Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 25, 2024 - No Agenda

03:21:43

1654: e-Safety

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Oh, everything is going to be electronic.
	Adam Couric, John C. Dvorak.
	It's Thursday, April 25th, 2024.
	This is your award-winning Kimber Nation Media Assassination, Episode 1654.
	This is No Agenda.
	Revealing Repos.
	And broadcasting live from the heart of the Texas Hill Country here in FEMA Region No.
	6.
	In the morning, everybody.
	I'm Adam Curry.
	And from Northern Silicon Valley, where we're wondering why people do weird rants while sitting in the front seat of their car.
	I'm John C. Dvorak.
	It's Crackpot and Buzzkill in the morning.
	Well, that is, yes, that is the collapse of society, of course.
	That's, that's not all.
	We'll have that and electrolytes.
	That's the future.
	Rants in your car and electrolytes in your belly.
	That's it.
	That's it.
	And you notice how everyone's always sitting on the left-hand side because somehow their cameras always mirror them?
	Yeah.
	Isn't that weird?
	Yeah, it's true.
	I don't understand.
	I don't understand why those cameras don't automatically just flip it around.
	You can flip it.
	I'm sure there's a button you can push.
	You think so?
	You think so, but they don't do it.
	They don't care.
	No.
	They're in their car screaming their heads off and then posting it.
	Ranting!
	Yes, that is what influencers do, John.
	Haven't you heard?
	All the kids are doing it.
	Yeah.
	I wonder who the first person was.
	This is something that has not been explored.
	This is very common.
	Who was the first person who, in their car, produced an online rant?
	Sitting under the driver's seat and yacking away at the camera, in the car, and then posting it.
	It had to be a number one.
	JFK, says the troll room.
	No.
	No, JFK.
	It's not right.
	You know, honestly, One of my early daily source codes I did in the car, there's even a picture of me in the New York Times doing a podcast from the car.
	Now it wasn't with a camera.
	Maybe it was you.
	Maybe you are the genesis.
	It wasn't video though.
	Oh, that's not good.
	It's not quite the same thing.
	Just ranting randomly.
	It has to be video.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	That person deserves a Nobel Peace Prize, just like you.
	I think it's maybe Jenna Marbles.
	I don't think so.
	Whatever happened to her?
	I don't know.
	Who is Jenna Marbles?
	I forget who she is.
	She was one of the early online influencers.
	At one point, I think she broke down and gave up on it and made a big scene.
	Oh yeah, I do remember this.
	It was just a stage name.
	She wasn't really Jenna Marbles.
	So that's an annoying thing.
	But there's something else that has cropped up.
	Well, there's a couple things.
	Do you ever go on X or any social media at all anymore?
	Or does that go away with your phone?
	You just threw that out?
	I never went on social media with my phone.
	No, I mean, but do you go on social media at all?
	Do you look at X?
	Of course I look at X. I'm on X all the time.
	I just gotta say something.
	I don't think that every famous woman who's an actress or is a performer, I don't think they're all dudes.
	This is getting a little annoying.
	People keep posting pictures like, here's Britney Spears.
	What do you notice?
	I'm not in that thread, whatever that thread is.
	Every woman's a dude.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Jennifer Aniston, dude.
	It's now Jennifer Maniston is what they're calling her.
	It's really rampant.
	Everyone's just calling women dudes now.
	It has something to do with the whole Um, you know, men and women's sports.
	It's like, it's... I think so.
	It's twisting everybody's brain.
	I think that's a reflection.
	Yeah, it's twisting everybody's brain.
	Oh yeah.
	Now you just see a dude in everything.
	You gotta question yourself if you're seeing that.
	You know, it's like, that's a little concerning.
	And then the other one... It's between R and Y on your keyboard!
	You seen this?
	No.
	Ah.
	You're keeping me up, I'm glad.
	Yeah, so if you're on Twitter, and it's between R and Y on your keyboard, that's a T, and you hit the T, then it brings up the menu to repost or retweet.
	But it immediately, from what I understand... Just a plain T?
	Yeah, oh no, they have... Don't you have to hit...
	Control?
	No, no.
	Oh, you didn't know that.
	If you go on Twitter, you can even use your J and K keys for up and down.
	And yeah, it's a complete Linux, what do you call it?
	Vim.
	VI.
	VI key mapping.
	Remapping to WordStar.
	Okay.
	Remapping to WordStar.
	But what it does is it creates an interaction on that post.
	So people get a hit for it or something.
	I think that's what's taking place.
	Everyone's scamming everything to get everything.
	Get eyeballs.
	I need eyeballs.
	I'm an influencer.
	I need eyeballs.
	Pay attention to me.
	Anyway, amidst all of this nuttiness that's going on, which we obviously will discuss, because there's four, four areas now, Ukraine, Russia, Israel, Hamas, Taiwan, China, TikTok, But what's happened today just kind of got snuck in and there wasn't a lot of chatter about it.
	Net neutrality is making a comeback with an FCC vote today and that means that internet providers will not be able to speed up or even slow down certain web traffic.
	I love that they're bringing this old trope back.
	Oh, it's so they won't be able to slow down your speed.
	Slow down your speed?
	Is there anybody, raise your hand, that has a slowed connection?
	This isn't an anachronism.
	This is a thing of 5, 10 years ago.
	But now they're still playing it off like, hey, these idiots, they'll believe anything.
	Yeah, man, they're slowing down my CompuServe.
	...certain web traffic. Now, new FCC rules ban blocking, throttling, or even disadvantaging certain content apps or services. They also bar prioritizing them in return for payment. An FCC vote under the Obama administration is what put net neutrality in place to begin with. You would get AOL and CompuServe and services like that saying, "This is Neelai Patel, of course, the lawyer." We provide email services and you can make websites and there's shopping.
	So we're more than simple utilities.
	And what's happened over time is that consumers don't want to get that stuff from their broadband provider.
	So it has been gone since 2018 due to a later FCC decision under the Trump administration.
	But this time around the FCC, as you just heard, is taking into account some modern uses of smartphones and other devices.
	So the FCC says it could take a couple of months before these rules get put into place.
	I want to get everybody's head on straight before you go, uh...
	Because this is one thing and one thing only, which we have explained over and over again, and every single time we do it, it's very controversial.
	People come out of the woodwork and go, that's not, this net neutrality is really important, man.
	It's really important.
	That's one of your better voices.
	It's really important, man.
	This is, there will be, so now your ISP will be forbidden, listen carefully, from blocking or throttling any legal traffic.
	Legal traffic.
	Here we go again.
	Yes, exactly.
	And they're allowed to shape their traffic and they will be able to throttle or block certain Protocols that they do not deem to be legal.
	I can think of a few.
	How about Tor?
	Tor gets blocked everywhere.
	I think that's at the top of the list.
	Hello?
	Because you can set up a web server at home with Tor.
	You don't need anything.
	That's the dark web.
	So that'll be on deck.
	And then Torrent.
	They'll block that traffic.
	And actually, that will be at the top of the list.
	I think it will be Tor first.
	I think the copyright paranoia, the passing around stuff is really... Well, that's what it's always been for, initially, but now, you know, it's dark webs, dark web, man, it's all dark web.
	Dark web, dark web.
	Yeah, Tor.
	So, go ahead, everybody, have another drink.
	You know, you thought, everyone's, oh, TikTok, TikTok, TikTok, the clock is ticking on TikTok!
	But meanwhile, they're just gonna be able to do anything they want.
	Well, they hope.
	Well, I mean, it'll... I mean, the workarounds are just...
	There's not really a workaround at the ISP level for TOR.
	If you want to serve TOR from your home, I don't think that's gonna work.
	Oh, Phoebe, it's okay.
	You're a good girl.
	The dog thinks so.
	It's like, TOR, TOR!
	TOR, TOR!
	It's okay.
	You're a good girl.
	Good job.
	Good job.
	You know, by the way, I should mention, because you always get a little annoyed when the dog is in the background barking.
	I think that dog, besides the fact that she has a terrific bark, is a dimension to the show that no other podcast has.
	I love it.
	Okay, you're on.
	We still have the painters here.
	And it's always a double bark.
	A lot of dogs do the double bark.
	That means something to dogs.
	I don't know why, but woof, woof.
	It's not just a woof.
	No, it's important.
	She's got something to say.
	There's the single woof, but then she'll do the double.
	She does double woofs.
	Yeah, she's good at it.
	Good girl.
	Good job.
	Uh, breaking.
	Breaking.
	It's breaking.
	Breaking!
	Cut off the press.
	The Harvey Weinstein conviction has been overturned.
	Who cares?
	Well, uh, it's interesting.
	Uh, our lawyer, I'm just going to let her bark, right, because you like it.
	Ruff, ruff, good girl.
	This really doesn't, it's not that, she's far enough away that it doesn't really interrupt the flow of the show, it just adds some sound effect.
	I can mic her.
	I mean, I could, I could mic her up.
	Okay, be quiet now, I've had enough.
	Good, come here.
	Our lawyer Rob comes in, he says it will be interesting to see how this plays alongside the current Trump prosecution.
	He says it could possibly help Trump, depending on the outcome.
	Hey, you're okay.
	Depending on how they, because this will go back to the court, I believe.
	It has to be returned to a trial court where the trial will start over again.
	Oh, yay.
	More of that.
	And the reason why is, so I take our lawyer's word as important here.
	Defendant was convicted by a jury for various sexual crimes against three named complainants and on appeal claims that he was judged not on the conduct for which he was indicted, but on irrelevant prejudicial and untested allegations of prior bad acts.
	We conclude that the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged alleged prior sexual acts against persons other than the complainants of the underlying crimes.
	So here's New York.
	"I'm not." New York trying to, you know, convict a former president of all kinds of stuff and then letting an actual creep go.
	I mean, it's just too beautiful to believe.
	It really is.
	It's like, what?
	And then, and I, and you know, so, you know, good girl.
	That worked.
	So even on, um, you know, on this podcast, hello, we're a podcast.
	We give you some real information and how that might actually be interesting in today's legal landscape.
	Other podcasts like The Midas Touch, well, they're collaborating with the New York Times and they've got some outstanding reporting on Donald Trump!
	Turning to the court proceedings as well, Maggie Haberman reports that Donald Trump continued to fall asleep during the proceedings as well.
	And, you know, what I'm hearing from my sources as well is that, you know, and I'm hearing from credible sources who know what's going on in the courtroom.
	And what I'm hearing is that, take it for what it's worth, but that Donald Trump is actually farting in the courtroom.
	Oh, yeah.
	And that it's very stinky around him.
	There you go.
	I mean, is this wonderful?
	I mean, this is fabulous reporting.
	This is the level that we get from Maggie Haberman, no less.
	He's farting in—oh, this has been top of the news.
	Everyone saw it.
	Trump—and it's not just farting, John.
	It's putrid odor in the courtroom, and that Trump's lawyers are, like, repulsed by the scent and the smell.
	And I'm not just saying that to be like, oh, funny.
	Yeah, you are.
	That's exactly why you're doing it.
	You should have said, breaking, breaking!
	You know we have good sources there.
	And I'm hearing it from actual credible people that as he's kind of falling asleep, he's actually passing gas.
	And that his lawyers are really struggling with the smell.
	I like the addition that his lawyers are really struggling with this.
	I mean, are the lawyers keeling over?
	Are they putting on gas masks?
	I mean, we need to add this to the Trump rotation!
	I have my list and you might want to see if there's anything left out.
	This is the Trump rotation.
	There's two categories.
	There's the regular and then there's the criminal.
	But here we go.
	Ready?
	Yeah!
	Liar.
	Incompetent.
	Unhinged.
	Illegitimate president.
	White.
	Supremacist.
	Racist.
	Bully.
	Immature.
	Russian agent.
	Narcissist.
	Mean.
	Long ties.
	Insane.
	Tweets too much.
	Small hands.
	Small penis.
	Big red button.
	Criminal.
	Mean. Racist.
	Immature.
	Thin-skinned.
	Runs the mob.
	Has no money.
	Unstable.
	Fatter than 239 pounds.
	Bankrupt.
	25th Amendment should be instituted.
	He hates women.
	Misogynist.
	Holds grudges forever.
	Plays golf a lot.
	Obstruction of justice.
	Money laundering.
	And clown.
	John.
	There you go.
	No wonder.
	No wonder.
	We're making a man for white again.
	Farts and cork would be the one.
	I also never put on that list that watches Gorilla TV.
	My all-time favorite.
	Farts in court.
	I mean... Farts in court.
	This is your media and alternative media together, cooperating with sources, reliable sources.
	Yeah.
	I mean, they literally were talking about, and he's scowling, and he's looking angry, and he's pursing his lips.
	Yeah, Rachel Maddow somehow got in.
	She was thankful that she got into the court, and she was talking about how he's scowling.
	I don't know about you, if you've ever been to a court, but generally speaking, if you're in the audience, you don't get to see their faces.
	No, no.
	You're behind them.
	How do you know the guy is scowling when you're sitting behind him, which is where you're seated.
	You're not seated anywhere else.
	I think they're looking at the court, which is still always funny to me that they have someone who, it's, you can't have cameras in the court, but you can have a guy drawing.
	Yeah, there's a guy drawing.
	It's just literally a caricature from someone who does that at Central Park.
	And it's Trump, you know, with his scowled, his pushed lips.
	I think they're getting it from that.
	But Rachel Maddow was going on and on about how happy she was to be there and he was scowling and he walks with a shuffle.
	I wish I recorded this.
	This sounds good.
	He walks with a shuffle.
	He looks like an old man.
	He's taller than you think.
	And it was just like, what has this got to do with anything?
	It's just a bunch of, it's so high school-ish, especially MSNBC, that it's an embarrassment.
	And these people get paid.
	Rachel Maddow literally gets millions of dollars to work one day a week.
	That's always a cry in your head.
	You're always mad about that.
	Yeah.
	So then, you know, this is affecting the general population.
	Here's one we didn't expect.
	This is from C-SPAN.
	Now, there's a number of Trump trials, so in this case we're talking about immunity.
	And it's a little confusing because all the things he did on January 6th, he was still president.
	So, you know, I presume that he has immunity from anything he said.
	He didn't go and bust down Uh, the doors at the Capitol himself, but okay.
	And somehow that gets conflated with stuff he's done after or wants to do after the election.
	I mean, the whole thing is weird, but now it seeps into the brains of people.
	Let's go to C-SPAN, Democrat line.
	This is David.
	Independent.
	Good morning.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	Independent?
	Yeah, if the court rules that he is immune, and the president is immune to anything, you know, actually, then the president could do anything he wants to, including assassinating his political opponents.
	So in that case, if the court rules for him, President Biden could have him assassinated, can have Trump assassinated, and get away with it.
	This is exactly what Putin is doing in Russia.
	Yeah, we're like Russia now!
	That's great.
	I hadn't heard that one.
	That's a good one.
	I like that.
	And then we can put to rest once and for all our clearly incorrect assumption that That Obama could be prosecuted for his drone... No!
	No, no, no!
	No, it can be put to rest because it was not addressed properly.
	Well, let's listen to it.
	I do.
	How about President Obama's drone strikes?
	This is Justice Kavanaugh asking the question.
	So the Office of Legal Counsel looked at this very carefully and determined that, number one, the federal murder statute does apply to the executive branch.
	The president wasn't personally carrying out the strike, but the aiding and abetting laws are broad.
	And it determined that a public authority exception that's built into statutes and that applied particularly to the murder statute, because it talks about unlawful killing, did not apply to the drone strike.
	So this is actually the way that the system should function.
	The Department of Justice takes criminal law very seriously.
	It runs it through the analysis very carefully with established principles.
	It documents them.
	It explains them.
	And then the president can go forward in accordance with it.
	And there is no risk of prosecution for that course of activity.
	Of course, you're right.
	And I think it's ignorance on the part of Justice Kavanaugh's part that he didn't frame the question correctly.
	Well, not only that, but he didn't do a follow-up that I can tell.
	I mean, that little clip's been floating around.
	I don't have the beginning or end of it, even though it's being played today.
	And the follow-up would be, so that even includes the assassination by drone of an American citizen.
	That is exactly what he should have followed up with.
	And if they said yes to that, great.
	That's good to know.
	Yeah, but I don't think he asked that.
	I don't think Kavanaugh knows.
	These people don't know that stuff.
	Well, Kavanaugh just dropped the ball.
	It's not his fault, it's his staff.
	He was too busy boofing.
	Phoebe, it's okay.
	You know who they are.
	Who's she barking at?
	Well, the painters are still here.
	It's their last day.
	Oh, the painters.
	Where is Tina?
	Oh, no.
	Important stuff outside the house.
	First she went to New York, and now she's here with the painters.
	It's important stuff, man.
	She's running this town.
	I do have a TRT report about the Supreme Court on former President Trump's immunity.
	While the US press is sniffing his farts, these guys are actually doing some analysis.
	Sitting in a courtroom day after day, this will be Donald Trump's life for the next few weeks and possibly for the next several months as well.
	Trump faces a total of four criminal trials.
	The Hush Money case concerns allegations before he became president.
	But the other cases centre on his activities while in office, most notably the claim that he attempted to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
	Today, an indictment was unsealed, charging Donald J. Trump with conspiring to defraud the United States.
	This is the special prosecutor.
	He sounds out of breath.
	He sounds weird, this Jack dude.
	Conspiring to disenfranchise voters.
	Yeah, you're right.
	And conspiring and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding.
	But Trump's lawyers would argue that making a president liable for criminal charges would make the job impossible.
	And I feel that as a president you have to have immunity.
	They say the threat of future prosecution and imprisonment would become a political cudgel to influence the most sensitive and controversial presidential decisions.
	And I feel that as a president you have to have immunity.
	Very simple.
	And if you don't, as an example, if this case were lost on immunity and I did nothing wrong, absolutely, Absolutely nothing wrong.
	I'm working for the country.
	In one sense, the court has already handed Trump a victory by agreeing to hear this case at all.
	The former president had been due to appear in court here in Washington last month.
	But the delay caused by this hearing means the chances of him appearing in another courtroom before November's election are getting slimmer by the day.
	Ah, there you go.
	Delay, delay, delay, delay.
	Our lawyer Rob is listening to everything today and he'll have a report for us.
	So we'll know exactly what to think.
	But that's better.
	You know, could it be jury intimidation if Trump is farting?
	Is he intimidating the jury?
	This could be something to do with gas attacks.
	Chemical warfare.
	Chemical warfare.
	Yeah, that's it.
	I thought before we just, since there's so many, I mean there's a lot going on.
	We're like in a classic Maoist struggle session in America right now.
	And it's spreading all over the world.
	All over the world, especially Australia.
	I have Australia clips.
	Before we do that, do you mind if I play the extended Wes Clark 7 clip just so we can remember where a lot of this is coming from?
	What's the extended version?
	Well, it's longer than him just naming the seven countries.
	He gives the background and how long this has been going on and tells you who the people are doing this.
	Okay, we played it recently, but we can play it again.
	We didn't play the extended one recently, I don't think.
	Well, here it is.
	A reminder for everybody.
	It's good.
	It's a backgrounder.
	And then I came back to the Pentagon about six weeks later.
	I saw the same officer.
	I said, why haven't we attacked Iraq?
	Are we still going to attack Iraq?
	He said, oh, sir, it's worse than that.
	He pulled up a piece of paper off his desk.
	He said, I just got this memo from the Secretary of Defense's office.
	It says we're going to attack and destroy the governments in seven countries in five years.
	We're going to start with Iraq, and then we're going to move to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
	Seven countries in five years.
	I said, is that a classified memo?
	He said, yes sir!
	I said, well don't show it to me.
	He was about to show it to me.
	He said, because I want to talk about it.
	And I couldn't believe it would really be true, but that's actually what happened.
	These people took control of the policy in the United States.
	And I realized then, it came back to me.
	A 1991 meeting I had with Paul Wolfowitz.
	You know, in 2001 he was Deputy Secretary of Defense, but in 1991 he was the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy.
	It's the number three position in the Pentagon.
