. | ||
| And all the Nordcucks will be in Sweden, and they'll say, at least I have my blonde hair and blue eyes and grenades thrown in their apartment. | ||
| There's a grenade! | ||
| Get down! | ||
| You know? | ||
| So, it's jokes! | ||
| It's jokes, everybody! | ||
| It's all jokes. | ||
| I'm only kidding. | ||
| I'm only... It's only... This is all jokes, everybody. | ||
| We love Nordic people. | ||
| We love... We love Nordic Slav. | ||
| We love them all. | ||
| Germanic. | ||
| We love Anglos. | ||
| We love everybody. | ||
| Cheeky Anglos and their funny words and accents. | ||
| We love them all. | ||
| So it's... We're only kidding. | ||
| But yeah, Italy's gonna be my contingency plan, definitely. | ||
| Unclean says referring to the Liberal Party as a conservative party is a bit of an overstatement. | ||
| We got some Aussie in here gonna challenge me on this. | ||
| They're basically the equivalent of the Republicans. | ||
| G'day, mate! | ||
| Look, dude, I'm not Australian, but what I mean to say is that... | ||
| At least it's the right-wing party in the country, right? | ||
| This is all relative, is what I... And I said that. | ||
| I said... And I said that at the top of the show. | ||
| I said, this is not the reactionary thing. | ||
| This is not like what we're seeing so much in Italy or whatever. | ||
| I said, but it is the right-wing as opposed to the left-wing. | ||
| So I said that. | ||
| Before I get some Aussie. | ||
| In before some Aussie. | ||
| Well, actually... Oy! | ||
| I can't even do an Australian accent, but they're like, you know... | ||
| But the Liberal Party isn't actually that conservative. | ||
| Well, I said that. | ||
| So, why don't you just calm down, big guy? | ||
| Well, thank you, bro. | ||
| Thank you, homie. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Well, thank you, bro. | ||
| Thank you, homie. | ||
| Smelly says, Thank you. | ||
| I kind of like when it's a little bit of scruff. | ||
| I like the look. | ||
| I'm probably going to shave tonight, but I like when it's a little bit. | ||
| I think it looks good when it's a little bit, little bit. | ||
| I got to get a full mustache and then this kind of stubble going. | ||
| I think that's going to be the look. | ||
| Justin says, remove women's voting rights and repeal the 1965 Immigration Act and this country will be number one for years to come. | ||
| Thanks, Nick. | ||
| Yeah, um... | ||
| I don't know about that big guy. | ||
| Sounds pretty prejudiced. | ||
| Sounds pretty racist, sexist, misogynistic. | ||
| I think everybody should vote. | ||
| Everybody should come here. | ||
| I don't discriminate based on those kinds of arbitrary divisions. | ||
| Sounds like you're trying to divide America. | ||
| I'm trying to unite America behind one unifying principle. | ||
| Behind two unifying principles. | ||
| Support for Israel and gay marriage. | ||
| You're trying to divide America. | ||
| You, you haters, you hate mongers, you spreaders of hate trying to divide Americans based on class and race and sex, dividing America, creating a divided state of America. | ||
| We are uniting America behind fractional reserve banking, foreign aid to Israel, gay marriage, transsexuality, hormone replacement therapy, and there's nothing you can do about it. | ||
| Tyrone says chain link just hit $1.20. | ||
| We're gonna make it bros. | ||
| How big's your stack big guy? | ||
| How big's your link stack? | ||
| Are you a linklet? | ||
| Imagine being a linklet. | ||
| Imagine not having a 50,000 stack of link. | ||
| No, I don't have any link. | ||
| I don't want to buy into link because there's so much shilling of it on biz that I'm highly skeptical. | ||
| You know, I was like, because I see all the posts initially and I'm like, what am I doing? | ||
| I got to buy link. | ||
| But then I'm like, wait a second. | ||
| Oh, oh, hold the phone. | ||
| Why is everybody shilling link? | ||
| Why is it like a dedicated link shilling going on? | ||
| Is it really the next big thing and everybody knows about it? | ||
| Or are people pumping and dumping? | ||
| Are people shilling it so everybody buys in, you know? | ||
| That's the cycle where you got these big players, and they accumulate very quietly, and then the public finds out, and then it skyrockets, and they dump, and while the big whale people are dumping the link, the price stabilizes up at the top, and then it crashes. | ||
| That's kind of what happened to Bitcoin, they say. | ||
| That's the cycle. | ||
| So I'm skeptical. | ||
| Highly skeptical. | ||
| Thanks for putting on a great show for us. | ||
| I just got the premium membership. | ||
| to everybody who's holding Link out there. | ||
| Gen Z says, thanks for putting on a great show for us. | ||
| I just got the premium membership. | ||
