Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 11, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

02:18:12

The Trump-Orban Summit | America First Ep. 385

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:58:26

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		music
		music music
		music music music music music music music
		music music music music music music music
		music music music music music music music music
		music music music music music
		wall so so
		so so so
		so so so so
		so so so
		so so wall
		so so so
		so so so so so
		so so so so so
		so so so so so so so so
		so so so so so so
		so so so so so so so so so so so so so
		Thank you.
		Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall.
		Thank you.
		Well, wall.
		music
		music
		music music
		music music music music music music music music music music music music
		music music music music music
		Thank you.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's a great day.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first.
		America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first.
		America first.
		Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening, everybody.
		We're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be with you this week.
		Monday again.
		Right, everybody?
		Back on the jobsite.
		No more nagging, GF.
		No more nagging, wife.
		We've got a great show for you this evening.
		Lots to talk about.
		Lots in the news.
		Big things happening.
		All over the place, big things happening in the White House, big things happening in China, in Iran, things happening on the internet.
		So there's a lot to talk about.
		It's going to be a big show.
		The feature story of tonight's show, of course, we're talking about the summit.
		It wasn't really a summit, more like just a conventional meeting, but a big meeting between the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and President Donald Trump of the United States.
		And I've got a whiteboard prepared, a nice little tea chart.
		We're going to compare and contrast the two leaders, but it's a big meeting.
		It's a big deal.
		If you've been following this show for a long time, if you've been watching me for a while, we know and we've talked about for a couple of years now that Viktor Orban in Central Europe is probably the visionary, or among the top tier, first among equal, visionaries and leaders leading the charge for the reactionary right, not just in Europe, but in the whole world.
		And he has really broken down and provided a path for the right wing moving forward in Europe and in North America.
		And so I think it's a very important moment in our history, moment in the Trump administration that we see these two characters Coming together and when they come together we can kind of see where the shortcomings of Donald Trump lie.
		I think that's going to be the critical point to make during tonight's show as we look at somebody like Viktor Orban from a far-flung Eastern European country, former Soviet bloc state, Who is really doing what needs to be done.
		Who is a competent politician who has a vision, a plan, these unifying principles for what we need to do moving forward versus Donald Trump where there hasn't been nearly as much in the way of practical progress or again the unifying vision.
		So we're going to talk about that.
		We have a nice clean, clean and good whiteboard to spell all that out for you.
		Very good visual representation.
		We'll be talking about that and we will be talking tonight about The trade war with China.
		We have a new development today.
		Of course, we saw on Friday that the Chinese pulled out of a deal.
		They said, and the president has said, that we were 95% of the way to completing a comprehensive trade deal, mutually agreed upon trade deal, that would have solved all the trade deficit problems and barriers between the two countries in trade.
		It would have solved all of that.
		The Chinese reneged on all their promises.
		They edited the deal.
		They said that out of 12 pages, 150 different concepts and principles, the Chinese just totally reneged on every promise that they made, every concession that they gave.
		And so in response on Friday, we saw Trump raise their tariffs.
		Raised tariffs from 10 and 15 percent up to 25 percent.
		200 billion dollars worth of Chinese imports into America.
		And today, the news was that in response, China has retaliated by raising tariffs from 10% to 25% on $60 billion worth of goods.
		And we're going to talk about that.
		It's just always so funny.
		Every time, it's the same take from the conservative establishment.
		Every time it's tariffs, whether it's China, Canada, the European Union.
		Every time, invariably, it's the same take.
		It's always, well, Donald Trump just must not understand free trade.
		Donald Trump doesn't understand comparative advantage.
		I took Economics 101 and if one country is making this widget and another country is making that widget, then they specialize and everybody wins.
		And it's so stupid!
		It's so stupid!
		We literally cannot lose.
		The trade situation with China literally cannot be worse than it already is.
		And so we're going to talk about that.
		It makes me so mad.
		It makes me so angry because every single time we try to retaliate, we try to up the ante, we try to engage, we try to challenge the status quo.
		We get the libertarians, the think tank people, oh, you just don't understand free trade.
		You just, you didn't, you read Milton Friedman.
		You didn't read Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell.
		People have no idea the kind of predatory practices that are in place and what we stand to gain here.
		So we're going to get into all of that in greater detail.
		Should be a high energy show.
		Full disclosure, I had a monster before I came on the air.
	Rare.
	I've only had a few of those in my lifetime, but it's another one of those situations.
	The sleep schedule's totally inverted.
	I've been sleeping all day, up all night.
	Yesterday I had a tension headache the whole night, making me suicidal.
	It was so bad.
	And I couldn't sleep.
	And I said, you know what?
	We have to take a stand here.
	We got to reset the sleep schedule.
	So I pulled out the big gun.
	So I went to the back of the fridge.
	I got one of the reserve Monster Zero Ultra sips, and I've been gradually sipping on it all day.
	It's been filling me with energy.
	It's been coursing through my veins.
	It's been filling me up.
	I'm maxed out!
	I'm juiced up!
	I'm on performance-enhancing drugs tonight, so if it's a better show than normal, you gotta understand where it's coming from.
	It's a chemical enhancement, alright?
	It's a chemically-induced, America-first show.
	So we're very animated, we're very charged up, trying to contain myself, you know?
	I'm sort of jittery a little bit, but we're gonna try and channel it into nationalist rage, nationalist polemics, okay?
	But before we get into the current events, we do have to say a few things about the weekend, of course.
	Yesterday, as we all know, it was Mother's Day, and we gotta say, we just have to remind everybody, hey, Happy Mother's Day to all the mothers out there.
	Thank you so much for what you do.
	You know, we see it's like every week it's some form of a Women's Appreciation Day.
	You know, I feel like there's been three already this year.
	It's like Women's Appreciation Day, International Women's Appreciation Day, Women's Visibility Day, Women's Rights Day.
	You know, it's...
	But the only one we care about, forget all that.
	You're a woman.
	I don't care.
	You're a femoid.
	Stop talking to me.
	Go away.
	But you're a mother and this is a day that I can get behind.
	We have to appreciate the mothers.
	Thank you.
	Shout out there to all the good mothers.
	Now we're not gonna, we're not gonna endorse, you know, divorcees.
	We're not gonna endorse bad mothers, people on drugs.
	But all the good mothers out there that raise their kids with good morals.
	You know, my mother, my grandmother, grandmothers, you know, mothers in my family.
	Thank you so much.
	You're the backbone of society.
	And that's not even... I don't even mean that in a patronizing way.
	Normally, if I were to compliment a woman like that, it would be sarcastic and patronizing.
	But when I say that about mothers, it's totally true.
	And that's the role that women have to have in the country.
	That's a thing they forget.
	They think they're empowered by going out and we celebrate international, you know, fighting, working women.
	Why?
	What kind of damage are you doing by, what, working for Goldman Sachs?
	Working for Liberty Mutual?
	What kind of damage are you doing on society?
	And by damage I mean impact, influence, empowerment.
	As opposed to actually rearing the next generation of people.
	You know, you think about how the society's falling apart, it's because there's not enough good mothers.
	Hello?
	You know, times are bad because people are bad.
	People are bad because they don't have good moms and dads.
	So you have good moms out there.
	They're the ones that are really, they're the backbone.
	They're the ones that are really making everything happen.
	So thanks to the moms.
	Shout out to my mom.
	It's also my mom's birthday tomorrow.
	So happy Mother's Day.
	Happy birthday.
	Happy Mother's Day to everybody else and any other birthdays that might be happening.
	Uh, so we do have to take a moment to appreciate that.
	There's one other thing, though.
	Aside from our usual... That's our annual Mother's Day message.
	We love the... Okay.
	We love the mothers.
	That's great.
	But aside from that, we do have to go off a little bit, because I saw this... And if this does not just send you over the edge...
	I don't know.
	Something's wrong with you.
	Because I'm trying to have a good Mother's Day.
	I went out to eat with my mom and my grandma last night, and it was great.
	It was great.
	I love talking to my grandma.
	She's so red-pilled, and she so gets it, what's going on.
	It's refreshing, actually.
	I talk to my normie friends, and I'm like, this is boring.
	You know, you're talking to me about Reddit.
	You're talking to me about weed.
	Dude, weed.
	I'm bored.
	But I talk to my grandma.
	I talk to my mom.
	Not that I'm like a mommy's boy, but it's like, okay, these are people, you know, they're telling me about politics.
	They watch the show.
	They're red-pilled.
	This is an enjoyable conversation, you know?
	So I'm enjoying my Mother's Day like anybody else.
	I'm having a fine, crispy stuffed chicken.
	We're talking about the situation.
	We're talking about the movement.
	And I'm scrolling through Twitter after the dinner, and what do I find?
	My favorite cookie brand.
	You might have seen this.
	You know the cookie problem we like to talk about on the show?
	I see my favorite brand of cookies, Chips Ahoy!
	They're running an advertisement for Mother's Day.
	And what does the advertisement feature?
	A black drag queen from the show RuPaul's Drag Race.
	This drag queen is doing a Mother's Day advertisement for Chips Ahoy.
	And the message is you've got a drag queen, it's a 45 second advertisement, and it's just your usual ridiculous, disgusting, degenerate drag queen, you know, act, promoting the cookies on Mother's Day.
	And I'm watching this and I'm thinking, Who okayed this?
	Who gave this the green light?
	Why am I looking this?
	Why am I looking at this?
	Why is it May, what is it, May 12th, yesterday, 2019 on Mother's Day, and I'm watching a Chips Ahoy Mother's Day ad with a drag queen?
	What does this have to do with cookies?
	You know, I imagine like the advertiser pitch meeting, hey, what if?
	Why?
	Why a drag queen?
	And you look at that, and that's a small thing.
	You know, the left likes to say, oh, drag queen and a cookie ad, what's the big deal?
	Is that the end of the world?
	How does that affect you?
	How does that bother you?
	But it's just so everywhere.
	That's really when it hits you.
	And I think that's what we really have to tap into for normal people.
	Like, for example, when I was a younger man, I'm still a very young man, but when I was a younger man, I didn't care about this stuff.
	I was in high school, I'm a libertarian, you know, I'm worried about what's on television, I'm worried about, you know, whatever, homework, and Girls and all that.
	Model UN.
	But what really woke me up was just this constant, what is going on in the advertisements and the sitcoms and the movies?
	Why with this overt political messaging and on these kinds of issues?
	Like it would be one thing if the advertisement was I don't know, it had a black eye in it, you know, or it had, I don't know, a more subtle liberal message, but you have a drag queen in there.
	This is just so... 20 years ago this would have been fringe.
	You would have been attacked by Moms Demand Action, some Christian advocacy group, and now it just permeates everything.
	And then you see everybody's giving Chips Ahoy grief about this.
	They're like, really?
	Drag queens in the cookie ad?
	And the cookie Twitter account, the Chips Ahoy Twitter account, is replying to all the left-wing people saying they didn't even watch the ad, they're getting triggered over a drag queen, what's the big deal?
	The world's coming to an end, alright?
	The cookie question, in short, and that's all I'm gonna say about it.
	I'm already speaking too long.
	It's a Chips Ahoy!
	advertisement.
	But I'll just say this.
	Cookie question has to have an answer one of these days, okay?
	These cookies, the Chips Ahoy!
	They've gotten away with it for too long.
	We know who's responsible.
	Chips Ahoy!
	I'm not giving patronage to the Chips Ahoy!
	controlled system anymore.
	I'm not doing it.
	I refuse to buy Chips Ahoy!
	I will name Chips Ahoy all day long.
	You want to tell me who's promoting degeneracy in the world?
	I'll name them Chips Ahoy.
	So, we're not going to kowtow to the Chips Ahoy system anymore.
	Their tyranny ends now.
	Their promulgation of degenerate filth, sexual and otherwise, it ends today.
	The answer to the cookie question?
	Maybe Chips Ahoy has to go out of business to send a message.
	Stop patronizing all Nabisco products.
	You know, people say, oh well, You don't understand.
	It's not all the cookies.
	It's just this one group.
	It's just the Chips Ahoy, but you know, the Oreos are okay.
	The Oreos are nationalists.
	The Oreos are supporting Hungary, and they're supporting the Czech Republic, and they're supporting Salvini and Bolsonaro.
	But you know what I say?
	It's all Nabisco cookie-related products.
	They're all in on it.
	They're all in the Federation.
	They're, you know, so...
	In short, we have to do something about it, alright?
	These nefarious Chips Ahoy Oreos moving their production to Mexico.
	Something has to be done, okay?
	So that's the Chips Ahoy, but you know, that's all we have to say about Mother's Day.
	Happy Mother's Day, and don't buy Chips Ahoy, alright?
	But we have to, but look, we have to save some time for the real current events.
	We have to save some go off for the actual news of the day.
	We're gonna start actually with this ABC article before we get into China and before we get into... Actually, you know what?
	I don't even know if we'll have time.
	It's already 7.20 or it's already 7.30.
	I mean, I don't even know if we'll have time.
	So maybe we'll have to save this for tomorrow, this ABC article that I was tweeting about.
	Yeah, I guess we'll save that for tomorrow.
	So we're going to start today with the Chinese tariff situation.
	Like I said, I previewed this at the top of the show.
	What's going on today is the Chinese retaliation.
	So the build-up to this, of course, and we talked about this a little bit last week, you have the build-up to this situation.
	Trump gets into office.
	We have to go all the way back to 2017, okay?
	Trump gets into office and immediately We start to see this trade war begin.
	You know, it's actually pretty smooth sailing from the beginning.
	Trump goes over to China.
	There's this lavish parade, a big welcoming ceremony, great relationship between Xi Jinping and President Trump.
	They work together on the North Korea deal and things are going okay.
