Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 11, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:53:55

Julian Assange Arrested | America First Ep. 365

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:30:13

Appearances

Clips

donald j trump

00:08

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		music
		music
		music music
		music music music music music music music music music music music
		music music I'll see you next time.
		Bye.
		Thank you.
		sad music Wall.
		Thank you.
		Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
		Thank you.
		Let's get started.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
unidentified		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America first.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening everybody.
		We're watching America first.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you.
		There is obviously lots to discuss today and it's funny because yesterday I was just lamenting the fact that nothing's going on, there's nothing in the news, and then this morning at like 4 a.m.
		we get a big story.
		Of course, Julian Assange Founder, leader of WikiLeaks has been arrested, and this is a big deal.
		Very controversial subject, and I have sort of conflicting opinions on it.
		I'm not one of these people who really kind of goes hardcore on Assange.
		If you watch this show, we were never really big on the WikiLeaks type stuff, never really big on the Julian Assange.
		I know some people are more into it than others.
		But I have some conflicting views on it.
		Obviously it's a very big deal.
		He was instrumental in the 2016 election.
		We remember for revealing the DNC emails, which many say could have swung the presidential election in the favor of Donald Trump.
		Those leaks were the subject, in many ways, of the Russia investigation.
		So it's a big story.
		We'll obviously be talking about that.
		We'll be talking a little bit about Kris Kobach and some new facts on the border.
		It's actually sort of interesting.
		There was a big piece in the New York Times today, of all publications, talking about how the immigration system has reached its breaking point, which we've been reading about this for a long time now, for the past several weeks.
		We've been reading from ICE, from Border Patrol, from Customs and Border Enforcement, from just about everybody that it's like worse than a catastrophe, it's worse than a crisis, maybe worse than ever.
		But the New York Times, of all publications I was surprised to learn, had this big long piece about just how bad it is, which maybe that tells you how bad it is, right?
		So we'll go over that, we'll go over a little bit about Chris Kobach, some of his background, and we're gonna try and pray, we're gonna try and meme him into a position at DHS, because maybe this is the...
		Kick in the butt that the president needs to get his act together on immigration.
		So, it'll be a pretty big show.
		Lots to discuss, as I said.
		We're excited, we're high energy, energized by the news, and it's almost the end of the week, right?
		We can see the light at the end of the tunnel.
		It's almost Friday.
		So, that's always a great feeling.
		Before we get into any of the news, however, I do want to discuss something really sad happened today.
		Something really disappointing.
		Today the first privately funded mission to the moon has crashed.
		Oh no!
		On the lunar surface after the apparent failure of its main engine.
		The Israeli spacecraft attempting to be the fourth nation to land on the moon didn't quite make it and you know I just found to go over that it's a real bummer.
		I have to tell you I saw this on the news I don't know if you caught this but it was all over Twitter.
		I guess it was a private company in Israel that was trying to get their spacecraft to land on the surface of the moon.
		They got it into orbit.
		It was just about to land on the surface.
		Engine fails.
		Crashed.
		What a bummer!
		What a bummer.
		What a disaster.
		You know, I saw that and I really was torn up about it.
		I was really upset.
		You know, I guess better luck next time.
unidentified		Right?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And some of the Israelis involved, they said, you know, well, we didn't make it, but we tried.
		I said, ah, yeah, you know, you really did attempt it there.
		And it got me to thinking a little bit.
		You know, I thought, well, I don't know, I just expected all these statistics about IQ and everything.
		I would have thought if anybody could make it happen, landing on the moon, it would have been them.
		Would have been them.
		But you know, maybe they just didn't have somebody on the moon sort of helping them up.
		And maybe that's why it didn't really work out so well.
		Maybe next time they could just strap their spacecraft onto ours?
		Maybe like an American spacecraft?
		Maybe if they could just sort of like latch it on like sort of latch it on right onto our spacecraft maybe next time then they'll be able to get on the moon and claim victory or maybe they'll they'll somehow get somebody up there they can give them the helping hand little boost that they need I guess the IQ wasn't enough that time but but that's alright so I just noticed that I just got me to thinking a little bit but it's just a shame when you see all that ingenuity and I remembered about the American space program because we obviously
		Americans got there first and I did a little digging actually about the American space program Because there was that movie that came out a few years ago that said this hidden figures film And so the reason that we got to the moon was because of these like black women who did all the calculations or something But you know, I did a little research if you get any spare time this week.
		Why don't you check out something called project paperclip?
		Maybe that'll give you some insight.
		I think that'll maybe red pill you about what's going on with the space question.
		Because we were able to get there just fine with our scientists, our guys.
		Israelis, not so much.
		But that's alright.
		Like I said, better luck next time.
		It was just something sad to see.
		You know, we just had a great victory with the black hole photograph.
		And they didn't quite get there.
		But that's alright.
		Was that out of the way?
		I don't know.
		I don't know what made me think of that.
		I don't know why that's even really news related, but just some observations I had just thinking about it.
		But we do just kind of want to dive right into this with Julian Assange because there is a lot to discuss.
		And it's a controversial subject.
		Obviously, Julian Assange is a, he's a big player.
		He's been around since about 2010.
		I think that's when he really rose to prominence.
		Been around longer than that, but that's really when he came into the limelight.
		You probably know him from 2016.
		Julian Assange is leader of the group WikiLeaks, and WikiLeaks was responsible for the DNC leaks.
		A lot of the emails, for example, about Donna Brazile giving the debate questions to Hillary Clinton.
		Or Hillary Clinton saying things like she wants a global common market and free trade and free immigration.
		And saying things like she wants a public position and a private position.
		All of that that we heard about in 2016 came from WikiLeaks.
		So that's probably, I think, the most relevant angle for a lot of younger people.
		You know, he really came on the scene in 2010 with something called Cablegate.
		If you're familiar with Chelsea slash Bradley Manning, who is like withering away in solitary confinement now, the transgender sort of freakazoid who did all those leaks back in 2010.
		He facilitated that as part of WikiLeaks.
		So that was before my time.
		I was in like elementary school and that happened.
		We kind of know him from...
		From the election, but obviously he's a big player and it's a controversial subject.
		People are calling him a journalist, some say he's a hero, some say he's a traitor.
		But the reason he's in the news today is because, and we're going to get into the background, but he's been holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in the United Kingdom for seven years.
		And I guess it happened today or yesterday at some point.
		I guess it depends on the time zone you're looking at.
		The Ecuadorian government revoked his asylum.
		So Ecuador is one of these countries that doesn't extradite people to America or to other countries.
		They tend to be pretty lenient giving out political asylum.
		So, and we'll get into the background, but he fled to the Ecuadorian embassy several years ago, seven years ago.
		He's been holed up there ever since.
		They terminated his asylum, and that allowed the United Kingdom to send police into the embassy, bring him out, arrest him.
		They say that he's facing 12 months in jail because he skipped bail in the United Kingdom when he fled to the embassy.
		And then, obviously, the more dramatic threat is he's facing extradition to the United States, where he could be tortured, could get the death penalty.
		I mean, there's a lot that could happen with him for facilitating the leak of U.S. government-slash-military secrets.
		So it's a pretty big deal.
		And we'll go into the background a little bit, and then I'll give you my take on what has happened.
		You know, I know people like, who's the one at...
		Who's the one in Jim Hoff's publication?
	The girl.
	What's the girl's name?
	She's in the alt-light.
	Her name escapes me right now, but people like Lucian Wintrich and around that circle, they're very big Julian Assange fans.
	Like I said, I've never really been on board that train, never really drank the Kool-Aid with him, but we'll get into my thoughts in a moment.
	So, the background for this.
	Assange, he's 47 years old.
	He's an Australian.
	He founded Wikileaks, which is a non-profit organization that publishes leaked materials from a wide range of sources.
	This is from The Guardian.
	Assange rose to prominence in 2010 when Wikileaks published a series of leaks by Chelsea Manning.
	A former U.S.
	Army soldier.
	In November of that year, WikiLeaks released what would come to be known as Cablegate, a dump of more than 250,000 U.S.
	diplomatic cables.
	And some of those were published before, but a lot of them were exclusive and those were dated between 1966 and 2010.
	They contain diplomatic analysis from world leaders and the diplomatic assessment of host countries and their officials.
	So that was a pretty big deal.
	And over the course of the WikiLeaks career, he revealed a lot more than that.
	He revealed things like secrets that the US government was keeping about their engagement in the Iraq war and a lot of the atrocities that happened, a lot of military secrets.
	He revealed a lot of collusion between the GOP and the Democratic Party to cover up things that were going on in the Middle East.
	A lot, a lot of things basically exposing the operations of the Deep State, the Pentagon, the CIA, sort of all the black operations that go on that we don't really hear about.
	And then of course in 2016 he was publishing the DNC emails, really made a difference in the election.
	So the background on the legal battle though, this is really, you know, because we can talk about the leaks but really the story today is about the asylum being terminated.
	So what happened was that he was in Sweden and there was an arrest warrant that was put out for him and this was in August 2010 for sexual assault.
	So there were two separate sexual assault allegations.
	He fled to the United Kingdom.
	When he went to the United Kingdom he feared that he could get extradited to Sweden and then to the United States and face charges for his crimes for the leaks.
	And then in December 2010 he appeared at an extradition hearing in the United Kingdom where he was granted bail after a legal battle.
	The courts ruled that Assange would be extradited to Sweden and so that's when he fled to the embassy.
	The Ecuadorian Embassy in the United Kingdom.
	So he was on the run from the U.S.
	government.
	He's in Sweden.
	He gets two sexual assault allegations.
	He flees charges from Sweden.
	He goes to the United Kingdom.
	He goes to court in the United Kingdom.
	They rule he has to be extradited to Sweden to face the charges for sexual assault.
	He fears, if I go back to Sweden, ultimately I go to the U.S., I go to jail forever, I get tortured, or You know, the CIA has their way with me.
	So then he flees to the Ecuadorian embassy where he gets asylum.
	And now I guess the Swedish warrant for his arrest has expired, but now that his asylum has been terminated, he's facing charges from the UK for skipping on bail, and then ultimately he'll once again be facing extradition to the United States.
	So that's a very simple version of what's going on here.
	Obviously there's a lot more.
	It's a very long and complicated history with this guy.
	But there's really sort of two sides that have emerged on this.
	And it's a little bit disappointing because the president says that he knows nothing about WikiLeaks.
