Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 19, 2018 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:34:06

Hell World Simulator | America First Ep. 298

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:16:57

Appearances

Clips

alex jones

00:31

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		music
		music Wall music
		music music music music music music music
		music music music music music music music music
		music music music music music music music
		Thank you.
		Bye.
		Thank you.
		Thank you.
		Wall. Wall.
		Wall. Wall. Wall.
		Thank you.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Thank you. Thank you.
unidentified		Thank you.
		Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Thank
		you.
		Thank you.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		We'll see you next time.
		Bye.
		Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening everybody.
		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you this evening.
		We have a substantial show.
		There's a lot, there's a lot we need to talk about tonight.
unidentified		It's one of those weeks, one of those weeks.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Trump has done something that is unpopular.
		for his base and uh... so it's gonna be it's gonna be a rough one for the old nicker nation for the old vindication nation we're gonna have another episode of our favorite show which is bad headline we get punished online it's a pretty fun game uh... pretty pretty good show and this is like what is the season three episode twenty five of the show going along very smoothly and of course that's what we'll be talking about tonight
		We're going off about Donald Trump and the latest updates on this wall funding battle, the budget battle in the Congress.
		Remember, the deadline is the 21st.
		It's the 18th today.
		So what is that?
		Saturday.
		If they don't pass a bill by the end of Friday, the government will have a partial shutdown.
		That's why there's a scramble on to finalize a long-term deal that will fund the whole government through to the end of next year.
		So we will be discussing that.
		We'll be discussing an article I found on vice.com.
		Very interesting article.
		If you follow me on Twitter, you know what it is.
		Wasn't even planning on talking about this, but, you know, it popped up in my timeline.
		This is something we must discuss.
		This is yet another vindication moment.
		You know, people have been seeing the bug thing happening.
		And they think that, oh, you know, I'm just some young guy.
		I'm not right.
		But I generally have a pretty good sense of what goes on in the world.
		This is another one of those picks.
		This is another one of these selections.
		You know, when we started to see the bug stuff several months ago, I said, you know, you're going to see a lot more of this.
		You're going to see people eating bugs.
		You're going to see the news media, social media, propagandizing you to eat insects as a substitute for meat because Global Homo doesn't want 10 billion people in the world who have a balanced diet of vegetables and meat.
		They want you to eat crickets and mealworms.
		Sure enough, we saw that.
		This is another one of those things.
		The article from Vice.
		Do I have it up in front of me right now?
		I'm going to show it to you guys, but let me find the title of it.
		The title of the article.
		Get a load of this.
		This is so rich.
		The title is, quote, why are so many women searching for ultra-violent porn?
		And the subtitle, new data reveals that women in their droves are searching for porn with tags like, quote, extreme Brutal gangbang, quote, forced, and rape.
		And so, that'll be a fun one.
		We're gonna go off on that one.
		Volcell Nation represent Alliance with Incel Nation.
		Give me the epic handshake meme.
		We got Volcell, we have Incel.
		The alliance is strong.
		I can assure you the state of the union is strong with these two.
		Gamers, I guess, are in the middle there.
		So we're going to be going off.
		We're sipping a little go off juice on that one.
		Women are going to like this one.
		Let me tell you that much.
		If they're into ultra-violent porn, BAM!
		They're going to like this episode of America First.
		I think that's why so many women like America First.
		I'm surprised.
		You know, it's 5% of the audience is women, but man, the women really love the show.
		The women who watch it really love it.
		Maybe it's because of that unconscious drive for punishment and pain.
		They watched the show and they're like, wow, I really like the way Nick lays down the law on the ladies in a rhetorical way.
		In a rhetorical way, purely in a linguistic fashion.
		So maybe that's why they love the show.
		Maybe this data will give us an insight into why there's so many female Nickers watching the show.
		Right?
		But so we'll be discussing that.
		And then lastly, if we have time, we'll be looking at Tucker Carlson, who's in hot water again.
		It's another one of these deals going on at Fox News.
		You remember, you know, first they came at Laura Ingraham with the advertiser boycott.
	Now they're coming at Tucker Carlson.
	And I'll reveal some new insights on the question.
	Normally, it's the usual, oh, the left-wing mob's at it again.
	It's Sleeping Giants and Jared Holt.
	They're deplatforming people and free speech.
	But I've got a new insight.
	All right, I was up until like 5 a.m. last night.
	Theorizing.
	You know, my third eye has sort of been opened.
	I'm much more focused.
	I've sort of entered into what some are calling NICO mode lately.
	So I've got some new insights.
	But it's going to be a fun show.
	It's going to be a packed show.
	We're going to start out tonight.
	I'm going to show you my old tweets, alright?
	I want to show you because I feel like there's this perception that exists that I'm the Trump cheerleader.
	I'm young Bill Mitchell.
	I'm eternally white-pilled, kind of a thing.
	Now, I know you guys don't think that.
	You guys are cool.
	You guys are alright.
	If you watch this show, you have a big brain, alright?
	Everybody who watches the show and supports me is a handsome and a very smart person.
	So, you wouldn't be watching this show if you didn't have high IQ, if you weren't intelligent.
	So, I'm sure it's not the people watching this show you guys know.
	I give a nuanced take.
	Throughout the Trump administration, I have given a fair and a balanced take.
	My position has always been that Trump wants to secure the border.
	Trump wants to get done certain things.
	His instincts are right on foreign policy, on trade, on immigration.
	This has been the narrative.
	It's not white pill.
	It's not, you know, cheerleading.
	The narrative is how we interpret events as they unfold is that Trump wants to secure the border.
	Trump wants to fix the trade situation.
	Trump wants a realignment in foreign affairs away from this neoconservative neoliberal kind of a system.
	However, because of entrenchment by globalist forces, because of subversion within his own administration, bad personnel choices put in place by people like DeStefano, Rob Porter, among others, he has not been able to get this done.
	Because of congressional leadership, because of judicial stonewalling, Because the entire system is against him, he's not been able to get it done.
	And so, that's been my take from the beginning.
	My take was not, Trump is going to save us, trust the plan, QAnon.
	My take was always, he's probably trying to do the right thing, but there are overwhelming forces working against him.
	And that's been the approach from the start.
	But people have interpreted this to mean that every time something does not go our way, it's... And this is what I get online all day long, and maybe you guys aren't aware of this, but it's...
	You know, 50 tweets.
	I wonder what Nick Fuentes has to say about this.
	I wonder how he's gonna spin this, that.
	It's not spin.
	It's not, you know, whatever.
	It is consistent with the narrative.
	So I'll show you, just to give you a little bit of credibility.
	If you're tuning in and you're thinking, oh Nick, I don't know, big guy.
	Trump's really not doing so hot.
	You know, you told us it was gonna go down a certain way, but now it's not.
	Just for the sake of Credibility, objectively.
	I'm not trying to prove a point to anybody, it's just a matter of credibility.
	I'll show you what my take has been on this situation throughout, from beginning to end here.
	So I tweeted out some of my old tweets, and I guess I should preface this by saying the reason we are where we are right now And I tweeted this out.
	It's because Trump didn't force the issue.
	He didn't force immigration and border security when we were doing the last spending bill.
	If you remember, it started out over a year ago in summer or fall when Trump rescinded DACA.
	That was step number one.
	Trump rescinds DACA.
	Then in January, you have the government money running out, there's an impending government shutdown, and the Democrats say, okay Trump, we're not going to pass anything until you give us DACA enshrined into law.
	Trump had rescinded it, the courts interceded to stop him from rescinding it, but that wasn't good enough.
	The Democrats said, you need to give us DACA and put it in congressional law.
	Obama created it with an executive order, you need to do it with congressional law.
	And so Trump said, OK, I'll give you DACA, but I want a wall.
	I want chain migration.
	I want diversity visa lottery system in exchange for it.
	And they said, no, we can't do that.
	They shut down the government.
	They shut down the government a second time.
	And then Paul Ryan shut Donald Trump out of the negotiating process.
	And he unleashed the spending caps.
	He raised the debt ceiling.
	He gave $715 billion for the military, but no funding for the wall.
	This is the omnibus spending bill in March.
	And I reacted to that in the same way that I am now.
	The omnibus spending bill is an absolute disaster.
	And Trump should have either vetoed or should have put Paul Ryan on blast.
	We have majorities in both houses and yet we capitulate on everything.
	Rough week.
	I wrote, maybe I'd see a silver lining if he used this terrible bill to bully Paul Ryan and the GOP to clean up their act, but he came in and tried to sell us on this trash.
	$640 billion for, quote, national security and not a dime to secure our border in any meaningful way.
	No good.
	Now then, I go on to say I don't think we can blame Trump because it's mostly congressional leadership.
	Trump went on the air and said, I will never sign another bill like this again.
	Right?
	But regardless, I said he's not pushing back.