	We see in the beginning of 2018 the first round of sanctions, I'm sorry, tariffs, Go into effect.
	The president implements something like 50 to 60 billion dollars worth of tariffs on China.
	This is January 2018.
	This is the opening salvo in our trade war with China.
	And why is this happening?
	We've had a trade deficit with China in excess of 300 billion dollars per year for the better part of two decades.
	And this goes back like 25 years really.
	This really goes back all the way to the beginning of this new world order.
	The construction of this international liberal financial system with you know, the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, the IMF, you know, this whole American-led system.
	And so for the longest time, we've just been hemorrhaging money.
	Every year, China exports more goods to our country to the tune of billions of dollars, a deficit, more than we send over there.
	And because of that, we see a lot of our assets going over to China.
	We see a lot of debt.
	You know, we had this meme, I think, a long time ago.
	Now people have a better understanding of how public debt works.
	But for the longest time the meme was that China owns us because they own so much of our debt.
	And that's true.
	They're the largest foreign holder of American public debt.
	Something like 13% of the total public debt is owned by the Chinese.
	And they're getting a lot of our currency.
	And they're manipulating the exchange rate.
	And they're abusing our technology.
	They're stealing our research and development.
	They're using cyber attacks to steal our information and so on.
	It's a response to all these practices and this is what was campaigned on.
	We begin to implement sanctions and of course the sanctions are to put leverage on China to come to the negotiating table, make a grand deal, open up the Chinese markets, try to mitigate some of these practices, implement some enforcement mechanisms so we can have some semblance of fair trade, a real fair trade system with China.
	So we start with some small tariffs in January 2018 This ramps up in summer of 2018 with big tariffs.
	$200 billion worth of Chinese imports get big tariffs.
unidentified		15%.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Now they were going to go up to 25% and Trump was threatening in October of 2018 that we were going to tariff all Chinese imports.
		So China imports about $550 billion worth of goods, rather they export, about $550 billion worth of goods to America every year.
		We have already implemented about $230 billion worth of tariffs.
		In October 18, Trump was saying we're going to raise the tariffs on the existing goods that we have tariffs on, and we're going to expand the tariffs to cover all the goods that China exports to us every year.
		And this is, by the way, in the meantime, this is destroying the Chinese economy.
		You look at the Shanghai Stock Index, it has collapsed since the tariffs go into effect.
		And in response to this, China has to inject a lot of credit into the economy.
		They have to use that, they have to use a lot of debt to keep their economy afloat, because they're just hemorrhaging funds.
		Businesses are leaving the country.
		Factories are shutting down.
		Business is going away.
		They're opening up in Vietnam.
		They're opening other places in Southeast Asia to evade these taxes.
		Also, all this money is filling the coffers of the US government.
		You charge a 15% tariff and what is that?
		It's a tax.
		So you have Chinese companies paying into the system and as a result the American economy is doing actually really good.
		People had predicted that this economic war would be catastrophic for us.
		That we implement tariffs on half of Chinese imports into America.
		People said that's a pretty big deal.
		That'll raise the prices for...
		Consumer goods because China is one of the biggest trading partners of America for manufactured goods, for industrial products, and so on.
		It didn't happen and instead we get lowest unemployment in 20 years and we get highest GDP growth in 15 years.
		So the numbers are great.
		This is the green light.
		So Trump says in October 2018, we're gonna take it to the next level.
		We're gonna expand the tariffs.
		We're gonna raise the tariffs.
		They sit down with Xi Jinping, this is in Buenos Aires, in December 2018, at the G8 Summit, and Xi Jinping says, okay, we can't take it anymore, we are ready to come to the negotiating table, we will make a deal with you.
		And so they sit down, the Chinese and the American delegation, at this summit, this is last December, and they say, we will put together a framework of a deal that is satisfactory to the Americans, such that Donald Trump announces in December, We are suspending all planned increases or expansions of tariffs.
		We're not going to implement any new tariffs.
		We're not going to raise tariffs on products that are already subject to tariffs.
		This will go on for 90 days while we figure out this framework agreement.
		The 90 days passes.
		It's a January or February deadline.
		Trump says we like the progress we're making.
		They're making big commitments, big concessions.
		So we're going to indefinitely delay the tariff increases and expansion.
		A lot of time goes by.
		And Trump, to his credit, actually has really good personnel managing the trade situation.
		You look at Wilbur Ross, who's in there.
		You look at Lightzinger, who's negotiating with China.
		And these are top-tier people.
		These are some of the finest people in the administration.
		And one of our biggest gripes is that people like John Kelly, and you look at the current Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, and you look at the DHS Secretary Nielsen and her replacement, they're terrible.
		They don't implement the policy.
		They don't believe in Trump's promises and his larger abstract principles of America first.
		But these guys who are handling the trade situation are top tier, competent, and they're committed to the cause.
		So we're working out a great deal.
		Like I said last week, we're 95% on the way to making a comprehensive deal, sorting out all these issues with China, and China pulls out.
		We have this draft agreement, it's 12 pages, they pull out of 150 different clauses of it, they edit, they remove things, they say we're not making these commitments anymore, they eviscerate the deal, they're now making no concessions.
		So in response to this, we're, of course, we're very upset by this.
		So Trump on Friday, this brings us up to speed to last week, he implements a 25% tariff on $200 billion worth of goods.
		So where we are right now...
		in the trade situation is that Trump hiked up the tariff from 15 to 25% on $200 billion worth of goods.
		So in total, now you have $250 billion.
		He hiked it up on $200 billion on Friday for a grand total, $50 billion of other goods that were not hiked up, but $250 billion in total Chinese imports that are subject to tariffs out of $540 billion.
		So, So about half, a little bit less than half of all Chinese imports into America are now under a 25% or a 15% tariff, which is very substantial, very big.
		In retaliation, and this is our news from today, this is the update, Is that China is now hiking tariffs from 10% to 25% on $60 billion worth of goods.
		And now they have a total of $110 out of $120 billion worth of American imports under tariff.
		So, you know, that's a lot of numbers.
		Maybe that's difficult to follow.
		So America has $240 out of $540 billion subject to tariffs.
		Chinese goods going into America.
	China has $110 out of $120 billion worth of American imports subject to a tariff.
	Now the obvious thing is the volume.
	You know, that's the most important thing about these numbers to understand.
	Is that you look at the totals of goods that are going back and forth.
	Why are we even doing this?
	It's because the deficit is so great.
	China is importing $500, rather they're exporting $540 billion in total worth of goods to America every year.
	We're only doing $110 the other way.
	So that's that's really the problem.
	It's a 340 or 440 billion dollar deficit when you look at the totals.
	Now the other problem comes in with and then how much can you max out on the tariffs?
	When you have a deficit that is this big, this is why I get mad when people say Consumer prices are going to rise.
	This is going to have a horrible effect if we put tariffs on the Chinese economy.
	This is their retaliation.
	This is the most that they can do.
	They can only put tariffs on 10 more billion dollars worth of goods.
	They're at 110.
	They cannot retaliate any further.
	We can go up another 100.
	We can go up another 100 on top of that.
	We could go up basically another 100 on top of that.
	We can escalate this and destroy the Chinese economy completely.
	We can double the amount that's already been tariffed, which is already double the amount that China's tariffing of imports that are American going into China.
	We can double the numbers that already double our imports and keep going on top of that.
	That's how much the deficit is.
	And that's to give you an idea how we simply can't lose.
	You know, this is something that the president talked about a lot during the election.
	And when the tariff war began, people made fun of him for this.
	He said, you know, when you have tariffs, or rather, when you have a deficit that is this big, when you have a $300-$400 billion trade deficit, and we're hemorrhaging $400 billion in cash, assets, debt, all this other stuff every year, And on top of that, they're stealing our technology, they're stealing our intellectual property, they're stealing our production and manufacturing techniques.
	They have access to our market and we don't have access to theirs.
	I mean, it's just, we are just getting slaughtered on trade.
	There's literally no way that you can lose on this.
	There's absolutely no way that you can lose.
	Right?
	Understand that.
	We can keep upping the tariff game.
	We make money.
	They're losing factories.
	Factories are coming into America.
	People are buying domestically.
	There is absolutely no downside.
	And it's just the sheer numbers of it, which to me should be obvious.
	That they can't raise the ante, that they can't up the ante and retaliate with big tariffs should tell you the whole story.
	They can't go any further because they don't buy any American goods.
	And as such, no Chinese money is going into the economy.
	It's totally zero-sum.
	And that's what I got so pissed off at at the top of the show.
	Kind of blew the load early, but I mean that's exactly what it's all about.
	You people like Ben Shapiro.
	And you get the libertarians, and the conservatians, and the fiscal conservatives, and the free market people, and they will tell you that with free trade, actually with free trade, you never lose.
	It doesn't matter how big the deficit is, you can never lose because you're getting goods.
	You know, that's what Milton Friedman said, and this is probably the most pernicious lie in the history of economics, modern history of economics.
	Milton Friedman promulgated this myth for decades and he was maybe the number two most influential economist in world history aside from maybe John Maynard Keynes or like Adam Smith.
	He said that deficits don't matter.
	You know, back in the 70s and 80s, he said that, you know, if you have a trade imbalance with a country like China, it doesn't matter because all that is is arbitrary accounting figures.
	Sure, you can say that you have a $400 billion deficit, but all that means is you're getting goods.
	And how can you be losing?
	Because you're getting all these goods from China.
	Well, what's never acknowledged is you don't get things for free.
unidentified		Duh!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hello short little Jewish economist man.
		You of all people should know you don't get anything for free.
		There's no such thing as a free lunch.
		So we've been told by the economists and we've been told by academics and we've been told by pundits for 50 years that a trade deficit is just totally, that's just an accounting term.
		It's totally arbitrary.
		It doesn't mean anything.
		You know, we have $400 billion worth of Chinese goods more coming into our country than we're sending them?
		Why would the Chinese do that?
		Like, think of that.
		If it's just an arbitrary accounting thing, then that means we're getting $400 billion worth of goods for free.
		Right?
		If we're bringing in, because that's what it comes down to, is valuing all the goods and services, that means we're getting all this stuff?
		We're getting four times the value of goods and services than we're sending them?
		What a deal!
		Right?
		Imagine if you entered into some kind of a And they said, well, you know what?
		I'll give you $100 every year and in exchange you only have to give me $25.
		How are we losing?
		Look, we're getting all this stuff.
		We're getting something for nothing.
		We're getting more and they're getting a little bit less worth of goods.
		Well, obviously that doesn't make sense.
		China wouldn't do that if that were the case.
		They wouldn't deliberately implement policies to make sure that it remained that way.
		Of course, we pay for the goods.
		The $400 billion deficit, we pay for every penny of it.
		We pay for it in cash, we pay for it in debt, and we pay for it in assets.
		So yeah, we're getting $400 billion worth of stuff.
		You know what that stuff is?
		It's largely cheap consumer products that we can make here that we can make here and it's no problem or you can get it from any other country that we do more business with that they actually import and they have fair trading practices.
		You know what we give them in exchange for the cheap consumer products that we can make here?
		We give them stake in our businesses.
		You know, China tried to buy the Chicago Stock Exchange last year, to give you an idea.
		So yeah, we got McDonald's toys, and we got Walmart products, and what you would find in a Target.
		And in exchange, we tried to give them the Chicago Stock Exchange, and we tried to give them pieces of Hollywood companies, and we give them property, ports, Real estate, land, stake in Fortune 500 companies, okay?
		We pay them in debt.
		So understand with debt you have the principal, of course, and then you have interest.
		So we're giving them a guarantee that, you know, we're gonna take their money now, but we'll be paying them back forever, basically.
		So yeah, we get cheap consumer goods now, but we're paying for it in interest every year, basically functionally forever, you know, because there's no chance we're paying it back anytime soon.
		And we pay for it in the form of currency.
		And so we're giving them our American dollar, and what do they do?
		They hoard it, and they release it at strategic times to devalue their currency so that they can continue doing this, so that American consumers and companies will continue buying their products.
		They take our U.S. dollars, they sell it off on the market strategically so that their currency is of a lesser value relative to the dollar.
		You have a weaker currency, you have cheaper products, cheaper products are more competitive, Americans buy Chinese products as opposed to American products, and the cycle keeps itself going.
		We buy more products.
		There's a trade deficit.
		They get the assets.
		They get the debt.
		So it's this giant sucking sound.
		They're just vacuuming up all of our liquidity.
		They're vacuuming up all of our assets.
		They're vacuuming up all of our debt, you know, our long-term financial position and exchange.
		We get the cheap products.
		And so understand, no, you are losing with the deficit.
		You know, it's not this, well, but you have this specialization and you have what you call Apparitive advantage?
		It's not economics 101.
		These things matter.
		And it goes so far beyond that.
		Because China doesn't only just do that, they also implement other things.
		Where, for example, if we want to have a company come in and do business with them, the whole reason we opened up the trading system to them with the World Trade Organization and other things in the 1990s and 2000s, deregulating our trade and lowering our trade barriers, was the idea that we were going to be able to sell to China, our companies was the idea that we were going to be able to sell to China, our companies would gain access to their markets, their consumers would buy our products, and money would That obviously didn't happen.
		And because of the trade deficit thing we just talked about, but on top of that, we didn't even get access to the Chinese markets.
		Instead, we go in there and they say, well, we're not even going to let you compete in our country unless you give us all of your intellectual property and you also enable something called co-production.
		So not only do we get all of your intellectual property and we figure out all your patents and we figure out, you know, maybe your private and public sector technology was 25 years ahead of us.
		And you invested hundreds of millions of dollars to get that advanced technology?
	We have it now.
