All Episodes
Previous Next
April 23, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:40:08
The Kushner Immigration Plan | America First Ep. 372
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:20:59
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
Thank you.
Thank you.
Bye.
Thank you.
wall.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
With respect, the respect that we deserve.
From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
America first.
Good evening, everybody. everybody.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back with you here on Tuesday.
Only Tuesday, right?
Early on in the week but we've got a great show.
There is a lot to discuss.
Lots going on in the news and actually I did change our title.
Tentatively titled the video for a short time talking about the announcement that Bibi Netanyahu is naming a town after the president in the Golan Heights in Israel.
But you know I thought about it a lot and really the big story from today is not that.
We are going to talk about that, but that's not the big featured story tonight.
The real story is what's going on with immigration.
That's the real story.
There's a lot of developments that are in play here which we'll be discussing.
Jared Kushner, senior White House advisor, says he'll be presenting an immigration proposal to the president later this week.
And at the same time, there are some pretty big white pills about immigration.
A new presidential memorandum, which says that we're going to crack down on visa overstays.
And also, the citizenship question on the census is being debated in the Supreme Court, and it's looking pretty good.
So, we'll be talking about that.
Some interesting things happening with immigration.
Possible turnaround?
We'll see.
I'm not holding my breath, but maybe.
We'll be talking about that.
We'll be discussing the meeting between Jack Dorsey, the Twitter CEO, and the President today.
It was actually unfortunate because I tweeted out Oh well, the President and Jack Dorsey are meeting later this week.
I didn't check.
It happened today.
I'm tweeting later this week.
It happened today.
So we'll talk about that meeting, the larger issue at work there, the social media censorship.
And then if we have time, we'll get to this announcement by the Prime Minister of Israel that they will be naming a town in the Golan Heights in Israel After President Donald Trump, because he recognized Israel's sovereignty over the region.
So if we have time, we'll get to that.
Not a big deal, but kind of a continuation on some themes we've been discussing on the show for the past couple of months.
I think you understand where we're going with that.
I gotta tell you, the stories today...
The story's like every week.
It just feels like we're just doing the same thing over and over and over.
I mean, of course, the show is the same.
Seven o'clock.
Well, seven o'clock, roughly speaking.
And the introduction and all that.
But the stories, it's like immigration.
It's going well.
Now it's not going well.
Maybe it'll work this time.
Nah, not gonna work this time.
And then it's something about Israel and it's... You know, I just feel like...
Groundhog Day.
I feel like the Truman Show or something.
Like, I'm supposed to get out every day and do the same thing.
Good morning, good evening, and good night, right?
Or whatever.
So, uh, so we're gonna get into it.
Before we get into the current events, I gotta tell you, it's kind of a rough day for me.
Having some issues with my car, just kind of general melancholy malaise, you know, as I've been talking about on the show lately.
It's just like, where do we go from here?
It just feels like every day we're just getting kind of Punched in the gut, in the personal life, and in the political sphere.
So, we're gonna try to be White Bill.
We're gonna try and have a good attitude tonight.
I know yesterday was a little dark.
I was re-watching the show from last night.
And, in fairness, it was a dark subject.
So, why should it be a very light, optimistic episode?
We're talking about Christian genocide and terrorism.
But I'm watching and I'm like, man, if I wasn't such an optimistic, funny guy, this would be some pretty dark, depressing stuff.
So, we're gonna try and keep it optimistic.
We're gonna try and see the funny side.
We're gonna try and see the lighter side of things.
Try and be a little bit more positive.
How about some positivity on the show, right?
We're gonna try!
I told you I'm gonna try, okay?
So, we're gonna dive right in.
I guess we'll talk about this Twitter meeting first.
Because it's not that big of a deal, honestly.
Today, this is according to CNN, President Donald Trump met with Twitter Chief Executive Jack Dorsey of Twitter hours after Trump accused the social media company of, quote, discriminatory behavior against conservative users.
Actually, in the CNN article, it says hours after Trump erroneously accused The Social Media Company of Discriminatory Behavior.
How is that erroneous?
I don't understand how anybody disputes that anymore, but that notwithstanding.
In a statement, a Twitter spokesperson said, Jack had a constructive meeting with the President of the United States today at the President's invitation.
They discussed Twitter's commitment to protecting the health of the public conversation ahead of the 2020 U.S.
elections and efforts underway to respond to the opioid crisis.
And this comes after Trump was tweeting this morning.
He said Twitter is very discriminatory and does not, quote, treat me well as a Republican.
The president said it was, quote, hard for people to sign on and accused the company of constantly taking people off the list.
He goes on, no wonder Congress wants to get involved and they should.
Must be more and fairer companies to get out the word.
So, a few thoughts about this.
Number one, I just find it hilarious.
The boomer vocabulary that he uses to describe Twitter.
People are having trouble signing on.
They're taking him off the list.
What does that mean?
What does that even mean?
I can imagine Donald Trump sitting in the Oval Office, frustrated on the phone, calling Barron into the office.
Barron, what does this mean?
They're taking him off the list.
How do I sign on to this thing?
What does that even mean?
The problem, I don't think, is that people are having difficulty signing on, you know, whatever that is, or getting on the list.
Like, that's not what it is.
The problem is they're banning people.
The problem is they're banning people, and they're...
Shadowbanning.
Or in other cases, if you want to really get technical, the problem is the payment processors.
We thought we had it bad when they were banning people off Twitter.
We thought we had it bad two years ago when they were just purging thousands of people for no reason.
Off the website.
But then we found out in the last year and a half or so, I guess maybe since around Charlottesville, we found out actually, no, it gets better.
They can take you off of PayPal.
And PayPal is in charge of 90% of payment gateways on the internet.
90% of internet transactions or 90% of internet payment gateways are handled through PayPal.
So you're banned off essentially 90% of e-commerce.
And then Stripe started doing the same thing.
They're about 2-3%.
So you're up to 95% people getting banned.
And then we found out Chase Bank is actually starting to do the stuff as well.
And then we found out Mastercard is doing that also.
Again, another case of we thought it was bad and we were getting kicked off Patreon.
I got kicked off Patreon years ago.
And then, excuse me, and then Patreon bans Robert Spencer, not Richard Spencer, Robert Spencer, the guy who does the Jihad Watch website.
They banned him, and then they came out with a statement that said, actually, it wasn't our decision.
MasterCard, the credit card company, called us up and said, you got to get rid of this guy or we're not going to handle your transaction.
So that's the real technical problem.
And if I'm talking about this, and you've heard about it, whatever, the point to be made is, like, these people have no idea what they're doing.
I think that's, at the end of the day, maybe the larger problem.
You've got a president who is, what, 73, 74 years old?
How old is the average congressperson?
How old is the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi?
How old is Mitch McConnell?
I think they're all pushing 80, basically, right?
And so you realize, if this sounds maybe complicated, or if you've heard it before, the people that are supposed to be making the laws on this stuff, I mean, they just don't get it.
So, my first point is, it's kind of funny when Trump says, we're having trouble signing on.
You know, my favorite account, Hashtag stop the bias with three star emojis is having trouble signing on.
It's funny, but you also realize, wait a second, they have no idea how any of this works.
They have no idea what even the real problem is.
Right?
So that aside, a lot of people got excited.
Myself included.
We saw the tweet today where Trump is saying maybe Congress should take action on social media.
And I'm thinking, okay, at least we're talking about it.
It's not Obviously there's no action.
There never seemed to be any action, but at the very least we're focusing on the right issue.
It's being discussed right now.
Now they have this meeting with Jack Dorsey.
So he, this morning, says they should pass laws and this is a problem and they're discriminating against me.
And then they have this sit-down meeting with Jack Dorsey.
And what do we hear from Twitter?
They say, and I said this Really?
You're introducing the topic?
Now to me, that's when you know things are not going to get better.
They're actually going to get a lot worse.
What does that mean?
Protecting the health of the public conversation?
Now to me, that's when you know things are not going to get better.
They're actually going to get a lot worse.
What does that mean?
Protecting the health of the public conversation.
Nine times out of ten, that means censorship.
Nine times out of ten, they talk about protecting the health of the conversation or anything pertaining to the health of the discourse, the health of the conversation.
That means these people are sick.
These people are haters or they're crazy.
We have to cleanse them off to make it healthy again.
People like Alex Jones are unhealthy.
People like Baked Alaska are unhealthy.
People like Faith Goldie, Laura Loomer, Jacob Wohl, they're unhealthy.
We have to make the conversation healthy again.
So I hear a statement like that and I say, uh, I was excited this morning when we heard there was going to be a meeting and there was talk on Twitter about laws being passed in Congress, but he sits down with Jack Dorsey and they say, we're going to protect the health of the conversation.
Please stop making it healthier.
You're making it a lot worse.
So that was from Twitter.
And then on the other end, I heard a unverified report, unconfirmed report.
That said, that somebody in the meeting in the Oval Office said that what really happened is Trump called Jack Dorsey in to complain about the fact that he's losing Twitter followers.
Which, you think that's plausible?
You think maybe that's possible?
That Trump flew Jack Dorsey all the way out from California to say, why am I not getting more Twitter followers?
