Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 15, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:38:33

The Worst Immigration Deal in History | America First Ep. 332

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:17:07

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		Thank you.
		Thank you.
		Wall. Wall.
		Wall. Wall. Wall. I'm out.
		I'm out.
		I'm out. I'm
		out. I'm
		out.
		I'm out.
		I'm out. I'm
		out. I'm
		out.
		I'm out.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The End
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening everybody.
		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be with you.
		There is some big news happening.
		It's a big week.
		Obviously tomorrow we are facing a partial government shutdown once again if no spending bill is passed.
		We have the deal in front of us finally.
		Over 1,100 pages, but we finally have the immigration appropriations deal in front of us, and it's not good, folks.
		Not good!
		And we'll be talking about it tonight.
		We'll be looking at everything that's in the immigration deal that everybody's talking about, all the different provisions pertaining to immigration, to the wall, to other things, and I think that should just about take up the bulk of the show because, boy, I didn't think it could be that bad!
		I thought, wow, You know, the worst part about it is that it's just not a lot of money, and it's not technically going to be the definition of a wall, but no, it's a lot worse.
		It is substantially worse.
		In fact, it is hard to overstate how bad it is.
		They talk about declaring a national emergency.
		This is the national emergency!
		This is a disaster!
		And we'll get into all of that, but it should be a great show.
		There is much to discuss with regards to this.
		Like I said, we'll be looking at the bill.
		We'll be looking at some other options the president can take which include a national emergency.
		They include some of the other provisions which I discussed yesterday.
		Some other places he could get the funds without the national emergency.
		We will talk about the prospects that the national emergency will succeed or that there could be a challenge by the Democrats.
		That's been The subject of a lot of heated debate from a lot of different people.
		So we will get into all of it and it should be a jam-packed, high-energy show.
		Look, we're going off.
		There simply isn't time to talk about anything else.
		The country is in crisis and as I've been saying for weeks, this is the turning point.
		This is the inflection point.
		This is the moment When we see, when we determine whether or not this president is serious about immigration.
		I know that's been said a lot of times, but you know me.
		We've been watching this for the last two years since Trump got into office.
		We've been watching the immigration debate.
		We've been watching the progress or lack thereof on immigration.
		And lately I've been much more critical.
		That's because it's much more urgent now.
		There's only two years left.
		Less than two years.
		Maybe substantially less than two years, depending on, you know, when you really say that an administration is over.
		I would imagine a few months before the election you won't see any big maneuvers, any big actions.
		So, time is running out and the moment is now for us to get serious on immigration.
		Somebody commented a little bit before this show on Twitter.
		They said, well Nick, it's nice when you see that you are going off on this.
		As opposed to some of these other people who are spurging out and they're losing their cool every 24 hours, every day.
		And so tonight, please do not take it with a grain of salt when I say that this is a disaster.
		As I say, you know, I'm the white-pilled guy, I'm the optimistic guy, I'm usually the person who will be a little bit more charitable if there's a setback, if...
		There's too much pushback from the judiciary or from the Congress or from other sources within the government, but this is it, folks.
		This is really the moment.
		If there were ever a time to be white-pilled or black-pilled, we will know after this week, because this is some pretty big stuff.
		So, to launch right into it here, if you guys remember, this was unveiled last week.
		This was unveiled, actually, I think at the beginning of this week.
		How we got here was the continuing resolution which was passed at the beginning of rather at the end of January to end the 35-day partial government shutdown.
		The continuing resolution is a funding bill.
		It reopened the government.
		Federal workers began to get paid, and they said that in the three weeks that this bill funds the government, we will come to some sort of agreement, some sort of a compromise on border security, and we will fund the government then until September.
		And this is only about a third of the government which is defunded until September.
		It includes DHS.
		That's why we're sorting out the immigration issue.
		And so initially they said on Monday that they had reached an agreement in principle.
		So they hadn't written anything.
		It wasn't a bill yet.
	As of last night, because we didn't even know this last night, as of last evening, this was simply an agreement in principle, and what they agreed upon was $1.375 billion for wall construction.
	And that's all we knew about it.
	And I think gradually people sort of came around to it.
	At first, people are disappointed because they said, well, of course, the president was asking for $5.7 billion, $5.7 out of $15 to $18 billion for the whole cost of the wall.
	And there were additional restrictions put on the $1.375.
	So people are disappointed about the amount, and they were disappointed about the provisions, the restrictions on what could be built using that money.
	But I guess over the course of the week, a lot of people, myself included, came around to the idea that, well, the bill is not the end of the world.
	Maybe they get $1.375 billion for this wall, this fence, and he gets additional money from other places.
	If that were the case, I think a lot of people said they would be happy with this.
	People initially were upset.
	People like Sean Hannity, Laura Ingram, among others.
	At the very beginning phases, people said, this is a disaster.
	You can't sign this.
	But as people started to understand, well, maybe there'll be emergency funds.
	Maybe there'll be other money.
	They started to say, okay, well, we will take 1.375 so long as other money is given.
	But now, Now that we've seen the bill, not that they've actually typed it up, we found that there's a lot of things which are much more disappointing, much worse, than just the fact that it's not going to be the full 5.7 and the fact that it won't be a concrete structure 30 feet tall, the kind that the president talked about during the campaign.
	It's actually a lot worse than that.
	So I'll go over and we'll read some of the provisions of the bill here.
	Boy is it rough.
	So, in the first place, the deal did pass the Senate, so it's on the President's desk.
	It only requires his signature to become law.
	It was passed 83 to 16.
	So, if you guys know how the legislative process works, appropriations bills must originate in the House.
	House has the power of the purse.
	So it passed the House, it got through to the Senate, it passed the Senate 83 to 16.
	So now President Trump can sign it, it becomes law.
	He cannot sign it, in which case it gets killed, and they'll have to originate another bill for it to go through.
	Or he vetoes it, and then if the Senate overrides that veto with a two-thirds vote, it becomes law anyway.
	So if you know a little bit about the math of the situation, they passed it 83 to 16.
	83 is well over a supermajority, so If the president vetoed it, they probably would be able to override that if they wanted to.
	The people that voted no on the bill from our side were Mike Braun of Indiana, very solid guy, Cotton, Cruz, Hawley, Einhoff, Lee, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Ben Sasse, Scott, and Toomey.
	So, if you're noticing, there is some white pill here.
	Before I hit you with the big black pill, which is this disaster of a pill, it's so bad.
	And if you've read anything about it, you know how bad it is.
	But before I get into that, I will, I will sort of moderate it a little bit by saying there is a little bit of a white pill, okay?
	There were a lot of Republicans that voted no on this, and a lot of the Republicans that voted no on this are Republicans that got into office only in 2018.
	A lot of them are people that just came around recently.
	For example, Braun, who is new.
	He was a businessman and he got elected in 2018 in Indiana.
	He voted no because it's a terrible bill on immigration.
	You got Hawley from Missouri.
	Another one just came in in 2018.
	He replaced Claire McCaskill.
	In Missouri.
	And a few others.
	Scott, he's been around for a while, but he was recently re-elected in Florida.
	So, you look at a lot of the names here, and I will say that what I said about the midterms basically came true.
	Which is that even in spite of, you know, let's say the worst comes to worst with President Trump, he signs this bill, he doesn't win re-election in 2020, and immigration is just never solved in this administration, in this term.
	And I think maybe the white pill here, maybe the silver lining, is that all these senators who voted no will be the future of the party.
	People like Cruz, Rubio, Sass, Cotton.
	There are a lot of people, there's a substantial amount of Republicans, who have shown that they can stand firm on the issue of immigration.
	So I'll say that there is a little bit of a silver lining in that.
	It's not the best thing in the world, obviously.
	It's not ideal, but that is a good thing.
	But what is in the bill?
	So a few of the different provisions here we've got section 207 and this isn't one of the worst ones but this is kind of rough section 207 of the immigration deal says that the Department of Homeland Security cannot increase border crossing fees which is not good but not the end of the world This is probably the worst provision of the whole bill.
	So again, it's only 1.37 billion for the wall and we'll get into the wall in particular, but just on immigration in general.
	Section 224 of this bill, you might have heard about this on Twitter.
	This is the poison pill.
	There's a lot of poison pills.
	This is just...
	Massive.
	This is horrible.
	Section 224 says that sponsors, potential sponsors, and the families of sponsors and potential sponsors of unaccompanied minors cannot be deported.
	So these people basically get immunity.
	If you have any illegal immigrants in the country who, again, are seen as sponsors of unaccompanied minors, which are the children, and children used very loosely, but people brought over And that was what that whole scandal was about last July was the unaccompanied minors.
	People that are sponsors of those people or potential sponsors and the families of those people have basically complete immunity.
	They have amnesty.
	So understand all a person has to do now is come across the border with a child, they're safe.
	That's what this means.
