Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 11, 2018 - No Agenda

02:54:08

1076: M-Word

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You know, it's a part of China.
	Adam Curry, John C. Dvorak.
	It's Thursday, October 11th, 2018.
	This is your award-winning Gitmo Nation Media Assassination Episode 1076.
	This is No Agenda.
	Reading the IPCC special report so you don't have to.
	And broadcasting live from the capital of the drone star state here in downtown Austin Tejas in the Cludio.
	In the morning, everybody.
	I'm Adam Curry.
	And from Northern California, which we consider the zone star state, I'm John C. Devorak.
	It's Crackpot and Buzzkill in the morning.
	Wow, first time in almost 11 years you said, you didn't say Silicon Valley.
	You said from Northern California.
	I did?
	Yeah.
	I've lost it!
	11 years was a good time.
	Good run, John.
	Good run.
	It's over now, I guess.
	Yeah, well.
	Hey, there was finally some news to look at.
	Well, I got a lot of news to look at.
	I think we're over-clipped, actually, for today.
	Just evaluating.
	And no dupes from the last show.
	No dupes.
	No dupes allowed.
	Yeah, there was just lots of stuff.
	Not for now, but I did go through the IPCC special report.
	I am glad, because I didn't.
	I knew you.
	Yes, of course you would.
	Now, what I do expect you did is you went through the Google, the good sensor leaked document and have an analysis of that for us.
	I did go through, but I don't have an analysis.
	Oh, that's too bad.
	Here I was.
	Like, Dad John's guy.
	He was tweeting.
	By the way, ever since you got fired for not having the right attitude about 5G, you've been insane on Twitter.
	I mean, you're on day or night.
	You're tweeting this.
	You're tweeting that.
	Hey, you should write a book about crazy California.
	You're all over the...
	You even agreed to an interview with Graymerica.
	I mean, your life is changing.
	Yeah.
	The guy keeps saying I blocked him.
	I don't know where he gets this.
	No, it's just because we never respond.
	Hey, come on the show.
	Well, the fact that we have it on the stream, I figure, oh, I guess I can do this show.
	Even though you're the one that told me not to.
	Oh!
	You are...
	Et tu, Brutus?
	Nice.
	Very, very nice.
	Alright, so we had a lot of pretty fun moments to look at.
	Although I'm really growing a little bit concerned about what's happening to people.
	They seem somewhat out of control.
	You know, there's banging on the Supreme Court doors, there's crying.
	It's kind of this Kavanaugh vote.
	To me, it felt a little bit like, you know, almost like the election again.
	Yeah, a little bit.
	People were getting just crazy, crazy.
	And a lot of inaccuracies.
	Here's a quickie.
	This is Caitlin Thomas from CNN, who just, in passing, just said something which I found interesting.
	No one corrected her on it.
	Clarence Thomas was seen clapping in the room.
	Now this was at the ceremony for Kavanaugh that the ceremony is swearing in.
	Clarence Thomas was seen clapping in the room.
	I don't know if any of the other justices were, but Clarence Thomas, who of course, during his confirmation hearings, was also accused of sexual assault, was there clapping as well.
	Uh...
	I know he wasn't.
	He wasn't accused of sexual assault?
	I've noticed this, and I think I tweeted about it in my frenzy, which is that Clarence Thomas, as they brought him in, they tried to make it sound as though the whole thing about him was the same as Kavanaugh, which was...
	No, not at all.
	It was about inappropriate comments in the workplace.
	Yeah, inappropriate comments.
	Yeah, what was it?
	Pubic hair, long dong silver.
	Long dong silver, pubic hair in a Coke can, which, by the way, I totally believe...
	I do too.
	He looks like a kind of goofball.
	Anita Hill, she worked everywhere he worked.
	I think she was a fangirl.
	And then something happened between him and then she said, oh, screw this stuff.
	I think that's what happened.
	Just recollecting from back in the day.
	It wasn't sexual assault.
	And the fact that CNN, none of this surprises me.
	They're terrible news people.
	That makes it so much fun for us.
	This week in...
	No, ABC This Week, which I caught a little bit of.
	There's a lot of clipping, actually.
	They had on a quote-unquote reporter from Vice.
	And I say quote-unquote reporter because it's an ad agency, so she's probably in sales.
	There goes the Zephyr!
	Oh!
	Perfect timing.
	And the question of the protesters in the halls of the Senate and outside the Supreme Court, were any of them paid?
	Well, yeah!
	The Vice News actually spent a lot of time with the protesters over this past week.
	We saw the President say these are professional protesters paid by George Soros, etc., etc.
	By the way, we need a Soros thing from...
	Fletcher?
	Do we have that?
	By the way, this is the only duplicate clip we have.
	I have this exact same clip.
	Oh, really?
	Because it's such a good clip.
	Because this guy, the host...
	Yeah, I think it's the same clip.
	It sounds like it.
	The host is, like, adamant.
	You think the president's a jerk?
	He says everyone's paying.
	And she confirms that they were.
	Et cetera, et cetera.
	Who were these people?
	What was going on?
	A lot of them were normal people who were mad.
	Normies!
	We hung out with a group from Alaska who was very specifically talking to Lisa Murkowski.
	A lot of them were Native Americans, which also played into Lisa Murkowski's decision.
	They actually felt a lot of respect for her because she brought them into their office.
	She had a real conversation with them.
	And we also saw people who were organized.
	And that moment with Jeff Flake on the Hill, we talked to one woman who works for Ultraviolet, who was paid.
	She helped steer people in the right ways to be able to confront sinners.
	There were people who were paid by organizations like Ultraviolet to try to harness that energy in a way that would make the viral moments that we ended up seeing.
	Well, there you go.
	It admits not just were they paid, but they were paid to harness the energy to create the viral moments that we were witness to.
	PR! Thank you very much, Vice Girl.
	Yep.
	She said it right there.
	That was very revealing.
	The First Lady was asked on ABC about her thoughts, and of course this is how it is portrayed, just a little snippet.
	I support the women, and they need to be heard.
	We need to support them.
	And, you know, also men, not just women.
	Do you think men in the news that have been accused of sexual assault, sexual harassment, have been treated unfairly?
	We need to have a really hard evidence that, you know, that if you accuse of something, show the evidence.
	All right.
	Yeah, it makes nothing but sense, show the evidence.
	Yeah, hard evidence.
	So the evidence.
	Oh.
	Well, while you're on that kind of thing, we also had on Tom Perez, on the Chris Hay Show, Tom Perez, head of the Democratic National Committee.
	Yeah, he's the head of the whole party.
	Yeah, he kind of makes a little flub.
	...day in and day out.
	When we see that there are no guardrails in Washington, I mean, we know that for sure.
	There are no moderate Democrats, basically, left, moderate Republicans left in the United States.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	You know, I need to say, Tucker Carlson has been doing something very douchey for the past two nights.
	And, actually, I should probably move back a little bit.
	So, for some reason, the word mob has now become a problem.
	Mob!
	Mob, yeah.
	If you use the mob about...
	It's like thug.
	Yeah, well, exactly.
	They haven't quite made it racist yet, but they're saying people who are stopping cars in Seattle, that's not a mob.
	That was Portland.
	Portland, I'm sorry.
	People who are banging on the doors of the Supreme Court and breaking down and trying to rip it open, that's not a mob.
	That's just...
	People who are angry.
	Peaceful protesters.
	And I think this is the clip that kind of started off with Matt Lewis of the Daily Beast who made the faux pas of using the word mob on Brooke Baldwin's show on CNN. I believe it's the overreaction of the left.
	When you see people like Ted Cruz getting chased out of restaurants by a mob.
	Oh, you're not going to use the mob word here.
	Oh, it's totally a mob.
	It is without a doubt.
	There's no other word for it.
	A mob is what we saw in Charlottesville, Virginia.
	No, a mob is not what we saw chasing.
	I'm not saying what they did was right.
	What about the people who were at the Supreme Court banging on the walls?
	What do you call that?
	Civil protest?
	Or is that a mob?
	I think it's easily a mob.
	Yeah, and if it were Tea Partiers, we'd call it a mob for sure.
	Come on, let's be serious.
	Let me move past the M-word, because I do feel like that is part of the weaponization of what's happening now on the right.
	It's the M-word.
	All right, let's look at mob.
	Oh, this is a very good idea.
	Of course, we should be doing this.
	Hold on, Fred.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	Yeah.
	Uh-huh.
	Uh-huh.
	Wrong!
	It's the M-word.
	That's another verboten word.
	Write it down.
	The M-word.
	The M-word.
	So, Tucker Carlson on Fox News took this, and Hillary Clinton had done an interview right before or after she spoke at Oxford.
	And the interview was on CNN by globalist extraordinaire CFR member Christiana Amanpour.
	I realize I've always been saying...
	I've always said Anumpur, but it's Amanpur.
	The M comes first.
	And so this is what he did with it.
	Hillary Clinton is so worried, though, about how dangerous the Republican Party has become, those angry Mormon grandmothers in black bandanas you're seeing in downtown Portland smashing windows, that she no longer considers Republicans Americans or even fully human.
	According to Hillary Clinton, you no longer have to be civil to Republicans.
	You can do whatever you want to them because they deserve it.
	You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about.
	That's why I believe if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and or the Senate, that's when civility can start again.
	Yeah, when we win, civility can return.
	So there you have it, the perfect distillation.
	There's the most recent Democratic presidential candidate, the leader of her party by default, endorsing viciousness openly against her political opponents.
	See, but this is out of context.
	And as I've said many times, whenever something is viral, because this clip of her saying that, not with the Tucker Carlson bit, but this clip of...
	Because that's where he gets his material from, or his producers, is from online.
	It was completely viral.
	Everyone's playing this.
	Oh, she's approving.
	Go...
	Mess up some Republicans.
	But really, in context of what came next, or the entire interview, which actually I pulled a couple other clips from, because I thought she said some really egregious stuff in the interview, this was not it.
	This is just her way of saying you've got to vote.
	And here's how she kind of wrapped it around.
	Here we go.
	When the Republican Senate denied The right of President Obama to have his nominee for the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, heard.
	I think you even wrote that they stole a justice from the Democratic Party.
	Well, I think they did.
	I mean, to keep a Supreme Court seat open for a year, to deny a distinguished jurist, they could have voted him down.
	They could have said, well, for ideological reasons, philosophical reasons, we're not going to vote for him.
	But no, they stonewalled.
	And that was such a breach of Senate ethics and the constitutional responsibility of the Senate to advise and consent on nominations that you cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy What you stand for, what you care about.
	That's why I believe if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and or the Senate, that's when civility can start again.
	So when you're dealing with an ideological party that is driven by the lust for power, that is funded by corporate interests who want a government that does its bidding, you can be civil.
	But you can't overcome what they intend to do unless you win elections.
	So if you take the whole thing in context, he's really riling people up.
	Yeah, she says you got to win elections.
	It has nothing to do with being a mob.
	I'm not going to argue.
	I could have had that clip.
	I listened to it and I decided that it was just like just tuckered.
	But he's doing it for two days in a row and I'm tired of it.
	It's riling people up.
	Well, here's what I'm thinking.
	It's going on there.
	We've watched this show since its inception.
	We've watched him, you know, get to certain modes and, you know, get people on and then attack them.
	And then everyone got a clue and nobody comes on.
	And he's had to readjust his model.
	The formula for the show has changed at least twice, maybe three times.
	And this is another attempt at changing it again to get something that works that doesn't end up making him be by himself or people not come on the show.
	I don't know.
	I think this particular model where he goes off on something a little minor in this case or exaggerated, which is the way you would have it.
	Yeah.
	I think this is just another attempt at getting a better formula.
	I'd rather see where it goes.
	It's like he's using O'Reilly's old fire.
	Yeah, and to me, it's off-putting.
	It's like, this is one of the few cable news shows I'll watch because he does have interesting people from the left come on.
	And although he always is asking the same stupid question, but this just went too far.
	There was some other stuff in this Hillary interview I'd like to share, though.
	So she had a number of, I found, rather remarkable little bits to say, of course, with this tour that's coming up, this speaking tour, which she also addresses.
	Yeah, the pre-20, Hillary 2020.
	Yeah, she's running.
	She is running.
	She's running.
	Duh.
	She's just sitting there, just waiting for the opportunity to say, well, seeing as you guys have nothing, I guess I'm your only hope.
	Yep.
	She's the new Adlai Stevenson.
	But she's got problems with the white women.
	White women!
	White people!
	White women!
	Last night, President Trump had a sort of ceremony for now Justice Kavanaugh at the White House, and he apologized on behalf of the American people for the immense amount of pain and harm that he said that the judge had been put through by this system.
	What do you make of that?
	And what message, including the president's mocking of Christine Blasey Ford for her allegations, what message does that send to women?
	And remember, women went for President Trump in 2016.
	White women.
	White women.
	All women went for me.
	All women.
	Look, white women have been voting against Democratic presidential candidates for decades now.
	Really?
	Yeah, because you're douches.
	Wait, didn't white women all come out for Obama?
	Am I missing something?
	Ah, good point.
	Please!
	White women were in love with the guy.
	White women.
	Why is it...
	The white vote has only been won twice in the last 60 years.
	My husband being one of the two.
	Lyndon Johnson being the other.
	So it's not a surprise.
	It's a disappointment.
	But it's not a surprise.
	Those guys must be racist then.
	So why is it disappointing that whites don't vote for your white husband?
	Whatever she's saying, she sounds racist.
	I don't know.
	It's part of a grand scheme identity politics thing.
	It dissuade the whites from doing anything as if there's no white.
	The whole thing is...
	I don't get it because I think it's counterproductive.
	I don't think it's working.
	It hasn't shown any signs of working.
	I don't know what she's thinking.
	She's just...
	Shooting herself in the foot yet again.
	Well, but already she's alienated white men.
	White men are just the patriarchy.
	We're the problem.
	Now white women are no good.
	This makes little sense to me, but let's talk about the Russians!
	If we don't get smarter, and I include myself in this, you know, and I did not know the extent to which there was Russian interference.
	I knew there had been some in my election.
	I didn't understand the pressures from the right wing, frankly, on Jim Comey that would cause him to interfere in the election to my detriment.
	Ooh, you hear that?
	Interfere in the election to my detriment?
	Mm.
	Hello, Jim Comey.
	Those were things that were almost unimaginable.
	Who, when setting up a presidential campaign, would say, oh, and don't forget, we have to worry about the Russians manipulating the outcome.
	Oh, I like this.
	This is more apology.
	Like, if I was setting up a presidential campaign, I'd have to think about the Russians?
	If I had known this, I would have won.
	Yeah, if I had only known about the Russians, then I would have won.
	Stop the Russians!
	We have to worry about the Russians manipulating the outcome.
	We have to worry about the FBI director intervening into it.
	We have to worry about WikiLeaks, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Russian intelligence.
	What?
	Yeah, wholly owned subsidiary.
	Since when?
	Since they paid off Julian Assange.
	Didn't you hear about the share transaction?
	It was a reverse merger.
	They backed into a shell.
	There's actually no evidence that indicates that.
	It's a wholly owned subsidiary of Russian intelligence.
	I mean, who would have thought that those were the challenges we face?
	So we do have to get tougher and smarter and stronger.
	Not cross the line into lying, but there's enough truth and facts that should be more widely known.
	It's very interesting what she says there.
	Like the lie she just told about Julian Assange?
	Maybe that's why she said that.
	I was trying to figure out, you know, why are you saying, oh, don't cross the line, don't lie about stuff, but there's enough, and you're right, maybe it was about Assange and WikiLeaks that she felt the need to say that.
	I'm not really lying, it's just enough facts and proof to show that it's a wholly owned subsidiary of the Russian government.
	Not what these Republicans stand for, whose bidding they are doing, and where Trump really comes from.
	And at some point, Queens?
	The accumulation of evidence about how Trump and his father manipulated their business, how they...
	Oh, please.
	The billionaire Fred?
	Oh, wait.
	This is really rich, to coin a phrase, coming from her.
	From her, Ms.
	Clinton Foundation, tax dodgers of the century.
	But listen to this.
	...business, how they, in so many ways, broke, you know, at least...
	Spirit, if not the letter of tax laws.
	Whoa!
	John, whenever I do my taxes, I always think in the spirit.
	Like, the spirit is to give more money to the government.
	Isn't that the spirit?
	What is the spirit of the tax law?
	Yeah!
	Tax law is no spirit!
	It's complete slave control.
	It's not spirit.
	How he did business with the mafia, how he's indebted to the Russians.
	At some point, that has to matter, but it won't matter unless Democrats keep driving this message about what's really at stake with the presidency of someone who admires dictators, who clearly has authoritarian tendencies.
	Now, she went on quite a tangent, and I clipped down a lot of stuff here, but now she's asking a very important question about this dictatorship around the world and the nationalists and the far right, and she has some questions about this.