	He was questioned about this at a press scrum at the White House today, and he says, I know nothing about Julian Assange.
	I don't know anything about WikiLeaks.
	That's not my deal.
	That's not my thing.
	Which is a little bit disappointing, and a lot of the conservatives, a lot of right-wing people are very hard on Julian Assange.
	On the one hand, they liked him in 2016 because he helped us win the election, but then we revert back to this sort of blind support for the deep state, blind support for the government, And he's an enemy of the state.
	He put our soldiers in harm's way, in jeopardy, so he should face jail.
	We have to have law and order, things like this.
	So that's sort of one side of the argument.
	The other side of the argument that I've seen a lot of people making on the left and the right, from people like Glenn Greenwald, people like Michael Tracy, Tulsi Gabbard, a number of others, is that he represents the press.
	He represents journalistic freedom.
	That Him facing extradition to the United States, not being afforded political asylum, is going to have a chilling effect on free speech.
	And I don't really subscribe totally to one or other side.
	I don't, look, I don't want to be a centrist.
	I don't want to appear like, you know, I'm just sort of fence-sitting or whatever, but there's sort of problems with both of these sides.
	I guess we'll start with the right.
	I look at it from the right-wing perspective, and if you're a traditionalist conservative, and what a conservative is is somebody who believes in order, you really can't be in favor of whistleblowers.
	You know, to say that he's a journalist isn't totally accurate.
	He's a whistleblower.
	This is not somebody who goes and reports on things that are public and This is somebody who goes to the scene of a crime and tells you what happens.
	This is somebody who hacks into government computers and leaks classified information.
	And again, if you're a conservative, if you believe in order, that's kind of antithetical to a conservative worldview.
	That you could have the press not only just reporting on things that are going on and trying to catch corruption and things like that, but hacking into computers, leaking things that You know, you would say would have executive privilege or something like that.
	There's sort of a line there.
	There's a line that has to be respected.
	So, on the one hand, you could say, well, the president denying that he knows what WikiLeaks is about, you could say that's maybe a betrayal and you're not standing up for your own people.
	But on the other hand, you could also say that what kind of precedent would that set for the president to pardon somebody like this or to say that this is okay?
	Julian Assange, somebody who helped a military whistleblower, if that's the message you're sending, How can you have any law and order?
	How can you have any secrets in the government?
	At a certain point, we have to acknowledge that the government has to keep some things classified, right?
	And so if you're going to give this sort of blank check to anybody who wants to blow the whistle on things that they don't like in the government, that's really not a good way to maintain order.
	On the one hand, I do sympathize with that argument.
	On the one hand, I do kind of understand the fact that there is this line.
	It does have to be respected.
	It's not really right-wing to be in favor of whistleblowers who could cause tremendous damage to the state.
	But in the current political climate, I think we have to recognize that we don't really like the state.
	Traditionally, that would be the case if we were talking about the American government 100 years ago or 150 years ago or something like that.
	Maybe I would say this, but we look at the situation now where the deep state is just totally above the law.
	Totally unaccountable, and totally working against our own interests, the interests of the people, and then I have to say there's a little bit of a gray area.
	Now, does that mean that he shouldn't face charges?
	Does that mean that it would make a lot of sense for the president to pardon him?
	Not necessarily, but by the same token, I think we have to have a certain mentality that is, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
	At this stage in the game, in 2019, who is a bigger threat to order in the world?
	Order in our society?
	Is it the CIA, the Pentagon, the Defense Department, the State Department, really the entire U.S.
	government?
	Or is it whistleblowers?
	Or is it people like Julian Assange?
	I would have to probably say it's the government.
	You know, if we're gonna really, if we're gonna choose sides here, and that's what it comes down to fundamentally, is making decisions.
	Who is the bigger threat?
	What is the better alternative here?
	Would we rather live in a world where the government can keep everything secret and we don't know anything that's going on, or we have whistleblowers?
	I kind of sympathize with Julian Assange.
	So, in principle, generally speaking, I don't think it's really consistent to be in favor of something like this, but these are desperate times.
	I think the state The state more or less acts as our enemy.
	Now, I'm not going to say they're our enemy because I don't want to be declared an enemy of the state.
	That would be a very bad thing for me.
	So I'm not going to outright say that the state is our enemy.
	But they act as our enemy when they facilitate certain things in the Middle East, certain things in our own country.
	So some of the problems with the right-wing argument is what exactly are we trying to defend?
	What kind of order are we trying to shore up?
	You know, I see a lot of people on Fox.
	I see a lot of Republicans that are very, they're very draconian about Julian Assange.
	We got to put him in jail, throw away the key and torture him.
	He's an enemy of the state.
	Well, I don't know.
	Are we really friends of the states?
	I don't really feel like a friend of the state, I have to tell you.
	I don't feel like the government's my friend, you know, with how they spy on Americans, the people they bring into this country, the terror that they visit upon this country.
	And you can read into that what you will.
	So that's sort of my position on the right wing take.
	On the left wing take, you know, here's another thing where there are problems with the left, where they say, well, he's a freedom fighter and he's a journalist.
	Well again, he's not really a journalist.
	You have to respect that line.
	So people that are saying this is going to have a chilling effect on press freedom, I don't really think that's the case because there's a fine line again between somebody who's hacking into US government computers and leaking privileged information between heads of state and military secrets.
	Things that You know, probably do compromise people that are out in the field, service people, military men, whatever.
	So I don't know if that's necessarily true.
	But I do tend to sympathize more at the left side that says that we do have a right to know what's going on in the government.
	You know, the extent to which there are lies, It does constitute abuse.
	You know, it's sort of a different system now than it was maybe 50 years ago, where you look at something like the Cuban Missile Crisis, for example.
	You look at the Kennedy administration, what was going on in the Cold War, and the press knew things at the time that were maybe being lied about, or, you know, whatever.
	Even you look at Franklin D. Roosevelt, he was in the wheelchair, nobody knew about it, the press covered it up, where there was this certain understanding between the government and the press of The common good?
	That there were certain things that it's probably best the public doesn't know and the press will sort of respect those boundaries.
	But I think we've kind of gone way past that.
	It's kind of gotten to the point where it's not like it's really in the public interest if we're covering up things with the Iraq war and things going on in Yemen and war crimes and deceit at the highest level, collusion between two parties.
	At that point, you probably are a journalist.
	I think at that point, you probably are doing better work as a whistleblower than as a conventional journalist.
	And I'll say there's also a lot of hypocrisy on the left.
	It's sort of interesting.
	They made this Jamal Khashoggi into a martyr.
	You remember the Saudi journalist who entered the Turkish consulate and disappeared, and they chopped him up into a million pieces, and everybody's crying bloody murder for months.
	Saying the Saudis are barbarians, and the U.S.
	government is complicit, and Donald Trump has blood on his hands, and the Congress is voting to end the authorization for the use of force in Yemen because of the journalist dying.
	Really?
	And the guy was best friends with Osama Bin Laden, and the Muslim Brotherhood, and Al-Qaeda, and all the rest.
	So it's sort of interesting that, you know, the journalists, all they do day in and day out is break their arms, patting themselves on the back.
	The truth is difficult, and an apple is an apple, and democracy dies in darkness, and all this other stuff.
	And here now you've got, you know, kind of a real ballsy guy.
	You know, this isn't somebody that's writing about how Kamala Harris likes a tribe called Quest, and isn't that so hilarious, and all this other stuff.
	Here's somebody who's actually going toe-to-toe with the U.S. government, going right up against it.
	You know, they're on the verge of drone striking this guy, right?
	And they're starving him, and they're using psychological warfare.
	He's basically in jail in this Ecuadorian embassy for seven years, and he needs medical treatment and so on, and it's kind of hush-hush.
	You know, they're not really defending him.
	They're not really out there.
	A few of them are.
	Like I said, the Glenn Greenwald types, the Tulsi Gabbard types, but not really so much anybody else.
	So you get sort of a rich hypocrisy that we see.
	Who is really telling the truth here?
	I think somebody like Julian Assange kind of shows the world the funny side, right?
	Kind of shows us who the liars are, who the frauds are.
	Now, again, as a rule, Not everybody can be like this.
	I think you can only have one Julian Assange, and in that way he's sort of a tragic hero.
	I think that's the way we have to look at him.
	Here is somebody who did what he had to do, he knew the consequences, he knew what he was doing, and now he's going to face jail time.
	And I think we can at once understand that what he did was good, and ultimately he's our ally, but at the same time understand that that really, that kind of mentality That in principle cannot be tolerated.
	So we can say he's a hero, he's a fighter, and he'll probably have to go to jail.
	So it's complicated.
	It's sort of a complicated subject, and I hope people don't interpret that as a cop-out or something, but I really am torn on that because it is tough.
	On the one hand, we do want to know what's going on.
	The government is hurting the people and abusing their power and lying to the people, but on the other hand, we do have to have some semblance of order.
	All of that might be true, but by the same token, if we in principle tolerate people at the highest levels of government who have this privileged information, who have confidential information, just leaking it to journalists for whatever agenda, for whatever purpose, that's not really a recipe for a stable, healthy, sustainable situation.
	Even if we're in a bad situation as it is.
	So that's kind of how I view Julian Assange.
	Sort of as a vigilante, a tragic hero, one of these Watchmen type characters who he accepted what he had to do.
	He's probably the only one who could have done it.
	And he did it to the benefit of mankind, and now he'll probably just have to face the consequence.
	Now, I don't see how he gets out of this one.
	I will say, though, it really does sort of irk me the way Donald Trump responded to this.
	I understand that it's sort of a sticky situation for him more than anybody.
	For somebody like me, it'd probably be easy to say, yeah, go get him, Julian Assange is epic, and, you know, I don't really have to pay lip service to this idea of tolerating in principle whistleblowing.
	With the head of state, it's a little bit more tricky.
	You know, you understand where if you're the president, and you pardon this guy, or you say something that's too nice, or something that's too lenient towards Julian Assange, you could see how that could cause problems.
	That could cause some rebellion within the ranks.
	If you're undermining law and order and you're the chief enforcer of law in the country and that all of that notwithstanding the fact that he's under investigation ongoing for Russia collusion and WikiLeaks was involved in the DNC and you've got Edward Snowden in Russia and that's not really connected but I mean you know how they try and paint all these connections together so I get all that but
	That he goes on the campaign trail, and how many times does he say, thanks to WikiLeaks, WikiLeaks leaked this about Hillary Clinton.