	So understand, we thought we were just, oh, it's only just a little bit of money for the wall as opposed to a lot of money for the wall.
	Okay, wrong.
	This is amnesty now.
	All you have to do, come across the border with a child.
	You don't even have to have a child.
	You could be a potential sponsor of a child.
	And your whole family have complete immunity.
	You can't deport these people.
	You cannot even initiate deportation against these people.
	So this is the humanitarian crisis.
	Forget about the border crisis.
	You think that it was bad when they incentivized caravans coming in by talking about a DACA amnesty?
	Because remember, when Trump got into office in 2016, immigration stopped.
	Illegal immigration dramatically collapsed because they said, oh boy, here's somebody who's going to enforce the law.
	We better not come into America because we'll just get turned around at the border.
	Well, then once they started talking about the DACA amnesty a little bit into the administration, then you saw the numbers go right back up, surged again, because every time you talk about amnesty, without fail, whether it's DACA, DAPA, whatever it is, you talk about amnesty, you get more illegals.
	It's common sense.
	If illegals or foreign nationals If they see what's happening in America and they see the Congress discussing that, oh well, basically you can come into the country and you can do that with impunity.
	You can come in illegally, you can come in a port of entry, it doesn't matter.
	We'll just give you the full benefits and legal rights of any citizen.
	Well, then people are going to say, hey, what are we doing hanging around here in El Salvador or Guatemala?
	Let's go into the United States.
	So forget that.
	Now they're saying anybody who comes in with the child, just anybody.
	And what do you think the caravan was about?
	What do you think happened last July?
	Last July they said, oh, all these people with unaccompanied minors, they're going to get amnesty.
	We can't deport them.
	What did he get?
	Like three caravans.
	Now they're saying these people, it's going to be signed into law.
	So it's not even just catch and release.
	Now it's just signed into law.
	These people can't be deported.
	Sponsors, potential sponsors.
	Nobody's getting deported folks.
	Not under this law.
	That's only the half of it.
	That's section 224.
	On the wall...
	The bill allocates $1.375 billion for, quote, pedestrian fencing.
	This is what they call the wall.
	Pedestrian fencing.
	Now there's some really awesome restrictions on the wall.
	Funds for that wall, so the $1.375 billion, can only be available for designs deployed as of the 2017 Consolidated Appropriations Act, or the Omnibus Bill.
	So you remember last year when they said, Oh, we'll give you $3.6 billion for border security, but it can't be built on anything resembling a wall.
	They're basically saying in this bill, yeah, all this money, the 1.375, same restrictions apply.
	So basically the kind of fencing that George Bush built and the kind of fencing that Barack Obama built, that's the only fencing that will be available to us.
	So just the steel bollard, 18 foot fence.
	And here's the cool thing about the steel bollard fence, which we talked about.
	And I said, you know, That would be nice, but even what Border Patrol says about this particular kind of fencing, with these requirements, these restrictions, is that this kind of fencing isn't even intended to keep out people.
	The only purpose of steel bollard fencing is to keep out vehicles.
	You'll see this in shopping malls, you'll see this in government buildings, you'll see this even in some residential areas.
	The only purpose of this kind of fencing is to keep out vehicles.
	People, wildlife, that kind of thing can get through easily.
	So 1.375 billion dollars for, again, the steel bollard fence and those funds are only available for designs deployed as of the 2017 Consolidated Appropriations Act.
	It gets even better.
	The wall cannot be built within the Santa Ana Wildlife Refuge, cannot be built within the Benson Rio Grande Valley State Park, cannot be built within the La Lomita Historical Park, cannot be built within the National Butterfly Center or the Vista Del Mar Ranch, even better than that.
	The wall can only be built in the Rio Grande Valley sector.
	So the only place, think about a map of the U.S.
	border.
	You've got California, you've got Arizona, you've got New Mexico, you've got Texas.
	The only place where you can build any of this wall, not only is it not even wall, it's pedestrian fencing, 18 foot high steel bollard that's not even meant to keep people out, it can't be built in any of those areas which I just listed, and The only place they can put up any of that wall is in the area in Texas that borders the Gulf of Mexico.
	That borders the Gulf of Mexico!
	So I don't know, are there going to be a lot of illegal crossings there?
	You know, probably not.
	So that's the only place you're going to be able to build it.
	On top of that, it's even better.
	Not only is it this paltry sum can only be spent on these terrible ineffective designs, can't be built in like 10 different locations, can only be built in one sector, but on top of that there's a special little provision in this bill which says that local Texas authorities Can basically veto any wall construction where the federal government wants to put a wall up.
	So that's a nice little subtle way of saying that if you have a blue democrat mayor or a democrat city council or anything like that if they say we don't want a wall there the wall doesn't get built.
	So you go down the list of all these different provisions People were saying earlier this week, oh well, 1.375, well that's a start.
	That's a down payment.
	We could pass this bill, get that money, and then use additional money.
	Wrong!
	You're not going to get to use any of this money.
	And if you do, it's going to be completely ineffective.
	There's no money here.
	There's no money for anything resembling a wall here.
	And even if you were to put something up, you could have a Texas councilman veto it, or it's in a wildlife refugee center, or whatever.
	So, the 1.375 is BS.
	There is a provision in the bill which allows for 1,200 new Customs and Border Patrol agents.
	You know, that sounds nice enough.
	But there is another alternative in there, another provision in there, which people said yesterday wasn't there.
	A lot of people were tweeting about this, a lot of disinformation yesterday, and I talked about this, or maybe it was on Wednesday.
	But I talked about this, how there were all kinds of conflicting reports, and there were a lot of people saying, oh, no, no, this isn't true.
	They struck that.
	It's not there.
	Well, that turned out to be not true because it does, in fact, expand catch and release by decreasing the number of detention beds from 49,000 to 40,000.
	So everybody said, oh, that's not true.
	That's not happening.
	They struck that.
	That's too radical.
	No, that's in the bill.
	So even though they're increasing the amount of Customs and Border Patrol agents, they're decreasing by a fifth the amount of detention beds controlled by ICE.
	So what that basically means is that you're going to have more people get caught and you won't be able to detain them.
	If they're limiting the amount of beds, that means that 10,000 additional people will just have to be released into the interior of the country because they cannot be detained by immigration officials.
	So that's great.
	Beyond that, another similar measure, another similar provision, it expands the Alternatives to Detention program from 82,000 to 100,000.
	So basically what that does is that instead of detaining illegal immigrants on the border, Alternatives to Detention, The alternative to detaining them at the border is they release them into the interior of the country, usually with an ankle bracelet or something like that.
	They're never seen again.
	You never hear of these people again.
	They just remain in the country indefinitely.
	So that ends the provisions for immigration.
	So if you got all that, you've got amnesty, complete immunity for anybody that is a sponsor or a potential sponsor of unaccompanied minors.
	So not only is that going to give immunity to all the people that are already here, but also potentially people that are going to come forward, and you're going to get a lot of people coming forward.
	More caravans, more border crossings, because of that provision.
	We have $1.375 billion for pedestrian fencing, which is subject to the restrictions from 2017.
	So it's going to be an 18-foot tall fence that isn't even designed to keep people out of the country.
	You're only going to be able to build it in one sector.
	And in addition to that, we're going to increase the amount of people who are caught and released by $10,000 if you're talking about detention beds, and by $20,000 if you're talking about the ATD program, alternatives to detention.
	So that's just on immigration.
	Now to me, Maybe the cherry on top to me what is just the icing on the cake of the whole bill.
	It's bad enough that you've got... I mean that's really terrific.
	Bang up job Congress.
	Thank You Mitch McConnell.
	Now remember in 2017 we got tax cuts through?
	No problem.
	It was no problem.
	To get tax cuts for corporations.
	We got the corporate tax rate down from 35 to like 22.
	Okay?
	Biggest tax cut for the wealthy and for corporations in U.S.
	history.
	No problem for that.
	We waited two years.
	Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan shined us on for two years saying we could get something on immigration.
	We'll do it in March.
	No, we'll do it in September.
	No, we'll do it in December.
	No, we'll do it in January.
	Nah, in February.
	So this is the product of two years.
	To add insult to injury, like I said, the cherry, or maybe the lox and schmear on top, maybe the bagel on top here, is that within the bill that does not even allocate more than 1.4 billion dollars for securing our own border, Is 3.3 billion dollars for, you guessed it, the state of Israel!
	Wow!
	How awesome is that?
	And that's only a part of the 5.3 billion dollars in total!
	Let's get this straight.
	to Israel, Ukraine, and Jordan.
	And aside from that, also $3.1 billion for foreign health assistance to the UN.
	So let's get this straight.
	$1.37 billion for bollard fencing that can basically be vetoed by local officials.
	A total of $8.4 billion for foreign assistance.
	So if you're doing your math correctly, that's something like seven times more money for foreign countries than for fencing that can basically be vetoed.