	Why is it when the world, and particularly the West, is by any measure richer, safer, healthier, stronger, What is giving rise to these yearnings not for greater freedom and for a democracy that really lives up to its name where you don't try to throw voters off the rolls but you want everyone to vote.
	What is it that is motivating large numbers of people to seek The kind of leadership that will limit freedom, starting with the press, academia, political parties.
	And why is it that so many on the right in the United States and in Europe look to Putin, a known authoritarian...
	They're all looking to Putin, John.
	Nobody's looking to Putin.
	Hey, Putin, what are you doing?
	Let me look at you.
	Vladimir, what are you doing today?
	I have to emulate it.
	How many on the right, in the United States and in Europe, look to Putin?
	Who looks to Putin?
	Everybody on the right, including the Europeans.
	How many on the right, in the United States and in Europe, look to Putin?
	A known authoritarian, someone who has journalists and political opponents murdered with impunity.
	What?
	What does that mean in that context, with impunity?
	What does that mean?
	Well, you know what?
	I think just because we want to...
	There we go.
	Impunity.
	Define impunity.
	Because he kills journalists with impunity.
	Does that mean like on Monday morning?
	It means the exemption from punishment or freedom from the injurious consequences of an action.
	Oh, okay.
	So he kills journalists without getting punished for it.
	Yeah, he doesn't get punished, although he has to take a lot of grief from her, or that's kind of punishment.
	No.
	What is going on in the minds of 21st century Americans and Europeans that would lead them to say, you know, I just want to have security, stability, and I think we need a strong leader.
	Well, hold on a second.
	Is that a bad thing?
	I'm asking you a question.
	Well, the way she puts it, it's not because you do want a strong leader.
	Isn't that exactly what everyone wants?
	Security?
	Everybody says they want a strong leader.
	They bitch about Trump being insane and on hand.
	She's not a strong leader.
	Let me hear it again.
	That would lead them to say, you know, I just want to have security, stability, and I think we need a strong leader.
	Security, stability, and a strong leader.
	That seems kind of like what everybody wants.
	She ran on that platform.
	Now, some of it is traced to discriminatory feelings, prejudice, bias, that other people are getting ahead at a greater rate or somehow to their disadvantage of me.
	And so people look and say, well...
	These cultural changes, whether it's, you know, a woman's right to choose or gay marriage or whatever it might be, that somehow they find threatening.
	And so there are cultural forces at work that are now spilling over into political allegiance that is often described as tribalism.
	So, yeah, I want my freedom, but limit hers.
	Take away her right to choose.
	He's just rambling.
	You know what?
	I shouldn't have to sell a cake or provide a service to a gay person because that impinges on my freedom.
	And all of a sudden, you start to see the atomization and the fragmentation.
	All right.
	Let's see.
	What do I have left here?
	Oh, yeah.
	This was atomization, fragmentation.
	I don't know what she's talking about.
	She's completely off the rails.
	She's just using alliteration everywhere.
	Now, she's very aware of what's going on with the China social credit score system.
	something everybody's aware of, I don't think.
	It hasn't really been subject to any real deep analysis.
	They think it's a good idea.
	The Chinese are engaged in constructing a surveillance state that will surveil everyone.
	You don't have to live in western China.
	You can be in Beijing or Shanghai or any other part of China where the Han Chinese live.
	And you're now going to be subjected to facial recognition, to something they call a social credit score, where you get points from your government for doing things your government approves of, and you get, apparently, demerits and maybe even punished for doing things your government doesn't approve of.
	You can tell she's liking the idea.
	This is interesting.
	I'm digging it.
	Who's making those decisions?
	There is a very concerted effort by this current Chinese government to prevent the internet from influencing opinion inside China.
	That's exactly what you want, too!
	Now, as they develop these tools, and they're very sophisticated...
	They're all very sophisticated.
	...they're going to sell them.
	And it won't necessarily just be the Russians who are competing to apply such tools.
	The Iranians...
	The North Koreans, who already have a police state, can actually impose even greater control through this.
	Other countries that are electing populist or nationalist leaders who are creating authoritarian regimes, even if they were first elected.
	So it's not going to only affect the Chinese people.
	She's got her checkbook ready, from what I can tell.
	It's like, this is great.
	I can buy that from the Chinese.
	What does she bring up the Han Chinese for?
	Well, because the question was a little more involved and about Muslims in China and how the Chinese are putting them in internment camps and stuff.
	Yeah.
	But I think the only thing we all really want to know, final clip, is how about the speaking tour?
	What is she going to do on the speaking tour?
	We know the short answer, which is prepare for and deploy her presidential campaign part trois.
	But let's hear it from the horse's mouth.
	Before you play, I should mention she's looking for playbooks.
	And I think she thinks this speaking tour will give her the kind of...
	Who had that as a playbook previously?
	Reagan.
	Reagan gave a speaking tour on behalf of General Electric, which is a very conservative speaking tour.
	It was called The Speech.
	And the speech was used as a model for his later speeches.
	Then he developed the speech over a number.
	But I think he did hundreds of lectures, hundreds of tours.
	He was floating all over the place.
	And the idea was to test the waters for his kind of conservative thinking.
	And I think that's the playbook.
	Okay.
	To that end, it appears that you and your husband, President Clinton, are going to go on a big 13-city-wide speaking engagement around the United States, just being announced.
	What is it that you plan to say?
	What are you going to talk about?
	Well, we were asked to do this.
	Apparently there's some appetite for it.
	But it's going to be both personal, which is something people are very interested in.
	Do you think that people will heckle her when she does this?
	No, they won't allow it.
	Yeah, but you can buy a ticket.
	You can just buy a ticket like everybody else if you have the money.
	I think the lowest ticket on the tour is...
	You think it's going to be paid for?
	They're just going to do it to make money?
	Oh, yeah.
	The lowest ticket is $75 and the highest, I think, is $700.
	Well, I would like to see him heckled, although it's less likely because it's not the heckling type of people that are against him.
	No, you get kicked out, but it would make for some great viral video, viral moments.
	It probably wouldn't make for any videos.
	It probably, you know, who knows?
	Whatever the case, I think there's another problem with this speaking tour.
	Do you want to hear the rest of the tour?
	What it's about?
	I do, but I want to mention this too.
	Which is that, how does she speak with Bill?
	Bill is the great speaker.
	Speaker, he'll just hog the mic.
	Ah, well, she does.
	She brings this up.
	Well, listen to it.
	Obviously, I'll talk about my grandchildren.
	But I think from my perspective, it will be also answering questions about what's happening in our country and the world.
	Both Bill and I are deeply concerned.
	Earlier in the interview, you quoted what Rahm Emanuel said about Bill.
	And You know, Bill had to be incredibly strong, first to get elected, then to get re-elected, and to survive.
	And it was not easy by any means, obviously.
	But he really believes that Democrats have to be tougher and have to stand up to the bullying and the intimidation.
	What?!
	By the way, I think if and when she runs, I'm pretty sure she will, they do this speaking tour, and I presume they'll time it pretty close towards an announcement, she can still pull off the old Kill Bill trick just before the election.
	Well, it'll be his swan song, you know?
	The problem with the last time around, we have this theory on the show, and people, you know, we haven't been called out on it for being gruesome or ghoulish, but we could have been.
	We had predicted that Bill would have been somehow, something would have happened to him before the election.
	No, remember, the full theory is he would die of a heart attack, but it would be in the saddle.
	With a couple of hookers.
	Well, that's not the full theory.
	That's a funny version of what you'd think is funny.
	It was your funny.
	It probably was.
	But I wasn't serious.
	But getting him killed so he could draw a lot of attention to how he balanced the budget and all this stuff, that was going to be done if she was losing the election.
	But there was never any indication that she was going to lose.
	She was going to win right until the last day.
	So she never got to pull this stunt.
	Well, it could be used as a precursor now.
	I'm just thinking.
	It just struck me.
	So I think he'll have things to say about it.
	You can't do it.
	I don't want to say this is the same debate we had before.
	The timing is everything.
	Yes.
	You can't do it too soon.
	No.
	But that all depends on the tour.
	I don't have the dates of the tour.
	And by the way, this tour, it maybe could happen during the tour because it's going to be apparent that you can't tour around with Bill.
	You just look like his sidekick.
	Bill.
	But also, Bill is speaking pretty slow these days.
	Yeah, but he gets all jacked up in front of an audience.
	He can move along.
	I've seen these guys.
	I've I went to, not to go too far off base, but I got to watch Arnold Toynbee give a speech once.
	Who's that?
	And I later tracked him down so I'd get him to autograph a book.
	Who is Arnold Toynbee?
	Arnold Toynbee is one of the greatest historians ever.
	Oh.
	And he was in his 80s or something when he gave this speech.
	He gives this rousing speech about, you know, world change and everything else.
	And then when you go to meet him, the guy's walking dead.
	Yeah.
	So some guys are pretty good at jacking themselves up in front of an audience.
	Yeah, some guys are like Weinstein.
	Oh no, I'm sorry, jacking up.
	Up to the bullying and the intimidation.
	So I think he'll have things to say about his own experience and how it applies here.
	See, it was hot.
	I will certainly have a lot to say about what's going on in the world today based on...
	Not only my Secretary of State years, but my travel.
	And my book, What Happened, which came out in paperback, which was an afterward where I talk about these threats to democracy.
	I don't want it to be too serious because I think a lot of people will be coming just to see us, to show their support.
	No, support for what?
	Support, support for...
	Get on the mailing list.
	To show their support.
	The support for what?
	To support her income?
	No.
	They're showing support for what?
	Support for what?
	Because she's running!
	Came out in paperback, which has an afterword where I talk about these threats to democracy.
	I don't want it to be too serious because I think a lot of people will be coming just to see us to show their support, to be part of a gathering of like-minded folks.
	But I do want to leave some thoughts, as I tried to do in the speech today, about what each of us can do.
	You say that you're going to talk about the difficulties that your husband went through, that you went through.
	Obviously, you're going to be prepared to have questions about that moment in 1998, the impeachment, the allegations of sexual harassment against your own husband.
	Are you prepared?
	Yeah.
	Well, go ahead.
	I thought they were going to talk about the troubles you went through when he threw out his back-stealing furniture from the White House after they left.
	I told Tina that story last night.
	She says, what?
	I said, yeah.
	Didn't they take China and stuff?
	They took all kinds of stuff.
	Whatever they could get.
	Did they give it back?
	Whatever happened to that?
	Yeah, they got busted for it until they return it.
	To answer those questions, is he prepared to answer them?
	And how do you see that similar or different from what President Trump is being accused of and Kavanaugh and others today?
	Okay, so now this is interesting.
	Let's just review.
	How is what Bill Clinton was accused of, namely rape, rape, rape, he was accused of rape, And inappropriate behavior in the Oval Office.
	To me, not impeachable.
	You know, dog.
	No, but it was the lie that got him impeached.
	Yes, it was the lie that got him impeached.
	Depends on what the meaning of the word is, is.
	But, how does it differ what he was accused of, namely rape, from Trump and Kavanaugh?
	Has Trump been accused of rape?
	Yeah.
	If you remember that bullcrap 13-year-old thing because he went with Jeffrey Epstein, Clinton's buddy, on the island supposedly.
	I mean, this is a lot of nonsense.
	Well, but they were women who actually said he raped me.
	Kavanaugh?
	That's Clinton.
	Also Trump.
	Who?
	The woman who was on the island.
	That was never documented.
	It was just a phony story that they printed.
	Okay, thanks.
	Just go with the flow.
	Okay.
	Kavanaugh.
	Now, was any rape accusation there?
	No, he just rolled over on somebody.
	Let's discredit the Avenatti accusation, since everyone else did, except for the media.
	All right.
	But is it different?
	...of sexual harassment against your own husband.
	Are you prepared to answer those questions?
	Is he prepared to answer them?
	And how do you see that similar or different from what President Trump is being accused of and Kavanaugh and others today?
	Well, there's a very significant difference.
	And that is the intense Long-lasting, partisan investigation that was conducted in the 90s.
	Great answer.
	What the hell did she say?
	What does that mean?
	The difference between what Bill was accused of and Trump and Kavanaugh and men like that is that Bill went through a very rough investigation.
	Ha ha ha!
	It's almost too delicious to believe, my friends.
	I mean, that is the land of unconfirmed.
	Yes, we came, we saw, we died.
	There you go.
	So she's running.
	Yeah.
	She's already circumventing questions like that.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Well, we knew she was going to run, and the Democrats have got to be completely freaked out about this because they know that she's not going to win.
	You can't keep running the same candidate.
	They didn't vote her in the first time for a lot of good reasons.
	Yes, but John— She's going to get less votes this time.
	No, but they're going to change the electoral college.
	At best, discredit it.
	No, of course they can't.
	But this talk, what the former New York banker was bitching about, this is really ratcheted up.
	What did he bet you about the Electoral College?
	The Electoral College.
	Wanting to run the country?
	Yes!
	Or isn't thinking straight, and now Edison Research, for the upcoming midterm, Edison Research will provide, by the way, they give this news, they give this to a lot of people, will provide exit polls and will tabulate the national vote across every county in the United States, and they will be doing that for ABC, CBS, CNN, and NBC News departments.
	You see, they're going to be reporting on the popular vote again.
	Here's what's going to happen.
	And I would include California in this.
	She's going to lose the popular vote.
	She's going to lose both the popular vote and the electoral vote, and it's going to be moot.
	And because no one's going to vote for her.
	I mean, you can't keep, she's just be a third time she runs and she's not effective.
	She's an ineffective candidate.
	She has the wrong people around her.
	She makes the wrong decisions.
	They're all just a bunch of lunatics working for her.
	They're no good.
	And there's no way she can win.
	It's going to get worse and worse.
	The thing they've got to do is they've got to run somebody who can beat Trump and they can't find anyone.
	And she's a lizard.
	Well, she probably is a lizard.
	That's true.
	She doesn't sweat.
	Just to add that.
	Hey, I got a lot of feedback from our Instagram Adderall convo.
	Yeah.
	And very little people – well, a couple agreed and just went, oh my gosh, you're so right about Instagram and Adderall being a perfect pairing.
	But what I got the most response for – and I'm talking 15, maybe 20 different emails – Is people listening to podcasts, in particular this podcast, at high speed And I had wondered, you know, do people on...
	Are they on Adderall?
	Is that why they have to listen to it at a higher speed?
	I can answer conclusively that people who listen to the show on high speed are not necessarily also taking Adderall or similar amphetamine.
	However, people who are on an amphetamine, without fail in my...
	Minor poll, all of them listen at fast speed.
	And the apparent optimum Adderall speed of this podcast is 1.75 times.
	And I got a lot of people talking about it and how it helps them and it's really a miracle for them.
	Which I don't want to take away any of that from anybody.
	And I'm sure if you need to get a test done, you take some speed.
	Yeah!
	Hell yeah, you get it done.
	Well, you're not going to do as well.
	Well, I'm not...
	This is probably why we get people that, hey, what did you say about the, you know, what was the name of that again?
	Why don't you rewind it and listen to yourself?
	Well, people ask for clarifications, people misunderstand us.
	Yeah, it's all because of this.
	Yeah.
	Anyway, 1.75.
	I was trying to think how can I do something with production or maybe just release a faster version for everybody or just release it faster for the Adderall generation.
	There you go.
	This is the No Agenda Show.
	The podcast for the Adderall generation.
	Yeah.
	Just a thought.
	Just a thought.
	So we have a couple of things going on.
	There's some meme changes.
	Are you done with Hillary?
	I hope so.
	Hell yeah.
	Well, first of all, Haley, Nikki Haley resigned, which brought up a bunch of speculation about her being the one behind the memo.
	Yeah, I don't think so.
	I don't think so either.
	She did bitch and moan about Trump early on, but she didn't, you know, I don't think so.
	Yeah, but here's the rundown.
	This is a Democracy Now!
	rundown on Haley resigning.
	Nikki Haley, the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, has announced she's resigning her post at the end of the year.
	The former South Carolina governor was one of the few women in Trump's cabinet.
	She gave no reason for her departure.
	There's plenty of cabinets with no women.
	Yeah, but this is democracy now, which you single-handedly support.
	Which you single-handedly support.
	They have DeVos, they have the woman as the head of Homeland Security, they have Nikki Haley.
	How about Gina Haskell from CIA? That's another one.
	Well, she's not in the cabinet, though, I don't think.
	Oh, right.
	No.
	But there's that other, that Chinese woman, and that just...
	The Chinese woman?
	Yeah, there's a Chinese woman that's the wife of, what's his name, the Speaker of the House, that guy.
	He's got a...
	She's Asian.
	I don't know if she's Chinese.
	Can we think about five women in this, Kevin?
	Anyway, go on.
	Just keep playing.