	So I called and up there he was available and he brought me in and I said to Paul, and this is 1991, I said, Mr. Secretary, you must be pretty happy with the performance of the troops in Desert Storm and he said, Well, yeah, he said, but not really, he said, because the truth is we should have gotten rid of Saddam Hussein and we didn't.
	He said, but one thing we did learn, he said, we learned that we can use our military in the region, in the Middle East, and the Soviets won't stop us.
	He said, and we've got about five or ten years to clean up those old Soviet client regimes.
	Syria.
	Iran.
	Iraq.
	Before the next great superpower comes on to challenge us.
	It was a pretty stunning thing.
	I mean, the purpose of the military is to start wars and change governments.
	It's not to sort of deter conflict.
	We're going to invade countries and, you know, my mind was spinning.
	This country was taken over by a group of people with a policy coup.
	Wolfowitz and Cheney and Rumsfeld and you could name a half dozen other collaborators from the Project for a New American Century.
	They wanted us to destabilize the Middle East.
	Turn it upside down.
	Make it under our control.
	There you go.
	That's the full Wes Clark 7.
	Well, that's actually a different clip.
	It is.
	It is.
	It's not the old classic clip.
	That's correct.
	Yeah, because he said he's brought this up into the conversation more than a few times, and that clip is probably more interesting.
	I haven't heard that for a while.
	You're right.
	Yeah, I knew you'd like it.
	I knew you'd like it, because it kind of sets the stage.
	It's a winner.
	It kind of sets the stage.
	Let's look at Australia.
	I didn't know Australia was all... Australia's gone nuts.
	Oh, okay.
	What do we have?
	Let me just say a few things, because I notice our Australia donors are down.
	They're gone.
	Half of them are dead.
	They're dead.
	Dead, Jim.
	We don't have a lot of them.
	They have this Prime Minister, this guy.
	We don't, nobody knows who he is.
	He's Anthony Albanese.
	He looks like Elmer Fudd and acts like Elmer Fudd.
	He's a labor, he's the head of labor and he is a censorship nut.
	And the whole country, both sides, oh, everybody in the entire political spectrum wants to censor everything.
	Yes.
	And all information should come from the government and the police.
	And I have a series of clips.
	Now this series of clips begins with one, these are all from Sky News, and it's a collection of various Australian politicians, all demanding censorship.
	And this guy Albanese thinks it should be illegal to make a meme that involves him.
	Oh, I saw this guy.
	Well, to be fair, I don't know if you have the clip, but he was talking about Superimpose.
	I don't know if it was a meme or not, but memes would fall under his outrage, yes.
	Yeah, and he thinks it should be, memes literally should be illegal.
	He said memes?
	He said memes.
	He hates memes!
	He's like you!
	You should move to Australia!
	My bags are packed!
	I'm ready to go!
	All right.
	I want to start this with, this clip is not part of the super clips, but this is a clip about the, and there's this woman named Julie Inman Grant, who is the e-safety chief.
	E-safety?
	And she's in charge of e-safety.
	Oh, I like e-safety.
	And she is the one who is, she's the A lot of the genesis for this is from her.
	And she's weird because she has a California accent.
	It doesn't sound like an Australian at all.
	But she put the clamps, the kibosh, on any... and she's the one really into...
	Misgendering and arresting people and throwing them in jail if they misgender is really important to her.
	This doesn't happen.
	So I want to play that clip first, which is just about the misgendering because some people got their tit in a ringer over this.
	And then I'll play the other one.
	This is e-safety Julie Inman Grant clip.
	Chris, we've had him on this program, has submitted a notice of appeal against the e-safety commissioner in this country, Julie Inman Grant.
	Overheard takedown order for his post where he supposedly misgendered a trans activist.
	Tell me the latest with this case.
	It's a fascinating one.
	It's one that got international attention.
	People were shocked that this was happening in Australia and you would think the East Safety Commissioner would have Bigger priorities, I don't know, child exploitation for one, than to bring down posts on X. Yeah, that's right.
	Look, there is a serious issue with the exposure of children to graphic and obscene content and it needs to be dealt with.
	The problem that you've got here with this eSafety Commissioner, she's an activist.
	Absolutely.
	She will continue to expand her role to police, If I can just add some colour to this expose of what's happening in Australia.
	views.
	We're just talking about the EPA.
	It's the exact same problem.
	You have these unelected bureaucrats that have vague powers, and they will fill it with their views.
	And, you know, she has a track record of censorship, and it only ever targets one side.
	And unfortunately, we're seeing that happen again.
	You know, if I can just add some color to this expose of what's happening in Australia.
	When I went up to Dallas for my buddy's 60th birthday, and up there was a Now she is, she has her own travel agent business and she booked a lot of stuff for us and she did it for free, you know, best friends of the family and it was really good because, you know, she gets all kinds of benefits.
	You know how travel agents work.
	They, you know, they get a piece of the back end somehow.
	And so I meet her, and I knew that she was Australian, and we're chatting as a party, and I say, wow, man, you know, I was in Australia in 1990, and she's from Perth.
	I said, you know, Perth was beautiful, I really loved that, but man, that country's really changed.
	And she goes, what do you mean?
	I said, well, ever since you took the guns away.
	Well, dude, I don't think she's ever going to do anything for us.
	She got really mad about that.
	And I was like, well, and COVID, that was, it was over.
	She was really defensive about it, which to me means she knows.
	She knows that something has gone really awry.
	And maybe that's why we're not hearing from our Aussies anymore.
	Something's weird.
	Something's going on.
	That's an interesting anecdote.
	I think they've been beaten down into submission.
	It's finally happened.
	And they're the first to go.
	It can't happen here.
	Yes, it can.
	Oh, yes, it can.
	All you're talking about is Trump farting.
	It's the best you can do.
	We're lost!
	We are so lost.
	So let's go with eSafety2 and then this will be, this is a roundup of the commentary from, unfortunately you don't see who the people are, you can't see the chyron, but it's, I can just tell you, this is, besides Albanese's in here, people from both sides of all political parties are making these comments.
	The entire country is all in for harsh censorship.
	Legal notices have been issued to Google, Meta, X, Telegram, WhatsApp and Reddit amid a surge in reports of harmful content being spread on the platforms.
	We are prepared to take whatever action is necessary to haul these companies into line.
	So is there a case, do you think, for tougher action against social media companies?
	No question at all.
	And I think there's a bipartisan position in relation to this.
	This is exactly as I'd expect from X or Twitter or whatever you want to call it.
	A disregard for the information that they pump into our communities.
	Lies and rumours spreading like wildfire.
	And then when things go wrong, throwing their hands up in the air to say that they're not prepared to do anything about it.
	We know that the companies, and we've seen some of the comments from Elon Musk overnight, they see themselves above the law.
	We've had enough.
	Sydney's had enough.
	Media companies, including social media companies, have a responsibility to act.
	It shouldn't need the eSafety Commissioner to intervene.
	And that was everybody.
	That's everybody from the political spectrum, left to right.
	Well, hold on.
	Doesn't that kind of fall in line with what I just said?
	Because people on X, whatever you want to call it, the people on X are saying, hey, Australia's crap.
	They went to crap.
	They're lost.
	Maybe everybody's offended by that.
	It could be.
	Just thinking.
	Okay, part two of this clip I think brings in Inman Grant and you can hear her and listen to her accent because she's introduced and she's chatting right away.
	And this is not an Australian accent, I can assure you.
	I don't know what it is, but it sounds like a California girl.
	Julie Inman Grant is the e-safety commissioner.
	Well, we have a range of graduated powers.
	Powers?
	There could be civil proceedings and we could take them to court or we could fine them.
	She has American Cali girl up talk.
	Fowers?
	Yeah, she's totally.
	And she says um?
	Well, what an offence.
	Um?
	Julie Inman Grant is the eSafety Commissioner.
	Well, we have a range of graduated powers.
	There could be civil proceedings and we could take them to court or we could fine them.
	Of course, the quantum of the fine would depend on the gravity of the non-compliance.
	This is where we try and work with the platforms to either voluntarily raise this or to use our codes and mandatory standards to force compliance.
	But we can use graduated tools like link to Alicia notices.
	So if they fail to remove the content, then we can go to the search engines such as Google or Bing to really minimize the amount of content the Australians can see.
	Since we'll work with the Commonwealth Government to pull down those pages, but I can't emphasise enough how difficult it is to contain a combustible situation when false and malicious rumours spread like wildfire in our community.
	We need to be in a position where we're dealing with truth.
	Information should be from police and law enforcement authorities and if people have concerns they should check our websites, our socials and any other Direct news from law enforcement about current information.
	Act on advice and information that's provided by the government or the police.
	So please be assured that police will be the source of truth and not social media and misinformation.
	And then when it comes to the misinformation and disinformation, the government does have, well it's working on draft laws to try and put in place some much tougher rules for the social media companies.
	Where are you at on this?
	Are you prepared to back such laws?
	Yeah we are and happy to have a look at Anything the government puts forward, as we've said over the last week, with the horrendous things that we've seen.
	But if extra Commonwealth laws are required to take down web pages that are inciting violence and smashing cohesion in Australia's largest city, then that's exactly what needs to happen.
	The more this content is up there, the more that is re-shared, the more the velocity and the virality continues.
	And we need to stem that.
	Velocity and virality?
	My favorite quote in that little commentary there was, the police is the source of truth.
	And that was a cop saying that some womp female police department chief... Shut up!
	Shut up, slave.
	Now listen... The police are the source of truth.
	I consulted the book of knowledge and allow me to share what we have learned from Wikipedia about Julie Inman Grant.
	She was born in 1968 in Seattle, Washington.
	Ah, there you go.
	She's an American public servant who is currently serving as the E-Safety Commissioner, a role which leads Australia's independent regulator for online safety.
	After graduating from university in early 1990s, Grant was offered a position as a case agent with the CIA.
	But declined the offer as it meant, quote, I won't be able to tell my friends and family what I was doing.
	She subsequently started working in the public sector as a policy advisor for United States Congressman John Miller.
	And then from 95 to 2000, she worked as a government affairs manager for Microsoft.
	And then she moved to Australia, I guess she married her now husband, and became the Asia-Pacific Director of Internet Safety, Privacy and Security at Microsoft.
	So, she glows in the dark.
	Yes, and the spooky thing is interesting because I think, I don't know if you can tell by seeing what's missing from that, to say that she is actually, is working for the CIA.
	Oh yeah, clearly.
	Which would, and the cover would be, oh I refuse that job because I wouldn't be able to tell my friends what I do.
	And then all of a sudden she's running e-security in Australia somehow.
	She only refused the case agent job.
	Didn't say she refused...
	C.I.A.
	position, just case agents.
	Ah, good, good catch on the parsing.
	Yes, that's how we do it.
	That's how we do it.
	So that's what's going on there.
	So the C.I.A.
	is, uh, yeah.
	Okay, so let's go.
	This is the last clip of the group.
	There we go.
	The Online Safety Act has significant powers in it.
	We passed it when we were in government and it needs to be enforced.
	It's about time that we strengthen rules in relation to the eSafety Commissioner.
	There's an age verification regime that's been recommended by the eSafety Commissioner from 2023.
	We think that's something the government should pick up straight away.
	We've just put some very strong mandatory codes in place to encourage companies to do more.
	If the laws are inadequate and they need to be strengthened or added to, then we would support any effort from the government.
	We are prepared to take whatever action is necessary to hold these companies into line.
	To really minimise the amount of content the Australians can see.
	They're going to cut off their internet.
	They're going to get kangaroo social media.
	I'd like to know why, what's the big deal?
	At the end, I think it was the kicker, she says, we have to make sure that we control what Australians can see.
	Let me just hear that exact quote again because that is quite beautiful.
	Let's hear it again here.
	To hold these companies into line.
	To really minimize the amount of content the Australians can see.
	Minimize the amount of... There goes the show!
	There goes the show, everybody.
	We will be cut off.
	This show, which does nothing more than analyze news stories, will be cut off from Australia, as will everyone, because they're trying to control the flow of information into Australia from outside sources.
	Why?
	I mean, what's the endgame here besides just, you know, control of a captive population?
	Is there any other endgame?
	That is the endgame, isn't it?
	Just control the population?
	And the point would be, I guess, because I guess maybe we're going to set up bases there or it's got something to do with China.
	There's an underlying reason for this that we don't understand, but it has to be.
	No, John, it's... Something to do with the military-industrial complex.
	Well, perhaps, but I think it's simpler than that.
	Australia was the first one to... they were really the test case.
	Here's your jab, shut up, stay home.
	We're cordoning off, you need a pass to get out of your city.
	That's what happened.
	I think this is the test case.
	They did have that little element we keep forgetting about with the pass to get out of the city.
	Yeah, can we break a country?
	Can we break... So you're just thinking Australia's a giant test tube.
	Yeah, in a way, sure.
	Sure.
	I mean, they broke Chris Wilson to a degree.
	That's a broken man.
	I talk to him frequently, not really often, but he's like, you know, I'm still overboard and, you know, he's just trying to get along.
	They've broken people there.
	And that response I got from the travel agent... That actually is an important story, yeah.
	Yeah, there's something really... something broke.
	And they don't, and they have no, at least in America, we think.
	Like, oh yeah, man, we got guns.
	Okay, sure.
	Woo, let's go everybody!
	You first!
	I got 2,000 rounds.
	But, you know, so that may be actually quite genius because we just think that we could always take it back.
	But I don't really see any evidence that there's anyone with enough chutzpah to do it en masse.
	However, it's going to get interesting.
	We have now in Fredericksburg, heart of the Texas Hill Country, Trumpland.
	Should have a little sign.
	You now entering Trumpland.
	Um, Shaq.
	Shaq has now entered our school system.
	SHAC, the School Health Advisory Committee.
	This is, uh, so this is... Oh, I thought you were talking about Shaquille O'Neal.
	If only.
	No, no, this is, uh, this is the outfit, you know, the organization, uh, they came from Austin and they bring in health consultants and they put up QR codes in the school.
	Hey kids, you feeling a little gay?
	Yeah, yeah.
	And, and the books.
	They put the books in the library, and so the ladies got together yesterday.
	Kudos to the ladies.
	These are books for nine-year-olds about jerking off and wet dreams.
	This is nine-year-olds!
	It's questionable whether schools should be teaching children about anything of this nature.
	And when they can't add.
	No!
	What else are you going to do?
	Two plus two, what?
	Might as well play with this thing.
	And so the women went en masse yesterday and so they're gaining some ground.
	They were supposed to approve all these books and they delayed this vote.
	It was calm, but I have a feeling that That it's going... and the whole idea that this is... Now this is that Moms4Liberty operation, right?
	Not just, no.
	Or just more.
	It's Moms4Liberty Plus.
	Yes, it's Moms4Liberty Plus.
	Well that's what's needed everywhere, but they'll beat them back somehow.
	Well, I'm not so sure.
	And it was mainly the amount, the number of women who showed up.
	Ah, good.
	You know, it was just so much.
	And one of the school board members said to someone we know, like, Hey, you gotta keep control of your group!
	He's like, I don't control anything.
	These are concerned parents.
	You know, sadly, because there are people on the pro side of this.
	It's not just, you know, this is a divided little city here with 11,500 people.
	And they believe, they've been propagandized into believing that this is a health issue.
	And that, you know, when your kid is, you know, feeling gay or trans or whatever, that, you know, this will prevent them from killing themselves.
	Which, of course, we know that all of these measures from the CAS report, was it not the CAS?
	Yeah, CAS.
	CAS review, I think it is.
	Yeah, the review of all the, everything ever printed on the topic.
	That all of it is just not well, not doing well.
	It's not good, it's a fraud.
	Yes, it's a huge fraud.
	Now, of course, the Cast Review gets zero attention because there's way too much money involved.
	Anyway, so that's playing out here in Little Fredericksburg.
	It's fascinating.
	So this is a global push.
	Fredericksburg would be a target.
	Because it has its normal politics and then the influence of nearby Austin, which is the most influential city in the entire state.
	Yes, and of course, Hollywood.
	I mean, I think the proportion of trans kids in Hollywood is way higher than anywhere else in America.
	I always have to laugh when you see... What's her name?
	From the Dior commercial.
	She has an adopted black son who she dresses in a dress.
	What's her name again?
	Yeah, I know who you mean.
	She's got two kids.
	It's like, what are you doing?
	Yeah, she's got two trans kids somehow.
	I mean, what are the chances?
	There's somebody in the troll room.
	Charlize Theron.
	Charlize Theron.
	Theron, yes she is.
	She's into it.
	But I mean, a lot of these women in Hollywood have this.
	It's like, you know, what?
	What is going on?
	It's like a pet.
	I'm not supposed to say Wiccans.
	I'm supposed to say witches.
	They're witches is correct, but I got the United States Association of Wiccans and they were a little upset.
	Hey, we're a fun-loving group.
	They sent you a note?
	Yeah, we're a fun-loving group.
	Stop it.
	Witches, yes.
	We're against witches, but we're of the Wicca tribe, so don't mess with us.
	I'm like, okay, all right.
	Witches it is.
	But, you know, there's stuff ending.
	It's interesting to watch.
	We have, particularly, I think DEI folds into this and it is unfolding before our very eyes.
	You sent me the link that the Women Who Code organization has folded.
	Yeah, folded.
	I mean, they couldn't even keep that going.
	That was a Kara Swisher thing, wasn't it?
	I don't know.
	It started in San Francisco in, I think, 2011.
	And then by 2018, they, I don't know why, but they moved to Atlanta.
	Oh.
	Which is like, you know, there are certain geographical areas that you want to be in because of certain, you know, there's this, I don't want to call it a vibe or a milieu or whatever it is.
	But Silicon Valley, or actually San Francisco, which is not Silicon Valley technically, is different than Atlanta when it comes to having the different types of people.
	And so they moved to Atlanta, which I thought was a blunder.
	And then they had a, just in January, they hired a new woman who was a DEI specialist.
	Oh, there it is!
	Yes.
	She had a certificate.
	Well, she was actually kind of a chief technical officer type.
	I would even say maybe a bean counter type.
	And she got a certificate which you could get from, I guess, the school she went to in DEI.
	And she took over the operation in January and four months later folded it.
	They brought in some new board members and said, hey, this is no good.
	We're closing down.
	And all the individual units, they were trying to confiscate their money.
	Now there's a big battle going on.
	Oh, for the money?
	Because they're trying to get the money?
	Chapters.
	Oh, brother.
	And there's a couple of tough women that are involved.
	You can tell because there's different threads you can follow and say, wow, this girl means business.
	Yeah.
	And it's not over.
	So, okay, so DEI, there you go.
	Then we have another story.
	This is Moe's prophecy, by the way, that DEI is unfolding.
	Now, that woman who codes, she wasn't black.
	She's a white woman?
	The new CEO?
	Yeah, the DEI lady.
	Middle-aged white woman.
	Okay.
	We do have the DEI official at UCLA School of Medicine.
	Turns out she massively plagiarized her dissertation on DEI.
	A lot of plagiarists are in DEI.
	On DEI!
	I'm a DEI official.
	I plagiarized my dissertation on DEI.
	That's terrible.
	And then big story in the New York Times about the inside the crisis at NPR.
	And a lot of it is, of course, you know, podcasting.
	Of course, podcasting is a much more efficient way to distribute instead of having expensive radio stations and, you know, you need people to run the buildings and the transmitters.
	With podcasting, they also don't have to adhere to the underwriting.
	They can just go straight on ads, which is a big improvement.
	For them.
	But also, there was a lot of DEI stuff.
	I quote from the article, so it came as a disappointment to some people on NPR's board last fall when they were presented with new internal data showing their efforts hadn't moved the needle much with black and Hispanic listeners.
	Black listeners made up roughly 11% of NPR's audience in the second quarter of 2023, unchanged from the same period in 2020 according to the data.
	The data further showed that the share of Hispanic listeners went up only two percentage points since 2020 to account for 16% of the total audience.
	One 2020 survey from Pew Research found that of the people who named NPR as their main source for political and election news, 75% were white more than any other outlet except for Fox News.
