Ep. 1727 - The Disturbing Facts The Epstein Files REVEALED
Today on the Matt Walsh Show, millions of pages of Epstein Files have been released. I will give you an honest and thorough analysis of what’s contained in the files, and what, if anything, they prove. Also, degenerate drug addicted musicians bravely speak out against Trump and ICE during the Grammys. And new work requirement officially go into place for food stamp recipients. And the recipients aren’t happy about it.
Ep. 1727
- - -
Click here to join the member-exclusive portion of my show: https://dwplus.watch/MattWalshMemberExclusive
- - -
Today's Sponsors:
Seven Weeks Coffee - Save up to 25% with promo code 'WALSH' at https://sevenweekscoffee.com/WALSH
Grand Canyon University - Find your purpose at Grand Canyon University. Visit https://GCU.edu/MyOffer to see the scholarships you may qualify for!
Ascension Press - You can join Crux with 90 days of premium access to the Ascension app for just $4.99*. Visit https://ascensionpress.com/WALSH to download the app and get the free Crux Action Plan to prepare for the challenge and track your progress through Lent. *Offer excludes current subscribers.
ARMRA - Go to https://armra.com/WALSH or enter WALSH to get 30% off your first subscription order.
- - -
DailyWire+:
Become a Daily Wire Member and watch all of our content ad-free: https://dailywire.com/subscribe
🍿 Real History with Matt Walsh available now, exclusively on DailyWire+!
Watch now: https://dwplus.watch/RealHistory
Subscribe here: https://dwplus.watch/RealHistorySubscribe
🍿 The Pendragon Cycle: Rise of the Merlin is here. Episodes 1-3 are now streaming exclusively on DailyWire+
Watch now: https://dwplus.watch/ThePendragon
Subscribe here: https://pendragonseries.com
🔥 Friendly Fire is here! No moderator, no safe words. Now available: https://dailywire.com/show/friendly-fire
👕 Get your Matt Walsh flannel here: https://dwplus.shop/MattWalshMerch
- - -
Socials:
Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3Rv1VeF
Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3KZC3oA
Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eBKjiA
Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RQp4rs
- - -
Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Today, the Matt Wall show, millions of pages of Epstein files have been released.
I'll give you an honest and thorough analysis of what's contained in the files and what, if anything, they prove.
Also, degenerate drug-addicted musicians bravely speak out against Trump and ICE during the Grammys to the sound of applause.
And new work requirements officially go into place for food stamp recipients, and the recipients aren't happy about it, to put it mildly.
We'll talk about all that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
In a decade that's already been marked by frequent major vindications for the alleged conspiracy theorists among us, Friday's Epstein files document dumped by the DOJ seemed relatively unsurprising at first.
Here, we were told, was yet more evidence that a handful of rich and powerful elites are conspiring behind closed doors, hosting degenerate parties and abusing victims.
And of course, following the document dump, there were the usual political cheap shots, which were mostly divorced from any semblance of reality.
On Saturday Night Live, which long ago abandoned the pretense of being a comedy show, there was an awkward and painfully on-the-nose joke by Pete Davidson implying that the Trump administration had released the latest Epstein files to distract everybody from the ICE shootings in Minneapolis, even though the ICE deployments in Minneapolis, as the SNL sketch helpfully pointed out, were supposedly intended to distract from the Epstein files in the first place.
In short, the message was that for the typical observer, this latest document dump contained nothing new.
We're told that this is all a political distraction that tells us nothing we didn't already know.
But the Epstein files that were released on Friday are, I think, far more consequential than you're being told.
First, the documents demonstrate that the size and scope of Epstein's network were much larger than we believed.
And these people are in some ways more demented, even more demented than we realized.
And second, it gives us a glimpse into how these people speak to each other, which is revealing for a number of reasons that I'll get into.
And third, there's new evidence about how blackmail operations may have been conducted in Epstein's network, as well as how Epstein's associates pushed things like the cult of transgenderism onto toddlers.
In short, Friday's release of the latest Epstein files vindicates a new wave of alleged conspiracy theories that a week ago would have been dismissed as unhinged or anti-Semitic or far-fetched.
And today I'm going to go through what I've seen in these files and just give you an honest summary and analysis of it from my perspective, because that's all that I can do.
But before we dive into these emails and documents, I need to point out a few things.
Now, first of all, a lot of fake emails are predictably circulating.
So if you see an email and you're not sure if it's authentic, it's very easy to go on the DOJ's website and find their Epstein database, search the words in the email and see if it's legitimate.
Secondly, many emails that are actually contained in the database are being wildly misrepresented.
And that's because the database contains every random accusation from every schizophrenic or otherwise mentally unwell individual who ever emailed Epstein or who was ever discussed by FBI agents.
So take this email, for example, that you may have already seen.
It involves FBI agents discussing an interview with a man who described all kinds of allegations against Epstein, including the claim that the man was the victim of a, quote, ritualistic sacrifice in which his feet were cut with a scimitar, but left no scarring.
The man also told agents that he was sexually assaulted by George H.W. Bush.
And in an email, one of the agents noted that the man was unemployed and resides with his mother and her unemployed, morbidly obese boyfriend.
And he had also ingested hallucinogenic mushrooms and seemed emotionally unbalanced and offered no supporting evidence whatsoever.
So the agent naturally recommended that the bureau drop the case entirely.
Which means that with that kind of email, if you are a sane, rational, honest person, there's obviously nothing to be gleaned from it whatsoever other than this was a crazy person saying crazy things.
And there's no evidence at all for the claims that are absurd and being made there.
Now, with that in mind, here's how a viral post on X with more than 10 million views and 100,000 likes describes that email, the email that the FBI acknowledges is not credible at all.
There's no evidence for it.
Quote, the Epstein files reveal horrifying events involving the American elite.
It is alleged that George H.W. Bush raped a male victim and that the same victim was also subjected to a ritual sacrifice in which his feet were cut off with a sword.
The victim says he witnessed a child being torn apart and having their intestines pulled out aboard a yacht.
He says the people on the yacht ate the intestinal waste.
So they strip out the context, which is the fact that we're talking about the rantings of a man who's clearly unwell, and they present it as fact-based testimony from a credible witness.
That's how a lot of these viral posts work.
There's another one that claims that Trump buried children under his golf course.
And, you know, because of posts like this, some conservatives have suggested that the administration shouldn't have released these files at all.
There was a mistake to release them because of all this bad information that's out there.
And I understand that argument.
It's not an unreasonable argument.
But the problem is that, first of all, Trump promised to release the files.
And then, of course, we had the infamous binder stunt.
And to promise to release the files and then not release them would be a problem.
Promising to release them and then pretending to release them, but then not releasing them would be even worse.
So these documents had to come out.