	Nikki Haley, the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, has announced she's resigning her post at the end of the year.
	The former South Carolina governor was one of the few women in Trump's cabinet.
	She gave no reason for her departure.
	Haley made the surprise announcement at the White House Tuesday alongside President Trump.
	During her remarks, she praised the president for politics.
	But I'm most excited.
	Look at the two years.
	Look at what has happened in two years with the United States on foreign policy.
	Now the United States is respected.
	Countries may not like what we do, but they respect what we do.
	They know that if we say we're going to do something, we follow it through.
	And the President proved that.
	Whether it was with the chemical weapons in Syria.
	Whether it's with NATO, saying that other countries have to pay their share.
	I mean, whether it's the trade deals, which have been amazing.
	They get that the President means business, and they follow through with that.
	But then if you look at just these two years at the UN, we've cut $1.3 billion in the UN's budget.
	We've made it stronger.
	We've made it more efficient.
	South Sudan, we got an arms embargo, which was a long time coming.
	Three North Korean sanctions packages, which were the largest in a generation, done in a way that we could really work towards denuclearizing North Korea.
	The Iran deal, bringing attention to the world that every country needs to understand.
	You can't overlook all of the bad things they're doing.
	You have to see them for the threat that they are.
	I think you look at the anti-Israel bias and the strength...
	Encourage that the president showed in moving the embassy and showing the rest of the world we will put our embassy where we want to put our embassy.
	During Nikki Haley's time as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, the United States withdrew from the Paris Climate Accord, the U.N. Human Rights Council, the Iran nuclear deal, UNRWA. The U.N. Agency that provides humanitarian aid to Palestinians and UNESCO, the U.N. Educational and Cultural Agency.
	The Trump administration also threatened to sanction judges on the International Criminal Court if it went after Israel or the United States for war crimes.
	And the U.S. refused to sign the Global Compact on Migration, a set of non-binding rules for safe, orderly, and regular migration.
	While Nikki Haley did not say why she was resigning, she dismissed speculation she'll be running for president in 2020.
	I don't see what the big deal is.
	A couple of stabs at the end.
	It was all globalist crap.
	Lionel had a funny bit on her.
	Lionel from RT. I haven't heard him for a while.
	Nikki Hanley always gave me the impression, whenever I heard her, she sounded like the assistant principal reading the lunch menu on the speaker.
	You know in the morning?
	I'm going to read this paper, and I don't know what it means.
	I'm just going to read it.
	Good morning, school.
	Today we have fish sticks and tater tots.
	I think you nailed that one.
	That's good.
	I'll give you that one.
	Give you a borderline clip for that, actually.
	Oh, thank you.
	I don't really deserve it.
	It's one of our producers made that.
	So they had a, you know, somebody came up, well, it's because, you know, Haley hates Trump and after the Kavanaugh thing, she quit.
	But it turns out that she actually told Trump six months ago that she was going to quit.
	Yeah, that's what I heard, too.
	Yeah, so that's bull crap.
	So here's who's taking over.
	It looks like it's going to be Dina Powell.
	That's the best estimate everyone has.
	And they keep running her out there as kind of a flyer all of a sudden.
	I never heard of this woman.
	Now she's in the news every which way.
	Donald Trump also said one possible candidate is Dina Powell, an Egyptian-born Goldman Sachs executive and Trump's former deputy national security advisor.
	Powell said to be close to the president as well as his daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared Kushner.
	While at the White House, Powell focused in part on U.S. relations with Israel and Saudi Arabia.
	She attended President Trump's first meeting with the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman.
	NBC reports she was also involved with overseeing a $200 billion arms deal between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia.
	So she looks like a shoe-in because she's a sales girl.
	Yeah, from the Goldmans.
	From the Goldmans.
	Yeah.
	Well, that's what it is, right?
	It's a sales job.
	That's exactly what it is.
	Yeah, of course it is.
	Most of these jobs are sales jobs.
	The way we do, we're a company of businessmen.
	One of our producers was saying, and trying to get in an argument, which I don't do, said, no, this was a deal with the Republicans to push Kavanaugh through only if Haley resigned.
	What?
	Yeah, to me that sounded like a pretty bad deal.
	Supreme Court justice for getting rid of the almost ceremonial role of a sales job.
	Yeah.
	I mean, there's plenty of sales people.
	Who comes up with this stuff?
	Oh, one of our producers knew that.
	I can't wait to hear what you guys talk about!
	I don't think it doesn't make any sense.
	Let's try to keep it within the realm of possibility.
	But it does bring us to the Koshugi thing.
	Ah, Khashoggi.
	Now, Khashoggi is a very famous name.
	Khashoggi is, and he is directly related to Adnan Khashoggi, who was probably one of the most famous and, at the time, richest arms dealers from Saudi Arabia.
	Yeah.
	Rumored to be worth about $4 billion at one point.
	And this guy is, you know, the reason why I know this is I looked into him because, you know, they say, well...
	This is really important.
	It's a Washington Post reporter!
	Washington Post columnist!
	Wappo, Wappo, Wappo, Wappo, Wappo, Wappo, Wappo, Wappo, Wappo.
	I'm like, a little too much Wappo.
	Yeah, I agree.
	I have a quick rundown that you can go into what you discovered.
	Saudi journalist NBC rap.
	Tonight, new images on Turkish television released by authorities there, showing an alleged 15-man Saudi hit team arriving in Istanbul on two private planes, then leaving their hotels.
	Their suspected target, a Saudi dissident, Washington Post writer Jamal Khashoggi, last seen entering the Saudi consulate in Istanbul the same day.
	Khashoggi?
	That was pretty funny.
	Khashoggi?
	Isn't it Khashoggi?
	I mean, that's what I've always...
	Yes, Khashoggi.
	Khashoggi.
	A Saudi dissident, Washington Post writer Jamal Khashoggi, last seen entering the Saudi consulate in Istanbul the same day.
	Some Turkish officials tell NBC News they believe he was killed inside.
	Today, the White House demanding answers from the Saudi rulers after an emotional appeal from his fiancée.
	We're in contact with her now, and we want to bring her to the White House.
	It's a very sad situation.
	It's a very bad situation, and we want to get to the bottom of it.
	Khashoggi is a leading critic of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the young leader closely allied with the president and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
	Kushner, National Security Advisor John Bolton, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo have all talked to the Crown Prince about Khashoggi as pressure builds for answers.
	If this man was murdered in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, if it did happen, it would be hell to pay.
	The Saudi leaders denying any involvement in the journalist's disappearance.
	So, without going too in-depth into a lot of this, I can just kind of abstract it all into...
	Initially, I was thinking, well, somebody wants some kind of conflict with Turkey.
	Or maybe we want some kind of conflict with Saudi Arabia.
	And the further I get into it, it looks like, and let's wait for the bills to hit the floor or to be proposed or become public, I think they're looking for some kind of Magnitsky-type act against Saudi Arabia.
	Someone is trying, you know, Trump is buddies.
	There's a whole bunch of reasons for that, although in the global warming segment we'll talk a little bit more about it.
	The Magnitsky Act is where you can just kind of have a bill that says these guys can't come in here.
	Well, there's a number of fishy aspects to this.
	Why do you need 15 guys to kill a guy?
	To me, it's all fabricated.
	The way this is told and explained is fabricated.
	I think the whole thing is fabricated.
	And why would you do it in a council if you want to assassinate the guy?
	It doesn't seem like a great place.
	No.
	Now, MI6 supposedly came in with their analysis.
	Did you hear that supposedly they killed him, chopped him up into little bits?
	Yeah, and then carried him out in his suitcases.
	Suitcases dripping with blood, I guess.
	I have no idea.
	So they sent 15 guys in to get him into counseling.
	They tricked him into going in there for some paperwork.
	His girlfriend and his fiancee Of course.
	So when doesn't she go in?
	No, no, no.
	She's going to stay outside.
	So that doesn't make any sense.
	And so he goes in and then he never comes out, although we don't know that for sure.
	Maybe he came out disguised.
	Maybe there's a million things that could have happened.
	We don't know.
	We haven't seen all the footage.
	They say, well, he left.
	Well, there's nothing to prove that.
	And then, but she's still outside.
	And the whole thing is so fishy.
	And it makes no sense.
	You don't need 15 guys to And they keep making a point of that, and they came in two private planes, like, okay, good for you.
	Let me give you some details on Khashoggi.
	By the way, I just want to mention this last thing.
	MI6, according to one other report, this thing that was in the Washington Post was...
	Who knows who was behind it?
	The guy who wrote it up does a lot of security stuff.
	The MI6, oh no, they grabbed him.
	They're going to do a rendition.
	I don't know how they're going to get him out.
	They're going to do a rendition, so they injected him with something to knock him out and it killed him.
	That's the one, the MI6 interpretation.
	Because it makes so much sense.
	Well, I'll tell you why they're mad at him.
	He did flee the country, Saudi Arabia.
	Let me see.
	In December 2016, The Independent, citing a report from Middle East Eye, said Khalil had been banned by Saudi Arabian authorities from publishing or appearing on television for criticizing U.S. President-elect Donald Trump.
	Khashoggi also criticized Saudi-led blockade against Qatar.
	Khashoggi has followed Osama bin Laden's career since the 1980s, had interviewed him several times.
	He knew bin Laden during his formative years as a radical Islamist.
	Both families are intertwined.
	Interviewed him in Afghanistan in 87 during the fight against the Soviet troops.
	He also met bin Laden in Tora Bora and the last...
	Time was in Sudan in 1995.
	It is reported Khashoggi once tried to persuade bin Laden to quit violence.
	Could you quit violence?
	Quit violence.
	But I think this is clearly someone pushing against the Saudis.
	And you know what?
	When we get to the global warming segment, it could easily be Trump himself who wants to, although this seems a little far-fetched for even him.
	To come up with something like this, but there's a lot at play with the Saudis at the moment.
	But first, I'd like to thank you for your courage to say in the morning to you, the man who put the sea in cracker, John C. DeVore.
	In the morning to you, Mr.
	Adam Curry.
	In the morning to all ships at sea, boots on the ground, feet in the air, subs in the water, and all the day.
	And in the morning, everybody, in our troll room.
	Hello, trolls.
	NoagendaStream.com, where you can listen live.
	We've got our troll room right there.
	You don't even have to identify yourself.
	You can be completely anonymous.
	Be a troll.
	Come on by the troll room.
	Be a troll.
	And we want to thank...
	Be a troll.
	Be a troll.
	All the world loves a troll.
	What?
	A little hint there for somebody.
	In the morning to Martin J.J. Good to have that name back on my list.
	Martin J.J. has created many fine pieces of artwork and saved the show in many ways with his always running backup recording systems when something breaks down in the studio.
	By the way, that's only happened on Mac so far.
	Martin did the artwork for episode 1075.
	The title of that was CIA Paid Me.
	And this was nice.
	We had a lot to choose from again.
	But this was the little icon for the Smart News app, which we laughed about the commercial, and he incorporated the No Agenda logo and wrote on it, really smart news.
	It was a pretty piece.
	It made a lot of sense, and it was great to have Martin J.J. back on the list.
	And we thank all of our artists.
	We love your artwork.
	It is a part of the value for value system.
	People like the recognition.
	Also, you know, throughout the network, our value network, we have noagendashop.com where the guys there are printing up t-shirts and mugs and other paraphernalia with this artwork and they split the profits a third for the show, a third for them, a third for the artists.
	It's fantastic.
	Noagendaartgenerator.com.
	Again, highly appreciated.
	And with that, we also get a lot of value from people who send us money to keep the show going.
	It's one of the main ways you can support the work.
	It's been working for 10, 11 years.
	Are you still looking for your spreadsheet?
	I can't stall much more than that.
	No, I'm not.
	I know I got the spreadsheet up, but the problem is I'm looking at this last, the anonymous one, the line 9, and I'm trying to decide.
	Oh, here it is.
	Okay.
	I'm set.
	Okay.
	I'm ready to go.
	Brandon Gamache is our top, he's the executive producer of everybody else's associates.
	And he, or Gamache, in Stanwood, Washington, $333.33.
	Greetings, grand creators of digital entertainment excellence.
	I hope this donation finds you in good health and spirit.
	On this day 33 years ago, I was given the gift of life, and after 33 revolutions around the sun, I'm pleased to say that your 33 revolutions around the sun would be 33 years.
	I am pleased to say that yours is truly the best podcast in the parts of the universe I have been so blessed to observe.
	Being that today is my 33rd birthday, I thought it only fitting to celebrate my involvement with the new Agenda Cult of Consciousness with a 33333.33 donation and offerings of fentanyl and Four Loko for the round table menu.
	What is Four Loko?
	I don't know.
	Fentanyl, I know, but fentanyl and Four Loko?
	It's something Washington they sell up there.
	I have no idea.
	It's something they sell up there.
	I've never heard of Four Loko.
	Do you get that with your fentanyl?
	Is that typical?
	I don't know.
	It doesn't sound healthy.
	I gave a shout out to my smoking hot girlfriend, Sky, who makes these arduous trips around the sun worthwhile.
	I want to thank you, John and Adam, for the hard work that you do, as well as the entire No Agenda community for everything they contribute, even all the douchebags.
	No karma necessary, but I think a 33 is the magic number jingle would be a nice bow to top this gift.
	Cheers!
	Nice way to celebrate your birthday.
	Thank you.
	You're also on the list for this segment.
	And the Four Loko is caffeine and malt liquor.
	Thanks, Trollroom.
	Dirty three, that's the magic number.
	Troll number!
	It's the magic number.
	You've got karma.
	Karma.
	John Boland in Brockport, New York, $250.
	And he says, thanks for meeting me for a great meal.
	Well, you're welcome.
	Was that to me or to you?
	Oh, I don't know.
	It must be...
	I just...
	I don't remember.
	I don't remember.
	I don't know either.
	Maybe it was the guy sitting at the table next to you.
	Okay.
	He needs a don't eat me, two to the head scream, karma for Tina and her family.
	He must have met with you.
	Um...
	Hold on.
	Oh, this is John.
	Yeah, he's been...
	No, he's been trying to meet with me.
	He's in Austin for a conference, and it's just...
	We've had a kind of a...
	With Tina's sister, we've had a lot of...
	Just...
	It's been a...
	It's not been a meeting kind of week.
	Oh, okay.
	So I haven't...
	But he's...
	I think he leaves today, so I apologize.
	Well, thank you very much.
	We appreciate the support of the show.
	Don't eat me, Hillary Clinton!
	You've got karma.
	You missed a two to the head.
	Oh, jeez.
	There you go.
	Sir James of the Mountains, $314 Canadian.
	Happy belated Scandinavian Thanksgiving to my two favorite turkeys.
	Hey-ho!
	Love and light.
	Goat karma, please.
	You've got...
	I keep him at $233.33 and he claims that's 314 Canadian.
	Well, wait a minute.
	Doesn't he become an executive producer then?
	Isn't that part of our deal?
	That's what I'm thinking, so we'll bump him up.
	Okay, bumped up.
	Peter DeJong, $203.53 and that is in Canadian.
	Sposom!
	And he claims to be from Sposom.
	And I said claims to be because his checking account doesn't reflect that, but okay.
	I occasionally do look at the MSM, he writes, and it always feels unhealthy.
	I fear that this donation will only serve to encourage you to, but if the show ends, I will miss the deconstruction humor and the OTG segments.
	$123.45 and 8008 in honor of Justin Trudeau, and he wants some respect.
	Okay.
	You could have told me that earlier.
	Respect.
	Okay.
	Well, good.
	Actually, I have an OTG, a little OTG segment for you.
	Does he need karma with that respect?
	I might as well.
	R-E-S-P-I-C-T. You've got karma.
	What an idiot.
	John Henry in Fajardo, Puerto Rico, $201.
	He actually sent also a second check.
	He sent a check for the Ronald McDonald Foundation, which I'll forward to you.
	Oh, yes.
	He sent a very nice long note about Tina's place of work, which actually was forwarded on to the CEO. It was really nice.
	Dear John and Adam, what does Justice Kavanaugh's dog say?
	Boof, boof.
	Wow.
	Sorry for that horrible joke, but I couldn't resist.
	I've been a douchebag for too long, so here's $201 to start me on my next step to knighthood.
	Give him a de-douching.
	You got it.
	You've been de-douched.
	I think wedding present will be the check to the Ronald McDonald House in their name.
	I both wish them immense happiness forever.
	Can you please give a shout out to my business, changeover.com, at www.changeover.com.
	In these times of a screaming economy and difficulty in hiring, reducing downtime is more important than ever.
	Cutting just 10 minutes of downtime per day adds an extra week of output, essentially for free.
	This is what to do.
	In addition to being a knight, I am the Changeover Wizard.
	Hold on, what is it?
	Changeover?
	What was the name of that website?
	Changeover.com.