You know, why am I stuck at 59 million?
I think it's possible.
I think it's 100% a possibility.
On the social media censorship, it's just so blackpilling.
To me, that's the biggest issue, because look...
We've made our bet.
I've been saying this for a long time.
Not a whole lot we can do in the way of any other policy.
You know, build the wall?
That's good.
Right?
Targeting visa overstays?
Wonderful.
Stopping immigration?
That's the dream, if we could just shut it all down.
But even if we took the most extreme actions, which is not going to happen anytime soon, clearly.
Problems getting worse, not better.
But even if it were optimal, right?
Even if we were taking every measure that we need to be doing, that we should have been doing yesterday, today, and that's nowhere close to happening, wouldn't change the fact that the demographics are going to change no matter what because of the birth rates.
So that's what people have to understand.
More or less, there has to be some sort of acceptance, at least in the short term, that this is what the country is going to look like anymore.
And the circumstances will change in 25 years when we feel it and see it more fully.
The political things will change, public opinion will change.
I have a feeling the dynamic will change a great deal as these effects begin to be seen and felt.
Now that said, at this point in time we understand that there's really nothing we can do about it Between now and then.
Maybe circumstances will radically change in the future, but as of right now, it's kind of incumbent, the radical change on these demographic changes taking effect, and they're going to, no matter what.
So with that said, okay, the wall's not happening, immigration reform isn't happening, infrastructure's not happening, like nothing the president promised is happening.
The one thing, oh, the one thing that we can do is protect our presence online, protect the payment processors, because so long as that happens, We are able to spread the message.
All these things will happen and we can tell people what's happening, why it's happening.
Hey, buy my book or become an America First Premium subscriber.
We can fund our own operations.
We can basically create parallel institutions.
There's a future if all of that is secured.
If the payment processor, the social media security, you can create these parallel institutions of media, maybe a think tank, advocacy, all these things become possible if that is guaranteed.
But it's not.
Their plan is to probably by 2020, Get everybody who can make a difference in elections off the internet.
Get them off the payment processors.
Get them off social media.
And then, if Trump wins, you know, there'll probably be more of that until 2024.
If he doesn't, it'll accelerate like 10 times.
And whoever becomes president after Trump, I imagine the problem gets worse.
It accelerates at a faster pace than it already has been since 2016.
So that's the one thing.
And I said this on Twitter, and I think this is the attitude we have to take.
I would feel a lot better if other people would join me in saying this.
I actually just decided I'm not going to vote for the president unless that's fixed.
Because you know what?
I've got this platform.
In 2016 and 2017, I used it to advance Donald Trump the candidate.
I used it to campaign and to push everything.
And I'm not going to do it again.
If Donald Trump is not going to protect my platform, why should I use my platform to advance his campaign?
And of course, that probably won't make a big difference in the grand scheme of things, one person saying that.
But if everybody started to say that, if everybody who was on the MAGA train in 2016 said the same thing.
You know what?
We're just not gonna show up for this guy.
Actually, we'll encourage people not to vote for him and it'll be negative and it'll be nasty until these conditions are met.
Because why should it be any other way?
It's a two-way street.
Help us help you!
Right?
I mean, it's not like we're saying that for our own benefit, although we are.
You know, it does benefit me to stay online and to have a career and all that other thing.
Give me job security and job certainty.
Forget about the black unemployment rate for a second.
How about a little job security for a knicker?
Right?
How about a job security for a mogapede, okay?
You know, so it benefits me, but it also benefits Trump.
Understand, he wouldn't have won in 2016 if it wasn't for people on Facebook, and if it wasn't for people on Twitter and on YouTube.
You know, I hate to say it, but even people like Jack Posobiec, Mike Cernovich, Miley Yiannopoulos, much as we don't care for all those people, a lot of them push people in the right direction.
I'm not saying that swung the election, but every little bit counts.
So why should we turn out then in 2020 and say, oh, we're going to vote Donald Trump and wave the MAGA hat and keep America great and all this other stuff if he's not willing to do his part to protect us because we're out there sticking our necks out for him?
So it's got to be a two-way street.
And that's really how I feel about it.
I will not vote for him.
I'm not going to advance.
Campaign not going to promote it and help other people start doing the same because it's ridiculous.
That should have been day one because it's easy.
They said that he had an executive order within the first few months after he got inaugurated talking about internet censorship.
It's not even like it's difficult.
You've got a variety of different ways you can go about that.
You could go with antitrust.
You could go with Section 230 from the Internet, or rather the Communications Decency Act in 1996, which we've talked about.
There's a variety of ways you could go about this.
And all you have to do is just begin the process.
Understand, there's also this element of game theory, basically, where I don't think you'd even have to follow it all the way through.
That's not to say that you shouldn't, but you wouldn't have to follow it all the way through for you to see a noticeable change.
If Google, Twitter, Facebook, they saw that this administration was getting serious about censorship, even if they just saw that something was beginning, that maybe there would be the threat of this someday, they may start to change their behavior, right?
If there was an executive order, even if it was toothless, right?
Even if you didn't have the manpower to follow through, because this administration's full of Never Trumpers and cucks and everything else.
Even that might have a little bit of a positive effect, but we just have nothing.
It's just all talk.
You know, every so often he gets mad because a follower count's going down and he decides to tweet about it or say something in a rally, and then we never hear about it again.
How many hearings?
How many tweets?
How many statements?
And just no progress, so...
How's that for positive, right?
How's that for staying positive?
So, we hope, we hope that sometime soon in the future there'll be something concrete, but until then, like, the future of the movement is a big fat question mark.
It's actually a big fat X, right?
If nothing is done, understand it's inevitable that we're all going away.
It's not even a question mark.
Until something is done, we have no future.
You know, if the idea is, well maybe you have a future, most likely you don't, well you just don't then, right?
I mean, we just can't bank on people like myself and others being out there fighting the good fight, spreading the message, creating viral content, doing that kind of thing in the absence of those protections.
Because we see the trajectory, it's accelerating, it goes in one direction, And nothing's being... there's no resistance on the other side.
And these people don't even understand it.
And I know people who are on Capitol Hill, I know people around the White House, and they'll tell you that.
These politicians, they're boomers or they're silent generation.
They're pushing 60, 70, 80.
You think they have the wherewithal to understand what's happening with this stuff?
They have no idea!
It's like magic to them!
You know, you can't explain anything to these people.
You just can't get it through their heads.
So, there has to be real leadership taken.
I don't know who's going to do it.
I don't know if it's going to happen, but it's the only ticket for us out of here.
You know, if that happens, we're all set.
I would be very white-pilled, but otherwise, maybe not so much, right?
But that's the Twitter meeting.
Like I said, don't want to spend too much time on that.
Not really a huge deal.
The big conversation that has to happen tonight is about immigration.
So, I guess we'll start with the bad and then we'll get to the good.
We'll end on a good note here.
Some things that made me a little bit nervous is that today, Jared Kushner, he sat down with Time Magazine for an interview because he was named as one of Time's 100 most influential people in the world for the year.
And the interview actually was about a half hour.
I watched the whole thing.
And actually, I was almost like defending Kushner, frankly, and I'll tell you why before I get mad.
The interviewer with Kushner, like right away, all the questions are about the Mueller report.
And it was just so nasty and disrespectful.
I just hate the press so much.
I just hate journalists.
There's no class of people I hate more than journalists.
They say, Nick, you have a problem with Jews.
I really don't.
I have no problem with anybody.
I have no problem with any group as a whole, except for journalists.
Nobody else.
You know, oh well you must hate atheists, you must hate this group, you must hate pagans.
I've got friends of all kinds, but journalists.
I just reserve this derision exclusively for them as a category.
They're just the worst people in the world.
So I'm watching this interview even more than I hate Jared Kushner.
I hate the interviewer who's just question after question.
Oh, well, the Mueller report.
What do you have to say?
Are you like colluding with Russia and all this other stuff?
For like three quarters of the interview, it's just negative.
It's nasty.
The first 10 minutes is about the Mueller report.
And then the next 10 minutes is about Khashoggi, the journalist in Turkey.
unidentified
Really?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
with this Khashoggi.
Really?
We're still hearing about this after six months?
People die every day.
People get murdered all the time for every reason under the sun.
You had 300 people exploded yesterday in Sri Lanka.
We're still talking about this one journalist who is best friends with Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda.
Really?
That's the kind of people journalists are.
So that aside, and I felt like compelled, I was like, you know, Kushner's actually given some good answers, and he's got to contend with this jerk-off, whatever.
But then, I'm like, oh, actually, hey, both of them, because then Jerry Kushner starts talking about...
Some other things.
He's talking about how he's in charge of Middle East policy.
He's in charge of immigration policy.
Seems like he's in charge of everything.
Once the interview actually got onto the substantive topics, we find out that, you know, some of the most substantive parts of the Trump administration and its policy is being totally controlled by Jared Kushner.
And at first I'm thinking, doesn't anybody see something wrong with this?
I don't think we voted for Jared Kushner, did we?
I know this is trite, I know we've done this before, but like seriously, you begin to realize, wait a second, he's controlling everything!