And there was no other way at this point.
And second, more to the point, it cannot possibly be overstated the extent to which all public trust in our institutions and ruling powers has been demolished in a post-COVID, post-Floyd, post-gender affirmation world.
There's just no trust in the powers that be in the elites, in our institutions at all at this point.
And deservedly so.
And in the face of that, full transparency is the only way forward, even with its attending complications, which are numerous, I admit.
Now, yes, one of those complications is that you're going to get a lot of false engagement bait.
You'll get posts that are intended to get views and generate revenue.
But it's also likely that some of these posts are intended to distract from the fact that if you pay attention, there is important information in the Friday release of the Epstein files.
Epstein's Email Controversy00:14:48
And it's so not just new information, but also important information that we should know.
We'll begin with a highly unusual series of emails from December of 2018 in which Ehud Barak, the former prime minister of Israel, discussed a meeting with Jabor Al Thani, a member of the Qatari royal family.
And Epstein is CC'd on the communications, and Barack eventually asked Epstein, hi, Jeff, are you going to be in London on Thursday?
Epstein responds, unfortunately not.
You should make clear that I don't work for Mossad.
And he adds a smiley face to the end of that email.
And then Ehud Barak writes back, you or I.
And then Epstein confirms that he's talking about himself, adding a smiley face, not an emoji, but the old school smiley face, you know, the colon in close parentheses.
And then Barack gives the thumbs up.
Now, for context, because context is important in all these things, Jeffrey Epstein at that point was a convicted sex offender.
He pleaded guilty several years earlier in very public circumstances to procuring a child for prostitution.
And despite that history, the former prime minister of Israel, who was planning a political comeback at the time while also running an Israeli emergency management startup called Carbine, was going out of his way to invite Epstein to this highly sensitive meeting with an important foreign official.
This is a meeting that had personal ramifications for Barack's business, which Epstein was an investor in, as well as the state of Israel at large.
And in the meantime, they were chatting with each other about how to reassure Jabbar Al-Thani that Epstein definitely 100% absolutely wasn't working for Israel's intelligence agency in any way, shape, or form.
Now, you could say, well, Epstein was just joking around.
That's what the smiley faces are for.
But those smiley faces in the context of a conversation between a 60-year-old man and a 70-something-year-old man look a lot like plausible deniability.
We already know from previous reporting by the Wall Street Journal that according to Epstein's private calendar, Epstein met with one of Barack Obama's top lawyers at the White House, Catherine Ruhmler, dozens of times.
Ruhmler was very close to Epstein.
She was a backup executor on his will.
And she also sent the following email to him in January of 2015.
It says, quote, John Brennan gave me the CIA agency medal, the CIA's highest award this morning.
How cool is that?
So here we have a top Obama official who was in private practice at the time running to Jeffrey Epstein for validation, phishing for compliments about winning the highest award offered by the CIA.
And she sent this email within hours of winning the award, as Mike Benz has reported.
And that suggests very strongly that Epstein had something to do with her receiving that award.
Maybe.
Epstein also met with William Burns, who later became CIA director.
He was a high-ranking official at the State Department when he met with Epstein.
So Burns met with a convicted sex offender and pedophile in Manhattan, then received a promotion to CIA director.
And furthermore, as Benz reported, Epstein, using a law form so that he remained anonymous, sent an FOIA request to the CIA in 1999 to obtain all of their records that might, quote, reflect an open or otherwise acknowledged agency affiliation between himself and the CIA.
In 2011, more than a decade later, Epstein sent a similar request to the CIA.
And we don't have any real information as to the exact CIA records that Epstein requested about himself in 1999, nor what dates he included in the Freedom of Information Act request.
The CIA has refused to release this information more than 25 years later.
And for Benz, that's an indication that Epstein had some ties to the CIA going back a very long time, possibly as far back as the early 1980s when Epstein was known to have a fake Saudi passport.
And then, of course, there was the reporting from the Daily Beast that Alex Acosta, the U.S. attorney who gave Epstein his lenient plea deal, told Trump administration officials that Epstein, quote, belonged to intelligence.
And then when he was asked about those comments during a press conference, Acosta dodged.
So it was painfully obvious that he was hiding something.
And we played this before, but I think it's worth repeating in the context of everything we see in the Epstein files.
Watch.
Secretary, were you ever made aware at any point in your handling of this case if Mr. Epstein was an intelligence asset of some sort?
So there has been reporting to that effect.
And let me say, there's been reporting to a lot of effects in this case, not just now, but over the years.
And again, I would, you know, I would hesitate to take this reporting as fact.
This was a case that was brought by our office.
It was brought based on the facts.
And I look at that reporting and others.
I can't address it directly because of our guidelines.
But I can tell you that a lot of reporting is just going down rabbit holes.
A few more questions.
So suffice it to say, Epstein's quote-unquote jokes with Ehud Barak about working for Mossad, which is obviously aligned with the CIA, don't actually seem like jokes at all.
And many more emails in this latest document don't raise additional questions on this front.
There's a question of why in September of 2015, Sultan Bin Sulyam of Dubai sent an email to Jeffrey Epstein confirming a meeting with former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, who was Russian prime minister at the time.
Quote, just got this from Trutnev office.
Dear Mr. Sultan, tomorrow I will receive the photos and meeting with the prime minister is confirmed.
Best regards, Yuri.
More than a decade earlier in May of 2013, Epstein sent this message to Ehud Barak, quote, Putin asked that I meet him in St. Petersburg the same time as his economic conference.
I told him no.
If he wants to meet, he will need to set aside real time and privacy.
Let's see what happens.
So to be clear about this, we hear we have a convicted sex offender playing hard to get with the Russian president.
He's demanding that Putin go out of his way to meet with him.
And based on his other meetings with high-level officials in Russia, it seems that he got exactly what he wanted.
Now, it can't be overstated how extraordinary it is that despite his reputation and his crimes, which he admitted to, Epstein had a connection with pretty much every power player and future power player in American politics.
So here's a 2009 email from Epstein's publicist Epstein, just as another example.
Quote, just left Ghislaine's townhouse after party for film.
Bill Clinton and Jeff Bezos were there.
Director Mira Nair, et cetera.
Film received tepid reaction, although women like it much more.
Studio went for free party from store and windows for a month.
Going to be in Wall Street tomorrow.
More to come.
XOXO, PEG.
Now, the director that's mentioned there, Mira Nair, who's mentioned in the email, is not a name you probably recognize, but it is a name familiar to Zorhan Mamdani because that is his mother, who supposedly is from Nowheresville, Uganda, came out of nowhere to become the mayor of our largest and most important city.
This, again, is perhaps the most important takeaway from the Epstein files.