	And not only that, but your factories are going to come into our country, and your people are going to come into our country, and they're going to teach us how to manufacture your goods so that we can set up a factory in our country after we've learned these techniques, and we've learned the schematics and the blueprints and the intellectual property, and we could just make a cheaper knockoff and we've learned the schematics and the blueprints and the intellectual property, and we could just make a cheaper knockoff product, sell
	So it's just like, and these are just a few examples, this is, we could spend hours talking about these kinds of practices at every level, monetary in terms of strategic sectors of the economy like artificial intelligence, robotics, it's so everything, and that's why we have to look at trade not so much as this mutual thing and that's why we have to look at trade not so much as this mutual thing and we want to be friends with China and we want to work out a deal where money is flowing in both directions, we're We want to destroy China.
	We want to put China basically on their knees.
	And just defeat them so that they cannot allow this to continue, so that they can stop abusing us.
	Because you understand that China is not simply a trading partner, they're a geopolitical foe.
	So as much as they're winning, we're losing.
	It is totally a zero-sum thing.
	You know, the economists like to say, well, a rising tide lifts all boats.
	The Chinese get richer, and you know, maybe Americans get a little bit poorer, but everybody's getting richer on the net, and the market is enriching itself, and the people in the multinational corporations are enriching themselves.
	No, but it is a zero-sum game.
	If China is rising relative to America, then America is weakening.
	It's all relative.
	And because we're geopolitical adversaries, that has very significant effects for military, for defense, for national security.
	And so we cannot afford to continue to inflate the Chinese economy and help them out and strengthen them at the expense of our own economy.
	So actually a deal, the deal that we would like to see is that we have some kind of enforcement mechanism that we can stop these predatory practices.
	You know, that we made China commit on paper saying, okay, we are not going to do cybercrimes, we are not going to do what we've been doing for 25 years, and there's some degree of enforcement, but you know what?
	It would actually be fine if we just remained in a state of trade war.
	It's costing us nothing.
	It's actually benefiting us.
	You know, we had $200 billion worth of tariffs for the last year and a half.
	Did anybody even notice?
	Unemployment's at 3.6%.
	GDP's at 3.2%.
	Did anybody notice that we had tariffs on half of Chinese imports?
	No effect.
	You know, and everybody said, oh, it's a doomsday.
	You're gonna be paying, oh, now you're gonna be paying $25 for a gallon of milk, you know, whatever.
	It didn't happen.
	We're winning because this is strengthening our economy.
	So, you know, the ideal scenario is We probably beat China into submission.
	They make the deal.
	But honestly, and maybe that would be better understanding the political reality that Trump won't be in office forever and whoever comes next will be bribed and bought and allow China to continue to rise.
	So I guess under those circumstances, the deal would probably be preferable.
	But in theory, there's nothing wrong with what we're doing right now.
	The only problem is that it could not be continued indefinitely because a future administration will be bribed, will become corrupt, and will kowtow to China again.
	But other than that, keep the pressure up.
	This is a beautiful thing, and this is really one of the few things that Trump has been excelling at, is the trade policy.
	Everything else has been kind of a miss.
	Foreign policy, immigration, been a little bit incompetent, been kind of a failure, and in some places compromised wholly on principle, like legal immigration, which we're going to get into.
	But on trade, it has really been the area, I think, where Trump is Which Trump is succeeding.
	In this way, he has some parallels with Nixon.
	You know, Nixon didn't achieve everything that he set out to achieve, and obviously his legacy is tainted by the resignation and the scandal and so on.
	But, you know, of course Nixon is remembered for realigning the entire world.
	They taunt with the Soviet Union, opening up with China, putting the Middle East in America's influence, shifting the balance of power away from the Soviet Union towards America.
	You know, he was remembered for Those strategic things which he could do unilaterally.
	Maybe Trump will go down in history the same way.
	So that's China.
	It just makes me... So if you see any of that stuff on the timeline, any of these, you know, tricks, any of these tricks that are being played by these money movers trying to lead you to believe that free trade is, you know, the greatest thing, and that's always what these conservatarians want to fight me on.
	It was the last thing that I came over to on Trump.
	You know, when I was a libertarian, I was like, okay, My conversion process over to the you know authentic traditional conservative type.
	I said okay I'm on board with anti-immigration.
	I'm on board with foreign policy non-intervention.
	I'm on board with all this stuff but you know Trump hasn't sold me on trade.
	But then I read Free Trade Doesn't Work by Ian Fletcher.
	I looked into it and it's just so obvious what's going on.
	So that's a trade situation.
	It couldn't be more obvious once you just look at the numbers.
	We literally there's no way to lose.
	It's a joke.
	You know, how far we would have to go for it to be worse than the current situation.
	We would have to like nuke ourselves, we'd have to get involved in a nuclear war for it to be worse than the current situation.
	So that's the Chinese trade war.
	Our other, our feature story for tonight, and actually I don't know if we'll even have that much time to talk about it unfortunately.
	I've just been going on and on and on.
	It's the monster, you know?
	I'm all full of energy, so we're just all over the place tonight.
	But our feature of the show is about the Trump-Orban visit.
	And I do have a whiteboard here.
	We'll adjust our settings here in a moment.
	Does that look good?
	Yeah, brightness can be brought down a little bit just so you can see that a little bit more clearly.
	So let me go in there.
	Okay, looks good.
	So, why are we talking about this?
	Viktor Orban, who is the Prime Minister of Hungary, is visiting the White House today.
	And actually, the President and Viktor Orban have met before, I believe.
	I think it was at a NATO summit in Europe not too long ago.
	I don't believe there's any video or picture of them shaking hands or anything, but there is a video of them sort of marching along with all the other NATO leaders, all the other European leaders.
	But this is the first time that Viktor Orban comes to visit Trump in the White House.
	They sit down, they talk, and this is a big deal.
	You know, this is a big deal in the realm of, if you're following the meta-political situation happening in Europe and North America, this is not obviously like front-page news, where the average normie is going to be like, oh, Viktor Orban in the White House, this is crazy.
	You know, it's not a cathedral burning down, it's not a terrorist attack, but this is big because of what Viktor Orban represented.
	And if you follow politics, you understand that Viktor Orban is.
	And there was a poll that was actually tweeted out today by Darren Beattie.
	Asking this question, who is the legitimate spiritual leader or the torchbearer of the reaction of the authentic like nationalist conservative movement in the world?
	Is it Bolsonaro?
	Is it Trump?
	Is it Salvini?
	Is it Orban?
	And there's legitimate debate to be had, but there's no question that Orban is definitely on the top tier.
	He is definitely a visionary leader of the reactionary right.
	He was propelled into the leadership of Hungary, I believe it was in 2010.
	And I'm not totally familiar with Hungary's history.
	But basically, it was sort of the same story as a lot of these other post-Soviet countries.
	They had this botched liberalization.
	You know, they sold off some of their most profitable and strategic industries like oil and other things to Russia and to multinational corporations.
	You know, this sort of vulture venture capitalism after The Cold War ended and the Soviet Union, communist countries opened up to Western investment and so they made a lot of mistakes.
	Liberalization didn't really work out.
	By 2008 they were in a similar situation to Greece.
	You know, you remember Greece tanked the Eurozone.
	They had high debt.
	They had a lot of problems.
	Hungary was in a similar situation.
	The IMF wanted them to implement This draconian austerity measure.
	There was a big corruption scandal because of their former Prime Minister.
	And in this environment, Viktor Orban rises up.
	And in sort of a similar vein to a lot of the other Christian Democrats like Merkel and others.
	But he begins to differentiate himself because he articulates a message other than liberal democracy.
	He calls it Christian democracy or illiberal democracy.
	Maybe that's what his detractors call it.
	And he's able to win big in Hungary.
	He's able to implement big economic reforms, he turns their economy around, he wins big majorities because of that, he wins two-thirds in the Congress there, in their Parliament, and they're able to rewrite the Constitution, change the judiciary, they're able to do media reform, they're able to make big substantial changes, they end the migrant crisis, and so Hungary is basically the prototype of what we want the nationalist idea to look like in Europe and in North America.
	He lays out, and this is what we're comparing and contrasting, This is why it matters.
	Orban laid out a couple of years ago five tenets.
	We only have four listed here because only four are relevant for our purposes.
	But he lays out in the speech five, and we're talking about four core tenets of what he calls a project for Central Europe.
	The project of building up Central Europe.
	Five tenets of what he calls this Christian liberalism, this Christian democracy idea.
	And we're going to compare, because I think it's interesting.
	We talked about this on Friday.
	What's happening in Europe with nationalism in the right wing with what's happening in America with the right wing.
	Obviously Trump kind of kicked all this stuff off.
	And I actually shouldn't say that.
	The populist nationalist thing has been rising in the world for 25 years.
	Ryan Gurdusky actually wrote a very good article about this in the American Conservative.
	Very long article but it details how this goes all the way back to like 1996 and it starts out in the Netherlands and in Finland and In some of these far-flung European countries that you don't hear too much about in the news.
	So this has been a long time coming, but we all know that Trump really blew the lid off of everything.
	He really turned the world upside down.
	He breathed new life into this movement, brought it to the forefront.
	And so we compared this on Friday with Matteo Salvini and the migrant crisis at our border and how that's going.
	With the migrant crisis in the Mediterranean Sea and how it's going for Salvini.
	But I think it's important to understand, and I think it's important to compare, what has been done so far in the way of Donald Trump, comparing with the principles of Victor Orban that he has articulated.
	So we're going to go over this.
	We'll read, I guess, the excerpt from the speech where Orban lays this out.
	This was at a campus commencement speech, I think it was back in 2017.
	The full speech, you can look it up.
	The American Conservative printed it.
	He writes, quote, I have formulated five tenets for the project of building up Central Europe.
	The first tenet is that every European country has the right to defend its Christian culture and the right to reject the ideology of multiculturalism.
	So that's the first tenet of his ideology, which to me is probably the biggest and most important one.
	Protecting the culture of the nation, not protecting You know, limited government, not protecting the GDP of the country, not protecting any material aspect of the country's well-being, you know, the unemployment rate or anything like that, but protecting the culture, and more importantly, explicitly acknowledging that it's a Christian culture and rejecting this idea that it can be many things at once or can have foreign influences.
	It's to defend Christian culture and reject multiculturalism.
	Tenet number one.
	To me, that's the most important.
	Number two, He says, our second tenet is that every country has the right to defend the traditional family model and is entitled to assert that every child has the right to a mother and a father.
	Another very important one, because what do we see in America?
	We see not only the promotion of homosexuality and transgender ideology, but it goes beyond that.
	You know, that's the most egregious part of it, that's the most fringe and radical turn that it's taken in recent years, but it's also the promotion of divorce.
	It's also the promotion of the single parent household, and adoption, and all these other things.
	It's the promotion of a lifestyle with no children.
	You know?
	So it goes beyond that.
	He's defending the traditional family.
	One mother, one father, an enduring marriage, they have children, and that's the way it goes.
	And traditional gender roles.
	So we have the promotion of the traditional family model.
	He says the third Central European tenet is that every Central European country has the right to defend the nationally strategic economic sectors and markets which are of crucial importance to it, which goes and ties in a little bit to what we were talking about with China.
	And this is a big part of his reforms.
	He said that, you know, without economic strength, anything we do in this country doesn't mean anything.
	Because you can have any foreign investor, any foreign multinational corporation or foreign government can go in and meddle and influence.
	So really nothing else matters if we're not solid economically.
	If we're vulnerable in the sense that, you know, for example, Russia can shut off our gas or an American multinational can shut off investment in the key industries.
	Well, you really don't have sovereignty, you really don't have independence.
	So he ties us in with the other tenants and says, well, really the foundation is the economy.
	We as the nation, we have the people, have the right to control our strategic sectors of the economy, ultimately the end goal being to protect the sovereignty.
	You know, it's indirect, but that is the foundational component there, and that's the reality of modern politics.
	And number four, he has five.
	Five pertains to the European Union, but the last one for our purposes, he says, the fourth tenet Maybe this is the most important.
	They're all very important.
	They're all highly important.
	He says the fourth tenet is that every country has the right to defend its borders and has the right to reject immigration.
	Two very important pieces.
	Defend the borders and reject immigration.
	So on this side we have a very strong Foundation.
	Not only do we have a politician who wins elections, right?
	You know, and that's kind of the only thing Donald Trump has going for him, is that he won an election.
	This guy wins elections.
	He wins big.
	He wins two-thirds majorities.
	He's a competent legislator.
	Not only does he get into office, but he rewrites the Constitution, and he changes the rules around, and he defies supranational institutions, and he negotiates, and he leverages.
	And he's able to manipulate the public, and he's able to do a lot of things which are the element of statecraft, which makes him a competent, a practical, effective politician and a statesman.
	But aside from that, not only does he win elections, not only does he get stuff done in the pursuit of these goals, but he has the ability to articulate an alternative vision.
	Perhaps that's the biggest problem.
	We on the right in America Don't really know what we want.
	You know, you look at the top conservative pundits today, people like Ben Shapiro, people like Sean Hannity, what's the vision?
	Well, we're going to try and win Republican elections and lower your taxes.
	What's really the argument outside from that?
	We're going to kind of support the traditional family, but if you don't want to, that's your prerogative.
	America's about freedom, and we're going to protect Christian culture, but if everyone's atheist, that really doesn't matter.
	And if you don't want to have a traditional family, well, you do what you want in your own home.
	And economics, hey, as long as the GDP's good, nothing else really matters.
	We can get raped by China, whatever.
	So that's really what's distinct and key about Orbán, is not only do we have a winner, a competent politician and a statesman, but we also have somebody who can articulate an alternative vision.
	The liberals haven't figured out.
	We have this rights talk.
	We have this morality.