If he's making the Middle East peace deal, and he's coming up with the immigration proposal, and he handled the government shutdown, and he negotiated the USMCA, What is he not doing?
What is the president doing then?
You know, once you begin to peel back the layers, and it's only recently that he started to get involved in immigration or things like this.
USMCA immigration proposal, it's mine.
Middle East peace deal, it's mine.
I'm rolling that out in three months.
It's like this guy literally is the president.
We used to say that as a joke.
We used to say that as like a pejorative.
You know, hyperbolic sort of thing to get under the president's skin.
President Kushner.
No, I'm starting to think he really is the president.
He's the acting president.
Him and the chief staff are buddy-buddy.
He signs off on every hire.
He signs off on every policy.
He's taking the lead on all the major policy initiatives.
What's the boomer doing?
What's the boomer doing?
Live tweeting Fox News and Saturday Night Live while this Jewish guy runs the show?
That's kind of symbolic, right?
Talk about symbolism.
Notre Dame?
Eh, maybe he's more like Jared Kushner.
So anyway, so he gives this interview.
I'm doing the Middle East policy and I'm working with the Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
I'm working with Netanyahu and all these others and the immigration proposal.
So he says next week he's unveiling an immigration proposal and a little bit ambivalent here.
This is according to the Hill.
It says Kushner said at Time Magazine's Time 100 Summit that he's put together a very detailed proposal that encompasses three major themes.
Improving border security, moving forward with a so-called merit-based system, and maintaining our country's humanitarian values.
So out of those three things, two of them sound okay, possibly.
One of them sounds really good.
One of them could go either way.
One of them's terrible, right?
Securing the border, I'm like, Okay.
If we're securing the border, I'm in favor of that.
You know, I think everyone's in favor of that.
Moving towards a merit-based system, that could go one of two ways.
That could go the way of the RAISE Act, in which case it's good.
Where the RAISE Act said we're going to cut immigration in half because we're going to just shut down chain migration or family-based migration.
We're going to shut down diversity visa lottery.
And in its place, we'll put in place this points-based system where it rewards skill, it rewards people who speak English, and other things.
So it goes in a good direction if in terms of volume it's cut, but it just changes the characteristics of who we're letting in.
It could go in a very bad direction.
And I think it probably will if this entails bringing in a lot more workers because, as the president's been saying, we need the workers.
Economy's growing, the businesses need them, so that means we're changing it to a merit-based system and we're increasing the volume of immigrants.
So it could go very well for cutting in half.
It's like RAISE Act type stuff.
It could go very poorly if it's what the president's been talking about for the past three months or so since the State of the Union.
So we'll see.
And then the last thing he said, humanitarian This is just the worst part of it all.
Stop with the humanitarian stuff.
I'm so sick of these humanitarians.
We've had enough humanity for once.
We need a little barbarism at this point.
We need our state to become barbarians.
At the border, with these criminals, with everybody else.
We need a little bit more of that.
We need to become more medieval.
Because everybody else is medieval and we're the humanitarians.
You know, everybody else in the world Foreign governments, foreign hordes, immigrants, refugees, terrorists, they've got the mentality of the barbarian.
We're gonna come in, we're gonna take what we want, we're gonna do what we want, we'll travel where we please, we're gonna kill, we're gonna do all this other stuff, and we're the humanitarians.
We're gonna take care of everybody.
Well, we can't do that.
That's inhumane.
You know, we have to advance human rights.
We have to promote women's equality in the third world.
We have to promote decriminalization of homosexuality.
Like, we're just dummies if we're the ones focused on humanity.
So, I hear humanitarian, I'm automatically like, oh, that means we're gonna get raped.
That means we're gonna get soft.
We're talking about humanity and these people are coming in and chopping our heads off.
Theoretically, symbolically speaking.
So we'll see how that goes.
He says that Stephen Miller likes the deal.
So we'll have to see what it is.
Now, I'm not easily fooled, so my prediction is that this is just going to be straight garbage.
I imagine it's going to be Weak on wall.
It's gonna be nothing close to the 30-foot concrete barrier we were promised.
I'm sure it'll be a lot of technology personnel.
In other words, nothing that cannot be removed by the next president.
So it's gonna be a lot of flimsy nonsense securing the border just like in 1986 under Ronald Reagan.
So the border security is gonna suck.
Merit-based is gonna be what the president's been saying.
Who did they talk to to come up with this proposal last month?
George W. Bush Center?
Heritage Foundation?
Koch Brothers?
So you think they're gonna cut the amount of immigrants?
I don't think so.
It's gonna be merit-based and it's gonna be 10 million more.
Humanitarian, you know, I don't see how that could in any way be good.
The most humanitarian thing we could do is just to put up, like, turrets at the border and just start, like, mowing down anybody that tries to come across.
Yeah, there'd be some casualties, but people get the message, they'd stop trying to come in, and then everybody be happier on both sides.
Now, I would never, I would never promote that because I hate violence.
You know, if you were really humanitarian, and I'm not, I'm not.
If they're suffering, I want it to be as much as possible so long as we don't have to make hard decisions, you know.
I'm the kind of person where I'm a humanitarian, I have the luxury of being totally fine with suffering that happens because it's not delivered by me, because it's indirect.
You know, people coming across the border, And they suffer across, and people in the country suffer because of it.
Well, I get to have a clean conscience because I didn't actually impose that suffering.
You know, it's just happening because I'm not acting.
As opposed to limited suffering, but you have to have the blood on your hands.
So, trust me.
No violence.
I'm a humanitarian.
I'll let the world burn, and I'll have the clean conscience.
You know, just in case Google's like, this guy's advocating turrets at the border.
I would never advocate for something like that.
Country's gonna go to hell, and I'm gonna be fine with that because, you know, like I said, I don't want to get my hands dirty.
So, immigration deal's probably gonna be bad.
That's the bad news, but I guess we'll have to wait and see.
The good news, there are some white pills here, which we haven't seen or heard of in a long time.
All these babies in the super chats always, Nick, where's the white pills?
Nick, tell us it's gonna be okay with immigration.
Well, here's some things that are okay.
The Supreme Court is hearing a case about the question on the 2020 Census about citizenship, and it looks like it's going well.
This is according to The Hill.
It says, key U.S.
Supreme Court justices seemed inclined to let the Trump administration add a question about citizenship to the 2020 Census in a clash that will shape the allocation of congressional seats and federal dollars.
In an 80-minute argument Tuesday that was both technical and combative, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh directed almost all of their questions to the lawyers challenging the decision to ask about citizenship.
Kavanaugh said Congress gave the Commerce Secretary huge discretion to decide what to ask on the census.
So, in other words, we need Kavanaugh, we need Roberts to rule in favor of the citizenship question.
It looks like if they're directing all their questions, At the opposition, and they're saying things like this about broad authority given to the Commerce Secretary, then it looks like we'll get a good decision.
And if that's the case, then in the census when they start printing out the papers for that, the questionnaires, people will be asked about their citizenship, it'll depress turnout.
And it's funny because this is also in the Hill.
It says opponents say a citizenship question could result in a census undercount in areas with large non-citizen populations.
They could shift congressional districts and federal funds away from those communities.
Oh, no.
No, not that.
Anything but that.
Sotomayor says there's no doubt that people will respond less.
That's been proven in study after study.
Like, that's a bad thing?
Good!
We want that to happen.
We want there to be an undercount.
We want people to stop answering.
Why should they be answering if they're not citizens, right?
Understand what they're saying is, well, if the census asks about citizenship, illegal aliens won't answer on the census, and then they won't get counted, and then electoral votes won't be apportioned to those districts based on the illegal population, and federal funds won't be allocated to communities full of illegal immigrants because they're not answering on the census.
Well, isn't that how it's supposed to work?
Right?
They're defending.
Well, but if you ask about their citizenship, all these illegal aliens won't get federal funds and they won't get counted for representation in Congress and for electoral votes.
Well, why should they be?
They're not citizens.
They're not citizens.
They're here illegally.
So, good.
You know, she's saying, in study after study, it's been proven that there's an undercount when they ask for citizenship.
Well, that's kind of what we're going for here, retard.
That's kind of what we're trying to have happen.
We're trying to have a country, if it's going to be a gay democracy, we should at the very least have some basic requirements for voting and participating.
You know, for example, that you have citizenship.
And it's not even hard to get citizenship.
This is something that's talked about...
And Sam Huntington's Who Are We book.
This was written 20 years ago.
But if you look at how to get citizenship, it's like nothing.
I think you have to pay a small fine.
You, like, take a test.
And that's about it.
Right?
I mean, there's some other things.
I'm oversimplifying here.
But it used to be difficult to get citizenship.
You had to prove proficiency in English, and you had to know things, and it was a difficult process.
And now, it's like people are simply choosing not to get citizenship because it's either inconvenient or they just don't need to.
If you look at a lot of communities, for example, in the Southwest, where this is a much larger problem, they don't need citizenship because they get all the services that citizens get.
So why would they?
Right?
It's not even something where it's like they're prevented from it or they can't or whatever.
It's simply like, why should I even bother?
In a lot of cases, they're totally eligible.
It would be very easy for them to just get it.
And it shouldn't be that easy, but it is.