| When can I expect to receive my leftist tears Tumblr in the mail? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Pretty soon. | ||
| Pretty soon. | ||
| We're still working on the design. | ||
| Still working on the design with Benny Palacek. | ||
| He's making it. | ||
| And, uh, and I'm sure it'll have some kind of satanic... We have to make sure that all the, uh, the symbolism is correct. | ||
| We have to make sure the sacrifices have been done before we can start distributing those. | ||
| Gen Z Philosophy says, PSA Knickers, if you need help, ContraPoints, aka a man in a dress named Natalie, can help you all escape the alt-light pipeline. | ||
| And he is referring to My recent premium show where he talked about Faraday Speaks, you know, this gay Jew guy who was like, oh, I was alright, but then I watched ContraPoints and like, ContraPoints was really speaking to me and, and he woke me up. | ||
| Yeah, well, she, he called it, she, she woke me up out of my alright brainwashing. | ||
| So yeah, we did a whole premium show on that. | ||
| So true, so relatable. | ||
| Cloudstar says, give us your diseased, poor, and huddled gangsters yearning to be lazy. | ||
| Shit. | ||
| Hey, that's racist, man. | ||
| That is racist. | ||
| Disavow. | ||
| So much hardcore disavowing on the show tonight. | ||
| It's out of control. | ||
| Racist in the audience. | ||
| I can't believe it. | ||
| I'm so disappointed in this community. | ||
| Michael says, FYI, the so-called Conservative Party in Australia are piss weak, but it's better than that they won. | ||
| Thanks again for your content, mate. | ||
| No, thank you, mate. | ||
| G'day. | ||
| Thank you so much for the Aussie shekels. | ||
| And yeah, I understand they're probably cucked, just like, you know, just like the... | ||
| What do they call them in Britain? | ||
| The Tories? | ||
| Or just like the Republicans or anybody else, but it's better. | ||
| You know, it's relative. | ||
| It's all relative, right? | ||
| David Spurnis's top three best and worst Super Chatters. | ||
| Top three best easily. | ||
| Poo Poo King. | ||
| Really good comics. | ||
| Um... And, um... Mumumumumum... Who's the one from... What's his, uh... Simon Scola. | ||
| I would say those are probably my top three, but it's a tough top three. | ||
| It's a tough top three. | ||
| You know, there's a lot of Super Chatters. | ||
| Well, um, what's his name also? | ||
| Um... What's the name? | ||
| What's the name? | ||
| What's the name? | ||
| I met him at CPAC. | ||
| Tall, tall gentleman. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I can't think of him off the top of my head. | ||
| Everybody's my favorite. | ||
| Everybody's the best Super Chatter. | ||
| Everybody is my top three favorite. | ||
| Uh, no, we like Jose Antonio. | ||
| We like, uh, who's, um... | ||
| Who's the one I'm thinking of? | ||
| It's on the tip of my tongue. | ||
| I met him at CPAC Tall. | ||
| I think I missed one on Friday, but I can't think of it. | ||
| So those are probably my top three, I guess. | ||
| Top ten. | ||
| You're all in my top Super Chatters. | ||
| I don't have any favorites, but definitely the top three worst, I would say. | ||
| What's a Wigmat? | ||
| I would say he's probably just the worst. | ||
| And that one guy was giving me a hard time the other week about Venezuela. | ||
| I don't know, but I don't really want to name anybody who's worse and they're not going to super chat me anymore. | ||
| So those are our favorites. | ||
| Yeah, hopefully. | ||
| He does give me a little bit of hope because it was a great speech. | ||
| He hit the right buttons. | ||
| Could he be a potential future for the dissident right? | ||
| Aside from you, of course. | ||
| Yeah, hopefully. | ||
| He does give me a little bit of hope because it was a great speech. | ||
| Very solid. | ||
| Hit all the right notes, the right ideas. | ||
| You know, talking about woke capital and social media and that kind of thing. | ||
| So yeah, I definitely think he's part of the future of the party and it's very exciting because he got in in 2018. | ||
| Don't forget, he's one of the new arrivals. | ||
| He's part of the MAGA, America First class. | ||
| So that gives me a little bit of hope, you know, that maybe the Republican Party could still have some future even after Trump. | ||
| So it's exciting. | ||
| Your local milkman says you like in Aquaman, or just like in Aquaman, women ruin society. | ||
| I don't remember the Aquaman movie, so I don't really know. | ||
| I saw that like months ago. | ||
| I'm totally forgettable. | ||
| Tony Belt says 19th Amendment was a mistake. | ||
| You know, disavow. | ||
| What a sexist thing to say. | ||
| BB says you still yang gang big guy? | ||
| No, not really. | ||