	You know, it's based on anti-racism, it's based on this liberation theology of, you know, turning the world, turning the clock back and having this vengeance against the white man and putting in favor of people of color and elevating the dispossessed and leveling the playing field and all that.
	And Orban is saying, well, we have a totally different worldview.
	And it's coherent, and it's strong, and it makes good arguments.
	It's a propositionally positive vision.
	It says, we're not going to just say, well, we don't want the liberal vision.
	We want a conservative vision of traditional families, of Christian culture, and so on.
	We compare that with Donald Trump.
	If you compare just these principles, you know, where we have strong, very good, these are winning tenets that I think we all agree with people who watch this show, what do we have on this side from Trump?
	As far as defending Christian culture and rejecting multiculturalism go, what do we have except for like a few tweets?
	This sort of haphazard ad hoc, we're gonna say Merry Christmas again.
	And we're going to protect your religious liberty.
	It's rhetoric.
	We have ad hoc, totally haphazard rhetoric.
	And it's all incidental.
	Is there policy behind it?
	Is there a larger, unifying principle being articulated?
	No.
	There's never been anything like that.
	During the campaign, the most we could get in terms of a defense of Christian culture and a rejection of multiculturalism is, we're gonna say Merry Christmas again instead of Happy Holidays.
	It's not cutting it.
	That's not enough.
	You know?
	That's one limit of the Trump agenda.
	Is there's only so far we can go with that.
	Because by the same token, he's in the White House celebrating the Muslim holidays and wishing a Happy Ramadan and wishing a Happy Hanukkah and Mazel Tov and whatever.
	And we're about, oh, we're gonna bring in all kinds of different people.
	Race doesn't matter.
	The only thing that matters is merit.
	We change our immigration policy.
	You know, we're gonna talk about that with the embracing of legal immigration.
	But it's not only that.
	We restructured immigration so that we value, instead of family relations, you know, the family-based or chain migration.
	Instead, we have merit-based.
	So even there, do we value our Christian culture?
	Do we value, you know, is there a cultural component to demographic change, the biggest earthquake politically in the country's history?
	No, we value economic utility.
	We value merit.
	Do they speak English?
	Do they have an education?
	Can they contribute to the economy?
	So there's nothing equivalent over here except for these ad hoc pronouncements.
	Nothing.
	Number two, defending traditional family model.
	There's nothing and actually it goes the other way.
	With Trump, we have him waving the LGBT flag at the Colorado rally when he's running for president.
	He says at the GOP National Convention, we're going to protect homosexuals from Muslims.
	How Everybody cheers.
	And I'm so glad to hear you cheering for that.
	Yeah, that's really terrific that the conservative party in the country is cheering for homosexuality.
	We have the Global Homosexual Initiative.
	Do you remember that?
	We have the Global Women's Initiative leadership.
	We have...
	The procurement of PrEP and HIV prevention drugs.
	And we talked about that on Friday.
	That's not a bad thing in itself, but ultimately, practically, we know what that's for, right?
	So if anything, not only are we not doing anything, we're not doing anything to defend and protect the traditional family model, we're actually working in subtle and little ways to the other way, domestically and abroad.
	In Hungary, if you have more than four kids, you don't pay income tax.
	How's that for protecting the traditional family?
	For people who want to say, Oh no, but Trump did such and such.
	No, but Trump said families are a good thing.
unidentified		Yeah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Okay.
		Well, Orban implemented a policy that if you have more than four children and you're married, you don't have to pay income taxes.
		You think we could use something like that in America, right?
		What do we have?
		We have the Global Decriminalization of Homosexuality Initiative.
		So, yeah.
		Oh, and the Transgender Military Band.
		That's really great.
		Red meat for the base, as they say, right?
		So we have nothing in the way of that going on with Trump.
		On number three, we have Defending Strategic Economic Sectors.
		This is the one where you could say, It's happening.
		But even here, again, it is ad hoc.
		It is haphazard.
		Is it systemic?
		Is there a broader unifying principle?
		If there is, I haven't heard it.
		By American Hire American, it's all sloganeering.
		It's all campaigning.
		It is not going to stand the test of time.
		It is sand.
		You know, these are cheap bubblegum slogans.
		Buy American, hire American.
		America first.
		Whatever.
		That's fine for a campaign, but it has to evolve.
		We have to articulate a bigger vision.
		Defending strategic economic sectors because it's the foundation of national sovereignty, that's a vision.
		That's a principle.
		That's a sustainable policy.
		Well, we'll just implement tariffs until they make a deal.
		You think Joe Biden's gonna care about that?
		You think Joe Biden will really get hit hard if he's not gonna go along with what Trump's been doing on trade?
		I don't think so.
		So, and we're being picky here, but we have to be.
		It's been better than everything else on tariffs, but it's not good enough.
		And then lastly, defending the border, rejecting immigration.
		To Trump's credit, he's trying to defend the border.
		He doesn't have the same clout that Orban does.
		Orban has two-thirds of the parliament, he rewrote the Constitution, he has loyalists in the government, so it's a different situation.
		Trump is trying to defend the border, but more important than that, even if it didn't matter, it doesn't matter, right?
		Defending the border, is he trying, is he not trying, did he give up, or is it just not working?
		It really doesn't matter because the more critical component is about legal immigration.
		Not only does Orban say we're going to defend our borders, which should be a given, And even if he can't do it, whatever.
		He says we're going to reject immigration.
		Rejecting immigration.
		Not illegal.
		Not securing the border.
		No, we have the right to reject immigration.
		This is our country.
		We're citizens.
		You know, we have this democratic electoral process.
		We the people are sovereign.
		If we don't want the country to change, we don't want more people coming in, we have the right to put our foot down and say, we don't want any more people coming in.
		We don't care how poor you are.
		We don't care what your plight is.
		If there's a war going on in your country, we have the right to say, no, this is our country and we're closing our borders.
		What is the alternative on the Trump side?
		We've never heard anything close to that.
		The argument has always been, well, we're going to build a wall, but there'll be a big, beautiful door in the middle where everybody can come in, no matter what color you are, no matter who you are, no matter how many, as long as you want to start a little trinket store, as long as you want to set up a street food vendor, you know, whatever.
		As long as you're going to contribute to the economic utility of the nation, as long as you'll boost the GDP, you can come right in.
		So we've embraced immigration as opposed to saying we have the right to reject immigration.
		And all this is to say is Trump is no Orban.
		These are wholly different figures.
	And I don't know if this is something where In the grand scheme of things, we will never be able to come close to an Orban.
	You know, I don't know if this is something where these are just qualitative differences and what each system is able to produce.
	You know, this is the best that we could produce.
	This is a Donald Trump-like character and in Europe it's different because they have these ethnic-based countries and a longer history and they have reactionary politics and so on.
	Or do you wonder, and this is I think the bigger question, is Donald Trump phase one?
	Does Donald Trump serve the historical purpose of sort of blowing the lid on everything?
	And he paves the way, then, for an Orban-like figure in America.
	Because, Trump, this is not our Orban, right?
	You can see that in every way, where it counts competence and in articulating the vision, Trump falls short.
	He can't get the job done.
	It's insufficient.
	So he is not an Orban.
	He is not a Salvini.
	He is not a Bolsonaro.
	The question remains, does he pave the way for somebody like this to come in the future?
	People have said, is Donald Trump the John the Baptist-like figure?
	He heralds the coming of a figure, not to be sacrilegious, but he paves the way.
	He announces, and he makes it possible for somebody to come in who will actually be an effective statesman, who will actually be able to articulate a new path forward for the country.
	And I think that's maybe the subtle white pill here.
	Because we've been bagging on Trump for a long time.
	He's not competent.
	He can't articulate this vision.
	It was charming at first.
	He talks like us.
	He speaks like the common man.
	But eventually it just gets frustrating that this guy just can't articulate what needs to be said.
	He can't deliver the message.
	He cannot communicate this kind of alternative that needs to be communicated to the American people and win people over to it.
	So the question remains, if Trump can't get the job done, can we be hopeful that maybe then, in 5, 10, 15, 20 years time, will there be another figure who can get the job done?
	Because Trump went in, and he messed it all up, but he blew up the system, and he discredited the media, and he changed the Republican Party, and he showed that it was possible, Does this make it possible for somebody to come in ultimately down the road, and I don't know how far down the road, but at some point who's able to actually wield the electorate, gain popular support from both sides of the aisle, and win on these major issues,
	articulate an alternative in America to, again, the sort articulate an alternative in America to, again, the sort of alt-progressive or progressive-light sort of a vision?
	Will that be able to happen in the future?
	And I think that's sort of what you see in Trump and Orban.
	I think you see phase one and phase two.
	When they shake hands, I definitely think that Orban is the kind of guy we need to get to, but maybe we had to necessarily go through a Trump-like figure first.
	Somebody transformative, turn it upside down, and he couldn't do everything.
	He wasn't our savior.
	He wasn't a miracle worker.
	We have these insurmountable obstacles, but this was a necessary first step.
	So maybe that's the white pill.
	And again, you know, this is metapolitical thinking.
	We have to keep in mind there are very practical limitations to something like this happening.
	You know, you look at Orban coming into America.
	This is from CNN.
	It says, Human Rights Watch and Human Rights First both said that Orban coming to the White House, they said that Orban has not only assaulted the rule of law and basic human rights in Hungary, but he has employed anti-migrant, anti-Muslim, anti-Semitic and xenophobic rhetoric while targeting civil society organizations and universities receiving funding from overseas.
	So basically he doesn't want foreigners to control his country.
	But you see that in America, an Orban-like figure would get destroyed by the media.
	You know, if that's the kind of coverage, this alarmist, you know, like they're running around with their heads chopped off about this kind of stuff, would that even be possible in America?
	Is it possible with the state of the media, the state of the electorate, the demographics of the southern states and the way people are, how partisan things are?
	Is it even possible?
	Also the foundation of America.
	Victor Orban was able to rally in a country that survived communism together, that survived world wars.
	You know, they were once a great empire, the Hungarian Empire, and then whittled away, you know, all their borders cut down and their country whittled down to this tiny fraction of what it once was in terms of population size and in terms of geography.
	And you've got Hungarians, you've got You know, the ethnic Hun people in Romania, you've got them in Serbia, you've got them all over former Yugoslavia and so on.
	So they understand perhaps what it means and they appreciate their national identity and their national sovereignty.
	Somebody like an Orban can come forward and say, I will protect the Hungarian culture and people and so on because we've been under assault for centuries and we remember what it was like and we see how precarious our future is.
	In America, is it a comparable situation?
	I don't know, and that's what makes me skeptical.
	That's why it's a big question mark.
	Is this a phase one, or is this the end game?
	Is this the best that we could do?
	I'm inclined to believe it's a ladder, unfortunately.
	I'm inclined to believe this was the best that we could salvage, and even if an Orban-like character were to appear in America, they'd get deplatformed from Facebook and so many other organizations.
	They wouldn't be given the time of day by the legacy institutions, like Fox News or the traditional donors.
	They wouldn't have a chance.
	And if they did, they'd get destroyed before they even got to become a state representative or a mayor or whatever.
	But I don't know.
	I mean, all that being said, circumstances can change very rapidly.
	We've seen that in the last, you know, however many years.
	Things can change very quickly and these sort of miracle, like what do you call them, black swan type events, they do come around and it seems like increasingly so.
	So that might be a subtle white pill that if we got Trump and that seemed miraculous by the standards of 2008, maybe in 2020 it seems crazy we could get an Orban-like figure, but maybe things go downhill.
	The country changes, the demographics change, polarization changes, and maybe by 2024, you know, 2028, something else becomes possible.
	Some new figure rises up.
	New possibilities open up.
	You know, we don't know what the future holds, but that's what I see when I see Trump and Orban meeting, is I see this very frustrating comparison.
	He really lays bare the shortcomings of Trump, and that's where people have to get it through their head.
	He's better than the other guys, sure, but it's not saying much.
	It's a far cry from what we would need to even begin to turn things around, which is what Orban, Salvini, these other people are.
	So anyway, that's our white pill.
	We're running out of time here.
	We're actually a little bit over.
	But that's our whiteboard.
	Hope you enjoyed that, and I hope you can kind of...
	Grasp that there.
	Either way, it's a cool meeting, it's a cool photo op, you know.
	I know, and I tweeted like, I'm excited to see Orban and Trump together.
	It's always cool when you see, you know, the so-called Trump of Brazil, the Trump of Hungary coming together for the photo op.
	You see the Avengers assembling, you know, the good guys crossover.
	Even though Trump has been disappointing.
	But I get people on Twitter like, why do you think that's cool?
	Blumpf is a total zog sellout.
	Well, I like the image, you know.
	I like I like the idea that we have this nationalist axis rising up, even if it's, you know, superficial or whatever.
	But I'm gonna adjust my brightness here, and then we're gonna read our superchats, and we'll see what you guys are saying.
	We'll hear from the unwashed masses.
	It's been a while.
	Been looking forward to it all weekend.
	I said, you know what I've been missing in my life is people telling me pee-pee poo-poo and other cryptic things.
	No, I'm kidding!
	I'm kidding!
	People say, oh, this guy complains that people are giving him money.
	It's not about the money for me.
	It's about sending a message.
	Right?
	So you should take that as a sign of good faith.
	If I weren't complaining about Super Chats, you would have to be worried.
	You would say, if Nick can't stand up to his Super Chatters, he's in it for the money.
	How could he stand up to Goldman Sachs or Qatar or Israel?
	He can't!
	He'll do anything for a $2 Super Chat.
	If he's degraded and debased to the point where he'll completely sell out and make the show worse because he's gotta make his $1.40 by the time YouTube takes their cut, well then I'll sell out for however much money from anybody else, so it's a good sign.
	But anyway, we gotta get to the Super Chats.