	I mean, he must have mentioned this a dozen times at the rallies.
	And then for them to ask him about it, and he says, I have no idea what that's about.
	That's not my deal.
	I don't know anything about that.
	It just strikes me as cowardly.
	It just strikes me as slimy.
	You know, this is the one moment, and there's a lot of things I'm disappointed in the president for.
	With the funding bill, with DHS, like policy-wise, it's clear he's lost control of the administration.
	But I've never really been disappointed in his character, him as a man.
	Maybe he's incompetent, maybe he's careless or whatever.
	He's, you know, abdicated his responsibilities.
	But this was really the first time when I sort of shook my head and I said, that's really just unbecoming.
	You know, you could be goofy and silly and not really presidential, and I don't really mind all that, but just to sort of slink away, it just struck me as kind of spineless.
	Oh, I don't know anything about that.
	Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, that's not my deal.
	When you could go back and see how many clips of WikiLeaks, thanks to the wonder of WikiLeaks, we found out about Hillary Clinton and so on.
	And he's done that with other things, you know.
	There's a big difference between a fence and a wall, and then he tries to massage it.
	You know, I get that for political expedience purposes, why you might need some maneuverability on that, but this was something where even if he had said he's a traitor, and yeah, he helped us in 16, but he's a traitor or something, even if he took a strong line in the wrong direction, or in the right direction, whatever your interpretation, I would add a little bit more respect, but to just kind of play dumb, and so I don't know anything about that.
	It was just kind of disappointing.
	And maybe he has to do that.
	Maybe there's a legal thing there that I'm not totally with it on.
	You do have this Russia investigation, which could be deadly, and that was a big part of it.
	But it really was disappointing to see that.
	So I don't know.
	It's sort of a lot of conflicting feelings about a character like this because it really forces us to ask some tough questions on what we're willing to do to get where we need to go.
	On the one hand, we do interpret the state as partially the enemy, this institution, and it has a lot of people.
	There's a lot of good people in there, but also a lot of bad actors.
	And it really calls into question, what are your principles about order and disorder?
	I think, again, the proper take is we can't really tolerate this stuff in principle, but this incident of it was, I think, a good thing.
	I think we need people like Julian Assange, but you can't really give a blanket go-ahead, a blanket green light to this kind of stuff, because don't forget, it's not like Julian Assange was our guy, right?
	I mean, he did help us in the 2016 election, but that's not like it was because he's a reactionary, or he was for Donald Trump, or he was for the right wing.
	It was because he's opposed to corruption, and Hillary Clinton just happened to be the most corrupt person in American politics ever.
	So, he ended up releasing a lot of stuff, I think in the last year or two, which was actually harmful to the police, harmful to the military, leaking, like, names and personal information, and a lot of people were, like, surprised by that.
	They were like, who's running WikiLeaks all of a sudden?
	Or maybe he's not in control of WikiLeaks, but you can start to see where, again, that in principle can sort of be problematic.
	It wasn't really ever ideologically on our side.
	It just happened to coincide with our interests, and maybe that's good enough for a lot of people, but in principle we can't tolerate that kind of behavior.
	So that's sort of my take.
	I don't know if that's making sense.
	I don't know if I'm really articulating it well, but I am very... I'm ambivalent about him.
	I don't really have, you know, a really strong ideological position one way or the other.
	Some people are hell-bent on this Free Assange!
	He's a hero!
	He's the greatest man who ever lived!
	You know, some people are like that.
	I'm a little bit torn.
	I'm very much not with the whistleblowing.
	I don't know if it constitutes journalism.
	I think there does have to be a line respected, but then again, we are in these times where I think our interests happen to coincide.
	What he's doing helps us, and insofar as that's happening, I think we have to be with him.
unidentified		So...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's Assange.
		And we'll see what happens to him.
		God only knows.
		I do not envy the situation that they're put in.
		You know, even somebody like Bradley Manning, who is a hardcore leftist and whatever, you can't help but wonder.
		Bradley Manning leaks government secrets with the help of Julian Assange.
		He gets put in jail, he gets released from jail, and then he becomes trans.
		He becomes this trans psycho nutjob, and you have to wonder, like, is that, like, the work of the government?
		You know, it used to be, if you went against the state, they'd just give you the death penalty.
		You know, if you're Julius and, uh, what's-her-name, Ethel Rosenberg or whatever, they'd just kill you.
		You know, they just kill you, or they put you in jail forever, and you're never heard from again.
		But you have to wonder, now, did they do that to Bradley Manning to make an example out of him?
		Were they like, okay, we're gonna put you in jail and release you, and then we're gonna show the world, this is what happens when you F with the CIA.
		And this guy comes out, and he's growing his hair out, he gets his Adam's apple removed, he's putting on lipstick, and doing all this other freakazoid stuff, and then he's, then they put him in solitary confinement, I mean, You have to wonder, like, is that the work of the government?
		Are they gonna do that to you?
		Where it's like, back in the day they just put you in jail, now they're gonna turn you into a woman?
		No, no!
		You have to wonder, what's gonna happen to me in 25 years?
		Normally they just come up and shoot somebody like me, or choke me out in my car or something.
		You have to wonder, in 25 years, am I just gonna get urges?
		Am I gonna start growing my hair out?
		People are gonna be like, what's going on, Nick?
		What's the deal?
		Is everything okay?
		And one day I'll just come on the show in a dress?
		I'll just come on the show with lipstick like nothing ever happened.
		This is Nicole, and you're watching Anarchy First, and I am an agent of Satan.
		You have to wonder if that's what's going on, because they do this stuff.
		MKUltra.
		They didn't close that down in 72.
		It goes on.
		Britney Spears, Miley Cyrus.
		Amanda Bynes?
		I don't know.
		I don't know.
		So I don't envy Julian Assange.
		He's got a lot of balls to do what he did.
		Because you know, if he ever gets extradited to the United States, not gonna be a pretty picture.
		I don't know what they're gonna do to him.
		And not like it's been easy so far, right?
		I mean, they say that when he was in the Ecuadorian embassy, First of all, he had all kinds of medical complications, and they would not give him a pass, basically.
		I don't know the technical terminology, but they wouldn't give him a pass to leave the embassy to go to a hospital to get proper medical treatment.
		So he was literally dying in the embassy.
		And then on top of that, I believe there were reports of some sort of weird things going on, like they were trying to influence his health.
		People speculated maybe he was being poisoned.
		Maybe there was some kind of other weaponry being used against him.
		So it's pretty messed up stuff.
		I don't like where things are going.
		You don't think that all the technology that's being developed isn't going to be used against you?
		Or might not already be being used against you?
		Because you see what's been going on just in the last like 30 years.
		Where they talk about technology, where they can point it at you, and they can make a message whisper in your ear.
		I mean, there's all kinds of things that go on.
		Weird, like, psychological things they can do to you, they can induce all kinds of effects, and that's things that we've known about for a long time.
		God only knows what we don't know about, what's already being used against us, or has yet to be used against us.
		I think we're gonna get to the point pretty soon where basically, We're all going to be prisoners of the state and that's why I am sort of leaning a little bit more towards chaos.
		Normally I'm a very hardcore, staunch, conservative, illiberal, reactionary type but now that I see what's being developed technology-wise where they talk about drugs that you can take that disable parts of your brain and make you less religious or make you less xenophobic or they put your brain in a machine and now you're not depressed anymore and things like that.
		They spray a little thing on your shoulders and now you don't produce sperm anymore Everybody thinks that's only going to be used for civilian proper purposes?
		Voluntarily?
		I don't think so.
		I don't know about that.
		So I think we're going to get to a point pretty soon where, like, these two trend lines are going to converge of government corruption and technological advancement.
		And at that point, basically, resistance will become impossible.
		We will basically be living in an open air prison.
	And like, yeah, you can in theory go against the government, but then they'll just turn you into gay tranny or something, you know?
	Or they'll just cut your brain in half, and you'll come out like, Hi everybody!
	I love the government!
	I love the government!
	I love immigrants!
	I'm gonna have a black son now!
	I'm gonna have a black son with my transgender wife, and I'm gonna become Jewish today!
	You know, you have to wonder, Is that down the road?
	Look, it sounds crazy now, but you know, I sounded crazy two years ago when I was talking about population replacement and all this other stuff and now here it is.
	So...
	Might be time to get a second passport.
	That's all I'm saying.
	Might be time.
	It's not illegal to get a second passport.
	You can do it.
	Maybe go to the Marshall Islands.
	Maybe go somewhere else where they don't have an extradition treaty.
	Marshall Islands is a bad idea because they're a partner of America.
	But maybe go to Venezuela.
	Maybe go to Cuba.
	Maybe go to the Congo.
	Not such a bad idea.
	Maybe the Congo's not looking so bad anymore, right?
	Yeah, okay, they've got all sorts of infectious diseases and poverty and drug lords, but they don't have the U.S.
	government there, so maybe that's a better bet, right?
	So that's Julian Assange.
	Those are my thoughts about that.
	A little bit conflicting.
	It's a very confusing time, right?
	But our last story of the day here, wow, we spent a lot of time talking about that.
	But our other story for today, I really wanted to go over again this New York Times article because I was genuinely surprised at what they're reporting on.
	Because we've been talking about this for weeks and weeks and weeks, just giving you a sheer idea of how bad the border crisis is from Breitbart, from New York Post, from Washington Examiner, and sources like this.
	But this is from the New York Times.
	They do this big article and they give you some pretty striking statistics and reports here just to give you an even better idea of what's going on.
	From the New York Times, they say that immigration courts now have more than 800,000 pending cases.
	Each one takes an average of 700 days to process that.
	Think about that.
	I had never heard that number before.
	800,000 pending immigration cases.
	Average one takes about two years to process.
	So, do the math.
	What are we going to be processing these things for?
	Like 1.6 million years?
	I guess that's if you take them one at a time.
	But, I mean, you get the idea, right?
	They say now that smugglers are buying radio ads in Central America.
	This is the New York Times saying, quote, if you ever want to go to the United States, now is the time.
	So they're actively now buying radio ads.
	That used to be a big myth, by the way, or the left called that a myth.
	If you remember, the president said when he announced, or then he was the candidate in 2015, when he announced he was running, Trump said they're sending people over the border.