And you may have already known this or thought that you knew it, but it has now been illustrated in very stark colors that there is an incestuous circle of elites, an exclusive club that you're not in and I'm not in.
And this club not only includes but produces, anoints the powerful people who run our country and the world.
That's not a conspiracy theory.
It's just how things actually work.
Now, Epstein also had several email communications with Elon Musk.
In September of 2013, Elon and Epstein had this exchange.
Epstein writes, any plans for NY?
The opening of the General Assembly has many interesting people coming to the House.
Elon responds, I run and lead product design engineering for two complicated companies.
Moreover, SpaceX is about to launch what is arguably the most advanced rocket in history.
Flying to NY to see UN diplomats do nothing would be an unwise use of time.
Then Epstein replies, do you think I am retarded?
Comma, period, question mark.
Just kidding, there is no one over 25 and all very cute.
So it appears that Elon rejected Epstein's attempts to involve him in his operation, which is a tremendous credit to Elon.
It should also be noted that Elon obviously knew that he had these email exchanges with Epstein and knew that they would be used to smear him, which is what's happening.
And yet he forcefully called for the release of the files anyway, which is even more credit to him, even if nobody on the left will give him credit for it.
But the fact remains that Epstein had connections and contacts everywhere with like every powerful person.
And it wasn't just foreign officials and tech executives that he was communicating with.
Epstein was coordinating meetings with high-level politicians in the United States as well.
This email thread is from January of 2018.
And a lawyer with a law firm that has offices in the U.S., Virgin Islands, and New York writes, we have to help Stacey get a meeting with Schumer.
Any thoughts?
The reply from Epstein should not be a problem.
Need to know the reason and subject.
Now, presumably in that context, Schumer refers to the top Democrat in the Senate who received thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Epstein.
There's also this email from 2013.
It's from Epstein and it reads, I have dinner with Schumer tonight.
Again, seems pretty straightforward and demands an immediate explanation from Chuck Schumer, who's been extremely loud since Trump's election about demanding the release of the Epstein files.
Like every Democrat, he claims to care so much about the issue, but never mentioned it.
Never mentioned it until Trump took office.
Biden was in office, I have to remind you, for four years, had control over the Epstein files, never released them.
And none of these Democrats that are now, you know, thumping their chests, none of them called for the release.
Not one single Democrat.
And now some of their names are appearing in the Epstein files.
And we haven't heard a word from Chuck Schumer about that as far as I know.
Now, to be clear, this is not a partisan issue, strictly speaking.
The Epstein files reveal that Trump Commerce Secretary Howard Luttnick was interacting with Epstein and planning to visit his island as recently as December of 2012.
Luttnick wrote, quote, hi, Jeff.
We're landing in St. Thomas early Saturday afternoon, planning to head over to St. Bart's on Monday at some point.
Where are you located?
What is exact location for my captain?
Lutnick falls up to confirm lunch plans with Epstein.
And, you know, that's an issue because Luttnick had previously said that he took one look at Epstein in 2005 and walked out the door, vowing never to interact with him again.
Watch.
Opens the doors, and there's a massage table in the middle of the room and candles all around and stuff.
So I ask very insightful, cutting questions.
I say to him, massage table in the middle of your house?
How often do you have a massage?
And he says, every day.
And then he like gets like weirdly close to me.
And he says, and the right kind of massage.
Now, my wife is standing here.
So she looks at me and I look at her.
And we say, I'm sorry.
We have to go.
And we left.
And in the six or eight steps it takes to get from his house to my house, my wife and I decided that I will never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again.
So I was never in the room with him socially, for business, or even philanthropy.
If that guy was there, I wasn't going because he's gross.
And so I look back at it as a gift.
Yes, he gave me a gift of a voice.
So, yeah, that's my story.
A one and absolutely done.
Now, there are other recognizable names in conservative circles who have popped up as well.
In conversations with Steve Bannon when he was in the Trump White House, for example, Epstein said that he needed passport details for Bannon's entourage.
And for his part, Bannon appeared to enjoy showing off for Epstein.
He wrote in one text, getting briefed by House Intel Now on IG and Spygate.
Epstein also praised Bannon's performance in an interview on ABC, saying that he looked like he was casting a spell on the anchor.
And in that context, Epstein writes, you're an honorary Jew anyway, to which Bannon responds, honored.
I will drop the Christian and Christian Zionist.
But Bannon didn't last long in the Trump administration.
In April of 2017, he was removed from the National Security Council shortly before he was booted from the White House entirely.
And that's what led to this email.
It's from Michael Wolf in 2017.
It's in response to Epstein sending a Bloomberg article about Bannon's termination, quote, war between the Jews and the non-Jews, Jews presently winning.
Now, by itself, you might think, well, you know, that's some odd one-off humor.
But actually, there was nothing one-off about it.
Throughout this latest document dump, it becomes abundantly clear that Epstein harbored a deep disdain for Christians to a pathological degree.
And many of his powerful associates shared that disdain and some of his Christian associates went along with it.
That's not a conspiracy theory or anti-Semitism or Nazism or anything like that.
Deep Disdain Revealed00:14:56
It's just true.
So it's what's in the documents.
And we can spend the next hour going through all the emails in which Epstein and his contacts openly mock and demean Christians using various slurs.
He also expresses an overt preference for Jewish people many times without mincing words.
For logistical reasons, we'll settle for just a few examples.
There are many more, but here's a 2015 email in which Epstein advises the banker, Ariande Rothschild, on how to build an advisory board.
And he says, he writes, quote, no diplomats, et cetera, not Africans, serious people with a strong finance operations reputation, not charity, preferable some Jews.
And there's this email from somebody named Mark Fisher to Epstein in March of 2010, rather, quote, thought about our conversation, remeditation.
Actually, it's not that hard.
Why?
A Jewish soul has a very different structure, different ingredients, components, relates to its higher levels differently, has different higher levels, relates to itself and other people in a different manner than a non-Jewish soul.
So Jewish souls have a different structure, evidently, whatever that means exactly.
But here's maybe the most quotable one that maybe you've seen quoted already.
It begins with Epstein writing to his assistant in August of 2010, quote, Dubin, Dershowitz, Zuckerman all said yes to September 18th, Yom Kippur.
Redemption sounds like a wrestling event.
I need you to oversee.
And then the assistant responds, is it going to be 100% Jew night?
Even Perlman on Yum Yum has some gom.
I'm getting my media elite list fed X'd out for Saturday and will email some names.
What about Charlie Rose?
Love him.
What about Jane Fonda, my new best friend?
Nothing like an ex-Jew hater with a Jewish boyfriend to mix it up.
Epstein then responds with, quote, no goyam in abundance, J.P. Morgan exec's brilliant wasps.