	It doesn't even matter that it's being put up.
	And even if it could be vetoed, it doesn't matter because you're just not going to deport anybody ever again.
	So that's our immigration compromise.
	That's our immigration deal.
	Wow!
	Good job, Mitch McConnell.
	Good job, Paul Ryan.
	We really did a bang-up job.
	So it was reported that the president was going to sign this.
	Mitch McConnell said he's going to sign the bill.
	He said that yesterday.
	He said that today.
	Today, Mitch McConnell said he'll sign the bill and declare a national emergency.
	That was what people were saying.
	Earlier in this week, I said he should do that.
	I said declare, or rather, sign this bill, get the money, and then declare a national emergency.
	No, we're changing that.
	After we've seen the text of the bill, after they finish the deal, don't sign the bill.
	Just let it die, don't sign it, and then declare a national emergency.
	And then talk about primarying Mitch McConnell.
	And then talk about primarying every single Republican that voted for this.
	Do you understand what a betrayal this is?
	Do you understand that this is, in a very simple way, the American Congress declaring war on the American people?
	That's what it is!
	We elected Donald Trump in 2016 with basically one goal in mind, and there were a lot of reasons.
	There was foreign wars, there was healthcare.
	Right?
	There was trade.
	There was tax cuts.
	But the overriding reason, what started it all in 2015, was we want to stop Mexicans and Hispanics from coming into the country.
	We wanted him to build a physical barrier on the border.
	He said a tall, beautiful, impenetrable, 30-foot wall.
	Mexico's going to pay for it.
	And we're willing to say, OK, maybe Mexico's not going to pay for it.
	We want to secure the border.
	OK, maybe it won't be 30 feet tall.
	OK, maybe it won't be concrete.
	But now, at the end of the day, our bill funds 55 miles of wall.
	It's not even a wall.
	They can veto it if they want it.
	And it comes with amnesty for everybody who ever come into the country illegally, ever, in the history of America.
	You can't have it.
	You can't have it.
	It's loaded with poison pills.
	I think Ann Coulter said this.
	It looks like it was written almost like it was designed to embarrass and humiliate the President.
	It's almost that bad that it looks like it was intended to embarrass the President.
	Because I don't understand how you could be a Republican Immigration Committee person and they stack the Immigration Committee with people like Shelby who are total cucks on immigration.
	And they produced something like this, which they know that would not be amenable to the base, which would not be acceptable in any condition, and they put it on his desk anyway, and they dared him to shut it down.
	But he has to shut it down.
	And I don't know, I hope that as I'm doing this show, at some point there's some announcement that the president's gonna veto it or shut it down or whatever, but this is unacceptable.
	He has to let it die.
	He has to veto it.
	If he passes this, it's over.
	I don't think I've ever said that before.
	I don't think I've ever said that before.
	A lot of people have said this, you know, throughout the past two years.
	They said it in, you know, November 2017 when they talked about giving amnesty to DACA.
	They talked about this in January 2018 when they talked about this grand immigration deal.
	I mean, there were a lot of times when people were willing to say, this is the moment when Trump is cucking and if this happens, it's game over.
	I don't think I've ever said that before, but this truly is the time.
	This is amnesty, and it's amnesty for nothing.
	I mean, this is everything that all the fear mongers, all the black pillars, all the critics warned about, was amnesty in exchange for nothing.
	That's exactly what it is.
	And we saw different variations of this before, where if you looked at it closely, it wasn't really like that, for example.
	And the president's compromise bill that he made in January.
	If you remember, he did a press conference.
	He came out on, I think, the 20th day of the shutdown or something like that.
	And he said, well, here's my final pitch.
	Here's my compromise.
	I'm going to break the gridlock.
	I'm going to break this logjam.
	And I will pitch something that's truly bipartisan and sensible.
	And even in that bill, it was $5.7 billion for a real wall.
	And it was three years of limbo for DACA and temporary protected status.
	So it wasn't even amnesty.
	It wasn't legalization.
	It was a continuation of former programs that were legal to allow them residence in the country, which would expire, which was set to expire within three years.
	And everybody said, oh, there's amnesty.
	Well, it wasn't amnesty.
	And even if it wasn't what we hoped for, we would say, oh, well, at least it's the real deal on the wall.
	At least we get like $6 billion for the wall.
	And previous deals were like that.
	Last year, in January, it was DACA and some might have said it might have even been amnesty.
	Some said it could have just been a permanent immunity for DACA people, which would have been the end of the world because there was a cutoff for that.
	But even still, even if it was an amnesty or something resembling it, we were going to get $25 billion for the wall as opposed to $5 billion.
	$25 billion for the wall and for ICE and for Border Patrol and judges.
	We were going to cut chain migration completely, cut the diversity visa lottery system completely, halving legal immigration, and you would have a full wall.
	I would say, okay, that's a deal.
	But what the scaremongers, the blackpillers, the critics, people said all along was, oh no, it's amnesty for nothing.
	It's amnesty for nothing.
	That was the nightmare scenario.
	And everybody, every time, people like myself said, well, that's not really what's happening.
	We can critique it.
	It's a good idea.
	It's a bad idea.
	It's probably unlikely to happen anyway.
	But it's not that.
	Well that's what this is.
	It's amnesty in exchange for nothing.
	You get immunity.
	Again, complete immunity.
	Sponsors and potential sponsors.
	That's like, that's everybody.
	That's everybody.
	And you're going to get more people.
	And you're not even going to get anything, even if it was a fence.
	But you won't even get that because they'll veto it and it's only in this area anyway.
	So it's amnesty for nothing.
	He's got to shut it down.
	And to show you how like this is a conspiracy, The Angel Moms actually came down to Washington DC.
	The Angel Moms is this non-for-profit and what it is is the families of children that have been killed by illegal immigrants.
	So all these people And they were talked about and talked to extensively during the election.
	All these people had kids that were murdered by illegals.
	A lot of them young, a lot of them older though.
	And President Trump said, I'll never forget you during the campaign.
	They were in Washington D.C.
	They came to the White House and they requested a meeting with the President because of the deal.
	Because it's amnesty!
	And White House aides didn't even tell the President.
	They were shut down, they refused a meeting, and the White House staff did not even tell the President.
	This is from Gerduski.
	He says, quote, Angel moms are in Washington D.C.
	right now and were rejected by the White House when they requested a meeting with the President by his staff.
	Two sources told me the staff doesn't want him to see them because, quote, he won't want to sign the DHS funding bill if he sees dead kids.
	Uh, and then he goes on, quote, from everything I heard, Trump is not even aware they are in town.
	Schumer's office took a meeting with them, but his White House staff denied one.
	So there's obviously a conspiracy going on here.
	There's a conspiracy on the part of the Congressional GOP leadership.
	There's a conspiracy on the part of President Trump's own White House staff to have open borders for the country, to have massive amnesty, to not get the wall completed.
	This is what the man is up against.
	And it's very simple from this point onward.
	We understand what the score is now.
	I think he needs to understand what the score is here.
	Your staff is working against you.
	They don't want the wall.
	They don't want to make America great again.
	They don't want to put America first.
	Your own party does not want the wall.
	They want open borders.
	They do not want to make America great again.
	They do not want to put America first.
	So then, what has to happen now is he has to go to war with all these people.
	He's got to clean out the staff.
	It might be too late, but he's got to do it.
	He's got to go to war against his own party, and that begins with killing this bill.
	I said it earlier this week.
	Dare Mitch McConnell to veto the bill.
	Bring them on television, do a press conference, shut down the bill, but dare Mitch McConnell, dare all the party leaders, Ronna, McDaniel, whatever her name is who runs the party, dare them to look at the, what is it, 90% of Republicans who approve of President Trump's message, 86% of Republicans who want the border wall, tell all of them, dare them to go on television and explain to the American people why we cannot secure the border, even though we control the Senate, even though we control the White House,
	Even though we can allocate $715 billion for the DoD, we can spend $55 billion on Afghanistan a year, we can spend $3.1 billion on foreign aid for Israel, a rich nation, when we can't even allocate $1.5 billion, half that, for a real and actual border wall to secure our own border.
	I think that needs to be explained.
	That needs to happen.
	So there's two options here.
	Either that can happen, And he can be the true and real defender of the American people and the America First agenda, or he can sign the bill, he can pretend like this isn't there, he can try and finesse, oh it's actually a wall, we're setting the table, he can play with the language, semantic arguments, and he can make us be the suckers.
	But those are the only two options here.
	He's been backed against a wall here.
	Or maybe he's backed everyone else up against a wall.
	You know, remains to be seen.
	By the end of the week, we'll know.
	Because again, the deadline is tomorrow night.
	So we'll know by midnight on Friday whether he's going to cuck out.
	And this would be a cucking.
	You know, I always hesitate to use that word.
	But this would be the biggest cucking in the history of cucking.
	This would be the worst thing you could ever see.