	They used him to get their fiscal agenda and now they leave him high and dry in immigration.
	Paul Ryan's not your friend.
	I'm holding out hope that perhaps he's distracted because he's doing the North Korea thing.
	But at the time, the omnibus bill looks like a genuine stumble.
	He can recover!
	This is always my take!
	It's a stumble.
	Here are some of the options that we can do to recover.
	But there's no denying it was a step backward.
	This was in March I said this, and we created the problem.
	Well then, if you recall, the next step was September 30th.
	That omnibus spending bill expired, we needed more money to keep the government open, and we were supposed to have a debate on the wall.
	Right, well then September 16th I tweeted, okay well after two years of Republicans controlling everything, the GOP leadership tells us we have to wait until after the midterms to secure wall funding, even though we're going to have a Democrat House.
	This is what I said in September, September 16th, because you know before I said okay, well the omnibus bill is a disaster, but we'll have another shot September 30th.
	Well then in September they said, oh no no, we're going to keep the government open, we'll do this whole thing in December.
	So I reacted, this is BS.
	How does it make sense?
	We have to wait until after the midterms when there's a good chance we'll have less votes?
	This is ridiculous.
	The GOP doesn't want to secure the border.
	They're just stalling until they lose the house so they have a better excuse.
	They want to lose.
	Exactly.
	And then after the midterms, I said, gonna be real with you, Chief, if Trump doesn't replace Nielsen and Kelly, DHS and Chief of Staff, and get funding for the wall in December, 2020 is not going to be a fun time.
	Trump has got to make it happen or we're so screwed.
	We'll see.
	So the reason I bring this up is not to say, to prove to anybody like, oh here's why I'm not a Trump cheerleader or whatever, but it's to say I have a lot of credibility on this issue.
	We've been following this since it originated.
	We've been following this extended budget battle for a year and I've rightly pointed out it has been mistake after mistake after mistake.
	But who has created this mess?
	Is it Donald Trump or is it the GOP?
	Paul Ryan controls the House agenda.
	Mitch McConnell controls the Senate agenda.
	Trump has the pen.
	He signs it into law.
	But the GOP congressional leadership sets the tone.
	So, Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell gave us a bad deal, and Trump said, this is a bad deal!
	And then in September, Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell said, we will give you the votes for wall funding after the midterms.
	And then they didn't!
	And so, that's where we are today.
	And actually, I can see that Donald Trump has just tweeted something about the wall.
	A little bit of a live update here.
	I just got a notification on my phone, so why don't we check this out?
	Just a little update before I proceed.
	Donald Trump has just tweeted, quote, "...the Democrats are saying loud and clear that they do not want to build a concrete wall, but we are not building a concrete wall.
	We are building artistically designed steel slats so that you can easily see through it.
	It will be beautiful and at the same time give our country the security that our citizens deserve.
	It will go up fast and save us billions." Okay, so that really doesn't contribute anything new.
	To the conversation.
	But in any case, I'm just establishing my credibility with those tweets.
	In other words, to say, it's not been cheerleading from day one.
	It's not been, you know, white-pilling on that.
	It's been Trump is trying.
	He's being misled by his so-called allies in his own administration and in the Congress.
	Now, that said, we'll get into some of the developments from today.
	Let me just go in.
	I got my camera settings.
	I'm looking a little dark here.
	Looking a little bit, uh, 2% there.
	Okay.
	So we'll get into today's developments.
	The reason everybody's all bent out of shape today is because of some bad headlines, in my opinion.
	The Washington Post reports today, this is the headline, Trump backs off demand for $5 billion for border wall, but budget impasse remains ahead of shutdown deadline.
	So all the headlines today say Trump is backing down from wall funding.
	He's not going to get the wall.
	He's given up on the wall.
	He won't shut down the government.
	And this is the basis upon which everybody is reacting and saying, well he's cocked and he's compromised and all this other stuff.
	Very opportunistic.
	Very deceptive.
	But if you read any of the actual articles, what does it say?
	It says, quote, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who did a press conference today, said the White House wants to avoid a shutdown and was exploring other ways to obtain $5 billion for the wall rather than getting it from Congress.
	She says, quote, we have other ways that we can get to that $5 billion and we'll work with Congress to do so.
	She said this morning that the administration could support $1.6 billion in border security proposed by Senate Democrats, the $1.6 billion proposed by Democrats, as long as it can, quote, couple that with other funding resources to get to $5 billion.
	She goes on to say, quote, you know, at this point the Senate has thrown out a lot of ideas.
	We're disappointed in the fact that they've yet to actually vote on something and pass something.
	So when they do that, we'll make a determination on whether or not we're going to sign that.
	So the headline says, the Trump administration has backed down.
	We don't want to fund the border wall.
	Okay, we're just totally paused and we're taking everything and we're going home.
	We're taking our ball and going home.
	What Sarah Huckabee Sanders actually said was, we're going to get five billion dollars one way or the other.
	You can give us 1.6 and we'll come up with that money another way.
	So in other words, she's saying we're not giving up on 5 billion.
	We're going to get our 5 billion or we're going to get our 5 billion.
	It just is a matter of how you want to go about doing that.
	Do you want to give it to us in this spending bill or are we going to have to take it from different agencies like the DOD and whatever like we promised to do last week?
unidentified		And in any case, she says, we're not committing to signing anything.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		If it's good, we'll sign it.
		If there's border security, we'll sign it.
		If it doesn't, we won't.
		But because the headline says, and again it's the deceptive media, this is, bewilders me.
		These people purport to understand that the open borders lobby is omniscient, basically.
		They purport to understand that there is a transnational cabal that has been working for fifty years to throw open the borders and destroy the country demographically.
		And it's the media, and it's the Congress, and it's the lobbyists, and it's the donors, and Everybody, every power structure in the country is working towards that end.
		And when Trump does not fix it in 24 months, they say, oh, you know what?
		Yeah, I hate him.
		Isn't he terrible?
		Anyone who supports him is bad.
		Shut him down.
		He's the worst.
		All this other stuff.
		And then, even better, these are people who purport to understand the media lies.
		Oh, the media is run by a certain group of liars who want to hurt our people and subvert our cause.
		The media does a headline like this.
		Oh, this headline is outrageous.
		The media, oh man, they're hitting Trump and I believe it wholesale.
		I won't even read the article, but then you read it and you find this is not happening.
		This is not happening, right?
		Now granted, this is not what we want to hear.
		What we want to hear is we're going to charge ahead and screw all this, but it's not what people are saying.
		And I recognize, you know, it's splitting hairs a little bit, but it does sort of matter the details, right?
		But here's where it gets interesting.
		This is in the same Washington Post article.
		They write, quote, soon thereafter, this is after the press conference, Senate GOP leaders summoned their Democratic counterparts to a meeting in McConnell's office where they made an offer, $1.6 billion for border security, a figure already agreed to on a bipartisan basis in the Senate, plus an additional $1 billion in unspent and reallocated money that could go to fund other Trump immigration priorities, but not a wall.
		So remember Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the the backing down was okay we'll take 1.6 as a start and then we're going to also need the remainder of the money.
		The 1.6 from the Democrats they already agreed to.
		She said that.
		Then Republicans say okay Democrats you know look we already agree to this we'll pass something give us the 1.6 you already agreed to plus a billion dollar Uh, you know, fund that'll go towards other immigration priorities.
		Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, Chuck Schumer, takes the offer to Nancy Pelosi almost immediately.
		This is according to the Washington Post.
		Democrats rejected it, terming the $1 billion a slush fund that would be spent on immigration policies they oppose.
		Additionally, the $1.6 billion the Senate agreed to earlier this year, in March, is now too high for Democrats Especially liberals who are about to be part of the majority in the house and will accept no more than 1.3 billion dollars for fencing.
		So, hmm, you know, I don't, look, I don't want to go four-dimensional chess.
		I don't think there's any four-dimensional chess being played.
		I would never suggest that.
		But the headline reads, you know, Sarah Huckabee Sanders and the administration back down on the wall funding.
		What's actually said?
		Sarah Huckabee Sanders says, okay, you don't have to give us all five, just give us the 1.6 you agreed to originally because we want to avert a shutdown, and we're willing to meet you halfway.
		We'll find the money in other places.
		They take it the Democrats.
		The Democrats say, yeah, we won't agree to any of that.
		1.6 that we already agreed to is too high.
		Now it's 1.3.
		I think, just as was the case with the last shutdown, which is exactly what happened in the last shutdown, what the Republicans are doing is pivoting.
		They are framing the issue to blame the Democrats for a shutdown.
		The only bill that can pass right now, and we got four days to pass a bill to fund the government, is a continuing resolution.
		And they're questioning if that even has the votes.
		But if this were to pass, it would fund the government through to January.
		Okay, so it wouldn't be a full year.
		We'd have another budget battle just like we did last year in January.
		No long-term resolution on that.