| Like I said, I was never really in the Yang Gang. | ||
| I memed on it for a while. | ||
| But I never intended to vote for him. | ||
| I never thought he would get the nomination and win the presidency. | ||
| And I said that. | ||
| And before somebody says, oh now he's backtracking, he's corn cobbing. | ||
| I said throughout the whole thing, I was never really Yang Gang. | ||
| I never really was gonna vote for him in the presidential election. | ||
| And I didn't think he'd win the nomination. | ||
| So, uh, so no the memes kind of dead. | ||
| I'm kind of off of it. | ||
| He's totally cringe now He's he was always a little bit cringe, but I feel like we were able to overlook it now. | ||
| Not so much God's plan says remember the Gerdusky interviews on the Gavin McInnis show. | ||
| I never saw him on The Gavin McInnis show so I don't remember those Max Carson says who in the mainstream do you think cares about demographics Carson Coulter? | ||
| Yeah, Tucker and Coulter, um Michelle Malkin I think cares, Pat Buchanan obviously. | ||
| Those are probably, that's almost about it in the mainstream that cares about demographics as far as I know. | ||
| I think everybody else is kind of in on it, you know. | ||
| At least everybody else is more cowardly about it if they do care. | ||
| So I would say those are probably the biggest ones that care about demographics or maybe care explicitly or directly about demographics. | ||
| The Angry Inch says, Heyo, how's it hanging, Big King? | ||
| It only took 50 years after women's suffrage for them to legalize them killing babies. | ||
| Ain't that whack-a-doodle? | ||
| Haha. | ||
| Well, to be fair, it was Roe v. Wade, not a law. | ||
| But yeah, birth control and abortion and all that. | ||
| Cause and effect? | ||
| Perhaps. | ||
| Bill says they act like it's a choice for women to work or have a family, but since the workforce doubled, only higher class couples can easily make that happen. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Yeah, 100% true. | ||
| Although I will say it's a little bit of a fallacy, because if you calculate the total cost of a woman working, Typically it doesn't exceed the income. | ||
| I guess it depends on what job you're getting. | ||
| A lot of people think in terms of, well, women have to work these days. | ||
| But if you think about it, if you're a working mother and you have kids, daycare is a huge cost. | ||
| Transportation is a huge cost. | ||
| There's a lot of costs associated with a woman in the household working. | ||
| Stefan Malin who's done the math on this. | ||
| And often you'll find that a woman will only add marginally on net to the household income, if at all, if it's not a net loss. | ||
| So that's something to keep in mind. | ||
| But yeah, I mean, it is basically a privilege now based on how expensive things are and how low wages are. | ||
| Rudolph says, what's wrong with increased expenditure with women's votes? | ||
| They raise kids. | ||
| What are you talking about? | ||
| What's wrong with increased expenditures? | ||
| Well, obviously, look at the national debt. | ||
| That's one problem, you know. | ||
| And also, they're not raising kids. | ||
| They're working. | ||
| So, voters, or rather, women's suffrage came with women in the workforce. | ||
| Elevating women and giving them the right to vote was the first step, obviously, in a long chain of other decisions which are not good. | ||
| What's wrong with increased expenditures? | ||
| I don't think we're in a good financial position, obviously, for a variety of reasons. | ||
| And also, beyond that, it's not just expenditures, it's also immigration. | ||
| It's also immigration as well. | ||
| Democrats don't just represent increased expenditures, they represent increased immigration, and there's a direct correlation between women voting and women's education and fertility rates. | ||
| So, fertility rate goes down after women's suffrage. | ||
| So, we say, well, they're raising kids, they're making kids. | ||
| Are they? | ||
| Not really. | ||
| Not really. | ||
| What's the fertility rate? | ||
| The Bunk says, I highly doubt femloids are more immoral than males. | ||
| I didn't say that. | ||
| I don't think I said that. | ||
| Desu says, honest question, if only a fraction... whoops, scrolled down too far there. | ||
| He says, if only a fraction, 15% of women were actually voting right after suffrage, how did that impact social spending so much? | ||
| Well it says, again, it says immediately after. | ||
| It says immediately in the short term after women's suffrage, social spending increased 0.6% to 1.2% in Western Europe. | ||
| And it says 14% in areas. | ||
| This is state-based. | ||
| In the Harvard paper by John Lott, it's not talking about national expenditures. | ||