	The shout-out allows me to claim the donation as advertising.
	It may help to point this out as a way to increase donations.
	Interesting.
	I think a lot of guys have been doing that.
	We changed downtime to uptime.
	A couple weeks ago, you mentioned the Amazon was banning books like Bang Estonia.
	As unsuitable.
	Yeah.
	The story of O. It's been called the most pornographic novel ever written and deals heavily as physical, sexual, and mental about women as a good thing.
	So why is that book still deemed suitable for listening on Amazon?
	Oh, the story about...
	Congrats to Tina and Adam and keep up the good work.
	Thank you very much.
	He hopes to be listening in 2050.
	Me too.
	Don't know what you'll be listening to, but I hope you're still listening.
	Sir John Zika is his name, he says, to you.
	Ah, yes.
	Alright, onward to Jim Van Beveren.
	Jim Van Beveren.
	And he wrote a handwritten note.
	He came in with $201 also.
	And he's from Concord, California.
	He has a handwritten note.
	And it's very long.
	It's six pages.
	I'm only going to read some of it.
	I'll just read the beginning.
	John and Adam, I'm writing this letter in the observation car of the California Zephyr.
	Headed east to Chicago, then on to Boston.
	As I sit and write, I am surrounded by many wonderful, friendly Amish traveling companions.
	Adam, talk about OTG. These people have mastered the art.
	Four days to cross the continent, I wanted to get a feel for my country.
	The whole country, not just the coasts.
	It's big!
	America's big and empty!
	By Bay Area standards for sure.
	Overpopulated, posh, yet another myth.
	These people I've met on the train have been great across section of real America with a few Europeans for variety.
	Amtrak dining cars have tables that seat four bench seat style so a couple of traveling across country will have new dining companions and varied conversations with every meal.
	This helps transition or transform the trip across the country into a journey, a land voyage on wheels of steel.
	I know John would want at least a passing comment on the Amtrak dining experience.
	What can I say?
	Amtrak, with a limited menu, serves passable plastic cutlery cuisine.
	The waitstaff is, however, pleasant and made the meals enjoyable.
	Enough of that.
	On to business.
	This is my first donation.
	Give him a dedouching.
	Okay.
	You've been dedouched.
	I could not stand being a freeloader.
	I could not stand being a freeloader any longer.
	How can one listen to the oh-so-entertaining donation segment and not donate?
	The hypocritical burden had become unbearable.
	Now as a contributing member of the NA club, I'd like to throw my two cents in on the dimension A, dimension B dilemma.
	And he goes on with the exposition and he says, he finally summarizes, the true split, he says the split's bullcrap, but the true split, the fundamental dichotomy is globalist versus nationalist.
	The fundamental tenet and cherished belief of each side being, for the globalist, equality, a justice for all, for the nationalist, independence, and self-reliance.
	Does he really talk like that all the time?
	I believe.
	I believe he don't.
	As a writer, I can pick up the voice.
	Ah, yes.
	This is one of your many talents.
	This is true.
	Yes, I can pick up the voice in the writing, and then I can kind of express it as best I can.
	I'm not great at it, but...
	I think I'd come closer than most people.
	Anyway, he goes on.
	And it's a very entertaining letter, and I appreciate it.
	All handwritten?
	Yes, all handwritten with a pencil.
	Oh, wow.
	Except once his pencil broke and he used an ink pen for one page.
	I'm going to give him a karma.
	Does he request anything specific?
	Well, let me look.
	You go to page 10.
	Here it is.
	He wants a little girl yay and a listen to that train.
	Oh, that's interesting because he's a foamer, obviously, so I already had that all queued up for him.
	Wow!
	Oh, my God!
	Oh, that's the goat foamer.
	Listen to that goat!
	Sorry.
	Wrong foamer.
	Yeah, that was a wrong foamer.
	I'm sorry.
	Here's the foamer we want.
	Oh, my God!
	Woo!
	Listen to that horn!
	You've got karma.
	I'll keep that letter.
	It's a good one.
	Onward.
	Steven Chanel.
	Chanel, I think.
	Chanel.
	McInville, Tennessee.
	Steven Chanel.
	Steven Chanel.
	I'm back again because I don't trust that my fellow team we eat and teammates will follow through and donate.
	If they don't, please double up on the douchebag call out.
	So what do I do?
	All right, do my douchebag.
	Douchebag!
	By the way, the National Comets from last week were a little ahead of the curve.
	Curve.
	Yes, there are Dimension B uptalkers riding scooters everywhere, but we still use restrooms and we don't have to watch our step while walking on Broadway.
	Hey, in your future, my friend.
	Poop on the streets in your future.
	If there's scooters, there's poopers.
	It's the no agenda rule.
	If there's scooters, there's poopers.
	Anonymous is $200.
	Stephen was $200, and this is $200.
	He did send an email in.
	I'm trying to see how long.
	Also, it's actually like the beginning.
	It's like a book proposal, this thing.
	But I'll read some of it.
	The trigger for this note and donation was due to your great last episode and analysis about millennials being hooked on Insta.
	Mm-hmm.
	Is this a note you read earlier?
	No.
	No, no, no.
	And as it's called in Sweden...
	It's called that here too.
	And Adderall.
	And subsequently smoking weed during night time to be able to sleep.
	To go to sleep, yes.
	Okay.
	I do definitely think there's something to it.
	And even though I never used Insta, I will share my similar experience.
	I've had this habit with Armodafinil.
	Oh, it's another fine product.
	That stuff is actually a lot easier to deal with.
	And weed for about four years at the end of my university studies and in the beginning in my qualified work life.
	Although armadaphinol has been a lot less euphoric and is a lot longer half-life, the addiction potential is nowhere near that of Adderall, which I have not had the pleasure to indulge due to it, as far as I know, seems to be very illegal everywhere except in the United States.
	Ayo.
	Maybe if a European pharmaceutical company had the patent, things would have been different.
	Yeah, hello.
	The downside is the lack of a kick and euphoric effect was that while I excelled at work and was able to come down in the evening, my social life and skills and interests thereof were deteriorating.
	I was happy to tell you I'm a year free from abusing weed and now only do it occasionally with friends in a healthy manner.
	I still do use and love armidafinil, although I think it is a wonderful nootropic, which is a brain stimulator thing, and I have jokingly convinced myself that I am self-medicating ADHD, which does seem to be the new black amongst my generation.
	There you go.
	I do not know everyone shares the same positive experience with our modafinil or modafinil as I do, and it affects people differently.
	I do recommend people to try it.
	This is the stuff that the Air Force pilots use to stay alert.
	So if anyone wants to, it's the modafinil is the one we use in the United States.
	Contributing to my ease, silence for a month at least.
	I do not abuse weed and insects to blah, blah, blah.
	I've appreciated your increased reporting of Sweden in recent shows, and even though I felt the need to get out to escape the social and cultural climate that ensured economical decline in my home country, I still do love some parts of it and hope it all ends in the best possible way.
	You know what you mentioned?
	It is funny.
	I'm still a slave to the Swedish tax authorities and hope to solve this by establishing myself someplace long-term next year.
	I'd like a call out to my brother Oscar and friend Max as douchebag.
	Douchebag!
	I also like some delayed fuck cancer for Max.
	He calls him a douchebag, and then he wants some delayed fuck cancer karma.
	And realizes this donation will tip me over to knighthood.
	Oh, I don't think we have him on the knighthood thing.
	Oh, wait.
	He's a knight?
	I said, this donation will tip me over to knighthood, and I would like to be knighted as Sir Antonin.
	Autonomous.
	Okay, hold on a second.
	A-N-T-O-N-Y-M-O-U-S of Seville Land.
	Yeah, hold on, hold on, hold on.
	I got to put this now.
	This is problematic.
	Oh, no, I got it in there.
	He's on the list.
	I didn't read the whole note.
	He's on the list.
	He's on the list.
	Somehow Eric got him on the list.
	Good.
	Eric got him on the list?
	He's on the list.
	Oh, I think I sent Eric this note just to read.
	But he's not with a plus one.
	It's a plus one.
	Last but not least, I've been thinking about how I should celebrate sending my first invoice to a client.
	I am currently thinking about treating myself with either an Oakland A's cap, as I regret, I left mine in Sweden, an Intel NUC to play with and maybe build a travel server router, or two Thai bar girls.
	We have a winner!
	I think so.
	I think the bar girls are probably a better bet.
	That's the way to go, my friend.
	I could go on longer, but you get the point.
	I found it worthwhile.
	I hope you found this worthwhile.
	He's got the accounting in here, and then I don't see any requests.
	So just give him a karma, and it will be done.
	Oh, and he wants an F-cancer karma.
	Oh, F-cancer karma, right.
	Yes, happy to do that.
	Fucking cancer!
	Fucking cancer!
	You've got karma.
	And we want to thank all these folks for being our executive and associate executive producers for show 1076.
	Yes, titles that are completely valid anywhere that titles are recognized.
	Certainly these types of credits, executive producer, associate executive producer of episode 1076 of the No Agenda show.
	And thank you very much.
	Really appreciate that, everybody.
	Also, for the notes, I learn a lot from this segment.
	Hear that?
	People who skip it?
	Oh, wait.
	By the way, do people who are on Adderall and listen at 1.75 speed still skip the donation segment?
	I don't know that they're paying attention to anything.
	Remember, we have another show coming up on Sunday.
	Please go and support us at...
	And it is National Hispanic Heritage Month on NFL. Our formula is this.
	We go out, we hit people in the mouth.
	Shut up, play.
	Yay!
	Shut up, play.
	Should have said ESPN. ESPN. ESPN. ESPN.
	I don't play clips from Scott Adams' Periscope.
	Because he tends to have a 45-minute ramble.
	and they're hard to get anything concise out of there.
	But he does come up with some good stuff once in a while.
	This particular one, I think you should promote it a little more.
	This is a funny idea that he got from Twitter and he talked about it a little bit.
	I did take a lot of the spaces out so it's a little tighter than it would normally be.
	But I want to play it because I just think this is a damn good idea.
	This is Scott Adams on Democrat gun control.
	Somebody on Twitter suggested that since the Democrats seem to have a temperament problem and at the same time the Democrats are anti-gun.
	So put these two together.
	The Democrats are anti-gun.
	And they also seem to have a temperament problem because they're rioting and they're doing the cathartic theater thing.
	So somebody suggested that we pass a law that Democrats can't own guns.
	Now, the first time you hear that idea, passing a law that says Democrats can't own guns, the first time you hear that you say to yourself, Well, that's a ridiculous, just joke idea.
	But here's what's so funny about it.
	If you're a Democrat, don't you believe that some gun control is better than none?
	Right?
	So if you were to say to a Democrat, let's just be completely rational here.
	Republicans will never give up their guns.
	But you believe, you Democrats believe...
	That more guns is worse and more people with guns is worse.
	So why don't we start somewhere where we can all agree.
	Let's just start where we all agree.
	We all agree that if you're a registered Democrat, you shouldn't have a gun.
	Now, would Democrats disagree with gun control for Democrats?
	It's an interesting argument, isn't it?
	Because, on one hand, it's ridiculous on its surface, because you don't make laws that only affect some people who have voluntarily signed up to be in a party.
	You don't do that.
	But on the other hand, it's what they want.
	Huh?
	I'm all in.
	Nah, it's funny, but...
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	It seems like a good idea to me.
	Well, so that means you can't own a gun as a registered Democrat.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, well, good.
	Then I'm all for it.
	Oh, it's so good to have that one back on the radar.
	Your favorite little birdies there, John.
	Don't forget, I have at least two, maybe three clips about this.
	Well, yes.
	So I did something I don't normally do, but I did listen to the one clip you have about the price tag, and I definitely want to incorporate that.
	Well, you know what it is.
	You can just incorporate it.
	I'm going to.
	What are your other...
	Oh, ethanol?
	The other one is I want to talk about Hurricane Michael a little bit.
	Oh, no.
	Oh.
	Okay, let's do that first because I have to say, with this IPCC special report, which came out just before Hurricane Michael even, I think, even existed, it came out so quickly, I was very surprised, scanning the news during the hurricane, that it really, I mean, maybe it started now, today, but But no one was really connecting it to the IPCC report, which to me seemed obvious as this storm was created by HAARP or some other entity.
	It seemed obvious.
	Well, State of Fear.
	Go read Michael Crichton's State of Fear.
	This is completely that script.
	Like, well, how come they're not saying this over and over and over again?
	I'm very surprised by that.
	So let's talk about Michael then.
	Well, here's the clip, the short roundup of CBS. I have one comment about it, and you can take the rest of it.
	Good evening, I'm Jeff Glor in Panama City Beach, Florida, and this region just endured one of the worst hurricanes in American history, the worst hurricane to ever hit the Florida Panhandle, the worst hurricane to ever hit the United States in the month of October on record.
	Tonight, the rain is basically gone in this region, but the wind is still here with us.
	You can see power lines down behind us, power poles down just across the street here.
	There is the side ripped off a building.
	That is a scene we are seeing all across this region tonight.
	Okay.
	Here's what gets me.
	Now, if you remember the last hurricane, the one that drenched North Carolina.
	Yes.
	This hurricane comes in, it's like a four, it's a five, and it stops at the coast and then turns into a zero tropical storm and just dumps like three feet of water on everyone.
	The hurricane before that was the one that hit Houston, which was the same thing.
	Oh, it's going to destroy everything.
	It comes in, it stops at the coast and dumps three feet of water on everything.
	Right.
	A climate guy comes on and says, this is the new hurricane.
	This is the new hurricane.
	What they're going to do, because of the temperature here and the temperature there, they're going to come in, and when they hit the land, they're going to stop, and they're going to dump all this moisture they picked up from the warm water that went into the hurricane.
	It comes down and down and down and just soaks them.
	Now, this particular hurricane, it should have been the same thing.
	It comes in at a 5, I expect it to stop.
	No, no, it doesn't drop down.
	Seven feet of water just blows through and goes on its merry way.
	I was told after the North Carolina event by these global warmest guys that this was going to be the way it was going to be for all these hurricanes.
	They're all going to be swamped with water.
	Jeff Glor is standing there in a completely dry area.
	The telephone poles were all bent, yes, and it was pretty funny looking.
	But there was cars going up and down like nothing had happened.
	Yeah, I was just listening to the coverage and Brian Williams on MSNBC got into a long rant about, you know, how sometimes it looks strange because, you know, we're we're standing in the storm without reporting and people just walking by in the background.
	But that's because you don't see off the shot that they're working behind a building.
	And, you know, my question is, why are you there at all?
	I don't need you don't need to stand there.
	I don't need Jeff Glor standing in this town.
	We do not need Jeff Glor standing in any town.
	The thing that gets me is we really build shitty houses in America.
	These are shit homes.
	And I'm surprised they're getting insurance at all.
	You have to have strapped-down roof, all kinds of stuff in Florida.
	Maybe the panhandle, for some reason, maybe they thought that wasn't necessary.
	I think the whole state of Florida, you have to have all kinds of hurricane-proof windows.
	But beside all that, we just build really crappy, overpriced houses made of wood.
	You have to do that in California.
	Your houses have to be built of wood.
	Or they will fall apart if there's one little earthquake.
	I guess Florida's the same then.
	Not for earthquake, but marshy swampland, maybe.
	I don't know, but they're crappy houses.
	Well, if it's marshy swampland, you probably don't want so much wood.
	I did notice this.
	They showed one of the houses that did have it blown up a little bit.
	I mean, at least half the house was missing.
	And they showed it, and it was interesting because the structure, the inner structure of the house was not 2x4s or 4x4s or 2x2s or anything else.
	It was metal.
	I thought that was what?
	They're building the...
	So the structure was metal.
	I thought it was weird.
	But metal on a...
	The structure was metal.
	In other words, the frame.
	The frame.
	The inside frame of the house appeared to be made out of metal.
	This kind of...
	Like these little mini beams.
	Hmm.
	Huh.
	Well, of course, there's many reasons to think this climate change, what used to be called global warming, is a bunch of ha-hui.
	We both are on the side of ha-hui.
	Well, we're both on the side of...
	No, there's climate change.
	No, it's climate change.
	We're both on the side that's not man-made.
	No, it's cyclical and it's just happening.
	And I think my biggest grievance is the idea that you can fix this with money.
	That's the problem.
	That's what bothers me.
	Now, I do understand, and I really first became aware of this report the minute it hit a Dutch member of European Parliament, Marijke Schalke, who was just a tone-deaf douche.
	She's like, oh, we have so much to do, so much work to do!
	And I realized that particularly, and I've listened to a number of European news channels, and the Dutch one is easier for me.
	I can really get all the nuance.
	And they have politician after politician.
	And you can hear that they're also kind of happy because this report, just globally speaking, says we have to forget the two-degree warming.
	Oh, no.
	No, no, no.