		Is it possible that Sarah Huckabee Sanders goes out and says, we'll take 1.6 and we'll get to the 5 no matter what, so that when Democrats inevitably say, oh, even that, well, we won't accept that.
		Could it be calling their bluff, in a way, so they say only 1.3?
		And then people say, hey, wait a minute.
		You said you would give a little bit for border wall.
		And Trump said he would shut down the government for wall funding.
		He's willing to meet you halfway and you won't even give him 1.6.
		You already agreed to.
		What's that all about?
		I don't know, I don't know if that's true.
		I'm not going to say with any certitude, I'm not going to say concretely that's what's happening, but I think that if you really look at the details here, none of this adds up.
	And by the way, this is the same thing that happened last January.
	This is the same exact thing.
	If you remember, Trump got Republican and Democrat congressional leaders into a room, they did a table meeting, and Trump said, oh, I'll sign anything.
	Give me three billion dollars, give me one billion dollars for wall, you know, I'll sign anything, and I'll give you DACA, and I'll give you amnesty for DACA.
	And everybody said, oh, Amnesty Don, this is the end of the world, he's gonna cuck on immigration.
	They didn't get DACA.
	They didn't get amnesty.
	They didn't get amnesty for any illegals.
	Now, granted, they ended up compromising for the $1.6 billion in wall funding, but we didn't give anything up for that.
	We didn't give up amnesty.
	We didn't give up anything additional.
	That's probably the deal that would have been made originally.
	So, I see this as something very similar to the first round of negotiations.
	I think it's uh it's been kind of fumbled though I will say the the framing is sort of bad that Trump initially said we'll take full responsibility for the shutdown now they're saying we want to avoid a shutdown I think that's a little sloppy but um I don't think anybody really has an idea of where this is going I think that Trump is negotiating right now.
	I think that's what this looks like, you know.
	And not to go all four-dimensional chess or anything, it's been mistake after mistake.
	It was a mistake to not resolve this last year.
	It was a mistake not to resolve it in March.
	It was a mistake not to resolve it in September.
	I think it's a mistake that we didn't push this on December 7th when the initial deadline was.
	It would have bought us like three more weeks, right?
	Or two more weeks.
	But in any case, I don't think the headline is true that the administration is backing down from $5 billion.
	So we'll have to see what happens, as usual.
	I'm not really optimistic about the process.
	You know, I said this on the Collins show on Friday.
	I tweeted this out.
	I am not optimistic about the process.
	I don't see how we're going to force the Democrats to capitulate outside of Trump doing something he's never done, which is be content with shutting down the government for a very, very long time, and really do just a scorched earth, you know, executive campaign against the Democrats.
	Outside of that happening, I'm not optimistic, but I'll say...
	That I put all this together, and I tell you the truth, if I wanted to be liked, if I wanted everybody to say, oh wow, Nick has the best take, wow, follow Nick, you know, retweet his content, like his content, I would come on the air and tell you, Trump is cucking, you know what, everything is over, amnesty done, he's not our guy, whatever, but I can't lie to you.
	I'm not shilling for Trump, I'm telling you exactly as I see it, which is, I don't think this is all just Serendipity.
	That Sarah Huckabee Sanders comes out and says, uh, we're gonna get our five billion dollars one way or the other.
	If Democrats want to do it this way, if they're only gonna give us 1.6, we'll take that as a start.
	And then they turn around and take it to Nancy Pelosi and they say, like, we will not accept anything less.
	Then full capitulation?
	To me that seems like the same negotiating process we saw last January.
	That's what it looks like to me.
	Now the last one didn't work out so well, ultimately.
	This one might not either.
	I think most likely this one might not work out either, but that's my assessment of where we're at.
	So, I still think Trump is committed to building the wall.
	I still think he's committed to ending illegal immigration, but You know, his GOP is not willing to stand by him.
	They're not steadfast.
	People in the administration are downright subversive.
	And I know that because I've talked to them.
	Because I've talked to people who are close to the man himself.
	I know the people in media.
	I know the people in the White House.
	You know, where do you think somebody like me comes up with a name like DeStefano?
	You know, where do you think I got that?
	Do you think I'm just really autistic about my research?
	Or do you think Anyway, so I have good sources.
	That's basically what's happening.
	Trump's got the right instincts, but the people around him are very bad.
	The media is very bad.
	And this is what I said in my premium show a couple of weeks ago when I addressed what was happening in the administration.
	We have to look at this pragmatically.
	The people that are telling you Trump is solely responsible for failure on immigration.
	This is just the wrong approach to look at it.
	Trump is the only person in politics that is actively still fighting on this issue.
	And sure, there are some people that throw in their support every now and again, but he's the best that we've got in electoral politics.
	What the opportunistic critics, their endgame, is to get people to turn away from electoral politics, ruin their lives, and embrace some kind of, like, anti-government movement.
	That's what it's about.
	That's why I think it's feds.
	Because there is no alternative to Trump.
	For people that are criticizing, that's great.
	I hear you.
	I'm frustrated too.
	What's the alternative?
	Show me the other viable, you know, legislator or politician or media figure.
	Businessman, show me the other person who is viable in politics to be the mouthpiece for this movement or to actually get something done.
	Well, there is nothing.
	What they're telling you is, it doesn't matter who you elect.
	Because one man was not able to fix immigration in 24 months, was not able to reverse 50 years of momentum, In two years with Congress, the media, you know, unprecedented obstruction, that means that, oh well, time to throw in the towel.
	This isn't worth it anymore.
	We gave electoral politics a shot for two years with one guy.
	Now it's game over.
	Don't bother showing up to GOP meetings.
	Don't bother voting.
	You know, vote for a Democrat instead.
	Join my little club where we're gonna talk about overthrowing the government.
	Yeah, do that!
	This is totally sincere and legitimate and authentic.
	This is where we need to go.
unidentified		We need to run Spencer for president.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's bad ulterior motives, just trust me on that.
		And, uh, you know, I don't want to elaborate too much on that, but...
		That's the way I see it, the debate going.
		And it's equally important to debate within the movement as what's going on.
		So that's my read of the situation.
		That's my read on the response to this stuff.
		You know, it's not cheerleading.
		I'm not, like I said the other week, I'm not optimistic.
		My two qualifications for if we should Be optimistic about the next two years in 2020 is will there be a based DHS?
		Will there be a base Chief of Staff?
		Chief of Staff didn't happen.
		DHS, they didn't even replace.
		So that's no good.
		Wall funding looks like if we get everything that we want, we're going to get a third.
		We're going to get less than a third of the predicted cost of the wall, which is not even close.
		So I'm not, you know, don't get me wrong.
		I'm not saying rah, rah, rah, everybody rally behind.
		It's all great.
		This is me saying, you know, recognize what's happening.
		Recognize the reality of the situation, the challenges, what's being tried, and then the solution then is, hey, what would happen if there were good personnel in the GOP?
		People look at this and they say, that's why blaming Trump is a mistake.
		Because if you blame Trump, then it's, well, this is, like, out of our control.
		If you blame the people around him, then you say, okay, well, what if there were good people around him?
		What if, in a 30-year time span, we filled up the legislatures and the internships and all the important people with based-in-red-pill type people?
		What if we had lots of people like Trump in the country, rising up, speaking out, whatever, in electoral politics?
		I think there's a real appetite for that.
		You know, so I don't understand why people say, oh, well, because Trump has been unsuccessful working against the system, that's his fault.
		Screw him.
		And, you know, we shouldn't even try to fill everybody up.
		It should be the other way around.
		Why wasn't he able to succeed?
		Well, it's because you had the substantial opposition.
		Let's work to turn that around.
		Let's work to build upon what we've already done rather than say the little work that we've done is insufficient.
		Let's explode it and do something that'll get us all killed.
		Oh, good idea.
		So that's my assessment on where we're at with wall funding.
		The proper response to this, the proper look at Trump.
		Now the other issue, this one's going to be a little bit more fun.
		This is going to be some more go-off stuff.
		Here's the article.
		The article is, why are so many women searching for ultra-violent porn?
		This'll be a good one.
		Like I said, gamers unite.
		We're gonna get through this one together.
		I will warn you, there is some scatological language in this one.
		It's not anything that's gonna be too, you know, I'm not gonna show any nudity or anything too crazy.
		But it is going to involve sex terms.
		This is more of a mature theme here, but it's very important.
		And I will elaborate on why that is.
		So there's not just shock value, there's not just self-indulgent.
		I don't really do that.
		But I'll show you the article and I'll explain why this is.
		Important, alright.
		So, here's the article.
		It's from Vice, of course.
		By the way, Will Nardi writes for Vice.
		I find that to be so funny.
		This guy lectures me about, like, not being Christian because I believe in ethnic nationalism.
		And he writes for Vice.
		Yeah, just check out LGBTQ Drugs, SFW.