	So they're literally number two in white supremacy.
	And this is the funny thing.
	This shows you how these people were thinking.
	NPR's efforts to diversify itself and its audience didn't always live up to the expectations of the people who work there.
	During a round of layoffs last year, NPR cut Louder Than a Riot, a hip-hop podcast that examined black and queer issues.
	Okay, let's stop right there.
	Here's the meeting.
	Hey, we need to do a little DEI and diversify.
	I know!
	Black people like hip-hop!
	Yeah!
	Let's find some black queer people and make a show!
	Gee, and it didn't work?
	You're kidding, right?
	I mean, so play this clip and then continue your rant, but play this first.
	This is from last show, so you have to look it up.
	It's podcast ad black stories.
	This is the latest NPR attempt to make a podcast that appeals to blacks.
	In this country, some truths aren't self-evident.
	In NPR's Black Stories, Black Truths, a collection of stories as wide-ranging and real as the people who tell them, we celebrate the Black experience for all its soul and richness.
	Search NPR, Black Stories, Black Truths, wherever you get podcasts.
	Oh, goodness.
	Yeah, no wonder this fails.
	It may come as a surprise to you, NPR, black people don't even want to be seen as black people.
	They're just Americans.
	They're interested in stuff, but you're pandering.
	Pandering, that's the word of the day.
	Pandering.
	Yeah, it's creepy.
	Just creepy.
	Like, duh!
	No wonder that didn't work.
	And now, just like this e-safety lady, they're bringing in some spook here to run the NPRs.
	Oh yeah.
	What do you give her?
	Six months?
	What do you think?
	How long will the board... Deadpool!
	Deadpool!
	Deadpool!
	NPR Deadpool!
	What do you give her?
	That's a good question.
	What do you give her?
	What do you give her?
	I can't give her more than six months.
	It just seems like... I mean, they're gonna... because they do quarterly reporting.
	It's gonna suck.
	It's, oh, and you know, since 20, 2022, I think it was... Well, by the way, I want you to continue, but before...
	That guy, Uri, that wrote that piece that got fired, basically.
	Yeah.
	Because of this.
	He wrote a piece in between the two CEOs, hoping that he would, you know, achieve favor with the newcomer coming in.
	But once she came in, she got rid of him because she's like any other, you know, some trouble maker.
	Get him out.
	Head chopper.
	Yes, of course.
	And so she got rid of him.
	That, I think, is going to come back to bite her in the ass.
	So that will affect the timeline of her disappearance.
	To, and I think it will negatively, so I think you, I think you, what's shortened to me is six months.
	I'm gonna give her a year.
	Well, she'll have a year contract at least.
	Here's the stat.
	NPR still has an audience of about 42 million who listen every week.
	Many of them digitally, which is down from an estimated 60 million in 2020.
	So even though they went all in on podcasts, they still lost 18 million listeners.
	Jeez, 18 million is a lot.
	Okay, so talk about your value for value.
	These people are such idiots.
	Um, hold on a second.
	They, uh, where is it?
	They put together a podcast subscription service.
	Here it is.
	The adoption of NPR's podcast subscription bundle.
	Bundle.
	Bundle.
	NPR Plus has also lagged behind competitors subscription business.
	According to internal documents obtained by the Times.
	Nice hit, Job Times.
	51,000 people subscribed to NPR Plus as of March, early March.
	This is since 2022, and they've done about 1.7 million in revenue.
	That's a failed product.
	If you've got 60, well, okay, let's say 42 million listeners, and you do a subscription bundle, and only 51,000 people sign up for it, that's a big fail.
	Well, either that, it's a big fail under any circumstances, but it also indicates to me that there is broken.
	No, it indicates to me that their numbers are not accurate.
	What do you mean?
	The big number.
	Oh, the big number?
	You're taking a percentage of the big number, which is what?
	50 million?
	No!
	That's bullcrap.
	If they only have 52,000 people that are subscribing, that 50 million is bogus.
	They probably have a few million, maybe.
	And they're double counting, triple counting, quadruple counting.
	They're fudging the number to make it look like there's more there.
	But then they screw themselves because in any sort of situation where you're doing, you're trying to get funds from eyeballs.
	So you have your eyeballs and you have the money coming from the eyeballs.
	The percentages are well known to everybody who does that kind of work and the numbers that you're expressing do not match.
	I'm with you.
	So they're full of it.
	They're lying.
	I want to get into some of the protests and I'll just, I have one clip to start off with and then you can take it away.
	I see you have a couple of clips.
	I do?
	Yeah, yeah, I've seen you.
	I mean, I got clips, but you got clips.
	You always want to play your clips.
	We got clips.
	We got clips.
	So, these, something, not you, not blaming you, but something is knocking against your microphone.
	I don't know what it is.
	Oh, no, I know exactly what it is.
	Okay, it's not you.
	And it's not knocking against the microphone.
	It's not you.
	I just have to tell you that I know I can fix it, I just haven't been able to.
	I'm not blaming you.
	I know it's mad.
	It's coming from the heavenly realms.
	No, I can make it happen.
	It's a long story.
	I'm sorry that it's bothering you.
	If it was a mic bump, it would sound like this.
	Which, by the way, somebody said that if I did that, they'd say donate.
	I just did it.
	I did it again.
	I need two donations.
	Thank you.
	It's more this sound.
	It's more like that.
	Yeah, well, I know what it is.
	I'm sorry.
	Okay.
	And you know what?
	We don't want to know.
	But you don't want to know.
	We don't want to know what it is.
	I just want to point it out.
	Okay, so these kids who are protesting at all the universities.
	And so there's a couple things going on.
	First some observations.
	I see a lot of the same green tents.
	That's just an observation everybody.
	The same green tent, so there's, it's obviously, it's clearly organized.
	There was, I got a short little clip, you may have seen this one, from NYU, where there's a couple of protesters, and by the way, what's with the masks?
	Are they afraid of COVID still?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	This is how smart they are.
	They're all wearing a calendar.
	They're wearing paper medicals.
	Spanish flu.
	Something's going on.
	And so there's this one girl and she's mildly cute, you know, and she's enthusiastic.
	I love this clip.
	She has this nose ring, which I just want to clip a dog leash to right away.
	I used to do that with my daughter.
	She came home with that ring like click.
	OK, come on.
	And she and her compatriots there are clueless.
	And what would you say is the main goal with tonight's protest?
	I think the goal is just showing our support for Palestine and demanding that NYU stops.
	I honestly don't know all of what NYU's doing.
	Is there something that NYU's doing?
	I really don't know.
	I'm pretty sure there is.
	Do you know what NYU's doing?
	About what?
	About Israel.
	Why are we protesting here?
	Palestine will be free!
	I wish I was more educated.
	I'm not either.
	I came from Columbia.
	I was there out by Columbia, and we came down.
	They said NYU students would not support.
	So I came down.
	I heard there's lots of cops.
	Some people were saying it was getting dangerous.
	Okay, so I'd like to be more educated.
	So they are under-educated and over-socialized, which is what we saw with the BLM riots, and boy, didn't that turn out to be a big farce, a big phony, a big money grab, a big write-off for hundreds of millions of dollars for corporate America.
	But they're really not, like, we hate Jews!
	We hate Jews!
	There's no anti-Semitism going on.
	I've looked at, you know, not hours, but I've looked at a lot of footage.
	No.
	There's a couple of agent provocateurs.
	Particularly in New York, there's some dude who's like, watch me, I've got a yarmulke and an Israel flag!
	It's almost like, remember Kentucky Fried Movie?
	There's this fantastic, they had this Thrill Seeker, I think it was the Thrill Seeker guy, for the Kentucky Fried movie, if you haven't seen it, it's almost required watching, although I'm sure very, very dated, and he would have, he had a crash helmet on and a cape, and there were a bunch of black guys playing craps on the street, and he went right in the middle of them and then yells the N-word, which back then you could still say, and that was, you know, that's how dumb this is, like, oh, oh, this guy is wearing his Israel flag, well,
	Of course you're gonna get people yelling at you, but in general, there's all these tents and like, Jews for Palestine, we love Jews, you know, all of that stuff.
	There's no one is being anti-semitic except the politicians!
	Good morning, there is another demonstration expected here later today.
	The Texas State Employees Union had planned a demonstration for a while in support of staff associated with DEI programs.
	Yeah, this is kind of interesting.
	As an aside, and kind of a follow-on, UT Austin just fired all of their DEI people.
	So on one hand, they're like, oh, we better get rid of this.
	This is not good.
	DEI is collapsing.
	And they probably have a bunch of these, I don't know, plagiarizers in there.
	Like, let's close the division.
	So it was already tense.
	The United States Union had planned a demonstration for a while in support of staff associated with DEI programs who are now losing their job here on campus.
	But now, student groups say that they will join them in another walkout.
	And the first walkout that they called for yesterday ended up being chaotic.
	The Student Palestine Solidarity Committee had planned this walkout.
	The university had told them the event would not be approved, saying that there's a time and place for everything, but that they couldn't disrupt campus with final exams next week.
	Well, UT Police and Texas DPS, they were ready, and they quickly issued orders for the crowd to disperse.
	They started pushing groups back off the main lawn, and when demonstrators would not leave, they started making arrests.
	This morning, Texas DPS says law enforcement on campus made 34 arrests.
	And there was immediately a public call for protesters to then call the jail and demand their release and begin raising money for bail.
	Governor Greg Abbott immediately backed the strong response, posting this on X as the demonstration was happening.
	These protesters belong in jail.
	Anti-Semitism will not be tolerated in Texas, period.
	Students joining in hate-filled anti-Semitic protests at any public college or university in Texas should be expelled.
	This is bullcrap!
	That's our governor saying, oh, anti-Semitism.
	No!
	This is the BDS crowd.
	By the way, I think people out there should be reminded that Greg Abbott is the governor of Texas.
	Yes.
	Is disliked by you.
	He's a globalist.
	Because you think he's a big phony.
	He's a big phony globalist.
	He gets a pass because of wheelchair.
	Yeah.
	But we're on to you, Abbott.
	No, he's a phony.
	He does phony things at the border with a phony little eagle pass.
	You know, oh, here's a fence.
	Oh, we're going to stop him.
	Yeah, we got forward operating base.
	No, you don't.
	He's a phony.
	He's a big phony.
	And now, and here he is ginning it up, ginning it, oh it's anti-semitism.
	Here's Deutsche Welle to add to it.
	This is definitely a nationwide topic.
	You just mentioned the White House.
	We also had the Secretary of Education who weighed in here saying that what he has seen on campus is a disgrace.
	The White House, the press release that they send out saying that anti-semitism has no space, not only in any college across the country, but also anywhere.
	And as we hear also the concerns of Jewish students but also faculty members.
	Rabbi Close to the university even told Jewish students to stay away.
	But there is important to make a difference between the protesters protesting inside the university but also outside.
	It came here earlier today.
	We were hearing some chants.
	Also some people were here saying and rejecting a two-state solution quite different to the chants that we hear inside.
	But we can imagine that this will still develop as we see more and more universities and more of this protest also happening across the country.
	They're just parroting whatever the CIA told them because this is a scam.
	They're setting it up and making it look like these kids hate Jews.
	It's not, this is not what, it's blatantly false because that's not what the chants are.
	There's none of that.
	It's pro-Palestine BDS.
	You know, boycott, divest and sanction.
	They want the universities to no longer invest in Israel, whatever.
	But stop the genocide.
	But they're not saying we hate Jews.
	They're just not.
	And even Mike Johnson was doing.
	Do you have that on your clip?
	I have the Mike Johnson clip.
	Let me see.
	Where is it?
	Under Mike Johnson.
	That would make sense.
	Here we go.
	At Columbia.
	House Speaker Mike Johnson in New York City today meeting with students as he calls for Columbia University's president to resign.
	NDD's White House correspondent Iris Tao was at the speaker's press conference.
	After meeting with Columbia University's president Manusha Fiqh here on campus, House Speaker Mike Johnson says she needs to step down as she's too weak in protecting Jewish students.
	Her feeling is that they have not acted to restore order on the campus.
	This is dangerous.
	This is not Free expression.
	This is not First Amendment.
	They are threatening, intimidating, saying that they will take violence upon Jewish students.
	We met with Jewish students who are in fear.
	They can't come on campus.
	Meanwhile, Johnson was repeatedly booed by pro-Palestinian protesters during his press conference.
	Though he responded with a blunt message.
	It does not matter who shouts in our faces.
	We're going to do what is right by America.
	My message to the students inside the encampment is go back to class and stop the nonsense.
	Stop wasting your parents' money.
	Johnson says he also... Oh, that's... By the way, I need to stop that for a second.
	That was edited together because I saw the whole thing and he's up there and some dude next to him, some Texas congressman, said, stop wasting your parents' money.
	And he said, yeah, stop wasting your parents' money.
	That's what the congressman just said.
	They cut that out of this report.
	That's interesting.
	Go back to class and stop the nonsense.
	Stop wasting your parents' money.
	Nice edit.
	Yeah, it's a good edit, but it's there.
	So plans to call President Biden, tell him what he's seen here, and also demand him take executive action to address this.
	President Biden on Monday said he condemns anti-semitic protests but also condemns those who don't understand what's going on with the Palestinians.
	Former President Trump says Biden does not know who he's backing.
	All this as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday called the situation on American college campuses horrific.
	What's happening on America's college campuses is horrific.
	It's horrific, alright.
	I cut it there because it was perfect.
	Alright, so, interesting.
	I have a different clip of Mike Johnson, and it's funny that he starts, you say, this is not free speech.
	What is he talking about?
	He, that's, it's the literal expression of free speech.
	And he again... Well, when I saw the one, I saw another one, there's a million clips of him.
	Yeah.
	But first of all, let's start with the fact that he's showboating.
	Totally!
	There's no reason for Mike Johnson to go to Columbia.
	Yeah, really.
	There's no reason for Mike Johnson to go to... He's the Speaker of the House.
	Why is he at Columbia?
	He's just to show up the fact that Biden won't go or Biden can't figure out where it is.
	Yeah.
	Or whatever.
	Because he's being blackmailed.
	He's being blackmailed.
	They got him.
	They got him.
	And now, hey, hey, little boy, go to New York and say something.
	Talk anti-Jew stuff.
	I'm telling you.
	Well, it's probably somebody... What you're saying is that there's a narrative that's been created by a third party and he is now a stooge.
	He's a stooge, yes.
	He's a stooge.
	Well, remember, he signed the... Yeah, he signed something he said he would never sign, ever.
	Yeah, let me play this clip, because there's some different stuff in here.
	We are standing here right now on the steps of the Lowe Library.
	In this very building right behind us, Columbia University once awarded Winston Churchill an honorary degree, and it was Churchill who said, it is manifestly right that Jews should have a national home where they may be reunited.
	We believe in that principle.
	And today, I'm here to proclaim to all those who gnash their teeth and demand to wipe the state of- Oh, ooh, ooh, do you hear what he said there?
	To those who gnash their teeth?
	That's like a biblical thing.
	That's a virtue.
	You want to hear a virtue signal?
	That's a virtue.
	Gnashing of teeth?
	Weak, weak Johnson.
	That would make sense from him.
	Yeah, but that's weak.
	That's really weak.
	We believe in that principle.
	And today I'm here to proclaim to all those who gnash their teeth and demand to wipe the state of- Hey, stop it again.
	Stop it.
	Is the reference to panties in a bunch, is that biblical too?
	It is now.
	And today, I'm here to proclaim to all those who gnash their teeth and demand to wipe the State of Israel off the map and attack our innocent Jewish students, this simple truth.
	Neither Israel nor these Jewish students on this campus will ever stand alone.
	Today, Hamas issued an endorsement statement of the protesters on this campus.
	They called them the future leaders of America.
	It is detestable.
	All of this has to be said because the cherished traditions of this university are being overtaken right now by radical and extreme ideologies.
	They place a target on the backs of Jewish students in the United States and here on this campus.
	A growing number of students have chanted in support of terrorists.
	They have chased down Jewish students.
	They have mocked them and reviled them.
	They have shouted racial epithets.
	I haven't seen that.
	They have screamed at those who bear the Star of David.
	Enjoy your free speech.
	They've told Jewish students who wear the Star of David to leave the country.
	And shamefully, some professors and faculty have joined the mobs.
	Things have gotten so out of control that the schools canceled in-person classes and now they've come up with this hybrid model where they will discriminate against Jewish students.
	They are not allowed to come to class anymore for fear of their lives.
	And it's detestable.
	As Columbia has allowed these lawless agitators and radicals to take over, The virus of anti-semitism has spread across other campuses.
	By some counts, as many as 200 universities have a similar form of protest right now.
	So, this guy has really lost the plot.
	And I think, I got this clip here.
	This is from NBC.
	The threatening of Johnson, which he is responding to, whatever they threatened him with, Whether it's like, oh, if you don't bring this to the floor, if you don't vote for, you don't get this passed, man, then, you know, America's gonna die, or you're gonna die, or... Or no, or we may reveal some photos.
	We may show some photos.
	Yeah, you're still on that.
	I give it a 10% possibility, but it's possible.
	Well, you can give it any possibility you want, but it seems the easiest way to do it.
	Yeah, well, listen to this report from NBC.
	Tonight with Ukraine struggling to fend off Russia's relentless military assault, new American weapons are finally on the way after President Biden signed that nearly $100 billion foreign aid package.
	It's a good day for world peace.
	It's going to make America safer.
	By the way, that's the quote.
	100 billion dollars in weapons!
	It's a good day for peace.
	It's a good day for world peace.
	It's going to make America safer.
	Yeah.
	It's going to make the world safer.
	The announcement comes after a six month long White House effort to approve more aid.
	The delay caused by conservative Republicans who threatened to oust House Speaker Mike Johnson if he supported it.
	Multiple officials tell NBC News the president broke the logjam by directing aides to court Johnson, privately making clear to him the consequences of inaction.
	Yeah, he had an Oval Meeting, that's what happened.
	They brought him- What was the- Yeah.
	What?
	What was the vote, when they did the final vote?
	I think there was something like a hundred Republicans that voted for that thing.
	Oh, well that's part of the whole distraction that the Republicans are doing.
	No, listen.
	Listen, look!
	The whole point is, look, focus on Mike Johnson.
	Focus on Mike Johnson.
	Please don't look at your representatives who voted for it.
	That's the point!
	All Johnson was doing was keeping it from the floor, doing these Republicans a favor.
	He was finally badgered into putting it to a vote, and the Republicans sold their own people out.
	If it wasn't for all the Republicans that voted for it, it wouldn't have passed.
	It has nothing to do with Mike Johnson.
	No, but that's why they're all, focus on him, focus on him, not on us, because, and I'm going to go there.
	These people did indeed receive a lot of money, and I'm talking Rubio, McCall.
	These are not Jews, by the way.
	They all got money from AIPAC.
	And I decided, you know what?
	I'm gonna go look at this AIPAC outfit.
	And AIPAC is a 501c4, which means they're a lobbying organization.
	And I'm like, well, where does their money come from?
	Of course, no one has to disclose this.
	And then I find it.
	They get their money from the AIEF.
	Ever heard of them?
	No.
	No, neither had I. AEIF at AEIFDN.org is the America Israel Education Foundation.
	The charitable, they have a one-page website.
	One page!
	The charitable organization affiliated with AIPAC.
	And they're 501c3, so when you donate to them, This is what we call a cutout.
	When you donate to them, you get a tax write-off and they then ship all that money over to AIPAC.
	And wouldn't you know it?
	Lockheed Martin, $1.9 million.
	Northrop Grumman, $1.253 million.
	General Atomics, $1.229 million.
	This is how it works.
	The defense contractors donate to AEIF.
	AEIF sent $35 million, and this is 2019 numbers because they don't have to report either.
	So I'm just getting stuff that has been reverse engineered on the internet.
	You know, from Open Secrets type places.
	That's how the money flows.
	And then you can always say, it's the Jews!
	But no, it's not.
	Not unless the Jews are running Lockheed Martin.
	I don't think so.