	Let's see, my throat's getting a little dry here.
	Should have been drinking water as opposed to Monster Zero Ultra maybe.
	It's drying me out.
	Cool Ranch says, heads up, I would be very wary of these gym bros telling you to go to the gym to get healthy.
	I went to the gym once and it was a total sausage fest.
	Really makes you question their true motives.
	It's true.
	Totally true.
	Well, and it's just all about priorities.
	You know, I'm at a stage in my life where You know, I have so much on my plate right now in terms of the show, in terms of other projects that are happening, other commitments that I've made in my life.
	And of course, you have to understand about a self-employment situation like me where it's not so simple as, well, you get up, you go to work and you go home.
	That's what people don't understand.
	And it doesn't really matter what level you are in terms of a business.
	It's just a wholly different prospect.
	It's a totally different sort of enterprise going up, or rather getting up, going to work, and the factory's there, you know, or the company's there, and you've got your tasks laid out for you.
	You just have to kind of do what you're told or, you know, complete this objective, and the payroll is taken care of so long as you do your job, versus, like, you know, being solely responsible for the whole operation.
	With that, there's really no hours.
	And what I mean by that is, you know, the human capital investment of getting a good night's sleep, staying up-to-date on my reading, reading books, reading the news, looking at new opportunities, business and otherwise, upping the technology, whatever.
	or And I'm not like I'm doing all that every day at all times, but you understand where a commitment like this is sort of open-ended.
	So for somebody that goes to school, it's like, well I did my homework for the day, now I can afford to go to the gym for two hours, you know?
	Or I did my work for the day, now I could go to the gym for an hour.
	But for somebody like me, it's like I got a lot going on already, but then the nature of the work is, it's open-ended.
	So I always feel like, you know, is going to the gym and constantly stressing about the macros and, you know, I got to whip up the, you know, protein shake and I got to make all these meals and prepare my meals for the week and I go to the go to the gym and people say, oh, well, you just got to do it or you just got to take the time.
	The mental energy, the physical energy to do that, is that the proper investment?
	People say it's an excuse.
	I think it's just a reality.
	You know, you look at the successful people in the world doing their own thing.
	Are they really, is that their priority?
	So, not that it's a bad thing to go to the gym.
	Going to the gym is great and I'm going to try and get back in the gym.
	I'm going to try to get back in the gym this month.
	I've been putting it off forever and I should because it's good for you and it is good to be able to lift and be strong and all that, but it really just comes down to priorities and it's paid off.
	You know, it's paid big dividends.
	The show's very successful as a result of putting in work and You know, money talks, bullshit walks, right?
	I see a lot of people.
	I saw somebody sent me a tweet the other day from somebody who's not my biggest fan, who's a big gym bro.
	Somebody who's, you know, big money in debt and they're getting old and they're having trouble in school.
	Oh, but they got the gym thing taken care of.
	Oh, that's a shame.
	You know, maybe you can lift your way out of paying your bills, big guy.
	Maybe you can lift your way out of paying the student loans, right?
	You can lift your way out of the homework.
	Oh, you can't?
	Oh, that's terrible, you know?
	So, that's not to say, I don't, people get very defensive, people get weird about it, but it's an important thing to keep in mind, you know?
	I'll get big and strong once I'm able to hire like a assistant who can take care of, or a wife, I can hire a wife, bring on a wife onto the team to take care of that, the meal prep and all that, you know, then maybe I'll get back on it, right?
	It'll be easier.
	But that's sort of my mentality.
	Okay, we gotta do these quicker if we're gonna get through them all.
	Peanut says, Nick, I've been sending my brother clips of you and he told me you remind him of Ben Shapiro.
	How does this information make you feel?
	Well, I mean the general impression that people get from Ben Shapiro is smart, quick, incisive, so I don't know.
	I think there are some positive connotations, obviously a lot of negative, but I think when people say, oh he's our Ben Shapiro, Maybe they mean a little bit dorky, but also fast, quick, intelligence.
	I take it as a compliment, if you want to know the truth.
	Let's see.
	Norwood says, JFL at Nick, or JFC I think he means, claiming that he isn't rich whilst having his suits tailored weekly for a more snug fit.
	So I think you're trying to say I'm gaining weight.
	Yeah, well thank you so much for that.
	Capitalist Manifesto says his suits aren't tailored.
	Nick's getting fatter.
	I'm not getting fatter!
	I'm not getting fatter.
	You're trying to gaslight me.
	It's not working.
	You wanna know why?
	Because I don't care if I get fatter.
	I've been trying to get fatter.
	I've been saying I want the Tony Soprano physique.
	So you think it's getting under my skin?
	I've been aiming for that.
	So...
	It doesn't bother me.
	Let's see, Nathan says, do you believe me?
	Nathan says, your house is on fire.
	What do you save, your dog or your USS Liberty index cards?
	That's a tough one.
	Well, the good thing is the USS Liberty information is all on a Google document ready to go.
	So I think I'm going in for the dog.
	Blue Quadrant says, Nick, when are you going to reconcile with All Type?
	You can form a new organization where he's the brains and you're the pee-pee poo-poo.
	Look, you know, I reconcile with people all the time, but there has to be a willingness to reconcile on both sides.
	I didn't have a problem with this guy.
	I like this guy's content.
	I think he's smart.
	I think he's good at what he does.
	I just watched his video the other day about Jared Diamond or whatever.
	So I have no problems with this guy.
	But he comes out swinging at me on two occasions for no reason.
	This Nick guy, he picks fights with everybody.
	Picking a fight with me?
	And what was the other time he called me a psychopath or something?
	Which may or may not be true, but...
	Like that's a compliment.
	I get millennial woes and all these people, Nick is a total sociopath!
	The Chad sociopath versus the virgin.
	Oh my god, what a delightful pair of cuties, right?
	Isn't that what he said?
	So it's like, you know, oh, he's a sociopath.
	What does that mean?
	Cunning, ruthless, strong, a little bit off-kilt, you know?
	I think I take that as a compliment, but...
	So I'm ready to reconcile, but I'm not gonna extend a hand when you're the one that has beef, you know?
	So, I had nothing but nice things to say, but then he comes at me because, what, I'm a traditionalist?
	If you want to reconcile, sure.
	And I know his buddy Sean or whatever.
	He follows me on Twitter.
	We're mutuals.
	So, you know, I'm ready to move on.
	I'm a mature person.
	I build bridges all the time.
	I put Bad Blood with James Alsop behind me.
	If we could do that, we could do anything, right?
	So, let's see.
	Avatar says buenos noches.
	I can tell you must be Portuguese because you're saying A instead of E. Should USA learn Spanish?
	No.
	No, and I deliberately tried not to learn Spanish.
	I was in Spanish classes and I said I object to this concept that I have to learn this language.
	I would always get yelled at, "I got a B in Spanish because I refused to do the accent in high school." They were like, "No, no." My Spanish name was Pedro.
	It's actually Nicolás, but you get to pick.
	They were like, "Pedro, Pedro, you have to work on your pronunciation." I said, "No, it's not that I can't do it.
	I refuse to do it.
	I am in America." And yeah, maybe it's a good thing to learn a foreign language, but I feel it's being imposed on me, and I object to that in principle.
	I shouldn't have to.
	I shouldn't have to learn Spanish to communicate with people at McDonald's, you know?
	So, I was just going up, you know, hola, como te llamas?
	Hello, I am in America, and I should be able to use an American dialectic.
	I have to, what, LARP as some kind of Mexican?
	Well, I wasn't brought up in Mexico, so I should have to pronounce it right.
	So, uh, no.
	So, no learning Spanish.
	We speak English, not Spanish.
	You know, if anything, I would learn Italian.
	Or Latin.
	Lee says, Hi Nick, big fan of the show.
	Next time you see QAnon, could you please ask them to quit screwing with the manga boomers?
	They're getting worse.
	With each passing day, keep up the great work, King.
	I will be sure to communicate that to my friend QAnon.
	QAnon is very black billed, I have to tell you.
	You know, I generally trust QAnon.
	He's seen enough.
	He's proven himself.
	He's a smart enough guy.
	I respect his intelligence.
	I respect him as a person.
	He says something, I take it seriously, I say, well, you know, he knows.
	So QAnon's been very black-billed.
	QAnon is very done with politics, and that should tell you something.
	QAnon is getting ready to get out of the political scene, and, you know, he's not really pleased with our prospects.
	It! Z! Z is not pleased.
	He's not a man.
	So I will just tell you that, you know, coming from the top chain of command, my connection, my buddy Q, he's none too pleased with our situation, but I'll tell him to quit screw with the Boomers.
	Mr. K says, when are you heading to Cali to do an interview with Jesse Lee Peterson?
	Also, what are your thoughts on progressive liberal white men?
	Nick, love the show.
	Thanks.
	I don't know.
	I hope he invites me.
	I hope he reciprocates.
	That would be nice.
	But I haven't... I don't know.
	I haven't gotten an invite.
	Progressive liberal men are pussies.
	You cannot be a man and be a progressive.
	Sorry, just can't.
	You cannot be a progressive and be a, or rather, you cannot be a man and be a feminist at the same time.
	You cannot.
	And I know people are gonna say, oh what you're some, not like I'm some big macho man, you know.
	We have now boiled down masculinity and virility to Like eroticism, and phallic nature, and like physical strength.
	Masculinity, virility, it's about more than that.
	You know, so I'm not coming at it from the perspective of, oh no no, you're a baby to old soy, libtard cuck.
	You know, I'm coming at it from the perspective of, you cannot properly understood, fulfill the obligations and duties of a man, and also be a feminist.
	You cannot believe, you just, it doesn't work like that.
	You cannot believe in things like egalitarianism, and You know, all these liberal virtues.
	Doesn't work like that.
	You give up your manhood.
	You give up, you know, the teleology of what it is to be a man when you embrace those ideas.
	So, I think they're not men.
	I think they are just simply, by definition, not men.
	And that doesn't mean you gotta drive a monster truck and throw footballs.
	It just means you have to fulfill the obligations of a man, which is you have to be a husband and a father.
	You have to be the head of the household.
	You got to bring home the bacon.
	You got to, look, you got to run the show in the house.
	You got to be the rock.
	Okay?
	And that means the women got to submit.
	And you have to be strong enough for the woman to submit.
	And you have to rear the kids in a strong way.
	If you're a liberal and it's like, oh, we'll just go with the flow, man.
	And hey, honey, do what makes you happy.
	You want me to be a house husband?
	That's fun.
	I'll make like cool pancakes.
	And I love the kids, man.
	We'll like, your job is so hard, but I'm taking it on for you, babe.
	Can't do it.
	That's not a man.
	Sorry.
	So, that's my opinion.
	Zypher says 8 p.m.
	EST with the echoes.
	I don't know what you mean by that.
	I don't know what you mean by that at all.
	Stupid Snakes is late again.
	Yeah, there it is always, right?
	You go hours over every night.
	Not a thanks, not an appreciation, but it's a little bit late.
	It's like two seconds later.
unidentified		He's late!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		He's late!
		Why don't you relax?
		Why don't you enjoy life a little bit?
		All right?
		The lobby music comes on.
		You see my face.
		You see the flag.
		Everything is all right with the world.
		You know that you're gonna get your... You can get it for free, by the way, but if you give a super chat, if you're a premium member, you're gonna get your bang for your buck.
		You're gonna get your money's worth.
		You're gonna be entertained.
		You're gonna laugh.
		You're gonna learn something.
		You're gonna get to take a little vacation from this place we call Clown World.
		So stop, enjoy, you know, just chill out, alright?
		Everybody always uptight, frenzied.
		You know, they log on.
		Where's the show?
		Where's the show?
		I need the show!
		Like, you know, you're some hopped up junkie.
		I have to be doing something.
		I have to be hearing and seeing something.
		Why do I have to fast forward?
		Why don't you...
		Relax, alright?
		You wanna watch a show that's on time?
		Watch Steven Crowder, okay?
		And it's got good visuals, and guess what?
		Jewish money, okay?
		You wanna know why they're on time?
		Jewish money.
		There it is, alright?
		I said it.
		No, it's all jokes.
		But it's all jokes.
		It's always jokes on the show.
		Ethan says, did you see Mel Gibson is making a satire film about the Rothschilds?
		My man's is about to open the eyes of the world.
		Yeah, I did see that.
		Very based in Redfield.
		My favorite actor.
		My favorite actor.
		You know, I drive a Ford Mustang.
		And Mel Gibson, favorite actor of all time.
		Favorite composer, Wagner.
		You know, I'm just a very cultured man.
		Good taste in art, machines, things like that.
		So, uh, yeah, I'm excited.
		I'm excited to see his resurrection movie and the Ross Child film.
		Mel Gibson, very, very good patriot.
		We love him.
		Norwood says, big guys getting more applicable every show.
		Yeah, another, another hit on my weight.
		Good.
		You know, people have been saying, that guy's a stick.
		I could, but the wind would blow him over.
		Well, maybe it's good.
		Maybe I gain a little bit of weight, throw it around a little bit, intimidate people.
		You know, my six foot nine frame getting large.
		You know, towering over Wignats and others.
		So, you know what?
		I'm proud.
		There's a lot more to love, you could say.
	You could say there's more of me to love.
	John Doe says, Orbán makes me proud to be half Hungarian.
	Want to send some support and throw a few bucks your way?
	Keep it up, big guy.
	Hey, thanks.
	Yeah, I'm sure.
	He's the pride of the country.
	Elon says, what are your thoughts on the Republic of Turkey?
	Based.
	Based.
	I like...
	Erdogan.
	I think Erdogan is a part of the reactionary rising up.
	He said something to the effect that liberalization or what was it?
	Liberal democracy.