	We have to get it down to one and a half degrees, and we've got to do it pretty soon, and it's going to cost a lot of money.
	And you can just hear these politicians are all jacked up.
	They're like, oh, yeah.
	We're going to spend some money.
	We're going to spend some money.
	It's what they live for.
	They don't even realize it, but that's what they live for.
	And you want to point out that we're not talking – that clip that I have, which you're going to play – We're not talking about nickel and dime stuff here.
	Your clip only scratches the surface, but it's a great starting point for the calculations I've come up with.
	I think the best lead-in to this is the BBC, who just had a word salad of beautiful fear about this report.
	This is the lead-in and background.
	Now, you might be forgiven for thinking that some joined-up thinking has been taking place, or perhaps it's just by far the most important issue of the day, the existential threat to us all posed by climate change.
	You talked through it.
	I just want to reiterate what she said.
	The existential threat to our soul, John.
	Our soul.
	It's by far the most important issue of the day, the existential threat to us all posed by...
	Oh, no, it's all.
	I'm sorry.
	I thought you said soul.
	To us all.
	To us all.
	It's an existential threat to us all.
	So we're all going to die.
	To thinking that some joined-up thinking has been taking place.
	Or perhaps it's just by far the most important issue of the day, the existential threat to us all posed by climate change.
	On the day the Nobel Prize for Economics is awarded to two men for their work on climate change and innovation, Professor William Nordhaus and Paul Romer, we're seeing the publication of a major UN report on the subject.
	The report says that society must enact unprecedented changes on how people live to prevent catastrophic changes to the planet.
	It comes from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and says dramatic changes are needed to On energy consumption, travel, building methods and the food that we eat.
	Let's speak to Matt McGrath, who's our environmental correspondent.
	He joins us from Incheon in South Korea, which is where the report was published.
	Matt, just outline for us the kind of dramatic key messages of this report.
	Yeah, Razia, there's two key points really about this report.
	The first is that keeping temperatures to 1.5 degrees is far, far better for the planet than allowing them to go to 2 degrees, which has been the standard up to now.
	So they're talking about things like coral reefs, they're talking about millions of people being flooded.
	All those are actually much, much better if they're kept to 1.5 degrees rather than allowing them to go to 2 degrees.
	The other big point in this report is that it is still possible to keep to 1.5 degrees if the world takes major steps, such as cutting emissions by 45%.
	Now, we gloss over this type of reporting.
	Again, it is the BBC. We're taking seriously.
	I actually want to mention something.
	We've been doing this show for almost 11 years.
	We're coming on 11.
	Every year we've been doing this show, this was the point of no return.
	Right.
	Every year, it's the point of no return.
	Children in the UK will never see snow.
	And if you look back at the literature, it was the point of no return in the 70s.
	Tipping point.
	Tipping point.
	Yeah, tipping point, if you want to use that phrase.
	Same thing.
	What happened to peak oil?
	Whatever happened to peak oil?
	Whatever happened to the DACA kids, for that matter?
	Well, they're probably doing the oil fields.
	Let's just go by.
	So, we gloss over it, but I think some people still get the overall message, which is millions die, millions migrate, horrible storms die, death, oh, soon, gonna die, death, but...
	You can be saved as long as you have enough money.
	It is still possible to keep to 1.5 degrees if the world takes major steps such as cutting emissions by 45% in the next 12 years, dispensing with coal as a power source altogether.
	Okay.
	45% of all emissions and no more coal at all.
	And boosting renewables massively and actually getting people to change their lifestyles.
	Plus, on top of all that, we're going to need carbon removal technology to remove carbon from the atmosphere.
	Carbon removal technologies.
	What are these carbon removal technologies, John?
	Well, they're called trees.
	Plant more trees and you'll get plenty of carbon removal.
	I take it differently.
	What is the number one source of carbon?
	Well, does he say carbon or carbon dioxide?
	Plus, on top of all that, we're going to need carbon removal.
	Yeah, see, this pisses me off.
	Carbon is not causing global warming.
	Carbon dioxide is causing global warming.
	Carbon dioxide is not causing global warming.
	I'm not telling you this for a fact.
	I know that.
	I'm saying that is what the report says.
	The report doesn't say carbon is causing it.
	No, it's carbon dioxide.
	Right.
	So, I think he's just abbreviating this to say carbon.
	It's part of the propagandistic ploy.
	Because the number one thing to remove if you want to remove carbon is humans.
	Right.
	Yeah, of course.
	Getting people to change their lifestyles to the lifestyle of dead.
	Plus, on top of all that, we're going to need carbon removal technology to remove carbon from the atmosphere.
	The big question in all this, though, is time.
	Now, I've been speaking to Professor Juski.
	He's one of the co-chairs of the IPCC. And I asked him how long policymakers have got to take action.
	Well, they really need to start work immediately.
	I mean, the report is clear that if governments only just fulfil the pledges they made after the Paris Agreement for 2030, it's not good enough.
	It will really make it very difficult to consider a global warming of 1.5%.
	If they go to Poland, they read the report and they decide to increase their ambitions and act more immediately, then 1.5 stays within reach.
	That's the nature of the choice they face.
	As Professor Jim Ski there speaking earlier on about the nature of this report and what actions governments might take.
	And one of the things that might prevent governments from taking action, of course, is costs.
	The report says it's going to cost 2.5% of global GDP over a period of about 20 years.
	So we'll see later down the road if governments will actually take the lessons of this report or whether they'll balk at the overall expense.
	So, apparently we have 12 years.
	And I will remind everyone that we dropped the climate change or global warming moniker many, many years ago and went for Agenda 2030.
	Because we knew that 2030 is a year that is in the sweet spot for someone my age.
	And even a little bit younger, because that's when you'll be thinking about, oh, the children, and it's really your end of life, and I need to do something to save the world.
	So it's been targeted specifically to get to people who still have some money, if you've got any money at all.
	And...
	They had a little announcement, they had a little get-together to celebrate this report, and I pulled three short clips from this, just so we can understand what this really is.
	Now, this is a special report.
	This is not some report that they've worked on for decades and decades.
	It's a special, like an interim report, but it has a very specific goal, and the leader of this little speech explains it to us.
	This report is a rich resource for governments formulating climate policy.
	There you go.
	That's what this whole report is for.
	It's a rich resource for governments forming climate policy.
	And we've given you a lot of great things in here.
	Climate policy areas that are affected by climate change.
	And a key input into coming climate negotiations.
	My colleagues will share the key findings.
	Who are you negotiating with?
	Oh, yeah.
	Oh no, this is negotiations.
	It's everywhere.
	This is your future.
	Climate, carbon, taxes, all these negotiations.
	Negotiate with who and why?
	Everybody.
	Who are you negotiating with?
	The water?
	For the money.
	For the money.
	The ocean?
	For the money.
	They're negotiating with other countries to get the money.
	Coming climate negotiations.
	My colleagues will share the key findings with you in a very short minute of time.
	Let me give you the highlights.
	First, climate change is already affecting people, ecosystems, and livelihoods all around the world.
	Not my mudflats.
	Second, limiting warming to 1.5 degrees is not impossible.
	But will require unprecedented transitions in all aspects of society.
	Third, there are clear benefits to keep warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius compared to 2 degrees or higher.
	Every bit of warming matters.
	Now, this is what's interesting.
	This every bit of warming matters is their slogan.
	You're going to be hammered with it.
	Because...
	Clearly, after the United States withdrew, or I'll just say President Trump withdrew from the Paris Climate Accord, the climate change community has been in flux.
	We need to create something that really shows we're all going to die, and we need to get this green economy, circular, sustainable economy, all these fuzzy words...
	Which, I mean, I understand if you want to start a new economy and you want to base it on, you know, some stuff that may or may not work and so far has proven to be pretty cost inefficient.
	Because it helps.
	It helps, you know, we have economies change all the time.
	We have a technology economy to some degree.
	But you do need to have some basics and, you know, just to be scaring people into this so that you as elites can go spend money and save people otherwhere or whatever it is, it's insane.
	It's really insane.
	And you can see that these are just a bunch of douchebag elites when you listen to the second speaker.
	So this is the guy who opened up, gives you some highlights.
	The second speaker from working group two, there's three working groups apparently.
	This is what she says right off the bat.
	Why is this not playing?
	Here we go.
	With that, I would like to hand over to Valerie, the Working Group Co-Chair, Working Group Co-Chair 1.
	Thank you, Hosung.
	Before we get on to presenting the findings of the special report on 1.5 degree global warming, I'm proud to unveil the draft cover page of this special report.
	An artist created the piece of visual art on this front cover, having been inspired by a scientific figure in the summary for policymakers.
	Perhaps you can recognize it.
	This is so typical where they hired an artist, actually some semi-well-known guy, to create the cover for this report.
	I've seen this so many times.
	This is douchebaggery of the highest order.
	And again, it's all about one simple slogan.
	Moving on to the second section of the SPM, which deals with projected climate change, potential impacts, and associated risks.
	Models project robust differences in climate between present day and global warming of 1.5 degrees and between 1.5 degrees and 2 degrees.
	Every bit of extra warming makes a difference.
	Alright, so that's what it's all about.
	Every bit of global warming, every temperature, every degree makes a difference.
	You'll hear variations of it.
	So now I'm going to play your global warming clip because it did have a little extra kicker there beyond just the GDP number.
	It's the biggest warning from the science community yet.
	A call for action.
	Where is this from, this clip?
	I thought it was from Democracy Now, but I think it's from one of the euro news sources.
	The IPCC's report is clear.
	Urgent and unprecedented changes are needed to keep global temperatures from rising to unbearable levels.
	Limiting warming to 1.5 degrees is not impossible.
	But will require unprecedented transitions in all aspects of society.
	There are clear benefits to keep warming to 1.5 degrees such as compared to 2 degrees or higher.
	Every bit of warming matters.
	The 2015 Paris Agreement aimed at keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
	But the IPCC's new report shows that the effects of global warming would already be disastrous with a 1.5 degree increase.
	1.5 degrees would cause a rise in global water levels of about 48 centimeters.
	56 centimeters if temperatures were to rise 2 degrees.
	The impact on the environment would be even more important.
	A rise in 2 degrees would cause the extinction of 18% of all insects, 16% of all plants and 8% of all vertebrates.
	Not to mention the effect on human populations.
	Limiting global warming to 1.5 compared to 2 degrees would reduce the number of people exposed to climate-related risks and susceptible to poverty by up to several hundred millions by 2050.
	Limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius comes with a hefty price tag.
	Some 2.1 trillion euros would have to be invested every year for 25 years.
	2.1 trillion dollars a year?
	No, 2.1 trillion euros a year.
	That's just for Europe.
	For 20 years?
	Are you kidding me?
	No, that's just for Europe.
	According to the World Bank, the global gross domestic products, I guess everyone would participate.
	You can't just say...
	Yeah, the Chinese and the Indians will not participate, so let's start there.
	But let's just say they had to because we're all going to die.
	Someone's got to go over there and kick their ass and tell them to pay up because it's all about the Benjamins.
	So the gross world product for 2015 was $74 trillion.
	That's $74,000 billion.
	Take 2.5% of that, you get $1.85 trillion multiplied by 20, $37 trillion.
	Well, this number was actually higher than that.
	That's for half a degree.
	Oh.
	That's for half a degree.
	Ha, ha, ha.
	So I read through the report, and I just have a couple of things that I marked up, and I just wanted to...
	It's a very long report, and there's a lot of this high confidence.
	Yeah, we think so.
	Magic 8-Ball says, looks like it.
	So this is the kind of report.
	91 specialist scientists wrote this report.
	So throughout the entire...
	There's a lot of, you know, over and over they use the words experts, last chance, carbon taxes, disaster, man-made, catastrophe.
	You know what?
	I'm going to put it in the show notes.
	Someone needs to download this and do a word cloud on it.
	I want a word cloud of this report.
	You'll see.
	Experts, carbon taxes, disaster, man-made, catastrophe, last chance.
	Also, they make it very clear, these experts, that nuclear power is not the way to go.
	Yes, this was the thing that kind of caught my attention.
	It is, quote, dirty and dangerous.
	And they are really pushing against that.
	You can't be doing that.
	Let's look at it from another perspective.
	If this is such a...
	And in fact, this is the argument I use if you get into an argument in a bar or at a cocktail party.
	Do you want me to read some of the more...
	Let me finish my thought.
	If you get into an argument in a bar, okay, supposedly dirty and dangerous when it's not...
	I mean, it has elements of that, but it's not dirty and dangerous.
	The point is, if we're all going to die, don't you think we should take the easiest way out?
	And that seems to me, nuclear power?
	If we're all going to die instead of spending trillions of dollars?
	No, no.
	I mean, come on!
	No, because proliferation of nuclear energy will be, I'm telling you, this is in the report, will be too tempting for people to weaponize that nuclear material.
	Bomb their neighborhood?
	What are they talking about?
	That's what the experts are talking about.
	That's literally in this report.
	France is mostly Duke-powered.
	I know.
	Look, I'm not in a bar and I'm not in an argument with you.
	Some other things I've noticed here.
	In general, carbon dioxide emissions must reach net zero by 2050 in order to keep global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius.
	The whole report is the 1.5 degree report.
	So they're really upping it all up and making you just worried.
	So, to reiterate, carbon dioxide use must fall by 45% by 2030.
	That's less than 12 years from now.
	Coal use will have to be reduced, quote, substantially by the middle of the century.
	And, as you heard in one of our clips, the technology that removes carbon from the atmosphere is unavoidable, and I still don't really understand what carbon has to do with it.
	If we fail to meet these goals, and the Earth warms by two degrees centigrade, according to the report, Hundreds of millions of lives are at stake.
	So what they're saying is very interesting.
	That if we wait until the two degrees, so many people are going to die.
	But if we can only get to 1.5 and we're at 0.89 right now, according to some magical unicorn calculation, then millions of people will live.
	Millions will live if only we can do this now.
	Let's see, the 1.5 degree report, it has...
	Yes, it's going to monumentally change our society.
	So, of course, in order to stop using coal and fossil fuels as a primary energy source by the middle of the century, we will transition to electric, solar, wind, and maybe just a little bit of remnants of nuclear, but also bioenergy and biofuels.
	The report also says...
	Limiting individual transportation, such as cars, airplane use, and shipping on a large scale, and improving access to electric transportation, public transit, and non-motor transit, like walking and biking, as well as restoring forests and non-human ecosystems, will need to happen at a large scale in order to limit warming to 1.5 degrees.
	You know, people are pooping on the BART train now.
	I like the idea, large-scale planting of trees.
	Yeah, that will definitely reduce some carbon dioxide.
	They just kind of slipped that in.
	I mean, I didn't know that individual transportation includes planting large-scale trees.
	This is the final quote from...
	What's her name?
	Skia.
	Skia.
	Anyway, finally, we've delivered a message to the governments.
	We've done our job.
	We've now passed the message on, and it's their responsibility, having invited us to produce this report, to decide if they're going to act on it, direct quote.
	They invited them to produce this report, because they get all jacked up on spending money.
	Let me see.
	Now, this 1.5 degrees.
	I mean, this was actually talked about in 2009.
	It's kind of a throwback.
	I won't object if you wrap this pretty soon.
	Every bit of warming matters.
	Okay.
	This will just take me into two interview clips about, you know, because who's going to be impacted by this.
	It'll be people who produce oil.
	The Saudis are getting hammered by Trump.
	What is the gas price right there in California at five bucks now?
	It's $3.75 for a premium.
	Oh, that's not too bad.
	I think we're a 220, 240 here, maybe?
	Yeah.
	Huh.
	That is because...
	240 is better.
	Better than what you got, for sure.
	Christiana Al-Ampur, and you never see this, you barely see these interviews, interviewed the Saudi foreign minister about what Trump said about Saudi Arabia, or I should say OPEC, at the United Nations, which is in this clip as well.
	Did anyone talk about what he said during the UN regarding OPEC? Was that in any news stories anywhere?
	No, there wasn't time for that because the world was laughing at him.
	Donald Trump launched a broadside at OPEC countries, he called them.
	Well, obviously Saudi Arabia is the biggest OPEC country.
	And we're going to play a soundbite of what he said regarding high oil prices at the moment.
	OPEC and OPEC nations are, as usual, ripping off the rest of the world.
	And I don't like it.
	Nobody should like it.
	We defend many of these nations for nothing.
	And then they take advantage of us by giving us high oil prices.
	Not good.
	We want them to stop raising prices.
	We want them to start lowering prices.
	And they must contribute substantially to military protection from now on.
	We are not going to put up with it, these horrible prices, much longer.
	Well, I mean, Saudi Arabia, as I said, is the biggest and most powerful OPEC nation.
	Were you surprised by that?
	I mean, we're not going to put up with these horrible prices any longer and accusing OPEC of being responsible for these high prices.