| It's talking about state government expenditures. | ||
| And it's saying in certain communities where they legalized it first as opposed to later. | ||
| And it increases over time. | ||
| I would say that it is a pretty direct correlation. | ||
| Once you look at as women are added into the voter turnout, you could see that expenditures are going up. | ||
| Because, you know, they're a pretty big percentage of the population. | ||
| Even if they're low turnout, if it's maybe 50-50, and women swing it one way or the other, if they have 15% turnout, that has a sizable effect, right? | ||
| But you can look up the study on that. | ||
| You can look up all the numbers. | ||
| It's pretty, it's not, it's not really a controversial thing. | ||
| You know, there's plenty of studies that show that, and not just in America, by the way, also in Europe. | ||
| Max Carson says, that's a good honest question, but it's all there in the data. | ||
| Max Carson says IQ-based suffrage? | ||
| Not necessarily, but maybe on qualitative things like if you own land, if you have a family, those kinds of things. | ||
| You know, I wouldn't say that blanket women should be able to vote, but maybe single women should be able to vote. | ||
| You know, maybe you vote if you're married, you vote if you're a mother or something like that, because clearly The suffrage, if anything, needs to be contracted, not expanded. | ||
| That's my humble opinion on this, and it should be contracted for everybody. | ||
| It should be contracted based on age. | ||
| It should be contracted based on ownership, perhaps. | ||
| I mean, it's a little dicey now because of the way the financial system works, but I'm not necessarily offering a path forward. | ||
| I'm just offering a critique of the current situation, but it definitely needs to be contracted. | ||
| Umph Love says, McFuentes, if people listen to the lab coats on the woman question, there would be no woman question. | ||
| Genetics and physiognomy shows their difference. | ||
| Not really. | ||
| Are lab coats really putting out a lot of studies on that or are the lab coats going along with it? | ||
| That's the thing. | ||
| All these dumbass lab coat defenders, lab coat apologists, they say, don't criticize science. | ||
| We win when we use science. | ||
| Really? | ||
| Science is in support of all this transgender stuff. | ||
| Science is in support of all this stuff. | ||
| They line up right behind the liberals on this. | ||
| There was an article not too long ago from BBC where it was some, it was some mystery meat, transgender or whatever, Who is saying, here's why quantum physics actually supports transgenderism. | ||
| I'm in two different states and gender just like an electron, you know? | ||
| And it's like, clearly science is not in support. | ||
| Oh, look at Bill Nye! | ||
| And I know Bill Nye only has a degree in engineering, but him and his ilk, our representative, pop science, whatever you want to call it, they're the ones pushing this stuff. | ||
| So people come at me all the time with this, oh, Nick, Nick, you hit on lab coats, but don't you know that actually science is legit? | ||
| Yeah, sure. | ||
| Empirical, physical sciences are legit, and we should talk about them. | ||
| But we're not really criticizing that. | ||
| We're criticizing... | ||
| The Reddit, like, liberal over-reliance on these kinds of material explanations, this scientist ideology that says everything is material, everything is reducible, this sort of Neil deGrasse Tyson, I-effing-love-science kind of cult. | ||
| So don't be a stupid bitch about this thing. | ||
| Don't be a little bitch about this. | ||
| Trying to defend the lab coats. | ||
| I have to defend the lab coats. | ||
| I have to defend vaccines and round earth and I have to defend all this other stuff. | ||
| Yeah, okay man. | ||
| Okay man, you do you. | ||
| White night for the lab coats. | ||
| That's a great idea. | ||
| Your local milkman says don't buy your wife a watch for Christmas. | ||
| There's a clock on the oven. | ||
| That's funny. | ||
| That's a funny joke. | ||
| Noit says, when was the last time you saw a platinum blonde male in public that was his natural hair color? | ||
| Are they going extinct? | ||
| Does it matter? | ||
| Platinum blonde male. | ||
| What does platinum blonde hair look like? | ||
| Platinum blonde hair. | ||
| Is that even naturally occur? | ||
| Platinum blonde? | ||
| Is that a naturally occurring phenomenon? | ||
| I've never seen it naturally occurring before. | ||
| If you mean like gray or white. | ||
| A lot of people dye their hair now. | ||
| It's very trendy, but I don't think I've ever seen that naturally occur. | ||
| Maybe it's because I'm Mediterranean. | ||
| I only see brown hair people in my native homeland of Italy. | ||
