The “Great Replacement” Is Not Just A Conspiracy Theory | Proof For Your Liberal Friend
The Left calls the ‘Great Replacement’ a conspiracy theory, but open your eyes — it’s happening in real time. Show this video to your liberal friend as proof.
- - -
Today's Sponsor:
Balance of Nature - Go to https://balanceofnature.com and use promo code WALSH for 35% off your first order PLUS get a free bottle of Fiber and Spice.
- - -
Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
It is dangerous and a deeply anti-American worldview.
It is poisoning minds.
So we hit a major milestone this week, and by we I mean everyone in the whole world.
Congratulations.
The global population officially crossed the 8 billion marks.
So there are now 8 billion people on the planet.
It took humanity until the 1800s to hit 1 billion, but only 200 more years to multiply that number by eight.
This, of course, has led to, as you might expect, lots of frantic and feeble hand wringing about the mythical threat of overpopulation, quote unquote.
There are too many people on the planet, they cry.
The whole planet is about to tip over on its access and we'll all slide off like dishes on an overturned table.
Infamously, there was once an elected Democrat who expressed a concern not far from that.
Slightly less delusional, though still plenty delusional, is the fear that we will run out of resources or habitable uh land for people to live on.
I mean, none of these scenarios are realistic.
There is more than enough land, more than enough resources to feed and house numbers even greater than 8 billion.
If the land or resources are misallocated or not properly utilized, or if people choose to huddle together in massive, smelly urban bundles, that's a different problem entirely that cannot be blamed on sheer numbers and also cannot be solved by reducing the numbers.
In fact, it's not just that overpopulation is a myth, one invented and propagated by nihilists and eugenicists and Bill Gates, but I repeat myself.
It's that the actual crisis we face as a globe, as a world, as a planet, the real apocalyptic cataclysm on the horizon is quite the opposite of overpopulation.
Our problem is not that there are too many babies being born, but that there are too few being born.
The world's population is getting older.
The average age of a human on Earth is a decade older now than it was in even the 1970s.
Now, sure, that's partly a product of modern medicine, which is good, people are living longer, but it's also a product of an aging population that isn't having enough babies.
And when the median age gets high enough, society becomes top-heavy with more elderly people than there are younger people to care for them.
This is a problem that developed countries like Japan are already dealing with.
Many others will soon join them.
The whole world is trending in that direction.
For all the talk about overpopulation, the population is actually projected to start declining by the 2060s as global fertility rates dip below replacement level.
Understand this.
Global populations have never declined due to declining fertility.
Okay, we've never seen a decline in the global population because of fertility or lack thereof.
The last decline was during the Black Plague 700 years ago, and that was from uh because of a pandemic that wiped out a quarter of human life on the planet.
A decline due to people simply not having babies is an entirely different matter, and it's never happened before through the whole history of the human race.
And it's not a good sign.
Older, slower, top-heavy populations cannot thrive, and after a while, they cannot survive.
They can't sustain themselves.
Human civilization is right now essentially giving up on itself, throwing in the towel.
And this again is not a positive development.
In the U.S., we're ahead of the population decline curve.
We fell below replacement level for fertility a couple of years ago.
And um actually for far farther ago than that, and we've been notching record low birth rates every year since.
Or almost.
I mean, birth rates hit another record low in 2020, falling 4% below the previous year.
However, in 2021, there was a slight uptick of 1%, which is still 3% below 2019.
It was the first increase in the birth rate since 2014, but that was likely only a function of the fact that the year before that was so low.
Overall, the U.S. has been below replacement level, actually, for the most part, and there have been, you know, there are peaks and valleys and everything, but for the most part, it's been below replacement since uh since really the early 1970s.
And even with the occasional blip on the radar screen, a spike here and there, we are trending in the wrong direction and fast.
Senator Chuck Schumer, of all people, has noticed this problem, and he uh and he made note of it yesterday to reporters when he was giving a press conference.
Given that Democrats despise the human species, and especially those members of the species Who are residents of their same country, those are the humans that Democrats hate the most.
We don't usually hear them lamenting declining birth rates.
In fact, they are engineering the decline.
So what has awakened Schumer to this issue?
Why does he care about all of a sudden?
Well, that becomes obvious pretty quickly when you hear what he had to say and why.
Here it is.
Now more than ever, we're short of workers.
We have a population that is not reproducing it on its own with the same level that it used to.
The only way we're going to have a great future in America is if we welcome and embrace immigrants, the dreamers, and all of them, because our ultimate goal is to help the dreamers, but get a path to citizenship for all 11 million or however many undocumented there are here.
So there you go.
That explains it.
The American population is declining.
We are short of workers.
The senator is concerned, of course, that there won't be enough people available to mow his lawn and clean his pool and dust his fireplace mantles.
And his solution is to import a peasant class, to import them rather than attempt to raise them organically the old-fashioned way.
He seeks to replace the American population with illegal immigrants.
He wants to replace them, replace us.
He wants to replace them on a very large scale.
Replace them on a large scale.