		What a great publication to write for.
		Anyway.
		So this is in the porn category, naturally.
	Why are so many women searching for ultra-violent porn?
	Ultra-violent pornography.
	New data reveals of women in their droves.
	This is from Australia, by the way.
	Australia.
	So, I don't know if in their droves is like some kind of colloquial thing.
	Anyway.
	The women in their droves are searching for porn with tags like extreme, brutal, gangbang, forced, and rape.
	So it goes on a quarter of straight porn searches by women are for videos featuring violence against their own sex 5% of searches by women are for content portraying non-consensual sex well men and against 5% but you know men do significantly more porn than women the search rates for these more extreme types are at least twice as common among women than men and
	It says those statistics make for fairly surprising reading, but are the facts, says Dr. Seth Stevens Davidowitz.
unidentified		Hello.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hello, closest ally.
		A former Google data scientist, so this is a legit guy, discovered when he was given complete access to Pornhub's search and views data for his upcoming book.
		But why are so many women so keen to see videos tagged with, say, painful anal crying, public disgrace, or extreme brutal gangbang, or content marked as forced or raped?
		And they talk about the feminist movement.
		I'm just showing you the data here.
		This is the last paragraph I'll read.
		There's a lot of filth on here.
		It isn't uncommon for women to have fantasies about coercive sex, as the findings of a study in Women's Rape Fantasies from 2012 indicate.
		The team of researchers from the University of North Texas and University of Notre Dame played 355 young women in erotic rape fantasies as opposed to a literal portrayal of sexual assault over headphones to investigate how aroused they became.
		The tape's material, derived from the kinds of storylines often found in romance novels, tell the tale of a male protagonist who is strongly attracted to the female character.
		He expresses a desire for sex with her, but she is clearly unresponsive.
		He attempts to convince her, without success, and she continues to refuse his advances.
		The male character then overpowers and rapes her.
		She resists her out and in no time gives consent.
		However, as the man is attracted to her and provides erotic stimulation, she does experience gratification from the forced sex.
		Now here's the data.
		Researchers found that 52% of the women had fantasies about forced sex with the man.
unidentified		52%!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Okay, so you meet a woman, All right, you sit down on a blind date, or you go meet some woman off Tinder, or somebody sets you up with their friend, flip a coin!
		Flip a coin!
		My friends, my kings, chieftains, You meet any woman, any woman you interact with.
		Nick, you're too hard on women.
		Nick, I know a lot of virgins that are really wholesome.
		Flip a coin!
		If it's heads, yeah, she's had a fantasy about rape.
		If it's tails, yeah, she's probably okay.
		32% fantasize about being raped, so that's one in three.
		28% about forced oral sex with a man.
		Overall, 62% of the women reported having had at least one fantasy around a forced sex act.
		The researchers then investigated if the women's fantasies were indicative, you know, blah, blah, blah.
		They try and blame it on all this other stuff.
		But here's the reason why I bring it up.
		If you want to know my take on why this is important, why we're talking about this, it's very simple.
		I have been pointing this out for probably the better part of a year and a half now.
		A lot of people have been pointing this out far longer than me.
		People in the men's rights activist community, or people in the pickup artist community.
		A good friend of mine once told me this.
		We were hanging out.
		He's a viewer of the show, and I'm stealing his line.
		He's stealing one of my lines.
		I'm gonna steal one of his.
		He said, you know, when he got into the pickup artist community, and he saw how the same little bag of tricks seems to work on women, generally without failure, you tend to realize that something's up.
		So, if you've been on to this for quite some time, I've been talking about this for a year, you have this dichotomy.
		It's kind of an age-old dichotomy.
		What women say, what women actually do and believe, okay?
		And what we've been hearing about for the past three years is the stuff about rape culture and consent, and for Christ's sake, in some of these counties, it's like you have to sit down, you have to have a notarizer, you have to have a witness, you have to, like, sign a contract.
		Okay, initial next to kissing, initial next to take off my shirt, sign under going to caress your leg, and, you know, Where it's out of control with the consent stuff, with the Me Too movement.
		It's like some woman, she says, oh well this man like grazed my leg 25 years ago, he's a rapist, cut his head off.
		And that's, that's one trend.
		On the one hand, that has been accelerating.
		And then on the other hand, you see that women seem to crave abuse.
		They seem to crave very perverse forms of aggression.
		What I've diagnosed this as is a form of repressed female desire for male aggression.
		It is no secret that male and female natures, tendencies, virtues, characteristics, biological components are complementary.
		Okay, the man and the woman are complementary.
		They were made this way.
		You know, I used to think it was somewhat juvenile when people would point out, like, ten years ago, well, there's a reason gay marriage is wrong.
		It's because it doesn't, like, work.
		Well, but hey, it makes sense because men and women are complementary.
		They were designed to be complementary in all ways.
		And so when women have been told, you're supposed to resent male power, you're supposed to resent male aggression, male chauvinism, male domination, in a word, they still have that intrinsic desire.
		It's hardwired into their DNA.
		It's in their blood.
		You look back for 10,000 years and the way it's been, you know, just look at the Bible.
		Women are taught they're supposed to submit to their husbands.
		Right?
		And you understand men are physically more powerful.
		What happens in sex?
		Not to get graphic, I tweeted this out.
		I don't think people got what I meant.
		It is not insignificant that the male is the penetrative partner.
		I mean, do you think that this is arbitrary in terms of the psychology, in terms of not purely the carnal?
		What is healthy, what is natural, what is ordained by God, is that men and women are brought into a union that is built on two complementary and very real natures.
		Now that union is procreative, the purpose of it, and why it is so controlled is so that you can rear children, you can create children, and then you can rear them in a responsible way.
		If you have monogamy, if it's controlled, if sexual immorality is not allowed, what you have is a stable union where the mother and the father stick around and they're able to instill the child with virtues and this is how you get a healthy society.
		What has happened when we are unmoored from all of these principles, the constraints of marriage, the separate and distinct characteristics and natures of the sexes, the complementary nature of the sexes, what happens when you're unmoored from all of that is that these desires which are baked into us culturally, evolutionarily, They're still present, and then they express themselves in very perverse ways.
		This is one of the perverse manifestations for that intrinsic desire in females.
		They still want it.
		You know, they still want that kind of thing, but it becomes manifest in Vice's so-called ultra-violent pornography.
		Now, this is where we have to confront libertarians, who present this as very simple.
		Well, it's not all women who want to be in a marriage.
		Well, it's not all women where this is good for them.
	Not all women are feminine.
	Some women are going to want to work, and hey, some women are going to get divorced, and some women do this, and that's fine too.
	And hey, what's all this about the new Puritanism about constraining sexuality within marriage?
	People like to paint the picture as a dichotomy between oppressive theocracy, where women are in chains, and they have to be a certain way, and men have to be a certain way, and there's no room for variability.
	And on the other side is, everybody just gets to do what they want.
	Hey, live and let live.
unidentified		Maybe you want to be in marriage, but I don't want to be in marriage.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, I'm just a free spirit.
		I can handle it.
		That's not the dichotomy.
		That's not, that is so charitable to what actually happens.
		The real reality, maybe that exists in a transitional stage.
		Maybe that existed for the past 30 years, but it is contingent on time.
		This is not something that can be locked down in stasis.
		This is transitional.
		The real dichotomy is you have sacred, virtuous unions between men and women where these animalistic and primitive drives are directed towards something good and natural under marriage.
		And everybody, whether they like it or not, they got to play by the rules.
		And maybe you have this middle period where things can kind of be, oh, like a little bit ambiguous.
		On the other side, you have complete unfiltered, unabashed hedonism, degeneracy, perversity, deviancy.
		These, these are the separate poles.
		It's not, well, I want to be a career woman.
		I want to...
unidentified		No, no, no.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You have that for 10 years.
		You have that for 20 years, 30 years.
		You know, it took a century for us to go from suffragettes to this shit.
		And people don't want to acknowledge that because people don't want to... Look, and the reason people don't talk about this is because women want the, you know, women don't really know what they want and they're kind of confused and, you know, they...
		they're just totally irrational.
		And men don't want to upset women.
		So men bend to the will of women.
		Certain people influence women.
		Women are crazy and irrational.
		Men, because they want women, don't really speak out against this.
		They bend to the women.
		And then we just get a society that's insane.
		You know, people talk about, the country would be so much better if women were in charge.
		Hey fellas, we've had our go and things kind of suck.
		Everybody's an asshole.
		Everybody's a douchebag and a racist.
		So what we really need is women in charge.
		We need to put women in charge of the presidency.
		Do you want this in charge of the presidency?
		People act like women are like...
		They're, they're so, oh my gosh, they're so high above everything.
		They're so smart and they're so nice.
		No, they're nuts, man.
		They're irrational.
		They've been telling us they've made the whole country grind to a halt because of this rape culture stuff.