	Or if he's going to make the biggest comeback in the history of comebacks.
	And he's going to fight against Mitch McConnell and all these other people.
	But this is a betrayal.
	Make no mistake about it.
	If this doesn't show you what's happening in the country, I don't think anything else will.
	They won't, they literally just will not secure the border.
	And to me, I guess the best part of it all is Israel.
	Because what the foreign aid proves, and people say, oh, why do you focus on Israel?
	Why do you focus on that?
	Here's why.
	Because what it proves is that we are not in control of our own government.
	That's what it proves.
	We are not sovereign anymore.
	Our government does not represent us.
	Our government does not defend us.
	Our government does not protect our interests.
	And you know this because just one week ago, or actually less than a week ago, on Monday, we were talking about AIPAC.
	You had Ilhan Omar, a congresswoman, and she's not somebody I care for, but she said, yeah, AIPAC basically controls the Congress.
	And we saw that over 24 hours, There was a an outcry like you wouldn't believe from McCarthy, from McConnell, from Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, all the congressional leadership, all the media, all the punditry class.
	You must apologize for saying what?
	That a organization which raised a hundred million dollars And I'm sure they organize a lot more money than that in campaign contributions with somehow manipulating policy in the government.
	Yeah, imagine that.
	And they got their apology.
	And at the end of the week, we cannot allocate half of the money that we give that country, that we give Israel in foreign aid.
	And the argument that they always make, why we're giving them that money, is they're a Western developed democracy.
	They're a candle in a sea of barbarity, of darkness.
	Well, if that's the case, they can defend themselves, they can take care of themselves, but they don't.
	They come here, and they take our money, and our representatives give it to them.
	And when Israel is attacked, our congresspeople, they pass a bill 452 to nothing.
	Or, I'm sorry, I think it was 432, something like that.
	But over 400 to nothing to protect them from being criticized and to authorize billions of dollars of aid for them.
	That shows you exactly what's going on.
	We are not in control.
	This is an occupied government.
	You also might have heard earlier this week from a 60 Minutes interview that the Deputy FBI Director McCabe was talking about overthrowing the President with the 25th Amendment.
	We are not in control of the country.
	Every one of these people.
	Republicans, Democrats, media, it doesn't matter.
	They're not us.
	The divide is no longer right and left, okay?
	It's no longer conservative and liberal.
	I don't even think it's black and white, as far as I'm concerned.
	It's them versus us.
	It's Washington D.C.
	versus the American people.
	And, you know, I guess maybe some groups are more willing to understand this than others.
	Some groups are pawns of the elites.
	And we know that.
	We've talked about that.
	But that's what it has to be from here on out.
	It's the rich versus the middle class.
	It is the politicians versus the citizens.
	It's the media versus media consumers.
	But that's the way it has to be now.
	This was Fort Sumter, you know, whatever it was.
	This was the shot heard around the world.
	Because this is a scandal.
	This is an embarrassment.
	It's a disgrace.
	Complete and total amnesty.
	And we don't even get a single dollar for a proper border wall.
	But three billion for Israel.
	That should tell you everything you need to know.
	Now, on the flip side, there are some other things that we can do here.
	Aside from killing the bill.
	I know I said earlier, sign the bill and get the money.
	We've seen the bill.
	Kill the bill.
	Declare a national emergency.
	And pull other funds.
	So they've said, Mick Mulvaney has said, that they found about 2.2 billion dollars in funds that can be mobilized if the president declares a national emergency.
	Now, a word on the national emergency, there's a lot of misinformation, there's a lot of disagreement.
	I've heard from people in the White House that it could be a very good thing.
	I've heard from people in the White House that it could go nowhere.
	I've heard from several people in the White House that this is a path to nowhere by itself.
	By itself.
	But some people, like Grodusky, have said that actually you could do this no problem.
	Apparently, and this is what Gerdusky says, and I trust him, he's a good source, he says that there's actually no legal standing for the Democrats or the Congress or anybody else to challenge the national emergency.
	So people saying, oh, well, they could shut it down in the judges or whatever.
	This is according to Gerdusky.
	I don't know, a lot of other people say this, some other people disagree, but they say there's simply no legal standing to challenge it because it has been used extensively by past administrations.
	And it's also been used by past administrations to get around appropriations laws.
	So some people have said in the past that...
	Well, if the Congress says you can't spend money on something, it would be unconstitutional for the President to spend money on that same thing with a national emergency.
	That's been done before.
	So I guess there would be no legitimate standing to challenge that on a legal basis.
	And so that's the argument.
	Some people say that it would be challenged anyway, in spite of that.
	Another argument I've seen from the conservative ink-type people, the true conservatives, is that if we pass a national emergency, this would set a terrible precedent.
	Well, there's two reasons why that's very stupid.
	First and foremost is it doesn't matter.
	We're in a crisis here.
	Our country is being invaded.
	You build the wall.
	You know, it's sort of like the Alien and Sedition Act or the Sedition Act or the rounding up of the Japanese in World War II.
	It really doesn't matter what the precedent is.
	It's like the suspension of habeas corpus.
	You're at war.
	There's a crisis.
	There's an emergency.
	The government has to act.
	It doesn't matter what will happen in 20 years.
	We're not going to be around in 20 years.
	We're going to be drowning In a sea of just low-IQ, low-skilled, violent people, it doesn't matter.
	Oh, the Democrats are going to use it.
	Texas is going to go blue in 10 years.
	Democrats will never lose another election until the end of time.
	You think it matters if they're going to be able to use a national emergency for illegitimate purposes?
	They won't need to!
	They're going to have 500 seats in the legislature.
	They're going to have 15 Supreme Court justices.
	They're gonna have everybody.
	They've already got everybody except for Donald Trump and Stephen Miller.
	What difference does it make?
	That's number one.
	And then number two is that, and this is a little bit more technical, but the state of emergency was designed specifically for unauthorized construction.
	People are saying, what if What if the Democrats use it to ban guns?
	Well, it can't be used for that.
	If you actually know anything about the law, it's designed specifically and invoking particular provisions are for unauthorized construction.
	So people... Oh, it could be used for anything!
	Wrong!
	It's very limited in scope and it's been...
	It's gone through the courts, I think, on more than one occasion to discuss exactly that fact.
	So that's completely wrong.
	And look, if he declares a national emergency, hey, maybe it's a bridge to nowhere.
	Do it anyway.
	Do it anyway.
	Try.
	But then do other things.
	They say, this is according to the Examiner, This is from, yeah, it says, quote, Capitol Hill aides confirm that there is $21 billion in unobligated military construction funds at the Department of Defense that Trump can pull for a border wall.
	Some of that money is in the OCO, which is the wartime funding account, and then they go on to say that none of the $10 billion in DoD military construction for fiscal 2019 has been obligated, meaning it's all up for grabs for the president's border wall, and this is according to aides from the Hill.
	So there you have it, 21 billion dollars in unobligated construction funds.
	You don't even have a national emergency that you need to declare.
	We went into a few different provisions yesterday.
	If you look at treasury forfeiture funds, if you look at civil engineering funds, if you look at other areas where you can pull money, there's a lot of money that can be used with the national emergency without a national emergency.
	Veto the bill, declare a national emergency, get as much money as possible, and begin construction this week.
	And if they try to stop you, keep going.
	If the judges try to stop you, keep going.
	It's time for that now.
	Because if you don't, we're going to lose in 2020.
	We will never secure the board.
	It really is at that point.
	And I know I've challenged that kind of doomsday type thinking before.
	But really, I think this is where the rubber meets the road.
	If he signs this bill, it's amnesty.
	And then here, you're not going to get anything on immigration for the next two years.
	And Trump will lose if he signs this in 2020.
	So, you know, there won't be time after that two years.
	So it would be game over.
	So veto the bill or kill the bill.
	Declare the national emergency.
	Get the other funding.
	But it's time.
	It's time for a serious border wall.
	It's time for Safety, it's time for demographic security, and you know, people have talked about the crime issue, the crime component.
	To me, it's not even that.
	At the core of it, obviously, is the problem of demography.
	At the core of it is that, I mean, we're simply being invaded by people who are not American, and that's the bottom line.
	But even deeper than that, what the real struggle about, what the real struggle is about, and I alluded to this earlier, is a struggle for American sovereignty.
	Everywhere you look, our country is just being, it's being raped.
	There's no better way to say it than we are just simply We are being raped in the most brutal fashion by foreign countries.
	Because you look at all the issues that the president ran on.
	Trade, foreign policy, immigration.
	We cannot have the American people put first.
	And these are areas where we've been abused for a long time.
	If you look at trade, what do we have?
	Like a trillion dollar trade deficit?
	That's coming out of your money.
	That's coming out of your wealth.
	When they're buying assets and they're buying credit and they're taking debt, you know, your grandchildren are already in debt because foreign countries are buying our public debt because we have a trade deficit.