	It wasn't surprising because the president has articulated this position before.
	Saudi Arabia is committed to balancing the oil markets.
	We're committed to ensuring that prices are at moderate levels so that consumers are not hurt and producers are not hurt.
	We have seen an increase in the demand for oil, and we're going to see a reduction in the supply of oil by Iran, and I think the markets are putting upward pressure on the price of oil.
	We have increased our oil production.
	We continue to increase our oil production to bring more oil to the market so that we have moderate prices.
	You see production increases in the United States.
	You see production increases elsewhere.
	There's a commitment to stabilize markets at prices that do not harm consumers or producers.
	This has been our policy for the last four decades and we continue to explain this to our friends in the U.S. The price of oil began to increase when American shale production came down.
	As a consequence of lower prices, now American supply is increasing and we're providing more supply to the market.
	With regards to the Iran sanctions, we are fully supportive of the President's policy on Iran.
	We believe it's the right policy, whether it involves withdrawing from the JCPOA or whether it involves imposing more sanctions on Iran to make Iran comply with international laws and international norms and behavior.
	So we're fully on board with that policy.
	Right.
	So this is the foreign minister and he's full of crap.
	And I hate this.
	Well, you know, it's what the market wants.
	It's like we're trying to keep it balanced so it doesn't hurt producers, doesn't hurt consumers.
	It's all very hurtful.
	This is completely wrong.
	And I don't know if the Saudi Arabia Magnitsky type act with the Khashoggi journalist ties into this at all.
	It could be that we need to put these guys on notice.
	But this led me to a clip from Dan Pena.
	Remember this guy?
	Dan Pena is the oil guy.
	We had a clip from him maybe a year ago, and he was saying global warming is a scam because if it was true, then you wouldn't be able to insure your home for more than 10 years.
	Otherwise, why would they insure that?
	Remember that guy?
	Yeah, a very loud-mouthed, brash guy.
	This clip, he explains the Saudis, the oil prices, and the reason we still have not seen the Saudi Aramco public listing.
	When I was in the energy business, and forevermore I'm being an oil man...
	Oh yeah, by the way, he's a little brash sometimes in his language use.
	Okay.
	You are an oil man.
	An oil man.
	Everybody knew that when...
	When people will take more seriously global warming is when Aramco, Saudi, the kingdom, runs out of oil.
	Now, two years ago, Aramco, which is a petroleum company of the Saudi government, announced they're going to go public.
	This was when oil was $28 a barrel.
	Now why would smart guys, MIT kind of guys, say they're going to go public at the lowest oil price In the last 30, 40 years.
	Why?
	Because when you go public, they're going to sell 2% of the company off.
	When they go public, they have to report a reserve report.
	Publish a reserve report.
	Which means that for the first time in the history since they discovered oil there, J. Paul Getty discovered oil there back 70, 80 years ago.
	They're going to know about, plus or minus 10%, how much oil the Saudis really have.
	Now, I'm here to tell you, they have hundreds of trillions of barrels.
	They're never going to run out of fucking oil in your children's lifetime.
	Now, they've now pulled back and they've changed three times the date of the public offering.
	Three times in the last two years.
	Now, 2019 looks good, but maybe, maybe not.
	We'll let the market dictate.
	Of course, oil is up from $25, $26 a barrel up to $65-ish, more or less.
	And they don't want to publish that number if they don't have to.
	The price, I hear, the price where the lines cross, supply and demand for Aramco, for the kingdom, is around $75 to $80 a barrel.
	Stabilized over two, three, four, five years.
	Not one day.
	Okay?
	So I don't see one that's going to go public.
	Because if they do, they're going to have to tell what the reserves are.
	And you know what the price of oil is going to do when they say that there's 42 gazillion jillion barrels of oil?
	It's going to drop.
	Like a fucking stone!
	I like that guy.
	Hello.
	Were you listening at all?
	Yeah, I heard him.
	I heard every hour of that clip.
	You know...
	I have a clip.
	Are you bored with this?
	I mean, we rarely talk about global warming bullshit.
	There's a huge report, and you're just, like, harping on me.
	One, you want to fight me in the bar.
	Then you're like, well, it's taking too long.
	And then every hour of that clip...
	This is a very boring report.
	The science is in!
	Science!
	It was like half the show, and I didn't get anything out of it.
	They didn't already know.
	Except they're supposedly...
	This guy doesn't know how much their reserves are in Saudi Arabia.
	Maybe they're not that much.
	We have pretty good expertise on reserves of the oil companies.
	They all know what everybody else is doing.
	I'm skeptical about that guy.
	I do have one clip that kind of falls into place.
	No, you cannot do that.
	It's too boring.
	It's a short clip.
	My clip is only 39 seconds.
	39 minutes of boring.
	Hit it.
	I don't know what clip it is.
	By the way, you really piss me off with that.
	That's okay.
	Don't worry about it.
	That's all commentary on democracy now.
	Are you commanding me to play something?
	No, I'm asking if you want to play it.
	President Trump has ordered the EPA to roll back limits on the amount of ethanol blended into gasoline in a move that will benefit big agribusiness companies.
	Trump announced the ethanol rule change at a campaign rally in Iowa Tuesday evening, where he appealed to his Republican base to turn out during next month's midterm elections.
	At the rally, Trump mocked California Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein, claiming she leaked a letter written by Professor Christine Blasey Ford, alleging Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh tried to rape her when they were teenagers.
	Trump then laughed as his supporters chanted, Lock her up, referring not to Hillary Clinton, but to Senator Feinstein.
	They don't know what they're referring to.
	So the question is, I thought ethanol was a big lifesaver.
	It was going to be the best thing ever since sliced bread.
	It was better for the environment.
	It didn't give off so much carbon.
	So why are they presenting it in a negative light on democracy now?
	That's what I thought.
	All right.
	You're back.
	No, no.
	Please entertain us.
	I'm just saying.
	It just seems screwy to me that they're condemning more production of ethanol when this is the guys, these are the global warmists.
	They want to see, you know, less and less carbon, and now all of a sudden, since Trump kind of wants to make more ethanol, this is bad.
	It all seems about Trump to me.
	Anyway...
	Yeah, tell me something I didn't know.
	All right, so I'll do something for the OTG segment to lighten the mood a little bit.
	It's another thing you bitch about.
	But, of course, I'm from the future, and that's why it now shows up on The Family Guy.
	Oh, looks like they really want me to come to that party.
	We're gonna have to go.
	You...
	you have a pager?
	Yeah.
	You get paged?
	Yeah, that's how a pager works.
	Why don't you just get a phone?
	Um, you mean one of your government tracking devices?
	No thanks, I'm using a pager.
	Oh, you're looking at your steps?
	No, the government's watching where you're going.
	It's not nap time, Stewie.
	Wake up!
	Alright, we're outta here.
	Okay, Stewie's going to the party.
	Yeah, but where's Chris going?
	I have no idea!
	He's completely off the grid!
	Dammit!
	He can't hide forever!
	Where are...
	Chris!
	Chris, isn't this cool?
	Stewie, don't say my name.
	There's an Alexa in here.
	Sir, we have eyes on Chris.
	He's at a douchebag vaping party.
	Sooner or later, they all get sloppy.
	I'm gonna show my support by donating to No Agenda.
	Imagine all the people who could do that.
	Oh yeah, that'd be fab.
	Yeah, on No Agenda.
	In the morning.
	Well, we do have a few people to thank for show 1076, starting with Sir Jim Briscoe, $151.51.
	Loves the shows recently.
	Hasn't donated for a while.
	Too busily engrossed in making some money.
	If you're making money, about us.
	Alex Talbert in Bozeman, Montana, $150.
	He's been a douchebag for too long.
	Give him a dedouching, please.
	You've been dedouched.
	He needs an F karma thing and we'll put that at the end for him.
	Antonio Sanchez Godinez, $120 from Spain.
	Happy 60th birthday on October 9th and a big job karma.
	I believe he's on the list.
	I think so.
	Is he?
	Yeah, I think so.
	Craig Dennison in Omaha, $111.11.
	He sent a note card, like a huge card, telling us how great we were.
	And I, of course, put the card down somewhere.
	There it is.
	It's a big giant card.
	It says 11.
	Think of it being number one twice over.
	It's a big 11th birthday card, which I thought was kind of cute.
	It's been just over a year since I last donated, so can I be de-douched?
	Oops.
	You've been de-douched.
	Apparently he's been a listener for a while.
	He says, I've been so happy that no agenda has been in my life these past 11 years.
	And here's to another 11 years.
	Great work, Craig from Omaha.
	Tony Schmidt, $111.11.
	Thank you for your courage.
	Keith Gibson, $101.
	This was a drunk donation that made me laugh from Tony Schmidt.
	I don't know if you feel like it, but...
	I thank you, okay.
	I'll give it a shot if he's really drunk.
	I thank you for your courage, hard work, and collective sanity.
	With this donation, I'd like to call Sir Matthew McVader to the stage.
	If I do recall correctly, I had a lot of beer.
	I love beer.
	He performs exclusively on the basement stage.
	I'm not sure how I got down here or back up, but I know I was there and I know it was him.
	The question is de-douching.
	Yeah.
	Two shots of the head and the karma.
	Shout out to freehollowbooks.com.
	And then...
	A rain stick shake to Florida because fuck them.
	That was probably drunk.
	We don't do that.
	We do not operate the rain stick in that manner.
	This is not a device to be used for follies.
	I have it locked up.
	I don't want the kids getting hold of it.
	In a gun case.
	Yeah, how'd you know?
	It's where it belongs.
	I don't have kids otherwise that have it locked up in a gun case too.
	Keith Gibson.
	Now, these are $101.01.
	This was to celebrate 1010 Day in Dimes, which is a famous Chinese celebration, which is actually celebrated by both the mainlanders and the Republic of China, Taiwan.
	I'm surprised I didn't get some nasty note about calling him Taiwan.
	Keith Gibson.
	Wait, wait, wait.
	It's called Taiwan.
	Well, you know, it's a part of China.
	Who listens to this show is going to send you a nasty note about that?
	I don't know.
	The one Chinese who's in Hong Kong?
	No, they'd be more inclined to agree with this idea.
	They'd have to be on the mainland.
	They'd be in Beijing.
	You're right, nobody listens.
	They probably have a clone of the show over there.
	Keith Gibson...
	Yeah, it's called...
	I can come up with some racist line for no agent.
	I can't come up with it.
	Keith Gibson, anonymous.
	He says he loves this...
	Oh, he's from...
	Loves from Zephyr Freed, Jack London Square, a former paradise.
	Yeah, that's because they have it at the big train station there.
	Kaelin Nistore, 101.
	Sir Malinowski in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
	Jeffrey Jock, I've been listening for a couple of years.
	Follow the tech industry.
	Very quickly it became clear to me that your deconstruction in the search for context data and facts made the world a saner and simpler place.
	You're right.
	Sir Bob of the dude's name, Ben, is this right?
	Am I right?
	No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
	Charles, what we got...
	Who'd you just do?
	I just did.
	Jeffrey Jack.
	Yeah, then you get Sir Pete, Baron of Friesland at Northern Holland.
	Well, it won't come up on my spreadsheet because he put a note in there that is way too big.
	You have to read it or read who it is.
	We don't read these.
	I don't understand why you're reading all these notes.
	No, I'm not reading.
	I can't read his name.
	Or the amount he donated.
	Sir Pate, Baron of Friesland and Northern Holland, 9999.
	And he says, thank you for your excellent work on show 1075.
	It just bounces around.
	Let me see if I can do it.
	John, you've had this problem for years.
	It's because it's not my problem.
	It's the spreadsheets problem.
	Okay.
	Charles Schultz, is that next?
	Mm-hmm.
	Or Anniston, Alabama, 81.
	Sir Bob of the Dude's Name, Ben.
	You know, if people didn't put...
	I don't know how they get a note jammed in there like that when people say, I can't write three words and then PayPal won't take it.
	I have a feeling that this was forwarded from an email that Eric put in there.
	Well, maybe.
	Sir Bob of the Dude's Name, Ben.
	Your problem is Eric.
	He's creating the spreadsheet.
	Sir Bob of the Dude's Name, Ben in High Point, North Carolina.
	Jim, garbage.
	You know, my latest policy, as I say to Eric, just put that I have the note, which I had on the other one earlier, and don't put it in the spreadsheet.
	I didn't know that was policy.
	No, it's a new policy.
	I didn't get the memo.
	It's a new experimental beta policy.
	That explains it, then.
	Sir Bob is of the dude's name, Ben, A-O-O-A. Now, I got grief.
	For the last newsletter for not using a boobs Easter egg.
	So I put one in this.
	When I get one.
	No one loves you.
	No, everyone.
	Face it.
	No one really loves you.
	Jim Garbazewski.
	80.
	Stephan Aret.
	We have a...
	Yeah, A-Ret.
	We have a plumbing firm in the area named A-Ret.
	It's 60-06.
	This is in Felbach.
	Which boob is the 60-06?
	That's all lopsided.
	No, it's not lopsided.
	It's saggy boob?
	Something's wrong.
	It's boob's woohoo.
	Something's wrong.
	Jim Buell in Spring Hill, Tennessee.
	Something's wrong.
	We have...
	Oh, by the way, NC4RG 73s.
	Oh, 73s.
	Jim Buell, 5858 in Spring Hill, with a happy belated birthday to his smoking hot wife, Stephanie.
	Chris Widden, 5050, and then now we have $50 donors, name and location.
	Roy Tenhaver in Pignacar.
	Pignacar.
	Pignacar.
	Roy Tenhaver.
	Roy Tenhaver.
	Nailed it.
	In Pignacar.
	Robert Bruckner.
	Kimberly Redmond in Toronto.
	Tony Smith in Fort Worth, Texas.
	Brett Yeo in Cantonsville, Maryland.
	Larry Hay in Mooresville, North Carolina.
	Does anyone in Texas think that Fort Worth is a shithole?
	No, it's actually very beautiful, has a great airport, and that's where things will be happening.
	Yeah, it's where Amazon's going to move.
	I thought that was a secret.
	You swore me to fucking secrecy.
	You said we've got to look for some real estate up there as another exit strategy.
	And now you're just telling everybody?
	I just wish I'd say this because I mentioned to a friend of mine, a Lib Joe, who seems to be worried sick that he's going to be swamped under by the rising oceans.
	You should ask him if he has a few hours to listen to my report on climate change.
	It'll change his mind.
	It's not that long.
	It's only an hour.
	Anyway, he...
	He's moaning and groaning about this.
	So you told them about Amazon?
	You told them our secret?
	It's going to be a great place to move.
	And he says it's a shithole.
	Wait a minute.
	This guy said, Lib Joe said Fort Worth is a shithole?
	Yeah.
	Well, screw him.
	It's not all that bad.
	I like the town.
	But anyway, so you might as well tell everyone now, now the cat is out of the bag, we've been researching Amazon moving to Fort Worth as their new headquarter, and you and I were like, oh, we've got to buy some real estate.
	It's going to make us rich.
	Don't you remember the whole sworn to secrecy bit?
	I made a mistake.
	Okay, now everyone's in on it.
	Well, they should be thinking about it.
	They should be thinking about it and working on our behalf, trying to find an exit.
	I found another real hot spot, by the way, even cheaper.
	In what, another Amazon possibility?
	No, no, no.
	This is a whole different game.
	Now, just so everybody knows, the reason why John came up with this is, you know, he's from Texas, Bezos.
	He's from that area.
	No, he's from Houston.
	Okay, I'm sorry, he's from Houston.
	They have an airport there in Fort Worth.
	They have a...
	What?
	It's Ross Perot's Alliance Airport.
	Yes, Alliance, yes.
	Which should be perfect.
	There's a lot of buildings, a lot of space, zero taxes, state taxes at least.
	I still think it's a...
	When are they going to announce this?
	Well, Ross Perot's got some sort of a real estate operation that has been buying up crap all over the area.
	Ah, see.
	And I think they're just waiting until they're all settled in so they can say, you know, Disney had this thing he did.
	Disney, when he formed Disneyland, which none of the banks wanted to help him with, so when he did Disney World down in Florida, he said, screw the banks, I'm going to do public offering, public bonds, and I'm not going to borrow from the banks anymore because they didn't help me when I needed help.
	And so he never went back to the banks.
	But he found one other problem with Disneyland is that around Disneyland, every sleazy little motel operator started, you know, planting their little motels and anything to kind of impinge on Disneyland.
	And they're butted up right against the park.
	If you go to Disneyland, the whole area around the park is all a bunch of little motels and cheap restaurants.
	So he said that's not going to happen again because it ruins the experience.
	Even though you're in the park, you don't really see outside.
	There's a hill around the whole park, so you can't look outside.
	But instead, he decided to buy up all of Central Orlando.
	And he did it with a phony baloney real estate company that was not associated with him, but it was.