As a side note, one thing you notice when you read these emails, especially if you're trying to read them out loud as I am right now, is that Epstein was apparently only semi-literate.
And same goes for many of the billionaires he consorted with.
So that was one surprising revelation that our elites all write like at a third grade level.
But anyway, yes, Epstein wrote that there will be gom in abundance.
And in case you're not familiar, in this context, goyim is a slur directed at non-Jews to imply that they're inferior, along with similar slurs that appears many, many times in these files.
Here's another example.
This is from an email Epstein sent in 2012 to somebody named Josh.
And it says, quote, you asked me to violate a basic conviction of mine and have an abortion.
Your mother said it would be in your best interest if I did.
You now ask why you should be ashamed.
Now that it is the high holy days, it's simple.
You behave just like the goyim.
You do not respect.
After the holiday, I'll be willing to share a meal.
No sex, none.
I love you.
My Jewish studies said that at 13, you should become a man.
It's not too late.
Again, there are many more emails like this.
There's discussions about how Jews became so wealthy.
Epstein writes that they were stingy, unlike Arabs who spent all their money, which forced the Arabs to borrow money from the Jews.
There are also messages like, the Goyam know how to have a good time and so on.
Now, for good measure, in 2017, former Harvard president Larry Summers asked Epstein for advice on tax breaks and the new law that was being passed by Congress.
And Epstein responded, I don't know of any.
They did a great job of closing most, at least for the Goyam.
And Summers responded with, oh, come on.
So he was openly talking like this to pretty much everybody.
And yet he was joined at the hip with some of the most powerful people in the world.
Now, put simply, throughout most of the history of this country, if you claim that powerful Jewish billionaires and influential figures were constantly saying stuff like this to one another behind closed doors, as a matter of habit, you'd be accused of being a raging anti-Semite.
You'd be banned from every social media platform.
Nobody would hire you.
There'd be segments on CBS about what an awful person you are.
And then one day, the DOJ dumps a million files where goys and goyam are being trashed all over the place by the single most well-connected man to ever walk the face of the earth, apparently, along with his associates.
And this is bigotry and deserves to be called out.
If Epstein were a rich and powerful Christian speaking to other Christians in this demeaning way about Jews, you can bet that it would be noted and condemned.
Same should happen in the reverse.
Now, consider the outrage over an anti-Semitic group chat involving random nobodies with no power influence at all.
If bigoted language and demeaning jokes deserve to be called out in that case, then they certainly deserve to be called out when used by some of the most powerful human beings on the face of the planet.
But it gets worse when you look at what exactly some of these people were discussing amongst themselves.
Here's an email from the billionaire Tom Pritzker to Epstein in June of 2011 when Pritzker's company was looking to invest in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Quote, I'm in a remote valley of Afghanistan.
And it's my birthday wish with boys with toys.
Spent time with Petraeus yesterday and he loaned me a chopper, actually two with one as a backup.
Can't call till tomorrow.
So officially, Pritzker was exploring investment opportunities.
Unofficially, his birthday wish was being granted.
He was fetishizing a war zone where many people, including Americans, were dying.
He was hanging out with, quote, boys with toys.
The U.S. commander of all forces in Afghanistan loaned him a chopper, actually two choppers, at taxpayer expense.
Will anyone be investigated for that?
Will anyone go to prison?
Of course not.
And again, it gets worse.
They weren't just demeaning Christians or planning degenerate parties that may or may not have been legal or getting off to the prospect of dead men, women, and children in Afghanistan.
They were also talking about pushing one of the most destructive anti-science, anti-human, satanic ideas ever invented by mankind.
I'm referring, of course, to transgenderism, particularly the idea that children against their will can be converted to another gender as toddlers.
There's this email from Robert Trivers to Epstein dated December 17th of 2018.
As you might remember, this is right around the time that the trans insanity took hold in this country.
Trivers or Trivers is described as one of the most influential evolutionary biologists of the 20th century.
And here's what he wrote to Epstein.
I'm going to read as much of this as I can, even though the content is profane.
So I'm going to have to censor it in parts.
But all this, again, is available online if you want to go see it.
Quote, it is very simple.
I will compare male to female with female to male.
With greater molecular control over development, we are increasingly capable of producing novel phenotypes, more feminine men by blocking testosterone receptors or castration, and at the same time, increasing estrogen production.
The one blocks male features.
The second encourages female features, more masculine women, heavy testosterone dosage, incredible external effects, heavily bearded men.
You would never guess they had a female bone in their body.
First kind.
Male female is four times more frequent than female male.
The first is attractive.
He is a woman with a penis.
So that if your fantasy is to perform sex acts on a man, otherwise you are completely heterosexual.
It would be much nicer if the rest of the organism is female.
Then you get the best of both worlds.
So so many transsexual women are very attractive and easily make money, which in turn, they assert promotes their prostitution since they have to pay hefty fees for injections every week.
But they're sexually happy.
Once you have reached manhood, even castration does not prevent the sensation of organism, orgasm, I assume is what it means there.
Contrast the poor female to male versions.
They are unhappy and lonely.
They are men with pum-pums, the worst of both worlds.
If you like smelly masculine men, you want that anatomy that comes with the show.
You do not want one of the nature's more complex and variable structures, the pum-pum, that is an acquired taste, and not with a man.
There are hundreds of female trans videos and websites.
I have never seen a male one.
By the way, we are now pushing the intervention earlier.
So you notice your three-year-old son has trans tendencies.
So now you intervene with hormones.
I would be frightened to do that, but who knows?
That was like many of these emails, pretty rough to read.
But I'll say that last part again.
That's really what should be the headline of this thing here.
By the way, we're now pushing the intervention earlier.
So you notice your three-year-old son has trans tendencies.
So now you intervene with hormones.
I would be frightened to do that, but who knows?
Yes, who knows?
Who could possibly say whether it's a good idea to inject a toddler with cross-sex hormones that will sterilize him for life and permanently destroy his natural development as a human being?
Robert Triverts wouldn't want to do that, but if the Goyam want to give it a try, who's to say?
And there's this.
It's a 2016 email from Jess Ting, the trans surgeon who supposedly pioneered a new way to carve out fake female genitals in men.
Ting is talking about research that, as far as I could tell, is unrelated to transgenderism.
But then the conversation immediately pivots to trans-related funding.
And it says this, quote, Hi, Jeffrey.
I hope you're well.
I have two things to tell you about.
One, the research you supported with a $50,000 grant has borne fruit.
We have submitted a paper for publication summarizing our results.
Two, I have been made surgical director of the brand new transgender surgery program in Mount Sinai.
That's right, Mount Sinai being the progressive place that it is, saw an opportunity and need to take a leadership position in the area of transgender health and created the first full-spectrum academic program in the U.S. focused on trans surgery and care.