	Think about that.
	So we can't have a good trade policy because, yeah, foreign countries and even aside from foreign countries, multinational corporations, you know, this great free market, it's big corporations, it's big business.
	Which is buying our trade representatives to make it that way because they benefit from hiring cheap labor and sending it to America without paying any tariff.
	So on trade, we're getting raped on that because foreign countries have bought out the people that are making the decisions.
	On foreign policy, yeah we've been trying to get people out of Iraq and Afghanistan for 10 years now.
	Barack Obama ran in 2008 on bringing the troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan.
	Two wars we should have never been in.
	Iraq more so, but Afghanistan also.
	I think we shouldn't have been there either way.
	But we've seen that over the past 10 years we have stayed there and actually we've gone other places.
	The president tries to bring us home and we're stopped by none other than Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates.
	So they control our foreign policy and it's you dying over there.
	4,000 Americans dead in the Middle East.
	Six trillion dollars spent for a war that has nothing to do with us.
	We can't secure the border, but we're over there in five, fifteen different wars because other countries have bought our Congress.
	Because organizations like AIPAC have bought our Congress.
	And by the way, Zionist Jews run the media, so you can't even talk about it.
	Occupied country.
	And then you look at immigration.
	The same is true there.
	You've got multinational corporations, people like the Koch Foundation, among others, which have so thoroughly bought and bribed the Congress that they simply will not, they will not, it will never happen, allocate any money to properly secure the border.
	And a lot of people are sort of deluded with this.
	They said, oh, Mitch McConnell's actually a good guy.
	Oh, the GOP, we just got to vote for the GOP.
	You know, maybe they're going to do it.
	Republicans are the party's strong Strong borders.
	Charlie Kirk, who is the grifter-in-chief, the biggest fraud, the biggest sellout.
	He is in it for the money.
	Shame on anybody who does any business with him.
	Yeah, shame on everybody who does business with him.
	They say, oh, this deal is perfect.
	It's the art of the deal, whatever.
	They say that because they are paid.
	They are paid by people who benefit financially from cheap labor.
	It's been that way for 50 years.
	And so it just won't happen.
	The only person in Washington who wants to secure the border is Trump and Stephen Miller.
	And that's it.
	And so I think that's the lesson here.
	I think that's what was proven unequivocally, beyond a shadow of a doubt, is that we are no longer a sovereign nation.
	That's simple.
	You know, you elect people, you vote, whatever, and that's what happens.
	I know I said in the past, don't believe people who say that your vote doesn't matter.
	It does matter!
	But, what has been demonstrated here is that it's going to take a lot more than Donald Trump.
	What has to happen is a revolution.
	And I don't mean a revolution in the streets, I don't mean get a costume and outfit on, get some gladiator helmet, and tape a foam-like spear together, Go into the streets and battle with Antifa.
	I'm not saying that.
	I'm saying there has to be a real populist revolution happen.
	Sort of like the Glorious Revolution in 17th century England.
	Sort of like that.
	Where we just have to say, we don't believe the media anymore.
	If you're in Congress, we're going to vote you out.
	It doesn't matter who you are.
	You know, out of those 84 people that voted for this bill, we're gonna vote all of them out.
	We're gonna vote everybody out.
	And we're gonna keep voting people out until we get the right people.
	And that's...
	Short of that happening, nothing is going to change.
	Now, I don't know if there's great prospects for that happening, but that's the way it has to be.
	So that's the immigration bill and I would have liked to talk more about McCabe and this Jussie Smollett thing.
	We'll have to save that for tomorrow.
	Jussie Smollett, he always gets pushed to the back of the bus by immigration.
	Funny how that works, right?
	But that's our immigration deal.
	It's a disaster.
	Has to be killed or vetoed.
	There's no other way around that.
	There's no recovering if it gets passed.
	That's the bottom line.
	We're gonna take a look at our Streamlabs and Superchats and we'll see what people are saying.
	We'll see what the reaction is here.
	But it's bleak.
	I gotta tell you, it's bleak.
	Hard to overstate how this could be any worse.
	Because it can't.
	It cannot get any worse than this.
	And let's see, we've got some Streamlabs here.
	Or I'm sorry, actually there's just been an update.
	The House has passed the bill from the Senate.
	So now it really is up to Trump.
	So we'll see.
	But let's take a look at Streamlabs.
	This is taking a sec to load.
	If it takes too long, I'll just jump into our Super Chats here.
unidentified		Yeah, I guess we'll start with the Super Chats then.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Robert Foy says, Seriously, people are still... We've got a national emergency.
		We've got a national crisis.
		The country is occupied by big business.
		And I guess that's the other thing.
		For all the free market people, this is the end.
		We are putting our foot down.
		This is officially the end of Ben Shapiro.
		This is the end of the free market worship.
		It stops here and now.
		Because you know that all these people that worship the free market, that cut the taxes for the free market and all that, those are the people that are behind this.
		Who do you think is bringing in all the cheap labor?
		You know, do you think it's... I don't know who they think it is, if not for cheap labor.
		You know, they say, oh, it's only Democrats that are for open borders.
		Clearly, that is not the case.
		Clearly, it is both parties that are for open borders.
		If there was any lingering doubt about that, and there shouldn't have been, but if there was, Mitch McConnell just put this on the President's desk, okay?
		Who do you think it is behind the Republicans that wants mass immigration into America?
		And they obviously want it.
		It's big business.
		So all these, oh the free market, we love the free market.
		No taxes for anybody and we can't restrict the ability of individuals.
		The freer the market, the freer the people.
		Wrong!
		It is time for the state to crush the free market.
		From now on, businesses and the market serve the people.
		That's how it has to be.
		There's no freedom, there's no Individual liberty?
		That's all secondary.
		That's all an afterthought.
		The primary concern now is, are businesses serving the good of the people?
		Are they executing the will of the people?
		And if they're not, they're going to get heavy fines, they're going to get taxed, they're going to get thrown in jail.
		But that's how it has to be.
		There is simply no argument left for these private sector, conservatarian people, because enough is enough and we know that.
		But anyway, we've got our super chat here from Robert Foy.
		As I say, the country is in crisis and And he's still talking about, and this just goes to show how you really have to have a high IQ to watch the show.
		If you have a low IQ, don't watch the show.
		Don't even give super chats.
		Just go away.
		But Robert Foy, who is among the low IQ, he says, are you not concerned with having the same opinion as cuck servanism, left-wing hegemony, and academia and media on Lincoln?
		He centralized power to help create the global homo empire we suffer from today.
		So you have people that are still hung up on a passing remark I made at the end of a 90-minute show three days ago.
		The country's burning, but that's all right.
		We'll talk about Abraham Lincoln, right?
		No, I like Abraham Lincoln for different reasons, clearly.
		Abraham Lincoln has been subject to a rewriting of history, you know, that he was this great benefactor of the black race, and that simply isn't true.
		We know this because he said, I would not free a single slave if it, you know, if I could end the Civil War tomorrow, you know, something to that effect.
		And he did not believe in the racial or political equality of black people.
		He was going to send them back to Africa.
		Now, I don't believe in any of that.
		But for people that say that Abraham Lincoln was this patron saint of equality, it's not true.
		I like Abraham Lincoln because he held the country together.
		He created the American nation in a true sense.
		Sam Huntington writes about this.
		You didn't have real national identity prior to the Civil War.
		It was largely regional identity.
		So out of the Civil War, he created the American nation.
		If you're a nationalist, if you're a conservative, you like that.
		If you're a gay, left-wing regionalist, if you're still hung up on your silly local customs, then maybe you can't see that.
		Like I said the other day, you got grits in your ear, your hat's on a little too tight, cowboy.
		James says, you going to change your intro to say fence?
		No, we're going to keep the wall, because we have to have the wall.
		James Russell says, at least we're leaving Syria and not bombing Iran.
		Well, that's a whole other issue, but that'll have to be for another show.
	Basketball American says, didn't Bush declare 13 national emergencies and Obama declare 12 national emergencies?
	What's the effing problem?
	Media negativity much?
	Great show.
	Well, thanks.
	And yeah, it's true.
	Extensive national emergencies by past administrations.
	Clinton had a significant amount of national emergencies and nobody talked about him.
	Obama declared a national emergency for swine flu, okay, when like 10 people died.
	So yeah, it's time.
	Blake Haymore says, hey Nick, look out, I think Moto Moto likes you.
	I don't know who that is.
	Daddy Boom says, Kushner in Supreme hoodie converting Ivanka to Judaism.
	Be like, are you sure you want to do this little girl?
	What if we're dangerous?
	Follow IG at boomerangism.
	Yeah, that's uh, that's very hip coming from a boomer.
	I'm surprised what a relevant reference that is.
	A123 says, at what point would you stop supporting Trump?
	I will never stop supporting Trump.
	I don't know why people ask me that.