| But I've never seen platinum blonde before I didn't know I don't think that was a real thing But yeah, if it is I guess it's worth preserving, but I don't I've never seen that before El Sapo says the Industrial Revolution has been a disaster for the human race Ted Kaczynski agree Calyxtus says Joe Rogan is gay. | ||
| Yeah true XL jackpot says shout out to my based in Trad pill Danish mate whose birthday it is today thoughts on America's long-term geopolitical future Well yeah, happy birthday to the Dane. | ||
| America's long-term geopolitical future is decline. | ||
| It is an absolute decline and a relative decline in power. | ||
| So, the long-term future is going to be losing power over NATO, you know, European countries. | ||
| It used to be that it was like NATO policy was American policy. | ||
| And now I think Trump has clearly shown that that's going to change a little bit. | ||
| I think there will be a little bit of a break between Europe and some of these other countries. | ||
| I also think that we won't have absolute control over the Western Hemisphere. | ||
| We won't have global hegemony, and I think regional hegemony will be contested. | ||
| But I think that'll be brought on by domestic problems, like, obviously, racial division, class division, a bad economy. | ||
| You know, there are a lot of systemic domestic problems that are going to result in geopolitical problems in the future. | ||
| You know, it's sort of a gay Heritage Foundation-type talking point, but one of the generals at some point said, our number one liability is the debt for our military, and that's basically true. | ||
| So I would say that's a long-term geopolitical outlook. | ||
| It's definitely declined relatively and absolutely unless something radically changes. | ||
| That's what I see. | ||
| I see China rising against America, India rising against America. | ||
| Not that I'm not one of these India superpower type people. | ||
| America will still be a great power by 2050 and probably still a hegemonic power by 2050, but definitely we're on the downswing I would say. | ||
| XL jackpot says or I'm sorry I just read that one local milk man says never under any circumstances mix your milks yeah definitely big mistake big mistake I've seen it happen a lot never ends well never ends well you mix the milks you know you mix the chocolate milk up with the white milk and somehow you always end up dropping the glass of white milk it always ends up that the white milk spilled on the floor it's completely battered beyond recognition it's like what we're just like oh I Whoops! | ||
| I just dropped that glass of milk. | ||
| Oops! | ||
| That glass of milk just knocked that other glass of milk off the counter. | ||
| Completely smashed it. | ||
| And I was like, what's going on? | ||
| What's going on in my kitchen? | ||
| Right? | ||
| But yeah, I don't know. | ||
| I don't know what you mean by that. | ||
| If there's some kind of subtext there. | ||
| A weird analogy to bring up. | ||
| It's something that's happened to me before. | ||
| I don't know if that's common. | ||
| Let's see. | ||
| Stereo says, okay, not reading that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Well, that's what he says, which I read. | ||
|
unidentified
|
M.A. | |
| says, get a female co-host. | ||
| Show would be twice as good. | ||
| Would be twice as bad, actually. | ||
| It would be half as good. | ||
| Stereo says, okay, still not reading that. | ||
| Patty McGill says, ask E. Michael Jones how, why the Irish Germans who built Chicago are displaced and why those old Catholic neighborhoods matter. | ||
| Pray the rosary. | ||
| In other words, ask him what he says on every other podcast. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I love that. | |
| Nick, Nick, Nick. | ||
| Ask him so he says this. | ||
| Ask him so you're not only dictating the question to me that I ask him, you're dictating that question because you already know the answer and you want him to say what you want him to say so everybody else can hear it. | ||
| Unbelievable the way people operate. | ||
| That's a thought process. | ||
| Nick, Nick, Nick. | ||
| Ask him this so he'll say this to everybody. | ||
| Patty McGill, get your own show. | ||
| How about that? | ||
| Get your own show. | ||
| For crying out loud. | ||
| He says that on every show. | ||
| We're gonna ask him some fresh stuff. | ||
| We're gonna change it up a little bit. | ||
| Okay, cuz I've heard that. | ||
| He talked about that on The Spencer Show. | ||
| He talks about that in his books. | ||
| We're trying to, we're gonna try and, you know, get a little new content out there. | ||
| Gen Z Philosophy says, you know, I'm 1000% pure Aryan blood, but my girlfriend is half Italian, one quarter Korean, and one quarter Dutch. | ||