		Rape, rape, you want to kill us?
unidentified		And, but they want it all along, at least half of them.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		They're nuts!
		You can't let them in charge of the country.
		You can't let them in charge of the vehicle.
		You can't let them in charge of the office.
		You can't let them in charge of the task force.
		Here's what you can let them in charge of.
		Kitchen knife, okay?
		Stove, oven, refrigerator, grocery list, shopping cart, you know, baby's bottle, diaper changing station.
		This is the domain, okay?
		This is the domain.
		And I don't think it's a stretch to say that people choose the former rather than the latter.
		I don't think it is a stretch to say that if people were shown the real dichotomy, and I think people are confronting that, do you want to be married, you know, do you want to be married and have somebody, as your beauty declines, your fertility declines, as his strength declines, you have a partner in old age and you have children and it's sane and normal and you're satisfied because you have love for God, or do you want to live in this world where it's like, You know what?
		I'm married, but I got a little bit frustrated, so now I want a boyfriend, and now my boyfriend's gonna live in my house.
		This is an article for the New York Times.
		You see this every other week.
		This is like the bug-eating thing.
		This has already been happening, but stay tuned.
		If you're a boomer, if you haven't seen this, New York Times, Huffington Post, you know, all these different papers.
		Every other day you'll see an article.
		Like, here's how me and my husband and my boyfriend and my boyfriend's kid all get along or, you know, that kind of thing.
		What do you think you prefer at the end of the day?
		Life is about choices.
		We cannot have it all.
		We have to make a decision.
		We live in a free country.
		We can make decisions we have to commit.
		And the other thing we have to acknowledge is that human nature is flawed.
		Our capacities, human beings, is limited by our biology, by our fallen nature.
		We cannot exceed our nature.
		In trying to exceed our nature, in trying to progress And saying, well, we can have it all ways.
		We fall very, very short.
		This is what we're talking about.
		We see women doing this ultra-violent porn.
		They think, I can have male sexuality, I can be empowered, I don't have to be dominated, we can all be equal.
		They are trying, through their own folly, they think they have knowledge of good and evil to surpass their own limitations, and as a result they've fallen short.
		As a result, their limitations Choke them.
		Constrict them.
		Force them into perversion.
		On the other side, we can acknowledge our limited nature.
		Say, you know what?
		This equality stuff, this goofy stuff sounds good on paper.
		Maybe it appeals to something inside of us which is wrong, but this is our nature, and we can optimize society based on it.
		We can recognize and meet our limitations, and we live in a better society.
		But that's, I think, the foundation of conservatism.
		Very much a big part of, you know, gender is a big part of it, very fundamental.
		But that's generally the conservative mentality.
		Man's nature is flawed.
		We have to make choices.
		That's the way it's gotta be.
		So ladies, you know, look, I'm not wild about the fact that I might have to die in a war, okay?
		I'm not wild about the fact that, you know, if there's an intruder in the home, I've gotta go and, you know, try and fist fight the guy.
		I've gotta go down there with a gun, and if I get shot, or if he disarms me, I'm gonna have to... I'm not wild about that.
		I'm not wild about the fact that I have to work my whole life.
		I'd like to just play Minecraft and Fortnite, okay?
		But we have to put childish things aside.
		We have to put away our own desires.
		We have to fulfill our obligations, okay?
		And everybody seems to be fine with that when it comes to men, right?
		And women seem to be fine with that.
		Women, you know, they want us to be everything at once.
		At once they want us to be White Knight, you know.
		Okay, ma'am.
		You could be the breadwinner and all this, but then, paradoxically, at the same time, they want somebody who's, you know, macho and all that other stuff.
		Let's all just recognize, we've got obligations.
	We readily, and are expected to, and if we rebel against this, we're ridiculed.
	We accept our obligations.
	We fulfill our obligations.
	Now it's time to do your fair share, sweetheart.
	You know, it's nice that you want to play Congresswoman.
	It's nice you want to play businessperson.
	It's nice you want to play all that other stuff.
	But the fertility rate is below 2.1.
	Okay, the divorce rate is skyrocketing.
	Men are killing themselves because they're lonely.
	Kids have anxiety and they're dumb and all this other stuff.
	We need mommy back in the house!
	Time for mommy to come home!
	It's enough!
	It's enough already!
	So, there you have it.
	That's the show.
	That's Vice.
	That's why you see this sick nonsense.
	This is my cup of go-off juice here.
	Did somebody say go-off tonight?
	But we're going to take a look at our Stream Lab and Super Chats.
	That's all I've got to say on the matter.
	It's enough, right?
	I mean, this is, you've got two worlds.
	You've got Hellworld Simulator, and you've got the past.
	And people are like, oh, but in the past, there was, like, Jim Crow.
	Okay, oh, yeah, whatever.
	Okay, now you've got women.
	Women!
	Women!
	Women, women, women, okay?
	Women, they're on their phones and they're googling violent rape porn, okay?
	Is this the world you want to live in?
	Is this the preference?
	Because you don't want to make what?
	You don't want to make meatloaf every night?
	You don't want to make chicken casserole?
	This is the world you asked for?
	You've got our baby girls, our baby daughters, precious angels.
	They're on their iPad, they're on their phone.
	Violent rape porn.
	This is our society.
	This is women's liberation, everybody.
	Good job!
	Great job, everybody!
	Man, you really did everybody a big favor!
	Good thing you liberated us from babies!
	Mommy's home!
	Yeah, good thing we don't have any of that.
	That's gonna penalize women in their lifetime earnings.
	Alright, we're taking our Streamlabs and Superchats.
	We'll have to save Tucker Carlson for tomorrow.
	Sorry, big guy, but I do have a big revelation on that.
	A big insight.
	But we'll take a look at our Streamlabs here.
	We'll see what people are saying about this.
	Madness about this crazy, crazy country we live in.
unidentified		Let's see.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So we've got one from... Let's see, we've got a lot.
		Barry says, hello Nick.
		Oh, I'm sorry.
		No, that's one from yesterday.
		One from... Where is it?
		There it is.
		Chad Nationalism says, I haven't donated in a while and feel guilty.
		Nickers, open your wallets and give Nick your money.
		He is willing to face the harsh persecution that we cower from.
		So true, thank you.
		So true.
		So true.
		You do have to give me a tithe, basically.
		And well, you know, I say that half-jokingly, but it's also true that you can't expect people to be on the front lines if, you know...
		They don't have support.
		I don't like doing the shilling thing.
		You notice on my show, I don't come on and say, please give me Super Chats.
		Please give me Streamlabs.
		You know, donate to my Patreon.
		I don't do that.
		You know, I take the questions for money and people give what they want.
		And the premium stuff, it's not like I'm just taking it.
		You know, I'm giving you a product.
		I'm working for it.
		But that is a good point.
		I do say that half jokingly, but it's also half serious that, you know, there are a lot of anonymous accounts who all they do is hit people who are, you know, out there fighting the fight.
		People like Donald Trump, people like me, people like others, you know, whatever, because they don't conform to their expectations.
		That only hurts your own cause.
		People are less likely to step out in the limelight if they can't even count on support from their own base.
		You know, if your expectation is, well, if I, you know, say what I'm going to say and put myself out there, I'm going to take the seat from the media.
		And also I'm going to have people shooting at me from behind saying optics cock and all this other stuff.
		Why bother?
		You know, if people get out there and say, nobody's gonna support whatever, so... So yeah, you better cough it up, everybody.
		Time to pay up.
		Time to pay up.
		I, uh, you know, it's like that meme of the guy taking all the arrows.
		That's me.
		I'm taking all the arrows.
		Time to pay up.
		But much appreciated for the big donation.
		We love you folks.
		Black Swan says, Nick, whenever challenged, my sister equivocates, quote, oh, but men have a lot of sex too.
		We should criticize women, but are they generally lower agency than men?
		They look to men for guidance.
		Lead women instead of blame women.
		Thoughts?
		This is, again, another people.
		They're so soft on women.
		Yeah, women lack agency, of course.
		But part of getting men to lead women, yeah, no doubt.
		But part of that is acknowledging the nature of women.
		So it's not saying we're not blaming women for all the problems.
		We're saying, hello, who decided to put these people in charge?
		Ridicule, scrutiny, this kind of criticism, this memeing, is a very strong way to convince not only women, it deflates women who are a very toxic force on the left, but it also is persuasive to men in saying, wake up fellas, we have to change our attitude.
		That's a big part of it.
		The thought patrol, and this is something I realized a couple of years ago.
		When you look at these shrieking harpies on college campuses, these are people that do not seek truth.
		Women do lack agency.
		They do not seek truth.
		You cannot argue with these people.
		You cannot sit down a radical left-wing woman at a table and show them facts and convince them this is the proper course of action.
		Yeah, we've tried that for 100 years.
		Okay, it's not going to happen.