	It's some woman.
	Exactly.
	And if you look at the board of directors of AEIF, it's three times as long as AIPAC.
	AIPAC, that's all your Jewish names.
	Oh, yes.
	Oi, we're doing it here.
	Oi!
	Doing it for Israel.
	But AEIF, that's where all the contractors are on the board.
	And so, I did the unthinkable.
	Uh-oh.
	I did the unthinkable.
	I went and marked up all 270 pages of this bill.
	This is a procurement bill.
	That's what this is.
	I'm just going to run through it.
	What's interesting, Is that this bill is entitled as an act to amend Title 38 U.S.
	United States Code to make certain improvements relating to the eligibility of veterans to receive reimbursements for emergency treatment furnished through the Veterans Community Care Program and for other purposes.
	It's always fun to see they take a bill that's already on the floor that's gone through the basic stuff and then they just rip it all out and replace it.
	And this thing is amazing.
	It consists of a couple of divisions.
	Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act.
	Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act.
	Indo-Pacific Security Supplemental Appropriations Act.
	The Century Peace Through Strength Act.
	Could it be more Orwellian?
	Century peace.
	I'm sorry, 21st century peace through strength.
	The Fend Act, which is fend off fentanyl.
	The Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity for Ukrainians Act.
	That's a big slush fund.
	Uh, then we have Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications.
	That's your TikTok act.
	TikTok!
	Then we have the SHIP Act, the Fight Crime Act, the MASHA Act.
	There's a whole bunch of stuff in here, but I just want to rattle off some numbers.
	I know how to read these things by now.
	Um, so we start with Department of Defense Operations and Maintenance.
	4.4 billion dollars transferred to the accounts under the heading operation and maintenance procurement and revolving and management funds so that's not going to Ukraine But the Secretary of Defense will notify the Congressional Defense Committees of the details of such transfers so that a determination that all or part of the funds transferred from this appropriation are not necessarily for the purposes provided herein.
	So he can do whatever he wants with it.
	No wonder they replaced him.
	Then we have it divided.
	Procurement of ammunition for the Army, $801 million.
	To respond to the situation in Israel and other uses.
	Defense-wide, $5.2 billion to respond to the situation in Israel and for related expenses.
	$4 billion given to the Secretary of Defense to provide for the government of Israel for procurement, i.e.
	buying from us for the Iron Dome, David's Sling, short-range rockets.
	$1.2 billion will be for the procurement of the Iron Beam defense.
	So that's just being spent on us.
	Then they have some Defense Production Act stuff in there, $198 million is not that interesting.
	But then we go to additional 2.4 for the Department of Defense for transfer to military personnel accounts, operation and maintenance and procurement.
	Defense working capital funds.
	It's not going anywhere.
	It's not going to Ukraine, or Israel, or anywhere.
	Then we have Title II.
	Department of Homeland Security.
	We throw them $10 million just for operations.
	FEMA?
	FEMA?
	Do they operate in Ukraine?
	FEMA?
	FEMA $390 million and $230 million for non-profit security grant program to eligible non-profit organizations to prevent, prepare for, protect against, and respond to acts of terrorism.
	To non-profits!
	This is dynamite!
	Then the Department of State, $150 million just to fly around, $100 million for security, worldwide security.
	They will give $4 million to the Office of the Inspector General to oversee everything.
	Then to the Diplomatic and Consular Services.
	$50 million for general stuff, in case you need it.
	You know, fly around jets, jets I guess.
	Mostly jets.
	Mostly jets.
	Bilateral Economic Assistance.
	5.6 billion dollars to address humanitarian needs, emergency food and shelter of vulnerable populations and communities.
	It doesn't specify, just, you know, 5.6 billion.
	And then my favorite, Department of State, migration and refugee assistance, 3.495 billion dollars for humanitarian needs of vulnerable populations to come in through the southern border.
	Yeah.
	I mean, this is literally what they're doing.
	That's why they're getting a $10,000 credit card.
	Yes!
	Here, come on, welcome here.
	Here's a $10,000 credit card.
	Yeah.
	And there are guys that we know for a fact, because they've said so, have come in, grabbed the credit card, escaped out of the country, and come back in again.
	To get a second credit card.
	Even Phoebe knows this.
	Yeah, it's okay, baby.
	It's okay.
	Then, in case someone has some issues, we're going to give away $3.5 billion for foreign military financing.
	Hey, do you need financing?
	We can give you a lease on this stuff.
	We have financing available.
	I mean, literally, with five mil- Hey, Phoebe, come here.
	With five million for the sales department.
	Expenses for general costs of administering military assistance and sales.
	They've even got the salespersons in there.
	Yeah.
	Phoebe, come here.
	Let me skip ahead here.
	There's a couple other things.
	Because then we get into my... Pheebs, come here, baby.
	Come here.
	U.S.AID.
	Three million dollars for monitoring of assistance made available for Gaza.
	So we give both sides some money.
	Go make sure that the missiles hit right.
	Here's three million dollars.
	Go monitor.
	Okay, now we go to Ukraine.
	This is great.
	Department of Defense, for military personnel, $207 million.
	That's our people, we're paying them.
	For the Marine Corps, $3.358 million for our Marines.
	$23 million for the Air Force.
	million for our Marines.
	$23 million for the Air Force.
	$4 million for Space Force.
	Phoebe. Space Force. Space Force.
	Operation and maintenance for the Army, $4.8 billion to respond to the situation in Ukraine and for related expenses.
	Provided that such amount is designated by Congress as for being for an emergency requirement pursuant to this section.
	So they're just going to hold on to it.
	That slush money is called.
	Oh, it's no slush money.
	Operation and Maintenance for the Navy.
	Are we sending the Navy to Ukraine?
	976 million.
	The Marine Corps, 69 million.
	And they just, this is, it just keeps on going.
	But here's the, I love this one.
	General operational maintenance defense wide, $27.9 billion to respond to the situation in Ukraine and for related expenses.
	So this is a huge procurement bill, which means buying stuff.
	And I go on and on, but I want to get to the Navy.
	Because the Navy has weapons procurement.
	$706 million to respond to the situation in Ukraine because, you know, the Navy's got to be there.
	Other procurement, $26 million, just in case you need it.
	Let's get to the submarines.
	Oh wait, for the Air Force, $3.2 billion.
	Oh, research and development.
	We need some research and development.
	$18 million for, who was that for, to remain available to respond to the situation in Ukraine.
	That's for the Army.
	The Navy gets $13 million for research and development, and for testing.
	Air Force, $406 million.
	I mean, this is bullcrap.
	It's absolute bullcrap.
	But then they added the cool things down at the bottom here.
	They got some nuclear stuff in there.
	Oh!
	Here it is.
	I love this.
	Title 2.
	Department of Energy Programs.
	For an additional amount for science.
	98 million dollars.
	It literally says science.
	In the bill, in quotes, for an additional amount for science.
	What does that even mean?
	It's code.
	If it's in quotes, it's code.
	But what's code for something we don't know?
	Then we go back to the Department of Health and Human Services.
	It could be hookers.
	It literally says science in quotes.
	It could be.
	You're right.
	It could be hookers and blow.
	Department of Health and Human Services, $481 million for refugee and entrant assistance activities.
	What?
	So a half a billion dollars to help more people come in?
	Yeah, that's the ones they're flying in.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	Precisely.
	Alright, we go down to... Oh, then the President gets $39 million to throw around for general expenses.
	Here, the Economic Support Fund, this is the real money that is going to quote-unquote Ukraine.
	$7.89 billion.
	But that is going into the Ukraine fund, you see.
	That's where everybody's going to be sucking off of that money.
	The Freedom Support Act and SEED, the Support for East European Democracy Act, they put that money in there and then you go there with your little non-profit and that's where you get some money from.
	And I'm sure Zelensky and all those guys get from that money.
	Then they've got more loan guarantees that we put in there.
	This was fun.
	They changed some words around, and so now money, instead of going to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO, and its allies, it now can go to North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies, major non-NATO allies, and the Indo-Pacific region.
	Eight billion dollars.
	Was $4 billion, they doubled it to $8 billion, and now they can give it to anybody they want, even a non-NATO ally.
	That's probably Taiwan, I'm guessing.
	Then on page 55, there was... I'm almost done here.
	Page 55, there was something interesting.
	I'm on page 55.
	Where this is about the, what do you call those?
	Attackums?
	This is a big thing in the news.
	That's the 300-mile Army Tactical Missile Systems.
	Oh yeah.
	Okay, so this bill...
	As soon as practical, after the date of enactment of this division, the President shall transfer long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems to the Government of Ukraine, that's the ATAKMS, to assist the Government of Ukraine in defending itself and achieving victory against the Russian Federation.
	Notification!
	If the President determines that executing the transfer of long-range army tactical missile systems to the government of Ukraine pursuant to Subsection A would be detrimental to the national security interests of the United States, the President may withhold such transfer.
	So this is just, they're just going to hold this until, you know, because it's always going to be, it's always going to be dangerous.
	We'll see if they actually send them over.
	And so then they probably won't.
	I don't think so either.
	Okay, so then we go to the submarines.
	$1.9 billion to respond to the situation in Taiwan for operation and maintenance procurement of submarines.
	We add to that $2.1 billion for submarine bases.
	Additional money, $1.9 billion for the Columbia-class submarine and $200 million for the Virginia-class submarine.
	So that's your pivot to the Indo-Pacific.
	And I'll skip everything else, it's all marked up in the show notes, but at the very bottom we have my favorite, which is the Repo Act.
	The Repo Act.
	This is the Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity for Ukraine Act.
	And this is where we get to take the Russian money.
	And so it's clearly spelled out.
	There's $300 billion of Russian money in the system.
	$190 billion is in Belgium through Euroclear.
	We have about, I think, $10 billion or $15 billion that is within our purview.
	And this authorizes the G7 countries.
	We're good to go.
	We're stealing the Russian money.
	Yeah, this is the end of our economic system.
	I would agree.
	It is the most insane thing I have ever seen.
	And of course, you know, Putin... Putin's like, uh... We also have prepared an answer, Speaker of Russian Upper House of Parliament says.
	We have a draft law which we are ready to consider immediately on retaliatory measures and the Europeans will lose more than we do.
	Whatever that means.
	I bet you that's true.
	Yeah, but what do you think they'll do?
	Well, they can confiscate all the European and American investments in Russia, and there's definitely more than that minuscule amount, for sure.
	They also cut out the oil guys, and we are there.
	It's a bad idea.
	You can have your wars, you can have your kinetic wars, and you can shoot at each other, but you start...
	Stealing money?
	Yes, surreptitiously stealing money where it's agreed upon that you don't do that because those systems are not based on, you know, just bull crap.
	They're solid.
	They work for a reason.
	And you mess with them?
	This is no good.
	This is the end.
	of American hegemony.
	This is going to screw up everything if we go ahead with this stupid idea of stealing money that's in a system that's secure.
	Here's two clips from CBS Face the Nation about these procurement bills, and they're even lying here, but it's okay.
	This Ukraine aid that finally has moved.
	President Zelensky was on another network this morning and he said the U.S.
	will send a signal with this that this will not be a second Afghanistan.
	The U.S.
	will stay with Ukraine.
	As you know, I was a supporter of the Defense Supplemental.
	This is Senator Mark Warner.
	And I think it's not just going to be important for Ukraine, as you and I have talked about before.
	It's going to be really important for the industrial base of America, which has atrophied dramatically.
	Sixty percent of this bill goes into building weapons, everything from submarines to... And many Republican districts, too, which is surprising.
	It took so long to get through that House.
	All over the place.
	So I think it's... I'm sorry, it's Dan Sullivan, Senator Dan Sullivan.
	Do that happens?
	All over the place.
	So I think it's important.
	But again, we're kind of giving Joe Biden a bit of a pass on not just, as I mentioned, how we got here, but the execution of the Ukraine effort.
	As you know, literally every major weapons system that the Ukrainians have said they need from HIMARS, Patriots, Stingers, tanks, F-16s, now attack them.
	Every single weapon system, this administration delays, delays, because they're scared of, you know, making Vladimir Putin mad.
	Yeah, they can make him real mad when they steal the money.
	But that's that's why I think they put it in here, that the president can still delay the attackums, which is, oh, it's all about the attackums.
	Senator, 61 billion in aid to Ukraine, about 60 percent of that stays as an investment into the U.S.
	industrial base, as I understand it.
	The U.S.
	industrial base.
	President Zelensky said this morning on another network, it's important that they get crucial, long-range artillery like attack guns.
	Is that what this money will pay for?
	And if so, when will they actually get them?
	These materials will be in transit by the end of the week.
	And on that schedule, what it will do is, it's clearly been the case that the Ukrainians' morale has been great, but it's been undermined over the last couple of months.
	They're dead!
	When they have been literally... How's the morale?
	They're dead, but it's great!
	given out rationed bullets, eight to 10 bullets a day on artillery shells, Russians 10 to one.
	You can't underestimate the Ukrainians' grit, determination.
	But if they don't have the materials, they can't carry this fight to the Russians.
	Will they get those long-range artillery?
	Yes.
	Not just ammunition?
	The ATAKMS.
	I believe the administration was prepared over the last couple of months to provide ATAKMS.
	It is written into this legislation.
	So, now, I'll be the first to say that this is clearly supporting our GDP, but we're not sending any of this to Ukraine.
	Now, I mean, we have the stuff, we just didn't want to give it to them.
	We, I mean, what, now we can send everything all of a sudden?
	Oh, now we got bullets!
	What, because we made bullets overnight?
	No!
	No, the military, the defense industrial base, which keeps our, what else do we make here?
	We make war stuff.
	And a cybertruck.
	4,000 cybertrucks.
	And jets.
	And jets.
	Well, it's war stuff.
	Submarines.
	These are big things.
	You ever see that buildsubmarines.com on the sports fields?
	This is going to be big business.
	You want to get into business?
	Get into that business.
	And what do the rest of the American people get?
	We get Ukraine flags.
	Wave them!
	Wave them, you idiots!
	Here's Kristen Welker, your buddy, speaking with Zelensky.
	Now is this it, brother?
	Brother Volodymyr, is this it?
	Do you need more?
	Can you win?
	Will this be it?
	President Zelensky, can you give Americans a sense of the timeline?
	Will you still need as much aid this time next year?
	Or do you think you can turn the corner on Russia?
	What's the timeline?
	Well, it depends on, like, how soon we get this aid.
	There are so many variables, so many factors, and sometimes when we protect the important line, you retreat because you don't have enough forces and equipment, and then retaking that line would take two or three times more.
	Oh, okay.
	I'm not saying that this is how it's going to end up, but I would like us to be open and very, very specific.
	From the moment we get our hands on these weapons systems, well, from that moment, we can talk about the timeline.
	We need three times more.
	That's what he's saying.
	Two to three times.
	Hey, I just want to be open with you guys.
	Give me some credit.
	I need two or three more.
	There was an interesting little tidbit that came up on Face the Nation as they were talking about, you know, this being a new Cold War.
	It's, you know, it's, we're back, now we have a Cold War with Russia and with China.
	These are short clips.
	Let's play these two because something interesting came up.
	First here's, who's David E. Sanger?
	Who's this jamoke?
	Dave Sanger, that's the guy that was in the New York Times.
	The New York Times guy.
	He's a reporter.
	The new Cold Wars are quite different, Margaret.
	We've got Russia and China coming together in a periodic partnership.
	I wouldn't say it's a full alliance.
	We have other players like Iran and North Korea, as you were discussing with our earlier guests.
	Supplying them becoming sort of that what the Iranians call an axis of resistance to the US.
	It is a far more volatile.
	I think, far more dangerous period than we had even then.
	And yet, as you point out, our ability to discuss it as a nation has somewhat degraded.
	You watch those Kennedy-Nixon debates and put aside who was sweating and who looked young and vigorous and all that.
	It was an incredibly sophisticated argument, largely about nuclear deterrence.
	I'm afraid that we're not having that incredibly sophisticated argument today.
	you know, 60 years, more than 60 years later.
	If you believe that there is something of a new Iron Curtain coming down, a place where you're going to divide the U.S., the NATO nations against China, Russia, Iran, others, it's somewhere in that borderland between Ukraine and Russia.
	Demilitarized zone.
	There you go.
	Good job, everybody.
	You moved it up.
	Into Ukraine, fantastic.
	But here's the kicker.
	The book opens with the days running up to the war in Ukraine.
	And while there were certainly lots of indicators coming from American satellites and signals intelligence and so forth, In the end, one of the key indicators that the Russians were getting ready to roll came from Microsoft, whose engineers were noticing that malware that had been placed by the Russians on Ukrainian government agencies were being activated and sent a notice through their channels, which ultimately went to the White House.
	At the end of the day, What kept Ukraine running was some combination of Microsoft and Amazon moving all of their data to the cloud and then Elon Musk coming in and providing Starlink so they could communicate to that cloud.
	Incredible.
	Something we never saw in the old Cold War.
	Yeah, I read that as Microsoft, Amazon and Starlink are all part of the intelligence services and spying on everybody and everything.
	The engineers noticed some spyware was activated.
	Please.
	Yeah, I agree.
	Please.
	I'm not in total agreement, but I agree with this nonsense that all of a sudden... I mean, first one thing, if the spyware's there, get rid of it.
	Yeah.
	Run that antivirus stuff.
	Don't watch it and wait for it to be activated.
	Oh, look!
	It's just been activated.
	Spy Hunter 5, people.
	Come on, run it.
	It'll probably do it.
	Probably all it takes.
	But wow.
	This is such a, this whole thing, and meanwhile, you know, we're being spied on by our own intelligence services.
	We got net neutrality to block any kind of private communications we want to have.
	It's, I mean, and obviously, what are we all doing?
	I'm scrolling on TikTok.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	TikTok, TikTok, click, clock, tocks, tick and tock, tock.
	Scott McFarlane has got the latest on that possible ban on TikTok.
	Scott, what do we know?
	Tony, TikTok is now on the clock.
	They have a year to be sold or digested by their China-based owner or face the prospect of a ban in the United States within that year, shutting down access to 170 million American users and millions of small businesses.
	In a Congress that seemingly can't agree on anything, this passed with overwhelming bipartisan support amid concerns China could use TikTok to exploit and access private Americans' information.
	One lawmaker called it a spy balloon in your phone.
	Another said it's a possible tool for propaganda.
	A big issue as we enter an election season.
	TikTok has indicated they will challenge this in the courts and file a lawsuit.
	They argue this is an infringement of First Amendment rights.
	But Tony, President Biden, is expected to sign this bill into law today.
	It's great!
	Of course it's not going to go away.
	It'll just be TikTok with USA inside.
	Steve Mnuchin.
	Speaking of TikTok.
	You're not going to let him get it.
	Oh, someone's got it.
	You know, it's going to be it'll be Google.
	Yeah, it'll be something like that, because I've already read that Google and Microsoft are the best candidates.
	Huh.
	Although Meta, their stock price took a dump yesterday, even though they had reasonable earnings.
	I don't know.
	That'll be back.
	That's just I don't even know why that glitch occurred.
	A glitch?
	Did you say glitch?
	It's a glitch.
	Zuckerberg announced it.
	Oh, we're going to invest in AI.
	Everyone went, oh no.
	Dump that thing.
	That may actually be the moment of the pivot.
	The pivot.
	The pivot to quantum.
	So people stop paying attention to AI.
	You don't have to say AI anymore.
	I do have this clip.
	Blinken's in China to talk about TikTok.
	Yes.
	I'm sure that's what he's talking about.
	Here's your clip.
	Because when our allies are stronger, and I want to make this apparent again and again, when our allies are stronger, we are stronger.
	The package includes a separate measure that would force TikTok to divest from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, or be banned on U.S.
	app stores.
	TikTok has about a year to do so, and that's because of data privacy concerns, as the Chinese regime can access TikTok's user data for any user that uses TikTok in the world.
	At the same time, Antony Blinken, the Secretary of State, is in China, and among many of the topics he'll be discussing with officials there are human rights.