	And a lot of people in the news said, oh, they're not sending anybody.
	They're not sending people.
	Well, a lot of people, again, Coulter said, no, they actually are.
	They're giving pamphlets, whatever.
	Now this is the New York Times reporting it.
	So it's kind of funny how quickly things change, right?
	Four years ago, they said, oh, nobody's being sent over here.
	Well, how else are they getting here and learning the right things to say?
	And, you know, it's not exactly easy to get across the border.
	Well, it kind of is, but you do have to kind of have a little bit of know-how or guidance or a coyote or something.
	And now the New York Times even reporting, yeah, smugglers are literally buying radio ads and telling people, go illegally cross the border into America.
	So, you have that happening.
	And then this is from, and this is incredible too, this is from the vice president of a local border patrol union.
	He says, quote, the majority of our agents get sick.
	Infectious disease is everywhere.
	This is according to Vice President Cabrera, who is in the Border Patrol's Migrant Processing Center.
	He says that they all have chickenpox, they have scabies, tuberculosis, you name it.
	It's probably been through that building, so it's dangerous.
	It's dangerous for our agents.
	It's dangerous for the detainees that don't have anything.
	So, here's another one.
	Where I debated destiny last year, it was in our second debate, and we were talking about immigration, and I brought up the fact that they're bringing infectious diseases.
	And this is happening all over the country now, by the way.
	They're forcing people in New York City to have measles vaccines because there's a measles outbreak.
	I believe there's a measles outbreak happening in Chicago.
	And even in this case, they're talking about all these infectious diseases.
	Which are ancient in America but that are now coming back across the border.
	All these things used to be basically controversial.
	The scale of the immigration, that they're abusing the asylum system, you look at the the processing thing, that they're sending them over, the infectious diseases.
	It's gotten so bad even the New York Times is reporting on all this stuff.
	And there is a little bit of a white pill here.
	I think that things have gotten to such a bad point And now this is optimistic, okay?
	This is hopeful thinking.
	I'm not saying I'm predicting this, okay?
	I'm not saying this is a shoe-in here.
	But I'm hoping that this is, the trajectory of this situation is that maybe it's gotten so bad that this will force the president to act.
	I'm hoping beyond hope.
	Because you have to really look at this situation and wonder, how can we really be impotent after this?
	Or even if the liberal media, even if like Democrats are talking about how bad it is, maybe this is what is needed.
	If it's so bad that even they can see it, maybe that's the impetus that is required to get us in the right direction.
	And we look at somebody like Chris Kobach, this would be such a white pill.
	I would be so excited to see this if Chris Kobach got in.
	They did a big spread about him in Breitbart today.
	Just to give you an idea, he graduated at the top of his class at Harvard University in 1988 before earning his doctorate in political science at Oxford in 92.
	Afterward, he earned a law degree from Yale in 1995.
	So, top of his class at Harvard, Oxford, Yale, these are like the best schools in the world.
	Well serving as a judicial clerk in the U.S.
	10th Circuit Court of Appeals for Judge Tatcha, Kobach was hired as a constitutional law professor at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law.
	In 2001, Kobach won one of 12 coveted White House fellowships.
	And then while overseeing the Justice Department's efforts to close loopholes in the legal immigration system, after 9-11, he created the National Security Entry Slash Exit Registration System, which is the first entry and exit system in U.S.
	history.
	In 2002, while at the Justice Department, Kobach overhauled the Board of Immigration Appeals to streamline the appellate court system to fast-track cases where outcomes were easily determined, and that eliminated a lot of waste and a lot of the bad things going on there.
	Years later, in 2009, Kobach co-authored Arizona's mandatory E-Verify law, which was taken all the way to the Supreme Court, where it was ultimately ruled constitutional.
	The reform led by Kobach resulted not only in mandatory E-Verify laws being adopted in Arizona, but also in non-border states like Mississippi and Alabama.
	So I look at these two things going on here, border crisis, and now we have a real opportunity here.
	Nielsen's out at DHS.
	Her deputy's out at DHS.
	Stephen Miller's orchestrating a big purge happening.
	Kobach is in touch with the White House.
	Here is really a great opportunity to make it happen.
	There's no better option than Kobach.
	Now, a lot of people are astroturfing this other guy called Cuccinelli or something like that, who's terrible.
	All the neocons, all the Koch brother type people, heritage people are pushing this other guy who's not qualified, not confirmable.
	But this would be a real opportunity.
	I'm not saying it's gonna happen.
	I'm not saying it's likely or there's a strong probability.
	But I'm saying that we should really keep our eyes open here.
	And these are the opportunities that are always sort of around the corner.
	This is why you never get totally blackpilled.
	Now I've been blackpilled for a long time.
	But I've always maintained there's room for course correction.
	We should probably wait and see.
	We can use our leverage.
	We can say, look, we're not going to vote for you.
	Earn back our vote.
	Here's an opportunity to win back our vote.
	Here's an opportunity.
	If he puts Kobach in charge of DHS, if he cleans house with the rest of the administration, you know, as much as we need, just as much as we need.
	If Kobach cleans up DHS, I think that's somebody who's serious enough that we could start to reconstitute a serious nationalist agenda in the White House.
	If we have Kobach and Miller and Trump, we're a lot better off than we were six months ago, right?
	Or a year ago, or whatever.
	Because it seems like the nationalist agenda went from Miller, Trump, Bannon, a few others, people like Sessions, Maybe a couple I'm forgetting.
	Two Sessions is out, Bannon is out, Miller's influence declines, then you get the rise of Kelly, the rise of this Mick Mulvaney character, so there's no nationalist influence.
	If we're able to start building it back up, Miller helps bring Kobach in, Kobach comes in, maybe some other people come in, I think maybe there might be still time to get us back on track here.
	We're starting to build some fencing, it's not ideal, it's not great, but Maybe we could still make something out of it.
	I don't want to over promise, okay?
	I don't want anybody to get their hopes up.
	I'm not getting my hopes up.
	I have no expectations and I get disappointed, right?
	So I don't want to get anybody's hopes up here.
	I'm not getting my own hopes up here.
	But I am trying to illustrate for you this is big.
	This is a big opportunity here.
	You've got a big crisis.
	Everybody wants to take care of it.
	Even the liberal media says it has to be cleaned up.
	It's that bad.
	I think That's a wake-up call for the president.
	I think he kind of understands this because everybody's pissed off.
	Kobach is in talks to replace DHS.
	There's a big opening there.
	We gotta pray that this happens.
	I see people pushing this hashtag, hire Kobach.
	I don't know if that stuff really works, but it might be worth it to try.
	Hashtag, hire Kobach.
	We'll see.
	But it is exciting.
	If he pulls it off, if this happens, I might be back on the Trump train.
	Who knows?
	We have to see some things going down.
	You know, I've been saying all week, Nothing happens till it happens.
	We cannot make the same mistake we made last year.
	Last year the mistake was, if Trump says it, it's like it already happened.
	If Trump says, oh, I'm going to take care of this, I'm going to take care of that, people treated it like it was the gospel truth.
	I'm going to withdraw troops from Syria.
	I'm going to, you know, do whatever.
	I'm going to declare a state of emergency.
	And we just had last week this total cucking, this total embarrassment on closing the border.
	Remember that?
	And now it's, I'll wait a year and then we'll tariff cars.
	So, have to wait and see, but it's a very good opportunity.
	It's very exciting, and I think people are not really understanding how big this is.
	So, Kouback's a very solid guy.
	If anybody can turn it around, it's him.
	He's got the expertise.
	He's competent.
	He's got the experience.
	He's a lawyer.
	He's smart.
	This is our guy.
	And, even better than that, think about what that would do down the line.
	Again, I don't want to get anybody's hopes up, but he gets in at DHS.
	He failed to win the governorship, right?
	He didn't get a position in the administration in the first year, but he gets into DHS.
	He cleans up immigration.
	He gets in the spotlight.
	Who knows?
	A lot of people have said, and I've talked to a lot of people in the administration, people very close to power.
	I'll say that much.
	And their top pick, every one of them, is Kobach.
	Their top pick for possible successor, possible, you know, whoever could survive this administration and keep the Trump revolution going, prevent Nikki Haley types from taking over, they all say it's Kobach.
	So, don't want to get anybody's hopes up, but it is just something to demonstrate.
	Politics moves very quickly, things happen unexpectedly, This is just the game that we play.
	Some days are good.
	Some days are bad.
	Some years are bad.
	Sometimes a decade is bad.
	But, you know, when the chips are down, that's when people really show their character.
	So, we'll see.
	We'll see what happens, but it's an exciting opportunity.
	So that's Quebec, but we're running out of time here, so I do want to take a look at our Super Chats and we'll see what you guys are saying.
	We'll see how you guys are reacting about Assange.
	I want to see what the reaction is because I really don't know where my audience is leaning on this one.
	I imagine people probably lean more towards Assange, that he's a good guy and everything.
	But I wonder if there are reactionaries who don't like him so much.
	So we'll take a look here.
	Philip Fry says, Hey big guy, just saw the new How do you watch a scene in a trailer with, like, no dialogue and you think you know everything that that scene's about?
	You haven't even seen the movie yet!
	Wait to see the movie!
	Subway at 2 a.m., a bit reaching.
	Well, why don't we wait to see the movie before we make a judgment, right?
	How do you watch a scene in a trailer with, like, no dialogue and you think you know everything that that scene's about?
	You haven't even seen the movie yet.
	Wait to see the movie.
	But, yeah, it looks interesting.
	Lauren Rose says, Nick, we're nearly two hours into the show and you won't answer my $2 super chat about the meaning of life comment.
	Coward!
	Yeah, I know we're gonna get a lot of that tonight.
	Really, really excited to get more of that this evening.
	Eric Wright says, hard times create strong Catboys.
	Strong Catboys create good times.
	Good times create feminine Catboys.
	Feminine Catboys create hard times.
	Such is life.
	Such is history, right?
	That is, that is how it goes.
	I think we're in a time of feminine catboys, right?
	Which is a real bummer.
	I have to say, it's a really disappointing thing.
	Mutant Joe says, hey Nick, who's your favorite person to argue with?
	Favorite person to argue with?
	That's a good question.
	I don't know.
	You know, I really liked arguing with James Alsup.
	I have to tell you.
	And it got a little contentious on more than one occasion.
	It got a little heated.