This was such an interesting and innovative idea that I thought it would make a good documentary.
I pitched the idea to a well-known director and we have started scouting interviews and are in the process of making a fundraising trailer.
If I could just be really forward, I was wondering if you would be interested in supporting this documentary.
If so, the producer director and I would love to come give you the pitch in person.
This is an exciting, groundbreaking project, both the center and the documentary, that will do good for the world.
I hope you can be a part of it.
Best regards, Jess Ting.
This, again, is a theme of these emails.
You know, as he was meeting with world leaders and apparently working with the CIA and the Mossad, Epstein was also in regular communication with degenerates pushing transgenderism when the movement was first really taking hold.
As I mentioned, there's evidence in this latest document dump that Epstein was blackmailing some of the degenerates that he was speaking with.
In 2013, for example, Epstein sent a strange email to himself in which he appears to be shaking down Bill Gates on behalf of and adopting the persona of an associate who Gates had recently fired.
Quote, dear Bill, I cannot believe that you have chosen to disregard our friendship developed over the last six years.
I am aware that accidents happen.
It is how each of us has chosen to deal with this unfortunate event that has me dismayed beyond comprehension.
You have decided to discharge me from my job.
To add insult to injury, you then implore me to please delete the emails regarding your STD, your request that I provide you antibiotics that you can surreptitiously give to Melinda and the description of your penis.
You also made it clear to me that I am not to refer to as that is another topic that must remain between the two of us in return for all those requests, which I would have done without a second thought.
I am not to attend meetings with Melinda.
I should continue to provide you the same level of service and dedication that I have done so diligently until you're ready to discard me and our friendship.
Now, the email also mentions that the associates hasn't been financially made whole by Bill Gates, so the implication is fairly obvious.
And Gates indeed went on to help launch the investment fund of this individual whose name is Boris Nikolich.
Whatever the circumstances of that particular deal were, I don't know.
What I do know is that Gates in general is a scumbag, along with everyone else that Epstein was working with.
And he managed to keep all these people quiet as he conducted foreign diplomacy, coordinated with leading members of both political parties, and advanced transgenderism in the United States.
Now, we really can't draw any other conclusion here.
And this is with, well, keeping in mind that millions more documents still have not been made public.
So this is just a small portion.
But the fact is that the conspiracy theorists were right.
There is a powerful network of evil, degenerate, incestuous elites whose behavior, even when it is not criminal, though it often is criminal, is nevertheless disgusting and depraved.
It has had and continues to have a lasting impact on our culture and on our children.
For years, these people have enjoyed far more privacy than they have ever granted us.
They deserve to be exposed.
It's as simple as that.
I don't see any other option.
As I said at the top, in a post-COVID world, trust in our institutions and the elites who run them is non-existent.
These are the people who locked us in our homes and lied to us about the reason.
They lied about George Floyd.
They spent years claiming that the best way to treat a gender-confused adolescent girl is to chop her breaths off.
They've lied so brazenly and so frequently at the highest levels of society that now we cannot be satisfied with anything less than complete radical transparency.
Now, yes, liars and charlatans will take whatever they want from these files out of context to support their preferred narrative.
That is certainly not ideal.
But the path we've taken for the past several years, allowing the very people implicated in the files to decide which parts of it we can see, is far less ideal.
In fact, it's just totally untenable.
This is where we are now.
Put it all on the table.
Let the chips fall where they may.
If this document dump is any indication, there's a lot more we need to see.
And no matter how much it may expose members of Congress, powerful political people, doesn't matter.
At this point, the government simply has no choice but to hand it all over.
Let the light shine.
Now let's get to our five headlines.
Perfect for Starting the Day00:09:21
You know, we've tried a lot of coffee over the years, but our sponsor, Seven Weeks Coffee, is the one that my wife and I landed on.
I personally love their medium roast.
It's super smooth with a sweet, nutty taste.
Perfect for starting the day, but it's not just great coffee.
It directly pushes back against the abortion culture.
Seven Weeks Coffee is America's pro-life coffee company on a mission to fund the pro-life movement one cup of coffee at a time.
Why are they called Seven Weeks Coffee?
Well, because at seven weeks, a baby is the size of a coffee bean, and it's the same time a heartbeat is clearly detected on an ultrasound.
They built their business around saving lives by donating 10% of every sale to pregnancy centers and pro-life organizations nationwide.
They've now raised over $1.5 million and saved thousands of lives.
Now let's talk about the coffee itself.
It's mold-free, pesticide-free, shade-grown, and low-acid, and it's organically farmed.
It's coffee that tastes better and feels better because they did it right.
So go to sevenweekscoffee.com and save 15% forever when you subscribe.
Plus, get a free gift with your order.
And exclusively, for my listeners, use CodeWalsh for an extra 10% off your first order.
That's a 25% total savings on your first order plus a free gift.
Just use CodeWalsh at checkout.
Our sponsor, Grand Canyon University, is an affordable, private Christian university based in beautiful Phoenix, Arizona, and it's one of the largest universities in the country.
GCU is widely praised for its culture of community and impact.
They boast 369 academic programs with over 300 of those being available online.
Join a nationwide community of learners who are redefining online education through GCU's 100% online MBA program.
At GCU, you can learn about ethical entrepreneurship and how to scale your business to serve your community.
In addition to federal grants and aid, GCU's online students received nearly $161 million in institutional scholarships in 2024.
Find your purpose at Grand Canyon University, Private Christian Affordable.
Visit gcu.edu/slash myoffer to see the scholarships that you may qualify for.
All right, the Grammys happened last night.
Needless to say, of course, I didn't watch.
Apparently, based on the clips, it was a highly politicized event.
Every musician on stage or on the red carpet took turns ranting about Donald Trump, ranting about ICE, about deportations, which is very brave.
I mean, words cannot describe the bravery required to stand there in front of a friendly audience and say things that are sure to promote or are sure to be met with applause.
Just incredibly courageous.
I'm not going to bother going through and playing all the clips of that.
I do want to play just this one clip of the acceptance speech from Billie Eilish, who apparently won, I think, for Song of the Year, I believe.
Even though the song is also from an album, apparently, that was like two years old and had already been nominated at last year's Grammys and lost.
So, I don't know if this is some kind of pity award or something that she got.
I don't know.
It doesn't really matter.
But she got up and she had this to say, listen.
No one is illegal on stolen land.
Yeah, it's just really hard to know what to say and what to do right now.
And I just feel really hopeful in this room.
And I feel like we just need to keep fighting and speaking up and protesting.
And our voices really do matter, and the people matter.
And I say, sorry.
Now, the whole event was like that, by the way.
Just one of these degenerates after another getting up there and spewing the most retarded cliches that we've ever heard to the sound of uproarious applause.