| Do you avow? | ||
| I avow. | ||
| I avow. | ||
| Prince of Conquest says, watching your work ethic has convinced me of Ben Franklin's quote about Italians being lazy and dumb. | ||
| Love you big guy. | ||
| Hashtag wasp gang. | ||
| Yeah, how has that worked out, right? | ||
| Lazy and dumb Italians and we elected Matteo Salvini and what's going on again in the... | ||
| What's going on again in the United Kingdom? | ||
| I'm sorry, who's your Prime Minister? | ||
| Lazy and dumb Italians! | ||
| We have Matteo Salvini, who's based in Red Pill, and he's got the rosary, and he's, you know, praying with people, and he's hugging and kissing, and there's hordes of fans, he's deporting migrants, and, um, I'm sorry, who's the leader of the United Kingdom? | ||
| Oh, it's a woman? | ||
| Oh, it's a woman named Theresa May who dances and, you know, does all this other crazy stuff and she's totally cringe and blue pilled? | ||
| Couldn't be me, can't relate. | ||
| Can't relate. | ||
| Oh, America is run by a fat drumpf? | ||
| Anglo-America elected fat blumpf? | ||
| Really? | ||
| Man, if only they had Matteo Salvini, right? | ||
| What a shame. | ||
| But yeah, I love you too, I guess. | ||
| Cloudstar says, Nick, your M-rated rant yesterday reminded me of how my parents were not like that. | ||
| I saw RoboCop when I was seven and it's still my favorite movie. | ||
| Have you seen it? | ||
| RoboCop? | ||
| Yeah, I think I saw it once a long time ago. | ||
| How's that your favorite movie? | ||
| I don't even consider that a great movie, but okay. | ||
| Yeah, it was okay. | ||
| I thought it was an okay film. | ||
| I watched it when I was in, like, middle school, though. | ||
| My parents were less strict about the movies than they were about the video games. | ||
| You know, I was always able to watch some of the, you know, explicit film-type content, but never the video games for some reason. | ||
| I guess my parents, maybe they bought into some of that scare stuff, that, you know, hype about violent video games or whatever. | ||
| I remember one time I got Dead Rising 2, that zombie game, and my mom was like, well let me see, it's M-rated, well let me see what it's all about. | ||
| I showed her, and I was like, but mom, it's zombies! | ||
| And she's like, oh so it's not people? | ||
| I'm like, no. | ||
| And for some reason that distinction was so important. | ||
| That was the difference between me being allowed to get it and not getting it. | ||
| But mom, there's zombies! | ||
| I'm only killing zombies! | ||
| She's like, well, in that case, you can get it. | ||
| Like, what are you... You're just cutting people in half anyway. | ||
| What difference does it make? | ||
| What difference does it make? | ||
| You see, when I play Grand Theft Auto, would it matter? | ||
| Does it really matter, you know? | ||
|
unidentified
|
But yeah, I... Childhood ruined! | |
| Childhood absolutely ruined, mom and dad! | ||
| Not letting me get M-rated games, had to get that Wallace and Gromp game or whatever from Blockbuster. | ||
| What was that stupid-ass game I got for PlayStation 2? | ||
| My first game for... Gromit. | ||
| My first game for PlayStation 2 was... Let me look it up. | ||
| Was Wallace and Gromit... Was it The Curse of the Were-Rabbit? | ||
| No, it was something else. | ||
| Project Zoo? | ||
| It might have been? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| How many, how many, how many PlayStation 2 games were there like this? | ||
| Google Images, maybe? | ||
| Okay, well I can't find it. | ||
| But nevertheless! | ||
| Yeah, my first PlayStation 2 game, Wallace & Gromit. | ||
| Thank you so much, Mom! | ||
| All my friends are playing Grand Theft Auto. | ||
| All my friends have PlayStation 3, and I had Wallace & Gromit. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| so anyway patty mcgill says uh do the whole show with dr jones about chicago the greatest american city and how it was destroyed how the catholic cities were clean safe strong yeah thank you for your input maybe we'll talk about this chicago was one of the finest cities and now obviously in decline and marie says nick you remind me of my granddaughter she's cute thank you yes i've i've heard about this That's good to know. | ||
| Boopers says, uh, hang on. | ||
| Boopers says, brah, I really like your cup. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks! | |
| You can order one at gearbubble.com slash njfmug. | ||
| Gearbubble.com slash njfmug. | ||
| You can buy it. | ||
| Fifteen bucks. | ||
| Very reasonable price. | ||
| ASDF says lady next to me at work said how she loved how her son's kindergarten teacher was gay. | ||
| Guy talking to her was countersignaling this Catholic school. | ||
| Wow, so progressive, so cool. | ||