		To counteract, and they're a very powerful force, you just need to ridicule.
	It just needs to be delegitimizing them, destroying their credibility, making them look foolish.
	That's why I do it on the one hand.
	On the other hand, there are a lot of men who say, oh, no, no, but this is all too radical.
	This is, this is a hundred-year-old way of thinking.
	This is so old-fashioned.
	Um, you know, people like Tara McCarthy.
	Tara McRetard, fat idiot.
	Okay, Tara McFake, Catholic, fourth-generation Holocaust survivor.
	You know, will tell me, oh, uh, oy, oy, Nick, I'm British, I'm a fourth-generation Holocaust survivor, and I'm a feminist.
	But what's really important is the white race, not, you know, making fun of women.
	Well, hey, retarded idiot, you know, there are a lot of followers of yours, men, who are gonna take that as a gospel truth, and we can't have that.
	So, the ridicule is as important for combating the, you know, bile from left-wing women, but also in bringing it home for the men, persuading them, it's the way we gotta do it, alright?
	It's the way we gotta do it.
	People don't like it.
	People see me attacking women and something inside of them says, oh, defend woman, fight for her honor, but you gotta force that down.
	Maybe you need a little bit more life experience.
	Alright, maybe you need to look at more of the data, but that's what's gotta happen.
	Dean the Wops says, hi big guy, didn't read my stream lab from yesterday.
	It might have been because I sent it on Friday right after the show.
	Anyway, here's more shekels.
	Keep up the good work.
	Well, thank you.
	Let me take a look and see what the one was from Friday.
	If you did it after the show, I probably didn't see it.
	So this is from Friday.
	Nick, you went off on me on Friday for pointing out your audio problems.
	Go back and listen to Friday's show.
	You can't hear the callers.
	Very disappointing when you've been waiting all week for this.
	Sad.
	Here's some shekels.
	Fix the problem.
	I love the orders.
	I'm really a big fan of...
	Being bossed around by Dean the Wop.
	And like I said, I didn't go off on you, but people say, oh, Nick, we can't hear it.
	I don't have a sound board.
	I don't have an engineer, okay?
	And I have a sound engineer, and I said it last week, I'll say it again.
	So yeah, I will try to adjust it for Friday, but you gotta cut me some slack here.
	We don't have the CRTV studio.
	I don't have an ombudsman.
	I don't have an engineer live editing it.
	So relax, big guy, but thanks for the stream labs.
	Joe the Boomer says, alright folks, it looks like Joe the Boomer and his shenanigans pushed Nick over the edge and now he's Harvey Dent on a rampage, murdering the prospective, I think you mean prospective, future of alt-right homos.
	You want to know how Nick got them scars?
	He got them from Joe the Boomer.
	Very true, very good point.
	I am, I'm going Harvey Dent.
	Lou Duvas says, what's your favorite Christmas carol, lad?
	Well, what qualifies as a Christmas carol?
	I don't really know the distinction.
	My favorite Christmas song is the Charlie Brown Christmas song.
	Not like the theme song, but the Christmastime is here.
	That's one of my favorites.
	I like Christmas Waltz by Frank Sinatra.
	That's a little bit of an esoteric one, but a good one.
	I like Mistletoe and Holly by Frank Sinatra, another esoteric Christmas song.
	Let me think, what are some other good ones?
	Those are probably among my top three, but I like a lot of the Christmas music.
	Me and Christmas music, we have a long past.
	My favorite time of the year, even though a lot of bad things tend to happen to me around Christmas season.
	It's my favorite time of the year.
	Very good aesthetic, very warm.
	That's why I can never move to the Southwest.
	It's too, how could you have Christmas when there's no snow and it's not cold, right?
	TakeCover says, it's totally hypothetical violence, or rather, he says, it's totally hypothetical violence ever a legitimate option for political movement or will it always turn the general population off?
	The problem with political violence, number one, is that's the quickest way you get shut down.
	You get sent to jail, or you're not allowed online.
	It's just stupid.
	People are like, we're going to challenge the political system openly.
	Well, what do you think the political system is going to do?
	Do you think they're going to say, oh, go ahead?
	I mean, more like, we're going to violently rebel against the government.
	And they think the government's going to be like, oh, yeah, we'll allow that to exist.
	And social media will allow you to do that.
	We will not try to thwart you.
	So it's just stupid.
	This is the dumbest thing.
	Look at the Proud Boys.
	Did that work out for them?
	They didn't even like advocate for violence.
	They just fought anti-fund the streets.
	They like defended themselves.
	And did that work out for them?
	Was that really successful?
	You know, how's Gavin McInnes doing?
	How's the Proud Boys doing?
	No Twitter, no Facebook, no Instagram, no YouTube, or you know, I guess...
	They got their YouTube back, but not not the best idea You know so anybody advocating violence is probably a fed trying to get you on a watch list trying to subvert your organization Find some pretext to shut you down in some way so anybody who brings it up.
	I just don't trust and I assume bad motives now Ultimately will America devolve into violence I don't think that's out of the question, but anybody advocating for it at this stage is not to be trusted probably has bad intentions We say, hope for the best, prepare for the worst.
	Prepare for the worst means you make sure you can defend yourself, you make sure, you know, you've got a group of friends in case things hit the fan, but anybody telling you, well, I've got a plan, we're gonna, you know, I saw today there was some tweet where somebody's like, we gotta start reaching out to generals and people in the military sympathetic to our cause, it's like, Whoa, whoa, whoa!
	I want no part of that!
	Yeah, great idea!
	Call up the Pentagon and tell them about your plans to overthrow the government.
	Great idea!
	What could go wrong?
	Ah, so dumb, so dumb.
	Bustin Ed says, Ayo, ayo, what's up, bruh?
	You's be watchin' America First and shit, nigga.
	Mine's name be Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	We finna be havin' a good show tonight.
	Off top, nigga.
	Great.
	We love busting that every day.
	I imagine it's like that meme with Drill.
	Please, my family's starving.
	Help me do my budget.
	It's like, you know, $200 for rent, $5,000 for Super Chats rephrasing the America First intro in different racial vernacular.
	I'll do the black one because I'm 2% African.
	I couldn't do the Asian one because I'm not Asian.
	But I can do the black one because I am 2% black.
	And yeah, I don't know why people don't come to my defense.
	I'm a black man.
	I'm a young black man.
	I'm a young black conservative, and I've been deplatformed just because I'm off the Democrat plantation.
	I'm off the Libertarian Democratic plantation as a young black man.
	You'd think Fox News would put me on television.
	You'd think people would retweet me.
	Ali Akbar would mentor me.
	I'm a young black man.
	Hello?
	Just a young nigga trying to make his way in the world.
	Nick.
	My name's Nick.
	Trying to make my way in the world against all odds.
	I'm brave.
	I'm smart.
	I'm high agency.
	A hyper-conservative says, how based in Red Pill do you think Pewds is?
	Probably pretty based in Red Pill.
	He follows a lot of conservative people on Twitter.
	Here's the thing.
	If you were indifferent to politics, you wouldn't fight against the system.
	The guy has almost 80 million subscribers on YouTube.
	You wouldn't be fighting the system if you didn't feel strongly about politics, Deep Town.
	If you were apathetic, why would you make a stand?
	Why would you hit back against the media if you could just apologize and keep making an assload of money?
	You wouldn't do that unless you actually had some convictions, which I...
	I admire greatly.
	And people like PewDiePie are very much the future.
	People like, and I tweeted this out last night, people like PewDiePie, Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Kanye West, these people are the future.
	You have a very small brain if you don't understand what I'm getting at.
	These people have the independence and the autonomy to rebel against the system and they all have an ego and a vision great enough that there's a reason for them to do so.
	That is immeasurably important.
	You look at Tucker Carlson, he gets three million people a night, but he's also got advertisers.
	You can't really do much with that.
	Kanye West, how are you going to go after him?
	People buy his music.
	What are you going to do?
	Where's a MAGA hat?
	How are you going to control that?
	PewDiePie fights back against the media.
	What are you going to do?
	You can't ban him.
	He doesn't say anything explicitly hateful.
	He's got 80 million subscribers on YouTube.
	That's a big deal.
	That's an independent subscriber base.
	He's got big money.
	He'll take people elsewhere online.
	Elon Musk, same there.
	He says things that are against the system.
	What are you going to do to him?
	He's got government contracts like crazy.
	He's got some of the most important tech companies in the world.
	He's got a billion dollars.
	When you've got FU money, you've got a big supporter base, it doesn't matter if you're explicitly political or you're totally ideologically on our side.
	People can't get it through their heads.
	Anything that creates disorder, anything that is opposed to the system is on our side.
	It doesn't matter if they're libertarian, it doesn't matter if they're left, it doesn't matter who they are.
	If they're fighting against the press, if they're fighting against the establishment, they are on our team.
	We have to think of it that way.