	The State Department released a human rights report documenting the atrocities and crimes against humanity still being committed by the Chinese regime today in China, including those against Uyghurs and Falun Gong.
	Falun Gong is a spiritual practice based on the principles of truthfulness, compassion, and forbearance.
	Here's Vedant Patel, the Deputy Principal Spokesperson at the State Department.
	On the Secretary's visit to China, he said he would address human rights, but on this report that came out on Monday, will he specifically address the persecution of religious groups like the Uyghurs and Falun Gong?
	And what have talks been like on this in the past?
	So what I can say is that in every engagement that we have had with the People's Republic of China since the onset of this administration, Human rights have always been on the agenda and they will continue to be so.
	And I have no doubt that human rights will be discussed this week while the secretary is there.
	There was on the agenda.
	Just put some on the agenda.
	There's some additional stuff there.
	It wasn't just the so-called TikTok bill, which actually is 270 days for TikTok to bite dance, to divest of TikTok to an American company, i.e.
	we're going to steal it from you.
	The president can extend that.
	Three months after the enactment of this act, TikTok has to start making available all data, all video, all posts, all pictures in machine-readable format so that people can export that and download it to import into Google and YouTube, I presume.
	But it also goes for any technology company the president deems to be, I'm paraphrasing here, operated by an adverse foreign entity if it has more than a million users.
	Except, of course, if you're a price comparison app.
	Or an Amazon or ordering app, or if you're Airbnb, that doesn't count.
	But then they have this No Technology for Terror Act.
	Which is not discussed.
	I don't know if it's anything, but a foreign-produced item shall be subject to the Export Administration regulations if the product is, so I guess you can't import anything that is in general.
	A license shall be required to export, re-export, or in-country transfer a foreign-produced item from abroad that meets the product scope requirements described in subsection B.
	Which is, uh, Bits and Bobs.
	I'm not, I don't understand that one yet, but there's something coming.
	You know, Meta got kicked out of China.
	So that would account for a stock drop.
	Yeah.
	That happened recently, I think.
	Well, something's up.
	Nobody would, you know, this whole, the idealism of the internet is over.
	Here's the EU, not to be outdone.
	Hey, we gotta get on that TikTok bandwagon, man.
	I know, let's see if we can steal some money of our own.
	Grabbing your phone and scrolling through videos for hours on end.
	It's a behavior that's become part of our daily lives and one which TikTok is seeking to encourage further through its new feature, TikTok Lite.
	The application's reward program allows users to earn points for watching and interacting with content, which they can then trade for gift cards on partner websites.
	A new way to gamify and monetize attention, which Brussels say could be as addictive as cigarettes.
	The European Commission on Monday launched a probe into TikTok Lite's impact on mental health, especially for children, in what it says could be a breach of the Digital Service Act.
	It's given Chinese group ByteDance until Wednesday to argue its case or face being suspended from operating in Europe.
	Unless TikTok provides compelling proof of its safety, which it has failed to do until now, we stand ready to trigger Digital Service Act interim measures, including the suspension of the TikTok Lite reward program.
	TikTok says it's already taken measures to limit addiction, including placing a cap on daily rewards and banning users under 18 from accessing the new feature.
	It remains to be seen whether these arguments will be enough to convince EU regulators that TikTok does enough to protect children.
	I mean, those guys are so genius, those TikTok guys.
	They actually did one of those things that everybody said, you know, well, one day you'll get paid for your attention.
	And they're doing it!
	Hey, watch this ad.
	We'll give you some points, some TikTok points.
	This is not a new phenomenon.
	This has been tried and tried over the years since even beginning before our show, which is a long time ago.
	There were all these efforts to do this and do that and you get points and there's games, there's all kinds of games where you get a weapon if you followed through on some certain things, you get an extra weapon.
	A weapon.
	Yes.
	Or you could buy the weapon on eBay.
	And there was all that.
	Nobody complained.
	And now they've managed to do a better job.
	All they're doing is better.
	Better.
	Better.
	Is better than what has been attempted so far.
	And so they're punished for it.
	This reminds me of, you know, the early days of the Internet or the early days of personal computer technology in the 70s, let's say.
	Oh, everything is going to be electronic!
	All the books will be available electronically, and there'll be a giant library with every, all knowledge will be accumulated, and you'll be able to look it up and find anything you want.
	And once they started doing that, they're bitching and moaning about it.
	Oh no, copyright!
	Oh, they copied my book!
	You know, old out-of-print book.
	Nobody reads anymore.
	Nobody cares.
	Hey, audiobooks.
	The audiobooks.
	I wanted to tell you, because I was listening to a bit of DH Unplugged, which you can listen to on Tuesdays.
	They do it live.
	Is it 9 Eastern?
	And it goes out.
	It's not.
	Yes, it's 6 o'clock West Coast.
	Coming up on episode 700.
	Help those guys out.
	The reason why Spotify got the bump.
	This is a great story.
	They, you know, they added audiobooks.
	And because they have audio books, there's some law or some, uh, I would call the loophole in the law that they now are not just providing music.
	Forget the podcast part for a moment.
	They're not just providing music, but they're providing a bundle, which means they can give the artists 25% less money.
	That's why.
	Their cost just went down by 25% because each user that actually pays or there's money coming in from ads, they have to give less to the artist because they're now a bundle company instead of just a music company.
	That's why.
	What?
	Yeah.
	I missed that one.
	It's beautiful, isn't it?
	Genius.
	Those Swedes, man.
	And we're bitching about TikTok.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Spotify people should be the ones that are excoriated.
	Just stealing from the poor creators.
	I refrain from comment.
	Well, speaking of guns, you said something about you win a weapon.
	New York is now off their rocker, but apparently it's YouTube's algorithm now under fire.
	Strong words tonight from the District Attorney of Manhattan aimed at YouTube for an algorithm that promotes video showing kids how to build an illegal fire.
	They're calling it games to guns, and law enforcement believes YouTube isn't doing anything to stop it, even though it's already against the company's policy.
	DA Alvin Bragg reached out to the CEO of YouTube about those guns on the streets of New York City.
	Talk about gun insanity.
	Here's Iowa News reporter Darla Miles.
	All you need is a computer and a mouse and an interest in gaming, and you can go from games to guns in 15 minutes.
	Here we see investigators conducting a call of duty search on YouTube that with just a few clicks can lead to videos about how to assemble guns that in real life kill people.
	This is an algorithm that is driving people, in particular our youth, with a few clicks from watching a video game to being able to build guns to then in turn walking around with ghost guns in our street and then in our office because we've charged them with a crime.
	Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and senior leadership of City Ghost Gun Enforcement calling out YouTube Wednesday afternoon.
	The DA sending this letter to the CEO of YouTube about instructional videos on how to assemble a ghost gun being actively pushed by YouTube's algorithms to minors who begin watching clips of video games.
	Well, there you go.
	They've got a ghost gun department in New York.
	I like it.
	Yeah.
	Well, I don't like what New York's doing, but I like the idea that I can go on YouTube and figure out how to put together a ghost gun.
	I mean, that's cool.
	Good for YouTube.
	I have one clip I wanted to play, which is one of those.
	Anything you see on C-SPAN, anything that is done in Senate, in these hearings, it's all showboating.
	It's all like, look at me, look at me.
	I'm Representative Waltz, and I'm holding the Air Force to account.
	This bag of bushings, stamped out by machinists, don't need a high school diploma, it's not anything high-tech about this, all of this bag is compliant with the FAA specifications.
	How much do you think the Air Force pays for this bag of bushings?
	I don't know, Congressman.
	- I don't know, Congressman. - $90,000.
	$90,000.
	This is a $90,000 bag of bushings that you need for any jet turbine engine, just to operate.
	So the exorbitant cost due to DOD only buying commercial parts from the OEMs, which is essentially sole source, is literally driving us out of business.
	I mean, the interest on our debt alone is now exceeding for the first time in American history.
	The entire defense budget.
	We can't afford it anymore.
	It costs a hundred bucks, that bag of brushes.
	And we're paying 90,000 dollars for it.
	Yeah, you know, this is nothing new, but if you want to talk about showboating, I have two clips.
	All right.
	By the King.
	The King?
	John Kennedy.
	Who I realized is a ridiculous showboater.
	Yeah he's funny though.
	He's very funny and he's got he should have his own channel on YouTube because there's probably a thousand videos of him badgering witnesses.
	Yeah.
	And he does the best job because what he does is he first he gets you to admit that you're an expert and then he starts asking questions that you can't answer.
	And then he doesn't understand why you can't answer, since you're an expert.
	And then he keeps asking the same question over and over to humiliate these people.
	But I kind of admire who he humiliates, because in this case it's this woman, Zorkin Millon, who is some sort of a consultant to the government, and she's a social truth justice warrior who happens to know something about tax law.
	And so he brings her on just to get her to answer a couple of simple questions.
	I take his side on this, but at the same time realize that John Kennedy is more of a kind of a showman in the way he does this.
	But it's enjoyable.
	I think it's a good break for us, especially after analyzing the legislation.
	So here we go.
	Ms.
	Mellon, is your expertise in the area, Mr. Bunn made this distinction, is your expertise in the area of tax avoidance or tax evasion or both?
	I would say both.
	I think the lines, there are situations where the lines might get blurry, especially on the corporate side, but in my... It's both?
	It's both.
	In short, it's both.
	Do you believe that there are major American corporations that are cheating on their taxes?
	I think yes, there are cases where the transfer pricing regulations are not being followed and Mr. Curry's testimony speaks to that.
	Tell me who they are.
	Who are they?
	Who are the five?
	Name the five American corporations that are the biggest tax cheats.
	Maybe I should mention that she is from the FACT Coalition and I believe... And elsewhere.
	I believe these are the people who want a global tax.
	Am I correct in assuming that?
	I think you might be right, but the bigger question is who names their daughter Zorkan?
	Well, this is a question for the IRS.
	It's their job to enforce the laws, so I wouldn't... That's a pretty serious allegation you made there, and I'm just asking you who they are.
	There are cases pending against a number of companies until those cases conclude.
	Who do you think they are?
	You're an expert in this area.
	I'm just asking you.
	You talked a lot and I've read some of your writings about American corporations cheating on their taxes.
	I'm just asking you who they are.
	I wouldn't use the word cheating.
	I think that they are taking advantage of the gray zone.
	You used it in your testimony.
	I'm sorry?
	You used it in your testimony.
	I'm not trying to trick you.
	I just want to know, you have been very vociferous in saying that American companies are cheating.
	Okay.
	America, you're entitled to your opinion, but you're an expert and just tell me who they are.
	I stand by that.
	I think that there is evidence to suggest that some of these companies and the IRS has pursued cases against a number of the companies that Mr. Curtis has analyzed, including Apple and Microsoft and Facebook.
	Is Apple called Tax Cheat?
	I wouldn't say Tax Cheat.
	I think that's putting it too strongly and I didn't use that word.
	Then who are they?
	So she's Serbian by birth.
	So that's why her name is Zorka.
	Zorka the Serb.
	Surely you've heard of her.
	And she, uh, uh, yeah, Zorka.
	So, uh, he just gets, he has her, it's dangling.
	And so I, I hate to play these clips because they're pretty long, but it's just fun to watch because it's a style of, of that you, anyone can adopt.
	If you've ever done testimony, if ever, especially with the government, uh, it's just a hone in on some weakness and just keep hounding a person who refuses really It's just a showboater herself because she can't name anybody.
	Here we go.
	I wouldn't say tax sheets, but I think they are crossing the legal lines that have been set by Congress and by the IRS in the relevant regulations.
	And because the IRS is outgunned, they're not able to enforce the law.
	Outgunned?
	They got 80,000 more positions to fill and the money for it.
	Do you believe that they're a major American corporation cheating on their taxes?
	I believe they are coming very close to crossing the line and it's difficult for IRS that it's outgunned to enforce the line.
	Are they crossing the line or not?
	Well, it's up to the IRS to enforce the line.
	I'm asking you your opinion.
	You're an expert.
	I think there's a good case to be made that yes, they are crossing the line.
	Yes.
	Who are they?
	That's up to the courts and the IRS to determine.
	You made this allegation, but you don't want to say who they are?
	I mean, if you know who they are, you just don't want to tell us?
	I think that's been explained by Mr. Curtis in his analysis.
	No, I'm asking you to explain.
	You talk about tax cheats, I'm just asking you who they are.
	And you don't want to tell us?
	It's, again, I think it's for the IRS to enforce the line and we need to make sure that the IRS is properly... Well, do you have a list of these tax cheats?
	No.
	Have you been to the IRS and said, here are these companies and they're cheating on their taxes and I can show you how they're doing it?
	No, I've never practiced in that area of law.
	I'm not a tax whistleblower lawyer.
	All you've done is run around saying American companies are cheating on their taxes.
	Tell you who they are, and I haven't been to the IRS to show my data to the IRS, but I want you to believe me that they're cheating on me.
	She should have said, but Mr. Senator, snitches get stitches, don't you know that?
	Is that your testimony today?
	No, Senator, no.
	Sure sounds like it.
	No, I think that the case against some of these companies has been well documented.
	Which companies?
	Which companies?
	I'm going to ask you one because I'm going to run out of time.
	Tell me.
	In the last 23 seconds, here's your chance.
	You believe there are major American corporations cheating on their taxes.
	You just testified to that.
	I believe you told me yes.
	Tell me who they are.
	I think they are the companies that Mr. Curtis discussed in his testimony.
	It includes some of the big tech companies.
	It includes some of the pharma companies.
	Who are the five worst?
	I don't have a ranking.
	You don't want to say.
	I haven't looked into that.
	You understand it makes it hard to believe your allegations if you won't tell us who they are.
	Talk's cheap.
	You ever heard that expression?
	Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
	That was good.
	Yeah, I mean... It's his schtick.
	That's what he does.
	Yeah, the schtick.
	It gets old, you can't listen to it all the time, but every once in a while you get some dummy up there who's just swinging in the wind and he's just taking pot shots at her.
	Yeah.
	And it continues and it's just like they can't answer a question at all.
	And it makes you wonder about the incompetence, basically, of all these consultants and people that work within the government.
	This fact organization is a non-profit.
	5-1-C-3, they do about $5 million a year, and they have not filed their 2022 Form 990.
	A tax cheat!
	She's a tax cheat!
	She's in default!
	She's in default.
	Having done 2022, let alone 2023.
	I'm going to move to climate change now.
	The true biggest danger we have amongst us in our crazy representatives, rented representatives who we have elected, who are all of them are all in on this.
	I doubt it's AIPAC funding it, but someone's funding this climate stuff.
	And finally, we have a little bit of it.
	We're going to turn up the corner and we're going to tell you what may be coming.
	This is from CBS.
	For some analysis, we want to bring on Melissa Lott.
	She's a professor at Columbia University's Climate School.
	Tell me what a climate emergency is and what that might entail.
	I don't know if you heard this, but President Biden has alluded to a climate emergency.
	That it might be an executive order, a climate emergency.
	And what that might entail.
	So when we talk about the potential for the president to declare a climate emergency, what it's saying is, you know what?
	There's a national emergency going on.
	And I need extra powers to be able to respond to it, to protect the U.S.
	This is a contentious decision.
	If it's made, this discussion has come up many times.
	But if it is made, then the president would have additional powers in the short term, almost immediately.
	And what might those powers look like, and who would be the first to be nervous about new powers the president might have?
	In other words, I mean, would it be fossil fuel companies?
	How might that work out?
	How about the American citizens should be worried about it.
	If Biden declares a climate emergency, we're in a state of emergency, that could be COVID-like powers.
	Could be anything he wants.
	Once you have emergency powers, it's just the beginning of the fun.
	Yeah, so if the president does this, he would have access to a lot of different powers.
	I know what's being talked about is the ability to control how we're able to sell fossil fuels.
	Are we able to export it?
	Are we able to send it to different parts of the world?
	Now, obviously, the countries, the organizations that depend on those exports, they would be concerned about it, as would companies.
	But that's not all that the president can do.
	The president can do a lot to bolster up the manufacturing, the production of clean energy technologies.
	And combined with some other powers that he has, or that he could take advantage of, he could move the needle when it comes to climate change and emissions.
	So it's a mixed bag.
	I will say, when you talk to companies, uncertainty is the worst.
	If I can plan around it, I'm happy, even if it's maybe not the outcome I wanted.
	So the uncertainty of, is this going to happen, when might it happen, and how might it be implemented, is a stress point.
	Yeah, it says stress point.
	Here's the best part.
	So yesterday he does an announcement and he brings back an Obama favorite because the first thing you do in an emergency is you get your brown shirts on the street.
	Let me ask you about the Climate Corps.
	How do you understand the Climate Corps and what it's supposed to do?
	It obviously echoes of FDR.
	Of Hitler.
	What are we getting from the Climate Corps, which the president discussed yesterday?
	Hello, we are from the Climate Corps.
	We're here to check your climate regulations in your house.
	How's your thermostat?
	What kind of car do you have?
	Yeah, so the Climate Corps is trying to address, or at least as an outsider, as a professor at a university when I'm studying it, it's trying to address a couple different things.
	One, we do not have the workforce that we need if we want to reduce emissions, if we want to clean up pollution.
	We don't have people trained in different skills.
	We don't have people to clean up pollution.
	What?
	What does that even mean, professor?
	We don't have people trained in the different skill sets that we need, and we need them very quickly if we're going to respond to climate change, which is already happening and already affecting our health.
	So as a result of that, how do we train up those people at the same time, show folks that there are opportunities for all different skill sets, all different backgrounds to contribute positively in their communities, in their states.
	Everybody can join the Climate Corps!
	It's fun, kids!
	Join the Climate Corps!
	Get a cool uniform with an armband!
	Yeah!
	These people are nuts.
	And this has got to be my favorite climate kook.
	This is a new climate kook.
	So, this is... I think this could be spun into a new Y2K bonanza?
	And of course we'll completely forget that Y2K.
	How about, just for people who are too young to remember, you have to realize that.
	In the year 2000, and leading up to the year 2000, we were told... Two-year ramp.
	Two-year ramp.
	That the world was going to... it was over.
	The world was going to melt down.
	You just want to summarize the Y2K issue for everybody?
	Yeah, there was a...
	Around, I think it was 97, but definitely by 98, someone had figured out that when the year 2000 comes around, that old COBOL and other FORTRAN and other programs which are dominating some parts of businesses couldn't Get the date right when we flip to the year 2000, all of a sudden it would become 1900 or who knows what.
	And because we go to 00 as opposed to 98... Wouldn't it go to like 1976 or something?
	Was gonna reset to some weird year?
	It was going to reset to 1900 as far as I remember, but it was going to reset to the wrong year and it was going to screw up everything because now nothing will work.
	Airplanes would fall out of the sky.
	Banking wouldn't work.
	All the ATM machines will either just...
	Throwing money away money printing out of it mm-hmm and the lights of the grid is gonna go down by the way Alex Jones was number one of the top guys on this yeah and I still have some old clips of him going oh it's beginning as you know the lights have gone out in Cleveland he was all over it and wait let me see do I have Do we have something?
	I have Alex Jones on Joe Rogan wrong about Y2K.
	That's, uh, that's, uh, what is this, Obama?
	So, you know, Alex was all, he was major Y2K nut.
	And, but meanwhile, what was going, really happening was that the consultants were coming out of the woodwork and making- They were printing, they were, the money was- They were literally printing money and I knew a couple of them.
	And I, and I was, you know, I was skeptical from the beginning cause it didn't make any sense to me that any of this stuff would happen cause it doesn't, just doesn't work that way.
	And I had a couple of the greats, I used to give a lot of speeches and my Y2K speech was generally a mockery of all these predictions.
	Is this when your public speaking career ended, around 2000?
	No, well actually it did drop off a bit because these speeches were quite popular.
	But it was a big major deal and it ended up costing American businesses Billions of dollars in fees and fixes that weren't necessary and everything in between.
	And auditing and compliance auditing.
	And it contributed to the dot-com collapse and sunk the economy and it really never recovered.
	And when it finally recovered, it was 2007-2008, when you had a secondary situation where it was just Folded.