| If you're not down with homosexuals in your schools teaching your kids... Alright, isn't that what Sam Hyde said? | ||
| It's all coming to fruition. | ||
| ASDF says meant his, not this. | ||
| Two upsetting things to hear. | ||
| Ah, yes. | ||
| Cassie says, speaking of, why did you ban him? | ||
| Because he was dumb. | ||
| He was talking mad smack in the comments, so I had to kick him out. | ||
| Andrew says, why do fools complain when you block them on Twitter? | ||
| They know what they are doing. | ||
| Their shock is silly when they know they were talking trash. | ||
| Well yeah, exactly. | ||
| All these people... | ||
| First of all, people are obsessed. | ||
| I block them and they're like, I'm not mad. | ||
| I'm not mad. | ||
| And then they talk about it for like literally years. | ||
| Literally for years. | ||
| Oh, yeah. | ||
| He blocked me like a year ago. | ||
| I'm like every post. | ||
| He blocks everybody. | ||
| He's the worst. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Blah, blah, blah. | |
| You know, so people, first of all, I block them because I'm like, I don't like you. | ||
| I don't want to associate with you. | ||
| I don't want to see your content. | ||
| You know, people get crazy about it. | ||
| But in most cases, they're like, ha ha, I'm going to get Nick to block me. | ||
| And then they'll reply to my tweet, and they'll be like, F you, block me. | ||
| And I block them. | ||
| And they're like, wow, wow, he blocked me. | ||
| Wow, he's so sensitive, he blocks everybody. | ||
| You literally are asking to be blocked. | ||
| I block, and then they can't get over it, and they're trouble. | ||
| He's, oh, he just blocks everybody. | ||
| I do block a lot of people. | ||
| A lot of people are stupid, and I don't want to see their content. | ||
| It's got nothing to do with being sensitive. | ||
| It's just got to do with, why would I allow somebody to harass me? | ||
| If somebody comes up to you on the street, and they're like, ooh, you suck, you're dumb, I hate you, you wouldn't just, you wouldn't just sit there and take it, you would get up and go somewhere else. | ||
| You know? | ||
| So people make it their their like whole their whole week is replying to my tweets and counter signaling me or you know whatever saying something nasty and I block because I'm like I don't want to deal with that I don't want to get this negative juju in my brain bad juju so I block I ban and then people make it out like oh he's just uh you know he bans everybody whatever yeah damn right 5,300 blocks and counting what about it? | ||
| And what about it? | ||
| Lauren Rose says grow a scraggly beard, bro. | ||
| Sam Hyde style. | ||
| Kino. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I kind of like being clean-shaven. | ||
| It's too itchy. | ||
| When it grows out too much, it just itches and I don't really like that sensation. | ||
| So, I think I'm just gonna keep it short. | ||
| Maybe we'll do a mustache at the max. | ||
| Simon Scola says, you know, I'm something of a scientist myself. | ||
| I don't know what that's referring to, but you know what I mean. | ||
| You know, scientist ideology. | ||
| Smelly says, uh, what should I tell Walter when I meet him? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Patty McGill says, the church is eternal. | ||
| www.latinmassdir.org. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Dominic says, hey there, big guy. | ||
| My wife and I just got married Saturday. | ||
| We both love the show. | ||
| We'd love to watch the rest, but we got to start making those white Christian Protestant babies. | ||
| God bless. | ||
| Well, yikes on the Protestant part, but hey, Congratulations. | ||
| God bless. | ||
| Congrats on the marriage. | ||
| Hope everything works out. | ||
| Hope the babies are forthcoming. | ||
| We can be progenitors of white race. | ||
| Glad you're making the most important kind of content there is. | ||
| Even though they're going to be Protestant. | ||
| Better than nothing, right? | ||
| Better than atheists. | ||
| Better than anything else. | ||
| Except for Catholic, of course. | ||
| But hey, congrats. | ||
| Lauren Rose says do a live stream with the Krusty Krab drive-thru. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Skye says what's up Monica? | ||
| I don't know what that means. | ||
| Patty McGill says no one ever detailed Chicago. | ||
| Paco Loco. | ||
| Ouch. | ||
| Reckoning says found out GF's make out with their gay friends barf. | ||
| Is that I don't think that's a very I don't know Maybe it's a common thing. | ||
| I wouldn't know I canceled women in 2019 wouldn't know anything about it All these women defenders be like, did you know that women are killing their babies and making out with gay men? | ||