	We had some heated game room moments on Nationalist Review, but I really did like arguing with him because what I liked about James was he had a thick skin, he was quick, and at the end of the day, we were just bros at the end of it.
	You know, my biggest problem these days is So often you get in an argument with people you don't really know where you stand with them afterwards because you don't know if they like take it personally or they get weird about it.
	So, and I can't really think of anybody who I've really had a lot of arguments with on a consistent basis like that, you know, on stream or otherwise.
	Maybe James, maybe PartyGoy.
	I really like to argue with PartyGoy because we like to banter and we go back and forth a lot.
	So he's fun.
	He's funny.
	So I'd probably say Jason, my friend Party Goy, or maybe James.
	Just off the top of my head.
	I argue with everybody.
	I like to argue with everybody.
	Bill Dinks of Sam Hyde's Kickstarter TV 2 starts on the 15th.
	Are you subscribed?
	No, I gotta I gotta get back on the gumroad I was on the gumroad and he stopped putting out content for like a year.
	So I had to unsubscribe And also because he didn't respond to my email So I was like, you know what you're not putting out content and he didn't reply to my email Okay enough with this guy, but if he's putting out Kickstarter TV 2 I'm subbing I'm coming back I like Sam.
	I like Sam Hyde.
	But, you know, look, I'm just as broke as he is, so I figured if this is just charity at this point, look, it can go both ways, right?
	Rob says, after last night, no more black, white, or Joker pills for me.
	I'm all about lemon pills now.
	Lemon and diamond pills.
	That's right.
	I'm diamond-pilled.
	I'm Ninja-ghini-pilled.
	Your mother says, do you disavow alt-right leader?
	Ben, make it 110 Shapiro.
	I do disavow Ben Shapiro.
	I disavow the alt-right and all their leaders.
	Ben Shapiro, Candace Owens, Charlie Kirk, all of them.
	I think they're all reprehensible.
	They're all morally reprehensible.
	I can't stand the alt-right.
	Terrible people.
	Candace Owens, Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro.
	These radicals, these extremists.
	Hey, speaking of which, for the last Super Chatter talking about the Lemons, you know, I streamed on DLive last night, and I was the number two streamer on the whole website.
	Pretty incredible stuff.
	You know, Twitch kicks me off earlier this week, I go on DLive, I'm the number two streamer on the whole website.
	That's not saying much because they're relatively new, but it was PewDiePie, me, and then I had more viewers than Fortnite and Apex Legends combined.
	All Fortnite and Apex Legends players.
	So do subscribe.
	Check me out at dlive.com slash nickchafewantus.
	I'll be streaming again over the weekend.
	Try to get the PewDiePie shekels.
	We're trying to get it, right?
	We'll see.
	Eric Wright says, they would have made it to the moon if they had some diversity.
	Too many old white men.
	They clearly needed some black women and trans lgbt bbq people.
	Yeah, maybe they, maybe that's what they needed, you know?
	I look over at Israel, it's too many old white guys.
	Too many old white guys.
	They need some of those Africans.
	You know, they wonder why they didn't make it to the moon.
	Did they have the hidden figures?
	Where were your hidden figures, Jews?
	Oy vey, where's the hidden figures?
	Didn't have them.
	They got all the calculations wrong because they didn't have the, didn't have the hidden figures.
	Wait, was that a pun?
	Now that I think about it, was that a pun about, like, mathematical figures?
	Probably not.
	But yeah, I think that's what did it.
	No blacks, no homosexuals, no Hispanics.
	Well no, actually I take that back.
	There's a lot of homosexuals in Israel.
	I think it's like the homosexual capital of the world in Tel Aviv or something.
	But yeah, they just didn't have enough of that diversity.
	That's probably what did it.
	That's how we got to the moon.
	That's how I remember it.
	Look, just the TRS stuff, I don't know why people watch that anymore.
	It's not even really like a competition thing.
	A lot of it is just very stale.
	Like, I don't have a personal beef with any of those guys anymore.
	Like, I don't mind jazz hands.
	I don't mind any of those guys.
	Like, I don't... I don't have a gripe with them.
	But, you know me.
	I do my thing.
	They do their thing.
	I don't really... I don't really understand how you could watch this show and at the same time watch that show only because we have a very different sort of a vibe, very different sort of a look, an aesthetic, a tone.
	And so, Look, what they do is kind of cringy to me.
	And maybe they say the same thing about me, but I don't know how you could watch both at the same time.
	You know what I'm saying?
	For example, I don't know how somebody could watch something like Bill Mitchell and watch this show.
	I don't know how somebody could watch God Emperor Trump podcast, you know, or the Mogapede podcast and watch this show.
	And a lot of people might say, oh, well, you both white pill about Trump.
	Well, maybe the message is similar, but the rhetoric, the sort of style is so different.
	I don't know how you could like stomach one and the other at the same time, you know, because we directly attack the boomer type content and vice versa.
	So I don't know how you do it.
	But yeah, I mean, watch whatever you want.
	Sure.
	Fascination is less offensive to me than, uh, TDS, you know.
	The name is, again, cringe and fascination.
	Like, who are you trying to impress?
	Who are you trying to offend with that, you know?
	So, so that kind of thing is just a little, and the jazz hands make feels like, if you're gonna have a fake name, how about a cool fake name, right?
	So, um, it's just not my thing.
	It's just not my thing, okay?
	No personal gripe, just not my thing.
	Fine by me.
	What is that a reference to?
	I'm not picking it up right now.
	you want to watch fine by me rianne says seriously this is effing crazy we've got to get down to the gulch right now scott's down there he needs our help what is that uh what is that a reference to i'm not i'm not picking it up right now steve z says looking forward to seeing your speech at amren any advice for a first-time attendee other than don't be fat check um well what do you mean in the What kind of advice would you need?
	You're just going to a public event.
	It's not like, uh, I don't understand.
	Um, they're very good about their OPSEC and everything.
	There's not really anything you need to worry about.
	Like last year, they had guards all over the place.
	It was like a military base.
	And I didn't see a single journalist the whole time I was there, which was very impressive.
	You know, throughout the years you go to certain other conferences and it's like they invite the worst... excuse me... they invite the worst journalists and they practically invite them to dox everybody in attendance.
	It's not going to name any names.
	We know what I'm talking about.
	But in American Renaissance they did a very good job.
	No protesters, no antifa, no journalists anywhere in sight.
	There were state troopers everywhere, police everywhere.
	Very, very good stuff.
	So...
	So, no advice in the way of that, if that's what you're talking about.
	One Pie says, Nick, you're great.
	Really appreciate the show.
	Impressed with your knowledge and presentation.
	I'm leaf, but really I'm a German colonist of leaf land.
	Well, thank you.
	Glad you like the show.
	And good to know.
	Thank you for sharing about your ancestry.
	That's okay.
	I mean, I'm an Italian colonizer in America.
	I'm a Roman colonizer.
	And I am Mexican, so I'm part Spanish conquistador, right?
	So we've all got that going on.
	Scotticus says, Weirner Von Braun, a true Faustian spirit.
	Keep up the good work, big guy.
	Not familiar, but thanks.
	Duke of Walton says, You hear about Spencer's subtle shot at you on JF's show, saying we had majoritarianism.
	Look at how it all turned out.
	Thoughts, good sir?
	Either way, I enjoy both of your perspective and efforts.
	I love the bait.
	Everybody always trying to bait.
	Everybody always trying to bait another confrontation.
	That doesn't sound like it was a subtle shot.
	You know, am I like uniquely representative of majoritarianism?
	I don't think so, right?
	So I don't see the connection there.
	But look, anyway, why do we have to bother with this stuff?
	We did it.
	We did it already.
	We did the rivalry in like 17.
	We did it again in 18.
	We did it again in the last months of 2019.
	Why are people always hell-bent on starting or renewing drama?
	And over something like that, like he didn't even, that wasn't even a direct shot.
	I don't even think that was an indirect shot.
	You know, so look, he's going to do his own thing.
	We've gone our separate ways.
	As far as I can tell, you know, we've sort of left it where it is.
	And we've reached sort of an understanding that, you know, they're going to do their thing.
	We're going to do our thing.
	And look, that's the way it is.
	You know, I don't know why we have to keep getting into it again.
	What more is there to be said?
	I think we've all said our piece.
	You know, I've said my feelings about him.
	He said his feelings about me.
	And, you know, there it is.
	There it is.
	So, we tried to bring it back together once before.
	It didn't work out.
	It was his fault.
	That's okay.
	You don't want to, you know, even be conciliatory.
	But at a distance, fine.
	We'll just be at odds at a distance.
	But, you know, that's fine.
	So...
	And that's all I'll say about that.
	Blue Force says, we are all Julian Assange.
	We could be next.
	The government is not our friend.
	Free Julian Assange.
	Yeah, I don't know if I'd go that far, but I definitely agree with the fact that the government is not our friend and, you know, he should be freed.
	Pie says, Knickers thinking farming would be the life for you.
	Check out Farmlink.
	There are boomers without children looking for high IQ Knickers.
	Grab the land.
	Okay, yeah, I'm not particularly suited for the farm life, but for all the knickers that are, you know, go right ahead.
	Look, I'm a born and raised... I'm a suburbanite, but, you know, my family are city folks.
	My parents are in the city, my grandparents are in the city, my great-grandparents are in the city.
	So, I don't really have these agrarian roots that everybody's...
	You know, really gung-ho about everybody talking about the the countryside, the rural life.
	You know, I meet this guy Sharia LaBeouf at American Renaissance and he's telling me all this stuff about how he's got like one stoplight in his town and all this, how remote his place is and I'm like, I like, I don't know how you do that.
	I just can't relate.
	It's not in my genes, okay?
	But yeah, for all the farmer people out there, for all the Farmer Brown's out there.
	Want to go check out the fields and the wheat fields and all that.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	Michelangelo says, Great show tonight, Nick.
	Suggestion for a premium show topic.
	Nick's critique of Aquinas' just war theory from a Hobbesian interstate relations perspective.
	Thank you, nerd.
	Thank you for the suggestion.
	Why don't you leave it on a comment on the premium show?
	I don't understand, but thank you for the super chat, but it's just... Well, I thank you.
	I'm being rude.
	I'm being rude.
	I'm trying to work on that, trying to be nice to my super chatters, okay?
	Thank you.
	I do appreciate you.
	That's an interesting topic.
	Well, I mean, my initial thoughts on this is that Here's my perspective.