But they choose not to, because all the services that are given to citizens, whatever that be, government assistance, transportation, even voting, they're entitled to that.
You know, they get it illegally, or in some cases, they even get it legally.
In Los Angeles, they've been doing this for years, they give out these cards where it entitles you to the same benefits as regular citizens, but they don't ask you about your citizenship.
They don't ask you about your legal status in the country.
So, that's the way the country's headed, and at the very least, it looks like we're going to be moving in the right direction with the census.
And it's not like this is unprecedented.
Apparently, they started asking about citizenship in 1820, and then it says that from 1960 to 2000, a sample of the population was asked about citizenship.
So not everybody, but some.
And then since 2005, they asked about citizenship in a separate survey.
And then since 2010, they just don't ask about it at all.
So for the vast majority of the country's history, we're asking about citizenship for obvious reasons.
It's only since 2010.
That's like 10 years old, nine years old.
Are we not asking?
So just goes to show your country's like a joke if that's the way we're operating, right?
What a silly country we live in where, you know, it's just like, there's just no rules.
Nobody has to play by the rules.
People think you're racist if you think there should be rules.
If you're out there saying like, hey, maybe we should all agree to like, you know, some ground rules here in this country.
That's somehow racist.
You're somehow a bad person.
You're a fascist, actually, for believing that.
We want a country where there's just no rules.
There's no orderliness.
There's no rules.
Nobody respects the law.
Like, don't you think there's even just gonna be basic logistical problems with that?
Like, beyond, like, large-scale demographic transformation and all its consequences, like, don't you think there's gonna be some even just logistical problems if people are just not following the laws?
Nobody respects the law anymore?
What a goofy, what a silly country we live in.
It used to be a very serious country.
This used to be a place where You know, this was the country to be, and now it's just a free-for-all.
It's a joke.
People shit on the streets.
People piss on our country metaphorically, and we're like, hey, that's awesome.
That's awesome.
Do a selfie while you're doing it, and all the rest.
So anyway, that's your white pill, right?
That's the white pill.
The white pill is, I guess we're combating that on the census.
Other white pill is this memorandum on visa overstays, which I'll read you.
It says President Trump, according to Breitbart, is ordering a crackdown on hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens who overstay their visas after arriving in the United States with a presidential memorandum.
On Monday, Trump signed the memo, which calls for the State Department and DHS to, quote, immediately begin taking all appropriate actions to reduce the overstay for all non-immigrant visas.
That is, more than 415,000 illegal aliens who originally arrived in the U.S.
legally but overstayed their visas and have yet to leave.
Specifically, Trump is ordering Secretary of State Pompeo and DHS officials to provide his administration with recommendations within 120 days on how to effectively cut the number of B-1 and B-2 visa overstays from countries that have a visa overstay rate higher than 10%.
So, here's what I'll say about this.
It's good.
That's a number one problem.
And everybody talks about this on the left.
They say, why would you build a wall when the all the illegals are visa overstays?
It's a dumb question because you just target both.
Obviously, it's like the house is on fire.
So, you know, why are you fixing these other problems?
Well, you know, you can fix multiple problems at once.
unidentified
Right.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
You know, the faucet's leaking and there's a big hole in the wall because you punched a hole in the wall because your Internet connection broke.
Well, you just fix both things.
You build a wall and you target visa overstays.
But nevertheless, it remains that visa overstays are the bigger problem.
It is a larger source of illegal immigration.
So this is a step in the right direction.
Unfortunately, what does this really mean?
You know, I used to be naive like a year ago.
And whenever something like this would happen, I would say, awesome.
The wall's coming any day now, MAGA-pedes.
The wall's coming any day, pedes.
Put on the MAGA hat.
We're keeping America great again.
But what does this actually mean?
What does the memorandum actually say?
Does it say we're deporting all these visa overstayers?
Or does it say we're asking the Secretary of State and the Homeland Security Department to look into methods that we can undertake to reduce the rate of overstays in the countries that are the most egregious offenders?
So that's not really action.
That's saying, um, look into ways that you might go about solving the problem if you wanted to solve the problem.
Well, okay, at the end of the study, they'll say, well, here's some of the things you could do, and then the president will say, oh, okay, either that's too hard or I'll do it, and then the courts will shut it down, right?
So I don't want to, like, get pessimistic.
I don't want to, you know, rain on anybody's parade, but yeah, it's a great thing, but what does this actually mean in substance?
Does it mean that visa overstay rates are going to turn around tomorrow?
Or that action is being taken to reduce the rates?
No, it means we're looking into ways to reduce the rates.
And besides that, even if we did undertake the measures that might be recommended as a result of this memo, because you don't have anybody good in DHS or in the State Department for that matter, it's not even going to get carried out.
So, yeah, this would be a step in the right direction if you had Kobach in charge of DHS and if you had a better Secretary of State.
But the problem is, like, it's inaction, but then even if it were action, who's gonna carry it out?
Somebody like Nielsen, and her replacement is just as bad, and all the people under her are the same?
Like, what?
Who do you expect to actually carry out these kinds of laws and provisions and memorandums?
All you have is a piece of paper.
Basically, Trump, this guy, it's actually kind of comical, this drunk guy, he signs a memo to do something and then he hands it off to whoever, you know, whoever, whether it's a DHS official or a State Department official, and they basically take your paper and they crumple it up and throw it in the garbage and then they spit on it.
So that's your president, and this is what the administration has come down to.
We don't even really live in a democracy if we elect somebody and the mandate of the people is not carried out, right?
I mean, that really goes to show how bankrupt the system is that we have it in such a way where this guy gets elected, he's supposed to turn things around, and he's actually, you know, In some ways trying.
In some ways you see these efforts being undertaken.
But if he just signs the memo and the people don't carry it out, like, is he really in charge there?
That's what the fundamental question is about.
And we talk about Kushner even.
Who's really in charge here?
Oh, he's the president.
Okay, but who's really in charge?
If the people below him are tasked with carrying it out and they simply choose not to, well...
They're the ones in charge.
You know, the bureaucracy's running the show.
The lunatics are running the asylum, so to speak.
So, don't get too excited.
Yeah, a memo was passed, and yeah, citizenship questions being asked, and the Kushner deal's being put together, but as always... I said this last week.
When they were talking about maybe Kovacs going to be the DHS secretary.
Could be really good.
Probably not going to be really good.
Because nobody cares.
Nobody cares in the White House.
Everyone's just kind of giving up.
So that's the memo.
The last thing we'll talk about, just a little funny joke here.
We're always just seeing the funny side.
Like my story the other day about the Jewish World Congress.
It's just funny at this point.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he intends to name a new settlement.
And I thought about that.
It's the same.
It's the same.
Same story.
Same story every day.
Same story every day.
We're working on that.
We're trying to get our name put up in towns and plaques and monuments over there.
It's just kind of sad that no town will ever be named after Donald Trump in America.
Because he's not doing anything for America.
You know, it just goes to show, maybe he should just go and retire to Israel.
When he gets done, I think nobody in America is really going to be excited with him.
The left hates him.
The middle, it's about 50-50.
And the right, I think they would have a good reason to resent him, but because a lot of them don't understand what's going on, they'll like him.
He should just go and retire to Israel.
He likes Israel so much.
He wants to help Israel out so much.
He wants to defend them from anti-Semitism.
Why doesn't he just go live there?
I wish everybody who cares so much about Israel would just get out of here.
If you like Israel so much, get out of our country and go to Israel.
Why would you stay here?
That's what I don't understand.
People like Ben Shapiro and all his people, and I see them on Twitter all the time, people like Aaron Bandler, Elliot Hamilton, Harry Katchetrian.
It's weird, it seems like he only hires ugly people and Jewish Zionists.
It's like, those are the requirements.
You know, they send in a photo ID and there's just two questions on it.
They say, uh, you're applying for Daily Wire.
Are you Jewish?
Yes or no.
Are you a Zionist?
Yes or no.
Send in a face picture, and then if they check, okay, Jewish, Zionist, totally ugly.
You're hired!
You're hired!
Come on in.
Mazel Tov.
We can't wait to have you here.
But I see all these guys, and all they post all day long is hardcore Jewish stuff, and I just wonder, like, I think if you like it so much, you should just probably be over there, right?
That's all they talk about is, we gotta defend and support Israel.
Like, if you're really that passionate about it, why do you have to be here?
Well, I guess the reason is that all the money's here.
I guess that's kind of funny how that works, right?
All the stupid taxable people are here, right?
That's where all the people are that you can swindle, right?
You know, Israel gets their 3.8 billion dollars from us.
That's why they're here.
That's why they like being here.
They have to be over here in a similar way like a colony, basically.
A British person might go to the British Raj to extract whatever tribute they can from the Indian people, from the vassal government.
They have to go over there.
Of course, they don't really like India.
They don't really give a shit about India.
You know, and whatever.
But they're there because, you know, it's a different form of patriotism.
They're there as a settler, as an explorer, a colonist.
And so maybe that's why people like Ben Shapiro and Trump and Kushner stick around, you know?
Kushner says that Benjamin Netanyahu, when he visits America, he stays at Kushner's high-rise.
He stays in Kushner's building, in the penthouse suite.