	Something, one of these terms.
	It was either liberal democracy or westernization.
	He said that, I think it was democracy.
	He said democracy is like a train and you get off when it arrives at your stop.
	Basically saying, okay, you know, Turkey liberalized and they were sort of the poster child for Islamic secularization or reform.
	He's working against our interests and we oppose him for that reason.
	to be.
	We industrialized.
	We're now a modern country.
	And now we can go back to the way things were.
	We can go back to our Islamic culture, our traditional values.
	So I think he's based.
	He's working against our interests and we oppose him for that reason.
	But aside from that, I think he's a solid dude.
	I think these guys are all solid, you know?
	Erdogan, Putin, Assad, Duterte.
	I think anybody who is a reactionary, revolting against the liberal financial system, I think is okay in my book, right?
	Norwood says, Oi Nick!
	Thanks mom!
	Emphasis on the U. Alright then!
	Alright then, thank you!
	America first!
	Alright then!
	I had some British people I was streaming with on Twitch the other day.
	Yeah, it was almost a little bit problematic.
	I was streaming at like 3 a.m.
	over the weekend and this British kid comes in and he's like, Oi!
	Oi!
	Hello!
	Alright!
	He was the youngest verified streamer on DLive.
	He was like 15 and he's like, let's play Fortnite or whatever.
	That's where we're playing Fortnite.
	This is a very good wholesome moment.
	So we get him on the stream.
	As I was looking for people to play Fortnite with, we get them on the stream, and, you know, we're gaming, whatever, and it's the Nick effect.
	You know, I have so much clout to go around.
	I got, like, the most viewers on the site.
	People are following him, and they're liking his content, and, uh, and they're following this friend of his, and my stream goes down because my internet breaks, you know, as it always does, and I'm watching their stream, and all the people who are watching my stream go to watch this guy's stream, and they're following, and they're sending them, uh, the lemons, you know, whatever the tips are on there.
	And the one kid starts bawling his eyes out.
unidentified		He's like, oi, oi, now I can apply to be a member.
unidentified		Now I can apply to be a verified partner.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And he's crying and he's so excited.
		And he's like, oh my gosh, thank you so much.
		I'm going to tell my dad.
		And it's like, you know, this is the side that Jared Holt doesn't see.
		This is the side where America first does good for the world.
		We're giving people a boost.
		It's all about the love, you know?
		So, we're always trying to help out our British blokes, our Anglo brethren from across the way, from across the pond.
		It was a very wholesome moment.
		You know, my old, my cold and jaded clown heart, you know, my joker heart, it began to warm a little bit.
		It began to thaw.
		I said, you know, couple of youngsters, and that's all it's about at the end of the day, right?
		Helping the kids out.
		We're doing it, we were out here doing it for the kids, right?
		We're doing it for the children.
		So, that was heartwarming to see.
		Speaking of the Brits, right?
		Speaking of the British.
		But they will never, but the liberal media will never report on this.
		They'll never report on my philanthropy for young streamers or anybody else.
		Only show the worst angle.
		Sadcast says, what about pit mommies?
		Pit mommies go to jail.
		Pablo says, women out here living on recruit difficulty.
		Living life on easy mode, as we like to say.
		Femmoids, right?
		Shyster says, these types of ads with drag queens and trannies are so bad.
		Kids nowadays sip, are so overexposed to this kind of degeneracy.
		My 16 year old, oh kids nowadays sip.
		30 year old boomer talk.
		My 16-year-old cousin knows like nine trannies and when I was in high school four years ago, I knew zero and drag queens.
		Yeah, I agree.
		The proliferation of the drag culture to me has been so blackpilling.
		The drag queen thing to me is just like the most disgusting, repulsive... I see that and it like... I can't tell you how angry it makes me, you know?
		And I don't know what it is about it.
		I guess it's just such a satanic perversion, you know?
		I think that's what you see in, like, Sodom and Gomorrah and all these, you know, evil societies.
		the cross-dressing, the inversion of gender, the perversion of the divinely ordered gender roles, and the way things ought to be, the natural law.
		And it just sickens me.
		And particularly because it's advertised to kids.
		You know, that's all I see eating this kind of stuff up is teenagers and 20-somethings.
		And they're watching.
		What is a drag queen?
		Some sick freak degenerate?
		And what's all the content about it?
		It's all about sex and drugs and drinking.
		and drugs, and drinking.
		It is like the epitome of cosmopolitan decadence and degeneracy.
		It is like the epitome of cosmopolitan decadence and degeneracy.
		And that's like the new, it's in vogue for this upper class, rich kid culture.
		And that's like the new, it's in vogue for this like upper class, rich kid culture.
		It's horrible.
		It's horrible.
		And you're right.
		And you're right, it's being advertised to children.
		It's being advertised to children.
		And as a result, you look at the numbers, it's horrible.
		And as a result, you look at the numbers, it's horrible.
		Like in Britain, they say it's something like 13% of, and I don't know the exact figure, but it's like astonishingly high.
		Like in Britain, they say something like 13% of, and I don't know the exact figure, but it's like astonishingly high.
		It's in like the teens.
		Percentage of primary school-aged children who are identifying as transgender.
		This is unheard of.
		It was 1% 10 years ago.
	It's 15% in some of these countries now.
	And why do you think that is?
	Because it's being promoted.
	And of course, children go through, you know, periods of questioning or whatever.
	They're children.
	You're developing your identity.
	You understand what it means to be a man.
	You know, a boy is not a man.
	A girl is not a woman.
	That's what the coming of age is, is understanding, well, how does this all work?
	How do we relate to one another?
	What is a, you need them to be molded in that direction.
	So why do you think they start identifying as transgender?
	Why do you think 15% of them identify as transgender?
	Are they experiencing gender dysphoria?
	Some legitimate mental illness or genetic disability?
	No!
	It's just questioning that's been enabled.
	Ideas get put in their heads.
	And you get somebody who, you know, normally it's a phase, or it's whatever, it's a natural exploring thing, part of childhood development, turns into, well, my gender identity is girl, and I'm gonna cut my genitals off, and go on hormone therapy, and permanently stunt my development.
	And what do you think happens?
	In two, three years, five years, you're like, oh, wait a minute, no, I'm just a normal guy, and I want a normal life again, and you're done then, you know?
	So you're right, it's totally sick and the numbers are rising and it's a direct result of the culture.
	So I see, you know, for example...
	The refrain has always been, Oh, so what?
	How does that affect you?
	Somebody's going to be a transgender.
	Somebody's going to be a homosexual.
	How does that affect you?
	You know, they're going to do their own thing.
	Well, we live in a society of children.
	You know, that's, I guess, the fatal conceit of the individual.
	As we think about things in terms of an adult society of totally autonomous people with free agency and they're totally choosing and they have complete choice and free will.
	But that's not the case.
	You got children!
	Children eating up media and children eating up all this stuff.
	So you have to have responsibility.
	You have to promote things that are in the interest of the public good, of the state, of the general order.
	That's not conducive to any of that.
	It's actually very unhealthy, degenerate, evil.
	You know, it doesn't get said enough.
	It's evil.
	So...
	Yeah, the drag queen stuff sends me over the edge with the Chips Ahoy thing.
	You see some freakazoid in clown makeup and in a dress and it's some, you know, dude.
	What kind of dude does that?
	A sick freak, that's who does that.
	And it's all about anything and it's all about sex, alcohol, drugs, promiscuity, bad morals.
	Totally sick.
	Yeah, that kind of... Normally I don't, you know, whatever.
	We get conditioned to accept a lot, but that kind of thing is just like, we're in hell world now.
	The devil is literally creating this stuff.
	It is New Babylon, Mystery Babylon, whatever, incarnate.
	MD Extremes is the united, diverse, people of colors, democratic, free, equal, Republic of America.
	No relation to Israel, but all citizens must submit to Israel.
	Yeah, that's where we're headed, right?
	Tyler says, Nick your show is so great.
	I just had to sign up for a premium membership.
	Keep up the great work.
	Hey, thanks, man.
	Hey, nicholasjfwences.com slash membership.
	Be sure to check it out, right?
	Is that where you found it?
	Just kidding.
	Thanks.
	Tim says, shout out to Hoff.
	He's 21 and just got potty trained.
	Okay, I don't know what that means.
	Your mother says, if you could only choose one, what would it be?
	Based or red-pilled?
	Hmm.
	I would choose based.
	Definitely based.
	Mister says, how do I stop Hoff from eating his own poo?
	I don't know what that is.
	Retard Department says, please don't look up the last name of Nabisco's CEO.
	Uh-oh, why?
	What is it?
	Well, now I have to.
	Oh, no.
	Irene Rosenfeld.
	That's quite the looker as well.
	Oh, so it's a white guy.
	So the CEO of Nabisco, Irene Becker-Rosefeld, who began his career at Dancer Fitzgerald Sample, an advertising agency.
	Yeah, so I guess he's the head of Nabisco.
	That's interesting.
	Very interesting.
	So it's run by a white male.
	You know, you learn something new every day, right?
	Let's see.
	Smelly says, how to act like Walter from Drake and Josh.
	I think we answered that one last week.
	Black Swan says, Nick, hey, thanks for the big super chat, by the way.
	Wow, holy smokes, very substantial.
	He says, Nick, I just broke up with my BF of seven years.
	I've rejected my wickedness and have chosen to celebrate life with a wife and children.
	Your show has been a light guiding me back to Christ.
	You truly help countless people.
	Nick, I love you and all the Nickers.
	PP Poo Poo.
	So is that like a homosexual thing then?
	Broken up with a boyfriend?
	Okay, well, I guess, uh, well you know what?
	But you know what?
	We want people to leave that lifestyle, so I suppose congratulations.
	That you're choosing to live the right way?
	Good, yeah.
	No, we're not.
	That's not the ideal starting position, but I guess that's good to hear, right?
	Better late than never.
	Welcome to the right side of history.
	Welcome to the right side of the natural law.
	But good to hear and God bless and thanks for the big donation.
	And you know, look, that is the position of the Catholic Church.
	You have people who have this wicked tendency, and I'm sure it's tough.
	They gotta be brought over.
	But the problem is they're so evil that a lot of them just, you know, kind of have to be, you know, a lot of them just kind of have to be shut down and pushed out of the public square.
	But, you know, at the end of the day, and I said this, I think on last week's show, Ultimately, we are trying to save souls.
	So that is what it's about.
	If we can get people to reject and turn their back on the wicked actions, you know, sexual practices, then that's a good thing, you know?
	And we're praying for them and they should be strong and all that.
	So good to hear.
	Good to hear.
	I haven't heard that one before.
	That's a new one.
	Two years of doing the show, we get a lot of, well, I wasn't Christian before, whatever, but we have a convert.
	We have a convert.
	I guess you could call America First conversion therapy, right?
	You watch the show and you start liking women again.
	Okay, I think we're in business then.
	So, but thanks so much.
	Good to hear.
	Good to hear, genuinely.
	And thank you for the big super chat.
	It's also better for you.
	You know, people don't tell you that, but not only is that the right way to live, but it's also, you know, look at the lifestyle that these people live on the other side.
	You know, drugs, disease, all that other stuff, so it pays off, I'm sure.
	Gen Z Philosophy says, have you seen the vid of Matt Bowling's comeback in the 400 meter relay in Texas?
	Look it up.
	Fastest kid in the USA and he's white.
	He's arguably putting the Aryan race on his back more than you are.
unidentified		Why?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Because he ran around in a circle?
		You know, I've known a lot of people who run around in circles.
		They don't have as much as I do.
		Alright?
		No, I'm joking, of course.
		Yeah, well, I did see that actually I believe I saw that on Twitter Where yeah where he outruns and they're all black and the one white guy he takes the lead.
		That's pretty pretty solid pretty impressive and terrific and all that but yeah, I don't I wouldn't go as far to say maybe in the Aryan race of you know, 200 meters and
		If we're talking about the Aryan race running around a track yeah he's doing more but I don't think you know cross-country running people I don't know if they're doing as much to save the white race you know not the biggest fan of those types so I'd be more inclined to say that America first really you know thank you we need our athletes I guess but Really, it's the content creators that are bearing the the brunt here, you know?
		But hey, but kudos to him, right?
		Aryan excellence!
		That's what we are looking out for, right?
		We are all about Aryan excellence.
		I wonder if Jared Hole watches this show and realizes it's jokes when we say that, that it's tongue-in-cheek.
		I'm sure a left-wing person is like, I can't believe she's Nazi!
		You know, but anyway.
		But I did see that.
		Congrats.
		Flannel says, I miss the good old days when Wignats invaded and sent their low IQ superchats.
		At least good content came out of it.
		Yeah, I guess they all got banned.
		You know, funny, funny you should mention that.
		I guess, I guess they all got banned and never to be heard from again.
		But you're right, it was good content while it lasted.
		The problem was they would never come on the call-in shows because they're not smart enough.
		Max says, do you think that your internet activity would prevent you from getting a normie job if you wanted one?
		Um, you know, probably?
		I don't know.
		I don't know.
		I haven't tried to get a job since... Actually, I did.
		I did try to get a job two summers ago.
		But then I ended up just working at UPS and they don't really care.
		So what do you mean by a normie job?
		I guess, like, the lowest rung, they don't really care.
		Like, if you're on an oil rig, if you're just, like, you know, totally disposable, expendable, they just need bodies.
		I think nobody cares, whatever.
		They hire, like, felons and convicts or whatever.
		Oh, but I think if you're talking about a high-level professional job or a desk job, I think it would be... eventually would become a problem.
		If they didn't discover it in the hiring process, eventually it would come out.
		I think and that'd be trouble.
unidentified		So yeah, I think so.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		David says, should we crush China's economy by tariffing them since they're becoming more of a world power?