	The economy just went under the tent.
	That was good times.
	It went down.
	So the economy was never the same based on the two constructs of that of the 99, 2000, 2001 era.
	That was the dot-com collapse combined with the Y2K fiasco.
	A scam, and we've never fully recovered from that downturn.
	Things are much better in the 90s than they are today.
	Well, that's for sure.
	And that was billions of dollars in 1999 dollars.
	That's when a billion dollars meant something.
	I mean, big difference in inflation.
	So the Y2K is still an issue?
	Well, we have a climate change related Y2K issue on the horizon.
	The guy who's pushing it in this clip is sketchy.
	He's a professor, but I think he's a professor.
	Yeah, he's a professor.
	But he- I think he's onto something.
	I think he- I think this could be played out.
	People will actually buy this.
	The more we see polar ice melt, the more scientists tell us that climate change will have real-world effects on our lives.
	Melting glaciers likely mean rising sea levels, threatening our coastlines.
	But it also means less ice at the Earth's poles, and more water weight spread around to other places, and that's leading to the Earth slowing down.
	Human activity has changed the rotation of the Earth.
	Not exactly like what happens when Superman flies around the Earth and reverses time in the movie, but enough to actually slow down the rotation of our planet.
	A rotation that's been speeding up, slightly, for decades.
	That trend slowed, turned around, and is now going in the other direction, and that's all because of the effect of global warming.
	That's Duncan Agnew who runs a study out of San Diego's Scripps Institute for Oceanography.
	His study says we may actually have to subtract a so-called leap second from our atomic clocks because of the slowing planet.
	A move that would be painful for satellites, computers, not to mention financial and energy systems that rely on precise timing.
	We've never had a negative leap second before.
	It's hard enough synchronizing computers when you add a second, but nobody's prepared to do what's necessary when you have to have a negative second.
	Come on, man.
	I can see this one spinning out.
	They can ramp this up.
	They can ramp it up.
	For one thing, I saw this.
	And this guy, he doesn't look right.
	This Agnew character.
	He looks like he's on the spectrum.
	He's got some issues.
	For sure.
	It's okay that we have to add a leap second every so often.
	I don't know what the frequency is.
	But now that it's going to be subtracting one, this is going to cause nothing but havoc, is what the theory is.
	And it's all because of global warming.
	If we stopped that, these problems wouldn't exist.
	Exactly.
	And it's like, oh please.
	How did this become a news story?
	These people on the networks, they really are giving us lousy product.
	This stinks.
	This is no good.
	We keep saying four more years, but there may be no more news to deconstruct by that time, because no one will want to hear it.
	I mean, it's become so stupid.
	I mean, we're going to deconstruct Megyn Kelly?
	What are we going to do?
	I have a COVID stuff, COVID Vax, I thought was funny.
	Okay, COVID Vax.
	Always funny, because then I'll talk about heart failures.
	Always funny.
	This is McCullough on a podcast.
	The Brian Shapiro Occupy Democrats podcast.
	And this is an example of some of the worst podcasting and types of questioning.
	That anyone can imagine from any podcaster.
	It's as though we did the podcast as does.
	Hey Adam, would you agree with me that... Oh brother, really is that what this is?
	You know what I mean?
	That style of... Leading the witness.
	It's like a congressional testimony.
	Yeah, leading the witness.
	Alright, so I want to talk about McCullough.
	I don't know why he's on this podcast or what he's got to do with it, but this guy is one of our, you know, top five.
	McCullough is the man.
	We trust him.
	He's the man.
	He's the guy you listen to, and he doesn't put up with guff, and so here we go, putting up with guff.
	Talk about vaccines with you.
	Would you agree with me that the vaccines for COVID have done far more good for people in this country than not good?
	There are so many people still that say COVID, the vaccines have killed millions of people, that all these professional athletes are dying of myocarditis when it's just not true.
	So would you agree with me that the vaccines have done far more good for people than bad?
	I have to be honest.
	I just did an interview the other day for a podcast.
	One of the Unheard, the Union of the Unwanted, who, by the way, want you.
	They really want John Cedar Grove.
	The Union of the Unwanted want me.
	Yeah.
	Says, go figure.
	And, you know, you get to, like, these long questions and, like, would you agree with me?
	And it's like, this, yeah, this is very podcast-y.
	Well, wait, it's bad podcasty, and it stems from, and I believe it evolves from people listening to too many Senate hearings, where the senator says, would you believe me?
	And they try to get beyond leading the witness.
	It's trying to pre-answer the question.
	But I have to sense that this guy doesn't know who McCullough is because he's not going to get away with any of this.
	Well, but the logical conclusion of what you just said there is that all Of our elected representatives in Congress are, in essence, bad podcasters.
	Exactly.
	Far more good for people than bad.
	Well, what evidence do you have for that?
	What evidence do you have that all these people are dying of the vaccines?
	Well, let's just take safety first, because we always discuss safety before efficacy.
	Would you agree with that?
	Sure.
	Yeah, right.
	So it doesn't matter how good a product is, it has to be safe.
	Would you agree with that?
	I don't think there's any vaccination that's 100% foolproof safe.
	You know that.
	Okay, but it would have to have acceptable safety.
	Would you agree with that?
	It depends what your definition of acceptable safety is.
	Oh brother, who is this guy, a doctor?
	What is he?
	Are you trying to torture us here?
	What are you doing with this?
	We're in a global pandemic where at one point we were losing 5,000 Americans per day, so obviously these were extenuating circumstances.
	Go ahead.
	But what would be your definition of acceptable safety?
	Well, while I'm not a doctor, and you are, I would say in my personal opinion looking back on half the world being vaccinated, in fact more than half the world as you know at this point, there is no direct evidence that These vaccinations are, people are dropping dead left and right.
	And as you know, specifically on right-wing media and right-wing talk shows, they claim that all these professional athletes are dying of myocarditis because of the vaccines when they don't even know if these people were vaccinated.
	They don't know their medical history.
	And it's frustrating for me, doctor, because I believe the vaccine saved my life.
	I believe it saved my parents' life.
	And in so many studies out there, You know, listen, you could, and as you know this, you can get COVID if you're vaccinated.
	It didn't give you a lesser chance of getting infected or giving it to somebody else.
	However, you are in so many studies that I've seen, and you can tell me if you disagree, far less likely to get the effects of having to go into the ICU or possibly dying if you were vaccinated.
	Am I wrong?
	Yeah, you're wrong.
	What is the name of this podcaster?
	It's the name is...
	Yeah.
	Brian Shapiro?
	Yes, the Brian Shapiro occupied Democrats.
	I'm taking his license away.
	I'm removing his podcast license.
	So this is another example.
	This is like the Kennedy stuff earlier.
	An example of how to testify.
	How to respond and how to deal with guys like this.
	This guy is so bigoted and so now McCall is going to stick it to him.
	You're a doctor, aren't you?
	Am I correct in assuming you're a doctor?
	And so I just thought...
	I just thought, I actually had three of these, I thought there was only two, but McCullough is, I don't know why he's on this podcast, I don't know what the point of it is.
	He needs an agent, like hey, hey, hey Pete.
	Don't do podcasts like this, but McCullough is irked, and this guy is like a Tim Pool wannabe, this podcaster, he's a fast talker.
	I don't know where these podcasters come from.
	I don't get it personally.
	Are you listening to these things?
	How do you acquire this?
	I acquire these things through sources.
	And here's the reason why.
	The prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of the vaccines never showed a reduction in severity.
	They never showed a reduction in hospitalization and death.
	And what's come out over time is the virus has mutated to become a much milder virus.
	So as the vaccines were rolling out, you know, we were being confronted with a less mild virus.
	The other thing, I mean, a less severe virus, more mild.
	The other thing that happened is we learned how to treat the illness.
	So we treated patients early, and we avoided hospitalization and death.
	So the two major things that saved people's lives were having natural immunity from the first round of infection, and then early treatment.
	What happened with the vaccines, remember the vaccines came in late, you know, so we're already a year in the pandemic.
	We've been treating people for a year.
	The vaccines come in late and in a recent paper by Norman Fenton from the UK, he's shown that there was tremendous misclassification bias So when they declared that there was a epidemic of the unvaccinated, in fact, the hospitals weren't, you know, they had no idea who was vaccinated or not.
	They didn't have connection to the CDC vaccine records.
	They weren't going in the ICU and figuring out people on the ventilator who were vaccinated and who weren't.
	In countries that actually did have the vaccine status, like the UK, they found far more vaccinated in the hospital on ventilators than dying.
	than the unvaccinated.
	And in a paper by Shretha and colleagues from the Cleveland Clinic, the least, the lowest risk workers that they have in 51,000 workers are the unvaccinated.
	And with every single injection, one is more and more likely to get COVID-19.
	So I presume this Tardcaster right away went, oh, okay, well, I guess I was wrong.
	Tardcaster.
	Is that what happened?
	Not really.
	I mean, he's upset with himself because he's convinced that the Vax saved him and his family.
	And no, I don't think anybody ever buys into the McCullough narrative if they've already assigned... I mean, once in a while you see it on threads.
	You'll see a bunch of people going up and down.
	Stop!
	You're on threads?
	No, I meant threads.
	Oh!
	I didn't mean threads.
	I meant on threads.
	In other words, a bunch of... On a thread.
	On a thread.
	Yes.
	I gotcha.
	I'm sorry.
	You scared me.
	I don't even know how to get on threads.
	But I don't know why you'd stop me anyway.
	Well, you said you'd read on Threads.
	I'm like, what?
	You're on Threads?
	Threads is a product.
	I thought you were on Threads.
	No, a thread.
	So you read, every so often there's somebody that goes, you know, I got too many shots.
	I got like, you're up to seven now, right?
	I think it's seven?
	Yeah.
	Oh, at least.
	And it's the same useless shot, but they keep getting them.
	Yeah, because they only last 60 days now, according to the chart.
	They didn't do anything from the get-go.
	You need to re-up, get a boost!
	Alright, should we just go into this last clip here from this guy?
	Yeah.
	Now the deaths that have been reported after the vaccine are unprecedented.
	Our safety system for vaccines records on average, half the country takes vaccines in the United States before COVID, records on average 150 deaths in a year on average.
	The COVID-19 vaccines roll out and as we sit here today Our CDC has verified 18,655 Americans dying after the vaccine.
	1,150 die on the same day they take the shot.
	Some die in the vaccine center.
	750 die on the same day they take the shot.
	Some die in the vaccine center.
	1,200 die the next day.
	Now, that's underreported by a factor in FDA testimony of about 30.
	We're looking as we sit here today at 550,000 plus Americans have died after the vaccine.
	The same pattern is seen worldwide.
	There are calls to pull these vaccines off the market.
	They're so grossly unsafe because people die quickly after taking them.
	Ugh, yeah.
	It's horrible.
	We just had a young mom with three kids die here in Fredericksburg.
	Her husband finds her dead in the morning.
	I mean, this is happening and it's not everybody, thank God.
	No, it's not.
	It's just a percentage, but it's a high.
	It's a high percentage.
	And if you just stop taking the shot, that might be a good idea.
	I mean, and of course, no matter what happens when someone dies suddenly, you can't help but think, Vax?
	And you don't want to ask.
	Actually, that is becoming, I think it's becoming a problem.
	Yeah.
	Because that is exactly right.
	The first thing you think of, you know, because you hear somebody, the guy's 33, he's in perfect condition, he's in great shape, he was pumping iron, dropped dead.
	Yeah.
	From, you know, just had a, whatever, it was a lot of different things.
	Well, let's just listen to some circumstantial evidence, shall we?
	Circumstantial evidence from a short little news report here, I think it's from Chicago.
	Lourdes and Ben, patients and their doctors are failing when it comes to heart care.
	Heart failure rates are now on pace to wipe out prior gains.
	According to JAMA Cardiology, long-standing declines in heart failure are now reversing.
	Heart failure death rates declined from 1999 to 2005, then plateaued to 2012.
	But from 2012 to 2019, mortality increased to levels greater than decades ago.
	The most troubling reversal was for people younger than 45, and it got worse.
	In the pandemic.
	Oh, oh, gee, no numbers there, but it got worse.
	It got worse.
	Oh, these people are killing us.
	And so this, of course, leads to other issues.
	This is we have societal issues, certainly in the United States, and that is our well, not just making babies, but they're actually calling it the fertility rate.
	I don't know if that means we're not fertile or we're just not reproducing, but it's a problem.
	The fertility rate in the United States has been trending downward for decades, and now a new report shows the rate's the lowest it's been in more than a century.
	According to the data from the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics, between 2022 and 2023, there was a 3% drop in the number of births.
	That brought the fertility rate just below the previous low from 2020, which was 56 births for every 1,000 women.
	Well then, there was another drop in births last year to less than 55 live births for every thousand women.
	Meanwhile, births continue to shift also to older mothers.
	So, of course, the Biden administration's answer to this is, open the borders!
	Let them all come in!
	Because we know that we need to suppress wages.
	We need to keep those low, especially with interest rates so high as they are.
	It's a real problem for the financial institution.
	And a lot of this is going on.
	You want to talk about, as we discussed in the opening, rants of people in their cars?
	You should look for Amazon drivers, Walmart drivers.
	They're ranting in their cars because they're not getting these jobs anymore because it's Venezuelans and other illegal immigrants who have, you know, basically have cartels with phones and they're, you know, they're getting the ping and they answer it right away and they got five other guys in a car and they've got, you know, they got no licenses, they don't have insurance, anything like that.
	Yeah, they don't have anything.
	They don't have anything, they're just driving stuff around.
	Like the whole country's gypsy cabs.
	Yeah, yes, exactly.
	And they're taking away the gig workers gigs.
	And so it's a real issue.
	Now, of course, you could call in the Curry Dvorak Consulting Group and say, what can we do to get our birth rate up?
	Karen DeVore, consultant group, do you have an answer?
	And we'd go, you know, do you want to get something on TV?
	You got to go Big Pharma, baby.
	All right, we'd like to talk about the health stories of the day.
	First up, a new study about men who take Viagra and Alzheimer's disease.
	That's right.
	There's been a lot of buzz in the medical world about the fact that Viagra may actually decrease the risk of Yeah!
	And a new study came out that showed that there was up to a 56% decrease.
	So this is huge.
	Now, when I first saw this story, I thought, okay, well, it increases blood flow to the genitals.
	It will increase blood flow to the brain.
	Maybe that's how it's working.
	But it turns out that's not the mechanism of action.
	What's happening is that folks that have Alzheimer's have an accumulation of amyloid, and they also have an accumulation of something called tau protein that causes tangles in the neurons that causes the decline in cognitive function.
	It turns out that Viagra interrupts the formation of these tau programs.
	I love this!
	Just take it all the time!
	Take it every day!
	Actually, the ER doctor told me that there is some validity to this.
	That there are all kinds of other health benefits from the blood flow created by Viagra.
	I find it highly interesting.
	Take it every day.
	Gotta do something with it.
	I have to pat myself on the back for early spotting of a trend.
	And it's just beginning.
	I mean, this is going to go on.
	This is the Parents of Criminals Bill in Tennessee.
	Yeah, you're right.
	You did spot this early on, and this is a thing.
	Parents might want to watch their children a little more closely tonight.
	A bill passed in Tennessee will now hold parents partially responsible for crimes committed by their kids.
	Hello, I'm Greg Hurst.
	Hi, I'm Stephanie Scurlock.
	It comes as part of an effort to curb juvenile crime in Memphis and in the state.
	WRG's Ashley Paul joins us now live outside of 201 Poplar after speaking with Sheriff Floyd Bonner about this bill and a couple of others that will soon become law.
	Ashley?
	It was just yesterday that Sheriff Bonner released a statement expressing concerns over the growing number of juveniles that are staying at the Youth Education and Prevention Center.
	And tonight when we spoke with him, he spoke with us about some of the efforts being made to curb that juvenile crime.
	If we don't sound the alarm now, what's going to happen this summer when the kids are out of school?
	113 juveniles are spending the night at the Youth Education and Prevention Center tonight.
	A slight dip from the 118 that were there yesterday, but uncomfortably close to the record high 125 since the center opened last summer.
	It's calling all parents to please, please, let's just take a look at our kids and what they're doing and who they're hanging out with.
	WREG sat down with Shelby County Sheriff Floyd Bonner today discussing these concerns and a potential solution passed today in Nashville.
	Under the Parental Accountability Act, after the first offense, parents of juveniles who commit a crime will be required to pay $1,000 for each additional offense.
	If they can't afford the fine, they will be able to work it off through community service.
	And I had to go along the interstate.
	Wow.
	And my friends, neighbors, loved ones saw me pick up trash because of something that my son had done.
	I think I would pay a little bit more attention.
	Wow!
	Wow!
	Wait a minute, so the what and the kid just sits back and kicks back and is on TikTok and the parents are now cleaning up the trash on the interstate?
	That would be one of the issues, yes.
	That's ultimate.
	Now this Bonner guy, who sounds like just this southern dude, is a big black man with a beautiful southern Tennessee accent.
	That's a Tennessee accent.
	It sure is.
	Absolute classic Tennessee accent.
	Except it's got a little more low notes.
	But this is the beginning of the end for bad parents.
	Well, and you think this will work?
	Yeah, I think it will.
	And at what age does that stop?
	Parents from the shooter right and I immediately and I first saw it when you said it you said it's gonna be but it wasn't from that it was from from a couple of years earlier and I said it then when there was a shooting a student shooting it was in Lithuania or some foreign country and they arrested the parents and that was the that was to me was the trigger did you and so I've
	This is happening, and it's going to happen, it's going to take a while, but it's going to happen, and the parents are going to now finally have to be responsible for juvenile delinquency.
	It's their fault.
	Couple questions.
	One, will this only be up until age 18?
	I guess, right?
	I think so, yeah.
	And can I just disown my child?
	Like, I disown this child.
	It's not mine.
	No.
	I can't do that?
	I don't think so.
	No.
	I have one quick story and one clip.
	There was a big fracas apparently at Joint Base Andrews.
	I don't know if you heard about this, but Secret Service agents on Vice President Kamala Harris' detail, they got into a fight!
	Yeah, did you research this and find out what the fight was about?
	Well, yes, I did.
	So this female Secret Service agent showed up at the terminal and was acting erratically, grabbing another senior agent's personal phone and deleting applications on it.
	So she didn't like the apps for some reason.
	Oh, this involved a female agent?
	Oh, it gets better.
	The other agent, who was the shift leader, was able to recover his phone and then acted as if nothing had happened, but the female agent's bizarre behavior did not stop there.
	She began mumbling to herself, hiding behind curtains, and then started throwing items at the other agents, including menstrual pads.
	Telling him that he would need them later to save another agent and telling her peers that they were going to burn in hell and needed to listen to God.
	She then screamed at the special agent in charge rattling off the names of female officers on the vice president's detail claiming they would show up and help her and allow her to continue working.
	At that point, other agents on the scene believed she was suffering from a mental lapse.
	You think?
	And the senior officer approached to tell her she was relieved from the assignment.
	That's when she snapped entirely, she chest bumped and shoved her superior, then tackled him and punched him.
	The agents involved restraining her were especially concerned because she still had her gun in her holster.
	They wrestled her to the ground, took the gun, cuffed her, and removed her from the terminal.
	This seems like there's more of a story behind this one.
	Yeah.
	What was, what apps were on his phone?
	Well, obviously she was having an affair with someone.
	This is what I'm thinking.
	Yeah.
	And this is the patron or what is it?
	Fraternization.
	Fraternization.
	Yeah.
	I can't get that one out.
	Fraternize.
	You can't, can't do that on the job, but it happens anyway, no matter whether you want to or not, but you get this psychos.
	It's like, remember the, it was a NASA astronaut that That was kind of stalking some guy, and she was sitting in her car, and she was peeing in a bottle.
	No, no, she wore a diaper, an adult diaper, and drove for 16 hours.
	That was a great story.
	That was a good story.
	Ah, the good old days.
	Yeah, so you have these situations with unstable people.