| I'm like can't relate wouldn't know anything about that That's 2019. | ||
| They're canceled. | ||
| Huh? | ||
| All these women defenders all these cope cope posters white nighters beta orbiters Reply guys, Nick, did you know women are acting... Nick! | ||
| These women are acting different! | ||
| And I'm like, they're, bitch, they're cancelled. | ||
| They're cancelled, what are you still doing? | ||
| What are you still doing hanging around them? | ||
| They're like, Nick, Nick, you liked that post of a trans catgirl in diehighs. | ||
| And then they come to me later and they're like, Nick, these women are off the goop. | ||
| And I'm like... You're gonna be saying, how do you live like you do? | ||
| And I'm gonna say, I tried to show you. | ||
| I tried to show you, right? | ||
| so not not surprising not surprising women are psycho degenerates oh oh my gosh surprising that's so surprising women are cancelled women remain cancelled uh glen c says my parents only let me play or watch e pg movies until i was 13 then only teen pg 13 lame childhood relatable relatable yeah very lame childhood my dad was very red pill though he took me to the r-rated films when i was uh | ||
| Probably when I was in like middle school. | ||
| But there's just the ones that didn't have sex. | ||
| We had to go on this website called, yeah, what a cringe moment. | ||
| We had to go on this website called With Kids in Mind. | ||
| Have you ever heard of this? | ||
| This creation. | ||
| It's called With Kids in Mind. | ||
| And they give a score for every movie based on three categories, which is nudity and sex, violence and swearing. | ||
| And if the nudity and sexuality score was low, I was able to see it. | ||
| If it was high, I couldn't see it. | ||
| So like, for example, Couldn't See the American with George Clooney, which came out in, I think, September, October 2011 or 2010. | ||
| Couldn't see it because it was R-rated and it had too much sex in it. | ||
| And the list went on and on with this kind of stuff. | ||
| I had to miss a lot of feature presentations because of this website. | ||
| Too much sex going on. | ||
| But if it had high violence, high swearing, low sex, then I was able to see it. | ||
| So that's how that worked. | ||
| But yeah, the video games cringe and blue pilled until the end. | ||
| Still had to get permission for Grand Theft Auto V when I was in high school, okay? | ||
| So, so cringe and blue pill childhood. | ||
| No good. | ||
| Lauren Rose says, your keyboard research is elite ASMR. | ||
| Thank you, King. | ||
| I'm glad you enjoy it. | ||
| Lauren says, we love our Chinese mugs, don't we folks? | ||
| Okay, Chinese manufactured, but the design is all American and the theme is American as well. | ||
| And really, that is what counts. | ||
| Okay, that's our last Super Chat. | ||
| to Pooper Chat. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Simon Scola says, you like Krabby Patties, don't you, E. Michael Jones? | ||
| Yeah, I'll ask him that as well. | ||
| Okay, that's our last Super Chat. | ||
| That's going to do it for us on the show tonight. | ||
| Wow, a lot of really terrific Super Chats. | ||
| I especially like the ones about Pooper Chats and, you know, asking to get Walter from Drake & Josh on the show. | ||
| I would say those are my favorites tonight. | ||
| But that's going to do it for us on the show. | ||
| Remember to check us out at nicholasjfuentes.com slash membership. | ||
| Five bucks a month to become a premium member. | ||
| You get one additional show every week. | ||
| And it also supports the show. | ||
| It's the best way to monetarily support the show. | ||
| We're 100% viewer funded. | ||
| We need, we need the Shekels, baby. | ||
| We're not getting them from Benny Politsak. | ||
| That's for sure. | ||
| We're not getting them from the World Jewish Congress. | ||
| So be sure to check that out. | ||
| The link is down below. | ||
| We got a two-hour show posted up from Sunday, and it's a pretty big show. | ||
| 20 plus hours of content already available. | ||
| So check that out. | ||
| Remember to subscribe to the channel, give us a big thumbs up, leave a comment down below, click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live. | ||
| Remember, we are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. | ||
| Central, 8 p.m. | ||
| Eastern Time, you know, somewhere around there. | ||
| Thanks so much for watching the show. | ||
| Thanks to our Super Chatters premium members, everybody who watches. | ||
| We love you folks and we will see you tomorrow. | ||
| Until then, have a great rest of your evening. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo. | |
| It's going to be only America first. | ||
| America first. | ||
| The American people will come first once again. |
Export Selection