	You know, that destructive mentality aimed towards disrupting the status quo.
	And those kinds of people, they've got the clout, they've got the money, they've got the independence, they've got the vision, the ego, all the right ingredients to do that.
	This new class of hyper-powerful independent creators created by the internet, basically in tech, these are the people that have got to rise up.
	Before, if a musician didn't toe the line, you just take them off television, game over.
	You take them off the record label.
	What are you gonna do about it?
	You know, if somebody like PewDiePie resisted the system, oh, he's fired on television, you never hear from him again.
	You can't get rid of these people.
	So, they're gonna be highly important in the future.
	Cyrus Irene says, can't watch tonight, gotta hit the gym.
	God bless!
	That's okay, I guess, uh, you know, I guess we all gotta hit the gym, right?
	But thanks for the Stream Lab.
	CloudStars says $25 billion for a wall is a waste of money, but spending trillions on foreign wars is A-OK.
	Ha!
	Yeah, I never thought of it that way.
	What a spicy take, man.
	Wow, what a good point.
	I should do a show about that or something.
	That's so true.
	Trillion dollars for a wall and we can't even fund a border wall?
	That's a really good point.
	I never thought of it that way.
	I love every time Trump doesn't succeed with the border wall.
	I'm not saying this is you, but this is what the Whig-nats do.
	Donald Drumpf, more like George Bush III.
	Yeah, did you ever think of it like that?
	Oh wow, they sent billions to Israel but none for the wall?
	Wow, isn't that great?
	Every time!
	They've been doing this for years!
	It's like, get a new joke!
	Get a new tweet!
	Every time it doesn't go exactly the way we want.
	Wow.
	38 billion for Israel, which, by the way, was passed in 2016 when Barack Obama was still president.
	But none for the wall?
	More like Donald Blumpf.
	It's like, 100 retweets, 1,000 likes.
	Go off, sis.
	Go off.
	Damn, spill the tea.
	Kill yourself.
	Not you though.
	I know, you're just making good point, but I'm talking about the Black Pillars.
	JP says, oh dude, love the show, man.
	Keep doing God's work.
	Thank you, brother.
	Much appreciated.
	Lord Akira says, gotta take on the whole Desmond is amazing fiasco.
	Got a kid stripping in Hangout.
	Felon sent to jail for dismembering their friend.
	Yeah, I did a show about it yesterday.
	We did like half the show on that, so you can check that out, but it's very sick.
	Ian Eds' Tacos or Tortellini?
	Your choice, pal.
	What is Tortellini?
	Let me Google that real quick.
	People are gonna call me a fake Italian for that.
	I don't know, we never really had that before.
	I don't know, I guess I go with the Tortellini.
	I guess I would go with the Tortellini.
	Jake Adams says, Merry Christmas, Nick.
	Your arguments for Christianity got me back into the faith.
	Currently reading City of God by Augustine.
	Here's to the McDonald's fund.
	Thank you, my white brother.
	It's been a while since I got McDonald's.
	I gotta go back.
	But glad to hear it.
	I love when people tell me I made them Christians again, or convinced them to be Christians again.
	That's what we need.
	We need faith.
unidentified		What?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's so dumb, dude.
		is hot take slash deep lore the women love rape narratives is fake and being pushed to get more men to rape and go to prison bonus points because the study was conducted by a jewish man from google what that's so dumb dude that's the dumbest thing i've ever heard in the world yeah that makes a lot of sense uh
		You know, the Jewish schemer said, oh, I'm going to come up with an article that says women like rape, and then men in mass will read the article and then rape, logically, will then rape women and get sent to jail.
		That makes a lot of sense.
		And he'll be, oh, I'm sending so many men to jail.
		Oh, yeah, OK.
		This is your mind on autistic culture of critique.
		I don't know if you're joking or not, but that's kind of retarded.
		This is all ridiculous.
		head says when you're confronted with population replacement how is male chastity a viable option seems counterproductive to demographic survival no eugenic polygamy 2020 this is all ridiculous i love when people do this stuff uh number one it's immoral and And number two, I don't understand how male chastity is the problem.
		Get married, retard.
		Have 10 kids within marriage.
		Here's the difference.
		If you're not chaste, okay, if you're not chaste, I still don't know how to pronounce it.
		If you're having sex like a degenerate, do you think that's a benefit?
		Do you think that's a eugenic practice, by the way?
		Do you think that's really furthering our aims?
		You going impregnate a bunch of women?
		And then what?
		You have a bunch of deadbeat, paused-up, drug-abused losers?
		Or, you get married, you have 8 or 10 kids, and those people all grow up to be strong fighters.
		You have 5 daughters, 5 boys.
		The 5 boys become warriors, the 5 daughters spawn 5 warriors each, and so on and so forth.
		Yeah, but chastity's the big problem.
		Retarded, pagan, degenerate hedonism.
		That's all it is.
		Anybody who opposes Christianity, anybody who opposes sexual morality does so for one reason.
		It's for, uh, I don't want to say the, uh, I don't want to say the slang term because I know, uh, you know, family watches the show and people expect, uh, maybe I'll say it on a Twitch stream, but They want sex.
		That's what it comes down to.
		They don't oppose it for any pragmatic reason.
		They can say, oh, it's eugenics.
		I'm helping the white race.
		I'm riding a tiger.
		No, it's because you want to get off.
		That's what it's about.
		You don't want to be responsible.
		It's time to grow up, men.
		Time to grow up.
		Take some responsibility.
		Find a wife.
		Have lots of babies.
		That's the way to do it.
		You know, we had chastity for thousands of years.
		We never had a fertility rate problem until we embraced hedonism.
		What's the problem, you know?
		Is unmoored, no-fault divorce, and sexual promiscuity for men and women, has that been good for the fertility rate in the last 50 years, or...?
		Give me a break.
		Low IQ posts tonight.
		Low Duva says, Spencer just retweeted you being dissed, big guy.
		Who cares?
		They won't debate me, so...
		The guy's just such a pussy.
		The guy's effeminate, like I said, effeminate, over-socialized, over-educated, trust fund, pussy.
		It's what he is, you know?
		And I get it.
		I'm 20.
		I know people are going to say, you're not a bodybuilder.
		Yeah, I'm 20.
		Okay.
		But the guy won't even confront me on a live stream.
		So he won't even confront me on a live stream.
		I talked to Ethan Ralph.
		I could show you the DMs.
		I'll tweet it out.
	Ethan Ralph said, hey, Nick, you want to debate Spencer on the kill stream?
	I said, yeah, no problem.
	Well, Spencer said he doesn't want to debate.
	He'll do a discussion.
	LOL.
	Okay, what a bitch.
	Ralph gets back to me.
	Actually, he doesn't want to do it at all.
	Okay.
	Then I get Spencer's fluffer, Ronnie.
	Ronnie, what's his name?
	Ronnie Coleman or something.
	Ronnie something who does the heel stream, the heel turn stream.
	Tweets at me.
	Oh Nick you say you're not all right, but you believe some of these things.
	Yeah Well, I'm also not a gay atheist pagan fag like you Uh, but I say, well, why don't you just debate me?
	I mean, you people, all you do is attack me.
	All you do is retweet this trash at me.
	Come on a stream.
	You know, if it's, if you got such a big problem, if that's so pressing.
	And then half the people on the stream, we don't want to platform that guy.
	He's toxic.
	He's, he's disingenuous.
	Okay, so.
	Spencer subtweeting me.
	Well, what else is new?
	You know, the guy's a pussy.
	Tell me on a live stream.
	Tell me on a live stream.
	Defend your record of, you know, just this terrible family life, destroying your family, just abysmal failure, being an effeminate academic.
unidentified		How do people... How do people... How is this viable to anybody?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		People, they're really ride-or-die for this effeminate academic.
		Hail Spencer, that effeminate, posh academic from Columbia!
		We need to become who we are again!
		Oh yeah!
		Hail Spencer!
		Wow!
		Hail Trump!
		Hail victory!
		Hail Spencer!
		Oh yeah, wow!
		What a hero!
		He got a degree!
		He did a magazine!
		He did a couple of magazines!
		My leader!
		Our leader for our people!
unidentified		Your IQ has to be 50 to fall for that crap.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, just goofy.
		Donald Trump, billionaire, supermodel wife, President of the United States, WWE Hall of Famer.
		Oh, screw him, but you know, this gay intellectual, that's the winner.
		Lou, or I just answered that one.
		Rick Smith says, many women lie, that number is way higher than 52.
		Yeah, that's also a good point.
		Cloudstar says, feminists hate men but are obsessed with letting immigrants in who are mostly brown men of military age.
		Really makes you think.
unidentified		What?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		There's no correlation there.
		But, okay.
		My mom says, what's your most degenerate habit other than video games?
		Video games, not degenerate.
		But I guess if people are going to be purists about it.