	It was a front.
	And they bought up all the land they could to keep the same situation from reoccurring.
	And so that's why that Central Orlando is all Disney.
	Well, it actually doesn't matter because I have another strategy.
	The real estate, I mean, that's shot anyway.
	Here's my strategy.
	The minute we know which city that's in and if it's going to be in Texas, I'm opening up a vape shop and a dog walking service.
	Well, I'm not going to say that those aren't great businesses for what you're describing.
	And that's exactly what was probably needed in Seattle because he put in 75,000 jobs in Seattle and all these apartment buildings went up and all that.
	It probably would be a good business if you wanted to run it.
	The problem is you have to run a business.
	It's different than just buying some real estate.
	No, we have producers.
	We have producers.
	You want to get Dexter to help you?
	He's going to make the juice.
	We'll have Amazon e-juice.
	Ooh.
	Mm-hmm.
	Mm-hmm.
	Anyway, that's our story.
	We still have some more people to thank.
	Tony Smith is the guy in Fort Worth.
	Thanks, Tony, for that combo.
	And by the way, Tony, buy up some property around your house and you can give us...
	You have to look out for a vape shop for me.
	Brett Yeo in Cantonsville, Maryland.
	Larry Hay in Mooresville, North Carolina.
	Richard Gardner, Sir Richard Gardner from...
	He's one of our Richard Gardeners.
	We've got a bunch of them.
	Jonathan Ferris in Liberal, Kansas.
	Drew Mochick in El Cerrito.
	Robert Decanay in Fairfax, Virginia.
	And last, Kyle Meyer in Atlanta.
	George, I want to thank all these folks for helping us out on the show.
	1076.
	Helping us produce and support this show with your generous donations.
	Yes, that is the way it works in our Value for Value system.
	What was the show worth to you?
	You send that amount of money, and we thank you for it.
	Except if you're under $50, that's where people usually come in for anonymous reasons, or you can always get on one of our subscriptions.
	We have a number of them.
	Check them out at our donation page.
	Dvorak.org slash NHL. We have requests for F cancer karma, some jobs karma, and I want to kick that off with a new jobs karma redux.
	I'll play the old one, just to make sure it works.
	It was just kind of cute from Tom Starkweather.
	The resistance.
	Jobs, jobs, jobs. Jobs, jobs, jobs. Jobs, jobs, jobs. Jobs, jobs, jobs. .
	Jobs, jobs, jobs, and jobs.
	Let's vote for jobs!
	You've got karma.
	You've got karma.
	It is Thursday, October 11th, 2018.
	Belated birthday, congratulations.
	Jim Buell says happy belated birthday to his smoking hot wife, Stephanie.
	She celebrated on the 5th of October.
	Antonio Sanchez-Godinez turned 60 on October 9th.
	Brandon Gamache will be 33 today.
	And Sir Bob of the Dude's Name Ben celebrated yesterday as well.
	We say happy birthday to everyone.
	Everybody here from the best podcast in the universe!
	Then we have our soul knighting for today, or anonymous.
	Need your blade there.
	Hello?
	It's stuck!
	hold on a second okay Okay, I got it.
	That's right.
	Theater of the mind is not lost on him.
	Anonymous, come on up to the stage.
	We've got a seat ready for you here at the round table of the No Agenda Knights and Dames.
	Thank you very much for your support of the best podcast in the university.
	The amount of $1,000 or more.
	And I hereby pronunciate the Sir Anonymous of Sveeland.
	And yes, for you, we have Hookers and Blow, Red Boys and Chardonnay, Fentanyl and Four Loko, Cookies and Vodka, Wipers and Waffles, Chilled Polish Potato Vodka.
	We've got Diet Soda and Video Games, Fish Pie and Fellatio, Brown Cheese and Aqua Beat with Smadajova, Harlots and Haldol, Press Milk and Pavlov, Ginger Ale and Gerbils, Sparkling Cider and Escorts, Vodka and Vanilla, Boggits and Bourbon, and...
	Of course.
	So mutton and mead.
	Head over to noagendanation.com slash rings and give Eric the Show all the information you have.
	And we'll get that off to you as soon as possible.
	We actually had, I think it was four or five different knights and dames tweeting out pictures of their ring, the sealing wax certificate.
	We had one dame even had a chalice and a nice bottle of wine in the picture.
	Did you see any of these?
	I retweeted all of them.
	It was like a run on it.
	It's like everybody was tweeting these things all around the same...
	I guess it was just a recent mailing or something.
	I thought it was odd.
	Well, because I've been asking for it and people listened.
	By the way, there's some scam that happened.
	I have Geico as insurance.
	What?
	For car insurance.
	Who sold you Geico?
	Was that a little lizard?
	Yes.
	Yes.
	I always liked the lizard campaign.
	So when we moved to the common law condo, I put Tina on the insurance.
	Tina Snyder, S-N-I-D-R. So I get the most recent bill.
	It comes in yesterday, the day before.
	Isn't Geico just property insurance and car insurance?
	I've had it for car insurance.
	Oh, so she's getting car insurance from Geico now?
	Have you ever seen the commercials?
	No.
	Actually, I love those commercials.
	They have a variety of different approaches and they use them in competition with each other.
	Somehow the commercial did not convince you they do car insurance.
	Great commercials.
	This is for my car.
	Tina, she has her own insurance.
	She has Allstate, whatever.
	Doesn't her insurance cover anything she drives?
	Okay, I'm just going to finish the story.
	So, I think you're supposed to put someone on if they're going to be a frequent driver.
	It doesn't matter.
	It didn't increase my premium.
	It made no difference.
	In fact, this is how...
	Okay.
	I'll tell you how it happened.
	When I sold the Airstream, then I had to call them up to get rid of the extremely expensive Airstream insurance.
	And they said, well, you got anyone else who's driving your car?
	I said, yeah.
	And I said, okay, will there be no change?
	Just put on the policy.
	Okay, it's fine.
	It's also like a gesture.
	We get mailed together.
	Yeah, okay.
	It's common law.
	It's nice to get a bill that isn't both our names.
	Until she sues you.
	What happens the other day?
	I get a note and it says, yeah, you know, your premium's been recalculated.
	And I think it went up by several hundred dollars.
	What?
	Yeah.
	Your premium's been recalculated based upon the driving record of the drivers.
	And in the same letter, they say they have added Elise's daughter.
	Spelled incorrectly, her last name with a Y instead of an I, to my insurance because she's living in this house.
	Now, she's not.
	She's had a...
	I think she has a bank account that comes to this address.
	But they just took the liberty of just putting her on my insurance, recalculating my premium, which is more because, you know, she's 21 and she's had issues driving.
	And I get this high insurance premium.
	What?
	This is an outrage.
	How can you do this?
	You can't.
	Oh, you can't?
	Well, they just did.
	Well, how?
	How do they even know?
	I mean, where do they get this information?
	Are they coming to somebody spooking around the house?
	Are there microphones there?
	What's going on?
	Well, so the bank...
	That Tina's daughter uses.
	I don't know which bank it is.
	Actually, her name is misspelled.
	So somewhere someone got a hold of her name.
	It's misspelled.
	Some mail comes to this address.
	Spam.
	Junk mail.
	And they sold that name to Geico.
	And Geico went, oh, same address.
	We better put her on the insurance.
	Especially since we can get more money.
	Is it an illegal practice?
	I assume that you call your agent, who isn't a gecko.
	I'm going to call gecko.
	They're on the list for today.
	And then you're going to talk to the agent and say, this is bull crap, and they take it right off and you get your money back.
	Yeah, but I'm going to call them and I'm going to...
	I want a supervisor and I want to know, what else are you doing?
	I'm going to make us think about it.
	They shouldn't make us think about it if they correct it immediately.
	Yeah.
	I'll make a stink about it.
	You should be one of those terrible clients.
	They're going to fuck you over if you try to make a stink.
	I can always go to Tina's Insurance.
	She has a great FICA score.
	And the only other thing I wanted to mention is, just while we're on grievances like this, Capital One, who I saw throughout the American Music Awards, here's what I have to say to you.
	Capital One, for your use of music by Michael Jackson, Prince, and Whitney Houston, three superstars in my life who I've respected and liked a lot and known, For you to be the first to use their music, well, Michael, not so much, but yeah, Michael, Prince, and Whitney Houston, fuck you!
	It disgusted me.
	It really disgusted me.
	Did anyone else have this?
	Sure they did.
	It disgusted me that the family, because they didn't want any of this.
	The families, they went, oh, great.
	The record companies publishing, oh, yeah, that's great.
	Now let's whore them out now that they're dead and can't say anything.
	And that's bad enough, but then Capital One, you're gonna use that?
	Nah.
	You guys suck.
	Maybe it'll curse them.
	I hope so.
	It really irked me.
	You know, it's just like Prince didn't let you play his music.
	He's like, you can't have my music!
	No one can have it!
	And then he dies and what is it?
	He's been dead, what, a year?
	Two years?
	I don't know.
	All his music is on Capital One.
	Pretty recent.
	Yeah.
	It's really annoying.
	Yeah, those guys are the market.
	Well, you, yeah.
	Well, you got one of the cars.
	He already gave us a report.
	Let's talk about, I believe, which might be the six-week cycle coming back.
	Okay.
	This is the stupid 200-pound bomb story.
	Oh, let's revisit this.
	You know anything about this?
	No.
	Where was it?
	It was played by all the networks.
	By the way, this 200-pound bomb is an 8-pound bomb in a wooden case, and so they weighed the whole thing.
	It was 200 pounds.
	They call it a 200-pound bomb.
	Very misleading.
	That's not like 200 pounds of TNT. It's not the same thing.
	It was 8 pounds of black powder he bought online.
	Oh, yeah.
	And it was 192 pounds of what?
	Metal.
	Plywood.
	A 56-year-old man from New York was charged today with making a huge bomb as part of a plot to blow himself up in Washington, D.C. on Election Day.
	Paula Reid fills us in on this.
	FBI agents today continued searching a home just north of New York City, where yesterday they discovered a 200-pound bomb.
	Prosecutors say Paul Rosenfeld planned to detonate that bomb in Washington, D.C. on Election Day.
	He allegedly wanted to kill himself and draw attention to his political beliefs.
	Over the past two months, according to court papers, Rosenfeld allegedly sent letters and text messages to a Pennsylvania resident detailing his plan to detonate the bomb on the National Mall to draw attention to the sortition political theory that advocates the random selection of government officials.
	The Pennsylvania resident alerted the FBI and police pulled Rosenfeld over Tuesday.
	After waiving his Miranda rights, Rosenfeld admitted his plan.
	He told agents he ordered...
	Wait a minute.
	He waived his Miranda rights?
	Who does that?
	A guy who's nuts?
	Oh, who's on the payroll, yeah.
	The Pennsylvania resident alerted the FBI and police polled Rosenfeld over Tuesday.
	After waiving his Miranda rights, Rosenfeld admitted his plan.
	He told agents he ordered large quantities of black powder online, built small test explosives, and then used about eight pounds to construct the 200-pound explosive device in a plywood box in his basement.
	He said he installed certain components in the device to ensure that he was killed in the blasts.
	FBI technicians removed the bomb from his basement and transferred it to a safe location.
	At a Senate hearing this morning, FBI Director Christopher Wray said his agents are investigating about a thousand homegrown terror threats in all 50 states.
	Now those cover the waterfront.
	Of the full range of extremist ideologies from right to left and everything in between.
	Oh, wow.
	No, this is a different kind of reboot.
	We're moving away from the crazy Islamic terrorists to crazy Republican white nutjob men.
	Yeah.
	That's what's going on here.
	And there's thousands of these white guys with these plywood bombs.
	I thought they upped the ante, because if you remember, it was the previous FBI guy, Comey, who said that I've maybe gone back to Mueller, but one of them said, we believe we have at least one per state.
	Every state, there's 50 of these nutcases out there that are going to do something that we have to keep an eye on them.
	Now, it's changed to 1,000.
	So that's how many per state?
	200?
	Yeah, that's ridiculous.
	No, no, it's not 200.
	You're off.
	It would be five.
	20.
	Let's try 20.
	20.
	Let's try 20.
	But you know what?
	Before the year is over, it'll be 200.
	The rate they're going.
	Thousands.
	Thousands of these guys.
	Well, who knows what's up with the FBI? Well, I'm marking today's date as a six-week cycle date.
	Okay.
	And we're going to keep track.
	Synchronized watches and mark.
	Okay.
	That's how they do it in the TV shows.
	Now, the other disgusting story is this...
	Do you know about this?
	They're putting...
	Didn't we talk about this on the last show?
	About Facebook coming out with an Alexa device?
	No, you talked about it on DH Unplugged.
	Ah!
	I'm glad you listened.
	Huh.
	You've got a clip here about this thing.
	Why would anybody put this in their house?
	The question is why is Facebook marketing it at this moment?
	Why should people trust Facebook to put this kind of device into their homes?
	So we have designed privacy from the ground out.
	The fact that we built from the hardware, the software, the AI technology that we show you, we have put privacy in every layer of the stack.
	Facebook is obviously an advertising business, so are you going to use this screen to put advertising in people's homes?
	No, that's not really the plan.
	We don't think we can get much value, neither to our users nor to us that way.
	Because it brings Facebook right into your home looking at you every day.
	We don't know too much about what information Facebook is going to retain from these devices.
	The only thing that companies could be sure about is that somehow the device is going to be hacked.
	That's what we've seen over and over and over again.
	Okay, girl genius.
	Well, Facebook is doing a lot of things.
	I'm seeing them advertising their Facebook marketplace a lot, which is their Craigslist type deal.
	I don't know any of this.
	I see it all the time, these ads on TV for Facebook.
	I have not seen any of these ads.
	Okay.
	I'm a little cord-cutted, but...
	Well, I know.
	They're in trouble.
	People are walking away.
	I think they've got to focus a lot of energy on the Insta.
	Which I think is, if the revenue is not already coming from there, it will in the future.
	It just seems to be the winner.
	It's a real winner.
	And I think this was just on the books.
	You know, it's a big company.
	It's like something, yeah, well, screw it.
	It's got to come out then.
	We'll release it.
	I haven't seen them.
	I saw the news shows jumping on it with a similar story.
	But I don't see anyone out there pushing it.
	No statement from Zuck.
	About how great it is.
	I think it was just in the planning and just got to release it and get it done with.
	Unless they start really pushing it for Christmas, which I think is unlikely.
	Now, I had another story, and I was only going to mention it unless I got the right clip.
	And I think I got the right clip.
	It was from a local Fox station.
	This is the emotional squirrel story, which I'm sure you heard.
	Yeah.
	Some idiot brings a wild squirrel onto an airplane.
	And expects to be let on as an emotional support squirrel.
	All of your questions about this process are answered, and she actually answers them in this clip.
	We heard that there was a squirrel on the plane that we needed to get off.
	Passenger Cindy Tork brought her emotional support squirrel on the plane, but Frontier Airlines said they don't allow rodents.
	I said, you're not taking my squirrel, sorry.
	Cindy was coming to visit family in Cleveland.
	She tells Fox 8 she got her squirrel named Daisy to help with severe anxiety.
	She'll fit in the palm of my hand.
	I can cover her up with my other hand.
	She gives you kisses.
	She says she went to the check-in desk with Daisy, but when she got in her seat, there was a problem.
	And she said, are you getting off the plane?
	If you don't, then we have to deboard everybody.
	Okay, deboard them, but I'm taking my squirrel with me.
	Everyone on the plane had to get off.
	We didn't want to get off.
	We were like, we're ready to go, let's go.
	But there's a squirrel.
	Who would have a squirrel?
	No offense, as a pet.
	And police came to take Cindy and the squirrel off too.
	It's cruel what they did to me.
	She should not have been able to get past TSA. If the squirrel was an animal that can't be on the plane, why did she even get as far as she did?
	That's a good question.
	Cindy went through security with no problem.
	He said, you can hold her so she doesn't have to go through x-ray.
	And TSA told us in an email the squirrel was screened the same way someone's cat would be screened.
	The container was sent through the x-ray machine, and the passenger carried the squirrel through the walk-through metal detector.
	They say it's up to the airlines to determine if an animal may fly.
	Cindy says she understands why Daisy might not be welcome on a plane.
	If somebody brought a rat or a snake or a spider, tarantula, onto the plane, I would feel a little creepy.
	I can sympathize with the people that don't want her there.
	She was in a carrying case.
	Frontier says it wasn't clear Cindy's animal was a squirrel, but they still refunded her money and gave her a ticket voucher.
	But Cindy says that's not enough.
	I will own a big portion of this airline.
	I'm going for blood.
	I am going all the way.
	I am contacting an attorney and take it from there.
	I'm going for blood.
	Squirrel!
	I'm going to own a big portion of this airline.
	We have now officially gone insane.