	I basically subscribe to the just war theory, the just war phenomenon, but you have to really articulate what you mean by war.
	You know, as we stand as America basically is like an empire.
	An empire has to conduct certain operations that don't necessarily constitute a war, but nonetheless are like military actions, kinetic military actions.
	So I would say I subscribe to just war theory, but You know, as an empire that is trying to sustain this hegemonic American order, we do have to do things, right?
	We have to take care of business.
	So, I mean, that's really my general thoughts, but yeah, maybe I'll do a show about that.
	Black Swan says, quote, I mean, you gotta participate joyfully in the suffering of the world.
	Tony Soprano.
	Blackpilling to white pill mentality.
	Exactly right.
	That's what we're about.
	Well that's that the final look the final red pill I guess or the final white pill or whatever is realizing that uh you know there is no point that we can reach where like everything is one and everybody's happy.
	Why do people think that this time it's uniquely unjust or this suffering is really unique to us?
	Our generation look I'm a zoomer.
	I can say this.
	I'm not one of these out-of-touch boomers, so I can say this.
	Our zoomers, they, they view our, our plight as somehow extraordinary.
	You know, it's really, this is really just so hard.
	What a burden this is.
	As if every other generation hasn't suffered, and don't get me wrong, the boomers had it really easy, relatively, you know, talking about in material terms, but everybody suffers Everybody suffers in different ways.
	Everybody has suffered in history.
	Um, and it is all relative, I guess, you know, and it comes in different ways.
	But, uh, I don't know why people see this as unique as well.
	It's just so hard for me, and I'm really just gonna take it easy on myself because I'm so sad.
	And, like, at a certain point you gotta grow up.
	That's the way of the world.
	There's one heaven.
	You know how to get there, right?
	It's not gonna come on Earth.
	So, that's really always been my mentality.
	Things get bad, you just kind of got to live with it.
	You kind of just got to roll with it.
	You got to survive.
	So, so no, no really blackpilling or whitepilling.
	It's just, it's just life.
	You know, life is just a pill, okay?
	Life is just a big, tough pill to swallow.
	But, you know, you get through it.
	Davis Beast is all talk, no action.
	Trump won't even pardon Clint Lawrence, who is even more innocent.
	By the way, watch out for Doug Ducey at DHS was with Pence Today at the Board or Yikes Department.
	Don't want Doug Ducey.
	And, uh, I'm not familiar with Clint Lawrence.
	I vaguely am familiar with this name.
	He was the soldier, right?
	Who... I vaguely remember this now.
	I don't know where I heard this from, but he was, uh...
	It was something like, it was similar to Hillary Clinton, right, where he leaked, uh, or he said something out of line, some kind of government secret to a family member.
	I'm vaguely remembering this, and he's in jail.
	I remember this was used as an example to delegitimize Hillary Clinton, to say, well, he did like one-tenth of what she did, and he got, it was like a similar situation, and he got put in jail for like ten years or something.
	So I'm vaguely, I remember like the Free Clint thing or whatever.
	But, uh, yeah, yeah, true, true.
	Yeah, I guess that's where we're headed, right?
	No, I'm not going to do that.
	Not going to unmute anybody.
	Yeah, exactly.
	That's why I say you got to be really careful about, you know, if you want to throw your support around this guy.
	to mute anybody deplorable mics as assange lost me when i started to actively dox ice agents yeah exactly uh that's why i say you got to be really careful about you know if you want to throw your support around this guy um that was no good billy says daily wire led by the incomparable ben shapiro That's right.
	We love the incomparable Ben Shapiro.
	Truly without comparison in the field.
	JC says Tel Aviv is the gay Mecca.
	Yeah, basically.
	I think that's more or less what I've heard about it.
	Not that there's anything wrong with that, right?
	Look, I like being on YouTube.
	I love YouTube.
	I like being on YouTube, and I think that's great.
	When I say Tel Aviv is the gay capital of the world, I'm saying that in a good way, okay?
	Israel being the gay Mecca, I mean that not in a pejorative way.
	I don't mean that to insult you, like, what a gay country, and maybe that says a lot about you.
	I don't mean it like that at all.
	I mean it to say, What a proud thing.
	Look, it's equal, okay?
	That's fine.
	Good for you.
	Do you want to be the gay mecca of the world?
	Hey man, that's fine and well.
	Just, you know, be safe about it, right?
	Be safe when you're going against God's natural law.
	So, uh, did I ever tell you how much I just love being on YouTube?
	I really just enjoy... What a great career I've been able to build for myself here.
	So when I say Israel, gay capital of the world, don't take it the wrong way.
	I mean that as a positive.
	Good on you, Israel.
	Wow, you know, what a great country.
	Really, Brian?
	Says another based gaming stream coming soon, hopefully?
	People are just so greedy, man.
	Such... It's never enough with these people.
	It's always... It's always demands, it's always requests.
	I look in the live chat, it's...
	You know, I stream for hours last night, do a gaming stream for hours.
	The next day, another gaming stream, hopefully, Nick, soon?
	Did you watch the last one?
	Did you watch all of the last one from beginning to end?
	For Christ's sake.
	People always, can you do a show on Saturday?
	Gaming stream soon, hopefully?
	Hey Nick, can you un-private all the old videos?
	Nick, can you?
	It's always more, more, more.
	It's never enough.
	Always they want more.
	$2 super chat.
	$2 super chat!
	When's the next gaming stream?
	Thank you so much.
	Thank you so much.
	I promise another one coming right up for you.
	How about right after the show and I'll go for 20 hours until tomorrow's show and then I'll just go after tomorrow's show until the premium show and you get the premium show free and... That's alright.
	No, it's okay.
	I'm just...
	I'm sorry.
	I'm sorry I got carried away like that.
	The customer's always right.
	I'll get right on it, okay?
	Now, we'll do one over the weekend, probably.
	I'll probably do another one over the weekend.
	Dylan Brown says, keep up the great work.
	I'll slip another 200 your way when I can in the coming weeks, Chief.
	Hey, thanks, big guy.
	Also, you're against separatism.
	How do we ensure our survival, then?
	Is it even realistic through democracy?
	I love this stuff.
	Don't you love it?
	Really high IQ superchatters, you know?
	Facebook says we are banning all white nationalist, white separatist content.
	And what did the genius, high IQ people in the comments section do?
	White nationalism is simply loving your country.
	You know, when I see Facebook saying we're going to target white nationalists, and I see the government saying we're going to prosecute white nationalists, you know, my first thought is let's make that definition as broad as possible.
	They're going after white nationalists?
	Let's define as many people as white nationalists as possible.
	What a great idea.
	Uh, Nick, you're trying to define it as people that just want a white ethnostate?
	No, no.
	Uh, yeah, right.
	It's everybody that just wants to, like, love their family.
	It's everybody that just loves their country.
	So, yeah, we're all white nationalists now.
	Please stop with the definitions.
	Stop with this kind of stuff.
	We're banning all white separatists.
	Nick, out of curiosity, why are you not a white separatist?
	What other way do you see?
	Well, aside from that, you know, aside from that, you know, look, I am against separatism.
	I am against secession.
	I am against all of that.
	You know, I just don't think it's a viable path forward in the country.
	How is that going to happen?
	You know, in the next 50 years, I don't see it happening.
	You know, all the people that are talking about it are talking about it.
	Even the people that are woke about what's going on don't actually want to put their money where their mouth is or do anything.
	They want to, like, tweet about it online.
	So, you know, all these grand projects that people are talking about.
	We're gonna all move in one place.
	We're gonna separate.
	We're gonna secede.
	We're gonna, you know, do this, that, or the other.
	Just, I don't see it happening.
	You know, I don't see that as really a viable path forward.
	You know, trying to secede from the U.S.
	government?
	Good luck with that.
	Let me know how that one goes.
	The whole South couldn't manage it 150 years ago when it was horses and bayonets.
	Now you're gonna get, what, 5,000 Wignats together?
	You're gonna get all 100 Goitok viewers together and go to, what, Montana or something and declare your own country?
	How did Waco go?
	How did Ruby Ridge go, okay?
	They've got drones, they've got, you know, everything else.
	We're going to secede from the U.S.
	government.
	Tell me how that one goes.
	Tell me how the white separation goes from the American government.
	Let me know when that one is taken care of.
	It's just not practical.
	It's not pragmatic.
	Look, we're in this country.
	The country's going to stay together.
	There's really... I mean, that's not going to change anytime soon, that one of those options is going to be viable.
	So we're going to have to work within the system.
	All this talk about, we're not going to vote our way out of this.
	You're an idiot if you say something like that.
	You know, not anytime soon is anybody going to challenge the government, right?
	I mean, this is our reality.
	It's denialism, plain and simple, to say we're just going to opt out and whatever.
	No, you're going to tweet about it.
	You're going to tweet about it.
	And you're lucky you don't get your life ruined one day for talking like that.
	You know, look, this is the world we live in.
	Got to accept it.
	Got to play within the rules of this game.
	People don't like to hear that.
	I don't want to burst anybody's bubble here, but you know, This kind of larping, running around in the woods and stuff is not going to change anything.
	We have to grow up, realize the situation, the predicament we're in, and this kind of talk about, we're not going to vote our way out of this, whatever.
	That's not what you're saying, but I do see that a lot on Twitter, even from people who are mutuals of me lately.
	And that kind of talk is just very reckless, careless, irresponsible, not well thought out.
	Think about what you're saying.
	Think about who you're going up against, right?
	It's all fine and well when you're tweeting about it by a clown, honkler, cringe, avi on Twitter.
	It's a different story when you look at some of these people...
	Like, how's that going for... What's that group that's still getting arrested after Charlottesville?
	I forget the name of them.
	RAM, is it?
	Or something like that.
	Not fun when you're getting locked up on RICO charges by the next administration, the administration after that.
	So...
	I just take that into consideration.
	We're not about that.
	We are against separatism.
	We are against white nationalism.
	We are American nationalists.
	We want to fix the country.
	We want to make sure it's stable.
	That's all.
	No breakaway.
	No takeover.
	No coup.
	Nothing like that.
	People talking like that.
	It's all young people, too.
	It's always young people.
	Not like I'm not a young person, but it's all these hothead, young, ah, I'm so sick of everything that's going on.
	I want to do something about it.
	Yeah, why don't you cool off a little bit?
	Why don't you relax?