So, really, that's what it is.
It's like a satellite.
America, in another way to think of it, is like, this is the place that Benjamin Netanyahu comes to stay when he's on vacation or when he needs another $3 billion.
So, oh, that's why.
You like it so much, why don't you go there?
No, but Israel doesn't have 300 million people to swindle.
Israel doesn't have $20 trillion GDP a year to just extract from.
Mmm just feed off of that so then I don't I mean oh, that's why why would you you know?
It's like when you go over to a friend's house And you eat everything in their fridge, and you play their video games, and you put your feet up on their table Why would you go at home when you've got a perfectly good friend's house?
And you just consume all their stuff go home when you need to come back It's all a joke.
It's all satire.
Of course that's a joke!
Of course that's a joke!
That doesn't happen.
What?
That was all kidding.
I'm kidding when I say that.
I'm kidding when I say that.
No, no.
Ben Shapiro is an American patriot.
Ben Shapiro loves America.
And he loves people like me.
He loves other American patriots.
Jewish people are some of the greatest patriots.
And I'm sure the amount that they give this country is definitely a lot more than they take.
I guarantee it.
I'm sure if you ran a balance sheet on that, you know, you got the World Jewish Congress, all the Jewish federations in the different sectors.
I'm sure if you ran it on that, I'm certain it would be a surplus for America.
It's a real benefit.
It's a real treat.
Diversity is our strength, as they say, you know.
So every little bit counts.
Every little bit helps.
So it's all jokes.
Don't let anybody take it too seriously and get the wrong idea.
Don't let anybody get the wrong idea.
I love them.
I can't get enough of them, right?
Alright, so I think I'm gonna get myself into trouble.
Every night, every night, it's like, you couldn't have just ended it after immigration.
You had to go there.
You had to go there!
And you had to go as far as you did, too.
It wasn't sufficient that you talked about it, but you also had to go really, really far with it, also.
You know?
And then, what are you gonna say?
Oh, I'm kidding?
But I am.
But I am.
It's all satire.
It's all satire.
I'm Stephen Colbert of the Reactionary Right.
I'm going to get a talk show and be a total liberal in a few years.
Just you wait.
So please, please no ban.
Please no ban.
It's all jokes.
Alright, we're going to take a look at our Super Chats.
We'll see what you guys are saying.
You're going to say things that aren't going to get me in trouble.
Trevor says, what do you think about Milo's book on gays and the clergy?
I haven't read Milo's books.
He gets all his books ghostwritten, so I wouldn't do that.
Nathan says, is it just me or is it getting crazier out there?
Is it just me or are things getting crazier out there?
That's why you might be looking at getting a life insurance policy.
Go to boomersheckle.com slash Ben Shapiro.
Oh, good tip.
I'll check that out.
Yeah, I'll be attending Benny Johnson's tour, actually.
Yeah, I'll be showing up.
Just tell me when the next stop is in Benny Johnson's college campus tour.
I gotta go.
I'm gonna bring all my friends to hear about how we can win the meme war.
I gotta hear Benny Johnson from Independent Journal Review.
Tell me about how we can win the meme war.
Heh, cack!
Shadily, my fellow meme lords!
Uh, you know... I don't know.
Truly, truly a clown society.
Truly a circus world we're living in.
You know, you feel like that's kind of a joke or a meme, and it's been ruined by a lot of people, but it just simply holds true.
It's just a big circus.
It's just like a big caricature.
It's just so silly and goofy all the time.
You can't get over it, right?
Rhianne Biazzo says, I'm going to take a shortcut, then we'll see who gets there first.
I don't know what you're talking about.
Sammy Davis Jr.
says, hey big guy, big fan of your content.
Keep up the good work.
Thoughts on pineapple on pizza?
Love it or hate it?
Pee pee poo poo.
Well, thank you so much.
Hey, thanks!
Thoughts on pineapple on pizza?
I've never had it.
I never will.
I'm a simple man.
I like just cheese pizza.
People want to put toppings on it.
I just like plain.
That's just how I am.
And especially the tropical things.
I never go in for the tropical.
If I have toppings on something, I have the toppings.
You know, the traditional toppings, whatever.
I don't go in for all this hipster stuff where it's like, oh, we're trying all these weird flavor combinations.
Try it.
You like it.
No, I'm in principle opposed to that yuppie filth.
It's this American nonsense.
And especially not on pizza.
No way.
unidentified
You know, people are like, oh, I put a chocolate bar in this bowl of spaghetti.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
It's actually, it'll blow your mind.
Why don't you kill yourself, actually?
Why don't you, you should be arrested and put in jail for that.
You know, with all these people, they think they're so innovative, creative.
unidentified
Stop!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Why are you doing this, you know?
Things should be a certain way.
It's not broken.
So I hate that stuff, that hipster garbage.
Casey Alexander says, I was just reading about a Congolese tribe who in times of famine and drought send their elders into the desert to die, thus leaving all the resources for the young.
Should we do the same with our boomers?
I think that's a great idea actually.
I think it's a great idea.
Hey boomers, time to take one for the team.
You've had it good for a long time.
Now it's our turn, all right?
Now it's the zoomers turn.
So yeah, I think we could, uh, I think we could arrange that.
I think we can arrange that.
Boss Vivo says, well, that's our last Super Chat.
Hey, I think that's going to do it for us tonight.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and as always, this has been America First.
Thank you guys for watching.
Oh, that's a great Super Chat.
Thanks for that.
Nick Spences, please pray that Bayston Ranch Bill Mike Enoch's gastric bypass surgery goes well.
Doctors fear his 600-pound F-type body will cause complications.
Big prayers, big prayers for the big man.
Big prayers for Big Michael Enoch!
That's funny.
I will never get over this ranch joke, Michael Enoch being overweight.
It's just so funny to me.
Well, it's just funny because what they're pitching is, you know, like white excellence.
And you're fat?
Like, what?
Come on, man!
Come on!
What are you doing?
I'm here to tell you about how the white man is not gonna take it anymore!
Hey, pass me those wings!
Hey, pass me that ranch bottle!
Ivy Envy says, did you see Drunker with Cutters CNN Town Hall livestream last night?
Really sloppy.
No, I didn't see it.
What happened?
Steven Crowder, he's just the epitome of what's wrong with the whole conservative thing.
I just see his advertisements and I think, how could you have an IQ of over 110 and, like, watch this as a serious person?
I just... If you like that, you just have no taste.
You just have no class.
Liking Steven Crowder.
Liking Steven Crowder is like... I don't know what would be comparable.
I don't know what would be comparable to that.
It's like watching football to me.
Kidding!
Kidding!
Don't offend all my sports fans.
It's like being a really intense sports fan.
It's just a cringe, blue pill thing.
Soredew says, America started collapsing in 1974 and won't finish collapsing until 2200.
Good luck with your show, anyways.
Good luck with your show, anyways.
It's not a phase, mom!
See, at least when I black pill, I'm chad about it.
I'm not like this gay...
Good luck with this show.
Anyways.
Eeyore over here.
At least when I blackpill, it's Chad.
It's like, yeah, country's going to hell, but we're going to deal with it.
You know, we're going to deal with it.
And that's the way it is.
She's got a man up.
And this guy's like, country's going away.
Anyways.
Dumb baby.
You sound like an adolescent.
And I would know.
I am an adolescent.
Hey you're welcome dude.
Glad to hear it.
Nick, thanks for helping me rediscover my faith and become an Easter worshiper again.
Hey, you're welcome, dude.
Glad to hear it.
Glad to hear it.
Nick Spence is big guy.
Please watch.
That's a little spit on my mouth there because I'm yelling so much.
Please watch Epic Vid rated M for MAGA.
So much MAGA.
It's based in Pumarpil.
Get the beans going.
Yeah, I don't know what this is a reference to, but sure.
MD Extremes has called me a stupid goy, but I can't help but notice that God took Israel away from the Jews whenever they fell into disbelief.
But the greatest expulsion after they killed our Lord is just a case of old-fashioned anti-Semitism.
That's a fair point.
Very good point.
They do spell for 2,000 years after killing God's son, and people are like, oh no, it's this other reason.
Yeah, very valid point.
Smiles says, thoughts on antidepressants and contrapoints.
Antidepressants, don't, don't do antidepressants.
I don't trust that stuff.
Not one bit.
You know, people say, oh no, you got to stabilize your mood and there's something to the brain chemistry.
I don't trust these scientists with that kind of stuff.
They don't know what they're doing.
Okay?
Scientists don't know anything.
They don't, they still don't know what you should eat for your diet.
The food pyramid was a lie and they don't know to this day How many carbohydrates and protein?
Like, they don't know anything and they're gonna... I'm gonna change your brain chemistry.
We're gonna get it back on track.
Like, you have no idea what you're doing.
So, I don't trust it.
I'm not popping pills to alter my mood or anything.
No way.
No way.
So it's very bad.
I would never do antidepressants.
Even if I got really depressed, wouldn't do it.
Wouldn't do it.
And ContraPoints, I don't really know that much about ContraPoints, but just kind of strikes me as this freakazoid, strange character.