	Pragmatic Culture says, we have one guy who's trying to make a difference and people are like, at what point would you stop supporting that guy?
	I will always support him.
	He can make mistakes and this would be a terrible mistake, but I will always support him for what he did.
	I don't think you can ever... I will never be disloyal to him.
	You know, that's the most important thing is loyalty and all these people he was the one guy who stood up with all his money and all these people who criticize him they sit around and they post things on the internet and they're like Trump didn't do enough I'm done with him Yeah.
	Well, Trump took his money, his reputation, his family, I mean, everything, and he put it on the line for the good of the country and to try to make a difference.
	And if he didn't succeed, you know, look, he's the man in the arena.
	So I will never stop supporting him.
	People say, well, at what point?
	He's the only one, the one guy in Washington.
	It would be like if you came up to somebody, you're like, at what point would you stop loving your father?
	At what point would you say, I'm disowning my son or something?
	You know, the one person in your life You know, at what point would you tell your parents, I don't support you anymore.
	I don't like you anymore.
	Well, you know, I don't think he can really revoke what he's done for the country, even if he makes mistakes.
	Pragmatic Culture says knowing Democrats won't give him any more or relinquish exceptions and that the government shutdown was a failing tactic.
	What is your strategy suggestion?
	Because I don't see many options left.
	Declare the national emergency.
	Use the other money.
	It's the only way.
	And like I said, it might not work.
	Might not work.
	Because you simply don't have enough staff in the White House that are on Trump's side to get it done just through the executive branch.
	Doesn't matter.
	Try.
	But to submit to this bill, to pass this bill, would be unconscionable.
	So, it doesn't, at this point, to me it doesn't really matter if it gets put up or not.
	You look at the forces arrayed against him, it's obviously too powerful.
	It just is.
	Sometimes it's like that.
	But if at the very least he were to try, if he declared a national emergency and he put it in motion, and even if he got a mile of wall built, I would say that was a small victory over the power in Washington.
	And then maybe we have a shot in 2020, and then maybe we could get it built in the next term.
	Who knows, right?
	But you're right.
	I mean, there are no options.
	There are no good options to get the wall built.
	I think from the start you had no good options to get the wall built.
	But now we're being forced to consider bad options because Congress is just simply unwilling to get it through.
	So National Emergency, use other funds.
	It's dubious if that'll get done, if that'll even begin before the election.
	But that's our best option.
	That's our best bet right now.
	God's plans is... But Nick, what about my precedent declaring a national emergency sets?
	Imagine what future Democrats with different values might do with that option, yeah?
	We went over that objection.
	Mountain Gear says Pelosi slash Democrats already announcing their revenge, quote, national emergency declarations on guns, income inequality, climate change, etc.
	once in power.
	Doesn't matter.
	Do it anyway.
	Does not matter.
	And the reason why, more fundamentally, is because it doesn't matter, but secondarily because, again, on a technical level, there are limits to the national emergency.
	The National Emergency explicitly says you can authorize new construction.
	So, I mean, there's really no legal ambiguity as to income inequality or guns versus building a physical structure.
	One is totally and explicitly justified and authorized, the other is not.
	So I would say go ahead.
	Pragmatic Culture says Trump has to pull an Andrew Jackson here.
	So true.
	John Smith says the only hope is in Jesus Christ.
	As always.
	Yes, very true.
	Douchebag says I see something interesting.
	Since Alvini Italy closed ports to the migrants, Spain's been taking them.
	The far-right party Vox went from 0% in the last poll to now 13.5%.
	Interesting pattern.
	Well, that's what happens in all these different countries.
	You bring in immigrants and the anti-immigrant parties do well.
	It almost makes you think there's something wrong with the immigrants, right?
	It almost makes you think that there's something beyond skin color that is different between us and them.
	Huh.
	John Sayers says call 202-456-1414.
	Press 1.
	Human answers.
	Ask for Avi Berkovits.
	It's Kushter's number 2.
	Tell him how we feel.
	Go ahead.
	Yeah, do it.
	Sharia LaBeouf says conflicting info but two local outlets reporting that Chicago PD conclude that Smollett attack was staged according to a Variety report.
	Yeah.
	I saw that.
	We're going to go over that in pretty great detail tomorrow though, so I'm going to save it for tomorrow if the masses don't mind because there's a lot to unpack there.
	And, you know, I predicted it would be a hoax.
	I guess it's not that great of a prediction because it was obvious, but I said that in January.
	I said that earlier this week, so a little, a nice little vindication there.
	Well, Monkey says, Happy Valentine's Day, Nick!
	Got any dinner reservations for you and your girlfriend?
	I mean, haha.
	Hey, how about that immigration deal?
	No, but seriously, Nick, I got a question for you.
	Should I join IE?
	To the left, take it back.
	Okay, this is just... My audience, what a great audience I have.
	No, no dinner reservations on Valentine's Day.
	Today, I am... I have a date with the country, with the national interest, which is why I'm here, with you guys.
	Yeah, I'm assuming that's a joke.
	Ice says, Did you see the culture video of Will Chamberlain taking Lil Benji to town on the national emergency?
	Heck off, Neocon.
	I only fear Democrats will use a national emergency to put white men in chastity and have us be slaves to cute Asian girls.
	That would suck.
unidentified		Ha ha.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that would be terrible.
		But about Will Chamberlain, yeah, I really hate that Ollie keeps putting this faggot on my timeline.
		I like Ollie.
		I like Ollie's content.
		And then I thought Will Chamberlain blocked me.
		I thought I blocked him.
		But Ollie goes and puts this absolute clown, this absolute joke of a man on my timeline.
		And I'm gonna have to mute.
		I'm gonna have to whip out the mute button if it continues because You know, I don't know, people are like, oh, this guy has a good take, and they forget that he's a 50% Zionist defector to Israel, basically, and a smarmy little homo who's friends with Jared Holt.
		So I think people are forgetting that when they watch his little clips, and he's like, you know, he's lip-syncing to his music and stretching, and he's this fat retard.
		Yeah, I think people forget about that.
		Darren Wilson says, are you finally ready to vindicate the Black Pillars?
		I'll still enjoy this, uh, his neg tweets, but how can he be the face of the movement if he signs this?
		Thank you, Rabbi Jared.
		Obviously a low IQ post.
		The Black Pillars are not vindicated because the Black Pillars, their contention was that the President, uh, was cucking on the wall.
		And, and I'll admit, you know, that may happen.
		We'll have to see.
		I'll say that he cucked then, but Donald Trump has not cucked up until this point.
		I mean that, that remains to be true.
		People said, oh well Trump is, he's bought and paid for, he's against the wall, or whatever.
		I mean Trump clearly still wants to build the wall, clearly.
		And if he signs this bill, then that'll show that he's turned, that something has gone terribly wrong.
		Either it's a big miscalculation, or he's just cucking.
		In which case I'll say, yep, you know, he cucked here.
		But the Black Pillars are wrong about everything else, you know.
		People say that if Trump, if there's a setback in the Trump administration, that means that they were right all along.
		Well, what did they say in June of 2017, or in May of 2017?
		They said Trump is going to invade Syria this month, and it didn't happen.
		In January 2018, they said Trump is going to sign DACA amnesty and get nothing in return, and it didn't happen.
		They said in May of 2018, Trump is going to war in Syria this month, and it didn't happen.
		They said last summer, Trump is going to invade Iran, and it didn't happen.
		So, you know, people are like, oh, Trump did something wrong, that means the Black Pillars are right, and Nick was wrong.
		Well, wrong!
		Wrong!
		Because they make very specific predictions about very specific things.
		They're wrong every week for two years.
		Trump does something wrong, which, by the way, I've been forecasting since the midterms.
		I said, this is bad news.
		And it changed after the midterms.
		And people are like, oh no, they were right all along.
		Please spare me the low IQ takes.
		And then Donald Trump can't be the face of our movement.
		Okay, who's it gonna be?
		You?
		Who's it gonna be?
		Richard Spencer?
		Matt Heimbach?
		I don't understand why people are so eager to jump ship, you cowards!
		Fools!
		We're going to jump ship on the president.
		Okay, good luck without him.
		Who's going to be the leader of the movement?
		Marco Rubio?
		There's nobody else.
		Obviously he's not the best in the world.
		We need somebody who has better political experience or expertise.
		Maybe somebody like that, but who's it going to be?
		Kobach?
		He doesn't even hold elected office.
		He doesn't hold any office.
		Ted Cruz?
		Oh yeah, that ought to really work out well, I'm sure.
		Marco Rubio, Guys Bond paid for by Israel.
	So, I don't know who you think it's going to be, but...
	I don't know what the eagerness is.
	We have to get rid of Trump.
	Who's it going to be?
	Shut up.
	Shut up.
	You have done nothing.
	You have done nothing.
	Trump, if he botches this, okay, yeah, he only won against Hillary Clinton, which is monumental.