Billy says that no one is illegal on stolen land.
We've heard this a million times, of course.
We've dealt with it on the show a million times.
I'm not going to belabor the point too much, but I do want to make a couple of observations here.
And this is, first of all, leaving aside the fact that the land is not stolen.
It was conquered, not stolen.
There is a difference.
Conquered fair and square.
That's how we got the land.
We conquered it fair and square, which is how every country on earth was formed.
Every single one.
So matter where you live on earth, you are not in a position to be high and mighty and judgmental about, oh, you conquered that.
Yeah, well, that's how the entire, that's where all that's how all the lines are drawn on the map.
That's how it works.
And it's how the Indians themselves obtained their land in the first place.
Which, by the way, we're going to flush this out in the next episode of Real History.
The first episode about slavery is available right now on Daily Wire.
And you have to become a subscriber.
Go subscribe dailywire.com.
And you can watch our first episode, which is getting a big reaction.
And in the next episode, which will be out in the next few weeks, we'll really go into excruciating and brutal detail on this point.
Are we on stolen land?
Did we steal the land from the Native Americans?
How did they get the land?
How did that work?
So we'll get into that.
But put that aside.
The perhaps even more fundamental problem is that no one is illegal on stolen land is a contradiction in terms.
It is incoherent.
Because if that proposition is true, right, then the reverse proposition is also true.
If no one is illegal on stolen land, then no land can be stolen because no one is illegal.
Right?
If no one is illegal, then land cannot be stolen.
So Billie Eilish, like everybody else on the left, is advancing two contradictory ideas at once.
On one hand, she's saying that the land belongs to everybody.
Borders should be open.
No one is illegal.
And on the other, she's saying that the land belongs to Native Americans because they have the deepest ancestral ties to it, allegedly.
So she's arguing in favor of open borders and blood and soil nationalism at the same time.
It is incoherent.
It makes no sense at all.
Because if it's true that Native Americans have the most credible ownership claim to the land because they've been here the longest and have ancestral ties to it that go back farther than anybody else, that would mean that even by that logic, whites of European descent have at least a greater claim to the land than any third world immigrant who shows up tomorrow or showed up last week.
Like either it matters how long your people have been here and how deep your ancestral ties to the land go, or it doesn't.
And if it doesn't matter, then Native Americans have nothing to complain about.
If it does matter, then we're back to illegal immigrants having no claim to this land.
Okay, these can't all be true.
They just can't.
And besides, even if I agreed that white people stole the land, which I don't, but even if I did, that doesn't actually excuse illegal immigrants who come here and steal it.
Okay, like, because this is really their kind of legal and moral claim is that, well, the land was already stolen, so we're allowed to steal it.
But, okay, if I steal Bob's car, okay, my neighbor Bob, if he has a car and I like it, I steal it.
And then Jim comes along and steals Bob's car from me, Jim is still morally and legally a thief.
He's still going to go to jail for stealing a car.
He's not going to be able to say, well, it was already stolen, right?
Stealing a thing that's already been stolen still makes you legally and morally liable for theft.
Saying that no one is illegal on stolen land is saying that a thing that has been stolen cannot be stolen again, which again makes no sense.
So what I'm saying is, even if I accept the premise, which for the millionth time, I don't, but I could accept, this is how dumb, everything on the left, it's so stupid that their premise is wrong.
But even if you accept the premise, they're still wrong.
Okay, they're so wrong that even if they were right, they'd still be wrong.
They're wrong on so many levels that you could even grant them like the first 10 levels.
But you get to the 11th and it all falls apart.
So the land was not stolen.
White people didn't steal the land, all that kind of stuff.
But I could say, okay, fine, they did.
That still does not do anything to excuse or vindicate a, you know, someone from Guatemala or Mexico or Somalia who comes here illegally today.
It doesn't do anything.
So the whole thing is very stupid.
Ash Wednesday is just two weeks away.
So you've probably started thinking about what you're giving up for Lent, chocolate, social media, usual suspects.
But here's a real question.
Food Stamps Obligation00:12:45
How do you plan to approach this season so you can see real lasting spiritual change?
Our sponsor and friends at Ascension Press invite you to join them for the Crux Lenten Challenge, a daily program that teaches you how to surrender your life to God.
Each day, participants take on four challenges inspired by the cross of Christ, daily scripture reading, a nightly examine, one physical exercise of your choice and one dietary fast of your choice.
But don't worry, Crux isn't about extreme penance or white-knuckled self-improvement.
It's about encountering your weakness honestly, discovering the God who meets you there.
You don't do this alone.
Each day, Father Columba Jordan shares short video reflections in the Ascension app to encourage you, guide you in your struggle, and help you recognize where God is inviting you to surrender.
For a limited time, you can join Crux with 90 days of premium access to the Ascension app for just $4.99.
Visit AscensionPress.com/slash walsh to download the app and get the free Crux action plan to prepare for the challenge and track your progress through Lent.
Offer excludes current subscribers.
All right.
What else we got?
So today is February 2nd, which is Groundhog Day, I believe, right?
Isn't that Groundhog?
Did the Groundhog see a shadow?
I'm not sure.
Oh, okay, I'm being told he did.
So it means that we have more winter.
Okay.
Well, that's, I was going to say happy Groundhog Day.
I guess not very happy, but to all those who celebrate.
But today is significant for a different reason.
For millions of Americans, it's a significant day for a different reason.
Today is the day that the new work requirements go into place for food stamp recipients.
And as expected, these work requirements are being treated like a form of slavery.
Every news channel in the country has been airing interviews with food stamp recipients complaining about the requirements.
So here's Chicago's PBS affiliate talking to a guy.
I think it's just like a random guy named Kenny.
I don't know where they found this guy.
He's just like a guy who's walking around outside.
They said, hey, what's your name?
Kenny?
Kenny, come in here.
We're going to assume that you're on food stamps.
Come on in and let's talk about it.
And so that's what they did.
Let's listen.
You know, Kenny, I know you're worried that these upcoming changes haven't been clearly communicated to folks who rely on this program.
Are you worried people who rely on SNAP know about the changes?
Or has that not been clear?
It's not clear.
I mean, a lot of people don't understand that working 80 hours, anything can happen if they fall short of 80 hours and get cut off.
What if they get hurt on the job working for these food stamps?
And everybody not on the same pay food stamp budget.
Some get less than others, you know.
I mean, what other benefits do we have?
I mean, what else can we look forward to?
What about permanent jobs?
You know, things like that, things of that nature.
I am a participant, but I am really tired of being on stamps.
I want to work.
I want to earn a living.
And I mean, I don't want to be on this for the rest of my life.
You know, I've tried looking for jobs, but there are barriers out there that's holding me back.