And, you know, it's funny because this whatever, he, she, whatever it is, this person says, oh, I'm like, What does she say?
I'm de-radicalizing the dissident right.
Yet she will never have, he will never have a conversation with anybody in the proper dissident right.
Because it's all a bunch of BS.
And I've seen a lot of people are like, oh, I used to be dissident right, but then I watched this freak, you know, doing her weird whatever routine, and now I'm no longer dissident right.
I don't know how people fall for that kind of stuff.
I don't know how anybody buys onto this.
Clown town with all these clown people walking around.
I don't get it.
Joshua Larson says the holocaust of Hanukkah worshippers was a crime against humanity.
That's true.
You know, look, holocaust, great tragedy.
But you know what else?
The holocaust is really radicalizing the far left.
The holocaust is really radicalizing a lot of these Jews.
It's just something to keep in mind.
That's what the Washington Post headline should have read all those years ago.
Holocaust attack is radicalizing far-left Jews in America.
You know, I think it would be consistent with their headline from yesterday on Sri Lanka, right?
It was a crime against humanity.
An attack on the Jewish people is an attack on us all.
In a way, the Holocaust actually affected me, right?
In a way, the Holocaust was an attack on me.
Just as it was an attack on Jewish people, it was an attack on me too.
So when people say, Nick, you're a Holocaust denier, why would I do that?
That's me you're talking about.
I was a victim of the Holocaust.
It was an attack on humanity.
So I agree.
I agree with you.
Emmitt Storms says, Nick checked your 23 and me lately.
They updated mine from 97 to 100% Euro over the last couple of years.
Seems they've gotten more accurate.
No, I haven't checked it lately, but I'll have to check that out.
Jordan F says, Nick here from Populist Wire.
We've been seeing crossover between you, Vox Day, and Owen Benjamin.
Glad to see our favorites joining together.
God bless and we'll continue to share the content.
Oh, thank you.
Thank you so much, Populous Fire.
Thank you for sharing my content.
What crossover?
I haven't done a stream with any of these people.
They haven't done a stream with me.
I mean, we were mentioning each other, but I don't know.
Am I being a little... What's the word?
What's the word?
Am I being a little cranky with that one?
I guess there's nothing wrong with that super chat, but I don't know.
God bless.
Well, thank you for sharing the content.
But I don't know what you mean about the crossovers.
We're just like talking about one another.
I still like JF, all right?
But no, I didn't catch his debate analysis.
Didn't watch it.
So, uh, I, I, like, don't... Watching that debate is painful.
Participating in the debate was painful.
So, to watch a recap, I just can't bring myself to do it.
Benjamin says, how do you feel about ladies with Big Mac bodies?
What does that mean?
Like fat?
No can do.
I just don't particularly care for fat people, you know?
I have some fat friends, sure.
But as a concept, as a principle, you know, a fat person, and particularly fat women, it's like, what are you doing?
What are you doing?
Just control yourself.
Some days I just forget to eat all day, okay?
And then I have one meal.
It's not hard.
Just have a little self-control.
No, it's got nothing to do with that actually.
How could it have something to do with anything else other than what you're eating?
You know?
So, I don't know.
With the fat people, it's like, how do you let it get to that?
How do you let it get that way?
I mean, I get letting things get out of control.
Yeah, my room's a little messy, my email inbox a little full, but I don't know how you like walk in the mirror one day and you're like, wow.
You know, I'm gonna just not change anything.
So...
Big Mac bodies.
Big disavow.
Big disavow.
No fatties, please.
No fatties.
Sorry.
Sorry.
No fat acceptance.
But that's okay.
You can get help, all right?
You can better yourself.
Boss Vivos' thoughts on E. Michael Jones.
He's terrific.
Real great guy.
Alan Hughes is sort of kidding, but since the southern border is a lost cause, should we begin talks of a wall along the northern border to defend the impending religion of peace invasion that will swallow Canada?
Um, that's a good question.
But, the thing is, is why would they leave Canada?
People are not, like, coming across the border for no reason.
They're coming here as we're a western, advanced, developed, white country.
And, uh, so if you're a Muslim in Canada, why would you come over to America?
Maybe because it's less shitty?
So, I don't know if a wall would be sufficient at this point.
It's not really a problem yet.
So, no.
No, not at this point.
Italian pal says, hey Nick, in a post-Trump GOP and with people like Nikki Haley possibly being the successor, do you think building a third party is the best option or infiltrating the GOP anyway?
Keep up the good work.
I don't know, man.
Talk about a third party is useless because it's just so not going to happen.
It just so isn't going to happen.
Are just, I don't know if it's inaction, or if it's stupidity, or incompetence, or I don't know what it is.
But like, we can't figure out the most basic things, you know?
We don't have a single news outlet that is actually really strong and good at what they're doing, right?
Breitbart isn't that good.
Gateway Pundit sucks.
You know, they're all bad.
They're all terrible.
So we can't even do that.
We don't have a think tank.
We don't have anything, let alone a national party.
No way is that going to happen.
No way.
Not anytime soon.
So talk about a third party.
It's like, yeah, that's interesting to like theorize about it.
But like we have nothing where we are.
The most that this movement has is just these very informal connections, people texting on Signal and like that's it.
So yeah, third party, maybe in our dreams.
That's a real pipe dream at this point.
So, uh, Yeah, infiltrating the GOP.
Infiltrate everything!
But a third party's probably not gonna happen for a long time.
Thomas says, can I get a shout-out for my friend Michael?
Yell at the camera and call him a sodomite.
He likes that also.
Pee-pee-poo-poo.
I don't take orders.
You ask for a shout-out, that's one time, but why don't you do this?
He likes that.
Yeah, I'm not gonna do that.
But yeah, shout-out for your friend Michael.
Alright, how's that?
Shout-out to Michael.
Okay, well you gotta love, you gotta love the audacity.
Do this, do that, dance for me, dance for me.
How about no?
How about I rein in the super chat a little bit?
Why don't you do something for me?
Bos Vivo says, whoa, whoa, whoa, this Jack Dorsey guy is taking me off the list.
I'm surfing the net here, I'm signing on here.
Yeah, yeah, right?
That's that's basically what we're dealing with here.
Whoa, I'm surfing the net over here.
Yeah, that's funny.
That makes me laugh.
Crazy Life says my niece also went to LT.
She was over for Easter and said you were a very smart, nice kid.
Your parents did a good job.
Wow.
Thanks.
We're real neighborhood compliment.
Well, thank you so much.
I wonder who the niece is.
Very interesting.
Because I was a bit of a polarizing figure even in high school.
I have to tell you.
LT, my high school.
Interesting.
Smart, no doubt.
But nice?
Well, yeah, I was nice enough, I guess.
I'd like to think I'm a nice enough person, sure.
But thanks.
Thank you, I appreciate that.
Joshua Larson says, but it's just to say, Bryce.
I say, Destiny is calling me.
Open a Big Mac with fries.
I'm Mr. Funny Side.
Oh, I see.
You're changing up the lyrics.
Destiny is calling me.
Open a Big Mac with fries.
I'm Mr. Funny Side.
That's good.
That used to be one of my favorite songs back growing up.
Mr. Bright Side by The Killers.
And then it became everybody's favorite song.
And I'm like, you know what?
I don't like the song anymore.
Oh, I still like it.
I'm not going to say that.
But it dampens the mood.
Whenever I like something and then everyone else gets on it, I'm like, come on.
Come on.
I don't like it anymore.
So I was playing that song in my car the other day.
And I was not trying to play to very loud volumes so other people could hear.
Didn't want the other motorists on the road to think I was cringing Blue Pill, the normie, you know?
So, but still a great song.
Very good.
Max says, Friendly reminder to all the new knickers to binge watch all the older episodes of America First.
Very true.
Yeah, that's very true.
John Smith says, speaking for myself, the reason lots of Super Chatters ask about your family is that it's uplifting and wholesome.
Thanks for giving us hope, big guy.
Well, thanks.
Yeah, the problem is just more when people ask me about their political views.
Everybody knows the climate we're in, so that's why I'm hesitant to give too many details.
You don't want to cause problems for people.
Doom Marines, as earlier you lamented never having had the hot flash variety of spiritual experience.
The 12 steps of AA were first written as a brass tacks recipe for that experience.
It was the only cure for many.
Interesting.
I'll have to look at that.
Sanctus says, thanks for the hard work, big guy.
Saw your talk with Molyneux where you mentioned how your views had changed over time and you two seem to agree a lot.
How have your views changed since that interview?
Good question.
Good question.
You know, it's tough.
When was that interview done?
June 2017, I want to say.
unidentified
June 2017.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I want to say, June 2017.
Yeah, June 2017.
I'm trying to think where I was at at that point in my development.
I was probably a little bit more Wignatt-ish if you want to know the truth.
A little bit more of an unsophisticated, un-nuanced view of race, a lot of these other things.
And it's unfortunate because people kind of mischaracterize me based on a lot of things I've said years ago.
That, um, I don't think you can blame people for that, because these are issues which, like, you're not allowed to talk about, and nobody's talking about, and nobody's exploring.
So, I think you can be forgiven if you find out about it, and you maybe go a little bit too far, or you don't really have a grasp on the subject matter.