	He only pulled us back from war with Iran, war with North Korea, war against Assad.
	He only reformed our relationship with China permanently.
	Right?
	He only did a lot of other good things, which, you know, they're not our top priority, but he got rid of the individual mandate and some other things.
	So, people that do that, I just can't stand, you know.
	You're a treacherous rat.
	I'm sorry, but that's just the case.
	You're treacherous if you do that.
	You're a traitor to the president.
	And, you know, I don't understand what people think is going to happen.
	You know, there are powerful forces going against us.
	And if it's not going 100% sunny all the time, always, and at the hint of trouble you're going to turn your back and start looking for new candidates and start voting for people that are worse out of spite, you know, good luck.
	But I guess that's, you know, that's the alt-right.
	That's your high-trust society.
	That's your glorious, you know, white identity movement that is so quick.
	To do that.
	So I can't stand when people say that stuff.
	Yeah, it's bad.
	It's very bad.
	Well, thanks.
	Top five movies.
	Highly relevant question.
	like Jordan Peterson make it out to be.
	Yeah, it's bad.
	It's very bad.
	My son Dwayne says, Last night we got your top five rappers.
	Tonight can we get your top five movies?
	Love the show, big guy.
	Keep up the good work.
	Well, thanks.
	Top five movies.
	Highly relevant question.
	I would say, oh, I don't know.
	I would probably put Taxi Driver at number one.
	You know, I really like movies about a guy who becomes increasingly isolated, increasingly alienated from society.
	And then one day he just goes off.
	You know, I really like movies with that sort of a theme, where it's just totally isolated and people just keep pushing.
	People just keep pushing and pushing and pushing.
	And he says, you better stop pushing.
	You better stop.
	And then one day they just push too far and everybody regrets it.
	You know, I really like movies where that's the theme.
	For some reason, they just... For some reason, I don't know, I just enjoy seeing that.
	So I really like Taxi Driver, you know, a movie about a guy who's got a couple of screws loose and he just keeps getting pushed and then he goes off.
	But I would say there's some other movies that I like also.
	I like Casablanca.
	I think that's a perfect movie.
	I like... what else?
	I'm trying to think.
	I don't know.
	I'm kind of blanking.
	The films I would say Goodfellas would be up there just in terms of enjoyment quality You know because there are movies that are like objectively the best and then there are ones that you just enjoy I like Citizen Kane a lot.
	I know that's like everybody's top pick, but that was a good one.
	I like Vertigo I don't one is never on television, but I like that one a lot so maybe that's your top five But I don't know that's just off the top of my head David S says, despite autists only making up 1.7% of the population, 110% of all knickers are autistic.
	Source BigGuyTable43A.
	Yeah, big if true.
	Italian pal says, hey Nick, it seems that any movement that's implicitly or explicitly pro-white is inevitably demonized as being associated with the KKK or Nazis.
	Can we effectively combat these labels or do we have to just accept that we'll always get called these labels?
	Well here, eventually the labels just don't mean anything.
	Which is what we should be hoping for.
	It's actually a good thing when the left says, oh, this is racist, this is white supremacist, this is white nationalist.
	We should welcome that.
	We should accept that.
	It's awesome when they do that.
	They're defining it down.
	You know, you notice they don't call you racist anymore.
	Or that's not the one that they really hit you hard with.
	Because racist doesn't mean anything anymore.
	If they call somebody a racist, nobody cares anymore.
	So they call you a white supremacist.
	They call you a neo-Nazi.
	They say you're literally Hitler.
	And they keep having to up the ante.
	And when they start calling people like Tucker Carlson white nationalists, that's the best thing that can happen for people in the dissident right.
	For explicit white identitarians.
	I don't think Tucker's a white identitarian.
	When he gets called a white nationalist, normal everyday people say, what?
	Tucker?
	You know, all these boomers go, what?
	Sonny?
	What, this Jared Holt character says that Tucker Carlson's a white nationalist?
	I watch him every night.
	He's fantastic.
	And then when we get called that, then everyone's like, oh, it's the same, it's a boy who cried wolf.
	So that's, to me, how I see it playing out, is we'll keep getting called that, it'll lose meaning eventually.
	Amnesty Dons is completely blackpilled after today.
	How are we going to deal with this ultimate betrayal by Trump?
	Any real nationalists that can primary him?
	You know, again, with this dumb nonsense.
	Hopefully Mueller indicts Jared and deports him back to Zion.
	Yeah, true.
	Nobody's going to primary Trump.
	That's not going to happen.
	They've already locked down the nomination, basically.
	Nobody would have more popularity than him.
	Those things just don't work, you know?
	People have tried, you know, Pat Buchanan tried to primary George Bush, and it didn't work.
	Even though George Bush lied and wasn't conservative and all the rest, it didn't work.
	So, people have to get out of this baby mentality.
	People, nibbles be acted like babies.
	This didn't go the way I want.
	I want other guy.
	I want another guy to make it better.
	Not gonna happen.
	Sometimes you don't have a good option.
	Sometimes you do not have an ideal option, a better option.
	Sometimes you have what you have.
	What we have is Trump.
	Take it or leave it.
	You don't like it?
	I don't know.
	Go to another country?
	Join the militia?
	Kill yourself?
	I don't know.
	Try and run for president yourself?
	But that's who we have.
	There's nobody else.
	Uh, maybe in four years you'll have somebody else.
	Maybe in eight years you'll have somebody else.
	But that's our guy for now.
	And that's what we got.
	So we have to move on from this juvenile mentality of, I don't like the cards I've been dealt.
	I want new cards!
	Give me new cards!
	This isn't good enough.
	I'll take a bad... I'll just take a bad hand over this one.
	I'll just...
	You know, it's like I always do this with my parents.
	Like if my parents tell me to do something and I don't want to do it, or if I have to do something I don't want to do, I'll do something that hurts myself.
	It's called cutting your nose to spite your face.
	I will do that.
	And that's what people are doing when they say, we'll vote for Tulsi Gabbard instead.
	Oh really?
	You're going to vote for someone who's explicitly, unapologetically, Pro-amnesty, anti-wall.
	What is she?
	Pro-abortion, pro-gun control, pro-gay.
	She's in the Council of Foreign Relations to spite Trump and she's a woman and she's non-white.
	Yeah, good luck with that.
	So all these people, what are we gonna do?
	I'm blackmailed.
	We need someone who's going to make it better.
	It's going to suck.
	It's going to be a war for the next 50 years and we're going to have options that are not good.
	Yeah, that's just how it's going to have to be.
	There are no good options.
	After a hundred years of neglect and bad policy and bad habits and bad actors, you don't have good options.
	You don't have someone who's going to ride in on a white horse and fix everything.
	You know, sometimes things like this happen.
	And this setback, as I said during the show, is a disaster.
	It's the worst.
	It's a cucking.
	It is a substantial betrayal.
	But that's who we got.
	What other options do you have?
	You don't have any.
	Is there anybody else?
	No, there isn't.
	Well, what about Ann Coulter?
	What about Tucker Carlson?
	Yeah, that's not gonna happen, okay?
	Tucker Carlson does a show on television.
	Ann Coulter is a woman who writes books.
	Nobody's gonna primary Trump anytime soon.
	Certainly nobody who's to the right of Trump.
	Not gonna happen.
	I hate to break it to you.
	That's not a white pill.
	I'm agreeing.
	That's a stoic pill.
	Look, these are the options.
	These are the cards we've been dealt.
	People like to hear that.
	That's the fact, though.
	David S. says, these traders in Congress are giving money to Israel and giving our country away to minorities, but I still haven't gotten my tax returns back three weeks after filing.
	These people don't work for us and they should be treated as such.
	True.
	Justice Kavanaugh says Chicago PD sources allegedly have told New York Magazine writer Yasir Ali that they can't make any promises about charging Jussie Smollett, citing race relations between CPD and the community.
	Is this not a perfect example of racial privilege?
	Oh, of course it is, 100%.
	And that's the thing, when black people, when the black community is hurt or offended or whatever, they lash out, they impose a penalty.
	And nothing similar happens on our side.
	Based One says, you are right, Nick.
	We need to reevaluate how we see the free market.
	The boomers in office now don't realize how the opposition is using the free market against their own people.
	Milo gets BTFO'd by every platform imaginable.
	Where is the free market then?
	Well, exactly.
	And with any of these people.
	Amazon paid no money in taxes on $54 billion in profits.
	No taxes.
	I'm gonna have to pay taxes this year.
	And I'm a small YouTube content creator.
	I'll have to pay a much, much, much higher rate.
	Zero times any number is still zero.
	So...
	I'm gonna have to pay an infinitely higher rate of tax than Amazon on 54 billion dollars in profits and Charlie Kirk and others turn a blind eye to that.
	They say that's great.
	That's the free market.
	The government wastes the money anyway.
	No, sorry.
	That has to stop.