		Is there a Chinese lobby people don't talk about?
		Yeah, we should.
		We shouldn't, like, destroy them, but we should, uh, we should, I think, try to choke them out a little bit.
		Should try to force all their rise as much as possible.
		Stunt their development.
		We certainly shouldn't help them get stronger than they are, right?
		And yeah, there is a Chinese lobby.
		Look at Nancy Chao.
		Or whatever her name is.
		The Transportation Secretary.
		Wife of Mitch McConnell.
		It's right there.
		She was bribed by the Chinese.
		And she's the wife of the Senate Majority Leader.
		Now she's in the White House.
		She's in the Executive Branch.
		So, it happens all the time.
		And they do buy off the trade representatives and everybody else.
		It's totally there.
		They got big money.
		Reactionary czar says can't wait for the Mel Gibson Rothschild movie.
		I mean either it's gonna be good We'll do a my allergies are acting up.
		We'll do a group Group visit to see that maybe right?
		That'll be the America first meetup Let's see.
		Smelly says, do you think getting a gf on tinder is cringe?
		Oh no, because that's where it happens these days.
		It's not ideal and I haven't used tinder before, but from what I've seen it's really not ideal.
		The people that are on there aren't great, but I'm sure there's winners on every platform for the most part.
		And I think that's just mostly how it happens.
		You know, a good bulk of the market share of the dating scene happens online, so I think it's unavoidable.
		So I don't judge, really.
		As long as you find somebody, you know, worthy.
		Nat Massad says, Chips Ahoy?
		More like Pee Pee Poo Poo.
		Good one, dude.
		James says, I know you don't like his ideology anymore and probably answered this a billion times, but what are your thoughts on Ron Paul?
		And in anarchist libertarian, I'm just not a fan.
		I think it's totally ridiculous Liberty is not the most important governing principle.
		So it's it's too secular.
		It's too Like enlightenment type Individualistic stuff, so I'm not a fan.
		I think he's right on some issues, but only like incidentally Zooms is what is the East and for an e-girl just means like online, you know, like email or whatever Ecommerce it's just means internet I don't know if I'd go that far.
		Sounds really racist to me.
		We don't allow that on the show.
		Maybe that's a little too far, I would say.
		have one simple rule.
		If you're black, go back.
		As simple as that.
		And that is a quote by the Estonian Minister of Finance, Martin Helm.
		Interesting quote.
		Definitely racist.
		I don't know if I'd go that far.
		Sounds really racist to me.
		We don't allow that on the show.
		So maybe that's a little too far, I would say.
		Too far, big guy.
		Eleutheria, sodomy is a crime against nature.
unidentified		Yeah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, any kind of anal sex is a crime against nature.
		You know, that's kind of the red pill.
		Because I used to be very blue-pilled on this in high school.
		Not that I was doing that, but I was like, in high school, I was like, oh, you know, whatever.
		People are going to do their own thing.
		uh, You know, and it doesn't matter.
		Between anybody, whatever.
		I had a very, you know, blasé, the libertarian attitude.
		Individuals consenting adults do what they want to do.
		But as I got older, I really thought about it.
		And you got to think about what sodomy is.
		I don't want to put that image in your head.
		Family show.
		But everybody knows what sodomy is.
		It's repulsive.
		You know, the idea that a rational, Dignified human being would engage in such a debased act.
		I don't know how anybody misses that, you know?
		Forget the idea of, well, it's consulting adults and whatever.
		It's wrong.
		It's perverted, you know?
		And everybody got a lot of heat for this.
		The Christians in the right wing got a lot of heat for comparing it to bestiality, but they are both crimes against nature.
		You know, one is a crime against nature probably more severe, I guess, having sex with an animal, but...
		You know, it is the same premise.
		It is something that is just morally reprehensible.
		You know, it's just something that is not meant to be.
		And the same is true with cross-dressing and all these other things.
		It is against natural law.
		And we all intuitively, subconsciously know what that means.
		That's why we're all repulsed when we see this stuff.
		You know, it's funny.
		They always say, well, you know...
		If God made me transgender, if God made me a lesbian, if God made me a homosexual, then, you know, we were born that way.
		It's like the animals are doing it.
		Well, then where is the natural repulsion?
		Where is the natural revulsion, rather?
		Where does that come from, then, right?
		If it's legitimate by the nature of you're born with this whatever, you know, then shouldn't it be the fact that 100% of the population is repulsed by this?
		Where did that come from, then, right?
		If not, but for an intuitive understanding of design, telos, natural law, all that.
		So yeah, it's just gross.
		It goes all ways.
		I've had a lot of, some of my peers, they talk about sodomy, but heterosexual, and we can give no quarter for sodomy of any kind.
		Remember, pro-creative, that's the only way we're doing it in 2019.
		Within marriage, we're going Catholic style, alright?
		Don't want to get too crude, don't want to get too explicit, but that's 2019, that's what we're doing, okay?
		Anyway, why it's all the sex questions tonight.
		Not massage since I stopped dating a man after getting Nick's premium.
		It cures homosexuality.
		You don't even need electroshock.
		You watch America first, you watch premium.
		It's such a high-T, you know, virile show that it's just sort of like this osmosis effect.
		You absorb it through watching the show.
		You get your balls back, you know?
		Mr. says thoughts on Dr. Michael Savage.
		I don't know enough about him.
		I guess he's... I've been told he's good.
		I've been told he's better than most.
		He attacked Shapiro and the others.
		So I've heard good things about him, but I've never listened to his show.
		I'm not too familiar with his whole scene.
		Yeah, it was pretty good.
		Pretty good.
		Pretty good wholesome stream.
	And we love our Anglos.
	We love the Anglos.
	Very, very quaint and petite.
	I find the British accent to be so quaint and silly and funny.
	I mean, I don't mean that in a condescending way.
	It's just funny to me.
	Hey, no, thank you, man.
	Briggs says Nikki blocked me on Twitter.
	I don't blame you.
	I wished you contracted Candida auris after the hunter Avalon debate got canned.
	I'm sorry I fired from the hip not asking to be unblocked just wanted to wish you a good week big guy peepee poo-poo the power of the block people say why do you block you block because you're mad because of results like this I block people and invariably it's
	You know, I don't know this isn't you said this isn't you but I get people who say please unblock me or I'm sorry I was mad or you get people who say you were right to block me, you know, that's okay Look, I'm forgiving apology accepted Apology accepted.
	I don't know what was said but I don't know what tweet you're referring to.
	I don't even look at my mentions anymore.
	I've been getting so many notifications lately, I don't even read them.
	I got 8,000 likes on a tweet a few days ago, 4,000 the other day, 2,000 today.
	I just can't keep up with it.
	Um, but... And I blocked, you know, 5,300 people currently, so I don't remember, but all is forgiven.
	Thank you for having the humility to own up to it, the integrity to say I was in the wrong, because people are very inconsiderate.
	I'm a human being, so I appreciate it.
	But I just texted Hunter today, so we're going to try and get that back on track.
	Reddit says, PP Poo Poo and then leaves a swastika emoticon.
	Thanks, but we do not endorse a swastika, but thanks for that.
	Spirit Bear with a couple of shekels, thanks.
	I says, will you be cosplaying at ACEN this year?
	I guess that's some kind of anime convention.
	I'll be going as Cat Noir, of course.
	I'll be going, of course, as Cat Noir from the Miraculous Ladybug and Cat Noir, or whatever the show is called.
	So you can catch me there.
	Look, alright, you watch the Cat Noir show.
	How can you not sexualize it?
	I mean, give me a break, right?
	Lock me away, right?
	If I'm a criminal for sexualizing Cat Noir and the Miraculous Ladybug, how can you not?
	It's almost by design, alright?
	No, but I'll be going as Cat Noir.
	I'll be going as Shinji Ikari.
	I'll be going as Ava One.
	I'm not going to the anime convention.
	I'm not a weeb.
	Simple as.
	I'm not a weeb.
	I watch NGE and that's it.
	So, no cosplay for me.
	Me and Stempie will be wearing thigh highs, I guess.
	you know we'll go in the we'll go and who's who's the famous cat boy you know the one we'll we'll be matching we'll be going as that ron son says nick just kidding just kidding i know this is the new thing people clip that and they're like no nicks whatever ron son says nick when are you going to release your long-awaited minecraft mod showcase on the mustard the mustard mod i don't know what you're talking about there i have been playing minecraft lately i've I went in there to check out the new update.
	I just don't like Minecraft anymore.
	I can't get into it.
	I don't know.
	It just seems so... you just do the same thing, you know?
	Chop down some wood, you make your tools, you mine, you go back up, you make a pickaxe, you mine, you go back up, you make things, you go back...
	You collect things.
	It's just too, like, I don't know.
	I feel like my life has enough of that.
	I feel like when you feel these responsibilities nagging you in a game, it's like it no longer is entertainment for me.
	I've got nagging things on my brain about what I have to do in real life, in the real world, and then it's like, oh, now I gotta go get more iron and more coal and, oh, I gotta, you know, dig down and then I gotta build this and that and...
	It's just too daunting.
	It's like, I can't, I can't do it anymore.
	The video games, I just need arcade-like games.
	I need to go into Grand Theft Auto, kill a bunch of people, you know, do car crashes and things in first person, and then I'm good, you know, and then I got my fix.
	But, you know, you got all these games where it's like a million features, and you gotta learn it, and there's this curve, and it's hard, and... I just can't do it anymore.
	Can't do it.
	Don't have the mental energy.
	The med does not have the mental energy for this.
	Facundo says, hey Nick, any thoughts on postmodern fiction?
	I don't know what that is.
	I don't read fiction.
	Joe Bros says, every day we continue to resemble the Weimar Republic.
	Wow, that's really fresh take, dude.
	You think we're resembling the Weimar Republic?
	You know, I never thought of it that way, but that's a really interesting way to look at things.
	Hmm.
	America like Weimar Germany?
	So like, Weimarica?
	Hmm.
	That's really interesting.
	I'll have to think about that, I guess.
	That's a thinker.
	Just joking, of course.
	Just busting your chops a little bit.
	No hard feelings.
	A little joke.
	Not really.
	He's kind of before my time.
	I'm a young man, so I wouldn't know.
	No.
	Gregory says, do you think Mike Pence could match Victor Orban in American politics?
	No.
	Mike Pence is an establishment guy.
	You know, total establishment shill.
	Look at Nick Ayers, his Chief of Staff, and he works with Nikki Haley.
	This guy is just like all the rest.
	He's just like George Bush.
	Not a fan.
	Dima says, can you do a cartwheel?
	I don't know.
	Probably.
	I haven't done one in a long time, since when I was young and spry.
	I could probably do it if I put my mind to it, but you know, it's been a while since I did one.
	I don't know.
	I'm just so sedentary.
	I don't know what I can and can't do anymore.
	You know?
	I don't know if I have a weak grip because I have a heart condition or because I'm dying, you know?
	Do I have cancer?
	Is it because I have the sleep schedule thing?
	Or is it because I just don't grasp things because I just sit around and work on my keyboard all day doing notes and reading, you know?
	So I don't know.
	I think I'm just sort of degenerating, deteriorating.
	I'm becoming just like this blob sort of thing, you know?
	I have no arms or legs, but I must save the white race.
	I have no physical form, but I must save the white race.
	That's what I'm becoming.
	Sooner or later, I'll just lose all functionality.
	I won't even be able to gesture.
	I'll just get ballooned up to 500 pounds.
	So yeah, but I could probably do a cartwheel.
	John says, what is your middle name?
	I'm not telling you.
	Why would I tell you more information about myself?
	So you could, what, file government records or, you know, look into things?
	I'm not telling you anything.
	You don't even know my real name is Nick Fuentes.
	What if that's not even my legal name?
	What if my real name is like Jimmy?
	What if my real name is like What if my real name is like the Derek Pops?
	What then?
	What would you say then?
	You'd probably feel pretty duped, huh?
	What if my real name was, you know, Jeremy McBigMac or something?
	You know, nobody knows.
	ASD, you haven't seen my birth certificate.
	How do you know?
	ASDF says we got a little toy to 200 followers.
	Yeah, very heartwarming moment.
	MD extremes thoughts on Chucky 2009.
	I don't know anything about that.
	I saw Jared Holt write an article, but I'm not familiar with it Zirconium says save the soap knife the Nabisco up the orb on very succinct.
	Very true and Cynical says hey Nick soap.
	Just got D platform said help what happened?
	She get kicked off YouTube Now I got a white knight now I gotta go Travis Bickle mode now I gotta go and I'll be like, you should be a dancer.
	You should be going out with boys.
	And she'll be like, you're square.
	You're square.
	And I'll be like, I'm square?
	You're the one that's square.
	You make racist YouTube videos?
	That's hip?
	What world are you from?
	You know, I'll say that.
	And then I'll go and rescue.
	I'll go and I'll be like, hey, are you Joe Bernstein?
	I'll be like, come on, get out of here!
	And I'll be like, ah, suck on this!
	And then I'll deliver a logical argument, you know?
	And that's, uh, you know, it won't, but then that is where it departs from the movie, you know?
	But that's where it goes in a different direction, alright?
	No violence, we hate violence.
	Uh, Travis Bickle, but, you know, with facts and logic, I guess you could say.
	Right, but I'll have to go in, save the day, get in my taxi cab, Such a good movie.
	But yeah, that's tough.
	I'll have to lend my support.
	I told you that was gonna happen.
	Nobody listens.
	Nobody listens to me.
	Smelly's just thoughts on depressed, emotionally crippled girls.
	Avoid.
	Yikes.
	Joe Bros just saw DJ Audit the Fed's Twitter from one mediocrity to another.
	I feel as though I must absolve you of mediocrity.