A grasp?
You don't have a grasp?
You're not grasping it with your hand.
You don't grasp it?
um so at the time i was probably saying a lot of things which were not um you know all the way there maybe a little out there whatever where at this point i think i've got a much better grip on sort of where we are as a country and what the philosophy is so i i think you kind of understand where i'm getting out with this kind of stuff you know kind of accepting the demographic picture and all these other things so uh so that's kind of how i've evolved i went from probably more you know like one of these angry people self-righteous
i just discovered all these things and i'm mad as hell to like fully gone through the grief cycle and now i've accepted it oh Okay, what's a pragmatic way forward?
So I think I've learned a lot in that way.
in that realm uh stella sundrop says uh don't feel pressure to answer but i have a debate tomorrow on immigration and i'm on the stricter immigration side what policy proposals would you offer to fix the problems we have thanks um policy proposals to fix the problems we have so the easiest one for that is to change the asylum laws and
That's the easiest one because the current crisis at the border is being caused by Central American families, particularly Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador.
They send over people who either they bring their own children or they bring other people's children because they know that given the recent funding bill, they get immunity with unaccompanied minors.
Moreover, people surrender themselves at the port of entry, declare asylum.
Our asylum laws say we have to process them.
It says we have to take their application, and because we don't have the facilities to house them while we're processing their application, we have to then just release them into the country and say come back when we finish processing the application.
So the asylum laws can be fixed.
Changing the immunity for the unaccompanied minors can be fixed.
Those are very easy things right out of the gate.
Obviously, a border wall, something like that.
Changing chain migration, reducing chain migration, the family-based migration, which you can look into.
The caps that were raised on that in 1990 and 1965.
You can look at the diversity visa lottery, which is just another source of 75,000 some immigrants per year, which is just terrible.
You know, I mean, there's no reason that that should be in place.
So that's a start.
E-Verify, mandatory E-Verify in all 50 states.
You know, why are the illegals here?
Well, they can have jobs.
If they can't have jobs with E-Verify, then they'll leave.
So that's another one.
So, those are some policy proposals to fix these problems.
I hope that helps.
Puppet Palace says, okay, this is epic!
Part of Golan Heights would be named after Trump.
Hell yeah!
I can't wait to go to Drumftown!
Can't wait to go to MagaTown!
Are you mad, libtards?
I'm going to MagaTown, Israel!
And we're going to be there to dab on Palestinians.
I know you're mad about that, right?
Very cringe.
Tyler Ray's just saw a thread on 4chan trying to push, whoops, oops, I scrolled too far, trying to push for a fake boycott on the new census tracking liberals, or tricking liberals into not taking part in the census lowering representation.
Yeah, I see that kind of stuff a lot.
Usually it doesn't go very far, but it's funny.
Zachary Alexander says, do you own a gun?
If not, what do you want to get?
I've got a gun.
Don't worry about that.
Don't worry about my arsenal, my friend.
I've got guns.
But I just, I don't like to talk about it too much on the show because you don't, you don't want to disclose all that information, right?
And in case there ever were any to use the firearm, you want, you want the element of surprise on your side.
So, and I'll tell you, my parents used to work in the security business.
They used to operate a company.
I don't want to give too much information, but they used to train people on how to handle firearms.
So, we're a very pro-firearm family.
We've got firearms in the house.
And, uh, we always have, so there's no problems there.
Derpster says, yo, why'd you block me?
At Derpster 2014.
Let me pull it up and see.
Let me pull it up and see, maybe I'll remember.
I've got, like, 5,000 people blocked, so, uh, you know, I might not know.
But let me pull it up, see if I recognize the Avi.
Mmm, yeah, I don't know, I don't recognize the, uh, account.
No idea.
Did you tweet anything at me?
Maybe that's why.
Or maybe you retweeted something?
Maybe you liked the wrong tweet?
That could be it.
Let me see, do you have any replies to me?
Oh, there must be this picture.
You replied, Bitcoin drip with some picture.
I remember, I think I remember the picture was, uh, goofy or something and that's why I blocked you.
Not sure, I forget.
Because the picture's not loading at the moment, so I can't tell you actually.
But, uh, but you added me, so it must have been that tweet.
So, but I'm not unblocking you.
Timed out says, semi-ironic question.
Who has done more for the movement?
E. Michael Jones or Alex E. Jones?
Keep it up, Nick.
You are the cutting edge.
Well, thanks.
Good question.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I would have to say... Depends on what you mean by doing things for the movement.
E. Michael Jones is providing things that are more true than Alex Jones.
The things he's saying are more true and more important.
But Alex Jones has a bigger following and is motivating people to get out there or vote or do whatever.
And he's defending free speech and he's a martyr.
So, in those terms, probably Alex Jones, but it just depends on what you define as, you know, what is, how do we quantify doing good for the movement?
So, it's different expertise, obviously.
We need both.
We need an intellectual vanguard and we need people that are in media, you know?
Me and Darren Beattie are not doing the same job.
Alex Jones and E. Michael Jones are not doing the same job.
And so on.
Right?
So, people like me, people like Alex Jones, people that are the face of it, the media, we have a different role entirely than the academics.
So, I think it's apples and oranges.
Martina says, I'm a recent viewer, but thanks for the work you do.
Any thoughts on FDR and his high ranking on many greatest US presidents list?
Theodore was better.
Well, thanks, man.
Glad to have you around.
Thoughts on FDR?
I like FDR.
You know, I know a lot of stupid conservatives are like, oh, FDR was one of the worst presidents ever.
Because you expanded the size of government.
I think you have to properly appreciate the role of FDR in American history, which was actually to stave off more radical things.
And anyway, he was a great American president.
Even though you don't agree with everything that he did, you have to love the iconography.
You have to love that here was this guy who served almost four terms and he was this towering figure in American history, so...
We have to love our history.
I hate the people like Dinesh D'Souza come into the country, immigrants, foreigners, and they start dictating who's bad, who's good, whatever.
It's like, you just got here.
So I wouldn't, you know, start bashing on Franklin Roosevelt and all these other people.
A lot of Americans really like FDR.
A lot of Americans got really helped out by FDR.
So I would say that.
Also about the Great Depression, people say, oh FDR made the Depression worse.
How is he supposed to know?
How is he supposed to know?
It was unprecedented to have an economic disaster of that magnitude.
I don't think you'd blame him for everything that went wrong.
So you have to also look at it that way.
Hindsight's obviously 20-20.
So I respect FDR.
I don't know if he's my favorite, but I respect his role in history.
I respect him as a great American president.
So that's my view of it.
That's my view of FDR.
Bone Lord says, Nick is not a Zoomer.
Nick is timeless.
Nick is perennial.
He bears the smile of emperors, artists, and centurions.
Nick, the living avatar of victory.
Yeah, very true.
That is very true.
A Zoomer, maybe a Zoomer in my physical form, but in a more transcendental sense.
You are correct.
It is.
There is a timeless element there.
John Natas says, long time, first time, excellent work tonight.
Premium milk subscriber here.
Keep it up.
They already got my IP.
PP.
unidentified
Poo poo.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Okay.
Well, thank you so much.
Much appreciated.
Horatious says, Vox Day said today that you are the future.
Oh and two.
Wow, really?
Big compliments, big compliments.
I appreciate that.
I like Vox Day.
You know, I'll tell you about me and Vox Day.
We actually got into it a little bit, I think, on Twitter many years ago.
I think we had some kind of a row.
He said something nasty, I said something nasty, and then we both followed each other.
But that was years ago.
I like Vox Day.
I love his content.
His dark streams.
I've watched a lot of it about Jordan Peterson, about Christianity.
Very, very smart guy.
I've watched his debates.
I'm a big fan of Vox.
Always have been.
And it's actually unfortunate because he got kicked off Twitter.
And I feel like the people that get on person on Twitter, you forget that they're there.
They're not as visible as before.
So it's very unfortunate because he was one of the better, in my opinion, content creators.
And same with, you know, Owen Benjamin's undergoing the same thing obviously, but he's obviously more visible because he's got 10,000 people on his live streams.
So I appreciate it.
I appreciate the compliments.
I like these guys.
Very humbling, very humbling, you know, to come out through the movement and all the people you like then take notice.
So it's a good feeling.
Glenn Cunnington says, I know this might be a bit controversial for your show, but a Grand Mac greater than Big Mac.
I agree, but I've never had one.
I wasn't into the Big Macs when they had them available.
Now they don't have them anymore.
So I might agree with you, but I wouldn't know.
Jen Shah says, I'm in the bath.
Splash, splash.
Thank you for that.
Litigious Liz says, much love from the 4%.
Ah, the 4%, the women in the audience.
Well, thank you so much for the big super chats.
We love hearing from the 4%.
The 4% that brave this show, they're troopers, I gotta tell you.
They're heroes.
Hardest job in the world, not being a mom, it's being a woman watching America First.
That's a tough one, right?
But uh, but thank you.
Much appreciated.
Hey, you're welcome.
Always.
I'll always be there.
Oh well, back to the grill.
Welcome, always.
We'll always be there.
CG says, I tried to sign on the Twitter this morning.
Didn't let me sign on.