	Well, she has.
	It's just the start.
	But I love how...
	If the thing was in a cage, you know, I wonder what the big deal was.
	Carrier.
	Like a carrier.
	The thing is, everyone they had in the report was like, that's just crazy!
	You're a squirrel!
	That's just crazy!
	Now, a goat?
	And all these are okay?
	Goats aren't okay either.
	Yeah, but on some airlines, they are.
	Yeah, if you're flying to Mecca.
	Yeah.
	Alright.
	I thought it was just some collective insanity.
	A couple of things I got here.
	I have a...
	Did you see the clip that was going around Twitter on John Meyer, the performer with his guitar on stage?
	Yes.
	I was actually going to mention to you that I, earlier before we started the show, I secreted some toxic masculinity on the mixing table.
	Well, wipe it up!
	Needs a big sponge.
	John Mayer.
	Alright, this needs some lead-in, I think.
	John Mayer.
	Okay, you give the lead-in, because I don't have a good lead-in.
	John Mayer is a womanizer.
	Yeah.
	He's a total womanizer, and all of a sudden, he's like Mr.
	Bitch.
	It's the idea that if you're a man, any woman you see, you should be able to get an erection.
	By the way, stop it right there.
	What?
	Who subscribes to this policy?
	He says that part of the male problem is that if you're a man, you should be able to get an erection for any woman, period.
	Yeah.
	I've never had that experience.
	I'm not walking around with an erection all the time.
	There's plenty of women that don't have any appeal to me.
	I don't know John Mayer personally, but he comes across to me as the type of character who really disrespects women because he thinks they're all his conquest, and he has proven that.
	He's projecting that.
	All he's doing is projecting.
	Yes.
	And blaming all men for his problems.
	Yes, this is the kind of guy that stops with his sports car next to the girl and he turns up the radio really loud with some thumping song.
	That's John Mayer.
	That's this kind of guy.
	He's a douche.
	And now, yes, now he's projecting.
	I agree.
	What is this bullcrap?
	Men think that they should always get an erection for every woman they see.
	Uh, no.
	It's very, very douchey.
	Douchey is the idea that if you're a man, any woman you see, you should be able to get an erection.
	And when we don't, that's the trauma.
	I don't want it to be the male contract.
	I'm telling you that's the contract and we have to tear the contract up.
	What's that?
	Quite honestly, and I'm having a hard time hearing it now, I saw this clip played on news stations.
	And I'm like, why are you even playing this clip?
	You can't hear what he says.
	He's just like, tear the contract up.
	You don't have to play it.
	No, I want to play it.
	I found this to be extremely annoying.
	Who does this guy think he is?
	I want to play more.
	Speaking for all men.
	I want to play more, because this is the longest version of the clip I've seen.
	What is happening?
	No, no, this is fine.
	She's actually asking a really decent, pertinent question.
	What you're saying, what is the mail contract then?
	The mail contract is to, between the ages of whatever, puberty and college, to be instructed to have a class, to have a voice of reason taught to young men.
	You are not supposed to be able to do this to everything that moves.
	You are not entitled to be able to do this to everything that moves.
	This does not come naturally to a man.
	This does not come unnaturally to a man.
	You do not possess the universal ability to have any woman that you see.
	The great philosopher John Mayer, everybody.
	I think he was coming out as gay.
	That's totally possible.
	I'm going to do a quick triage of Trump hates.
	We start with CNBC, who just can't stop comparing him to Nixon.
	He thinks to have a president call out the Fed in that aggressive way.
	If at all.
	It's all advised.
	Nixon was critical in his day.
	Well, he was an idiot.
	I mean, look, he was really good on the China thing.
	We're undoing that now, right?
	But, you know, Nixon was, he's not the role, you know, classically not the role model, including the Christmas Day bombing of the Children's Hospital in North Vietnam.
	Okay.
	Morning Joe.
	Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
	What was that?
	That would sound like Kramer.
	What's he got to do with this conversation?
	That's all they talk about is CNBC. Oh, my God.
	Oh, yeah.
	Morning Joe.
	Now, are you familiar with the two minutes of hate, this term, this concept?
	No.
	You will be reminded by the Morning Joe show during this little segment.
	And I think they're talking about Feinstein.
	Can you believe that?
	Before the hate had proceeded for 30 seconds, uncontrollable exclamations of rage were breaking out from half the people in the room.
	In its second minute, the hate rose to a frenzy.
	People were leaping up and down in their places and shouting at the top of their voices.
	The horrible thing about the two minutes hate, that's the name of the exercise, was not that one was obliged to act apart, but that it was impossible to avoid joining in.
	And yet, the rage that one felt was an abstract, undirected emotion, which could be switched from one object to another, like the flame of a blow lamp.
	Sound like a Trump rally?
	State.
	That was former Massachusetts Governor Bill Weld in November of 2016.
	Reading from George Orwell's 1984 and predicting what we are now seeing two years later as last night's Trump campaign rally broke out into a spontaneous chant demanding to lock up Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein.
	We've arrived in 1984.
	Has anybody gone to one of these things?
	You've been to one.
	You see them.
	If you watch them, these people are just doing it just to irk.
	They're doing it not as hate.
	They're doing it as kind of a moment of irking the other side.
	It's humorous.
	It's actually a moment, two minutes of humor more than it is two minutes of hate.
	Well, that piece was completely produced with this in mind.
	They overlaid two events.
	That is so pathetic.
	I'm going to give you a clip of the day for that only because it's a clip of the day.
	Sick clip.
	Sick.
	Yeah, I'm sorry for the sickness of the clip.
	Sick, sick, sick, sick, and more sick.
	Not as sick as my last clip in the triage.
	You may have seen this one, but I like to play this on the show so that we have it on the show.
	Because not everyone sees the insanity.
	This was on the Don Lemon Show.
	As you know, he is the overnight sensation on CNN. Along with him, Tara Setmeyer.
	Oh, yeah.
	Bakari Sellers.
	And then there's one guy from, I don't know, the Daily Beast or something like that.
	After you play this clip, I'm going to explain why I didn't clip it.
	Okay, and then I'll explain, I'll tell you what I think about it.
	So here it is.
	This is about Kanye West meeting with Donald Trump.
	Kanye West is what happens when Negroes don't read.
	And we have this now, and now Donald Trump is going to use it and pervert it, and he's going to have somebody who can stand with him and take pictures.
	I'm just looking at Scott's face.
	Listen, black folks are about to trade Kanye West in the racial draft, okay?
	They've had it with him, and he's an attention whore like the president.
	He's all of a sudden now the model spokesperson.
	He's the token Negro of the Trump administration.
	This is ridiculous, and no one should be taking Kanye West seriously.
	He clearly has issues.
	He's already been hospitalized.
	Okay, why didn't you clip it?
	I think there's a lot to unpack here.
	Well, first of all, that's a clip of a clip.
	Because in the interim, they talked about how the Negro who doesn't read a book and taking a Negro on the Negro draft or whatever she was saying, were both taken and they expressly mentioned that they were taken from comedy skits.
	Oh, really?
	One was Chris Rocks.
	He's the one who did The Negro Doesn't Read a Book.
	And then the other one was some other comic that the third person that was on that panel brought that up.
	He says, well, at least I got that reference.
	So these were references to comedy acts, and that's what had Don Lemon cracking up.
	I just thought it was just they were trying to be funny, and they weren't very funny, and I don't – I saw the tweets, oh my god, they said this and they said that, but if you want to give Trump a break for being humorous, you've got to give the other side a break too if they're trying to be funny.
	It wasn't serious.
	I was...
	I too was like, why is everyone upset?
	I love this.
	I wish people would talk more like this on CNN. At least it's a little more real.
	This is the kind of jokes you make.
	This is jokes you make amongst yourselves.
	I don't know.
	I mean, I've been amongst African Americans, and when there's some jokes, it's funny.
	If you're going to bitch about nobody, oh, nobody gets it that Trump's funny.
	He's actually funny.
	And the locker up is really actually funny.
	It's humorous.
	It is.
	You've got to give the other side the same leeway.
	I didn't realize, was this, because then I got duped by this, was this somewhere in their conversation they mentioned?
	It was right, it was right.
	No, no, let me tell you what happened.
	Let me tell you what happened.
	I did not do what I did with the Tucker Carlson clip.
	I did not go and look for the original.
	I did not notice an edit.
	So what you're saying is it's edited.
	Yes.
	Ah, okay.
	Well, then, you know what?
	That's actually all the reason to bring it to the show and explain it, because it's going around exactly what you said.
	Like, everyone's all going crazy, but they were jokes, and they actually explained that?
	Ah.
	Yeah, they referenced the jokes.
	I think the jokes are funny.
	I thought so too.
	But more importantly, that's how normal people talk amongst themselves.
	It was good.
	If you want to jump all over these boneheads, I think earlier in the show you did it.
	You found some clip of some idiot claiming that...
	One of the judges, or Clarence Thomas, was a sexual predator, or he's a sexual assaulter.
	He didn't do anything, but that's where you...
	There's your condemnation, not against some mild commentary.
	Right.
	I wasn't condemning it.
	Again, I like it.
	No, I know.
	You didn't.
	I thought...
	I didn't know where you're going to go with it, but I just thought it was humorous.
	But I thought it was humorous, especially in lieu of the...
	Of the notice they gave discussing the origins of these lines.
	Okay, there is one part of it though that is not okay.
	And that's not okay by today's social justice standards.
	And what's her face?
	Tara Setmeyer should be called out on it.
	It's this last bit.
	It's the token negro of the Trump administration.
	This is ridiculous.
	And no one should be taking Kanye West seriously.
	He clearly has issues.
	He's already been hospitalized.
	You don't make fun of these people.
	This is in the victim culture, social justice warrior.
	That is foreboding.
	You don't say this.
	You don't say, hey, we can't take him serious.
	He's already been treated for mental problems.
	That's very egregious.
	That's egregious.
	That's really not okay.
	That was inexcusable.
	Now, my last little thing, or last one of two things, What is the deal that started with the guy, apparently some astronaut, this is all over Twitter, and I put the little back and forth tweets on the newsletter.
	Astronaut comes back and he quotes Winston Churchill.
	And then he gets a bunch of these SJWs jump all over him saying, the racist of all time is the worst man ever.
	Winston Churchill is a douche.
	They go on and on.
	And so then it ends up showing up on Good Morning Britain.
	Of course.
	With the, you know, his name.
	Oh, Pierce Morgan.
	Pierce Morgan and his cast.
	They brought out some guy.
	Of course, you know how to do this.
	You've done it.
	You bring out some guy who's a bonehead, you know, the worst possible character.
	They brought in a professor, a black guy from Haiti or somewhere.
	Some black guy teaches at some no-name college in London.
	And they bring him out just to stir things up.
	And the And it's fine.
	I mean, this guy has his opinion.
	He's kind of a douche.
	But what is the point in the first place of jumping all over these guys because they're old white guys who have some influence on the culture?
	Yes.
	Amongst many other things that men are responsible for.
	Well, listen the way this goes down.
	Why?
	I mean, the historical record here is clear.
	Even Boris Johnson admits that he was a racist.
	He was someone who believed that the white race was superior, that natives didn't have any right to their lands in the Americas, that Indians were a ghastly people, and just was a general imperialist racist.
	Is there any way that we can say...
	Because those were the views of their time.
	And the fact that he actually achieved something which saved, defended, protected our nation means that we can separate those things out.
	That's the Jimmy Savile defence, isn't it?
	It was just a bit different back in the day.
	Well, let's make a better comparison.
	At the time, Leo Amory, the Secretary of India, not an anti-racist, actually said that Churchill's views were so extreme on India, he couldn't separate them from Hitler's.
	And the truth is, Hitler was a great military leader, a product of his time, and if they'd won the war, we'd be having discussion now.
	Do people watch that show?
	I think so, yeah.
	Jimmy Savile.
	Yeah, the child rapist.
	So Churchill and Jimmy Savile, kind of the same kind of thing there.
	Totally the same.
	What are they trying to accomplish with this?
	This is just annoying people, by the way.
	Well, this is a version of us pulling down statues, you know.
	Let's go after Churchill now.
	Yeah.
	And you know what?
	Everybody needs their 15 minutes.
	They've got a story, you're some whacked up.
	Television news especially, it's not that this was news, it's just useless.
	Except for C-SPAN, that's kind of useful still.
	Well, I got two shorties.
	Now, you already said you had two shorties, and you can do one more.
	I got one left.
	Yeah, one more.
	I'll skip the love baguette.
	And this is good.
	This is a new disease we now have to fret about.
	A new disease.
	Tonight, doctors in Chicago say two-year-old Julia Payne has acute flaccid myelitis or AFM, the rare polio-like disease on the rise.
	Her mother thought she had a cold.
	I took her to the ER because she turned blue.
	I noticed she couldn't hold her head up anymore and she couldn't use her right arm.
	Doctors believe AFM, which can cause partial paralysis, is linked to viruses, but say there's no known cure.
	Hand-washing the best protection.
	The CDC confirming at At least 38 infections in 16 states, now investigating even more, including a new cluster in Illinois.
	We started to see clusters of it back in 2014, and it went away relatively in 2015, and then we saw a resurgence of cases again in 2016.
	Tonight, doctors scrambling to solve a medical mystery.
	Why are some children falling ill from such a dangerous disease?
	I've never heard of this.
	Well, you're going to start hearing about it.
	I think that was the salvo.
	I don't quite get the premise when she said the woman took the baby or the kid in because she thought she had a cold and the description was she turned blue, couldn't lift her arm and couldn't lift her head.
	She couldn't breathe maybe then.
	Well, I mean, something's up, but it's not a cold.
	But it has this name, AFM, so it's been around, clearly.
	Yeah.
	Okay, you bummed me out with that, so let's play the love baguette, because I can't leave on dead children.
	A good love baguette.
	The love baguette is not just a funny-shaped loaf of bread.
	Its ribbon shape emulates the symbol of the French non-profit EDS, which raises money to fight and prevent AIDS. Like 900 other bakers in France, Marc-Antoine Hébert is selling this baguette for two euros.
	Half the proceeds are sent to the organization.
	It's a small baguette that can save lives.
	This is the first time Marc-Antoine has participated.
	Even his clients who aren't familiar with the Love Baguette appreciate the initiative.
	If he can help fight the disease, I buy a Love Baguette regularly.
	Last year, the Love Baguette helped raise €80,000, money that Ed's used to buy HIV screening kits and finance preventative measures.
	I think I would have preferred the dead children, honestly.
	I predict love baguettes in the United States within the next six months.
	A lot of predictions.
	By the way, the love baguette is like that little ribbon, you know?
	Yeah, like a pretzel, only it's not.
	It's like a pretty pretzel.
	Well, it's a big giant thing.
	It's a baguette.
	It's pretty.
	All right, everybody.
	That's our show.
	I will remind you that Google Plus closed because you cannot monetize the network.
	And I am coming to you from downtown Austin, Texas, capital of the Drone Star State.
	I'm, uh...
	What is it?
	FIBA Region 6 on the governmental maps.
	That's what it is.
	It's always forgetting.
	In the 5x9 Cludio in the common law condo.
	In the morning, everybody, I'm Adam Curry.
	And from Northern California, where, uh...
	The mudflats are still there.
	I'm John C. Dvorak.
	You said it again.
	It's northern Silicon Valley.
	I said it on purpose this time.
	Remember us at Dvorak.org slash NA. We return on Sunday, and you can always support us at Dvorak.org slash NA.
	Until then, adios, mofos.
	The Resistance. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs.
	Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. The Resistance. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs.
	Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. .
	The resistance.
	Jobs, jobs, jobs.
	Job, job, job. Jobs, jobs, jobs. Jobs, jobs, jobs.
	A major excise.
	The New York Times has revealed President Trump inherited his family's wealth.
	President Trump inherited his family's wealth.
	And here's an example of this.
	We can't relent.
	Starch is an outright fraud.
	How did you get home?
	I don't know.
	The New York Times, $13,050 million.
	A thousand dollars in taxes in a major organization.
	Inherited his family's wealth.
	years ago was it i don't know what's the same egg the the new york times 13,050 million dollars 36 years for the new york times has revealed president trump inherited his family's wealth no there was one beer good How did he get his family's wealth?
	There it is, a fashion man.
	There was one beer, good.
	$13,050 million.
	How did you get home?
	I don't know.
	There was super day.
	No, no.
	President Trump, $50 million.
	How to relax, please.
	One beer, how did he talk?
	He's getting lunch at Chipotle.
	Hey.
	The tortis in the race.
	Kim Kardashian.
	Siganoi Weaver.
	R-E-S-P-I-C-T. They're all jitty.
	R-E-S-P-I-C-T. There's no real conflict.
	Resist.
	We must.
	Resist.
	We must.
	We must.
	And we will much.
	About that.

▲