	That was a great story.
	Hold on a second.
	Let me see.
	Psycho.
	Diaper.
	The diaper lady.
	What?
	Uh... I don't think I... That's so old I don't even have the story anymore.
	Yeah, I don't think so.
	I got some good Texas border clips.
	Well, hold on a second.
	Because I need to bring us up to speed on the bird flu.
	And then we gotta take a break!
	We're running late.
	Well, bird flu because, you know, there's actually two clips.
	It's important because they're starting to scare us now.
	Oh, bird flu!
	Bird flu!
	It's in the milk!
	It's in the milk!
	This morning the FDA insists... Listen to the urgency of his voice!
	The nation's milk supply is safe.
	It's safe!
	After fragments of the bird flu virus were found in some milk samples.
	Stop the clip.
	Fragments.
	How do you find fragments?
	Oh, I'm glad you asked.
	According to the FDA, remnants of bird flu were detected in samples of pasteurized milk.
	What do we need to know?
	Yeah, let me take you through this headline because for sure it's concerning and you're going to get a lot of attention today.
	Particles of the virus detected in grocery store milk is not really a surprise and I want to tell you why.
	Remember back in the COVID days with PCR testing, people were testing positive weeks or even months after being infected.
	Why?
	Because that PCR detects particles of the virus, not the active live virus.
	Now, okay, you're full of crap, Dr. Jen, America's favorite doctor.
	The PCR test, you can find anything you want as long as you spin up enough cycles.
	That's what's going on here.
	And I'm just pointing this out because we have to be careful when they're using PCR, which was never intended to be a test of anything.
	According to the guy who invented the test.
	And died just before COVID kicked off.
	Yeah, this is, so this is, this is, why are they doing this?
	I don't know.
	I'm sure it has something to do with the bird flu.
	I don't like it.
	I don't like them bringing up this bird flu thing again.
	Well, yeah, I got an email from one of our producers, one of our famous Duke producers says, oh, I think they're doing this, get back to mail-in voting just before the election.
	Why not?
	Well, I think it's too late.
	You can't pull this stunt now.
	It's over.
	Well, they may try.
	It's too late.
	There was a lead-in to mail-in voting before.
	There was a build-up.
	It took a while to propagandize the public.
	The public is a little hardened against this.
	They're not going to go for this.
	I hope not.
	But, you know, look at all those kids on the college campus all wearing masks.
	Oh, bird flu.
	Yeah, well, I think they're wearing masks so they don't get detected by face recognition.
	No, I think they all want to go work for Goldman Sachs after school.
	They don't want to be put on some list.
	For sure, they don't want to be put on some list.
	Let's take our break, John, because I would like to say in the morning to you and thank you, the man who put the sea in the climate core.
	Say hello to my friend on the other end, the one and only Mr. John C. DeMora.
	Well, in the morning to you, Mr. Adam Curry and Mr. Forrest.
	1485 on the troll room count.
	and some of the dames and knights out there.
	Hey, in the morning to the trolls.
	Let's go.
	Hey, I got a...
	A couple of them got away, but I think I got most of them.
	14.85 on the troll room count.
	We had 14.56 on the last Thursday, so we're up.
	Oh, barely.
	But a couple of them got away.
	I couldn't count them all.
	Hello, trolls.
	They're hanging out there in the troll room.
	And the reason they're there is because they love being our live studio audience.
	Our live studio audience, and it's well worth it.
	If anyone does a podcast, you should just do it live.
	Do it live!
	And then have a troll room, because it makes you feel alive, you know, it gives everybody the sense of urgency, you know, they all think they're important.
	It's great, you know, you get a portion of your audience, yeah, we're important, we're in the troll room, we're doing it.
	And they actually are.
	And they get warmed up by Darren O, the pre-show guy.
	It's great.
	Yes, you're welcome, says Matthew.
	You're right, thank you.
	We appreciate it.
	You can become a troll yourself by going to trollroom.io.
	There's 24 hours a day.
	We have our No Agenda livestream going, and there's always trolls in there trolling other shows.
	And then obviously you can use a modern podcast app, which I recommend you do because, you know, you see what's happening with net neutrality?
	See what's happening?
	It's all going to become outlawed.
	You're doomed!
	You're all doomed!
	Get a podcast app where your favorite podcast will remain on it.
	It's backwards compatible with any other podcast you use.
	You can search, you can find them, you can import it.
	PodcastApps.com.
	Now, I want to talk about value for value, but I was actually surprised to hear the tinfoil hat podcast, which you introduced us to.
	You introduced us to the tinfoil hat podcast.
	So you got Steve on here and Sam.
	Sam Tripoli, the comedian, who I called a sidekick.
	And Sam gets around.
	He's been on the Rogan Show a lot.
	He's got a special coming out.
	And they discussed value for value and accredited us.
	And would you like to hear them explain value to value?
	Yes, I'm all in!
	One of the things about, you know, being shadowbanned very very early on, being demonetized on YouTube very very early on, is that it forced me to figure out if I want to stick around here, You know, then I've got to have a model that is going to allow me to survive the obvious de-platformings that I'm going to face absolutely everywhere else.
	And so that's why I do the Value for Value system.
	So far, so good, right?
	I mean, this is his experience.
	Of course, we preempted all, we started to show... We skipped the middleman.
	We skipped all the de-platforms.
	You go through that bull crap.
	We don't want any of that stuff, no.
	Explain that.
	What is that?
	So Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak, the guys from No Agenda, this is something that they conceptualized when they took the show full-time.
	And it's based on recognition that the show that you're watching or listening to has value.
	And that's going to look different to absolutely everyone.
	And absolutely everyone is going to have a different level of value that they can contribute.
	I love, he's really, he really gets it.
	I mean, I'm loving hearing this.
	This is, and I love the kind of stoner voice when he explains it.
	Amen.
	So which of the two guys is this?
	This is Steve.
	Steve, this is Steve.
	Steve.
	Sam's in the background going, yeah, explain it.
	So what are the things that you really need to make a show run?
	You need time, you need talent, and you need treasure.
	Okay, so that's the value for value system.
	There's some things that we need a hand with.
	Clips.
	Promotion, because I hate it.
	You know, that requires time, okay?
	Well, if you have some time and you can do that, please do that.
	Share the show, throw a clip, whatever.
	We've got a clip channel, send it to us, we'll put it on.
	Talent, that's where making things overlaps too.
	Being able to book guests.
	Being able to go out and have conversations that allow for other people to watch the show and stuff like that.
	Do you make music?
	We'd like to play it.
	That kind of thing.
	Talent.
	Treasure, that's pretty obvious.
	We have bills that we have to pay.
	We've got kids that are growing and like to eat.
	You know, all that kind of stuff.
	If you don't have a lot of time, if there's things in the digital space that you're not great at, but you do have some coin you're sitting on, great!
	You know, and at whatever level of ability or comfortability you have, participate.
	Because the only way the show happens is that way.
	And what that ultimately means is I never work for an advertiser.
	I never work for a sponsor.
	I am 100% self-sufficient, and if necessary, the show can go out in freaking, you know, USB drives and direct email and stuff like that.
	I love it.
	Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
	No, we hope it doesn't come to that, but well done, boys, over there, tinfoil hat.
	Perfect explanation.
	That is, that's as good as anyone could do.
	It hits all the points.
	It does.
	It makes everything clear and it's sincere.
	That's the key.
	Yes, and after 17 years, it's good to see someone else picking up on it.
	With sincerity.
	With sincerity, yes.
	Which we said from the beginning, I have at least, that you need sincerity.
	You're not asking for money insincerely.
	No, we're not.
	No, no.
	No, but it's the real deal.
	I mean, you want your show?
	Provide value back.
	Time, talent, treasure.
	And since he was 24, 24 years old, Void Zero has been providing his time and his talent, his resources to the show and today he turns 40 years old.
	16 years!
	Yeah, and he has a real business too.
	And we helped him start his own business.
	That's right.
	And we're very, very proud of him and he's on the birthday list.
	But first, let us thank some talent.
	Yes, of course, it's his birthday.
	That's why he's on the list.
	But he gets a special mention.
	I mean, Void Zero, man.
	Just like a pawn him off.
	Like, yeah, it's Mark's birthday.
	Yeah, Void Zero.
	That guy.
	That guy.
	But first, we need to thank one of our talented artists for bringing us the artwork for episode 1653.
	We titled that Twigs, which is a new product, formerly known as Vines.
	That was a great bit, by the way.
	A lot of people thought that was very funny.
	It was a classic.
	Oh, the twigs, yeah.
	It was a classic Johnson and Warrick moment.
	And Dame Kenny Ben comes in again with Uncle Joe's, or Joe Biden's Uncle Finnegan.
	With his leg sticking out of the cannibal pot.
	Not everybody got it right away, but if you know, you know.
	And it was well done.
	And you actually remarked...
	That between Dame Kenny Benn and Tante Neal, and of course Martin JJ and others, that the Dutch artists are really holding true to their legacy of being great artists.
	I mean, these are the modern Van Gogh, Rembrandts, Vermeers.
	I mean, these are...
	Well, I don't know about that.
	What do you mean?
	This is Nightwatch level.
	Yeah, I equate great art with those people you just mentioned, and there is a tradition in Holland of great artists, but doing cartoony show art for the No Agenda Show, it kind of demeans Vermeer, I'd say, a bit.
	What do you mean, man?
	What do you mean?
	But it's interesting that there is this, it's in the blood or something that allows this weirdness, especially on, I mean, we're not a Dutch show.
	No, no, we're not.
	And we do have three, at least three and maybe more Dutch artists that contribute winning art consistently.
	For years and years.
	Yeah, and then we have another one that's very competitive, who's Italian?
	Scaramanga.
	Scaramanga, yeah.
	So we have this association, where's our Americans?
	Arts Center, Pasadena, come on people!
	We've got the Michelangelo of album art, Scaramanga.
	Although we do have, if you look at the leaderboard, who's number one?
	I don't know.
	Nick Durant.
	New Yorker.
	He used to be really good.
	We don't know what happened.
	No, he doesn't do any art anymore.
	He doesn't care.
	He has some once in a while.
	He does his own podcast.
	He's in a sewer.
	We want to thank all the artists who contributed.
	We love being able to choose.
	Scaramanga tried something with the witches.
	Dame Kenny Ben also threw in an ABC, noagendaabc.com coloring book.
	A couple of people tried some Twig stuff.
	We kind of liked Kenny Ben's Title IX, where he's kicking the girl in the crotch.
	Actually, the one we liked, but we knew we could not do, because it was just too much.
	Was Scaramanga's luxury seaside jumeniums.
	Oh yeah, that wasn't gonna happen.
	That wasn't gonna happen.
	It was a beautiful piece.
	He had everything in there.
	Virtual tours on twigs.
	33 units.
	Welcome to Gaza.
	I mean, yeah.
	It was a genuine, it was a gem.
	Oh man, and then we had a comic strip blogger did some A.I.
	art, which is kind of cute, little kid eating sugar.
	But the A.I.
	stuff, I mean, it's like, you know, people are like, oh, we've got a song for the, we've got a new tune for our podcast.
	It's from A.I.
	I'm like, yeah, well, that's obvious, because it sucks.
	Everyone's just like doing A.I.
	stuff.
	You're going to be bland, man.
	You need the human soul in there.
	And now Facebag is going to get into it.
	I think you're right.
	This is the pivot.
	The pivot of AI.
	There's nothing left, nothing left, it's no good, it's not working, and it's expensive, and they're not saying anything about the amount of energy it costs to run these things.
	And there's no... No, that's the key.
	And there's no model.
	Especially in the era of, you know... Global warming.
	The global emergency, the global warming emergency, or whatever it is that you play the clip of.
	Yeah, yeah, climate emergency.
	Climate emergency.
	Climate emergency.
	And I can tell you right now, people doing Trump with farts, you're not going to be chosen.
	No.
	What are you thinking?
	Don't you know us by now?
	Don't you know us by now?
	Thank you very much, Dame Kenny Benn.
	You are fantastic.
	All the artists are.
	And thank you to Dreb Scott, who uses all different pieces of artwork in our chapters.
	You need a modern podcast app for that, but you probably have one by now.
	If not, what are you doing?
	You're doing it wrong!
	And thank you again.
	NoahJendaArtGenerator.com.
	It's open for all.
	Anybody can participate, and everybody makes just as much chance.
	And it doesn't have to be some slick piece.
	It's amazing.
	Sometimes it's just the creativeness that does it for us.
	So you heard it there from the Tinfoil Hat Boys, Time, Talent, we got that covered, and Treasure.
	We go to the Treasure portion as we thank our executive and associate executive producers.
	For episode 1654, $200 and above is an associate, that's a real title, you get to keep it forever, you get to open up an account on imdb.com, and we read your note, and $300 and above is the executive producer, and you get real kudos for that, and you get to walk around town saying, I'm an executive producer.
	And Stephen Hutto, Gets to do that.
	He's from St.
	Petersburg, Florida.
	$384.50, and I see no note from him.
	Yeah, I went back and looked, and he does donate every so often.
	I know he does.
	I recognize the name.
	But he does not necessarily send in a note.
	And my spreadsheet, by the way, is wonking.
	I can't move anything.
	I may have to reload.
	Yeah, well... Reload!
	I can't.
	It's just not working.
	Oh, there it popped back into normality.
	Weird.
	Last time he wrote a note in, which was a $400 donation, it was just a tie.
	I got a 333 on my car thing.
	It was in June of last year.
	So I just assume he didn't write us a note.
	So he gets to double up karma.
	Yeah, he sure does.
	You've got It brings up Dixon, Craig, and St.
	Albert, Alberta, Canada, 333.33, ITM from Dixon, Upwind from Chris, and the Sherwood Park, Alberta, refineries.
	Nice.
	Okay, ITM.
	Mark Kucharski.
	I would think it is.
	Aurora, Colorado.
	Our favorite number, 333.33.
	It's the magic numbers.
	And I've been listening, he says, since Adam's second Rogan appearance.
	Rogan donation.
	First time donation.
	You've been de-douched.
	Got yourself a de-douche in there.
	I was going to ask for a childish sequence of jingles, but thought better of it.
	Good man!
	Can I get a TPP Jobs Karma from my smoking hot fiancé and an R2-D2 Karma?
	Thanks!
	Well, of course you can!
	Jobs!
	You've got... Karma.
	James Boyle in Champaign, Illinois, 333.33, and all he says is value for value, and that's what he thinks the show is worth, and we appreciate him.
	Yes, thank you very much.
	Then we have something in blue here, which I shall open up.
	That means we have a note.
	This is from Sir Furr.
	And Surfer donates $300 and this, oh, I think he's going to change a title today.
	Let's see what he has to say.
	Note here, Surfer.
	It's loading on my computer for some reason.
	Why is this taking so long?
	It's just a PDF.
	Let's go.
	Here we go.
	ITM John Adam, switcheroo!
	Please credit Neil Jones, Clip Custodian, with this executive producership.
	Whoa, hold on a second.
	Let me put that in.
	Clip.
	Custodian Neil Jones.
	Wow, this is a very nice... a very nice gesture.
	Let's find out if he has any more to say.
	I'm suspending... Oh, this is the switcheroo guy.
	I'm suspending switcheroo donations for Mr. Dana Brunetti, governor of El Dorado.
	Sadly, Mr. Dana has hardened his heart.
	So that John may never get a bit part.
	Hoping someday he might relent and at least let John have a free image and likeness scan.
	I'd go for that.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	He was really mad at me.
	Dana.
	Oh yeah, you got into a beef.
	Yeah, he's like, you're all wrong.
	Tesla, Cybertruck is great.
	It's awesome.
	You've fallen.
	You've fallen for the M5M, TikTok, Psyop.
	It's not quite his voice, but yeah.
	Yeah, and I said no.
	No, he's a huge Tesla fan.
	I don't know why.
	He lives out in the middle of nowhere, but he is.
	And he has a Cybertruck.
	Yeah, when the apocalypse comes, he's going to be dead.
	Because the Cybertruck won't work.
	He's got the right idea.
	I think he has like three or four Teslas.
	The way you do it is you hook them all together and you have one Tesla tow three Teslas and you keep driving south and south and then the Tesla drops dead and there's nothing you can do about it.
	You jump in the next Tesla.
	And you drive some more until it drops dead, and then you have another Tesla, you jump into that, you can get across the country that way.
	He's smart, that guy.
	Anyways, he says, I became a bona fide Black Baron after Adam's teeth fell out and he forgot to pronounce the title changes.
	Wow.
	Black Baron is a rare title, if not unique.
	Seems pretty cool.
	I'm going to stick with this title while I continue to donate.
	We have never, the peerage committee has never approved this title.
	Are you not approving it now?
	Yeah, I'm just not approved.
	I mean, if you want to call yourself Black Baron, that's fine, but that's, it's not official.
	There's only Black Knights.
	Well, okay.
	Well, I'm just, I'm just looking at the official, uh, show prep information.
	And, uh, no, you're right.
	He's not on there.
	Okay.
	So he can't say that?
	He can't call himself that?
	He can, it's just not official?
	I mean, he's a guy donating and he thinks it is... You could put him on the list.
	No, I'm not doing anything.
	I don't want to get my head chopped off by the Peerage Committee.
	The Parish Committee does not have that power.
	Hey, he says, I'm going to stick with this title while I continue to donate.
	Good, you stick with that.
	Okay, well, you can stick with the title all you want.
	But you're a baron, and actually what's going to be a black earl?
	A black viscount?
	He's going to go on and up, up and up and up and be... I don't know.
	He says, this leaves me free to bestow switcheroos on worthy producers.
	He says, I'm looking at you, Ashlyn Speed.
	How about that?
	That's cute.
	He's a good guy, ma'am.
	He is a good guy.
	I request Yak Karma for all producers.
	Love is Lit, Surfer, Black Baron of the I-4 Corridor.
	You've got... Karma.
	The Fibromyalgia Recovery Foundation in Monument, Colorado has donated $255.44.
	Wow.
	Interesting.
	Threefer for my son, Eli, who turned 33 on tax day, April 15th, 24A.
	Switcheroo for my little bro, Monty, who turns 49 on 26th of April, and he hit me in the mouth last summer.
	Linda Lupatkin, thank you!
	Loves!
	Oh.
	Well, there's a lot of mysterious notes in there, but I guess Monty gets that donation.
	Yep, Monty's a switcheroo.
	Nathan Cook, Seven Hills, New South Wales, Australia.
	There he is!
	There's one who made it through.
	Made it through the East Safety Net.
	The only one, I might add.
	The East Safety Net.
	And he promotes the Sydney Meetup at the Fiddler Pub, Rouse Hill, this Saturday the 27th.
	Bring the family!
	Contact at cook at no authority dot social or see details at noagenda meetups dot com.
	I've been doing overtime to justify this donation to the Mrs. Ha!
	Time well spent, he says.
	Thanks.
	Thank you.
	Thanks, Nathan.
	Thanks for keeping it alive down under.
	We do love all the producers who are still hanging in there and whatever we can do.
	And you can be sure their five eyes will be represented.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Spot the spook and let us know.
	Matthew Saladino in Katy, Texas.
	21060.
	ITM.
	No note, no jingles, no karma.
	Perfect.
	Boom.
	All right.
	And then we might as well go on with this one.
	We're at the end.
	Which is Linda Lou Patkin, Lakewood, Colorado.
	$200, Jobs Karma.
	For a competitive edge, go to ImageMakersInc.com for all your executive resume and job search needs.
	So we have a person on this list that used her services, I guess, and liked him.
	That's ImageMakersInc with a K. Or just find Linda Lou Patkin, Duchess of Jobs and writer of resumes on the producer list.
	Jobs, jobs, jobs, and jobs.
	Let's vote for jobs!
	Oh, the karma didn't fire.
	There it is.
	You've got karma.
	All right, that is our executive and associate executive producer for episode 16, uh, yeah, 1654.
	Wow, we are moving towards the 1700.
	And for more years!
	Pause.
	We need a new shout.
	Do you have that clip?