Yes, Kenny wants to know what other benefits he can expect.
If he's going to have to deal with the work requirements, he wants other benefits.
Benefits, like he says, permanent jobs.
I'm not sure what a permanent job is.
I guess it's a job that you have forever and can never lose, no matter what you do.
Well, unfortunately for Kenny, permanent jobs don't exist unless you're a bureaucrat in the federal government or you're a public school teacher.
Or you're on the Supreme Court or you're the Pope.
So that's really, those are the four categories of jobs that are permanent.
And no matter how good or bad a job you're doing, you keep the job.
Those are the only four categories.
Federal bureaucrat, public school teacher, Supreme Court, or Pope.
And well, he's probably not going to be Pope.
I mean, anything's possible, probably not going to happen.
And not going to be on the Supreme Court, even though he's, I'm willing to grant he's just as intelligent as Contanja Brown Jackson, probably more intelligent.
If he can't get a job as a teacher or a bureaucrat, then he's just going to have to jump into the same boat as all the rest of us and get a job that's not necessarily permanent.
But what are these work requirements?
Okay, so you heard him say, you heard him say 80 hours, right?
You heard him say that, 80 hours.
And at first blush, even as someone who's opposed to the food stamp program entirely, I think the whole thing should be abolished.
I don't think it should exist.
But you hear that and you think, well, 80 hours, that's pretty steep, actually.
That's a lot.
80 hours?
80 hours a week?
That's like 15, 16 hours a day for five days a week.
That seems a little excessive.
I never thought that I would say that about work requirements for food stamps, but that's a little much.
Well, the good news for Kenny is that the work requirement is indeed 80 hours, but it's 80 hours a month, not a week.
Yes, the requirement is merely that you work for 80 hours a month, which to do the math is 20 hours a week.
Or, you know, you could average that out to four hours a day, five days a week, but really it'd be like, you know, two full eight hours a day, eight hour days a week, and then like a half a day.
That's it.
KTLA has more quote reading.
Work requirements are kicking in for more older adults and parents of teenagers across the U.S. who could help with groceries through SNAP.
The implementation dates vary by state and some people could lose benefits as soon as Sunday if they can't show they're working, but many people have a month or more before the benefits are at risk.
The work requirements previously applied to adults ages 18 through 54 who are physically and mentally able to work and don't have dependents under age 18.
The new law applies those requirements, so expands them to also include those ages 55 through 64 and to parents with children without children younger than 14.
And it repeals work exemptions for homeless individuals, veterans, and young adults aging out of foster care.
And it limits the ability of states to waive work requirements in areas lacking jobs.
So now if you're between the ages of 18 and 64 with the new requirements added to the previous requirements, if you're 18 to 64, so an adult below retirement age and you don't have children under the age of 14, then you need to work for 20 hours a week to qualify for food stamps.
Otherwise, it says you can have food stamps, but only for three months in a three-year period.
So it's like a cushion that, and then, and then you got to get back on your feet.
These are not only reasonable requirements, but so minimal and so basic that they barely even count as requirements.
And yet the Congressional Budget Office estimates that these bare minimum requirements will disqualify millions of people.
You know, because millions of people are on the dole bilking the system, taking money out of your pocket while making no attempt to care for themselves and not even putting in the bare minimum of effort.
Like needless to say, if you're an able-bodied adult, there is no valid reason why you can't work at least a part-time job.
Like there's no reason why you can't go out and get and then work at least a part-time job, but really a full-time job, especially if you don't have young children at home.
No young children at home, you're able-bodied.
You're an adult below retirement age.
You should be able to work.
That's it.
Now, I'm happy these requirements are going into place.
I would much prefer that everybody in this category, which is adults without young children who are not elderly or disabled, I'd prefer that everyone just be disqualified from food stamps outright.
I think that'd be perfectly fair.
And I don't even think you need to wind it down.
Before up to me, I wouldn't even wind it down for somebody like Kenny.
I would just say, you're out.
Like, you're out.
Go get a job, man.
Like, what are you doing?
Oh, there are barriers.
What barriers are preventing you from getting any job at all?
Stop it.
Okay, a 16-year-old can go out there and get some kind of job.
You're telling me that a 16-year-old could go out there and get some kind of job, but you can't get any as a grown-ass man, as an adult in your, what, your 50s?
You can't get any job, none.
Come on.
And look, I'm sure Kenny is a nice guy.
I have no problem with Kenny.
But this is really the question.
Why should I be forced to give Penny, to give Kenny, to give Kenny a single penny?
Why should I be forced to give Kenny a penny?
Why should I?
Like to anyone who supports the SNAP program, this is kind of the question.
This is really, really where the rubber meets the road.
What moral obligation do I have to Kenny, who we just saw there?
Again, probably a nice guy.
What obligation, what obligation do I have to him?
Because that's the whole premise of entitlement.
It's right there in the name, entitlements.
Like they're entitled to it.
Well, entitled from who?
Because the money's not coming out of nowhere.
It's coming from taxpayers.
So what we're being told is that they are entitled to your money.
So Kenny is on the food stamps.
It's an entitlement.
He is entitled, entitled, entitled to your money.
Entitled.
You owe it to him.
Why do you, what do you owe him?
Why do you owe him anything at all?
So I'd like for someone to explain that.
Why do I have any obligation to Kenny?
Where does this obligation come from?
Why do I owe anything to some random grown adult man who is perfectly capable of going out and getting a job?
And if there is a barrier to a job, I mean, the only barrier that, and when you hear this, like, well, there's, there's barriers in place.
I mean, there's what one barrier could be if you have a criminal record.
Now, I'm not saying Kenny does.
I don't know.
I'm not saying that.
I'm just saying, like, when people talk about barriers in this context of food stamps, oftentimes they're talking about something like that.
Well, if it is something like that, if it's like a self-imposed barrier that you screwed up in your life, you can still get a job, but it's, that will make it harder for you.
So now, what, I have an obligation to you?
I have an obligation.
So if you've done stuff in your life so that you can't even get a part-time job in your, as an as a physically capable adult man, now I have an obligation to you because you're a dysfunctional person.
You didn't fulfill your basic obligations as a citizen of the country, as a member of society.
And so then that turns into an obligation for me to you?
It doesn't make any sense.
Now, you could argue that in a civilized society, we have, in a Christian society, we have obligations to people who are truly the elderly, children, people who through no fault of their own are disabled or on hard times.
Of course, we know that disability as a concept is expanded into meaninglessness.
So a lot of people are on disability who are not really disabled.
Like putting that aside, you could argue that we have obligations to some extent, generally speaking, or at least even if you don't want to say obligation, it's like as a civilized society, as a Christian society, we should take care of people like that.
And I would agree with that.