	So, I agree.
	We've got a couple more Super Chats here.
	Let's take a look.
	Well, yeah, you can see the future.
	That's Commander Heimbach to you.
	Yeah, exactly.
	thing.
	I think even when Trump cucks tomorrow, which he will, the dissonant right and paleoconservative will always be there and grow.
	Well, yeah, you can see the future.
	Josh Sayers says, That's Commander Heim back to you.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Exactly right.
	Pragmatic Sensible.
	Realistic.
	Sober.
	You know, these are the kinds of attributes that we need.
	Not this sort of fanciful, who's gonna be the white pill savior?
	You know, I don't think I've ever said Trump is going to fix everything.
	I don't think I've ever said that.
	I always said, look, X, Y, or Z has happened because he's trying this strategy.
	Or, well, this is how it is because the courts have stopped him.
	You know, for example, when we talked about the immigration deal last year, people said, oh, you're white-pilling when you say that Trump doesn't really want to give amnesty for nothing, actually wants this deal.
	Well, that wasn't a white-pill.
	I said, what he's trying to do is he's doing this tactic.
	And when he says, "I'll sign anything," that was a tactic.
	And when people said, "You're white-pilling because you said that his bombing Syria is just an attempt to leverage Kim Jong-un into North Korea negotiations." Well, that's not really a white pill.
	I mean, that's just saying, what is his intention?
	What is the strategy there?
	Is it working?
	Well, kind of.
	But it's in contrast to people who say, "Trump is sold out.
	Everything is over.
	The sky is falling.
	Join my militia." So I don't think I've ever, you know, I use the white pill meme.
	I guess, you know, I can't really... It would be foolish to say I've never talked about the eternally white pill meme and all that, but if you're saying you're optimistic about something, you're saying everything's gonna go well, I've never said that.
	So now not to be technical but let's see we've got another one here from Josh Sarah says Nick have you ever seen the Christopher Walken Walker Walker lion speech it perfectly encapsulates you poke poke poke go off moments now I haven't seen that basketball American says what's your favorite Michael Bay movie I don't I don't really watch any of those I watched a couple of the Transformers movies but that's about it I think
	level bass says if trump signs this i'm getting a mohawk and aviator sunglasses yeah i'm with you on that one michael mckenzie says god bless you buddy hey hit the big show soon info wars etc exposing this this bill in detail whether he signs it or not so people don't overlook it i will be sure to get on info wars 100 Highman Protector?
	That's the other thing.
	You know, InfoWars will bring on, like, Gav McInnes and these others.
	Really classic.
	Really class act.
	Highman Protector says these jump-shit, blackpilling, alt-right losers are just spiteful little girls.
	Well, that's exactly what the mentality is.
	I don't know if by saying that people are gonna threaten to fight me, like the last time.
	But, uh... And I don't... Look.
	I understand the frustration.
	I understand why people are disappointed.
	I am abrasive.
	I tell it like it is.
	I'm frank.
	I'm straightforward.
	So I understand why people get upset when I say that and they want to, oh, just this little cuck, this Trump shill.
	They want to drop poopy all over the comments section.
	I understand why people are offended by that or why they're frustrated, but that doesn't help.
	That kind of thinking is wrong.
	It is flawed.
	You know, if you're thinking in that way, stop.
	You know, please just stop.
	Reel it in.
	You know, take a couple of deep breaths.
	Let yourself get mad.
	You know, kick the table around.
	Get in the nuclear bunker for a little while.
	Get in the fetal position.
	And then when you've calmed down, then think, okay, well, what are our other options?
	Does it help us or does it hurt us to oppose Trump?
	Does voting for President Trump in 2020, is he a better option than Tulsi Gabbard?
	And think it all the way through.
	Is he a better option than whoever the Democrats are going to put up?
	And think it all the way through, in terms of policy, but also in terms of us, pragmatically.
	Are we better off if we get a Democrat in office who increases immigration, who gives amnesty to immigrants?
	Is that going to help us?
	Is it going to help us to have somebody who's going to enforce gun control and you can't arm yourself?
	Is it going to help us that they're going to completely kill any attempt at free speech legislation and internet?
	It's not happening now.
	But is it going to help that they're going to crack down on hate speech?
	Because you know they will.
	Will that help our cause?
	Even if you don't believe it's going to fix things in the ballot box, will that help anybody?
	No, of course not.
	So you really have to take a deep breath.
	I understand people are upset.
	People might not like that I'm so frank and straightforward about it, but you gotta have a sober mentality about it.
	You might have to, uh, grit your teeth, do what has to be done.
	You know, that's how it goes.
	Eddie Cade says, Nick, I'm sitting in class today and my white boomer professor used Lil Pump and SoundCloud rappers as success stories of 21st century globalization.
	Revolutionized by the internet specifically by uploading.
	What should I have done?
	Thoughts?
	Don't say anything.
	Why do people want to do this?
	Why?
	Why would you want to do this?
	I can tell you it's not fun.
	It's not all it's cracked up to be.
	I know you think it's going to feel really good to red pill the whole class.
	and show everybody how how woke you are.
	I'm gonna show everybody that I'm smarter than you and I'm more based in red pill than you and you think man that's gonna really help when I give it to him.
	Let me tell you though it's it feels bad though but in the long run it feels bad when your friends are like you're a racist I don't want to hang out with you anymore and you your oldest friends you check up on them on Facebook and they unfriended you and you can never go back to your high school or middle school that Say hello to your teachers because you don't know if they hate you because you went to Charlottesville.
	It's like, you know, it might feel really good in the moment, but then in the long term, you damage relationships with people you care about and you're like, well, was it worth it?
	I don't know.
	You know, it was one thing if you were given an opportunity.
	Am I going to be on Fox News?
	Well, then maybe.
	Hey, go off chief.
	You got to do what you got to do.
	We have to save the republic.
	You know, am I going to become a senator?
	But people are not going to like me.
	Hey, man, Obligation first.
	right?
	America first.
	But if you're just, I'm going to prove to all my classmates that I know about, that I know that the only, the only people that integration and egalitarianism has been good for has been exceptional blacks, but on that has been a disaster for everybody.
	It's not going to, not going to be fun on balance.
	David S says, Happy Valentine's Day.
	Hey, thanks.
	Yeah, Happy Valentine's Day.
	Yeah, Happy Valentine's Day to all the happy couples out there and all the unhappy couple and all the unhappy singles.
	Also unhappy couples.
	Happy Valentine's Day to everybody.
	Right?
	What a spectacular holiday.
	Certainly my favorite.
	I had a date with a bacon Big Mac this morning, this afternoon.
	That was a real treat.
	So certainly it has been a happy V-Day for me.
	But it looks like that's everything.
	That is all our Streamlabs and Superchats.
	That's gonna do it for us on the show tonight.
	Be sure to tune in tomorrow.
	We've got a big show tomorrow also.
	We'll be talking about the Jussie Smollett hoax and that'll be a fun one.
	Man, we're closing off the show by saying, look, call your representatives, call the White House.
	It's code red.
	I mean, it's code black.
	Code black pill here.
	Doesn't get any worse than this.
	It's amnesty.
	It's foreign aid to Israel.
	It's like if, I don't know, it's like if Andrew Anglin were to write parody legislation to show How the government is controlled by Zionists.
	It's like if he were writing that to show people and wake people up as to what's happening.
	That's how bad it is.
	It's through the Senate.
	It's through the House.
	It's through both chambers of Congress.
	Let me update my Twitter real quick, see if there's any new developments.
	Yeah, looks like nothing so far.
	Yeah, so I guess we'll have to wait until tomorrow or later tonight and we'll have to see if he signs it.
	If he signs it, not going to be a good day, folks.
	Not going to be good.
	Total amnesty, no wall.
	But like I said, that's going to do it for us.
	Remember to tune in tomorrow.
	We'll have a big show and be sure to check us out on nicholasjfwences.com slash membership.
	If you like what I do, if you like my commentary, the way I talk, I can't have sponsors.
	No billionaire wants to back me because I talk about Israel and I talk about multinational corporations.
	So we can't do it without the support of the viewers.
	We're totally viewer funded.
	The best way to support the show is by going on nicholasjfuentas.com slash membership and becoming a premium member.
	It's only five dollars a month to become a premium subscriber and you get one additional show every week exclusive for premium members.
	One show on Sunday every week.
	We've got like a total of 14 or 15 shows in the backlog so that's all available even a new subscriber so it's a lot for a little.
	So be sure to check that out and remember to subscribe to the channel.
	Give me a big thumbs up.
	Leave a comment below.
	Click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
	I'm on the air Monday through Friday 7 p.m.
	Central 8 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time.
	I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	As always, thank you guys for watching.
	Thanks to our Streamlabbers, Superchatters, Premium Members, everybody who watches the show.
	We love you folks, and we will see you tomorrow.
	Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		America First!

▲