Had to ask my grandson for help.
They must be taking our data off the list.
Oh, well, back to the grill.
Got to keep an eye on those burgers, Jim.
Well, thank you, Jim.
Thank you, Jim.
Yeah, that's a real problem.
Don't you hate when you're trying to sign on to the net and they keep taking you off the list?
Damn, makes me so mad.
Gotta call my nephew over here to come fix it for me.
Right?
I'm clicking, I'm clicking, but it won't let me sign on.
Billy says stop eating McDonald's.
Okay, I think we've summed up all the superchats there.
Okay, I think we've summed up all the super chats there.
Ian says, Nick, what do you think about Mormonism?
Not Christianity.
Sorry.
Sorry.
It's just not really canon.
You know, all this stuff about the Book of Mormon, some of this other wacky stuff they do.
Eh, not really buying into it.
Sorry.
Mormons have a similar power structure to Jewish people.
Nobody talks about it.
They do a very good job of covering it up, but Mormons are powerful in America.
And that's a pretty good analogy for people to say, oh, you single out this one group.
Mormons have power structure too, just like Jews.
So, uh, you know, I, uh, Mitt Romney, eh, not a fan.
But Mormons, I have no problems with Mormons in general, but just, um...
You know what I think the American government went to war with Mormons and Mormons used to say things like our enemy is the American government like there's some stuff there that people don't know they keep a lot of things very quiet for reasons I'll just say they're very secretive clannish powerful group and That's fine, but that's fine.
That's great.
That's terrific Matt McKinnon says, Hey Nick, could you please do a premium show or stream where you react to some old clips of you when you were a libertarian?
I was watching a video called Nick Fuentes is a feminist and it had me laughing.
It had me in a laughing fit.
I've done that on Twitch stream before, but yeah, maybe I'll do a premium show like that.
Joel Vaz is off topic.
Do you believe prostitution should be banned?
Why?
Yes, it should be banned because it's evil and wrong.
And a country that has its girls being prostitutes is disgraceful.
So no prostitutes.
If they want to do that, they should exist on the margins of society, you know, outside the law.
Michael says, will Drumpf move the embassy to Drumpftown?
Yeah, hopefully.
Cameron says, randomly bumped into Sargon doing a free speech event in my city.
I said, I liked your debate with Nick Fuentes.
He said, Nick Fuentes is a good guy.
He is a radical Catholic though, but I like him.
Epic!
Wow!
Wow!
Very cool!
Very cool!
What a loving stream!
It's nothing but love today.
Wow!
I said we were going to be positive and I got positive back.
You see how that works?
You see how that works?
You put out a good vibe in the world, the good vibe comes back.
I appreciate that.
Warms my heart that big man Sargon, big man Sargon with the big guns, giving me props like that.
I like Sargon too.
I like old Uncle, Uncle Carl as well.
Good dude.
I appreciate that.
I'm surprised.
Well, not so much.
He seemed like a decent guy on the stream, but you know, he's obviously this liberal, liberalist type character.
So I, you know, obviously we clash on ideology, but you know, I guess he seems like a solid guy.
So I appreciate that.
Altlet says, watching you read superchats makes me feel better about being a wagee.
Love your show, you beautiful WAP.
Well, thank you.
Thank you so much.
I do appreciate that.
I don't know how it makes you feel better about being a wagee.
It'd make me feel worse, bud.
But hey, to each their own, right?
HyperConservative says, where do you see America first in five years?
Good question.
I don't know.
I don't know.
We're trying to hang on, knock on wood.
Hopefully we'll still be around.
You know, I'm more worried about tomorrow and the day after and next week and next month.
Where are you going to be in 10 years?
It's like, wow, we're getting a little ahead of ourselves.
Where's America first going to be tomorrow?
Is that going to be the day when I wake up and then see it all?
You got banned or whatever and we're knocking out wood man every day, but I hope we're still around You know, I hope we're still there kicking and screaming and doing streams, but you never know right?
Hopefully hopefully we're still there Send me your prayer energy.
unidentified
Yikes!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I didn't hear that.
But it wouldn't surprise me one bit, frankly.
I'm ex-Mormon and you described it perfectly.
So I didn't hear that, but it wouldn't surprise me one bit, frankly.
Glenn Cunnington says, Mormons be like, give us 10% of your yearly income, Goy, or you won't go to heaven.
I'm ex-Mormon, and you described it perfectly, LMAO.
I've talked to ex-Mormons, and I'll tell you, there's a lot that nobody knows about, that they, like, tell you, you can't tell people about this stuff.
It's very very strange some of the things that go on there.
They like to keep it very quiet.
But I'm woke.
I'm woke on all these questions.
I know.
Box says, Love the stream, Nick.
My girlfriend broke up with me last Thursday.
Could you give me some advice on feeling better when you're alone?
Ouch!
unidentified
Sorry to hear that, my friend.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Well, I'm laughing.
I'm laughing.
I shouldn't be laughing.
It's your suffering.
It's unfortunate.
Hey, it happens.
It happens.
Heartbreak.
Oh, it's a story we know all too well, right?
Here in the America First Campfire.
Here, gathered, sitting around the America First Campfire.
It's a tough one.
Look, it just sucks.
That's a thing that people have to realize.
You know, I don't understand.
Bad things happen in life and you feel bad, right?
And you just feel bad for a little while and then you don't.
So I don't know if that helps, but that's generally my mentality is, you know, somebody dies in somebody's life, right?
Or there's a breakup or, you know, some other tragedy befalls somebody.
How do I feel better?
Well, like, why do you want to feel better?
Sometimes you just have to, it just sucks for a while.
And you just have to let yourself be sad sometimes, right?
That's life.
That's life.
That's my advice.
But how do you feel better about being lonely?
Look, I hate to break it to you, but we're kind of alone in life, right?
I mean, all this stuff about, you know, pair bonding or friends and things, you know, as I've been ostracized by polite society, I've come to realize as a polite society, society, polite society, you know, as I've been ostracized, I've, I've come to realize, you know, whoops.
Loneliness is kind of just part of the experience.
You die alone.
You're born alone.
You die alone.
You go to sleep alone.
It's just kind of, you know, we are to an extent individuals.
We relate to each other with relationships, and it's dynamic, but we are individual people.
We only know it's in our own heads.
So I would say that, you know, you got to kind of just get realistic about things.
You know, I'll feel lonely, for example, and then I realize, like, do I really want to go out and hang out with people and like hear stories I don't really want to hear.
You got to contrast the ideal with the real.
You know, what you think things are like versus what things are actually like, you know, kind of put it on balance.
And if you do it like that, then I think you realize, you know, things aren't, things aren't really that bad unless, unless you like get burned alive or something.
It's pretty bad.
But for the most part, things are just, you know, life is just kind of like life, right?
You just kind of hang out and then you just do your thing.
And sometimes it sucks.
Sometimes it's okay.
And, uh, so I just take that kind of, I take a very, uh, you know, a Buddhist approach, I guess, detaching, right?
Just giving up your attachments, just participating, as Tony Soprano says, in the joyfully participating in the sorrows of life.
I guess that's my advice to you.
Is that, is that too, is that too, uh, is that too, what would be the word for that?
Abstract?
Is that too, uh, Conceptual?
I don't know.
That works for me.
That's my thoughts on it.
Brian W says, it's all dumpy in my typey peepee poopoo until workers organize for better working conditions.
Thank you for that super chat.
That's great.
Joel Vaz says, any thoughts on the Christian identity religion?
Christian identity?
I don't know even what that is, so I don't have any thoughts on that.
Feeling for the guy with the girlfriend, though.
R.I.P.
Really hope that gets better, you know?
People with GFs now having no GF, hard to feel bad.
Hard to feel bad in our circles, right?
unidentified
It's hard to, oh no, that's so terrible!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
You know, I imagine people like Eggie and others like, oh, we took the GF's white knight and we brought him down to our level, you know?
I feel like that's what it's like.
But we do feel for you, Buster.
You'll get them next time!
I'm just kidding.
I'm just joking.
It's tough out there, right?
Okay, thanks.
It's true.
Adam and Eve, Italian.
Jesus Christ, Italian.
Simple as.
Simple as.
Look at the pictures.
Look at the pictures.
Does Jesus Christ look black to you in all the pictures?
Looks Italian to me.
So, that's the way I see it.
Okay, that's all our Super Chats.
That's everything.
I think that's going to do it for us tonight.
That's all we got for you.
So remember to sign up to America First Premium.
Five bucks a month.
Help support the show.
It's 100% viewer funded.
You got to do it.
Don't let Israel win.
Israel is giving billions to their outlets and, you know, greater Jewish power is.
So you got to support our show with the premium subscription.
Just five bucks a month.
You get one additional show every week.
Excuse me.
Remember to subscribe to our channel.
Give us a big thumbs up.
Leave a comment down below.
Click the notification bell to be notified every time I go live.
Remember, we are on the air Monday through Friday 7 p.m.
Central, 8 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time.
I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
As always, thank you guys for watching.
Thanks to our Super Chatters premium members.
Everybody watches the show.
We love you folks, and we'll see you tomorrow.
Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
America First!
▲
Export Selection