	Did I see you had that clip?
	Yeah, play it.
	Where is it?
	Oh yeah, here it is.
	Biden.
	I see an America where we defend democracy, not diminish it.
	I see an America where we protect freedoms, not take them away.
	I see an economy that grows from the middle out and the bottom up where the wealthy pay their fair share so we can have childcare, paid leave, and so much more, and still reduce the federal deficit and increase economic growth.
	And free Viagra.
	Imagine what we can do next.
	Four more years. Pause.
	Four more years.
	Pause, he reads on the teleprompter.
	What a dope.
	You know what we call that in Dutch?
	An oen.
	An oen.
	A what?
	An oen.
	Oen?
	Yeah, O-E-N.
	Oen.
	He meant an oen.
	He's an Oon.
	Oon.
	Yeah, there you go.
	Perfect pronunciation.
	Oon.
	Thank you.
	Our president is an oon.
	Exactly.
	Thank you to these execs and associate executive producers.
	Of course, these titles are real.
	You can use them anywhere.
	Credits are recognized.
	You can put them on your LinkedIn and your social media profile.
	Or, of course, you can open up an IMDB account if you don't have one already and walk around town with business cards.
	I'm an executive or associate executive producer of the No Agenda Show.
	Yeah, I produced episode 1654.
	Check it out sometime.
	We have a lot of people to thank.
	We don't thank anybody under the 50s for reasons of anonymity, and we especially want to thank people who came in with whatever value they could under that 50 amount, and certainly those on sustaining donations.
	They help a lot.
	John's going to take us through to the 50s now.
	Yeah, starting with Ben Grease in Grice, maybe, in Overland Park, Kansas at $111.11.
	Colin Widden in Gibsonia, Pennsylvania, $105.35.
	Colin Witten in Gibsonia, Pennsylvania, 105.35.
	And this is a birthday donation for him.
	David Erilanus, I think.
	Aurelianus, probably.
	Aurelianus in Escondido 100.
	He does make a note here.
	He says, is it bad if I say you guys rock?
	We rock, baby.
	We rock.
	We rock.
	Yeah, man, we rock.
	In fact, we rock hard.
	We rock very hard.
	Ian Field, 800.
	Kevin McLaughlin comes in from Concord, North Carolina.
	He is the Archduke of Luna, lover of American boobs, and he comes in with a boob donation of 8008.
	Eric Mackey, M-A-K-I, in Blairsville, Georgia, 8008.
	Jason Marrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr That's kind of an interesting note.
	I'm a teacher and parent in a small northern Minnesota community.
	It's easy to believe that the woke agenda will stay in the cities, but it's starting to sneak in its way in.
	We've kept the litter boxes out, though, so far.
	Now, this is pretty much what you said about Fredericksburg.
	Mm-hmm.
	Oh, yeah?
	So these suburbs are being attacked.
	We're not really a suburb.
	Brankov.
	Yeah, okay.
	Technically, you're rural.
	Rural.
	Brian Kaufman, Scottsdale, Arizona 7575, Matthew Elwhart in Weatherford, Texas 6006.
	David Spring in Anna, Texas, 6006.
	Sir Pauly Bravo in Fort Collins, Colorado, 5567.
	Brendan Flemmer in Bismarck, North Dakota.
	5567. Brendan Flemmer in Bismarck, North Dakota.
	He's got a birthday for Zoe. 5432.
	54.32.
	Radu Menescu in Romania.
	All right.
	That's interesting.
	Nice.
	We get a Romanian listener.
	Marenescu.
	That's a very Romanian name.
	53.77.
	Sir Paul in Twickenham, UK.
	52.72.
	Tired of listening to John complaining about no one donating.
	It's working.
	We got his donation, finally!
	Sir Paul.
	Blair Williams in Orange Beach, Alabama, 5272.
	H Ringelberg in Dronten, Holland.
	The Netherlands, yes.
	Yeah, 5257.
	It's always easy to find an excuse not to donate, he says.
	Barron Henry, Rancho Palos Verdes, 5242.
	Hold on, he says differently.
	He says, it's always easy to find an excuse not to donate, especially when your government, meaning ours, blows up our pipeline.
	Don't hold that against us.
	It wasn't the show.
	The show didn't do that.
	We told you who did it.
	They blamed Norway more than us.
	They were the ones that took part of the scam.
	Yeah, really, man.
	Blame those guys.
	Forrest Martin, oh I'm sorry, Baron Henry and Ranchos Palos Verde, I said 5242.
	Forrest Martin comes in at 50.05 along with Andrew Benz in Imperial, Missouri, 50.05.
	And the following people, this is a very short list that I should mention for a Thursday.
	These are the $50 donors, name and location starting with Michael Sycora in New Richmond, Wisconsin.
	Ah!
	There's our buddies in Redondo Beach, California.
	Gaucho Woodworking.
	Check them out.
	You can look it up.
	Just Google them.
	James Farrell in Haverhill, Massachusetts.
	Cara Paravelle in San Rafael.
	Cara.
	It'll be Cara Paravelle in San Rafael.
	Alexa Delgado in Aptos, California.
	Brian Hummel in Wimberley, Texas.
	Charles Boyd in San Marcos, Texas.
	Samuel Cannarday in North Riverside, Illinois.
	Brett Denton in Boise, Idaho.
	Amy Grohl in Burien, Washington, right by the airport.
	John Walter in Wenatchee, Washington.
	And we get the Washingtonians today.
	And last but not least, Fall Line Farm in Columbus, Georgia.
	Go over there and get some vegetables.
	This is a group of well-wishers and supporters for show 1654.
	That's right.
	I want to thank them all.
	And once again, thank you to our executive and associate executive producers who came in big for us on 1654.
	Our formula is this.
	We go out, we hit people in the mouth.
	Water.
	Water.
	Shut up, plane.
	Shut up.
	Become a producer at NoAgendaDonations.com.
	It's your birthday birthday on No Agenda.
	And we congratulate Eli who turned 33 on April 15th, Anonymous turns 33 yesterday, Sharon Searle celebrating tomorrow, Brendan Flemmer wishes his daughter Zoe Flemmer a happy birthday, turns 14 tomorrow, Monty turns 49 tomorrow, Colin Whidden turns 41 on May 12th, getting in nice and early.
	And once again, not just from us, from Adam and John, but also from his lovely wife Iris, Iris, Mark Void Zero, 40 years old today.
	Happy birthday, brother, from everybody here!
	Now we have some nightings here, but first some notes to read, because this first one is from the donation that came in on the last show, $1,000 from Joseph Smolik.
	In the morning, gentlemen, my right-hand man Josh hit me in the mouth about four years ago.
	I've been a freeloading douchebag ever since.
	Please forgive my douchebaggery, except my humble offering.
	I would like to be knighted Sir Jojo of the Holden Forest.
	I would like Slivovitz and Potisa at the round table.
	I have no idea what Potica is.
	Potica.
	Potica.
	I don't know what that is.
	How do you spell it?
	P-O-T-I-C-A.
	Potica.
	Thanks for all you do, John.
	With a C?
	No, with a C. P-O-T-I-C-A.
	I'm sorry, P-O-T.
	Someone's vacuuming.
	P-O-T-I-C-A.
	Potica.
	The traditional Slovenian nut roll.
	Nice nut roll.
	Got a note from Dame Wind Chimes Partridge.
	In the morning to you and Adam, I've completed my knighthood layaway plan.
	Would like to switcheroo the title of knighthood over to my smoking hot husband, Walker Phillips.
	We just celebrated our one-year wedding anniversary a couple of weeks ago, which also marks 11 years together, and we never had a fight.
	His knight name shall be Sir Sevener Partridge, and he requests...
	A falafel wrap from Falafel Hut in San Rafael, California, and a bottle of Benovia's 2018 Oakville Cabernet at the round table.
	You're really stressing the staff here, but we got it for you.
	We also humbly request some karma.
	Thank you for your courage.
	For both of you, Dame Wynne Chimes Partridge, of course we have a karma for you.
	You've got karma.
	And let's bring out those blades for these two knights, John.
	There you go.
	Ooh, ooh, I love that.
	That's a good one.
	A happy one.
	Walker Phillips, Joseph Smolik, both of you hop up here on the podium.
	You both have supported Noah Jett and the show in the amount of $1,000 or more.
	Doesn't matter how long it takes to get there, you get there.
	And then what happens, I am very proud to pronounce the KV as Sir Seven Up Partridge and Sir JoJo of the Holden Forest.
	For you, we've got Hookers and Blue, Rent Boys and Chardonnay.
	By request, we have a falafel wrap from the Falafel Hut in San Rafael, California, a bottle of Benovia's 2018 Oakville Cabernet, a Slivovitz, and Potica.
	It's a nut roll!
	Enjoy it!
	Along with that, Rubenes, Women in Rose, Gayson, Sake, Bong, It's a Bourbon, Sparkling, Saturn, Escort, Ginger Ale, and Gerbil's Breast Milk.
	And of course, the mutton and mead.
	Everybody loves a little bit of mutton and mead.
	As I can see, you're chomping away.
	Head over to noagenderrings.com.
	Select the right size.
	There's a handy sizing guide there.
	We'll get that off to you.
	It's a Signet ring, so it comes with wax.
	You can then seal your... I'm sorry?
	Wax.
	What did I say?
	Wax.
	I said wax.
	Comes with wax.
	Wax.
	Yeah, wax.
	Wax to seal your important... Don't interrupt the flow, man!
	Wax to seal your important correspondence with and a certificate of authenticity.
	And we love seeing our knights and dames at the No Agenda Meetups, which we're going to talk about now.
	No Agenda Meetups.
	Yeah, the No Agenda Meetups.
	This is what will keep your amygdala in check so you won't go off and do crazy stuff like set yourself on fire.
	No!
	You'll be calm, you'll be cool, you'll be collected because you get to hang out and talk with your fellow No Agenda, No Agenda Nation listeners.
	Everybody's cool, chill, you can come from any background, any kind of background, any age, any creed, any religion, any race.
	Everybody gets along at the meetups.
	We've never had a fight break out at a meetup.
	Never.
	It's always fantastic.
	And here's an example.
	The Richmond Meetup.
	I think that's Richmond, Virginia.
	We had some celebrities there.
	In the morning, this is Dame Trill Triggin, hostess of the ITM Richmond Meetup.
	Hi, this is Roundy.
	Welcome to the ITM Richmond Meetup.
	I'm wearing my fez today and it has made me utterly evil to people.
	Sorry.
	Hey, it's DC Girl in the morning.
	Jim in the morning.
	This is Rob from Richmond in the morning.
	Jeff from Springfield.
	Has anybody ever had a full conversation with Roger Roundy?
	This is Tony from Williamsburg in the morning.
	Hi, this is Marshall from Richmond.
	Thank you for protecting us from cannibals.
	In the morning from Edeshia in Studley, Virginia, where I had to have at least two human resources to live in the neighborhood.
	Alex happy in Virginia.
	Trains good, planes bad.
	This is Tom Starkweather.
	I'm very happy with another great Virginia crowd here.
	In the morning!
	That's what I'm talking about, roundy DC girl Alex and Tom.
	I mean, there's celebrities there, man.
	Celebrities should have been there.
	You can join some cool meetups.
	We have some taking place today.
	The North Georgia Monthly One-Year Anniversary starts at 6 o'clock at Cherry Street Brewing in Alpharetta, Georgia.
	The St.
	Macedonius Feast Day Denver Meetup, 6.30 at Lincoln's Roadhouse in Denver.
	On Saturday, the Little Alsace of Texas Meetup.
	I know someone's going to get me for that.
	Elsos.
	Elsos?
	I don't know what that means.
	At the Blue Lace Smokehouse, Castroville, Texas.
	There you go.
	Dame Taylor's organizing that.
	Also on Saturday, Northeast Indiana Meetup.
	This is the Solar Eclipse Survivors Club 33, 1 o'clock at Casa Grill & Bar, Fort Wayne, Indiana.
	Then we have Sydney, Australia.
	We talked about it earlier, 1.30 on Saturday, Australian Eastern Standard Time.
	The Fiddler, Commercial Hill in Rouse Hill, New South Wales.
	Asked for Cook.
	We have the 10th Northwest Houston Meetup at 5.30 at Wakefield Crow Bar in Houston, Texas.
	That's also on Saturday.
	And the Central Ohio Meetup, 5.30 at Dempsey's in Columbus, Ohio.
	And the Must Be High, No.
	15, 2 o'clock at Granite Brewery in Toronto, Canada.
	And the organizer of that is Sir I Must Be High.
	On the horizon for May, Torrance, California, Arlington, Virginia, Blaine, Washington, Leiden, the Netherlands, Charleston, South Carolina, Charlotte, North Carolina, Richmond, Virginia, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
	For June, Fargo, North Dakota, Scottsdale, Arizona, Moseley, Virginia, Amsterdam.
	It looks like we're combining the two meetups into one.
	I'll be there on June 15th and coming up to be scheduled June 18th.
	Baron Scott here in Texas, Austin, Texas, will be hosting a barbecue meetup at his house, so that should be good.
	Those are just some of the No Agenda Meetups that you definitely do not want to miss.
	It's where you find your community.
	Can't spell community without unity, and connection brings protection.
	Go to noagendameetups.com.
	If you can't find one near you, start one.
	It's easy.
	Sometimes you want to go hang out with all the nights and days.
	You want to be where you want to be.
	Triggered on hell's flame You wanna be where everybody feels the same It's like a party Yeah, it's always a party It's a party at those places.
	I'm looking forward to the Amsterdam meetup.
	It's gonna be fun.
	It's gonna be fun.
	End of show ISOs.
	I have three to test on you today.
	Here we go with number one.
	Yo!
	Okay, I'll stand back for the enthusiasm.
	I have this one.
	Imagine what we can do next.
	Okay, and I think this is a contender.
	Enjoy your free speech.
	There you go.
	Mike Johnson.
	I actually like the Biden one better.
	Really?
	Yeah.
	You got any isos?
	I have one lone iso which is similar to yours.
	Talks cheap.
	Enjoy your free speech.
	You like the Biden over that one?
	Yeah, play it.
	Hold on.
	There we go.
	Imagine what we can do next.
	Well, if you like the free speech when I'm not, I'm not wed.
	Because he's such a dork.
	Enjoy your free speech.
	I kind of, I want to do free speech.
	Okay, you can play it.
	If you don't mind, I'll do the free speech.
	Good news, everyone!
	That's right, time for some good news!
	John takes us into the rest of your day and evening with some good news to make you feel good about life after all the horrible mainstream propaganda you've had to listen to.
	But you already feel good about that because we've kept your amygdala in check.
	Laugh about it, these people are crazy.
	Nothing to worry about.
	Now let's up it a bit with some good news.
	All right, so we have a nine-year-old who won the European, he had to go to, he's an English kid, seagull screeching contest.
	Nine-year-old.
	Wow, this is a new twist, yes.
	It's a big, it's like the song Eros.
	And he wins and he's a cute little kid that apparently had a seagull snatch a ham sandwich from him one year and he got bit by the thing and now he sounds like one.
	The European Song Contest with a difference.
	The EC gulls screeching competition sees entrants mimicking the sound of seagulls.
	Britain has just won it thanks to a nine-year-old from Chesterfield who traveled to Belgium to claim the championship title.
	Here's Sally Biddle.
	Yes, ladies and gentlemen, that is a little boy dressed as a seagull, sounding exactly like a seagull, on the cusp of winning a seagull competition in Belgium.
	Channeling the emotion of a hungry gull, sealed the victory.
	No, you have not entered a parallel universe.
	This is the European Gulls Screeching Competition.
	And with a score of 92 out of 100, the now reigning junior champion, Cooper Wallace from Chesterfield.
	How, you may ask, did it all begin?
	Well, cue our colleagues at This Morning.
	It was in Devon on Wollacombe Beach.
	When one stole my ham sandwich and it went over my head and nipped my finger.
	So we think it's a Spider-Man effect that I'm, you know, made a seagull noise.
	Cooper beat off competition from many others.
	Including from an adult group ensemble which entered as a colony.
	For Cooper's family, it was an experience...
	Really, really big day for me.
	And like, it was awesome.
	Well, I love that these children are not scrolling on TikTok.
	No, no, they're not just doom scrolling away.
	They're getting out there doing something with their friends.
	And I wonder how many dogs went nuts during that good news clip because that was quite interesting.
	Good news, good, good news.
	Good news, a good good news, good news!
	Good news always ends our broadcast day, and we thank everybody in the Troll Room for being here once again.
	We love you all Trolls, you're great.
	Thank you to our artists, thank you to everyone who sends us clips, boots on the ground, and helps produce the best podcast in the universe.
	Without you it would be nothing, and without us it would be nothing.
	So it works out well that way.
	We have some end of show clips coming up.
	We got Professor Jay Jones from China.
	And not one but two, count them, two Fantomville classics.
	You'll love them.
	Up next on noagendastream.com, so just stay tuned at trollroom.io or your modern podcast app, we have live abs in a six-pack.
	Sir Cedar standing by.
	To take over the stream.
	It's just like a radio station.
	It's crazy.
	Coming to you from the heart of the Texas Hill Country, here in FEMA Region No.
	6, where it's heating up in Fredericksburg.
	In the morning, everybody.
	I'm Adam Curry.
	And from Northern Silicon Valley, where I remain, I'm John C. Dvorak.
	We return on Sunday with another jam-packed episode to shrink your amygdala, make you feel like you're in control of your world, and remember, Just look at the ground.
	If you feel dizzy, it'll all go away.
	Remember us at noagendthedonations.com, dvorak.org, slash n-a.
	Until next time, adios, mofos, a-hooey-hooey, and such!
	Well, I see Ukraine's going far right And the Rusk is keeping bombing all night Fighting isn't going nowhere Did you see when it fell up the stairs?
	Come on, it's to the left of me Look to the right, here I am Stuck in the middle with Jews And I'm wondering what they're covering up Take some batches and some cupboard in blood Five's a day that says they're all dead And the Schwab started waiting instead Come on, it's to the left of me
	Look to the right, here I am Stuck in the middle with Jews Come on, it's to the left of me Now, it's to the right, here I am Stuck in the middle with Jews Come on, it's to the left of me Now, it's to the right, here I am Stuck in the middle with Jews The USA.
	Supreme Court today heard arguments in the most significant case on homelessness in decades.
	A majority of the Supreme Court appeared to side with the local ordinances allowing cities to ban homeless people from sleeping or camping in public spaces.
	These laws punish homeless people who have no other choice really but to sleep outside.
	Your ordinance prohibits a single person who is homeless.
	You don't have to have a tent, you don't have to have a camp.
	These were people who had lived in Grants past their whole lives and went to high school there.
	What a crisis homelessness has become in the state of California.
	Your statute says that person cannot take himself, can't take a blanket and sleep someplace.
	Violating this ordinance means you're homeless.
	Homelessness is not something you can do, it's just something that you are.
	We have nine times more unsheltered homeless.
	In a tent on the Little League field, a dead body was found.
	Officials say they only cite or arrest homeless people when they refuse offers of shelter and only clear encampments if they are a public health issue.
	Sleeping in public is kind of like breathing in public.
	Crime increasing with the quality, the condition of our cities deteriorating, waste, fires.
	These laws help encourage people to accept Unchecked growth of homeless encampments.
	The Biden administration, who had filed an amicus brief in support of the homeless.
	That's why we see them all over, in our parks, on our sidewalks, in front of businesses, near schools.
	650,000 nationwide.
	Isn't the real issue here not moving people out of public spaces but actually dramatically increasing the amount of housing that we have?
	I know a lot of people want to send blankets or water.
	Just send your cash.
	Your statute says that person cannot take himself, can't take a blanket and sleep someplace.
	I know a lot of people want to send blankets or water.
	Just send your cash.
	That's right.
	TikTok. .
	TikTok!
	TikTok. TikTok. TikTok. TikTok. TikTok. TikTok. TikTok. TikTok.
	TikTok!
	TikTok!
	That's right!
	TikTok!
	TikTok!

▲