Even you might say, you know, a large, another synonym would be great.
He wants to replace the declining American population on a great scale.
Replace great, replace on a great scale.
So a great replacement, you might say.
That thing that we're not allowed to notice or mention, that's the thing that Chuck Schumer is explicitly advocating for.
And by the way, not for nothing, I should also say 11 million.
We keep hearing 11 million, they're 11 million illegals or undocumented immigrants, as they put it.
They've been telling us about the 11 million undocumented immigrants since like since I was in high school, okay?
That number now is much higher than 11 million.
We don't know exactly what it is, but uh probably closer to 50 million or higher.
In any case, there are, of course, other ways to reverse the trend of population decline.
And the most simple strategy, and frankly, the most enjoyable, is for us American citizens to get down to business and have babies, lots of babies.
Not to brag, but I am already pulling more than my fair share of the weight in this arena, now that I have six kids and And my wife and I have, in our family at least, tripled the replacement rate.
And if if you really want to encourage more people to have babies, and if you want those babies to have the greatest chance of success in life, that entails more people getting married and getting married younger.
So we could create a society that encourages marriage and incentivizes people to start families and to have children.
But that is not what we have done.
Thanks to Chuck Schumer and his ilk, we've gone exactly the opposite direction.
To start with, we kill our babies in the womb.
60 million babies have been killed in the past 50 years or so.
That means we've erased not just 60 million human beings.
I mean, we've erased 60 million to begin with, but actually we've erased hundreds of millions of potential humans.
A large portion of those babies, after all, would have grown up and had kids of their own.
And soon the kids of those kids would start having kids.
Entire family trees have been uprooted and tossed into the incinerator.
The loss of human potential is absolutely staggering.
And yet Schumer and his party support, fund and facilitate all of this, even as he laments or pretends to lament the declining populations.
Not only that, but Schumer and his party have attacked the nuclear family.
They've encouraged sexual perversion and sexual dysfunction.
They have invented a human right to subsidized birth control.
I mean, they want to give up birth control in middle schools now.
They've created an economy that forces millions of women out of the home and into the workplace.
Now they're even castrating and sterilizing people, including children, in the name of gender ideology.
This is all part of a deliberate plan.
There's no escaping that conclusion.
And that's to say nothing of the drug epidemic killing millions of Americans by, or you know, killing Americans by the thousands every single year, uh, violent crime, which is doing exactly the same.
They are obviously aware that their policies are wreaking havoc on the birth rate while eliminating in mass those who have managed to be born.
They're aware that this creates a crisis situation for the country.
And here they are at the ready with the solution.
Which is to import Democrat voters from the third world.
Send in the replacements.
I mean, they're right.
The grace the great replacement theory is outrageous.
It's outrageous to talk about the great replacement theory.
And that's because there is no theory here.
It's just a fact.
Right in front of our faces.
More than 90% of Americans don't get enough fruits, vegetables, and fiber in their diet.
We're all basically walking nutritional disasters.
That's where balance of nature supplements comes in.
These aren't your typical synthetic vitamins with names you can't pronounce.
We're talking about 47 whole ingredients, 16 fruits, 15 vegetables, plus spices and fibers.
Real stuff like wild blueberries, kale, turmeric, and uh mushrooms as well.
I've taken the fruits and veggies supplements for a while now, and uh honestly, it's nice knowing I'm getting all that variety without having to turn my kitchen into a produce section, especially handily handy to uh have while traveling as well.
Plus, their fiber and spice blend is the only supplement on the market combining 12 spices with four whole fibers.
Look, I'm not saying this replaces eating actual vegetables, but when life gets crazy and your diet consists mainly of whatever doesn't require cooking, it's nice knowing that you'll still get healthy ingredients with balance of nature.
They are vegan, kosher, gluten-free, and made with zero artificial anything.
Just nature, doing what nature does best.
Go to bouncenature.com, use promo code Walsh for 35% off your first order's preferred customer.
Plus, get a free bottle of fiber and spice at Bowels of Nature.com, promo code Walsh.
Um, speaking of Buffalo, I want you I want you to listen to what this reporter says when asking Karen Jean Pearl about the so-called great replacement theory.
Just listen to the uh the words that are used here.
Very telling.
Listen.
There's polling that shows one in three Americans believe in some element of replacement theory.
You just spoke in very broad brush strokes there.
Are there specifics that this White House is willing to do, willing to take in order to stop this form of thinking from further seeping out of the fringe and into the mainstream?
So, you know, we're gonna continue to call this out as we have uh talked about many times, uh, the president at every chance he's had when we've seen uh a violent uh attack like this that is uh uh that is as we you know say it with hatred um and racially motivated, he calls it out and calls it what it is.
What are we gonna do to stop this form of thinking?
They're not even trying to hide it.
How are we gonna stop?
This is somebody in the press asking this, by the way.
How are we gonna stop people from thinking like this?
And thinking like what exactly?
I mean, what is the form of thinking?
Well, it's this uh, it's uh the the so-called great replacement theory.