		I mean, I like to game.
		I like McDonald's.
		That's about it, right?
		McDonald's, the video games, rap music, apparently.
		But it's none of your business.
		None of your concern.
		What I do, my preferences, my taste.
		Leave me alone.
		People will be like, yeah, you sacrificed your life to do all this stuff, you know.
		Nobody wants to be friends with you.
		There's all these other things going on.
		And you like rap music?
unidentified		Pfft.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Stop liking rap music, dude.
		Like, uh, no.
		No Soap Radios is paying an indulgence to unblock my boy Yanni on Twitter.
		He's a good boy in the spirit of Christmas.
		Remember the season of forgiveness?
		Uh, no.
		Yanni is a sick, degenerate pedophile and has said very nasty things about me.
		Remains blocked.
		This is the kind of thing.
		I love to block people.
		I've blocked like 3,200 people on Twitter manually.
		And everybody's always like, oh, he blocked me!
		He's so mad right now!
		And then six months later, invariably, it's, oh, hey, Nick, can you please unblock me?
		I said some things I regret.
		You were right.
		You know, you get the friends.
		Someone is telling me to unblock them.
		We just want to be friends.
		No, no, you don't get to be unblocked.
		Especially not if you're a pedophile.
		Umph Love says, you'd make a great Baptist preacher there.
		No, no, thank you.
		I don't want to be a part of heresy.
		Lou Duva says, listen to In the Bleak Midwinter, Son of Beauty.
		I'll check that out.
		Natalie says, can a Christian female zoomer knicker meet you at CPAC?
		I guess, but I really am dubious about the the old honey trap.
		You know, women like this, you know, Hi, I'm based in Redfield.
		Can I meet you?
		And you just have to be on guard at all times.
		So yeah, alright, I guess I'll meet some female knickers.
		I guess I'll meet some female zoomers.
		But please, keep in mind, I'm trying to keep it together.
		I'm Catholic, alright.
		I don't want anybody to be like, hey Anon, come into my hotel room and we're gonna take pictures with guns and bomb materials and things like that.
		I am fully aware of the honey trap trick.
		We did this a lot in Model UN, you know, back in the day.
		I'm on to you, but sure.
		I guess I'll meet all my female fans.
		I guess I'll have to do it.
		Dr. H says, is PewDiePie invited to be a guest on America First?
		Always, of course, but probably bad optics for him.
		Otto Weimer says, I'll see you at CPAC, big guy.
		Glad to hear it.
		I'll see you all.
		So remember, if you're going to go to CPAC, please, please, you know, you got to clean yourself up nicely.
		Okay, I don't want people to show up.
		Just, you don't have to be a movie star, but please, you know, wash your hair, get a haircut, you know, have a suit that makes sense.
		Don't show up with like a purple shirt and a purple tie and some black suit that doesn't fit all right.
		If you don't have, if it's not within your means to buy a suit to business casual, but there's some basic guidelines that we've got to follow if we're going to be the optical right.
		You've got to show up.
		There's a few things you can do.
		Get a haircut that suits your head shape and is styled correctly.
		Wash your hair.
		Wash your face.
		I know I shouldn't have to say that, but you never know, you know, especially with the internet.
		You have an expectation that it'll be like, oh, it's going to look like a certain thing.
		And then it's like, well, hi, Nick.
		I came from the dumpster.
		I'm not saying that to you, but just saying we got to keep in mind.
		I stress this.
		If we're going to do the Zoomer hangout, if we're going to T-pose, we got to be optical.
		We got to be ready to be optical.
	All right.
	Tough love time.
	Ian Head says, but seriously, True Deal Tom misses you and wants to hang.
	I'll hang out with True Deal Tom.
	I'll say this much until he doesn't invite me on his channel.
	I love the guy.
	You know, he super chatted me the other day.
	It was just a little gentle ribbing, but, uh, that's the thing.
	You know, I invite people on my channel all the time with few exceptions.
	I don't really get, you know, Patrick Casey had me on his podcast the other week and, uh, you know, who else?
	That's about it.
unidentified		That's about it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But everybody else is like, oh, come on the show.
		I want to come back on.
		I want to, it's like, well, where's the, you know, do people reciprocate?
		Jake Lloyd had me on InfoWars.
		That was great.
		Never really.
		But that's okay.
		Well, we'll get them on anyway.
		Who's keeping track?
		I don't keep count.
		I don't keep track of that stuff.
		That's so petty.
		I'm only Italian.
		I don't, you know, I don't keep track of that.
		But yeah, we'll get them back on.
		We like True Deal Tom.
		Our Aussie Chad friend Theo Johnson says, here's a four towards your next four piece.
		Merry Christmas.
		Thank you, big guy.
		Trans Catgirl says, absolutely based and red-pilled knicker.
		Thank you.
		Thank you Trans Cat Girl for that.
		Doctorate says Senate just passed criminal justice reform bill, law and order.
		Yeah, this is no bueno.
		Jared Kushner's agenda there.
		Not happy about that one.
		Let's see, we've got a few more here.
		Pollsbo says, damn Nick really laying it into the lady folks tonight.
		Don't forget that we cherish women.
		Here we go.
		We cherish him and his mother.
		They're the center of the family.
		We want what's best for them.
		Take it easy, big guy.
		Great show tonight.
		Thanks.
		Yeah, that's true, but, uh, you know, this is always, I think you have to sort of separate out the two arguments.
		Yeah, of course, but we can never forget that that doesn't mean that we're not fighting demons here.
		This is the same crap I got from, uh, who's that idiot, Mauritian Struggle, who's like, Nick is too mean to women, I cannot support him as a Catholic, you know, shut up.
		Dummy.
		These people critique me more than they critique the demons.
		They critique me more than they critique the women themselves.
		Maybe you haven't seen it firsthand, but we'll have plenty of time to cherish women as mothers once we fix the problem.
		So, I appreciate the sentiment.
		I agree.
		Women are important.
		We cherish them.
		We want what's best for them, sure.
		But, we're laying down the tough love.
		You gotta...
		Gotta lay it down.
		But, you know, for people that haven't been in college recently or in high school or they're not on TikTok or whatever, you know, you don't see firsthand what goes on.
		But I can assure you that women don't feel cherished is not really the big problem there.
		It's that they're all over the place.
		Based once is everything that is wrong in today's society can be traced to women trying to reach for power and dragging the potential of men.
		Yeah, a big deal of it, a great deal of it.
		Never forget the Sam Hyde skit.
		Thank you white people.
		You know, what happened right before the boulder fell down?
		What happened in the infamous skit?
		The white man rolls the boulder up the mountain, you know, he creates all these great things.
		What distracts him so that our closest ally can knock it back down?
		What distracts?
		That's the red pill.
	Richard says, America First always brings me back to a level head.
	Keep it up, big guy.
	Much appreciated.
	Little Guy says, ultimately, who was worse, Spencer or Shapiro?
	Well, you know, at least Shapiro was successful.
	So, I'll say that much.
	Say what you will about Ben Shapiro.
	He's successful, you know, and people actually listen to him.
	So, I guess I'll leave it at that.
	None of them are real winners, but...
	Hey, one of them's making a difference, so... He's, uh, he's dominating!
	He's, he's got power!
	I care about power!
	Well, you know, Ben Shapiro's got it, so maybe it's him.
	Well, that's gonna be it for us tonight.
	That's our show.
	That's all we got.
	Remember to check us out on nicholasjfwences.com slash membership to get your premium America First membership.
	Uh, if you sign up, you get one additional show every week.
	And remember, next week I'm taking the Christmas break off, okay?
	So, next week it'll be what?
	It'll be, um...
	Today's the 18th.
	Yeah, so it'll be Christmas Eve on Monday, Christmas Day on Friday.
	Maybe I'll come back for Thursday or Friday.
	I haven't really made up my mind, but if you want America First content through Christmas, I'll be doing premium on Sunday.
	I'll be doing premium the next Sunday, so be sure to sign up.
	It's only five bucks a month.
	Like I said, you get that one extra show every weekend.
	We're not going to be taking a break from that anytime soon because I just Missed a couple when I went to Prague, so the premium show stands, and it's the best show.
	Still zero authentic dislikes.
	People love the content.
	It's deep dives, it's whiteboards, it's books, it's everything people crave.
	So check it out.
	The link is in the description.
	Remember to subscribe to the channel, give me a big thumbs up, leave a comment below, click the notification button to get notified every time I go live.
	We just recently passed 20,000 subscribers, so...
	Pretty good.
	We've been at it for about a year or so, and we don't really do viral content, so it's a pretty big milestone.
	We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
	Central, 8 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time.
	I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	This is America First, as always.
	Thank you guys for watching.
	Thanks to our Streamlabbers, Superchatters, Premium Members, everybody who watches the show.
	We love you folks, and we will see you tomorrow.
	Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		America first!

▲