	Look, look, look.
	Appreciate the super chats, but, you know, you're getting everybody, you're gonna get everybody in trouble here with that kind of talk.
	Uh, Dippet's Era says, did you have an opinion on Babylon B?
	Uh, no, I'm not really familiar with them.
	That's like that click hole, uh, like onion type site, but for conservatives, it's kind of, kind of lame.
	I think that's what it is, right?
	Let me look it up real quick.
	I'm like 99% sure that's what it is.
	Yeah, I don't know.
	People like Ben Shapiro retweet that stuff, and for that reason, I'm out.
	You know, I look at that, and I'm like, eh, maybe it's a good concept, but the people that are pushing it are cringe and blue-pilled.
	Look, on the government stuff, you just can't play around with that.
	You can't play around anymore talking like that.
	Maybe a year ago, we could make ironic jokes about that kind of stuff, but it's not a year ago.
	It's a very different situation, and if you're in it like I am, you pay attention to the walls closing in, and it just You just can't joke about it anymore.
	You just can't play around with that kind of talk.
	It could get you in big trouble.
	So I know for the Super Chatters, they don't really understand.
	They don't really understand, you know, what kind of trouble that could bring you in, especially to me and my livelihood and everything else.
	But, you know, that's the way it has to be.
	Don't like to be, don't like to play the adult, but that's just how it goes, right?
	Clark Smith says hi Nick.
	I am new to the show and trying to quote catch up with the class as it were May I ask what is a cat boy?
	What is a cat girl?
	What do you think of Tucker Carlson?
	Thanks cat boys and cat girls Oh, I don't know.
	That's just some silly stuff.
	We talked about on the internet You know, it's one of those things if you get it you get it if you don't it's no big deal You know, it's just a funny Just a silly, random thing that we talk about.
	No need to look any further into detail.
	But Tucker Carlson, we like.
	Big fans of Tucker Carlson.
	I'm a fan.
	You know, he's anti-tech.
	He's anti-market fundamentalism.
	He's based in Redpill.
	Simple as.
	Simple ass, okay?
	So, we like Tucker.
	Um, and on the Catboy and Catgirl, you know, it's just this funny, like, joke that we do.
	It's like this inside, just silly, random little joke that we talk about.
	Like, no big deal.
	You probably shouldn't look into it again.
	Probably shouldn't Google it or anything.
	Uh, just a funny, light-hearted thing.
	You know, a lot of people like to give me grief about it, but it's all just silliness, you know?
	It's all just a little light-hearted, ironic, uh, you know, irony bro type fun.
	Nothing to worry about.
	Bill Gates says, hey Nick, at one point I held a little animosity towards you, but knowing you're a fellow white Afro-Latino has completely changed my view.
	Cheers, buddy!
	Hey, you're not the first one to hold the animosity against me.
	A lot of people have a problem with me, and a lot lately.
	Every time I name-search myself on Twitter, and yeah, I name-search myself all the time, okay?
	Deal with it.
	I don't know, maybe that says something about me.
	I like to do it, all right?
	I like to see what people are saying about me.
	I think, you know, I like to know, okay?
	I just like to know, and there's nothing wrong with that.
	But when I name search myself lately, all I see is nasty tweets.
	All I see is people being, it's all these wignats.
	It's all people just taking pot shots at me, making accounts, impersonating me.
	And, um, you know, so you're not the first one.
	A lot of people have a problem with me lately.
	I don't get it.
	I think it's because every time I, like, get a boost, I get more hate, you know, from, from all around.
	From the left, from the right.
	That's just how it goes.
	You know, it's like Kanye West says in the song, I Thought About Killing You.
	If I wasn't shining so hard, there wouldn't be any shade.
	There wouldn't be no shade.
	In other words, if I wasn't, it's sort of a, you understand the play on words?
	If I wasn't shining so bright, there wouldn't be any shade, as in, you know, light casts shadows, therefore shade.
	So, but the double meaning is, my future is so bright, I am such a star, I'm doing so well, that people are throwing shade at me.
	If I wasn't doing well, people wouldn't be throwing shade, people wouldn't be dissing me.
	So, In that way, I feel very similar to Kanye.
	I feel like Kanye when I see myself on the timeline, so to speak.
	But glad you're coming around as my Afro-Latino friend there.
	Look, it's my heritage.
	I have to celebrate my heritage, right?
	You know, people are like, Nick Fuentes is not even white.
	How could he be a white nationalist?
	It's like, you're right, but you've just got it all wrong.
	They're like, he's not white, but he's a white nationalist.
	He's wrong.
	No, it's your wrong.
	I'm not a white nationalist because I'm not white.
	How could I be white nationalist if I'm not even white?
	Hello?
	Maybe you need to rethink your calculations there.
	They're like, oh, he must just not know one of these things.
	Or maybe you just misjudged me.
	Maybe you were prejudiced against me because of the color of my skin.
	Ever think of that?
	Because I'm white passing?
	I'm not white.
	Italian, Irish, Mexican, African, where is the white?
	Where's the white?
	Sorry, Italians don't really identify as white.
	We don't really want to identify with white.
	Sorry.
	Anglos, you can kind of have it.
	Germans, I see what's going on in Germany.
	I see what's going on in Great Britain.
	You can keep it.
	You know, we're Italian.
	Celts, Irish, strong Catholics, Mexicans, you know, again, we've got that connection to the soil, also to the sun.
	To the Spanish conquistadors.
	Again, another proud Catholic country.
	So, um, no, not white.
	Not white.
	How could I be a white nationalist, white separatist, not even white?
	They're like, they won't even let you into the ethnostate.
	Look, the ethnostate's just going to be a bunch of gay pagans anyway.
	Why would I want to be in there?
	I'm not even in favor of that.
	I'm for this big bloated McDonald's country.
	That's what I'm in favor of.
	So, anyway.
	The Fire Rises says your parents are city slickers.
	Well, la-dee-da.
	Yeah, they are city slickers.
	They come from the city.
	Grandparents from the city.
	We're city dwellers.
	It's a city family.
	That's how it goes.
	We are Chicago originals, you could say.
	George Henry says, Nick, it's urgent.
	Uh, wait, whoops.
	Scrolled down too far there.
	It's urgent.
	Look at this.
	I'm not pulling that.
	I'm not clicking on some unknown link there.
	Elston says, with so many levels of irony, I don't know if you were serious about space travel being fake.
	Pretty cringe if true.
	Love the show anyways, big guy.
	Another science tard totally triggered by my righteous crusade against outer space and the big globe.
	If you actually take offense to that, ironic or not, you're the cringe one, bro.
	Imagine somebody, serious or not, saying outer space isn't real and being such an uptight, blue-pilled normie, lab coat worshipper fag that you're like, you don't think space is real?
	That's pretty cringe.
	Why?
	What are you, an expert?
	What, have you been there before?
	What are you, a big outer space guy?
	You got a big poster of Neil deGrasse Tyson in your bedroom that you You're telling me you don't believe in evolution?
	You're telling me you don't believe in space?
	What if I don't?
	I've never been up there and I'm pretty sure you haven't either, okay?
	So how do you really know what you know?
	Because, again, some guy in a lab coat and some guy in glasses Well, according to my calculations, according to my computer graphic here, according to my microscope... Shut up, bitch.
	You don't know anything.
	So yeah, I don't know.
	Is outer space real?
	Maybe it is.
	Maybe it isn't.
	Maybe if I go to Mars, I'll believe it, okay?
	Maybe one day we're forced to flee this planet.
	Fossil fuels cause, you know, trash planet to become a reality.
	We have to jettison off to another world.
	And I see it for myself and I'll believe it.
	But I don't know.
	I simply don't know.
	Maybe it's hollow.
	Why does John Kerry go to Antarctica?
	Can anybody tell me that?
	Maybe you can answer me why two people got stabbed to death in Antarctica in one week.
	And then I'll tell if I believe in outer space and, you know, the globe and all that, but... I think you're the cringe one, buddy.
	David Sperner says, Nick, you must settle the debate uwu or owo.
	I'm not an expert.
	You're gonna have to bring in Stempi on that one.
	Gonna have to bring in my friend, uh, Stempi.
	We have kind of this love-hate relationship, but you'll have to bring that person on board.
	I can't really... I'm not the expert.
	No, I won't play it.
	Catboy Stempi he's the expert on that one SFConstantine says have you done a reaction stream on Jared Holt's podcast yeah I did one a long time ago on Twitch so it's probably lost by now very old NWord says thoughts on CSGO and will you play it no I won't play it I don't really know anything about it so I don't have any thoughts on it GWC says, PP PooPoo, thoughts on this?
	Disavow.
	Shlomo says, great job calling Destiny a pedo.
	Hey, thanks man.
	John Dose is really sickin' to see Assange get dragged out like a dog.
	Enough resources to get Assange, but not the grooming gangs.
	The UK is such a joke.
	Yep, that's a good point.
	Priorities, certainly.
	Uh, Joseph, excuse me, says, I love the Wignacks, Mott, and Bailey strategy.
	Retreat to your castle when you need to farm and return to your open fields when the enemy attacks.
	Uh, yeah, basically.
	George Henry says, Nick, you used the false equivalence fallacy.
	Where?
	George Henry says, at Gabe, I am not an idiot.
	I don't know who you're talking to.
	Steve Z says, I mean tips for maximizing my experience at AmRen.
	I don't know.
	What does that even mean?
	What does that even mean, dude?
	What does that even mean?
	What is the mentality?
	What do you?
	Who asks?
	Who asks?
	Wow, real African hours.
	Who asks a question like that?
	Seriously though, I cannot imagine.
	How can I maximize my experience?
	How can I maximize my time at Amaranth?
	What are you talking about?
	What kind of question is that?
	You go, you listen to the speeches.
	What do you mean maximize?
	What?
	What kind of question is that?
	I don't know, man.
	I don't know.
	If you need me to tell you how to... It's just a regular conference.
	You show up, you wear a suit, you dress appropriately, you mingle, you watch the speeches.
	This is not complicated stuff, okay?
	Like, if you've been to one conference, you've been to them all.
	I don't know.
	I don't know what to tell you.
	I don't know.
	You go, you just figure it out, all right?
	I don't... I'm just so confused by this.
	I don't know what this concept is.
	James Russell says, don't worry Nick, based Ruby Ridge Bar and Glowy Pompeo are going to Fort H.S.
	the people by jailing Assange and turning him into a tranny.