But we are so far beyond that.
We are so far beyond that.
And we are spending billions of dollars a year, billions, just giving money to people who are not in any of those categories at all.
And that's total nonsense.
Speedy Gonzales In Court00:07:33
Okay.
When you prioritize your health, you're investing in your ability to show up fully, think clearly, and stay resilient through whatever life throws your way.
Take charge of your health with our sponsor, Armra Colostrum.
Armra Colostrum taps into nature's original superfood packed with over 400 bioactive nutrients that strengthen your gut and boost your immune system from the inside out.
Unlike probiotics that only address one piece of the puzzle, colostrum strengthens your entire gut wall system, easing bloating and supporting healthy digestion.
The result is a stronger immune system, healthier metabolism, and noticeable improvements in your hair and skin.
It's a secret that elite athletes have relied on for years to boost performance and speed up recovery.
We've worked out a special offer for my audience.
Receive 30% off your first subscription order.
Go to armra.com slash walsh or enter Walsh to get 30% off your first subscription order.
That's armra.com slash Walsh.
Finally, here's a story from the New York Post.
A gay Texas judge allegedly had a defense attorney handcuffed in her courtroom and detained in the jury box.
Bexar County Judge Rosie Gonzalez was indicted Thursday on a felony charge of unlawful restraint by a judicial officer and misdemeanor official oppression in this incident, which took place a year ago.
Gonzalez is 60 years old, was arrested.
I'm a proud public servant.
I'm LGBTQ.
I own a gun.
I'm bilingual.
I'm an American citizen.
I have every right to defend myself, Gonzalez told the Post.
Now, there isn't much to say about this story other than the fact that this gay Mexican judge is unhinged.
And this judge, by the way, has also been in conflicts over the pride flag that, or the multiple pride flags that she chooses to hang in her courtroom.
So here's a video that Livs of TikTok found and posted.
Watch this.
Within months of taking the bench, a complaint was made by a local defense attorney to the State Commission on Judicial Conduct about the rainbow pride flag she had in her courtroom.
It came across very much like I was being targeted and discriminated against.
And it wasn't just the rainbow pride flag that she was forced to remove.
I was also ordered to remove all rainbows from the courtroom.
My mouse pad, the pen that I used, the robe where I had a subic colors.
Gonzalez states her disappointment is also because other judges across the state have not been required to remove flags or different color robes from their courtrooms.
Are they going to go to these judges who have an Irish flag in their courtroom or wear a camouflage robe when they want to?
Or, you know, make sure that out in the rural counties there isn't a Confederate flag flying in some little JP court.
She has since made an appeal on the ruling and is awaiting to get her day in court, which can come later this year.
And as she waits, she's making sure to continue to be a leading advocate for the LGBTQ plus community anyway she can.
It's become a year-round type of approach to life to live authentically and to live out loud.
Live authentically and live out loud.
So She should be disbarred just for using that phrase alone, along with all the other reasons.
So, what's not to love here?
This is America now, a gay Mexican female judge who plasters her courtroom in rainbow paraphernalia and speaks in bumper sticker slogans is what we got.
But I haven't told you the best part, which frankly is the only reason I'm even mentioning this story.
Her full name is Judge Rosie Gonzalez, but she actually has a hyphenated last name because of course she does.
And her full hyphenated last name, and I'm not making this up, I promise you.
This is what her name is.
I had to triple check this.
I had to check three different sources just to make sure that this was right.
But her full name is actually Rosie Speedlin Gonzalez.
Yes, her actual name is Speedy Gonzalez.
This is a gay Mexican judge named Judge Speedy Gonzalez.
This is, I have no further analysis of the situation.
I just needed to tell you that.
I needed to tell you that this is the country we're living in now.
There's a gay Mexican judge named Judge Speedy Gonzalez running around out there.
Not running around right now because she's in jail, I guess, but she was running around out there.
And here's what I'm trying to figure out because I thought about this.
I saw this story and I was haunted by it.
I was haunted by all the questions, all the questions that immediately, and I spent hours researching, trying to get to the bottom of this, hours, because it's baffling.
Like, how does this happen?
You're a Mexican, Speedland Gonzalez, because that's her, your hyphenated name.
So that means presumably, I'm assuming that her original, her surname, her family name is Speedland.
And apparently, she's married, you know, emphasis on the air quotes, she's married, quote unquote, to a woman who I would assume the woman's surname is Gonzalez.
So here's just where this is where I'm totally dumbfounded.
Your last name is Speedland and you're Mexican.
And then you fake marry someone named Gonzalez.
Why in God's name would you hyphenate the names?
Why would you do that?
I mean, you're just, is this like it's it's she's daring people, but it's really probably why she doesn't.
She's daring people.
She's daring them to say something, especially in the courtroom.
She's just looking for it.
She's looking for someone who's in her courtroom and she gets up there.
The honorable Judge Speedy Gonzalez presiding.
She's just looking for someone to just kind of smirk a little bit.
That's what this is.
I don't know.
It's like, I'm trying to think of what an equivalent would be.
It's like if your last name is Donald, you know, some people have that last name.
And then you marry someone whose surname somehow is Duck.
And then you're, and then you say, you know what, let's just go with it.
Let's just go with it.
Okay.
Yep, Donald Duck.
I shall heretofore be known as Donald Duck.
I'm going to lean into this thing and we're just going to go with it.
I don't know.
I guess in a certain way, you have to respect someone just accepting their fate.
I guess, I don't know, your name is Speedland.
You're Mexican.
You're a lesbian.
You end up with a woman who's Gonzalez and you're just like, yeah, what are we going to do?
What are we going to do?
It's meant to be Speedy Gonzalez.
Still is baffling.
And the upshot is that, again, in the United States of America, circuit circa 2026, we have a gay Mexican female judge who is now under arrest and whose name is Speedy Gonzalez.
So that's it.
That's what we get.
The wonders of diversity.
And we will leave it there for today.
Thanks for watching.
Thanks for listening.
Talk to you tomorrow.
Have a great day.
Godspeed.
Real History Unveiled00:00:58
They told you America invented slavery.
They told you the Indians were peaceful.
They told you colonialism was evil and that Joseph McCarthy was a bad guy.
And guess what?
They lied.
For half a century, generations of American school children have been taught to hate our history, hate our country, and hate themselves.
Time to set the record straight.
And since no one else is going to do it, I will.
Who sold us the slaves?
What were India and Africa like before Europeans arrived?
What caused white flight?
Some of the most well-known stories from American history are designed to demoralize you.
Trail of Tears, Smallpox, Blanket Smith, the Red Scare.
It's all baseless.
It's time for a lesson on what they're not teaching in public schools.
On the real history of slavery, of colonialism, of the Indians, of America, and the world.