	I am not mediocre.
	I don't know what DJ Audit the Fed has to do with this.
	uh let's see scroll down a little far there whoops now i scrolled up too far where are we uh mercer says will you run for president in 2036 and become our orban i probably not but who knows i think i'm done you know i i you say enough things on the internet you're kind of toast You know I'll run in 2036, and you know all the clips are gonna pull.
	Oh, here's the time Nick picked his nose.
	Here's the time Nick said to kill globalists.
	Here's the time Nick said, uh, you know, cat boys, you know, whatever.
	Here's the time Nick said, uh, you know, this and that.
	And it's just, you know, not gonna be a fun time.
	Gonna be a rough year.
	You know, Sargon of Akkad had a pretty rough go.
	Imagine how it's gonna be for me.
	But maybe, who knows.
	Randos says, hashtag free self.
	So true.
	Elon says, have you ever been asked out by a girl?
	Yeah, I was asked out by a girl one time in eighth grade.
	Yeah, I can say this because that dummy, she, after Charlottesville, I think it was, she like blocked me on everything.
	We were friends for years, and she blocked me on everything.
	Just another red-pilling moment on the femoid question, by the way.
	You know, we've been friends for years.
	We did a radio show together.
	We went to school in the same city for a year.
	We were pals.
	You know, we went back to middle school.
	We hung out.
	You know, probably the only time I had a girl who I considered a friend, and it wasn't, like, a, you know, relationship thing.
	Anyway, so I can say this because she betrayed me and that was a that was a c-word thing to do.
	Not gonna say it because I'm a polite gentleman, but you know, that was a real, you know, you're real C for that one.
	But anyway, that's not polite.
	Not on Mother's Day of all days, but you deserve that.
	But we were at a party.
	It was the summer party, the summer get-together, and this girl was hosting this party in her backyard.
	It was like her birthday party, and she was this psycho.
	Not the girl who asked me out, but the girl was hosting the party.
	I didn't know her that well.
	She was psycho.
	Nobody liked her.
	Well, I didn't like her.
	But she had this party, was co-ed, and that was a big deal because it was middle school.
	And usually, you know, around that age, boys run with the boys and girls run with the girls.
	But it was like this co-ed party and I was there.
	And this girl who was in my English class, we knew each other for about a year.
	She was like, hey, um... She was like, it was in front of everybody.
	She was like, hey, um, do you want to like go out sometime?
	And I was like, no, I'm good.
	I was like, no.
	No, thanks, but uh, I don't remember the exact verbiage, but you know the general sentiment conveyed was like basically That's okay.
	I think we're good where we are.
	You know, we're friends.
	That's fine.
	And she was not happy, you know But she didn't she didn't say anything, you know She kind of took it like a champ and you know The party went on and I had a good time at the party, you know And then like, uh, you know, probably a week or two later, she was like, I asked you out and you know, you said I'm good.
	So this allegedly, you know, tore her up inside.
	She was not happy.
	Eventually she got over it, apparently.
	But, uh, I was like, I was like, what?
	You know, you can't just impose that on me.
	What, I gotta say yes?
	I don't even like you that much.
	And she asked me in front of everybody.
	It's her fault.
	She puts me on the spot like that.
	I gotta, you know, be beholden to all these people.
	Can't even let her down gently.
	But uh, but yeah, that was the one time, that was the one time a girl asked me out.
	I don't think it ever happened.
	It's, I guess it's happened in like subtle ways.
	I'm sort of autistic so, you know, because girls have tried to get my attention before and only until after the fact I realized, oh, they were trying to...
	People have texted me the most outrageous things and I don't even but I know I don't even see what is I can't read between the lines many times because I'm just look I'm just kind of a weird guy I'm a little you know sort of off you know I'm a very uh what is the word
	neurotic sort of sort of guy so So I don't really I don't really catch the drift a lot of the times I can't really read between the lines, but that was the one time when there was an explicit Proposition made and I was like, you know, no, thanks So, uh, so yeah, so, you know you block me on snapchat Well, you know you tried to ask me I might turn you down so who won there so wins, you know
	Anyway, Jerry says, I hope you like that joke, or that story.
	Julie says, donating to wish Black Swan the best of luck.
	Truly heartwarming and I hope he has best days ahead.
	God bless you.
	Yeah, yeah, congrats.
	It's a little, I don't know, I mean it's a touchy subject, but you know, I guess if you're reforming, if you're reforming in that lifestyle, that's what we want to see.
	And it's a tough thing, right?
	I imagine that's probably a difficult Hard road ahead.
	But hey, God bless, man.
	God bless that you're going to be on the right side of history.
	The right side of God.
	You want to be on the right side of the big man.
	Or not going to be fun, right?
	Black Swan says, I know it's not ideal.
	Was lost with that long before my faith or politics.
	You brought me back and gave me hope to stop living that way.
	Thank you.
	Amen.
	Great to hear and God bless.
	I am glad because, you know, ultimately we say that because, you know, people get led astray into these lifestyles to their own detriment.
	You know, I guess that's the... It has a negative effect on society, obviously, but who are the victims?
	It's all the children that are being propagandized to, and this lifestyle is enabled.
	And people are told, basically, you know, if you have these feelings or if you, whatever, for whatever reason, whether it's genetic or childhood development, that's kind of irrelevant.
	But if you're in that situation, the narrative is, well, that means that you've got to wave the flag and you've got to march in the parade and you have to, it's a death sentence, basically, to a life of drugs, sexual promiscuity, misery, disease, all these things.
	and ultimately nobody wins.
	You know, even these people that are like, you know, we're gonna shirk the Christian moral code, and we're, you know, love is love, we're gonna do our thing finally.
	And what, they're all just miserable.
	They've created their own personal hell.
	And it's no coincidence you live against God's ordained laws and rules for you, and your life turns into literally AIDS.
	You know, you literally get AIDS.
	And there's this disease that ravages you and it's drug abuse and, you know, just the social dysfunction.
	So, so it's good to hear.
	But in short, it's good to hear that everybody's getting right with God.
	That's what we want, because we're all, we're all going to, we're all going to die one day.
	That's gotta, it's gotta be the big decision, right?
	David Sperner says, Catholic Match is greater than Tinder.
	Find QT Trad Catholic GF.
	I haven't tried Catholic Match, but you know, look, it's a LARP.
	All these people that say, Oh, you're Catholic.
	Let's just, uh, you know, go.
	No, no, we're too good for Tinder.
	We're too good for this.
	We're too good for that.
	We got to live in the world.
	This is the world we have, you know, and you can find people on Tinder, you know, not that again, not ideal.
	I'm not trying to be the defender of Tinder.
	It's like a hookup thing for a lot of people.
	But, um, You know, a lot of it is, oh no, but it has to be Catholic Mass, and it has to be Catholic traditional Latin Mass, and it has to be Catholic this.
	I mean, sure, you gotta live a devout life, and that's gotta be it, but, you know, um, I don't know, it just strikes me as LARP-y, you know, that's, uh, people need to look at their options.
	Brian Shepard says, who wins in a fight?
	You or Ben Shapiro?
	He's not allowed to use his hat as a weapon.
	Oh, definitely me.
	Definitely me, because I'm mean.
	You know, if it came down to me and Shapiro, I've got the indomitable will to survive.
	I didn't have a billionaire prop me up.
	I have Aryan courage, alright?
	I have the Aryan heroic ideal values.
	You know, what does Ben Shapiro have?
	He worked out some deal with Daddy, and they got some Hollywood producer, and...
	You know, some big money guy involved?
	So yeah, maybe if Ben Shapiro could work out some deal where somebody sneaks into the fight at the last minute, runs interference, distracts the referee, he uses a steel chair.
	You know, that'd be how Ben Shapiro could pull out a win.
	But otherwise, I've got heart.
	What does Ben Shapiro have?
	Brian says we says the same thing twice.
	The champ says I never miss a show.
	Thanks for all you do Nick.
	Hey, thanks, man Jimbo says doesn't like Minecraft anymore.
	Yeah, okay, Jew I don't know.
	I don't like the way that sounds that sounds like covert anti-semitism Disavow disavow, you know saying it like it's a bad thing, you know, look I We can't tolerate that on this show.
	All right?
	We have to be welcoming to all faiths and backgrounds.
	All right?
	YouTube is out there taking people out, and Ilhanovar is being anti-Semitic.
	We have to be on guard.
	Miles says, if you started flipping burgers, dear, we'd still probably try to get you fired.
	These cycles won't stop until you're broke and starving.
	Until then, here's some shekels and keep up the great work.
	Well, thanks.
	You're right.
	It's true.
	That's what happened to Sean and everybody else.
	Well, you're welcome.
	Yeah, I do make Catholicism cool.
	I make it based and red-pilled.
	you start watching sam hyde and how weren't you red-pilled then as a libertarian well you're welcome yeah i do make catholicism cool i make it based and red-pilled um i started watching sam hyde when i was in college second semester probably so like 2017 probably started watching sam hyde How was I not red-pilled as a libertarian?
	Well, I was in high school, you know, and in high school I was in an all-white community.
	How can you get red-pilled in that environment?
	You know, I didn't go on 4chan.
	My conservative digest was like, it was all Normie stuff.
	It was Ben Shapiro, it was Andrew Clavin, Bill Whittle, Fox News, Mark Levin, you know, all that kind of thing.
	And I couldn't get red-pilled by circumstance.
	So, then I go to college and I see what's going on, I get exposed to some new stuff, and the rest is history, but...
	That's how it's actually very easy to see you know so it's not evident when you're uh when you're in the bubble and it doesn't affect you and you're not uh sort of a fringe internet culture sort of a guy you don't get exposed to that stuff so that was a normie cg says here's 10 bucks hey forget about it hey thanks uh first name says nick what's a cat boy i'm out of the loop you know just look it up it's whatever Generation Z Philosophy says, Behold, Matt Bowling, a pristine Aryan specimen.
	Perfect blonde hair and blue eyes.
	Jared, take notes.
	Yeah, that's gonna get me in trouble.
	Forget building the wall, Mexico is our Liebenstrom.
	Disavow, disavow all of this.
	Cloudstar says, Nick, when Kanye came out as Mog, I decided to check out his music and got Yeezus and Yay.
	Then I just got Graduation, a beautiful dark twisted fantasy.
	What should I get next?
	Yeezus, Yay, Graduation.
	Well, you gotta do, uh, College Dropout, of course, if you haven't heard that yet.
	And, uh, Late Registration.
	You know, Yeezus is, uh, well, Yeezus and Yay are not the best releases, at least that's, you know, the critical reaction.
	Graduation's the finest.
	Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy's the finest, but, you know, Late Registration, College Dropout, Round Out, The Trilogy, 808s is, you know, a game changer, and maybe wrap it up with Life of Pablo, but...
	Yeah, it's all good.
	It's a perfect discography.
	With one exception.
	Drunken Hot Girls.
	That song's bad.
	Amir says, is it easier to turn a skinny hot thot- Oh, and wolves.
	Also.
	And, uh, Silver Surfer.
	And, uh, Part 2.
	Okay.
	Amir says, is it easier to turn a skinny hot thot into a trat or a fat trat into a skinny trat?
unidentified		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I haven't tried.
		Haven't tried either way.
		Uh, but thots, it seems to be tough to recover from that.
		So probably a fatty.
		Patrick says, how do you feel about trying to mend the schism between the Catholics and Orthodox?
		Yeah, I think it should be tried, but I don't know if it'll work.
		Ghani says, how do you feel about this James Charles guy?
		He's a degenerate.
		I'm glad he's collapsing.
		Because that guy was, he's just the epitome of everything wrong.
		You know, hyper-sexualized, effeminate, emasculated, all that.
		The says, you see the teacher from Arthur got gay married?
		Yeah, I saw that.
		Yeah, isn't that great?
		Arthur's teacher getting gay married from the cartoon Arthur on PBS.
		It just doesn't, uh, just doesn't stop.
		Ian with the big super chat there, thanks so much.
		He says, are you going to read Michael Malice's new book, On the New Right?
		Yeah, I might check it out.
		I like Michael Malice, so maybe I'll take a look.
		Boopers says trying to tell my friends on Facebook that women choosing birth control is a bad idea and the Jewish power is real.
		They don't care.
		Pray for me, brother.
		Yeah, good luck with that.
		It's not just don't bother trying.
		Honestly, it's never worth it.
		Jordan says, Nick my IT guy adblock solution ain't working for premium content even on Chrome, Firefox, Safari.
		Closing with a compliment.
		You get it.
		Much love.
		Okay, I will check it out.
		But thanks.
		Yeah, I will look into it.
		Okay, that's all our Super Chats.
		It is 9.15 and my head hurts and my nose is congested and I'm hungry and tired.
		So that's going to do it for us on the show tonight.
		Remember to check us out.
		NicholasJFuentes.com slash membership.
		It's only five bucks a month.
		We're 100% viewer funded.
		That's the best way to support our show.
		We need your support because we don't get government money.
		We don't get sponsors, advertisers.
		We turn them away because we want to keep it independent.
		So be sure to check us out.
		The link is down below.
		You get one additional show every week if you subscribe to become a premium member.
		Like I said, it's only five a month.
		Not a bad price.
		Pretty good price point if you ask me.
		Remember to subscribe to the channel and give us a big thumbs up.
		Leave a comment down below.
		Click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
		Remember, we are on the air Monday through Friday 7 p.m.
		Central, 8 p.m.
		Eastern Standard Time.
		I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		As always, thank you guys for watching.
		Thanks to our Super Chatters.
		Thanks to our premium members.
		Thanks to everybody who watches the show.
		We love you folks.
		We love you.
		Happy Mother's Day and we'll see you tomorrow.
	Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		America first!

▲