	Okay, I don't... I don't know who this is a joke about.
	David DeLaGarza says, hey Nick, just wanted to zip some dough your way.
	Hopefully I have a good question next time.
	You're doing a great job.
	Well, thank you so much for the super chat.
	Much appreciated.
	John Doe says, your rants on Wignats reminded me of Adam Woffin to a tee.
	I've met those guys and they were nuts to think they were going to overthrow the government.
	Okay, I want nothing to do with you.
	I want nothing to do with you or anybody who has anything to do with Adam Woffin.
	What in the world is this?
	What in the world is this stream today?
	People popping into the super chats.
	Hey Nick, I love your show.
	You know, I met Adam often.
	Do you think that's a smart thing to say?
	We want nothing to do with that.
	We want nothing to do with you.
	We want nothing to do with anything to do with those people.
	Take that somewhere else.
	I should have screened that one before I read it.
	Sheesh!
	Yeah, we are not in favor of that.
	We are the peaceful America First Coalition.
	We are not about that.
	We're not about atomic terrorism like Atomwaffen is.
	What is the... What are we thinking today?
	Please!
	The one guy's like, why are you not a white separatist?
	The other one, you know, I've actually met Atomwaffen.
	Do you think you're helping?
	Keep the $5.
	It's really not about the money at this point, okay?
	Keep the $5, please.
	Sheesh!
	Why?
	Oh.
unidentified		Ah, jeez.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't know, man.
		Please.
		Can we just... Can we try and use our heads a little bit here?
		Oh yeah, they are nuts.
		They are nuts.
		That's why we want nothing to do with them.
		Western Man, and by the way, you know, I'm just, I'm gonna leave it at that.
		Completely, 100%, unequivocally, disavow on every count.
		Western Man says, thanks for all you do, Nick.
		Hey, thanks.
		Much appreciated.
		That's more like it, okay?
		$20.
		Thanks for you do.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Thank you.
		You know $5 You know, I actually okay, you know, not really a great idea, right?
		Cloudstar says Nick.
		I like your level attitude tonight frustrated people need to resist the urge to quote do something and realize we can win by outsmarting them Exactly exactly, right?
		Well, and it's not even so much outsmarting.
		It's just a matter of Look, the world belongs to people that show up.
		It's really that simple.
		You know, the people that are going to inherit the world are people that are just there.
		People that have something that works, something that is robust.
		something that's functional, something that lasts long.
		That's all we need.
		We just need to survive.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So all this stuff about radical, we need to do it now.
		We need to take action.
		Oh, oh, my own.
		No, you just need to show up.
		All right.
		We just need to build a network.
		Just do the right things.
		Check off all the boxes and we'll be okay.
		You know, that's that's our task.
		Staying alive, just be in this defensive position and you know, build up our networks, build up our infrastructure and one day, you know, we'll be able to make a difference.
		So...
		It's got to have that conservative mentality.
		Look at Jewish people.
		You know, all these people talk about on the alt-right is Jewish power.
		How do you think Jewish power was constructed?
		Do you think that, well, and the Soviet Union was different, but how do you think they came to achieve so much power in America?
		Was, do you recall, a Jewish violent insurrection?
		Or are they just, do they just know how to work the system, right?
		They get educated, they take care of their own, It's really like that simple.
		Educated, take care of their own, you know, they've got connections, they've got networks.
		That's all that is, by the way.
		You know?
		And everybody knows in Washington, D.C., if you go to, what do they call it, the Shabbat dinner, whatever, on Saturdays, that's all that is.
		Networking, helping each other out, education, being responsible.
		I mean, for the most part, I'm not going to say that's all that goes on.
		You know, I'm not naive, right?
		But all I'm saying is to demonstrate We can learn from other power structures in the country a model for what our future is going to look like.
		People want to look at the 1930s.
		You know, anywhere.
		All this instability that happened in the first few decades of the 20th century and say we should be like the Bolsheviks, we should be like other groups, we should be like, you know, the brown shirts or the black shirts or, you know, some other revolutionaries.
		Why?
		Why would we do that?
		Why would we copy models that are ridiculous and impractical and also morally wrong and all the rest when we could adopt a model that is proven, workable, obviously much more conservative, much more pragmatic.
		That's the way I look at it.
		Amir says you recommend Mafia-style activism where everything is real low-key.
		This Waiji is listening to an audiobook on Mafia history.
		Read the knife, Nick.
		Ready the knife, Nick.
		Yeah, that's basically it.
		Mafia style.
		You know, we're not committing real crimes, but like thought crimes, it's got to be similar.
		Well, I'm not familiar, but okay.
		White rapper is LilJesus at DevilMKE on Twitter.
		I'm not familiar, but okay.
		Steven Chernets says, Hey Nick, as a proud Jew, I support Yang because free shekels, the economy should serve the people, not the other way around.
		Also, you should totally buy a clown nose.
		Honk honk.
		I disavow the honk honk part.
		But yeah, we got the clown noses already.
		George Henry says, Nick, you seem afraid of me.
		Apologize.
		Okay, I don't know who this is.
		Mutant Joe says, what is up with the I effing love science cult?
		What do you mean, what is... Great question.
		What is up with these guys?
		What does that even mean?
		I don't know, man.
		I don't know, dude.
		Just a bunch of vapid normies, basically.
		Samurai says, you're right.
		I now embrace my non-white Irish identity.
		It's time, it's time for us ethnics to reclaim, to become who we are, reclaim our heritage, right?
		Steve Z says, cool, see you there, big guy.
		Yes, see you there, man.
	I'll tell you how to, when we meet, I'll tell you how to maximize your experience.
	Mel says, watch Code Geese.
	FYI, I am MKUltra.
	I don't know what Code Geese is, but yeah, I'll check it out.
	816 says, you sound so scared, Nick.
	Can't follow a coward.
	Yeah, okay.
	Coming from somebody with a fake username, right?
	Hidden on the channel by... Deasvolt says, hey Nick, love the show.
	I love that too.
	I love... it's always coming from, uh, you know, the people that are saying, you're cucking, you're shilling, whatever.
	It's always people with fake names.
	Really makes you think, right?
	That's always really interesting.
	It always comes from Very safely hidden inside the mob, with the mask on, totally safe, totally insulated from any kind of fallout or personal damage, any slight personal sacrifice we are protected from.
	It's always from those people that we hear this stuff about, you need to do this, you need to say that, you should engage with this person, you should put yourself in harm's way or in jeopardy.
	It always comes from those people, really makes you think.
	Right?
	It almost makes me think that maybe there's a nefarious motive.
	Maybe they're not exactly who they say they are.
	Right?
	Days Vault says, Hey Nick, love the show.
	Ever think of doing a Protestant versus Catholic video?
	Brothers in Christ must stick together.
	Thanks.
	Take care.
	Why would we do that?
	Why would, if we have to stick together, why would we do a video highlighting distinctions and differences?
	Yeah, maybe we'll do a show like that one time, but I don't know what you're getting at.
	How would that bring people together?
	John Doe says, LOL.
	Just kidding, Nick.
	I just wanted to see you freak out.
unidentified		LOL.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, well, you accomplished that.
		Sammy Sosa says, do you ever watch Adam 22 and No Jumper?
		Uh, no.
		I like John Doe.
		Yeah, I was just kidding.
		Yeah, I'm sure you were.
		Waldorflor says, 1.
		Get educated.
unidentified		2.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Take care of your own.
		Yeah, really, it's that simple.
		Sammy says, what is your take?
		Oh, I just read that one.
		Oh no, he's posted it twice.
		Why would you post it twice?
		I don't know Adam-22 still, and I still don't know Nojumper.
		Default settings says Magyar Power, the power of the Hungarians.
		Very based in Red Pill.
		Trump Army says, will there be a... Okay, I'm not gonna read that.
		GW says, what is the praxis of pee-pee poo-poo?
		Okay, yeah, thank you.
		$8.44, $2, the praxis of pee-pee poo-poo.
		Thank you.
		Zirconium says, all sip will be fun.
		Argue with the golden one, please.
		The golden one.
		He's the, uh, pagan bodybuilder, right?
		Yeah, maybe we'll get him on the show one time.
		I'd do Bloodsports with him if somebody set it up.
		Not IRL Bloodsports, obviously.
		You know, he's, uh, you know, he's really a little bit more into the bodybuilding than me.
		I have a feeling he'd have an advantage in that arena.
		But, uh, if it's a debate, I'd do it.
		Um, Epi says, Fallout New Vegas sucks.
		The originals are better.
		Sorry for the caps.
		Another Normie.
		I love always the, uh, the blue pill consumption opinions.
		Your game is bad.
		My game is the good one.
		You watch that movie?
		That movie isn't very good though.
		My movie with the characters that I like?
		That's the good movie.
		Like, come on man.
		Come on.
		This is a show for red-pilled people.
		Take your, you know, consumption Philistine attitudes somewhere else.
		Your game is bad.
		My game good.
		Okay, dude.
		Adam Riley says, great show, Nick.
		Thanks a lot for the content.
		Marco is a manlet.
		Marco Rubio?
		Or I don't know which Marco you're referring to, but but hey, man, thanks.
		Glad you're enjoying the content.
		OK, it looks like that's our last Super Chat.
		So that's going to do it for us tonight.
		Remember to check us out at NicholasJFuentes.com slash membership to get your premium membership.
		The show is 100 percent viewer funded, if you can believe it.
		I wouldn't be taking Super Chats if it wasn't, by the way.
		Right.
		Jokes, jokes, jokes.
		But it is 100 percent viewer funded.
		We do need your support.
		The best way to support the show Is to become a Premium Member.
		It's only $5 per month to become a Premium America First Subscriber.
		The link is down below.
		NicholasJFuentes.com slash membership.
		Premium Members get one additional show every week.
		So it's Monday through Friday and then Premium Members get their exclusive show on Sunday.
		It's the best, longest episode of the week.
	So, excuse me, we hope that you will check that out.
	Link is down below.
	Remember to subscribe to the channel.
	Give me a big thumbs up.
	Leave a comment down below.
	Click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
	Remember, we are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
	Central, 8 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time.
	I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	As always, this is America First.
	Thank you guys for watching.
	Thanks to our Super Chatters premium members.
	Everybody watches the show.
	We love you folks, and we will see you tomorrow.
	Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
unidentified		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.

▲