And one of the clubs I want to play for you on this, and then uh, and then I have a couple exact actually.
I have some examples, in fact, of the great replacement theory that I want to present to you.
But first, here's Chuck Schumer on the floor of the Senate yesterday, also railing.
There are so many examples we could pull from because this is this has been uh the current thing for the Democrats of the last couple of days is the uh the great replacement theory, which they're accusing Republicans of engaging in.
And so here's just one example.
Chuck Schumer on the floor of the Senate railing about it.
Listen.
This is replacement theory in a nutshell.
It is dangerous and a deeply anti-American worldview.
It is poisoning minds, people's minds, who spend hours wandering the darkest wastelands of the internet.
And let's be clear.
It's a message that is also found a special home in several right-wing outlets, and on one cable news channel in particular, Fox News.
In a craven quest for viewers and ratings, organizations like Fox News have spent years perfecting the craft of stoking cultural grievance and political resentment.
Thank you.
Stoking grievance and resentment is, of course, all these people do.
That is their entire MO.
That's their entire political strategy.
They have nothing else to offer.
They don't do anything but that.
It's just stoke, especially racial grievance and resentment, while he accuses everybody else of doing that.
Now, the the what is the theory here?
Well, as I pointed out yesterday, it this actually is a theory from the Democrats.
And their theory is that whiteness, generally speaking, is something that can be and should be mitigated.
Like it's it's a disease.
That's the theory on the left, is that whiteness is a disease that needs to be cured.
And I mean that in a very literal sense.
So I'll just give you one example here.
Um a guy by the name of Donald Moss wrote uh a paper.
This was just last year, wrote a paper for the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.
And we could put this up there for you.
This is just the abstract of this paper.
This is what he writes.
And this, by the way, is totally in keeping with CRT.
I mean, this is basically CRT with a little bit of uh psycho babble, a little bit of extra psychobabble added in.
So this is what Donald Moss says.
Whiteness is a condition one first acquires, and then one has a malignant parasitic like condition to which white people have a particular susceptibility.
The condition is foundational, generating characteristic ways of being in one's body and one's mind and in one's world.
Parasitic whiteness renders its host's appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse.
These deformed appetites particularly target non-white peoples.
Once established, these appetites are nearly impossible to eliminate.
Effective treatment consists of a combination of psychic and social historical interventions.
Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape whiteness's infiltrated appetites to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation.
And then we go forward a little bit, and it says there is not yet a permanent cure.
So this is the again, totally consistent.
This is not just some fringe concept, totally consistent with CRT.
This way of thinking is a reason why it was published in the psychoanalytic journal.
It's all over the psychology, uh psychology and psychiatry industry.
And he is quite literally saying that whiteness is a parasitic condition for which it is necessary that we find a permanent cure.
You find this in the media too.
Here's this from this is Jennifer Rubin at the Washington Post, um, somewhat infamous tweet from last year.
And she was responding to census data, which which was which showed at the time, and as we we've seen this in successive um census reports, the number of white people falls for the first time.
So she's responding to a headline which says census data shows widening diversity, number of white people falls for the first time.
Jennifer Rubin's response: a more diverse, more inclusive society, this is fabulous news.
Now we need to prevent minority white rule.
So she is responding specifically to a headline that says the number of white people falls for the first time.
She says, fabulous news.
Now, if for some reason it's not immediately obvious why this is a horrific thing to say, all you have to imagine is if the headline had said number of black people falls, and then someone had responded and said fabulous news.
So if anyone in media responded that way to um the hypothetical headline saying that the number of black people falls, that person would be done forever.
Like their career is over, it's destroyed.
There would be 100% agreement among everyone everywhere that that is very racist.
And it would be.
Of course.
Like if you're cheering for the for the for the population of a certain race to dwindle, then that's that's racist.
Like I can't think of a more racist thing than that.
And this is what you get on the left.
Um, another example.
This is from a Hollywood producer Morgan J. Freeman.
We have a couple of tweets from him, not to be confused with not that Morgan Freeman, not the fan, not the famous one, the different one.
Um He says, this is just today, or yesterday he tweeted this.
Being anti-racist starts by admitting whiteness is a disease.
Whiteness is a dominant cultural space with enormous political significance with the purpose to keep others on the margin.
So it's a disease, whiteness is a disease, we've got to get rid of it, so on and so forth.
Now, so this is the game they play.
First of all, again, the theory that whiteness is a disease, a problem, and we have to minimize it, mitigate it, replace it.
That is the theory on the left.
And if you notice it, if you simply notice what they're saying, and then you point to it and say, hey, did you hear what that person just said?
Then all of a sudden, you're the conspiracy theorist.
This is the game they play.
Um to great effect, in fact.
They just scare people into uh into silence.
And they create this environment where they can, of course, say whatever they want.
Uh, but then they also get to decide.
You know, they could just say what they want, and uh, but it if if in certain circumstances they might not want you to quote them, they might not want you to notice what they're doing, even when they're explicit about it.
